Friday, August 20, 2021

 

Levitation: Classic Magic Trick May Enable Quantum Computing

Abstract Particle Physics Technology

A new project will use the electric field in an accelerator cavity to try to levitate a tiny metallic particle, allowing it to store quantum information.

Quantum computing could solve problems that are difficult for traditional computer systems. It may seem like magic. One step toward achieving quantum computing even resembles a magician’s trick: levitation. A new project at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility will attempt this trick by levitating a microscopic particle in a superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) cavity to observe quantum phenomena.

Typically at Jefferson Lab and other particle accelerator facilities, SRF cavities enable studies of the atom’s nucleus. They do this by accelerating subatomic particles, such as electrons. This project will use the same type of cavity to instead levitate a microscopic particle of metal, between 1 and 100 micrometers in diameter, with the cavity’s electric field.

“No one has ever intentionally suspended a particle in an electric field in a vacuum using SRF cavities,” said Drew Weisenberger, a principal investigator on this project, as well as Chief Technology Officer and head of the Radiation Detector and Imaging Group in the Experimental Nuclear Physics Division at Jefferson Lab.

Accelerator Cavity Line Drawing


This is a line drawing of an accelerator cavity that will be used in a proof of principle project that aims to levitate a tiny metallic particle, allowing it to store quantum information. Credit: Jefferson Lab

If the project team is able to levitate a particle, they might be able to then impart a quantum state on it by cooling the trapped particle to its lowest possible energy level (because that’s when quantum properties occur).

“Storing quantum information on a levitated nanoparticle is our ultimate goal, but for now, it is a proof of principle experiment,” said Pashupati Dhakal, another principal investigator on the project and a staff scientist at Jefferson Lab in the Accelerator Operations, Research and Development Division. “We want to know if we can trap and levitate particles inside the cavity using the electric field.”

Exploring the Quantum with Accelerator Cavities

The idea for this project came from observations of accelerator experts. They think they have already unintentionally levitated unwanted and rare nanoparticles of metal, such as niobium and iron, inside SRF cavities during particle accelerator operations. They suspect that this unintentional levitation has impacted the performance of SRF cavity components.

Researchers are attempting to use a several-decades-old technique called “laser trapping”, as a step toward reliably imparting a quantum state on a particle suspended in a laser beam. But, the Jefferson Lab project team thinks that SRF cavities may provide a better tool for those researchers.

“An electric field could go potentially beyond the capabilities of laser trapping,” Weisenberger said.

Intrinsic characteristics of SRF cavities will overcome some limits of laser trapping. A levitated particle in an SRF cavity that is under vacuum and chilled to super cold temperatures will only interact with the cavity’s electric field and not lose information to the outside, which is important for maintaining a quantum state.

“Like storing information on a computer chip, the quantum state will stay and not dissipate,” Weisenberger said. “And that could eventually lead to applications in quantum computing and quantum communications.”

This project, titled “SRF Levitation and Trapping of Nanoparticles Experiment,” is funded by the Laboratory Directed Research & Development program, which provides resources for Jefferson Lab personnel to make rapid and significant contributions to critical science and technology problems relevant to the mission of Jefferson Lab and the DOE.

A Multidisciplinary Approach

The project was conceived and launched by Rongli Geng in October 2021 before he transitioned to Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It has now shifted to a larger and more multi-disciplinary team led by Weisenberger and Dhakal, the current co-principal investigators.

Weisenberger’s team researches detector technology for nuclear physics research, whereas Dhakal’s work focuses on developing SRF cavities to accelerate electrons at high speeds. Weisenberger says that the multidisciplinary approach will bring together their expertise as they branch out together into the less familiar territory of this LDRD project.

Both principal investigators remark that the project is moving forward well, thanks to the diligence and expertise supplied by every member of the team. Team members include John Musson, Frank Marhauser, Haipeng Wang, Wenze Xi, Brian Kross and Jack McKisson.

“It’s an interesting step outside of the usual things that we do,” Weisenberger said. “The LDRD program lets loose Jefferson Lab scientists and engineers on a research question that isn’t directly related to what we’re actually hired to do, but is making use of all the expertise that we bring and it’s a great resource to tap to try to stretch. That’s what we’re doing with this project, stretching.”

Building and Testing

Before turning the project over the Weisenberger and Dhakal, Geng and his colleagues had determined the required parameters of the cavity and electric field with simulations and calculations.

“We have everything on paper but we have to make it into a reality,” Dhakal said.

The team is currently setting up the experiment in real life.

“We have to see if what was simulated can actually happen,” Weisenberger said.

First, they’ll assemble a mock-up of the experiment at room temperature. Then, they’ll circulate liquid helium around the outer surfaces of the cavity to cool it to superconducting temperatures approaching absolute zero.

Next comes the most difficult part. They must get a single microscopic particle in the correct region of the cavity while the cavity is locked up inside a containment vessel at superconducting temperatures, under vacuum, and with the electric field on.

“We’ve come up with a way to remotely launch a particle in the cavity under experimental conditions, we just have to test it now,” Weisenberger said. “In the research and development world, you often can’t do what you thought you could do. We try and test and run into problems, try to solve the problems, and keep going.”

This is a year-long project with the possibility of another year of funding, depending on how things go. It is also an early stage, proof of principle project. If it is ultimately successful, there would still be a long road of R&D before the concepts could be applied toward building quantum computers. Such computers would require levitating and imparting quantum states on tens to hundreds to thousands of much smaller particles predictably and reliably.

Still, the researchers are looking forward to the discoveries they hope this study will enable regarding microscopic particle levitation and potential observation of a quantum state.

“I’m optimistic,” Dhakal said. “Either way, we’ll discover something. Failure is just as much a part of R&D as success. You learn from both. Basically, whether the particle levitates or not, or whether we can impart the quantum state to it or not, it’s something that’s never been done before. It’s very challenging and exciting.”

The team already has a research paper in the works for this project, but only time will tell whether they can realize this bit of magic in the laboratory.

Oil firms made ‘false claims’ on blue hydrogen costs, says ex-lobby boss

Chris Jackson believes companies promoted ‘unsustainable’ fossil gas projects to access billions in taxpayer subsidies

A vehicle at a hydrogen production plant in Germany. Hydrogen is far more expensive to produce than conventional fuels. Photograph: Friedemann Vogel/EPA


Jillian Ambrose Energy correspondent
Fri 20 Aug 2021

Oil companies have used false claims over the cost of producing fossil fuel hydrogen to win over the Treasury and access billions in taxpayer subsidies, according to the outgoing hydrogen lobby boss.

Chris Jackson quit as the chair of a leading hydrogen industry association this week ahead of a government strategy paper featuring support for “blue hydrogen”, which is derived from fossil gas and produces carbon emissions.

He said he could no longer lead an industry association that included oil companies backing blue hydrogen projects, because the schemes were “not sustainable” and “make no sense at all”.

The government’s strategy for the sector, announced this week, was criticised by environmental groups for taking a twin-track approach, giving equal weight to blue hydrogen and “green hydrogen”, which has no negative climate impact because it uses renewable electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen.

By contrast, blue hydrogen is made from natural gas, which has to be extracted from gas fields and then purified by the removal of carbon dioxide and methane, which have to be stored back underground. The process typically fails to capture 10-15% of its greenhouse gas emissions, which would accumulate as production ramps up.

Both kinds of hydrogen are much more expensive to produce than conventional fuels, so the government is proposing subsidies. It has launched a consultation to fund the difference between what producers can sell hydrogen for and what it costs them to manufacture it – similar to a scheme already used to drive down costs of offshore wind power.


Government reveals plans for £4bn hydrogen investment by 2030

“The Treasury has been told that blue hydrogen is cheap and will take millions of tonnes of carbon emissions out of the economy, which is all they need to hear. It checks the boxes they’re worrying about,” Jackson said.

“If the false claims made by oil companies about the cost of blue hydrogen were true, their projects would make a profit by 2030, after starting up in 2027 or 2028, because carbon prices are forecast to rise to £80 a tonne.

“Instead, they’re asking taxpayers for billions in subsidies for the next 25 years. They should tell the government they don’t need it. The fact that they don’t tells you everything you need to know.”

Jackson said energy companies had made the case for “big, bold” multibillion-pound blue hydrogen projects, which had proved a draw for ministers who were “trying to find ways to show that they really are doing something” to support the green agenda.

“They’re desperate to find something to put their hat on. It’s been easy for big energy companies to make the case for blue hydrogen, but we need to show that there is another way. We need to be better at that,” he said.

The UK’s future blue hydrogen projects include plans for BP to develop a hydrogen plant in Teesside, and for the Norwegian state oil company, Equinor, and SSE to build the world’s biggest hydrogen production plant with carbon capture and storage technology near Hull.

Jackson resigned from the UK Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association on Monday, saying he could “no longer in good conscience” remain in a role in which he would be expected to hold a neutral stance.

“I believe passionately that I would be betraying future generations by remaining silent on that fact that blue hydrogen is at best an expensive distraction, and at worst a lock-in for continued fossil fuel use that guarantees we will fail to meet our decarbonisation goals,” he wrote in a post on LinkedIn.

He is the chief executive of Protium Green Solutions, which plans to develop green hydrogen projects. These will be “an essential part of the UK story towards net zero emissions”.

“The UK has all the ingredients to be a world leader in green hydrogen, which is an essential net zero technology – we just need the will and support from government to make that happen,” he said.

A government spokesperson said investing in both green and blue hydrogen would allow the foundation to be laid for a hydrogen economy that created tens of thousands of jobs and unlocked billions of pounds in investment.

“Achieving the scale we need would be more challenging if we just used green hydrogen,” the spokesperson said. “We have always been clear that affordability and fairness are at the heart of our plans to reach net zero, and our hydrogen strategy is completely transparent about the estimated costs for hydrogen technologies, which are all based on thorough analysis.”

BP and SSE have been contacted for comment. Equinor declined to comment.

 PERMANENT ARMS ECONOMY

Turkish Aerospace Signs MoU with GE Marine on Warship Engines Production

Our Bureau
August 18, 2021


Ada-class corvette

TUSAS Engine Industries Inc. (TEI), a subsidiary of Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI), signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with GE Marine to explore opportunities pertaining to production of engines for warships.

The MoU was signed during the ongoing IDEF 2021 exhibition in Istanbul.

“On the second day of IDEF 2021, we signed a MoU wirh GE Marine where we discussed cooperation opportunities regarding the manufacture, installation and repair of the LM2500 and LM500 gas turbines,” TEI posted on its official Twitter account on Wednesday.

The LM2500 engine powers a number of vessels including Turkey’s Ada-class corvettes and Barbaros-class frigates.

LM2500 Engine

The LM2500 marine gas turbine is a simple-cycle, two-shaft engine. The 33,600-shp LM2500 is GE's most popular marine gas turbine, powering more than 400 ships in 33 world navies. Derived from GE's CF6-6 aircraft engines, the LM2500 consists of a gas generator, a power turbine, attached fuel and lube oil pumps, a fuel control and speed governing system, associated inlet and exhaust sections, lube and scavenge systems as well as controls and devices for starting and monitoring engine operation. Possible applications for the LM2500 include patrol boats, corvettes, frigates, destroyers, cruisers, cargo/auxiliary ships and aircraft carriers. The LM2500 is also available as a military generator set.

Signing of TEI-GE MoU on August 18, 2021, during IDEF-2021 exhibition in Turkey's Istanbul.

LM500 Engine

The simple-cycle, two-shaft LM500 offers an aerodynamically coupled power turbine, and is similar in design to GE’s LM2500 gas turbine. The 6,130-shp LM500 is adapted from the CF34 engine and has the highest fuel efficiency of any gas turbine in its output class. The LM500 is basically a CF34 engine without its fan and is very similar in materials. The LM500 incorporates a variable stator compressor driven by an air-cooled, two-stage turbine. The LM500 has the latest in proven design technology and corrosion-resistant materials to provide a mature design with maximum reliability and component life.

This gas turbine is suited for marine applications requiring light weight and fuel economy. The LM500 is ideal for patrol boats and hydrofoils, as well as a military generator set.

GE Marine, TEI To Explore More GE Gas Turbines Production And Maintenance Sites In Turkey

GE Marine, TEI To Explore More GE Gas Turbines Production And Maintenance Sites In Turkey

GE Marine and TUSAS Engine Industries, Inc. (TEI) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) whereby GE and TEI will explore additional localization efforts relating to the manufacture, assembly and repair of GE’s LM2500 and LM500 gas turbines, the companies announced today at the IDEF 2021 industry exhibition.

GE Marine press release

“GE Marine and TEI have partnered in Turkey for many years. With this MOU in place, we hope to discover other opportunities for TEI to play a critical role in supporting the Turkish shipbuilding industry in partnership with GE Marine.”

“Our philosophy is to provide in-country support from build to delivery to lifetime maintenance of GE’s gas turbines.”

Steve Rogers, EMEA Business Development and Sales Director, GE Marine.

Under the MOU, GE and TEI will continue discussions on localization relating to the manufacture, assembly, test, maintenance, inspection, repair, and overhaul of Turkey’s national and exported fleet of marine GE LM2500 family and LM500 gas turbines. The MOU also seeks ways to incorporate TEI into various design processes for potential naval programs.  

“Since 1985, with its partner GE, TEI has been a major player in the defense and aerospace industries by manufacturing high quality aero engine components, rendering preeminent in-service support for military and commercial engines, and producing and servicing its indigenous engines not only for national needs but also global OEMs and end-users.”

“With this signed MOU, TEI will have the opportunity to become an approved and certified OEM service provider to Turkey’s marine engines and exported fleet of LM2500 family and LM500 gas turbines. This collaboration also will enable the localization efforts in design, component manufacturing, assembly and test of such aeroderivative gas turbines and open new doors for utilizing the capability of other local companies and organic depots in the ecosystem.”

Mahmut Faruk Aksit, Ph.D., CEO and Prsident of TEI.

LM2500 for Turkish Naval Forces  

The LM2500 family — the base LM2500 (25.1 MW), LM2500+ (30.2 MW) and the LM2500+G4 (35.3 MW) — all are two spool engines that offer quick start capabilities, easy on-board maintenance, and an outstanding worldwide fleet performance of greater than 99% reliability and more than 98% availability.  

GE has long been a trusted supplier to the Turkish Naval Forces. In fact, all of Turkey’s MILGEM multi-purpose corvettes are powered by a GE LM2500 and two diesel engines in a combined diesel and gas turbine configuration. Additionally, 24 LM2500s operate aboard the Turkish Navy’s Barbaros– and Gabya-class frigates, and two LM2500 engines will power the DIMDEG Fleet Replenishment Ship currently under construction.  

GE Marine’s vast in-country experience makes the LM2500 and LM500 gas turbines ideal for the Turkish Naval Forces’ new TF2000 and Fast Attack ship programs, respectively.  

Lightweight composite module  

Graphic illustration of the future Independence-variant littoral combat ship USS Santa Barbara (LCS 32). U.S. Navy illustration by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Paul L.

In 2020, GE delivered its first new lightweight LM2500 composite gas turbine module to Austal USA for the future USS Santa Barbara (LCS 32). GE also celebrated the completion of the first new module for the Arleigh Burke destroyer USS Ted Stevens (DDG 128).  

This new module, which was fully certified by the United States Navy in 2019 after receiving MIL-S-901D shock qualification, offers these benefits:  

  • One-piece composite carbon fiber construction eliminates corrosion
  • Shock, fire, and smoke tested
  • 5,500 lb wall weight reduction versus steel
  • Improved sound attenuation; 60% (4 dBA)
  • Reduced wall temperature (25°F to 50°F cooler)
  • Improved entrance with access doors that are 60% lighter, 6” taller than steel design; large 8”x 18” viewing window; new, large external plenum access panel; and larger, lighter rear panel for easier maintenance access.

Worldwide support 

With a GE gas turbine, navies have worldwide support whether onshore or at sea, and interoperability benefits with other allied ships. GE has delivered gas turbines onboard 646 naval ships serving 40 navies worldwide and provides 95% of the commissioned propulsion gas turbines in the United States Navy fleet. With GE’s split casing compressor and power turbine design, in-situ maintenance is allowed, often making a gas turbine removal unnecessary; navies save millions of dollars a year and weeks/months of ship unavailability.

-End-

 

Images courtesy of Wind Catching Systems

News

Supertall floating ‘Windcatchers’ will make wind farms affordable, company says

18 August 2021 | By Joe Quirke | 0 Comments

A new, floating offshore wind turbine system using stacked, square grids nearly as tall as the Eiffel Tower is being developed by Norwegian firms Wind Catching Systems, contractor Aibel AS and holding company Ferd.

The grids will be 1,000 ft tall, reports Asia Times, some three times the height of a typical turbine and nearly matching the Eiffel Tower’s 1,063 feet.

Wind Catching Systems says its ‘Windcatchers’ will cut land use by 80% and can be produced at cheap fixed prices.

The company says the system will make floating offshore wind farms financially competitive before 2023, at least a decade earlier than traditional floating offshore wind farms.

It plans a pilot project consisting of several 1 MW turbines using an Integrated “mother vessel” substation connecting all units.

Eventually, each Windcatcher will be able to produce enough electricity for 80,000 homes, with five units creating the equivalent of 25 conventional turbines, the company says.

Windcatchers are claimed to be able to generate two and a half times more electricity than a conventional turbine because their height exposes their rotors to higher wind speeds.

In addition, rotor blades are pitched, allowing for an energy output higher than a conventional turbine, Wind Catching Systems says.

Ole Heggheim, the company’s chief executive, said: “Our goal is to enable offshore wind operators and developers to produce electricity at a cost that competes with other energy sources, without subsidies.

“Simply put, we will deliver floating offshore wind at the costs of bottom-fixed technology solutions, which provides great opportunities on a global basis for the Norwegian supplier industry.”

Erik Bjørstad, Ferd investment director, said: “The goal is to complete the technical testing and verification during 2021 and to offer commercial development solutions in 2022.

“Wind Catching has significant competitive benefits compared to conventional floating offshore wind technologies and we see great opportunities for the Norwegian supplier and export industry.”

Images courtesy of Wind Catching Systems

LeBron James calls Edmonton community 'amazing' after it gifts basketball hoop to teen


CTV News EdmontonStaff
 Thursday, August 19, 2021
Community steps up for Edmonton basketball player




Anthony Muobike used to spend hours practising without a hoop.

EDMONTON -- The kindness of a north Edmonton community caught the eye of NBA superstar LeBron James.

On Tuesday, Anthony Muobike received a hoop and basketball from Canadian Tire and a $750 Sport Chek gift card from his community after a neighbour noticed the 14-year-old would always dribble and shoot into the air without a net.

A surprised and thankful Muobike told CTV News about his big dreams after he had what he needed to practice.

"You'll see me out there, in the NBA, that’s where you’ll find me."

'That really touches my heart': Edmonton teen gifted basketball, hoop

A guy who knows a thing or two about the NBA believes in him, and showed love to Edmonton's north side.

"This is pure and beautiful. That community is amazing. Nobody can fulfill their dreams alone," James, a four-time NBA champion and four-time MVP, wrote on Instagram.

"Anthony keep working kid. You have another fan in me."

In an interview with CTV News Edmonton, Muobike said he was surprised that one of his basketball idols commented on his post.

"I'm like, 'Wow. Lebron. Like, Lebron James is commenting on me,'" Muobike said. "I was really happy. It got me a little emotional. Lebron is my idol.

"(He) is the main reason why I started doing basketball," he added. "I did not know this would sky-rocket this way."

Muobike says he is simply trying to process everything that is happening and is grateful for all the support he has received.

"I am trying to process everything right now. I am still trying to process the net. I haven't gotten over that.

"What Lebron said just made my brain stop," he added. "Everything is just happening so fast."



Los Angeles Lakers forward LeBron James looks on during the first half of an NBA preseason basketball game against the Denver Nuggets, Sunday, Sept. 30, 2018, in San Diego. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)
GREENWASHING FROM VISUAL CAPITALIST
CANADIAN INVESTMENT IN URANIUM
YOU MAY OR MAYNOT FIND THESE ATTRIBUTED IN MSM

Uranium: Powering the Cleanest Source of Energy


Published 12 hours ago
on August 19, 2021
By Sponsored Content
The following content is sponsored by the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust



Uranium: Powering the Cleanest Source of Energy

The world’s energy needs are growing with its population. However, achieving a net-zero carbon economy while meeting our growing energy needs requires a larger role for clean, sustainable, and reliable sources. Nuclear is one such energy source.

The above graphic from the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust highlights how uranium is powering one of the cleanest and most reliable sources of energy in nuclear power.
The Cleanest Energy Sources

Although all energy sources have tradeoffs, some are better for the environment than others.

To find the cleanest sources of energy, Our World in Data calculated CO2-equivalent emissions per gigawatt-hour (GWh) of electricity generated over the lifecycle of power plants for different energy sources. This includes the footprint of raw materials, transport, and construction of power plants.

Energy SourceCO2-equivalent Emissions Per GWh (tonnes)TypeCoal 820 Fossil fuel
Oil 720 Fossil fuel
Natural Gas 490 Fossil fuel
Biomass 78-230* Non-renewable
Hydro 34 Renewable
Solar 5 Renewable
Wind 4 Renewable
Nuclear 3 Non-renewable


*Emissions from biomass vary depending on the type of fuel combusted.

It’s not surprising that coal, oil, and natural gas plants emit much more greenhouse gases than their renewable and non-renewable counterparts. In fact, emissions per GWh from coal power plants are roughly 273 times higher than nuclear power plants.

Hydropower offers a cleaner and renewable alternative to fossil fuels, however, the concrete and materials used in dam construction contribute to emissions. Furthermore, the decomposition of underwater vegetation in reservoirs also releases methane and carbon dioxide into the environment. Still, emissions per GWh from hydropower are around 24 times lower than coal.

Solar and wind are often the most mentioned energy sources when it comes to the clean energy transition. However, their energy densities are lower than fossil fuels and as a result, they often require more units to generate the same amount of power. For example, generating one GWh of electricity can take more than three million photovoltaic panels, or 412 utility-scale wind turbines. Constructing these massive solar and wind farms adds up to a relatively large material footprint and consequently, GHG emissions.

This is where nuclear power comes in.

Why is Nuclear the Cleanest Source of Energy?

Nuclear power plants use fission to generate electricity without any combustion, avoiding emissions from the process of electricity generation. What’s more, on average, it only takes one typical nuclear reactor to generate one GWh of electricity. The power generation capacity of nuclear reactors is largely due to the high energy density of uranium and nuclear fuel.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, a single, eraser-sized uranium pellet contains the same amount of energy as 120 gallons of oil or 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas. This allows nuclear power plants to generate large amounts of electricity efficiently, making them one of the cleanest energy sources per GWh of electricity produced.
Nuclear’s Role in the Clean Energy Transition

Nuclear power offers several advantages in the transition to clean energy.

Besides being carbon-free and sustainable, nuclear power is also one of the most reliable and safest sources of energy. In fact, nuclear plants in the United States have a capacity factor of 92.5%, which means that they run at maximum capacity for almost 93% of the time during a year.

As one of the cleanest, most powerful, and reliable sources of energy, nuclear power could play a key role in helping countries achieve decarbonization goals in the fight against climate change.


Road to Decarbonization: U.S. Coal Plant Closures

This infographic highlights announced coal plant closures in the U.S. and how much power will be affected.


Published 2 days ago
on August 17, 2021
By Sponsored Content


Road to Decarbonization: U.S. Coal Plant Closures

As the push to decarbonize starts to kick into gear in the U.S., how do coal plant closures factor into the equation?

With a target of net-zero emissions by 2050, the U.S. is examining all aspects of its economy to see where action is needed. In the automotive industry, for example, the Biden administration is aiming for half of new vehicles to be electric by 2030, following in the footsteps of automakers that have made similar commitments.

But in the power sector that supplies electricity for much of the country, fossil fuels continue to be large emission sources. Coal, which accounted for just 19% of electricity generated in the U.S. in 2020, created 54% of the power sector’s emissions.

That’s leading to U.S. utilities feeling the pressure to retire coal plants and look for alternatives. This infographic from the National Public Utilities Council visualizes the coal plant closures that have been announced, and how much power will be affected as a result.
Where Are U.S. Coal Plant Closures Happening?

Accurately tracking coal plant closures currently means turning to non-profits and parsing through company reports. To assemble this list, we leveraged the Global Energy Monitor and Carbon Brief and cross-referenced against company sustainability reports and news releases.

The result? 80 coal plants with a total capacity of 98.3 GW publicly scheduled for full retirement over the next three decades.
Search:
PlantStateRetirement DateCapacity (MW)Burlington IA 2021 212
Dolet Hills LA 2021 721
AES Hawaii HI 2022 204
Coal Creek ND 2022 1,210
E.D. Edwards IL 2022 645
Edgewater WI 2022 414
Fayette* (announced not confirmed) TX 2022 1,690
Heskett ND 2022 115
Joppa IL 2022 1,100
Meramec MO 2022 924

Showing 1 to 10 of 80 entries

Noticeably, most of the coal plant closures are targeted in the Midwest (which uses the most coal for power). And most of the retirements are coming early, with the 2020s seeing more than half of announced closures and retired capacity (53.6 GW).

But the largest coal plants with announced retirement dates are currently scheduled for the 2030s and 2040s. That includes Duke Energy’s Gibson power plant in Indiana, the fifth largest coal plant in the U.S. and the largest with a retirement date.
What’s Next for U.S. Decarbonization?

Though it seems like the U.S. has a lot of coal plant closures announced, there’s a lot left to go.

The 98.3 GW of tracked coal plant closures is just 45% of U.S. coal electricity production in 2020. Though many utilities have talked about eventually assessing and planning retirements for some of the remaining 55%, no concrete plans have been announced yet.

“In our industry, deciding to exit coal-fired power is not taken lightly,” said Omaya Ahmad, Sustainability Policy Consultant at Arizona Public Service. “Our coal plants are often the oldest in our fleet and are largely the reason our service territories have grown and flourished into what they are today. However, the pressures presented by climate change and the economic demands tied to coal have required a commitment to transition to clean energy.”
Coal Plant Closures Are Part of a Larger Equation

But as Ahmad explains, turning off coal plants is not such a quick-and-easy fix.

“Such a transition will be a lofty undertaking and will not come without its own challenges,” said Ahmad. “Recognizing the regional transition landscape and timeline depicted on a map like this one will help utilities adequately prepare for and support their coal communities as we all take steps to reach a clean energy economy.”

And coal plants are just one part of the decarbonization equation. Some utilities are opting to transform coal power plants into natural gas plants, which are more cost-efficient and emit less than coal. Even though many utilities and consumers are turning away from carbon emitting fuel sources entirely, there are more than 200 new natural gas plants planned in the U.S.

But the big question is how the generated electricity from coal will be replaced. Communities that rely on coal for power (and economic strength) will have to turn to natural gas or work on renewables capacity, while others have already started the transition.

National Public Utilities Council is the go-to resource for all things decarbonization in the utilities industry. Learn more.


Deep Diving for Metals: Visualizing Ocean Mining


As more metals are necessary for electrification and clean energy transition, companies are looking at an unexplored market: ocean mining.


Published 1 week ago
on August 12, 2021
By Sponsored Content


Deep Diving for Metals: Visualizing Ocean Mining

The mining sector has been one of the biggest beneficiaries in the COVID-19 recovery.

Several countries’ recovery packages have ignited demand for commodities like copper, iron ore and lithium. Given that more metals are necessary for electrification and the clean energy transition, many companies are looking at an unexplored market: ocean mining.

Mining of the Deep Sea is still under study but metals are abundant on the seafloor. Reserves are estimated to be worth anywhere from $8 trillion to more than $16 trillion.

This infographic from Prospector provides a visual overview of the seabed mining process.
Down in the Depths

The most prolific area for ocean mining is the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, between Hawaii and Mexico. Almost 20 international mining companies have contracts to explore the region which spans over 5,000 kilometers.

Most of the metals are found in potato-sized rock-like polymetallic nodules. Millions of years old, the nodules grow by absorbing metals from the seawater, expanding slowly around the core of shell, bone, or rock.
Show entries
Search:
Mineral DepositsDepthMineralsPolymetallic sulfide 1,000 to 4,000m Copper, lead, zinc, silver, and gold
Polymetallic nodules 3,000 to 6,500m Nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, ammonium sulfate
Cobalt crusts 1,000 to 2,500m Cobalt, nickel, manganese, rare earth, iron, copper

Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries
PreviousNext

Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts

It is estimated that there are 21 billion tonnes of polymetallic nodules resting on the ocean floor in the CCZ, containing an estimated:
6 billion tonnes of manganese
226 million tonnes of copper – about 25% of land-based reserves
94,000 million tonnes of cobalt – about six times as much as current land-based reserves
270 million tonnes of nickel – 100 times the annual global nickel production in 2019

Cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts are found on the sides of underwater mountain ranges and seamounts. Similar to nodules, these crusts form over millions of years as metal compounds in the water. Roughly 57% of them are located in the Pacific.

Polymetallic sulfide deposits formed after seawater seeps into volcanic rocks can be found along tectonic plate boundaries on the Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, and the Atlantic Ocean.
How Does Ocean Mining Work?

Extraction of minerals from the seafloor is planned to involve either modified dredging (for nodules), cutting (for massive sulphides and crusts), and transport of the material as a slurry in a riser or basket system to a surface support vessel.

The mineral-bearing material is then processed in a ship (cleaning and dewatering – with the wastewater and sediment being returned to the ocean) and then transferred to a barge for transport to shore where it will be further processed to extract the target metals.
Towards a Greener Future

Growing demand for batteries to power electric cars and store wind and solar energy has driven up the cost of many metals and bolstered the business case for seabed mining.

According to a study published in the Journal of Cleaner Production, producing battery metals from nodules could reduce emissions of CO² by 70-75%, cut land use by 94% and eliminate 100% of solid waste.

Here is a look at how ocean and land mining compares:
Show entries
Search:
ProcessOcean MiningLand MiningProspecting time 1-2 years 2-8 years
Exploration cost USD $20 million USD $10 million
Development time 4-6 years from discovery 10+ years from discovery
Development cost USD $1 billion Up to billions of dollars a year
Mining and extraction Less than USD $1 billion yearly, 20-30+ years Up to billions of dollars a year, 50+ years
Closure and reclamation Investigative ways to offset displacement of sea life and surfaces Restore the lands to the extent possible, revegetate, dry tailings ponds

Source: The Metals Company

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) has so far approved 28 exploration contracts in the Pacific, Indian and Atlantic Oceans, covering 1.3 million square kilometers of the ocean floor.

With many companies turning their eyes to the unexplored riches of the ocean, seabed mining could offer a wealth of untapped minerals on the ocean floor.

THE VISUAL CAPITALIST
CLIMATE CHANGE
Contradictory Headlines Show Fossil Fuel Market Confusion

Photo by Cynthia Shahan, CleanTechnica


By David Waterworth


It surely must be turmoil in the fossil fuel future predictions industry. Huge variations can be found in expectations of demand and supply. A recent newsletter from mining.com had the following headlines, all in the one issue of its energy news digest. My head is spinning.

US push for green energy could strand $68 billion in coal, gas assets – report


S&P Global Market Intelligence has issued a report warning emitters that their efforts to decarbonize might not go far enough. Pollution control equipment installed at gas and coal-fired power stations will not be able to do enough to meet the Biden administration’s Clean Energy Standard.

Brazil offers lifeline to coal after UN calls for ‘death knell’


Brazil’s Mines and Energy Ministry on Monday published details of the Program for Sustainable Use of National Mineral Coal, a new program that would support the coal sector through 2050. Using special tax regimes and a program of modernization for coal plants, the government seeks to maintain jobs in the industry.

China’s green ambitions aren’t halting new coal and steel plans


How will President Xi Jinping’s goal of peak CO2 emissions be achieved by 2030 when state-owned firms are proposing to build 43 new coal-fired generators and 18 new blast furnaces? This will lock the steel-making sector into further coal dependency. Mixed signals indeed.

First new oil sands pipeline in years could start next month

More heavy oil from Canada’s tar sands. As early as mid-September, the oil could start to flow (760,000 barrels a day) from Alberta to Wisconsin. Another pipeline is due to commence service in 2022. Both pipelines have faced years of litigation and protests.

Russell: Asia coal demand surge in stark contrast with UN climate warning


On the one hand we have the stark warnings of the IPCC report and on the other we have surging demand and prices for coal in Asia. A staggering 80 million ton of coal was delivered to Asian ports in June.

So, when will demand fall? Who knows? Nail biting time for executives in the fossil fuel industry. One could say they are making hay while the sun shines, but I think we need a better metaphor. Dig it, pump it, sell it where you can … the end is nigh, sometime.
AUSTRALIA

Household power bills could jump if ageing power plants are paid to remain open, report warns


By business reporter Gareth Hutchens
Posted 8h ago
Is the National Electricity Market under threat from the influx of renewable energy providers?
(ABC News: Chris Gillette)
Share

Households on Australia's east coast could see their power bills jump by hundreds of dollars a year if they are forced to pay coal and gas plants to keep running, a new report warns.

Key points:

The Energy Security Board has recommended paying ageing power plants to remain open

A new report warns the cost will be borne by consumers

It estimates household power bills could face charges more than double the carbon price


The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), and Green Energy Markets, have released a report warning households could face power bills of $182 to $430 more a year if a new proposal goes ahead.


They say those charges would far exceed the impact of the carbon price on power bills.


Their report criticises a proposal by the Energy Security Board (ESB) to introduce a "capacity payment" to the National Electricity Market.


The National Electricity Market (NEM) spans Australia's eastern and south-eastern coasts, connecting five states (and the Australian Capital Territory) with electricity via thousands of kilometres of transmission lines.
The National Electricity Market (NEM) connects every state and territory, except for Western Australia and the Northern Territory. This map shows some of the network's major transmission infrastructure.(

Source: Australian Energy Market Operator website)

The ESB says it is concerned about the speed with which renewable energy providers are entering the electricity network.

It has recommended paying ageing power plants to stay open — even if they're not providing power — in case they're needed during extreme demand peaks in coming years.

It said such payments would ensure the system had capacity to meet any demand, and avoid blackouts, without suffering from the sudden withdrawal of ageing coal plants as the network evolved towards lower emissions.

However, Johanna Bowyer, report co-author and IEEFA electricity analyst, says the ESB's proposal would see consumers paying extra money to bail out ageing power generators for little benefit.

“The ESB’s new proposal will require electricity consumers to pay primarily conventional generators such as coal and gas plants for what they could produce if the plant was operating at its full level of capacity, regardless of whether or not, or how often, the generator uses all of its capacity to produce electricity,” Ms Bowyer said.

“While it is true that several coal power plants are facing financial difficulties, our analysis finds that reliability is not at threat by the level of likely coal power plant exits over the next 10 years.

“Thanks in part to actions of the federal government, there is a flood of dispatchable capacity entering the NEM. This covers a range of controllable sources of power from hydro to batteries, bioenergy, gas and even some small coal power plant upgrades.”
Electricity has become a jigsaw


When the early closure of Victoria's second-biggest coal-fired power station was announced last week, something the energy minister said was less than complete.Read more


Report co-author, Tristan Edis of Green Energy Markets, says the grid is in a very different situation to when Hazelwood was shut down in 2017.

“From 2017 to 2027, almost 6,500 megawatts of dispatchable power project capacity will be added to the grid,” Mr Edis said.

“To put this into perspective, this is almost double the capacity that will be lost from the next three coal power stations due to close after 2027 — Yallourn, Callide B and Vales Point B.

“This means that all states across the NEM have enough power capacity for the next decade to meet the strict reliability standard of satisfying more than 99.998 per cent of demand.

“There are also thousands of megawatts of further battery projects in development which could be committed to construction if required," he said.
What are the current rules?

Under current rules, power plants are paid for the power they produce which is used by consumers.

Verrender: Truth on energy

Much of the debate about our future power generation has become mired in political point scoring and simplistic arguments designed to inflame and outrage, writes Ian Verrender.Read more


However, when renewable energy generators (such as wind and solar) provide large amounts of energy to the system, ageing power plants (such as coal and gas) can run at a loss, threatening their viability.

The ESB has therefore recommended introducing a "capacity payment" to the market, which would see energy retailers paying additional money to conventional power plants based on the size of the installed capacity of their generators, rather than the power they actually provide.

Federal Energy Minister Angus Taylor has accepted the logic of the ESB's recommendation.

The Energy Security Board was created after South Australia's state-wide blackout in 2016, following a recommendation by the Finkel Review into the security of the National Electricity Market.
Analysis of potential impact

However, to estimate the potential impact the plan could have on household power bills, IEEFA has looked at the "capacity market prices" faced by households in Western Australia's electricity market.

According to its analysis, if households on Australia's east coast faced similar prices, the cost of power bills would rise by between $2.9 billion to $6.9 billion every year.


"We found households in the NEM would see their electricity bills increase anywhere between $182 and $430 a year," Ms Bower said.

"By way of comparison, the cost increase by New South Wales, Victorian and Queensland consumers from the carbon price was between $112 to $150.

"Based on the Western Australian capacity payments experience, consumers could be facing a new charge which is potentially more than double that of the carbon price."

The 22-page report, Energy Security Board's Capacity Payment: Burden on Households, was released on Friday.
Contested space

The "capacity payment" proposal has been welcomed by some players in the energy space, and opposed by others.

Electricity prices predicted to fall

A new report by the Australian Energy Market Commission predicts all states in the National Electricity Market will have lower energy prices in 2023 but not the ACT.Read more


Major energy consumer representative groups such as the Energy Users Association of Australia and the Aluminium Council do not support the proposal.

But large generators say the plan is necessary to keep ageing power plants viable and the power supply stable as the network slowly transitions to renewable energy.

They say sudden withdrawals of ageing power plants could threaten network's ability to provide uninterrupted power through the day.

The ESB's recommendation is sitting with Mr Taylor, and state energy ministers are also considering it.

A spokesman for Mr Taylor questioned the reliability of the report's analysis, and said the government was focused on "ensuring outcomes for consumers."

"A mechanism that values capacity provides the investment signals needed to ensure we have the reliable generation we need to safeguard affordable, reliable power for Australians as more renewables enter our energy system," the spokesman said.


Energy reforms are adrift and consumers and the planet will pay

Today the federal, state and territory energy ministers will meet to discuss a range of proposed, clean energy-based redesigns of the National Electricity Market (NEM), prepared by the Energy Security Board (ESB).

While Barnaby Joyce may still want to see what’s on the climate action ‘menu’, we know already that the Prime Minister’s easiest path to emissions reduction would be to reform the energy market in a way that allows renewables to crowd-out coal.

Institutional investors and millions of households are already building and installing the new solar, wind and batteries that will power the grid of the future.

All the federal government has to do is accelerate the redesign of the electricity system so that it is secure and reliable when coal power stations inevitably retire or fail.

In May the coal-fired Callide C power station in Queensland exploded. This caused cascading failures at Callide B, Stanwell and Gladstone coal power stations.

A month later it was Victoria’s turn when the Yallourn power station flooded, leading the government to declare a state energy emergency.

The Australian Energy Regulator has reported an incredible 1,000 days of “baseload outages” in the second quarter of this financial year.

As the climate crisis worsens and our aging coal fleet falters, there is a clear and urgent need to build a future-proof electricity system that is able to operate securely without fossil fuels.

The Australian Energy Market Operator recently announced that the NEM will be able to operate safely on 100% renewable energy for brief periods by 2025.

The primary challenge of the clean energy transition is political, not technical. Federal energy and emissions minister Angus Taylor has consistently undermined clean energy reform of the NEM and promoted subsidies for gas and coal.

Taylor has twice tried to sack the Board and terminate its reform project. Progressive Liberal energy ministers in NSW and SA teamed up with Labor and Green ministers to keep the reform process going.

Last month the ESB finished the “Post-2025” project and the redesign recommendations were sent to ministers. Taylor seems to be using ‘cabinet-in-confidence’ to control information about the reform process, even though they are not cabinet documents.

The federal government tasked the ESB’s work to the Energy National Cabinet Reform Committee. The problem is that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal recently ruled that the National Cabinet is not a committee of the federal cabinet and therefore not subject to confidentiality. Yet minister Taylor is yet to release the reform recommendations the public.

Bizarrely, Taylor has been campaigning on his preferred ESB recommendation, while at the same time keeping the paper secret. Other ministers are respecting the supposed confidentiality of the process that he is undermining.

Australia Institute research has shown that the policy Taylor supports would create a new market to prop up failing coal power stations and would be bad for consumers. It has been widely condemned by environmentalists and renewables companies.

It makes no sense to supposedly safeguard the NEM by forcing consumers to pay in advance for baseload that is out of action at a rate of 1000 days per quarter.

Imagine if the federal government banked on its coal capacity market to get Australia through a long hot summer and the outage rate was even higher.

For two and half years, hundreds of energy experts from across the industry, stakeholder groups and the research sector have worked with the ESB on the NEM redesign. Millions of dollars worth of effort has been expended.

Now nobody knows when the reform recommendations will be made public or when ministers will make their final decisions.

This policy uncertainty is delaying investment, which pushes up the cost of energy. It is bad for the economy and makes it harder for the Prime Minister to commit to deeper emissions reductions.

The states are stepping up while the federal government fails to lead. States are committing to carbon emissions reduction targets while building out massive Renewable Energy Zones. But they need to do more.

In the immediate-term, the report the states and commonwealth commissioned from the ESB should be made public immediately. It is policy advice to government, not a cabinet document.

In the short-term, the states must agree to schedule the orderly retirement of their remaining coal generators.

In the medium-term, they should draw on constructive recommendations from the ESB to procure the security services and energy resources required to safely manage that phase-out.

It is regrettable, but just as the states have led in Australia’s response to the COVID-19 crisis, they must now step in once again and save the NEM reform process from the clumsy mishandling of the federal government.

Dan Cass is an energy policy and regulatory expert at the independent think-tank the Australia Institute. @danjcass