Saturday, August 24, 2024

 

New gels could protect buildings during wildfires



Stanford University
Fire Gel 

image: 

During a test on plywood, researchers showed how the new gel transitions from a hydrogel to an aerogel under heat from a gas hand-torch. The torch burned at a much higher temperature than would result from a wildfire. | Andrea d’Aquino

view more 

Credit: Andrea d'Aquino




As climate change creates hotter, drier conditions, we are seeing longer fire seasons with larger, more frequent wildfires. In recent years, catastrophic wildfires have destroyed homes and infrastructure, caused devastating losses in lives and livelihoods of people living in affected areas, and damaged wildland resources and the economy. We need new solutions to fight wildfires and protect areas from damage.

Researchers at Stanford have developed a water-enhancing gel that could be sprayed on homes and critical infrastructure to help keep them from burning during wildfires. The research, published Aug. 21 in Advanced Materials, shows that the new gels last longer and are significantly more effective than existing commercial gels.

“Under typical wildfire conditions, current water-enhancing gels dry out in 45 minutes,” said Eric Appel, associate professor of materials science and engineering in the School of Engineering, who is senior author of the paper. “We’ve developed a gel that would have a broader application window – you can spray it further in advance of the fire and still get the benefit of the protection – and it will work better when the fire comes.

Long-lasting protection

Water-enhancing gels are made of super-absorbent polymers – similar to the absorbent powder found in disposable diapers. Mixed with water and sprayed on a building, they swell into a gelatinous substance that clings to the outside of the structure, creating a thick, wet shield. But the conditions in the vicinity of a wildfire are extremely dry – temperatures can be near 100 degrees, with high winds and zero percent humidity – and even water locked in a gel evaporates fairly quickly.

In the gel designed by Appel and his colleagues, the water is just the first layer of protection. In addition to a cellulose-based polymer, the gel contains silica particles, which get left behind when the gels are subjected to heat. “We have discovered a unique phenomenon where a soft, squishy hydrogel seamlessly transitions into a robust aerogel shield under heat, offering enhanced and long-lasting wildfire protection. This environmentally conscious breakthrough surpasses current commercial solutions, offering a superior and scalable defense against wildfires,” said the lead author of the study, Changxin “Lyla” Dong.

“When the water boils off and all of the cellulose burns off, we’re left with the silica particles assembled into a foam,” Appel said. “That foam is highly insulative and ends up scattering all of the heat, completely protecting the substrate underneath it.”

The silica forms an aerogel – a solid, porous structure that is a particularly good insulator. Similar silica aerogels are used in space applications because they are extremely lightweight and can prevent most methods of heat transfer.

The researchers tested several formulations of their new gel by applying them to pieces of plywood and exposing them to direct flame from a gas hand-torch, which burns at a considerably higher temperature than a wildfire. Their most effective formulation lasted for more than 7 minutes before the board began to char. When they tested a commercially available water-enhancing gel in the same way, it protected the plywood for less than 90 seconds.

“Traditional gels don’t work once they dry out,” Appel said. “Our materials form this silica aerogel when exposed to fire that continues to protect the treated substrates after all the water has evaporated. These materials can be easily washed away once the fire is gone.”

A serendipitous discovery

The new gels build off of Appel’s previous wildfire prevention work. In 2019, Appel and his colleagues used these same gels as a vehicle to hold wildland fire retardants on vegetation for months at a time. The formulation was intended to help prevent ignition in wildfire-prone areas.

“We’ve been working with this platform for years now,” Appel said. “This new development was somewhat serendipitous – we were wondering how these gels would behave on their own, so we just smushed some on a piece of wood and exposed it to flames from a torch we had laying around the lab. What we observed was this super cool outcome where the gels puffed up into an aerogel foam.”

After that initial success, it took several years of additional engineering to optimize the formulation. It is now stable in storage, easily sprayable with standard equipment, and adheres well to all kinds of surfaces. The gels are made of nontoxic components that have already been approved for use by the U.S. Forest Service, and the researchers conducted studies to show that they are easily broken down by soil microbes.

“They’re safe for both people and the environment,” Appel said. “There may need to be additional optimization, but my hope is that we can do pilot-scale application and evaluation of these gels so we can use them to help protect critical infrastructure when a fire comes through.”


For more information

Appel is a senior fellow of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment; a member of Stanford Bio-X, the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, the Maternal & Child Health Research Institute, the Stanford Cancer Institute, and the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute; and a faculty fellow of Stanford Sarafan ChEM-H.

Additional Stanford co-authors of this research include postdoctoral researchers Andrea I. d’Aquino and Samya Sen; graduate students Changxin Dong and Anthony C. Yu; and undergraduate student Ian A. Hall.

Other co-authors on this work are from California Polytechnic State University.

This work was funded by the Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation, Schmidt Science Fellows, and the National Science Foundation.

NO THANKS

Scientists propose guidelines for solar geoengineering research



New paper focuses on feasibility and impacts of Earth-cooling stratospheric aerosol injection



National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research





Scientists for several years have studied the theoretical effectiveness of injecting sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere to reflect heat from the Sun and offset Earth’s warming temperatures. But they also want to ensure that the solar geoengineering approaches being studied are evaluated for their technical feasibility, as well as their cooling potential and possible ecological and societal side effects.

To guide future work, an international team of scientists led by the U.S. National Science Foundation National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR) has published a paper with specific recommendations for evaluating proposals to inject sulfur dioxide, which is known as stratospheric aerosol intervention (SAI). The paper also suggests criteria for discontinuing those scenarios that are not feasible because of scientific, technical, or societal issues.

“The goal is to work toward an assessment that can be used to identify the most feasible and legitimate scenarios, based on both how much they reduce natural and societal risks as well as any unwanted side effects,” said NSF NCAR scientist Simone Tilmes, the lead author. “If society were to ever consider implementing SAI, it is imperative that we provide the best possible scientific understanding to policy makers and the public.”

The paper, based on work funded by NSF and NOAA, was published in Oxford Open Climate Change.

Mimicking volcanic eruptions

Once injected into the stratosphere, sulfur dioxide would form sunlight-reflecting sulfate aerosols. Previous studies, drawing on computer modeling and observations of large volcanic eruptions, have shown these aerosols would have a cooling effect similar to that of a major volcanic eruption.

The injections could continue to cool Earth for decades or even centuries, buying time until heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere return to lower levels.

The previous research, however, has also emphasized the potential risks of SAI, such as changing the stratospheric ozone layer and altering global precipitation patterns. 

Since such injections cannot perfectly offset the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions, Tilmes and her co-authors write that informed policy decisions require a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and risks of SAI. They emphasize the need for a research and governance structure, with fair representation from both the Global South and North, to oversee SAI research and technology developments.

“Research on various solar geoengineering methods has been going on for a few decades now, but there hasn't been a formal assessment collating all the information in one place suitable for policy makers and the public,” said NOAA scientist Karen Rosenlof, a co-author of the new paper. “It’s time for such an assessment to occur, covering the criteria described in this paper, and repeated on a regular basis."

The paper proposes eight research criteria for assessing SAI developments. The criteria are:

  • Technical and economic limitations
  • Cooling potential
  • Ability to meet climate objectives
  • Infrastructure for monitoring, detection, and attribution
  • Large-scale and regional climate response
  • Impacts on human and natural systems
  • Societal risks
  • Mitigation of risks through governance

The paper recommends issuing assessment reports about SAI developments every few years with globally representative participation. The criteria can also be applicable to other solar radiation modification proposals, such as the brightening of marine clouds.

“The goal of these criteria is to promote optimal approaches from a climate perspective while carefully weighing the benefits and risks and making sure to include the perspectives of underrepresented groups and the Global South,” Tilmes said. 

About the article

Title: Research criteria towards an interdisciplinary Stratospheric Aerosol Intervention assessment

Authors: Simone Tilmes, Karen Rosenlof, Daniele Visioni, Ewa M. Bednarz, Tyler Felgenhauer, Wake Smith, Chris Lennard, Michael S. Diamond, Matthew Henry, Cheryl Harrison, Chelsea Thompson

Journal:  Oxford Open Climate Change

 

Why and How Harris Should Take Her ‘Opportunity Economy’ to Rural Voters


 
 August 23, 2024
Facebo

Photo by Colin Lloyd

Campaign strategists obsess over the ‘blue wall,’ that is, those Midwestern states that regularly went Democrat in Presidential races until Trump eked out victories in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin in 2016.

But within those states and around the country, they should not forget another supposed partisan bulwark – the Republican’s ‘red wall.’  Not in any particular state, these are the rural counties that have trended right increasingly since the 2000s.  Trump garnered clear majorities in such areas in 2016 and 2020.

Now, as Harris has begun to compose her policy proposals – with the idea of the ‘opportunity economy’ and the need to lower the cost of living that she announced in her North Carolina speech – her campaign should make a play to pierce that wall of staunch Republican support.  Strategically, all she needs is to strengthen and target some of her economic messaging.  Moreover, there are clear reasons for Harris to do so as her campaign needs to keep the pressure on Trump while also making her appeal truly national.

But does the Harris campaign need to appeal to voters outside the Democratic base?  Polls show her catching up with Trump, even outpacing him in some cases.

Still, Harris making a play for rural votes makes strategic sense.

First, such a move shows strength while also keeping Trump on the defensive.   The former President’s campaign appears flailing, struggling to find an attack on Harris that sticks.  Taking the fight to him where his campaign believes they are strong, would further keep the Republican nominee on his heels.

Also, campaigns these days are won at the margins, or rather, races are won by the thousands of votes in the handful or so of swing states that garner so much attention given how the electoral college operates.  Taking just some of the rural vote in these states could make the difference in races that are expected to be tight.

There is also the question of policy.

Harris’ website is short on details aside from requests for contributions and a list of upcoming campaign stops.  That may work now, but the energy that she has generated cannot be trusted to carry her through November.

This also involves respect, as voters – including the people in rural areas – deserve to know what Harris stands for.  Real policy positions that address rural voters’ needs would also grant her campaign credibility. A stump stop at some farm is a cheap campaign trope.  Even selecting Walz as VP, with his own rural background, is superficial identity politics without policy substance.  In democracies, voters deserve transparency and to know what their elected representatives plan to do if elected.

All Harris needs to do in terms of making credible appeals to rural voters is to strengthen some of economic messaging – particularly on pricing – that she presented in North Carolina.

The Farm Bill, for instance, is stalled in Congress.   With this legislation that governs our food system most likely becoming law in 2025 after our elections, Harris could address the fact that farm incomes are slated to fall this year when compared to 2023.  Sticking it to Trump, she could also mention how his trade war with China negatively hit many producers’ bottom line, while a Harris administration would improve farmer economic well-being by reforming the check-off program, advocating for country of origin labeling, and strengthening federal food procurement initiatives.

Farmers also know price-gouging just as well as the consumer at the grocery store.

In this regard, Harris could include prioritizing competition in the farm economy among her policy ideas.  Not a stretch for the presumptive Democratic nominee, she could pledge to support President Biden’s efforts to strengthen antitrust law enforcement and prevent further consolidation.

Similarly, Harris could promote small rural businesses, as on average, people in rural areas tend to be entrepreneurs more so than their urban counterparts.  Accordingly, she could discuss making tax breaks for businesses that operate within or move to rural areas, and advocate for more grants for those who recently began.

In her speech in North Carolina, Harris also referenced the high cost of healthcare.  This is especially true for folks with disabilities, who are most present in rural areas when compared to cities.  She could promise to strengthen social security and Medicaid, also pledging to continue to issue grants to improve rural hospitals.
Democrats have momentum, but a lot can happen from now until November.  Making a credible play for her opponent’s trusted voter base would continue the VP’s show of strength while keeping Trump on the defensive.  At the same time, building her coalition by going to rural areas with a strong economic message would show that Harris is sincere about governing for everyone, and not keeping us divided.

Anthony Pahnke is a Professor of International Relations at San Francisco State University. His research covers development policy and social movements in Latin America. He can be contacted at anthonypahnke@sfsu.edu

Hindus For Kamala Harris: Hindus in US create group to rally support for Democratic presidential nominee

'We must help her win. This is the best outcome for America, India and the World! The alternative Trump is a disaster!'

PTI Washington Published 23.08.24,

Kamala Harris

Some Hindus in the US have come together to create “Hindus For Kamala Harris”, a support group for the Democratic presidential nominee, saying she would be good for India, America and the world.

The group has been created “to support Kamala Devi Harris to become the 47th President of the United States of America”, its founding members said.

On Thursday, Harris, 59, formally accepted the nomination of the Democratic Party to be its presidential nominee.

“We must help her win. This is the best outcome for America, India and the World! The alternative Trump is a disaster!’ one of the members of the group said.

“There is a simple path to victory. Without rejecting the other side, promote Harris candidacy because of what it stands for and the solution it will provide," another member said, adding that the candidacy has a unique momentum to win.

The group is urging Hindus to vote in the elections, display signs of support near their house, and make donations in support of the Harris campaign.



Desi President: Indian-Americans launch website for Kamala Harris campaign with tagline 'Kamala Ke Saath'

This is not for the first time that a Hindi slogan is used by a presidential campaign. In the 2016 elections, the Trump campaign had used the slogan 'Ab Ki Baar Trump Sarkaar'

PTI Chicago Published 23.08.24, 09:38 AM

Screengrab

Electrified by the fact that someone among their community has become the Democratic presidential candidate, a group of enthusiastic Indian-Americans have launched a new website – DesiPresident.com, with the tagline ‘Kamala Ke Saath”.

Harris, 59, is of mixed parentage; her mother immigrated to the United States from Chennai and her father moved to the country from Jamaica.

“The coming months are filled with excitement and promise as we rally together to make history. Your participation and enthusiasm are key to our success, and we can't wait to embark on this journey with you,” the website said.

The Desi President, a project of the Indian American Impact Fund, has launched a T-shirt with the tagline “Kamala Ke Saath: Vote Kamala”, which has become an instant hit on social media platforms.

Among other activities, the group is organising a weekly virtual phone bank “Kamala Ke Saath" to canvass voters and supporters over the phone. A T-shirt was presented to Indian American Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi by the Indian American Impact Fund at an event this week.

This is not for the first time that a Hindi slogan is used by a presidential campaign. In the 2016 elections, the Trump campaign had used the slogan “Ab Ki Baar Trump Sarkaar”.

“The Indian American Impact Fund supports Kamala Devi Harris for President. We're mobilizing South Asian voters to help elect the first Indian-American president. Kamala Harris stands for our values and communities,” it said.
Uncommitted delegates urge Harris to impose arms embargo on Israel

'Harris’ biggest applause line of the night was on Palestinian freedom. Let’s go get an arms embargo,' says Uncommitted National Movement

Diyar Güldoğan |23.08.2024 - TRT/AA



WASHINGTON

The Uncommitted National Movement (UNM) on Thursday called on US Vice President Kamala Harris to halt arms shipments to Israel amid its ongoing war in the Gaza Strip.

"Harris’ biggest applause line of the night was on Palestinian freedom. Let’s go get an arms embargo," the UNM posted on X.

The demand followed Harris’s acceptance of the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination on the final night of the four-day Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago, Illinois.

During her speech, Harris called for a cease-fire and a deal for the release of hostages in Gaza.

Stressing Israel’s right to defend itself, she said: "What has happened in Gaza over the past 10 months is devastating. So many innocent lives lost, desperate, hungry people fleeing for safety over and over again. The scale of suffering is heartbreaking."

Harris added that she and President Joe Biden are working to end the war "in a way that ensures Israel’s security, secures the release of hostages, ends the suffering in Gaza, and allows the Palestinian people to realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self-determination."

Earlier, the UNM criticized the Democratic Party for rejecting their demand to have a Palestinian American speaker on the final day of the convention.

"There are forces in the Democratic leadership who do not want us to talk about Palestinian human rights. But we will. This is a watershed moment. People all over are saying: Free Palestine!" the movement stated.

The UNM delegates later entered the convention arena hand in hand to take their seats.

"We must keep up the pressure on VP Harris to take action to ensure #NotAnotherBomb. Join tens of thousands who’ve sent a message to her: turn the page on the disastrous Biden-Harris Gaza policy, save lives, stop the bombs, and unite the party," they demanded.

Israel has continued its offensive on the Gaza Strip following an attack by the Palestinian group Hamas on Oct. 7, despite a UN Security Council resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire.

The offensive has resulted in over 40,200 Palestinian deaths, mostly women and children, and nearly 93,000 injuries, according to local health authorities.

An ongoing blockade of Gaza has led to severe shortages of food, clean water, and medicine, leaving much of the region in ruins.

Israel faces accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice, which has ordered a halt to military operations in the southern city of Rafah, where over one million Palestinians had sought refuge before the area was invaded on May 6.