Tuesday, October 01, 2024

HONG KONG

INTERVIEW: Umbrella Movement was form of anti-colonial resistance: former leader

'It was about not just accepting' a fate decided by colonizers, says Alex Chow.

By Chen Zifei for RFA Mandarin
2024.10.01

Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Alex Chow speaks during a rally at Union Square to support Hong Kong, June 12, 2021 in New York, New York.
Alex Wong/Getty Images

The 2014 Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong was about standing up and resisting the city's fate as a democracy-free zone under Chinese rule, former student leader Alex Chow told Radio Free Asia in an interview marking the 10th anniversary of the protests.

Now, overseas activists are continuing that work for their comrades in prison, he said.

Chow was head of the Hong Kong Federation of Students and vice president of the Hong Kong University Student Union when the ruling Chinese Communist Party issued a plan on Aug. 31, 2014, outlining electoral reforms.

They would give everyone a vote – but they would choose from among government-approved candidates.

The decision came despite earlier mass protests for fully democratic elections, including a sit-in the Central business district on July 1, 2014, organized by Chow.

While the annual mass march was allowed to go ahead, the sit-in that followed was forcibly broken up by police. It was a brief preview of what was to come as the city's pro-democracy movement pivoted towards large-scale civil disobedience.

The public backlash took the form of a student strike, camps on major roads, sit-ins, mass rallies of hundreds of thousands of people and an unofficial referendum that came out overwhelmingly in favor of open nominations for electoral candidates.

While the authorities refused to back down, saying there was 'no room' for discussion on the electoral rules, police kept up the pressure by firing tear gas and beating protesters, in clashes that began this week 10 years ago.

To protect themselves, demonstrators used umbrellas, and the “Umbrella Movement” was born.

Reaching the limits of patience

Chow, who had been about to start a PhD at the University of California in Berkeley, served a seven-month jail term for the storming of Civic Square outside government headquarters, which kicked off the movement on Sept. 26, 2014. Fellow democracy activist Joshua Wong got six months and Nathan Law eight months.

Pro-democracy activists, from left, Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law, walk out from the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong, Feb. 6, 2018. (Vincent Yu/AP)

His sentence was later overturned by the city's Court of Final Appeal, and he eventually left Hong Kong for good.

"The whole meaning of the Umbrella Movement, even at the time, was closely linked to the idea of resisting our fate, of not just accepting [the Aug. 31 decree]," Chow told RFA Mandarin in a recent interview.

"It was about the people of Hong Kong being in charge of their own destiny, and it showed that they had reached the limits of their patience, and would no longer tolerate a situation in which their fate was decided by colonizers."

Hong Kongers, who were shut out of their own political process in the early years of British colonial rule, enjoyed increasing democratic representation from the 1980s until 2021, when the authorities rewrote the electoral rules to bar opposition candidates from running for public office, saying only "patriots" loyal to Beijing would pass the complex political vetting process.

"The people of Hong Kong wanted to take back their autonomy," Chow said, in a reference to promises of a "high degree of autonomy" made by Beijing before the 1997 handover to Chinese rule. "That has always been the starting point ... for resistance by the people of Hong Kong over the past decade."

"The Umbrella Movement was about refusing to accept that fate, and the 2019 protests showed that the only option they had left by then was to resist desperately," he said.

Another path


While former Umbrella Movement student leaders like Nathan Law, Agnes Chow and Joshua Wong took the movement forward by forming a new political party, Demosisto, and running for seats in the Legislative Council, Chow thought there had to be another way.

"There was some discussion after 2014 about whether or not student leaders should run for election, but ... that wasn't the answer for me," he said. "I felt that my contribution would be to look back at the shortcomings of our organization, and the methods used by mass movements."

"I chose to go to the United Kingdom and the United States to study for my masters, then my PhD, and find my answers that way," Chow said.

Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong (C) is escorted into a van as he leaves the Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre, the day after appearing at the West Kowloon Court on the charge of conspiracy to commit subversion, in Hong Kong on March 2, 2021. (Vernon Yuen/AFP)

Chow has spent the decade since the movement thinking and discussing the Umbrella Movement in depth, in a bid to find a better way to run such mass campaigns.

"We have learned our lesson, which is that the regime is going to cling very tightly to its power, and it won't share power or govern along with the people [of Hong Kong]," he said. "As rebels and advocates, should we hang in there, or should we back off and surrender at certain points?"

But the main thing stopping overseas activists from focusing on something else is the sheer number of their comrades who remain behind bars back home, jailed or arrested in an ongoing crackdown on public dissent and peaceful political opposition that began under the 2020 National Security Law, and has continued this year with the Article 23 legislation.

"Of course the regime retaliated, and the political leaders and my former comrades now in prison are the scapegoats of the movement," he said. "They can't leave Hong Kong."

"Besides being sad for them, it's about how we can actively channel their suffering into a force that fuels the pro-democracy movement. How those of us in the resistance movement overseas can put that energy back into the movement, and give it back to those who stayed behind, and who are suffering."

"That's the only thing we can do right now," Chow said.

Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.



EXPLAINED: How the umbrella became a Hong Kong protest symbol

10 years ago, demonstrators used umbrellas to protect against pepper spray – and images went viral.

By Paul Eckert for RFA
2024.09.26

A protester holds a placard that reads "Occupy Central" between anti-riot policemen and protesters outside the government headquarters during the Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong, Sept. 27, 2014.
Vincent Yu/AP




Ten years ago, as the streets of Hong Kong pulsed with pro-democracy demonstrations, riot police repeatedly fired pepper spray and tear gas at the crowds that sometimes swelled to more than 100,000.

To protect themselves, protesters held up umbrellas – which became an iconic image of the protests that went viral in local and international media. Yellow became the protest umbrella color for its contrast against the dark clothing of many demonstrators, and the protests became known as the "Umbrella Movement."






It was the largest show of civil disobedience since control of the former British colony was handed over to China in 1997. Tens of thousands of people, many of them students, camped in the streets and for 11 weeks occupied much of the business district of the city of 7 million people.

What sparked the protests?

The protesters’ main demand was the right to elect the chief executive of Hong Kong, which was promised in the Basic Law, the constitution for post-handover Hong Kong as a “special autonomous region” of China under the "one country, two systems” formula that gave the city some autonomy and the right to retain its system for 50 years.

Small protests over the lack of movement on candidate selection had been increasing when, on Aug. 31, 2014, China’s parliament decreed that elections in Hong Kong in 2017 would be permitted -- from a list of candidates pre-approved by Beijing and nominated by a body of business elites and pro-Beijing groups.

Pro-democracy protesters open their umbrellas to mark one month since they took the street, in the Admiralty district of Hong Kong, Oct. 28, 2014. (Nicolas Asfouri/AFP)


The ruling sent people out into the streets banging pots and pans and chanting, and prompted waves of university campus strikes and protests.

Pro-democracy leaders formed plans for a civil disobedience campaign against the decision, releasing a manifesto called “Occupy Central with Love and Peace” and calling for the takeover of streets outside the city’s financial district on Oct. 1, China’s national day.

A fast-moving series of campus protests and actions by student groups to take over city streets led “Occupy Central” to be moved up several days.

People built a protest city of tents and stages that rang out with protest songs while students did homework in camps. Activists and ordinary citizens demonstrated outside government headquarters and occupied city intersections and thoroughfares.

How did umbrellas get involved?

Hong Kong authorities declared the protests illegal and a “violation of the rule of law,” and tensions began to mount.

On the night of Sept. 26 and into the next day, riot police clashed with protesters on the streets, firing pepper spray at them and arresting some. Over subsequent days, protesters began using umbrellas to protect themselves.

“The image is a poignant one, and emphasizes the asymmetry of force: an innocuous household object held up against helmeted police officers wielding poisonous substances for crowd control,” the U.S. publication Quartz wrote.

Riot police use pepper spray against protesters after thousands of people block a main road to the financial central district outside the government headquarters in Hong Kong, Sept. 28, 2014. (Vincent Yu/AP)


The first known appearance of the term "umbrella revolution” was in the hashtag #UmbrellaRevolution generated by a news aggregator and circulated with a Sept. 28, 2014, report on the protests in the online edition of the British daily, The Independent.

Use of the hashtag along with eye-catching umbrella photographs spread among Hong Kong journalists and activists. The outpouring of umbrella memes included clever Cantonese puns and word play – and even a meme featuring Chinese paramount leader Xi Jinping holding a yellow umbrella.

Was the Umbrella Movement an example of a “revolution?”

Despite the worldwide sympathy for Hong Kong protesters, campaign leaders were quick to disavow the term “revolution.”

They flatly rejected comparisons to the color revolutions that had seen authoritarian governments in former Soviet republics and elsewhere overthrown, stressing their focus on practical reforms.

"We are not seeking revolution. We just want democracy!” Joshua Wong, a leading figure of the student movement, was quoted by The Washington Post.

"This is not a color revolution," Lester Shum, the deputy leader of the Hong Kong Federation of Students, told the Post.

Riot police fire tear gas on student protesters occupying streets surrounding the government headquarters in Hong Kong, Sept. 29, 2014. (Wally Santana/AP)


Protest leaders warned that talk of revolution would alienate the broader Hong Kong public and give ammunition to Chinese Communist Party leaders who viewed the protests as rebellion and wanted to crush them.

The mainstream Occupy Central campaign agreed on “Umbrella Movement,” but some groups that advocated more aggressive tactics continued to use “Umbrella Revolution.”

The occupation and protests that began on Sept. 26 lasted in pockets of Hong Kong for 79 days, until Dec. 15.

They did not achieve their goal of universal suffrage and Wong, Shum and many protest leaders are in jail, while others have gone into exile to avoid arrest under draconian security and sedition laws.
Biden Administration Doubles Down on Harmful Asylum Rules

New Regulations Poised to Increase Rights Violations at the US-Mexico Border


Bill Frelick
Director, Refugee and Migrant Rights Division
HRW



A man seeking asylum in the US uses his phone to access the US Customs and Border Protection CBP One application to request an appointment at a land port of entry to the US, outside a shelter in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, January 12, 2023. © 2023 REUTERS/Jose Luis Gonzalez

An asylum regulation announced by the administration of United States President Joe Biden yesterday is flat-out contrary to both US and international law and is likely to bring immeasurable harm to people seeking asylum at the US-Mexico border.

The regulation, effective immediately, extends from 7 to 28 the number of days in which the average amount of daily immigration enforcement encounters at the US border must fall below 1,500 in order to lift a suspension of asylum processing at the border, which President Biden had first announced on June 5. The Biden administration said it issued the extension to ensure “that the drop in encounters is a sustained decrease and not the result of a short-term change.”

These measures follow a May 2023 regulation that also violated rights by generally blocking people from applying for asylum in the United States if they crossed between US ports of entry or did not seek asylum in a country of transit. These measures went into effect despite US law explicitly stating that the right to seek asylum applies to any person “physically present in the United States … whether or not at a designated port of arrival … irrespective of such alien’s status.”

The idea that the right to seek asylum should be suspended because too many people are seeking asylum or because some asylum seekers might be unable to wait in line, flouts centuries-old principles of refugee protection and the reality of conflict and persecution. Refugee flows from the exodus from Egypt described in the Bible to the modern flight of millions that followed Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine show that when lives are in danger, there is no place for turnstiles. Coming on the heels of World War II and the Holocaust, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declared the right of any person “to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.” This human right is not limited to those who ring the doorbell.

Particularly in the fevered political rhetoric of an election year, when anti-foreigner prejudices are whipped into a frenzy and politicians jockey for position in their toughness towards immigration, it is important not to lose sight of the principles that have traditionally made the United States a refuge for the persecuted. It should remain such a refuge for the many today who continue to entrust their lives to the decency and goodwill of the US government and its people.
New report shows wildlife criminals in UK 'getting away with it'

A new study led by an Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) expert has revealed alarming shortcomings in the UK's efforts to prosecute wildlife criminals.

The report System set to fail—prosecuting wildlife crime, reveals that despite widespread public demand for strict penalties, many perpetrators escape justice due to systemic failures. The study was conducted by Angus Nurse, Professor of Law and Environmental Justice at ARU and Nadine Harding from the University of Gloucestershire.

Commissioned by the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), the report offers a comprehensive analysis of the obstacles faced by those on the front line of wildlife law enforcement. Professor Nurse, an expert in , led a team of criminologists in compiling first-hand accounts from , legal professionals, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Their findings describe a legal system struggling to handle the growing threat of .

The report highlighted the significant challenges facing enforcement agencies, including a lack of resources, inadequate training, and inconsistent evidence-gathering procedures.

The report's release coincides with a YouGov poll that shows overwhelming public support for harsher penalties against wildlife criminals, with 97% of respondents saying that those who torture  should face punishment, and 92% supporting the establishment of a formal reporting system for wildlife crimes.

Despite this, the System set to fail report reveals that many cases go unpunished, with criminals finding ways to exploit weaknesses in the system.

One of the most pressing issues identified by Professor Nurse and his team is the lack of capacity which leads to problems in collecting evidence and consistency in preparing cases for prosecution.

The team also identified the "non-notifiable" status of wildlife crimes. This  means that such incidents do not have to be reported to the Home Office, thereby excluding them from national crime statistics. As a result, these crimes are often obscured within broader categories like violence and anti-social behavior, making it difficult to assess the true scale of the problem.

Professor Nurse said, "Research consistently shows wildlife crime doesn't get the priority or the resources it deserves. Instead, we have a system reliant on the diligence and dedication of individual enforcement staff. We need better systems in place to provide the necessary support to investigate and prosecute these crimes."

"The current system fails to provide the necessary support to protect wildlife and bring wildlife criminals to justice. The need for reform has never been more urgent."

IFAW's recommendations include making wildlife crime a "notifiable" offense, implementing mandatory legal training on wildlife crime, and establishing clear sentencing and prosecution guidelines. Additionally, the  calls for enhanced multi-agency collaboration and a renewed commitment to funding the National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU).

More information: System set to fail—prosecuting wildlife crime: d1jyxxz9imt9yb.cloudfront.net/ … -set-fail-report.pdf


Provided by Anglia Ruskin University Report: Animals at risk as wildlife crime falls down the list of policing priorities

Trumpian economic  nationalism is not  what the world  or America needs

Donald Trump’s policies are a recipe for higher global inflation, greater fragmentation, and more inequality.


Trump has promised to impose at least a 10 per cent tariff on all imports coming into the United States (Adz/Wikimedia)


Roland Rajah
Published 2 Oct 2024
THE INTERPRETER

This article also appears in Trump 2.0, a collection of essays written by Lowy Institute experts imagining the implications of a second Trump administration. A companion series, Harris 1.0, will appear this week.

It is difficult to tell the difference between Donald Trump’s bluster and what policies might result were he to win office again. However, the direction a second Trump presidency would pull the world economy seems reasonably clear. Trump’s signature policies would foster a future world economy that is more divided, less prosperous, and increasingly unstable. Domestically, his policies would likely have analogous effects, reinforcing the economic cleavages fueling political polarisation and thus also the forces behind America’s retreat from international openness and cooperation.

Trump has promised to impose at least a 10 per cent tariff on all imports coming into the United States. China specifically would be hit by 60 per cent tariffs across the board. Trump also wants Congress to pass the Reciprocal Trade Act, which would enable him to impose tariffs on specific products to match what other countries impose on the United States. Reciprocal tariffs could notionally be used as bargaining chips to force open other countries’ markets. But more likely, they would simply be used to cherry-pick fights over specific products.

China specifically would be hit by 60 per cent tariffs across the board.

On the budget front, a key Trump policy is to extend expiring income tax reductions introduced under his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Trump also promises to slash government spending. However, American politics, let alone Trump’s populism, imply any spending cuts would likely be limited. That means bigger budget deficits. Trump might seek to repeal key Biden-era industrial policies — the CHIPS and Science Act and Inflation Reduction Act — but as these substantially benefit many “red states”, Trump might instead opt to largely keep these in place with relatively minor adjustments.

Trump also wants to substantially curb illegal immigration, including through expanding his border wall, tougher law enforcement, removing work rights, and mass deportations. At the extreme, this could include following through on a threat to deport roughly 11 million illegal immigrants currently residing in the United States.
Higher inflation and interest rates

One predictable result from all this is higher inflation. More expensive goods from tariffs, increased demand from a bigger budget deficit, and reduced labour supply due to less immigration and more deportations would all push up inflation. This would in turn mean higher interest rates as well as a stronger US dollar as more capital is pulled into the United States.

To Trump’s chagrin, the trade deficit would likely expand, not shrink, with a higher dollar making imports cheaper and exports less competitive, while a bigger budget deficit would add demand to an economy already operating beyond full capacity, again encouraging higher imports and fewer exports.
Vicious spiral and currency wars

As the trade deficit is, erroneously, seen by Trump as a key measure of success, a higher deficit would likely spur further tariff escalations. Robert Lighthizer — the US Trade Representative during Trump’s first term, one of his most effective lieutenants, and a candidate as Trump’s Treasury Secretary — thinks America should go further to target a lower US dollar. Achieving this would be very difficult without the active cooperation of other major economies, which is unlikely. Unilateral action — direct currency intervention by the Treasury or Trump pressuring the Federal Reserve to act — would add a contentious currency war to Trump’s repertoire of beggar-thy-neighbour policies.

All of this mirrors the economics of Trump’s first term in office. The only question, as last time, is exactly how far he goes. This time, the potential costs could be much higher.

While Trump 1.0 was impeded by his own disorganisation and resistance from various parts of government, this time the Trump movement is reportedly much better organised and already planning to install loyal lieutenants across key government posts.
Global vulnerabilities

In addition, the world economy is in a much more parlous state compared to last time — still reeling from high inflation, interest rate hikes, the Ukraine war, and the after-effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. Global growth remains weak. Households the world over have been battered by a cost-of-living crisis. Government debt and budget deficits are much higher. Developing countries have especially suffered and progress in reducing global poverty is stalling. Rising global protectionism is becoming entrenched and China’s renewed export surge since 2020 is adding fuel to the fire.

The world is also struggling to deliver the international cooperation needed to deal with ever more urgent shared challenges such as combating climate change, restoring global development, preventing future pandemics, and managing the rise of artificial intelligence. Not addressing these shared challenges would mean reduced global prosperity, more instability, and less security for all.

A return to Trumpian economic nationalism is not what the world needs. Unfortunately, the world does not get a vote.

Yet Trump’s signature policies offer no solution to America’s problems. Automation means reshoring manufacturing, and deporting immigrants would not bring back many working-class jobs. Trump’s tariff hikes would hurt lower-income households the most, while his tax cuts benefit the rich. And an even bigger budget deficit only means larger future fights over who will ultimately have to pay for soaring government debt.

It is, then, doubly unfortunate for the world that a second Trump term would only aggravate the internal cleavages driving America’s retreat from international openness and cooperation.

 

Trump amplifies cherry-picked US migrant crime data

Border wall fencing divides the United States and Mexico on August 1, 2024 in Jacumba Hot Springs, San Diego County, California ( AFP / Patrick T. Fallon)
Amid intense debate over illegal immigration in the US election, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and his supporters claim the Biden administration allowed some 425,000 migrants with criminal records, including 13,000 with murder convictions, to enter the country without detaining them. This is false; the figures refer to the cumulative number of convicted non-citizens, including those from the Trump administration -- many of whom are in state or local custody.

"JUST OUT: 13,000 people convicted of murder have crossed into our Country through Kamala Harris’ Open Border - NON DETAINED, NON CITIZEN, CONVICTED CRIMINALS!" Trump said in a September 27, 2024 post sharing a Fox News graphic on his Truth Social platform.

Similar claims have circulated on FacebookTikTok, XThreads and in online articles.

"Under the Biden-Harris administration, over 425,000 illegal immigrants with criminal convictions have been released into the U.S., including 13,099 convicted murderers, 15,811 convicted rapists,  425,431 total convicted criminals," says a September 28, 2024 Instagram post

Screenshot from Instagram taken September 30, 2024
Image
Screenshot from X taken September 30, 2024

Republican lawmakers amplified the allegations as Vice President Kamala Harris pledged to devote more resources to "fix" the immigration system if elected to the White House in November. Conservatives have repeatedly accused the Biden administration of failing to control the US-Mexico border, while also spreading misinformation about migrants.

The latest claims stem from a September 25 letter Patrick Lechleitner, deputy director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), sent to lawmakers in response to queries about the number of non-citizens with criminal records in the United States (archived here).

The letter says that from mid-May 2023 through the end of July 2024, the agency removed or returned more than 893,600 individuals. As of July 21, there were 662,566 non-citizens with criminal histories on ICE's dockets of detained and non-detained individuals.

"Of those, 435,719 are convicted criminals, and 226,847 have pending criminal charges," the letter says.

The vast majority of those migrants are not currently detained by ICE, according to Lechleitner's letter. The document also indicates 13,099 non-citizens with homicide convictions and 15,811 with sexual assault records are not in agency custody.

However, the numbers do not only represent those who entered and were released during the Biden administration.

"The data in this letter is being misinterpreted," a US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson said in a September 30 email.

"The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this administration."

A 2023 DHS report (archived here) indicates there were 405,786 convicted non-citizens on the "non-detained docket" as of June 5, 2021, some five months after Trump left office. A 2017 Inspector General's report estimated the number at 368,574 as of August 2016 (archived here).

'Overwhelmingly in prison'

The claims also lack context about the status of migrants with criminal records.

The DHS spokesperson said the figures shared online include "many who are under the jurisdiction or currently incarcerated by federal, state or local law enforcement partners."

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council (archived here) told AFP: "These are people who, primarily, have already been charged and convicted and served their time."

Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, offered a similar analysis in a September 30 blog post (archived here).

"When ICE uses the term 'non-detained,' they mean not currently detained by ICE," Nowrasteh wrote.

"In other words, the migrant murderers included in the letter are overwhelmingly in prison serving their sentences. After they serve their sentences, the government transfers them onto ICE's docket for removal from the United States."

Nowrasteh added that some individuals cannot be deported because the United States has no or limited repatriation agreements with countries such as Iran, Cuba, China, Vietnam and Laos. He said other nations, including Venezuela, "periodically suspend their agreements for political reasons, or the United States government suspends deportations because of civil disorder in the destination country."

Lechleitner of ICE said in his letter that the agency is "bound by statutory requirements not to release certain non-citizens from ICE custody during the pendency of removal proceedings."

AFP has fact-checked other claims about US politics here and migration here.

Ex-NBA player says NYC mayor withdrew support from him on Turkey’s orders

ByTurkish Minute
October 1, 2024































Former NBA player and activist Enes Kanter Freedom has said New York City Mayor Eric Adams withdrew his support for him due to orders from the Turkish government since Freedom is a follower of the faith-based Gülen movement, labelled as a terrorist organization by Turkey.

Adams is charged with bribery, wire fraud, conspiracy and soliciting campaign contributions from foreign nationals in a 57-page indictment unsealed last Thursday. The indictment accuses him of accepting illegal donations and more than $100,000 worth of free plane tickets and luxury hotel stays from wealthy Turkish nationals and at least one government official in a nearly decade-long corruption scheme.

Adams is accused of granting political favors to the Turkish government in return for the bribes.

One of those favors, according to Freedom, was to end their relationship.

He told cable news network NewsNation’s “Elizabeth Vargas Reports” he felt he got the cold shoulder from Adams after the two of them were invited to Greece to accept an award.

“Me and Eric had a conversation about organizing free basketball camps for kids in New York. And I remember he got so excited. He gave me his phone number and said, ‘As soon as you come back, let me know,’” Freedom said.

But the former player, who spent two seasons with the New York Knicks, said that when he returned from the 2022 trip, Adams ghosted him.

Freedom also said friends in the Turkish expatriate community told him that in 2016 Turkish officials warned then-Brooklyn Borough President Adams to “steer clear of a major Turkish American grassroots organization in New York because they oppose [Turkish president] Erdogan – because they stand with democracy and human rights in Turkey. And right after that, Eric promptly distanced himself from the organization.”

The Turkish organization is referred as the “Community Center” in the indictment without mention of its name, but it is believed to be the Gülen-linked Turkish Cultural Center Brooklyn, part of a non-profit organization promoting intercultural and inter-religious dialogue.

According to the indictment, a Turkish government official told Adams, who had a relationship with the Turkish community center in Brooklyn, in or around 2016, that the community center was affiliated with a Turkish political movement that was hostile to Turkey’s government and that if Adams wanted to continue receiving support from the government, he could no longer be associated with the community center, a demand to which Adams acquiesced.

The Gülen movement is accused by the Turkish government and President ErdoÄŸan of masterminding a failed coup in 2016 and is labeled as a “terrorist organization,” although the movement denies involvement in the coup attempt or any terrorist activity.

Following the coup attempt the Turkish government launched a massive crackdown on Gülen-linked people and organizations not only in Turkey but also abroad, pressuring other countries’ governments to close down Gülen-affiliated organizations and to close their doors to Gülen followers.

Freedom, who has not had a team to play for since 2022, reportedly for speaking out against human rights abuses around the world, has lived mainly in the United States for more than a decade and has used his substantial platform as an international star athlete to condemn Turkey’s pivot towards authoritarianism under President ErdoÄŸan and its crackdown on the Gülen movement members.

Turkey canceled his passport in 2017 and attempted to have him deported from Romania on May 20 of the same year, during one of his international trips. His passport was briefly seized by the Romanian police upon a request from the Turkish government. The NBA said it had worked with the State Department to ensure his release in Romania.

On the Turkish Interior Ministry website, Freedom is described as a member of a terrorist organization due to his affiliation with the Gülen movement.

Although the Turkish government has classified the Gülen movement as a terrorist organization, none of its Western allies have fallen for Ankara’s portrayal and consider the group a civic initiative focused on educational activities. Fethullah Gülen, who inspired the movement, lives in exile in the United States, which has refused to extradite him to Turkey on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence that he committed a crime.

Maldives seeks to join South African genocide case against Israel

'Israel must be held accountable for its unlawful acts in Gaza,' demands President Muizzu



Anadolu staff |01.10.2024 - 


ANKARA

The Maldives Tuesday said it has officially filed a declaration of intervention in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to join the genocide case against Israel for committing massacres in the Gaza Strip.

“The Maldives, pursuant to the Article 63 of the CIJ_IC Statute, filed the declaration of intervention to the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa vs. Israel)," Maldives’ President Mohamed Muizzu said in a post on X.

“Israel must be held accountable for its unlawful acts in Gaza. The rule of law must be upheld, and Israel must cease its genocidal acts against the Palestinian people," he added.

The Maldives, he went on to say, will always side with “humanity, peace and justice, and in doing so, we will continue to stand with the Palestinian people.”

Muizzu further said that Palestine “must” be recognized and established based on the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.

South Africa filed the case at the tribunal based in The Hague in late 2023, accusing Israel, which has bombed Gaza since last October, of failing to uphold its commitments under the 1948 Genocide Convention.

The top UN court ordered Israel in May to halt its offensive in the southern Gaza city of Rafah. It was the third time the 15-judge panel issued preliminary orders seeking to rein in the death toll and alleviate humanitarian suffering in the blockaded enclave, where casualties have surpassed 41,600.

Several countries have joined the genocide case against Israel, including Türkiye, Nicaragua, Palestine, Spain, Mexico, Libya and Colombia. The court began public hearings in January.
UK families of Gaza captives say Lebanon attack 'takes focus away' from loved ones

As Israel attacks Lebanon, the families of UK captives in Gaza said the attack could distract from the captives being released.

The New Arab Staff & Agencies
01 October, 2024

Protesters in Tel Aviv, demanding captive swap deal [GETTY]


Families of captives with British links held by Hamas in Gaza said on Monday that Israel's invasion of Lebanon could distract from their loved ones being released.

Sharone Lifschitz, whose parents were taken captive during Hamas' attack on Israel last year, warned that an Israeli ground invasion of Lebanon would "take away" the focus from the remaining captives held in Gaza.

Her mother, Yocheved, was released, but her father, Oded, 84, remains in captivity.

Israel's military offensive has killed at least 41,638 people, most of them civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.

While Israel has claimed the mission was to free the hostages, Netanyahu has reportedly turned down numerous deals with Hamas that would see the captives released.

Israel has now started a brutal air and ground assault on Lebanon, launching deadly airstrikes across the country, where no Israeli captives are being held.

However, for Steve Brisley, whose brother-in-law Eli Sharabi is still being held captive in Gaza, that "takes focus away from what is the most important thing, which is the release of the captives".

He said there had been an "abject failure of international diplomacy" in securing a captive return deal and felt as though the captives had "been forgotten".

Brisley called for the UK government, which has called for a ceasefire and the release of the remaining captives, to find a "new and innovative" approach to end the crisis.

Lifschitz said there was a lack "of will from both sides", referring to Israel and Hamas.

Netanyahu has faced huge domestic criticism for not doing enough to free the hostages with the war on Gaza now widely viewed as an attempt to annex the territory for Israel and save the PM's political skin.

Meeting UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy earlier in the day, the family members pushed for the government to prioritise bringing their relatives back home.

"I hold the prime minister responsible for the life of these captives", said Lifschitz, adding she was feeling "encouraged" by the meeting.

Starmer told the families that "we need to see the captives returned immediately and unconditionally".

The relatives also received a message from Britain's head of state, King Charles III, and his wife, Queen Camilla, who said they "continue to keep them and all captive families in our special thoughts".
CERN at 70: Smashing elementary particles for humanity
DW
September 25, 2024

CERN has been an epicenter of scientific breakthroughs since 1954, including the discovery of the Higgs boson.

 Scientists there hope a new, larger particle smasher will lead them to more discoveries for years to come.

The long tubes of CERN's Large Hadron Collider
Image: Martial Trezzini/Keystone/AP/picture alliance


The European Organization for Nuclear Research — better known as CERN — is a place of scientific breakthroughs.

Since 1954, thousands of the world's best scientists and emerging minds have converged on Switzerland to explore how the universe works. On September 29, CERN will celebrate its 70th anniversary.

CERN has been the seat of some of the most important discoveries in science — from the confirmation of the elusive Higgs boson in 2012, to more practical innovations like the invention of the World Wide Web.

The Large Hadron Collider

CERN is perhaps best known for its extensive underground particle accelerator known as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) — a 27-kilometer-long (16-miles-long) tube built beneath the Swiss and French borderlands near Geneva.

Scientists have been accelerating particles around the LHC since September 2008.

The LHC works by sending separate, highly energized particle beams in opposite directions through the 27-kilometer-long tubular vacuum.

The particle beams consist of a type of particle called protons, which are guided by superconducting electromagnets, making them collide at almost the speed of light.

The particles are so tiny that the task of making them collide is like firing two needles 10 kilometers at each other with the precision to make them collide.

When the particles collide, they produce energy that is used to create new particles.

The LHC is one of 11 other particle accelerators based at CERN. Researchers use them to help advance a range of technologies, including some that impact our daily lives.

Their research has helped construct more powerful computers and microchips, improve the quality of technology used in healthcare, energy and space exploration.

Higgs boson breakthrough in 2012

At the top of CERN's agenda using the LHC was the ambition to find the Higgs boson particle.

The Higgs boson is a type of particle named after Nobel Prize physicist Peter Higgs. Higgs believed the particle created a field which fills the entire universe and gives other particles their mass.

In 2012, after decades of research, scientists at CERN finally found proof of Higgs' theory — they had found a Higgs boson.

It was a colossal scientific breakthrough that opened a whole new field of particle physics research and helped explain why particles bunched together at the formation of the universe.


CERN aren't trying to create black holes


Prior to the LHC being switched on, there were concerns that smashing protons together at sub-light speed would lead to the formation of tiny black holes.

We think of black holes forming only when massive stars implode, but some theories suggest that tiny, quantum black holes can form when particles collide.

These tiny black holes are nothing like the black holes that suck matter inside them in space. They would only last for fractions of a second and be completely safe.

In fact, CERN researchers might like the formation of such a theoretical black hole inside a particle accelerator. It would give them an opportunity to see how gravity behaves on a quantum scale.

Peter Higgs, who along with Francois Englert won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on the Higgs boson.
Image: Sean Dempsey/AP Photo/picture alliance


What's next for CERN?


Scientists aren't finished with CERN's LHC. Beyond the discovery of the Higgs bosons, there are many other fundamental, unanswered questions about the universe.

They are developing a second-generation High Luminosity LHC. The upgrade will enable them to increase the number of proton collisions in the LHC to be at least five times.

This "LH-LHC" will likely be operational around 2041. Scientists aim to perform detailed studies of Higgs bosons by generating at least 15 million of the particles each year.

With the use of upgraded technology to generate more particles (and collisions), CERN hopes it will learn more about the once elusive Higgs boson, and discover new particles as yet unknown to science.

Edited by: Fred Schwaller



Mysteries of universe revealed? Hardly. CERN still fascinates on its 70th anniversary

The scientific center that is home to the world’s largest particle accelerator and is billed as the world’s biggest machine is celebrating its 70th anniversary

ByJAMEY KEATEN 
Associated Press
October 1, 2024

GENEVA -- The research center that is home to the world’s largest particle accelerator is celebrating its 70th anniversary on Tuesday, with the physicists who run it aiming to unlock secrets about dark matter and other mysteries to promote science for peace in today's conflict-darkened world.

Over the last seven decades, CERN, the sprawling research center on the Swiss-French border at Geneva, has become a household name in Europe, the West and beyond, but its complex inner workings remain a puzzle to many people.

Here's a look at CERN and how its discoveries have changed the world and our view of the universe — and could change them more in coming years.

The European Organization for Nuclear Research, which has retained the French-language acronym CERN for its predecessor outfit, had its origins in a 1951 meeting of the U.N.’s scientific organization that sought to build a state-of-the-art physics research facility in Europe and ease a brain drain toward America after World War II. Groundbreaking was on May 17, 1954.

Today, for cognoscenti, CERN is probably best known as home to the Large Hadron Collider, trumpeted as the world’s biggest machine, which powers a network of magnets to accelerate particles through a 27-kilometer (17-mile) underground loop in and around Geneva and slam them together at velocities approaching the speed of light.

By capturing and interpreting the results of the collisions — as many as a billion per second — of such beams of particles, thousands of scientists both on hand at the center and remotely around the world pore over the reams of resulting data and strive to explain how fundamental physics works.

CERN says collisions inside the LHC generate temperatures more than 100,000 times hotter than the core of the sun, on a small scale and in its controlled environment.

At the collider, “every day we are able to reproduce the conditions of the primordial universe as they were a millionth of a millionth of a second after the Big Bang. Yet, many open, crucial questions remain,” CERN Director-General Fabiola Gianotti told an anniversary celebration attended by many leaders of its 24 member countries.

Over the years, CERN and its experimental facilities have grown into a vast research hub with applications in many scientific fields and industries.

“In a world where conflicts between countries, religions and cultures sadly persist, this is a truly precious gift which cannot be taken for granted,” Gianotti said.


Experiments in the collider helped confirm in 2012 the subatomic Higgs boson, an infinitesimal particle whose existence had been theorized decades earlier and whose confirmation completed the Standard Model of particle physics.

CERN is also where the World Wide Web was born, in the mind of British scientist Tim Berners-Lee 35 years ago, as a way to help universities and institutes share information. In 1993, the software behind the web was put into the public domain — and the rest is history, in smartphones and on computers worldwide.

The spillover science and tools generated at CERN have rippled through the world economy. Thousands of smaller particle accelerators operate around the world today, plumbing applications in fields as diverse as medicine and computer chip manufacturing.

Crystals developed for CERN experiments roughly four decades ago are now widely used in PET scanners that can detect early signs of health troubles like cancer and heart disease.

“It is thanks to CERN that we have touch screens. It is thanks to CERN that we have new tools for fighting cancer," European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen said at the anniversary celebration. “You are constantly working with European industries to build low-emission airplanes, or to create new solutions to transport liquid hydrogen.”

"CERN is the living proof that science fosters innovation and that innovation fosters competitiveness,” von der Leyen said, adding that she wanted to increase spending for research in the next EU budget.

Some skeptics have over the years stirred fears about CERN. Insiders variously argue and explain that such fears are overblown or inaccurate, and CERN has issued its own retort to some of the theories out there.

For the most part, CERN technicians, researchers and theoreticians of more than 110 nationalities today carry out new experiments that aim to punch holes in the Standard Model — smashing up conventional understandings to move science forward — and explain a long list of lingering scientific unknowns.

Its scientific whizzes hope to solve riddles about dark energy — which makes up about 68% of the universe and has a role in speeding up its expansion — and test hypotheses about dark matter, whose existence is only inferred and which appears to outweigh visible matter nearly six-to-one, making up slightly more than a quarter of the universe.

CERN has two big projects on its horizon. The first is the High-Luminosity LHC project that aims to ramp up the number of collisions — and thus the potential for new discoveries — starting in 2029.

The second, over the much longer term, is the Future Circular Collider, which is estimated to cost 15 billion Swiss francs (about 16 billion euros or $17.2 billion) and is hoped to start operating in an initial phase by 2040.

Despite its aim to foster scientific progress in the cause of peace and humanity, CERN has found itself ensnared in politics.

Its constitution says the organization “shall have no concern with work for military requirements.” In 2022, CERN's governing council voted to pause ties with institutes in Russia because of President Vladimir Putin’s order for Russian troops to invade Ukraine earlier that year. Some fear that applications from CERN's research could make their way into Moscow's war machine.

On Nov. 30, CERN will formally exclude Russia — affecting some 500 scientists, about 100 of whom have joined non-Russian institutes in order to maintain their research with the center.

The suspension will come at a cost, depriving CERN of some 40 million Swiss francs in Russian financing for the High-Luminosity LHC. It amounts to about 4.5% of the budget for its experiment, which will now have to be shouldered by other CERN participants.

CERN counts 19 European Union countries plus Britain, Israel, Norway, Serbia and Switzerland as members, while the United States and Japan — plus the EU and the U.N. educational, scientific and cultural organization — have observer status. Russia and a Russia-based nuclear research institute had their observer status suspended in 2022.
FASCISM VS THE PEOPLES REVOLUTION
Turkiye announces killing of 13 YPG and PKK members in Iraq and Syria



2024-10-01 

Shafaq News/ On Tuesday, the Turkish Ministry of Defense announced the killing of 13 members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) in Iraq and the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) in Syria.

In a brief statement reported by Anadolu Agency, the ministry stated, “The Turkish Armed Forces killed 11 PKK members in the Claw-Lock operations in northern Iraq, and 2 YPG members in the Peace Spring operations in northern Syria.”

On Sunday, the ministry also confirmed the killing of two YPG members detected in the area of Operation "Euphrates Shield" (Fırat Kalkanı) in Syria, reiterating its determination to continue operations against the PKK and its affiliates.

Turkiye, in coordination with the Syrian National Army, has conducted several military operations in northern Syria, including "Euphrates Shield" in 2016, "Olive Branch (Zeytın Dalı)" in 2018, and "Peace Spring (Barış Pınarı)" in 2019, targeting ISIS and the YPG, which Turkiye considers linked to the PKK.

The PKK operates across several countries in the region, including Iraq, Syria, and Iran.

The conflict between Turkiye and the PKK dates back to the early 1980s when the PKK started advocating for an independent Kurdish state within Turkiye.

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the conflict intensified, with the PKK engaging in guerrilla warfare and the Turkish military conducting large-scale operations against PKK bases.

On August 15, after two days of high-level security talks in Ankara, Turkiye and Iraq signed an agreement focusing on military, security, and counter-terrorism cooperation, explicitly targeting the PKK. This agreement includes establishing joint coordination and training centers in Baghdad and Bashiqa.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, speaking alongside his Iraqi counterpart Fuad Hussein after talks in Ankara, described the defense agreement as having "historical importance." Hussein noted that the accord was "the first in the history of Iraq and Turkiye" in this field.

Notably, after signing the agreement, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler told Reuters that the recent counter-terrorism measures taken by Turkiye and Iraq marked a turning point in their relations. He added that Ankara wanted Baghdad to take an additional step and officially designate the PKK as a terrorist organization as soon as possible.