Wednesday, December 18, 2024

 

Experts issue new ethical standards for body donation programs



Wiley




A new report in the journal Anatomical Sciences Education outlines best practices and standards for human body donation programs across the United States, which accept whole body donations after death for research and education.

The report, issued by a task force of American Association for Anatomy members, seeks to align body donation programs with evolving societal values and legal frameworks. It aims to maintain the highest ethical standards for donors by upholding the principles of informed consent, oversight, and dignity.

The report emphasizes the importance of ensuring potential donors and their families fully understand the donation process, stressing the need for public education and transparent engagement.

“We hold a profound moral and ethical responsibility to honor the selfless contributions of our body donors, and this document represents a significant step towards fulfilling their wishes with the highest standards of ethical care,” said corresponding author Joy Y. Balta, MSc, MEd, PhD, of Point Loma Nazarene University.

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2520

 

Additional Information
NOTE: The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
An official publication of the American Association for AnatomyAnatomical Sciences Education is an international journal publishing evidence-based opinions, innovations, and research in education in the anatomical and physiological sciences. In particular, education in gross anatomy, embryology, histology, neurosciences, physiology, biomedical, and life sciences. The journal covers all levels of education including, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, nursing, allied health, veterinary, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental.

About Wiley      
Wiley is one of the world’s largest publishers and a trusted leader in research and learning. Our industry-leading content, services, platforms, and knowledge networks are tailored to meet the evolving needs of our customers and partners, including researchers, students, instructors, professionals, institutions, and corporations. We empower knowledge-seekers to transform today’s biggest obstacles into tomorrow’s brightest opportunities. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on FacebookXLinkedIn and Instagram.

 

Carnivorous squirrels documented in California

First evidence of ground squirrels hunting and eating voles in Bay Area

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of California - Davis

Squirrel runs with vole in mouth 

image: 

A California ground squirrel in Conta Costa County runs with a vole it hunted in its mouth. A study from UC Davis and University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire is the first to document widespread carnivorous feeding of voles by squirrels.

view more 

Credit: Sonja Wild/UC Davis

A ground squirrel with cheeks stuffed with nuts, seeds or grains, is a common sight. But a new study provides the first evidence that California ground squirrels also hunt, kill and eat voles. The study, led by the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire and University of California, Davis, is the first to chronicle widespread carnivorous behavior among squirrels. 

Published in the Journal of Ethology, the study fundamentally changes our understanding of ground squirrels. It suggests that what was considered a granivorous species actually is an opportunistic omnivore and more flexible in its diet than was assumed. 

The observations occurred in 2024 — the 12th year of the Long-term Behavioral Ecology of California Ground Squirrels Project conducted at Briones Regional Park in Contra Costa County. Out of 74 observed interactions with voles between June and July, 42% involved active hunting of these small rodents by ground squirrels.

“This was shocking,” said lead author Jennifer E. Smith, an associate professor of biology at UW-Eau Claire who leads the long-term ground squirrels project with Sonja Wild of UC Davis. “We had never seen this behavior before. Squirrels are one of the most familiar animals to people. We see them right outside our windows; we interact with them regularly. Yet here’s this never-before-encountered-in-science behavior that sheds light on the fact that there’s so much more to learn about the natural history of the world around us.”

Wild has observed hundreds of squirrels in nature and yet, even for her, when the undergraduate students came in from field work and told her what they had witnessed, she said, “No, I’m not sure what you’re referring to.” Then she watched the video. 

“I could barely believe my eyes,” said Wild, a postdoctoral research fellow in the UC Davis Environmental Science and Policy department. “From then, we saw that behavior almost every day. Once we started looking, we saw it everywhere.”

Opportunists amid rapid change

Through videos, photos and direct observations at the regional park, the authors documented California ground squirrels of all ages and genders hunting, eating and competing over vole prey between June 10 and July 30. The squirrels’ carnivorous summer behavior peaked during the first two weeks of July, coinciding with an explosion of vole numbers at the park reported by citizen scientists on iNaturalist. This suggests the squirrels’ hunting behavior emerged alongside a temporary increase in the availability of prey, the study said. The scientists didn’t observe the squirrels hunting other mammals.

“The fact that California ground squirrels are behaviorally flexible and can respond to changes in food availability might help them persist in environments rapidly changing due to the presence of humans,” Wild said. 

Smith added that many species, including the California ground squirrel, are “incredible opportunists.” From raccoons and coyotes to spotted hyenas and humans, the flexibility these mammals apply to their hunting strategies help them change and adapt with the human landscape. 

“Through this collaboration and the data coming in, we’re able to document this widespread behavior that we had no idea was going on,” Smith said. “Digital technology can inform the science, but there’s no replacement for going out there and witnessing the behavior because what animals are doing always surprises us.” 

The researchers said many questions remain unanswered, including how widespread hunting behavior is among squirrels, whether and how it is passed down from parent to pup, and how it effects ecological processes. The authors are also excited to return to the field next summer to see what impact, if any, this year’s vole hunting may have on squirrel reproduction compared to the past decade.

Coauthors include Joey Ingbretson, Mackenzie Miner, Ella Oestreicher, Mari Podas, Tia Ravara, Lupin Teles and Jada Wahl of UW-Eau Claire and Lucy Todd of UC Davis. 

Several coauthors conducted field work during their undergraduate studies. Their work was partly funded by the Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program, Diversity Mentoring Program and Summer Research Experience for Undergraduates. Additional funding sources include the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Vicki Lord Larson and James Larson Tenure-track Time Reassignment Collaborative Research Program.

A California ground squirrel eats a vole it hunted in Briones Regional Park in Contra Costa County. 

A California ground squirrel dines on a vole it hunted in a Bay Area regional park.

Credit

Sonja Wild, UC Davis

UK Environmental groups to support Just Stop Oil M25 protestors appeal sentences

Yesterday



‘Peaceful protesters shouldn’t be locked up, period.’

Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth have revealed they will work together to help five Just Stop Oil activists appeal their ‘record-length’ sentences.

In July, Five Just Stop Oil activists were handed four and five-year jail sentences for joining a Zoom call to discuss a planned protest on the M25 motorway.

Founder of JSO, Roger Hallam, was sentenced to five years in prison in July while activists Daniel Shaw, Louise Lancaster, Lucia Whittaker De Abreu, and Cressida Gethin received four-year sentences.

The protestors were sentenced under the ‘conspiracy to cause a public nuisance’ offence which was introduced in the previous government’s draconian Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act and Public Order Act in 2022.

The two environmental groups have said they will combine their expertise to support the appellants’ cases, after the Court of Appeal granted them permission to intervene with written submissions.

Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth (FoE) have said that the protestors’ custodial sentences are excessive, stating that they “breach human rights legislation, which requires that sentencing must be proportionate where fundamental rights, such as the right to protest*, are engaged.”

The groups said they “believe the mounting authoritarian crackdown” on peaceful protest over the climate emergency “is a serious threat to our democracy and civil liberties”.

In addition, they are calling on Labour to repeal the Conservatives’ anti-protest legislation to “help restore the UK’s once-respected tolerance for peaceful protest”.

Katie de Kauwe, senior lawyer at Friends of the Earth, said: “To be jailed for up to five years for planning a peaceful protest over the UK’s laggard progress in preventing runaway climate and ecological breakdown, shows the chilling effect of the previous government’s anti-protest laws in stifling our democracy and allowing the government of the day to curb dissent.

“In what functioning democracy can it be right for those peacefully raising the alarm about the climate crisis to receive longer jail sentences than people who participated in racially-motivated violence this summer, and deliberately targeted migrants, refugees and Muslim communities? Peaceful protesters shouldn’t be locked up, period.”

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward
UK
National parks celebrate 75 years since creation under 1945 Labour government

IN NORTH AMERICA NATIONAL PARKS HAVE EXISTED SINCE 1900
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward 

‘Like the NHS, National Parks and access to the countryside are much beloved by the nation’

This week marks the 75th anniversary of national parks, a landmark achievement of Clement Attlee’s post-war Labour government.

The National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which established the parks, was passed into law exactly 75 years ago yesterday.

The legislation also introduced nature protections, including sites of special scientific interest, nature reserves, and protected paths across England and Wales.

A cross-party group of MPs tabled an Early Day Motion earlier this month celebrating the 75th anniversary of national parks and commending Labour ministers, including Lewis Silkin, who championed the creation of these protected areas.

The charity Campaign for National Parks has noted that the purpose of the legislation, hailed as a People’s Charter, was to “enable all citizens, no matter their background, to immerse themselves in the wonders of nature”.

Marking the anniversary, the charity Campaign for National Parks, has called for the government to ‘renew’ the People’s Charter, stating that “we have the opportunity to build on Labour’s historical legacy of National Parks and access to the countryside”.

The charity stated that “Like the NHS, National Parks and access to the countryside are much beloved by the nation; offering opportunities to connect with nature and improved health and well-being.”

Campaign for National Parks highlighted that these green spaces contain “some of the rarest species” on the brink of extinction and the “last fragments of precious habitat”.

Dr Rose O’Neill, Chief executive of Campaign for National Parks said: “When drawing up the first laws to protect National Parks, legislators could not comprehend the nature and climate emergency.”

However, O’Neill warned: “Our Health Check shows that nature in England’s National Parks is in rapid decline and there are also large inequalities in who visits and governs National Parks.

“We should rightly celebrate the 1949 legacy, but to secure the future, we urgently must invest in our National Parks and reform them, with strengthened powers to set a clear mandate for nature and fix broken governance.”

Image credit: Chris Hepburn, Campaign for National Parks


Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward
Campaigners  protest outside the High Court over £3 billion Thames Water bailout plea

Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

Interest and fees related to the loan 'could easily approach or exceed £1 billion'



Protests took place at the High Court this morning as Thames Water seeks approval for a £3 billion temporary bailout.

Campaigners are set to gather outside the Royal Courts of Justice to oppose the bailout plea, which We Own It has said will rack up £300 million in interest a year over two and a half years, and add an extra £250 a year to customers’ bills.

Groups including We Own It, Windrush Against Sewage Pollution and the Henley Mermaids are calling for Thames Water to be brought back into public ownership instead of receiving the bailout at customers’ expense.

A letter from Cat Hobbs, director at We Own It, to the High Court, states that the cost of interest, bondholder consent fees and advisor fees related to the loan “could easily approach or exceed £1 billion in due course”.

Hobbs’ letter said that “it is particularly egregious” that the transaction contains a 3.5% fee for the primary backstop providers, which could enable the backers to achieve an internal rate of return (IRR) of nearly 20%.

Thames Water is currently in £15.7 billion worth of debt, and is trying to secure the £3 billion loan to remain operational beyond the middle of next year.

Court approval is needed because the loan terms effectively breach Thames Water’s agreements with existing creditors by reducing the priority of their claims.

In July, regulator Ofwat proposed an average £19 a year ceiling on water bill rises, with a final decision due this month.

Thames Water responded to this proposal stating that it will not survive unless it is allowed to increase water bills by almost 60% over a five-year period.

Despite its troubled finances, Thames Water gave executive bosses £770,000 in bonuses in 2023-24.

Oftwat said the bonuses were not justified given the water company had a two star Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rating in 2023 and received a criminal conviction as a result of an Environment Agency prosecution.

Weston argued: “We need to attract talent to this company… If we don’t offer competitive packages, people will not come and work at Thames”.

Weston, who was hired in January, was also awarded a bonus of £195,000 for his first three months at the company.

In November, the regulator gained new powers to prevent bonuses being funded by customers if the company is judged to have missed environmental or performance targets.

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward

Police raids on London’s Kurdish community – an update


DECEMBER 16, 2024

Last month Labour Hub reported on the coordinated police raids on the Kurdish Community Centre in Haringey, north London at 2am on 27th November, as well as on the private homes of individuals and their families. Here we provide an update, compiled with the help of the Institute of Race Relations News Team.

The raids involved counter-terror units, closure of airspace, helicopters, dogs and a military-style occupation, which left the community angry and apprehensive. The raids meant the closure of the centre and the road for over a week, with residents forced to seek police permission to go to their homes; the occupation of the area by hundreds of riot police in armoured vans to contain a protest vigil and hunger strike; reports of brutality and violence towards children and elders. The raids provoked a series of demonstrations, joined by owners of local shops and restaurants shocked at the invasion of their community.

Six people arrested in the raids were charged on 9th December with membership of the Kurdistan Workers Party or PKK, a proscribed organisation. A seventh was released without charge after being held for eleven days.

The PKK is banned in the UK, although the campaign to free its leader Abdullah Öcalan, imprisoned in Turkey since 1999, has the support of trade unions and parliamentarians in the UK. Foreign Secretary David Lammy, whose Tottenham constituency contains the biggest proportion of diaspora Kurds in the UK, has previously voiced support for the campaign to release Ocalan and in  2016 was photographed at a protest where Kurdish groups displayed flags, including the proscribed PKK flag.

While the Belgian courts recognise the PKK as a legitimate party to an internal armed conflict, the UK’s Terrorism Act 2000 makes no such distinction between liberation struggles and terrorism. But whether or not the PKK’s proscription is justified, the Metropolitan police accepted that there was no imminent threat to public safety. Why, then, such colossal, trauma-inflicting expenditure of police resources?

Such political policing is not a purely local affair. For the Kurdish community, it is significant that the police operation here happened days after 200 Kurdish activists were arrested in Turkey, where Kurdish parliamentary parties are systematically harassed. Turkish forces and their proxies inflict gross human rights abuses on Kurds in Turkey and Syria, and the toppling of the Bashar al-Assad regime makes the future for Syria’s Kurds even less secure, even as European governments freeze asylum claims. Diplomatic and trade relations with Turkey dictate silence over these abuses – and perhaps require the criminalisation of a peaceful community in the UK.

The Turkish state’s attacks on Kurds in Syria, and Western complicity in them, are to be examined by a Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal in Brussels on 5th-6th February 2025. Meanwhile, in the cause of racial justice, the demand for an end to the criminalisation of the Kurdish community must be supported.

Image: Metropolitan police counter-terrorism officers. https://the-siu.org.uk/uk-and-us-cooperate-to-arrest-man-for-funding-terrorism/ Creator: rawpixel.com / Sergeant Matt Hecht | Credit: rawpixel.com / Sergeant Matt Hecht. Licence: CC0 1.0 Universal CC0 1.0 Deed.



 

Nicaragua’s blanket of repression


DECEMBER 17, 2024

The Ortega-Murillo regime has betrayed the legacy of the Sandinista Revolution and makes a US-led neoliberal takeover more feasible, argues Mike Phipps. A Labour Hub long read.

The latest bulletin from the UK’s Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign Action Group expresses alarm at the continued  – perhaps increased – hostility of the US Administration towards Nicaragua. It reports:

“On 22nd November President Biden signed an Executive Order stating that Nicaragua still poses an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States’. In doing so Biden repeated a designation that began under the last Trump presidency. It also has echoes of an identical 1986 Executive Order by President Ronald Reagan at the height of the contra war.”

As John Perry asked recently, “What ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’ does Nicaragua pose to a country with 50 times its population and the world’s biggest military budget, whose southern border is in any case nearly 2,000 miles away?”  Nicaragua spends less of its national income on defence than almost any other country in the hemisphere.

The re-election of President Trump poses further threats. In 2018, Trump signed into law the Nicaragua Investment Conditionality Act, which sought to cut Nicaragua off from loans from international lending institutions. Biden renewed Trump’s sanctions and indeed tightened them. No-one concerned with the independence and sovereignty of Latin American countries can look on the return of Trump with anything but apprehension.

It’s in this context that the Solidarity Campaign reports on the Nicaraguan government’s new proposed constitutional amendments, introduced supposedly to update the 1987 document “in line with reality. The key changes,” we are told, “relate to the protection of national sovereignty and institutionalising poverty reduction.”

Constitutional changes

Others have a different analysis. Gioconda Belli is a renowned poet and former militant who clandestinely transported weapons for the Sandinistas in the 1970s and later became responsible for international press liaison in 1982 and director of State Communications in 1984. She believes the constitutional changes are designed to enshrine a co-presidency that guarantees the succession of President Daniel Ortega’s wife, Rosario Murillo, in the event of his death. To head off potential opposition to this, the constitutional reforms, says Belli, enshrine a “voluntary” paramilitary army. This force, loyal to Murillo, “will be well-funded, ideologically driven, and trained by the military or by those who participated in the deadly repression of youth in 2018.”

The reforms further extend control over all branches of the state, eliminating the separation of powers enshrined in previous constitutions. Even before  this, at the Human Rights Council in Geneva, the Group of Experts on Human Rights on Nicaragua (GHREN)  already declared that the country “does not meet even the most minimal reasonable standard of judicial independence.” 

The constitutional reforms also undermine municipal autonomy – a favourite target of dictators – which was restored to Nicaragua by the earlier Sandinista constitution of 1987. Additionally, mayors can be dismissed by the Attorney-General .

Belli concludes: “Never in the history of Nicaragua, with its eleven Constitutions, has one been crafted with such shamelessness to suit the convenience of a married couple.”

Some background

 How did it come to this? The Nicaraguan Revolution was a beacon of hope in the 1980s in a continent firmly under the domination of US imperialism. But there is a long history of revolutionary movements gradually becoming corrupt bureaucracies. As elsewhere, the rot set in when the controlling faction in the leading party adopted a policy of stifling internal dissent and closing down opposition viewpoints. To its credit, the experience in Nicaragua was more gradual than many – but it happened nevertheless.

On July 19th 1979, the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) overthrew the country’s brutal dictatorship and embarked on a radical programme of economic and social reform. In 1984, the Sandinista government held the country’s first free elections in decades, denounced by Washington, but validated by international observers from many US-aligned countries.

Throughout the 1980s, the Reagan Administration unleashed a campaign of terror against Nicaragua. The indiscriminate savagery of the US’s contra war makes the current threats from the White House look tame by comparison. Yet, the Sandinista government survived thanks to its huge popular support. By the end of the 1980s, the head of the capital’s police force could boast that he was the only police chief in the whole of Latin America that had not fired a single round of tear gas during the previous decade.

The Sandinistas left office peacefully when they lost the 1990 elections. Seventeen years later, Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega returned to the presidency under very different conditions, having made the party his personal electoral vehicle. As I have previously argued, “His team made a pact with the then governing party, which granted immunity to one of the most corrupt politicians in the hemisphere. It also did a deal with the hierarchy of the Catholic Church which would support Ortega in return for his introduction of one of the most draconian anti-abortion laws anywhere in the world.”

Ortega made his wife vice president. Three sons became directors of TV channels and another headed a government agency working with incoming businesses. Opposition parties were de-registered and presidential candidates jailed. Critical social movements were repressed.

The government’s murderous repression against protesters in 2018 sparked an uprising across the country, which led to considerable loss of life on both sides. Human rights monitors say 355 people were killed by government forces. Regime supporters choose to describe this as a US-directed coup, but are less vocal on the initial killings by the regime or the subsequent blanket of repression that has smothered the country, prompting tens of thousands to go into exile.

Repression branded as anti-imperialism

The formal continuity of today’s Ortega regime with the traditions of Sandinismo makes it easier for it to brand its repression as a kind of anti-imperialism. Dissidents are labelled foreign agents. Hundreds of opponents have been stripped of their Nicaraguan nationality, their pensions cancelled. A  2021 reform to the Criminal Code extended the period for detention without charges from 48 hours to 90 days, violating the right to the presumption of innocence. Hearings have been held behind closed doors, with detainees denied the right to choose their legal counsel. Political prisoners allege beatings, electric shocks and other forms of torture.

Recent months alone have seen new laws proposed to restrict the right of Nicaraguans to leave or enter the country, limit international cooperation and stifle social media criticism of the regime. This is on top of the draconian national security laws passed in 2021 that suspended habeas corpus and gave the government sweeping powers to detain and prosecute critics.

In September, the UN Human Rights Office concluded that the human rights situation in Nicaragua has seriously deteriorated since last year, with increasing cases of arbitrary detentions, intimidation of opponents, ill-treatment in custody and attacks against Indigenous peoples.

Universities, media outlets and NGOs, including the International Red Cross, have been closed on a massive scale.  In 2024 alone, the regime shut down nearly 2,000 NGOs, from religious groups to livestock associations, bringing the total number of such nullifications to over 5,500 since 2018, a 70% reduction. Many of these were run by prominent former Sandinistas, such as the Nicaraguan Centre for Human Rights’ Vilma Núñez, who was once Vice President of the Supreme Court of Justice.  All of these NGOs’ assets are now under government control, “recovered for the people of Nicaragua,” as the regime euphemistically puts it.  The UN Human Rights Office called the cull “deeply alarming”.

Later that month, the regime banished 135 political prisoners to Guatemala. It was just the latest in a series of mass banishments, often for trivial ‘offences’.  According to Confidencial, a newspaper founded by the former director of the Sandinista newspaper Barricada, “Former university professor Freddy Quezada’s crime was to ‘like’ a post supporting the Nicaraguan Miss Universe, Sheyniss Palacios. Kevin Laguna was imprisoned for painting a mural of her; and TikTok influencer Geovany Lopez Acevedo overstepped by criticizing the official narrative against the Nicaraguan beauty queen’s victory.”

The controversy around a Nicaraguan winning the Miss Universe competition seems almost surreal, were it not for the shocking consequences. Sheyniss Palacios was the first Nicaraguan ever to win the beauty pageant and the regime initially expressed “legitimate joy and pride” at her achievement – until pictures emerged of her participation in an anti-government protest in 2018. At that point, the owner of the Miss Nicaragua franchise was accused of – and faced police arrest for – deliberately rigging beauty contests in favour of competitors who were critical of the government as part of a ‘coup plot’. Others who expressed support faced more serious victimization.

The persecution of ‘old Sandinistas’

Former Sandinista comandante Dora María Téllez joined the Sandinistas in the 1970s. Aged just  22, she was third in command in the guerrilla operation in 1978 that occupied the Nicaraguan National Palace in Managua, where the National Assembly was in session, capturing 1,500 civilian hostages. She then played a central role in negotiating the release of Sandinista political prisoners and a million-dollar ransom payment. After the Revolution, she served as Health Minister from 1979 to 1990 before leaving the Sandinista in 1995.

In 2021, she was arrested in a violent police operation, involving 60 members of the riot squad. Police smashed down the doors, opened fire and physically hit the former Sandinista leader. She was sentenced in an express hearing that took place within the prison where she was held. After 605 days of imprisonment, she was expelled from the country, stripped of her Nicaraguan citizenship.

Recently she has said that “the obsession of the Ortega-Murillo regime is to control absolutely everything.” Referring to a new wave of arrests and purges of military, police and public officials, she called it “a sweep aimed at establishing in high-level public positions people who are unconditionally loyal.”

Even Jorge “El Cuervo (The Raven)” Guerrero, one of Daniel Ortega’s inner circle for more than four decades, was taken. His arrest and imprisonment at the age of 81 “informs everyone who was in the Sandinista Front guerrilla, no matter how old they are, how long they’ve been imprisoned, or how close they are to Daniel Ortega, that none of them have immunity,” said Téllez.

None – not even Humberto Ortega, brother of the President and another leading comandante, one of the original nine members of the Sandinista National Directorate and Minister of Defence from 1980 to 1995. Earlier this year he was placed under house arrest after criticising his brother’s regime as “authoritarian, dictatorial”. The President called him a “traitor”. His computers and phones were seized and his bodyguards and service workers arrested.

“Ortega and Murillo see in Humberto a competitor, someone annoying, who does not submit to their control, who is not subject to them,” commented Dora Maira Téllez. “He can say anything, as he has done. So this siege against Humberto — the same siege as against thousands of Nicaraguans — is to silence him.”

And silenced he was. Denied specialist medical treatment, he was later rushed to Managua’s Military Hospital and died a few months afterwards. Many feel his persecution and humiliation was aimed at removing him a as potential successor to his ailing elder brother who will be 80 next year.

A day after Humberto Ortega’s detention, 83-year old Judy Butler, a US citizen who had lived in Nicaragua for over 40 years and had done a small amount of translating for Humberto Ortega, was visited by several police, ordered to pack a small bag and then deported. She was given no reason, her phones were confiscated and all her personal belongings, including her computer, were left behind.

Between 1977 and 1983, Butler had been the editor of the Report on the Americas of the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA), an NGO of social science scholars. She had also worked on the magazine Envío, produced by the Central American University, which the regime took over and closed in 2023, cancelling the enrolment of hundreds of students.

Humberto Ortega was not the first historic Sandinista leader to die in the captivity of the Ortega-Murillo regime. Commander Hugo Torres, a Sandinista militant since 1971 and a retired general, collapsed and died in El Chipote prison in 2022 due to a lack of adequate medical care. 

Voices on the left speak up

As with Venezuela, voices  on the left are increasingly expressing concern about the Ortega regime. Chilean President Gabriel Boric called recently for political prisoners to be freed and human rights abuses prosecuted “regardless of the political affiliation of who is governing.”

Pablo Iglesias of Podemos in Spain, and former Uruguayan President José Mujica have also been sharply critical of Ortega. None of these individuals seek to promote US Administration interests.

Gregory Randall, a professor at Montevideo University and son of Margaret Randall, a prominent feminist supporter of the Sandinista Revolution in the 1980s, said recently that if the left does not denounce President Daniel Ortega and Vice President Rosario Murillo’s government, it will lead to a “moral catastrophe, like not condemning the crimes of Stalinism at the time meant a disaster for communism that still affects us today.”

The parallel may look overblown at first sight, but the key similarity is that, just as Stalin tried and executed a great number of old Bolsheviks, today the focus of the repression of the Ortega-Murillo regime is on arresting, jailing and banishing many former Sandinista militants who risked their lives to make a popular revolution and build a better society.

The regime is an obstacle to defending the gains

The return of Trump to the White House ramps up the external threat against Nicaragua. The country’s Sandinista legacy remains significant, not least in the field of civic engagement. As Dora María Téllez says, “The most enduring feature of the revolution is the progress that has been made in terms of citizen organization and participation. By this I mean the capacities that various social sectors have developed to create the conditions necessary to improve their lives and to organize themselves to assert their rights, which is precisely what the dictatorship and its state of terror has turned against.”

There are important social gains as well that have not been overturned, even if they have been undermined. The Sandinista Revolution doubled the proportion of GNP spent on pre-university education in five years. It also established a single national health service available to all Nicaraguan citizens. But increased private sector penetration introduced after the Sandinistas left office in 1990 has weakened this and many non-governmental and volunteer bodies had to fill the gaps in poorer, rural areas. Their work has been adversely impacted by the current regime’s war on NGOs.

Furthermore the extreme politicisation introduced at all levels of administration by the regime post-2018 has led to state hospitals refusing to treat people based on their political orientation. “The health system as conceived and developed during the revolution, as a system of universal coverage, was simply turned into another instrument of Ortega and Murillo’s political and repressive interests,” comments Dora María Téllez.

The gains of the Sandinista Revolution were real and some remain so. But if they are to be successfully defended, the corrupt dynasty that has betrayed the Revolution’s great achievements  – and persecuted so many of its bravest militants – will have to leave the stage.

Image: President Daniel Ortega and his wife and Vice-President Rosario Murillo lead a rally in Managua in 2018.  https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/world/2021/11/17/nicaraguan-president-wife-banned-from-us/ Creator: Alfredo Zuniga | Credit: AP Copyright: Copyright 2018 The Associated Press.  Licence: Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0 Deed

Mike Phipps’ new book Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow: The Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn (OR Books, 2022) can be ordered here.

Lawsuit Claims State Department Illegally Arming Israel via Leahy Law 'Loophole'

"This lawsuit demands one thing and one thing only: for the State Department to obey the law requiring a ban on assistance to abusive Israeli security forces," said one advocate.



U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken. meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Tel Aviv on October 12, 2023.
(Photo: Eyepress Media Limited/Reuters via Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Dec 17, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

Palestinians and Palestinian Americans on Tuesday filed a lawsuit accusing the U.S. State Department of creating a "loophole" allowing Israel to skirt federal legislation barring American military aid to foreign militaries that violate human rights law.

The lawsuit, which was filed by five individuals and supported by the group Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), accuses the State Department and Secretary of State Antony Blinken of violating the Leahy Law, legislation passed in two parts in the late 1990s that built on the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961's proscription of U.S. military aid to foreign security forces that commit gross human rights violations.

According to DAWN, the suit "documents how the State Department has created unique, insurmountable processes to evade the Leahy Law requirement to sanction abusive Israeli units, despite overwhelming evidence of their human rights violations" including "torture, prolonged detention without charge, forced disappearance, and flagrant denials of the right to life, liberty, and security, such as genocide, indiscriminate and deliberate killings, and deprivation of items essential to survival, including food, water, fuel, and medicine."



Case plaintiff Ahmed Moor, a Palestinian American from the southern Gazan city of Rafah who has lost numerous relatives in Israeli attacks, toldZeteo's Prem Thakker, "I'm hoping, through this action, through this lawsuit, that we can just call out the federal government to begin to enforce American laws."

The State Department has sparked international outrage by repeatedly finding that Israel is using U.S.-supplied arms in compliance with domestic human rights law, citing the key ally's right to defend itself and the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack. However, Israel's 438-day retaliation has left more than 162,000 Palestinians dead, wounded, or missing in Gaza and millions more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened. Thousands more have been killed or maimed in the West Bank.

South Africa is leading a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. Last month, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, his former defense minister, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Both men have been warmly welcomed in Washington, D.C.. Congress and the Biden administration have approved tens of billions of dollars in arms transfers to Israel. U.S.-supplied bombs have been used in some of Israel's most notorious airstrikes. The U.S. has also vetoed numerous United Nations Security Council resolutions demanding a Gaza cease-fire.



"This lawsuit demands one thing and one thing only: for the State Department to obey the law requiring a ban on assistance to abusive Israeli security forces," DAWN executive director Sarah Leah Whitson said in a statement on Tuesday. "For too long, the State Department has acted as if there's an 'Israel exemption' from the Leahy Law, despite the fact that Congress required it to apply the law to every country in the world. As a result, millions of Palestinians have suffered unimaginable, horrific abuses by Israeli forces using U.S. weapons."

Stephen Rickard, a former U.S. official who helped pass the landmark legislation, said that "long-standing concerns that the State Department was not cutting off aid to specific Israel units as required by the Leahy Law... have been given dramatic urgency by the tragic ongoing crisis in Gaza."

"If the State Department will not comply with the law, then it is time for the courts to vindicate the rule of law and order it to do so," Rickard added.



The new lawsuit came a day after relatives of AyÅŸenur Ezgi Eygi—the Turkish American woman who, according to witnesses, was deliberately shot in the head while peacefully protesting the expansion of Israel's illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank in September—met with Blinken in search of justice and accountability for the activist's killing.

Referring to another American activist killed by Israeli forces while defending Palestinian homes, Hamid Ali, Eygi's widower, said that Blinken "was attentive in listening to us, but unfortunately repeated a lot of the same things that we've been hearing for the past 20 years, particularly since Rachel Corrie's killing."

Ali called Blinken "very deferential to the Israelis," adding that "it felt like he was saying his hands were tied and they weren't able to really do much."

A journalist asked State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller during a Tuesday press conference why the U.S. has not suspended arms transfers to Israel by invoking the Leahy Law and citing the cases of victims like Eygi or Shireen Abu Akleh—the Palestinian American Al Jazeera correspondent who, according to witnesses and several independent probes, was deliberately shot dead by an Israeli sniper in the West Bank in May 2022.



"We have taken those cases extremely seriously," Miller claimed. Referring to Eygi, he added that he made it clear to Israel that "her death was unacceptable, that it should have been avoided, it should have never happened in the first place, that we want to see the results of their investigation, and we want to see them change their rules of engagement."