Monday, August 12, 2024

As war halts Israel permits, Palestinians return to farming

Agence France-Presse
August 12, 2024 

Hussein Jamil is one of dozens of Palestinian farmers who have set up greenhouses in the West Bank after they lost permission to work in Israel in the wake of the Gaza war (Zain JAAFAR/AFP)

Hussein Jamil held a permit to work in Israel for 22 years until the war in Gaza broke out. Now, after setting up a greenhouse in a West Bank village, he swears he'll never go back.

Harvesting his tomatoes in the occupied West Bank, the 46-year-old says his former Israeli boss has already called several times to ask him to return.

"But I told him that I would never go back to work there," he says in Bayt Dajan near Nablus, the northern West Bank's commercial centre.

There, dozens of men have returned to the traditional pursuit of tilling the land, rather than board buses to queue at the heavily guarded checkpoints that lead into Israel.

"It's a very useful job and above all safer" than working in Israel, says Jamil, as he tends to his plants with his sons.

Israel stopped issuing work permits for Palestinians after the October 7 attack by Hamas, the Islamist movement that rules in the Gaza Strip, which resulted in the deaths of 1,198 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP count based on official Israeli data.

Israeli reprisals in Gaza have so far left 39,790 dead, according to the health ministry of the Hamas-run territory, which does not give a breakdown of civilians and fighters killed.

Jamil was one of 200,000 Palestinians from the West Bank who were working in Israel legally or illegally, according to the Palestinian General Confederation of Labour, and who lost their livelihoods overnight.

Salaries in Israel are more than double what Palestinians can make in the occupied territories, according to the World Bank.


Many of those workers are now busy in the greenhouses that have sprouted up in recent months on the hillsides where, Palestinian elders say, their ancestors once grew wheat.

Working this way, "we are independent and peaceful," says Jamil, adding: "It's much better than working in Israel. Here we work on our land."

- West Bank violence -

Economic prospects have dived since the war, with West Bank unemployment leaping from 12.9 percent to 32 percent in the final three months of 2023.

Some 144,000 jobs have been lost in the territory, many because of rising violence that has prompted the army to block roads, strangling economic activity.

Since October 7, at least 617 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank by the Israeli army or settlers, according to an AFP count based on official Palestinian data.

At least 18 Israelis, including soldiers, have died in Palestinian attacks in the same period, according to official Israeli data.

Every day, around $22 million in income is lost in the West Bank, according to International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates.

In Bayt Dajan alone, 300-350 men worked in Israel out of a population of 5,000.

Mazen Abu Jaish, 43, who spent 10 years working in Israel, took his time before deciding to pick up his shovel and rake and set up a tomato greenhouse.

"We waited, thinking that we would get our jobs back again after the war," he told AFP.

But unlike previous wars in Gaza, which never lasted more than a few weeks, the current conflict is fast approaching its first anniversary.

"So we ended up getting together with 35 other people from the village and we decided to start farming rather than keep waiting," says Jaish.

Since October 7, 15 hectares of Bayt Dajan have been covered by greenhouses with tomatoes and cucumbers, grown by people who used to work in Israel, municipal officials say.

Mohammad Ridwan, a member of the municipal council, sees other advantages as well, as the greenhouses are in Area C -- the West Bank land controlled solely by Israel, and vulnerable to being used for illegal Israeli settlements.

Area C makes up 59 percent of the West Bank, and 63 percent of its agricultural land.

The Norwegian Refugee Council also says that Israel had denied Palestinians access to 99 percent of the land in Area C, in many cases preventing them from growing their own fields there.

"Local unemployed people have found work and above all, we are preserving land in Area C," said Ridwan.
Koch network’s flagship super PAC pours big money into 2024 elections

Maia Cook, OpenSecrets
August 12, 2024 

Charles Koch during an interview on MSNBC (Screenshot)

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets

The Koch network’s flagship group, Americans for Prosperity, has spent two decades pouring money into influencing U.S. elections.

As the group celebrates its 20-year anniversary, its hybrid super PAC ranks third in outside spending in the 2024 cycle.


Americans for Prosperity Action, a hybrid PAC affiliated with the group, has spent over $257 million since 2004 to support conservative congressional and presidential candidates.

The organization is known for supporting reduced government spending, opposing collective bargaining, curbing environmental regulations, and backing the oil and gas industry.

Its website calls Americans for Prosperity “the premier grassroots advocacy organization transforming policy around the country.”



Americans for Prosperity has spent approximately $62 million to bolster Republican candidates and $10 million to oppose Trump in the 2024 cycle, as of August 6. Despite pledges to reach across party lines and work with Democrats in the wake of former President Donald Trump’s election, not a single penny has been spent in support of Democrats during the 2024 cycle.

Court decisions such as Wisconsin v. Right To Life in 2007, Citizens United v. FEC in 2010 and Speechnow v. FEC in 2010 spurred the proliferation of “dark money,” enabling organizations like Americans for Prosperity to legally raise and spend unlimited sums of money through 501(c)(4) nonprofits without having to disclose the original source of funding behind their donors’ network.

One out of every $5 fueling the Americans for Prosperity Action committee comes from nknown sources. Americans for Prosperity’s hybrid PAC has received large donations from Stand Together Chamber of Commerce, a dark money group that is part of the Koch network and gave the hybrid PAC $25 million.

Heir to oil giant Fred C. Koch and his multinational company Koch Industries, Charles Koch founded Americans for Prosperity and spearheaded the Koch network along with his late brother, David. Charles Koch is ranked by Forbes as the 24th richest man in the world, with a family net worth of $67.8 billion as of August 2024.

His own company, Koch Industries, gave another $25 million to Americans for Prosperity Action in 2024. The hybrid PAC has also received contributions from Alice and Jim Walton, heirs to the Walmart fortune.

But since the hybrid PAC’s top donor is a dark money group that does not disclose its donors, millions of dollars come from donors whose identities remain undisclosed.

Americans for Prosperity was Nikki Haley’s second largest outside supporter in the 2024 presidential election, spending over $31 million to back her campaign during the GOP primaries. In a memo released in November 2023, the organization justified its decision to support Nikki Haley, writing, “Haley is more viable amongst GOP Primary voters to take on Trump.”

The presidential campaign of Ron DeSantis, who has since withdrawn from the race, responded to Americans for Prosperity’s decision to support Haley, arguing, "Every dollar spent on Nikki Haley's candidacy should be reported as an in-kind [donation] to the Trump campaign.”


Americans for Prosperity's Most Expensive Targeted Candidates 2024

Totals include outside spending by Americans for Prosperity Action PAC. 

Table with 3 columns and 10 rows.
1Nikki Haley (R)
$31,220,854
For
2Donald Trump (R)
$10,001,464
Against
3Joe Biden (D)
$9,389,906
Against
4Sam Brown (R-Nev.)
$3,205,046
For
5Dave McCormick (R-Pa.)
$2,378,891
For
6Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.)
$2,003,392
For
7Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio)
$1,818,543
For
8Eric Hovde (R-Wis.)
$1,768,087
For
9Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.)
$1,055,443
Against
10Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.)
$1,002,775
Against


Americans for Prosperity’s hybrid PAC has spent approximately $10 million to oppose former President Donald Trump and over $9 million to oppose President Joe Biden, who withdrew from the race and has since handed over his campaign to Vice President Kamala Harris.

The political giving of employees of Americans for Prosperity tends to be in line with their organization’s viewpoints. Since 2010, a total of $150,000 has been contributed to Republicans and a mere $286 to Democrats.

Although Americans for Prosperity steers millions toward outside spending on elections, it has also been active on the lobbying scene for a decade — hiring 28 different lobbyists since 2014.

In 2023, Americans for Prosperity spent over $1.9 million between 17 lobbyists — setting a record for the most it has ever spent on lobbying fees in one year.


Lobbying firms working for Americans for Prosperity reported lobbying around 131 bills in 2023 filings, including companion bills in both the House and Senate.

A key issue that Americans for Prosperity lobbied on in recent years was immigration, including the Protecting Children of Long-Term Visa Holders Act, the Integrating New Technologies to Empower Law Enforcement at Our Borders Act, and the DIGNIDAD Act.

“Congress’s failure to strengthen our border and streamline lawful migration pathways created a system that undermines the rule of law and fails to meet the needs of American families, workers, and entrepreneurs,” Americans for Prosperity states on its website.

Quarterly lobbying by Americans for Prosperity

The Koch brothers' group shattered its own lobbying records in 2023, spending a total of $1.9 million among 17 hired lobbyists.

$10K
$20K
$0
$0
$20K
$10K
$15K
$10K
$10K
$10K
$20K
$10K
$40K
$40K
$30K
$60K
$60K
$60K
$70K
$110K
$80K
$185K
$200K
$130K
$161K
$150K
$120K
$180K
$190K
$320K
$350K
$410K
$490K
$490K
$410K
$73K
$507K
$460K
$520K
$440K
$460K
$260K
$30K
$55K
$50K
$170K
$300K
$595K
$611K
$1.3M
$1.5M
$1.9M
$720K


In addition to spending on lobbying, Americans for Prosperity’s foundation files amicus briefs weighing in on court cases.

The Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed 23 amicus briefs last year, 14 of which were for cases heard by the Supreme Court. The foundation has submitted 20 amicus briefs in 2024, as of August.

Recently, it submitted an amicus brief for a Supreme Court case No On E v. Chiu, which addresses “Whether requiring political advertisers to name their donors’ donors within their advertisements advances any important or compelling state interest.”


Americans for Prosperity argued that the requirement to disclose donors’ donors would abridge their First Amendment rights to “speak anonymously” and “associate freely,” and would “driv[e] civil society further into tribalism.”

OpenSecrets Editorial and Investigations Manager Anna Massoglia contributed to this report.
'Rocket fuel for conspiracy': Experts share MAGA's expected playbook for election denial

Kathleen Culliton
August 12, 2024 

A Trump-themed flag is flown by supporters across the street from Trump Tower before former U.S. President Donald Trump holds a press conference in New York City on May 31, 2024. (Photo: Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)

Donald Trump's allies have readied swing states across the U.S. to challenge his potential defeat in the upcoming presidential election by means recently described as a "5 alarm fire for democracy" in Georgia, experts warned Monday.

Republicans for years have been quietly readying election workers to not certify 2024 presidential election results should Trump lose to the Democratic nominee, the Guardian reported Monday.

“You can force certification through legal mechanisms, [but] those events tend to be like rocket fuel for conspiracy theories and misinformation and undermining confidence in the election," Ben Berwick, a lawyer at the non-profit Protect Democracy, told the Guardian. "There’s damage done even where certification is eventually forced."

Voting rights experts told the Guardian that Trump, allies such as firebrand Cleta Mitchell and MAGA politicians at the Republican National Committee have learned subtly in the years following the Capitol riots on Jan. 6, 2021.

Christina Bobb, an election denier facing criminal charges for her effort to return Trump to the White House in 2020, is leading an election litigation team preparing to challenge results as the RNC recruits tens of thousands to "observe" polls on Nov. 5, the Guardian reports.

“I think we saw efforts by Republicans in 2020 that were pretty ham-handed,” voting rights lawyer Marc Elias reportedly said. “I worry that there will be both legal and extralegal efforts by Republicans to keep ballots from being counted.”

Their efforts have been eased by the entryway of far-right conspiracy theory into the mainstream as election denialism became a pillar of conservative movement, the Guardian reports.

"This is no longer the province of people who thought that there were bamboo filaments in paper or mythical sea creatures involved in the election with Venezuelan dictators," Elias reportedly said.

“It has become now the standard position of the Republican party.”

In Georgia, Republicans have already managed to pass a "reasonable inquiry" rule that empowers voting officials to investigate results before certifying results.

This could provide Republicans the means to push certification beyond a vital Dec. 11 deadline that could put swing state results at risk, said Berwick.

“The point is to have enough of it stick to create enough uncertainty for that critical post-election period," Berwick said. “If we get past that deadline, it opens up a lot of questions, like tricky legal questions and room for shenanigans."


The MAGA plot to steal 2024 election is on a 'different level than 2020': experts

Alex Henderson, AlterNet
August 12, 2024 



When Bill Maher predicted, in 2020, that Donald Trump would not concede the presidential election if he lost, Trump's defenders accused the "Real Time" host of having "Trump derangement syndrome." But Trump, just as Maher predicted, refused to admit defeat after losing the 2020 election to now-President Joe Biden.

Now, four years later, a variety of Trump critics — from Maher to Democratic elections lawyer Marc Elias — are warning that Trump will do the same thing again if he loses the 2024 election.

But The Guardian's Sam Levine, in an article published on August 12, stresses that there is a crucial difference between 2020 and 2024: Trump and his MAGA allies "may be better prepared" to steal the election this time.

"(Cleta) Mitchell, a close Trump ally, has spent the last few years building up a network of activists focused on local boards of elections," Levine explains. "And the Republican National Committee's election litigation team is now being led by Christina Bobb, an election denier who is now facing criminal charges for her efforts to overturn the 2020 race."

The reporter continues, "The RNC claims it is recruiting an army of 100,000 poll observers who could provide significant disruption during voting and counting…. But more significantly, the idea that the 2020 election was stolen has moved from the fringes to being a pillar of the Republican Party. A January poll from PRRI found that 66 percent of Republicans believe the 2020 election was stolen.


Elias laments that election denialism has become the GOP's "standard position."

The attorney and Democracy Docket publisher told The Guardian, "I think we saw efforts by Republicans in 2020 that were pretty ham-handed. I worry that there will be both legal and extralegal efforts by Republicans to keep ballots from being counted."

Similarly, Ben Berwick, an attorney for Protect Democracy, told The Guardian, "It's all part of creating sort of a pretext to say, 'Oh, we need to throw out this set of ballots' or 'We can't really know who the real winner is.' I think much of it won't stick, but I think the point is to have enough of it stick to create enough uncertainty for that critical post-election period."

Richard Pildes, an election law expert at New York University, told The Guardian he is "definitely concerned" that there will be "a lot of efforts to disturb" vote counting.


Sean Morales-Doyle of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, believes that MAGA election denialism is much more sophisticated in 2024 than it was four years ago.

Morales-Doyle told The Guardian, "This has started earlier in the cycle and is louder and is more consistent. That is all just at a different level than it was before 2020.”


Read The Guardian's full report at this link.
Right-wing podcaster bought West Virginia skate park — then rebellion ensued

Brad Reed
August 12, 2024 

A man jumps on his skateboard on August 15, 2023
. (Photo by APHOTOGRAFIA/Getty Images)

The Washington Post's Will Sommer has written a lengthy report about tensions that have erupted after right-wing podcaster Tim Pool purchased property that housed a skateboarding park in West Virginia.

The saga began back in August of 2023 when regulars at the venue in Martinsburg, West Virginia rejected Pool's offer of $20,000 in prize money for the park's 10-year anniversary celebration.

Some skaters informed Pool that not only was he not welcome at their event but that he would "be removed if he showed up," Sommer writes.

Chace Amos, a regular at the park, told Sommer that he and other skaters who objected to Pool aren't committed left-wingers by any stretch of the imagination, and simply insisted that "we didn't want to be associated with that hateful stuff" that Pool regularly spews on his podcast.

Another organizer said that they simply didn't want Pool publicizing the existence of what they saw as their private skate park.

“We didn’t want a billion people showing up to our small town DIY looking for a $20k payday,” one tells Sommer. “We’re not in wheel sports for a paycheck."

Pool didn't take this snub lying down, however, and instead bought the land where the skate park was located, along with a nearby building, for $850,000 months later.

Pool would justify the purchase later by saying that now the skaters could no longer block him from being on the property.

“They don’t own the spot,” Pool explained. "By what right do they have to tell me I can’t stand on a derelict piece of property where they’re squatting?”

Amos tells Sommer that many of his fellow skaters have stayed away ever since Pool bought it, as they suspect he will make it into a private skate park in the future.

However, Sommer writes that the anti-Pool skaters left a going-away present for him at the park.

"Amid the usual skatepark graffiti, nestled above a drawing of Garfield the cat smoking a joint, someone spray-painted a message implying that Pool can’t pull off a skateboarding trick called the 'slappy grind,'" Sommer reports. "Their message: 'Tim Pool can’t slappy.'"