Monday, October 28, 2024

AMERIKA
‘Expect war’: leaked chats reveal influence of rightwing media on militia group

Jason Wilson
THE GUARDIAN
Mon 28 October 2024

A man in Washington DC holds leaflets falsely claiming that Trump won the 2020 presidential election, in November 2020.Photograph: NurPhoto/Getty Images

Leaked and public chats from Arizona-based “poll watching” activists aligned with a far-right militia group show how their election paranoia has been fueled by a steady drumbeat of conspiracy theories and disinformation from rightwing media outlets and influencers, including Elon Musk.

The materials come from two overlapping election-denial groups whose activists are mostly based in Arizona, one of seven key swing states that will decide the US election and possibly end up at the center of any disputed results in the post-election period.

Chat records from a public-facing channel for the America First Polling Project (AFPP) were made available to reporters by transparency group Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDOSecrets). The activist who leaked those materials to DDOSecrets provided the Guardian directly with an archive of the Arizona 2022 Mid-Term Election Watch (A22) chat channel.


Related: The far-right megadonor pouring over $10m into the US election to defeat ‘the woke regime’

The materials offer a window into the way in which the rightwing information environment – and the unverified, distorted or false information it proffers – erode faith in elections, and encourage those who would violently disrupt them.
From the media to far-right conspiracy

The materials underline previously reported links between poll watching groups and the American Patriots Three Percent (AP3) militia, such that the militia provided “paramilitary heft to ballot box monitoring operations”.

At least half a dozen pseudonymous activist accounts are present across all of the chats, and early posts in the AFPP chat show activists at “tailgate parties” that brought together election denial groups and militia members ahead of the 2022 midterms election.

They also show the broad cooperative effort among a range of election denial groups, whose activities were fueled by disinformation from high-profile conservative activists.

On 6 October 2022, in one of the first archived messages on the semi-private A22 chat, a user with the same name as the channel (Arizona 2022 Mid-Term Election Watch) announced to the group that they had “heard back from the cleanelectionsusa.org so I might try to coordinate between the two efforts”. They added: “In any case I will schedule a couple of zoom calls so we can connect.”

Two days later, the same account updated: “There are 13 drop box only locations in Maricopa county of which only 2 are 24 hour locations,” adding: “We will need help with getting these watched. I have also been able to connect with cleanelectionsusa and am coordinating with those folks.”

Clean Elections USA, founded by Oklahoman Melody Jennings, is one of a number of election denial groups that sprang up in the wake of the 2020 election, after Trump and his allies mounted a campaign to reverse that year’s election result on the basis of false claims that the vote was stolen.

During the 2022 election season, the organization was slapped with a restraining order over its ballot monitoring – some of it carried out by armed activists – that the federal Department of Justice described in its filing as “vigilante ballot security efforts” that may have violated the Voting Rights Act. That lawsuit was settled in 2023.

The organization’s website has shuttered; however, archived snapshots indicate that the organizers were motivated by discredited information from long-running election denial organization True the Vote and 2000 Mules, the title of a conspiracy-minded book and accompanying documentary by rightwing provocateur Dinesh D’Souza.

The book and film repeated True the Vote’s allegations that paid “mules” had carried illegal ballots to drop boxes in swing states in 2020. D’Souza’s publisher in June withdrew the book and film from distribution and apologized to a man whom D’Souza falsely accused of criminal election fraud.

The “mules” falsehoods were treated as baseline reality in the A22 chat. On 9 November, a user named “trooper” sought to account for Republicans’ unexpectedly poor showing with the claim “275k drop-off ballots – meaning the mules flooded the system on election day while the disaster distraction was in play”, adding that “they swarmed the election day drop boxes like fucking locusts”.

The pro-democracy Bridging Divides Initiative (BDI) at Princeton University recently published research indicating elevated worries about harassment on the part of local officials, including election officials. BDI’s research backed up findings from the Brennan Center indicating that 70% of election officials said that threats had increased in 2024, and 38% had personally experienced threats, up from 30% last year.

Shannon Hiller, BDI’s executive director, said: “We continue to face elevated threats and risk to local officials across the board,” however in 2024, “there’s been a lot more preparation and there’s a clearer understanding about how to address those threats now.”

Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism (GPAHE) said that talk of election fraud using drop boxes had returned in 2024. “I can’t think of an election-denying organization, whether it’s Mike Lindell, True the Vote, or more local outfits in various states that aren’t talking about patrolling drop boxes and watching voters while they’re voting”, she said.
From disinformation to violent threats

Beirich’s warnings are reflected in ongoing AFPP Telegram chats, where any prospect of a Harris victory is met with conspiracy theories, apocalyptic narratives, and sometimes threats.

The Guardian’s review of the materials found many instances in which disinformation or exaggerated claims in the media or from rightwing public figures led directly to violent rhetoric from members of the chat.

On 13 March, a user linked to a story in the Federalist which uncritically covered a claim by the Mississippi secretary of state, Michael Watson, that the Department of Justice was “using taxpayer dollars to have jails and the US Marshals Service encourage incarcerated felons and noncitizens to register to vote” on the basis of Biden’s March 2021 executive order aimed at expanding access to voting.

A user, “@Wilbo17AZ”, replied: “If we don’t fight this with our every waking breath, we are done. Expect war.”

On 24 June, a user posted an article from conspiracy-minded, Falun Gong-linked news website Epoch Times, which reported on the supreme court’s rejection of appeals from a Robert F Kennedy-founded anti-vaccine non-profit,

The court declined to hear the appeals over lower court’s determinations that the non-profit had no standing to sue the Food and Drug Administration over its emergency authorization of Covid-19 vaccines during the pandemic.

In response, another user, “cybercav”, wrote: “I do not see any path forward for our Republic that doesn’t include ‘Purge and Eradicate’ being the general orders for both sides of the next civil war.”

In January, the @AFPP_US account posted a link to an opinion column on the Gateway Pundit by conspiracy theorist Wayne Allyn Root. Root characterized cross-border immigration as an invasion in the piece, and concluded by telling readers to “Pray to God. Pray for a miracle. Pray for the election in November of President Donald J Trump.”
Fueling paranoia

Over the summer, overseas events fueled the paranoia of chat members.

On 6 August the @AFPP_US account posted a link to Guardian reporting on anti-immigrant riots that took place in the UK over the summer.

The article described the riots as “far-right violence”; @AFPP_US captioned the link “‘Far Right’ = ‘Stop raping women and stabbing children’”.

The next day, the same account apparently attempted to link the riots to UK gun laws, which are more restrictive than the US.

The stimulus was a story on the riots by conspiracy broadcaster Owen Shroyer, an employee of Alex Jones who was sentenced to two months in prison for entering a restricted area at the US Capitol on 6 January 2021.

@AFPP_US wrote: “UK is a failed state and possession of the Calaphite [sic]. The imperialists have become the Imperiled. This is what just a few generations of disarmament and pussification hath wrought.”

One major vector of bad information in the A22 chats is the Gateway Pundit, a pro-Maga website operated by Jim Hoft. That website has been a noted source of election disinformation for years. Earlier this month Hoft’s organization settled a defamation suit with two election workers that it had falsely accused of election fraud. Accountability non-profit Advance Democracy Inc reported in August that in the first nine months of 2024 Hoft had published at least 128 articles referencing election fraud and election workers.

Gateway Pundit articles were shared many times in the chat.

On 21 January, the @AFPP_US account shared a Gateway Pundit story by Hoft in which he claimed that liberal philanthropist and chair of the Open Society Foundation, Alexander Soros, had posted a coded message advocating the assassination of a re-elected President Trump.

The basis was that Soros’s post carried a picture of a bullet hole and a hand holding $47. But those pictures came from a story in the Atlantic, about falling crime rates, that Soros was linking to in the post.
‘Millions of illegals’

On at least one occasion, the Gateway Pundit was quoted in the group because it was amplifying the claims of another major source of disinformation for A22: Elon Musk.

The Gateway Pundit article posted to the chat in January was titled “JUST IN … Elon Musk Rips Mark Zuckerberg for Funding Illegal Voting Vans in 2020 Election”. It highlighted Musk’s false claim that Zuckerberg’s funding of county-level voting apparatuses in 2020 was illegal.

As elections approached, AFPP members added more of Musk’s pronouncements into the stew of disinformation on the site, with a particular emphasis on anti-immigrant material.

On 7 September, as rightwing actors stoked panic about Haitian immigrants, @AFPP_US posted a link to a Musk post quote-posting a video of Harris addressing the need to support Haitian migrants with the comment: “Vote for Kamala if you want this to happen to your neighborhood!”

On 29 September, the AFPP lead account linked to a Musk post that claimed “Millions of illegals being provided by the government with money for housing using your tax dollars is a major part of what’s driving up costs”.

On 1 October, the @AFPP_US account shared an X post in which Musk asserted that “if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election”, and wove that claim into a narrative resembling the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, claiming that “Democrats are expediting” the conversion of “illegals” to citizens in an attempt to make America a “one-party state”.

The Guardian reported in 2021 that a separate AP3 website leak, which exposed the paramilitary organization’s membership list, showed that at that time members included serving military and law enforcement officers.

In August, ProPublica reported on an earlier leak of AP3 materials from the same source, showing that AP3 had carried out vigilante operations on the Texas border, and had forged close ties with law enforcement officers around the country.

Beirich said that chatter monitored by the organization has obsessively focused on the narrative of illegal immigrants voting in a “rigged” election. “Non-citizens voting is the big fraud that they’re talking up,” she said.

Earlier this month, Wired reported that the current leak showed evidence of plans to carry out operations “coordinated with election denial groups as part of a plan to conduct paramilitary surveillance of ballot boxes during the midterm elections in 2022”.
Trump backer calls Harris the ‘antichrist’ as he waves crucifix onstage at New York City rally
Justin Rohrlich
Sun, October 27, 2024

David Rem, seen on Sunday at Donald Trump’s MSG rally. During his speech he refered to Kamala Harris as the antichrist (REUTERS)

A friend of Donald Trump’s referred to Vice President Kamala Harris as “the devil” and “the antichrist,” drawing an ecstatic roar from the MAGA-hatted crowd that filled Madison Square Garden on Sunday.

Queens resident David Rem, a 60-year-old sanitation worker who was billed as the former president’s “lifelong friend,” but apparently first met him just two weeks ago, gesticulated with a crucifix while delivering a particularly manic address, telling the crowd at Madison Square Garden that “the cross that I’m holding is the cross that my mother… used to hold in the air when she prayed at night, every night, for Donald Trump and his family, because we knew three years ago that he was going to be, his life was going to be attempted to kill [sic], because they don’t want Donald Trump at the ballot box.”

David Rem, seen on Sunday at Donald Trump’s MSG rally. During his speech he refered to Kamala Harris as the antichrist (REUTERS)

Rem — who was reportedly arrested in 1992 for transporting 18 kilos of cocaine from Los Angeles to Chicago, but is now “reformed,” according to an associate — told the New York City audience “they” will stop at nothing to eliminate Trump from politics, then offered his linguistic services during the nine remaining days before voters head to the polls.

“I just want to tell President Trump that I’m fluent in Spanish, and I will follow you to the swing states and I will speak in Spanish to the voters, and I will make a difference,” Rem proposed.

Trump needs Latino voters, according to Rem, who said the bloc would “switch this election for your favor.”

David Rem offered to travel to swing states with Donald Trump and translate for him (AP)

“And I just want to drop an announcement here,” Rem shouted in summation. “I’m gonna, I decided I’m gonna make a run for mayor of New York City. Please go to David Rem, D-A-V-I-D-R-E-M for mayor…. And I want to say, ‘I love you, President Trump. I love your entire family. They give you nothing but grief and to the fake media out there who… won’t back Donald Trump. I love you, Donald.”

He then signed off, declaring, “God bless America! And God bless the United States of America!”

In May, Rem was interviewed by right-wing network Real America’s Voice, telling host David Zere that shaking Trump’s hand was his mother’s “last dying wish.”



Wisconsin’s critical Senate race devolves into bitter feud as GOP targets partner of gay senator

Manu Raju and Haley Talbot, CNN
Sun, October 27, 2024

Sen. Tammy Baldwin seemed to be in a comfortable spot in August.

The Democratic incumbent was leading in the polls and favored to hang onto her seat. Her GOP opponent, Eric Hovde, CEO of a $3 billion bank, was on the defensive after tens of millions in Democratic attacks over his vast wealth and past comments. And she had a new nominee atop the Democratic ticket, with Kamala Harris injecting fresh energy into one of the nation’s most evenly divided battlegrounds.

But then the GOP zeroed in on a new line of attack. In the run-up to Election Day, Republicans have put a spotlight on Baldwin’s same-sex relationship and the career of her partner. And Baldwin, who became the first out gay senator when elected in 2012, has been on the defensive.

Since August, Hovde and GOP groups – including a super PAC linked to his brother – have cut no fewer than eight ads in a multimillion dollar campaign accusing Baldwin of a conflict of interest because her partner of six years, Maria Brisbane, is a financial adviser for high-end clients, a charge lacking proof and one Baldwin strongly denies.

As Republicans say the attack is fair game, Democrats see a dog whistle, noting that questions are rarely raised about girlfriends of male senators.

“I think he is,” Baldwin told CNN when asked whether she believed Hovde is trying to remind voters that she’s gay.

Hovde pushed back.

“Oh, come on, I could care less whether she’s gay,” Hovde said in an interview. “I mean, this is a ridiculous question.”

The Wisconsin Senate race has devolved into one of the most personal and nastiest affairs in the country. The seat is one of eight battlegrounds that Democrats are fighting to hold as Republicans try to win control of the Senate. And the race is now locked in a dead heat. If Democrats lose Wisconsin, they have almost no shot at holding on to power in the Senate.


Senator Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat from Wisconsin, during a campaign event with US Vice President Kamala Harris, not pictured, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, on Tuesday, July 23, 2024. - Daniel Steinle/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesMore

Hovde has worked to align himself with former President Donald Trump to shore up GOP support to eke out a win against a longtime incumbent who is revered by the progressive left.

The race has featured fierce debate between the two candidates over a range of hot-button issues, including abortion rights, immigration and the economy. But with the divided electorate here polarized in the Trump era, Hovde has leaned heavily on the culture wars in his closing argument, attacking Baldwin over transgender policies and homing in on the senator’s partner’s work in an effort to bring GOP voters and right-leaning independents into the fold.

“The one that you’re in is always the hardest race,” Baldwin said when asked to rank her battle against Hovde against her past campaigns. She first won a House seat representing Madison in 1998. “And it’s a very divisive time. I don’t see as many ticket-splitters as I’ve seen in the past. I certainly am hoping for some, but I think it is a different type of race.”

The GOP ads focused on Baldwin’s relationship often stress that Brisbane is Baldwin’s “girlfriend” and demand that the senator disclose her partner’s assets, something required only for spouses under Senate rules — not for girlfriends or boyfriends.

“Baldwin’s in bed with Wall Street,” a woman, sitting in her kitchen, says in one Hovde ad.

Asked if she should disclose her partner’s clients to avoid any appearance of impropriety, Baldwin said that was out of bounds.

“If I was dating a doctor, should they disclose their patients? I mean, come on,” Baldwin said. “Just, stay out of my personal life. I disclose everything that I’m legally required to disclose.”

Hovde’s wealth and California ties

Hovde could be one of the richest senators – if not the richest – if he’s elected. After growing up in Madison and attending the University of Wisconsin, Hovde helped build his family’s real estate empire and took ownership of $3 billion Sunwest Bank.

Hovde’s exact net worth is unclear because Senate rules only require disclosure of a range of assets. But he has at least $195 million in assets, according to public records.

Asked if he’d reveal his specific net worth, given his demands that Baldwin disclose information about her partner, Hovde declined.

“No, I’m not going to get into that,” he told CNN, as he declined to also say how much of his own cash he will ultimately pour into the race. He’s dropped $20 million of his own money into it so far.

And Hovde demurred when asked if he believed his vast wealth could be a liability.

“Why would that be a liability?” he asked.

“I’m out of touch?” Hovde said of the Democratic attacks. “I go to work every day with the people of Wisconsin.”

Hovde hasn’t committed to selling his bank if he’s elected — a point that Democrats have seized on to argue he could face conflicts of interest if he does not.

He also has faced Democratic attacks over a $7 million home he owns in Laguna Beach, California, and his ties to Orange County, California. Hovde was named by Orange County Business Journal as one of the 500 most influential people of the year between 2018-2020.

“And I like to remind Wisconsinites, we have a Green County, we have a Brown County, Wisconsin,” Baldwin said. “We do not have an Orange County, Wisconsin.”

Hovde said the attacks are unfair, noting he lives in Madison off Lake Mendota and that he has only spent about three months a year in Laguna Beach over the past five years.

“She went total scorched earth, trying to tell people I’m from California,” Hovde lamented. “And I’ve had my home, my residence, not even a mile away down here on Lake Mendota.”

But it’s Hovde’s past comments that have gotten him in hot water as well – some of which he made in his unsuccessful Senate primary bid in 2012.

Among the comments: Hovde saying there should be “consequences” for poor personal choices like eating unhealthy food and for being obese and that those individuals’ health insurance “is going to cost more.” The comments are now a key part of Baldwin’s attack ads against Hovde, asking: “What’s wrong with this guy?”

Asked last week if he still believes that overweight individuals should pay more for health care, Hovde said: “I’ve backed off that view” and noted that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has helped inform him about the potential dangers of the food supply.

“We want to encourage people to make good choices,” said Hovde, who developed multiple sclerosis at the age of 27. “But I’ve really come to appreciate how much our food supply is causing a lot of our health problems in our country.”

Eric Hovde speaks during the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on July 16. - J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File


Baldwin’s 2009 comments on an ex-partner resurface

Despite the aggressive attacks against Baldwin’s partner, Hovde says that he is the one who has been unfairly targeted.

“I started this race talking about issues,” he insisted.

Yet it’s the huge influx of GOP cash that has helped changed the tide of the race. Even as Democrats are poised to outspend the GOP for the cycle in Wisconsin since the start of the year, Hovde and his allies have spent $51 million on air from October 1 through Election Day, compared with $39 million for Democrats over that same timeframe. And a sizable chunk of that late money has focused on GOP attacks over Baldwin’s partner’s work.

In the latest line of attack, Republicans are spotlighting resurfaced comments from 2009 when Baldwin was a congresswoman and testifying as she pushed a bill to give federal employee benefits to domestic partners. At a hearing, Baldwin said she should have to disclose her domestic partner’s financial information.

“Surely, the public interest would require that these obligations apply also to partners of gay and lesbian officeholders,” she said at the time.

Asked to reconcile her previous position with her current situation, Baldwin said there was a distinction between her current and past relationship. Previously, she said, she was in a domestic partnership. And now, she and Brisbane are still dating, though they own a condo in Washington together. They bought the condo in 2021 for $1.3 million.

“So I don’t particularly want to talk about my past life, but we had a domestic partnership law here in Wisconsin, and my ex and I were legally domestic partners,” Baldwin said when asked about her 2009 remarks. “That’s not the case in my current situation.”

To push back against Hovde’s attacks, Baldwin has gone on air to call the ads accusing her of a conflict as “a complete lie” and also noted she has pushed a bill that would restrict stock trading of senators and their spouses. Asked why that bill shouldn’t apply to her partner, Baldwin said there’s a difference.

“Yeah, I think that the distinction has always been clear,” Baldwin said. “And if you’re dating someone, you don’t have to disclose their finances. If you’re married to someone you do, and that’s a clear line, and I think it’s very appropriate.”

Baldwin then pointed to questions about whether Hovde would continue to own his bank if elected.

“I disclose everything I’m required to,” she said. “I think he’s also trying to distract from his sort of judgmental weaknesses. …. Think of him on the Banking Committee, setting regulations for banks. I mean, this is a horrifying conflict of interest that I think he wants to deflect attention from.”

Asked about his ads that say that Baldwin is “in bed with Wall Street,” Hovde said: “Well, one of my design or ad guys created that, yeah. And the point is, have you seen her ads on me?”

But when asked about his own ties to the financial sector, Hovde said: “I don’t have a problem if you have connections to Wall Street. But don’t sit here and run for 26 years trying to say ‘I’m fighting against Wall Street’ while you’re taking massive money from Wall Street.”

CNN’s Morgan Rimmer, David Wright and Max Rego contributed to this report.

AMERIKAN OLIGARCH

Musk isn’t the first tycoon to flirt with a foreign dictator. History hasn’t been kind.

Derek Robertson
Sat, October 26, 202

Elon Musk just vaulted himself into some troubling historical company.

A bombshell report from The Wall Street Journal Friday morning revealed that Musk has secretly been in regular contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin for the past two years.

Musk might pitch himself to Americans as an avatar of the future, electrifying the car industry and leading humans to a sci-fi future on Mars. But the way he relates to geopolitics has unsettling echoes in America’s past, putting him in the company of business figures whose international misadventures have almost always been a black mark on their historical records.



At times the government has been able to rein them in. This time, it might not be possible.

Seasoned diplomats and government watchdogs were aghast at the report of Musk’s relationship with Putin, especially given Musk’s possible appointment to an ambiguous-but-sweeping role in a second Trump administration.

It’s unavoidable for international business leaders to have contact with foreign leaders, said Richard Stengel, an undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs under President Barack Obama.

This first appeared in Digital Future Daily, POLITICO’s afternoon newsletter about how tech and power are shaping our world. Subscribe here.

Musk’s relationship with a global pariah like Putin, however, carries another level of risk.



“This in particular is just much more sinister,” Stengel said. He called the report that Putin implored Musk not to activate Starlink service over Taiwan as a favor to Chinese President Xi Jinping “really dicey business.”

(Neither SpaceX nor X returned a request for comment on the report, or on Musk's relationship with Putin.)

This might be norm-busting for a contemporary CEO, but Musk’s move has clear precedent in the behavior of tycoons of another generation, whose vast empires and outsize egos led them to write their own scripts on the global stage.

“Musk’s wealth is immense by historical standards, comparable to Carnegie and Rockefeller, so there aren’t too many points of comparison,” said Mark Wilson, professor of history at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte.

Musk’s use of his business empire to cultivate close ties with a brutal dictator actually is reminiscent of one Rockefeller — David, the head of what was then called the Chase Manhattan Corporation (and later of the Council on Foreign Relations) who in the 1970s tried to make nice with the deposed Shah of Iran and the perpetrators of the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

Then there’s Henry Ford, the paradigm-shifting carmaker with whom Musk is most often compared. Before Ford became the face of World War II-era isolationism, he embarked in 1915 on an ill-fated personal mission aboard his “Peace Ship” to stop World War I — an effort unsupported and unaligned with the administration of President Woodrow Wilson, who heard Ford’s pitch for the endeavor but declined to sponsor it.

“Every crackpot and nut in the country wanted to get on that boat,” a Brooklyn Eagle reporter noted at the time. Ford ultimately abandoned the trip out of fear for his company’s reputation, but he would remain active in anti-war politics, for a time heading up the isolationist America First Committee.

One pattern seems to be that moguls don’t mind sitting down with dictators if it prevents a conflict. Ford notoriously received emissaries and awards from Nazi Germany. William Randolph Hearst, in 1934, visited Hitler in Berlin, in a quixotic attempt to communicate American views of the Nazi regime to its leader.



According to the Journal’s reporting, Musk has been cultivating a direct personal relationship with one of the few world leaders on the Treasury Department’s blacklist, on which Putin sits aside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad.

Whatever their ideological sympathies for history’s butchers, Ford, Hearst and Musk’s efforts all share a Pollyannaish belief that ruthless men with ambitious, complex geopolitical goals can be pacified if only they could just sit down and talk. It’s a worldview that only a man not used to hearing the word “no” might embrace, as when Ross Perot launched a batty mission to send the mercenary Bo Gritz into Southeast Asia to “rescue” POWs from the Vietnam War.

It’s also one of the primary critiques of Trump’s approach to foreign policy.

Sometimes there can be backlash. Perot didn’t canoodle with dictators, but his freelancing infuriated the Reagan administration all the same — and just a few months later, the Army canceled a massive contract with his Electronic Data Systems.

For Musk, it’s not clear that kind of repercussion is even possible. Plenty of information technology firms existed at the time to make up Perot’s contracts. But there’s only one company with the size and expertise to launch missions to the International Space Station, provide satellite internet access in crucial global war zones and break new ground by landing humanity’s first reusable rocket. And Musk controls it.

That means the American government is in a far trickier position than it was with any of these past moguls in putting a leash on his one-man diplomacy. (A Pentagon spokesman told The Wall Street Journal “We do not comment on any individual’s security clearance, review or status, or about personnel security policy matters in the context of reports about any individual’s actions.”)

“If this was any other contractor, it would be looked into by the agency … but the question about Musk is, is he ‘too big to fail?’” asked the former undersecretary of state Stengel.

DESANTISLAND

DeSantis machine battles $100M ‘yes’ campaign in Florida’s abortion nail-biter

Nathaniel Weixel
Sat, October 26, 2024



The campaign to pass a ballot measure enshrining abortion rights in Florida’s Constitution has raked in cash in recent months, giving it a massive financial advantage over the opposition with days until votes are counted.

But abortion-rights advocates are running into a political buzz saw as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and his allies in the administration deploy levers of government power to try to stop the amendment from passing.

Backers of the amendment say DeSantis’s heavy-handed efforts are a brazen misuse of taxpayer funds and show just how high the stakes are in the state, where a law signed last year makes abortion illegal after about six weeks.

The political group Floridians Protecting Freedom has raised more than $100 million for the measure since it launched in April 2023, including $17.2 million in a single week in early October.

The political committee launched by DeSantis to oppose the measure has raised only about $6.3 million total.

Ten states are voting on abortion amendments this year. Opposition to abortion-rights ballot initiatives from conservative state lawmakers and activists has been a hallmark of this election cycle.

But supporters of Florida’s amendment said what’s been happening in their state is different.

“What we are seeing is an incredible pushback from our government in terms of just our freedom to have a free and fair election,” said Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida.



Chris Melody Fields Figueredo, executive director of the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, said there has been a steady increase in efforts “to undermine the will of the people” and sabotage progressive ballot measures over the last few years.

“What’s happening in Florida this year is definitely unprecedented. And I would say non-stop,” Fields Figueredo said.

In Florida, ballot measures must undergo a review by the state Supreme Court. The DeSantis administration unsuccessfully argued earlier this year to stop the measure from qualifying for the ballot.

In recent weeks, the opposition has gone all in. And it may be working. Support for the amendment has fallen in recent months, with most polls showing it just short of the 60 percent threshold needed. A poll at the end of July had it at 69 percent.



A Republican-controlled state panel added a financial statement beneath the question on the November ballot, stating that the amendment could cost the state money because of lawsuits.

Then last month, the state agency in charge of running Florida’s Medicaid program launched a website attacking the amendment. At least three public agencies have aired television and radio ads against the measure.

The state Department of Health threatened local television stations that had run an ad supporting the amendment, and a state election police unit visited residents’ homes as part of a fraud investigation into the signature-gathering process months after the measure was approved.

“The reality is that we’re seeing taxpayer dollars weaponized against us right now,” said Lauren Brenzel, campaign director for Yes on 4.

“We don’t know what state resources are being wasted on this campaign, so we’re not getting too comfortable at any moment,” she added. “Right now, unfortunately, as a taxpayer in Florida, we’re all funding an attempt to try to keep Florida’s extreme abortion ban in place.”

Kelly Hall, executive director of the Fairness Project, said the $100 million raised by the “yes” campaign may seem like a lot, but much of the early spending went to ensuring the measure made it onto the ballot.

“I don’t want the narrative that our campaigns are awash in cash to be the impression across the map,” Hall said. “You often see higher fundraising numbers from our proactive campaigns that our opponents do not have to spend, especially when it is taxpayer funded elected officials who are leading the charge so often on trying to keep us off the ballot or battling against us on the airwaves.”

Hall also noted Florida is the most populous state with an abortion ballot amendment this year. The “yes” campaign is spending far less per registered voter than those in smaller states like Montana or Nebraska, she said.

DeSantis has been crisscrossing the state this week with a group of anti-abortion doctors to campaign against the amendment. He’s called it fraudulent and a bait-and-switch that would allow abortion up until birth.

During a rally in Jacksonville on Tuesday, he said the state Supreme Court made a “mistake” by allowing it on the ballot.

“The whole idea is to try to jam this through with a blizzard of lies,” DeSantis said. “And these are things you don’t get a mulligan on. Once it’s in the constitution, there really is no going back.”

DeSantis signed the six-week ban into law just before he launched his failed presidential campaign. Progressives and Republicans speculated the governor is likely eyeing another national campaign and needs to reassert his authority in the state.

“Amendment 4 flies in the face of the DeSantis agenda,” Fields Figueredo said. “That’s really what is at stake here.”

A Florida GOP strategist said it’s important for DeSantis to show conservatives he fought for a hard-line anti-abortion position.

“Obviously, if he’s able to make this stand, and he wants to run for president, he’s going to gain a big chip with pro-life allies,” the strategist said.

“But also, if you’re the governor of the state and you want to be seen as being effective, you certainly don’t want to be slapped down for something that you’ve worked hard for since the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade. I don’t think any governor wants to be told no.”

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 


Liz Cheney blasts Trump as 'depraved,' 'unstable,' claims pro-life and pro-choice women rallying behind Harris

Alex Nitzberg
Sun, October 27, 2024 

Former Rep. Liz Cheney, who is backing Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024, blasted former President Donald Trump as "unstable," "depraved," and "cruel" during an appearance on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday.

Cheney also suggested that former Trump administration figures who have been speaking out against Trump, like former White House chief of staff John Kelly, "know" that Trump "has no conscience," and is "erratic," "chaotic," and "cruel."

The former congresswoman, who identifies as pro-life, also claimed that since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, some states put laws in place that prevent women from obtaining "life-saving care." She asserted that there have been situations in which physicians are unsure whether the care a woman requires has been criminalized under state law.

Cheney said that there are pro-life and pro-choice women rallying behind Harris so that they never find themselves in a scenario "where either their own life is at risk, where they can't have babies in the future."

She also appeared on CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday morning to share similar thoughts, including the view that Trump lacks a conscience.

Cheney said that she thinks Donald Trump has ushered "violence … into our politics in a way that we haven't seen before."

When CBS News' Margaret Brennan asked Cheney how she set aside her pro-life views and chose to vote for Harris, Cheney responded, "I don't think it's about putting convictions aside. I think it's about looking at the reality on the ground of what's happened since Roe was overturned."

Cheney was one of the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Later that year, she was ousted from her role as House Republican Conference Chair.

She was one of the House Republicans who served on the House Select Committee that probed the Jan. 6 episode.

While Cheney is a vociferous Trump critic, Trump is also an outspoken Cheney critic.

Trump has referred to Cheney as "Muslim-hating warmonger Liz Cheney," "Crazed Warhawk Liz Cheney," and he has called her "a low IQ War Hawk."

Original article source: Liz Cheney blasts Trump as 'depraved,' 'unstable,' claims pro-life and pro-choice women rallying behind Harris


'Pro-Life' Liz Cheney Urges People To Vote For Harris For 'Life-Saving' Health Care

Paige Skinner
Sun, October 27, 2024 

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) urged people to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris to make sure women have “life-saving health care” and said the overturning of Roe v. Wade is “uniting women who are pro-choice and pro-life.”

“You have pro-life women all across this country who have been watching what’s happened in places like Texas and places like North Carolina, where since Roe was overturned, you had laws put in place at the state level that are preventing women from getting life-saving care,” Cheney said on Sunday’s episode of “State of the Union.”

She continued: “You have women like me, who have been pro-life, are saying, ‘What we have seen happen cannot stand.’”

She referenced the attorney general of Texas suing for the medical records of women who have sought abortions out of state, calling out that former President Donald Trump, who took credit for the overturn of Roe v. Wade, won’t make his medical records public.

At the beginning of September, Cheney announced she would vote for Harris, and a few days later called Trump “depraved” and said that reelecting him would be an “unrecoverable catastrophe” for the country. Cheney was also the vice chair of the Jan. 6 committee that investigated the coup attempt in 2021, in which Trump was charged with trying to overturn the 2020 election results.


Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris holds a town hall event with former Congresswoman Liz Cheney Oct. 21. Sara Stathas for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Cheney seems to be walking back her anti-abortion stance. After Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, she praised the decision, saying she has “always been strongly pro-life.”

Last week, Cheney campaigned with Harris in Wisconsin, where she said Trump is a “threat” on democracy.

“You don’t have to take my word for it, but look at what people closest to Donald Trump are saying about him,” Cheney said. “We’ve never faced a threat like this before, and I think it’s so important for people to realize this republic only survives if we protect it, and that means putting partisan politics aside and standing up for the Constitution and for what’s right and loving our country.”

Along with Harris, Cheney has also endorsed Democratic Rep. Colin Allred for Senate in his race against Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

Progressives upset Kamala Harris is campaigning with Liz Cheney: report

Hanna Panreck
Sat, October 26, 2024 


Some progressive Democrats are upset with Vice President Kamala Harris' decision to lean on Liz Cheney in the weeks ahead of the election, suggesting the vice president should focus more on her Democratic base.

"The truth of the matter is that there are a hell of a lot more working-class people who could vote for Kamala Harris than there are conservative Republicans," Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT., told the Associated Press.

Cheney, an anti-Trump Republican, has appeared on the campaign trail with Harris several times. Other progressive leaders, such as Sanders or Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have been "relegated to low-profile roles," according to the AP.

"She has to start talking more to the needs of working-class people," Sanders told the AP. "I wish this had taken place two months ago. It is what it is."


CNN's Jake Tapper asked Bernie Sanders on Sunday why VP Kamala Harris was campaigning with Liz Cheney and not him.

"There’s been an odd disconnect between the campaign’s economic populist ad strategy and the event strategy that focuses almost exclusively on Liz Cheney kumbaya optics that depress the base right as voting begins and don’t provably win more swing voters than bread-and-butter issues," Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, told the AP.

However, Green praised the Harris campaign for focusing their ads on grocery prices and economics.

Joseph Geevarghese, the executive director of the progressive group Our Revolution, told the AP that 10% of progressives might not vote for Harris and warned some might vote for Trump.

"We just want to raise a red flag. Don’t take the progressive movement for granted," Geevarghese said. "There’s got to be an economic argument at the end of the day. That’s the No. 1 thing that matters to voters."

Sanders was pressed by Jake Tapper on Sunday about why Harris was out campaigning with Cheney, as opposed to himself.

"What does it say that Kamala Harris is starting this week with only 16 days left, campaigning with Liz Cheney, a very conservative former congresswoman, daughter of Dick Cheney, obviously, but she has not yet held a public campaign event with you, arguably the leader of the progressive movement in the United States?" Tapper asked.

Sanders said that it had to do with "people really disgusted with Trump’s constant lying with his attempt to prevent the first peaceful transition of power" and his "undermining of American democracy."

Sanders has campaigned for Harris but has not appeared with the vice president on the trail.

The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.




Gen Z vows to ‘cancel out’ their parents’ votes in new presidential election TikTok trend

A recent survey from NBC News found that Harris has a strong lead among Gen Z voters.

Brooke Kato
Sat, October 26, 2024 

With the presidential election just 10 days away, a new TikTok trend is helping get Gen Z to the polls.

Zoomers are making viral videos vowing to fill out their ballot to “cancel” votes cast by their parents.


While most of the TikTok creators don’t disclose which candidate they’re voting for, several have said they’ll be casting their ballot for Kamala Harris in order to “cancel out” their parents’ votes for Donald Trump.

A recent survey from NBC News found that Harris has a strong lead among Gen Z voters.


In true Gen Z fashion, the TikTok savvy generation has ushered in a new trend just in time for the 2024 election. The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Just a dad & daughter duo off to cancel out each other’s votes,” wrote one creator, who clocked up millions of views with her clip.

“Going to cancel out my parents’ vote today,” TikTok user Abigail Grace declared beneath a video that showed her dolled up for the voting booth.

While votes can’t technically be canceled out, Gen Z is bragging about casting a vote for the opposite candidate that their parents, partners or pals are voting for. Anadolu via Getty Images

While the act of “canceling out” votes may initially seem toxic, the light-hearted trend implies families can make it through the divisive election season.




First-time voter McKenzie Owens, 19, told NBC News that the trend can make others realize “that people can co-exist even though nowadays politics can also drive people apart.”

The Pennsylvania Gen Zer, who posted about “canceling” her boyfriend’s vote online, declined to disclose who she will be voting for in this election but said she and her partner are able to respect each other’s views.


Becca Puga joked online that she had to “cancel out” her dad’s ballot with her vote in Utah. Tiktok/@noitsbecca_

Becca Puga, a 28-year-old Utah resident, also joked online about canceling her father’s ballot, said he would find the trend “funny,” not offensive.

“Although they are very conservative, very Christian, they raised me to have my own thoughts and values, and they give me space to do that,” Puga told NBC News. “So when I posted that, I wasn’t worried about any family member seeing it, because my dad would think that that’s funny.”

Some users, however, and putting their own spin on the trend. Instead of boasting about “canceling” opposing votes, they’re boasting that they’re on the same political page as their family members or partners.

Survey data shows that Gen Z voters favor Harris over Trump in the 2024 election. Anadolu via Getty Images

“Leaving the polls except neither of us canceled each other’s votes out,” wrote on creator named Jess, who captioned the clip, “Cancelling my fiances vote out??? Couldnt’ be me.”

“Voting against your partner? Couldn’t be us,” TikTokker Alexis Voss wrote in the caption of her video.

“Cancel out votes? Cancel that marriage, sis lol,” joked one commenter.

“My kids dad is voting opposite my vote. That’s when I decided I no longer wanted to be with him. Cancelling out votes is crazy to me,” chimed in another viewer.

“Marked safe from having my husband cancel out my vote,” Florida resident Robin Nickell wrote on TikTok, praising her husband for voting for Harris and Tim Walz and calling him “a dream.”

The 49-year-old told NBC News that the pair have always “aligned on political views.”

Authoritarianism Expert Breaks Down Donald Trump’s Madison Square Garden Rally

Lee Moran
Updated Mon 28 October 2024

Authoritarianism Expert Breaks Down Donald Trump’s Madison Square Garden Rally

Authoritarianism expert Ruth Ben-Ghiat delivered a damning critique of former President Donald Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City on Sunday.

The history professor at New York University, who has warned extensively of the dictatorial threats posed by the Republican presidential nominee, used X (formerly Twitter) to comment on multiple controversial moments at the event.

When speakers claimed that “they” (without explaining who “they” actually were) had tried to assassinate Trump, she responded: “The purpose of this is to conjure a threat environment sufficient to justify authoritarian action if they win. Old trick of those planning coups as well.”

To Trump’s claim that non-supporters are “the enemy from within,” Ben-Ghiat wrote: “Where have I heard this before.”

“And there we have it: pure Fascism,” she said of another speaker saying there has to be a 100 million vote landslide victory for Trump and that “we need to slaughter this other people.”

And to the speaker calling 2016 Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton a “sick son of a bitch,” she said: “Violence misogyny and racism are now the brand of the GOP. This is the apotheosis of Trump’s Fascistic use of rallies to radicalize followers so they will be ready to follow the leader and commit violence on his behalf.”

Read HuffPost’s full report on the rally here.

Trump Singles Out Dems Again as ‘Enemy From Within’ at NYC Rally

Althea Legaspi
ROLLING STONE
Sun 27 October 2024


Donald Trump looked to go big in the final full week until Election Day with a rally at New York City’s Madison Square Garden, which gave him a large venue (capacity: 19,500) to attract not just a big crowd, but national attention when seven battleground states are in play. During his speech, he drove home his closing arguments in the race to the finish line with his oft-repeated unfounded claims, including that the U.S. is an “occupied country” due to alleged migrants taking over, and he railed on transgender people playing sports.

He also invoked his baseless “enemy from within” claims against the Democrats as well as the press.

Trump made the claim after rambling on about President Joe Biden not being smart and saying his Democratic opponent in the election Vice President Kamala Harris “means nothing,” adding that “She’s purely a vessel. That’s all she is.” He inexplicably said, “she’s becoming more MAGA than those politicians I told you about,” though it’s unclear to whom he was referring.


“We need very smart people. We’re running against something far bigger than Joe or Kamala and far more powerful than them, which is a massive, vicious, crooked, radical left machine that runs today’s Democrat Party. They’re just vessels,” he said. “In fact, they’re perfect vessels, because they’ll never give them a hard time. They’ll do whatever they want.”

“I know many of them. It’s just this amorphous group of people, but they’re smart and they’re vicious, and we have to defeat them,” he continued. “And when I say the enemy from within, the other side goes crazy, becomes a salvo — ‘Oh, how can he say’… No, they’ve done very bad things to this country. They are indeed the enemy from within. But this is who we’re fighting. These are the people who are doing such harm to our country with their open border policies, record-setting inflation, green new scam, and everything else that they’re doing. But we’re not going to let it happen any longer.”

In a conversation with CNN‘s Jake Tapper on Sunday morning before the rally, Trump’s VP running mate J.D. Vance denied that Trump’s “enemy within” rhetoric was referring to the Democratic Party. “He did not say that, Jake,” Vance responded when Tapper asked about Trump’s words. “He said that he was going to send the military after the American people? Show me the quote where he said that.” (During a Fox News town hall earlier this month, Trump specifically pledged to use either the National Guard or the military against “the enemy within,” whom he described as “radical left lunatics.”)

The Democratic Party is not the only “enemy” for Trump. As he’s said many times previously, he also places the press in that camp — a profession whose freedom is protected by the Constitution’s First Amendment, in case Trump needs reminding. While in the midst of calling Harris a liar, saying she lied about working at McDonald’s, without any evidence, and claiming she’s said he doesn’t want fracking, without evidence, he went after the press.

“One thing I have been — even the enemy, because they are the enemy — what they’ve said, even that enemy too, and they’re really the enemy. They’re the enemy of the people, the press, they said one thing about me that I consider a great compliment,” he said. “They said this guy is the most consistent person we’ve ever seen, because I’ve been against cars and car factories being taken out of Detroit and being taken out of our manufacturing, of automobiles being taken out of our system, out of our country for years.”

These are far from the first times he’s appeared eager to shut down democracy in pursuit of his openly authoritarian vows and his extreme policy agenda. Among the many examples, on Thursday in Las Vegas, he used similiar “enemy of the people” talk, saying of the media: “they sort of have a death wish.” Following an assassination attempt on him in July, his allies tried to bully Democrats and the media to stop discussing his fascist rhetoric. He’s also recently proposed a fascist plan to deploy military forces against U.S. citizens who oppose him on Election Day, just to name a few. Earlier this week, even his former Chief of Staff John Kelly said the former president fit “into the general definition of fascist.”

Trump’s MSG appearance on Sunday made sense for a man who appears to have dictator ambitions and seems to view himself as some sort of rock star, seeking to be adored by fans, drawing large crowds, and appearing to feed off enthusiasm from attendees, performing better when he gets that. Unfortunately for him, when it comes to the music realm, several rock stars have not felt a mutual kinship with him, sending cease-and-desist letters for him using their music without their approval. Still, he drew the likes of Dr. Phil, Hulk Hogan, and other celebrities to tout him before he took the stage.

The appearance was in the former president and GOP presidential nominee’s hometown, a solidly blue area where he’s been indicted and found liable of sexual abuse and defamation. Trump has been venturing into blue territory for recent stops as the election has drawn closer, though not to great results. At his rally in Coachella Valley in California, Trump threatened to withhold wildfire aid if Gov. Gavin Newsom doesn’t bend to his whims about the state’s water issues, should he win.




Donald Trump Tells Madison Square Garden Rally That Political Rivals Are The “Enemy From Within”
Ted Johnson
Sun 27 October 2024 at 7:21 pm GMT-6·3-min read




Speaking to his Madison Square Garden rally this evening, Donald Trump revived his attack on Democrats as “the enemy from within,” despite efforts earlier in the day by his running mate, JD Vance, to try to clarify what he actually meant.

“We’re running against something far bigger than Joe or Kamala, and far more powerful than them, which is a massive, vicious, crooked, radical left machine that runs today’s Democrat party,” Trump told the crowd. “They’re just vessels. In fact, they’re perfect vessels, because they’ll never give them a hard time. They’ll do whatever they want.”

More from Deadline

Bad Bunny Backs Kamala Harris, Shares Video Of Her Talking About Her Plans For Puerto Rico


Dr. Phil Endorses Donald Trump At Madison Square Garden Rally


Stevie Nicks Says Not Getting An Abortion Would Have "Destroyed" Fleetwood Mac

Trump added, “I know many of them. It’s just this amorphous group of people, but they’re smart and they’re vicious, and we have to defeat them. And when I say the ‘enemy from within,’ the other side goes crazy…They’ve done every bad things to this country. They are indeed the enemy from within.”

In a Fox News interview last week, Trump suggested using the military to handle the “enemy from within” on Election Day, as he railed against “far left lunatics.” He later said that Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff were examples of the “enemy from within.”

Earlier in the day, Trump’s running mate, JD Vance appeared on CNN’s State of the Union with Jake Tapper and claimed that Trump was talking about using the military to handle those who rioted.

Another guest, Liz Cheney, responded to Vance’s comments and told CNN, “What we just watched is what it looks like when someone has got to go through just unbelievable contortions to try to find a way to defend the person that J.D. Vance himself called America’s Hitler.”

Last week, Trump’s former chief of staff, John Kelly, spoke out in an interview with The New York Times, saying that he was disturbed by the former president’s “enemy within” remarks. He told of moments when Trump praised Adolf Hitler, and said that the former president “falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure.”

Trump’s rally rivaled the Republican National Convention in the number of MAGA stars who appeared, including Hulk Hogan and Tucker Carlson. Unlike the RNC, First Lady Melania Trump made remarks, as Elon Musk and Robert Kennedy Jr.

But the event also was notable for its extreme and even racist rhetoric, including remarks made by a comedian, Tony Hinchcliffe, who said that Puerto Rico was a “floating island of garbage” and talked of he and a Black friend having “carved watermelons” together.

He also said of Latinos, “They love making babies, too. Just know that they do. There’s no pulling out. They don’t do that. They come inside, just like they did to our country.”

Trump’s remarks were carried by the major cable news networks, but CNN and MSNBC eventually cut away.

The Democratic National Committee projected the words “Trump Praised Hitler” on the side of Madison Square Garden, while the Lincoln Project hosted a conversation with Marshall Curry, the director of the 2017 short A Night at the Garden, about the 1939 Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden.

Deadline






Trump Doesn’t Hold Back at Hate-Filled Madison Square Garden Rally

Zachary Folk
Sun 27 October 2024 at 9:03 pm GMT-6·5-min read


Michael M. Santiago


Former President Donald Trump played the hits at a sold-out rally at New York City’s Madison Square Garden—railing against migrants, inflation, and complaining about the Justice Department’s investigations into him, after a marathon rally featuring bristling speeches from MAGAworld’s biggest stars.

“I would like to begin by asking a simple question—are you better off now than you were four years ago?” the former president asked a cheering crowd of fans at the Midtown arena, who chanted “No!” back to him. The Trump campaign reportedly sold out of tickets for the 19,500 capacity arena, which is typically the home of the New York Knicks and the New York Rangers.

“I am here today with a message of hope for all Americans. With your vote I will end inflation. I will stop the invasion of criminals from coming into our country and bring back the American Dream, we need the American Dream to come back home. Our country will be bigger, better, bolder, richer, safer, stronger than ever before.”

Trump used the rally to advocate for some new tax policies, including a tax credit for “family caregivers.” The policy mirrors a similar one proposed by Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, which would extend Medicare to cover the cost of in-home health care.

“It’s about time that they were recognized,” Trump said. “They add so much to our country, but they’re never spoken of ever, ever, ever. But they’re going to be spoken of now.”

However, much of the Republican nominee’s subsequent speech was filled with fear—demonizing his opponents and portraying the country he ran only four years ago on the brink of collapse.

“Over the past four years, Kamala Harris has orchestrated the most egregious betrayal that any leader in American history has ever inflicted upon our people,” Trump said. “She has violated her oath, eradicated our southern border, and unleashed an army of migrant gangs who are waging a campaign of violence and terror against our citizens. There has never been anything like it, anywhere in the world for any country.”


The speech followed an hours-long rally featuring some of Trump’s loudest celebrity supporters, including Hulk Hogan, Tucker Carlson, and Elon Musk. An early opener, comedian Tony Hinchcliffe, bombed on stage after calling Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage,”—remarks that were broadly condemned by both Republicans and Democrats. Lawmakers including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville were also in attendance.

In the weeks leading up to the rally, Trump faced fierce criticism from some of his former staffers. Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Trump, called Trump “fascist to the core,” veteran journalist Bob Woodward reported. John Kelly, his former chief of staff, told The Atlantic that the former president praised some of Adolf Hitler’s policies and the military generals serving in Nazi Germany.

Trump denied Kelly’s accounts, and has sought to portray the two men as disgruntled ex-employees.

But critics were quick to draw comparisons between Trump’s event and the notorious Nazi rally held at Madison Square Garden by the German-American Bund in 1939, on the eve of World War II. While the rally was underway, the Democratic National Committee projected the message “TRUMP PRAISED HITLER” on the side of the arena.

Some of the speakers addressed the comparison head-on. “I don’t see no stinking Nazis in here,” Hogan proclaimed. “I don’t see no stinking domestic terrorists in here. The only thing I see in here are a bunch of hardworking men and women that are real Americans, brother.”

Also in his speech, Trump bragged about the record-breaking early voting numbers reported in swing states. The early data available just shows how many registered Republicans, Democrats, and independents have voted in some states—not who those voters selected.

“We are leading every one of the swing states, all seven of them,” Trump still claimed. “We usually get them from behind, because Republicans like to vote on a thing called Election Day.”

When talking about the “weaponized” Justice Department, Trump thanked New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat elected in 2021. Adams was indicted on charges of bribery in September.

“Mayor Adams has been treated pretty badly,” Trump said. “I think they upgraded his seat in an airplane. That’s a very serious charge. I don’t know, maybe it was something else. But I have to tell you he’s been really great.”

Sunday’s event was not the first time Trump headlined an event in his home state this campaign season. In September, the former president spoke at the Nassau Coliseum on Long Island. “We are going to win New York,” he insisted to a crowd of supporters at the New York Islanders’ stadium. Trump lost the state in both 2016 and 2020.

On Sunday, Trump was similarly adamant about winning over the city where he was born. “We want to win our country, but we also want to win New York—and make it safe and strong and beautiful and affordable and vibrant again,” Trump said, before promising to work with the city’s mayor and governor to accomplish the somewhat vague goal.

As Trump concluded his speech, a singer took the podium to belt out a rendition of the theme from New York, New York as the former president and first lady smiled at the cheering crowd.