Saturday, October 09, 2021

Journalists from Russia, Philippines win Nobel Peace Prize for upholding press freedoms


Maria Ressa, the first woman to win a Nobel Prize this year, is a forceful critic of the Philippines government under President Rodrigo Duterte and his violent war on drugs in the island nation. The committee called her a "fearless defender of freedom of expression." 
File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo

Oct. 8 (UPI) -- Two journalists from Russia and the Philippines -- Dmitry Muratov and Maria Ressa -- were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for their work in countries where the press often comes under attack from hostile authoritarian governments.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee said the pair have made tireless efforts to maintain press and speech freedoms while under constant threat and harassment.

Ressa, 58, is the co-founder of the Philippines digital media outlet Rappler and Muratov is the longtime editor of and co-founder of the independent Novaja Gazeta newspaper in Russia.

The two were recognized with the Nobel Prize on Friday for their investigative reporting amid ferocious pushback from their governments.


"Ms. Ressa and Mr. Muratov are receiving the Peace Prize for their courageous fight for freedom of expression in the Philippines and Russia," the committee said in a statement.

"At the same time, they are representatives of all journalists who stand up for this ideal in a world in which democracy and freedom of the press face increasingly adverse conditions."



Rappler and Ressa, the first woman to win a Nobel Prize this year, are forceful critics of the Philippines government under President Rodrigo Duterte and his violent war on drugs in the island nation. The committee called Ressa a "fearless defender of freedom of expression."

"Ressa and Rappler have also documented how social media is being used to spread fake news, harass opponents and manipulate public discourse," the committee said.

Ressa is also the first Filipino to win a Nobel Prize.


Novaja Gazeta has functioned as one of Russia's most independent newspapers since 1993, and Muratov has been editor-in-chief since 1994. The paper has covered corruption, police violence, unlawful arrests and electoral fraud in Russia and exposed "troll factories" used by Russian military forces both inside and outside of Russia.

"Novaja Gazeta's opponents have responded with harassment, threats, violence and murder," the committee said. "Since the newspaper's start, six of its journalists have been killed, including Anna Politkovskaja who wrote revealing articles on the war in Chechnya.

"Despite the killings and threats, editor-in-chief Muratov has refused to abandon the newspaper's independent policy."

"Rappler is honored -- and astounded -- by the Nobel Peace Prize Award given to our CEO Maria Ressa," the outlet said in a statement. "It could not have come at a better time -- a time when journalists and the truth are being attacked and undermined."

Friday's Peace Prize was the last of the five major Nobel Prizes awarded each year. A semiofficial prize, the Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, will be awarded on Monday.

U.S.-based scientists David Julius and Ardem Patapoutianwon the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Monday; Syukuro Manabe, a senior meteorologist at Princeton University, shared the Nobel Prize in Physics with Klaus Hasselmann and Giorgio Parisi on Tuesday; Professor David MacMillan of Princeton University and German scientist Benjamin List won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry on Wednesday; and novelist Abdulrazak Gurnah, an African immigrant who detailed the experiences of refugees and the impact of colonialism, won the Nobel Prize in Literature on Thursday.


Nobel Peace Prize awarded to journalists Ressa and Muratov
FILE - A combo of file images of Novaya Gazeta editor Dmitry Muratov, left, and of Rappler CEO and Executive Editor Maria Ressa. On Friday, Oct. 8, 2021 the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to journalists Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia for their fight for freedom of expression. (AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko and Aaron Favila, File)

MOSCOW (AP) — Journalists Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia won the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for their fight for freedom of expression in countries where reporters have faced persistent attacks, harassment and even murder.

Ressa and Muratov were honored for their “courageous” work but also were considered “representatives of all journalists who stand up for this ideal in a world in which democracy and freedom of the press face increasingly adverse conditions,” said Berit Reiss-Andersen, chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

Ressa in 2012 co-founded Rappler, a news website that the committee noted had focused critical attention on President Rodrigo Duterte’s “controversial, murderous anti-drug campaign” in the Philippines.

She and Rappler “have also documented how social media is being used to spread fake news, harass opponents and manipulate public discourse,” it said.

Muratov was one of the founders in 1993 of the independent Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta, which the Nobel committee called “the most independent newspaper in Russia today, with a fundamentally critical attitude towards power.”

“The newspaper’s fact-based journalism and professional integrity have made it an important source of information on censurable aspects of Russian society rarely mentioned by other media,” it added, noting that six of its journalists were killed since its founding.

Ressa, the first Filipino to win the peace prize and the first woman to be honored this year with an award by the Nobel committee, was convicted last year of libel and sentenced to jail in a decision seen as a major blow to press global freedom.

Currently out on bail but facing seven active legal cases, Ressa, 58, said she hopes the award will bolster investigative journalism “that will hold power to account.”

“This relentless campaign of harassment and intimidation against me and my fellow journalists in the Philippines is a stark example of a global trend,” she told The Associated Press.

She also pointed to social media giants like Facebook as a serious threat to democracy, saying “they actually prioritized the spread of lies laced with anger and hate over facts.”

“I didn’t think that what we are going through would get that attention. But the fact that it did also shows you how important the battles we face are, right?” she said. “This is going to be what our elections are going to be like next year. It is a battle for facts. When you’re in a battle for facts, journalism is activism.”

Muratov, 59, said he sees the prize as an award to Novaya Gazeta journalists and contributors who were killed, including Anna Politkovskaya, who covered Russia’s bloody conflict in Chechnya.





“It’s a recognition of the memory of our fallen colleagues,” he said.

“Since the Nobel Peace Prize isn’t awarded posthumously, they came up with this so that Anya could take it, but through other, second hands,” Muratov said, referring to Politkovskaya.

According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 17 media workers were killed in the Philippines in the last decade and 23 in Russia.

Muratov said he would use part of his share of the 10 million Swedish kronor (over $1.14 million) prize money to help independent media as well as a Moscow hospice and children with spinal muscular problems. He said he wouldn’t keep any of the money himself.

Former Soviet leader and 1990 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mikhail Gorbachev used some of his award to help fund what would become Novaya Gazeta. He congratulated Muratov, calling him “a wonderful, brave and honest journalist and my friend.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also praised Muratov as a “talented and brave” person who “has consistently worked in accordance with his ideals.”

But Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s envoy to international organizations in Vienna, tweeted that Novaya Gazeta’s editorial policy “has nothing to do with strengthening peace” and that “such controversial decisions diminish the value of the Prize.”



Moscow-based political analyst Abbas Gallyamov said the award marked “a painful strike to the Russian authorities ... because the freedom of speech and the principles of independent journalism are an evil in the eyes of Russian authorities.”

As part of a new crackdown on independent journalists in Russia under President Vladimir Putin, the government has designated some of them “foreign agents,” saying they received funding from abroad and engaged in undescribed “political activities.” Muratov said he asked government officials who congratulated him if he would now also receive that designation, but received no reply.

The state RIA Novosti news agency quoted lawmaker Alexander Bashkin as saying the Nobel wouldn’t fall under the definition of foreign funding under the bill on foreign agents. Hours after the prize announcement, the Russian Justice Ministry added nine more journalists to its list of foreign agents.

Muratov on Friday denounced the foreign agent bill as a “shameless” attempt to muzzle independent voices.

Referring to the hopes by many in Russia that the prize should go to imprisoned opposition leader Alexei Navalny, Muratov said he would have voted for him if he were on the committee, saying that he admires Navalny’s courage and adding that “everything is still ahead for him.”

Some critics have questioned if honoring journalists respected the will of Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel and its original purpose to prevent war, but Reiss-Andersen said freedom of expression was essential to peace.

“Free, independent and fact-based journalism serves to protect against abuse of power, lies and war propaganda,” she said. “Without freedom of expression and freedom of the press, it will be difficult to successfully promote fraternity between nations, disarmament and a better world order to succeed in our time.”

She also cited the danger of misinformation and attacks on journalists by leaders denouncing them as purveyors of “fake news.”

“Conveying fake news and information that is propaganda and untrue is also a violation of freedom of expression, and all freedom of expression has its limitations. That is also a very important factor in this debate,” she said.

Media rights group Reporters Without Borders celebrated the announcement, expressing “joy and urgency.”

Director Christophe Deloire called it “an extraordinary tribute to journalism, an excellent tribute to all journalists who take risks everywhere around the world to defend the right to information.”

“Journalism is in danger, journalism is weakened, journalism is threatened. Democracies are weakened by disinformation, by rumors, by hate speech,” said Deloire, whose group has worked with Ressa and Muratov to defend defend journalism in their countries and comes under regular criticism from authoritarian governments.

U.S. President Joe Biden congratulated Ressa and Muratov for the “much-deserved honor.”

“Ressa, Muratov, and journalists like them all around the world are on the front lines of a global battle for the very idea of the truth, and I, along with people everywhere, am grateful for their groundbreaking work to ‘hold the line,’ as Ressa so often says,” Biden said in a statement.

After the announcement, the Nobel committee itself was put on the spot when a reporter asked about its decision to award the 2019 peace prize to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, who has since become entangled in a domestic conflict with the powerful Tigray region.

“Today, I will not comment on other Nobel laureates and other issues than we have on the table today, but I can mention that the situation for freedom of press in Ethiopia is very far from ideal and is facing severe restrictions,” Reiss-Andersen said.

In other awards announced this week by the Nobel Committee:

— The medicine prize went to Americans David Julius and Ardem Patapoutian for their discoveries into how the human body perceives temperature and touch.

— The physics prize went to three scientists whose work found order in seeming disorder, helping to explain and predict complex forces of nature, including expanding understanding of climate change.

— The chemistry prize went to Benjamin List and David W.C. MacMillan for finding an easier and environmentally cleaner way to build molecules that can be used to make compounds, including medicines and pesticides.

— The literature prize went to U.K.-based Tanzanian writer Abdulrazak Gurnah, for his “uncompromising and compassionate penetration of the effects of colonialism and the fate of the refugee.”

The economics prize will be awarded Monday.

___

Gera reported from Warsaw, Poland, and Rosario reported from Manila. Kostya Manenkov in Moscow, Masha Macpherson in Paris, Jan M. Olsen in Copenhagen, Denmark, and Frank Jordans in Berlin contributed.

___

Read more stories about Nobel Prizes past and present by The Associated Press at https://www.apnews.com/NobelPrizes


Philippines' Nobel Prize winner Ressa says award for 'all journalists'


Issued on: 09/10/2021 -

Philippine journalist Maria Ressa (pictured after her arrest in 2019)
says her Nobel Peace Prize is for 'all journalists around the world'
TED ALJIBE AFP/File

Manila (AFP)

Veteran Philippine journalist Maria Ressa on Saturday said her Nobel Peace Prize was for "all journalists around the world", as she vowed to continue her battle for press freedom.

Ressa, co-founder of news website Rappler, and Russian journalist Dmitry Muratov were awarded the prize on Friday for their efforts to "safeguard freedom of expression".

"This is really for all journalists around the world," Ressa, a vocal critic of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte, told AFP in an interview.

"We do need help on so many fronts -- it is so much more difficult and dangerous to be a journalist today."

Philippine press groups and rights activists hailed Ressa's award as a "triumph" in a country ranked as one of the world's most dangerous for journalists.

Since Duterte was swept to power in 2016, Ressa and Rappler have endured what media advocates say is a grinding series of criminal charges, investigations and online attacks.

Duterte has called Rappler a "fake news outlet", and Ressa has been the target of abusive messages online.

Ressa, 58, said she hoped the prize would provide a protective shield for her and other journalists in the Philippines against physical attacks and online threats.

"This 'us against them' was never the creation of the journalists, it was the creation of the people in power who wanted to use a type of leadership that divides society," Ressa said, describing the award "like a shot of adrenalin".

"I hope this allows journalists to do our jobs well without fear."





- 'Fearless' -


Ressa has been a staunch critic of Duterte and his government's policies, including a drug war that rights groups estimate has killed tens of thousands of mostly poor men.

Rappler was among the domestic and foreign media outlets that published shocking images of the killings and questioned its legal basis.

International Criminal Court judges have authorised a full-blown investigation into a possible crime against humanity during the bloody campaign.

Other media outlets have fallen foul of Duterte, including the Philippine Daily Inquirer and broadcasting giant ABS-CBN, which lost its free-to-air licence last year.

But Ressa said Rappler's independence meant it could fight back. "We have no other businesses to protect... so it's very easy for us to push back," she said.

Ressa said seven legal cases, including tax evasion, still in the courts were "ludicrous" and she was determined to win.

She is on bail pending an appeal against a conviction last year in a cyber libel case, for which she faces up to six years in prison.

Two other cyber libel cases were dismissed earlier this year.

"That abuse of power would have worked if I allowed the fear in my emotions and in my head to dominate our reaction -- the biggest challenge was always to conquer your fear," she said.

"Being fearless doesn't mean not being afraid, it just means knowing how to handle your fear."

The author of "How to Stand Up to a Dictator" hopes to get permission to travel to Norway to pick up her Nobel Prize.

© 2021 AFP

What Peace Prize says about freedom in Russia, Philippines


1 of 8
FILE - In this Jan. 19, 2018, file photo, journalists and supporters display their messages during a protest against the recent Securities and Exchange Commission's revocation of the registration of Rappler, an online news outfit, northeast of Manila, Philippines.
 (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez, File)


MOSCOW (AP) — The Nobel Peace Prize sometimes recognizes groundbreaking efforts to resolve seemingly intractable conflicts, such as once-sworn enemies who sat down and brokered an end to war. In other years, the recipient is someone who promoted human rights at great personal cost.

The prestigious award also can serve as a not-so-subtle message to authoritarian governments and leaders that the world is watching.

What does the selection of two journalists, Maria Ressa, 58, of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov, 59, of Russia, say about freedom of expression and the history of dissent in the countries of the 2021 peace prize winners?

“It is a battle for facts. When you’re in a battle for facts, journalism is activism,” Ressa said Friday.




RUSSIA

Dmitry Muratov is part of a historic cycle that links him to two other Russian winners of the Nobel Peace Prize.

When Andrei Sakharov, a prominent Soviet nuclear physicist turned political dissident, received the prize in 1975, the Cold War was at its height and the Soviet Union seemed invincible.

The country’s Communist leaders tolerated no dissent. Five years after becoming a Nobel laureate, Sakharov’s bold criticism of the Soviet regime got him sent into internal exile.

Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev allowed Sakharov to return from exile in 1986, and went on to win the 1990 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to end the Cold War.

But while he was earning international accolades, Gorbachev was under attack from both members of the Communist old guard who opposed his reforms and democracy champions such as Sakharov who accused him of being indecisive.

The Soviet Union collapsed after a string of Soviet republics declared their independence and Gorbachev stepped down as president on Dec. 25, 1991.




The former leader would use some of his Nobel Prize money to help a group of Russian journalists, including Muratov, buy computers and office equipment for their new independent newspaper in 1993. Gorbachev eventually became Novaya Gazeta’s co-owner; Muratov was its editor from 1995 to 2017, and returned to the post in 2019.

Under his leadership, the publication has become the country’s top independent newspaper, broadly acclaimed internationally for its fearless reporting on the bloody separatist war in the Russian republic of Chechnya and on official corruption. The paper has taken a consistently critical look at the rollback of post-Soviet freedoms during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s more than two decades in power.

Several Novaya reporters and contributors were killed. The paper’s leading reporter, Anna Politkovskaya, who relentlessly covered human rights abuses in Chechnya, was shot dead in the elevator of her Moscow apartment building on Oct. 7, 2006.

A Moscow court convicted the gunman and three other Chechens in the killing, as well as a former Moscow police officer who was their accomplice. But on Thursday, the 15th anniversary of Politkovskaya’s slaying, Muratov noted that the Russian authorities never tracked down the person who ordered it.

“Regrettably, there is no probe going on now,” Muratov said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We don’t even know when an investigator last touched that criminal case.”

He vowed that the newspaper would continue working to track down the mastermind of Politkovskaya’s killing on its own.

Muratov also pledged to use his Nobel Prize to help independent Russian journalists. Many people in Russia voiced hope that the prize, by emphasizing global support for media freedom, would help restrain the government’s multi-pronged crackdown on independent media.

PHILIPPINES

The Philippines was one of the few places in Asia where freedom of the press seemed assured when Maria Ressa and other journalists founded the online magazine Rappler in 2012.

The government of long-time dictator Ferdinard Marcos had muzzled the media, imprisoned opponents and tortured activists. But after the 1986 “people power” revolution toppled Marcos, a myriad of newspapers, lively radio stations and closely watched TV channels sprang up to chronicle the new chapter in the Philippines.

Their mission: delivering timely information to a Filipino population hungry for news.

In the following years, the Philippines remained a dangerous place for journalists, a free-wheeling country where retaliatory violence often accompanied the freedom to speak up due to an abundance of firearms, legal impunity and political instability. It had one of the highest numbers of reporters killed each year.

Then came the election of President Rodrigo Duterte in 2016. After campaigning on a promise to deal with widespread crime, he launched a bloody crackdown on illegal drugs, enlisting police and unidentified gunmen who became the judge and jury for thousands of mostly poor suspects in Manila’s sprawling urban slums.

Rappler CEO Ressa and other staff members took to reporting the nighttime raids that left hundreds and then thousands dead in overwhelmed morgues. Police said they were acting in self-defense when officers gunned down alleged drug dealers. Few suspects were questioned in what human rights activists soon described as extrajudicial executions.

As the death toll mounted, so did Rappler’s stories, some of which suggested that weapons could have been planted on the people killed.

In a Nov. 9, 2020, story, Rappler reporter Rambo Talabong quoted the last words of Vicent Adia, a 27-year-old man who was labeled a drug pusher and initially survived “a vigilante execution” only to be slain by a gunman at a hospital near Manila. According to Rappler, Adia had told his close friend: “The police are about to kill me.”

Duterte’s fury at journalists increased as well. The tough-talking president declared that “corrupt” journalists were not “exempted from assassination.”

“In 2016, it was really, really laughable. And I thought, ‘Oh, doesn’t matter.’ I laughed,” Ressa said in a 2020 interview, recalling her disbelief that the president would make good on his lethal threats in a country where democracy and human rights had been restored.

Any hint of humor evaporated when she became a target. She was arrested and held for a night, prosecuted in a series of criminal cases, including tax evasion, and convicted of libel. She remains free on bail while the libel case is on appeal, but faces up to six years in prison.

At about the same time, Ressa began wearing a bulletproof vest because of threats. In the 2020 documentary “A Thousand Cuts,” by Filipino-American filmmaker Ramona S. Diaz, she is seen pleading with Facebook representatives to delete violent posts against her and to remove livestreams of Duterte supporters protesting outside Rappler’s offices.

“The Philippine government filed 10 arrest warrants against me. In the last year, the government has prevented my travel four times, including when my mother was diagnosed with cancer and I needed to go to see my aging parents,” Ressa said in a Zoom interview after she won the Nobel Peace Prize.

Duterte and other Philippine officials have said the criminal complaints against Ressa and Rappler were not a press freedom issue but a part of normal judicial procedures arising from their alleged violations of the law.

In June, a Manila court dismissed a cyber-libel case against Ressa arising from a complaint filed by a wealthy businessman. A 2012 Rappler article included allegations that the businessman was linked to illegal drugs and human trafficking, and that a car registered in his name had been used by the country’s chief justice.

The law under which Ressa was charged by the government, the Cybercrime Prevention Act, did not go into effect until months after the article appeared, according to Rappler.

In August, another case against her was dismissed. Ressa has pleaded not guilty to charges of breaching a ban on foreign ownership and control of media outlets in the Philippines, as well as tax evasion charges.

“You don’t know how powerful government is until you come under attack the way we have. When all the different parts of government work against you, it’s kind of shocking,” Ressa said.

___

Associated Press writer Hrvoje Hranjski reported from Bangkok and has previously reported from Manila. Anna Frants in Moscow contributed to this report.

___

Read more stories about Nobel Prizes past and present by The Associated Press at https://www.apnews.com/NobelPrizes

___

 

NOBEL NEWZ

Montreal-raised physicist linked to Nobel win urges Quebecers to continue 'to believe in science'


The Canadian Press
Thursday, October 7, 2021

Scientist Patrick Charbonneau, the Quebec-born scientist whose research has been linked to this year's Nobel Prize in Physics, says he hopes to inspire Canadians to value science. 
THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO-Duke University Communications


MONTREAL -- A Quebec-born scientist who has contributed to research that won his collaborator this year's Nobel Prize in Physics says he hopes to inspire Canadians to value science.

Patrick Charbonneau has worked closely with Italian physicist Giorgio Parisi, who was a co-winner of this year's prize for his work on complex physical systems. Over the last decade, Charbonneau has worked with Parisi on publishing a number of papers on complex glasses, two of which were cited by the Nobel committee as scientific background.

The Montreal-born Duke University professor said Thursday in an interview from North Carolina that Parisi's prize is the culmination of decades of research.

"We had been hoping for this for many years, but at the same time, we had a hard time believing that it would ever happen because this was not the result of recent advances," he said.

But he said that above all, the Nobel Prize is a collective opportunity to celebrate science, which has become more meaningful than ever in the last year and a half as the world has struggled with the COVID-19 pandemic.

"The communities which believe and which have accepted to get on board are doing better today, from a public health point of view in particular, than those that refuse," Charbonneau said.

"So my message for the people of Quebec is to continue to value, to believe in science, because it's important."

Parisi won the Nobel Prize for his work in explaining disorder in physical systems ranging from atomic to planet-sized.

His discoveries "make it possible to understand and describe many different and apparently entirely random materials and phenomena, not only in physics but also in other, very different areas, such as mathematics, biology, neuroscience and machine learning," the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said in a news release Tuesday announcing the prize.

Charbonneau's work with Parisi has focused on one kind of disordered material -- specifically glasses -- which he says are poorly understood despite being used by humans for thousands of years and being found in everything from window panes to cellphones.

"Those materials are really ubiquitous, but we don't have a good understanding as to what makes them solid, what's the microscopic origin of rigidity," he said.

While his work is theoretical and focuses on molecular simulations, he said it could contribute to a better understanding of the commonly used material.

Charbonneau is originally from Montreal, where he grew up in the Ahuntsic district and sang in a well-known choir as a child. He obtained his undergraduate degree at McGill University before moving on to Harvard and eventually making his way to Duke University in 2008, where he is a professor of chemistry and physics.

Melanie Joly, the MP for his home neighbourhood, congratulated Charbonneau on Twitter, saying there's "a little bit of Ahuntsic in the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics."

"Congratulations dear Patrick, we are extremely proud of you!" she wrote.

Charbonneau said that being cited by the Nobel committee is a big honour, adding that it's one he hopes will bring greater attention to his area of work.


He said he marked the win with a bottle of champagne with his wife, and is looking forward to meeting up for a celebratory dinner with his collaborators from France and Italy when he travels to Europe later this year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 7, 2021.

Duo share Nobel chemistry prize for work on solar cell advances
Bloomberg News | October 6, 2021 |

David MacMillan. Image: Princeton University

Two scientists, working independently of each other, won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for their work into molecular construction and its impact on a range of uses from solar cells to battery storage.


Benjamin List, from the Max-Planck-Institut in Germany, and David MacMillan, a professor at Princeton University, won the award for developing “an ingenious tool” for building molecules, according to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

 
“Researchers can now more efficiently construct anything from new pharmaceuticals to molecules that can capture light in solar cells,” the academy said.

The two recipients will share the 10 million-krona ($1.1 million) award.

Annual prizes for achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine, peace and literature were established in the will of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish inventor of dynamite, who died in 1896. A prize in economic sciences was added by Sweden’s central bank in 1968.

(By Charles Daly)


Masking, social distancing cut flu cases among children by 99% in Ohio

Masking and social distancing for COVID-19 likely also stopped the spread of the flu among children in Akron, Ohio, a new study says.
 File photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo

Oct. 8 (UPI) -- Widespread use of facemasks and social distancing to control COVID-19 cut the spread of flu among children by 99% in 2020-21 winter season in northern Ohio -- similar to what happened in most of the country -- an analysis presented Friday during the American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition found.

People who practiced frequent hand hygiene and were able to self-isolate during the height of the pandemic in the United States also helped contain the flu, as well as respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, the researchers said.

Before COVID-19, the peak incidence of the influenza A virus among children in the area surrounding Akron Children's Hospital, where the research was conducted, occurred in February during both the 2018-19 and 2019-20 flu seasons.

In February 2019, 41% of nose and throat swab samples tested came back positive for the virus, while in February 2020, 24% came back positive, the data showed.

RELATED COVID-19 protection measures likely limiting flu spread

However, during the 2020-21 winter season, only two isolated cases of Influenza B virus and no cases of Influenza A virus were detected among Akron Children's patients, a finding that is similar to what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that much of the United States experienced.

"Numbers don't lie," co-author Dr. Osama El-Assal said in a press release.

"Face masking, and proper hygiene and isolation can be effective means to protect the vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and young children during the respiratory virus season," said El-Assal, a pediatric emergency medicine physician at Akron Children's Hospital.

RELATED CDC: Number of flu, other virus cases reach 'historic' lows in 2020-21

In July, the CDC reported that cases of the flu and other viruses had reached "historic lows" in 2020-21, likely due to COVID-19 measures and restrictions. This included positive flu test rates dropping to well under 1% from the 25% or so that is historically expected.

Similarly, positive tests for RSV dropped to between 1% and 2% from a range of 3% to 17% in the previous four years, the agency reported.

For this study, El-Assai and his colleagues tracked prevalence of the flu and RSV, which causes the common cold, among patients at Akron Children's from October 2018 through April of this year.

RELATED As COVID-19 rules ease, common colds rebound across U.S.

In addition to dramatic declines in flu cases, the peak in spread of RSV for the 2018-19 winter season occurred in December 2018, when nearly 29% of samples tested came back positive, the data showed.

Similarly, December 2019 was the peak of the 2019-20 season for RSV, when nearly 25% of the nose and throat samples tested came back positive for the virus.

However, after social distancing measures were implemented in March 2020, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, none of the samples tested came back positive for RSV.

This was true until March 14, when the first RSV case was detected among Akron Children's patients, which coincided with the relaxation of social distancing measures in the area, the researchers said.

Masking and social distancing "can be a simple non-medicinal way to save lives," El-Assai said.
#ECOCIDE

California spill not the environmental disaster first feared
  

AMY TAXIN
Fri, October 8, 2021, 

HUNTINGTON BEACH, Calif. (AP) — After a crude oil sheen was detected on the waters off the Southern California coast, environmentalists feared the worst: A massive spill that would wreck the ecosystem.

A week later, the region and its signature beaches appear to have been spared a potentially calamitous fate, though the long-term toll on plant and animal life remains unknown.

The Coast Guard estimates a minimum of about 25,000 gallons (95,000 liters) of oil spilled from a ruptured pipeline off the shores of Orange County and no more than 132,000 gallons (500,000 liters).


“Based on what we're seeing, it's a lighter impact than expected of a worst-case discharge,” California Fish and Wildlife Lt. Christian Corbo said. “We're hoping to see less impacts to the shoreline, less impacts to wildlife, based on that lowered threshold.”

The news was welcome after a harrowing week of beach closures in seaside communities where life revolves around the water. Officials initially feared Huntington Beach — dubbed Surf City USA — could be off-limits to surfers and swimmers for months. But Mayor Kim Carr on Thursday said she was “cautiously optimistic” they could be back in the water in weeks.

Many beaches remain open for volleyball, sunbathing and other activities, though people must stay away from the water.

An oily sheen was reported on the water the evening of Oct. 1. But it wasn't until the next morning that officials confirmed the spill. The Coast Guard is investigating whether a ship’s anchor might have snagged, bent and ruptured a pipeline owned by Houston-based Amplify Energy Corp. that shuttles crude from its three offshore platforms to a facility on the shore.

Out by the oil platforms, there was no visible sheen by mid-week, and the putrid odor that blanketed Huntington Beach last weekend had faded. Dolphins jumped in the waves, and birds skimmed the water’s surface.

But environmental advocates said the situation remains serious, and they fear the long-term effect on wetlands and ocean life. Crude oil components can linger beneath the surface of the ocean and affect tiny organisms that are ingested by fish, which are later eaten by birds, marine mammals and people.

In an offshore spill, birds are often among the first hit as crude can stick to their feathers, leaving them chilled by cold water temperatures. Ten oiled birds were found dead over five days, and 25 were recovered and taken to a wildlife center for treatment. Those recovered include seven snowy plovers, which are a threatened species, according to the Oiled Wildlife Care Network.

John Villa, executive director of the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, said the community was hit with more crude during a 1990 spill, and more than 1,000 animals were affected. In this spill, oil has entered three marshes near the beach, but the damage was minimized by quickly erected barriers, he said.

“It's not as bad as we feared," he said, adding that the latest challenge is to pump oxygen back into the marshes because no new water is coming in. “We expected a lot more of a problem in our marshes.”

Mike Lynes, director of public policy for Audubon California, said migratory birds aren’t typically seen in the region in large numbers until November, and that may have helped limit the harm.

But many birds are likely affected by oil and haven’t been found, and other species that don’t have the same migratory patterns might not be as fortunate, he said. That’s why tallying oiled birds isn’t an ideal measure for the effect of an oil spill, he said.

“The oil still persists in the coastal environment and causes all sorts of problems for a long time,” Lynes said.

As the crude has drifted south, tar balls have appeared on beaches about 50 miles (80 kilometers) from the original site, an ominous sign that the impact on the environment is widening.

“We just don't know what the impacts are going to be,” said Garry Brown, co-founder of the advocacy group Orange County Coastkeeper. “Sad to say, it's still early.”

Some of the greatest concerns are the impact beneath the ocean's surface. Crude oil can smother deep-water corals and kill a critical food source for blue whales, according to Oceana, an ocean conservation organization. Environmental experts said fish can ingest oil, and the toxins can travel up the food chain. Because of the spill, fishing has been barred for miles off the shore of Orange County.

Dan Kalmick, a Huntington Beach city councilman and board member for the wetland conservation group Bolsa Chica Land Trust, said things look better than they did in the early hours after the spill. But there are still a lot of unknowns about where the crude will go as winds and the tides shift, he said.

“There's still a lot of oil out in the water,” Kalmick said.








California Oil Spill Environment
FILE - A seagull rests as workers in protective suits clean the contaminated beach after an oil spill, Wednesday, Oct. 6, 2021 in Newport Beach, Calif. After a crude oil sheen was detected on the waters off the California coast, environmentalists feared the worst. Now, almost a week later, some say weather conditions and quick-moving actions have spared sensitive wetlands and scenic beaches in Orange County's Huntington Beach a potentially calamitous fate, though the long term toll of the spill remains unknown. (AP Photo/Ringo H.W. Chiu, File)More


California oil pipeline could have been leaking a year: investigators

Issued on: 09/10/2021 
The clean-up has shuttered long stretches of coastline to the south of Los Angeles, in an area known for its surfing 
Frederic J. BROWN AFP

Los Angeles (AFP)

A fractured pipeline spewing crude oil off the coast of California could have been leaking for a year, US investigators said Friday.

Tens of thousands of gallons of oil are feared to have leeched into waters that are home to whales, dolphins and otters since a leak was discovered last weekend.

Stretches of prime surfing coastline have been shuttered as clean-up crews raced to prevent the spoiling of beaches and rescue animals caught up in the slick.

US news outlets reported that a ship's anchor could have been responsible for dragging the pipeline along the seabed and splitting it open.

But Coast Guard officials investigating the incident said Friday the rupture might not be new, and could have happened as long as a year ago.

Captain Jason Neubauer said multiple ships' anchors may have contributed to the displacement of the pipe, and it was not initially clear when the leak began.

Martyn Willsher, the chief executive of pipeline operator Amplify Energy, said this week that underwater observations revealed that 4,000 feet (1,200 meters) of the pipeline was not where it should be.

"The pipeline has essentially been pulled like a bowstring," he told a press conference on Tuesday.

"At its widest point it is 105 feet away from where it was," he said, adding the break in the pipeline was at the apex of this bend.

An oil platform and cargo container ships are seen on the horizon as environmental response crews clean the beach after an oil spill in the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach, California on October 4, 2021
 Patrick T. FALLON AFP

Willsher refused to speculate on the cause of that displacement and whether a ship's anchor could be responsible, but said: "It is a 16-inch steel pipeline that's a half inch thick and covered in an inch of concrete.

"For it to be moved 105 feet is not common."

Small crack in U.S. pipeline may have delayed oil spill detection

An aerial photo shows floating barriers known as booms set up to try to stop further incursion into the Wetlands Talbert Marsh after an oil spill in Huntington Beach, Calif., on Huntington Beach, Calif., on Monday, Oct. 4, 2021. (AP Photo/Ringo H.W. Chiu)

Michael Biesecker, Stefanie Dazio and Michael Balsamo
The Associated Press Staff
 Thursday, October 7, 2021 

HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. -- Video of the ruptured pipeline that spilled tens of thousands of gallons of crude oil off Southern California shows a thin crack along the top of the pipe that could indicate a slow leak that initially was difficult to detect, experts said Thursday.

The 13-inch-long (33-centimeter) narrow gash could explain why signs of an oil slick were seen Friday night but the spill eluded detection by the pipeline operator until Saturday morning, they said.

"My experience suggests this would be a darned hard leak to remotely determine quickly," said Richard Kuprewicz, a private pipeline accident investigator and consultant. "An opening of this type, on a 17-mile-long (27-kilometer) underwater pipe is very hard to spot by remote indications. These crack-type releases are lower rate and can go for quite a while."


Related Stories
How oil spills harm birds, dolphins, sea lions and other wildlife
California oil spill response in question after delay in shutting down pipeline

When pipes experience a catastrophic failure, the breach typically is much bigger, what's referred to in the industry as a "fish mouth" rupture because it gapes wide like the mouth of a fish, he said.

Amplify Energy, a Houston-based company that owns and operates three offshore oil platforms and the pipeline south of Los Angeles, said it didn't know there had been a spill until its workers detected an oil sheen on the water Saturday at 8:09 a.m.

The cause of the spill is under investigation by numerous agencies as the cleanup continues along miles of shoreline on the Orange County coast south of the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

The Coast Guard on Thursday slightly revised spill estimates to at least about 25,000 gallons (95,000 liters) and no more than 132,000 gallons (500,000 liters).

The Coast Guard on Thursday said it is investigating the incident with other agencies as a "major marine casualty" due to the potential involvement of a vessel and damages exceeding $500,000. It said they will determine if criminal charges, civil penalties or new laws or regulations are needed.

Investigators are looking into whether a ship waiting to offload its cargo snagged and bent the pipeline with its anchor.

Coast Guard investigators boarded the massive German-flagged container ship Rotterdam Express on Wednesday to determine if it was involved in the spill. The Rotterdam was the ship anchored closest to the pipeline last week.

Hapag-Lloyd, the shipping company that operates the vessel, confirmed Thursday that investigators boarded the ship while it was docked at the Port of Oakland in San Francisco Bay. The Coast Guard interviewed the captain and crew and was provided access to the logbook showing the ship's locations, according to Nils Haupt, a spokesman at Hapag-Lloyd's headquarters in Hamburg, Germany.

Afterward, the Coast Guard called the company to say the Rotterdam no longer was under scrutiny for the spill, Haupt said. The ship was cleared to depart Oakland was headed to Mexico.

The leak occurred about 5 miles (8 kilometers) offshore at a depth of about 98 feet (30 meters), investigators said. A 4,000-foot (1,219-meter) section of the pipeline was dislodged 105 feet (32 meters), bent back like the string on a bow, Amplify's CEO Martyn Willsher has said.

Jonathan Stewart, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles, said he was surprised the damage wasn't more severe given how far the pipe was moved.

"My first reaction when I heard that it is displaced so far was that it's remarkable that it's even intact at all," Stewart said.

Questions remain about when the oil company knew it had a problem and delays in reporting the spill.

A foreign ship anchored in the waters off Huntington Beach reported to the Coast Guard that it saw a sheen longer than 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) just after 6 p.m. A satellite image shot by the European Space Agency indicated a likely oil slick in the area around 7 p.m., which was reported to the Coast Guard at 2:06 a.m. Saturday after being reviewed by a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration analyst.

Federal pipeline safety regulators have put the time of the incident at 2:30 a.m. Saturday but say the company didn't shut down the pipeline until 6:01 a.m. and didn't report the leak to the Coast Guard until 9:07 a.m. Federal and state rules require immediate notification of spills.

Willsher, who took questions alongside Coast Guard and other officials over four days, did not show up at Thursday's news conference. Other officials declined to explain his absence.

The type of crack seen in the Coast Guard video is big enough to allow some oil to escape to potentially trigger the low pressure alarm, Kuprewicz said. But because the pipeline was operating under relatively low pressure, the control room operator may have simply dismissed the alarm because the pressure was not very high to begin, he said.

Ramanan Krishnamoorti, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Houston, said the pipeline might have leaked for days before being discovered.

"If you have a massive crack or massive hole, you get a huge pressure drop and therefore you know you have a massive leak," he said. "When you have a hairline crack like that, perhaps this could have been going on for two, three, four days."

The fact that the San Pedro Bay line was still encased in concrete in the video is another indication that oil was likely leaking at a low rate. A major breach on a highly pressurized line would blow the concrete off, Kuprewicz said.

A second underwater video released Thursday showed a broader view of a bent section of pipeline. Long indentations in the sand can be seen intersecting with one side of the pipe at the point of the bend, but do not appear to continue on the far side of the line.

"That's pretty revealing," Krishnamoorti said. "It seems to me you've got something that was dragged in the sand that might have impacted the pipeline."

But he remained puzzled that the leak came from a crack and not a larger gash, assuming it was hit by an anchor or some other object.

A crack suggests the pipe, which was installed in 1980, perhaps withstood an initial impact, but had been weakened over time by corrosion and become more prone to fail, Krishnamoorti said. That means Amplify would have some responsibility for it failing.

Because the line is encased in concrete -- a means of keeping it weighted down on the sea floor -- the Coast Guard videos don't reveal the condition of the half-inch-thick steel pipe underneath.

Once federal safety investigators cut out the damaged section of pipe and remove it, they will be able to conduct a closer examination, looking for signs of corrosion, metal fatigue or other anomalies that would have made it more susceptible to failure. That examination should also reveal if the crack grew larger over time, Kuprewicz said.

------

Associated Press writers Michael Biesecker and Michael Balsamo contributed from Washington. Michael R. Blood contributed from Los Angeles.


Is Facebook facing a “Big Tobacco moment”?


Mike Bebernes
·Senior Editor
Fri, October 8, 2021

“The 360” shows you diverse perspectives on the day’s top stories and debates.

What’s happening

Facebook, the world’s largest social media network, is facing a fresh wave of criticism in response to accusations from a former employee that the company knowingly made decisions that put profit over the public good.

Last month, the Wall Street Journal published a series of stories based on leaked internal Facebook documents that show the company was aware that its products — which include Instagram and WhatsApp, in addition to the main Facebook platform — cause significant harm, but didn’t act to fix the problem. The Journal’s reports include claims that Facebook knew Instagram was toxic to young girls’ self-esteem, allowed popular accounts to avoid its content rules, failed to stop illegal activity like drug trafficking, struggled to contain COVID misinformation and made changes to its algorithms that rewarded inflammatory content.

Those documents were leaked by Frances Haugen, a data scientist hired by Facebook to help combat election misinformation. Haugen testified before Congress on Tuesday, accusing the company of “buying its profits with our safety.” The company has said characterizations of its decision making in the Journal’s reporting and Haugen’s testimony are unfair.

Facebook was dealt a different sort of blow on Monday, when a critical outage rendered its network and its affiliate apps unaccessible for hours.
Why there’s debate

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said Haugen’s testimony was a “Big Tobacco moment” for Facebook — a reference to past revelations that major cigarette companies knew their products were addictive and deadly. Facebook has weathered a number of scandals in recent years, but some industry experts agree with Blumenthal’s assessment that the company is facing a “moment of reckoning.”

They argue that this latest crisis is different from previous ones because it suggests that Facebook’s leadership was actively complicit in the damage its products does, rather than simply being taken advantage of by bad actors. Some argue that the combined pressures of public outrage, employee discontent and potential hits to the company’s stock price may be enough to convince CEO Mark Zuckerberg to change Facebook’s underlying structures that boost controversial content. Recent critical statements by lawmakers from both parties also suggest that Congress may have the momentum to pass legislation that forces Big Tech firms to adjust their business models.

Skeptics, however, predict that this latest scandal will pass with little substantive change. They say that, as much as Facebook’s public image has suffered in recent years, the company has only become more powerful and profitable. As long as Facebook has a business incentive to permit and even promote harmful content, it will continue to do so. Others add that making fundamental changes to a collection of apps used by billions of people around the world may be too large a task. There is also significant doubt that Congress can overcome its many flaws to pass meaningful legislation that changes Facebook’s business practices.
What’s next

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault is also reportedly interested in interviewing Haugen about how Facebook may have been used to facilitate violence at the U.S. Capitol. Lawmakers from both parties called on Zuckerberg to testify before Congress, though no hearing date has been set.
Perspectives
Optimists

Enough public outrage could force Facebook to change

“Like tobacco, Facebook is a dangerous product one uses at one’s own risk. It’s worth noting, however, that tobacco use in this country declined not just because it was regulated, but also because people became educated to its perils.” — Leonard Pitts Jr., Miami Herald

Facebook may be more vulnerable than most people think

“Facebook is in trouble. Not financial trouble, or legal trouble, or even senators-yelling-at-Mark-Zuckerberg trouble. What I’m talking about is a kind of slow, steady decline that anyone who has ever seen a dying company up close can recognize. It’s a cloud of existential dread that hangs over an organization whose best days are behind it, influencing every managerial priority and product decision and leading to increasingly desperate attempts to find a way out.” — Kevin Roose, New York Times

Investor confidence may be waning

“Investors who have held on to the stock throughout the controversies should realize that this time, the company’s Teflon shield may finally be cracking.” — Therese Poletti, MarketWatch

Haugen provided a roadmap for fixing Facebook

“Regulators have been at a loss for how to deal with Facebook up to now, but Haugen’s cool-headed suggestions coupled with internal details on how Facebook's systems are set up could provide a clearer way forward.” — Parmy Olson, Bloomberg

Congress may finally be fed up with Facebook

“A key reason why this latest scandal feels more significant is that politicians on both sides of the aisle feel deceived by Facebook.” — Shirin Ghaffary, Recode
Skeptics

It’s not in Facebook’s business interest to combat harmful content

“The social media giant pledged to ‘tackle the spread of misinformation and harmful content.’ But as long as the social network makes money off such garbage, such a promise comes across as a sick joke rather than reassurance.” — Eugene Robinson, Washington Post

Even a major user revolt wouldn’t be enough to force Facebook’s hand

“Could enough people come together to bring down the empire? Probably not. Even if Facebook lost 1 billion users, it would have another 2 billion left. But we need to recognize the danger we’re in. We need to shake the notion that Facebook is a normal company, or that its hegemony is inevitable.” — Adrienne LaFrance, The Atlantic

Facebook has proven it will pursue profit over everything else

“Despite the executive team’s awareness of these serious problems, despite congressional hearings and scripted pledges to do better, despite Zuckerberg’s grandiose mission statements that change with the tides of public pressure, Facebook continues to shrug off the great responsibility that comes with the great power and wealth it has accumulated.” — Jathan Sadowski, The Guardian

Facebook’s flaws are fundamental to its existence

“It may in fact be the case that the platform is corrupt by its very nature—and that talk of a safer Facebook ... is a bit like the ‘safer cigarettes’ tobacco companies began marketing in response to health concerns more than half a century ago.” — Eric Lutz, Vanity Fair

Lawmakers’ tough words won’t lead to actual legislation

“Congress has been hauling in Facebook executives to testify since early 2018, during the height of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In those three and a half years, it has passed precisely zero laws significantly regulating the conduct of social media platforms. Instead, with some notable exceptions, it tends to do what it spent most of the latest hearing doing: browbeating the companies into fixing things themselves.” — Gilad Edelman, Wired

Company leadership isn’t up to the task of fixing Facebook

“The issues, which become clear in all of this reporting, are not of a company that is nefariously run by evil geniuses toying with people’s minds (as some would have you believe). … It seems pretty clear that they are decently smart, and decently competent people … who have ended up in an impossible situation and don’t recognize that they can’t solve it all alone.” — Mike Masnick, Techdirt

Facebook is too big to reform

“These are clearly problems of scale, which Facebook has had many years to deal with and has been fundamentally unable to, for the simple reason that it has never stopped chasing growth at all costs. This could be framed as an issue of priorities that Facebook can still rectify with ‘help,’ but the issue is complicated when the problems exist precisely because of Facebook’s size.” — Edward Ongweso Jr., Vice

Is there a topic you’d like to see covered in “The 360”? Send your suggestions to the360@yahoonews.com.

Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Getty Images, Drew Angerer/Getty Images
A US nuclear submarine's mysterious collision with an object in the South China Sea suggests it was lurking near the bottom, expert says


Ryan Pickrell
Fri, October 8, 2021

The crew stands atop the Seawolf-class fast-attack submarine USS Connecticut in this 2018 photo.
 Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

A US Navy submarine collided with an object in the Indo-Pacific, the Navy revealed Thursday.

A former Navy submariner told Insider reports suggest the submarine was operating along the sea floor.

The collision, which took place in the South China Sea, is currently under investigation.


The US Navy Seawolf-class submarine USS Connecticut collided with an unknown object in the South China Sea recently, damaging the powerful fast-attack boat and injuring nearly a dozen crew members.

The US Navy statement on the collision said specifically the Connecticut collided with an "object," and service officials talking with Navy Times indicated it was not another vessel and not likely to have been a land mass.

Navy officials told the Associated Press that the object the submarine hit might have been a sunken ship, a shipping container, or some other uncharted object.

Public details on the incident are still very limited, but a former US Navy submariner and defense expert told Insider reports on the collision indicate the submarine was probably operating close to the bottom, possibly on a surveillance mission.

The South China Sea is already a challenging operating environment for submarines because it is, for the most part, actually quite shallow, especially compared to the waters of the nearby Pacific Ocean, with depths of thousands of feet.

Comments from Navy officials speculating that the nuclear-powered submarine may have collided with a container or shipwreck suggests that the ship was not only in shallow waters but likely close to the sea floor, said Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute.

And reports that only about a dozen crew members suffered only minor injuries suggest the submarine may have been moving slowly, possibly because it was near the bottom or possibly to remain undetected or both.

"The things you might do near the sea floor are hide, if you are just trying to surveil Chinese submarine operations, or try to put something on the sea floor or pick something up, which might be a sensor," explained Clark, who is a retired submarine officer and former special assistant to the chief of naval operations.

A potential point of interest for surveillance would be Yulin Naval Base on Hainan Island, from which China operates an unknown number of submarines.

Beyond surveillance, other possible operations could include activities like sea floor mapping.

Clark told Insider he "would not be surprised if the Connecticut was up there doing some kind of surveillance operation on Chinese submarine operations out of Hainan Island and it was close to the bottom because it was trying to hide and it ran into something while it was doing that."

It is unclear what kind of operations the Connecticut was conducting at the time of the collision, but a Navy official characterized them to the AP as routine.

The challenge with operating near the sea floor is that there is debris down there that can pose a threat to the submarine.

For instance, the South China Sea is an important strategic waterway through which trillions of dollars in global trade pass each year, and shipping containers are frequently lost at sea.

Submarines have a rudder and use water and compressed air in ballast tanks to control its depth.

And "you can operate fairly closely to the sea floor pretty competently because you have good maps and you've got a bathometer that's measuring the distance between you and the sea bottom," Clark said, explaining that topography charts, depth senors, and passive sonar allow a submarine to steer clear of most obstacles.

But if there is a big uncharted object, like a massive shipping container possibly standing on end, the submarine may not be able to detect it until it is right on top of it.

"That's the problem you run into with operating near the sea floor in an area like that, where there's lots of objects on the sea floor," Clark said.

The Navy is conducting an investigation into the submarine collision, an uncommon occurrence that happened on October 2 but was not reported until five days later due to concerns about operational security, according to the Associated Press.
Ancient art uncovered in dark, dangerous zones of southeastern US caves. Take a look

Karina Mazhukhina
Fri, October 8, 2021

Miles below the Earth’s surface are some of the most dangerous caves in the southeastern U.S.

“You are in an alien world,” Jan Simek, archaeologist and anthropology professor at the University of Tennessee Knoxville, told McClatchy News. “It’s a very different world than we live in. A dangerous world, in fact. Your perceptions are different. Your experiences are different.”

Simek is referring to the dark zones of caves deep underground that are “not influenced by the exterior light.” It’s here that he and his team have found Native American art from hundreds of centuries ago.


They have explored close to a 100 cave sites already — a majority of which are located in Alabama, Tennessee, and Kentucky, Simek said. They have also visited a few in Virginia, West Virginia, Georgia, and one in Florida.

Even now, new caves are being discovered including four earlier this year, according to Simek.

The Appalachian Plateau, which stretches from New York southwest to Alabama, contains thousands of caves, Simek said. It also includes the world’s longest cave called “Mammoth” in Kentucky.


Flowing Stone Cave (Credit: Alan Cressler)

The caves in the Appalachian region were “very important parts of the landscape for ancestral Native Americans,” Simek told McClatchy News. “They used those caves like they used other parts of their landscape as sacred places.”
Types of ancient Native American art inside caves

Some of the ancient cave art, according to Simek, include:

Mud glyphs: drawings traced into mud surfaces.

Petroglyphs: drawings embedded into limestone of cave walls.

Pictographs: paintings made up of charcoal-based pigments.

Petroglyphs of ceremonial weapons and a birdman figure (Credit: Alan Cressler)

Mud Glyph of an owl from 1250 AD in Mud Glyph Cave, Tennessee (Credit: Alan Cressler)

Mud Glyphs in main passage of “first Unnamed Cave” in Tennessee (Credit: Alan Cressler)

Petroglyphs of ceremonial weapons and a birdman figure (Credit: Alan Cressler)

The oldest caves with art inside date back to nearly 6,500 years ago — though the sites are rare and are found between the Kentucky and Tennessee state line, Simek said in a University of Tennessee Knoxville news release earlier this month.

Researchers have found “that cave art has strong connections to the historic tribes that occupied the Southeast at the time of European invasion,” Simek said in the news release.

For example, mid-19th century inscriptions of the Cherokee syllabary were found on cave walls in Alabama and Tennessee, according to the news release.

The writing system was created by a “Cherokee scholar Sequoyah between 1800 and 1824” and became the “primary means of written expression,” the news release said.

“Cherokee archaeologists, historians, and language experts” often consult with him “to document and translate these cave writings,” Simek said in the news release.


Bryers Cave in Georgia (Credit: Alan Cressler)
Remains found from 3,000 years ago in a cave

Native Americans created art in the Southeast “all the way through to the historic period just before the Trail of Tears saw the forced removal of indigenous people east of the Mississippi River in the 1830s,” according to the news release.

Some of them died due to dangerous cave conditions.

For example, Native American remains from 3,000 years ago were found in Mammoth and Salt Cave in Kentucky, Simek told McClatchy News.

“If you went into the dark zone to make artwork you had to carry your light sources and food with you,” Simek said. “It was not a simple undertaking. Lots of things could still go wrong to this day.”

Ever since the first dark zone cave was discovered south of Knoxville in 1980, Simek and his team have set their sights on studying and uncovering more ancient art — exploring caves “any chance they get,” he said.

Four new caves, in fact, were discovered in the “first half of 2021,” Simek said in the university news release.

“In a certain way, by following in their (Native Americans) footsteps into these places, feeling the nature of the experience that they experienced, brings people a little bit closer,” Simek told McClatchy News. “You can kind of feel their spirit.”