Friday, October 04, 2024

Elephants evacuated, animals stranded in floods in Thailand

Agence France-Presse
October 4, 2024 

More than 100 elephants had to be evacuated from a sanctuary in Thailand due to rising flood waters (AFP)

More than 100 elephants in northern Thailand have been moved to higher ground to escape rapidly rising flood waters, local media reported, but many other animals were still stuck as their sanctuary struggled to evacuate them on Friday.

Saengduean Chailert, director of the Elephant Nature Park in Chiang Mai province, had posted a video of the panic-stricken elephants splashing through muddy waters and asked the government to send "urgent help".

"The water is flooding worse than before. The entire area is flooded. The whole village is flooded... Right now, we have nowhere to go," she wrote on social media.


Photos and videos showed brown water rushing through the Elephant Nature Park as staff and volunteers carried dogs in blankets and placed cages on rubber tyres to transport animals to safety.

The park falls under the remit of the Save the Elephant Foundation, one of Thailand's biggest elephant conservation NGOs.

One of the foundation's officers told AFP that aside from 126 elephants, there were around 5,000 animals –- including dogs, cats, cows, pigs and rabbits -- stuck in the floods.

Local media reported that more than 100 staff and volunteers were able to safely transport 117 of the elephants to higher ground.

Major inundations have struck parts of northern Thailand as recent heavy downpours caused the Ping River to reach "critical" levels on Thursday, according to the district office.

Thailand's northern provinces have been hit by large floods since Typhoon Yagi struck the region in early September, with one district reporting its worst inundations in 80 years.


Thai Elephant Alliance says there are around 3,800 captive elephants in the country, and there are more than 4,000 individuals living in the wild, according to the Thailand Environment Institute.

The Asian elephant is classified as endangered by the IUCN, and contact and conflict between humans and the species is common in Thailand.

© Agence France-Presse
You can count female physics Nobel laureates on one hand

The Conversation
October 2, 2024

Nobel Prize (Jonathan NACKSTRAND/AFP)

Out of 225 people awarded the Nobel Prize in physics, only five have been women. This is a very small number, and certainly smaller than 50% – the percent of women in the human population.

Despite several studies exposing the barriers for women in science and the many efforts to increase their representation, physics continues to be a male-dominated field. Only 1 in 5 physicists are women, a number that has not moved since 2010.

Three of the five Nobel Prizes in physics awarded to women have been in the past decade. As a woman physicist, seeing three women join the cadre of Nobel laureates in Physics in just a handful of years is beyond exciting.

Nobel Prize-winning work

The three woman physicists receiving Nobel Prize honors in the 21st century are Donna Strickland, who won in 2018, Andrea Ghez, who won in 2020, and Anne L’Huillier, who won in 2023. All three made important contributions to science.

Strickland, a physicist from the University of Waterloo, won the award for her work on lasers, implementing a method called chirped pulse amplification.

Ghez, an astrophysicist from UCLA, got the Nobel for her work observing stars, especially those near the center of the Milky Way.

L’Huillier, a physicist from the University of Lund, received the 2023 Nobel, also for her work with lasers.

What are some common threads in their lives?

Being a minority in a research field isn’t easy. Sticking with it long enough to have a storied career, as the three winners have, is a huge accomplishment. Since winning the prize, the three winners have recounted their research journeys and offered advice to the next generation of physicists in a variety of interviews. I’ve noticed a few common threads.



Nobel laureate Donna Strickland won the prize for her research into laser pulses. Bengt Nyman/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY


A career in academia is a long haul. All three women emphasize the timescale involved in going from first steps in their research to being recognized by the Nobel committee. L’Huillier refers to it as a long journey.

While winning a Nobel may come with some glamour and notoriety, if you are after a quick reward, this career may not be the right line of work. It now takes an average of 28 years between publishing a discovery and receiving a Nobel in physics.

You cannot predict which basic science topic is going to lead to a Nobel – nor, for that matter, which will end up having any kind of impact. The best an early-career physicist can do is to explore different topics, try new things, lean into discomfort and find something they’re passionate about.




Nobel laureate Andrea Ghez won the prize for her work on supermassive black holes. BorderlineRebel/Wikimedia Commons, CC B Y-SA

All three women talk about how many times they ran into difficulties. Before she got the chirped pulse amplification method to work, Strickland had started to wonder whether she would ever get a Ph.D., having hit so many dead ends. The first time Ghez proposed the project that would lead to her celebrated work, she was turned down.


All three of them thought of quitting at some point. So don’t be discouraged if you are turned down or if others say you cannot do it.

“Keep going,” says L’Huillier. “You need to be obstinate.”

Ghez recommends seeing experiments that don’t work not as failures but as opportunities.


Movies and TV shows paint a picture of the scientist as a social misfit, an individual working alone in the laboratory. But that’s not how it works. All these women work in teams.



Anne L'Huillier won the Nobel Prize for her work on attosecond laser pulses. Bengt Oberger/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA


“Science is a team sport. You need to know what you don’t know and seek help for what is missing,” says Strickland.

Seeking help often leads to collaborations with other research groups. As Ghez puts it, “Science is a very social enterprise.”

And above all else, the three medalists referred to luck as an essential ingredient for success. The world is full of physicists just as dedicated and just as smart who don’t get the Nobel.

Themes specific to women

Strickland, Ghez and L’Huillier are always asked about their experiences being a woman in science and their views on diversity and equity in physics. All of them emphasize the importance of diversity.

The three laureates have recognized how critical female role models have been in their lives. To believe a physics career is even possible, you need to see people in the field who look like you.


They also mention the importance of a support network, especially for women. Having a group of people you trust to cheer you on can help when you feel discouraged.

The three women also talk about their experiences balancing work and life. It’s not always easy.

Strickland left the standard academic path after a postdoctoral fellowship to become a technician so she could be close to her husband and start her family. L’Huillier walked away from her job and moved from France to Sweden, where she was unemployed for a while. Ghez waited years to have kids. There is no single trajectory. But time away from research can give you fresh perspectives and inspiration to take the next steps.

They also talk about how diversity enriches the research itself. A team that is open to different points of view is more creative. It is also more fun to work in.

These women have pointed out that the culture for women in science has improved over their careers and they are optimistic about the future. If you calculate the percent of Nobel Prizes in physics awarded to women in the past decade alone, then about 1 in 10 Nobel recipients have been women. To me, this indicates that, indeed, things may be getting better.

And perhaps the Nobel committee is addressing, at least in part, possible gender inequities in their processes. For example, the lack of nominations of women and the influence that stereotypes could play in their evaluations. So it is with great expectation that I await this year’s announcement.

Filomena Nunes, Professor of Physics, Michigan State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Top execs exit Trump Media amid allegations of Devin Nunes' mismanagement and retaliation


Robert Faturechi, ProPublicaJustin Elliott, ProPublicaAlex Mierjeski, ProPublica
October 4, 2024 

Devin Nunes (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Former President Donald Trump’s media company has forced out executives in recent days after internal allegations that its CEO, former Rep. Devin Nunes, is mismanaging the company, according to interviews and records of communications among former employees.

Several people involved with Trump Media believe the ousters are retaliation following what they describe as an anonymous “whistleblower” complaint regarding Nunes that went to the company’s board of directors.

The chief operating officer and chief product officer have left the company, along with at least two lower-level staffers, according to interviews, social media posts and communications between former staffers reviewed by ProPublica. The company, which runs the social media platform Truth Social, disclosed the departure of the chief operating officer in a securities filing Thursday afternoon.

ProPublica has not seen the whistleblower complaint. But several people with knowledge of the company said the concerns revolve around alleged mismanagement by Nunes. One person said they include allegations of misuse of funds, hiring of foreign contractors and interfering with product development.

In a statement, a spokesperson for Trump Media did not answer specific questions but said that ProPublica’s inquiry to the company “utterly fabricates implications of improper and even illegal conduct that have no basis in reality.”

“This story is the fifth consecutive piece in an increasingly absurd campaign by ProPublica, likely at the behest of political interest groups, to damage TMTG based on false and defamatory allegations and vague innuendo,” the statement said, adding that “TMTG strictly adheres to all laws and applicable regulations.”

Trump Media’s board comprises a set of powerful figures in Trump’s world, including his son Donald Trump Jr., former U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and the businesswoman Linda McMahon, a major donor and current co-chair of Trump’s transition planning committee.

Nunes was named CEO of the company in 2021, with Trump hailing him as “a fighter and a leader” who “will make an excellent CEO.” As a member of Congress, Nunes was known as one of Trump’s staunchest loyalists.

After the internal allegations about Nunes were made at Trump Media, the company enlisted a lawyer to investigate and interview staffers, according to a person with knowledge of the company.

Then, last week, some employees who were interviewed by the lawyer were notified they were being pushed out, the person said. The employees being pushed out include a human relations director and a product designer, along with Chief Operating Officer Andrew Northwall and Chief Product Officer Sandro De Moraes. The person with knowledge of the company said Trump Media asked the employees to sign an agreement pledging not to make public claims of wrongdoing against the company in exchange for severance.

On Thursday afternoon, Northwall posted on Truth Social announcing he had “decided to resign from my role at Trump Media,” adding that he was “incredibly grateful” to Trump and Nunes “for this opportunity.”


“As I step back, I look forward to focusing more on my family and returning to my entrepreneurial journey,” the statement said.

De Moraes now identifies himself on his Truth Social bio as the “Former Chief Product Officer” of the company.

Some word of the departures became public earlier this week when former Trump Media employee Alex Gleason said in a social media post that “Truth Social in shambles. Many more people fired.”

Trump personally owns nearly 60% of the company. That stake, even after a recent decline in the company’s stock price, is worth nearly $2 billion on paper, a significant chunk of Trump’s fortune. He said last month he was not planning to sell his shares. What role Trump plays, if any, in the day-to-day operations of the company is not clear.

Since it launched in 2021, the company has become a speculation-fueled meme stock, but its actual business has generated virtually no revenue and Truth Social has not emerged as a serious competitor to the major social media platforms.

Among Nunes’ moves as CEO, as ProPublica has reported, was inking a large streaming TV deal with several obscure firms, including one controlled by a major political donor. He also traveled to the Balkans over the summer and met with the prime minister of North Macedonia, a trip whose purpose was never publicly explained by the company.

Trump Media has a formal whistleblower policy, adopted when the company went public in March, that encourages employees to report illegal activity and other “business conduct that damages the Company’s good name” and business interests.

Do you have any information about Trump Media that we should know? Robert Faturechi can be reached by email at robert.faturechi@propublica.org and by Signal or WhatsApp at 213-271-7217. Justin Elliott can be reached by email at justin@propublica.org or by Signal or WhatsApp at 774-826-6240.
Analysis shows Trump tax plan would make rich people richer — and working people poorer

















Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's proposal to further reduce the U.S. corporate tax rate from 21% to 15% would make the bottom half of the nation's income distribution poorer while boosting the fortunes of those at the very top, according to an analysis published Thursday by economists at American University.

The analysis, released just over a month before the high-stakes November 5 election, projects the hypothetical macroeconomic and distributional impacts of corporate tax rate plans put forth by Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee. Harris has called for increasing the corporate tax rate to 28%.

If implemented, the economists found, Trump's plan would "modestly reduce" the nation's gross domestic product (GDP), decrease government revenue, and "significantly increase inequality," given that wealthier households "are the primary owners of corporate stocks" that would benefit from the former president's tax cuts.

The "share of national income going to the top 5% would increase by around 1.6%, while the share of the bottom 50% would fall by roughly 4.8%," the analysis estimates.

Harris' plan, by contrast, would "mildly" raise U.S. GDP, increase federal revenue, and "decrease inequality, reducing the share of income earned by the top 5% of the distribution by about 1% and increasing the share of income earned by the bottom 50% of the distribution by about 4.7%, compared to current policy."

The analysis came a day after the Congressional Budget Office released a report showing that the richest 1% saw their share of the nation's wealth grow to 27% between 1989 and 2022 while families in the bottom half of the distribution held just 6% of the country's wealth in both 1989 and 2022—a wealth gap that further slashing corporate taxes would exacerbate.

Trump's call to reduce the corporate tax rate to 15% was the "centerpiece" of an address he delivered last month at the Economic Club of New York, as Bloombergreported at the time.

When Trump took office in 2017, the statutory corporate tax rate was 35%. Later that year, Trump and congressional Republicans rammed through an unpopular tax-cut package that slashed the corporate rate to 21% and led to a surge in tax avoidance. The law has been hugely regressive, delivering major benefits to the rich and very little to the working class.

Cutting the corporate tax rate to 15% would hand roughly $50 billion in annual tax cuts to the 100 largest and most profitable U.S. companies, according to a recent analysis by the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
Trump Bibles only ones in the world to meet new criteria for purchase by Oklahoma schools

Travis Gettys
October 4, 2024

Donald J. Trump walks from the White House Monday evening, June 1, 2020, to St. John’s Episcopal Church, known as the church of Presidents’s, that was damaged by fire during demonstrations in nearby LaFayette Square Sunday evening. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Oklahoma is accepting bids to supply its Department of Education with 55,000 Bibles, but vendors can only find two versions that meet all the statutory requirements – and both of them happen to be endorsed by Donald Trump.

The bid documents show that Bibles must be the King James version, contain both the Old and New Testaments, be bound in leather or leather-like material, and include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but vendors are suspicious of the requirements, reported The Oklahoman.

“It appears to me that this bid is anything but competitive,” said Drew Edmondson, a Democrat who served as the state attorney general from 1995 to 2011. “It adds to the basic specification other requirements that have nothing to do with the text. The special binding and inclusion of government documents will exclude almost all bidders. If the bid specs exclude most bidders unnecessarily, I could consider that a violation.”

Mardel Christian & Education carries 2,900 Bibles, but a salesperson who searched their inventory found none that fit the parameters outlined by state schools superintendent Ryan Walters, but country singer Lee Greenwood's God Bless the U.S.A. Bible, which Trump endorsed in exchange for a cut of the sales, fits the criteria perfectly.

“The [request for proposals] on its face seems fair, but with additional scrutiny, we can see there are very few Bibles on the market that would meet these criteria, and all of them have been endorsed by former president Donald Trump,” said Colleen McCarty, executive director of the Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice.

The God Bless the U.S.A. Bible sells for $60 online, while the Trump-backed We The People Bible, which also meets Walters' criteria, sells for $90, but King James Version Bibles are widely available online for $2.99 each and many Bible apps are free.

"For (Walters) to craft this RFP, to specifically identify this Bible, this document that the state taxpayers would spend money on, either is a dereliction of duty, a dereliction of stewardship or maybe it is a … signal to former President Trump: ‘Hey, hey, I’m on your team, sir,’” said Alicia Andrews, chair of the state Democratic Party.

Four civil rights organizations announced they are making a joint open records request to determine the source of $3 million in the Department of Education budget that Walters says is available to purchase the Bibles, and the outgoing chair of the House Appropriations and Budget education subcommittee is wondering the same thing.

“It was not in any appropriation or even mentioned in any budget request," said state Rep. Mark McBride (R-Moore).

Walters announced the Bible mandate in June “as an instructional support into the curriculum” for grades 5-12, and he asked for $3 million on Sept. 26 to purchase them for classrooms as part of his fiscal year 2026 budget request to the Oklahoma Legislature.

“We have talked about ensuring that our history courses include the role the Bible played throughout American history,” Walters said. “We’ve talked about the efforts of left-wing groups and the teachers’ unions to drive the Bible out of school. I believe it’s important for historical context for our kids to understand the role the Bible played.”


Some of the superintendent's critics believe that Walters is angling for a cabinet position if Trump wins re-election, and he has been outspoken in his support for the former president in his frequent appearances in conservative media.

“We are going to be so proud here in Oklahoma to be the first state in the country to bring the Bible back to every single classroom and every state should be doing this," Walters said in one interview this week. "President Trump praised our efforts. President Trump has been the leader on this issue.”
'No money is being stolen': CNN's Pamela Brown slaps down Trump disaster aid claims

Brad Reed
RAW STORY
October 4, 2024 

Pamela Brown (Screen cap via CNN)

CNN's Pamela Brown on Friday slapped down false claims being peddled by former President Donald Trump about disaster relief funds being "stolen" and given to undocumented immigrants.

Brown began by playing a clip of Trump at a campaign rally in which he said, "They stole the money just like they stole it from a bank so they could give it to their illegal immigrants that they want to have vote for them in this year's election."

After playing the clip, Brown wasted no time shredding the latest false Trump claim.

"One: It is illegal for undocumented immigrants to vote in presidential elections," she began. "Two: Congress appropriates funds for specific purposes. The money allocated to DHS for helping states to house migrants is separate from the money for disasters. No money is being stolen from disaster relief."

ALSO READ: 'Scores of people leave early': Interviews reveal why Trump rallygoers bow out prematurely

Brown then argued that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is telling people it has enough money to pay for relief for Americans suffering in the aftermath of natural disasters and is fully encouraging people to apply for disaster assistance.

Brown then recounted a conversation that she'd had with a government official to demonstrate why these false claims about Hurricane Helene are so dangerous.

"The concern is that if people hear the money is going elsewhere, they may not apply for relief," she said. "This official says people should know there is money available now to help. If you or a loved one needs disaster relief help, you should visit disasterassistance.gov or dial 1-800-621-FEMA."


Watch the video below or at this link.





HANDMAIDS TALE


Pregnancy Criminalization

Woman accused of murder after losing pregnancy tells her story

Lauren Sausser, KFF Health News
October 4, 2024 

Amari Marsh of Orangeburg, South Carolina, was charged with murder/homicide by child abuse three months after losing her pregnancy in 2023. A grand jury cleared her of that charge in August. (Sam Wolfe for KFF Health News)


ORANGEBURG, S.C. — Amari Marsh had just finished her junior year at South Carolina State University in May 2023 when she received a text message from a law enforcement officer.

“Sorry it has taken this long for paperwork to come back,” the officer wrote. “But I finally have the final report, and wanted to see if you and your boyfriend could meet me Wednesday afternoon for a follow up?”

Marsh understood that the report was related to a pregnancy loss she’d experienced that March, she said. During her second trimester, Marsh said, she unexpectedly gave birth in the middle of the night while on a toilet in her off-campus apartment. She remembered screaming and panicking and said the bathroom was covered in blood.

“I couldn’t breathe,” said Marsh, now 23.

The next day, when Marsh woke up in the hospital, she said, a law enforcement officer asked her questions. Then, a few weeks later, she said, she received a call saying she could collect her daughter’s ashes.

At that point, she said, she didn’t know she was being criminally investigated. Yet three months after her loss, Marsh was charged with murder/homicide by child abuse, law enforcement records show. She spent 22 days at the Orangeburg-Calhoun Regional Detention Center, where she was initially held without bond, facing 20 years to life in prison.


This August, 13 months after she was released from jail to house arrest with an ankle monitor, Marsh was cleared by a grand jury. Her case will not proceed to trial.

Her story raises questions about the state of reproductive rights in this country, disparities in health care, and pregnancy criminalization, especially for Black women like Marsh. More than two years after the U.S. Supreme Court issued its Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which allowed states to outlaw abortion, the climate around these topics remains highly charged.

Marsh’s case also highlights what’s at stake in November. Sixty-one percent of voters want Congress to pass a federal law restoring a nationwide right to abortion, according to a recent poll by KFF, the health policy research, polling, and news organization that includes KFF Health News. These issues could shape who wins the White House and controls Congress, and will come to a head for voters in the 10 states where ballot initiatives about abortion will be decided.


Current Mississippi law bans abortions “except in the case where necessary for the preservation of the mother’s life” or where the pregnancy was caused by rape and reported to law enforcement. Doctors who perform abortions outside of those parameters face up to 10 years in prison, in addition to the loss of their license.

OB-GYNs in the state told Mississippi Today the lack of clarity around the law worries them. Life-threatening conditions during pregnancy often occur on a spectrum and can develop over time – calling into question what does and does not constitute a threat to the life of the mother, one Jackson area physician told Mississippi Today after the Dobbs ruling in 2022.

The South Carolina case shows how pregnancy loss is being criminalized around the country, said U.S. Rep. James Clyburn, a Democrat whose congressional district includes Orangeburg, and an alumnus of the same university Marsh was attending.


“This is not a slogan when we talk about this being an ‘election about the restoration of our freedoms,’” Clyburn said.
‘I Was Scared’

When Marsh took an at-home pregnancy test in November 2022, the positive result scared her. “I didn’t know what to do. I didn’t want to let my parents down,” she said. “I was in a state of shock.”


She didn’t seek prenatal care, she said, because she kept having her period. She thought the pregnancy test might have been wrong.

An incident report filed by the Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Office on the day she lost the pregnancy stated that in January 2023 Marsh made an appointment at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Columbia to “take the Plan-C pill which would possibly cause an abortion to occur.” The report doesn’t specify whether she took — or even obtained — the drug.

During an interview at her parents’ house, Marsh denied going to Planned Parenthood or taking medicine to induce abortion.


“I’ve never been in trouble. I’ve never been pulled over. I’ve never been arrested,” Marsh said. “I never even got written up in school.”

Zipporah Sumpter, Amari Marsh, Herman Marsh, and Regina Marsh at the Marshes’ home in Orangeburg, South Carolina. Herman and Regina Marsh hired Sumpter, an attorney, the same day their daughter Amari was arrested in 2023. The college student was charged with murder/homicide by child abuse after losing a pregnancy. A grand jury cleared her in August. (Sam Wolfe for KFF Health News)

She played clarinet as section leader in the marching band and once performed at Carnegie Hall. In college, she was majoring in biology and planned to become a doctor.


South Carolina state Rep. Seth Rose, a Democrat in Columbia and one of Marsh’s attorneys, called it a “really tragic” case. “It’s our position that she lost a child through natural causes,” he said.

On Feb. 28, 2023, Marsh said, she experienced abdominal pain that was “way worse” than regular menstrual cramps. She went to the emergency room, investigation records show, but left after several hours without being treated. Back at home, she said, the pain grew worse. She returned to the hospital, this time by ambulance.

Hospital staffers crowded around her, she said, and none of them explained what was happening to her. Bright lights shone in her face. “I was scared,” she said.


According to the sheriff’s department report, hospital staffers told Marsh that she was pregnant and that a fetal heartbeat could be detected. Freaked out and confused, she chose to leave the hospital a second time, she said, and her pain had subsided.

In the middle of the night, she said, the pain started again. She woke up, she recalled, feeling an intense urge to use the bathroom. “And when I did, the child came,” she said. “I screamed because I was scared, because I didn’t know what was going on.”

Her boyfriend at the time called 911. The emergency dispatcher “kept telling me to take the baby out” of the toilet, she recalled. “I couldn’t because I couldn’t even keep myself together.”


First medical responders detected signs of life and tried to perform lifesaving measures as they headed to Regional Medical Center in Orangeburg, the incident report said. But at the hospital, Marsh learned that her infant, a girl, had not survived.

“I kept asking to see the baby,” she said. “They wouldn’t let me.”

The following day, a sheriff’s deputy told Marsh in her hospital room that the incident was under investigation but said that Marsh “was currently not in any trouble,” according to the report. Marsh responded that “she did not feel as though she did anything wrong.”


More than 10 weeks later, nothing about the text messages she received from an officer in mid-May implied that the follow-up meeting about the final report was urgent.

“Oh it doesn’t have to be Wednesday, it can be next week or another week,” the officer wrote in an exchange that Marsh shared with KFF Health News. “I just have to meet with y’all in person before I can close the case out. I am so sorry”

“No problem I understand,” Marsh wrote back.

She didn’t tell her parents or consider hiring a lawyer. “I didn’t think I needed one,” she said.

Marsh arranged to meet the officer on June 2, 2023. During that meeting, she was arrested. Her boyfriend was not charged.

Her father, Herman Marsh, the band director at a local public school in Orangeburg, thought it was a bad joke until reality set in. “I told my wife, I said, ‘We need to get an attorney now.’”

Herman and Regina Marsh at their home in Orangeburg, South Carolina. The Marshes’ daughter Amari experienced a pregnancy loss last year during her junior year in college and was later charged with murder/homicide by child abuse. While Amari was cleared of the charge in August, the Marsh family is still processing the ordeal. (Sam Wolfe for KFF Health News)


Pregnancy Criminalization


When Marsh lost her pregnancy on March 1, 2023, women in South Carolina could still obtain an abortion until 20 weeks beyond fertilization, or the gestational age of 22 weeks.

Later that spring, South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature passed a ban that prohibits providers from performing abortions after fetal cardiac activity can be detected, with some exceptions made for cases of rape, incest, or when the mother’s life is in jeopardy. That law does not allow criminal penalties for women who seek or obtain abortions.

Solicitor David Pascoe, a Democrat elected to South Carolina’s 1st Judicial Circuit whose office handled Marsh’s prosecution, said the issues of abortion and reproductive rights weren’t relevant to this case.

“It had nothing to do with that,” he told KFF Health News.

The arrest warrant alleges that not moving the infant from the toilet at the urging of the dispatcher was ultimately “a proximate cause of her daughter’s death.” The warrant also cites as the cause of death “respiratory complications” due to a premature delivery stemming from a maternal chlamydia infection. Marsh said she was unaware of the infection until after the pregnancy loss.

Pascoe said the question raised by investigators was whether Marsh failed to render aid to the infant before emergency responders arrived at the apartment, he said. Ultimately, the grand jury decided there wasn’t probable cause to proceed with a criminal trial, he said. “I respect the grand jury’s opinion.”

Marsh’s case is a “prime example of how pregnancy loss can become a criminal investigation very quickly,” said Dana Sussman, senior vice president of Pregnancy Justice, a nonprofit that tracks such cases. While similar cases predate the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, she said, they seem to be increasing.

“The Dobbs decision unleashed and empowered prosecutors to look at pregnant people as a suspect class and at pregnancy loss as a suspicious event,” she said.

Local and national anti-abortion groups seized on Marsh’s story when her name and mug shot were published online by The Times and Democrat of Orangeburg. Holly Gatling, executive director of South Carolina Citizens for Life, wrote a blog post about Marsh titled, in part, “Orangeburg Newborn Dies in Toilet” that was published by National Right to Life. Gatling and National Right to Life did not respond to interview requests.

Marsh said she made the mistake of googling herself when she was released from jail.

“It was heartbreaking to see all those things,” she said. “I cried so many times.”

Amari Marsh tears up during an interview. She was jailed without bond for 22 days, then placed under house arrest for more than a year, before being cleared of a charge of murder/homicide by child abuse after losing a pregnancy at home in 2023. Marsh says she is still processing how the ordeal has changed her life. (Sam Wolfe for KFF Health News)

Some physicians are also afraid of being painted as criminals. The nonprofit Physicians for Human Rights published a report on Sept. 17 about Florida’s six-week abortion ban that included input from two dozen doctors, many of whom expressed fear about the criminal penalties imposed by the law.

“The health care systems are afraid,” said Michele Heisler, medical director for the nonprofit. “There’s all these gray areas. So everyone is just trying to be extra careful. Unfortunately, as a result, patients are suffering.”

Chelsea Daniels, a family medicine doctor who works for Planned Parenthood in Miami and performs abortions, said that in early September she saw a patient who had a miscarriage during the first trimester of her pregnancy. The patient had been to four hospitals and brought in the ultrasound scans performed at each facility.

“No one would touch her,” Daniels said. “Each ultrasound scan she brought in represents, on the other side, a really terrified doctor who is doing their best to interpret the really murky legal language around abortion care and miscarriage management, which are the same things, essentially.”

Florida is one of the 10 states with a ballot measure related to abortion in November, although it is the only Southern state with one. Others are Montana, Missouri, and Maryland.

‘I Found My Strength’

Zipporah Sumpter, one of Marsh’s lawyers, said the law enforcement system treated her client as a criminal instead of a grieving mother. “This is not a criminal matter,” Sumpter said.

It was not just the fraught climate around pregnancy that caused Marsh to suffer; “race definitely played a factor,” said Sumpter, who does not believe Marsh received compassionate care when she went to the hospital the first or second time.

Zipporah Sumpter, Amari Marsh’s attorney, says law enforcement treated her client as a criminal instead of a grieving mother. “This is not a criminal matter,” Sumpter says. (Sam Wolfe for KFF Health News)

The management of Regional Medical Center, where Marsh was treated, changed shortly after her hospitalization. The hospital is now managed by the Medical University of South Carolina, and its spokesperson declined to comment on Marsh’s case.

Historically, birth outcomes for Black women in Orangeburg County, where Marsh lost her pregnancy, have ranked among the worst in South Carolina. From 2020 through 2022, the average mortality rate for Black infants born in Orangeburg County was more than three times as high as the average rate for white infants statewide.

Today, Marsh is still trying to process all that happened. She moved back in with her parents and is seeing a therapist. She is taking classes at a local community college and hopes to reenroll at South Carolina State University to earn a four-year degree. She still wants to become a doctor. She keeps her daughter’s ashes on a bookshelf in her bedroom.

“Through all of this, I found my strength. I found my voice. I want to help other young women that are in my position now and will be in the future,” she said. “I always had faith that God was going to be on my side, but I didn’t know how it was going to go with the justice system we have today.”

KFF Health News Florida correspondent Daniel Chang contributed to this article. KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Mississippi Today's Kate Royals contributed to this report.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.



Trump dumps on overtime — but his Ohio supporters won’t comment


Marty Schladen, Ohio Capital Journal
October 4, 2024

Bernie Moreno for U.S. Senate campaign

ERIE, Pa. — As he does during rallies, on Sunday former President Donald Trump talked about a lot of things. He said nobody knows what a Marxist is. He claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris wants to legalize fentanyl. And he said that American cities have been taken over by “migrant gangs and criminal thugs.”

None of those claims is remotely true. But then Trump said something that sounded like it was: That he hated paying overtime and that he didn’t do it.

As Trump tries to attract the blue collar votes he needs to win, it seems counterproductive to disparage an 86-year-old law that for some workers can make the difference between paying the rent and being evicted.

Two of his most prominent allies in Ohio, vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance and Republican U.S. Senate candidate Bernie Moreno, aren’t talking about Trump’s comments. A spokesman for the Democrat Moreno is challenging, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, pointed to what he said was the senator’s long record of protecting and trying to expand overtime.

Trump is notorious for stiffing people who work for him. They include undocumented workers at his golf courses.

In Erie on Sunday, Trump also bragged about not paying overtime, even though it’s required under federal law.

“I know a lot about overtime,” Trump said. “I’d hated they give overtime. I hated it. I’d get other people, I shouldn’t say this, but I’d get other people in. I wouldn’t pay. I hate it.”



Overtime — the requirement that employers pay 150% of workers’ base pay for every hour over 40 worked in a week — was created in 1938 as part of the Fair Labor Standards Act. It applies to all blue collar workers, which the U.S. Department of Labor defines as “workers who perform work involving repetitive operations with their hands, physical skill and energy.”


But over the past 40 years the labor force has shifted dramatically away from jobs that meet that definition, and many of those working in other ways have lost their overtime rights.


Exempted from overtime requirements are jobs that consist mostly of clerical or computer work. The only exception was for those who until July made less than $36,000 a year.

The percentage of salaried workers covered by overtime pay requirements dropped from 60% in 1975 to about 15% now. That means the average such worker is losing almost $18,000 a year that he or she otherwise would have been making, Time Magazine reported in 2022.





During Tuesday night’s vice presidential debate, Vance again made much of his family’s working-class roots. But a spokesman didn’t respond when asked whether the Ohiosenator “hated” overtime the way his billionaire running mate did.

Also not responding was Moreno, a Cleveland businessman whose net worth is estimated at between $38 million and $173 million. The GOP Senate candidate and Trump supporter has issues of his own when it comes to paying his employees overtime.

He was sued in 2017 by a Massachusetts employee who claimed that Moreno refused to pay him overtime compensation he had earned. Moreno testified in the case that he shredded monthly overtime records.


Brown, the senator Moreno is challenging, is a longtime supporter of bolstering overtime requirements, his office said.

Last year he introduced the Restoring Overtime Pay Act of 2023, which he said would increase the portion of salaried workers eligible for overtime from 15% to 55%. And this year the Labor Department adopted Brown’s plan to increase the salary threshold below which overtime would be required from $36,000 to $44,000 in July, $59,000 on Jan. 1, and update every three years after 2027.

However, unlike a law passed by Congress, Labor Department rules can be undone by a new administration.














Ohio Capital Journal is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Ohio Capital Journal maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor David Dewitt for questions: info@ohiocapitaljournal.com. Follow Ohio Capital Journal on Facebook and X.


TEAMSTERS FOR TRUMP (SIC)

Trump campaign hands out signs with white supremacist slogan at rally

David Edwards
October 3, 2024 

RSBN/screen grab

Former President Donald Trump's campaign distributed signs with a phrase often used by white supremacists.

Before Trump spoke in Saginaw, Michigan, Thursday, campaign staff could be seen handing out pre-printed signs with the words "Reclaim America."

"You've got to put on a great show today, and the president will recognize your efforts," Michigan GOP Chair Pete Hoekstra said as the signs were distributed.


As CNN noted, white supremacist members of the Patriot Front recently carried a banner with the same slogan while shouting "Sieg Heil" and "Deportation saves the nation" at a rally in Nashville.

The group was also seen using a similar banner at a 2021 rally in Washington, D.C.

Trump has previously used the slogan during events with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.

Supercharged storms: how climate change amplifies cyclones

Agence France-Presse
October 3, 2024 

A drone view shows a damaged area following the passing of Hurricane Helene, in Lake Lure, North Carolina, US, October 1, 2024. © Marco Bello, Reuters

From Hurricane Helene to Typhoon Yagi, powerful storms are battering the globe, and scientists warn that a warming planet is amplifying their destructive force to unprecedented levels.

Here's what the latest research reveals about how climate change is supercharging tropical cyclones -- the generic term for both weather phenomenon.

- Packing more punch -


First, the basics: warmer ocean surfaces release more water vapor, providing additional energy for storms, which intensifies their winds. A warming atmosphere also allows them to hold more water, boosting heavy rainfall.

"On average, the destructive potential of hurricanes has increased about 40 percent due to the 1 degrees Celsius (roughly 2 degrees Fahrenheit) warming that has already taken place," Michael Mann, a climatologist at University of Pennsylvania, told AFP.

In a recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Mann added his voice to calls for the Saffir-Simpson scale to be expanded to include a "new class of monster storms" -- Category 6, where sustained winds exceed 192 miles per hour (308 kph).

According to experts, climate change set the stage for Helene, which peaked as a Category 4 hurricane.

"The oceanic heat content was at a record level, providing plenty of fuel and potential for a storm like this to gain strength and become a large and very damaging storm," David Zierden, Florida's state climatologist, told AFP.

- Rapid intensification -

"Rapid intensification," defined as a hurricane speeding up by 30 knots within a 24-hour period, is also becoming more common.

"If intensification happens very close to the coast in the lead up to landfall, it can have a huge effect, which you saw last week in the case of Helene," Karthik Balaguru, a climate scientist at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, told AFP.

Balaguru was the lead author on a paper this year in journal Earth's Future that used decades of satellite data to show "a robust increase in the rates at which storms intensified close to the coast, and this is across the world."


The explanation is two-fold.


Warming climate patterns are reducing wind shear -- changes in wind speed and direction with height -- along both the Atlantic Coast of North America and the Pacific Coast of Asia.

"When you have strong wind shear, it tends to tear apart the core of the storm," explained Balaguru.


Climate change is also driving higher humidity along coastlines compared to the open ocean.

This is likely due to a thermal gradient created as land heats faster than water, causing changes in pressure and wind circulation that push moisture into the mid-troposphere where storms can access it. More data is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Additionally, rising sea levels -- about a foot over the past century -- mean cyclones are now operating from a higher baseline, amplifying storm surges, said Zierden.


- How often? -


While the impact of climate change on how often cyclones happen is still an active area of research, studies suggest it can either increase or decrease frequency, depending on the region.

Particle pollution generated by industry, vehicles, and the energy sector blocks sunlight, partially offsetting the warming effects of greenhouse gases.


In a Science Advances paper, Hiroyuki Murakami, a physical scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, found that particle emissions from the US and Europe peaked around 1980, and their decline leading to a rise in hurricane frequency in the Atlantic.

Conversely, in Asia, high pollution levels in China and India may be suppressing more frequent storm in the western Pacific, Murakami told AFP.

Another study he led found that human activity has increased tropical cyclone activity off Japan’s coast, raising the risk of rare precipitation events in the country's west through frontal rainbands—even when the storms themselves don’t make landfall.


This year's North Atlantic hurricane season was initially projected to be highly active. However, various meteorological factors created a lull from August through September, according to Zierden and Murakami.

Now, though "we've seen a dramatic ramp-up over the past week," said Mann. With hurricane season running until November 30, we're not in the clear yet, he stressed.


Amadeo Bordiga. Murder of the Dead. Page 2. In Italy, we have long experience of "catastrophes that strike the country" and we also have a certain ...