Monday, September 30, 2024

Closing in on the Kill: Heat and the Breadth of Land Animal Vulnerability Including People, Bison, Grizzlies, and Moose



 September 30, 2024
Facebook

Bison in Grand Teton National Park. Photo: Jeffrey St. Clair.

While this article will be nowhere near a comprehensive review, a sampling of just three studies offers an introductory glimpse into heat’s broad capacity to govern and regulate behavior, health and death across the realm of Earth’s land animals. Some further detail will surface in subsequent paragraphs.

For a first example of heat’s broad impacts across animal species, the October 13 2008 issue of Science published an informative review article under the title, “Physiology and Climate.” The authors remind readers that “All organisms live within a limited range of body temperatures. They further explain that “the direct effects of rising temperatures include “impairments in growth, reproduction, foraging, immune competence, behaviors and competitiveness.”

The Journal of Animal Ecology picked up the story in January 2014. The authors confirm that “organisms have a physiological response to temperature, and these responses have important consequences.”  “They go on to explain that “biological rates and times (e.g. metabolic rate, growth, reproduction, mortality and activity) vary with temperature.”

A third and final example comes from the September 20, 2024, issue of ScienceAuthors traced the history of CO2 and temperature across the last 485 million years. Authors discovered that our current era is cooler than much of this history, and C02 levels lower.

In a plain language news release, one of the authors explains that, because we are addling 40 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere, “We are changing the climate into a place that is really out of context for humans. The planet has been and can be warmer – but humans and animals can’t adapt that fast.”

Humans as a species of special interest

As a first example, little is more certain than that heat can kill us, and many, if not all, outdoors-minded readers have noticed news reports of hikers dying during a heat wave. Reports have included the 10-year-old boy who died after he suffered a heat-related medical emergency during a hike in Arizona.

Given the headline stories of heat-driven human mortality in the great outdoors, it’s likely no surprise that The Outdoor Industry Association would ask ”Why Does Climate Change Matter to the Outdoor Industry?”

Candidly answering its question, the Association says, “Climate change is having a direct impact on outdoor recreation. The quality of outdoor experiences are suffering as summers grow longer and hotter, winter and snowpack become more unpredictable, river flows are diminished, and devastating natural disasters become more frequent.”

The risks don’t end there.

Heat steals our food

The authors of a January 9, 2009 Science article cited evidence that “In temperate regions, the hottest seasons on record will represent the future norm in many locations.” They add, “Coping with the short-run challenge of food price volatility is daunting. But the longer-term challenge of avoiding a perpetual food crisis under conditions of global warming is far more serious.”

A Nature journal, Communications Earth & Environment, went to the heart of the pricing matter in a study titled, “Global warming and heat extremes to enhance inflationary pressures” in its March 21, 2024 issue. The article’s authors found that “Higher temperatures increase food and headline inflation persistently over 12 months in both higher- and lower-income countries.”

To the inflation of food prices, add the risk involved in simply eating and digesting it. Because digesting forces body temperature higher, how much we eat on a hot day can push our temperatures toward lethal levels.

Hail batters our solar energy

A study by Northern Illinois University researchers projects that the frequency of hailstones roughly 1½ inches or larger will rise by 15% to 75%, depending on how much greenhouse gas pollution humans emit.

Risk and Insurance journal cites researchers who found that “The solar panels rapidly being deployed across the country are vulnerable to damage from hail.”

Similarly, the Department of Energy reports that “Hail can cause invisible damage through solar cell cracking at hail diameters and speeds less than that which would break the glass..”

Heat can abort human pregnancies

Some disruptions are more pressing than others. Right alongside the prospects for pricier food, and costly hail damage to solar panels, we have to include risk of aborted pregnancies. According to the National Institute of Health’s National Library of Medicine, one research team “observed that exposure to high ambient temperature (mean > 25°C) in early pregnancy increased unobserved pregnancy loss rates. In a case–control study conducted in Nanjing, Zhao et al. found a non-linear association between high ambient temperature and increased risk of spontaneous abortions.

Heat is already forcing costs on human health and mortality

As of January 30, 2024, Nature Medicine could run a report under the title, “After millions of preventable deaths, climate change must be treated like a health emergency.”

The urgency of these findings was underscored in an Energies article, “Quantifying Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Human Deaths to Guide Energy Policy,” in which the authors report that “Several studies are consistent with the ‘1000-ton rule,’ according to which a future person is killed every time 1000 tons of fossil carbon are burned (order-of-magnitude estimate). If warming reaches or exceeds 2 °C this century, mainly richer humans will be responsible for killing roughly 1 billion mainly poorer humans through anthropogenic global warming, which is comparable with involuntary or negligent manslaughter.”

Similarly, authors of a 2024 Harvard Law Review analysis conclude that “in jurisdictions across the United States, fossil fuel companies could be prosecuted for every type of homicide short of first degree murder.”

We humans aren’t the only ones we’ve put at risk

A broad trend was underscored in June 13, 2022, when The Conversation published “We know heatwaves kill animals. But new research shows the survivors don’t get off scot-free.”

The authors report that “Extreme heat waves can cause birds and mammals to die en masse. But it’s more common for an animal to experience relatively mild heat stress that doesn’t kill it. Our new findings suggest that unfortunately, these individuals can suffer long-term health damage.”

Authors of a related 2024 study on the effects of hot nights conclude that “ Given the major role of sleep in health, our results suggest that global warming and the associated increase in extreme climatic events are likely to negatively impact sleep, and consequently health, in wildlife.

Bison, grizzlies, and moose

A December 2022 Ecology and Evolution study found that temperature predicted bison movement better than any other factor measured. It increased movement, but only up to a point where it put on the brakes.

Authors suggest that increased movement was driven by searching for grasses that grow better with heat, which is important if only because the bison get much of their water from foraging. However, once the temperature rose above 83F, bison movement stopped, and they rested in the shade or near cooling water, which may have saved them from heat stroke.

It’s likely not a coincidence that grizzlies choose well-shaded daybeds in the thick cover of dense forest. Under protective canopy, temperatures are at lease a bit cooler than out under direct sunlight. According to studies referred to by  Western Wildlife Outreach, “In the heat of the day, grizzly bears will rest in day beds in dense vegetation.” Moreover, a Functional Ecology article reports that grizzlies can dissipate excess body heat by taking a dip in chilly water.

Reducing body heat is just as crucial to moose. A recent study in the Journal of Animal Ecology tested the hypothesis that a moose’s allocation of energy to the likes of foraging and travel can face a barrier in the form of heat dissipation limit. Under this limit, feeding and movement are impaired until an overheated animal can lose, shed, or dissipate at least some body heat.

Up to a point, a moose will be able to shed some heat in the shade alone. However, beyond that point, they narrow their bedding choice to shaded surfaces with moist soils because those soils facilitate the release of body heat. However, the authors point out that “… the importance of dissipating endogenous heat loads conductively through wet soil suggests riparian habitats also are critical thermal refuges for moose.” They quickly add that “Such refuges may be especially important in the face of a warming climate in which both high environmental temperatures and drier conditions will likely exacerbate limits to heat dissipation, especially for large, heat-sensitive animals.”

While the above strategies can save these four species from heat-determined mortality, their usefulness seems likely to diminish as heat and, with it, drought become more extreme. A 2013 Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences study found that if the surrounding air temperature gets hot enough, an animal could die of starvation — as a consequence of trying to avoid overheating.

Plainly enough, things won’t have to go that far to start getting ugly. Still, the extreme case cuts to the chase, and the risk of heat-driven mortality across a wide range of domestic and wild animals is a factor even now.

Lance Olsen, a Montana native, was president of the Missoula, Montana-based Great Bear Foundation from 1982-1992. He has also served on the governing council of the Montana Wilderness Association and the advisory council of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies. He was previously a college teacher and associate of the American Psychological Association and its Division on Population and Environmental Psychology, and the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues. Now retired, he runs a restricted listserv of global scope for climate researchers, wildlife researchers, agency staff, graduate students, and NGOs concerned about the consequences of a changing climate. He can be contacted at lancolsn@gmail.com

Russian offers cash to voters to keep Moldova out of the EU

ByAlexander Tanas
September 30, 2024 —

Chisinau:

 Moldovans are being urged to shun “thieves, fugitives and bandits” after an exiled pro-Russian business magnate pledged to pay voters to vote “no” in a referendum on joining the European Union.

Infrastructure Minister Andrei Spinu’s warning underscored the increasingly unruly campaign for the October 20 presidential election in which pro-European incumbent Maia Sandu is seeking a second term.

Voters will also take part in a referendum on altering the Constitution to enable ex-Soviet Moldova, one of Europe’s poorest countries, to press for membership of the 27-nation EU. The country of 3 million is wedged between southern Ukraine, near Odesa, and Romania.



Much of Moldova’s capital Chisinau has had to be rebuilt repeatedly thanks to the wars and conflicts of the 20th century.CREDIT:ISTOCK

The most vocal opponent of EU membership, fugitive pro-Russian businessman Ilan Shor, offered in a weekend Telegram post to pay voters the equivalent of $42 if they registered for his campaign in the country lying between Ukraine and Romania.



Voters, he said, would get larger rewards if they cast “no” ballots in the referendum and if results showed they lived in electoral districts rejecting the proposal.

Israel-born Shor, who holds Russia, Israeli and Moldovan nationalities, was sentenced to 15 years in prison last year in absentia in connection with his role in the disappearance of $US1 billion ($1.4 billion) from Moldova’s banking system.

Exiled in Russia, the 37-year-old now heads the Victory election bloc, but is barred from taking part in the campaign.



President Maia Sandu signs the decree initiating Moldova’s EU accession negotiations, in Chisinau in June.CREDIT:PRESIDENCY/AP

Spinu, who besides being minister, heads Sandu’s re-election campaign team, said opponents of the president’s EU drive were “using money to buy votes and people”.

“They are using propaganda to spread lies about the European Union and frighten people with all sorts of tall tales,” he wrote on Telegram. “Let us not believe thieves, fugitives and bandits.”

Sandu, who denounces Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and views Moscow as one of the biggest threats facing Moldova, also told voters in a Saturday address to be on guard against fraud.

“The liars are now trying to intimidate us and oblige us to take decisions other than those that we want,” she said. “We must not let them decide our own fate.”

In recent days, paint has been daubed on buildings belonging to Moldova’s state-owned broadcaster, the Supreme Court and two other state institutions. Police blame the incidents on a group trained in Moscow to destabilise the election.

Sandu is favoured to win the presidential vote against 10 challengers, with a recent poll crediting her with about 27 per cent support. That poll put backing for EU membership at 56 per cent among decided voters with 34 per cent opposed.

Reuters


Kremlin’s Influence Looms over Georgian Dream in the October Elections


The ruling Georgian Dream party’s campaign ahead of Georgia’s parliamentary elections in October has been marred by fear-mongering and echoes of Russian-style propaganda on the war in Ukraine.

by Euractiv | September 30, 2024, 
Georgians attend a rally organised by the ruling Georgian Dream on April 29, 2024. 
Vano SHLAMOV / AFP

The ruling Georgian Dream party’s campaign ahead of Georgia’s parliamentary elections in October has been marred by fear-mongering and echoes of Russian-style propaganda on the war in Ukraine.

A month before the polls open, Georgia’s pro-Russian oligarch and honorary chairman of Georgian Dream, Bidzina Ivanishvili, pledged to apologise to South Ossetians for the actions of the former ruling party during the August 2008 war.

His statement, seen as blaming Georgia for starting the conflict with Russia, came during a campaign speech in Gori, a city persistently bombed by Russia, near the occupation line.

In outrage, the wives of the Georgian fighters murdered by Russia during the August 2008 war started publicly apologising to their fallen husbands.
Advertisement

Maka Chikviladze, a wife of Georgian National Hero Giorgi Antsukhelidze, who was captured, tortured and murdered during the war, posted the photo of Giorgi’s torture with the quote: “August 9, 2008… ‘Ossetian brothers’ boot on Giorgi’s back. Apologies [to you] Giorgi.”

Launching his party’s campaign, Ivanishvili voiced the goal of securing a constitutional majority. Ivanishvili justified this as a way to punish the former ruling United National Movement (UNM) party, which Georgian Dream blames for the 2008 war with Russia, and to dismantle the “agents’ network,” eliminate radicalism, reduce polarization, and counter “liberal fascism”.

Despite the EU’s expansion fatigue, it is imperative that the West welcome North Macedonia into its fold, as the region is strategic and the forces pulling it in the opposite direction are perilous.

This encapsulates Georgian Dream’s election campaign, which is riddled with disinformation tactics reflective of those used by the Kremlin.

Russian propaganda as the election strategy

Disinformation strategies, adopted by Georgia’s ruling party to deepen societal divisions, have long been a hallmark of the political landscape of Georgia. Euractiv has extensively reported on the “Second Front” and “Global War Party” disinformation narratives promoted by Georgian Dream.

Oligarch Ivanishvili has publicly and repeatedly blamed the former Georgian government for starting the 2008 August war during the campaign. For years, Russia has been trying to make the citizens of Georgia, as well as the rest of the world, believe this lie with its own propaganda.

Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s Charge d’Affaires to the United Nations, even referenced portions of the statement from Georgia’s ruling party, with the exact same wording as Ivanishvili’s team did.

People at home protested Ivanishvili’s apology to South Ossetians, reminding the Oligarch that “Russian propaganda no longer works”, “Georgia will never apologize”.

Kremlin propagandists praised Ivanishvili’s war accusations, with Margarita Simonian calling it “amazingly adequate” and welcoming the change in tone, while Nadara Friedrichson called Ivanishvili’s statement as “historic” marking a new phase in Tbilisi-Moscow relations.

Halted EU integration

“To Europe only with peace, dignity and prosperity” – Georgian Dream advertises the parliamentary elections as a referendum between war and peace; slavery and dignity; regression and progress; complete hopelessness and Georgia’s European future.

As done in Russia, Georgian Dream openly leverages the LGBTQ community, claiming that anti-Christian forces aim to erase national, state, and individual identities, reducing people to beings without dignity, religious, or national identity.

The narrative is further used to depict the West as a force attempting to subjugate the Georgian people. This has recently culminated in the passage of another Kremlin-style anti-LGBTQ law, further fueling hate crimes and increasing stigma and discrimination against the LGBTQ community.

Hostile actors, “instead of spreading poorly fabricated stories… are playing with emotions, especially on fears of war,” Tamar Kintsurashvili, director of Georgia’s Media Development Foundation, told Euractiv.

But the European perspective in Georgian Dream’s election promise is, perhaps, very far from reality.

The EU has frozen Georgia’s accession process, as well as millions in funding over a Russian-style foreign agents law. Brussels has repeatedly stated that “all options are on the table” and has recently issued a warning about the temporary suspension of visa-free access. Georgian PM Irakli Kobakhidze has conversely claimed that after the initiation of the foreign agents law, the chances of opening negotiations with the EU have increased.

“It isn’t always easy to detect the problem, especially in the case of a ruling party which doesn’t deny EU integration per se in public discourse but speculates on division in Western society and amplifies the message that they are planning to integrate in a conservative EU rather than a perverted one,” Kintsurashvili added.

All eyes on elections


For the first time in the history of Georgia, the 2024 elections will be held in a fully proportional system. The opposition, bidding on ousting the government and saving Georgia’s democracy and Western orientation, is motivated by a need to collaborate in order to minimize wasted votes.

Following the 2023 ban on electoral blocs, the only viable option for opposition parties has been to unify. The president is endorsing these efforts, having first introduced the Georgian Charter as a framework to assist opposition parties in guiding the country towards European integration.

Georgian Dream vows to ban all opposition parties, prompting Brussels to issue another warning. The party, nonetheless, continues to dance to the beat of its own drum. Georgian Dream MP Nino Tsilosani argued that banning political parties is a viable method for safeguarding democratic states.

Georgia approaches parliamentary elections amid the shadow of laws borrowed from the Kremlin and a climate of mass repression that includes beaten and jailed government critics. Despite punitive measures, civil society is coming together to observe elections at its maximum capacity.

In the face of repeated efforts to divide society, Georgian citizens remain united around their national interests, pledging to defend their votes, the country’s sovereignty, and its Euro-Atlantic future.

This autumn will show whether the will of the Georgian people will be upheld.

This article is part of the FREIHEIT media project on Europe’s Neighbourhood, funded by the European Media and Information Fund (EMIF).

Reprinted from Euractiv. You can find the original here.
Kashmir to vote in final phase as top leader says India silencing voices


The multistage election, the last phase of which is being held Tuesday, will allow Kashmir to have its own truncated government and a regional legislature with limited powers.



First Friday of the holy fasting month of Ramadan in Srinagar
 / Photo: Reuters

Ahead of the final phase of a local election in India-administered Kashmir, a key resistance leader says the regional polls to choose a local government will not resolve the decades-old conflict that is at the heart of a dispute between New Delhi and Pakistan.

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, who has spent most of the last five years under house detention, said the polls are being held as political voices contesting India’s sovereignty over the region remain silenced after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government stripped the region of its long-held semi-autonomy in 2019.


The detained leader said in a phone interview with The Associated Press that the election, touted by the Modi government as a “ festival of democracy ” in the region, cannot be an alternative to resolving the dispute.


“These elections cannot be the means to address the larger Kashmir issue,” said Mirwaiz, who is also an influential Muslim cleric and custodian of the six-century-old grand mosque in the region’s main Srinagar city, the urban heartland of anti-India sentiment.


It is the first such vote in a decade and the first since 2019, when New Delhi downgraded and divided the former state into two centrally governed union territories — Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir — both ruled directly by New Delhi through unelected bureaucrats.


Authorities have said the election will bring democracy to the region after more than three decades of strife, but many locals see the vote as an opportunity not only to elect their own representatives but also to register their protest against the 2019 changes they fear could dilute the region’s demographics.


India’s clampdown following the 2019 move “has silenced people” in the region who “feel dispossessed and disempowered,” Mirwaiz said.


“You may not see active turmoil like before 2019 but there is a strong, latent public resistance to all this,” he said. “We have been forcibly silenced, but silence is not agreement.”


India’s sudden move, which largely resonated in India and among Modi supporters, was mostly opposed in Kashmir as an assault on its identity and autonomy.

Fearing unrest, authorities detained Mirwaiz and thousands of other political activists, including Kashmiri pro-India leaders who objected to India’s move, amid an unprecedented security clampdown and a total communication blackout in the region.


The region has since been on edge, with civil liberties curbed and media gagged.


Mirwaiz heads the All Parties Hurriyat Conference, an umbrella grouping that espouses the right to self-determination for the entire region, which is divided between India and Pakistan.


According to Mirwaiz, the crackdown has restricted his group’s access to people and shrunk its “space and scope for proactive involvement” like before.


“The massive assault has considerably weakened the organizational strength of the Hurriyat, but not its resolve,” he said.


India and Pakistan have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir, and both countries control parts of the Himalayan territory divided by a heavily militarised frontier.

After their first war in 1947, a United Nations referendum a year later gave Kashmir the choice of joining either Pakistan or India, but it never happened. The part of Kashmir controlled by India was granted semi-autonomy and special privileges in exchange for accepting Indian rule.


However, Kashmiri discontent with India soon began taking root as successive Indian governments started chipping away at that pact. Local governments were toppled and largely peaceful anti-India movements were harshly suppressed.


In the mid-1980s, an election that was widely believed to have been rigged led to public backlash and an armed uprising. Since then, rebels have been fighting in the India-controlled part for a united Kashmir, either under Pakistani rule or independent of both.


They also did not boycott India’s recent general election. Instead, some lower-ranking activists, who in the past dismissed voting as illegitimate under military occupation, are running for office as independent candidates.


“Boycott was the democratic means to express anger, reject this projection and draw attention towards the unsolved issue (of Kashmir),” Mirwaiz said. But India’s crackdown has left people “powerless and disempowered” and in such a scenario a “poll boycott cannot work anymore."


Mirwaiz has distanced himself from the election, but said it had been engineered in favor of Modi’s Hindu nationalist politics before it started on September 18.


SOURCE: AP


Top Kashmir leader says India has silenced dissenting voices as region votes in final phase of polls

A key resistance leader in Indian-controlled Kashmir says the regional polls to choose a local government will not resolve the decades-old conflict over the disputed region


By AIJAZ HUSSAIN
 Associated Press
September 29, 2024


SRINAGAR, India -- Ahead of the final phase of a local election in Indian-controlled Kashmir, a key resistance leader says the regional polls to choose a local government will not resolve the decades-old conflict that is at the heart of a dispute between New Delhi and Pakistan.

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, who has spent most of the last five years under house detention, said the polls are being held as political voices contesting India’s sovereignty over the region remain silenced after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government stripped the region of its long-held semi-autonomy in 2019.

The detained leader said in a phone interview with The Associated Press that the election, touted by the Modi government as a “ festival of democracy ” in the region, cannot be an alternative to resolving the dispute.

“These elections cannot be the means to address the larger Kashmir issue,” said Mirwaiz, who is also an influential Muslim cleric and custodian of the six-century-old grand mosque in the region’s main Srinagar city, the urban heartland of anti-India sentiment.

The multistage election, the last phase of which is being held Tuesday, will allow Kashmir to have its own truncated government and a regional legislature with limited powers. It is the first such vote in a decade and the first since 2019, when New Delhi downgraded and divided the former state into two centrally governed union territories — Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir — both ruled directly by New Delhi through unelected bureaucrats.

Authorities have said the election will bring democracy to the region after more than three decades of strife, but many locals see the vote as an opportunity not only to elect their own representatives but also to register their protest against the 2019 changes they fear could dilute the region’s demographics.

India’s clampdown following the 2019 move “has silenced people” in the region who “feel dispossessed and disempowered,” Mirwaiz said.

“You may not see active turmoil like before 2019 but there is a strong, latent public resistance to all this,” he said. “We have been forcibly silenced, but silence is not agreement.”

India’s sudden move, which largely resonated in India and among Modi supporters, was mostly opposed in Kashmir as an assault on its identity and autonomy. Fearing unrest, authorities detained Mirwaiz and thousands of other political activists, including Kashmiri pro-India leaders who objected to India’s move, amid an unprecedented security clampdown and a total communication blackout in the region.

The region has since been on edge, with civil liberties curbed and media gagged.

Mirwaiz heads the All Parties Hurriyat Conference, an umbrella grouping that espouses the right to self-determination for the entire region, which is divided between India and Pakistan.

According to Mirwaiz, the crackdown has restricted his group’s access to people and shrunk its “space and scope for proactive involvement” like before.

“The massive assault has considerably weakened the organizational strength of the Hurriyat, but not its resolve,” he said.

India and Pakistan have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir, and both countries control parts of the Himalayan territory divided by a heavily militarized frontier. After their first war in 1947, a United Nations referendum a year later gave Kashmir the choice of joining either Pakistan or India, but it never happened. The part of Kashmir controlled by India was granted semi-autonomy and special privileges in exchange for accepting Indian rule.

However, Kashmiri discontent with India soon began taking root as successive Indian governments started chipping away at that pact. Local governments were toppled and largely peaceful anti-India movements were harshly suppressed.

In the mid-1980s, an election that was widely believed to have been rigged led to public backlash and an armed uprising. Since then, rebels have been fighting in the Indian-controlled part for a united Kashmir, either under Pakistani rule or independent of both.

Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels’ goal. India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle.

Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict.

Mirwaiz's group believes only talks between India, Pakistan and the region’s people can end the conflict. In the past, he has held several rounds of talks with both New Delhi and Islamabad leaders, including their heads of government. However, under Modi, India has shifted its Kashmir policy and stopped engaging with the region’s pro-freedom leaders, including Mirwaiz.

Previous elections in the region have been marred by violence, boycotts and vote-rigging, even though India called them a victory over separatism. This time, the pro-freedom groups, largely incapacitated with most of their leaders jailed, have issued no calls for boycotts.

They also did not boycott India’s recent general election. Instead, some lower-ranking activists, who in the past dismissed voting as illegitimate under military occupation, are running for office as independent candidates.

“Boycott was the democratic means to express anger, reject this projection and draw attention towards the unsolved issue (of Kashmir),” Mirwaiz said. But India’s crackdown has left people “powerless and disempowered” and in such a scenario a “poll boycott cannot work anymore."

Mirwaiz has distanced himself from the election, but said it had been engineered in favor of Modi’s Hindu nationalist politics before it started on Sept. 18.

He cited the government’s July amendment to legislation that gives sweeping executive powers to the federally appointed administrator even after a new local government comes to power in the region. He also referred to the redrawing of assembly districts in 2022 as “electoral gerrymandering,” an act that gave more electoral representation to the Hindu-dominated Jammu areas over the region’s overwhelmingly Muslim-majority Kashmir Valley.

Mirwaiz, however, hoped Kashmiri groups, including pro-India parties, would jointly seek a resolution of the conflict. He expressed his willingness to engage in talks with India but warned that the election should not be seen as public acceptance of New Delhi’s changes in the region.

Public participation in the election, Mirwaiz said, “is a release of their pent-up emotions and a means to oppose these disempowering and dispossessing measures, besides hoping to get some relief and redressal for their bread and butter issues.”