Saturday, December 14, 2024

Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All

"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."


U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks at NHTI Concord's 
Community College on October 22, 2024 in Concord, New Hampshire.
(Photo: Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Dec 13, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.

"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.

"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."

Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."

"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."

"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.

"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."

"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.

The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.

Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.



In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.

Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.

"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."

Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.

"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."



Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."

"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."

After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."











Michael Moore: Rage at health insurers is 'justified' — we should 'pour gasoline' on it

Matthew Chapman
December 13, 2024 
RAW STORY

Michael Moore / Shutterstock

Left-leaning documentary filmmaker Michael Moore doesn't support the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson — but he feels the public anger this crime brought to the surface about the health insurance industry is "1,000 percent justified," reported The Independent.

Moore is well known for his 2007 documentary "Sicko," in which he explored how the U.S. health care system exploits and neglects vulnerable people. The accused killer of Thompson, Luigi Mangione, cited "Sicko" himself, saying it "illuminated the corruption and greed" of insurers.

Mangione himself comes from a family that is likely even wealthier than the slain CEO.

Since then, the landmark Affordable Care Act has reined in many of the worst ways health insurance companies used to abuse people — but that doesn't mean people don't still have reason to be angry, he said.

“It’s not often that my work gets a killer five-star review from an actual killer,” Moore wrote in Substack. “Do I condemn murder? That’s an odd question. In Fahrenheit 9/11, I condemned the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi people and the senseless murder of our own American soldiers at the hands of our American government.”

The killing was undeniably wrong, he emphasized. That being said, “Some people have stepped forward to condemn this anger. I am not one of them. The anger is 1000 percent justified. It is long overdue for the media to cover it. It is not new. It has been boiling. And I’m not going to tamp it down or ask people to shut up. I want to pour gasoline on that anger.”

The public response to the killing has included a vocal chorus of online activists celebrating, as well as attacking anyone who helped police capture Mangione, with the McDonald's where he was caught getting hit with a deluge of bad reviews about "rats in the kitchen."

In Wake of Killing, UnitedHealth CEO Admits 'No One Would Design a System Like the One We Have'

One critic said UnitedHealth Group chief executive Andrew Witty should "resign and then dedicate every dollar he has to dismantling the current system brick by brick and building one based on public health in its stead."


UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty testifies before the Senate Finance Committee on Capitol Hill on May 1, 2024 in Washington, D.C.

(Photo: Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Dec 13, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty wrote in a New York Times op-ed Friday that the for-profit U.S. healthcare system "does not work as well as it should" and that "no one would design a system like the one we have," admissions that came as his industry faced a torrent of public anger following the murder of UnitedHealthcare's chief executive.

Witty declared that his firm, the parent company of UnitedHealthcare and the nation's largest private insurer, is "willing to partner with anyone, as we always have—healthcare providers, employers, patients, pharmaceutical companies, governments, and others—to find ways to deliver high-quality care and lower costs."

But critics didn't buy Witty's expressed commitment to reforming an industry that his company has helped shape and profited from massively. Witty was the highest-paid healthcare executive in the U.S. last year, and 40% of the private insurance industry's total profit since the passage of the Affordable Care Act has flowed to UnitedHealth Group.

"It is (barely) true that UnitedHealth didn't design the U.S. system of corporate insurance, which kills tens of thousands of people a year through denial of care," Alex Lawson, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works, told Common Dreams. "But they certainly have perfected it and turned it into a medical murder apparatus at industrial scale. They not only block all attempts to change the system in the direction of public health, they bribe and bully with their billions in blood money to make it even crueler."

"Andrew Witty is the high priest of the temple to Moloch and Mammon, murder and money," Lawson added. "And there is no way for him to wash his hands of it, except perhaps to resign and then dedicate every dollar he has to dismantling the current system brick by brick and building one based on public health in its stead."

"Medicare for All is the only proposal on the table capable of delivering universal, continuous coverage for everyone, while also securing the efficiency and savings only possible through the elimination of private insurance."

While publicly pledging to cooperate with reform efforts, Witty has defended his company's care denials in private and urged his employees not to engage with media outlets in the aftermath of Thompson's murder.

Contrary to Witty's depiction of his company in his Times op-ed, UnitedHealth has historically been an aggressive opponent of reform efforts aimed at mitigating the harms of for-profit insurance and building public alternatives. The Leverreported in 2021 that UnitedHealth Group "held a webinar to pressure its rank-and-file employees to mobilize against efforts in Connecticut to create a state-level public health insurance option."

At the national level, UnitedHealth has spent over $5.8 million this year lobbying federal lawmakers, according to OpenSecrets.

Michael Lighty, president of HealthyCalifornia Now, offered condolences to the family of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in an email to Common Dreams and argued that supporters of healthcare justice must reject reform paths "controlled by economic elites such as collaborations like Andrew Witty invites."

"Our demand is actually simple: free healthcare paid for by our taxes (like firefighting). Let's build on this powerful moment of righteous outrage to change what's possible," Lighty added. "The healthcare industry needs to understand that they are not putting this genie back in the bottle: The healthcare system is a cancer that will take down anyone who defends it."

Witty, who was born in a country with a public healthcare system, did not detail the kinds of reforms he would support in his op-ed Friday, but it's clear he would oppose a transition to a single-payer system such as Medicare for All, which would effectively abolish private health insurance and provide coverage to all Americans for free at the point of service—and at a lower total cost than the status quo.

In a column for The Nation on Friday, writer Natalie Shure argued that "the appalling amount of resources and energy we put into maintaining the existence of health insurance is wasted on an industry with no social value whatsoever."

"You could eliminate every one of these corporations tomorrow and build a system without them that works better, for less money, and with less hassle," Shure wrote. "Other countries already have systems like this. Medicare for All is the only proposal on the table capable of delivering universal, continuous coverage for everyone, while also securing the efficiency and savings only possible through the elimination of private insurance."

"None of that means that murder is justified or useful," Shure added. "But anger can be. Some politicians, from Bernie Sanders, to Elizabeth Warren, to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have begun to make public statements ascribing the reaction to Brian Thompson's murder to widespread fury over the health insurance industry. The next step is to harness it, and to build something new."

This story has been updated to include comment from Michael Lighty, president of HealthyCalifornia Now.



Chinese spy claims add to Prince Andrew's woes

Agence France-Presse
December 13, 2024 

Prince Andrew withdrew from frontline royal duties in late 2019 after public outrage at a BBC television interview in which he defended his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein 
(Adrian DENNIS/AfP)

A former UK security minister said Friday that it was "extremely embarrassing" that a suspected Chinese spy had become a confidant of disgraced royal Prince Andrew.

The story dominated the UK's front pages on Friday, the latest humiliation for a prince whose reputation is already in tatters over his ties to accused sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Judges on Thursday upheld a ban on the businessman, identified only as H6, from entering the country, and said the prince's troubles had left him "vulnerable" to exploitation.

In the ruling, judges assessed H6 was in a position to "generate relationships between senior Chinese officials and prominent UK figures which could be leveraged for political interference purposes by the Chinese State".

Asked whether the prince's advisers should have been more alert to the danger, former minister of state for security Tom Tugendhat told the BBC that "it's not quite as black and white as it may first appear –- but it's certainly extremely embarrassing".

The tribunal heard that the prince's aide Dominic Hampshire told the suspected spy that he could help in potential dealings with Chinese investors.

"Outside of his (Andrew's) closest internal confidants, you sit at the very top of a tree that many, many people would like to be on," Hampshire told H6 in a 2020 letter.

H6 also received an invitation to the prince's birthday party.

Former interior minister Suella Braverman banned H6 from entering the country in 2023 after her ministry found he had engaged in "covert and deceptive activity" on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The tribunal upheld the ban on Thursday, ruling that Braverman "was entitled to conclude that his exclusion was justified and proportionate".

Andrew withdrew from frontline royal duties in late 2019 after public outrage over a BBC television interview in which he defended his friendship with Epstein.

The former Royal Navy helicopter pilot, 64, in February 2022 settled a US civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre, who claimed he sexually assaulted her when she was 17.

Andrew's mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, stripped him of his honorary military titles and patronages soon afterward, effectively shutting him out of royal life.
Ex-Man City striker set to be Georgia's new far-right president

THE COUNTRY NOT THE STATE 

Agence France-Presse
December 13, 2024 

Mikheil Kavelashvili is known for his expletive-laden parliament speeches and tirades against government critics (Georgian Dream party's press service/AFP)

by Irakli METREVELI

Georgian ex-footballer turned far-right politician Mikheil Kavelashvili is set to become Tbilisi's next figurehead president in an indirect election denounced as "illegitimate" by the current pro-EU leader.

Picked by the governing Georgian Dream party as a loyalist, the former forward for the English Premier League's Manchester City is known for his expletive-laden parliament speeches and tirades against government critics and LGBTQ people.

He is expected to be voted into the role by an electoral college controlled by Georgian Dream, after the party abolished the use of popular votes to elect the president under controversial constitutional changes passed in 2017.

Kavelashvili being catapulted to the role comes at a dramatic moment as thousands of anti-government protesters have flooded Tbilisi for weeks, furious at Georgian Dream for shelving EU accession talks.

Protesters have described Kavelashvili as a "puppet" of billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili, Georgian Dream's founder, who in turn has called him "the embodiment of a Georgian man".

Sporting a mustache and combed back hair, his comments on LGBTQ people have raised alarm, as Georgian Dream has adopted Kremlin-style laws curbing their rights.

The ex-footballer slammed the West for wanting "as many people as possible (to be) neutral and tolerant toward the LGBTQ ideology, which supposedly defends the weak but is, in fact, an act against humanity."





- Football roots -



Born in Georgia's tiny southwestern town of Bolnisi in 1971, Kavelashvili began his career as a professional footballer in the 1980s, playing for clubs in Georgia and Russia and becoming a striker for his country's national team.

The 53-year-old played for Manchester City between 1995-1997, scoring on debut against bitter crosstown rivals Manchester United.

He then joined Swiss club Grasshoppers, where he spent most of his time on the bench, before stints elsewhere in Switzerland at Zurich, Luzern, Sion, Aarau and Basel.




AFP Mikheil Kavelashvili played for Manchester City in the mid-1990s and represented Georgia internationally

Kavelashvili was disqualified from running for president of the Georgian Football Federation in 2015 due to a lack of higher education, a requirement for the role.


He has served as an MP for Georgian Dream since 2016 and was elected to the legislature on the party's list in October 2024 polls -- which opposition groups say were rigged and do not recognize.

In 2022, Kavelashvili, alongside other Georgian Dream lawmakers, established a parliamentary faction called People's Power -- an anti-Western group that officially split from the governing party but was widely seen as its satellite.

His political affiliations align with far-right ideologies.



- 'Oligarch's puppet' -

He is known for obscenity-laced statements against opponents and has accused Western leaders of trying to drag Georgia into Russia's war on Ukraine.

Georgian Dream nominated Kavelashvili for the largely ceremonial post in late November, aiming to strengthen its grip on power.

But the nomination outraged many in Georgia, especially those who have been taking to the streets daily for two weeks to protest Georgian Dream's drift from its aim of joining the EU.

On the 14th day of mass protests this week, demonstrators did not hold back in expressing their disdain for Kavelashvili.

"I can hardly imagine anyone less suited for the role of head of state," historian Nika Gobronidze, 53, told AFP.

He said Ivanishvili, the businessman widely believed to be pulling the strings in Georgian politics, chose Kavelashvili as a tool he could control.

"Caligula wanted his horse to be a consul, our oligarch wants his puppet Kavelashvili to be a president," he said, referring to the Roman emperor.



















- 'Illegitimate' -

The new electoral process makes it a foregone conclusion that Kavelashvili will be the next president, with incumbent Salome Zurabishvili set to lose office.

But Kavelashvili will see his legitimacy undermined from the onset, with constitutional law experts -- including an author of Georgia's constitution, Vakhtang Khmaladze -- saying the election will be "illegitimate".

Tbilisi is currently engulfed in a constitutional crisis, with Zurabishvili demanding a re-run of October's parliamentary elections.

Parliament had approved its own credentials in violation of a legal requirement to await a court decision on Zurabishvili's bid to have the election results annulled.

Zurabishvili has declared the new parliament and government "illegitimate" and vowed not to step down at the end of her term on December 29 if Georgian Dream does not organize a fresh vote.


Trump's latest demand: An end to ‘inconvenient’ Daylight Saving Time

Erik De La Garza
December 13, 2024 4:15PM ET

President-elect Donald Trump wants to end Daylight Saving Time changes – and he said Friday the Republican Party will work to do just that.

Americans have grown increasingly irked by the need to adjust the time every spring and fall, and many have called for a change — though abolishing the seasonal changes would require an act of Congress.

“The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn’t!” Trump said Friday in a post to his Truth Social platform. “Daylight Saving Time is inconvenient, and very costly to our Nation.”

A bipartisan push in the Senate to end the time change and make Daylight Savings Time permanent gained steam in 2022 when the Sunshine Protection Act was passed by unanimous consent. It ultimately failed to pass when the House did not act on it.

ALSO READ: The reckoning: Plenty of hurts coming for the people who didn't care about their country

Trump’s announcement drew mixed reaction across social media, with some users showing support for the idea, while others raised questions surrounding the change.

“Get in losers, we’re ending Daylight Savings Time,” Townhall columnist Dustin Grage told his followers on X. “We are so back.”

"Donald Trump says he wants to get rid of Daylight Saving Time. He needs to make it permanent,” artist Art Candee wrote in a social media post. “It shouldn't get dark at 4:30 in the afternoon in the winter.”

“Ok does he mean permanent standard time?” reporter Emily Brooks wrote to her followers on X. “Or permanent daylight savings time like a lot of people want? Because there is a big (1 hour) difference!”

HuffPost reporter Arthur Delaney pointed out to his followers on X: “The US Tried Permanent Daylight Saving Time in the ’70s. People Hated It.”
IT DRIVES YOU MAD

'Alternate reality': NYT experiment immerses reporter in far-right media

Carl Gibson,
 AlterNet
December 13, 2024 

Alex Jones speaks with media after day six of trial at the Travis County Courthouse, in Austin, U.S. August 2, 2022. Briana Sanchez/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

One common explanation for the outcome of the 2024 presidential election is that the far-right's vast social media ecosystem was able to reach more Americans than traditional media, influencing a decisive number of voters in key battleground states. One New York Times reporter decided to put himself in those Americans' shoes for a week and document the results.

In a Friday article, journalist Stuart A. Thompson — who covers right-wing media — dove head-first into Rumble, which is a preferred video news platform for the extreme right. As Thompson noted, Rumble began as a YouTube alternative that was known for cat videos until the January 6, 2021 siege of the U.S. Capitol. Once YouTube banned multiple accounts for their defense of insurrectionists, those content creators migrated their channels and audiences to Rumble.

As part of his research process, Thompson wrote that he watched approximately 47 hours of Rumble content for his report. For one week, Thompson deactivated all of his news apps, filtered out emails from news outlets and newsletters and exclusively watched Rumble content creators like Dan Bongino, Roseanne Barr, Candace Owens, Russell Brand and Clayton Morris, among others.


These are just a few of the most popular Rumble commentators. Other top Rumble contributors include conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and misogynist influencer Andrew Tate. Another is Stew Peters — a former bounty hunter who has roughly 556,000 followers and has praised Adolf Hitler and called for shooting nonprofit workers who help undocumented immigrants.

"Just a few hours into the experiment, it was clear that I was falling into an alternate reality fueled almost entirely by outrage," Thompson wrote, noting that he could feel his worldview and perspectives shift the more he was exposed to far-right narratives.


"When I described to my wife what I was hearing on Rumble, she said I was right to feel uneasy because the world I was immersing myself in sounded genuinely awful," he continued. "Hour by hour, Rumble’s hosts stoked fears about nearly everything: culture wars, transgender Americans and even a potential World War III."

Thompson reported that while he expected blowback from Rumble contributors after his article went live on the Times' site, he was surprised to get public backlash before publication. He recalled one interaction in which Jake Pentland — Roseanne Barr's son, who co-hosts her podcast — posted an email inquiry he sent to X, which resulted in him getting doxxed and brigaded with hate from Rumble viewers.


"Rumble’s chief executive reposted [Pentland's tweet], then Elon Musk reposted that to his more than 200 million followers," Thompson wrote. "My phone number was visible, and apparently seen more than 50 million times on the platform, so I was soon flooded with angry phone calls and texts calling my article (which hadn’t yet been published) a 'hit job' focused on World War III."

After the election, Pew Research found that roughly 37% of Americans under 30 — and approximately 20% of all American adults — get their news from "social media influencers" rather than from traditional news outlets. 63% of those influencers are men, and 77% of those influencers have no background or ties to any news organization. A majority of influencers lean conservative, and 85% of them have a presence on X. 50% of news influencers are active on Instagram, and 44% also have a YouTube presence.

"These Americans also say they get a variety of different types of information, from basic facts and opinions to funny posts and breaking news," Pew reported last month. "When it comes to opinions, most who see them say they are an even mix of opinions they agree and disagree with (61%), but far more say they mostly agree with what they see (30%) than mostly disagree (2%)."

Click here to read Thompson's report for the Times in its entirety (subscription required).
Dogs may be taught to communicate by pressing buttons: study

Travis Gettys
December 13, 2024 
RAW STORY



A new study suggests dogs can learn to express themselves by pressing buttons to create two or more word combinations.

Researchers have been following several thousand dogs since 2022 whose button presses are logged through an app designed by Fluent Pet, which makes soundboards, and they then selected 152 dogs who were pressing two or more buttons in a sequence and found they frequently selected their own name, followed by "want" and then topics like "food" or "outside," reported the Washington Post.

“If we know that they are using the buttons intentionally, they can use them in ways that seem smart, like a young child, “said Federico Rossano, an associate professor of cognitive science at the University of California at San Diego. “This should lead owners to a renewed appreciation of the intelligence of their pets and help them provide for their dogs.”

The data was self-reported by dog owners, but those selected for the multi-word combination study were not informed about it to avoid bias, and the researchers conducted computer simulations on probability to determine whether the combinations were random.

“This is how we know that most dogs in this pool were doing multi-button combinations in nonrandom ways,” Rossano said. “Note that nonrandomness can be caused by many things, including imitating the training they received, though the first analysis comparing button presses by owner and their dogs suggests that this is unlikely to be the main explanation.”

However, he said some of the dogs were pressing the buttons at random, which he said bolstered the credibility of their findings.

"If the data lined up as if they were all extremely systematic," Rossano said, "it would seem very hard to believe."

"The dogs understand the meaning of the more frequently used words on these soundboards and suggest that dogs are capable of using these soundboards to communicate with humans about their needs and wants,” Rossano added. “It further raises the possibility that they might be communicating the way a 2-year-old human might, which is more sophisticated than previously believed.”

Amritha Mallikarjun, a researcher at the Penn Vet Working Dog Center who was not involved in the study, said the dogs' first button press might have been random but led to more button presses through reinforcement.

“Dogs trained on buttons will often like to try things and will take a guess at what we want by performing a random behavior,” she said. “The button-trained dog presses ‘want outside’ one time just to try it. There is no real knowledge of what the concept of the verb ‘want’ is. ‘Outside’ usually means the dog’s person lets you in the backyard, and sometimes you hear your owner press ‘want food,’ so the dog associates the ‘want’ button with good things.”
AMERIKA

'Really concerned': Millions of women warned they'll bear brunt of govt program cuts

Sarah K. Burris
December 13, 2024 3:26PM ET
RAW STORY

African-American woman with 11-day-old baby (Shutterstock)

Advisers of President-elect Donald Trump are pushing to cut the U.S. budget by one-third — and women's groups are bracing for much of that cash to come from services they depend on.

“With this new administration that is coming in … I really am concerned about the lives of women. We are seeing so many policies, so many budget cuts,” said Christian Nunes, president of the National Organization for Women, in an interview with The Guardian.


Republicans now seek cuts to "Medicaid, the joint state/federal health insurance program for people with lower incomes; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), a cash-allowance program that replaced welfare; and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), widely known as food stamps," the report said.

Conservatives say these cuts are necessary to reduce the deficit, make government more efficient, and even restore freedom. Advocates and experts warn that cutting these programs will "throw more people — especially women and children — further into poverty."

The report cites that Medicaid accounts for more than 40% of births in the U.S. It also pays for new mothers who have post-pregnancy-related care for 60 days. For seniors, Medicaid pays for 60% of all nursing home medical care. The report noted that more than 70% of those in nursing homes are women.

The Guardian turned to The Heritage Foundation's "Project 2025," a blueprint for the new Trump administration. Their economic agenda promises to improve "marriage and 'family values.'"

“Marriage, healthy family formation, and delaying sex to prevent pregnancy are virtually ignored in terms of priorities, yet these goals can reverse the cycle of poverty in meaningful ways,” claims the section on proposed changes to TANF and Snap.

The Republican Study Committee claims there should be more work requirements for TANF and Snap. However, considerable research proves that demanding more work requirements "does anything other than force people off benefits without helping them find employment."



















HAIR ON FIRE

'You have to be kidding': MAGA melts down as Spelling Bee accepts new word

Erik De La Garza
December 13, 2024 

May 31, 2018; National Harbor, MD, USA; Karthik Nemmani from Texas spelled the word koinonia correctly to win the 2018 Scripps National Spelling Bee at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center. Jack Gruber-USA TODAY NETWORK

The Scripps National Spelling Bee’s annual list of study words for third graders drew the ire of conservatives fuming over its embrace of the feminist variation for “women.”

The 2024-25 study list posted on school district websites includes the term “womyn” as an approved option for spelling “women” that third graders who want to compete in the national spelling competition can use, Fox News Digital reported.

While the spelling list noted that “women” is the “preferred spelling,” allowing the option for third-grade students to spell “womyn” in the competition lit up MAGA world.

“You have to be kidding,” Turning Point USA wrote in a social media post.

“No. Freaking. Way,” Far-right conspiracy theorist webcaster Alex Jones told his followers on X.

“Question for the National Spelling Bee: What is a womyn? Kristen Waggoner, the president of the Alliance Defending Freedom, asked her X followers.

X user Dean Cramer opined that the change comes “because ‘womyn’ doesn’t have ‘men’ in the word.”

“Changing the spelling of ‘women’ to ‘womyn’ in a spelling bee? This isn’t progress, it’s ideological nonsense,” The Calvin Report wrote. “Leave language and kids out of this agenda.”

A Scripps spokesperson defended the change, telling Fox News Digital in a statement that the spelling came from the Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary, which the spokesperson added was “the final authority and sole source for the spelling of all words offered in competition.”

"All of the words used in the Scripps National Spelling Bee program are pulled from our official dictionary, Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary,” the statement to the network said. “During competition, our policy is to accept any correct spelling listed in our official dictionary that isn’t marked archaic or obsolete. The alternate spelling ‘womyn’ is therefore included on our study list because it is listed as an alternate spelling for 'women' in Merriam-Webster.”

The spelling competition will celebrate its 100th anniversary when the 2025 National Finals are held in May, according to Fox News Digital.

'Ontario is not having it': Trump reportedly set stage for Canada to cut off U.S. energy

Tom Boggioni
December 13, 2024 
RAW STORY

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump talks with Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a North Atlantic Treaty Organization Plenary Session at the NATO summit in Watford, Britain, December 4, 2019. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

With MSNBC host Jonathan Lemire pointing out that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been surprisingly sanguine about Donald Trump's insults and tariff threats, CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin claimed the president-elect's taunts are not going unnoticed north of the U.S. border.

With Trump wielding tariff threats against Canada, Mexico and China before he even takes office, the "Squawk Box" host reported that there is the danger that some Americans could end up scrambling to keep the lights on if Canada's leaders choose to cut off power supplies to the U.S. provided by their country.

"Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau, at least to this point, has not really fought back against Trump's taunting, whether about tariffs or the suggestion he would annex Canada and be our 51st state, calling him Governor Trudeau in a social media post," Lemire prompted his guest. "But all eyes turns to the province of Ontario and Doug Ford which is floating the idea they're going to hit back, they may bar American-made alcohol and other restrictions if Trump follows through on these tariffs threats."



"Ontario is not having it," Ross Sorkin bluntly replied. "And they're throwing down the gauntlet on the alcohol front because it would make the export of alcohol from the U.S. complicated and much more expensive.":

"But more importantly there's this electricity piece," he continued. "Ontario delivers electricity to about 1.5 million homes in the United States and suggesting maybe they would consider cutting that off."


"You know, this is when people talk about the tariffs and the uncertainty the tariffs could create, it's –– it wasn't just the cost of the tariffs, it's the retaliation," he elaborated, "and this is an example of the kind of thing that could happen and, therefore, a kind of different leverage points you think either the U.S. has or, in this case, Canada, may have."

You can watch below or at the link here.

'Counterintuitive – and dangerous': Agency that fights foreign disinformation may shutter

Erik De La Garza
December 10, 2024 
RAW STORY

A hacker at work (Shutterstock)

A State Department agency that fights to disrupt disinformation abroad could shut down just as Donald Trump is set to return to the White House.

The Global Engagement Center learned over the weekend that the latest National Defense Authorization Act did not include a multi-year extension for the unit, the Guardian reported Tuesday. The threat to its funding can only be addressed through an act of Congress, which could develop another route for an extension by Dec. 24, the report said.

The snub provoked a terse response from a State Department spokesperson.

“As our adversaries continue to ramp up their efforts globally, it’s counterintuitive – and dangerous – to weaken or worse yet dismantle, the US’s leadership in this critical mission,” the spokesperson told the Guardian.

The funding decision comes as Republicans in Congress have vowed to dismantle governmental agencies they have grown leery of. The House Committee on Small Business applauded the decision in a social media post on Tuesday as “a win for free speech and Main Street America!”

“The shuttering of the State Department’s Global Engagement Center means there is one less way for unelected bureaucrats to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights,” the post said.

But the threat still looms.

“According to the center’s own assessment, countries like China have invested ‘billions of dollars’ to exert global information control through disinformation and propaganda,” the report stated.