Thursday, October 31, 2024

UK
‘A proper Labour Budget’: MPs, unions and readers overjoyed at NHS and NMW cash – but some fear for public services
Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivers the Autumn Budget 2024. Photo: Lauren Hurley / DESNZ via Flickr.Share this article:

“Lots of messages in my Constituency Labour Party WhatsApp saying they are looking forward to canvassing this weekend much more now,” one MP told LabourList in the immediate aftermath of Labour’s first Budget since 2010.

Labour’s £70bn hike to public spending over the next five years – and the tax hikes and borrowing that will fund it – may ruffle feathers on the right, but it has given many on the left a spring in their step after more than a decade of austerity – and months of gloomy messaging from ministers.

One new MP dubbed it a huge success, “nowhere near as gloomy as people were predicting  – a proper Labour budget”.

The New Statesman‘s George Eaton called it a “redistributive statement”, The Times’ Patrick Maguire dubbed it “workerist”, and the MP Melanie Ward said charts like the below showed “the difference that a Labour government makes”:

LabourList readers and unions impressed by the Budget

More than half of around 200 readers who voted in our informal snap poll rated the Budget “better than expected”, and less than one in 10 said it was “worse than expected” – albeit partly reflecting just how bleak Labour’s pre-Budget messaging had been.

Around two-thirds said they felt “positive” or “very positive” about the Budget, with fewer than one in five “negative” or “very negative”.

Among the most common words used by those who left comments about what they liked most were “tax”, “investment”, “NHS”, “housing”, the minimum wage and “spending’.

Some 58% said it struck the right balance between tax, spending and borrowing.

Several unions also welcomed the Budget’s tax hikes, with the Fire Brigades Union welcoming the windfall tax on oil and gas and VAT on private school fees . The TUC’s Paul Nowak said tax rises ensured “much-needed funds”, and those with broader shoulders paying “a fairer share”.

Unite’s Sharon Graham called it a “misstep” that Reeves had not gone further to “ensure the super-rich pay their fair share”, however, through a 1% tax on the richest 1%.

MPs delighted by minimum and living wage hike – and small business support

Luke Akehurst.

Every MP LabourList spoke to shortly after the Budget highlighted the significance of the record hike to the national minimum and living wages.

“In July, I stood on a manifesto pledge to Make Work Pay. This 6.7% rise in the National Living Wage and a record rise in the minimum wage for 18-20 year olds will put money in the pockets of more than 8000 low paid workers in my area of Fife,” said Ward, MP for Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy.

County Durham MP Luke Akehurst made a similar point about the thousands of his constituents who would benefit, noting it meant a £1400 boost for a full-time worker.

Chris Webb, MP for Blackpool South, said it would be “massive” for constituents who “count the pennies”, and the rise was big enough to have real cut-through.

“What I was really pleased by, and never thought possible, was the lower rate rise for younger workers – the amount who have told me they feel exploited, they’ll find moving towards parity hugely welcome.”

Beccy Cooper, new MP for Worthing West, said such measures made this the “first Budget in over a decade that is unambiguously on the side of working people”.

There was also contentment among several MPs about Labour balancing out such measures with some support for firms.

Webb, chair of the all-party parliamentary group on hospitality and tourism, said Labour’s tax measures to support hospitality and leisure firms, as well as some relief for smaller firms from its employer NI hikes, were welcome too. “It shows Labour is pro-business as well as pro-worker, and it puts investment into the high street.”

He said retailers locally would similarly welcome investment in tackling shoplifting, with small firms telling him “crime is one of the biggest issues”.

Paddy Lillis, general secretary of the large Labour-affiliated shopworkers’ union Usdaw, agreed. He said measures would “help save our shops and retail jobs” to ensure job security alongside a welcome “path to a genuine legally binding real living wage”.

NHS cash ‘just what first-time Labour voters wanted’

One new MP in a marginal seat said the £22.6bn investment in the NHS was “just what people who voted for us for the first time in 2024 will want to see – and we’re only getting started”.

That and wider investment in the economy put “the wind in the sails of the government as we press on with our mission of change”.

Another MP made a similar point that it is a “Budget that supports what people value in their community”, through not just NHS investment but also cash for schools and support for high streets and pubs.

Labour leader Keir Starmer and Blackpool South Labour candidate Chris Webb.
Labour leader Keir Starmer and Blackpool South Labour MP Chris Webb.

Cooper, a public health doctor by background, said she was “particularly delighted” by the NHS funding, calling it a “transformational increase”.

“I hope to work closely with colleagues on a plan to move the NHS from hospital to community, from analogue to digital, from treatment to prevention,” she added.

Webb said it was “vital” for areas like Blackpool, with local A&E services often overstretched amid huge deprivation, severe mental health problems and millions of visitors each year to the seaside town. “It’ll make a huge difference,” said the MP, previously chair of a mental health charity.

Graham said extra cash was “much needed”, and changes Unite had called for to the “borrowing straitjacket” for were “welcome”.  She said scanners “need people to use them”, however, noting NHS recruitment challenges.

Miners’ pension funding and school breakfast club cash win praise

Several MPs singled out a tripling in funding for school breakfast clubs and support for former miners for praise, in two moves likely to benefit many Labour MPs’ constituents in more deprived areas.

“I’ve argued for years we should turn the page on a system that’s not working for so many communities, particularly post-industrial ones – and this Budget’s a step towards that,” said Hemsworth MP Jon Trickett.

“I particularly welcome in my constituency the decision on the miners’ pension scheme, putting significant money into the pockets of those who did so much to produce the wealth of this country.”

Akehurst also added: “I am particularly pleased that former mineworkers will receive £1.5bn of money that has been kept from their pensions. This will mean substantial pay-outs for many of my North Durham constituents.”

Concerns over public services and two-child cap

Photo: Mark Pinder

Some 27% of LabourList readers said the Budget didn’t strike the right balance between tax, spending and borrowing, however – and argued Labour should be taxing more to fund services.

Almost half of those polled said the Chancellor should have done more to raise funds through taxes on wealth, on top of measures announced such as inheritance tax and capital gains tax hikes.

Trickett said that extra funding for public services was “welcome”, but said there was still “a lot more to do” overall.

He noted the Budget’s implications for every department’s budgets beyond several highlighted by the Chancellor – such as health, education and defence – were not immediately clear from her speech.

“Some neutral observers are saying its eye-wateringly tight, and it does look it.”

The Labour-affiliated FBU’s general secretary Matt Wrack said increased public spending should “ease some pressures”, but the government must go “further and faster”, saying fire and rescue services had lost 30% of their funding from central government since 2010.

The Public and Commercial Services Union’s general secretary Fran Heathcote claimed the Chancellor “seems to have given with one hand while taking away with the other” by including a 2% savings target for departments alongside a 1.7% increase in cash.

One MP also said they were “disappointed” not to hear more said on child poverty or compensating WASPI women, warning campaigners on the latter – protesting outside Parliament today – were “not going away”, and that the two-child cap row could rumble on for another year. Not signalling some progress on the two-child cap is a “huge misstep”, they added.

But another MP was much more positive about public spending overall, adding: “The weeks of stories beforehand suggested massive cuts to public services and spending, instead we have a Budget for long-term economic growth and which gets to work rebuilding our services and infrastructure.”

Ward noted that Labour had delivered the “largest funding settlement for the Scottish Government in the history of devolution”, putting the onus on the Scottish Government to now deliver “desperately needed improvements in the Scottish NHS”.

Who key Budget policies are aimed at – and the electoral strategy they signal


Rachel Reeves prepares for the Autumn Budget 2024. Photo: Kirsty O'Connor / Treasury via Flickr
Rachel Reeves prepares for the Autumn Budget 2024. Photo: Kirsty O’Connor / Treasury via Flickr

The Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ Budget today gives one of the biggest signs yet of Labour’s electoral strategy over the coming years.

It also comes hot on the heels of a Downing Street staffing shakeup intended to give the governnment more political edge.

Here are what some of the key policies appear to be aimed at, and what they signal about Labour’s political priorities:

Prioritise the NHS as voters’ key test of Labour’s success

The NHS has been key to Labour messaging around the Budget. Reeves today announced a £22.6bn increase in day-to-day health spending and £3.1bn in capital spending, calling it the largest investment since 2010 (outside Covid).

She said funding and reform would bring down waiting lists and “move towards” waiting lists being no longer than 18 weeks and delivering on manifesto pledges of 40,000 appointments a week.

Reeves notably chose this week to visit a hospital on Monday too, and told journalists: “We will be known as the government that took the NHS from its worst crisis in its history, got it back on its feet again and made it fit for the bright future ahead of it.”

Labour has ploughed a huge amount into public services, with £70bn extra spending a year over the next five years, funded through measures including £36bn in tax hikes and £32bn in borrowing.

It could have chosen to spread cash more evenly among government departments, though – and the level of focus on the NHS signals senior strategists think it’s on healthcare where most voters will either most want progress or most notice a lack of it in the coming years.

Recent polling seems to vindicate that idea politically:

Screenshot

While improving education isn’t that high on that poll at least, the £6.7bn pledged for education capital projects could reflect having the most state-educated cabinet ever. It could also reflect a sense new or repaired school buildings will be a highly visible signal to many parents that Labour is fixing the public realm, with New Labour similarly investing significantly in school buildings.

Extra funding for special educational needs support budgets, devastated in recent years, will also help not just unitary authorities in deprived Labour-leaning urban areas, but also many similarly cash-strapped county councils in wealthier and poorer areas alike ahead of local elections next year.

Note how high reducing “waste in government spending” is too on that voter priority list – that may partly explain measures announced like a new covid corruption commissioner and chair of the new Office for Value for Money. There was also a promise of a “new approach to public service reform” alongside cash. There is also a crackdown on fraud in our welfare system”.

The latter is unlikely to go down well on the left given how much the Conservatives whipped up public scepticism about benefit claimants – which is probably why Reeves hastily said fraud is “often the work of criminal gangs”.

A left agenda for working people – and employers will have to lump it

Tough questions from journalists over the definition of ‘working people’ may have caused ministers headaches in recent weeks, and Labour may have ditched some of its more radical policies in recent years, but make no mistake – making workers substantially better off remains absolutely central to Labour’s agenda.

No. 10 chief of staff Morgan McSweeney is said to be a strong believer it’s crucial to Labour’s broad election-winning coalition. Joe Biden’s troubles in the US have also cemented the sense economic growth is not enough – as both Starmer and Reeves said this week, “change must be felt”. There’s a reason that most of the New Deal – now rebranded Make Work Pay – has survived the cull of more contentious policies in recent years.

So it’s no surprise it’s central to Budget messaging:

It’s no surprise that Labour has stuck to its pledge of no national insurance or income tax hikes for workers, and vowed not to extend the freeze on tax thresholds, despite speculation about the latter – and despite the taxes being such a large potential source of much-needed revenue.

It’s no surprise Labour has significantly hiked the minimum and living wages, too: Reeves confirmed that the living wage will rise by 6.7 percent,

Given Reeves’ need for revenue to avoid the Tories’ real-terms spending cuts, she’s instead opted for significant hikes to employment national insurance (up 1.2 percentage points to 15%) and a lower threshold it’s paid at, plus a hike to capital gains tax (the lower rate will rise from 10% to 18%; the higher rate from 20% to 24%).

That signals a Labour party much more willing to face down intense business lobbying than many of Keir Starmer’s critics on the left might think – and than Starmer and Reeves let on themselves in the run-up to the election.

There may be a political battle to stop the employer NI hikes undermining its messaging though, as Bloomberg’s Alex Wickham notes:

Perhaps sensitive to how many small (as opposed to large) businesses owners there are in Britain though, and how much many voters care about their high streets, Reeves notably raised the NI allowance for employers, taking 850,000 organisations out of paying it altogether.

Meanwhile the 40% relief on business rates for retail, leisure and hospitality will be extended, and small business multiplier be frozen. Reeves also pledged tougher action on shoplifting, which will make many shopkeepers and retail workers cheer.

Hammer home Tory blame game for floating voters

Political anoraks may tire of Labour’s relentless repetition of attacks on the Tories for their legacy, but there’s an old saying that once journalists get bored of a message, it’s probably only just starting to cut through.

Senior figures know their best bet for getting the public and media to acquiesce in the £40bn Reeves confirmed in controversial tax hikes – to fund public services crying out for investment – is to lay the blame squarely on the Tories.

Hence Reeves spending the first chunk of her Budget attacking the “broken public finances” inherited, and accusing the Tories of hiding “hundreds of unfunded pressures”.

For good measure, Reeves similarly tried to buy the government some further time to fix “broken public services”, highlighting the grim state of school buildings, NHS waiting lists, pollution and prisons “overflowing”.

Rule changes and savings to reassure markets over borrowing hike

Governments rely on investors buying up bonds to fund much of their spending, and past Labour governments and Liz Truss alike have paid the price for market fears about unsustainable spending and inflation, which raises borrowing costs.

So reaassuring investors Labour can be trusted is  key for Reeves, particularly when official figures suggest her revised fiscal rules will mean a £32bn-a-year hike in borrowing – one of the biggest leaps in decades.

Her new “stability rule” – imposing even tougher debt reduction targets than the Tories had on day-to-day spending, and pledging to bring it down within three years, not five – is a clear bid to do just that.

So is confirming too that Labour will implement Britain’s fiscal watchdog’s recommendations and a new Charter for Budget Responsibility.

Perhaps her 2% productivity, effiicency and savings target for each government department has the same intent – even if it won’t endear Reeves to her cabinet colleagues.

The Treasury will hope such moves help to counterbalance investor worry over Labour’s “investment rule”, which allows Labour more leeway to borrow for longer-term projects by redefining government debt.

A pitch for aspiring homeowners – as wealthy ones pay the price

Labour’s manifesto includes plans to get Britain building again (Photo: @Keir_Starmer)

Other notable pledges include £5bn on its housing plans, including £3.1bn to increase housebuilding, and funds to recruit more planners, remove more cladding and make the government’s mortgage guarantee scheme permanent for first-time buyers with low deposits.

That could reflect how important senior figures think aspiring homeowners, or recent buyers hoping to upsize, are to their electoral coalition. Age was a key factor at the last election, and the move will be welcomed by many younger voters.

The funding, and a wider boost to local government budgets, are a win for deputy PM Angela Rayner too after years of local government funding squeezes – and be welcomed by Labour councillors nationwide.

Given how many more MPs in marginal seats Labour now has in slightly better-off areas with often-higher house prices, perhaps the home ownership focus should also come as no surprise.

Reeves effectively declared war on second-homeowners as well by raising the stamp duty surcharge they pay from tomorrow – and  explicitly said it could help more than 100,000 people to buy their first home or move in the next five years.

Meanwhile inheritance tax changes – often spurned by governments worried about alienating better-off older voters or the newspapers they read – could hit some wealthier homeowners hard.

That said, the voter targeting has a limit – with Reeves not extending a wider stamp duty discount that expires early next year.

Fending off Farage and the Tories on fuel, defence and pints

Pre-Budget speculation of fuel duty hikes came to nothing – as Reeves confirmed the current temporary 5p cut will endure for another year.

With low-traffic neighbourhoods under fire in recent years and newspapers regularly championing drivers, there was always a risk someone like Nigel Farage used any fuel duty hike to whip up anti-Labour sentiment.

It was a fuel tax rise that sparked the yellow-vest movement in France, sparking wider unrest and a sense among many drivers the French government didn’t represent the interest of people like them.

Similarly, a cut to draught duty lets Reeves claim there’ll be “a penny off a pint”, depriving Farage of another potential campaign given other drinks taxes are set to rise. A pledge of extra defence spending also helps shore up Labour against the Tories and right-wing press questioning, as ever, how far it can be trusted on defence.

That said, the raising of the bus fare cap, like the winter fuel cuts, could prove a continued thorn in the government’s side that Labour’s opposition left and right exploit in the weeks and months to come.

5 key takeaways from Labour’s first budget in 14 years
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

Chancellor Rachel Reeves laid out her plans to rebuild Britain once more, as she set out Labour’s policies to repair public services, help those struggling to make ends meet and repair the economy.

Today was a day many in the Labour Party had been waiting for. Labour’s first budget in 14 years and the first ever delivered by a female Chancellor.

Following 14 years of stagnant wages, falling living standards and poor productivity, after the Tories took a wrecking ball to the economy, today was the day that the Labour government set out its plans to repair public finances, grow the economy and deliver for working people.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves laid out her plans to rebuild Britain once more, as she set out Labour’s policies to repair public services, help those struggling to make ends meet and repair the economy. So, what are the key takeaways from Reeves’ budget? We take a look at five of them below:

1.Labour gives a pay boost to millions of working people with a 6.7% rise in minimum wage

The Labour government has announced a pay boost for millions of working people with a 6.7% rise in the minimum wage. The minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour next year.

The minimum wage for over 21s, known officially as the National Living Wage, will rise from £11.44 to £12.21 from April 2025. For someone working full time, or a 37.5 hour week, that equates to £23,873.60 a year, up from £22,368.06.

For 18 to 20-year-olds, the minimum wage will rise from £8.60 to £10. This means someone on a 37.5 hour week would earn £19,552 a year, up from £16,815.

Apprentices will also benefit, with their pay rising from £6.40 to £7.55 an hour.

As a result of the increase in the minimum wage, more than 3 million low-paid workers are in line for a pay rise.

2. Compensation schemes for the victims of the infected blood and Post Office Horizon IT scandals

The Chancellor also announced funding for compensation schemes for victims of the infected blood and post office scandals, announcing £11.8bn for victims of infected blood scandal and their families, and £1.8bn for victims of Post Office Horizon scandal.

Reeves argued that while the last government had apologised for the infected blood scandal, it had failed to budget at all for compensation payments.

3. NHS budget increases

After more than a decade of being neglected by the Tories, Reeves also announced a £22.6bn increase in the day-to-day health budget, and £3.1bn increase in the capital budget. That includes £1bn for repairs and upgrades and £1.5bn for new beds in hospitals and testing capacity. She said: “This is the largest real terms growth in day to day NHS spending outside of Covid since 2010.”

4. More money for schools and education

The budget for free school breakfast clubs will be tripled to £30m, in 2025 and 2026. The core budget for schools will also rise by £2.3bn next year.

Reeves also announced that there will be a £6.7bn increase in capital funding for school building.

5. Capital gains and inheritance tax changes

Rachel Reeves also announced changes to capital gains and inheritance tax. Capital Gains tax will be increased. The lower rate will be raised from 10% to 18%, while the higher rate will rise from 20% to 24%.

The government will extend a freeze on the threshold for inheritance tax, allowing £325,000 to be inherited tax free.

There will be tax raises worth £2bn from reforming reliefs for business and agricultural assets. After £1m, those assets will attract inheritance tax of 20%.

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward




Chart shows how poorest households gain most, while wealthiest pay most after Labour’s budget

Today
Left Foot Forward


With economists and analysts still digesting Labour’s first budget in 14 years, one thing is becoming increasingly clear, those on lower incomes stand to benefit the most while the wealthiest households will pay the most.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves set out plans yesterday to get Britain’s economy growing again, investing in public services which had been neglected under the Tories.

Labour announced a 6.7% hike in the minimum wage, which will benefit millions of low-paid workers, while the budget also saw a £22bn increase in the day-to-day budget of the NHS. Other measures included committing to the largest increase in Carers allowance since it was introduced in 1976, more money for our schools and compensation for the victims of the infected blood and Post Office Horizon IT scandals.

While right-wing papers bemoaned tax rises, which include changes to capital gains and inheritance tax, a chart produced by the Treasury shows how the poorest households stand to gain most from the policies contained in the budget, while the wealthiest households will pay the most.



Analysis of the policies in the Treasury impact assessment report states: “Increases in spending on public services, such as health and education, benefit households on lower incomes the most. The distributional analysis published alongside the Budget shows that on average, households in the lowest income deciles in 2025-26 will benefit most from the policy decisions as a percentage of net income and increases in tax will be concentrated on the highest income households. Overall, on average, all but the richest 10% of households will benefit as a percentage of income from policy decisions in 2025-26.”

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward



How trade unions responded to the budget

Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

"Today's budget is a vital first step towards the growth, jobs and living standards working people desperately need."



The Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves today delivered her first budget since Labour entered government earlier this year. Being Labour’s first budget in 14 years, it has naturally attracted significant public discussion and reaction from across the political spectrum.

The UK’s trade unions are among the organisations to issue extensive responses to the budget. And, in general, the budget has been welcomed by the labour movement.

Giving an overall verdict on the budget, the GMB union’s general secretary Gary Smith said: “After 14 years of chaos and failure, it’s great to see a serious budget that focuses on the big issues facing our country.

“Much needed money for schools, including SEND, hospitals and a hefty wage rise for millions of low paid workers is something to be celebrated.

“And, there is good news on investment in hydrogen and carbon capture and storage. But, the government must get moving on other key infrastructure projects too – starting with a new nuclear power station at Sizewell.”

In a statement, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) called the budget a ‘vital first step’ towards growth. The statement read: “Today’s budget is a vital first step towards the growth, jobs and living standards working people desperately need.

“The Chancellor was dealt a terrible hand by the Conservatives – economic chaos, falling living standards and broken public services. But with today’s budget she has acted decisively to deliver an economy that works for working people.

“Tax rises will ensure much-needed funds for our NHS, schools and the rest of our crumbling public services, with those who have the broadest shoulders paying a fairer share. The Chancellor was right to prioritise hospitals and classrooms over private jets.

“There is still a lot more work to do to clean up 14 years of Tory mess and economic decline – including better supporting and strengthening our social security system. But this budget sets us on an urgently needed path towards national renewal.”

Public service workers’ union UNISON likewise praised the budget. UNISON assistant general secretary Jon Richards said: “The chancellor’s vision shows economic stability can be restored by investing in the NHS, schools, care and local councils.

“Good quality, well-funded and sufficiently staffed services are essential for a healthy, highly skilled and well-supported population.

“The last government hid the true state of the country’s finances, leaving public services in tatters. No one should have to put up with long delays for treatment, dilapidated schools, roads full of holes, community facilities sold off to prevent councils from going under or a lack of support when their elderly relatives need care.

“By putting up the minimum wage and ending the freeze on tax thresholds, the government has shown it understands the pressures working families face.

“Asking those with deeper pockets to pay more is the right thing to do. Decent public services can’t be delivered on the cheap. It’s important to spend to invest in the UK’s future.”

On specific elements of the budget, the verdict has been more mixed. The move to raise the minimum wage by 6.7 per cent has been welcomed by many in the trade union movement. Paddy Lillis – the general secretary of the shop workers union Usdaw – said: “Usdaw very much welcomes these significant pay increases for the lowest paid, after a three-year long cost of living crisis under the Tories.

“We are pleased that Labour’s new remit for the Low Pay Commission has resulted in progress towards delivering a statutory real living wage and started on the road to ending rip-off youth rates.

“Usdaw has consistently campaigned for a legal minimum hourly rate of over £12 per hour, so we are pleased to see that achieved within months of Labour being elected. We are now looking for a roadmap to achieve £15.”

Paul Nowak – the TUC general secretary – made similar comments. He said: “The TUC wants to see a £15 minimum wage as soon as possible – but this is an important step forward. When low paid workers get a pay rise, we all benefit, because that money goes straight back into local communities.”

However, some unions were critical of other elements of the budget.

The UCU – which represents teaching staff in universities and colleges – has criticised the lack of funding for universities. Jo Grady, the union’s general secretary, said the budget was ‘thin gruel’ for the higher education sector. She said: “Today’s Budget is thin gruel for those working in universities. Employer national insurance rises will hit the sector hard when higher education is already on its knees. Universities are crying out for increased public funding to secure their future as Britain’s last world-leading sector, yet the Chancellor failed to deliver.

“There will be no decade of national renewal if the government’s approach to universities continues to be one of de facto disinvestment. This is not a matter of special pleading: a properly funded higher education sector is a foundation stone of economic growth”

Meanwhile, civil servants’ union PCS, expressed concern about the impact efficiency savings on government departments will have on public services. The union’s general secretary Fran Heathcote said: “The Chancellor seems to have given with one hand while taking away with the other.

“By announcing a 2% ‘productivity, efficiency and savings target’ for all government departments, she appears to be wiping out the 1.7% real terms increase in departmental spending. This is concerning at a time when the vital public services our members work so hard to deliver are crying out for real investment.”

Image credit: Lauren Hurley / DESNZ – Creative Commons


How Green, Independent, Lib Dem, SNP and Plaid Cymru MPs responded to the budget

Chris Jarvis
Yesterday

MPs on the left have responded to Labour's budget




MPs from across the political spectrum have been responding to the first Labour budget in 14 years announced by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves today.

Here’s a quick rundown of what parties on the left have said about Labour’s budget.

The Green Party

While the Greens have praised some elements of the budget, they’ve been critical of it overall, with the party’s co-leader Carla Denyer saying that Reeves delivered ‘half measures’. She tweeted: “We needed a Budget to build a fairer society and a greener economy. The chancellor had the option to fund our future by taxing the super-rich. Instead, today we have a set of half-measures, some positive, but a #Budget2024 that gives with one hand and takes away with the other.”

Delivering heavier criticism, the party’s other co-leader Adrian Ramsay argued that the budget fails to address the climate and ecological crises. He said: “Yet again, a Chancellor delivers a budget which makes absolutely no mention of the two biggest crises facing us – climate breakdown & nature degradation We will not *restore stability & rebuild Britain* if the natural world we all depend on is ignored”.

Meanwhile, Green MP Sian Berry criticised the level of funding given for active travel infrastructure. She said: “Rachel Reeves has only allocated £100 million extra to cycling and walking infrastructure: a fraction of what was needed. A failure to invest in Labour’s commitment to safer roads, cleaner air, healthier people and a healthier planet.”
Independents

A number of independent MPs have also released comments on the budget.

The Independent Alliance – a group of independent MPs which includes the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn – were heavily critical of the budget, branding it a ‘missed opportunity’. In a statement, the five MPs said: “Today’s budget was a missed opportunity to bring about the transformative change this country needs.

“These crises demand bold solutions. The government could have implemented wealth taxes to bring about a more equal and sustainable society. Instead, it has chosen to bake in decades of inequality by feigning regret over “tough choices” it does not have to make.”

The statement went on to criticise the inclusion of additional military spending in the budget, the retention of the two-child benefit cap and the cutting of the Winter Fuel Allowance. It continued by arguing for water and energy to be brought into public ownership.

Liberal Democrats

Like the Greens, the Liberal Democrats have welcomed some aspects of the budget while being outspoken on others.

The party’s leader Ed Davey said: “I’m glad that the Chancellor has listened to Lib Dem calls for more investment in the NHS to start repairing all the damage done to local health services by the Conservatives. But the Government is still ignoring the elephant in the NHS waiting room: the crisis in social care.

“I urge the Government to end the dither and delay and begin cross-party talks on social care now. Liberal Democrats will now hold the Government to account on delivering its promises so people can see a GP or dentist when they need to.”

The Lib Dems’ work and pensions spokesperson Steve Darling struck a similar tone, saying: “There’s good news like the NHS funding boost & minimum wage increase, but concerns remain. The bus fare cap hike and NI rise will hit hard-working people and small businesses.”

The SNP


The SNP have similarly welcomed additional funding for the NHS and public services. Stephen Flynn, the party’s Westminster leader said: Commenting on the UK Budget, SNP Westminster Leader Stephen Flynn MP said: “It’s clear the SNP is winning the argument on the need for more investment in our NHS and public services. I welcome those areas where the Chancellor has listened, including the decision to change the Labour government’s conservative fiscal rules to allow for more investment.”

However, Flynn was also critical of the government’s policy on welfare and the decision to increase National Insurance. He said: “The Chancellor’s decision to cut the winter fuel payment will leave around 900,000 Scottish pensioners up to £600 worse off this winter. The decision to keep the two child benefit cap and bedroom tax will push thousands of Scottish children into poverty. And the decision to raise National Insurance will hit low and middle income workers, and small businesses, the hardest.”

Plaid Cymru

Plaid Cymru have also been critical of the budget. Liz Saville Roberts, the party’s leader in Westminster, focussed her criticism on funding for Wales and – like the SNP – welfare cuts. She said: “The Budget will still feel like austerity to many. The Chancellor promised to ‘get to grips with HS2’, but failed to deliver the billions owed to Wales. She kept Tory cuts to welfare, failed to help pensioners keep warm this winter, and failed to scrap the two-child limit.”

Chris Jarvis is head of strategy and development at Left Foot Forward


Image credit: Kirsty O’Connor – Creative Commons


Autumn Budget 2024: Updates and reaction as £40bn tax hikes and huge NHS boost unveiled


Photo: Lauren Hurley / DESNZ

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is unveiling Labour’s first Budget since 2010 today, laying out new spending policies alongside long-promised “difficult decisions” over £40bn tax hikes and departmental spending plans that could define the years to come.

Follow for live updates below as Reeves, the first woman to ever deliver the Budget, gives her speech in Parliament from around 12.30pm following Prime Minister’s Questions, and the Treasury publishes accompanying documents on the small print soon after. (Scroll to 10.50am below to stream live or watch back)

READ MORE: Who key Budget policies are aimed at – and the electoral strategy they signal

“Rebuilding Britain”, fixing the health service, and “protecting working people’s payslips” are the key Labour messages. 

Reeves confirmed the biggest hike to carers’ allowance in decades, a fuel duty freeze, a £25bn-a-year hike to employer national insurance, and compensation worth £11.8bn for infected blood victims and £1.8bn for Post Office scandal victims.

Policies revealed in advance (full list here) include a minimum wage boost, an extended but increased bus fare cap, extra NHS, school and defence funding, and overhauled fiscal rules to boost investment.

Refresh this page for the latest updates, analysis and reaction below from across the Labour movement and beyond.


4.10pm: ‘A proper Labour Budget’

Another new Labour MP has praised the Budget and described it as a “proper Labour Budget”.

They said: “I thought it was a huge success and nowhere near as gloomy as people were predicting.”

4.00pm: Read Rachel Reeves’ speech in full

Photo: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

In case you missed it, you can read all of Rachel Reeves’ Budget speech in Parliament here.

3.50pm: ‘Just what the country needed’

One MP in a marginal seat told LabourList: “This is just what the country needed. Turning a page on 14 years of Tory failure, and putting the wind in the sails of the government as we press on with our mission of change.

“This Budget delivered just what people who voted for us for the first time in 2024 will want to see: investment in the NHS and investment in our economic future. And we’re only just getting started.”

3.45pm: Reeves 1/3 to remain as Chancellor for next Budget

As if it were in any doubt, bookmakers William Hill give the Chancellor Rachel Reeves 1/3 odds on her remaining in post by the time of the next Budget.

A spokesman for William Hill said: “achel Reeves’ daring Autumn Budget – Labour’s first in 14 years – will certainly have divided opinion, but we think the Chancellor has a very strong chance of remaining in her post for the next Autumn Statement in 12 months’ time.”

3.40pm: ‘Government serious about industrial revival’

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak has said that the Budget shows the government is serious about industrial revival and described it as a “step change from the Conservatives who started our nation’s infrastructure of investment”.

He also praised the decision to redefine fiscal rules to allow for greater capital investment and said: “This is common sense – countries that invest in the infrastructure of the future are better off over time. The Chancellor’s approach marks a vital first step towards the good jobs, energy independence and high-quality national infrastructure that the nation urgently needs.”

3.30pm: ‘Budget comes up short for people in fuel poverty’

The End Fuel Poverty Coalition has said that the Budget does not go far enough to help those suffering with energy bills.

Simon Francis, co-ordinator of the organisation, said that the only way to bring bills down permanently is through investment in insulation, home improvements, renewable energy and infrastructure.

He expressed fears that the increase to the Household Support Fund with no adjustment for inflation would see local authorities stretched even further and was disappointed at a lack of support for vulnerable households affected by the means testing of the winter fuel allowance.

Francis said: “What we needed to see in the short term was a restoration of winter fuel payments, an expansion of warm home discounts and reforms to improve and extend cold weather payments. Longer term, the Chancellor also needed to commit to a social tariff providing a unit rate discount on energy alongside existing support.”

3.20pm: ‘Step in right direction, but need for bold measures’

NEC member Jess Barnard has said that the Budget is a “step in the right direction”, but said that, after 14 years of austerity, “we need and expect Labour to deliver bold measures to tackle inequality and to revitalise our public services and infrastructure”.

She said that the hike employer national insurance contributions would “impact millions of workers who are likely to feel the effects of this in wage freezes” and expressed disappointment at the Budget not axing the “cruel” two child benefit cap.

Barnard said: “In short, this is a Budget with some welcome measures, but it falls short of the change we need, to revitalise services, put pay in workers’ pockets and destroy the Tory legacy of rampant inequality.”

3.10pm: £1bn boost for SEN ‘music to my ears’, says new NEC member

3.00pm: ‘A government that finally understands problems and opportunities London faces’

Labour’s Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has welcomed the Budget this afternoon, particularly more funding for Transport for London, social housing, schools and the NHS.

He said: “I am under no illusion about the extent of the economic difficulties inherited by the new Government. This budget is about fixing our economy and public services after more than a decade of mismanagement and decline, and beginning the process of national renewal.”

2.57pm: More in Common reaction to Budget

2.55pm: ‘Decisive shift but more ambition still needed’

The IPPR think tank has said that the government will have to continue ramping up investment and make the tax system fairer over the rest of the parliament.

Interim executive director Harry Quilter-Pinner said that the Budget marks a “decisive, positive shift” for the economy, but said there is more to do on tax reform, especially for high earners.

He said: “Today’s tax reforms have prevented the worst of the planned spending cuts that were inherited from the previous government. But there is more work to do. A wealthy millionaire or billionaire will still be able to pay a lower rate of tax than the average nurse. And the overall spending envelope will still leave some departments with tough decisions to make.

“The new government inherited a terrible economic situation after many years of crisis and mismanagement. Today the chancellor has taken important steps towards building a better Britain. But decades of economic damage cannot be undone in one budget. This must be the start of a decade of national renewal.”

2.50pm: What do the Budget’s policies mean?

As the dust begins to settle following Rachel Reeves’ inaugural Budget speech, it’s becoming increasingly clear what electoral strategy the Chancellor’s announcements point to down the line.

Read post-Budget analysis from LabourList editor Tom Belger here

2.45pm: ‘Enormous relief’

One new Labour MP has said they feel “enormous relief” after the Budget. They told LabourList: “The weeks of stories beforehand suggested massive cuts to public services and spending, instead we have a Budget for long-term economic growth and which gets to work rebuilding our services and infrastructure.”

2.40pm: Budget ‘absolutely superb’ says Labour council leader

A Labour council leader in England has told LabourList they thought the Budget was “absolutely superb”.

Among their highlights included increased funding for local government, especially for social care and homelessness, school breakfast clubs, taking small businesses out of employer national insurance contributions and a “transformational investment” in the NHS.

2.32pm: ‘Our two governments are working together to deliver for Wales’

First Minister of Wales Eluned Morgan has said the Budget shows the benefit of having two Labour governments working in tandem to improve the lives of people in Wales. She heralded the boost in the funding block grant for Wales, the largest in real terms in the history of devolution.

She said: “Over the past fourteen years, the Welsh government has tried again and again to have productive conversations with our UK counterparts. It has been like wading through mud.

“Meaningfully engaging with the UK government in this process shows once again that this UK government respects devolution, and our two governments are working together to deliver for the people of Wales.

“We knew that this Budget, tough choices would have to be made. But Rachel Reeves has set out her plan to fix the foundations of the economy, and look to the future.”

2.29pm: ‘First Budget in over a decade on side of working people’

Worthing West MP Beccy Cooper has said that the Budget “delivers on our promise of change”.

She said: “I am particularly delighted to hear the Chancellor announce a transformational increase in funding for frontline NHS services of £22.6bn. I hope to work closely with colleagues on a plan to move the NHS from hospital to community, from analogue to digital, from treatment to prevention.

“From investment in school breakfast clubs to raising the minimum wage for millions, this is the first Budget in over a decade that is unambiguously on the side of working people.”

2.25pm: Working people tax commitment ‘in place through parliament’, says Jones

Speaking to the BBC, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones has said the manifesto commitment to not raise income tax, VAT or national insurance on working people will last for the duration of the parliament.

He said: “Our promise not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT on working people is a promise that has been honoured today in the Budget, very clearly. They will see that in their payslips.

“That is not just the promise for this Budget, it is the promise for the whole of this parliament – so I can categorically tell you today, we will not be coming back in future Budgets to break that manifesto commitment. It is a commitment that lasts between the last election and the next.”

2.20pm: ‘Significant missed opportunities’, says FBU general secretary

Matt Wrack has praised elements of Rachel Reeves’ Budget but lamented “significant missed opportunities”.

He said: “Firefighters and other public sector workers have faced years of real term cuts to pay since 2010, while frontline services have been starved of funding.

“An increase in the minimum wage and additional funding for the NHS, which is facing its worst crisis in decades as a consequence of Tory cuts, is welcome. So are windfall taxes on oil and gas, and adding VAT to public school fees.

“But there are also significant missed opportunities. Having the lowest corporation tax in the G7 is not something to boast about it – it is a symptom of a broken economic model in which profits are prioritised above the needs and safety of the public.

“While a real-terms increase in day-to-day spending should ease some pressures, the government must go further and faster in rebuilding our broken public services.

“The FBU will fight hard for substantial increases in funding for the fire and rescue service, which has lost 30% of its central government funding since 2010. This must be a feature of the forthcoming spending review. That’s what the FBU expects from a Labour government.”

2.15pm: Full details of Budget published

The “red book” of the Budget has just been published online – you can view it here.

2.10pm: ‘Reeves failed to outline bold, transformative vision’

Left-wing campaign group Momentum has responded to Labour’s first Budget for almost 15 years, accusing the government of failing to outline a “bold, transformative vision to fix Britain”.

A spokesperson for the group said: “We welcome the Chancellor’s decision to raise the minimum wage and increase public borrowing for infrastructure.

“But overall, the Budget fails to outline a bold, transformative vision to fix a declining Britain. Refusing to scrap the two-child benefit cap, cuts to Winter Fuel Payments and lifting the cap on bus fares are damaging and unnecessary political decisions. The government must change course immediately and start standing up for real Labour values.”

2.06pm: ‘Serious budget that focuses on big issues’

Gary Smith, GMB General Secretary, said: “After 14 years of chaos and failure, it’s great to see a serious budget that focuses on the big issues facing our country.

“Much needed money for schools, including SEND, hospitals and a hefty wage rise for millions of low paid workers is something to be celebrated.

“And, there is good news on investment in hydrogen and carbon capture and storage. But, the government must get moving on other key infrastructure projects too – starting with a new nuclear power station at Sizewell.”

2.00pm: First reaction from Labour MPs

We have received some reaction from Labour MPs immediately after the Budget, praising the measures taken despite difficult economic challenges.

One MP described the Budget as a “very strong response to the very difficult economic situation we inherited from the Tories”.

Another praised moves on the minimum wage while protecting SME businesses, as well as the “big boost for the NHS”.

One new MP also told LabourList that she has seen “lots of messages in my CLP WhatsApp saying they are looking forward to canvassing this weekend much more now”.

They added: “I think it’s a Budget that lays the foundation to fix all that has become crumbling after fourteen years of Tory misrule.

“It’s a Budget that supports what people value in their community, like their high street and the local pub, invests in the public services we all care about like our schools and the NHS, takes first steps to fix our broken housing system, and puts more money in people’s pockets while driving long term economic growth.

“It’s a Budget I’m keen to get out on the doorstep and discuss with residents this weekend.”

1.50pm: Labour taking the steps to ‘rebuild Britain’

Rachel Reeves is concluding her Budget address, saying that the government is taking the difficult steps to “rebuild Britain”. She also challenges the Conservatives to explain what they would cut or what taxes they would raise if they disagree with the measures she has taken.

Revees says she has made “responsible choices to protect working people” and restore stability to the economy.

1.48pm: ‘Fixing the foundations’ of the health service

The government has unveiled its plans to grant the NHS more funding in order to “fix the foundations” of the health service. Among the policies announced by the Chancellor include a £22.6bn increase in the NHS’ day-to-day budget, £1bn of capital investment for repairs and upgrades, and £1.57bn of capital investment for new surgical hubs, scanners and radiotherapy machines.

It comes after the new Labour government allocated £1.8bn to cover work by hospitals in England to reduce waiting lists for planned treatment and appointments soon after the general election.

Reeves has said the government will work to cut waiting lists to no more than 18 weeks.

1.44pm: £6.7bn capital investment for education

Reeves has outlined extra investment to improve education, including £2.1m to improve school maintenance.

1.42pm: £100bn in investment via capital spending

Reeves said that the government will invest £100bn of capital spending over the next five years through the change to the government’s fiscal rules.

1.41pm: Bus fare cap to rise

The Chancellor has said that the bus fare cap in England introduced by the Conservatives will continue next year, but at the higher rate of £3. The measure was confirmed by the Prime Minister on Monday, who said that the Tories had only funded the £2 cap until the end of this year. The extension of the scheme will last until the end of December 2025.

Read more here

1.40pm: Increase in funding to tackle potholes

Rachel Reeves has confirmed plans to increase funding to tackle potholes across the country. The new Labour government has allocated £500m in funding to fix roads, helping to deliver on the party’s manifesto pledge to fix one million potholes. Reeves has said the extra cash will come from deferring the delayed A27 bypass in Sussex, which was set to cost around £320m.

1.38pm: HS2 will reach Euston, Reeves confirms

The Chancellor has confirmed rumours that HS2 will reach Euston station, after initial speculation that the rail project could be cut short at Old Oak Common railway station.

1.36pm: £5bn investment for house building plans

Reeves has announced £5bn in investment to support the government’s housebuilding plans over the course of the parliament.

1.31pm: Fiscal rules altered to boost investment

Rachel Reeves has said that the government will change Britain’s fiscal rules in order to open the door to spend more on infrastructure projects and “drive growth in the economy”. She confirmed the move will free up £15.7bn of headroom.

The move was announced last week in Washington, when the Chancellor addressed the International Monetary Fund.

Read more about the change here

1.26pm: Support for local government

Reeves has said there will be an increase in funding to help local councils with the cost of social care and tackling rough sleeping.

She said there will be a real-terms funding increase next year, including £1.3bn for additional grant funding for essential services.

1.24pm: Almost £3bn allocated for defence spending

The Chancellor has confirmed that £2.9bn will be allocated in the Budget for the armed forces. However, some have noted that updated growth forecasts mean that defence spending is actually slightly down as a percentage of GDP.

In July, the Prime Minister committed to spending 2.5% of GDP on defence, with a Strategic Defence Review setting out a roadmap to reaching that target. The Chancellor confirmed that the government intends to reach this target at a future fiscal event.

1.21pm: Tripling investment in breakfast clubs

Reeves has said there will be no return to austerity and unveiled plans to triple investment in breakfast clubs to help young people.

She also unveiled £300m in investment for further education and a £1bn uplift in funding for special educational needs schools.

1.17pm: Income tax and national insurance thresholds will not be frozen, Reeves reveals

Reeves has said there will be no extension of the frozen on income tax and national insurance once they expire in 2028.

She said: “When it comes to choices on tax, this government chooses to protect working people every single time.”

1.15pm: Abolition of non-dom tax regime

Reeves has announced a new residence-based tax scheme and said she will close loopholes made by the Conservative government.

1.15pm: Penny off pints in pubs

Rachel Reeves has announced she will cut draft duty by 1.7%, which she says will shave a penny off the cost of pints in pubs. She also said there will be a 40% relief on business rates for the retail, hospitality and leisure sector.

1.12pm: New duty on vaping liquid

1.10pm: Inheritance tax thresholds remain frozen

Reeves has said inheritance tax thresholds have remained frozen until 2030.

1.08pm: Capital gains tax hiked on shares

The Chancellor has confirmed that capital gains tax on the sale of shares will be hiked, with the higher threshold rising from 20% to 24%. However, the rate for second homes has not been altered.

1.06pm: Rise in employer contributions to national insurance

Rachel Reeves has confirmed that employer national insurance contributions will rise to 15% in April 2025, with the salary threshold where contributions come into force also cut significantly from £9,100 to £5,000. The measure will raise £25bn a year. The employment allowance has been raised from £5,000 to £10,500.

She said: “In the circumstances I have inherited, this is the right choice to make.”

1.04pm: ‘Working people will not see higher taxes’

Rachel Reeves has said the government has stuck to its pledge not to raise income tax, VAT or national insurance on working people.

1.02pm: Fuel duty to remain frozen

Rachel Reeves admits she has had to take “difficult decisions on tax” but said that the fuel duty freeze will remain in place next year amid concerns about the cost of living, costing the Treasury almost £3bn and saving motorists £60 a year.

1.01pm: Carer’s allowance boosted

The Chancellor has announced that the carer’s allowance will be increased, allowing carers to earn more £10,000 a year, “the largest increase in carer’s allowance since it was introduced in 1976”.

1.00pm: Productivity savings target for departments

Reeves has also said the government will work to reduce wasteful spending in government, with a two percent productivity savings target for government departments.

12.57pm: Inflation-busting increase to minimum wage confirmed

Rachel Reeves has confirmed that the minimum wage will rise by six percent, granting millions of workers on low wages a significant pay rise. From next year, the national living wage for over 21s will rise from £11.44 an hour to £12.21 an hour, an increase of 6.7%. She also said the government will move towards implementing a single adult minimum wage, to be phased in over time.

Read more here

12.55pm: Crackdown on fraudsters

Reeves has announced a crackdown on welfare fraudsters, which is forecast to save £4.3bn for the Treasury.

12.53pm: Government to appoint Covid corruption commissioner

Reeves said that the government will soon appoint a Covid corruption minister to recover money paid for dodgy pandemic contracts.

12.45pm: Budget to raise taxes by £40bn

Reeves confirms that the Budget will raise taxes by £40bn. She said that any Chancellor would “face the same reality”.

12.44pm: ‘Tories did not budget for scandal compensation’

Reeves has set aside £11.8bn for those affected by the infected blood scandal and £1.8bn for those affected by the Post Office Horizon scandal, accusing the Conservatives of not budgeting for the cost of the compensation scheme.

12.42pm: ‘Government has inherited broken public services’

Reeves is now talking about the poor state of the country’s public services inherited by the Conservatives and claims they had no plan to improve them or put the nation’s finances on a stable footing.

12.40pm: £22bn black hole in public finances

Reeves is discussing the state of the public finances and repeats how the government uncovered a £22bn black hole, which she claims was covered up by the last government. She quotes an OBR report that said that the government had not disclosed all pressures on public finances, something Reeves as the “height of irresponsibility”.

12.38pm: ‘Deeply proud to be Britain’s first female Chancellor’

Reeves has addressed that she is the first female Chancellor and said that her place should send a message to girls and young women that there is no ceiling to their ambition.

12.37pm: ‘Turning the page’

Reeves said that investment is necessary in order to drive economic growth, and investment requires economic stability. She says it is not the first time the Labour Party has been put in the position to rebuild Britain and said that the government would “rebuild Britain once again”.

12.35pm: ‘Country voted for change’

Rachel Reeves is beginning her address to Parliament by saying the country voted for a “decade of national renewal” and said that her belief in Britain “burns brighter than ever”.

She said that change must be felt with an NHS that is there when you need it and with more pounds in people’s pockets.

12.32pm: Rachel Reeves to take to dispatch box imminently

PMQs has just concluded, with Rachel Reeves expected to take to the dispatch box to deliver her first Budget within the next few minutes. It is hard not to overstate the historic nature of this occasion – not only is this an important moment for the party, but also for the country as the first Budget delivered by a female Chancellor.

12.29pm: Budget ‘potentially era-defining moment’

12.20pm: Budget will deliver change Britain needs, says Nandy

12.10pm: ‘Let this be a sign that there should be no ceiling on your ambitions’

12.04pm: Starmer pays tribute to Sunak

Starmer has thanked Rishi Sunak for his service as they have their final exchange across the dispatch box, thanking him for his decency and wishing him and his family well in whatever he goes on to do next.

12.00pm: ‘Budget to fix the foundations’

11.55am: Who is speaking at PMQs?

Before we have the Budget, we have the weekly clash of Prime Minister’s Questions – the last where Rishi Sunak will be posing questions as leader of the opposition.

The full list of those who will be asking a question to the Prime Minister later is:

  • Katrina Murray (Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch)
  • Meg Hillier (Hackney South and Shoreditch)
  • Rachael Maskell (York Central)
  • Melanie Ward (Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy)
  • Rachel Blake (Cities of London and Westminster)
  • Ben Goldsborough (South Norfolk)
  • Jim Dickson (Dartford)
  • Richard Tice (Boston and Skegness)
  • Alex Baker (Aldershot)
  • Dan Norris (North East Somerset and Hanham)
  • John Slinger (Rugby)
  • Yuan Yang (Earley and Woodley)
  • Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne)
  • Helen Morgan (North Shropshire)

11.45am: Louise Haigh on £3 bus fare cap

Transport Secretary Louise Haigh has heralded the decision of the government to maintain the bus fare cap, albeit at the higher rate of £3. Haigh said that the government is “stepping in to keep fare affordable and protect services”.

11.40am: Ellie Reeves with sister and Chancellor Rachel ahead of Budget

11.35am: ‘Circles of fiscal hell’

The dire state of public finances is absolutely no secret, with Labour’s core messaging ahead of the Budget revolving around fixing the fiscal black hole left by the Tories.

In a thought-provoking piece on LabourList, Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff Sam White looks at the challenges facing the Chancellor by way of a tour through the circles of hell.

11.30am: What taxes do people want to see increased?

According to pollster Ipsos, 71% of voters think it is likely the government will increase taxes in today’s Budget. Their survey found that those polled were more supportive of raising taxes for higher earners, with 48% backing an income tax increase paid on income over £125,000.

11.25am: Business leaders ‘concerned’ ahead of Budget

New polling from Savanta has found that business leaders are feeling anxious and apprehensive ahead of the Budget this afternoon.

The pollster found that one in four business owners and senior leaders (25%) surveyed felt “concerned” about the Autumn Statement, with a similar number (22%) feeling “apprehensive”. A further 12% said they felt “nervous” ahead of the announcement by Rachel Reeves.

However, one in five (20%) said they felt “positive”, with eight percent feeling “excited”.

Matt McGinn, consultant at Savanta, said: “There’s a real sense of concern among business leaders ahead of Labour’s first Budget in 15 years. Our research suggests that the optimism of summer hasn’t just made way for realism, but some pretty apprehensive company leaders.

“In some ways, this is all unsurprising. Labour and everyone else knew there was a challenging financial settlement to contend with in government, and someone had to pay for it. But Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves will likely be concerned how quickly years of goodwill among businesses appears to have dissipated.”

11.20am: Rachel Reeves leaves No 11

Photo: Kirsty O’Connor / Treasury

11.17am: PM says Budget ‘huge day for Britain’

11.15am: What are MPs looking for from today’s Budget?

Speaking to MPs ahead of today’s Budget, there has been an acknowledgement of the difficult choices set to be unveiled in just over an hour’s time. However, some expressed hope around greater investment in healthcare and efforts to build more homes across the country.

One key message that Downing Street will be keen to follow came from one MP, who said the government need to avoid today’s announcement as an “austerity Budget”.

Read more of their thoughts here

10.50am: Watch the Budget live

10.30am: ‘Labour chooses investment over decline,’ says Reeves

10.10am: Local government’s role in boosting growth

Councils up and down the country have been facing nothing short of a funding emergency in recent years, with several declaring bankruptcy over the financial strain. But Luton council leader Hazel Simmons has written for LabourList about what local government can offer Whitehall when it comes to chasing economic growth – it is well worth a read.



Autumn Budget 2024: Read Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ full Budget speech


Photo: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

Madam Deputy Speaker, on July the 4th, the country voted for change.

This government was given a mandate to restore stability to our economy and to begin a decade of national renewal, to fix the foundations and deliver change through responsible leadership in the national interest.

That is our task, and I know that we can achieve it.

My belief in Britain burns brighter than ever and the prize on offer is immense.

As my Right Honourable Friend the Prime Minister said on Monday – change must be felt.

More pounds in people’s pockets, an NHS that is there when you need it, an economy that is growing, creating wealth and opportunity for all because that is the only way to improve living standards and the only way to drive economic growth is to invest, invest, invest.

There are no shortcuts and to deliver that investment we must restore economic stability and turn the page on the last 14 years.

This is not the first time that it has fallen to the Labour party to rebuild Britain.

In 1945, it was the Labour party that rebuilt our country from the rubble of the Second World War.  In 1964, it was the Labour party that rebuilt Britain with the white heat of technology. And in 1997, it was the Labour party that rebuilt our schools and our hospitals.

Today, it falls to this Labour party, this Labour government, to rebuild Britain once again.

And while this is the first Budget in more than fourteen years to be delivered by a Labour Chancellor it is the first Budget in our country’s history to be delivered by a woman.

I am deeply proud to be Britain’s first ever female Chancellor of the Exchequer.

To girls and young women everywhere, I say: Let there be no ceiling on your ambition, your hopes and your dreams.

And along with the pride that I feel standing here today there is also a responsibility to pass on a fairer society and a stronger economy to the next

generation of women.

Madam Deputy Speaker, the party opposite failed this country.

Their austerity broke the National Health Service, their Brexit deal harmed British businesses and their mini-budget left families paying the price with higher mortgages.

The British people have inherited their failure. A black hole in the public finances, public services on their knees, a decade of low growth and the worst parliament on record for living standards.

Let me begin with the public finances.

In July, I exposed a £22bn black hole at the heart of the previous government’s plans.

A series of promises that they made, but had no money to deliver.

Covered up from the British people, covered up from this House.

The Treasury’s reserve, set aside for genuine emergencies spent three times over just three months into the financial year.

Today, on top of the detailed document that I have provided to the House in July the government is publishing a line by line breakdown of the £22bn black hole that we inherited. It shows hundreds of unfunded pressures on the public finances this year, and into the future too.

The Office for Budget Responsibility have published their own review of the circumstances around the Spring Budget forecast.

They say that the previous government – and I quote – “did not provide the OBR with all the [available] information to them” and – had they known about these “undisclosed spending pressures that have since come to light” then their Spring Budget forecast for spending would have been, and I quote again: “materially different”.

Let me be clear: that means any comparison between today’s forecast and the OBR’s March forecast is false because the party opposite hid the reality of their public spending plans.

Yet at the very same budget they made another ten billion pounds worth of cuts to National Insurance.

It was the height of irresponsibility, and they knew it because they had run out of road. They called an election to avoid making difficult choices.

So, let me make this promise to the British people. Never again will we allow a government to play fast and loose with the public finances and never again will we allow a government to hide the true state of our public finances from our independent forecaster.

That’s why today, I can confirm that we will implement in full the 10 recommendations from the independent Office for Budget Responsibility’s review.

But, the country has inherited not just broken public finances but broken public services too.

The British people can see and feel that in their everyday lives. NHS waiting lists at record levels, children in portacabins as school roofs crumble, trains that do not arrive, rivers filled with polluted waste, prisons overflowing crimes which are not investigated and criminals who are not punished.

That is the country’s inheritance from the party opposite.

But they had no plan to improve our public services and they had no plan to put our public finances on a sustainable footing.

Quite the opposite. Since 2021, there had been no detailed plans for departmental spending set out beyond this year.

And their plans relied on a baseline for spending this year which we now know was wrong because it did not take into account the £22bn black hole.

The previous government also failed to budget for costs which they knew would materialise. That includes funding for vital compensation schemes for victims of two terrible injustices, the infected blood scandal and the Post Office Horizon scandal.

The Leader of the Opposition rightly made an unequivocal apology for the injustice of the infected blood scandal on behalf of the British state but he did not budget for the costs of compensation.

Today, for the very first time, we will provide specific funding to compensate those infected and those affected, in full with £11.8bn in this budget.

And I am also today setting aside £1.8bn to compensate victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal redress that is long overdue for the pain and injustice that they have suffered.

Madam Deputy Speaker, the leadership campaign for the party opposite has now been going on for over three months. But in all that time not one single apology for what they did to our country. Because the Conservative party has not changed.

But this is a changed Labour party and we will restore stability to our country again. The scale and seriousness of the situation that we have inherited cannot be underestimated.

Together, the hole in our public finances this year, which recurs every year, the compensation schemes that they did not fund and their failure to assess the scale of the challenges facing our public services means this budget raises taxes by £40bn.

Any Chancellor standing here today would have to face this reality. And any responsible Chancellor would take action.

That is why today, I am restoring stability to our public finances and rebuilding our public services.

As a former economist at the Bank of England, I know what it means to respect our economic institutions.

I want to put on record my thanks to the Governor of the Bank, Andrew Bailey and to the independent Monetary Policy Committee.

Today, I can confirm that we will maintain the MPC’s target of two per cent inflation, as measured by the 12-month increase in the Consumer Prices Index.

I want to thank James Bowler, the Permanent Secretary to the Treasury, and my team of officials.

Madam Deputy Speaker, I would also like to thank my predecessors as Chancellor of the Exchequer for their wise counsel as I have prepared for this Budget. In particular, I would like to thank the former Rt Hon member for Spelthorne for his invaluable advice in this weekend’s papers where he concluded that his “mini-budget” – and I quote – “wasn’t perfect.”

For once, Madam Deputy Speaker, I think he and I are in absolute agreement.

Finally, I want to thank Richard Hughes and his team at the Office for Budget Responsibility for their work in preparing today’s economic and fiscal outlook.

Let me now take the House through that forecast.

The cost of living crisis under the last government stretched household finances to their limit, with inflation hitting a peak of above 11%.

Today, the OBR say that CPI inflation will average 2.5% this year, 2.6% in 2025, then 2.3% in 2026, 2.1% in 2027, 2.1% in 2028 and 2.0% in 2029.

Next, I move on to economic growth.

Today’s budget marks an end to short-termism. So I am pleased, that for the first time, the OBR have published not only five year growth forecasts but a detailed assessment of the growth impacts of our policies over the next decade, too and the new Charter for Budget Responsibility, which I am publishing today, confirms that this will become a permanent feature of our framework.

The OBR forecast that real GDP growth will be 1.1% in 2024, 2.0% in 2025, 1.8% in 2026, 1.5% in 2027, 1.5% in 2028 and 1.6% in 2029.

And the OBR are clear: this budget will permanently increase the supply capacity of the economy, it may sound shocking to them, boosting long-term growth.

Every budget I deliver will be focused on our mission to grow the economy and underpinning that mission are the seven key pillars of our growth strategy developed and delivered alongside business all driven forward by our Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

First, and most important, is to restore economic stability. That is my focus today.

Second, increasing investment and building new infrastructure is vital for productivity, so we are catalysing £70bn of investment through our National Wealth Fund and we are transforming our planning rules to get Britain building again.

Third, to ensure that all parts of the UK can realise their potential we are working with the devolved governments and partnering with our Mayors to develop local growth plans.

Fourth, to improve employment prospects and skills we are creating Skills England, delivering our plans to Make Work Pay and tackling economic inactivity.

Fifth, we are launching our long-term modern industrial strategy and expanding opportunities for our small and medium sized businesses to grow.

Sixth, to drive innovation we are protecting record funding for research and development to harness the full potential of the UK’s science base.

And finally, to maximise the growth benefits of our clean energy mission, we have confirmed key investments such as Carbon Capture and Storage to create jobs in our industrial heartlands.

Our approach is already having an impact. Just two weeks ago – we delivered an International Investment Summit which saw businesses commit £63.5bn of investment into this country creating nearly 40,000 jobs across the United Kingdom.

But we cannot undo fourteen years of damage in one go. Economic growth will be our mission for the duration of this parliament.

Madam Deputy Speaker, in our manifesto, we set out the fiscal rules that would guide this government. I am confirming those today our stability rule and our investment rule.

The “stability rule” means that we will bring the current budget into balance so that we do not borrow to fund day to day spending. We will meet this rule in 2029-30, until that becomes the third year of the forecast. From then on, we will balance the current budget in the third year of every budget, held annually each autumn.

That will provide a tougher constraint on day to day spending so difficult decisions cannot be constantly delayed or deferred.

The OBR say that the current budget will be in deficit by £26.2bn in 2025-26 and £5.2bn in 2026-27 before moving into surplus of £10.9bn in 2027-28, £9.3bn in 2028-29 and £9.9bn in 2029-30 meeting our stability rule two years early.

Monthly public sector finances data shows that government borrowing in the first six months of this year was already running significantly higher than the OBR’s March forecast.

And so the OBR confirmed today, that borrowing in this financial year is now £127bn reflecting the inheritance left by the party opposite.

The increase in the net cash requirement in 24-25 is lower than the increase in borrowing, at £22.3bn higher than the spring forecast.

Because of the action that we are taking borrowing falls from 4.5% of GDP this year to 2.1% of GDP by the end of the forecast.

Public sector net borrowing will be £105.6bn in 2025-26, £88.5bn in 2026-27, £72.2bn in 2027-28, £71.9bn in 2028-29 and £70.6bn in 2029-2930.

Madam Deputy Speaker, before I come to tax it is vital that we are driving efficiency and reducing wasteful spending.

In July, to begin delivering, and dealing with our inheritance, I made £5.5bn of savings this year.

Today we are setting a 2% productivity, efficiency and savings target for all departments to meet next year by using technology more effectively and joining up services across government

As set out in our manifesto, I will shortly be appointing our Covid Corruption Commissioner, they will lead our work to uncover those companies that used a national emergency to line their own pockets.

Because that money belongs in our public services. And taxpayers want that money back.

And I can confirm today that David Goldstone has been appointed as the Chair of the new Office for Value for Money to help us realise the benefits from every pound of public spending.

Today, I am also taking three steps to ensure that welfare spending is more sustainable.

First, we inherited the last government’s plans to reform the Work Capability Assessment. We will deliver those savings as part of our fundamental reforms to the health and disability benefits system that my Right Honourable Friend the Work and Pensions Secretary will bring forward.

Second, I can today announce a crackdown on fraud in our welfare system, often the work of criminal gangs. We will expand DWP’s counter-fraud teams using innovative new methods to prevent illegal activity and provide new legal powers to crackdown on fraudsters, including direct access to bank accounts to recover debt. This package saves £4.3bn a year by the end of the forecast.

Third, the government will shortly be publishing the “Get Britain Working” white paper tackling the root causes of inactivity with an integrated approach across health, education and welfare, and we will provide £240m for 16 trailblazer projects targeted at those who are economically inactive and most at risk of being out of education, employment or training to get people into work and reduce the benefits bill.

Before a government could consider any change to a tax rate or threshold it must ensure that people pay what they already owe. So we will invest to modernise HMRC’s systems using the very best technology and recruit additional HMRC compliance and debt staff. We will clamp down on those umbrella companies who exploit workers, increase the interest rate on unpaid tax debt to ensure that people pay on time, and go after promoters of tax avoidance schemes.

These measures to reduce the tax gap raise £6.5bn by the end of the forecast and I want to thank the Exchequer Secretary for his outstanding work on this agenda.

Madam Deputy Speaker, I know that for working people up and down our country family finances are stretched and pay checks don’t go as far as they once did. So today, I am taking steps to support people with the cost of living.

It was the Labour government that introduced the national minimum wage in 1999. It had a transformative impact on the lives of working people.

As promised in our manifesto, we asked the Low Pay Commission to take account of the cost of living for the first time.

I can confirm that we will accept the Low Pay Commission recommendation to increase the National Living Wage by 6.7% to £12.21 an hour worth up to £1,400 a year for a full-time worker.

And for the first time, we will move towards a single adult rate, phased in over time, by initially increasing the National Minimum Wage for 18-20 year olds by 16.3% as recommended by the Low Pay Commission taking it to £10 an hour.

A Labour policy to protect working people, being delivered by a Labour government once again.

Second, I have heard representations from colleagues across this house about the Carer’s Allowance and the impact of the current policy on carers looking to increase the hours they work, including from the Honourable member for Shipley, the Honourable member for Scarborough and Whitby and the Rt Hon Member for Kingston and Surbiton, too.

Carer’s allowance currently provides up to £81.90 per week to help those with additional caring responsibilities.

Today, I can confirm that we are increasing the weekly earnings limit to the equivalent of 16 hours at the National Living Wage per week, the largest increase in Carer’s Allowance since it was introduced in 1976. That means a carer can now earn over £10,000 a year while receiving Carer’s Allowance allowing them to increase their hours where they want to and keep more of their money.

I am also concerned about the cliff-edge in the current system and the issue of overpayments. My Right Honourable Friend the Work and Pensions Secretary has announced an independent review to look at the issue of overpayments, and we will work across this house to develop the right solutions.

Third, we will provide £1bn from next year to extend the Household Support Fund and Discretionary Housing Payments, to help those facing financial hardship with the cost of essentials.

Fourth, having heard representations from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Trussell and others, I can today announce that we are introducing a new Fair Repayment Rate to reduce the level of debt repayments that can be taken from a household’s Universal Credit payment each month by reducing it from 25% to 15% of their standard allowance.

This means that 1.2 million of the poorest households will keep more of their award each month, lifting children out of poverty, and those who benefit will gain an average of £420 a year.

Madam Deputy Speaker, our Plan to Make Work Pay will also protect working people.

I know the party opposite are deeply interested in our plans here.

Having seen their colleagues repeatedly dismissed at short notice, I know they are now worried about their future under the Rt Hon Member for North West Essex.

So they should rest easy, knowing our plan will protect working people from unfair dismissal, safeguard them from bullying in the workplace, and improve their access to paternity, and maternity leave.

I hope the new Shadow Cabinet will soon be grateful for these increased protections at work.

It is right that we protect those who have worked their whole lives.

In our manifesto, we promised to transfer the Investment Reserve Fund in the Mineworkers’ Pension Scheme to members, and I have listened closely to my Honourable Friends for Easington, Doncaster Central, Blaenau Gwent, and Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock on this issue.

Today we are keeping our promise so that working people who powered our country receive the fair pension that they are owed.

Our manifesto committed to the Triple Lock, meaning spending on the State Pension is forecast to rise by over £31bn by 2029-30 to ensure that our pensioners are protected in their retirement.

This commitment means that while working age benefits will be uprated in line with CPI, at 1.7% the basic and new State Pension will be uprated by 4.1% in 2025-26.

This means that over 12 million pensioners will gain up to £470 next year, up to £275 more than if uprated by inflation.

The Pension Credit Standard Minimum Guarantee will also rise by 4.1% from around £11,400 per year to around £11,850 for a single pensioner.

While I have sought to protect working people with measures to reduce the cost of living, I have had to take some very difficult decisions on tax.

I want to set out my approach to fuel duty.

Baked into the numbers that I inherited from the previous government is an assumption that fuel duty will rise by RPI next year and that the temporary 5p cut will be reversed.

To retain the 5p cut and to freeze fuel duty again would cost over £3bn next year.

At a time when the fiscal position is so difficult, I have to be frank with the House that this is a substantial commitment to make.

I have concluded that in these difficult circumstances, while the cost of living remains high and with a backdrop of global uncertainty, increasing fuel duty next year would be the wrong choice for working people. It would mean fuel duty rising by 7p per litre.

So, I have today decided to freeze fuel duty next year and I will maintain the existing 5p cut for another year, too. There will be no higher taxes at the petrol pumps next year.

Madam Deputy Speaker, the last government made cuts of £20bn to employees’ and self-employed national insurance in their final two budgets.

These tax cuts were not honest because we now know they were based on a forecast which the OBR say would have been “materially different” had they known the true extent of the last government’s cover-up.

Since July, I have been urged on multiple occasions to reconsider these cuts, to increase the taxes that working people pay and see in their payslips.

But I have made an important choice today: To keep every single commitment that we made on tax in our manifesto.

So I say to working people: I will not increase your National Insurance, I will not increase your VAT and I will not increase your income tax.

Working people will not see higher taxes in their payslips as a result of the choices I make today. That is a promise made – and a promise fulfilled.

But any responsible Chancellor would need to take difficult decisions today to raise the revenues required to fund our public services and to restore economic stability.

So in today’s Budget, I am announcing an increase in Employers’ National Insurance Contributions.

We will increase the rate of Employers’ National Insurance by 1.2 percentage points, to 15%, from April 2025, and we will reduce the Secondary Threshold – the level at which employers start paying national insurance on each employee’s salary – from £9,100 per year to £5,000. This will raise £25bn per year by the end of the forecast period.

I know that this is a difficult choice. I do not take this decision lightly.

We are asking business to contribute more and I know that there will be impacts of this measure felt beyond businesses, too as the OBR have set out today. But in the circumstances that I have inherited, it is the right choice to make.

Successful businesses depend on successful schools, healthy businesses depend on a healthy NHS and a strong economy depends on strong public finances.

If the party opposite chooses to oppose this choice then they are choosing more austerity, more chaos and more instability. That is the choice our country faces too.

As I make this choice, I know it is particularly important to protect our smallest companies. So having heard representations from the Federation of Small Businesses and others I am today increasing the Employment Allowance from £5,000 to £10,500.

This means 865,000 employers won’t pay any National Insurance at all next year and over 1 million will pay the same or less than they did previously. This will allow a small business to employ the equivalent of 4 full time workers on the National Living Wage without paying any National Insurance on their wages.

Madam Deputy Speaker, let me come now to capital gains tax.

We need to drive growth, promote entrepreneurship, and support wealth creation while raising the revenue required to fund our public services and restore our public finances.

Today, we will increase the lower rate of Capital Gains Tax from 10% to 18%, and the Higher Rate from 20% to 24%, while maintaining the rates of capital gains tax on residential property at 18% and 24%, too. This means the UK will still have the lowest Capital Gains Tax rate of any European G7 economy.

Alongside these changes to the headline rates of Capital Gains Tax, we are maintaining the lifetime limit for Business Asset Disposal Relief at £1m to encourage entrepreneurs to invest in their businesses.

Business Asset Disposal Relief will remain at 10% this year, before rising to 14% in April 2025, and 18% from 2026-27, maintaining a significant gap compared to the higher rate of Capital Gains Tax.

Together, the OBR say these measures will raise £2.5bn by the end of the forecast.

In a sign of this government’s commitment to supporting growth and entrepreneurship, we have already extended the Enterprise Investment Scheme and Venture Capital Trust schemes to 2035 and we will continue to work with leading entrepreneurs and venture capital firms to ensure our policies support a positive environment for entrepreneurship in the UK.

Next, inheritance tax. Only 6% of estates will pay inheritance tax this year. I understand the strongly held desire to pass down savings to children and grandchildren. So I am taking a balanced approach in my package today.

First, the previous government froze inheritance tax thresholds until 2028. I will extend that freeze for a further two years, until 2030. That means the first £325,000 of any estate can be inherited tax-free, rising to £500,000 if the estate includes a residence passed to direct descendants and £1m when a tax free allowance is passed to a surviving spouse or civil partner.

Second, we will close the loophole created by the previous government, made even bigger when the Lifetime Allowance was abolished by bringing inherited pensions into inheritance tax from April 2027.

Finally, we will reform Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief. From April 2026, the first £1m of combined business and agricultural assets will continue to attract no inheritance tax at all, but for assets over £1m, inheritance tax will apply with 50% relief, at an effective rate of 20%. This will ensure we continue to protect small family farms and three-quarters of claims will be unaffected by these changes.

I can also announce that we will apply a 50% relief, in all circumstances, on inheritance tax for shares on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) and other similar markets setting the effective rate of tax at 20%.

Taken together, these measures raise over £2bn in the final year of the forecast.

Next, I can confirm that the government will renew the Tobacco Duty escalator for the remainder of this Parliament at RPI+2%, increase duty by a further 10% on hand-rolling tobacco this year, introduce a flat rate duty on all vaping liquid from October 2026 alongside an additional one-off increase in tobacco duty to maintain the incentive to give up smoking.

And we will increase the Soft Drinks Industry Levy to account for inflation since it was introduced as well as increasing the duty in line with CPI each year going forward.

These measures will raise nearly £1bn per year by the end of the forecast period.

Madame Deputy Speaker, we want to support the take-up of electric vehicles.

So I will maintain incentives for electric vehicles in Company Car Tax from 2028 and increase the differential between fully electric and other vehicles in the first year rates of Vehicle Excise Duty from April 2025. These measures will raise around £400m by the end of the forecast period.

Madam Deputy Speaker let me update the House on our plans for Air Passenger Duty, and I can see the Rt Hon Gentleman’s ears have pricked up.

Air Passenger Duty has not kept up with inflation in recent years, so we are introducing an adjustment meaning an increase of no more than £2 for an economy class short-haul flight.

But I am taking a different approach when it comes to private jets, increasing the rate of Air Passenger Duty by a further 50%. That is equivalent to £450 per passenger for a private jet to, say, California?

These measures will raise over £700m by the end of the forecast period.

Madam Deputy Speaker, let me turn now to our high street businesses.

I know that for them, a major source of concern is business rates.

From 2026-27, we intend to introduce two permanently lower tax rates for retail, hospitality and leisure properties which make up the backbone of high streets across the country and it is our intention that is paid for by a higher multiplier for the most valuable properties.

But the previous government created a cliff edge next year, as temporary relief ends, so I will today provide 40% relief on business rates for the retail, hospitality and leisure industry in 2025-26 up to a cap of £110,000 per business. Alongside this, the small business tax multiplier will be frozen next year.

Next, I can confirm that alcohol duty rates on non-draught products will increase in line with RPI from February next year, but nearly two-thirds of alcoholic drinks sold in pubs are served on draught, so today, instead of uprating these products in line with inflation I am cutting draught duty by 1.7% which means a penny off a pint in the pub.

Alongside the changes I am making today, I am publishing a Corporate Tax Roadmap, providing the business certainty called for by the CBI, British Chambers of Commerce and the Institute for Directors. This confirms our commitment to cap the rate of Corporation Tax at 25% – the lowest in the G7 –  for the duration of this parliament, while maintaining full expensing and the £1 million Annual Investment Allowance and keeping the current rates of research and development reliefs, to drive innovation.

Madam Deputy Speaker, in our manifesto we made a number of commitments to raise funding for our public services.

First, I have always said that if you make Britain your home, you should pay your tax here. So today, I can confirm we will abolish the non-dom tax regime and remove the outdated concept of domicile from the tax system from April 2025. We will introduce a new, residence based scheme with internationally competitive arrangements for those coming to the UK on a temporary basis, while closing the loopholes in the scheme designed by the party opposite.

To further encourage investment into the UK, we will also extend the Temporary Repatriation Relief to three years and expand its scope, bringing billions of pounds of new funds into Britain.

The independent Office for Budget Responsibility say that this package of measures will raise £12.7bn over the next five years.

Next, the fund management industry provides a vital contribution to our economy, but as our manifesto set out, there needs to be a fairer approach to the way carried interest is taxed. So we will increase the Capital Gains Tax rates on carried interest to 32% from April 2025, and, from April 2026, we will deliver further reforms to ensure that the specific rules for carried interest are simpler, fairer and better targeted.

In our manifesto we committed to reforming stamp duty land tax to raise revenue while supporting those buying their first home. We are increasing the stamp-duty land tax surcharge for second-homes known as the “Higher Rate for Additional Dwellings” by 2 percentage points, to 5%, which will come into effect from tomorrow. This will support over 130,000 additional transactions from people buying their first home, or moving home over, the next five years.

Next, we committed to reform the Energy Profits Levy on oil and gas companies. I can confirm today that we will increase the rate of the levy to 38%, which will now expire in March 2030, and we will remove the 29% investment allowance.

To ensure the oil and gas industry can protect jobs and support our energy security we will maintain the 100% first year allowances and the decarbonisation allowances too.

Finally, 94% of children in the UK attend state schools. To provide the highest quality of support and teaching that they deserve, we will introduce VAT on private school fees from January 2025 and we will shortly introduce legislation to remove their business rates relief from April 2025, too.

We said in our manifesto that these changes, alongside our measures to tackle tax avoidance, would bring in £8.5bn by the final year of the forecast. I can confirm today that they will in fact raise over £9bn to support our public services and restore our public finances. That is a promise made – and a promise fulfilled.

Madam Deputy Speaker, I have one final decision to take on tax today.

The previous government froze income tax and National Insurance thresholds in 2021 and then they did so again after the mini-budget. Extending their threshold freeze for a further two years raises billions of pounds – money to deal with the black hole in our public finances and repair our public services.

Having considered this issue closely I have come to the conclusion that extending the threshold freeze would hurt working people. It would take more money out of their payslips.

I am keeping every single promise on tax that I made in our manifesto. So there will be no extension of the freeze in income tax and National Insurance thresholds beyond the decisions of the previous government.

From 2028-29, personal tax thresholds will be uprated in line with inflation once again. When it comes to choices on tax, this government chooses to protect working people every single time.

Madam Deputy Speaker, these are the choices I have made to restore economic stability and to protect working people.

The next choice I make is to begin to repair our public services.

In recent months, we have conducted the first phase of the Spending Review to set departmental budgets for 2024-25 and 2025-26, and I want to thank my Right Honourable Friend the Chief Secretary to the Treasury for his tireless work with colleagues from across government.

Because I have taken difficult decisions on tax today, I am able to provide an injection of immediate funding over the next two years to stabilise and to support our public services.

The next phase of the Spending Review will report in late Spring, and I have set the overall envelope today. Day to day spending from 2024-25 onwards will grow by 1.5% in real terms and total departmental spending, including capital spending, will grow by 1.7% in real terms.

At the election we promised there would be no return to austerity. Today we deliver on that promise.

But given the scale of the challenges that are facing our public services, that means there will still be difficult choices in the next phase of the Spending Review. Just as we cannot tax and spend our way to prosperity, nor can we simply spend our way to better public services.

So we will deliver a new approach to public service reform, using technology to improve public services, and taking a zero-based approach so that taxpayers’ money is spent as effectively as possible. and so that we focus on delivering our key priorities.

In the first phase of the Spending Review I have prioritised day-to-day funding to deliver on our manifesto commitments.

I want every child to have the best start in life and the best possible start to the school day, too, and I know my Right Honourable Friend the Education Secretary shares my ambition.

So I am today tripling investment in breakfast clubs to fund them in thousands of schools.

I am increasing the core schools budget by £2.3bn next year to support our pledge to hire thousands more teachers into key subjects.

So that our young people can develop the skills that they need for the future, I am providing an additional £300m for further education.

And finally, this government is committed to reforming special educational needs provision to improve outcomes for our most vulnerable children and ensure the system is financially sustainable.

To support that work, I am today providing a £1bn uplift in funding, a 6% real terms increase from this year.

There is no more important job for government than to keep our country safe, and we are conducting a Strategic Defence Review to be published next year. And as set out in our manifesto, we will set a path to spending 2.5% of GDP on defence at a future fiscal event.

Today, I am announcing a total increase to the Ministry of Defence’s Budget of £2.9bn next year, ensuring the UK comfortably exceeds our NATO commitments and providing guaranteed military support to Ukraine of £3bn per year, for as long as it takes.

Last week, alongside my Right Honourable Friend the Defence Secretary, I announced in addition to this further support to Ukraine – on top of our NATO commitment through our £2.26bn contribution to the G7’s Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration agreement, repaid using profits from immobilised Russian sovereign assets.

And as we approach Remembrance Sunday, it is vital that we take time to remember those who have served our country so bravely. So I am today announcing funding to commemorate the 80th anniversary of VE and VJ day next year to honour those who have served at home and abroad.

We must also remember those who experienced the atrocities of the Nazi regime first hand. I would like to pay tribute to Lily Ebert, the Holocaust Survivor and educator who passed away aged 100 earlier this month. I am today committing a further £2m to holocaust education next year so that charities like the Holocaust Educational Trust, can continue their work to ensure these vital testimonies are not lost and are preserved for the future.

Madam Deputy Speaker, to repair our public services we also need to work alongside our mayors and our local leaders.

We will deliver a significant real-terms funding increase for local government next year, including £1.3bn of additional grant funding to deliver essential services, with at least £600m in grant funding for social care and £230m to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping.

We are today confirming that Greater Manchester and the West Midlands will be the first mayoral authorities to receive integrated settlements from next year giving Mayors meaningful control of the funding for their local areas.

And to support our local high streets we are taking action to deal with the sharp rise in shoplifting we have seen in recent years. We will scrap the effective immunity for low-value shoplifting introduced by the party opposite, and having listened closely to organisations like the British Retail Consortium and USDAW, I am providing additional funding to crack down on the organised gangs which target retailers, and to provide more training to our police officers and retailers to help stop shoplifting in its tracks.

Finally, I am today providing funding to support public services and drive growth across Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Having discussed the matter with the First Minister of Wales, Eluned Morgan, and my HFs for Llanelli and Pontypridd, I am providing a £25m to the Welsh Government next year for the maintenance of coal tips to ensure we keep our communities safe.

And to support growth, including in our rural areas, we will proceed with City and Growth Deals in Northern Ireland in Causeway Coast and Glens; and Mid-South West.

And we will drive growth in Scotland, a key priority for Scottish Labour and our leader Anas Sarwar, including a City and growth Deal in Argyll and Bute.

This budget provides the devolved governments with the largest real-terms funding settlement since devolution, delivering an additional £3.4 billion for the Scottish Government through the Barnett formula, funding which must now be spent effectively to improve public services in Scotland.

This budget also provides £1.7 billion to the Welsh Government and £1.5 billion to the Northern Ireland Executive in 2025-26.

I said there would be no return to austerity, and that is the choice I have made today.

Madam Deputy Speaker, to rebuild our country we need to increase investment.

The UK lags behind every other G7 country when it comes to business investment as a share of our economy. That matters. It means the UK has fallen behind in the race for new jobs, new industries, and new technology.

By restoring economic stability, and by establishing the National Wealth Fund to catalyse private funding, we have begun to create the conditions that businesses need to invest.

But there is also a significant role for public investment. For too long, we have seen Conservative chancellors cut investment and raid capital budgets to plug gaps in day-to-day spending. The result is clear for all to see – hospitals without the equipment they need, school buildings not fit for our children, a desperate lack of affordable housing, economic growth held back at every turn.

Under the plans I inherited, public investment was set to fall from 2.5% to 1.7% of GDP.

But in Washington last week, the International Monetary Fund were clear: more public investment is badly needed in the UK.

So today, having listened to the case made by the former Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney, former Treasury Minister Jim O’Neill, and the former Cabinet Secretary Gus O’Donnell, among others, I am confirming our investment rule.

As set out in our manifesto, we will target debt falling as a share of the economy. Debt will be defined as Public Sector net Financial Liabilities, or “net financial debt”, for short, a metric that has been measured by the Office for National Statistics since 2016, and forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility since that date too.

“Net financial debt” recognises that government investment delivers returns for taxpayers by counting not just the liabilities on a government’s balance sheet, but the financial assets too. This means that we count the benefits of investment, not just the costs, and we free up our institutions to invest, just as they do in Germany, France and Japan.

Like our stability rule, our investment rule will apply in 2029-2030 until that becomes the third year of the forecast. From that point onwards, net financial debt will fall in the third year of every forecast.

Today, the OBR say that we are already meeting our target two years early with “net financial debt” falling by 2027-28 with £15.7bn of headroom in the final year.

So that we drive the right incentives in government investments, we will introduce four key guardrails to ensure capital spending is good value for money and drives growth in our economy.

First, our portfolio of new financial investments will be delivered by expert bodies like the National Wealth Fund which must, by default, earn a rate of return at least as large as that on gilts.  Second, we will strengthen the role of institutions to improve infrastructure delivery. Third, we will improve certainty, setting capital budgets for five years and extending them at every spending review every two years. Finally, we will ensure there is greater transparency for capital spending, with robust annual reporting of financial investments based on accounts audited by the National Audit Office and made available to the Office for Budget Responsibility at every forecast.

Taken together with our stability rule, these fiscal rules will ensure that our public finances are on a firm footing, while enabling us to invest prudently alongside business.

The capital plans I now set out to drive growth across our country and repair the fabric of our nation are only possible because of our investment rule. Let me set out those investment plans.

Today we are confirming our plans to capitalise the National Wealth Fund, to invest in the industries of the future, from gigafactories, to ports to green hydrogen.

Building on these investments, my Right Honourable Friend the Business Secretary is driving forward our modern industrial strategy, working with businesses and organisations like Make UK to set out the sectors with the biggest growth potential.

Today, we are confirming multi-year funding commitments for these areas of our economy, including nearly £1bn for the aerospace sector to fund vital research and development, building on our industry in the East Midlands, the South-West and Scotland; over £2 billion for the automotive sector to support our electric vehicle industry and develop our manufacturing base, building on our strengths in the North East and the West Midlands; and up to £520m for a new Life Sciences Innovative Manufacturing Fund.

For our world-leading creative industries, we will legislate to provide additional tax relief for visual effect costs in TV and film and we are providing £25m for the North East Combined Authority which they plan to use to remediate the Crown Works Studio site in Sunderland creating 8,000 new jobs.

To unlock these growth industries of the future, we will protect government investment in research and development with more than £20bn worth of funding. This includes at least £6.1bn to protect core research funding for areas like engineering, biotechnology and medical science through Research England, other research councils, and the National Academies.

We will extend the Innovation Accelerators programme in Glasgow, in Manchester and in the West Midlands.  And with over £500m of funding next year, my Right Honourable Friend the Science, Technology and Innovation Secretary, will continue to drive progress in improving reliable, fast broadband and mobile coverage across our country, including in rural areas.

We committed in our manifesto to build 1.5 million homes over the course of this parliament and my Right Honourable Friend the Deputy Prime Minister is driving that work forward across government.

Today, I am providing over £5bn of government investment to deliver our plans on housing next year.

We will increase the Affordable Homes Programme to £3.1bn, delivering thousands of new homes.

We will provide £3bn of support in guarantees, to boost the supply of homes and support our small housebuilders.

And we will provide investment to renovate sites across our country, including at Liverpool Central Docks where we will deliver 2,000 new homes, and funding to help Cambridge realise its full growth potential.

Alongside this investment, we will put the right policies in place to increase the supply of affordable housing.

Having heard representations from local authorities, social housing providers and from Shelter, I can today confirm that the government will reduce Right to Buy Discounts and local authorities will be able to retain the full receipts from any sales of social housing to reinvest back into the housing stock, and into new supply so that we give more people a safe, secure and affordable place to live.

We will provide stability to social housing providers, with a social housing rent settlement of CPI+1 percent for the next five years.

And we will deliver on our manifesto commitment to hire hundreds of new planning officers, to get Britain building again.

We will also make progress on our commitment to accelerate the remediation of homes following the findings of the Grenfell Inquiry with £1bn of investment to remove dangerous cladding next year.

The last government made a number of promises on transport but failed to fund them. Working with my Right Honourable Friend the Transport Secretary, I am changing that.

We are today securing the delivery of the Trans-Pennine upgrade to connect York, Leeds, Huddersfield and Manchester, delivering fully electric local and regional services between Manchester and Stalybridge by the end of this year, with a further electrification of services between Church Fenton and York by 2026, to help grow our economy across the North of England with faster and more reliable services.

We will deliver East-West Rail to drive growth between Oxford, Milton Keynes and Cambridge, with the first services running between Oxford, Bletchley and Milton Keynes next year, and trains between Oxford and Bedford running from 2030.

We are delivering railway schemes which improve journeys for people across our country, including upgrades at Bradford Forster Square, improving capacity at Manchester Victoria, and electrifying the Wigan-Bolton line.

My Right Honourable Friend the Transport Secretary has also set out a plan for how to get a grip of HS2. Today, we are securing delivery of the project between Old Oak Common and Birmingham and we are committing the funding required to begin tunnelling work to London Euston station. This will catalyse private investment into the local area.

I am also funding significant improvements to our roads network.

For too long, potholes have been an all too visible reminder of our failure to invest as a nation. Today, that changes with a £500m increase in road maintenance budgets next year, more than delivering on our manifesto commitment to fix an additional one million potholes each year.

We will provide over £650m of local transport funding to improve connections across our country in our towns like Crewe and Grimsby, and in our villages and rural areas, from Cornwall to Cumbria.

And while the previous government’s policy was for the bus fare cap to end this December, we understand how important bus services are for our communities, so we will extend the cap for a further year, setting it at £3 until December 2025.

Finally we will deliver £1.3bn of funding to improve connectivity in our city regions, funding projects like the Brierley Hill Metro extension in the West Midlands, the renewal of the Sheffield Supertram, and West Yorkshire Mass Transit, including in Bradford and Leeds.

Madam Deputy Speaker, to bring new jobs to Britain and drive growth across our country we are delivering our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower, led by my Right Honourable Friend the Energy Secretary.

Earlier this month, we announced a significant multi-year investment between government and business into Carbon Capture and Storage creating 4,000 jobs across Merseyside and Teesside.

Today, I am providing funding for 11 new green hydrogen projects across England, Scotland and Wales. They will be among the first commercial scale projects anywhere in the world, including in Bridgend, East Renfrewshire and in Barrow-in-Furness.

We are kickstarting the Warm Homes Plan by confirming an initial £3.4bn over the next three years to transform 350,000 homes, including a quarter of a million low-income and social homes.

And we will establish GB Energy, providing funding next year to set up GB Energy at its new home in Aberdeen.

Overall, we will invest an additional £100bn over the next five years in capital spending only possible because of our investment rule.

The OBR say today that this will drive growth across our country in the next five years and in the longer term increase GDP by up to 1.4%.

It will crowd in private investment, meaning more jobs, and more opportunities in every corner of the UK.

That is the choice that I have made. To invest in our country and to grow our economy.

Today, I am setting out two final areas in which investment is so badly needed to repair the fabric of our nation.

Madam Deputy Speaker, my Right Honourable Friend the Member for Lewisham West and East Dulwich and I joined the Labour party because of the condition of our schools in the 1980s and 1990s under Conservative governments.

When I was at secondary school, my sixth form was a couple of prefab huts in the playground. My school, like so many others, was rebuilt by the last Labour government.

But today, after 14 years of Tory government, progress has gone backwards, schools’ roofs are crumbling, and millions of children are facing the very same backdrop as I did.

I will be the Chancellor that changes that.

So today, I am providing £6.7bn of capital investment to the Department for Education next year, a 19% real-terms increase on this year.

That includes £1.4bn to rebuild over 500 schools in the greatest need, including St Helen’s Primary School in Hartlepool, and Mercia Academy in Derby, and so many more across our country.

And we will provide a further £2.1bn to improve school maintenance, £300m more than this year, ensuring that all our children can learn somewhere safe, including dealing with RAAC affected schools in the constituencies of my HFs the members for Watford, Stourbridge, Hyndburn, and beyond.

Alongside investment in new teachers, and funding for thousands of new breakfast clubs, this government is giving our children and young people the opportunities that they deserve.

Madam Deputy Speaker, I come to our most cherished public service of all: our NHS.

My Right Honourable Friend the Health Secretary is beginning to repair the damage of the last 14 years.

In our first week in office, he commissioned an independent report into the state of our health service by Lord Darzi. Its conclusions were damning.

While our NHS staff do a remarkable job, and we thank them for it, it is clear that, that in so many areas we are moving in the wrong direction.

100,000 infants waited over 6 hours in A&E last year, 350,000 people are waiting a year for mental health support, cancer deaths here are higher than in other countries, it is simply unforgiveable.

In the Spring, we will publish a 10 year plan for the NHS to deliver a shift from hospital to community, from analogue to digital, and from sickness to prevention.

Today, we are announcing a downpayment on that plan to enable the NHS to deliver 2% productivity growth next year.

These reforms are vital, but we should be honest. The state of the NHS we inherited after – and I quote Lord Darzi – “the most austere decade since the NHS was founded” – means reform must come alongside investment.

So today, because of the difficult decision that I have taken on tax, welfare and spending, I can announce that I am providing a £22.6bn increase in the day to-day health budget and a £3.1bn increase in the capital budget over this year and next year.

This is the largest real-terms growth in day to day NHS spending outside of Covid since 2010.

Let me set out what this funding is delivering.

Many NHS buildings have been left in a state of disrepair. So we will provide £1 billion of health capital investment next year to address the backlog of repairs and upgrades across the NHS.

To increase capacity for tens of thousands more procedures next year, we will provide a further £1.5bn for new beds in hospitals across the country, new capacity for over a million additional diagnostic tests, and new surgical hubs and diagnostic centres so that those people waiting for their treatment can get it as quickly as possible.

My Right Honourable Friend the Health Secretary will be announcing the details of his review into the New Hospital Programme in the coming weeks and publishing in the new year, but I can tell the House today that work will continue at pace to deliver those seven hospitals affected including West Suffolk Hospital in Bury St Edmunds, and Leighton Hospital in Crewe.

And finally, because of this record injection of funding, because of the thousands of additional beds that we have secured, and because of the reforms that we are delivering in our NHS, we can now begin to bring waiting lists down more quickly and move towards our target for waiting times no longer than 18 weeks, by delivering our manifesto commitment for 40,000 extra hospital appointments a week.

That is the difference that a Labour government is making.

Madam Deputy Speaker, the choices that I have made today are the right choices for our country. To restore stability to our public finances, to protect working people, to fix our NHS and to rebuild Britain.

That doesn’t mean these choices are easy, but they are responsible.

If the party opposite disagrees with the choices that I have made then they must answer: What choices would they make?

Would they again choose the path of irresponsibility, the path taken by Liz Truss, and ignore the problems in our public finances altogether?

If that is their choice, they should say so.

But let me be clear.  If they disagree with my choices on tax, then they would not be able to protect working people. If they disagree with our plans to fund public services, then they would have to cut schools and hospitals. And if they disagree with our investment rule, then they would have to delay or cancel thousands of projects which drive growth across our country.

This is a moment of fundamental choice for Britain.

I have made my choices; the responsible choices to restore stability to our country; to protect working people.

More teachers in our schools, more appointments in our NHS, more homes being built, fixing the foundations of our economy, investing in our future, delivering change, rebuilding Britain.

We on these benches commend those choices and I commend this Statement to the House.

Britons are in favour of increasing taxes on businesses and the rich in order to improve public services, poll finds

Basit Mahmood 
29 October, 2024 
Left Foot Forward

The findings come ahead of Labour’s first Budget in 14 years due to be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves 


TweetShareWhatsAppMail


An overwhelming majority of Britons are in favour of increasing taxes on businesses and the rich in order to improve public services, a poll has found.

The poll, carried out for YouGov, asked voters how they thought money should be raised for public services, with 82% of those asked supporting raising income taxes on the super-rich. Around 75% supported raising income tax on the rich, while 59% supported raising corporation tax.

The findings come ahead of Labour’s first Budget in 14 years due to be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves tomorrow, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer saying that his government would take “tough decisions”, opting to raise taxes in order “to prevent austerity and rebuild public services”.

The Chancellor has repeatedly highlighted how the previous government has left a £22 billion shortfall in the public finances, meaning that tough decisions would have to be made.

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward






















 

Budget 2024: Poll reveals NHS top priority – for both cash and reform

Photo: Ian Dewar Photography/Shutterstock

Voters believe the NHS is a top priority issue for the Chancellor to address in tomorrow’s Budget – although the electorate is divided on whether extra funding or structural reforms are the required solution to fix the beleaguered health service.

A survey from More in Common found that while the public broadly agrees that healthcare should be at the top of the concern list for Rachel Reeves, the left-leaning segments favour higher spending on the NHS while the more conservative side puts more weight on the service’s reform.

The organisation splits the electorate into six different archetypes designed to inform the views of various segments of the British public. Progressive activists were the group most supportive of additional funding for the NHS, whereas backbone conservatives are the likeliest to get behind reform.

It comes as the government is set to pledge billions of pounds of extra cash for the NHS in a bid to open up two million extra appointments per year.

READ MORE: Budget 2024: The tax rises and spending plans to expect as PM revises bus fare cap and reveals back-to-work package

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce £1.5bn for new surgical hubs and scanners and £70m for radiotherapy machines.

However, Health Secretary Wes Streeting has repeatedly made clear his intention for the NHS to undergo substantial reform under the new Labour government.

Speaking during a vist to St George’s Hospital in Tooting, Reeves said: “I don’t think in one budget you can undo 14 years of damage.

“But in this budget we’re going to provide the resource necessary to deliver on our manifesto commitment to 40,000 additional appointments every single week, to reduce the huge backlog and as well as the increase in the capital budget to take it to its highest level since 2010 to invest in the new scanners and the radiography equipment.”

Streeting added: “There will be people waiting on trolleys in corridors this winter. I can’t turn the situation around that fast.”










UK

 

Chancellor must take action on rising gender affordability housing gap ahead of Budget, says Women’s Budget Group

OCTOBER 30, 2024

The gender housing affordability gap has widened in the year to April 2024, WBG’s analysis of the Office of National Statistics’ Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) data released today shows. 

Private renting has become significantly less affordable for both men and women in the past year, with both spending a larger proportion of their incomes on rent. However, the burden has grown higher for women, who now have to spend on average almost half of their earnings on rent for a one bedroom flat.

Ahead of today’s budget, the Women’s Budget Group is urging the Chancellor to tackle the widening gender housing affordability gap by permanently re-linking Local Housing Allowance with actual rents.

Key findings

  • Earnings are not keeping up with private rents. In England, the percentage of women’s median earnings absorbed by rent for a one-bedroom property was 47% in the year to April 2024, up from 36% at the same time in 2023. 
  • For men, this figure stood at 26% in 2023 and has increased to 34% in the year to April 2024.
  • This comes to an increase in the gender housing affordability gap from 10 percentage points to 13 percentage points.
  • The same is true for two-bedroom properties, where the gap increased from 12 percentage points to 15 percentage points for England. 
  • The situation in London is especially acute, where a woman renting a two-bedroom property could expect to see 70% of her earnings absorbed by rent as of April 2024. This is up from 62% at the same time last year. For men, this figure is 55%.
  • However, the average rent of a one-bedroom property has gone up a further £39 per month between April and September this year. 
  • The average rental price of a one-bedroom property in England has gone up by £133 from £956 a month to £1089 per month since September 2023. In London the average price of a one-bed has risen by £153.
  • WBG analysis released last month showed that women were hardest hit by cuts to public services and changes to tax and social security since 2010, losing 9.4%, equivalent to £3,162 per year, in living standards, compared to men’s loss of 5.8% (£2,395 per year).

WBG calls on the Chancellor to

  • Unfreeze and permanently re-link Local Housing Allowance rates to local rents, raising it to the 50th percentile to ensure housing benefit actually covers renting costs and protect women from falling into poverty and/or becoming homeless.
  • Review overall benefit rates to make up for losses experienced by benefit claimants, and women in particular, over the past 14 years; and prevent the real value of benefits getting further eroded by the rising cost of living.

Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson, Director of the Women’s Budget Group commented: “The Chancellor committed to make this economy work for women. Rachel Reeves needs to address the widening gender housing affordability gap in order to deliver on this promise; an economy in which women can barely afford to rent on their own is clearly not working.

“With September’s inflation rate at 1.7% expected to determine benefit increases from April, and many predicting that inflation will go up again by the end of this year due to a rise in energy prices, we’re looking at a real-term cut in benefits for many people already struggling to make ends meet. 

“Our work has shown that the on-and-off freeze in benefits over the past decade has been the main driver of women’s income loss since 2010, and that cuts to social security and public services have disproportionately hit women’s living standards. 

“At the same time, the cost of private renting has been increasing, eating up more and more of women’s incomes. It is clear that women’s earnings are not keeping pace with private renting costs, and neither is Local Housing Allowance. 

“The realignment of LHA with the 30th percentile of average local rents at the last Autumn Budget brought a flicker of hope to those on the lowest incomes facing spiralling housing costs. But this was a temporary measure and the Chancellor must be bolder than the previous Government. Permanently re-linking Local Housing Allowance rates to rents would give private renters more security and ensure housing benefit actually meets the cost of renting. Unless she acts on this, gender inequalities will deepen, leaving more women and their children vulnerable to homelessness and poverty.”

The UK Women’s Budget Group is the UK’s leading feminist economics think tank, providing evidence and analysis on women’s economic position and proposing policy alternatives for a gender-equal economy. We act as a link between academia, the women’s voluntary sector and progressive economic think tanks.

Image: Rachel Reeves,https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/world/2024/07/08/uks-finance-minister-says-will-make-difficult-decisions-to-drive-growth/ Licence: CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International



Sam White: ‘Budget 2024 leaves Reeves facing nine circles of fiscal hell’


Rachel Reeves prepares for the Autumn Budget 2024. Photo: Kirsty O'Connor / Treasury via Flickr
Rachel Reeves prepares for the Autumn Budget 2024. Photo: Kirsty O’Connor / Treasury via Flickr

In the ‘Divine Comedy’, Dante tells the story of the hero being led through the Nine Circles of Hell by the spirit of the ancient poet Virgil. This week, it’s our very own Britain that must begin its journey out of the Nine Circles of Fiscal Hell, with the role of guide played by Chancellor Rachel Reeves.

‘Yeah yeah, we know this is a grim inheritance’ people tend to respond, but then we are quick to move on. It’s an understandable impulse, but it risks leaving us all surprised or disappointed that there isn’t a quick fix to all this. When the government talks of a Decade of Renewal, they’re not joking.

But this is no counsel of despair. As the historian Max Hastings observes in The Times this week: “No voter, whatever our allegiance, has much current cause for rejoicing. Our task as citizens — indeed, our duty — is to avoid succumbing to mere vacuous despair. Instead, we should keep trying to help things turn out a little better than we fear, on both sides of the House.”

We all need this to work.  The alternative is a collapse into populism and a further cycle of decline. By recognising the nine distinct problems we face, we can gain greater insight into the challenges this government must navigate.

The circles of fiscal hell

Let me divide the nine circles into three groups.  The first group are the Fiscal Horrors.

We begin on the first circle where we find the Pre-Election Traps. Here the previous government set a trap with real cuts to unprotected departments all the way to 2028 and a further cut to public investment. How did Labour avoid the trap? By pretending they hadn’t noticed it and proceeding on their merry way. This is the trap that makes Paul Johnson of the Institute of Fiscal Studies really cross. This specific problem was predictable, he fumes (not unreasonably).

The second circle is the Hidden Horrors. This is the further £22 billion blackhole in the public finances that were hidden before the Election.

Paul Johnson agrees. In his recent ‘Expert Factor’ podcast he says: “It is the case, I think, that the current government will face pressures in the order of £20bn more than was completely evident this year pre-election… more than was completely evident in the numbers they inherited” – although he adds they should have anticipated some public pay pressures.

The third circle contains the Double Headed Fiscal Hell Hound. One head spews forth the highest tax levels for 70 years, while the second taunts us with debt approaching 100% of GDP. These are both far higher than incoming governments faced in 1997 or 2010. You have to reach back most of the way to WWII to find Britain’s public finances so comprehensively wrecked.

READ MORE: Budget 2024: The tax rises and spending plans to expect as PM revises bus fare cap and reveals back-to-work package

The next group comprise the Broke and the Broken.

We begin in the fourth circle with the Walking Wounded: the public services. The highest waiting lists in the NHS ever. Schools literally crumbling.  Full prisons. You know this one.

The fifth circle contains the Living Dead. Are they still alive or just shambling forward in the appearance of life?  Or to put it in financial terms – are they bankrupt already?  Here we find tortured universities, local authorities and the like. Central government cut grants to local authorities for years. Local government cut everything they weren’t obliged by statute to deliver.  Now there’s nothing left to cut. 12 councils declared bankruptcy since 2018, with more at death’s door today.

The sixth circle contains the Spectres of Past Sins. Here we find sins of past administrations for which this government may now need to provide compensation: Contaminated blood. Horizon Post Office scandal. Grenfell. WASPI women. £10bn here, £10bn there. Sooner or later you’re talking about serious money.

Now we arrive at the final group: the layers of Structural Misery.

READ MORE: Budget 2024: ‘We can avoid taxing workers by hiking capital gains tax’

On the seventh circle reside the Long-term Pressures we’ve known about for some time. The Ageing population means for each person of working age, there are more retired people to provide for. For the NHS just to stand still, it needs a real increase in its budget of 4% every year. Meanwhile, Climate Change has moved from a ‘future risk’ to real costs today as we grapple with the increase in extreme weather events. The OBR estimate the cost of illness, age, climate will triple our debt levels over the next 50 years.

The eighth circle are New Challenges. Front and centre is geopolitical risk. Since the end of the Cold War, we have enjoyed a ‘peace dividend’ where we could cut spending on Defence to fund schools and hospitals without raising taxes. That has now gone sharply into reverse with the wide recognition we need to raise Defence spending to 2.5% or more. No small beer.

Finally, there are The Endless Flats. Imagine it, standing in a featureless wasteland with nothing in any direction. These are the Flats of Productivity (flat for a decade), the Flats of Investment (flat since Brexit) and the Flat Real Incomes (no higher than 15 years ago). We need the courage to build something productive on these plains or Britain will remain shackled to a flat economy.

Fixing the future

It may sound like I’m feeling pessimistic, but in truth it’s quite the opposite. On his entry to hell, Dante famously saw the sign: ‘Abandon all hope, ye who enter here’.

But we’re in the opposite place. For the first time in a decade, there is hope.

Why? The move to address Britain’s long-term failure through investment is THE most important thing to fix growth, productivity and living standards. And it looks to be core to Reeves’ budget this week.

So I say: ‘Abandon pessimism, ye who enter’. The turnaround has begun.

Read more of our Budget 2024 coverage:



The Chancellor must use the
 budget to abandon neoliberal policies

25 October, 2024

Chancellors come and go but the crisis has deepened because they have all become slaves to neoliberal dogmas



Tthe Labour government will present its first budget for 14 years. In a post-Brexit world, it faces considerable challenges in reviving a stagnant economy, diminishing living standards and broken public services.

Despite being the world’s sixth largest economy, a large proportion of the population is overwhelmed by poverty and a sense of helplessness. Adjustments to tax base and rates need to be used to reduce income and wealth inequalities and improve people’s spending power, a key requirement for building a sustainable economy.

Chancellors come and go but the crisis has deepened because they have all become slaves to neoliberal dogmas. People’s living standards have been eroded through never-ending austerity and corporate profits have been guaranteed through privatisations, outsourcing of public services and Private Finance Initiative’s (PFI). It all needs to change.

Profiteering by the energy sector is responsible for creating poverty and killing off the steel and shipping industry. Returns extracted by water company shareholders are the cause of high prices, pollution of rivers and seas, and low investment in infrastructure.

In the 1970s, the UK was lucky enough to win the nature’s lottery in the form of oil and gas deposits in the North Sea. The government squandered the break by handing it all to private corporations and subjecting the industry to comparatively lower rates of tax. The UK handed everything to the private sector, collected $1.72 per barrel in taxes and squandered it on tax cuts for the rich. Norway also found oil and gas deposits in the North Sea but didn’t privatise. It collected $21.35 per barrel in taxes and ring-fenced the revenue for future use. It now has a sovereign fund of $1.4 trillion whilst the UK public finances are a mess. The UK state is still enamoured with privatisation and despite failures won’t bring water into public ownership.

The neoliberal dogma portrays workers as the problem. With the state-sponsored onslaught on trade unions, workers’ share of gross domestic product (GDP) in the form of wage and salaries declined from 65.1% in 1976 to barely 50% now. 12m people, including 4.3m children, live in poverty. 9.3m people, including 3m children are facing hunger and hardship. The pre-tax annual median wage of £28,764 is lower in real terms than in 2008, and is inadequate for people to access good food, housing, healthcare and pensions. Last year some 3.12m people relied upon food banks to survive. Some 17.8m adults have annual income of less than £12,570. The average state pension of between £9,000 and £9,500 is a major source of income for pensioners, and is less than 50% of the minimum wage. Last year, some 5,000 pensioners died from cold as they struggled to afford eating and heating. Unsurprisingly, the UK has labour shortages. 2.8m people are chronically ill and unable to work and 6.33m people are waiting for 7.64m hospital appointments in England alone.

The tax system has been used to impoverish the poor. The richest fifth pay 31% of gross household income in direct taxes; poorest fifth 14%. The Richest fifth pay 9% of disposable income in indirect taxes; poorest fifth 28%. Altogether, the poorest pay higher proportion of income in tax.

Even getting higher education and skills does not necessarily offer a way out of poverty. Student debt has reached £240bn and expected to hit £500bn by 2050. Not so long ago, this was part of the public debt but successive governments have dumped it onto households. The cash which once fuelled spending in the local economy now boosts profits of the finance industry. Unsurprisingly, too many town centres resemble economic deserts.

Due to government policies the top 1% has more wealth than 70% of the population combined. The bottom 50% of the population owns less than 5% of wealth, and the top 10% has 57%. The systematic creation of poverty means that fewer have the capacity to spend and stimulate the economy.

Neoliberal policies have not boosted investment in productive assets. The UK’s investment performance is worse than every other G7 country. Successive governments have offered tax reliefs, subsidies and grants to stimulate investment but why would companies invest when people lack the power to purchase the resulting goods and services.

Against the above background, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves needs to boost people’s incomes, a necessary condition for securing economic growth and building a sustainable economy. She needs to increase the living wage and at the very least impose a triple-lock on all social security benefits. By ending the two-child benefit cap, government can lift thousands of children out of poverty. By restoring the winter fuel payment to all; it can prevent thousands of pensioner deaths.

Personal allowances have been frozen since 2021 and dragged millions of poor people into income tax brackets. The government needs to end the freeze. Each £1,000 increase in personal allowance costs around £10bn. The benefit to the rich can be clawed back with adjustments at the top end of the scale. This can boost disposable incomes and local economies.

The Employment Rights Bill currently going through parliament offers an opportunity to reset worker rights and end insecure employment. The Bill must be revised to end zero-hour contracts and obnoxious practice of firing and rehiring workers on lower wages. It must give workers a say in corporate affairs by ensuring that worker-elected directors have seats on the boards of all large companies. This can help to secure equitable distribution of income. Only strong trade unions can negotiate with belligerent employers to secure a fair deal for workers.

Taxation policy must be used to reduce inequalities and redistribute wealth. Taxing capital gains and dividends at the same rates as wages is a necessary step. Recipients of capital gains and dividends use the NHS and social care but do not pay any national insurance. That is unfair and must end, and can raise £25bn or more a year for redistribution and or investment in infrastructure.

Indeed, the government has vast policy choices for redistribution and reduction in inequalities. These include wealth taxes on the ultra rich, financial transaction tax, taxes on private planes and yachts. Since 2010, HMRC admits that it failed to collect over £500bn in taxes though others say it is closer to around £1,400bn. This does not include taxes lost due to profit shifting by large corporations. Some £570bn is stashed away in tax havens by UK residents and HMRC has made no estimate of the taxes consequently lost. Altogether, there is a huge potential to raise tax revenues to alleviate inequalities and poverty, and rebuild the economy.

Rather than reviving the discredited Private Finance Initiative (PFI) under which the government paid corporations £6 for every £1 of investment, the government needs to directly invest in the social infrastructure. Neoliberals always wheel out the argument about public debt whenever any public investment is mentioned. They need to be reminded that post-war construction of the UK was facilitated by government debt of 270% of GDP. This built the welfare state, infrastructure, new industries, revived the private sector, boosted employment and generated tax revenues. By 1976, the debt was reduced to 49% of GDP. Such policies are necessary again. The current government debt is around 100% of GDP, and includes the effects of quantitative easing. When excluded it comes down to about 65% of GDP. So there is room to borrow, and the Chancellor is thought to be considering loosening the self-imposed debt straitjacket.

The hikes in water and energy price have increased household poverty and business costs, and shown that governments obsessed with privatisation have fewer economic levers to manage the crisis. It can acquire more by bringing essential services into public ownership and thus eliminate profiteering and provide economic stability. Neoliberals sing praises of markets and competition, and surely would welcome break-up of banks and internet companies, as that can enhance competition and lower prices.

The Chancellor must abandon neoliberal policies which have held the UK back for so long. They have neither produced prosperity nor happiness for the people. Often emancipatory change is imposed in the teeth of opposition and the same is necessary now. The government must prioritise people’s welfare over the short-term selfish motives of giant corporations and the finance industry.

Prem Sikka is an Emeritus Professor of Accounting at the University of Essex and the University of Sheffield, a Labour member of the House of Lords, and Contributing Editor at Left Foot Forward.


Richard Burgon MP: Why we need Wealth Taxes, not more cuts in the Autumn Budget
Yesterday


'We need to recognise that the cuts and austerity that got us into this mess will not get us out of it'




The first Labour budget in 15 years comes at a time of deep crisis for people all across the country.

The Tories left behind a toxic legacy of plummeting living standards, stagnant wages and public services stretched beyond breaking point.

No one can deny the scale of the mess left by consecutive Tory administrations. But we also need to recognise that the cuts and austerity that got us into this mess will not get us out of it.

Labour was elected to solve the crises our communities face and that means breaking the austerity doom loop.

One crucial question for our new government is who should pay for cleaning up the Tory mess: those who have thrived in the past decade, or those who have borne the brunt of Tory policies?

While millions have struggled to make ends meet in recent years, the wealthiest have flourished.

The total wealth of UK billionaires has skyrocketed from £246 billion in 2013 to an astonishing £684 billion just a decade later. That equates to an increase of £120 million every single day for 10 years.

Yet in Government the Tories implemented a series of regressive tax increases that tried to pay for the economic crisis on the backs of the majority of people. Labour must stand for the exact opposite.

So instead of further austerity that will hit the poorest hardest, the wealthiest in our society should be made to pay to fix the damage caused by the Tories and to fund the investment our public services so desperately need.

That’s why this week I have brought a public petition to the Government ahead of the Autumn Budget on October 30th, calling for Wealth Taxes and not more cuts. So far, 50,000 people have backed this call.

The package of three progressive taxes that I’m proposing will specifically target the wealthiest, the tax advantages enjoyed by those who live off their wealth and the greedy corporations that have profited from the energy crisis.

The first is the introduction of a 2% Wealth Tax that would apply to any assets over £10 million, raising up to £24 billion annually. That would affect just 20,000 people, less than 0.1% of the population.

The next calls for the equalisation of Capital Gains Tax with Income Tax rates, so that those who live off their investments pay the same tax rates as ordinary workers who go out to work day-in day-out. That would generate an additional £17 billion.

The third measure would end the state subsidies that go to fossil fuel giants and to close the loopholes in the oil and gas windfall tax, raising another £4 billion.

These three measures alone would bring in an additional £45 billion per year, providing vital funds to rebuild our crumbling public services, invest in a higher-wage economy and boost people’s incomes.

The funds raised through wealth taxes could also tackle the deep inequality that plagues our society. It would be a very popular measure to make the richest pay and then to use the funds to combat child poverty and support pensioners for example by lifting the two-child benefit cap and reversing cuts to the Winter Fuel Allowance.

After so many years of austerity, cronyism, and corporate profiteering under Tory misrule, the new Labour Government has the opportunity to directly improve the lives of millions at the Autumn budget. Wealth taxes can help it secure the resources to do so.

You can add your name to Richard Burgon MP’s petition calling for Wealth Taxes, not more cuts, in the Autumn Budget here.


IPPR: Why Labour’s first budget in 14 years gives us cause for hope

Yesterday
 Opinion

'We must celebrate the wins when they come, but the case for bold ambition on areas such as fair taxation and the green transition must be made and remade throughout the course of this parliament.'



Pranesh Narayanan, research fellow at IPPR

The first Labour budget in 14 years is shaping up to be a significant event. In the run-up we’ve heard a lot about ‘fiscal black holes’ and bleak inheritances. Many have been complaining about a narrative defined by gloom rather than hope. However, it is important to acknowledge the scale of the challenge facing Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves at this point in time.

Ordinary people have seen a decade and a half of stagnant wages and rising living costs. Many regions outside of London and the South have seen a decline in meaningful and prosperous work. There is a palpable sense that things are just not working – whether that’s the courts, the NHS or community services. Britain is no longer at the technological frontier and lags many advanced economies on productivity and investment.

There are two pieces of good news – firstly, after being battered by the pandemic and an energy crisis, economic conditions are returning to some sense of normality. Inflation is back at normal levels, interest rates are expected to fall, and the risk of recession has faded away. In fact, the International Monetary Fund has revised the UK’s growth forecast up.

The second piece of good news is that a way forward is emerging. We’ve seen that the low-tax, small-state policies of successive conservative governments have failed to deliver prosperity. There is consensus that we need to improve, not cut, public services and investment to build a better economy.

This change in mindset was at the heart of Rachel Reeves’ recent announcement that the government will tweak its fiscal rules to allow more borrowing for public investment. For many people, this might sound like a simple edit of numbers on a spreadsheet, but it removes a key barrier to public investment that has effectively been in place since the Coalition government of 2010. This is the Treasury finally admitting that being responsible with the public finances is about spending wisely not just cutting costs.

This can release up to an additional £50bn a year for public investment in infrastructure, buildings, equipment and industrial development. It’s unlikely that Reeves will use up the entirety of this ‘new money’ – investment projects take time to set up and deliver. A careful approach is needed so that we don’t see the mistakes of previous governments in creating instability in the funding pipeline.

Whilst there is undoubtedly good news for public investment, this government’s rules on day-to-day spending state that they will have to be funded by tax revenues. However, we know that spending cuts would be a mistake.

This time last year, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt delivered a budget that cut taxes whilst complaining about poor public sector productivity. The idea was that public services would get less money and would magically improve their productivity through better discipline or some vague turn to ‘responsibility’. This was a ludicrous proposition – when services are already on their knees and dealing with huge and immediate pressures, it’s simply not possible to do root and branch reform or introduce new systems and technologies. They need funding for the present and investment for the future.

Both Starmer and Reeves have committed to not repeating austerity. It’s easy to be sceptical when the rhetoric of ‘tough choices’ has been deployed ad-nauseum. Still, it’s possible to make a different set of touch choices – most people link this idea to spending cuts thanks to George Osbourne’s brutal austerity measures but today, it’s more likely to mean tax rises. Most of the speculation in the run up to the budget has been about which taxes to hike, not about whether taxes should increase.

Capital gains tax reform could bring an extra £14bn, with almost all that revenue coming from the wealthiest in society. Closing inheritance tax reliefs could also raise some of this revenue. However, if it is not possible to fully close the funding gap through these measures, adding national insurance to employer pension contributions could also be a reasonable option – this would raise up to £14bn, of which £6bn would come out of contributions into the pension pots of the top 10% of earners.

It’s unclear how far Starmer’s Labour will go on many issues that are important to progressives – rumours around capital gains tax, for example, suggest that reforms will fall short of what is technically possible. That being said, there does seem to be a more constructive approach to economic policy. We must celebrate the wins when they come, but the case for bold ambition on areas such as fair taxation and the green transition must be made and remade throughout the course of this parliament.


Budget 2024: Here’s how Rachel Reeves could re-build our economy, rescue public services and deliver the green transition

Yesterday
Opinion

Adrian Ramsay explains what the Green Party would put forward in this year's budget



Adrian Ramsay is co-leader of the Green Party of England and Wales and the MP for Waveney Valley

Listen to Labour ministers answering questions about next week’s Budget and there’s one consistent soundbite – “the £40 billion black hole left by the Conservatives”. It leaves the impression that the only objective of the Budget is to fill that black hole.

But the Budget needs to do so much more. We need to start to re-build our broken economy, rescue our public services from years of under-funding and accelerate the transition to a greener, more sustainable future.

A Budget with zero ambition wouldn’t only be disastrous for our country, it would mean Labour turning its back on its key election promise that it would be the party of change. The caution coming out of the Treasury suggests this Budget will be austerity by another name.

Yet it is clear to anyone who’s tried to get a GP appointment, been on an NHS waiting list for years, struggled with social care or SEND provision or tried to find a home to live in that we cannot afford another 15 years of austerity. Investment is desperately needed across all our public services, from the NHS to prisons, schools to transport. And if we are to successfully build a carbon-free future and a more sustainable economy, investment in the green transition also needs to happen now.

It is deeply alarming that rather than speculating which areas might be favoured for investment, the talk instead is of ministers fighting the cuts being proposed for their departments by the Chancellor. The only area being “spared” is the NHS but even then the money coming down the track would allow it merely to stand still and do almost nothing to plug the £37 billion shortfall in capital spending identified by Lord Darzi.

This lack of ambition, even lack of vision, risks not only leaving people facing more years of poor health, poor housing and poor public services. It will drag us further away from the resilient and nature-rich future we could be creating. The roll-out of financial support for nature-friendly farming schemes has had a rocky ride since we left the EU and the Common Agricultural Policy. But reducing its budget, as has been rumoured, would be an act of economic and environmental vandalism and would undermine what little progress has been made towards improving the UK’s biodiversity and food security.

If the past 15 years have taught us anything, it should be that austerity and slashing spending on public services leads to static or even lower living standards, an unhealthier population and a weak economy. We won’t get out of the hole we’re in by following the same path.

The Government needs to drop its slavish commitment to the existing fiscal rules so it can borrow to invest, especially in the green transition, thereby creating jobs and reviving the economy.

If, as reported, the Chancellor borrows to invest, this will win the Green Party’s support because it is only by closing the yawning investment gap that we can build a flourishing economy. The list is a long one: crumbling hospital and schools, poorly-insulated homes, inadequate public transport not to mention decarbonising our economy.

So how to pay for this? There are options alongside borrowing to invest. We should close the unfairness gap in the tax system by equalising tax rates on income from wealth with those on income from work. It makes no sense that people who are paying 40 or 45 percent tax on their salaries are taxed at only 20 percent on capital gains.

We should go further by introducing a tax on the very wealthiest in society – a policy supported by Patriotic Millionaires who argue that the best way to delivering investment is through taxing the richest in our society. The wealthiest 10 percent of the population own around half of all wealth, much of which is taxed at a much lower rate than the income of ordinary working people. Yet all the talk is how to stop them leaving the country, rather than looking to them to pay their fair share of tax so everyone can benefit from improved public services.

A 2 percent tax on those with more than £10 million could raise £22 billion a year, going a long way to plugging that “black hole” identified by Rachel Reeves and start the process of turning around our ailing economy.

It is only right that those with the broadest shoulders should pay a bit more to fund the public services that our economy relies on: a better education system to teach people the skills they’ll need in the future; a strong health service so people can get the treatment they need so they can return to work; decent housing stock so people are less likely to fall ill in the first place; and decent social care for those who can’t look after themselves. That is the pathway to creating a thriving, resilient economy and a compassionate society.

There is more at stake next week than a thriving economy and healthy society. Voters need to believe that politicians can make a difference in their lives. They voted for change in July. If trust in democratic politics is to be restored, this Government needs to deliver it.

Image credit: Keir Starmer – Creative Commons








Sales of Boris Johnson’s memoir slump by 62% in second week

Basit Mahmood 
25 October, 2024 
Left Foot Forward

It was also reported earlier this month that Johnson’s book had been hit by delays and won’t be hitting the shelves in European capitals as quickly as he had hoped, due to Brexit.



It’s not going well for Boris Johnson after sales of his memoir ‘Unleashed’ dropped by 62% in its second week since publication.

Despite the former Prime Minister spending much time in promoting his book, including a prolonged media round, with the Guardian reporting that the book “only just managed to cling on to the No 1 spot in the official UK Top 50 this week, selling 133 more copies than Tim Spector’s The Food for Life, according to Nielsen Bookscan’s Total Consumer Market data.”

It was also reported earlier this month that Johnson’s book had been hit by delays and won’t be hitting the shelves in European capitals as quickly as he had hoped, due to Brexit.

In a review for the Guardian, Martin Kettle said of Johnson’s book: “It is full of angry self-righteousness … Though Johnson likes to parade the outward signs of his intellect, there is not a philosophical sentence in the entire book.”
What are the differences between Westminster and Holyrood?

25 October, 2024 
Opinion

They are apples and pears. They really cannot be compared because they are so innately different.

Jamie Stone is the Liberal Democrat MP for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross and the chair of the House of Commons Petitions Committee.

“You’ve been in both, Jamie, so what’s the difference between the Scottish Parliament and the House of Commons?”

If I had a penny for every time I’d been asked that…

Right, here goes: the first is formality versus informality. In the Scottish Parliament, where I had the pleasure to work for twelve years, the staff all called me Jamie. In fact, sometimes they would comment in a derogatory way on what they had just heard me say in the Chamber.

“We’re all Jock Tamson’s bairns.” They’d say.

In other words, we’re all equal. This was and very much still is the style of the Scottish Parliament. In fact, only the other day when I popped into Holyrood (they still allow me in now and again!) Kirsty behind the bar in the Garden Lobby greeted my appearance with a loud and cheerful, ‘Jamie! What are you doing back here?’.

If one quote was to typify the Scottish Parliament then that’s it. Indeed, having been a Member since its inception in 1999, I happen to know that when they were being trained, the staff were instructed to address the newly elected MSP’s as Mr, Mrs, Ms and so forth… but never by their first name. I also happen to know that this training fell on deaf ears from the very start. I was Jamie on day one, and still am today. I must admit that’s how I’ve always preferred it.

In stark contrast, the members of staff in Westminster will never call me Jamie. Every morning when I’m going to the Chamber the doorkeepers in their white bow ties and tailcoats say, ‘Good morning, Mr Stone’. I’ve tried saying, ‘please call me Jamie’, but it hasn’t stuck.

Don’t get me started on the Chamber… You’d have to pass the smelling salts if anyone dared call me by my name. It’s the Honourable Member for Caithness Sutherland and Easter Ross – and even if somebody did refer to me as Jamie, Hansard would always correct it. It’s a funny old place down here.

I once arrived a minute late for the start of a statement by Theresa May, when she was Prime Minister. I then dared to try and catch the Speaker’s eye (in other words, indicate that I intended to ask a question). Within minutes, one of the aforementioned doorkeepers appeared with a posh envelope for me. On the back, it said ‘Mr Speaker’s Private Secretary’:

“As you attended the Chamber tardily for the commencement of the Prime Minister’s statement, Mr Speaker has no intention of calling you for a question.”

Smacky wristy time…

Another big difference is the access to Government Ministers. In Holyrood, you simply cannot help bumping into Scottish Ministers as you walk about the place. There is no hiding for them, and indeed with the boot on the other foot, there is no hiding for an MSP. A good example of this is the offices themselves. In Holyrood, the walls and doors are transparent glass – you simply cannot have anything to hide. To put it plainly, there’s no easy way to shirk your responsibilities. People notice.

In Westminster, how different. Boris Johnson and Liz Truss never really bothered circulating at all. And on the rare occasion when they did, they didn’t seem to know who anyone was. In fact, on the one occasion that Liz Truss did speak to me, she thought I was a Tory MP! Very different indeed. It’s as if the thick old wooden doors in the palace are designed precisely to keep things hidden.

If you want to buttonhole a Minister or Prime Minister in Westminster, then really your only chance is when it comes to a vote. Only then, you might catch them in one of the two voting lobbies. Apart from that, they’re into their black limousines and away into the night. Indeed, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss would be deeply shocked to think of themselves as being one of ‘Jock Tamson’s bairns’. No no, not them – not alongside the likes of me. Even then, I’m sure the expressions would have to be carefully explained to those untuned to Scottish expressions.

In closing, it does seem to me that I have been a little harsh on my present workplace, the House of Commons. There is one thing, however, that cannot be taken away. To walk this place, to sit in the same room that Winston Churchill may have sat, or to touch the toe on his statue outside the Chamber and make a wish, is to walk alongside history. Every time I step into Westminster Hall I am both privileged and humbled. I imagine the great people who have stood in the very same spot, and I realise that I am a cog in a much greater democratic machine which has preceded, and will succeed, me. I’m immensely proud of that. That much can never be taken away.

So when I answer the question I started with, I always use the same formula. They are apples and pears. They really cannot be compared because they are so innately different. It is quite fascinating to experience their different political cultures and I think it’s wonderful that, like us all, they hold very different personalities. All in all, it is an enormous privilege to be elected to either of them. How lucky I’ve been.

Image credit: Diliff – Creative Commons
Bombshell poll shows more people support Universal Basic Income than oppose it

Chris Jarvis 
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

46% of Brits back a UBI



New polling has found that a plurality of the British public support the introduction of a Universal Basic Income (UBI). A UBI is a scheme through which every person in the country would receive a payment from the state which is designed to help meet some or all of their basic needs and costs.

Advocates for a UBI argue that it could play a major role in alleviating poverty and addressing income inequality in the country by ensuring that nobody falls below a minimum standard of living.

The new poll found that 46 per cent of people in Britain support the introduction of a UBI, compared to 33 per cent who oppose it. The remaining 20 per cent said they didn’t know whether they support or oppose a UBI.

The poll also found that 50 per cent of people think a UBI would improve quality of life and 52 per cent think it would reduce poverty.

YouGov – who carried out the poll – also found that half (50 per cent) of those who support a UBI think it should cover all a person’s basic living costs, irrespective of other forms of income. Meanwhile, 45 per cent of UBI supporters think it should only cover some basic living costs, with people being expected to supplement the UBI with other forms of income.

Despite the levels of support for a UBI, the YouGov poll also found that more than half (56 per cent) of the public don’t think such a scheme would be affordable for the government.

Support for a UBI is highest among Labour voters – 61 per cent of whom said they support the measure. 54 per cent of Lib Dem voters said they back it, as did 31 per cent of Reform voters, and 21 per cent of Tory voters.

Chris Jarvis is head of strategy and development at Left Foot Forward