Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Unearthing tension: Sand runs the world, but most don't realize the conflict it generates

Sand is the second-most commonly used resource on Earth and its environmental and social impacts are massive

By MATTHEW ROZSA
Staff Writer
SALON
 FEBRUARY 25, 2024 

As William Blake famously wrote, "To see a World in a Grain of Sand / And a Heaven in a Wild Flower" is to "Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand / And Eternity in an hour." But as innocuous, ubiquitous and just plain mundane sand can be, it can also be the source of significant conflict and violence while often being extracted to the detriment of our planet.

When the term "conflict mineral" is used, people often think of precious stones like rubies or valuable fuels like coal. Certainly the industry of mining those rocks is fraught with controversy and peril, yet even the most seemingly ubiquitous minerals can serve as the source of conflict. But is sand really in the same category as cobalt and blood diamonds?

"Whilst not normally listed as a conflict mineral, the extraction of sands and gravels in some countries clearly has characteristics of being such."

According to a 2022 United Nations report, sand is the second-most consumed resource on Earth, surpassed only by water. And just like water, humans are consuming sand at an unsustainable rate — increasing by 6 percent every year, to be exact. As they do, they leave behind a wake of polluted rivers, severe droughts, shrinking aquifers and flooded communities. One statistic especially stands out: China alone has used more construction sand in the last few years than the United States used in the entire 20th century.

Even worse, sand is so valuable that it frequently becomes the source of tension. This is partially due to the fact, as corporations dredge up sand from the sea, they start altering local geography such as the shape of coastlines and the presence of small islands. Because sand miners are often unregulated, their activities can destroy local ecosystems, contaminate potable water for nearby communities and destroy entire agricultural sectors.

If all of this seems like a whole lot of ado over a common substance, guess again.

There is a reason why sand provokes violence: Like so many other minerals extracted from the ground, it is quite valuable.

Related
Advocates demand halt to uranium mine near the Grand Canyon

"In some regions, illegal sand and gravel mining is associated with crime syndicates, coercion and violence, and many other related social impacts," James Leonard Best, a professor of sedimentary geology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, told Salon by email, adding that there have even been reported of so-called "sand mafias." "Whilst not normally listed as a conflict mineral, the extraction of sands and gravels in some countries clearly has characteristics of being such."

This is because, quite simply, every human being alive today relies on products that are at least in large part made from sand. Most people reading this article are doing so with the help of sand.

"Sand is used in many products such as smartphone screens, glass bottles and many other products but sand is predominantly used in the construction industry," Jakob Kløve Keiding from the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) told Salon by email. "Aggregates (sand, gravel and rocks) are a granular material used in construction in many ways such ready mixed concrete, precast concrete, asphalt products, and structural (unbound) materials. Aggregates have superior mechanical properties, good durability and are low cost products compared to many other materials that could potentially be used instead."

Best further elaborated on sand's multifaceted properties.

"Sand is a key ingredient of concrete globally, and in addition is a major material used for landfill and reclamation: many areas on which urbanization proceeds require infill of low/wet areas in order for construction to proceed," Best explained. "Dredged sands along coasts are also used in coastal protection works, construction of flood defenses and schemes to mitigate coastal erosion."

Best also pointed out that high-quality silica sands are widely used to manufacture glass for products like medical vials, microchips and glass panels. "As such, sand and gravels underpin our modern economies, and also are key in many aspects of the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Best said.

"Sand and gravels underpin our modern economies."

Yet precisely because sand can be used for so many things, it is particularly vulnerable to being overused. As Keiding explained, even though sand may seem like a limitless resource to anyone who has hiked through a desert, it is in fact quite finite. Even worse, human beings have barely scratched the surface of mapping our sand allocations on a global level.

"It is important to stress that the aggregates sector is by far the largest amongst the non-energy extractive industries," Keiding told Salon, "so the demand is really massive and sand is occurring in different qualities. So when we talk about shortage, it is demand of certain high quality types — for instance used in concrete — that is critical and where there is scarcity." Keiding added that "the resources are unevenly distributed, so certain areas and regions can locally have significantly problems with the availability of enough resources (transportation of sand and gravel is very costly)."

Sand also leads to conflict because it can be mined from a diverse range of locales. Even though one would think finding useable sand is as easy as wandering through the Arabian desert, the unfortunate reality is that Arabian desert sand is too fine to be easily used for construction and other commercial endeavors.

In contrast, sand found in shallow marine environments and rivers has rougher edges and therefore can be properly used for construction (although as Best warned, sand acquired from shallow marine environments can be problematic when it comes to making strong concrete because of the high salt concentrations). Sand extracted from ancient geological reserves like sand quarries has likewise not been smoothed out by exposure to wind and the elements.

In short, while only certain types of sand possess the correct physical properties to be commercialized, that type of sand can be found in a wide range of locations. That in turn increases the environmental damage that can be caused by sand mining, as well as the conflicts that inevitably ensue when large groups of humans seek profit from a natural resource.

"Market price can dictate that use of local sands is far more feasible than those from further away, and thus in areas that are experiencing rapid economic growth, and especially urbanization, the demands for sand has increased greatly," Best wrote to Salon. "This can create scarcity in some areas, drive up the price of sand, which then feeds back to increase the economic feasibility of mining sands in modern environments and ancient sediments. Excessive sand mining can cause a range of environmental impacts to rivers and coasts, with a wide range of socio-economic issues associated with this (ranging from degradation of environments, to human migration, to poverty, crime and gender issues)."

If there is any hopeful edge to this story, it is that the sand crisis is not unsolvable. Best referred to a 2019 paper he co-authored for the journal Nature, one that included a so-called "agenda for sand." It entailed requiring sustainable sources of sand to be sought and certified, encouraging national and local governments to use alternatives to sand, reusing sand-based materials whenever possible and reducing the amount of concrete used in structures. The paper also called for multinational regulation of sand use, constant public education about the dangers of sand mining and a global monitoring program to assess when there have been ecological catastrophes related to sand mining.

"We have to take a holistic approach that centrally involves the stakeholders – those who lives are affected by sand mining (both positively and negatively) — and base our approach on the sustainable needs of communities, as well as the need to safeguard the environment to help mitigate harmful change," Best told Salon. "This demands approaches that are multidisciplinary and integrate the human and physical landscapes, to tackle the many issues of sand mining (across many different spatial scales – the issues of mining vary greatly between countries and continents), and how these issues will change in the coming decades as populations grow, technologies evolve and the demands for sand shifts spatially across the globe."

As Keiding put it, "The use of sand/aggregates is faced with two major challenges; one is related to the availability of high-quality resources addressed in my previous comments; the other is the environmental/climate impact of sand exploitation."

Read more

about mining:California’s Salton Sea eyed for lithium extraction with new tech

Facing shortages, chemists propose "mining" electronic waste for rare earth metals


By MATTHEW ROZSA is a staff writer at Salon. He received a Master's Degree in History from Rutgers-Newark in 2012 and was awarded a science journalism fellowship from the Metcalf Institute in 2022.





Study on fighter pilots and drone swarms sheds light on the dynamics of trust within human-machine teams

by Eric W. Dolan
February 25, 2024


(U.S. Air Force photo/R. Nial Bradshaw)

In a new study published in the Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, researchers from the U.S. Air Force, Leidos, and Booz Allen Hamilton have taken a significant leap in understanding the dynamics of trust within human-machine teams, specifically in the context of military operations involving unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

This research illuminates how fighter pilots’ trust in one component of a technological system can affect their trust in the system as a whole—a phenomenon known as the pull-down effect. Crucially, the study finds that experienced pilots can differentiate between reliable and unreliable UAVs, suggesting that the pull-down effect can be mitigated, thereby enhancing mission performance and reducing cognitive workload.

The trust between humans and machines is a pivotal factor in the successful deployment of autonomous systems, especially in high-stakes environments like military operations. Trust is considered a cornerstone of effective human-machine interaction, influencing operators’ reliance on technology.

Prior research has shown that trust in automation is directly linked to system reliability. However, when multiple autonomous systems are involved, as in the case of UAV swarms, judging reliability becomes significantly more complex. This complexity introduces the risk of the pull-down effect, where trust in all system components is reduced due to the unreliability of a single element.

“I was interested in conducting this research because the pull-down effect is a phenomena based in heuristic responding that has relevance to the U.S. Air Force,” explained study author Joseph B. Lyons, the senior scientist for Human-Machine Teaming at the Air Force Research Laboratory and co-editor of Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.

“In the Air Force, we need to understand how humans respond to human-machine interactions and, in this case, if perceptions of one technology can propagate to others, that is something we need to account for when fielding novel technologies. Also, this is a topic that has only been done in laboratory settings, so it was not clear if the observed effects would translate into more Air Force relevant tasks with actual operators.”

To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers employed a highly immersive cockpit simulator to create a realistic operational environment for the participants. The study involved thirteen experienced fighter pilots, including both retired and currently active pilots, with a wealth of flying hours in 4th and 5th generation Air Force Fighter platforms, such as the F-16 and F-35.

Participants were exposed to a series of six flight scenarios, of which four included an unreliable UAV exhibiting errors, while the other two scenarios featured perfectly reliable UAVs. Each pilot encountered 24 UAV observations in total, with a mix of reliable and unreliable UAVs designed to simulate real-world operational conditions closely.

The simulation environment was designed to reflect the complexities of managing UAV swarms, requiring pilots to monitor and control multiple UAVs (referred to as Collaborative Combat Aircraft or CCAs) simultaneously. The scenarios tasked pilots with monitoring four CCAs for errors, communicating any unusual behaviors, and selecting one CCA for a mission-critical strike on a ground target, all while managing the cognitive workload and maintaining situational awareness.

Contrary to what might have been expected based on previous research, the study revealed that the presence of an unreliable UAV did not significantly diminish the trust that experienced fighter pilots placed in other, reliable UAVs within the same system. This suggests that experienced operators, such as the fighter pilots participating in this study, are capable of nuanced trust evaluations, effectively distinguishing between the reliability of individual system components.

This finding challenges the assumption underpinning the pull-down effect — that the unreliability of one component can tarnish operators’ trust in the entire system. Instead, the pilots demonstrated what can be described as a component-specific trust strategy, suggesting that their expertise and familiarity with operational contexts enable them to make more discerning judgments about technology.

Moreover, the study found a significant increase in cognitive workload associated with the unreliable UAV compared to the reliable ones. This was an expected outcome, logically aligning with the notion that dealing with unreliable system components requires more mental effort and monitoring from human operators.

Yet, the researchers observed that higher trust in UAVs corresponded with lower reported cognitive workload, hinting at the potential for trust to mitigate the cognitive demands placed on operators by unreliable technology.

“After reading about this study, people should take away a couple things,” Lyons told PsyPost. “First, we found no evidence that negative experiences with one technology contaminate perceptions of other similar technologies in realistic scenarios with actual operators (in this case fighter pilots). While this is interesting, it also represents one study and thus requires replication in other settings. Second, people should take away the idea that theories and concepts should be tested in realistic domains with non-student samples wherever possible.”

Interestingly, despite introducing heterogeneity in the UAV systems to see if this could mitigate the pull-down effect — through different naming schemes and suggested capability differences — the study did not find significant evidence that such measures influenced the pilots’ trust evaluations. This result suggests that the pilots’ ability to maintain specific trust towards reliable components was not necessarily enhanced by these attempts at system differentiation.

“I was surprised that our manipulation of different asset types did not seem to have any bearing on the pilot’s attitudes or behaviors,” Lyons said. “However, and as noted in the manuscript, it is possible that the scenario did not pull out the need (or affordance) for this asset heterogeneity as much as it should have. I think this is an area that is ripe for additional research.”

However, the study is not without its limitations. The small sample size and the specific context of military aviation may limit the generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, the researchers acknowledge the need for future studies to explore the mitigating effects of factors such as system heterogeneity and operator training on the pull-down effect.

“There are always caveats with any scientific work,” Lyons said. “This was just one study, with a pretty small sample size. These findings need to be replicated across other samples and other domains of interest. Never put all of your eggs into the basket of just one study.”

This research opens up new avenues for enhancing the design and deployment of autonomous systems in military operations, ensuring that trust calibration is finely tuned to the demands of high-stakes environments.

“Within the Air Force, we seek to understand how to build effective human-machine teams,” Lyons told PsyPost. “A significant part of that challenge resides in understanding why, when, and how humans form, maintain, and repair trust perceptions with advanced technologies. The types of technologies we care about are diverse, and we care about the gamut of Airmen and Guardians across the Air and Space Force.”

“I feel that the heuristics we use in making trust-related judgements are underestimated and underrepresented in the literature,” he added. “This is a great topic for academia to advance our collective knowledge.”

The study, “Is the Pull-Down Effect Overstated? An Examination of Trust Propagation Among Fighter Pilots in a High-Fidelity Simulation,” was authored by Joseph B. Lyons, Janine D. Mator, Tony Orr, Gene M. Alarcon, and Kristen Barrera.

 

Your air quality may be more dangerous than your phone is telling you: The EPA seems fine with that

traffic pollution
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's recent adoption of a more stringent annual limit on fine particulate matter, or soot, fulfills an overdue obligation to curb a pervasive and deadly type of air pollution that triggers asthma, heart attacks, strokes and a host of other health problems.

But the agency made a serious mistake by leaving the 24-hour standard for fine-particle pollution, or PM2.5, at the level set 17 years ago, despite more recent scientific evidence of how harmful soot is even at lower levels of exposure. This limit protects people against short-term spikes in unhealthy air quality and underpins the public forecast and alert system, the . Americans rely on the AQI to know how dirty the air is, but they will be stuck with an outdated yardstick that understates the health risks.

PM2.5 is composed of health-damaging specks of pollution so tiny they can lodge deep in the lungs and enter the bloodstream. It's formed largely from vehicles,  and other combustion sources, and increasingly from wildfires, which are growing larger and more frequent because of climate change.

It's troubling to see this kind of failure on something as fundamental as informing the public about bad air days. The daily limit on lung-damaging pollution that the EPA refused to update determines whether the air violates health standards, and is therefore the most important metric on the AQI.

The color-coded scale uses six categories from green to maroon to communicate to the public how polluted the air is and how it could affect their health. It triggers air quality alerts on people's phones and helps parents decide whether it's safe for their kids with asthma to play outside.

An EPA spokesperson said agency Administrator Michael Regan decided against strengthening daily limits based on "uncertainty in the epidemiologic studies" about the health effects of short-term exposure to fine-particle pollution and because lowering the annual limit would provide "supplemental protection."

But in doing so, he ignored the advice of the agency's own experts, members of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, a majority of whom recommended tightening the 24-hour limit on PM2.5 to between 25 to 30 micrograms per cubic meter, based on health studies showing that the current level "is not adequately protective" against illness and death. Instead the EPA kept the standard at 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

The EPA did make some changes to the AQI "to improve public communications about the health risks from PM2.5 exposure," a spokesperson said. But it did nothing to modernize the most important metric: the concentration of pollution that determines whether the air is unhealthy or within safe levels.

This inaction is especially disappointing at a time when large swaths of the country are increasingly experiencing prolonged episodes of wildfire smoke that are undermining decades of gains in air quality. California has the nation's most polluted air, particularly in the Central Valley, Bay Area and Southern California, dominating the list of communities with the worst fine-particle pollution which contributes to thousands of early deaths in the state each year.

The Biden administration gets credit for tightening the annual limit even as big business lobbying groups mounted a campaign to squash the proposal, claiming it would hurt the economy and harm the president's chances at reelection.

The Clean Air Act doesn't allow the EPA to set air quality standards based on what they will cost, only on what is necessary to protect public health "with an adequate margin of safety." That hasn't prevented past administrations from shirking their obligations for economic or political reasons. Last year, the EPA needlessly delayed action to update ozone pollution standards until after the November election.

The administration whiffed on this one too, squandering the opportunity to update the nation's air quality alert system to better reflect scientific reality and communicate clearly to the public about the  of air .

2024 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.      

US proposes stricter air quality standards for soot 
How Culture Shapes the Stories We Tell About Our Emotions

By Katie Hoemann and Batja Mesquita
February 25, 2024



In the 1980s, there was a burst of research on how people told stories about emotion; social scientists wanted to understand how people react to common experiences. Their subjects described clammy hands on a first date, clenched jaws during a final exam, road rage while sitting in traffic. From this collection of stories, researchers created a map of sorts—where certain situations and behaviors corresponded to specific emotions (like anger, joy, and sadness).

The only problem was that almost all the people surveyed were students from North America and Western Europe. What we knew about the experience of emotion and how people talked about it came from a relatively small slice of the global population. And as a result, we had a limited understanding of how some cultures made meaning differently than others.

As a team of researchers focused on cross-cultural emotion, we wanted to help close this gap. So in November 2016, we traveled to a remote part of northern central Tanzania to study how a community of hunter–gatherers told stories. We were interested in how these community members, known as the Hadza, described their experiences of emotion, and how those descriptions diverged from Western standards.

It immediately stood out to us that the Hadza stories often highlighted physical experience—bodily sensations and movements.

In our research recently published in Perspectives on Psychological Science (open access), we juxtaposed these Hadza conversations with a similar set of interviews with Americans to explore the stories people tell about emotion. Our findings suggest that these cultural groups do not organize emotion in the same way. What’s more, the differences we observed are not adequately captured by traditional approaches to understanding emotion. How people talk—and think—about their emotions can influence social interactions and relationships, the success of therapeutic or medical treatment, and the outcomes of institutional and judicial processes. Without tools that allow for nuance and diversity in the understanding of emotion, we may miss what others are trying to say.

During our visit to Tanzania, we interviewed 94 Hadza adults in teams of Hadzane- and English-speaking researchers. Our interviewees recalled a recent time they felt pleasant or unpleasant, and then answered questions like “Where were you?,” “What happened?,” and “How did you feel about it?” It immediately stood out to us that the Hadza stories often highlighted physical experience—bodily sensations and movements. For example, one middle-aged woman described not being paid for a job with reference to her heart, head, and hands:

“My heart is beating very fast until my head is pounding, because I’m using so much power while working hard, because I expected I would get something for it. But I got nothing.… When someone refuses to pay you, it’s like they cut your hands: because even if you go do other jobs, you worry the next guy also won’t pay you.”

When we got back home, we dug up a similar set of 41 interviews previously conducted with university students and community members in North Carolina. In contrast to the Hadza focus on physical sensations, these stories about emotion foregrounded mental experience—subjective feelings, inferences, and explanations. For example, in another story about work-related conflict, a middle-aged American woman emphasized her anger, her feelings of “unworthiness,” and the malintent of the person who slighted her:

“I was very angry, but unfortunately I never had any respect for this person anyway. She abused her power, she manipulated people, she … [thought] that all of the decisions that she made were the right ones. But the effect that she had on so many people was, well, so discouraging, and … she really liked to make you feel totally unworthy.”

Another thing we noticed is that Hadza stories about emotion attended to shared experience—the needs and perspectives of others. After a successful hunt, the young man below reported feeling joyful because he “knew [his] kids would be satisfied”:

“I waited for the impala to come close to where I was hiding, ready to hunt them. I was hiding by a big branch of the baobab so they could not see me. So, when they are starting to eat, and I started descending slowly and I started to shoot them … I was laughing so much because I had never killed an impala before. My whole life I had been trying to kill impala. This was a very lucky day for me.… I loved it so much because I knew my kids would be satisfied.”

Compare this to a quote from a young man in North Carolina whose account of his triumph over another type of big game was much more self-focused. He highlights the praise he received and his feature in the local paper—a self-described “ego-trip”:

“I played for our varsity basketball team, and we were playing one of our big rivals, and I ended up scoring, I don’t know, like 16 points in the last quarter, which basically won the game for us. I received a lot of praise for that, and then the next day in the newspaper it had a big article write-up about me, and the picture, and so … I felt praised, kind of an ego-trip.… I knew I would get a lot of recognition that night and have a lot of fun.”

Looking across both sets of interviews, we summarized our observations as a set of tendencies in Hadza and North Carolina stories about emotion. In addition to the focus on individual versus shared experience and mental versus physical sensation, we also noted differences in the way they talked about time, goals, and the motivations behind their behavior.

These differences build on a growing body of research that shows how stories about emotion, as any other narrative practice, are culturally shaped. There is no one way to talk about feelings—in fact, feelings might not even play a central role in how people make meaning of their experiences. As we saw from the Hadza, elements such as physical sensation and the impact on others can also take center stage.
Stories about emotion told by Hadza and North Carolina community members diverged in several key ways. Source: Hoemann et al., Perspectives on Psychological Science.

The Hadza stories form a counterweight to much of the science on emotion to date, serving as a reminder that people in contemporary Western cultures may not be the norm. The implications for research are clear: if we are to capture the richness of human experience, we need to broaden our perspective. This means sampling a wider array of contexts, both in and outside the cultural West, and paying attention to the stories people tell. When we apply Western tools to the stories Hadza people tell, for example, their experiences appear to fall flat. Not because they are dull or unemotional, but because our methods don’t capture their richness. We need tools geared toward discovering variations rather than confirming expectations.

There are implications beyond research, too. How do therapists and counselors interact with patients who concentrate on physical more than mental experience? How do judges and juries evaluate victims and defendants who do not present themselves as we expect? As our everyday lives bring us in contact with an ever-broader spectrum of viewpoints and backgrounds, it is important to realize that these experiences and perspectives may come in different packages.

Research team statement: Community members (Msafiri and Endeko) and psychologists (Hoemann, KU Leuven; Gendron, Yale) collected data in the field, and were joined in planning and interpretation by an anthropologist with long time ties to the community (Crittenden, UNLV) and experts in culture and emotion (Barrett, Northeastern; Dussault and Mesquita, KU Leuven). This unique team composition represented a holistic, culturally appropriate, and community centered approach to interdisciplinary psychological research.



Katie Hoemann is a postdoctoral fellow at University of Leuven in Belgium. She studies the role of context—situational, individual, and cultural—in how we make meaning of emotion.
Twitter
Website

Batja Mesquita is a distinguished professor of psychology and the director of the Center for Social and Cultural Psychology at the University of Leuven, Belgium. She studies the role of culture in emotions, and of emotions in culture and society. She is the author of Between Us.
Twitter
Website
'Janitors' of the sea: Overharvested sea cucumbers play crucial role in protecting coral

by Catherine Barzler, Georgia Institute of Technology
Sea cucumbers with coral and fish in Mo'orea. 
Credit: Georgia Institute of Technology (Cody Clements)

Corals are foundational for ocean life. Known as the rainforests of the sea, they create habitats for 25% of all marine organisms, despite only covering less than 1% of the ocean's area.

Coral patches the width and height of basketball arenas used to be common throughout the world's oceans. But due to numerous human-generated stresses and coral disease, which is known to be associated with ocean sediments, most of the world's coral is gone.

"It's like if all the pine trees in Georgia disappeared over a period of 30 to 40 years," said Mark Hay, Regents' Chair and the Harry and Anna Teasley Chair in Environmental Biology in the School of Biological Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. "Just imagine how that affects biodiversity and ecosystems of the ocean."

In first-of-its-kind research, Hay, along with research scientist Cody Clements, discovered a crucial missing element that plays a profound role in keeping coral healthy—an animal of overlooked importance known as a sea cucumber.

Their study, undertaken in remote tropical islands in the Pacific, investigated the role that sea cucumbers play in coral health. The small, unassuming, sediment-eating organisms function like autonomous vacuum cleaners of the ocean floor. But, because they have been overharvested for decades for food and cannot reproduce effectively when in low densities, they are now rare and slow to recover following harvests. They have been gone so long that it wasn't known exactly how important they are—until now.

"We knew that removing big predators has cascading effects that commonly change how ecosystems are organized and how they function," said Hay. "What we didn't know is what would happen following removal of detritivores—or as we like to call them, the janitors of the system."

The team's research was published in the journal Nature Communications.

A missing component


The idea began when Hay saw an etching of a 19th-century sailing ship in a Fiji museum. The caption explained that the ship was leaving Fiji carrying many tons of dried sea cucumbers. Hay realized that the creatures he would rarely see while diving and working around reefs had likely once covered the bottom of shallow tropical oceans.

Sea cucumbers are invertebrate sea animals that come in all different sizes, colors, and shapes. They lie on and burrow under the sand all day, sucking, digesting, and excreting sediment, consuming bacteria and other organics. Hay and Clements were curious about the role sea cucumbers played when they were abundant. But it wasn't until Clements was doing unrelated field work in Mo'orea, a tropical island in French Polynesia, that an opportunity presented itself.

Clements, who has worked in coral restoration for years, has planted upwards of 10,000 corals in his career. He was planting corals in the sand just off the island shore, in an area where many sea cucumbers were present. He decided to clear out the sea cucumbers from the area because there were so many.

He noticed that the corals started to die, which seemed unusual.

"I've planted a lot of corals in my day, and my corals generally don't die," Clements said. "So I thought there must be something to this."


A sea cucumber excretes sediment out its back end. 
Credit: Cody Clements, Georgia Institute of Technology



Experiment and findings

Hay and Clements set up patches to monitor coral health with and without the presence of sea cucumbers. They marked the patches via GPS and went to check them daily.

For the patches without sea cucumbers, they often observed a white band developing at the base of the corals, which would work its way up and eventually kill the entire colony. It was a hallmark of sediment-associated coral diseases seen around the world.

The presence of sea cucumbers seemed to suppress coral disease. They observed that corals without sea cucumbers present were 15 times more likely to die. They did a similar experiment in Palmyra Atoll, which is part of the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands that is protected by the Nature Conservancy and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In Palmyra, the experiment had different coral species and different sea cucumbers, but they found similar results—suggesting a robust interaction.



Sea cucumber feeding on ocean sediment. 
Credit: Cody Clements, Georgia Institute of Technology.

The experiment painted an alarming portrait. Sea cucumbers seemed to be a missing component of what had been, at one point, an intact ecological system. Before humans started harvesting these sediment-cleaning organisms, they had helped protect corals from disease.

"If you remove all the scum suckers in the great fish tank of Earth, you're going to get a dirty tank eventually," Clements said. "People have paid lip service to the idea that sea cucumbers could be important for a long time, but we didn't know the scale of their importance until now."

Hay explains long-term sea cucumber removal as the lighting of an ecological fuse that has been burning for more than 100 years. With the exponential increase of human populations, the overfishing of reefs, human input of nutrients and organics, and the removal of sea cucumbers, there is now a buildup of organics and nutrients that enhance bacterial growth in the sediment. All of that is what sea cucumbers would be cleaning.

"Basically, we've been polluting our environs at the same time that we've removed all the janitors," Hay said.

Application and resilience

Hay and Clements hope their findings will encourage communities to limit harvesting and begin to repopulate sea cucumber species. The species from their study are of little commercial or food value and could be cultured and released into the ocean. This would help to mitigate coral disease and help reefs worldwide return to health.

"Bringing these little guys back from the brink and drawing awareness to their value for ecosystems might improve the situation overall," Clements said. "It will take effort, but increasing the health of reefs would improve biodiversity and therefore the livelihoods of people in coastal communities."

Despite the many ecological fuses that humans have lit, whether knowingly or unknowingly, Hay still has hope for corals and sea cucumbers.
Sea cucumbers on the ocean floor off the coast of Mo'orea. Credit: Georgia Institute of Technology (Cody Clements)
Drone image of sea cucumbers in Mo'orea. Credit: Cody Clements, Georgia Institute of Technology.

"Organisms like sea cucumbers give us insurance for another few decades, and focusing on their importance is something to try," Hay said. "We're looking for little tweaks that can really improve the situation, while we as a society get our act in gear and do better."

He added, "If we don't cut back on pollution, if we don't cut back on overharvesting, and if we don't cut back on global warming, there isn't much hope. It's a challenge, but you can either give up and go home, or you can keep working on it."

More information: Cody S. Clements et al, Removal of detritivore sea cucumbers from reefs increases coral disease, Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45730-0

Provided by Georgia Institute of Technology

Explore further Underwater gardens boost coral diversity to stave off 'biodiversity meltdown'
One in three women carers in Northern Ireland forced to give up work, research shows

The report from Carers NI and the Women’s Regional Consortium says that nearly three-quarters (73%) are losing out on between £500 and over £1,500 per month in wages because of challenges juggling employment with their loved one’s care needs


By Claire Cartmill
Published 27th Feb 2024

One in three women who provide unpaid care for sick or disabled family members or friends in Northern Ireland have had to give up their job because of the pressures of caring, according to new research published today (Tuesday).

The report from Carers NI and the Women’s Regional Consortium says that a further 28% have been forced to cut their working hours, with nearly three-quarters (73%) losing out on between £500 and over £1,500 per month in wages because of challenges juggling employment with their loved one’s care needs.

Local women say that employer support for staff with unpaid caring roles is a ‘postcode lottery’ and that a lack of workplace rights and reliable community care services can make it impossible for them to stay in their jobs while caring. Trying to juggle the two roles often causes burnout, ill-health and financial strain.

Deborah McAllister, from Larne, cares for her mum, who has dementia, as well as her daughter, who has complex needs. She had to give up a 35-year career in nursing because of the impact of unpaid caring


Deborah McAllister, from Larne, cares for her mum, who has dementia, as well as her daughter, who has complex needs. She had to give up a 35-year career in nursing because of the impact of unpaid caring.

She explained: “I’ve been caring for different family members for 15 years and look after my mum and daughter around-the-clock. There is no rest from it for me, and trying to go to work, with little support or understanding from my employer, was really difficult. It made me become unwell.

“Mum was sick one day and I asked for time off to take her to the GP. My boss just said, ‘you’ll have to take an annual leave day’. That was it. There was supposed to be a carer policy in place, but I was denied the day off that I needed. From management down, they rarely asked about what I was dealing with or what was going on in my world. During my last two years at work, no one ever asked how I was doing. There was no support for me as a working carer. I walked out one day and thought, ‘I just can’t do this anymore’.

“It is very difficult being an unpaid carer and working at the same time. I have been diagnosed with compassion fatigue, PTSD symptoms, and am physically unwell, but I didn’t ever intend to leave my job. If I’d got the mental health support I needed, I might not have had to. I had to give up my career and now I have no idea what I’m going to do. I wouldn’t give up my mum or daughter for the world, I just needed a little bit of support for me.”

The research report calls for a new day-one right to flexible working and dedicated carer’s leave from work, as well as better community care, education and childcare services, to help women in Northern Ireland balance their caring responsibilities with employment.

Angela Phillips, of Carers NI, and Siobhán Harding, of the Women’s Regional Consortium, co-authored the research. They explain: “Too many women across Northern Ireland are being forced out of the labour market because of a postcode lottery of support for their caring roles. This isn’t just robbing them of the careers they cherish and the income they rely on to make ends meet, but also denies Northern Ireland’s economy a skilled and experienced workforce with a lot to offer.

“It isn’t enough to leave the support working carers need to the discretion of employers, so we need new rights, enshrined in law, that will give them flexible working options and time off for unpaid caring. Robust community care and childcare systems are also vital. Delivering all of these reforms should be a priority for Stormont if it is serious about delivering equality for women with caring roles and growing the local economy.”

The new research will be launched at an event in the Stormont Hotel today (27 February), with MLAs, carer charities and organisations from the business and women’s sectors in attendance.












Four in 10 Irish parents skip meals or reduce portions so their children have enough to eat, new study shows



Children's charity Barnardo’s is calling on the Government to tackle food insecurity. 

Darragh Nolan
Yesterday 

More than 40pc of parents say they have skipped a meal or reduced the size of their portion so their children had enough to eat, according to a new survey.

The annual Food Insecurity Research from Barnardo’s and Aldi Ireland found the number of parents skipping meals or eating smaller portions rose by 12pc from 2022.

Figures indicate food poverty is worsening for families, with a growing number of children in homes where parents are eating less to ensure children are fed, cutting back on other essentials to make sure there is food on the table or accessing services like food banks.

“The results in this survey reflect what Barnardo’s are seeing on the ground every day. Parents are being faced with difficult decisions to make for their families more frequently than ever,” Barnardo’s CEO Suzanne Connolly said. “A lack of nutritious meals has an impact on the emotional and mental well-being of both child and parents for a long to time to come. Because childhood lasts a lifetime.”

More than half (54pc) of parents said they cut back on their own leisure and hobbies to afford food for the family.

The survey also found 21pc of families have cut back on children’s activities, while a quarter of parents have been forced to reduce medical costs to afford food.


A total of 45pc of parents are “always” or “sometimes” worried about having enough food – that figure has more than doubled since January 2022 (19pc).

The number of people who have never had to cut down on other costs to afford food fell by 9pc compared to 2022, while 24pc of parents said they had borrowed money to feed their child.

Barnardo’s has called on the Government to roll out a number of measures to tackle food insecurity, including extending free school meals to secondary schools and piloting out-of-term and weekend meals for children who rely on these meals during the school term.

The charity has also called for targeted support for low-income families in Budget 2025; a timeline to be set out for a government action plan on food insecurity; and decisions to be provided within 48 hours to families who apply for additional needs payment where the payment would provide children with sufficient food.

Group managing director of Aldi Ireland Niall O’Connor said: “We believe that no one should face the dilemma of choosing between affordability or quality, nutritious food.”


He said Aldi has raised more than €1.5m for Barnardo’s, putting the retailer on track to reach its target of €2m raised for the charity by the end of this year.
French cinema has a sexual abuse problem. Why is it persisting?


Jean-Francois Fort/Hans Lucas/ReutersView caption

By Colette Davidson 
Special correspondent
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
@kolet_ink

February 26, 2024|PARIS

For many American filmgoers, actor GĂ©rard Depardieu is one of the iconic faces of French cinema, known for his leading role in “Cyrano de Bergerac” or for playing Dominique Strauss-Kahn in the 2014 film “Welcome to New York.”

But Mr. Depardieu has more recently gained notoriety as a sexual predator. More than a dozen women have accused the actor of sexual assault or harassment, and he is accused of raping a woman in 2018.

In December, the actor’s fall from grace seemed complete after a television broadcast of the documentary “Depardieu: The Fall of an Ogre,” in which the actor was seen making sexist remarks while in North Korea in 2018.

WHY WE WROTE THIS
A story focused on TRUST

Auteurs and actors are held in high esteem in France. That may be in part why the country is still wrestling with sexual abuse scandals involving some of its cinematic leading lights.

But two weeks later, despite widespread condemnation, 56 stars of French cinema signed an open letter on his behalf. French President Emmanuel Macron defended the actor on national television, saying Mr. Depardieu had “made France proud” with his past cultural contributions. And Mr. Depardieu’s former agent called the actor “a monster, yes, but ... a sacred monster.”


Alessandro Bianchi/Reuters/FileView caption

It’s an issue not limited to Mr. Depardieu. The presentation of the CĂ©sar Awards, France’s top cinematic honors, on Friday were dominated by a speech by actor Judith Godrèche, in which she condemned the “level of impunity, denial, and privilege” in French cinema. Ms. Godrèche, now 51 years old, has accused two directors, BenoĂ®t Jacquot and Jacques Doillon, of sexually assaulting her while she was a teenager and they were both decades older. Both men have denied doing anything illegal, but it is only recently that their behavior has come under public scrutiny.

With all of the progress made by the #MeToo movement in allowing victims of sexual violence to be heard, why does it seem that French people are more willing to extend their trust to their cinematic icons instead of those who accuse them?

“The trend is moving towards listening to victims, but it still remains one person’s word over another,” says Bruno Pequignot, a sociologist and professor emeritus of arts and culture at the Sorbonne Nouvelle University in Paris. “Meanwhile, there is a feeling that cinema stars exist above the common man, that their behavior lies outside the norm.”
Recommended

“The artistic cult”

French actors have enjoyed a special star status since the 18th century. But starting in the 1950s and with the advent of the “film d’auteur” – films that reflected their director’s artistic personality – directors also began enjoying a unique place in the hearts and minds of the French.

Films themselves were soon granted “artistic legitimacy” and equated with intellectual creation – likened to works of art or literature – and their directors, usually men, elevated to the status of demigods, living outside checks and balances. That has endured and been extended to creative minds across the pond such as Woody Allen or Quentin Tarantino, as well as films’ leading men.

Petros Giannakouris/AP/FileView caption

“The religious cult in France has been replaced by the artistic cult,” says Geneviève Sellier, professor emeritus of film studies at Bordeaux Montaigne University. “There is a vision of the male genius who is given free rein to express himself, the artist who exists outside of the law.”

But some say that power has allowed French male film stars and directors to engage in borderline criminal behavior in the name of artistic creation. Industry insiders say there is often an element of seduction starting from the audition process and an expectation for young actresses to have physical relations with directors to accelerate their careers.

Thus, situations in which life imitates art – even when inappropriate – become more commonplace and thus tolerated, both on set and in the public eye.

“This is an industry that exists outside of societal norms,” says Fatima Benomar, the president of the women’s rights organization Coudes Ă  Coudes. “A minor might kiss an older man in a film or have a nude scene, and it’s acceptable because it’s in the name of art, but obviously in real life, these things are illegal. So already they don’t obey the same rules.”

Recommended

Beijing and Washington don’t trust each other – maybe that’s OK


What makes this situation uniquely French, says Dr. Sellier, is partly due to a controversial theory by historian Mona Ozouf that in France, men and women must obey a “code of seduction,” as opposed to America’s “war of the sexes.”

“This myth of seduction, which is widespread among France’s cultural elite, is without a doubt responsible for our refusal to realize that masculine domination is an integral part of social relations, even in the private sphere,” says Dr. Sellier, “and a reason why France was so late on #MeToo.”

Incremental change


Still, the 2017 #MeToo movement has had a positive effect in breaking the code of silence surrounding sexual abuse in the industry. Filmmaker Christophe Ruggia was indicted for 15 years on charges of sexual assault of a minor, following accusations by actor Adèle Haenel. And the industry has seen an increase in female directors and roles for strong female characters.

“There will always be narcissistic perverts in the industry, but we must be careful not to stigmatize all directors,” says Jonathan Broda, a film historian at the International Film & Television School of Paris. “I’m really in favor of education and respect. I always tell my female students to be on guard, keep their senses, and rise above.”


Christophe Ena/AP/FileView caption

But women’s rights groups point to roadblocks that have made trusting sexual assault victims over their accusers more difficult in France. In addition to the special status France’s cultural male elite enjoy in their ability to promote the country’s soft power, says Dr. Sellier, French celebrities can also count on an exceedingly slow legal system.

Around 80% of rape cases are dismissed, and fewer than 1% end in a conviction, according to France’s High Council on Equality Between Women and Men. Though a 2018 law has helped better punish sexual harassment, sexual violence, and sexism, President Macron has refused to define rape as nonconsensual sex, in line with 11 other European countries.

“It’s hugely important for the government to be behind [sexual harassment and abuse] laws in order to create new societal norms,” says Violaine de Filippis Abate, a lawyer and activist with the nonprofit Osez le FĂ©minisme. “There is still far too much ordinary sexism, as well as this idea that when a woman complains, she’s just exaggerating, that ‘it’s not that bad.’”

Oftentimes, media investigations have been more successful in unofficially “trying” French celebrities accused of sexual abuse in the absence of a formal legal decision. Figures like acclaimed film director Luc Besson – accused of rape in 2018 – have escaped a public lynching. And only time will tell the long-term effect Ms. Godrèche’s comments at the CĂ©sar Awards had. But Mr. Depardieu’s latest comments seem to have been one offense too many

Several actors have since removed their signatures from the letter defending Mr. Depardieu. And though Mr. Macron did not retract his comments, he seemed to have realized their political toll, telling French journalists weeks later that he should have spoken up in the name of victims’ plight.

“In the case of Depardieu, the public has taken the law into its own hands, and he has been found guilty,” says Mr. Pequignot, the sociologist. “I think, if nothing else, going forward his case has strengthened the power of victims’ ability to be heard.
El Nino triggered melting of Doomsday Glacier decades ago

World's widest glacier in West Antarctica is losing ice at a worrying rate of acceleration, researchers find

The retreat of Antarctica’s Doomsday Glacier, so-called because its collapse could trigger a catastrophic rise in global sea levels, began in the 1940s after an extreme El Nino weather event, researchers have found.

Thwaites, the world’s widest glacier, is losing about 50 billion more tonnes of ice than it receives in snowfall, in an accelerating process first observed in the 1970s.

However, a study in the US has discovered the significant rate of melting actually began in the 1940s, about the same time the retreat of the nearby Pine Island Glacier began, probably due to an extreme El Nino that warmed the western Antarctic.

El Nino, which occurs every few years, is the warming of sea surface temperatures that typically occurs in the central-east equatorial Pacific.

[The Thwaites glacier has not recovered since and is currently contributing to 4 per cent of global sea-level rise.

For that reason, the researchers say the current changes detected in Thwaites and Pine Island could have been set in motion in the 1940s.

“A significant implication of our findings is that once an ice-sheet retreat is set in motion, it can continue for decades, even if what started it gets no worse,” said James Smith, a marine geologist at the British Antarctic Survey and study co-author.

“It is possible that the changes we see today on Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers – and potentially across the entire Amundsen Sea embayment – were essentially set in motion in the 1940s.”

“It is significant that El Nino lasted only a couple of years but the two glaciers, Thwaites and Pine Island, remain in significant retreat,” said Julia Wellner, associate professor of geology and US lead investigator of the Thwaites Offshore Research project (Thor), an international collaboration whose team members are authors of the study.

“Once the system is kicked out of balance, the retreat is ongoing,” she added.

If the vast Antarctic ice sheet collapsed completely, scientists predict global sea levels could rise by 65cm.

The researchers measured levels of lead-210, a radioactive isotope naturally buried in sediment core to date the samples, and reached the conclusion that significant ice melt began in the 1940s.

Rachel Clark, a corresponding author of the report, said: “Lead-210 has a short half-life of about 20 years, whereas something like radiocarbon has a half-life of about 5,000 years,” she said. “That short half-life [of lead-210] allows us to build a timeline for the past century that’s detailed.”

The methodology is important because although satellite data exists to help scientists understand glacial retreat, images only go back a few decades.

Their findings also suggest retreat at the glaciers’ grounding zone, or the area where the glaciers lose contact with the seabed and start to float, was due to external factors.

“The finding that both Thwaites Glacier and Pine Island Glacier share a common history of thinning and retreat corroborates the view that ice loss in the Amundsen Sea sector of the West Antarctic ice sheet is predominantly controlled by external factors, involving changes in ocean and atmosphere circulation, rather than internal glacier dynamics or local changes, such as melting at the glacier bed or snow accumulation on the glacier surface,” said Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand, UK lead investigator of Thor and study co-author.

Ms Clark said the findings showed the change in the glacier was not random, nor specific to only the one.

“It is part of a larger context of a changing climate, you just can’t ignore what’s happening on this glacier,” she added.

The researchers said the Thwaites Glacier plays a vital role in regulating the West Antarctic ice sheet stability and global sea-level rise.

“The glacier is significant not only because of its contribution to sea-level rise but because it is acting as a cork in the bottle holding back a broader area of ice behind it,” Prof Wellner said.

“If Thwaites is destabilised, then there’s potential for all the ice in West Antarctica to become destabilised.”

Tipping point

Global temperatures are now warming so rapidly and the polar ice is retreating so quickly that scientists at the British Antarctic Survey have warned the world could have already reached a tipping point.

That spells bad news because currents that circulate around the world are directly influenced by the Antarctic.

Advancing on a 120km front at about 2km a year, Thwaites, also known as the Doomsday Glacier, has been the subject of a major investigation since 2020, when scientists found its movement led to warmer seawater flowing underneath it for the first time.

It is now predicted a catastrophic collapse could happen as soon as five years – or within 500 years.

Boeing review finds 'disconnect' on safety

Getty Images

A new report for the US government has raised serious concerns about Boeing's safety management systems, adding to the scrutiny facing the US plane maker.

The review found a "disconnect" between senior management and regular staff, and signs that safety-related messages and behaviours were not effectively implemented across the company.

The report was ordered after crashes involving Boeing planes in 2018 and 2019.

Boeing pledged to review the findings.

"We've taken important steps to foster a safety culture that empowers and encourages all employees to share their voice. But there is more work to do," the company said.

"We will carefully review the panel's assessment and learn from their findings, as we continue our comprehensive efforts to improve our safety and quality programs."

The company, one of two major global plane makers, has been under added pressure since last month, when a section of one of its passenger jets blew off in mid-air, forcing an emergency landing.

The incident, which narrowly avoided serious harm, revived questions about Boeing's manufacturing processes, years after the 2018 and 2019 accidents, which killed 346 people and led to accusations that the company had put profits before safety as it produced its planes.

The panel of experts, which was convened after the earlier crashes, said Boeing had taken steps to improve, but that it saw indications of "gaps in Boeing's safety journey".

It said some Boeing staff were hesitant to report problems and worried about retaliation because of how the reporting process was set up.

Boeing also did not have a clear system for reporting problems and tracking how those concerns were resolved, it said.Boeing 737 Max boss out after blowout
Ryanair warns of 10% fare rise as new planes delayed

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it would also review the findings.

The agency is currently investigating Boeing's manufacturing processes, triggered by the 5 January blowout. It has barred the company from expanding production of its popular 737 Max planes while the review is under way.

"We will continue to hold Boeing to the highest standard of safety and will work to ensure the company comprehensively addresses these recommendations," the FAA said as it released the report.

The troubles at Boeing are expected to lead to delays delivering new planes to airlines, which Ryanair has said could cause ticket prices to rise. Other airlines have also voiced frustration over the issues.

Earlier this month, Boeing said it was replacing the person in charge of the 737 Max programme and creating a new position of senior vice president for quality.