Showing posts sorted by relevance for query STRAYS. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query STRAYS. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, April 09, 2020

Strays feel the bite as pandemic spreads  

AFP / ANGELOS TZORTZINISThe global lockdowns against the coronavirus are tantamount to a death sentence of stray cats and dogs
As coronavirus forces billions of people around the world into lockdown, another sizeable population has also been hard hit -- stray animals.
While pet owners in many countries are still allowed to walk their dogs, thousands of other animals -- the exact numbers are unknown -- are starving and turning feral.
The mass closure of restaurants has also deprived hungry animals of leftover meals, forcing them to take greater risks.
For many, the restrictions are tantamount to a death sentence.
"We are seeing an increase in the numbers of cats in areas where we feed, some appear to have been abandoned, while others have roamed far from their usual spots in search of food," says Cordelia Madden-Kanellopoulou, a co-founder of Nine Lives Greece, a network of volunteers dedicated to reducing the overpopulation of stray cats in Athens and other cities.
According to the municipality, the stray dog population in Athens is put at hundreds while the cats run into the thousands.
"It is a huge worry to us that strays could be exposed to more cruelty and poisoning, being more visible and hungrier now, and thus more likely to trust and approach people," said Madden-Kanellopoulou.
Greek officials over the weekend said an online platform had been created for food donations and veterinary services for strays and pets whose owners are unable to care for them.
"During the lockdown, we make sure that all dogs have enough food so that they don't become aggressive. This week we will also start installing feeders in different areas of the city making sure that dogs and cats are fed regularly," said Serafina Avramidou, city of Athens councillor for animal welfare.
Avramidou said she has also already signed more than 350 permits for volunteers to visit feeding areas without getting fined.
In neighbouring Turkey, authorities in Istanbul distribute around a tonne of food for street cats and dogs every day.
- 'We'll care for your friends' -
"We were taking care of strays even before the coronavirus," Tayfun Koc, an Istanbul municipal feeding worker, told AFP.
"I say this to all our citizens, stay at home, we will take care of our little friends," he said.
AFP / ANGELOS TZORTZINISEuropean authorities are realising that allowances must be made for populations of stray animals
Authorities elsewhere in Europe are gradually realising that allowances must be made for stray populations.
After Spain went into a nationwide lockdown on March 14, Madrid officials closed down 125-hectare Retiro park in the city centre where around 270 cats live in 19 different colonies.
For days, volunteers were not able to enter. City hall authorities eventually allowed them to give food to park gardeners to distribute.
A single volunteer may also enter the park three times a week, for an hour at a time, to check on the health of the cats.
Mercedes Hervas, the president of the Association of Friends of the Cats of Retiro, says this was not enough time to check on them all and look after those in need of medical care.
On March 30, a park employee found dead a female cat that the group had been treating with antibiotics. Hervas predicted other cats would also die.
"You have to go from colony to colony and wait for the cat to come out. Maybe Olympic athletes can do it in one hour, we can't," she says.
Elsewhere in the Balkans, provision is more ad hoc.
In Serbia, where there is no state-organised effort to feed and shelter stray animals, people in several cities and towns have organised help locally.
A similar effort is under way in North Macedonia where NGOs are calling on people to leave food on the street for the estimated 10,000 stray dogs in Skopje.
In Croatia, about 40 animal shelters which had to close their doors for visitors are imploring citizens not to abandon their pets.
In Albania, locked-down citizens say it is impossible to secure permission to walk a dog, let alone feed strays, so people go out in secret.
- 'Death sentence' -
"These measures taken for humans are effectively a death sentence for dogs and cats," says Indrit Osmani who heads the Animal Rescue Albania volunteer group.
AFP / ANGELOS TZORTZINISPets are not entirely safe even at home
In Bulgaria, veterinary clinics ran an information campaign after pets were increasingly found on the street because their owners thought they may transmit the virus.
There was a similar campaign in Beirut, where Lebanese animal rights groups have reported an increase in abandoned pets.
The group, Beirut for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, last week said it had received "countless" calls concerning poisonings across the country, mainly around the capital.
Last month, it said that the number of abandoned pets had "at least tripled in recent weeks because of the panic" caused by the virus.
But in a time of heightened health concerns, pets are not entirely safe even at home.
French veterinarians last week warned owners against attempting to disinfect their dogs and cats with detergent or alcohol gel.
The move came after images online showed dogs whose legs had been burned by disinfectants.
"Soapy water or a dog shampoo works very well", said Christine Debove, regional adviser of the Order of veterinarians for Ile-de-France.
Not only are dogs and cats unable to digest alcohol properly, but these products can also cause respiratory irritation and skin reactions, Debove said.
burs-jph/bsp/spm/je

Saturday, July 13, 2024

STRAYS

Turkey proposes bill aimed at managing large stray dog population. Critics say it’s inhumane



A stray dogs rests at Kadikoy sea promenade in Istanbul, Turkey, Thursday, July 4, 2024. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party on Friday July 12, 2024, submitted to parliament a controversial bill aimed at managing the country’s large stray dog population. Critics are concerned that the proposed legislation will result in dogs being confined to cramped shelters and potentially lead to the killing of many of the animals. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco)


Pro animal rights activists shout slogans during a protest in Istanbul, Turkey, Friday, May 24, 2024. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party on Friday July 12, 2024, submitted to parliament a controversial bill aimed at managing the country’s large stray dog population. Critics are concerned that the proposed legislation will result in dogs being confined to cramped shelters and potentially lead to the killing of many of the animals. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco)
Updated 10:25 AM MDT, July 12, 2024

Updated , July 12, 2024

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party submitted to parliament Friday a controversial bill aimed at managing the country’s large stray dog population. Critics are concerned that the proposed legislation will results in dogs being confined to cramped shelters and potentially lead to the killing of many of the animals.

The bill is pitting animal rights activists against those calling for measures to make the streets safe from the feral dogs.

Erdogan has said that an estimated four million strays are roaming Turkey’s streets and countryside.

The legislation is a watered-down version of an initial proposal, which reportedly called for the strays to be rounded up, housed in shelters and euthanized if they are not adopted within 30 days. That proposal, which was not submitted to parliament, had ignited a public uproar, with animal rights activists arguing it would result in the mass extermination of unadopted dogs.

Abdullah Guler, a senior legislator from the ruling party, told reporters that under the revised proposal, stray dogs would be removed from the streets and placed into shelters where they would be neutered and spayed.

The dogs that are at risk of rabies, exhibit aggressive behavior and have no possibility of being rehabilitated would be euthanized, Guler said.

Municipalities would be required to enhance and improve conditions in existing shelters while people would be encouraged to adopt the dogs, the legislator added.

Erdogan’s ruling party and its nationalist and Islamist allies hold a majority in parliament and the bill is likely to pass when it reaches the floor. No date has been set.

A report released by the Safe Streets and Defense of the Right to Life Association, an organization campaigning for the removal of all stray dogs from the streets, says that 65 people have died in street dog attacks since 2022.

The government promised to tackle the issue earlier this year after a child was severely injured after being attacked by dogs in the capital Ankara.

Despite existing legislation that requires stray dogs to be caught, neutered and spayed, and returned to the spot where they were found, a failure to implement those regulations over the past years has caused the feral dog population to explode, animal rights groups say.

They argue that proper implementation of these regulations would be sufficient to control the population.

Britain has recently issued a stray dog warning for travelers to Turkey, stating that they often form packs and can be aggressive. It has advised visitors to be cautious and avoid
approaching them.



Saturday, July 27, 2024

Turkish police scuffle with protesters rallying against bill targeting stray dogs
Reuters
Fri, July 26, 2024 


Turkish police scuffle with protesters rallying against bill targeting stray dogs
Animal rights activists take part in a rally in Istanbul

ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish police scuffled with protesters in the capital Ankara on Friday during a demonstration against plans to round up millions of stray dogs.

The plan, presented to parliament by President Tayyip Erdogan's ruling AK Party earlier this month, has alarmed animal lovers who say a mass neutering campaign would be a better solution than locking dogs up in shelters.

Police pushed back the protesters as they tried to gather in the city centre, leading to scuffles.

The demonstrators held banners reading, "You cannot round them up, you cannot jail them, you cannot kill them" and "Take back the law".

"People here are those taking care of many animals. What is this grudge? Do you want the dogs and cats on the street to be killed?" one protester said through a megaphone.

Under the draft law, municipalities would be charged with moving strays off the streets and into shelters until they are adopted. Aggressive dogs or any with untreatable diseases would be put down.

The population of street dogs in Turkey is estimated to be 4 million, and 2.5 million dogs have been neutered in the past 20 years by municipalities, according to the draft bill.

There are currently 322 animal shelters with a capacity to host a total of 105,000 dogs, the bill says.

(Reporting by Ece Toksabay; Editing by Gareth Jones)


Thousands protest in Istanbul against bill they fear will lead to mass cull of stray dogs

Euronews
Sat, July 27, 2024 

Thousands protest in Istanbul against bill they fear will lead to mass cull of stray dogs

Thousands of people have gathered in Istanbul to protest against proposed legislation that critics fear will lead to the mass killing of stray dogs across Türkiye.

The draft bill aims to regulate the country's millions of stray dogs and make streets safer but animal rights advocates are concerned many animals would be put down or end up in neglected, overcrowded shelters.

Demonstrations against the bill, which was proposed in mid-July, have been an almost-daily occurrence for the past several weeks as the proposed legislation makes its way through the judicial system.

A parliamentary committee approved the draft earlier this week, and the full assembly is scheduled to have a final vote in the coming days with deliberations starting on Sunday.

The government estimates that around four million stray dogs roam Türkiye's streets and rural areas.

Although many are harmless, numerous people, including children, have been attacked in Istanbul and elsewhere.


Protest in Istanbul against bill critics say could lead to mass culling of stray dogs, July 27, 2024 - Screenshot from AP video 4508835

The proposed legislation mandates that municipalities collect stray dogs and house them in shelters where they would be neutered and spayed.

Dogs that are in pain, terminally ill, pose a health risk to humans or are aggressive would be put down.

Municipalities would be required to build dog shelters or improve conditions in existing ones by 2028.

The legislation is a watered-down version of an initial proposal, which reportedly called for the strays to be rounded up, housed in shelters and euthanised if they are not adopted within 30 days. That proposal, which was not submitted to parliament, sparked a public uproar, with animal rights activists arguing it would result in the mass extermination of unadopted dogs.

But animal rights activists worry that some municipalities might kill dogs on the pretext that they are ill, rather than allocate resources to shelter them.

The government denies the bill would lead to a widespread culling and the country's justice minister said anyone killing strays "for no reason" would be punished.
Why does Türkiye need to control its stray dog population?

A report released by the Safe Streets and Defense of the Right to Life Association, an organisation campaigning for the removal of all stray dogs from the streets, says that 65 people have died in street dog attacks since 2022.

The government promised to tackle the issue earlier this year after a child was severely injured after being attacked by dogs in the capital Ankara.


A woman feeds a stray dog in the Kadikoy neighbourhood in Istanbul, July 6, 2024 - Francisco Seco/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved

Despite existing legislation that requires stray dogs be caught, neutered and spayed, and returned to the spot where they were found, a failure to implement those regulations over the past years has caused the feral dog population to explode, animal rights groups say.

They argue that proper implementation of these regulations would be sufficient to control the population.

Britain has recently issued a stray dog warning for travellers to Türkiye, stating that they often form packs and can be aggressive. It has advised visitors to be cautious and avoid approaching them.



Wednesday, August 26, 2026

 

Eastern flank drone incidents test NATO's defences

Eastern flank drone incidents test Nato's defences
Video footage posted by Romania's defence ministry shows a suspected Russian drone being destroyed several hundred metres from the Neptun Alpha natural gas platform. / MApN via FacebookFacebook
By IntelliNews August 25, 2026

Three drone incidents in 36 hours last week highlighted the growing security challenge facing Nato's Black Sea flank, culminating in Romania scrambling an F-16 to destroy an explosive-laden naval drone near the country's biggest new offshore gas project.

European officials have warned that repeated drone incursions into Nato territory are increasingly difficult to dismiss as accidental spillover from the war in Ukraine.

The first incident occurred at 02.23 on August 20, when Romanian radar detected an aircraft north of Tulcea county, as detailed by Euronews. It entered Romanian airspace at 0321, about 13 km east of Galati, and crashed three minutes later, about 4 km northeast of the village of Grindu. Two Spanish F-18s and a Romanian IAR-330 SOCAT helicopter were scrambled, according to Euronews.

Three hours later, at 06.28, the Romanian coastguard spotted a naval drone carrying explosives a few hundred metres from the Neptun Alpha gas platform, around 80 nautical miles east of Constanta. One of two Romanian F-16s destroyed it.

Overnight into August 21, Russian drones damaged the Tabaky border crossing between Ukraine and Moldova in Ukraine's Odesa region, forcing traffic to be suspended.

"An escalating campaign of threats is underway, unsettling our citizens and seeking to divide our Union," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen wrote on X on August 21. "This is hybrid warfare."

For much of the war, drones entering the airspace of Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria and the Baltic states have been described as strays - weapons knocked off course by electronic warfare or otherwise unintentionally crossing borders.

That explanation has become harder to sustain as incidents have multiplied. A purpose-built naval drone carrying explosives and found beside critical offshore energy infrastructure is difficult to characterise as an accidental incursion.

From strays to a pattern

The number and frequency of incidents have increased sharply over the past year. In September 2025 between 19 and 21 Russian drones entered Polish airspace and flew halfway across the country; Warsaw triggered Nato's Article 4 for the first time in the alliance's history.

On November 25, drones crossed into both Romania and Moldova, one of them landing on the roof of a house in Cuhurestii de Jos.

By April 2026, Moldova was logging three airspace violations in a single week. On April 25 a Geran-2 carrying explosives flew 15 km at low altitude over Romanian territory and crashed on the northern edge of Galati, damaging an outbuilding and a power pole; debris from two more drones turned up in Tulcea county over the following day, and Bucharest summoned the Russian ambassador.

On the night of June 7-8 a drone with an explosive payload detonated at Lopatna in Moldova, 50 km from Chisinau, while on the same night a French jet shot one down over Latvia. Between July 24 and 26 Romanian F-16s downed three drones in three days, and on July 27 Romania expelled a Russian diplomat and recalled its ambassador from Moscow.

Then on August 8 a drone crossed roughly 100 metres into Bulgaria from Romania and exploded near the town of General Toshevo. Romania's radar had not seen it cross. Sofia ordered more counter-drone systems the following week.

Four years of war have produced a Russian drone force that no longer resembles the one Nato planned against. Moscow is out-producing Ukraine across its whole missile and drone arsenal, and the newest Geran-4 and Geran-5 classes are jet-powered, fly close to 1,000 km with a 90 kg warhead and are far harder to intercept than the propeller-driven Shaheds.

The Telegraph reported on August 16, from satellite imagery and leaked documents, that Russia has built ten launch-pad bases along the Ukrainian and Belarusian borders carrying at least 59 rails, roughly 20 of them lengthened for the bigger aircraft.

That infrastructure potentially puts Poland, Romania, Turkey and the Baltic states within the arc of Russian drone operations.

The problem of attribution

Not every drone entering Nato airspace is Russian. Latvia's armed forces said on August 20 that debris from a drone shot down over Balvi municipality on August 14 was of Ukrainian origin, Brussels Signal reported. Officials declined to identify its model, saying that could reveal information affecting Ukraine's defensive operations. Latvian officials believe it entered from Belarus.

"The risks of drones flying in exist," Defence Minister Raivis Melnis told Latvian Television. "Ukraine, in defending itself, is continuing strikes on Russian territory with drones as well, while Russia is carrying out countermeasures."

Russian electronic warfare can disrupt Ukrainian drones and send them off course, creating an awkward situation for Nato governments that must decide whether to treat an incursion as an attack.

Latvia also identified a Ukrainian-origin drone in March. Neither incident caused casualties and both were shot down over Nato territory.

Warsaw's security committee reviewed the risk of a Russian false-flag operation using captured Ukrainian drones in July, with Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz warning they could be turned against the Baltic states, Finland, Romania or Poland itself. Neither government has published evidence that such an operation has taken place.

After a Ukrainian drone was found deep inside the port of Constanta, Bucharest and Kyiv used a direct communication channel within minutes. Kyiv confirmed that the naval drone found near the gas platform was not Ukrainian.

A five-kilometre bubble

This month, Bulgaria ordered counter-drone systems from US company Axon, receiving the first two of four and considering up to 10. The mobile platforms combine radar, sensors, cameras and jammers, but have an effective range of only about three to five kilometres.

"Two anti-drone systems are useless," said Todor Ivandzhikov, chairman of the Association of the Bulgarian Aviation Industry, according to Bloomberg TV Bulgaria. "A circle of 3-5 km will not save Bulgaria."

The problem is therefore not simply the number of systems but the lack of a layered network combining low-altitude radar, drone detection, electronic warfare and command centres.

Latvia faces a similar problem. Melnis has acknowledged that the country lacks sufficient counter-drone systems and radar along its eastern border. Latvian equipment is intended to cover the frontier with Russia and Belarus by the end of September, although the timetable is under review.

Latvia has no combat aircraft of its own and relies on allied deployments. Italian Eurofighters are currently based in Lithuania as part of Nato's Baltic air policing mission.

The economics are also unfavourable. Poland reportedly spent about $1.2 billion countering drones costing $10,000-$20,000 each, against a Russian production capacity estimated at roughly 2.5 million drones a year.

Using an F-16 and an expensive missile to destroy a cheap drone is not a sustainable long-term solution.

Von der Leyen used the Neptun Deep incident to push the EU's Eastern Flank Watch, the counterpart to the European Drone Wall she first called for in her 2025 State of the Union address. The two projects are meant to give the Union a multi-layered network able to detect, track and neutralise hostile drones along its eastern border. They were due to launch in the first quarter of 2026, reach initial operating capability by the end of this year and be fully functional by the end of 2027.

Nato has also established Eastern Sentry following the Polish incursions of September 2025 and agreed to broaden Baltic Air Policing into an air-defence mission. Romania has proposed an EU Centre for Maritime Security in the Black Sea, with one headquarters in Constanta.

Sunday, November 05, 2023

UK
LICENSE OWNERS NOT DOGS
Ban on XL bully dogs ‘will leave abandoned strays roaming the streets’
ITS THE OWNER NOT THE BREED

Joe Pinkstone
Sat, 4 November 2023

Don't Ban Me - License Me spokeswoman Sophie Coulthard with her XL bully Billy - Paul Grover

The ban on XL bully dogs could lead to a large number of them being abandoned on the streets as strays, charities have warned.

It will be illegal to sell, breed or abandon an XL bully type dog from Jan 1 2024 and it will be an offence to own one from Dec 31 unless the animal is registered to the Index of Exempted Dogs.

In the latest incident on Friday, two people were taken to hospital with serious injuries after an attack by a suspected XL bully.


One woman reportedly fell out of the window of the flat where the attack happened on Friday night in Mansfield, said Nottinghamshire Police.

The large dog, believed to be an XL bully, was seized from a nearby property and taken to secure kennels.

Campaigners against the ban on American XL bully dogs have launched a legal challenge to the Government asking for the planned ban to be scrapped in favour of tightening laws around breeding and owning dogs, and educating owners.

Campaigners from Don’t Ban Me – License Me, largely made up of XL bully owners, have raised more than £50,000 towards a Judicial Review and plan to ask the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to rethink its plans to ban the breed.

John Cooper KC, the campaigners’ barrister, sent a Pre-Action Protocol in Judicial Review to Therese Coffey, the Environment Secretary, last Thursday, Nov 2.
Knee-jerk reaction

He said “It was a knee-jerk reaction done too quickly without proper consideration of the evidence – much of the evidence hasn’t been examined at all, and some of it is wrong.

“The public must be protected, but the Government’s decision does not protect them. The Dangerous Dogs Act of l99l didn’t stop dog bites or fatalities – in fact there are more fatalities and bites now than then.

“The way forward isn’t to add XL bullies to the banned list, but for owners to have proper control over their animals, and for there to be severe penalties for dog owners who don’t take their responsibilities seriously.

“Vets being asked to euthanise any XL bully dogs who don’t have an exemption certificate by the end of January 2024 say they can’t administer it. This ban is an ill thought-out mess.”

The ban has been called a “death sentence” and some charities, such as Dogs Trust, have already said they will not take in any more XL bully dogs because they have a policy of never putting down a healthy dog..

Animal charities told the Telegraph that any dogs in their care in 2024 will most likely have to be euthanised because it would be unethical to keep them in a kennel for the rest of their lives, which is the only other option, and many shelters are already full.

As a result, there are fears owners forced to relinquish their dogs will abandon them on the streets because it is the best chance the animal has at survival.

An owner can have the dog euthanised by a vet and get £200 compensation from the Government, or the dog can be given to a charity for rehoming until the end of the year. A charity will get £100 compensation from the Government for euthanising an XL bully.
Unscrupulous owners

The more unscrupulous owners may also opt for at-home destruction of animals too, to avoid veterinary costs, now the business of breeding and selling XL Bullys is outlawed.

Dr Sam Gaines, head of the companion animals team at the RSPCA, told the Telegraph: “It is now our fear that, as a result of this ban, we will see more dogs being abandoned and surrendered.

“In most cases, we expect that owners who are not going to be able to keep their dogs will do the responsible thing and not just abandon them on the street, but I think we have to expect that there will be some dogs that will be abandoned.

“We are going to end up with lots of authorities that are going to have to go out and collect those dogs and then euthanise them.”

Coventry council has reportedly seen a small rise in the number of stray XL bully dogs already this year. It is the statutory duty of the local authority to collect stray dogs where they are kept in a council pound for a week and their owners sought. In normal cases the stray will enter the rehoming process after seven days but if the dog meets the XL bully definition then it will be destroyed as of 2024.

However, some councils have already said they will not collect a stray dog if it is suspected it is an XL bully. Colchester and Cumberland councils have said the dog is too dangerous for their staff to collect and are in talks with their local police forces to help collect suspected stray XL bullys, for example.

‌This will add an additional burden on the dog units of local police forces which will be tasked with assessing if every XL bully in the country meets the definition laid out by Defra this week.

‌The definition of what an XL bully is includes descriptors of head size, height, muscularity and other physical features but was made without the input of the leading UK dog experts who withdrew from talks with the Government because of concerns it was too vague and broad a description.

‌The Government’s definition could also cover non-XL bully breeds, the experts say, with other bulldogs, mastiffs and some mongrels likely to inadvertently meet the XL bully criteria.

‌“Defra has been told that one of the big unintended consequences of having a broad definition is that potentially hundreds of thousands of dogs are going to be caught up in this,” Becky Thwaites, head of public affairs at Blue Cross, told the Telegraph.
Increased levels of euthanasia

‌Since the ban was formally announced on Tuesday, shelters have seen a surge in inquiries, with owners of an XL bully trying to figure out the best course of action.

‌“We’ve already been taking an increased number of calls from owners who are really worried about what this announcement means for them,” said Ms Thwaites.

‌“There’s going to be thousands of dogs who are going to be coming into organisations like ourselves, and it’s going to be a real challenge to rehome them. Ultimately, these pets are going to have to be put to sleep based purely on a law that we know actually isn’t even going to improve public safety.

‌“We are planning for increased levels of euthanasia over the next three months.”

‌She added that staff in the rescue sector are distraught at the prospect of spending months killing thousands of XL Bully dogs.

‌“I think we’ve got to be very realistic that the likelihood of being able to rehome some of these dogs is going to be very, very difficult,” Ms Thwaites said.

‌“The only thing we can do [with surrendered XL Bullys] is to keep it in a kennel for the rest of its life and that is not something from a welfare point of view that we could ever do.

‌“We aren’t able to provide the stimulation that a dog would need. It is a death sentence for dogs, that much we know.”

Thursday, March 20, 2025


Restored stream supports new wild salmon run


Study confirms salmon of Putah creek origin for first time




University of California - Davis

Juvenile chinook salmon 

image: 

A juvenile chinook salmon is measured by UC Davis researchers during its migration out of Putah Creek.

view more 

Credit: Lauren Hitt, UC Davis




Almost everywhere in California, salmon are on the decline. But in Putah Creek — a restored stream running through the University of California, Davis, campus — wild salmon are not only increasing, they also are completing their life cycle.

A UC Davis study, published in the journal Ecosphere, is the first to document Putah Creek-origin salmon. Chinook salmon have been observed at the creek since 2014, but prior studies had shown them to be strays from hatcheries. This study now confirms that some salmon returning to Putah Creek in the fall to spawn are actually born there.

This should not be news. Salmon are famous for their simple life cycle: Hatch in a stream, migrate to the ocean, and return to the stream to spawn at their life’s end. Yet salmon in 21st century California are sometimes trucked or flown to the ocean from hatcheries due to dams, habitat loss, warming streams, drought and other threats restricting their natural migration.

This study shows that at Putah Creek — and potentially other altered and dam-controlled streams worldwide — restored waterways can help restore and even create salmon runs.

“The fact that you have Putah Creek-origin fish is a big deal,” said senior author Andrew Rypel, director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences at the time of the study. “To have a growing, stable population that’s natal means it’s a well-managed ecosystem. It means we’re taking care of the water and the land the right way, and that there’s a future for fish in that place. It also shows there’s hope for other streams that are degraded.”

Water brought back birds, bugs and salmon

Putah Creek is a tributary of the Sacramento River, flowing through the cities of Winters and Davis. It barely flowed at all after Monticello Dam was installed in the 1950s, which created Lake Berryessa and drastically reduced water to Putah Creek.

Then, in 2000, a lawsuit brought about the Putah Creek Accord, which mandated year-round flows to protect fish and habitat. Since then, local community members, nonprofits, state agencies and UC Davis researchers have worked to restore and study the creek. They’ve found that once water returned to the stream, so did insects, songbirds, and eventually, salmon.

Hatchery fish and new wild salmon

Until this study, the hundreds of salmon in Putah Creek were all thought to be hatchery strays.

“People began speculating whether any of these Putah Creek-spawning fish were returning to Putah Creek,” said Rypel, a professor in the UC Davis Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology department. “It was a challenging scientific riddle to figure out.”

First author Lauren Hitt, a graduate student in Rypel’s lab during the study, used otoliths — or ear bones — from adult Chinook salmon carcasses recovered from Putah Creek between 2016 and 2021 to determine their origin.

No bigger than a thumbnail, otoliths carry within them the water chemistry of the streams they have traveled, allowing scientists to map their movements and migrations against the chemical tracers of individual streams. This powerful technique allowed Hitt to reconstruct each salmon’s life history. She showed that while hatchery-origin fish were most abundant, a handful — 11 of 407 — of returning salmon analyzed were born in Putah Creek, completing their full life cycle as wild salmon.

This new run of wild salmon at Putah Creek descended from hatchery fish­ — a finding that could upend some long-held perspectives about the role of fish hatcheries in conservation. Hatcheries provide food and a fishing boost for anglers, yet they have often been criticized for impacts to wild fish genetics, health and habitat. 

“The idea that hatcheries can be part of the solution might take people off guard,” Rypel said. “But there may be positive effects so long as the salmon have a good place to go. There’s a lot of potential to have more Putah Creeks out there.”

Local love

Salmon born in Putah Creek face many challenges in completing their life cycle. They must leave Lower Putah Creek, enter the Yolo Bypass floodplain, travel to Liberty Island, down the Sacramento River and into the San Francisco Bay before emptying into the Pacific Ocean. At the end of their life, they get to do this in reverse. Along the way, restricted fish passage, reduced flows, too-warm, too little or too much water at the wrong time can be fatal.

In a sobering illustration of these risks, Putah Creek-origin salmon from 2021 died before being able to spawn because an atmospheric river sent debris and ammonia-saturated waters into Putah Creek just as spawning salmon were beginning to arrive. The authors say such setbacks are significant but not insurmountable provided collaborative management of Putah Creek in the future.

“There’s so much local love for these fish,” said Hitt, currently a Ph.D. student at University of Canterbury in New Zealand. “I hope people recognize that their caring about the system and advocating for the system are what made the changes possible. If not for local community engaged and supporting local streams, I don’t think we’d have salmon in Putah Creek today of hatchery or Putah Creek origin. This is just so special.”

A salmon run at UC Davis

As for UC Davis’ salmon run? Scientists will continue to sample and monitor the fish as they come home. Visitors and community members may see salmon spawning each fall at the Putah Creek Riparian Reserve and throughout the creek.

The study’s additional coauthors include Malte Willmes of Norwegian Institute for Nature Research; Rachel Johnson of National Marine Fisheries Service and UC Davis; and George Whitman, Mackenzie Miner, Carson Jeffres, Dennis Cocherell and Nann Fangue of UC Davis.

The study was funded by the Solano County Water Agency, Yolo Basin Foundation, UC Davis Agricultural Experiment Station, Peter B. Moyle and California Trout Endowment for Coldwater Fish Conservation, and UC Davis Erica Kelly Memorial Award and Jastro-Shields Research Award funds.

Study coauthors Mackenzie Miner, left, and Dennis Cocherell of UC Davis install a fish trap on Putah Creek in California's Central Valley to monitor juvenile chinook salmon migrations.

Credit

Lauren Hitt, UC Davis

UC Davis Professor Andrew Rypel holds an adult chinook salmon found in Putah Creek in 2023. 

Credit

David Ayers


An otolith, or fish ear bone, from Putah Creek-origin chinook salmon viewed under a microscope.

Credit

Lauren Hitt, UC Davis

From left, UC Davis lead author Lauren Hitt, junior specialist Jordan Colby and coauthor Mackenzie Miner prepare to search for chinook salmon on Lower Putah Creek by canoe.

Credit

Dennis Cocherell, UC Davis


Lower Putah Creek during fall salmon spawning season. 

Credit

Lauren Hitt, UC Davis

From left, Jordan Colby, Mackenzie Miner, and Sebastian Gonzales of UC Davis hold carcasses of adult chinook salmon collected in Lower Putah Creek.

Credit

Dennis Cocherell, UC Davis