Saturday, August 24, 2024

Court permanently blocks environmental civil rights protections for LA Black communities


Terry L. Jones, Floodlight News
August 24, 2024 

Judge with Gavel (Shutterstock)

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana this week issued a permanent injunction that prevents the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Justice from using Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to control how Louisiana regulates polluting facilities.

Judge James Cain’s ruling solidifies his earlier decision in January, which blocked EPA from imposing or enforcing so-called disparate impact-based requirements in its permitting decisions. In the earlier decision, Cain wrote that “pollution does not discriminate,” and that if a regulating authority had to consider race in its enforcement decision making, it will “indeed participate in racism.”

Cain is federal court appointee of former President Donald Trump.


EarthJustice, a nonprofit environmental law organization, said the court’s ruling is a significant setback for civil rights and environmental justice in Louisiana. EarthJustice’s Patrice Simms said it could embolden other states to seek similar exceptions and discourage other federal agencies from implementing civil rights enforcement.

“Louisiana has given industrial polluters open license to poison Black and brown communities for generations, only to now have one court give it a permanent free pass to abandon its responsibilities,” Simms, EarthJustice vice president for healthy communities, said in a statement. “Louisiana’s residents, its environmental justice communities, deserve the same Title VI protections as the rest of the nation.”

The EPA responded with a short statement saying the agency and DOJ would remain committed to enforcing civil rights law, consistent with the court’s order.

The ruling comes the same week the EPA unveiled new Title VI guidance aimed at ensuring state and local governments receiving federal funding put safeguards in place that prevent discrimination in their programs and activities. Officials at EarthJustice said that guidance still applies in Louisiana, but recognizes it does not apply to disparate and cumulative impacts.

The EPA in 2021 announced it would use “affirmative authority” to ensure recipients of federal funds complied with the Title VI’s nondiscriminatory guidelines or face loss of those funds. It was considered a historic first step in the fight against environmental injustices in marginalized communities disproportionately impacted by industrial pollution.

Courts use a three-part test to determine if a funding recipent’s policy or practices violated Title VI disparate impact guidelines. Does the adverse effect of a policy or practice fall disproportionately on a race, color or national origin group? If so, does the record establish a substantial legitimate justification for the policy or practice? And is there an alternative that would achieve the same legitimate objective but with less of a discriminatory effect?

EarthJustice filed a complaint in January 2022 on behalf of residents in St. John the Baptist Parish, asking the federal agency to investigate whether Louisiana regulating agencies had violated Title VI by failing to protect predominantly Black communities from disproportionate pollution and environmental harm.

In May 2023, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, who was then the state’s attorney general, sued the EPA to block the agency from investigating civil rights complaints and using the disparate impact standard. The standard allows the federal agency to penalize state regulating authorities for issuing operating permits in communities overburdened with pollution.

Attorneys general in 23 states in April petitioned the EPA to stop taking race into account when regulating pollution.

Landry’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment Friday.

Last year, the EPA announced that it was dropping its investigation in Louisiana without making public any findings of its probe.

Since then, Black residents in Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley” have tried to push the EPA to implement more stringent updates to its guidelines geared toward the oversight of facilities emitting toxic pollutants — such as mandating fence line air monitors to track emissions levels, limiting excessive flaring events and installing systems to detect chemical leaks.


Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and X.
Why Chicago’s 2024 Democratic convention didn’t devolve into 1968

Jordan Green, Investigative Reporter
August 23, 2024 

A pro-Palestine protester confronts an undercover police officer during a chaotic protest against the Democratic National Convention. (Jordan Green / Raw Story)

CHICAGO — Despite some protesters’ vows to “make it great like ’68,” history did not repeat itself, and the streets of Chicago did not descend into chaos during this year’s Democratic National Convention.

And inside the United Center, delegates cheering the presidential nomination of Vice President Kamala Harris experienced none of the turmoil that upended the 1968 convention, when security forces roughed up journalists and attacked campaign volunteers.

Despite the parallels between opposition to the Vietnam war in 1968 and protests against U.S. support for Israel’s war in Gaza in 2024, there are some key differences that explain why the dynamic is different this time.

Most importantly, the nominees: Harris is not Hubert Humphrey.

Sure, Harris is currently the sitting vice president, as Humphrey was in 1968. But as the daughter of immigrants from India and Jamaica, and as a woman poised to become leader of the free world, she can credibly claim to be a change candidate. Humphrey, in contrast, was the embodiment of the 1960s-era Democratic Party establishment.

ALSO READ: Inside the Democratic National Convention corporate moneyfest

Harris’ campaign promises “a new way forward” — primarily from the era of Donald Trump, but also from the political style — if not entirely the policy prescriptions — of a Silent Generation politician in Joe Biden, who entered the U.S. Senate in 1973, when Harris was in grade school.

Humphrey, in contrast, represented a continuation of then-President Lyndon Johnson’s policies, including an unpopular, war and efforts to address racism and poverty that, taken together with rioting in American cities in response to the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King, prompted a backlash from white voters.


(A Chicago police commander raises his fist while standing behind a police line near the Israeli consulate on Tuesday. (Jordan Green / Raw Story)

Another key difference between 2024 and 1968 is the Republican nominee. Simply stated,Trump is not Richard Nixon.

Voters and, more importantly, the Democratic Party rank-and-file, know Trump because he’s already served one term as president and has never stopped running for president since, shattering democratic legal standards and norms all the while.

Nixon, the Republican nominee, ran on the sufficiently vague promise of “peace with victory” in Vietnam that allowed him to evade scrutiny before going on to win the election and dramatically expand the war.

While Nixon would of course resign in 1974 amid nation-shaking abuses of power, neither Democrats nor Republicans in 1968 could not have predicted the events that would precede his political demise.

In contrast, Democratic Party delegates who gathered in Chicago this week are well aware that Trump intends, for one, to gut the civil service to install loyalists in the federal government. Trump’s risible efforts to distance himself notwithstanding, Project 2025, with its prescriptions for restructuring the government with authoritarian efficiency, is practically a household name among Democratic voters.

Thanks to the threat of Trump, Democratic Party activists are giving their nominee extraordinary leeway on policy issues. Aside from the politically perilous issue of Gaza, there was little evidence inside the United Center of factions jockeying for influence over particulars concerning environmental policy, healthcare or immigration. Many Democrats are happy to unify behind Harris with the imperative to beat Trump in November.

Another key difference between then and now is the Chicago police, who arguably bear the largest share of responsibility for the violence in 1968.

In 1968, violent skirmishes broke out between police and protesters roughly six miles from the convention center in what an independent commission later described as a “indiscriminate and unrestrained police violence.”

Protesters at the 2024 Democratic convention leaned into the legacy of 1968 in a bid to elevate the suffering in Gaza into the national discourse.

“Just like 1968, there’s nothing here to celebrate,” the protesters chanted on Wednesday, as their march idled in a residential neighborhood four blocks from the United Center. “The whole world’s watching — the bombs are dropping.”

Chicago police in riot gear — aided throughout Chicago by local and federal law enforcement officials from across the nation — held the line despite attempts by protesters throughout the week to break through security fences and access the United Center.

There were some minor skirmishes, as on Tuesday evening, when officers grabbed protest leaders out of a crowd outside the Israeli consulate, about two miles away from the United Center. The police sometimes used aggressive tactics, including trying to grab media credentials from journalists and arresting two on Tuesday. They also detained protesters in train stations near the march route, although they later released them, and in the end, the clashes didn’t amount to much.


Chicago police confront a photojournalist near the Israeli consulate on Aug. 20, 2024, in downtown Chicago. (Jordan Green / Raw Story)

Contrast this week’s events with the 1968 protests, as described by Peter Hayward, then a college student, to CBS News: “Cops on motorcycles — on those three-wheeled motorcycles — just driving us north. I saw some kids fall down — in a panic to see this kind of thing happening — and the National Guard just walking over them, and the motorcycle cops showing absolutely no respect for the fact that these people were lying there.”

The violence in 1968 was so horrifying and grotesque that Humphrey was forced to acknowledge it before giving his acceptance speech.

In 2024, it’s safe to say that for the vast majority of the Democrats, the joyful chaos of celebratory balloons and throngs of elated delegates chanting long after Harris left the stage left a more lasting impression than anything transpiring outside the United Center.


Jordan Green is a North Carolina-based investigative reporter at Raw Story, covering domestic extremism, efforts to undermine U.S. elections and democracy, hate crimes and terrorism. Prior to joining the staff of Raw Story in March 2021, Green spent 16 years covering housing, policing, nonprofits and music as a reporter and editor at Triad City Beat in North Carolina and Yes Weekly. He can be reached at jordan@rawstory.com. More about Jordan Green.
Cruelty is all the Republicans have left

Thom Hartmann
August 24, 2024

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) speaks to members of the press on the steps of the House of Representatives at the U.S. Capitol on May 8, 2024. (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

During the 1950s, Republicans were the party that promoted labor unions, Social Security, and a top 91% income tax bracket and 70% estate tax on the morbidly rich. Dwight Eisenhower successfully campaigned on what we’d call a progressive agenda for re-election in 1956.

During the Reagan years, Republicans embraced Milton Friedman’s neoliberalism with its free trade, opposition to unions, ending free college, and tax cuts for the fat cats. They called themselves “the party of new ideas.” They may have done more harm than good, but for most Republicans it was a good-faith effort.

Today, they’ve pretty much given up on all of that. All they have left is cruelty.

When Governor Tim Walz gave his heartwarming acceptance speech Wednesday night here at the DNC in Chicago, his son Gus was caught on camera proudly proclaiming, through tear-streaked eyes, “That’s my dad!”

The response from Trumpy Republicans was immediate: Ann Coulter wrote, “Talk about weird.” Rightwing hate jock Jay Weber posted, “Meet my son, Gus. He’s a blubbering b---- boy. His mother and I are very proud.” Trumpy podcaster Mike Crispi ridiculed Walz’s “stupid crying son,” adding, “You raised your kid to be a puffy beta male. Congrats.” Another well-known podcaster on the right, Alec Lace, said, “Get that kid a tampon already.”

Compassion for a learning-disabled child is dead on the right: all they have left is cruelty.

Ronald Reagan helped shepherd through Congress the most consequential border bill in American history, and when it needed updating Oklahoma’s Republican Senator James Lankford worked with Democrats to update it in a meaningful way. Trump demanded Republicans kill the legislation, invoking the memory of his tearing over 5,500 babies away from their mothers and trafficking them into fly-by-night “adoption” schemes (around 1000 are still missing) and his demand that the border patrol shoot immigrants in the legs.

Trump’s acolytes in Congress don’t even pretend any more to have a border policy: all they have left is cruelty.

Stephen Miller and 16 Republican state attorneys general are suing for the right to tear apart about a half million American families because at least one member of their family has brown skin and is not yet a US citizen.


Their hatred has almost no limit because all they have left is cruelty.

President George HW Bush worked with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to unwind the USSR in the hope of creating a democratic Russia. Neither expected Vladimir Putin to turn that nation into a virtual concentration camp where gays are routinely murdered, child pornography is legal (and they’ve kidnapped over 700,000 Ukrainian children), and dissenters are tortured, poisoned, and sent to brutal Siberian gulags. Donald Trump celebrates Putin, calling his invasion of Ukraine “genius” and “savvy,” handing Putin’s ambassador a western spy and top-secret information in his first month in office, and trying to abandon America’s traditional role as a moral leader in the world.

Trump’s GOP has abandoned our founding principles: all they have left is cruelty.


During the 2020 election, Trump followers tried to run a Biden/Harris campaign bus off the road in Texas, threatening to kill the occupants (which they believed included Kamala Harris). A crazed Trump supporter broke into Nancy Pelosi’s home and attacked her 82-year-old husband with a hammer. Trump tweeted a picture of the bus being attacked, writing below it, “I LOVE TEXAS!” and repeatedly makes jokes about the attack on Pelosi, as if to encourage future attacks on the families of other Democratic politicians. Most recently, Donald Trump posted a picture on social media of Joe Biden tied up in the back of a pickup truck with a bullet hole in his forehead.

Not a single elected Republican (as best as I can find with a pretty thorough web search) has condemned any of these, because all they have left is cruelty.

Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis turned down federal money that would have fed 2.1 million low-income children in his state; he was one of 13 Republican governors to do the same, in a nation where one in seven children — over 11 million every year — go to bed hungry.


We are literally the only developed country in the world with a massive child hunger problem because all Republicans have left is cruelty.

When President Obama succeeded in passing and signing the Affordable Care Act, it offered every state funds to expand Medicaid to give healthcare coverage to all their low-income citizens with the federal government covering 90% of the cost. To this day, ten states under Republican control have refused to accept the money, leading to millions of preventable illnesses and early deaths.

Republican states could have joined all the Blue states and every other developed country in the world by providing universal healthcare, but refuse to because all they have left is cruelty.

When a 10-year-old girl was raped and impregnated, Republicans like Congressman Jim Jordan, Governor Kristi Noem, Fox’s Tucker Carlson and Jesse Waters, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost ridiculed the claim. When the rape and pregnancy were proven and the girl fled Ohio to a state where abortion was legal to terminate the pregnancy, Indiana's Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita promised to launch an “investigation.”

Rokita didn’t investigate the rape, however: he instead went after the physician who performed the abortion. Because cruelty is all Republicans have left.

When Donald Trump lost the 2020 election by seven million votes, he sent a violent mob against the US Capitol. As they tried to murder the vice president and speaker of the house, covered the walls of the building with feces and defaced priceless paintings, Trump gleefully watched on live television for over three hours while refusing to call in the national guard or take any other meaningful action.


Five civilians and three police officers died as the result of his sending that murderous mob because all he and his GOP have left is cruelty.

This week Americans saw Democrats display compassion, care, respect, and reverence for our democracy. We saw the best of this country, hope for the future, and actual plans to improve the lives of Americans.

Last month, in sharp contrast, we watched the Republican convention and saw, instead, a cavalcade of anger, bile, grievance, hate, and, of course, cruelty.


Because cruelty is all Republicans have left.
As RFK Jr. backs Trump, here's the secretive billionaire plutocrat funding them both

Jake Johnson, Common Dreams
August 24, 2024 


Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former President Trump at a GOP campaign rally at the Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Arizona, Aug. 23, 2024.
Photo: Olivier Touron/AFP via Getty Images

Joining Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump onstage at a campaign rally in Arizona Friday night, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to emphasize what the two share.

"We talked about not the values that separate us, because we don't agree on everything, but on the values and issues that bind us together," Kennedy said shortly after suspending his independent presidential bid to throw his support behind Trump.

But Kennedy did not mention that he and Trump have in common the same billionaire megadonor, a reclusive heir to a Gilded Age fortune who has pumped over $165 million into the 2024 campaign thus far.

Timothy Mellon, the grandson of plutocrat Andrew Mellon, has poured tens of millions of dollars into the campaigns of both Trump and Kennedy, making the secretive billionaire the top individual donor to both.

The campaign finance watchdog OpenSecrets noted Friday in an analysis of Mellon's donations that the billionaire "made a $50 million cash infusion to pro-Trump super PAC Make America Great Again, Inc." in July, according to new Federal Election Commission filings.

"This brings his total contributions to the group to $125 million this election cycle, including a $50 million check he wrote to the super PAC the day after Trump was convicted of 34 felonies," OpenSecrets added. "Mellon's latest $50 million contribution accounts for over 90% of what MAGA, Inc. raised in July."

As for Kennedy, his hybrid PAC American Values 2024 received $25 million from Mellon earlier this year. OpenSecrets observed that Kennedy is quoted on the cover of the billionaire's autobiography, "praising Mellon as a 'maverick entrepreneur.'"

"He and Trump both shared the same major donor—billionaire nepo baby Timothy Mellon. RFK Jr.'s campaign was always a MAGA spoiler."

Robert Reich, the former U.S. labor secretary, wrote Friday that "it's no surprise" Kennedy dropped out of the 2024 race and endorsed Trump.

"He and Trump both shared the same major donor—billionaire nepo baby Timothy Mellon," Reich added. "RFK Jr.'s campaign was always a MAGA spoiler."

Mellon is a member of a powerful group known as "guardian angels," a label "for big donors who supply 40% or more of a committee's funds and are a political group's top contributor," OpenSecrets explained.


Spending from super PACs and other outside groups has topped $1 billion this election cycle, and the largest spender to date has been MAGA, Inc.

But U.S. billionaires, who are collectively richer than ever, aren't exclusively backing pro-Trump groups. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has cut huge checks to Democratic PACs, and groups backing Democratic nominee Kamala Harris have received large donations from LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and Netflix executive chairman Reed Hastings, among other rich executives.

In his primetime speech at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) condemned the outsized influence of billionaire "oligarchs" on the U.S. political process, particularly in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United ruling.

"Billionaires in both parties should not be able to buy elections," said Sanders. "For the sake of our democracy, we must overturn the disastrous Citizens UnitedSupreme Court decision and move toward public funding of elections."

He’s out, but scammers like Kennedy will never run out of marks

John Stoehr
August 24, 2024

Robert F Kennedy Jr (JOSH EDELSON/AFP)

Robert F Kennedy Jr. said this afternoon that he’s ending his so-called independent campaign for president. He’s endorsing Donald Trump. With that announcement, I won’t have to talk about him anymore, thank God, though the need to talk about third parties hasn’t stopped.

“I no longer believe that I have a realistic path to electoral victory," Kennedy said today. "I cannot in good conscience ask my staff and volunteers to keep working their long hours or ask my donors to keep giving when I cannot honestly tell them that I have a real path."

He never had a path. He’s a scammer.

This can’t be said enough.

Third parties can’t win. We know this is true, because they never win. The last and only time a third party won was in 1860. A major party had disintegrated and the country was on the brink of civil war. Since then, every single president has been a Republican or a Democrat.

But Kennedy – and Jill Stein and Cornel West and the rest – always say there’s a chance, like there’s a chance that a 5-foot, 10-inch man who’s 50 years of age can be an NBA all-star. It’s not impossible in theory, I suppose, but in practice, it’s too stupid to even mention the idea.

We know they can’t win and so do they. That’s why, when they say they can win, they are in fact lying. And they know they are lying. They know they are lying to Americans who don’t know any better or who have an elevated opinion of themselves. And because there will never be a shortage of the ignorant and delusional, there will never be a shortage of third parties that say they can win when they can’t.

Scammers like Kennedy and Stein and West rob supporters of their money and time, but that’s not all. They rob them of their hope in democratic politics. They say the goal of their campaigns is to save America from the anti-democratic grip of the two-party system. Then, when they lose, and they always lose, their supporters give up hope. What’s the point of participating in politics when the system is rigged?

While our system isn’t rigged, it was in fact designed in such a way that ultimately prevents more than two parties from having the resources needed to compete for the presidency. But it wasn’t designed that way for nefarious reasons. It was just a choice the founding fathers made.


The alternative would have been what’s called a proportional system. That’s when competitors take a percentage (or a proportion) of their winnings. Such a system might benefit someone like Kennedy, as the person who won the most votes (say, 51 percent) might have to bargain with him in order to form a government, because he took some votes (say, 5 percent). This is how things work in Israel and the UK.

I don’t know why exactly (perhaps we should ask Professor Heather Cox Richardson), but Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and the others chose something else. It’s called the winner-take-all system. In it, the winner (at least 50 percent, plus one) gets everything and the loser gets nothing. With a system like that, it’s virtually impossible for more than two parties to compete with a realistic expectation of winning.

I don’t mean to suggest that the Republicans and the Democrats don’t do their best to maintain the status quo. It’s in their interest to box out third parties, especially in swing states. But the major political parties did not establish the system. They emerged after the system had already been established. As a member of a political dynasty, Kennedy knows this better than most.


He knows something else – that lots of Americans don’t take their democracy all that seriously. Oh, they say they do, and they act very high-minded! But, in fact, they know very little about politics. They don’t want to know, because knowing something is beneath them. Let the partisans sling the mud, they say. We are above that! They prefer to be called “independents,” rather than Republican or Democrat, and their feelings about the parties are so strongly negative they might not even vote. Pollsters often call them “undecideds,” but they have decided plenty. They have decided to make ignorance a virtue.

Which makes them easy marks.

Sadly, Kennedy’s announcement won’t dampen enthusiasm for such cultivated naivete. Nor will his Trump endorsement. (Update: As I was writing, the AP reported his campaign is suspended, but not ending, a distinction without a difference. It also said he’s not endorsing Trump, though in a court filing he said he was.) He was always a greater threat to Trump than he was to the Democratic nominee. (Now that he’s out, his supporters will move over to Trump.) This was evident in Trump’s welcoming of Kennedy’s endorsement. Meanwhile, according to Kennedy, the Harris campaign wouldn’t give him the time of day. That’s the best indication that there’s nothing he has that she needs.


It’s also an indication that Kennedy’s departure has changed nothing about the election, including the fact that the people most attracted to third parties are attracted for the wrong reasons. His run is over, but as there will never be a shortage of the ignorant and delusional, there will never be a shortage of scammers trying to rip them off.

 

How personality traits might interact to affect self-control


Neuroticism may play a key role for the effects of conscientiousness and extraversion on self-control



PLOS




Neuroticism may moderate the relationship between certain personality traits and self-control, and the interaction effects appear to differ by the type of self-control, according to a study published August 21, 2024 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Fredrik Nilsen from the University of Oslo and the Norwegian Defence University, Norway, and colleagues. 

Self-control is important for mental and physical health, and certain personality traits are linked to the trait. Previous studies suggest that conscientiousness and extraversion enhance self-control, whereas neuroticism hampers it. However, the link between personality and self-control has mostly been studied using a narrow conceptualization of self-control, and no previous studies examined whether and how personality traits interact with one another to increase, or reduce, self-control. 

To fill this knowledge gap, Nilsen and colleagues collected data from 480 military cadets to examine the relationship between the Big Five personality traits (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) and self-control dimensions (general, inhibitory, and initiatory self-control). Inhibitory self-control reflects the ability to resist temptation, whereas initiatory self-control is the ability to initiate proactive actions to achieve long-term goals. The authors also investigated how neuroticism might moderate the relationship between other personality traits and self-control.  

Participants scoring highly for neuroticism tended to score lower for general and inhibitory self-control, after controlling for the effect of other variables – a negative correlation. A positive correlation was seen for extraversion and conscientiousness, with participants scoring highly on these traits being more likely to also score highly on self-control dimensions. Openness and agreeableness traits did not consistently link with self-control after controlling for other variables. 

The researchers found that neuroticism negatively moderated the relationship between extraversion and both general and inhibitory self-control, and the relationship between conscientiousness and both general and initiatory self-control, such that extroverted or conscientious participants scored less highly than otherwise expected for these types of self-control if they were also highly neurotic.  

According to the authors, one take-home message from the study is that it is important to differentiate between the types of self-control when studying their relationship with personality traits – in particular, we should distinguish between inhibitory self-control and initiatory self-control.  

The study may have practical implications, since self-control can be a valuable resource for good health, success, and proper conduct. For example, knowledge about strengths and weaknesses of personality profiles and their accompanying self-control qualities might help select individuals for professions that require high self-control. In clinical and personal growth settings, the development and training of self-control may benefit from an increased understanding of the relationship between personality profiles and self-control patterns. 

The authors add: “Our research reveals a more complicated relationship between personality traits and self-control than is previously found. First, there are two different types of self-control – the ability to inhibit impulses, and the ability to initiate proactive actions – and personality traits are differently related to these two ways of exhibiting self-control. Second, the level of neuroticism can significantly alter the relationship between personality traits like conscientiousness and extraversion, and self-control. Understanding the nuanced interplay between personality and self-control can help to find more effective ways to select individuals for roles that demand high levels of self-control, and to design interventions for developing self-control.” 

##### 

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS ONE: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307871 

Citation: Nilsen FA, Bang H, Røysamb E (2024) Personality traits and self-control: The moderating role of neuroticism. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0307871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307871  

Author Countries: Norway 

Funding: E.R. was supported by the Research Council of Norway, Grant 288083. https://www.forskningsradet.no/en/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. 

 

Following a Mediterranean diet may be associated with reduced risk of COVID-19 infection, per systematic review



PLOS





Following a Mediterranean diet may be associated with reduced risk of COVID-19 infection, per systematic review, although it's unclear if the diet is also associated with reduced symptoms and severity of illness. 

####

Article URL:  https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301564 

Article Title: Relevance of Mediterranean diet as a nutritional strategy in diminishing COVID-19 risk: A systematic review 

Author Countries: Indonesia 

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. 

 

Pennington Biomedical study to explore effects of soy on blood sugar levels



Recruiting is underway for adults and seniors in MOTIVATE study



Pennington Biomedical Research Center





Pennington Biomedical Research Center’s Dr. Candida Rebello wants to know more about the intersection of blood sugar levels and a diet rich in soy. This intersection is the primary focus of her new study, “Lifestyle Intervention for Improving Metabolic and Motivational Outcomes,” or MOTIVATE, which explores how specific diets can impact blood sugar, and potentially improve mood and energy levels.  

When soy seeds are cut, they produce the anti-microbial compound known as glyceollin, which has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity and cognition. The cut soy seeds will be milled into flour and will be included in the diets of some of the participants. The MOTIVATE study is open to adults aged 50 to 75 years who feel that they have low energy levels, lack motivation, and have a body mass index of 30 or greater. The study will last approximately 12 weeks, and meals are provided to participants at no cost. 

“Soy is widely recognized for its health benefits, and my research is focused on studying the effects of soybeans that have been activated to produce a component that the plant uses to protect itself,” said Dr. Rebello, who is the Director of the Nutrition and Chronic Disease Program at Pennington Biomedical. “I’m particularly interested in understanding how this form of soy, when integrated into a healthy diet, influences blood sugar. The MOTIVATE study will examine the impact of a healthy eating plan and exercise on blood sugar, mood, and energy levels.” 

Qualified participants will undergo a screening process before being enrolled in the study. Once in the study, participants will be provided with a diet and exercise regimen and will be required to visit the Center three days per week for exercise and to collect their meals over the study’s duration. Study participants will be segmented into groups, with some receiving the meals that do contain soy, and others receiving meals that do not contain soy.  

During these visits, participants will provide test administrators with their medical histories, height and weight measurements, and vital signs. The study also includes physical examination, insulin sensitivity test, electrocardiogram and a DXA scan to measure bone density, muscle, and body fat. 

"At Pennington Biomedical, we are putting science to work for a healthier Louisiana, and as we age, healthier can mean being more alert, energetic and motivated,” said Dr. John Kirwan, Executive Director of Pennington Biomedical. “Dr. Rebello’s MOTIVATE study will explore the hidden benefits of soy on mood and energy levels, and we are counting on Louisiana residents to join the study and help us uncover new insights.” 

In addition to being provided with all meals, MOTIVATE study participants will receive compensation of up to $660 for the study. To confirm eligibility, or to apply to participate, visit www.pbrc.edu/motivate, call 225-763-3000, or email clinicaltrials@pbrc.edu. This research is supported by the National Institute on Aging under award number R00AG065419. 

About the Pennington Biomedical Research Center

The Pennington Biomedical Research Center is at the forefront of medical discovery as it relates to understanding the triggers of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and dementia. The Center conducts basic, clinical, and population research, and is a campus of the LSU System. The research enterprise at Pennington Biomedical includes over 530 employees within a network of 44 clinics and research laboratories, and 13 highly specialized core service facilities. Its scientists and physician/scientists are supported by research trainees, lab technicians, nurses, dietitians, and other support personnel. Pennington Biomedical is a state-of-the-art research facility on a 222-acre campus in Baton Rouge. For more information, see www.pbrc.edu.

 

Wounds are common among people who use illicit opioids, but proper wound care is hard to find



University of Pittsburgh

Raagini Jawa, M.D., M.P.H. 

image: 

Raagini Jawa, M.D., M.P.H., UPMC addiction medicine and infectious diseases physician and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh

view more 

Credit: UPMC




The animal tranquilizer xylazine is increasingly found in the illicit opioid supply nationwide, leading to severe wounds among people who use drugs. New research led by a University of Pittsburgh physician-scientist and published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence seeks to understand wound care experiences of this population. 

A cross-sectional survey of people who use drugs identified through three syringe service providers in Massachusetts found the vast majority had experienced xylazine wounds in the prior year. As the need for comprehensive, low barrier wound care grows, access to such care continues to lag behind the demand. As a result, these wounds often lead to serious complications, such as infections, or become chronic, non-healing wounds necessitating amputation.

Of 171 individuals surveyed, 87% reported xylazine wounds. Among people who inject drugs, those with xylazine wounds were 10 times more likely to engage in subcutaneous injection. Nearly three-quarters (74%) reported experiencing health care stigma when seeking wound care and more than half (58%) reported inadequate pain and withdrawal management. 

“Patients with xylazine wounds often don’t have access to low barrier wound care services that would address their substance use,” said lead author Raagini Jawa, M.D., M.P.H., UPMC addiction medicine and infectious diseases physician and assistant professor of medicine at Pitt. “When health systems do not respond to the rapidly changing drug supply, patients with xylazine wounds are forced to treat themselves.” 

Proper wound healing requires specialized and consistent wound care, something not easily accessible to people who use drugs. Jawa’s previous research found that most addiction care providers nationwide are inadequately trained to provide proper wound care treatment and depend on referrals to external specialists. 

More than half of survey respondents reported cleaning wounds with alcohol-based sanitizers which can be corrosive for a delicate wound bed and impact wound healing. Nearly 1 in 5 individuals did not cover their wounds because of a lack of access to appropriate wound care supplies. More than half of people surveyed also used heroin or fentanyl for pain caused by their xylazine wounds.

While the survey was conducted in Massachusetts, which has both syringe service and community-based drug-checking programs, the problem of xylazine wounds is even more pronounced in Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth leads the nation in xylazine entrenchment according to one measure.

“While we don’t yet fully understand the mechanism by which xylazine and other factors cause these wounds, we do know that there is an urgent need for high-quality, longitudinal wound care and linkage to addiction treatment, all provided without judgment,” said Jawa. “People with xylazine wounds need resources, education on how to care for their own wounds and compassionate care at every point that they touch the health care system – from the hospital to the emergency room to their PCP’s office.”

Jawa, with study co-author Margaret Shang, M.D., and colleague Ilana Hull, M.D. are leading efforts along with a multidisciplinary team of providers to streamline such care across UPMC, including distributing wound self-care resources and xylazine test strips to people who use drugs and developing systemwide protocols for other clinicians to follow.

Other authors on the study include Jane M. Liebschutz, M.D., M.P.H., Cristina Murray-Kerzen, Ph.D., M.S., Yihao Zheng, M.S. and Gary McMutrie, all of Pitt; Samia Ismail, M.P.H., and Michael Stein, M.D., both of Boston University; Stephen Murray, M.P.H., and Alexander Walley, M.D., M.Sc., both of Boston Medical Center; Sarah Mackin, M.P.H., and Kenny Washington, both of the Boston Public Health Commission; Pedro Alvarez, of Tapestry; and Jaime Dillon, of Life Connection Center.

This work was supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) grant K12DA050607 and the 2023 Boston University School of Public Health Impact Grant.

 

Suicide rates among doctors have declined, but female doctors still at high risk



Results highlight ongoing need for research and prevention efforts among doctors, particularly women



BMJ Group





Suicide rates among doctors have declined over time, but are still significantly higher for female doctors compared with the general population, finds an analysis of evidence from 20 countries published by The BMJ today.

The researchers acknowledge that physician suicide risk varies across different countries and regions, but say the results highlight the ongoing need for continued research and prevention efforts, particularly among female physicians.

According to some estimates, one doctor dies by suicide every day in the US, and around one every 10 days in the UK, but evidence on suicide rates for physicians is inconsistent across countries.

To address this, researchers analysed the results of observational studies published between 1960 and 31 March 2024 that compared suicides rates among physicians with the general population. 

A total of 39 studies from 20 countries (mainly Europe, the USA, and Australasia) were included. Together, they reported 3,303 male and 587 female suicides over two observation periods (1935-2020 and 1960-2020). 

Across all studies, the researchers found no overall increase in suicide risk for male doctors compared with the general population. For female doctors, however, suicide risk was significantly higher (76%) than the general population.

Analysis of the 10 most recent studies versus older studies showed a decline in suicide rates for both male and female physicians over time, although the rate for female physicians remained significantly elevated (24% higher) compared with the general population.

The exact causes of this decline are unknown, but more mental health awareness and workplace support for physicians in recent years might have played a role, say the authors.

The high level of variation (heterogeneity) between studies also suggests that physician suicide risk is not consistent across different populations, they add. This is likely to be due to training and work environments across healthcare systems and varying attitudes and stigma regarding mental health and suicide.

Additional analysis showed a significant (81%) higher suicide rate among male physicians compared with other professional groups of similar social and economic status. Results appeared similar for female physicians, but the number of eligible studies was too low to draw any firm conclusions.

The researchers acknowledge several limitations including scarcity of studies from outside Europe, the US, and Australasia and likely underreporting of suicide as a cause of death because of stigma. Nevertheless, their analysis was based on a complete assessment of the available evidence and explored a range of factors as potential causes for the variation.

As such, they researchers call for continued efforts in research and prevention of physician deaths by suicide, particularly among female physicians and say future research is also needed to assess any covid-19-related effects on suicide rates in physicians around the world.

In a linked editorial, Dr Clare Gerada and colleagues explain that while doctors share risk factors with their non-medical peers, they face additional risks such as burnout and barriers to accessing timely help for poor mental health. 

Selection for the medical profession also favours personality traits such as perfectionism, obsessiveness, and competitiveness, which in highly stressful work environments can result in a triad of guilt, low self-esteem, and a persistent sense of failure. Doctors also have access to potentially dangerous drugs. 

Some studies have also reported links between mental illness and suicide and being the subject of a complaint or regulatory processes.

They argue that measures to reduce mental distress and suicide risk among doctors, particularly women, means addressing longstanding systemic issues that create distress, such as tackling poor work and regulatory cultures, allowing doctors a sensible work–life balance, and paying attention to the basic emotional and psychological needs of all staff. 

Finally, they say all doctors must have access to early intervention and confidential treatment services so that they do not suffer in silence.

[Ends]

 

Calls for cold water swimming to be made safer for women




University College London




Cold water swimming is growing in popularity amongst women, but more support is needed to make many wild swimming sites in the UK safer and more accessible, finds a new study led by UCL researchers.

The research, published in Women’s Health, explored the habits of women who enjoy cold water swimming and was carried out in collaboration with researchers from the University of Portsmouth, University of Sussex, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, University of Plymouth and Bournemouth University.

The team surveyed 1,114 women in the UK aged 16 to 80 years old in 2022 and found that most women who participated in wild swimming usually did so in the sea (64.4%) and the majority (89%) swam all year around.

The women surveyed stated that they swam for longer in the summer, with the most common length of time being 30-60 minutes (48.2%). However, in the winter a majority of swims lasted between 5-15 minutes (53.8%).

Earlier this year, the same survey revealed that menopausal women who regularly swim in cold water report significant improvements to their physical and mental symptoms. It was also found to improve menstrual symptoms.*

However, while there are many benefits to the sport, there are also risks that can be exacerbated by the swimming environment.

Lead author, Professor Joyce Harper (UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health) said: “One of the health risks linked to cold water swimming is the increased likelihood of gastroenteritis and other infections due to pollution in UK rivers and seas. This could be avoidable with better monitoring of sites.”

Co-author Dr Mark Harper (University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust) added: “Barriers to cold water swimming can be overcome and our early research in non-pregnant populations suggests that the activity has a significantly positive effect on mental health.”

Designated bathing waters in the UK are typically monitored during the summer months (May-September). However, many do not meet the prescribed standards and researchers believe this may be worse for undesignated sites.

As a result, the researchers are calling for the UK government, water companies, the Environment Agency, and others across the world, to improve the safety and accessibility of open water for people who like to swim outdoors.

Professor Harper said: “Our previous research has found that women strongly perceive cold water swimming to benefit their health. Exercising in nature, with a community, is a combination that should be encouraged. However, it is currently not well supported.

“For example, in the UK, the government bathing-water quality website only runs from May to September, ignoring the winter months where heavy rainfall and consequent sewage overflow most commonly occur.

“Globally we should be ensuring that cold water swimming is accessible and safe. It is time to make this increasingly popular and beneficial sport more secure and supported for all.”

Co-author Professor Sasha Roseneil (University of Sussex) said: “In recent years cold water swimming has become a passion for many thousands of women across the UK, bringing numerous benefits to well-being. Whilst the free and unregulated nature of swimming in open water is part of its attraction, it is time for the government and regulators to pay serious attention to the quality of our rivers, lakes and seas, to protect both swimmers today, and the ecosystems of these precious natural resources for the future.”

The team are continuing their research into the topic and are involved in an upcoming study led by Professor Jill Shawe (University of Plymouth) into cold water swimming and pregnancy.

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2024/jan/cold-water-swimming-improves-menopause-symptoms