Wednesday, January 01, 2025






Resilient Roots: Indigenous Agriculture and Climate Change in Latin America

01.Jan.2025 
Harvard International Review



In Guatemala and Mexico, the milpa system is an Indigenous practice that increases soil fertility and crop yields. This system involves intercropping, the cultivation of diverse crops in the same plot. Along with most Indigenous knowledge, it is typically maintained by the women of agricultural communities. Women are responsible for selecting the crops that will be planted, overseeing the rotation of the crops, harvesting the crops, and preparing meals for consumption or products for selling. Their dedication to these native practices has led not only to agricultural prosperity but also climate resiliency due to the diversity and strength of their crops.

In efforts to provide more nutritious foods, generate a greater variety of crops, and establish their role in agriculture, women are creating a more sustainable food system. These agricultural practices not only demonstrate how sustainable procedures help the economy and provide food for communities; they also contribute to the fight against climate change. Many countries are involved, but the common customs found in communities in Peru, Mexico, and Guatemala have proven eye-opening.

Across these three countries, the agricultural practices are not only female-led, but also rooted in Indigenous knowledge. Studies have shown that Indigenous agricultural and conservation practices are a key way to produce local climate adaptation strategies. These practices yield large quantities of highly nutritious crops that sustain communities in a way that conserves and restores the land. This combination of natural climate mitigation and heightened agricultural production places Indigenous women at the forefront of resilience against the negative effects of climate change in Latin America.

Laramate and Kichwa Women in Peru

In the Laramate district of Peru, the revival of Indigenous practices occurred when the negative effects of climate change on crop yields became increasingly apparent. A decline in production led women in the community to revive traditional Indigenous practices—such as eliminating agrochemicals, rotating crops for soil fertility, and efficient irrigation—to produce healthier crops.

Training and education efforts about these practices are supported by the Centro de Culturas Indigenas del Peru (CHIRAPAQ), which receives funding from the UN Women’s Fund for Gender Equality. This program provides Indigenous women with training on these Indigenous agricultural practices. For example, the training inspired Lucia Rupire to emulate her father and grandfather by fertilizing with manure from cows, sheep, and alpaca: “I started doing the same after the trainings because I understood that the techniques of my ancestors respected the environment while improving fertility of the soil and improving our health. Now we have learned to prepare even better organic manure…my husband is astonished by what we have harvested!”

Indigenous women have explained that implementing these ancestral practices has not only helped the soil become more fertile but has also provided economic benefits. This agricultural transition has allowed women to sell the surplus crops and seeds. For a community that was struggling to produce enough for its members, the ability to sustain families and have enough to generate income has been life-changing. For example, Carmen Tenorio from the Yauca community described how her family enjoys more food and income: “In the past we only sowed potatoes, we just ate a bit of wheat… We couldn’t afford buying anything. Now I grow my own vegetables and our food is better because I combine it with vegetables. Part of what I sow, I cook for myself and I sell the rest to earn some money.”

In other Peruvian regions home to the Kichwa, Indigenous women are taking a different approach to the negative impacts of climate change. The people in this region have a history of rotating seeds and planting year-round, but these practices are at risk of disappearing due to the increasing amount of farmland dedicated for singular crops such as coffee or cacao. While these cash crops have the potential to bring in a large profit, they are more vulnerable to adverse environmental conditions, and the lack of diversification is often damaging to the soil.

Recognizing this problem, the women of the community have increasingly advocated for shared gardens across multiple Kichwa communities. These shared gardens are characterized by a diverse array of crops that are native to the region, such as daledale, a root vegetable, and majambo, a type of yellow gourd. These gardens have reduced food insecurity in rural areas, as Luz Sinarahua—leader of female farmers in Chirikyacu—described: “Food prices are increasing. Sometimes we don’t have money for bread. That’s why we’re glad to have the beans, yucca, and plantains from the garden.” The goal of this shared garden program is not only to protect Indigenous cultural traditions and provide enough food, but also to sell excess produce, similar to the women of the Laramate district.

The incorporation of Indigenous practices into agricultural systems has made them more resilient. Crop rotation, selecting native crops, and eliminating chemical use have revitalized the soil and farmlands of these Peruvian regions. These insights highlight the importance of diversification in agriculture and the impacts of reducing chemical use. Heeding the calls of Indigenous women in Peru has established food security, incurred economic benefits for their communities, and enhanced environmental sustainability.

Milpas in Mexico

In a similar vein, reviving a specific Indigenous agricultural system in Mexico has helped women combat climate change and preserve traditional practices. This system, known as a milpa, grows diverse crop species within the same space, especially maize, beans, and squash. These systems only incorporate crops that are native to the land, which are often complementary and provide mutual benefits. For example, bean plants fix nitrogen that can be absorbed by other plants, while maize physically supports and shades beans. Similar to the processes in Peru, this diversification helps maintain healthy soils and provides essential nutrients to the harvesting communities. Numerous studies indicate that milpas are more productive and resilient than monocultures featuring single crops. Milpas are also culturally important for Indigenous peoples such as the Maya.

Across Mexico, efforts are being made to increase the presence of milpas in a culture dominated by cash crop farming. Given growing concerns about the adverse effects of climate change on agricultural yields, the key to promoting this practice has been through education about how milpas are resilient in the face of  climate change. Milpa systems help maintain healthy soils; increase biodiversity; conserve water; reduce erosion; and lower temperatures of surrounding areas. The most important aspect of these systems, however, is that in times of food scarcity or global economic interruptions, farmers will have a secure source of food.  

Women are typically at the forefront of maintaining these systems; they possess the knowledge of these practices and are responsible for making the food from the yields of milpas. For example, in Chiapas, a state in Mexico, women use the corn from harvests to create tostadas—a typical food in the region—and other products that are not only for community consumption, but are also sold to markets outside the community. Therefore, just like in Peru, these women are both responsible for cultivating nutritious foods to feed their communities and are able to earn income when there is a crop surplus. These community benefits are coupled with increased resilience to the changing environment, which allows women to continue to provide for their communities.

This Indigenous system in Mexico maintains agricultural yields in a sustainable and climate-resilient fashion. Women lead the milpa systems and will continue to support their communities with this practice. As climate change worsens, women will be able to pass down the tradition of milpas to guarantee the continued viability of this resilient agricultural infrastructure.

Mam in Guatemala

Guatemala’s Indigenous communities also promote the milpa system similar to those in Mexico while advocating for their own practices such as K’uxu’rum—which co-cultivates corn, beans, and madre cacao trees—and the incorporation of organic fertilizers. Women play a central role in communicating and encouraging these practices, driving the expansion of and transition towards Indigenous knowledge in agricultural systems across the country.

There has been an increased effort to promote Indigenous styles of farming, which are often small-scale but resilient to climate change. In Guatemala, women have promoted seed exchanges, adjustments to agricultural calendars, and expansion of the milpa system. For example, the Maya-Mam women in Guatemala have established a nursery for seedlings. This nursery was created when the surrounding land started to decay due to industrial mining activity and climate disasters. As one elderly woman in Tuixcajchis described: “The streams that flowed here before are dying. Our harvests were once plentiful, but today there’s only desert. We don’t want our children and grandchildren to inherit this reality.”

The protection of seedlings was also implemented because industrial-scale agriculture companies were attempting to sell these women seedlings that would not survive in the region’s ranging weather conditions. Women also gather at this nursery to share strategies for land preservation and their experiences with farming. While this practice is small and not seen everywhere in Guatemala, the community-oriented preservation of seedlings has created more resilient biodiversity in the area, enabling harvests under harsh conditions.

In addition to the protection of native seedlings and incorporation of milpas, the K’uxu’rum system has also enhanced resilience against climate change and food insecurity. The K’uxu’rum system is mainly implemented in the Dry Corridor of Guatemala and promotes the natural regeneration of soil. The main crops grown are corn, beans, and cacao trees. The interactions among these crops improve soil moisture retention and the cycling of nutrients, allowing these crops to withstand long droughts and adverse conditions. The practice emerged from the revitalization of Indigenous practices and provides crucial resilience to droughts in the area.

Recognizing Inequality and Moving Forward

Despite the irreplaceable role Indigenous women play in leading resilience against climate change in the agricultural sector, they still face inequality within these countries. They often suffer from discrimination based on gender, and outside of Indigenous communities, they are less likely to own land compared to men. Furthermore, they are more vulnerable to health risks and malnutrition. Given these disproportionate risks, these women are increasingly concerned about climate change, which has the potential to exacerbate the inequality that they already face.

As demonstrated in these examples from Peru, Mexico, and Guatemala, Indigenous women are at the forefront of climate resilience, but their efforts are often  unrecognized. As these women are typically responsible for communicating Indigenous practices and conserving land, international organizations are calling for their inclusion in decisions about climate change resilience. UN programs are promoting the role of women in the agricultural sector both by facilitating access to education as well as economically supporting the implementation of sustainable systems.

Nicolette Reale

Nicolette Reale is a staff writer for the HIR. She is a junior studying Government and Psychology with interests in environmental justice, Latin American policy, urban planning, and human rights law.



 


“Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown” 

– Founder of TSMC


January 01, 2025 22:04

Morris Chang is both proud and uneasy about Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the company he founded in 1987 that has become the undisputed world leader.

To describe his feelings, he likes to quote a phrase from “King Henry the Fourth” by William Shakespeare, one of his favourite authors -- “Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown”.

“To become the leader is not easy to do. As Shakespeare says, the crown is very heavy,” he said at the publication of the second half of his autobiography in Taipei last month. “(Donald) Trump did not name TSMC directly, but said that Taiwan companies stole the chip business from the U.S.”

In his desire to bring the chip industry back to the U.S., what measures would Trump take against producers in Taiwan and other foreign countries?

The Commonwealth magazine of Taiwan published the autobiography. Chang released the first part 27 years ago, recounting his early career with Texas Instruments and the foundation of TSMC. The second part traces his leadership of TSMC to its current global prominence until his retirement in 2018, after 31 years as its head. In the initial run, Commonwealth printed 140,000 copies, compared to the average initial printing of a book of 3,000 copies.

In 1993, TSMC was listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In 1997, it become the first Taiwan company to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

On December 10, it released net revenue for the first 11 months of 2024 -- NT$2,616.15 billion, an increase of 31.8 percent compared to the same period in 2023.

The book revealed that, in 2013, Chang invited Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to join TSMC. After the 2008 financial crisis, Nvidia’s market value had fallen to US$9 billion and its stock price to US$1.55 due to weak demand for personal computers. Huang was so dejected that he did not want to get out of bed or leave his house.

Huang declined the invitation, saying that he already had a job and that his ownership of 7.5 per cent in Nvidia would pose a conflict of interest. “I admire Huang’s visionary leadership and professionalism,” said Chang. “He is one of the second generation of semiconductor leaders who prioritise design and computer science over manufacturing.”

Since then, Nvidia has never looked back. It is one of the world’s leading suppliers of AI software and hardware. In one day in June 2024, it overtook Microsoft as the world’s most valuable publicly traded company, with a market capitalisation of more than US$3.3 trillion.

The book describes Chang’s relationship with his two biggest rivals – Intel and Samsung – whom it has defeated in the market.

He said that he had a good relationship with the three founders of Intel – Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore and Andy Grove but not with Pat Gelsinger, who took over as CEO in 2021. “His communication skills outweighed his strategic vision. He was hostile to TSMC.

“Intel’s Achilles heel is the lack of a new strategy and a problematic switch a wafer foundry services. This is leading the company to miss out on AI business opportunities. It has not developed a new strategy and is searching for yet another CEO,” he said. Trump wants Intel to the U.S. national champion in the field of semiconductors, and one other major American firm in this sector.

On Samsung, Chang said that its strategic flaw was technology rather than leadership or administration. “South Korea’s recent political instability is a further impediment to its operations.”

Chris Miller, author of “Chip War” said that, despite its poor performance, Samsung remained committed to its foundry operation. Given the influence of the founding family and the company’s complexity, Samsung was likely to continue investing in foundry, even it was not immediately profitable, he said.

He said Intel was likely to receive future U.S. support, such as it has already received through the CHIPS Act and the “Secure Enclave” programme.

One possible threat to TSMC is an anti-trust investigation because of its dominant market position, Miller said. “It is hard to find a trillion-dollar technology that has not faced anti-trust scrutiny, such as companies like Microsoft, Google and Nvidia, We should not be surprised if TSMC faced a similar set of questions.”

TSMC has taken a giant step to meeting the nationalist demands of Trump by a planned investment of US$65 billion in three semiconductor plants in Phoenix, Arizona. Of this, the U.S. government is providing US$6.6 billion in grants and US$5 billion in loans.

This should make Chang’s crown a little lighter.

A Hong Kong-based writer, teacher and speaker.
‘Heads of state not invited to Trump inaugural’

Story by Alexis Romero
1/1/2025

‘Heads of state not invited to Trump inaugural’© Donald Trump Campaign / File

MANILA, Philippines — President Marcos will not attend the inauguration of US president-elect Donald Trump, who will return to the White House this month after staging what has been described as one of the most remarkable political comebacks in modern history.

Philippine Ambassador Jose Manuel Romualdez will represent the Philippines during the inauguration, which will take place on Jan. 20.


“Since the 1800s, no head of state has been invited to the US presidential inauguration. Only ambassadors represented in Washington, DC are invited,” Romualdez said in a text message to The STAR.

“I am looking forward to working once again with president Trump’s administration,” he said after he met with the president-elect at the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Presidential Communications Secretary Cesar Chavez said the US secretary of state, on behalf of the Joint Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, has invited the chiefs of diplomatic missions and their spouses to represent their respective heads of state and their governments at the principal inaugural events.

“In this case, Ambassador Jose Manuel Romualdez will represent (President Marcos) at the inauguration,” Chavez said in a statement issued yesterday.

He added that there is no confirmation on whether Marcos would visit the US to meet with Trump in the early months of 2025.


Marcos has visited the US four times since becoming president in 2022.

His first trip was in September that year, when he participated in the general debate at the 77th session of the United Nations General Assembly, while his second was his official visit from April 30 to May 4, 2023.

In November of the same year, the President went to San Francisco to attend the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Leaders’ Meeting.

He also went to Los Angeles to tour a SpaceX facility and to Hawaii to visit the US Indo-Pacific Command.

His fourth and latest visit to the US was his attendance at the first US-Japan-Philippines trilateral summit held in April last year.

Trump became the 45th president of the US after beating Hillary Clinton in 2016, but lost his reelection bid to Joe Biden in 2020.

Trump faced a string of legal challenges, including his conviction on 34 felony counts in his home city of New York.

Despite his court battles and controversies, he managed to pull off a convincing victory over Vice President Kamala Harris in last year’s presidential race, securing 312 electoral votes against his rival’s 226.

Trump, the first US leader to be convicted of a crime, also won the popular vote, garnering 77.28 million votes against Harris’ 75 million.

In a recent statement, Marcos said he is looking forward to working with Trump on various issues that would benefit the Philippines and the US.

Marcos also expressed optimism that Trump’s “robust leadership” would result in a better future for the two countries.

“President Trump has won, and the American people have triumphed. I congratulate them on their victory in an exercise that showed the world the strength of American values,” Marcos said following the results of the US presidential elections in November last year

“I am hopeful that this unshakeable alliance, tested in war and peace, will be a force for good, blazing a path of prosperity and amity in the region and on both sides of the Pacific,” he added.

Positive momentum

Meanwhile, the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said the Philippines looks forward to working with the incoming Trump administration, continuing the positive momentum in economic, security and defense cooperation between the two countries.

The DFA welcomed the call between Marcos and Trump on Nov. 19.

The agency noted the congratulatory call, described by Marcos as very friendly and productive, underscored the positive momentum and trajectory in the Philippines’ bilateral relations with the US and highlighted the positive role of Filipino-Americans in US society, including in the recent successful and peaceful conduct of US elections.

“The United States remains an important ally, partner and friend to the Philippines. We look forward to working with the Trump administration in ensuring that Philippines-US relations remain robust and benefit from continuing the positive momentum in security and defense cooperation, economic partnership, as well as broader and deeper engagement across other areas of mutual interest,” the DFA said. – Pia Lee Brago


Pro-Palestinian Movement Faces Steeper Challenges as Trump Returns to Power


A pro-Palestinian protester demonstrates outside the Liberal Party of Canada holiday party in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, December 17, 2024. REUTERS/Patrick Doyle


As Donald Trump prepares to take the reins of the White House again, pro-Palestinian groups in the U.S. are bracing for what they predict will be an even more difficult fight to push their agenda. With Republicans gaining full control of Congress alongside the presidency, these groups find themselves facing diminished leverage and heightened risks to their advocacy.


A Movement at a Crossroads

The Palestinian rights movement has historically focused its efforts on persuading Democrats to soften unconditional U.S. support for Israel. But with Trump’s staunchly pro-Israel policies likely to intensify, the movement’s leaders fear that a Republican-controlled government could undermine their work in unprecedented ways.

“The Palestinian rights movement is very clear-eyed in understanding that this Trump administration will mean things get much worse for Palestinians,” said Beth Miller, political director for Jewish Voice for Peace Action.

Miller added that the administration may quickly move to curtail the movement’s freedom to operate, referencing legislative actions targeting organizations that challenge U.S. support for Israel.


Legislative Threats and Republican Pushback

Under Republican leadership, pro-Palestinian activism has already faced significant opposition. A GOP-led House panel has scrutinized Ivy League universities over campus protests, accusing them of fostering antisemitism. Additionally, recent legislation threatens the tax-exempt status of organizations deemed to support terrorism—a move activists fear could stifle their advocacy.

Sandra Tamari, executive director of the Adalah Justice Project, warned of the broader implications: “Palestine is, in many ways, the canary in the coal mine. What authoritarian forces want is to shut down dissent entirely.”

James Zogby, founder of the Arab American Institute, echoed these concerns, predicting a crackdown on demonstrations and speech under Trump. “We don’t know how far Trump will go in aligning with Netanyahu’s plans, but the signs are troubling,” Zogby said.


A Divisive Impact on Democrats

While pro-Palestinian groups have long criticized Democrats for their unwavering support of Israel, they also view the party as their best hope for change. Progressive lawmakers like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders have amplified the movement’s message, but the broader Democratic establishment has often resisted calls for policy shifts.

The issue came to a head during Vice President Kamala Harris’s unsuccessful 2024 presidential campaign. Pro-Palestinian activists withheld endorsements and launched protests over the Biden administration’s Gaza policies, a strategy some believe contributed to Harris’s loss in key battleground states like Michigan.

“I really regret that Harris and the Democrats didn’t listen to us,” said Layla Elabed, co-founder of the “Uncommitted” campaign, which urged voters to protest against Biden’s Gaza policies. “She might have won if she had turned the page on Biden’s approach.”


Looking Forward: New Tactics for Advocacy

With fewer allies in Washington, the movement plans to pivot to local initiatives, including boycotts, community organizing, and pressuring Democratic lawmakers to publicly oppose military aid to Israel. Miller stressed the need to expose the disconnect between Democratic leadership and its voter base: “The greatest pressure point exists within the Democratic Party because of the massive gap between what voters demand and what leadership delivers.”

The movement’s leaders are also preparing for intensified legislative challenges. They aim to block measures they view as attacks on constitutional rights and free speech while continuing their push for an end to unconditional U.S. weapons transfers to Israel.


A New Reality Under Trump

Trump’s alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and pro-Israel megadonors like Miriam Adelson underscores the challenges ahead. During his 2024 campaign, Trump made inflammatory remarks targeting pro-Palestinian activists and Democratic lawmakers critical of Israel.

Despite these hurdles, activists like Tamari remain committed to the cause: “This fight has never been easy, but silencing dissent will not succeed. The Palestinian rights movement has faced obstacles before and will adapt to meet the challenges of this new era.”

Trump's Return to Power: What It Means for Transgender Students in America




With Donald Trump's return to the White House confirmed for January 20, 2025, transgender students across the United States face an uncertain future. Many fear that a second Trump administration will usher in significant setbacks for transgender rights, particularly in education, healthcare, and general societal acceptance. Having previously rolled back key protections during his first term, Trump's return is likely to accelerate the erosion of legal safeguards for transgender youth, leaving them vulnerable to discrimination and marginalization.

Throughout his campaign and policy proposals under Project 2025, Trump has made it clear that he intends to reverse many of the advancements in LGBTQ+ rights that were achieved in the previous administration. For transgender students, this could mean the loss of critical protections in schools and broader societal spaces, making the next few years a critical period for advocacy and resistance.

Potential Rollback of Protections

One of the most immediate concerns for transgender students is the rollback of protections that allow them to access restrooms, locker rooms, and sports teams that align with their gender identity. Trump's administration has signaled its intention to rescind federal guidance that prohibits discrimination based on gender identity in educational settings. This would potentially strip transgender students of their rights to use facilities consistent with their gender, exposing them to increased harassment and making schools unsafe spaces.

Rebated video: Transgender New Yorkers voice concern over Trump's agenda (Reuters)

According to the Movement Advancement Project, 26 states already have restrictions on transgender students participating in sports consistent with their gender identity, and more than half of U.S. states have banned transgender individuals under 18 from receiving gender-affirming healthcare. If Trump's administration follows through on these rollback plans, the legal landscape for transgender students could become even more hostile.

Trump is also expected to target Title IX, the federal law that governs sex-based discrimination in education. Under a second term, proposed changes to Title IX could exclude transgender students from protections related to pronouns, gender-specific facilities, and even participation in extracurricular activities. These changes would reinforce a binary view of gender, disregarding the lived realities of transgender and nonbinary students and leaving them vulnerable to exclusion and mistreatment.

Gender-Affirming Care Under Threat

Another area where transgender youth could face severe challenges is in accessing gender-affirming healthcare. Trump has previously stated that he would ban gender-affirming care for minors, labeling it as “child sexual mutilation.” If enacted, such a policy would deny thousands of transgender youth access to essential medical care, including hormone therapy and surgeries, that align their physical appearance with their gender identity. This kind of care is widely recognized by medical professionals as necessary for the well-being and mental health of transgender individuals.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has consistently advocated for access to gender-affirming care, emphasizing that it significantly reduces the risk of mental health challenges such as depression and suicidal thoughts in transgender youth. Denying this care could lead to devastating psychological consequences for an already vulnerable population.

Impact on Mental Health and SafetyThe impact of Trump's rhetoric on transgender youth’s mental health is already being felt. Crisis hotlines have reported a surge in calls from transgender individuals concerned about their futures under a Trump administration. In Alabama, a 16-year-old nonbinary teen called a crisis hotline after being disturbed by anti-trans ads that painted transgender individuals as threats to society. The Southern Poverty Law Center reported a rise in anti-trans rhetoric during the 2024 election, with the Republican Party spending over $222 million on anti-trans ads. The emotional toll is evident: the Rainbow Youth Project reported a 50% increase in calls to their crisis hotline, which normally receives about 3,700 calls monthly, spiking to 5,500 in the final days of the election.

As a result of these heightened fears, many transgender students are grappling with their safety and mental well-being in an increasingly hostile political climate. Advocacy groups, such as the Rainbow Youth Project, have noted an uptick in distress calls from transgender youth, reflecting the urgent need for emotional and mental health support.

Community Response and Advocacy

In response to these potential challenges, LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations are preparing for an intensified fight for transgender rights. With more states passing anti-trans legislation, these groups are working to strengthen legal protections at both the state and federal levels. Virtual support networks, youth advocacy programs, and legal assistance are all part of the efforts to ensure transgender youth have the resources and community they need to navigate the upcoming political landscape.

While Trump’s return to power marks a daunting period for transgender students, continued advocacy, resistance, and community solidarity will be essential in safeguarding their rights and well-being. As the battle for equality continues, the resilience of transgender students and their supporters will play a crucial role in shaping the future of transgender rights in America.