Monday, October 14, 2024

The power of finance and capital is maintained by sacrificing the lives of innocent people

11 October, 2024 
Left Foot Forward


The high priests of neoliberalism do not want to shackle capital or curb profiteering.



In the age of enlightenment the grand narratives of social progress are routinely paraded. However, they are rarely questioned. How civilised are we? Do we still practice human sacrifices?

Some would be puzzled by such a question in the twenty-first century. After all, human sacrifices have long been abolished. In medieval societies they were not uncommon. Innocent men, women and children, mainly from poorer backgrounds, were arbitrarily tortured or killed by ruling elites to strengthen their hold on power. Their high priests chanted mumbo-jumbo and cast spells in obscure languages and promised that pain to the innocents would somehow bring economic growth, prosperity and happiness.

In the modern world, people are no longer sacrificed in town squares but the practice continues. The power of finance and capital is maintained by sacrificing the lives of innocent people. The new high priests chant the magical powers of defunct economic theories, fiscal rules, austerity, privatisations, balancing the budget, outsourcing, and free markets. They obfuscate power and inflict misery and premature death on millions of people, mostly the less well-off. But the new social gods still don’t deliver prosperity and happiness to all. The magical mantras have enabled elites to amass disproportionate amount of wealth and power. The dissenters are ostracised, silenced and exiled by main stream media and political parties. Ministers flanked by high priests insist that people must deepen their faith in social gods and make more sacrifices.

The National Health Service (NHS) was created in an era when governments believed that human misery could be reduced by collective welfare. On the back of that, life became less financialised and the UK became more prosperous. That didn’t go down well with those intoxicated with bigger profits. Every Conservative government since the Second-War increased the NHS waiting list, hoping that individuals will seek out private healthcare. Under the spell of neoliberalism, insufficient investment has been made in the NHS. Today, in England alone some 6.42m individuals are waiting for 7.64m hospital appointments. Around 300,000 people a year die prematurely as they await a hospital appointment. Due to lack of timely access to family doctors, dentists and hospitals, some 2.8m people are chronically ill and unable to work. More than 500,000 under-35s are out of work due to long-term illness. Ministers complain about labour shortages but none connects the dots.

The threat of premature death and disability had the desired impact. More are taking out private health insurance. In 2022, some 11.7m Britons, 22% of the population, had health insurance. This was an 83% increase from 2021. Millions can’t wait for the NHS and are privately paying for cataract surgery, knee and hip replacements to alleviate pain and misery. Insurers have hiked their prices by 25% in the past year.

The high priests of neoliberalism do not want to shackle capital or curb profiteering. Instead, normal people are forced to make sacrifices. 72 people died in the Grenfell fire tragedy because it was profitable for housebuilders to use combustible foam insulation. The Post Office prosecuted innocent postmasters because it was profitable to do so. Rivers, lakes and seas are flooded with raw sewage because it is more profitable for water companies to do so, especially as they don’t bear the cost of health hazards inflicted on people. Since the pandemic, the UK’s leading 17,000 companies have increased their profits margins by an average of 30% and many by much more. For example, electricity generation companies trebled their profit margins by nearly 198%; electricity and gas supply by 363%; health and social work by 118% and water and sewage companies by 44%.

Punishing the working class has been a favourite sport for wealthy elites. In 1976, worker’s share of gross domestic product (GDP), in the forms of wages and salaries was 65.1%. Under onslaught of anti-trade union laws this is now barely 50% of GDP. In August 2024, the pre-tax median wage for a full-time worker was £29,040, lower in real terms than in 2008. Work doesn’t pay enough and the wages of some 2.6m workers have to be topped-up through the welfare system. Some 12m people, including 4.3m children, live in poverty. 6m people live in fuel poverty. 2.3m households owe over £1,200 arrears for energy and energy debt is over £3bn. The UK accounts for 80% of homelessness across the OECD countries. Around 9.3m people, including 3m children (one in five) are facing hunger and hardship. Reliance upon charity has been normalised. In 2023/24 food bank charity The Trussell Trust delivered 3.1m emergency food parcels to people. Some 800,000 patients were admitted to hospital with malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies, which piles on the pressure on the NHS.

A research report estimated that between 2012 and 2019, government imposed austerity caused 335,000 excess deaths in England and Scotland i.e. nearly 48,000 a year. Poverty makes people choose between heating and eating. Between 2011 and 2020, over a million people in England died prematurely from a combination of poverty, austerity and Covid. Another study estimated that around 93,000 people, including 68,000 pensioners and 25,000 working age adults are dying in poverty.

Yet the high priests were not satisfied. They invoked the gods of fiscal rules and balanced budgets to demand more sacrifices. They imposed two-child benefit cap to condemn 500,000 children to poverty, the biggest cause of child poverty. Just £2.5bn would lift more than half a million out of absolute poverty but successive governments have refused to do so, though they have handed tax cuts to banks and subsidies to corporations.

Winter is a harsh time for pensioners. The average state pension of between £9,000 and £9,500 is a major source of income for pensioners, and is less than 50% of the minimum wage. Their hard choices between heating and eating have been cushioned by winter fuel payments of between £100 and £300 a year. Even then last year, some 5,000 pensioners died from cold. The government responded by cutting Winter Fuel Payment for millions of pensioners below the poverty line. Thousands more will die. Seven Labour MPs voted against the cut and government ostracised them by withdrawing their parliamentary whip.

Some are unhappy about the downgrading of promised reforms to workers’ rights; something which might improve workers incomes and dignity. Any sustained dissent can undermine the power of high priests, Whips have warned Labour MPs not to put down any amendments on government bills and to resolve disagreements privately with ministers. The government is now planning to cut benefits of the old, sick, poor and disabled to force them to work.

In common with the medieval times, it is children, women, elderly and the less well-off who continue to be sacrificed. Wealth has not trickled-down and is hoarded by a few. The top 1% has more wealth than 70% of the population combined. Just 50 families have more wealth than 50% of the population. The bottom 50% of the population owns less than 5% of wealth, and the top 10% a staggering 57%. The wealthy elites control media, think-tanks and fund political parties to get shape public opinion and get their way. the government promised modest reforms to taxation of non-doms and private equity, but they are to be diluted as wealthy elites don’t like it.

Human sacrifice has changed form but hasn’t disappeared. Millions are sent to misery and premature death by elected governments. The mantras of fiscal rules, austerity, balancing the budget, outsourcing and privatisations have neither delivered prosperity nor happiness to the masses. Despite economic growth, people’s real incomes have been stagnant. Schools, healthcare and much of infrastructure is not fit for purpose. For investment in productive assets, the UK is ranked 28thamong 31 OECD countries. The state hands out vast subsidies and tax reliefs to corporations without any assessment of economic objectives.

A new leaf must be turned by restructuring the state, without that millions more will be sent to premature death. There is an urgent need to redistribute income and wealth, direct state investment in public services and democratisation of work. All legislation must be accompanied by assessment of the human cost. But corporate elites will oppose any loosening of their control of the state and any power for workers to shape corporate policies. Yet people must put lives before profits, critique the power of high priests and advance competing discourses. Our predecessors used oratory, leaflets, music, theatre, plays, unions, protests, marches, and community organisations to secure a modicum of rights and reliefs. We too need to do the same. As a wise man once said, ‘we are many, they are few’.


Prem Sikka is an Emeritus Professor of Accounting at the University of Essex and the University of Sheffield, a Labour member of the House of Lords, and Contributing Editor at Left Foot Forward.

Labour Growth Group: MPs urge Rachel Reeves to spend more on public services

Rachel Reeves

A group of Labour MPs has written to Chancellor Rachel Reeves urging her to spend billions on improving public services, The Observer has reported.

The Labour Growth Group, which features Labour MPs including Josh Simons and Torsten Bell, wants Reeves to back a rewriting of fiscal rules that would allow for billions more to be poured into services including education, health and transport.

The letter, seen by The Observer, reportedly reads: “We give voice to the silent majority who benefit from economic reforms, infrastructure projects and growth, no matter how well organised the vocal minority.

“It is time to value these assets properly in our fiscal framework … Time is of the essence – the sooner we invest, the sooner our constituents will begin to benefit from that investment in their communities.

“If we delay, we risk further entrenching the barriers to growth that have held our country back for too long. We say this upcoming budget is the time to grasp the opportunity efore us and act with conviction.”

Recap on all of the news and debate from party conference 2024 by LabourList here.

It comes as the Chancellor has been reported to be considering options to raise further revenue in this month’s budget, including introducing national insurance on employer pension contributions and a potential rise in capital gains tax to as much as 39%.

Labour’s first budget since returning to office will be held on October 30.

UK

Budget 2024: ‘How Labour can fix the worst economic inheritance since 1945’

Photo: QQ7/Shutterstock

Winning the last election means we have the chance to start rebuilding this nation’s prosperity after fourteen years of Conservative failure.

We have inherited the worst economic conditions since 1945. Fourteen years of cuts in investment left us with an historic fall in wages, the highest energy bills & inflation in the G7, and almost 3 million out of work due to sickness. Winning on July 4th means we get the chance to fix all this.

We can fix our economy by investing to rebuild our prosperity. When we were last in government, we invested in our public services, physical infrastructure, and skills. The result was each of us producing more year-on-year a.k.a. economic growth. Real wages increased by over a third as we invested in our workerscarbon emissions fell as we invested in clean energy, and waiting lists fell as we invested in our NHS. 

In stark contrast, the past fourteen years were characterised by stagnation and then decline. The list of what we need to fix is very, very long. Below I set out (just) three of the major economic problems we face and how this Labour government can fix them.

Problem 1: Worst wage squeeze in 200 years 

The previous government’s decisions led to historic cuts in investment. Less investment led to a no-growth economy where each of us stopped producing more. Wages first stopped growing and then started falling. The squeeze in wages was unprecedented – the worst since Napoleon threatened our shores.

The Conservatives directly cut public investment (austerity) and indirectly cut private sector investment too. The private sector invested less as the last government created instability and lowered returns to investment by, for example, cutting skills funding.

UK real wage growth since 1900

Fixing It: Ending austerity will mean a very welcome increase in public investment. Private investment will rise when, firstly, we create the basic stability businesses need to invest and, secondly, when we rebuild our skills and infrastructure so each of us can produce more.

Problem 2: Highest energy prices and inflation in the G7

The last government’s cut and then blocked green investment. David Cameron’s decision to “cut the green crap” led to declines in home insulation and the blocking of onshore wind farms. This left us dependent on natural gas. Natural gas is more expensive than clean energy in any case. But Putin’s invasion of Ukraine caused the price of natural gas to skyrocket even higher, which then left us with the highest energy prices and inflation in the G7. 

Inflation in G7 nations

Fixing It: Investing in our own clean energy and insulation through GB Energy and our Warm Homes Plan will lead to lower energy bills. Home-grown clean energy is also more secure than fossil fuels supplied by foreign dictators. Solar and wind are 50 to 75% cheaper than natural gas. This is likely to fall even further in the coming years. 

Problem 3: Three million too sick to work

Almost three million are too sick to work because the last government broke our NHS. They left us with the longest waiting times in history, which means we were the only OECD nation to continue to see long-term sickness rise after COVID. A functioning health service is not an optional extra, it is serious economic infrastructure that the Conservatives decimated.

NHS waiting lists

Fixing It: Rebuilding and reforming our NHS will help us all be healthier – and a healthier nation is one that produces more. We need to rebuild our NHS by hiring more doctors and nurses and we need to reform it too.

To stop chronic health conditions like heart disease becoming more common and costly, we need to invest in prevention rather than cure, and we need to prioritise funding for GPs rather than hospitals. That is the whole essence of the Darzi report that we will implement.

‘Building economic strength from the rubble’

We can meet the economic challenges we face and create a nation where each of is better off. Previous Labour governments have built economic strength from rubble.

As Attlee once built the welfare state and laid the foundations for Thirty Glorious Years of growth, so too can this Labour government. We can raise public and private investment, build clean energy, and rebuild our healthcare system so that each of us can be more prosperous in the years to come.

UK

New Employment Rights Bill must build an economy that works for women


OCTOBER 11, 2024

By the Women’s Budget Group

The Government’s Employment Rights Bill is an ambitious step forward for workers’ rights, which has the potential to build an economy that truly works for women. Recent research carried out by WBG found that:

  • 1.47 million women will have new rights to sick pay under new provisions.
  • 555,000 women to have job security due to banning of exploitative zero-hour contracts and focus on women-led sectors.

Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson, Director of the Women’s Budget Group, commented: “Women are still the majority of workers in low paid or precarious work in our economy. They have the most to benefit from new workers’ rights laws pledged by the new Government. The ambition set out in today’s Bill has the potential to reduce the gender pay gap and economic inactivity, growing the economy over time. Maintaining this ambition throughout the consultation process over the coming months will be vital to ensure the Bill is effective in building a feminist future of work where every woman is paid fairly, can work flexibly but with security and is free from discrimination or injustice.”

“But the Government can and must go further to genuinely improve women’s working lives and address the impact of unpaid care work and lack of access to justice. To deliver a feminist future of work, these reforms must also go hand in hand with bold reform and invest in our early education and childcare and social care systems as well as restoring access to legal aid. The Government must carry out and publish meaningful equality impact assessments to ensure policy is truly effective in reducing inequalities in the workplace and across the economy.”

On pregnancy and maternity discrimination, she said: “It is promising to see a commitment to strengthening the pregnancy and redundancy protections in line with what was set out in Labour’s manifesto. Our research finds that the most widespread employment law issue women seek help with is pregnancy/maternity discrimination. Extending the time limit for bringing a claim for three to six months will hugely increase vulnerable women’s access to justice. And we eagerly await the review of parental and carer’s leave. We urge the Government to continue to prioritise and deliver this within their first year, as committed to within the manifesto.”

On extending sick pay, she said: “The Bill also brings good news on lowering the threshold for statutory sick pay eligibility and removing the three-day wait period before a worker can claim it. It is important that rights to sick pay are extended to all workers. This would mean that 1.5 million women would have new rights to sick pay.”

WGG calculate there were 555,000 women on zero-hours contracts between April and June 2024 and 910,000 women who currently earn less than £123 a week according to TUC in January 2024 – that is 70% of 1.3 million.

Dr Stephenson added: “This is a step toward tackling women’s health-related economic inactivity, with 1.5 million women out of the workforce due to long term sickness (200,000 more women than men). Extending it to all workers and paying it at an adequate rate increases the impact on economic activity, allowing workers to take time off at early stages of a health condition and increasing the chances of recovery and remaining in the labour market.”

On gender pay gap reporting, she said: “However, it is important that policy design within the Bill is truly able to achieve its aims. For example, proposals around gender pay gap reporting for outsourced workers may inadvertently entrench low wages within female-dominated sectors like cleaning, rather than promoting fair, in-house pay. Addressing the root causes of the gender pay gap, which are often linked to low pay in roles traditionally occupied by women, should be a primary focus.

On Equality Impact Assessments, she said: “We welcome the extensive consultation Labour has pledged across many of the measures in the Bill, and are ready to support the Government in ensuring these policies are effective in creating an economy that works for women. To this end, it is critical for the Government to publish comprehensive equality impact assessments (EIAs) for the Bill as a whole and for each individual policy by the second reading of the Bill on 21st October. Meaningful EIAs will provide a foundation for informed policymaking, helping to dismantle systemic inequalities and avoid perpetuating cycles of inequality.”

Dr Stephenson argued for a holistic approach to policy-making: “Furthermore, if this Bill is to ‘genuinely improve women’s working lives,’ it must address the intersecting challenges women face. This includes not only employment protections but also improvements to childcare and social care infrastructure, as well as expanded access to legal aid. Only through holistic, well-designed policies can we build a resilient and inclusive economy.”

WBG argues that Labour’s Employment Rights Bill has the potential to help reduce the gender pay gap over time and build a feminist future of work:

– More women (3.5%) than men (2.8%) are employed on zero-hours contracts.

– 6.5% of women do not earn enough to qualify for sick pay compared to 2.8% of men.

– The gender earnings gap (weekly pay) was 25% for all workers in 2024 while the gender pay gap (annual pay) was 14.3%.

– More women (10.5%) than men (7.2%) are classified as low earners.

– 72% of people who work part-time are women.

– 25.1% of women compared to 19.1% of men are economically inactive.

WBG recommends that in order to deliver on the aim of closing the gender pay gap and increasing gender equality the Government should go further by:

  • Extending statutory sick pay to self-employed workers and increase the rate without changing the period of payment.
  • Delivering comprehensive reform of the social care and childcare systems as well as paid carers’ leave, to help redistribute unpaid care work.
  • Ensuring genuine flexible working by introducing an advertising duty for all jobs to be advertised as flexible except in reasonable exceptions.
  • Reviewing and restore legal aid in discrimination cases to ensure women have access to new employment rights as well as adequately resourcing the EHRC to enforce women’s rights.
  • Introducing a new model of parental leave ensuring six months non-transferable leave for each parent and, a six-month shared leave entitlement.
  • Strengthening and properly enforce the public sector equality duty with new duties and training on government officials.

The UK Women’s Budget Group is the UK’s leading feminist economics think tank, providing evidence and analysis on women’s economic position and proposing policy alternatives for a gender-equal economy. It acts as a link between academia, the women’s voluntary sector and progressive economic think tanks.

Image: Woman Suffering from Stress at Work. Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/193749286@N04/51418722107. Author: CIPHR Connect,  licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

'Innocent' British nerve agent victim caught in global murder plot: inquiry

London (AFP) – A British woman who died after being exposed to the Soviet-era nerve agent Novichok was unwittingly caught up in an "illegal and outrageous international assassination attempt", a public inquiry was told on Monday.



Issued on: 14/10/2024 - 
The attack on the Skripals was the first offensive use of chemical weapons in Europe since World War II 
© Daniel LEAL-OLIVAS / AFP

Dawn Sturgess, a 44-year-old mother of three children, died in July 2018 after spraying herself with what she thought was perfume from a discarded bottle containing the deadly chemical weapon.

Her death followed a failed poison attack against former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal in Salisbury, southwest England. The UK government has said it was "highly likely" Russia was behind the plot.

Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found unconscious on a bench in Salisbury in March 2018. They survived after intensive hospital treatment and now live under protection.

At the start of public hearings into Sturgess's death in Salisbury, inquiry lawyer Andrew O'Connor said the perfume bottle contained enough Novichok to poison "thousands" of people.

"It's no exaggeration to say the circumstances of Dawn Sturgess's death were extraordinary," he told the hearing.

"When Ms Sturgess was poisoned by Novichok four months after the Skripal poisoning, the real possibility emerged that she had been caught -- an innocent victim -- in the crossfire of an illegal and outrageous international assassination attempt," he added.

UK authorities believe that agents targeting the Skripals threw the perfume bottle away, making the two cases "inextricably interwoven".

The attempt to kill Skripal, on whom Russian President Vladimir Putin had sworn vengeance, plunged London-Moscow relations to a new low.

Britain blames the Novichok attack on two Russian security service officers who allegedly entered the country using false passports. A third has been named as the operation's mastermind.

All three are thought to be members of the GRU Russian intelligence agency. Russia, whose constitution does not allow extraditiona, has denied involvement and dismissed the inquiry as a "circus".


Diplomatic ties

Six years on, relations between the countries -- already hit by claims that Russia was behind the 2006 radiation poisoning of former agent Alexander Litvinenko -- remain in deep freeze.

The Sturgess inquiry will include closed sessions to investigate "private material" and intelligence related to the case. The Skripals will not give live evidence due to safety concerns.

Dawn Sturgess died after handling a perfume bottle that contained the deadly nerve agent Novichok © - / METROPOLITAN POLICE/AFP

Sturgess's family was "particularly concerned" about whether the UK government had taken appropriate steps to protect the Skripals and the wider public from collateral damage, according to O'Connor.

International arrest warrants have been issued for the suspects, but Theresa May, who was prime minister at the time of the attack, warned justice was unlikely.

She told the BBC last week that she hoped the inquiry would help "the family and friends of Dawn Sturgess feel it has got to the truth."

But "closure to all the people affected would only finally come with justice, and that justice is highly unlikely to happen," May added.

The Salisbury incident resulted in the largest-ever expulsion of diplomats between Western powers and Russia, and a limited round of sanctions by the West.

Those sanctions have now been outstripped by the West's response to Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Wiltshire Police Chief Constable Catherine Roper said it was "important to remember that at the heart of this inquiry are Dawn's family and loved ones whose lives have been irreversibly changed".

"The purpose is to provide Dawn's family, friends and our wider communities in Wiltshire the opportunity to access the fullest possible information surrounding Dawn's death," she added.

Sturgess' family is to give evidence on Tuesday.

© 2024 AFP
POSTMODERN SHOW TRIAL
Russian prosecutor demands 3 years prison for French researcher

Moscow (AFP) – A Russian prosecutor on Monday requested a sentence of three years and three months in a penal colony for a French researcher accused of breaching a "foreign agent" law.

Issued on: 14/10/2024 -
Vinatier is a veteran researcher on Russia and is married to a Russian © Alexander NEMENOV / AFP/File

The trial of Laurent Vinatier, who works for a Swiss conflict mediation NGO, comes amid tensions between Russia and the West over the Ukraine war.

The 48-year-old was arrested in Moscow in June and charged with collecting information on Russia's military without being registered as a "foreign agent", a crime punishable by up to five years in a penal colony.

A prosecutor told the judge that Vinatier should be found guilty and sentenced to "three years and three months to be served in a penal colony", as the researcher listened with head bowed.

Vinatier has acknowledged violating the Russian law, saying he was unaware he should have registered as a "foreign agent".

Wearing jeans and a pale blue shirt, he looked weary and subdued but gave a final speech in Russian, even quoting the national poet, Alexander Pushkin.

"I agree with the charge fully. I fully admit guilt," he said.

"I ask for a merciful and just sentence in the case," he added, apologising to Russia for breaking the law as well as to his NGO and family.

He read a poem by Pushkin titled "If life deceives you" with the lines that "the heart lives in the future: The present is desolate: everything is momentary, everything will pass."

The judge was due to announce the verdict at 1330 GMT.

The proposed sentence took into account that Vinatier "fully admitted guilt" and "repented for what he did" but also "significant threats connected to Russia's security", the prosecutor said.

Vinatier's lawyer Oleg Bessonov said the proposed sentence was "extremely harsh".

"Our client committed a crime for the first time in Russia... and fully admitted his guilt," the lawyer said, asking the judge to fine him instead.

The "foreign agent" law has been widely used to crack down on Kremlin critics but not usually foreign citizens.

French President Emmanuel Macron has demanded Vinatier's release, saying the "propaganda" against him "does not match reality".

Vinatier was charged over a requirement introduced in 2022 that people who collect information on Russia's military and arms that could harm country's national security, register as "foreign agents".

Russia has not charged or publicly accused Vinatier of espionage.

Tensions between Moscow and Paris are running high after France charged Russian-born Telegram founder Pavel Durov in August over illegal content on the popular social media platform, with the Kremlin warning against a "political persecution".

France has also strongly supported Ukraine in its fight against Russia's offensive and is training thousands of Ukrainian troops.

Vinatier is an adviser with the Geneva-based Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, and is a veteran researcher on Russia and other post-Soviet countries.

The Centre "works to prevent and resolve armed conflicts around the world through mediation and discreet diplomacy", it says in a statement on its website.
'Love for Russia'

According to sources interviewed by AFP, the Frenchman had been working for years on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, before Russia launched its full-scale offensive in February 2022.

In his final speech in court, Vinatier said that he first visited Russia 20 years ago and decided to work there.

"I fell in love with Russia. My wife is Russian, my friends are Russian. I lived a Russian life, that's who I am," he said.

Russia has arrested several Westerners and charged them with serious crimes during its Ukraine offensive, which ruptured ties with the West.

Washington has accused Moscow of arresting US citizens on baseless charges to use them as bargaining chips to secure the release of Russians convicted abroad.

On August 1, Russia freed US reporter Evan Gershkovich, former US Marine Paul Whelan and more than a dozen others -- including Russian opposition politicians -- in its biggest prisoner swap with the West since the Cold War.

© 2024 AFP

Russian state targets Ukraine Solidarity Campaign

OCTOBER 11, 2024


A Russian authority — the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (ROSKOMNADZOR) have issued a demand to the Internet website hosting company WordPress to remove the website of the UK-based Ukraine Solidarity Campaign (USC).

Campaign organisers have been notified by WordPress’s legal department that they have received the demand from ROSKOMNADZOR to shut down the campaign’s website, following multiple successful appeals to raise money for urgent frontline, medical and transport aid.

The web hosting company confirmed to USC that it will not comply with the request. USC has been informed that while Russia has previously sought to close criminal activities online, this was a new initiative, and they had singled out the USC.  

The USC website is now blocked by the Russian Federation. However, the intervention by ROSKOMNADZOR demonstrates the determination of the Russian state to attack international organisations that support Ukraine.

Alex Sobel MP, Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Ukraine, said: “Censorship in Putin’s Russia is the norm. He is trying to spread his autocratic tendencies far and wide. We not only need to resist them but ensure Russians can read and hear the truth about Putin’s murderous actions in Ukraine.”

 Mick Whelan, General Secretary of ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, an affiliate of the Ukraine Solidarity Campaign said it was the act of “a desperate despot seeking to hide his actions not only from his own people but the world. Deluded, as the world already knows and stands with Ukraine.”

Christopher Ford, USC Secretary said: “Russian hybrid war has sought to undermine popular support for Ukraine. Due to our campaigning, the Russia and Putin apologists have failed and the majority of the labour movement has stood by Ukraine. Now Russia wants to silence us, but they will fail and solidarity will win.”

John McDonnell MP, former Shadow Chancellor and a founder of the Ukraine Solidarity Campaign, said: “This is just another grubby attempt by Putin to prevent the Russian people from knowing the truth about Putin’s attack on Ukraine and the heroic resistance of the Ukrainian people.”

The organisers of the campaign remain determined to grow their activity and strongly condemn the use of such intimidatory tactics. They view the demand as another example of Russia’s continued censorship of online content and its increasingly authoritarian laws to control information. These actions have seen the country plummet in global rankings of Internet freedom. Russia scores just 21 out of 100 points according to Freedom House, down by yet another two points since 2022.

The Ukraine Solidarity Campaign, founded in 2014, exists to build solidarity and support for Ukraine across the UK labour movement and build links between trade unions in the two countries. Five national trade unions, including UNISON, NUM, UCU, PCS and ASLEF are affiliated to the campaign, as well as a number of local and regional branches. The campaign group has been organising fundraisers and the delivery of material aid, including medical equipment and vehicles to units staffed by trade unionists on the ground in Ukraine.

US Government Announces Entry Ban on Rafael Correa


Pablo Meriguet 




The decision also includes the former Ecuadorian vice-president; Jorge Glas, and both their families. According to the former president, the measure has a clear political intention.


Julian Assange with Rafael Correa on October 2, 2024 at the Council of Europe. Photo: Rafael Correa / X

On October 9, the US State Department published a statement declaring former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa, as well as his former vice-president Jorge Glas, as ineligible to enter the country. According to the United States, the measure was taken due to the alleged “involvement in significant corruption during their time in public office”.

In 2020, Correa and other politicians close to his party were sentenced to prison in Ecuador for allegedly committing acts of corruption. Correa was not arrested and imprisoned because he was living in Belgium, a country that has, on several occasions, ruled out apprehending and deporting him for the charges he faces in Ecuador. Correa, as well as political leaders in Ecuador and across the globe, have affirmed that the cases against him and Citizen Revolution leaders are politically motivated. Legal experts have also criticized their convictions citing the complete lack of evidence in the case. For example, in lieu of concrete evidence linking Correa to any acts of corruption, the court resorted to sentencing Correa based on having “psychic and cognitive influence” and being able to “control others’ will.”

Perhaps because of the ease with which Correa traveled through several countries without being arrested since his conviction, his ban from the United States surprised some. For others it confirmed the collusion of the US government in the persecution of the progressive leader.

More than four years after Correa and Glas were sentenced for alleged bribery, the State Department declared: “Correa and Glas abused their positions as former president of Ecuador and former vice president of Ecuador, respectively, by accepting bribes, including through political contributions, in exchange for granting favorable government contracts…Anti-corruption provisions, including in government procurement contracts, help ensure the government delivers for its citizens. This designation also reaffirms our commitment to counter global corruption, including at the highest levels of government.”

The 7031(c) designation, which applies to persons that the US government considers to have participated directly or indirectly in acts of corruption or serious human rights violations, also affects the immediate family members of Correa and Glas who are also prohibited from entering the United States.

Correa’s reaction

The former Ecuadorian president categorized the US decision as nonsense. According to Correa’s lawyer, Sonia Vera, the communiqué appears at a time when Correa had not requested to enter the United States, and Jorge Glas, who was kidnapped from the Mexican Embassy in Quito in April, is being held in a maximum-security prison, so it seems that the intention of the communiqué is for extrajudicial reasons.

On his X account, Correa hypothesized that the decision may have to do with his historical support to Julian Assange, specifically because on October 2 the former president published a photo with the Australian journalist during the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

He added that it also seems to be a smokescreen to distract public attention from the questionable administration of Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa, whose government faces a serious crisis. Ecuador is currently in a very serious energy crisis, and the population must endure up to 10 hours of power outages a day, in addition to a wave of violence that the government does not seem to be able to contain. Given this, Noboa’s popularity is at risk, which is why, says Correa, the State Department would seek to discredit the Correista party Citizen Revolution: “In a few months, presidential elections will be held in Ecuador, in which the Citizen Revolution is the favorite and where Daniel Noboa, a US citizen…is collapsing due to [his] ineptitude and corruption.”

Correa also maintains that the State Department document “omits relevant aspects such as the fact that INTERPOL has refused to process the international arrest warrants related to this case because it considers them political, or that the ‘condemned’ have received asylum in countries with a strong rule of law such as Mexico, Canada or Belgium, because they are considered political persecuted.” He added that “nobody in the WORLD has accepted the sentence for ‘psychic influence.’”

Finally, Correa has acknowledged that throughout his life he resisted assuming the anti-imperialist posture that his counterparts in Latin America and progressive movements have maintained over the last century, but that in the face of these facts, he cannot fail to recognize his mistake: “In the decade I was president, when Ecuador and Latin America were boiling with progress and dignity, I tried to moderate certain progressive colleagues because of their deep anti-imperialist sentiment. It is up to me to recognize that I was the wrong one. They will not break us.”

Grupo de Puebla, a grouping of progressive Latin American political leaders, released a statement on his entry ban, calling it a, “clear act of interventionism in the current electoral process, political persecution and revanchism after the recent embrace of Correa and Assange in Europe. Comparing the country left by Correa and the chaos of the current Ecuador, the truth is clear.”

The political implications of the State Department’s communiqué

The truth is that the anti-Correa parties as a whole (including President Noboa’s) have not waited to use the US communiqué to their advantage. Many argue that this was the last piece to confirm that Correa participated in acts of corruption and that therefore his co-ideaties share an alleged corrupt attitude.

Beyond Correa’s interpretations, it is evident that the statement will be used by such political parties to undermine the possibilities of the Citizen Revolution to achieve a presidential victory. Although in Ecuador, Correism is the most loyal and solid political force (it usually reaches 30% of the valid votes in the first electoral round), in the last two elections, it failed to achieve victory in the second round by itself since the anti-Correa positions usually unite political adversaries behind the same goal: to prevent Correism from winning an election again.

In this sense, it remains to be seen how the decision of the United States will affect the internal affairs of Ecuador, a country in which the US Embassy has already played an important political role by making statements on internal affairs through its ambassador on duty or simply withdrawing visas to public figures, many times without giving explanations. These measures have a great media and political impact, so it would not be strange if the same thing happens now.

Correism will have to demonstrate if it can overcome this new adversity and conquer the presidency of the Republic, a golden goal that until today has been elusive after the election of its last winner, Lenin Moreno, who quickly turned his back on Correísmo. On his part, Daniel Noboa could use the decision of the US as a possible escape valve to face the serious energy, economic, and security crisis that is undermining his popularity and putting at risk his re-election as President of Ecuador.

Courtesy: Peoples Dispatch