Saturday, July 13, 2024

STRAYS

Turkey proposes bill aimed at managing large stray dog population. Critics say it’s inhumane



A stray dogs rests at Kadikoy sea promenade in Istanbul, Turkey, Thursday, July 4, 2024. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party on Friday July 12, 2024, submitted to parliament a controversial bill aimed at managing the country’s large stray dog population. Critics are concerned that the proposed legislation will result in dogs being confined to cramped shelters and potentially lead to the killing of many of the animals. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco)


Pro animal rights activists shout slogans during a protest in Istanbul, Turkey, Friday, May 24, 2024. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party on Friday July 12, 2024, submitted to parliament a controversial bill aimed at managing the country’s large stray dog population. Critics are concerned that the proposed legislation will result in dogs being confined to cramped shelters and potentially lead to the killing of many of the animals. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco)
Updated 10:25 AM MDT, July 12, 2024

Updated , July 12, 2024

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party submitted to parliament Friday a controversial bill aimed at managing the country’s large stray dog population. Critics are concerned that the proposed legislation will results in dogs being confined to cramped shelters and potentially lead to the killing of many of the animals.

The bill is pitting animal rights activists against those calling for measures to make the streets safe from the feral dogs.

Erdogan has said that an estimated four million strays are roaming Turkey’s streets and countryside.

The legislation is a watered-down version of an initial proposal, which reportedly called for the strays to be rounded up, housed in shelters and euthanized if they are not adopted within 30 days. That proposal, which was not submitted to parliament, had ignited a public uproar, with animal rights activists arguing it would result in the mass extermination of unadopted dogs.

Abdullah Guler, a senior legislator from the ruling party, told reporters that under the revised proposal, stray dogs would be removed from the streets and placed into shelters where they would be neutered and spayed.

The dogs that are at risk of rabies, exhibit aggressive behavior and have no possibility of being rehabilitated would be euthanized, Guler said.

Municipalities would be required to enhance and improve conditions in existing shelters while people would be encouraged to adopt the dogs, the legislator added.

Erdogan’s ruling party and its nationalist and Islamist allies hold a majority in parliament and the bill is likely to pass when it reaches the floor. No date has been set.

A report released by the Safe Streets and Defense of the Right to Life Association, an organization campaigning for the removal of all stray dogs from the streets, says that 65 people have died in street dog attacks since 2022.

The government promised to tackle the issue earlier this year after a child was severely injured after being attacked by dogs in the capital Ankara.

Despite existing legislation that requires stray dogs to be caught, neutered and spayed, and returned to the spot where they were found, a failure to implement those regulations over the past years has caused the feral dog population to explode, animal rights groups say.

They argue that proper implementation of these regulations would be sufficient to control the population.

Britain has recently issued a stray dog warning for travelers to Turkey, stating that they often form packs and can be aggressive. It has advised visitors to be cautious and avoid
approaching them.



 INDIA

The Escalating Ethnic Conflict In Manipur – OpEd

Location of Manipur in India. Credit: Wikipedia Commons


By 

The ethnic conflict in the northeastern Indian state of Manipur is at the moment experiencing a deeper dimension of violence due to the activities of the insurgents and the cross border tension between the Indian and Myanmar armies. This has led to increased conflict that has claimed many lives and displaced a large number of people, thus implying the complex social and political factors that characterise the conflict in the region. Manipur is also known as the ‘Land of Jewels’ and is culturally very diverse. It is inhabited by 39 different ethnic groups with different religions such as Hindus, Christians, Muslims, and the Meiteis with Sanamahi as their god. But this diversity is set against a background of conflict. The state’s integration into India in 1949 was not welcomed and subsequent events like the AFSPA in 1958 have further fueled historical injustices. This legislation provides extensive powers to the military in the so-called ‘disturbed areas,’ which mainly concerns the areas in the Northeast and Jammu and Kashmir. AFSPA has been a subject of controversy to human rights bodies and has greatly influenced the tension between Manipur’s state government and the central government in New Delhi. 


The situation in the region has worsened in the recent past due to the occurrence of some events. The Manipur High Court got down to hearing a directive on May 3, 2024, to decide the Scheduled Tribe status for the Meitei community, which constitutes a large part of the population of Manipur. This decision has angered the Kuki and Naga indigenous people and led to massive protests that have led to the loss of many lives, burning of buildings and thousands of residents have been forced to seek refuge in relief camps.

The current situation in Manipur is that the clashes are common and the insurgent activities are increasing. Currently, the Myanmar army has escalated its operations against insurgent groups including the Kuki National Army of Burma (KNAB) and the People’s Defense Force (PDF). These encounters have led to losses and major battles with both sides fighting for control in areas that are disputed along the border. Other encounters between Indian Special Forces and different rebel groups have resulted in deaths and injuries. Due to the unpredictable security situation, the attempts to bring back order and stability have been hampered by the occasional fighting that poses a threat to civilians and their confidence. 

The emergence of factions such as NSCN-Youth from the parent insurgent groups has further compounded the security dynamics. These factions work autonomously, and instead of helping the authorities and security forces, they only aggravate the situation. Cases of the use of deception by the Indian forces and counterattacks by the militants have escalated the conflict. Such strategies as fake news and cyber warfare have continued to fuel the conflict and create division between the affected communities. 

The problems of Manipur are complex and stem from the years of social and political as well as economic exclusion. Existing historical enmity due to non-acceptance of integration into India and other sensitive issues like AFSPA still persist and are major causes of ethnic unrest in Manipur. These tensions define the views on identity and loyalty, which in turn, hinder the creation of a coherent vision of the state’s development. 

The emergence of more groups and the complexity of their operations are a major security concern. These groups are known to cross national borders and take advantage of the existing gaps and poor leadership to continue with their acts of terrorism. AFSPA has been criticized for the use of military and security forces in which there are many cases of human rights abuses and excessive force. The militarized response to insurgency has further strained relations between communities and state institutions, undermining efforts to build trust and cooperation


The violence has increased and this has led to the displacement of thousands of civilians and destruction of infrastructure. Humanitarian assistance has been hindered by access limitations and other practical obstacles, which has only worsened the plight of the civilians trapped in the conflict. The fact that Manipur shares its border with Myanmar also complicates the conflict. Insurgent arms trafficking and movement across borders, as well as the seeking of refuge, makes it difficult to control the region and maintain order. 

 The consequences of such changes for India are rather significant in terms of its image. The inability of the Indian government to contain the situation in Manipur is considered as a major drawback. The increase in intensity of the conflict, the human rights violations perpetrated under the AFSPA, and the displacement of thousands of civilians all paint a rather grim picture of India’s capacity to deliver the rule of law and ensure the safety of its people. The conflict has also drawn criticism from the international community including human rights organizations and this has further worsened India’s image. 

Furthermore, the insurgent groups from Myanmar and cross border operations have put question mark on the regional security policy of India. The violence continues to erode India’s attempts at projecting the image of a stable and secure country that is capable of policing its territory. The case of Manipur also presents a problem to the bilateral relations between India and Myanmar in dealing with issues of insurgency and arms smuggling across the border.

The way ahead for Manipur is to work towards the resolution of conflict and healing. It is crucial to start a dialogue with all the stakeholders, including ethnic groups, rebels, and the government. This dialogue should seek to redress past injustices, establish confidence and consensus on the future of the society. It is therefore important to review and possibly change AFSPA to ensure that the security concerns are met while at the same time protecting the rights of individuals. Improving the local administration and supporting the community policing can improve the security situation while increasing the accountability and transparency. 

 Fostering the socio-economic development programs can help to reduce the socio-economic inequalities that lead to insurgency. Education, health, housing, and employment can offer hope and a chance for a better life, which is a better way to fight terrorism than a military intervention. Relief and assistance to the affected populations and reconstruction of the destroyed facilities are essential. Aid in providing primary needs such as health and education can reduce the humanitarian crisis and help with the rebuilding process. 

There is a need to improve cooperation with the neighboring states especially Myanmar to deal with security issues that cut across the borders. Regional cooperation in fighting arms proliferation, cross-border terrorism, and movement of refugees can help in bringing stability and security in the region. 

The growing tension in Manipur calls for a more elaborate and participatory strategy in the processes of conflict resolution and healing. It is therefore important to work for the elimination of the causes of violence, encourage dialogue between the parties involved, work for change of governance and security systems and support economic growth as some of the ways of achieving sustainable peace in this volatile area. It is only through continued and sincere attempts and active participation of all the stakeholders that Manipur can hope to come out of the existing problems and emerge as a progressive and a peaceful state in the Indian Union.



Muskan Moazzam

Muskan Moazzam is a student of Quaid e Azam University and has worked with institutes like National Assembly of Pakistan and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and is currently associated with some national and international think tanks.

 

Women In Islam: Changing Status And Challenges – OpEd

Selfie Girls Women Woman Indonesia Asian Hijab Ramadhan Muslim


By 

Islamic traditions regarding women are deeply rooted in religious texts and teachings, primarily derived from the Quran and Hadith (the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad). These traditions encompass various aspects of a woman’s life, including family, social, legal, and religious roles.

The key aspects include:

a. Family and Marriage: Marriage:

Marriage is highly valued in Islam. The Prophet Muhammad emphasized the importance of marriage and described it as completing half of one’s faith. A woman’s consent is essential for a marriage to be valid. Dowry (Mahr): Upon marriage, the groom must give the bride a mahr, which is a gift or financial sum agreed upon by both parties. This is solely for the bride to use as she wishes.

Roles in the Family: Women are often seen as the primary caregivers and nurturers within the family. However, Islam also stresses mutual respect and cooperation between spouses. Men are traditionally seen as the providers, but women can also work and contribute financially if they choose.

b. Dress and Modesty:

Hijab: Modesty is a significant aspect of Islamic teachings. The hijab, which refers to modest clothing including a headscarf, is one way Muslim women express their faith and modesty. The specific requirements can vary based on cultural interpretations.

c. Education and Knowledge:

Seeking Knowledge: Islam places a high value on education for both men and women. The Prophet Muhammad encouraged the pursuit of knowledge, saying, “Seeking knowledge is an obligation upon every Muslim.”

d. Social Participation:

Community Involvement: Women are encouraged to participate in community and social activities. They can work, engage in business, and contribute to social welfare.

Religious Activities: Women participate in religious activities such as prayer, fasting, and Hajj. While there are certain gender-specific rules in places of worship (e.g., separate prayer areas), their spiritual obligations and opportunities are equal to those of men.

e. Social and Cultural Traditions:

Festivals and Celebrations: Women actively participate in Islamic festivals such as Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha. They often play key roles in family gatherings and community celebrations.

The traditions and roles of women in Islam are multifaceted and can vary widely across different cultures and communities.

Global status

The global status of women in Islam is diverse and complex, reflecting the vast differences in culture, legal systems, economic development, and religious interpretations across various Muslim-majority and Muslim-minority countries:

a. Legal Rights and Status:

Varied Legal Frameworks: The legal status of Muslim women varies significantly. In some countries, Sharia law is applied in personal status matters, while others use secular laws or a combination of both. This affects rights related to marriage, divorce, inheritance, and custody.

Reforms and Progress: Several countries have enacted reforms to improve women’s legal rights. For example, Tunisia and Morocco have progressive family laws that grant women greater autonomy and protection.

b. Education and Employment:

Education: Access to education for Muslim women has been improving, with increased enrolment in primary, secondary, and higher education. In countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, and Turkey, women often achieve high levels of educational attainment.

Employment: The participation of Muslim women in the workforce varies widely. In some regions, women are highly active in various professions, while in others, cultural and legal barriers limit their employment opportunities.

c. Health and Well-being: Healthcare Access:

Mental Health: Awareness of mental health issues among Muslim women is growing, with more resources and support services becoming available.

d. Challenges and Barriers:

Discrimination and Violence: Muslim women often face discrimination and violence, including domestic violence, honour-based violence, and forced marriages. Efforts to address these issues include legal reforms, awareness campaigns, and support services.

Economic Inequality: Economic disparities persist, with many women lacking access to financial resources, employment opportunities, and entrepreneurial support. Grassroots Movements: Grassroots organizations and activists are making impactful changes within their communities, addressing issues like education, health, and gender-based violence.

e. Global Networks and Alliances:

International Collaboration: Muslim women are increasingly participating in global networks and alliances, sharing strategies and resources to promote gender equality and women’s rights.

Interfaith Initiatives: Interfaith collaborations are helping to build mutual understanding and address common challenges faced by women of different faiths.

f. Regional Differences:

Middle East and North Africa (MENA): In the MENA region, the status of women varies significantly. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran have strict gender-based laws, while others like Tunisia and Morocco have more progressive legal frameworks.

South Asia: In South Asia, countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh have seen significant female political leadership, but cultural and socio-economic barriers still impact women’s status.

Southeast Asia: In Southeast Asia, countries like Malaysia and Indonesia have made strides in women’s education and employment, though challenges remain in rural areas.

Sub-Saharan Africa: In Sub-Saharan Africa, Muslim women face diverse challenges and opportunities, with significant efforts to improve education and health outcomes.

The global status of Muslim women is characterized by diversity and complexity, with significant progress in some areas and ongoing challenges in others. 

Reforms and days ahead

The prospects for women in Islam are shaped by ongoing changes and efforts in various fields, including legal reforms, educational advancements, and social movements. The key areas where the prospects for Muslim women are evolving include:

a. Legal and Political Reforms:

Legal Reforms: Several countries are implementing legal reforms to enhance women’s rights. These include changes to family law, inheritance rights, and protections against domestic violence.

Political Participation: The number of women in political leadership and decision-making positions is gradually increasing. Efforts are being made to ensure greater representation of women in government and political parties.

b. Social and Cultural Shifts: 

Changing Attitudes: Attitudes towards gender roles are slowly shifting in many communities. Greater acceptance of women’s participation in public life and support for gender equality are emerging trends.

Role Models: Prominent Muslim women in various fields serve as role models, inspiring younger generations to pursue their ambitions and challenge traditional norms.

c. Religious Interpretation and Reform:

Progressive Interpretations: Some scholars and religious leaders are advocating for progressive interpretations of Islamic teachings that emphasize gender equality and women’s rights. These efforts aim to reconcile religious beliefs with contemporary values of equality and justice.

Interfaith Dialogue: Interfaith initiatives are fostering dialogue and collaboration between Muslim women and women of other faiths to address common challenges and promote mutual understanding.

d. Education and Awareness Programs:

Gender Sensitization: Educational programs aimed at raising awareness about gender equality and women’s rights are being implemented in schools and communities.

Empowerment Programs: Workshops, training sessions, and mentorship programs are empowering women with the skills and knowledge needed to advocate for their rights and pursue their goals.

The prospects for Muslim women are increasingly positive, with significant progress being made in education, legal rights, economic opportunities, and social empowerment. FacebooTwitterEmailFlipboardMastodoLinkedIn


Dr. Rajkumar Singh

Dr. Rajkumar Singh is a University Professor for the last 20 years and presently Head of the P.G. Department of Political Science, B.N. Mandal University, West Campus, P.G. Centre,Saharsa (Bihar), India. In addition to 17 books published so far there are over 250 articles to his credit out of which above 100 are from 30 foreign countries. His recent published books include Transformation of modern Pak Society-Foundation, Militarisation, Islamisation and Terrorism (Germany, 2017),and New Surroundings of Pak Nuclear Bomb (Mauritius, 2018). He is an authority on Indian Politics and its relations with foreign countries.

 

UN General Assembly Demands Immediate End To Russian Aggression In Ukraine

The UN General Assembly on Thursday demanded that Russia immediately cease its aggression against Ukraine and unconditionally withdraw all military forces from Ukrainian territory.

The Assembly also called for an immediate end to attacks against Ukraine’s critical energy infrastructure, following weeks of escalation.

The resolution entitled Safety and security of nuclear facilities of Ukraine, including the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant was adopted with 99 countries in favour and nine against (Belarus, Burundi, Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Eritrea, Mali, Nicaragua, Russia and Syria). Sixty Member States abstained.

Nuclear demand

The resolution demanded that Russia “urgently withdraw” its military and other unauthorized personnel from the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and “immediately return” the plant to full Ukrainian control - to ensure its safety and security.

“[The Assembly] calls upon the Russian Federation, until it returns the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant…to provide the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Support and Assistance Mission to Zaporizhzhia with timely and full access to all areas at the plant that are important for nuclear safety and security in order to allow the Agency to report fully on the nuclear safety and security situation at the site,” the resolution said.

The draft resolution was introduced by Ukraine, and was sponsored more than 50 other countries, including France, Germany and the United States.

Ukraine: Radiation knows no borders


Introducing the text, Ukrainian Ambassador and Permanent Representative Sergiy Kyslytsya said that the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant has been deliberately made an integral element of Russia’s military strategy and warned that the repercussions of an incident there would be catastrophic.

“Radiation knows no borders,” he stated, adding that radioactive fallout can travel great distances and affect regions far removed from the site of the incident.

He said the draft resolution fully supported the mandate of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and reinforces the importance of the seven indispensable pillars of nuclear safety and security outlined by the IAEA Director-General.

He urged all nations to vote in favour the resolution, stressing “we owe it to future generations to ensure that the horrors of nuclear disasters are not repeated.”

Russia: A pseudo nuclear package

Explaining his country’s position before the vote, Russian Deputy Permanent Representative, Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy said the draft resolution was harmful, heavily politicized and had nothing to do with nuclear safety.

“The true goal is to use this pseudo nuclear package to sneak in political elements that have nothing to do with the stated problem, even a cursory glance at the text is enough to make this clear,” he said.

He also said that the sponsors of the draft resolution resorted to non-inclusive and non-transparent methods of work, “flatly refusing” any amendments from a number of delegations that sought to depoliticize it.

He accused Ukraine of being the real threat to nuclear safety and security and carrying out regular and reckless attacks on Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, its related infrastructure and the nearby city where plant employees and their families live.

© Scoop Media

IT'S STILL AN EPIDEMIC

COVID-19 is still killing 1,700 a week, reveals WHO

JULY 13,2024


Picture used for illustrative purposes.

COVID-19 is still killing around 1,700 people a week around the world, the World Health Organisation (WHO) said Thursday, urging those most at risk to continue receiving vaccinations against the virus.

At a press conference, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus expressed concern over declining vaccine coverage globally.

Despite the continued death toll, “data show that vaccine coverage has declined among health workers and people over 60, which are two of the most at-risk groups.”

“WHO recommends that people in the highest-risk groups receive a COVID-19 vaccine within 12 months of their last dose,” Adhanom added.

WAM
India’s government must take action against the online hate campaigns targeting journalists


Investigative journalist Srishti Jaswal, who infiltrated the groups that cyber-harassed her, spoke to RSF about the tactics of these trolls

As Narendra Modi begins his third term as Prime Minister, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is concerned about the growing campaigns against journalists perpetrated by extreme right-wing nationalist networks. The authorities – who have remained silent on the subject – must put an end to these attacks. Investigative journalist Srishti Jaswal, who infiltrated the groups that cyber-harassed her, spoke to RSF about the tactics of these trolls and the terrifying experience of being their target.


"Voices that dare to speak out against the ruling party and ideology disseminated by the far right are immediately attacked by waves of trolls, threatened, and branded 'traitor' or 'anti-national'.’ This constant harassment has created a climate of fear, driving much of the Indian press into self-censorship. RSF condemns this tactic, engineered by those in power, to destroy the credibility of journalists and silence them. The Indian authorities must put an end to this scandal at all costs, which has been stifling the right to information for ten years. The perpetrators of harassment and defamation campaigns against journalists must be prosecuted and brought to justice. This total impunity can no longer continue.
Célia Mercier
Head of RSF's South Asia Desk


The online attacks on journalists are, in large part, the work of coordinated networks of the far-right nationalists, according to several journalistic surveys. One such network is the Hindu IT Cell co-founded by Vikas Pandey, who was campaign manager for the party currently in power, the nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in the 2014 elections. This cell has targeted several dozen journalists in the past decade, according to Srishti Jaswal, a freelance journalist who infiltrated this network. According to her investigation, the group has a digital army of followers on X (formerly Twitter), and at least 400 volunteers.

The cyberstalking prison

Srishti Jaswal, was also the victim of cyberstalking in 2020, while working for the English-language daily Hindustan Times. "I was receiving 20 insult notifications per second, with unspeakable pornographic content, death and rape threats. I couldn't leave my house and didn't feel safe there either. Cyberstalking isolates you in so many ways – it's like a prison," she laments.

Jaswal, whose parents were also being harassed, had no choice but to leave her native town and go into hiding. "Neither the state nor the police are going to help you since these campaigns are connected to the BJP," she explains. On 2 July 2020, the Hindustan Times, challenged by trolls on their social media accounts, , publicly announced its decision to suspend Jaswal. What’s more, a blasphemy complaint was filed against Jaswal by men from these far-right groups. Jaswal was summoned by the police, who ordered her to apologize to the complainants.

Tactics to ruin reputations

By documenting the trolls targeting her, Srishti Jaswal discovered that those responsible for this organized cyber-harassment were from the Hindu IT Cell. Jaswal was able to infiltrate this cell and discover its modus operandi: "The members of this network first identify their targets, such as journalists who cover minorities, criticize the extreme right or the BJP. They then publish screenshots of their publications out of context, with the aim of discrediting them. Finally, the campaign is amplified via multiple accounts.”

Partisan TV channels and Hindu nationalist propaganda sites then amplify this false information. Srishti Jaswal herself was the target of a smear campaign by site OpIndia, which in 2020 hammered home the fact that she was "hinduphobic" and had made blasphemous remarks. "The psychological impact of cyberharassment is very significant, raising fears of real physical attacks. This pressure leads journalists to leave the profession. In general, self-censorship has taken hold among journalists on a massive scale," concludes Shrishti Jaswal.

Protecting journalists: a matter of urgency


The fight against this online harassment in an urgent priority when it comes to protecting Indian journalists. It is one of the most important recommendations RSF made for the new government, which took office at the beginning of June.

Published on 12.07.2024

OPINION

Does the US want to end the Algerian-Moroccan conflict?


July 12, 2024 

A picture taken from the Moroccan region of Oujda shows Algerian border guards patrolling along the border with Morocco on November 4, 2021 [FADEL SENNA/AFP via Getty Images]

by Nizar Boulihya


Two years ago, Blinken appealed to Algeria from the capital, Algiers, to limit ties with Russia and look to improve relations with neighbouring Morocco, but neither the US Secretary of State nor his administration did enough to urge the Algerians and Moroccans to put an end to the relatively long diplomatic rift between their countries. This has raised a major question mark about what Washington really wants in North Africa, in particular?

Perhaps many would say it certainly wants to strengthen its presence in that part of the world, protect its interests, on the one hand, and restrict the growing Russian and Chinese infiltration of the region, on the other. Does maintaining the current situation between the two largest countries in that region, i.e., the situation of silent conflict that is open to all possibilities, seem appropriate and conducive to achieving that goal? There is no doubt that the two Maghreb neighbours have been competing fiercely for several decades, but are they ultimately chasing an illusion and a mirage?

READ: Israel reiterates recognition of Morocco sovereignty over Western Sahara, after Netanyahu contradiction

To some, it might seem like that, but others might consider that picture a bit exaggerated. They may not initially see that there is a race, neither apparent nor hidden, between the two countries, or rather a competition that, even if it is intense and violent at times, remains normal. However, the question that arises in this case is: Why do Moroccans and Algerians spend millions of dollars annually to buy and accumulate huge arsenals of weapons? Why do they travel around the world in an effort to strengthen their relations with major powers and expand and diversify their circle of partnerships and alliances? Doesn’t at least part of all of this lie in the twin brothers, as the Moroccan King once described Algeria and Morocco, seeking to win the leadership race in the region? The Algerians would surely reply to this by saying, “Who is more worthy than us?” Meanwhile, the Moroccans would say “Who is more worthy than us?” It is clear that the way in which this decades-long debate between the two major Maghreb countries will be resolved, over which of them seems more worthy of leading the region is open to many theories.

In this regard, it was not surprising that, a few days ago, an Algerian newspaper believed that the matter had been completely resolved after the Americans forcefully became involved. The local Algerian newspaper, Al-Shorouk, said in an article published on Saturday that Washington chose to award that honorary crown, which has always fuelled conflicts and hostilities between the two neighbours, to Algeria. How did that happen? All the newspaper said was that the operation was executed through the congratulatory message that the American President addressed to his Algerian counterpart on the occasion of Independence and Youth Day, last Friday, and included the following, “Algeria’s regional leadership has played a critical role in solving the world’s most pressing problems, such as transnational crime, extremism, instability and conflict.” This means, according to the original source, that the phrase “Algeria’s regional leadership” indicates that Washington believes and operates based on the logic that Algeria is a leading country in its regional environment and that this region can be controlled from its borders extending from the Maghreb region in the north to the heart of the African continent in the Sahel region in the south, and in the Mediterranean basin from its far east to its far west, with maritime borders over 1,200 kilometres. However, do the Americans really think that way? Do they look at Algeria through the lens presented by that newspaper? What does regional leadership refer to apply to? What are the standards that allow a country to possess regional leadership? Is it military, economic, geographic or political weight? Or is it all of them together?

Biden’s message was limited to referring only to what it called Algeria’s decisive role “solving the world’s most pressing problems” and the Palestinian issue, for example, was not at its forefront, nor was the most prominent and important regional file that continues to hinder the achievement of rapprochement and integration between the Maghreb nations, which is the Sahara file. On the other hand, the American administration chose only to refer to these problems in a short phrase by saying, “transnational crime, extremism, instability and conflict”. This means that the Americans view regional leadership in a functional manner with a very fragmented and limited view, that hardly deviates from the scope of their immediate and urgent interests in the region. They are not, as the newspaper might imagine, complimenting Algeria for free, as much as they are aiming to give it responsibility for assuming a role that serves its goals and projects.

READ: Algeria’s support for Polisario pushed Morocco to normalise ties with Israel, says former MP

They definitely know the extent of the Russian and Chinese infiltration in that particular country, and they appreciate its potential consequences and repercussions in the region. When their Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, met the Algerian President more than two years ago, he said to reporters immediately after the end of that interview, “the Ukraine conflict should cause all countries to re-evaluate relations with Russia and express their support for the territorial integrity of other states,” adding, “I know that that’s something Algerians feel strongly about.” It was clear that the most important point they were keen to focus on in this matter was calling on Algeria to pump larger amounts of energy into global markets to compensate for the shortfall caused by the Western blockade of Russia. They knew, of course, that this would strengthen Algeria’s position internally and externally, but was that offer a poisoned gift?

There is no doubt that the BRICS countries’ rejection of the Algerian request to join that group may reflect that, to some extent, but the statement by the Russian Foreign Minister, which preceded the rejection by a few days, in which he said that the criteria for expanding BRICS took into account the weight and status of the state and its position on the international arena, may have disrupted many of Algeria’s calculations and may have given Washington more room for manoeuvring and allowed it to get closer to Algeria. Was the implicit agreement between the two sides that the Americans would maintain the existing situation in the region, and not go too far in perpetuating the Trump administration’s announcement of its recognition of the Moroccan Sahara? It is clear that the current American administration preferred to play on both the Moroccan and Algerian sides, as official delegates often do not hesitate to give conflicting statements in the two capitals and try to hold the stick from the middle by talking about full support for the UN’s efforts to solve the Sahara problem. Did the Americans try to use their influence to push the two countries toward reconciliation? It is not certain that they did. The magic word remains the American interests in the region, and we are not yet certain whether preserving them depends on the return of warmth to Algerian-Moroccan relations.

OPINION: Where could the escalation between Algeria and Morocco lead?

This article first appeared in Arabic in Al-Quds Al-Arabi on 9 July 2024