Friday, October 11, 2024

Obama blasts men for finding 'all kinds of excuses' to avoid voting for a female president

Noah Bierman
Thu, October 10, 2024 

Former President Obama speaks during a campaign event for Kamala Harris in Pittsburgh on Thursday. (Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images)


Former President Obama joined the campaign trail for the final stretch Thursday with some "truths" for men, especially Black men, who he said were not delivering the enthusiasm for Vice President Kamala Harris that they did when he was running for president.

He told a group of campaign volunteers in Pittsburgh they have "a choice that is clear" between someone who "grew up like you, knows you," understands the same struggles and triumphs and has concrete proposals to make life better, and "someone who has consistently shown disregard, not just for the communities, but for you as a person.”

Obama said he had a problem with men who are "coming up with all kinds of excuses" to sit out the election or vote for former President Trump.


“Part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren't feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you're coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that,” he said.

Read more: Harris and Trump campaigns are targeting Black men, but many say they feel neglected

He said it was not acceptable that some men are “thinking about sitting out or supporting somebody who has a history of denigrating you, because you think that’s a sign of strength, because that’s what being a man is? Putting women down?”

The comments underscore the urgency Democrats are feeling in an election that remains a virtual toss-up with less than a month to go. Pennsylvania is the biggest of seven battleground states that are neck and neck in the polls and likely to decide the election.

The same polls show Harris with a wide lead among female voters but at a deficit with Trump among men. Harris is overwhelming ahead with Black men but Trump has been courting them, and polls suggest Harris has work to do to motivate them to come to the polls. Their impact could be especially large in Pennsylvania and Georgia, where both campaigns are making concerted efforts to appeal to them.

Trump may not have helped his own case Thursday when, speaking in Detroit, he disparaged the majority-Black city.

"Our whole country will end up being like Detroit if she's elected president," Trump said at the Detroit Economic Club, speaking of Harris. "We're not going to let her do that to this country."

Speaking to reporters at the Las Vegas airport Thursday, Harris called out Trump's comment. "It is great to be back in Las Vegas. ... By contrast, my opponent, Donald Trump, has yet again trashed another great American city, Detroit."

Trump's remarks echoed his labeling of Haiti and African nations as "shithole countries" during a 2018 White House meeting with a bipartisan group of lawmakers. He has also falsely accused Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, of stealing cats and dogs to eat them.

Read more: Kamala Harris was hailed as ‘the female Barack Obama.’ It built credibility, and a burden

Obama did not reference those comments directly. But when he spoke for 45 minutes Thursday night at a large rally in Pittsburgh, he devoted most of his speech to the contrast between the two candidates' personal qualities.

"It's not just about policies that are on the ballot," Obama said. "It is about values and it is about character."

Obama touted Harris' stances on abortion, the Affordable Care Act and economic programs designed to help low-income people buy homes. He portrayed Trump as an old rich guy who complained and cared only about lowering taxes for people like himself and cast blame for all of the nation's problems on immigrants. He eviscerated the former president for lying to victims of the recent hurricanes about the federal government's efforts to deliver relief.

"If you had a family member who acted like that, you might still love him, but you'd tell him, 'You got a problem,'" Obama said. "And you wouldn't put him in charge of anything."

"And yet, when Donald Trump lies or cheats or shows utter disregard for our Constitution, when he calls POWs losers or fellow citizens vermin, people make excuses for it," Obama continued. "They think it's OK. They think, well, at least he's, he's owning the libs."

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.


Obama Roasts Trump for Everything From Selling Bibles to Needing a Diaper at Pittsburgh Rally | Video

Sharon Knolle
Thu, October 10, 2024 



Barack Obama laid into fellow former President Donald Trump so thoroughly on Thursday that more than one X user quipped, “I’d like to report a murder.

Obama, speaking at a rally in Pittsburgh, ticked off a long list of reasons why voters should reject Trump and vote for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris next month.

He disparaged “the constant attempts to sell you stuff” including gold sneakers, a $100,000 watch and the Trump Bible. “Who does that?” asked Obama with an incredulous shrug.

“You know, he wants you to buy the word of God, Donald Trump edition. Got his name right there next to Matthew and Luke,” he said of Trump’s “God Bless the USA Bibles,” which, it was reported this week, were printed in China. They are priced at $59.99 each.



The 44th president continued to blast the 45th, recalling his shock at finding out how much diapers cost after his oldest daughter Malia was born. “Do you think Donald Trump ever changed a diaper?,” he asked about the father of five.

One attendee shouted, “His own!”

Obama admitted with a laugh, “I almost said that, but I decided I should not say it.”

Trump was dubbed “Diaper Don” by the media in 2020 over reports that he wore adult diapers while filming the reality competition “The Apprentice.”

Trump supporters not only shrugged at the suggestion when it resurfaced during Trump’s tax fraud trial earlier this year, but proudly began wearing the absorbent underwear themselves at campaign events and carrying signs that read “real men wear diapers.”

Obama also blasted Trump for taking credit for the state of the economy when he took office in 2021. “I remember that economy when he first came in being pretty good. Yeah, it was pretty good, because it was my economy. It wasn’t something he did. I spent eight years cleaning up the mess that the Republicans had left me,” he said.

Watch a clip from the rally in the video above, and click through to @Acyn’s X account for more.

The post Obama Roasts Trump for Everything From Selling Bibles to Needing a Diaper at Pittsburgh Rally | Video appeared first on TheWrap.


Donald Trump Goes to Detroit and Insults the Entire City

Mini Racker
Thu, October 10, 2024 

Donald Trump on Thursday addressed business leaders in Detroit, where he insulted their city and big companies.

“You want to know the truth?” Trump told members of the Detroit Economic Club as he painted a picture of what his opponent would do to America. “It’ll be like Detroit. Our whole country will end up being like Detroit if she’s your president. You’re going to have a mess on your hands.”

Audience members clapped when Trump said he wouldn’t allow Kamala Harris to make the rest of the country mirror their hometown, suggesting that, at least among his fans, Trump’s comments weren’t too off base.

The former president has insulted Democratic-leaning urban areas before, especially by claiming they are hotspots of voter fraud. But three weeks before the election in a crucial swing state, the derision of the city was shocking.

Michigan Democrats hit back. Hard.

“I represent Detroit in Congress,” Rep. Shri Thanedar posted on X. “Detroit is a city with a booming economy, diverse culture, and some of the best people in America. Donald Trump: keep Detroit and our people out of your mouth. We will elect Kamala Harris.”

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer also attacked Trump's election-eve insult against Michigan's Motor City.



Trump and Harris are locked in a razor-thin race in the state, with Harris just slightly ahead in the polls. The Great Lakes is part of the “blue wall,” which will be key to winning the presidency. The former president won the state by a tiny margin in 2016, but lost in 2020.

On Thursday, Trump sought to change that narrative by positioning himself as Detroit’s savior—if it would only vote for him. In particularly brutal language, he emphasized that he would be the one to ensure the U.S. makes better trade deals to rein in big, powerful companies “outside of our world.”

“We allowed them to come in and raid and rape our country,” Trump said, mockingly adding, “Oh, he used the word rape.’ That’s right, I used the word rape.”

For emphasis he repeated, “They RAPED our country.”
Opinion

New York Times Faces Backlash After Sanitizing Trump Eugenics Claim

Paige Oamek
Thu, October 10, 2024

The New York Times has taken the mainstream media’s sanewashing of Donald Trump to the next level, this time with an innocuous-sounding headline: “Trump’s Remarks on Migrants Illustrate His Obsession With Genes.”

The headline and corresponding article, published Wednesday evening, are actually obfuscating a far darker reality: Trump’s obsession with eugenics.

Speaking on conservative radio on Monday, Trump went on an incredibly racist rant about bloodlines while speaking about immigrants. “You know, now a murderer, I believe this, it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now. They left, they had 425,000 people come into our country that shouldn’t be here, that are criminals.”

But the paper of record minimized the true horror of that comment, summarizing that Trump was “invoking his long-held fascination with genes and genetics.”

The Times received plenty of flack online for its whitewashing of the Republican nominee’s dangerous lies about immigrants and his white supremacist rhetoric.

Twitter screenshot Clara Jeffery @ClaraJeffery: Just call it eugenics, @nytimes. Screenshot of NYT article

Twitter screenshot Maya May @mayaonstage: Hey @nytimes did “fascism” autocorrect to “fascination”? Fix your settings. Quote tweet Maya Contreras @mayatcontreras: Hi @nytimes , this is insane. Donald Trump is literally talking about eugenics and ethic cleaning. What the f—- are you doing? This isn’t just sanewashing, this is *white*washing.More

Twitter screenshot Joyce Carol Oates @JoyceCarolOates: "In remarks about 'life unworthy of life,' Adolf Hitler invoked his long-held fascination with genes & genetics; in building ambitious extermination camps, Adolf invoked his long-held fascination with architecture." #NYTRacist-Washing Quote tweet Mark Jacob @MarkJacob16: This New York Times headline makes it seem as if Trump has a deep intellectual curiosity about genetics instead of stating the obvious fact that he’s simply a racist.More

Several paragraphs in the Times article mentioned Trump’s remark last year about immigrants “poisoning the blood of our country,” with the article’s author calling it “a phrase criticized by many for evoking the ideology of eugenics promulgated by Nazis.” The author then discussed the role of the eugenics movement in politics in the past, without acknowledging its role in the present

As Trump vows to enforce “bloody” mass deportations in a second term, what’s the point of painting his racist “bad genes” comments as benign?

Sanewashing? The banality of crazy? A decade into the Trump era, media hasn't figure him out

DAVID BAUDER
Wed, October 9, 2024


FILE - Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump arrives to speak during a campaign rally at Dodge County Airport, Sunday, Oct. 6, 2024, in Juneau, Wis. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File)


NEW YORK (AP) — Nearly a decade into the Trump Era of politics, less than a month from his third Election Day as the Republican candidate for president and there is still remarkably little consensus within the media about how best to cover Donald Trump.

Are reporters “sanewashing” Trump, or are they succumbing to the “banality of crazy?" Should his rallies be aired at length, or not at all? To fact-check or not fact-check?

“If it wasn't so serious, I would just be fascinated by all of it,” said Parker Molloy, media critic and author of The Present Age column on Substack. “If it didn't have to do with who is going to be president, I would watch this and marvel at how difficult it is to cover one person who seems to challenge all of the rules of journalism.”


Books and studies will be written about Trump and the press long after he is gone. He's always been press-conscious and press-savvy, even as a celebrity builder in Manhattan who took a keen interest in what tabloid gossip columns said about him. Most issues stem from Trump's disdain for constraints, his willingness to say the outrageous and provably untrue, and for his fans to believe him instead of those reporting on him.

It has even come full circle, where some experts now think the best way to cover him is to give people a greater opportunity to hear what he says — the opposite of what was once conventional wisdom.

‘Sanewashing’ creates an alternative narrative, some say

Molloy first used the phrase “sanewashing” this fall to describe a tendency among journalists to launder some of Trump's wilder or barely coherent statements to make them seem like the cogent pronouncements of a typical politician. One example she cites: CNN distilling a Trump post on Truth Social that rambled on about the “radical left” and “fake news” into a straight news lead about the former president agreeing to debate his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris.

At its best, polishing Trump creates an alternative narrative, she said. At its worst, it's misinformation.

During a Wisconsin rally the last weekend of September, Trump talked of danger from criminals allowed in the country illegally. “They will walk into your kitchen, they'll cut your throat,” he said. The New Republic writer Michael Tomasky was surprised not to find the quote in The New York Times' and Washington Post's coverage, although The Times noted that Trump vilified undocumented immigrants, and there were other media references to what Trump himself called a dark speech.

“Trump constantly saying extreme, racist violent stuff can't always be new,” Tomasky wrote. “But it is always reality. Is the press justified in ignoring reality just because it isn't new?”

One likely reason the remark didn't get that much attention is because Trump — at the same rally — referred to Harris without evidence as “mentally disabled.”

That comment merited quick mention on the ABC and CBS evening newscasts the next day, in the context of criticism from two fellow Republicans, and after stories about Hurricane Helene's devastation and war in the Middle East. NBC's “Nightly News” didn't bring it up at all.

In other words, Trump said something wild. What's new? More than sanewashing, political scientist Brian Klaas calls that the banality of crazy, where journalists become accustomed to things Trump says that would be shocking coming from other candidates simply because they're numbed to it.

It's a hard fit for a daily news cycle

Illuminating reporting on Trump rarely fits the model of quick news stories that sum up daily developments. “This really serves the small group of news consumers that we would call news junkies, who follow the campaign day to day,” said Kelly McBride, senior vice president of the Poynter Institute, a journalism think tank. “But it doesn't help people decide how to vote, or understand the candidate better.”

Trump critics often complain about how the nation's leading news outlets cover him. But they sometimes overlook attempts to bring perspective to issues they're concerned with. The Times, for example, used a computer to compare his speeches now with older ones in a story Sunday, and similarly had a Sept. 9 examination of questions about Trump's age and mental capacity. The Post has written about how Trump doesn't mention his father's Alzheimer's Disease as he attacks others about mental capacity, and distortions about a cognitive test he took. The Associated Press wrote of Trump's Wisconsin rally that he “shifted from topic to topic so quickly that it was hard to keep track of what he meant at times.”

“Trump is a really difficult figure to cover because he challenges news media processes every day, has for years,” The Times' Maggie Haberman, one of Trump's best-known chroniclers, told NPR last month. “The systems ... were not built to deal with somebody who says things that are not true as often as he does or speaks as incoherently as he often does. I think the media has actually done a good job showing people who he is, what he says, what he does.”

Press critics may instead be frustrated that the work doesn't have the impact they seek. “The people who don't like or are infuriated by him cannot believe his success and would like the press to somehow persuade the people who do like him that they are wrong,” said Tom Rosenstiel, a journalism professor at the University of Maryland. “And the press can't do that.”

Fact-checking is a bone of contention

One of the central issues surrounding the three general election debates was how, or whether, the television networks would fact-check the candidates in real time on the air.

CNN didn't during Trump's debate with President Joe Biden last spring. When ABC's moderators corrected Trump four times during his September debate with Harris, the former president's supporters were infuriated. CBS News sought a middle ground during the vice presidential debate, and learned how hard it is to satisfy everyone.

“F you CBS — how DARE YOU,” Megyn Kelly posted on X when CBS briefly cut JD Vance 's microphone after correcting him on a comment about immigrants. Salon media critic Melanie McFarland wrote that the people best equipped to point out truth “barely rose to that duty.”

The fact-check industry flourished during Trump's years in office, the number of such websites devoted to that duty jumping from 63 in 2016 to 79 in 2020, according to the Duke Reporters' Lab. Yet limitations were also exposed: Republicans demonized the practice, to the point where many Trump supporters either don't believe those who try to referee what's true or false, or don't bother reading. In day-to-day reporting, it's not enough to point out when a politician is wrong, Rosenstiel said. They must clearly explain why.

Journalists, who rarely win popularity contests to begin with, saw their collective reputations plummet under withering attacks from Trump.

In the heady days of 2015, television news networks like CNN showed Trump campaign rallies at length. It was entertaining. It drove ratings. What harm could be done?

Many later regretted that decision. Throughout his presidency and beyond, television outlets that are not Trump-friendly have grappled with the question of how much to show Trump unfiltered, and still haven't fully settled on an answer. CNN shows Trump at rallies on occasion, rarely at length.

But in a back-to-the-future move, some experts now say it's best to let people hear what Trump says. Poynter's McBride praised The 19th for a story on child care when, frustrated by an attempt to clarify Trump's positions with his campaign, the website simply printed a baffling 365-word direct quote from Trump when he was asked about the issue.

While fact checks and context have their place, there's value in presenting Trump in the raw. “Showing Trump at length is not sanewashing,” Rosenstiel said.

Molloy admitted to some surprise at how much traction her original column on sanewashing received. It may reflect a desire to define the undefinable, to figure out what the news media still hasn't been able to after all this time. She notes the politicians who try to emulate Trump but fail.

“They don't have what makes him Donald Trump,” she said. “People can look at it as part of his brilliance and people can look at it as him being crazy. It's probably a little of both.”

___

David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder.

NYT Criticized for Headline ‘Sanewashing’ Trump on Immigrants’ ‘Bad Genes’

Liam Archacki
Thu, October 10, 2024

Brendan McDermid/Reuters


The New York Times drew the ire of journalists for a headline that some said downplayed the outrageousness of comments former President Donald Trump made in which he suggested that immigrants have “bad genes.”

Trump was discussing President Joe Biden’s immigration policy on The Hugh Hewitt Show Monday when he embarked on a eugenics-tinged rant.

“How about allowing people to come through an open border, 13,000 of which were murderers? Many of them murdered far more than one person,” he said. “And they’re now happily living in the United States. You know, now, a murderer—I believe this—it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”

(The figure Trump cited includes data that spans decades, including his administration, the Associated Press reported.)

Trump’s campaign team tried to argue that his comment wasn’t about immigrants, just murderers, but many saw a tie between his words and the rhetoric of avowed white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

The Times’ headline on a story about the comments read, “In remarks about migrants, Donald Trump invoked his long-held fascination with genes and genetics.”

“With the presidential race in its closing weeks, Donald J. Trump’s language has grown increasingly strident on the issue of immigration,” the article’s opening paragraph reads. “But as he continues to demonize undocumented migrants as violent criminals, the former president is also reviving another old habit: invoking his long-held fascination with genes and genetics.”

To many, though, the story’s framing—especially the headline’s wording—failed to capture just how dehumanizing and offensive Trump’s words were.

A former Times reporter, Andrew Revkin, called it “headline lunacy” in a post on X, and tied it to the fact that the massive daily paper ditched its copy desk several years ago.

Mehdi Hasan, a former MSNBC host who founded the news startup Zeteo, in an X post characterized the story as “the sanewashing of Trump.”

The former metropolitan editor of the Chicago Tribune, Marc Jacob, explained in greater detail his gripe with the headline’s accuracy.

“The New York Times headline makes it seem as if Trump has a deep intellectual curiosity about genetics instead of stating the obvious fact that he’s simply a racist,” he wrote in an X post.

As of 5 p.m. on Thursday, the Times appears to have tweaked the headline’s wording after the wave of criticism. It now reads, “Trump’s Remarks on Migrants Illustrate His Obsession With Genes.”

Opinion

Trumps Is Now Threatening All Immigrants, “Illegal” or Not

Edith Olmsted
THE NEW REPUBLIC
Wed, October 9, 2024 at 8:21 AM MDT·2 min read


Donald Trump has taken yet another page out of the fascist handbook and decided that immigrants in the United States with legal status aren’t actually legal.

During an interview Tuesday night on Newsmax, Trump said he didn’t care about what legal processes the Haitian immigrants of Springfield, Ohio, had gone through. They’re still “illegal” to him.

“I mean, look at Springfield where 30,000 illegal immigrants are dropped, and it was—they may have done it through a certain little trick, but they are illegal immigrants as far as I’m concerned. They’re destroying the towns, they’re destroying the whole—they’ll end up destroying the state!” he ranted.


The Haitian immigrants in Springfield are in the country under temporary protected status, which Trump has already pledged to revoke if he is put into office. The Republican presidential nominee’s reckless disregard for legal processes isn’t surprising, but it is alarming, as it widens the field of whom he hopes to displace in his plan to carry out the largest mass deportations in U.S. history. Whether you’re in the country legally or not legally depends entirely on whether you’re a convenient scapegoat for the former president.

Vice presidential nominee JD Vance has also stated that he doesn’t care about the legal status of immigrants. “Well, if Kamala Harris waves the wand illegally, and says these people are now here legally, I’m still going to call them an illegal alien,” Vance said during a campaign event in North Carolina last month. “An illegal action from Kamala Harris does not make an alien legal. That is not how this works.”

Trump has been not-so-subtly increasing the number of Haitian immigrants in Springfield every time he mentions it. In reality, there are between 10,000 and 12,000 Haitian immigrants in Springfield, according to CNN. Using fake numbers, and even faker stories, Trump has repeatedly exaggerated the supposed negative effect of immigrant communities on American cities.
View comments (814)


Ohioans know Trump’s claims about immigrants are false — but they still plan to vote for him

Alex Woodward
Thu, October 10, 2024 

Most voters in Ohio do not believe Donald Trump’s racist falsehood that Haitian immigrants are “eating the pets” of Springfield.

But the Republican presidential candidate is still leading Vice President Kamala Harris by roughly six percentage points in the state, maintaining his lead from his 2016 and 2020 victories, according to polling from The Washington Post.

Roughly 55 percent of Ohio voters, including nearly every Democratic voter in the survey, correctly believe that the debunked viral claim that Haitian immigrants in the state are eating people’s cats and dogs is false.

But 42 percent of Ohio Republicans believe Trump, the poll found. Taken together with the respondents who say they’re “not sure,” that figure is 68 percent.

Law enforcement and city officials in Springfield have firmly rejected the allegation — which was amplified by Trump on the debate stage and by his running mate JD Vance and their allies, dovetailing with Republican campaign promises and inflated claims on immigration and the US-Mexico border.

The claims appeared to fuel death threats as well as hoax bomb threats that temporarily closed schools and city buildings and forced hospitals into lockdown.


An electronic billboard in North Carolina displays a message against Donald Trump referencing his false claims that immigrants in Ohio are eating pets. (REUTERS)

Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican who supports Trump, wrote an op-ed for The New York Times defending the city’s “rich history of providing refuge for the oppressed and being a place of opportunity.”

Haitian immigrants, who are living there legally, have been an economic boon to the city amid a population decline and a depressed business outlook as the city’s labor force dried up, DeWine said.

“As a supporter of former President Donald Trump and Senator JD Vance, I am saddened by how they and others continue to repeat claims that lack evidence and disparage the legal migrants living in Springfield,” DeWine wrote. “This rhetoric hurts the city and its people, and it hurts those who have spent their lives there.”

Trump won the state by roughly eight percentage points in 2016 and 2020 after Democratic candidate Barack Obama carried the state in 2008 and 2012.

Ninety percent of Republican voters in the state plan to vote for Trump in 2024, while 95 percent of Democrats plan to support Harris, according to the poll.

The Washington Post poll also found that the race for Ohio Senate is in a dead heat, with incumbent Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown at 48 percent and his Republican rival Bernie Moreno at 47 percent — within the poll’s margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

Ohio voters don’t back Trump’s false claims about Haitian immigrants, poll says

David Rees
Thu, October 10, 2024



COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Although former President Donald Trump holds an edge over Vice President Kamala Harris in Ohio, a majority of voters in the state do not believe the false claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield are “eating people’s pets,” a new poll shows.

About 57% of Ohio voters said the debunked comments are probably or definitely false, while 24% said Trump’s claim is probably or definitely true, according to a new Washington Post poll that surveyed 1,002 likely Ohio voters. The poll comes after Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, have pushed untrue claims about Haitian immigrants eating cats and dogs in Springfield, even as local officials have said there is no evidence for such claims.

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating — they’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” said Trump during a debate with Harris on Sept. 10.

About 55% of Ohio voters said they back Gov. Mike DeWine’s assertion that Trump’s claim is not true, and that those Haitian immigrants are in the state legally. Still, about 4 in 10 Ohio voters, about 42%, said Haitian immigrants in the state make the communities they live in worse, while 32% said they make them better.

His son died in a crash with a Haitian immigrant. He says Trump, Vance are using it for ‘political gain’

Trump has said he would deport Ohio’s Haitian immigrants if elected, vowing to revoke the migrants’ temporary status that allows them to remain in Springfield legally. Trump said that, in his opinion, “it’s not legal” and that Springfield has “been overrun.”

“Absolutely, I’d revoke it, and I’d bring them back to their country,” Trump said in an interview with NewsNation’s Ali Bradley at a Texas fundraising event. “They’ll receive them. If I bring them back, they’re going to receive them.”

Even through the Springfield controversy, the poll found Trump holds a six-point advantage, 51% to 45%, over Harris among likely Ohio voters, which is similar to his eight-point winning margin over President Biden four years ago. Ohio voters have a more favorable view of Trump, at 47%, compared to an unfavorable rating of 46%. Ohio’s view of Harris is reversed, with an unfavorable rating of 51% compared to 43% favorable.

Vance holds the state’s highest favorable rating at 49%, compared to an unfavorable of 42%. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, holds a favorable view of 42% to an unfavorable of 43%.

Meanwhile, voters are about evenly split in Ohio’s U.S. Senate race, with 48% supporting Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown and 47% supporting Republican Bernie Moreno. Voters said Brown has a lead on handling issues, like abortion, health care and helping the middle class, while Moreno has an edge on immigration, taxes and crime.

Voters prefer Brown to Moreno by 13 points to handle abortion, after Ohio approved a measure last November to establish the right to abortion in the state constitution. Still, Moreno holds an advantage in that 51% of Ohio voters want Republicans to control the U.S. Senate, compared to 42% who wants Democrats to control the chamber.

Brown is more popular than Moreno, with 45% rating the Democratic senator favorably and 42% unfavorably. Moreno’s image is underwater, with 37% favorable and 46% unfavorable. The poll also found that Black voters in Ohio favor Brown by 72% to 24% for Moreno, similar to Harris’s margin over Trump, 70% to 24%.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 

Most in Ohio survey say baseless Trump claim that immigrants are eating pets is false

Tara Suter
Thu, October 10, 2024 




Most in a new Ohio survey from The Washington Post said baseless claims about immigrants eating pets are false.


Fifty-seven percent of registered voters in the Buckeye State labeled a claim by former President Trump that “Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are eating people’s pets” as “definitely false” or “probably false.” About 24 percent labeled the claim as “definitely true” or “probably true.”

The false claim came into the national spotlight during last month’s presidential debate between Trump and Vice President Harris, with the former president stating that Haitian migrants are “eating the dogs” in the Ohio city.

“What they have done to our country by allowing these millions and millions of people to come into our country — and look at what’s happening to the towns [in the] United States, a lot of towns don’t want to talk. Not going to be Aurora [or] Springfield,” the former president said. “A lot of towns don’t want to talk about it because they’re so embarrassed by it. In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs.”

When asked about “Haitian immigrants in Ohio” and how they affect “the communities they live in,” 32 percent of registered voters said they believe they “generally make” the communities they live in “a lot better” or “a little better.” Forty-two percent said they believe Haitian immigrants in their state generally make the communities they live in “a little worse” or “a lot worse.”

The Post poll was conducted Oct. 3-7 with 1,002 Ohio registered voters and has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. T


 

 













Harris-Walz campaign hits the ground running in Arizona

Daniel Herrera Carbajal
Wed, October 9, 2024
ICT

GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY — In a meeting with more than a dozen tribal leaders in the battleground state of Arizona, Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz vowed that a Kamala Harris administration would keep a seat at the table for tribal nations in Washington, D.C.

In a unifying message that touched on the importance of the Native vote, he said the Harris-Walz campaign would build on the gains made by tribal nations over the last four years.

“We are not going back to the way it was,” Walz said, hitting a common theme in the Democratic campaign against former Republican President Donald Trump and his vice presidential nominee, JD Vance.

“I feel it across the Indian Country that people know this is an opportunity to keep this momentum going forward,” he said. “This is an opportunity that many of us have waited lifetimes for, to finally see that we're seeing sovereignty as absolute truth.”

As early in-person voting began Wednesday, Oct. 9, in Arizona, Walz touched on the importance of the so-called “Native Wall” of voters who could help swing the tight race in a state where President Joe Biden beat Trump by a margin of just about 10,500 votes in the 2020 election.




Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz met with a group of tribal leaders on Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2024, at the Gila River Indian Community near Phoenix, Arizona. He told the group a "Native Wall" of votes could help determine the election. (Photo by Daniel Herrera Carbajal/ICT)

Gila River Indian Community Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis joined Tohono O'odham Nation Chairman Verlon Jose and Navajo Nation Vice President Richelle Montoya in greeting Walz, who is currently the governor of Minnesota. Walz then shook hands and spoke with the other tribal leaders and their guests.

Lewis said the “Native Wall” in key battleground states such as Arizona, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina and Michigan could determine the outcome of the election.

“They could be the margin in a lot of these razor-thin races here, up and down the ballot, including the presidency as well,” Lewis said.

Walz also touted the accomplishments of the Biden-Harris administration in working with tribal nations, including the reestablishment of the White House Council on Native American Issues and what he called “the largest investments in tribes that we’ve seen in American history.”

“We work hand-in-hand in that vote that we want to earn,” said Walz, who is currently the governor of Minnesota. “You earn that by policies you put in place.”


Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz talks with Mary Kim Titla, executive director of United National Indian Tribal Youth, Inc., at Walz's meeting with tribal leaders on Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2024, at the Gila River Indian Community, as Gila River Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis, left, looks on. (Photo by Daniel Herrera Carbajal/ICT)More

The gathering Wednesday came amid campaign swings by both the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates through Arizona. Walz continued on from the Gila River community to Tucson, where later Wednesday he and Vance held dueling campaign events.

Vice President Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, is scheduled to hold a rally in Phoenix Thursday, while Trump is set to hold a rally Sunday in the Republican stronghold of Prescott Valley, about 90 miles north of Phoenix.

Campaign officials said the Arizona campaign will be among the most expansive tribal organizing efforts, with events scheduled throughout the state.

Walz reminded tribal leaders Wednesday of the work that has been done across Indian Country by the Biden-Harris administration.

Many of the projects funded over the last four years are already coming to fruition, including the Casa Blanca solar panel project by the Gila River Indian Community, which aims to battle water loss and boost tribal sovereignty by producing its own power.

Walz shifted to his home state of Minnesota, saying he and Minnesota Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan, White Earth Band of Ojibwe, have worked closely with tribal communities. Flanagan would become the nation’s first female Native governor if the Harris-Walz ticket wins election to the White House.

Flanagan and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, Laguna Pueblo, have been campaigning in Arizona for the Harris-Walz campaign.

Walz emphasized the importance of having Native voices at the table and establishing connections with tribal nations.

“If the children of our tribal nations are doing well, everyone's doing well,” Walz said.

Many of the tribal nations represented at the meeting are small nations that often have had little-to-no say in political and economic matters in Indian Country.

Roland Maldonado, chairman of the Kaibab Paiute Tribe, a small nation in northern Arizona, spoke with Walz about rural communities and the indifference historically shown to them.

“It was encouraging, continuing to build on the government-to-government relations, and really understanding the needs of rural communities. and understanding and accepting things that are, you know, historically missing,” Maldonado said. “And he understands the negative impact of that missing component of our history as a country and as individual Native communities.”

Ervin Jackson, president of the Nal-NiSHii Federation of Labor, issued a statement saying the Walz meeting with tribal leaders “once again highlighted the stark contrast” between the presidential tickets.

“Throughout their careers and on the campaign trail, Vice President Harris and Governor Walz have demonstrated deep respect for Indigenous peoples, championing our rights, our sovereignty and our cultural heritage,” said Jackson, who is Áshįįhí (Salt People) born for the Tódích’íi’nii (Bitter Water Clan).

“Trump’s presidency brought land loss, worsened health disparities, and challenges to our sovereignty,” he said in the statement. “Another term under Trump would be devastating.”

Jackson said the union would be reaching out to Indigenous members to spread the word about the Harris-Walz campaign.

The Nal-NiSHii Federation is the only AFL-CIO federated body in the U.S. representing Indigenous families in the Navajo Nation region, including miners, power plant workers and construction workers.

This article contains material from The Associated Press.


Our stories are worth telling. Our stories are worth sharing. Our stories are worth your support. Contribute today to help ICT carry out its critical mission. Sign up for ICT’s free newsletter.

ATOMIC AGE REDUX
Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Japanese organization of atomic bombing survivors Nihon Hidankyo
ARE THERE ANY SURVIVORS LEFT?!

MIKE CORDER and ELENA BECATOROS
Updated Fri, October 11, 2024



The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded Friday to Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese organization of survivors of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, for its activism against nuclear weapons.

Jørgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, said the award was made as the “taboo against the use of nuclear weapons is under pressure.”

In September, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a shift in his country’s nuclear doctrine, in a move aimed at discouraging the West from allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with longer-range weapons. It appeared to significantly lower the threshold for the possible use of Russia’s nuclear arsenal.


 Kazumi Matsui, right, mayor of Hiroshima bows, at Hiroshima Memorial Cenotaph, at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park in Hiroshima, western Japan, Aug. 6, 2015. The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese organization of survivors of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, for its activism against nuclear weapons.
 (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko, File)


Watne Frydnes said the Nobel committee “wishes to honor all survivors who, despite physical suffering and painful memories, have chosen to use their costly experience to cultivate hope and engagement for peace.”

Hidankyo's Hiroshima branch chairperson, Tomoyuki Mimaki, who was standing by at the city hall for the announcement, cheered and teared up when he received the news.

“Is it really true? Unbelievable!” Mimaki screamed.

Efforts to eradicate nuclear weapons have been honored in the past by the Nobel committee. The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons won the peace prize in 2017, and in 1995 Joseph Rotblat and the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs won for “their efforts to diminish the part played by nuclear arms in international politics and, in the longer run, to eliminate such arms.”


This year's prize was awarded against a backdrop of devastating conflicts raging in the world, notably in the Middle East, Ukraine and Sudan.

“It is very clear that threats of using nuclear weapons are putting pressure on the important international norm, the taboo of using nuclear weapons,” Watne Frydnes said in response to a question on whether the rhetoric from Russia surrounding nuclear weapons in its invasion of Ukraine had influenced this year's decision.

“And therefore it is alarming to see how threats of use is also damaging this norm. To uphold an international strong taboo against the use is crucial for all of humanity,” he added.


EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on X that "the spectre of Hiroshima and Nagasaki still looms over humanity. This makes the advocacy of Nihon Hidankyo invaluable. This Nobel Peace Prize sends a powerful message. We have the duty to remember. And an even greater duty to protect the next generations from the horrors of nuclear war.”


Alfred Nobel stated in his will that the peace prize should be awarded for "the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”

Last year’s prize went to jailed Iranian activist Narges Mohammadi for her advocacy of women’s rights and democracy, and against the death penalty. The Nobel committee said it also was a recognition of “the hundreds of thousands of people” who demonstrated against “Iran’s theocratic regime’s policies of discrimination and oppression targeting women.”

In a year of conflict, there had been some speculation before the announcement that the Norwegian Nobel Committee that decides on the winner would opt not to award a prize at all this year. The prize has been withheld a total of 19 times since 1901, including during both world wars. The last time it was not awarded was in 1972.

In the Middle East, persistently spiraling levels of violence over the past year have killed tens of thousands of people, including thousands of children and women. The war, sparked by a bloody raid into Israel by Hamas-led militants on Oct. 7, 2023 that left about 1,200 people dead, mostly civilians, has spilled out into the wider region.

In the past week, Israel sent ground troops into Lebanon to pursue Hezbollah militants firing rockets into Israel, while Iran – which backs both Hamas and Hezbollah – fired a barrage of ballistic missiles into Israel. Israel has yet to respond, but its defense minister vowed this week that its retaliation would be both devastating and surprising.

The war in Gaza has killed more than 42,000 people, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which doesn’t differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count but says more than half are women and children. In Lebanon, more than 1,400 people have been killed, with thousands more injured and around 1 million displaced since mid-September, when the Israeli military dramatically expanded its offensive against Hezbollah.

The war in Ukraine, sparked by Russia’s invasion, is heading toward its third winter with a massive loss of human life on both sides.

The U.N. has confirmed more than 11,000 Ukrainian civilian dead, but that doesn’t take into account as many as 25,000 Ukrainians believed to have died during the Russian capture of the city of Mariupol or unreported deaths in the occupied territories.

The Nobel prizes carry a cash award of 11 million Swedish kronor ($1 million). Unlike the other Nobel prizes that are selected and announced in Stockholm, founder Alfred Nobel decreed the peace prize be decided and awarded in Oslo by the five-member Norwegian Nobel Committee.

The Nobel season ends Monday with the announcement of the winner of the economics prize, formally known as the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.

___

Corder reported from The Hague, Netherlands, and Becatoros from Athens, Greece. Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo, Lori Hinnant in Paris and Vanessa Gera in Warsaw, Poland, contributed.


Reaction to Nihon Hidankyo winning Nobel Peace Prize

Reuters
Fri, October 11, 2024 at 4:10 AM MDT·1 min read
1


Nobel Peace Prize winner 2024

(Reuters) - The Nobel Peace Prize was won by Japanese organisation Nihon Hidankyo, a grassroots movement of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also known as Hibakusha.

Here is reaction to Friday's announcement:

NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE

"The Hibakusha help us to describe the indescribable, to think the unthinkable, and to somehow grasp the incomprehensible pain and suffering caused by nuclear weapons."

NIHON HIDANKYO CO-CHAIR TOSHIYUKI MIMAKI

"(The win) will be a great force to appeal to the world that the abolition of nuclear weapons and everlasting peace can be achieved," he told a news conference in Hiroshima, site of the Aug. 6, 1945 atomic bombing during World War Two.

"Nuclear weapons should absolutely be abolished."

JAPANESE PRIME MINISTER SHIGERU ISHIBA

"It's extremely meaningful that the organisation that has worked toward abolishing nuclear weapons received the Nobel Peace Prize," the prime minister told a press conference in Laos.

PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OSLO

"Nihon Hidankyo's work reminds us of the devastating human cost of nuclear weapons, a message we cannot ignore. In an era where automated weapon systems and AI-driven warfare are emerging, their call for disarmament is not just historical — it is a critical message for our future. This prize highlights the need for global cooperation to steer humanity away from another world war and towards lasting global peace."

(Reporting by Reuters bureaux; Compiled by Alison Williams)













Harris is riding a dream economy into the election. It may be too late for voters to notice.

Politico · Ben Curtis/AP
Victoria Guida
Thu, October 10, 2024 

Annual inflation has fallen to 2.4 percent, its slowest pace since early 2021, signaling that the price spikes that have clouded President Joe Biden’s four-year term are over.

The latest numbers, released on Thursday, add to a solid economic picture that's coming together just weeks before the 2024 election. The question now is whether it’s too late for Vice President Kamala Harris to get credit for it.

The unemployment rate stands at 4.1 percent, the S&P 500 stock index is up more than 20 percent this year, and GDP has been growing at a robust 3 percent pace. Middle-class Americans are more optimistic about their financial future than they were a year ago. And with inflation approaching the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target, Chair Jerome Powell has begun lowering interest rates, providing relief to debt-burdened businesses, credit card holders and potential homebuyers.

But polls still show that Americans trust GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump on the economy more than they do Harris, a sentiment that plagued Biden throughout his presidency.

“While Harris is performing better than Biden was against Trump on handling the economy … being given some benefit of the doubt as a newer candidate, voters still feel that day-to-day costs are expensive and thus there is a limit to how much improvement this news will bring for her,” said Carly Cooperman, a Democratic pollster who is CEO of Schoen Cooperman Research.


But, she added, it certainly doesn’t hurt.

“Poor inflation numbers would have caused a good deal of harm to her at this point, as this is likely to be the most important issue to undecided voters in critical swing states,” she said.

The positive economic picture is a remarkable victory for both Biden and Powell, even as consumers still feel squeezed by higher prices. Last year, economists widely expected that the central bank might cause a recession in its bid to choke off inflation. Instead, the job market has remained resilient and economic growth has not slowed.

Still, according to a NYT/Siena poll, voters still mostly rate the economy as fair or poor. And while Harris has been closing the gap with Trump on who voters trust on the economy, she still trails him, according to the latest polling from Gallup.

Gas prices have been falling, one of the elements that contributed to the drop in annual inflation in September, a politically salient number.

According to a survey by Santander US of middle-income Americans, 81 percent of people still consider inflation a major concern. But 71 percent say they’re on the right track toward financial prosperity.

Powell’s Fed is warily watching for signs of weakness in the job market, where unemployment has risen from lows of 3.4 percent. Fed officials argue that the labor market is now in better balance, with the number of job seekers and job openings in more of an equilibrium than when “Now Hiring” signs adorned businesses across the country. But they also want to prevent a surge in layoffs.

There was good news on that front last week when the Labor Department estimated that the economy added a net 254,000 jobs in September — far higher than expectations.

Matthew Luzzetti, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank Securities, said he’s less worried about the job market now than he was a few weeks ago.

“The latest data suggest greater stability in the labor market story, with hiring trends not as weak as believed,” he said. “If it continues — and I suspect it will, given a solid consumer backdrop — there will be a larger buffer for payrolls to remain resilient even if layoffs” rise.

Inflation has come down due to a combination of factors — higher rates and a smoothing out in supply chains that were scrambled by Covid, as well as an influx of workers, such as immigrants, who have joined the workforce and helped meet unusually high demand for labor.

Now the hope is that the central bank can ease off the economy without causing a dangerous rise in unemployment.

“Fed help is on the way and, as long as inflation remains reasonably well behaved, there’s a cap on how much worse the labor market can get,” said Guy Berger, director of economic research at the Burning Glass Institute. “We’re just not seeing recessionary dynamics kicking in, at least not yet. There’s time for policy to save the day.”

 Biden Calls on Congress to Return and Provide More Hurricane Aid


GOP SPEAKER SAY'S 'NO'

Yuval Rosenberg
Thu, October 10, 2024



After Hurricane Milton swept across Florida overnight, leaving a trail of destruction and millions of people without power, President Biden on Thursday called on Congress to come back to Washington, D.C., to pass additional emergency relief.

“I think the Congress should be coming back and moving on emergency needs immediately,” Biden said at the White House. “They're going to have to come back after the election as well because this is going to be a long haul for total rebuilding. It's going to take several billion dollars. It's not going to be a matter of just a little bit.”

Biden said that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has what it needs for the time being, but that the Small Business Administration, which also provides aid to some victims of natural disasters, is “right at the edge right now.”

At a press briefing, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas warned that more emergency funding would be needed. “We will need additional funds, and we implore Congress when it returns to, in fact, fund FEMA as is needed,” Mayorkas said.

Biden said he has not yet spoken to House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, about upcoming funding needs. In a letter he sent to congressional leaders six days ago, Biden warned that the SBA need was most urgent since the agency’s disaster loan program “will run out of funding in a matter of weeks and well before the Congress is planning to reconvene.”

In Thursday’s update on hurricane response, the president again lashed out at those who have been spreading misinformation and lies about the federal relief efforts. “Those who engage in such lies are undermining confidence in the rescue and recovery work,” Biden said. “These lies are also harmful to those who most need help. Lives are on the line. People are in desperate situations. Have the decency to tell them the truth.”

Asked if he had spoken with Trump, Biden seemed to get his hackles up. “Are you kidding me?” he said. “Former President Trump — get a life, man, and help these people.”

Asked if he plans to speak with Trump, Biden responded with a blunt, “No.”

The bottom line: Congress recently provided FEMA with just over $20 billion in funding, and the agency has already spent $9 billion of that, meaning that Congress may quickly be called upon to appropriate more money for disaster relief in addition to the funding for the Small Business Administration.
No, Biden, Harris didn't spend hurricane relief FEMA funds on immigrants | Fact check

Joedy McCreary, USA TODAY NETWORK
Thu, October 10, 2024 


The claim: Biden administration spent FEMA hurricane relief money on ‘illegals’

An Oct. 2 Facebook post (direct link, archive link) claims President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris redirected funds meant for disaster relief.

“Kamala and Biden spent the (Federal Emergency Management Agency) emergency money on housing and caring for illegals. They now are not prepared for the current hurricane damage,” the post's text states.

Similar versions of the claim were amplified by former President Donald Trump, billionaire Elon Musk and Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan.

More from the Fact-Check Team: How we pick and research claims | Email newsletter | Facebook page
Our rating: False

FEMA and a White House spokesperson both said the claim is false. It conflates the agency's disaster relief fund with a separate program that helps homeless people. The money provided by Congress for the disaster relief fund must be used for that purpose, and any other use is against the law.
Claim conflates disaster relief fund, homelessness program

Hurricane Helene devastated the southeastern U.S. in late September, causing widespread flooding, billions of dollars in estimated damage and more than 200 deaths. Hurricane Milton bore down on Florida less than two weeks later, packing sustained winds of 180 mph on Oct. 7 as it approached the state’s Gulf Coast. It came as Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas warned that FEMA does not have enough funding to last through hurricane season, which ends Nov. 30.

Fact check: This storm footage isn't from Hurricane Helene in Florida

But contrary to the claim in the post, the Biden administration has not used hurricane-relief funds on immigrants, according to both FEMA and a White House spokesperson. There is no credible evidence that such spending – which would be illegal – has taken place.

The post’s use of the phrase “FEMA emergency money” and its mention of “current hurricane damage” asserts a connection between the disaster spending and funding used for immigrants. But this conflates multiple FEMA programs, which have funds appropriated from different sources for use in specific ways.

When asked for evidence to support the claim, the Facebook user shared a September 2022 clip of White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre referencing FEMA’s emergency food and shelter program as a means of assistance after dozens of migrants were flown to Martha’s Vineyard with false promises of jobs and housing. But that program has nothing to do with the disaster relief fund. Its stated purpose is to provide the homeless with food and shelter.

In a statement posted to its website, FEMA stated that “no money is being diverted from disaster response needs." And White House spokesperson Angelo Fernandez Hernandez posted to X, formerly Twitter, that the Disaster Relief Fund is “completely separate from other grant programs administered by FEMA.”

The disaster relief fund, which received $20 billion as part of the bill Congress passed to fund the government through Dec. 20, is administered under the Stafford Act. However, the much smaller emergency food and shelter program is funded by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, with FEMA in April announcing $117 million in funding.

USA TODAY previously debunked false claims that people affected by Helene receive “only $750” in aid and that Biden said those people would receive no more aid.

The Washington Post also debunked a version of the claim.
Our fact-check sources:

FEMA, Oct. 3, Hurricane Rumor Response


FEMA, June 26, 2023, Emergency Food and Shelter Program


FEMA, April 23, FEMA Bulletin


Angelo Fernandez Hernandez, Oct. 3, X post


National Constitution Center, accessed Oct. 8, Appropriations Clause


The White House, Sept. 16, 2022, Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby, September 16, 2022


Emergency Food and Shelter Program, accessed Oct. 8, EFSP


GovInfo, March 18, Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act


GovInfo, March 9, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or e-newspaper here.

USA TODAY is a verified signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network, which requires a demonstrated commitment to nonpartisanship, fairness and transparency. 

Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Meta.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Hurricane FEMA funds diverted to immigrants? Not true | Fact check


Trump's claim that Biden stole $1 billion from FEMA for migrants is Pants on Fire
Maria Ramirez Uribe and Amy Sherman
Wed, October 9, 2024 

Austin American-Statesman

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as he attends an event about the damage caused by Hurricane Helene, in Valdosta, Georgia, U.S., September 30, 2024.

Donald Trump

Statement: The Biden administration stole $1 billion “from FEMA to use it for illegal migrants. … And FEMA is now busted. They don’t have any money.”

As he arrived in Augusta, Georgia, to survey Hurricane Helene’s devastation, former President Donald Trump said the Biden-Harris administration’s spending on immigrants has left the Federal Emergency Management Agency broke.

"Well, for one thing, $1 billion was stolen from FEMA to use it for illegal migrants," Trump said Oct. 4. He added, "And FEMA is now busted. They don’t have any money."

He continued, "FEMA has not done the job, meaning the federal government, Kamala and Joe, have not done the job obviously. They have $1 billion, $1 billion with a 'B,' missing that's supposed to be used for hurricanes and things like that and they don't have any money."

Trump used his visit to the hurricane-ravaged battleground state as an opportunity to attack his opponent, Kamala Harris, and argue that she cares more about immigrants in the U.S. illegally than Americans.

He has repeated versions of that claim since Oct. 3.

"Kamala spent all her FEMA money, billions of dollars, on housing for illegal migrants, many of whom should not be in our country," he said at an Oct. 3 campaign rally in Saginaw, Michigan.


"We’re missing $1 billion that they gave to migrants coming into our country," he said in an Oct. 4 town hall in Fayetteville, North Carolina.


"The GREAT people of North Carolina are being stood up by Harris and Biden, who are giving almost all of the FEMA money to Illegal Migrants," he wrote Oct. 7 on Truth Social. He added: "NORTH CAROLINA HAS BEEN VIRTUALLY ABANDONED BY KAMALA!!!"

Here are the facts: Current FEMA funding for migrants does not come at disaster relief’s expense. Neither of FEMA’s two programs for migrants uses money from the agency’s Disaster Relief Fund, which is primarily used after natural disasters. Congress funds the migrant and disaster relief programs separately. And Trump’s administration, not Biden’s, shifted FEMA funding — including money from the Disaster Relief Fund — to address immigration.

When contacted for comment, the Trump campaign pointed to spending by FEMA’s Shelter and Services Program, which gives money to state and local governments and nonprofit organizations that provide migrants with temporary shelter, food and transportation. Trump arrived at the $1 billion figure by combining the fiscal year 2023 and 2024 budgets for the Shelter and Services Program.

"FEMA has been spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the transportation and shelter of illegal immigrants," Trump campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said.

That’s different from Trump’s claims, which distort the facts.

FEMA’s rumor response website says no money from the Disaster Relief Fund was diverted for immigration. The White House issued a similar statement.
No money ‘stolen’ at FEMA, agency not out of money

It’s inaccurate to describe the $1 billion as "stolen," said Joshua Sewell, a federal budget expert at the nonpartisan Taxpayers for Common Sense.

Congress — not the president — decides how much money government programs receive. The Biden-Harris administration requested the money from Congress, and Congress granted it to FEMA for the Shelter and Services program.

"It’s definitely not stealing," Sewell said. "It is in an appropriations bill."

FEMA is expected to face a deficit during the current fiscal year that started Oct. 1, but the agency is not out of money. And Congress can set aside more money, as it has done nearly every year since 2017, Sewell said.

Two FEMA programs have supported immigrants, neither takes money from hurricane relief


Destroyed homes are seen across the Broad River in Chimney Rock, NC after Hurricane Helene, October 7, 2024.

Directing federal money to help states and cities handle immigrant influxes didn’t start with the Biden-Harris administration. With Congress deadlocked for decades over immigration bills, state and local politicians in red and blue areas have demanded that the federal government step up and provide money to help provide basic services to new immigrants.

Starting in 2019, as illegal immigration ticked up during Trump’s administration, Congress gave FEMA funding to expand its Emergency Food and Shelter Program, which previously had been used only for people facing homelessness and hunger, to include migrant support services. FEMA gave federal money to local and state governments and nonprofit organizations that provide services to immigrants whom officials have released into the U.S. to await court proceedings.

Neither that program nor the one that replaced it was, or is, funded with money promised to FEMA’s disaster relief work. And the Biden administration didn’t transfer money from FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund to either program, the White House said in an Oct. 5 memo.

Sewell reiterated this point: "The Disaster Relief Fund has nothing to do with any migrant assistance account because all that spending is from separate funds."

In 2023, Congress directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection and FEMA to create the Shelter and Services Program for migrants, removing immigration grants from the Emergency Food and Shelter Program. The Shelter and Services Program uses money Congress has given Customs and Border Protection, and is administered by FEMA.

In fiscal year 2024, which started October 2023 and ended September 2024, Congress directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to give FEMA $650 million for the Shelter and Services Program. From fiscal years 2021 to 2024, Congress has set aside about $1.5 billion combined for both the Shelter and Services and Emergency Food and Shelter programs. The money is used for food, shelter and medical care.
Mayorkas: FEMA can meet immediate needs but will need more funding

Statements from Trump and other Republicans saying FEMA is out of money stem from Oct. 2 comments to journalists by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas as he traveled to South Carolina to survey devastation caused by Hurricane Helene.

But Mayorkas didn’t say FEMA was out of money.

When a reporter asked Mayorkas about FEMA funding, he said, "We are meeting the immediate needs with the money that we have. We are expecting another hurricane hitting. FEMA does not have the funds to make it through the (hurricane) season," which lasts from June through November.

Mayorkas said the Biden-Harris administration has requested additional funding from Congress.

Congress has approved extra money for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund nearly every year since 2017, totaling nearly $170 billion, Sewell said. This money is on top of the $100 billion Congress has set aside in annual legislation.

On Sept. 26, Congress added $20 billion to the disaster fund as part of a stopgap bill to fund the government through Dec. 20.

Even before Hurricane Helene made landfall, the Disaster Relief Fund was headed toward a deficit. A mid-September report FEMA published before Hurricane Helene projected a deficit starting in February 2025. That was also before Hurricane Milton.
Trump administration moved FEMA funding to immigration efforts

Former President Donald Trump speaks during his visit to Evans, Ga., on Friday, Oct. 4, 2024. Trump came to get a briefing on Hurricane Helene and speak to supporters.

When Trump was president, his administration shifted FEMA funding, including money from the Disaster Relief Fund, to address immigration.

In 2019, the Department of Homeland Security announced it was "reprogramming" some funds Congress had set aside.The department said it would transfer $271 million to immigration efforts. That included about $155 million from FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund base budget.

PolitiFact found in 2019 that the funding shift would not deplete FEMA’s available funding for disaster-hit areas; the federal government has a process to provide disaster relief. But we wrote it could have some effect, depending on the storm season’s severity.
PolitiFact's ruling

Trump said "$1 billion was stolen from FEMA to use it for illegal migrants. … And FEMA is now busted. They don’t have any money."

This is a gross mischaracterization.

The Biden-Harris administration did not "steal" money from FEMA. Congress — not the president — decides how much money government programs receive.

Congress approved FEMA funding to give grants to state and local governments and nonprofit organizations for immigrant services. The program’s funding comes from Customs and Border Protection, and is separate from FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund that’s used to respond to natural disasters.

The money for immigrants does not come at storm victims’ expense. The federal government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on hurricane recovery and will continue to do so.

Furthermore, FEMA is not out of money. The agency’s Disaster Relief Fund is expected to face a deficit, but that’s unrelated to the program for immigrants. Congress can step in and provide more funding for FEMA, as it has done nearly every year since 2017.

We rate this statement Pants on Fire!
Our sources

Former President Donald Trump, Truth Social post, Oct. 7, 2024


CNN State of the Union, Transcript, Oct. 6, 2024


Federal Emergency Management Agency, As Federal Assistance for Hurricane Helene Exceeds $210 Million, FEMA Prepares for Dual Response with Hurricane Milton Strengthening as it Moves Toward Gulf Coast of Florida, Oct. 7, 2024


Congressional Research Service, FEMA’s Emergency Food and Shelter Program-Humanitarian Relief (EFSP-H) and the New Shelter and Services Program (SSP), Aug. 30, 2023


Congressional Research Service, The Disaster Relief Fund: Overview and Issues, Jan. 22, 2024


CNN, Fact check: Six days of Trump lies about the Hurricane Helene response, Oct. 6, 2024


Washington Post The Fact Checker, No, Biden didn’t take FEMA relief money to use on migrants — but Trump did, Oct. 4, 2024


Verify, FEMA is running low on disaster money, but not because the funds went to housing undocumented migrants, Oct. 4, 2024


New York Times, Trump’s False Claims About the Federal Response to Hurricane Helene, Oct. 4, 2024


Acyn, Clip of Trump in Georgia, Oct. 4, 2024


Fox News, Trump holds town hall in Fayetteville, North Carolina, Oct. 4, 2024


NBC News, False claims about FEMA disaster funds and migrants pushed by Trump, Oct. 4, 2024


FEMA, Rumor response, Accessed Oct. 7, 2024


FEMA, Disaster Relief Fund: Monthly Report, Sept. 10, 2024


FEMA, Shelter and Services Program, Accessed Oct. 7, 2024


White House spokesperson Angelo Fernández Hernández, X post, Oct. 3, 2024


Congress, H.R.9747 - Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, Sept. 26, 2024


PolitiFact, FEMA money taken for immigration enforcement: What you need to know, Oct. 2, 2024


PolitiFact, Fact-checking whether FEMA funds were shifted to indefinite detention at the border, Aug. 30, 2019


PolitiFact, How the U.S. funds disaster recovery, Sept. 14, 2017


Email interview, Karoline Leavitt, Trump campaign spokesperson, Oct. 7, 2024


Department of Homeland Security, Statement to PolitiFact, Oct. 7, 2024


Email interview Joshua Sewell, director of research and policy at Taxpayers for Common Sense, Oct. 7, 2024


Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Food and Shelter Program, accessed Oct. 6, 2024


Federal Emergency Management Agency, Shelter and Services Program, accessed Oct. 6, 2024


Congressional Research Service, FEMA’s Emergency Food and Shelter Program-Humanitarian Relief (EFSP-H) and the New Shelter and Services Program (SSP), Aug. 30, 2023


PolitiFact, Key facts about immigration data: What it can and can’t tell us about border policies, Jan. 3, 2024


Congressional Research Service, Shelter and Services Program (SSP) FY2024 Funding, April 17, 2024


U.S. Congress, Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, Sept. 30, 2024


Congressional Research Service, FEMA Assistance for Migrants Through the Emergency Food and Shelter ProgramHumanitarian (EFSP-H) and Shelter and Services Program (SSP), Aug. 31, 2023


FEMA, The U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) Fiscal Year 2024 Shelter and Services Program - Competitive (SSP-C), accessed Oct. 6, 2024

This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Trump's claim that Biden wiped out FEMA aid for immigration is absurd