Thursday, August 08, 2024

 

“British government must scrap Legacy Act and deliver on the Stormont House Agreement” – Gerry Kelly MLA

“Since the Legacy Act was first introduced, state bodies have continued to hide information from families to cover up the British government’s shameful actions in Ireland and to protect their soldiers and agents.”
Gerry Kelly, Sinn Féin MLA for Belfast North

Sinn Féin MLA Gerry Kelly said on Monday that the British government needs to deliver on its commitment to scrap the Legacy Act and implement the Stormont House Agreement legacy mechanisms.

Gerry Kelly was speaking after the British government abandoned an appeal against a High Court ruling that its Legacy Act is incompatible with the Human Rights Act.

Gerry Kelly said: “We welcome the fact that the British government has abandoned its appeal against a High Court Ruling that the Legacy Act is incompatible with the Human Rights Act. Human rights experts, churches, the US, UN, EU, the Irish government and all main political parties on this island have opposed this cynical and cruel piece of legislation. Since the Legacy Act was first introduced, state bodies have continued to hide information from families to cover up the British government’s shameful actions in Ireland and to protect their soldiers and agents. The shutting down of legacy inquests and investigations have already had a very real and human impact on families.

It is welcome that inquests halted by the imposition of the Legacy Act will be resumed, and that families who lost loved ones during the conflict will once again have access to the criminal and civil courts. However, the ICRIR, which the current government wants to retain, does not have the confidence of most victims and survivors and it doesn’t have the powers it needs to deliver truth. The legacy mechanisms agreed at Stormont House by the two governments and political parties in 2014 provided for two separate mechanisms to conduct independent investigations and facilitate information recovery, with both bodies attracting political and public endorsement via the agreement and the subsequent public consultation. The British government should scrap its Legacy Act and implement the Stormont House Agreement mechanisms in a human rights compliant manner.”


UK  CND

Remembering Hiroshima & Nagasaki as the world draws closer to nuclear war than ever before

“As we come together to remember the destruction the atom bombs inflicted on the people of Japan, action against nuclear weapons has never been more urgent.”

Carol TurnerCampaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), describes what happened when atom bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and reminds us how close we could be to that same fate today.

Ceremonies will be taking place in towns and cities across Britain in this coming week to remember and respect the hundreds of thousands of innocent victims of the atomic bombs that dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6th and 9th August in 1945.

At least 75,000 died in the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bomb; another 40,000 died when the second bomb hit Nagasaki. By the end of the year, it is estimated 210,000 were dead, which had risen to 340,000 by the end of 1950. Second and third generation Hibakusha, the survivors, still suffer severe health consequences.

London CND has estimated that over 2.3 million would die in a nuclear attack on London, and 2.6 million more would be injured. An 8-minute graphics video. What if we nuke a city, by Kurzgesagt (In a Nutshell) explains what would happen to the local population if a nuclear bomb hit their city.

As we come together to remember the destruction the atom bombs inflicted on the people of Japan, action against nuclear weapons has never been more urgent. Our world is closer to nuclear war than it has ever been:

  • The war in Ukraine is escalating. The decision by the US and other NATO governments, to permit the weapons they supply to Ukraine to be deployed against military targets inside Russia is the latest in a saga of escalating threats and belligerence on both sides.
  • Israel’s remorseless bombardment of the people of Gaza poses a spill-over into war across the region. Events of the past week move us even closer. Israel too is a nuclear armed state, one of nine in the world.
  • All nine nuclear-armed states are capable of wielding nuclear bombs hundreds of times more powerful than those used against Japan. All nine are continuing to ‘modernise’ their nuclear arsenals.

Remembering Hiroshima and Nagasaki is more than an historical gesture. London Region CND’s Hiroshima Day commemoration takes place on Tuesday, 12 noon in Tavistock Square Peace Gardens, opened by the Mayor of Camden. CND General Secretary Kate Hudson will join me there for speeches, prayers, songs. and poems.

Events take place in venues across London and in others cities throughout the week. If you can’t make it, you may like to visit CND’s online exhibition or view the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum’s short testimony of a survivor.


  • Carol Turner is a Vice Chair of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and Chair of London Region CND. She is author of Corbyn & Trident: Labour’s continuing controversy and Walter Wolfgang: A Political Life.
  • You can view a list of commemorative events here.
  • You can follow the CND on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter/X.
  • If you support Labour Outlook’s work amplifying the voices of left movements and struggles here and internationally, please consider becoming a supporter on Patreon.

UK

Two risks facing the labour movement – Matt Wrack, FBU

“We need fighters on our side prepared to struggle, prepared to organise, prepared to think about the challenges that we face.”

The following is taken from a speech given by General Secretary of the Fire Brigades Union Matt Wrack at the eve-of-Gala rally in Durham in July.

We’ve had an election where we have driven out the spivs, the con men, and the clowns out of government, with a well-deserved eviction notice, and we should be celebrating that. I’m sure everyone had your own individual moments.

I know that firefighters had a particular dislike of Penny Mordaunt, who lied in Parliament about our pensions, with two hundred firefighters watching her in their smart uniforms, and she would not look them in the eye as she gave her comments to the House of Commons. So, we’re very pleased to see the back of her and the rest of them.

The risk for our movement, I think, is two-fold. The first one is complacency, and the second one is dismissiveness.

Complacency, because if we think the job has been done by voting Labour into office, we are making a big mistake.

There will be huge pressures put on this government to water down the legislation that we want to see in place. The job of all of us, in the friendliest way we can, by the way – I’m not talking about slagging people off – but saying in a firm, determined, organised way: you’ve been elected on the pledge of delivering on workers’ rights. Your job is now to deliver on workers’ rights, and we will be watching you every step of the way.

But there’s another risk, and that risk is dismissiveness. I understand the frustrations that people have with the Labour leadership. My union did not vote for Keir Starmer. I’ve been very forthright in a polite way about the disagreements we have with Keir Starmer on Gaza and other issues – but it would be remiss of us if we didn’t see the opportunities that open up before us with the kicking out of a Tory government and the bringing in of a Labour government which will be the first in more than a generation to start with rolling back seriously some, not enough, but some, of the anti-union legislation.

The MSL [minimum service level] for my industry is a fundamental threat to our right to operate, to our right to take industrial action, and even the repeal of that will give confidence to Fire Brigades Union members. And we can then say we’ve done that, we now need to go further, and we need to demand more.

So, it’s that risk of simply dismissing it as not going far enough, it’s been watered down. We’re talking about the Labour party here for God’s sake. It’s inevitable that there is a battle about what is delivered and what’s put in manifestos and some of us were part and parcel of that. But the question is, can we use the opportunity now to rebuild our movement? To build a movement fit for the 21st century, for the new world of work, for the millions of people who aren’t even in trade unions, who frankly don’t know what a trade union is.

That’s the task in front of us and we have to face reality hard in its face. We used to have twelve million plus people in trade unions in 1979. We now have around six million people in trade unions, with a much bigger workforce. That is a significant and historic setback, and we need to face up to it- and say we’re going to use this opportunity to rebuild organisation fit for fighting back against the employers today. And that means the Amazon workers, the Uber workers, the so-called gig economy. And some people say it can’t be done.

I always point to the example of the East London women workers in the Bryant & May factory in Bow, who were some of the most downtrodden migrant workers, young women looked down on, including by trade unionists. And yet they lit a spark. Permit the pun. They lit the spark by taking strike action. These people that people thought would never join a union. They lit a spark which, the following year, led to the dock strike and to the beginnings of mass trade unionism at the end of 19th century and into the early years of 20th century.

That’s the sort of vision we need to put before people today. You can change the world of work and think about how much time we spend in work during the course of a lifetime. We can make work better by being organised.

The miners’ strike has been mentioned. Let’s remember, that was a class offensive by the British ruling class against the most determined organised and one of the most militant sections of the trade union movement. They did it for a reason, because they wanted to send a message to the entire class. You step out of line, we will come after you, and we will destroy you, and destroy your lives, and lock you up. And we need the same level of determination in our movement as she had for her class, frankly, as Thatcher had for her class.

We need fighters on our side prepared to struggle, prepared to organise, prepared to think about the challenges that we face. And the key thing for me, the key task: rebuilding workers’ power in the workplace. That’s what we have to seize, the opportunity that this election and the platform of workers’ rights and legislation, that’s what it offers us.

Rebuild workers’ power in the workplace – that’s the challenge before all of us.

 

Demand real change, not empty promises or half measures – Sarah Wooley, BFAWU

“In the wake of the election, we need to send a clear message to our newly-elected representatives: we will not accept empty promises or half measures. We demand real change, and we will not rest until we see it.”

The following is taken from a speech given by General Secretary of the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers’ Union Sarah Woolley at the eve-of-Gala rally in Durham organised by the Institute of Employment Rights and Campaign for Trade Union Freedom in July.

We are at a pivotal moment for workers’ rights in our country: after fourteen years of austerity and our rights being systematically stripped back, we have an opportunity for change.

I know there are mixed feelings around just how much change there will be under this Labour government. The election has shown us that the fight for justice and fairness in the workplace and our communities is far from over, and now more than ever, we need to unify our voices and our efforts, because seeing five Reform candidates be elected into Parliament should be much more of a concern to all of us than what Starmer is or isn’t going to do in the next one hundred days.

Our union, the Bakers Food and Allied Workers Union (BFAWU), recently conducted a comprehensive survey to understand the concerns and priorities of our members. The results highlighted the urgent need for political and economic transformation.

Whilst many would argue there is no difference in the main political parties and ask what the point is in politics, our members are actually politically engaged and determined to see change. They are not content with the status quo. The issues they face are not unique to our sector but reflect broader societal challenges. The cost-of-living crisis, which makes it difficult for families to afford basic necessities like food, energy, and housing, was, unsurpisingly, the main concern. A crisis that has been compounded by low pay, poor management practices, and insecure working conditions.

In the workplace, our members are grappling with low wages, bullying management styles, unsafe working conditions, and insufficient staffing. They are asked to do more with less, often under the strain of unsociable hours and insecure contracts.

Our survey results clearly outline what our members believe is necessary to address these challenges. Their voices have shaped the Bakers’ Dozen manifesto of 13 key demands that we will continue to advocate for tirelessly:

  • £15 an Hour Minimum Wage: because every worker deserves a living wage, regardless of age. This will end the unfair youth limit on the national minimum wage.
  • Abolish Zero-Hour Contracts: We demand job security and predictability for all workers- and this should be all Zero Hour contracts, because they can all be exploitative.
  • Full Employment Rights from Day One: All workers should have their rights protected from the moment they start their job.
  • Contractual Sick Pay at 100%: Employers must provide six weeks of sick pay at full wage to all workers.
  • Repeal Anti-Union Legislation: Unions need the freedom to organise and advocate without restrictive laws.
  • Maximum Workplace Temperature: Legislation is needed to ensure safe and comfortable working conditions.
  • Accountability for Company Failures: Companies must not evade their financial responsibilities through administration loopholes.
  • Public Ownership of Utilities: Water, energy, and Royal Mail should be publicly owned to curb excessive pricing and ensure fair access.
  • Right to Food: A statutory right to food, free school meals, and a cap on supermarket profits are essential to combat food insecurity.
  • Affordable Public Transport: Re-nationalise train companies, cap bus fares, and provide free public transport for young people aged 16-25.
  • End Arms Sales to Israel: We must take a stand for human rights and justice globally.
  • Abolish Tuition Fees: Education should be accessible to all, regardless of financial background, and they must bring back a new and improved version of the Union Learning Fund in England so everyone has the opportunity to upskill and develop themselves.
  • Create a National Care Service: Providing dignity and care for the elderly and vulnerable is a societal duty.

These demands are not just aspirations; they are essential changes that will improve the lives of our members and the wider community. Our collective strength and solidarity are our greatest assets. We must continue to organise, educate, and mobilise to hold those in power accountable: just because they are now the Labour Party it does not mean we can rest on our laurels.

In the wake of the election, we need to send a clear message to our newly-elected representatives: we will not accept empty promises or half measures. We demand real change, and we will not rest until we see it.

Together, we can build a future where every worker is treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. We can’t rely on politicians to do that, we have to do it ourselves.

We can push out the far right and stop Reform gaining any more ground, but to do that we need to be able to do our jobs as trade unionists, have access to workers and work together across the movement, challenging their rhetoric and showing people that we are the ones who will support them, not Farage and his ilk.




UK

Why we are occupying

 

By Lesnes Resistance

August 7, 2024

Currently the only protest occupation of a housing estate in the UK, the ongoing occupation at the Lesnes Estate in Thamesmead began on Sunday 7th April 2024, led by Lesnes Resistance (LesRes) in partnership with Housing Rebellion, an umbrella group of independent housing campaigns and activists. During this first weekend of the occupation, there were workshops by the Architects Climate Action Network, Public Interest Law Centre and Corporate Watch, all of whom had been supporters of LesRes. Subsequent weeks saw a further three properties being occupied, and talks on site from Nick Bano, Anna Minton and Paul Watt.

The Lesnes Estate is a small portion of the immensely ambitious 1960s plans of the Greater London Council for its utopian new town of Thamesmead, which was to include facilities for a modern, communal way of life, even including a yacht basin adjacent to the Thames. Eventually, the much-needed access roads and railway lines that were meant to connect this new part of the city to the centre failed to be built, and the project was branded a ‘failure’.

Nowadays, however, these long-awaited transport connections have finally reached the local population, with the Elizabeth Line taking only 16 minutes to Canary Wharf — a much-advertised fact on the demolition hoardings. But instead of being allowed to enjoy the improved connections to their area, the local community, now majority West African, is being torn apart and displaced.

In October 2022, Peabody Housing Association was given planning permission for a regeneration plan that proposes to demolish the existing 400 three- and four-bedroom social homes, modernist terraces with ample storage space and generous gardens, organised around car-free courtyards where children play freely as their parents keep an eye from a balcony or kitchen window. Instead of these carefully designed homes, Peabody proposes to build 1,950 new flats, of which only 61 will be social rent and 35% will be ‘affordable’, or priced at up to 80% of market rent. Peabody’s plans also aim to remove the pedestrian streets and destroy the estate’s green spaces.

Crucially, as a result of Peabody’s plans, long-standing homeowners are facing compulsory purchase of their homes at a fraction of the price of the planned new homes. They fear they will be displaced out of London and torn away from a close-knit community, as has become the customary practice of so-called ‘regeneration’ projects across London. This process of social cleansing will in time be extended beyond Lesnes by Peabody, who are in charge in 40 hectares of land in Thamesmead, in what is currently London’s largest regeneration front.

Since taking over management of the Lesnes Estate in 2014, Peabody have been boarding up hundreds of social homes, keeping them long-term empty even as the need for social housing, and especially for family homes, has reached unprecedented proportions. The housing association’s former reputation as a pro-social and charitable housing provider has been increasingly tarnished over the years, with four recent counts of “severe maladmnistration” against it by the Housing Ombudsman and findings of chronic mismanagement from two recent FT investigations into damp and mould and overcharging [paywall]. In the viability assessment for its planning proposal for Lesnes, Peabody estimated that it stood to lose £35m from the demolition and new development, and used this projected loss, as all developers do, to justify shrinking the minimum recommended provision of social housing, which is set to 50% when demolition is involved. However, the independent viability assessment carried out by Bexley Council found instead that the scheme would turn a £98m profit. Sadly even this huge discrepancy did not move the Conservative-controlled Council to seek any significant amendments to the planning proposals before stamping them through to the Mayor’s office.

The estate occupation is seeking to denormalise estate demolition and the destructive consequences it has for individuals and communities. By occupying empty homes, we also aim to draw attention to the fact that hundreds of social homes are being boarded up and kept long-term empty amid a housing crisis of unprecedented proportions. Last but not least, we are voicing the residents’ calls for Peabody to refurbish rather than demolish the estate.

Previously, the residents had been calling on the Mayor of London to hold a public hearing in which they could express their concerns surrounding the planning application, which has yet to be approved by the Mayor. Sian Berry, when at the London Assembly, raised a number of concerns about the failure to consider retrofit and the way that the resident ballot was carried out — with the word “demolition” not once being used in the ballot document for Peabody’s plan, so that residents who agreed with the proposals thought they were being offered improvements to their homes and nearby public spaces.

Currently, LesRes are working with AAB Architects and ACAN to produce a series of practical retrofit proposals to show that there are real, viable alternatives to Peabody’s destructive plans for demolition, dispossessionBy  and displacement. As Sadiq Khan has yet to approve the redevelopment plans, this work to produce community-led retrofit proposals aims to force the Mayor to consider whether it is right to sacrifice communities and climate, and the principles of his London Plan, for the sake of Peabody’s profits. You can help by supporting us to hire a Retrofit Assessor at a reduced, community rate with even the smallest donation, and also by signing the petition to protect communities and climate by saying no the demolition of Lesnes. 

Finally, the estate occupation will be featured at Open House London on September 21st, so all are welcome to come and visit us then!

Main image: Thamesmead. Source: geograph.org.uk. Author: Kenneth Yarham, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. Inset image: c/o Les Res.

UK
Fresh calls for windfall tax on banks as HSBC reports pre-tax profits of £16.8bn

31 July, 2024
Left Foot Forward News

'Banks continue to prosper from the same higher interest rates which have forced thousands into mortgage arrears'


Calls to introduce a windfall tax on banks have grown amid the latest profit reports by the UK’s big banks, which have increased since the pandemic and cost of living crisis.

The not-for-profit organisation, Positive Money, that advocated for banking reforms, has called once again for the government to place a windfall tax on bank profits, with banks recording profits that far exceed the pre-pandemic period.

HSBC reported pre-tax profits of £16.85bn for the first half of 2024 and has given a further $4.8bn to shareholders.

“HSBC’s latest profits are proof that not everyone is worse off from the cost of living crisis, with the bank having made far more than they did in the low interest rate period before the pandemic,” said Ellie McLaughlin, senior policy and advocacy officer at Positive Money.

McLaughlin said: “If the new government wishes to dispel swelling rumours that it’s allowing City lobbyists to trade cash for access to policymakers, it should place a windfall tax on these unmerited bank profits, showing that it intends to work in the public’s best interests, not bankers’.”

Contributing LFF editor Prem Sikka said: “HSBC hands another $4.8bn to shareholders in dividends and share buybacks. $34.4bn in the last 18 months.

“Profits rise without extra effort. To manage inflation govts force people to hand wealth to banks and their shareholders. Why no windfall tax?”

MPs including Richard Burgon, Diane Abbott, John McDonnell, Clive Lewis and Angela Eagle have previously called for a windfall tax on banks, with pressure ramping up last year when the UK’s Big Four banks, Lloyds, HSBC, Barclays and Natwest, together recorded pretax profits of £44.2bn for 2023, up 41% from 2022 as they benefited from global interest rate hikes.

HSBC reported a 80% jump in its pre-tax profit at the start of this year, which rose to $30.3bn (£24bn) in 2023.

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward
UK

GPs vote overwhelmingly to take collective action over funding

1 August, 2024 
Left Foot Forward


GPs to take action for first time in 60 years over a budget row



GPs have voted overwhelmingly to take collective action for the first time in 60 years over a dispute around funding.

More than 8,500 GPs and GP contractors took part in a ballot held by the British Medical Association (BMA) with 98.3% voting in favour of taking industrial action.

From today, practices will be encouraged to choose from a list of actions, which stop short of strikes but can include limits on the number of patients medics can see each day. Currently, some GPs do 40 consultations or more a day, which could be limited under the action to 25 – said to be the maximum safe level.

It follows funding crisis fears in general practice and dissatisfaction with the previous government’s increase in GP budget by just 1.9% this year. The doctors’ union recognised that the new Government was “keen to find solutions” but stressed that “the causes of practices closing and GPs leaving remain”.

Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer, chair of BMA’s GP committee for England (GPCE), said: “This is an act of desperation. For too long, we’ve been unable to provide the care we want to.

“We are witnessing general practice being broken. The era of the family doctor has been wiped out by recent consecutive Governments and our patients are suffering as a result.”

Dr Bramall-Stainer added: “We understand that the new Government has inherited a broken NHS, and we’ve had some positive conversations with the new Health Secretary about the situation in general practice.

“The DDRB award is a small a step in the right direction but we still have hundreds of millions less resource to run our practices compared to even five years ago.”

General practices were recommended 6% of guaranteed funding by the DDRB in an announcement this week. The BMA’s GPC England Committee believes this needs to gradually increase by 1% year on year, to 15%.

Speaking today on the BBC Radio 4 Today Show, Dr Clare Gerada, former Chair of the Royal College of GPs and a working GP shared her experience in the profession. She said “we do more as GPs in this country than any other GP ever” and that the latest government pay offer is “not enough”.

“I’m doing more today than I’ve ever done in my life, we do more as GPs in this country than any other GP ever in the world,” said Dr Gerada.

Dr Gerada welcomed the government pay offer but said, “I’m afraid we need a complete reset of what is going on within the NHS.”

“Wes Streeting has said that the NHS is broken, and the only way to fix the NHS is to fix general practice.”

According to the union, the impact of the collective action will be a “slow burn” that “may not be felt for some time”, in order to give the Government time to consider the proposed solutions, “including fixing our contract once and for all.”

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward

Shocking chart reveals how bad public sector pay got under the Tories


31 July, 2024
Left Foot Forward

While Labour has acted swiftly to help public sector workers who have suffered a fall in real wages, the Tories failed when in office



A chart produced in the Financial Times has revealed just how bad public sector pay got under the Tories, with doctors among the worst affected when it comes to real terms pay cuts.

In recent days, the Labour government has announced that it has decided to accept the recommendation of the independent pay review bodies to hand public sector workers a pay increase of 5 to 6 per cent. It has also offered junior doctors a salary rise of 22% over two years to end the strikes.

The BMA’s junior doctors’ committee has agreed to put the offer to its members. If accepted it would spell an end to long-running strike action which has led to the cancellation of hundreds of thousands of appointments since March 2023.

While Labour has acted swiftly to help public sector workers who have suffered a fall in real wages, the Tories failed when in office.

The scale of that failure has been revealed in the chart below, showing how while public sector workers have suffered a -2.5% fall in real earnings between 2010 to 2013, Doctors have suffered a pay cut of 14.7% in real terms over the same period.



Teachers meanwhile were on -9%.

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward

UK
Fabian Society column: Labour must take co-ordinated action on raising living standards

1 August, 2024 
Left Foot Forward

It's time to create a new Commission on Living Standards.

TweetShareWhatsAppMail


Eloise Sacares is a researcher for the Fabian Society.

Improving living standards was central to Rachel Reeves’ first speech as Chancellor. It is no wonder. In 2022/23, disposable incomes (after housing costs and inflation) were barely higher than in the mid-2000s, while the lowest-earning British households has a standard of living that is 20 per cent lower than their counterparts in Slovenia. And the cost-of-living crisis has made falling living standards a concern for most of the population. This is why we at the Fabians are developing a living standards action plan for the new government.

A major challenge is that the issue of ‘living standards’ doesn’t sit neatly in a single department. From reducing transport costs to providing employment support; from maximising workplace pensions to increasing benefits – policies to tackle living standards come under several government departments. This means that ensuring co-ordinated action can be tricky, especially when each department will be balancing its own internal priorities and dealing with tight fiscal constraints.

Our forthcoming research will propose the structures needed to implement an action plan, to significantly raise living standards. One idea, set forward in last year’s Fabian pamphlet ‘Plans for Power’, is to create a new Commission on Living Standards.

There are multiple benefits to having such a commission. An independent body could provide politically neutral, evidence-based advice on controversial issues, such as minimum benefit levels, and could help to depoliticise such topics. A commission could also be designed so that the voices of those living in poverty are considered on an ongoing and equal basis. They could also help to ensure the longevity of any targets beyond political cycles. Finally, such a commission should also be empowered to hold the government to account on any targets or actions related to living standards.

There are many examples of commissions and independent bodies that have been successful. The Climate Change Committee has held the government to account on climate change targets over several parliaments, not least because the Act stipulates that government can be taken to court if it fails to meet these. And the Low Pay Commission paved the way for increases to the national minimum wage, despite this initially having significant political opposition from the right. This then led to the greatest year-on-year increases occurring under a Conservative-led government.

Some argue that a commission would only kick vital action into the long grass. They suggest that evidence gathering isn’t necessary – there is already a wealth of knowledge on what to do to improve living standards. Action is often what’s lacking. The last Labour government did brilliant work on living standards without any formal strategy or structures until the very end of their tenure. But what a commission can offer is the accountability to ensure that governments take action, which may be all the more needed in a difficult fiscal environment. If Labour were to create a Commission on Living Standards, they must ensure that it has both the political will and statutory backing to prevent it from becoming redundant, and that it doesn’t end up delaying vital decision-making.

Commissions can also fail if external factors end up limiting their ability to influence government policy. The Social Mobility Commission has lost credibility over time, as political will on such issues declined and their proposals were increasingly ignored by successive Conservative governments. A 2020 report found ministers have only delivered on 23 per cent of the Social Mobility Commission’s proposals since 2013. But Labour has the chance to learn from commissions that have come before. By reflecting on these experiences, they can make sure to replicate the processes that worked well and learn from previous governments’ mistakes.

The task of improving living standards is urgent – both for people and the broader economy. At the next election, the government will be held to account for decisions they must take now. The recent trends in living standards were not inevitable. Poverty fell the last time Labour was in power, with over half a million children and one million pensioners lifted out of poverty. This government must now step up to the challenge, and increase living standards for all. A Living Standards Commission could give them the necessary push to achieve this.

UK
For the first time ever Uber Eats couriers have union representation through the GMB

2 August, 2024

"This deal between GMB and Uber Eats is good news for couriers. We will now be fully engaged on improving their pay and conditions and making work better."


In a historic move, for the first time ever Uber Eats couriers have secured union representation, with members set to be represented by the GMB union.

It means that couriers throughout the UK will be able to seek representation through the union. The GMB said the partnership builds on the “landmark” agreement between the union and Uber, signed in 2021.

Going forward, GMB bosses will sit down with Uber Eats representatives quarterly to discuss issues affecting couriers such as pay and conditions.

Andy Prendergast, told the Mirror: “This deal between GMB and Uber Eats is good news for couriers. We will now be fully engaged on improving their pay and conditions and making work better.”

Matthew Price, Uber Eats UK general manager, said: “Uber Eats is delighted to build our partnership with GMB that first began in 2021.

“We strongly believe that couriers should have flexibility, protections and benefits when they earn with us.

“Today’s partnership agreement will mean that together we can continue to raise the standard of flexible work for couriers across the UK.”

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward
UK
Tories fume as Labour axe draconian anti-strike law
6 August, 2024 
LEFT FOOT FORWARD

Angela Rayner said repealing the legislation was the first part of the party's plan to "reset industrial relations so they are fit for a modern economy”



The Labour government announced today it will axe the anti-strike law brought in by the previous Conservative administration in a welcome move for workers’ rights.

Britain’s new Government has said it will be repealing the controversial Strikes Act legislation which gave ministers sweeping powers to extend minimum service levels across the economy, and could be used to force striking workers back to work or risk losing their job.

In the announcement today, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said Labour was scrapping the “pointless law” and instead creating a new partnership between business, trade unions and working people through the New Deal.

“Attempting to clamp down on the fundamental freedom of working people has got us nowhere and this was targeted at sectors who dedicate their lives to serving us all,” said Rayner.

“Repealing this legislation is the first part of our plan to reset industrial relations so they are fit for a modern economy.”

Trade unions had described the legislation as “unworkable and undemocratic”, as Paul Nowak, leader of the Trades Union Congress responded, “it speaks volumes that not one employer was daft enough to use the Tories vindictive” law.

Strike action in the NHS alone cost the taxpayer £1.7bn in 2023 as Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting highlighted how the legislation had failed to resolve a single dispute, and that Labour will focus instead on “strong but fair negotiations” to tackle issues between workers and employers.

The move has left Tory politicians fuming, with former Tory party leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith coming out to attack the return of the hard-won workers’ rights.

Duncan Smith said: “Welcome back to the 1970s. The hardline Left are back. This is the beginning of radical change that will give power to the unions to strike at will.”

Shadow Health Secretary Victoria Atkins was also quoted in the Daily Mail criticising the reversal of the minimum service laws and said that scrapping the laws would threaten “safe staffing levels” in hospitals. However unions representing health workers have long argued that safe staffing levels had already been compromised by the Tory government, due to cuts and dire staff retention levels, not strikes.

Wes Streeting, said: “Scrapping minimum service levels marks another significant step in resetting relationships with staff, as we fix the broken health service.”

(Image credit: Number 10 / Flickr)


Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward
UK
How the Government can combat right-wing extremists by challenging neoliberalism


5 August, 2024
LEFT FOOT FORWARD

The political system has abandoned low/middle income families and makes them an easy target for right-wing extremists offering simplistic solutions



Right-wing extremists continue to use their well-tried playbook to demonise minorities for the UK’s economic and social woes. They wave flags and populist slogans to blame Johnny Foreigner for social problems. With charismatic leaders, they persuaded people to believe that exiting the European Union (EU) would somehow restore a golden age and enable the English to ‘take back control’. In 2016 the UK left the EU, the biggest trading bloc right at its doorstep. This has cost the UK economy around £100bn a year and has sliced 5% off economic growth. The only Brexit benefit that Brexiteers could offer was a return to imperial measurements of pounds and ounces.

The bigoted utterances of right-wing politicians such as Boris Johnson, Suella Braverman and Nigel Farage are amplified by newspapers such as Daily Express, Daily Mail and The Sun and have created space for hate and social divisions. The standard practice is, blame migrants and minorities rather than neoliberal economic policies for social problems. This has emboldened thugs who in broad daylight are attacking, burning and looting libraries, citizens’ advice bureaus, hotels, foodbanks, supermarkets, wine, shoe, phone, vaping, travel and other businesses to create panic and fear. Black and Asian people have been physically attacked. Muslims and mosques have been particularly targeted by racist thugs. This is organised violence and terrorism rather than protests or demonstrations in any traditional sense.

Communities are uniting to counter misinformation and racist propaganda of right-wing extremists. Firm policing is a key requirement but policing alone can’t tackle the underlying issues. The government needs to attend to the economic causes of the unrest. These are neoliberal economic policies which have institutionalised never-ending austerity, deprivations, real wage cuts and loss of public services and polarised society.

The evidence of social exclusion and a polarised society is all around us. The richest 1% have more wealth than 70% of the population combined. The bottom 50% of the population owns less than 5% of wealth, and the top 10% owns a staggering 57%. Some 37% of total disposable household income in the UK goes to the fifth of individuals with the highest household incomes, while 8% went to the fifth with the lowest.

To boost corporate profits, successive governments have sought to cheapen labour and imposed real wage cuts. Workers share of gross domestic product, in the form of wages and salaries, has declined from 65.1% in 1976 to barely 50% now. The median pre-tax wage of £28,584 is lower in real terms than in 2008. Due to spread of fire and rehire on low pay and zero-hour contracts early 6.2m workers are in insecure jobs. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation estimates that a single person needs £29,500 a year to reach a minimum acceptable standard of living, and a couple with two children need to earn £50,000 between them. The grim statistics are that over 50% of the population lives on income which is below the level needed for minimum standard of living, and governments have not listened to cries for help.

Most Britons are now unlikely to own a home, which has an average price of £375,000. First-time homebuyers are spending 40% of pay on mortgage repayments and renters are spending nearly 40% of their wages on rent, leaving little for other essentials. Governments promise to build new affordable homes but rarely hit the targets. Social housing has severely declined. Household incomes are depleted by unchecked corporate profiteering. Most mobile phone and internet companies hike prices by the rate of inflation + 3.9% each year. Water and energy companies are guaranteed real returns by regulators, regardless of the quality of service. Profit margins of companies have soared by an average of 30% since the pandemic. Electricity and Gas supply companies have increased their profit margin by 363%. Bank profit margins have increased by nearly 50% compared to their pre-pandemic average. Big supermarkets have increased their profit margins by 19% and made an extra £17.4bn in profits.

Work doesn’t pay enough and people increasingly rely upon charity and benefits to make ends meet. Some 38% of the people claiming Universal Credit are in employment. In 2008/09, just 26,000 individuals used foodbanks, but by 2022/23 the numbers soared to nearly 3 million. Social security benefits have not kept pace with inflation and some 12m people, including 4.3m children, 30% of all children, live in poverty. For the period 2013-2019, the government reduced social security benefits in real terms by freezing their value or increasing them by a lower rate than inflation. In 2017, the government introduced the two-child benefit cap, condemning millions of children and their families to poverty. Due to low incomes and profiteering 6m people are trapped in fuel poverty. In 2022-23 around 800,000 patients were admitted to hospital with malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies, a threefold increase in 10 years. Scurvy and rickets, once banished, have returned as the UK hurtles towards a new Victorian era.

Youth clubs offered younger people a chance to build solidarity and communities, but with government cuts to local council funding over 1,200 have been closed since 2010. Hundreds of children’s centres, council-owned and affordable leisure centres, community centres and village halls have closed.

In England, 6.38m patients are waiting for 7.6m hospital appointments. Those who can afford to pay for private healthcare may bypass the queues, others pay with their lives. Some 300,000 people a year are dying whilst waiting for a hospital appointment. Social care is shambles as corporations fleece public budgets. Nearly 29,000 people a year die waiting for social care. People struggle to see a family doctor or dentist and some have taken it upon themselves to extract infected teeth. Due to lack of healthcare 2.8m people are chronically ill and unable to work. Due to lack of investment public buildings such as schools are literally falling down.

None of this has put the brakes on neoliberalism. Governments tax wages at marginal rates of 20%-45% whilst capital gains accruing to the wealthy are taxed at the rates of 10%-28%. Since 2021, income tax thresholds and annual tax free personal allowance have been frozen at £12,570. Millions more people are sucked into paying income tax. In its last two budgets, the Tory government loped £21.4bn off national insurance rates, which benefited the richest the most. It gave zero benefit to 17.8m adults surviving on incomes below £12,570. Social mobility has been reduced as fewer people are going to university. Those going are saddled with lifelong debt. Not so long ago, higher education was funded from the public purse. Now the cost has been dumped onto households who carry a debt of £236bn and paying interest at the rate of up to 8%, way above the rate of inflation. UK Households have a debt of £2.1 trillion and there is no relief in sight.

The Labour Party came to power in July 2024 with 33.7% of the votes, winning 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons. It promised ‘change’ but remains committed to neoliberal economics. Almost its first act was to confirm continuation of the two-child benefit cap and withdrawal of the winter fuel payments for retirees. Some 2.1m retirees live in poverty. The UK state pension is less than 50% of the minimum wage, and almost the lowest in industrialised nations. Some 68,000 pensioners a year die in poverty. Last winter resulted in 5,000 excess deaths of retirees as they struggled to make a choice between eating and heating. Labour promised no tax rises for corporations or the rich.

The above provides a brief glimpse of people’s desperation. Hope and social wellbeing has been drained by neoliberal economics and self-imposed fiscal rules. The social strains are the direct result of governments appeasing corporations and wealthy elites. The political system has abandoned low/middle income families and makes them an easy target for right-wing extremists offering simplistic solutions. The government needs to redistribute income and wealth and invest in public services. Such calls always lead to the usual question “How are we going to pay for it?” Well, a country that can bailout banks and energy companies, fund foreign wars in Ukraine, Afghanistan and Iraq and hand over billions in subsidies to corporations can also eradicate poverty and injustice, if the political will is there. Since 2010 HMRC failed to collect between £500bn and £1,400bn of taxes. Billions more can be raised by taxing capital gains at the same rate as wages and through wealth and financial transactions taxes.

Immediate steps should include abolition of VAT on domestic fuel and reduction in the standard rate of VAT. A sizable increase in personal allowance will take millions out of the income tax net. Two-child benefit cap must be ended. Real value of benefits must be preserved. Profiteering must be curbed. Councils must be allowed to build social housing, which will be at a lower cost than profiteering developers. There should be worker-elected directors on boards of large companies to ensure that wealth is equitably shared. Wherever possible, customers too should elect company directors and vote on executive pay as that would curb exploitation by water, energy, supermarkets, banks and insurance companies. Rather than guaranteeing corporate profits through privatisation, outsourcing and private finance initiatives, the state should invest directly in key infrastructure and meet community needs. Another world, a better world, is possible.


Prem Sikka is an Emeritus Professor of Accounting at the University of Essex and the University of Sheffield, a Labour member of the House of Lords, and Contributing Editor at Left Foot Forward.