Thursday, October 10, 2024

Nixon’s “War on Drugs” Was a Sham

AS WAS REAGAN'S

 October 8, 2024
Facebook

Photograph Source: Nixon White House Photographs – Public Domain

The New York Times recently revealed that while Pres. Richard Nixon publicly referred to marijuana as “public enemy No. 1” he really felt it was “not particularly dangerous.”

Kurtis Hanna, a Minnesota cannabis lobbyist and advocate for drug legalization, discovered revealing tape recordings while researching marijuana at the Nixon Library archive.  According to one source, he was startled by Nixon’s position on cannabis because it fundamentally differed from his public stance. “He was essentially saying the exact opposite of what I understood him to believe,” Hanna reflected. So surprised by his findings, he shared his discoveries with the Times.

Nixon’s anti-drug position underwrote his 1968 presidential run.  At a campaign speech at the Anaheim, CA, convention center on September 16, 1968, he said marijuana and other drugs were “decimating a generation of young Americans” and, if elected, he would stop illicit drugs coming into the country.

Shortly after taking office, he convened a Special Presidential Task Force Relating to Narcotics, Marijuana, and Dangerous Drugs.  On July 14, 1969, he sent a special message to Congress identifying drug abuse as “a serious national threat.” And on September 21st, he launched “Operation Intercept,” the first step in what would become the “war on drugs.”

In a 1971 conversation, Nixon declared: “I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana.”  At a press conference on June 17, 1971, he stated that drug misuse was “public enemy number one,” saying that “in order to fight and defeat this enemy, it is necessary to wage a new, all-out offensive.” That month, Nixon formally declared a “war on drugs,” insisting, “Drug abuse is the single most deadly social problem in America.”  The Nixon administration provisionally placed marijuana as a Schedule I drug and appointed a commission to study the health risks. Nixon picked nine of the commission’s 13 members.

In an interview with Marijuana Moment, Hanna observes:

“President Nixon, the man who signed the bill into law to put marijuana in Schedule I, who kept it in Schedule I after the Shafer Commission report, and who created the Drug Enforcement Administration through administrative action didn’t believe marijuana was addictive or dangerous.”

He added, “Jack Herer declared in 1973, ‘The Emperor Wears No Clothes,’ in his book by the same name.” “Through the release of the audio I found, we now have definitive proof of the Emperor himself admitting in private that he knew he was naked.”

The panel was formally titled the “National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse,” and it found that while marijuana use might pose some health risks, the policy of criminalization was excessive and unnecessary. The commission recommended decriminalization of marijuana.  As it argued:

“It [current policy] implies an overwhelming indictment of the behavior which we believe is not appropriate. The actual and potential harm of use of the drug is not great enough to justify intrusion by the criminal law into private behavior, a step which our society takes only with the greatest reluctance.”

Hanna’s revelations reframe Nixon’s attitude toward marijuana and other drugs.  Against his more public stand against marijuana, the private Nixon expressed a very different attitude.  In a 1972 recording, Nixon can be heard telling a senior aide that he favored a “modification of penalties” as they discussed drug crimes, “but I don’t talk about it anymore.”

In a meeting with John Ehrlichman, the White House Council, he stated: “Let me tell you, I know nothing about marijuana.”  And added, “I know that it’s not particularly dangerous, and most of the kids are for legalizing it. But on the other hand, it’s the wrong signal at this time.”  He then noted:

“I have no problem that there should be an evaluation of penalties on it, and there should not be penalties that, you know, like in Texas that people get 10 years for marijuana. That’s wrong.”

In secret Oval Office tapes from March 1973, he stated, “The penalties should be commensurate with the crime.” Nixon argued that a 30-year sentence in a cannabis case he recently heard about was “ridiculous.”

In 2016, Harper’s Magazine published excerpts from a 22-year-old interview with Ehrlichman that revealed how the “war on drugs” was concocted as part of a broader “war” against Black activists and opposition to the Vietnam War. He admitted the following:

“You want to know what this [war on drugs] was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying?

“We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news.

“Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

This hypocrisy defined the “war on drugs” and shapes the changes in popular attitudes toward marijuana and state decriminalization efforts.

Today, 25 states have decriminalized recreational marijuana use and 48 of the 50 states allow for some form of medical weed.

On September 1, 2024, former president Donald Trump came out in support of a pending amendment to the Florida state constitution to decriminalize marijuana. “In Florida, like so many other States that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalized for adults with Amendment 3,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. He claims he never smoked marijuana.

“Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the Voters, so it should be done correctly.” He added, “We do not need to ruin lives & waste Taxpayer Dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them, and no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana.”

VP Kamala Harris once admitted, “And I inhaled,” giggling. “I did inhale. It was a long time ago,” she added, “I think it gives a lot of people joy. We need more joy in the world.”  Vanity Fair notes that many recent political leaders have imbibed the once “evil weed,” including the two Bush brothers, Al Gore, Barack Obama and Newt Gingrich.

“The U.S. Attorney General is currently circulating a proposal to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III,” Justice Department Director of Public Affairs Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement. If, as expected, this change is adopted, marijuana will move from a drug that has “a high potential for abuse and the potential to create severe psychological and/or physical dependence” to a drug “with a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence.”

When this happens, the “war on drugs” may finally be over. Sadly, the FBI reports that in 2022, police made at least 227,108 arrests for marijuana, down from the 872,721 arrests in 2007.  One can only wonder as to the millions of arrests for marijuana possession and/or sales that have occurred since Nixon launched the fictitious “war on drugs” in 1971.

David Rosen is the author of Sex, Sin & Subversion:  The Transformation of 1950s New York’s Forbidden into America’s New Normal (Skyhorse, 2015).  He can be reached at drosennyc@verizon.net; check out www.DavidRosenWrites.com.

Glyphosate and Neonicotinoids are Poisoning Honeybees (and the World)



 October 8, 2024
Facebook
A bee on a yellow flowerDescription automatically generated

Honeybee on a flower, Argolis, Peloponnesos, Greece. Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos

Prologue

The twentieth century gave birth to honeybee neurotoxins – organophosphate, carbamate and neonicotinoid pesticides. It also gave birth to glyphosate, a weed killer that achieved global significance, being the biggest selling pesticide — ever. But where does this chemical come from? Rosemary Mason, a European physician, prolific science writer, and environmentalist, tracked down the toxic birth of glyphosate. At her 2021 Open Letter to Head of Pesticide Unit at the European Food Safety Authority, she explained how Monsanto created glyphosate. She said:

“Monsanto’s weedkiller comes from beneath the soil. The active ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate, which is ultimately derived from elemental phosphorous extracted from phosphate rock buried below ground. Monsanto gets its phosphate from mines in Southeast Idaho near the town of Soda Springs, a small community of about 3,000 people. The company has been operating there since the 1950s. I went to visit last summer [2020], and what I found was startling. I stood just beyond a barbed-wire fence at about nine o’clock at night and watched as trucks dumped molten red heaps of radioactive refuse over the edge of what is fast becoming a mountain of waste. This dumping happened about every fifteen minutes, lighting up the night sky. Horses grazed in a field just a few dozen yards away, glowing in the radiating rays coming from the lava-like sludge. Rows of barley, for Budweiser beer, waved in the distance.”

Glyphosate in the market, 1974

We don’t know when Monsanto figured out phosphate rock would become its gold-minting weed killer glyphosate. But we know that, in 1974, Monsanto received EPA’s blessing to start selling glyphosate to farmers. Billions of kilograms of glyphosate have drenched America.

During my tenure at the US EPA, I did not know if glyphosate was tested by IBT, a large private laboratory that used fake data in testing pesticides for decades. But glyphosate studies came out of IBT. Other researchers[1] also say glyphosate came out of the house of IBT.[2] The truth is that a cloud of suspicion and outright agribusiness fraud has tainted glyphosate and Monsanto, a subsidiary of the German chemical and pharmaceutical giant Bayer. This history and Monsanto’s fight for global dominance give glyphosate the attention of champions. It is the “active” ingredient of the popular roundup weed killer and the driver of Roundup Ready, genetically engineered crops designed to tolerate the killing power of glyphosate. Monsanto claims the best, almost harmless virtues, for its precious glyphosate products. Most international organizations, governments, agricultural universities, and the agribusiness industry like Monsanto. Glyphosate continues to be the powerhouse of week killers and GMOs – worldwide.

Biological warfare, glyphosate style

Glyphosate, however, does huge damage because, for several decades, it has been touching the environment and public health in vast quantities. According to Don Huber, expert in chemical and biological warfare and professor emeritus of microbiology at Purdue University, glyphosate makes it difficult for crops to absorb micronutrients necessary for their health and nutrition. This means that honeybees suffer from collecting nectar and pollen from crops and wildflowers affected by glyphosate, being deficient in those vital micronutrients. This is because glyphosate acts as a powerful antibiotic against these bacteria. Honeybees eating nectar and pollen from flowers sprayed by glyphosate don’t have these life-saving bacteria (lactobacillus and bifidobacterium). And without them honeybees cannot digest the nectar they collect and the honey they make. They become disoriented in their foraging.

Anthony Samsel, a research scientist, and consultant on public health, reminded me that glyphosate “causes Alzheimer disease in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. It destroys memory in the creature, so that it forgets its way home. This is probably also true of the Monarch butterfly!” Add neonicotinoid sprays to the broad deleterious mantle of glyphosate covering the agricultural regions of the Earth, and the honeybees are cooked. My beekeeper friend in Colorado is right. Neonicotinoids are straightforward nerve poisons. They, too, disorient honeybees and kill them outright.

Entomologists warn that neonicotinoids are spreading all over the world, contaminating the environment, harming and killing beneficial insects, pollinators, and threatening ecosystems and food webs. They also suggested that unless we are careful and act on time and regulate or eliminate neonicotinoids, we are bound to repeat the disastrous course of the world contaminated by DDT, the ecocide that gave birth to Silent Spring of Rachel Carson, 1962. More than fifty years after EPA banned DDT in 1972, Americans and people around the world have detectable traces of DDT in their bodies. Birds like the California condor and peregrine falcon are just making a comeback from a near certain DDT extinction. We should avoid repeating this toxic history.[3]

Ban glyphosate, worldwide

This is a valuable lesson that we ignore at our peril. Neonicotinoids have become the new DDT for farmers. We should act promptly and interrupt that addiction and prevent the extinction of honeybees. At the same time, we need to be alert about the other gigantic menace: glyphosate. In the logic of Don Huber, glyphosate is just as dreadful to honeybees as the neonicotinoids. In the presence of glyphosate, “honeybees are starving to death even with plenty of honey and bee bread in the hive,” Huber says. In addition, glyphosate disrupts the hormones of honeybees, which means honeybees “never learn to forage efficiently.” “Put glyphosate and Neonics [neonicotinoids] together in the environment, as we have, and the bees don’t have a chance!” Huber wrote me. In addition, Huber is certain that the two microorganisms that glyphosate kills, lactobacillus and bifidobacterium, do more than help honeybees digest their food. They give honeybees “immunity to mites, foul brood, viruses and stress”: “so with very low drift of glyphosate,” Huber says, “you see all of these [illnesses] present because glyphosate gives bees a bad case of ‘AIDS,’” by which he means glyphosate destroys their immune system.

Epilogue

Huber is right. We must “remove” glyphosate. I would add neonicotinoids, and most pesticides deserve the same fate of removal. Pesticides are big business.

The pesticide industry is valued at about $ 50 billion. Something like 80 percent of its 600 active ingredients are weed killers. “No wonder,” Mason says, “Bayer doesn’t want to lose its license for glyphosate or for clothianidin, a long- acting neonicotinoid insecticide that is very persistent in the soil. Both chemicals are on the market illegally thanks to the corrupt EU and US regulatory authorities.”

Mason also reminds us that the owner of Monsanto and glyphosate, Bayer, the German giant company of chemicals and pharmaceuticals, is none other than the post-WWII continuation of I.G. Farben, the chemical German colossus of WWII. Farben worked closely with the Nazi German state. It operated the concentration camp at Auschwitz, where its nerve gases killed hundreds of thousands of European Jews.

NOTES

1. Carol Van Strum, “”Failure to Regulate: Pesticide Data Fraud Comes Home to Roost,” Truthout, April 9, 2015. 

2. I give a detailed account of IBT in my book, Poison Spring: The Secret History of Pollution and the EPA

3. S. D. Frank and T. F. Tooker, “Neonicotinoids pose undocumented threats to food webs,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, September 2, 2020. 

Evaggelos Vallianatos, Ph.D., studied history and biology at the University of Illinois; earned his Ph.D. in Greek and European history at the University of Wisconsin; did postdoctoral studies in the history of science at Harvard. He worked on Capitol Hill and the US EPA; taught at several universities and authored several books, including The Antikythera Mechanism: The Story Behind the Genius of the Greek Computer and its Demise. He is the author of Earth on Fire: Brewing Plagues and Climate Chaos in Our Backyards, forthcoming by World Scientific, Spring 2025.