Friday, December 20, 2024

The Return of Odysseus to Ithaca


 December 20, 2024
Facebook

The Trojan War by Evi Sarantea. Astronomical phenomena during the Trojan War. In the first half of the image, starting from left, we see the death of Patroklos by Hector and the death of Hector by Achilles. At the remaining painting we see the Odysseus in Ithaca killing the suitors during an eclipse of the Sun (Odyssey 20.356-357).

Prologue

Homer and his epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are fundamental to Greek history, mythology and civilization. Homer lived during the Bronze Age, and, most likely, during late thirteenth or late twelfth century BCE. The stories Homer sings are about the Trojan War (the Iliad) and about the return of Odysseus to his home, Ithaca, (the Odyssey). But these stories include insights about the Cosmos, cosmology, science, technology, politics, geography, the gods, athletics, adventures, heroism, farming, the beautiful day of return to Ithaca (Νόστιμον ήμαρ), and Nostos (νόστος), the passionate effort and struggles to return home. In addition, the Odyssey says a lot about the love of Odysseus for his wife Penelope and son Telemachos. Odysseus even turned down Calypso’s promise of immortality in order to return home to Penelope.

Homer: the teacher of the Greeks

The immense richness of Homer made him the teacher of the Greeks, their greatest poet and philosopher. Rhapsodes, singers of tales, sang extensive sections of the epics in sixth century BCE Athens and other cities. Greek children learned Greek from Homer. The great poets of the fifth century BCE (Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides and Aristophanes) were inspired by Homer’s stories and wrote masterpieces for the theater of Dionysos. Aristotle edited the epics of Homer for his pupil Alexander the Great. Scholars in the Library of Alexandria in the third century BCE gave the epics the form they have today, each divided in 24 chapters / books. And the Roman Emperor Hadrian asked the Oracle of Apollo at Delphi about Homer and Pythia, priestess of Apollo, said that Homer was the son of Telemachos and Polykaste,[1] daughter of King Nestor of Pylos, Peloponnesos. Nestor was a colleague of Odysseus and a great hero of the Troyan War. This explains the detailed knowledge in the epics on heroes, places, gods, science and Greek culture. That is also the reason the epics became the greatest stories ever told in Greek and world literature. They survived barbarian invasions of Greece and the Christianization of Hellas. In fact, despite the 1082 Christian anathema of Hellenism,[2] Christian scholars like Ioannes Tzetzes (c. 1110-1180) and Eustathios (c. 1115-1195), archbishop of Thessalonike, loved Homer. Tzetzes wrote “Allegories of the Iliad.” Tzetzes wrote his allegorized Homer in the 1140s or 1150s. He dedicated it to “the most powerful and most Homeric queen, Lady Eirene of the Germans.” Queen Eirene was none other than Bertha von Sulzbach of Bavaria who came to Constantinople in 1142 to marry Manuel I Komnenos. Manuel I reigned from 1143 to 1180. And archbishop Eustathios also edited the epics of Homer and left extensive commentaries on Homer.[3] Both Tzetzes and Eustathios used allegories to diminish or make invisible the gods in Homer, a tradition that continues to some degree to this day among monotheist scholars and theologians. In fact, since WWII, several modern commentators on Homer “study” Homer to degrade him and the Greeks. They say Homer did not exist and his epics are fiction.

This decline mirrors a general decline of Western civilization and the weaponization of nearly everything. In the case of Homer, even films on the immortal Homeric epics, sanitize both the text and the gods.

The Return

The 2024 film on “The Return [of Odysseus to Ithaca]” mirrors the fear and power of cinematographers. The producers of the 2024 film did not read the Odyssey carefully. They ignored the Trojan War and the struggles of Odysseus to return home to Ithaca.

The film begins with Odysseus sprawled on an unknown beach, nearly dead. Then we see a very old-looking Odysseus finding his way to his own land where his swineherd Eumaeus takes him in and gives him food. But neither Odysseus nor the swineherd recognize each other. However, Odysseus sees his old dog Argos on heaps of manure and the 20-year old faithful Argos recognizes Odysseus, moves his ears and tail, and dies. Eumaeus observes the dog and Odysseus petting him and suspects his guest is Odysseus. On his part, Odysseus is tight-lipped to a disturbing extent. His own son Telemachos is hostile towards him, refusing to accept Odysseus as father. At the same time, Telemachos is threatened by the suitors courting his mother. Penelope follows to some degree the Homeric script of making and unmaking a woolen coat for Laertes, father of Odysseus, who does not appear in the film. The other person who recognizes Odysseus is his nanny, Eurycleia. She was washing his legs when she recognized a scar from hunting a boar when Odysseus was a young man. Odysseus stopped Eurycleia from expressing her joy.

Odysseus wanted to kill his wife’s suitors who had turned his palace into a perpetual eating and wrestling ground. That moment arrived when Penelope brought Odysseus’ bow and said to the men courting her that she would choose as her husband the man who could string the bow and shoot an arrow through 12 axe shafts. No one of the suitors was strong enough to match the strength and skills of Odysseus, save for Odysseus himself camouflaged like a beggar. The film producers even put Telemachos as one of the suitors trying to string his father’s bow. This was a very offensive misreading of Homer, an opportunity for a suitor to accuse Telemachos of scheming to marry his own mother. Finally, Odysseus grabs the bow and effortlessly strings it and shoots an arrow through the 12 axe shafts and, immediately, starts killing the suitors. At that moment, Telemachos joins him in finishing the orgy of the suitors. Eventually Penelope realizes that the beggar was Odysseus and the two, Odysseus and Penelope, come together after 20 years separation. The war was over. Odysseus was finally home to Ithaca with Penelope and Telemachos and his old father Laertes.

Sanitizing Homer

The film producers made up Telemachos behaving like a barbarian. By ignoring the dangerous struggles of Odysseus and his leading role in the conquest of Troy, and by ignoring goddess Athena that guided Odysseus, they diminished Homer and the heroism and humanity of Odysseus. And by filming the story in a place with British medieval architecture, they insulted the audience.

Despite these defects, overlooking the gods and other crucial details of the Odyssey of Homer“The Return” succeeded portraying Odysseus and Penelope as the Homeric heroes they were. The protagonists, Ralph Fiennes (Odysseus) and Juliette Binoche (Penelope), were outstanding in expressing the tragedy that, pretty much, engulphed their lives. Virtues like love between husband and wife, passion to return home, and the importance of the family triumphed.

1. Anthologia Palatina 14.102. 

2. N. G. Wilson, Scholars of Byzantium, revised edition (Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America, 1996) 154. 

3. Eric Cullhed, ed., Eustathios of Thessalonike Commentaries on the Odyssey Rhapsodies A-B (Uppsala University Press, 2016). 

 

Evaggelos Vallianatos, Ph.D., studied history and biology at the University of Illinois; earned his Ph.D. in Greek and European history at the University of Wisconsin; did postdoctoral studies in the history of science at Harvard. He worked on Capitol Hill and the US EPA; taught at several universities and authored several books, including The Antikythera Mechanism: The Story Behind the Genius of the Greek Computer and its Demise. He is the author of Earth on Fire: Brewing Plagues and Climate Chaos in Our Backyards, forthcoming by World Scientific, Spring 2025.

Capitalists Should Be Removed From All Our Systems, Not Just Health Care



 December 19, 2024
Facebook

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

Imagine that your household was regularly broken into by a sadist who systemically beat-up everyone in your home. He’d start by punching folks in the stomach. Then he’d smack people on the both sides of their heads. Then he’d kick your legs out from underneath you and pound you all on your backs and necks before kicking you all in the jaw and punching your noses.

In forming a response to this outrageous oppression would you tell this monster that the next time he breaks into your home with his fists balled he’s going to have to forgo one of the shots he takes at people – say, the head smacks. Would you say, “listen, bully, you can punch us in the stomach and kick our legs out and pound our backs and necks and kick our jaws and smack our noses but you can’t smack our heads anymore!”

Hell No! You’d join forces to subdue him and call the police to have him hauled off to jail.

Which brings me to a 2019 Chris Hedges statement that has been making the rounds of the Internet in connection with the supposedly surprising amount of support Americans have voiced for Luigi Mangione, the young “folk hero” assassin of the CEO of United Health Care. “Capitalists,” the statement says:

should never be allowed near a healthcare system. They hold sick children hostage as they force parents to bankrupt themselves in the desperate scramble to pay for medical care. The sick do not have a choice. Medical care is not a consumable good. We can choose to buy a new or used car, shop at a boutique or thrift store, but there is no choice between illness and health.”

This Hedges quote is typically put up in support of Single Payer national insurance and the longtime progressive argument that “health care should not be a commodity” and should instead be a human right.

Please note that Hedges’ statement references the whole “healthcare system,” not just health insurance. The entire healthcare system includes providers, hospitals, drug makers, medical device manufacturers and more, of course.

I agree with the statement. Look at the nightmare that is the entire US “healthcare” regime, combining the highest medical costs in the world with horrifically bad outcomes while capitalist “healthcare” investors rake in obscene profits. It’s a racket with rewards beyond the wildest Mafia Don dreams!

But let’s go further. I get the difference between (a) having no choice but to pay through the nose (and go into crippling debt, far too often) when it comes to sickness and injury and (b) having the choice to buy a less pricey car rather than an expensive one. And yes, “capitalists should never be allowed near a healthcare system.” Damn straight.

Okay, but, dear progressives, what major US societal system under the commodifying command and control of capital/capitalists/capitalism isn’t a disastrous racket? Just what systems should capitalists ever be “allowed near”?

The transportation system, which capitalism has turned into a carbon-spewing and accident-ridden calamity?

The food system, which capitalism has turned into an obesity-, cancer-, and pollution-generating catastrophe?

The educational system, which capitalism has degraded in service to mindless nationalism and soulless profit-seeking?

The electoral system, which capitalists have fashioned into a noxious vehicle of oligarchy and tilted towards fascism?

The communications and media system, which capitalism-imperialism has harnessed for relentless sale of commodities and the manufacture of mass consent to empire, class rule, and police statism?

The earth — air, water, climate, biodiversity, and soil, etc. — systems that capitalism relentlessly destabilizes and poisons, placing livable ecology at ever-more grave risk?

The “international relations” and weapons system that are a recipe for war and mass murder on a monumental scale under the command of capitalism-imperialism?

The work and labor systems that pervert and crush homo sapiens’ remarkable capacity to create and produce wonders beneath the wheel of the alienating and mind-numbing capitalist division of labor?

The despotic capitalist work regime, where human labor power is exploited as itself a commodity — a commodity with the core function of producing surplus value and hence profit for employers in a system where people are seen as disposable once it is no longer profitable to keep them on the payroll?

The for-profit housing system that helps render millions homeless?

The distribution system wherein prices regularly run ahead of wages, helping keep most Americans living from paycheck to paycheck.

I could go on. I could write a book or three on how capitalists and — more fundamentally — capitalism ruins all of these and other human and societal systems. (A worthy project perhaps, but I suspect that the gestation period for such an undertaking is longer than the amount of time humanity can continue to live under this exterminist system.)

No health care system, no matter now socialist and wonderful, can keep people healthy when their Earth, political, labor, media, educational, cultural, and broad social systems are captive to and poisoned – both literally and figuratively – by the capitalist system.

The anti-communism/anti-revolution-ism that is so sadly prevalent among US-American lefties ends up miring them in this endless cul-de-sac where they lose the ability to forthrightly critique and propose alternatives to the whole damn system.

Which brings me back to the analogy I suggested at the outset of this commentary: what good is it to get the vicious bully to stop smacking us upside the head when he still gets to punch us in the gut, kick our legs out, and do all the rest of the horrible stuff I mentioned in my opening paragraph? Why stop at the healthcare industry when it comes to walling off key societal and life systems from capitalists and capitalism?! As a revolutionary communist friend recently wrote me, “every damn thing is a commodity under capitalism, including people! These endless attempts to construct arguments for why one or the other necessity of life should be exempt from the workings of the profit system are delusional, tiresome and just lazy. Marx figured this out — what? Something like 150 years ago?! As you put it, the whole lethal system is way past its overthrow date. Let’s get to work on THAT.”

Yes.

De-commodify health care? Yes, and everything else, including ourselves!

Paul Street’s latest book is This Happened Here: Amerikaners, Neoliberals, and the Trumping of America (London: Routledge, 2022).


Bring Back Normalization With Cuba



 December 20, 2024
Facebook

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

Ten years ago, the U.S. and Cuba announced the start of normalization between our two countries. Americans and Cubans alike could see a bit of light through a crack in the wall of U.S. restrictions that, for six decades, have blocked normal interaction between close neighbors.

The brief opening was largely ceremonial — President Trump rolled much of it back in his first term. And only Congress can truly end the world’s longest running embargo.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio, President-elect Trump’s pick for Secretary of State, embraces the same old Cold War playbook on the issue: punish Cuba, stoke chaos and civil unrest, and hope the government collapses. As far back as JFK, U.S. officials have been trapped in this irrational family feud that empowers hardliners in both governments while holding citizens here and there hostage to a bureaucratic status quo.

But it doesn’t have to be that way. Two years of limited opening had a positive impact and was supported by a majority of Cuban Americans. Buoyed by Cuban government reforms and cash from families in the U.S., the island’s private sector boomed. Internet access increased and social media exploded with honest voices. American tourists flocked to the country.

Then Trump emphatically rolled this progress back — he even added Cuba to the list of “state sponsors of terrorism,” despite a complete lack of evidence.

Today, after a brief glimmer of hope, Cubans are suffering. Hardliners have stopped the economic reform process. Confusion plagues new leaders transitioning from the Castros’ dominance. The pandemic gutted tourism, while storms and flooding ravaged crops.

The results have been predictable: An exodus from Cuba has surpassed all migration since the imposition of the embargo in 1962. At least half a million have migrated since the end of Trump’s first term — and more are on the way. The island has lost around 10 percent of its population in recent years, a staggering total.

We need to break our addiction to this big government policy that displaces people and blocks the rest of us from engaging with our neighbors. Ending the embargo would also open doors for Cuban reformers, dissidents, human rights activists, and religious leaders alike by removing the Cuban government’s excuse for its failures.

A bipartisan majority in Congress could potentially back a full lifting of the embargo. Gulf Coast states who took the big hit in the 60s when they lost a top trading partner in Cuba could be especially delighted to renew those relations.

”In a scenario of unrestricted trade, the aggregate of food and medical exports alone could amount to $1.6 billion with 20,000 associated U.S. jobs,” former International Trade Commission Chair Paula Stern PhD found in a 2000 study presented to Congress. Those numbers could be much higher today.

There would be other benefits as well.

Companies like Roswell Park in Buffalo, who had to jump through hoops to bring a groundbreaking Cuban-developed lung cancer vaccine to people in the United States, and other health care companies would finally be able to economically partner with world-class Cuban scientists on new medical advances.

For Trump, the next steps should be obvious: Avoid bloodshed. Ease the pain. Light the way to a new era in U.S.-Cuba relations.

Lissa Weinmann is a board member of Windham World Affairs Council. She helped found and direct Americans for Humanitarian Trade with Cuba, a coalition that helped ease the embargo’s restrictions on food sales to Cuba, and directed the National Summit on Cuba.