Saturday, January 11, 2020

Iranians marched in fiery protests to demand Ayatollah Khamenei's resignation after officials shot down a commercial plane

 

Iranians shout slogans as one of them holds-up a placard with a Persian script that reads, Death To The Liar, during a gathering to mark the victims of the Ukraine Boeing 737 passenger plane, in Tehrans business district on January 11, 2020. Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images


Thousands of protestors flooded the streets of Tehran to demand the resignation of the country's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 
Demonstrators had first turned up for a vigil for the 176 passengers who were killed when Iran shot down a Ukrainian commercial airliner.

Fiery chants and marching triggered a response from the city's riot police, and videos on social media show tear gas launched at the crowds. 

Thousands of protestors flooded the streets of Tehran days after Iran shot down a Ukrainian commercial airliner, killing all 176 passengers on board.

Emotional vigils for the passengers who were killed in the attack devolved into fiery demonstrations that saw Iranians marching with signs to demand the resignation of the country's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 

In video captured by The New York Times, angry protestors chanted "death to the dictator," and "shameless," with protestors on university campuses reportedly calling the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps "incompetent" and "the people's shame."
—Farnaz Fassihi (@farnazfassihi) January 11, 2020

Video posted to social media showed the protests triggered violent clashes with riot police, who responded with tear gas. 
—Saina M (@Sainaraha) January 11, 2020

Tensions in the country reached a breaking point when Ukrainian Airlines Flight 752, which was carrying at least 130 Iranian citizens, was shot down on January 8 by Revolutionary Guard air defense forces after it took off from Tehran.

The country initially denied responsibility for the plane crash, suggesting it was a mechanical problem. However, in a statement released by military officials early January 11, Iran admitted to hitting the plane with a missile. 

Despite the statement, foreign minister Javad Zarif immediately pointed some blame at the US, saying the crash was caused by "human error at a time of crisis caused by US adventurism."


US-Iran relations quickly devolved as the countries have traded barbs since Iran's attacks in retaliation to the US killing of Qassem Soleimani, a top military official, who was killed by a drone strike ordered by President Donald Trump.                                                                      

Protesters in Tehran demand Iranian officials resign over PS752 missile strike
Semi-official Fars news agency says demonstrators ripped up pictures of Soleimani

The Associated Press · Posted: Jan 11, 2020

Demonstrators are seen in front of the Amirkabir University
 in Tehran, Iran, on Saturday. (Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

Hundreds gathered at universities in Tehran on Saturday night to protest the Iran government's late acknowledgement that it "unintentionally'' shot down the Ukrainian jetliner that crashed earlier this week, after the government had for days repeatedly denied Western accusations and mounting evidence that it was responsible.

A military statement carried by state media earlier on Saturday said the plane was mistaken for a "hostile target" after it turned toward a "sensitive military centre" of Iran's Revolutionary Guard. The military was at its "highest level of readiness," it said, amid the heightened tensions with the United States.

Iran President Hassan Rouhani tweeted: "Iran deeply regrets this disastrous mistake."

The protesters demanded officials involved in the missile attack be removed from their positions and tried.

The semi-official Fars news agency reported demonstrators ripped up pictures of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a targeted attack by the U.S. earlier this month.

Police later broke up the demonstrations.

ANALYSIS Admitting to downing Ukraine jetliner will cost Iran regime dearlyUkrainian plane was 'unintentionally' shot down, Iran says

The Kyiv-bound flight PS752 plane was shot down early Wednesday — killing all 167 aboard, including 57 Canadians — hours after Iran launched a ballistic missile attack on two military bases housing U.S. troops in Iraq in retaliation for the killing of Soleimani in an American airstrike in Baghdad. No one was hurt in the attack on the U.S. bases.

Iranians had rallied around their leaders after the killing of Soleimani, who was seen as a national icon for building up armed groups across the region that project Iranian influence and battle the Islamic State group and other perceived enemies.

The shooting down of the plane and the lack of transparency around it could reignite anger at the country's leadership. Iran has already seen unrest over joblessness and the expense of basic household goods.


'We need full clarity'

Abroad, various governments condemned the strike on the passenger jet and demanded a full investigation.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he told Rouhani that Iran's admission was an important step in providing answers for families, but that more must be done.

"A full and complete investigation must be conducted," Trudeau said. "We need full clarity on how such a horrific tragedy could have occurred."

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau held a news conference in Ottawa on Saturday, saying Iran must take "full responsibility" and that a full and complete investigation must be conducted.

In their conversation, he said Rouhani promised further investigation into the circumstances surrounding the plane crash.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky said the crash investigation should continue and the "perpetrators" should be brought to justice. He said Iran should compensate victims' families — Prime Minister Oleksiy Honcharuk had separately said Ukraine would pay 200,000 hryvnia each to families (about $11,000 Cdn) — and he requested "official apologies through diplomatic channels."

Zelensky thanked the U.S, Britain, Canada and others for information about the crash and their support. He says that support "undoubtedly helped" push Iran to acknowledge its responsibility for the crash.

Trudeau says Iran must take 'full responsibility' after admitting its missiles brought down PS752'It was clearly a war zone': Aviation experts question why Flight PS752 was cleared to fly

The crash killed 11 Ukrainians.

The Ukrainian airline criticized Iran's decision to leave its airspace open despite the hostilities.

"It's absolutely irresponsible," Ukraine International Airlines vice president Ihor Sosnovskiy told reporters. "There must be protection around ordinary people. If they are shooting somewhere from somewhere, they are obliged to close the airport."

Watch: Why flight 752 could take off amid missile strikes


Watch
Why Flight 752 could take off amid missile strikes

If Iran was firing missiles at U.S. military bases in Iraq that night, why was Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 able to take off? CBC News’s Susan Ormiston looks for answers. 2:08

Protesters In Tehran Call For Justice Over Iran’s Downing Of Ukrainian Plane

By RFE/RL 
January 11, 2020 

Protesters gathering in front of Amir Kabir university in Tehran.
Share

Protesters outside a university in Tehran have called for justice after Iran admitted it mistakenly shot down a Ukrainian passenger plane on January 8.

“Resignation is not enough," protesters chanted outside Amir Kabir university on January 11 while demanding a trial for those responsible for the downing of the plane that killed all 176 people on board.

Amateur videos posted on social media also showed protesters chanting “dishonorable” in an apparent reference to Iranian authorities, who finally admitted that a missile fired by its forces caused the crash.

The authorities announcement -- coming after repeated denials -- left many Iranians in shock and grief.

Amirali Hajizadeh, the head of the aerospace division of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), said on January 11 that his unit accepts “full responsibility” for the tragedy.

In comments aired by state TV, he said that when he learned about the downing of the plane, “I wished I was dead.”

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei expressed his “deep sympathy” to the families of the 176 victims and called on the armed forces to "pursue probable shortcomings and guilt in the painful incident.”

Nearly half of those killed were Iranian citizens while many others were ethnic Iranians living in other countries.With files from Reuters and CBC News

Iran police disperse student air crash protesters: news agency

BY AFP

Iranian police dispersed students chanting "radical" slogans during a Saturday gathering in Tehran to honour the 176 people killed when an airliner was mistakenly shot down, Fars news agency reported.

AFP correspondents said hundreds of students had gathered early in the evening at Amir Kabir University, in downtown Tehran, to pay respects to those killed in the air disaster.

The tribute later turned into an angry demonstration.

The students chanted slogans denouncing "liars" and demanded the resignation and prosecution of those responsible for downing the plane and allegedly covering up the accidental action.

Iran said on Saturday that the Ukraine International Airlines Boeing 737 was "unintentionally" shot down on Wednesday shortly after taking off from Tehran's main airport.

All 176 people on board died, mostly Iranians and Canadians, many of whom were students.


Fars, which is close to conservatives, said the protesting students chanted "destructive" and "radical" slogans.

The news agency said some of the students tore down posters of Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian general killed on January 3 in a US drone strike on Baghdad.

Fars published pictures of demonstrators gathered around a ring of candles during the tribute and a picture of a torn poster bearing the image of a smiling Soleimani.

It said that police "dispersed" them as they left the university and blocked streets, causing a traffic jam.

In an extremely unusual move, state television mentioned the protest, reporting that the students shouted "anti-regime" slogans.

A video purportedly of the protest circulated online Saturday evening showing police firing tear gas at protesters and a man getting up after apparently being hit in the leg by a projectile.

It was not possible to verify the location of the video, or when it was filmed.

Iran's acknowledgement on Saturday that the plane had been shot down in error came after officials had for days categorically denied Western claims that it had been struck by a missile.

The aerospace commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards accepted full responsibility.

But Brigadier General Amirali Hajizadeh said the missile operator acted independently, shooting down the Boeing 737 after mistaking it for a "cruise missile".


Protests in Tehran after Iran admitted shooting down plane


Videos and comments on social media show angry Iranians calling on leadership to resign over plane crash incident.
Protesters raise slogans to show their sympathy to victims 
of the plane crash in Tehran [Nazanin Tabatabaee/WANA/Reuters]
MORE ON IRANTruth about Iran plane crash could not be hidden: ZelenskyytodayIran says it 'unintentionally' shot down plane: Latest updatestodayIran's retaliation is not overtodayProtests in Tehran after Iran admitted shooting down planetoday

A group of Iranian protesters has demanded Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei step down after Tehran said its military mistakenly shot down a Ukrainian plane, killing all 176 people on board.

"Commander-in-chief [Khamenei] resign, resign," videos posted on Twitter showed hundreds of people chanting in front of Tehran's Amir Kabir University on Saturday.

Others on Twitter asked why the plane was allowed to take off when tensions in Iran were so high.

More:
US believes Iran accidentally shot down Ukraine plane: Reports
'No survivors': Ukrainian jet crashes in Iran with 176 on board
'Disastrous mistake': Iran admits it shot down Iranian plane

Fars news agency reported that Iranian police dispersed students that were chanting "radical" slogans during the gathering in Tehran.

The students chanted slogans denouncing "liars" and demanded the resignation and prosecution of those responsible for downing the plane and allegedly covering up the accidental action.

Fars said the protesting students chanted "destructive" and "radical" slogans.

Earlier on Saturday, Iran said its military had shot down the Ukrainian plane, calling it a "disastrous mistake".

The military claimed air defences were fired in error during an alert which was imposed after Iranian missile struck US targets in Iraq.

Iran denied for days after Wednesday's crash that it brought down the plane, although a top Revolutionary Guards commander on Saturday said he had told authorities about the unintentional missile strike the day it happened.


BREAKING:Public mourning gatherings turn into protests in #Iran. Angry crowds chanting, "Death to the liars."#IranPlaneCrash #UkrainePlaneCrash pic.twitter.com/20jPNia6WJ— Farnaz Fassihi (@farnazfassihi) January 11, 2020

Speaking from Tehran, Al Jazeera Dorsa Jabbari said: "There is a lot of anger. Iranians are demanding justice and accountability. Many people including families of the victims are in shock. They do not understand why their government would have lied to them for this long."

"Vigils that were held near Amir Kabir University quickly turned into anti-government protests with people calling for the IRGC to leave the country," she said.

Iran's leadership last faced mass protests in November following the rise in petrol prices.
Condemnations

Foreign governments have condemned Iran's action, with Ukraine demanding compensation and a United States official calling the downing "reckless".

The United Kingdom said Tehran's admission was an important first step and urged a de-escalation in tensions.

Supreme leader Khamenei, until now silent about the crash, said information should be made public, while top officials and the military issued apologies.

What caused a Ukranian plane to crash in Tehran?

But the state television suggested revealing the truth might be used by the "enemies of Iran", usually a reference to the US and Israel.

The crash heightened international pressure on Iran after months of friction with the US and tit-for-tat attacks.

A US drone strike killed a top Iranian military commander in Iraq on January 3, prompting Tehran to fire at US targets on Wednesday.

Experts said mounting international scrutiny would have made it all but impossible to hide signs of a missile strike in any investigation.

They said Iran may have felt a U-turn was better than battling rising criticism abroad and growing grief and anger at home, as many victims were Iranians with dual nationality.
Rare apology

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), in a rare step, apologised to the nation and accepted full responsibility for the plane crash.

Senior Guards commander Amir Ali Hajizadeh said he had informed Iran's authorities on Wednesday about the unintentional strike, a comment that raised questions about why officials had publicly denied it for so long.

Speaking on state television, he said he wished he "could die" when he heard the news about the incident.

Ukraine demanded an official apology and compensation. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called for "a complete and thorough investigation" with Iran's full cooperation.

Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif wrote on Twitter that "human error at time of crisis caused by US adventurism led to disaster", citing an initial armed forces investigation into the crash.

A military statement said the plane flew close to a sensitive Revolutionary Guards site at a time of high alert.

But Ukraine said the plane was in a normal flight corridor. Iran's Civil Aviation Organisation also said the airliner had not veered off its normal course.

Ukraine International Airlines said Iran should have closed the airport, adding that it received no indication it faced a threat and was cleared for take-off.

Analysts said an investigation would almost certainly have revealed signs on the smashed fuselage of a missile strike.

"There's nothing you can do to cover it up or hide it," said Anthony Brickhouse, an air safety expert at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and former US National Transportation Safety Board investigator. "Evidence is evidence."

The disaster echoed a 1988 incident, when a US warship shot down an Iranian airliner, killing 290 people. While Washington claimed it was an accident, Tehran said it was intentional.

Iran's 'Unforgivable Mistake' Downing Jet Elicits Furor At Home And Abroad


January 11, 2020
COLIN DWYER

Mourners gathered for a candlelight vigil Saturday in Iran's
 capital, Tehran, to remember the victims of the Ukrainian
 plane crash.Ebrahim Noroozi/AP

Less than a day after Iran finally acknowledged that its armed forces unintentionally brought down a Ukrainian jetliner, Iranian authorities' admission of the "unforgivable mistake" has had major reverberations — both in Iran's capital, Tehran, where demonstrators crowded local universities Saturday, and around a stunned world.

"The fact that Iran has now taken responsibility for the downing of that aircraft means that it is likely that they will be full participants and fully allow a credible, independent international investigation with all partners involved," Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a news conference Saturday.

"We still have work to do to ensure that happens," he added, "but the question of responsibility, I think, takes us a step forward towards truly having a very credible and thorough investigation."

The prime minister's comments came two days after he first revealed Canada's suspicion that an Iranian missile system shot down the plane near Tehran early Wednesday. Of the 176 people who were killed aboard the aircraft, 57 were Canadian nationals.

"I had a chance to sit with some of the families of the victims," Trudeau said Saturday. "They are hurt, angry and grieving. They want answers. They want justice. What Iran has admitted to is very serious. Shooting down a civilian aircraft is horrific. Iran must take full responsibility. Canada will not rest until we get the accountability, justice and closure that the families deserve."

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addresses a news conference Saturday in Ottawa, flanked by high-level ministers. Trudeau called the Iranian admission a "step forward," but noted there are lots of questions still to be answered.Dave Chan/AFP via Getty Images

Canadians were far from the only passengers who on board. Most of the passengers on board Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 were Iranian. Demonstrators there turned out in droves Saturday to mourn the victims and protest the actions of their own government, which spent days forcefully denying the missile strike before reversing course with its admission.

NATIONAL SECURITY
Ukrainian Plane Crash In Iran: Here's What The Available Evidence Shows

WORLD
Iran Says It Shot Down Ukrainian Jetliner By Mistake

The Iranian government, already beleaguered with recent protests over a spike in fuel prices, enjoyed an upswell of popular support after a U.S. drone strike killed a prominent Iranian military commander in Baghdad last week. The killing of Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, who enjoyed a towering reputation among Iranians, elicited massive rallies of mourners and expressions of support for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Earlier this week, Khamenei and the Iranian military retaliated for Soleimani's killing with a series of missile strikes on Iraqi bases hosting U.S. troops. The attacks, which resulted in no casualties at the bases, came within hours of the Ukrainian jetliner's crash.

Now, the downing of that plane threatens to unravel the broad domestic support Iran's government enjoyed just one week ago. Circulating on social media Saturday were videos of angry protesters, many of whom took aim at Khamenei with chants of "shameless" and "death to the dictator," according to Reuters.

Tehran: University students chanting “Soleimani is a murderer. His leader, Ali Khamenei is also a murderer.” Protest by thousands of Iranians in Tehran burst the propaganda balloon of the regime regarding Qassem Soleimani’s elimination. #Iran #IranPlaneCrash Via #MEK network. pic.twitter.com/n0hmasMSgj— Shahin Gobadi (@gobadi) January 11, 2020

Other images depicted security forces attempting to disperse the throng by firing canisters of tear gas and manhandling demonstrators.

And here comes the tear gas-> #Tehran, #Iran, #UkranianPlaneCrash #IranPlaneCrash pic.twitter.com/8ka3USC04l— Bahman Kalbasi (@BahmanKalbasi) January 11, 2020

"Why should I vote for this regime? I don't trust them at all," one protester told Reuters. "They lied to us about the plane crash. Why should I trust them when they don't trust people enough to tell the truth?"

Iran newspaper, the official daily publication of the government of Iran, also released a cover story listing the names of the victims and featuring, in bold white lettering, the word "Unforgivable."



صفحه نخست روزنامه ایران
یکشنبه ۲۲ دی ماه ۱۳۹۸

نابخشودنی..

*تیتر یک «روزنامه ایران» پس از اعلام علت سقوط سه روز پیش هواپیمای اوکراینی

*همراه با گرامیداشت یاد و نام قربانیان پرواز هواپیمایی اوکراین باانتشار اسامی تمام جانباختگان ایرانی و خارجی در صفحه اول pic.twitter.com/BEz8aTE9nd— روزنامه ایران (@IranNewspaper) January 11, 2020

Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who has been taking a close interest in the investigation into the causes of the crash, said he spoke over the phone Saturday with his Iranian counterpart, Hassan Rouhani.

Zelenskiy said Rouhani, who initiated the call, personally apologized for the tragedy, while the Ukrainian leader insisted on the speedy identification and return of the bodies of the 11 Ukrainians on board.

"Recognizing the 'missile version' as the cause of the disaster paved the way for its further investigation without any delay and obstruction," Zelenskiy said in a statement released Saturday. "I look forward to further constructive cooperation with Iran in accordance with international law."


Iran admits it 'unintentionally' shot down Ukrainian plane (13:30)

An Iranian commander said 'I wish I could die' after Tehran accepted responsibility for shooting down Ukrainian Airlines flight 752

Ukraine's president wants a 'full admission of guilt' and compensation from Iran after it shot down a commercial plane

Trump doesn't want to go to war, he just wants to look tough, even if it puts US troops in danger



Justin Trudeau toughens his stand on the world stage as he demands justice over plane downed by Iran
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau emerged this week from a long holiday break to face a tragedy that may recast his nation's role on the global stage ...
Trump spokesman tries to defend Iran strike by attacking Obama — and it blows up in his face


By Alex Henderson, AlterNet
- Commentary
January 11, 2020


One of the “justifications” that officials in President Donald Trump’s administration have been using to defend the killing of Qasem Soleimani is that the Iranian military commander was planning “imminent attacks” against the United States, even though that explanation has crumbled since it was first rolled out.

On Friday, Hogan Gidley (principal deputy press secretary to Trump) reiterated the administration’s “imminent attacks” assertion without evidence, but he then went on to hit back at critics by saying that when President Barack Obama “killed” al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and Libyan dictator Moammar Gadaffi, he did so “without congressional approval.”

This factually challenged claim drew a lot of criticism on Twitter for Gidley.

Soleimani was, in fact, planning “imminent attacks.” While Democrats and the media quibble over its definition, quick point: When Obama killed bin Laden, al-Awlaki and Gaddafi, without Congressional approval, there were NO “imminent attacks” and Democrats did not ask or care.

— Hogan Gidley (@hogangidley45) January 10, 2020

Politico reporter Andrew Desiderio, responding to Gidley, tweeted that Gadaffi, the late Libyan dictator, “was not killed by the United States” — and the 2011 operation that killed bin Laden, according to Desiderio, came under the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF).

“Reporters are asking questions about the ‘imminent attacks’ because that was the administration’s stated justification for taking out Soleimani,” Desiderio added.

The Washington Post’s Shane Harris tweeted that Obama’s administration “consulted members of Congress in advance of killing bin Laden.” And Gadaffi, Harris pointed out, was “killed by a mob,” not Obama.


Bin Laden’s killing was under the 2002 AUMF because it centered on al Qaeda. Reporters are asking questions about the “imminent attacks” because that was the administration’s stated justification for taking out Soleimani. https://t.co/GSzYfFL7kP

— Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio) January 10, 2020

I’d love to hear more about how Obama killed Gaddafi. That’s a new one.

— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) January 10, 2020

Susan Hennessey, executive editor of Benjamin Wittes’ Lawfare website and a legal/national security analyst for CNN, said of Gidley’s tweet, “Beyond this being factually false, it also completely ignores the fact that Obama was candid with Congress about the factual underpinnings of the threat, whereas Trump appears to be obfuscating and lying.”

She also pointed out that the drone killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen who U.S. officials said was a member of al Qaeda, was in fact very controversial and generated pushback against Obama even from within his own party.

@ICanBeAHandful, in response to Gidley, tweeted, “Is pathological lying a requirement to working in this administration? Have you gotten a performance bonus?” And @spdustin posted, “Osama bin Laden wasn’t a general of a sovereign nation,” while @sadielou01 posted, “Where does the WH find you guys? Do you all have to have flunked history for consideration?”

@Joshtpm chastised Gidley, “Dude, can you do the basic level of homework to know that ‘Obama’ didn’t kill Gaddafi? He was caught by a rebel militia and executed, you ridiculous goof.”

1.) Obama didn't kill Gaddafi. He was killed by a mob. 2.) The Obama administration consulted members of Congress in advance of killing bin Laden. Republican Mike Rogers said he was talking to the CIA four months before the operation. https://t.co/VpIBnQQDJg https://t.co/uBJvuoBLt7

— Shane Harris (@shaneharris) January 10, 2020

Didn't "ask or care"? The legality of the Awlaki strike was a huge political issue. It was such a significant concern that Democrats joined with Rand Paul to hold up David Barron's circuit confirmation to force Obama to release the al-Awlaki memo. https://t.co/MdB2qthqKq

— Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) January 10, 2020

1.) Obama didn't kill Gaddafi. He was killed by a mob. 2.) The Obama administration consulted members of Congress in advance of killing bin Laden. Republican Mike Rogers said he was talking to the CIA four months before the operation. https://t.co/VpIBnQQDJg https://t.co/uBJvuoBLt7

— Shane Harris (@shaneharris) January 10, 2020

Obama killed Gaddafi ?!?
Boy that IS news!

— Diedrich Bader (@bader_diedrich) January 10, 2020


In the Trump White House, history can be whatever you want it to be, just follow your dreams

— Clue Heywood (@ClueHeywood) January 10, 2020



Extinction Rebellion could sue police over extremist ideology listing

Group threatens action after being named in guide designed to help prevent terrorism

Vikram Dodd Police and crime correspondent
Sat 11 Jan 2020 

Counter-terrorism police placed XR on a list of extremist ideologies that should be reported to the authorities running the Prevent programme. Photograph: Dominic Lipinski/PA

Extinction Rebellion is threatening legal action against counter-terrorism police for what it said was the illegal listing of the group as an extremist ideology in a guide designed to help stop terrorist violence.

The Guardian revealed on Friday that counter-terrorism police had placed the non-violent protest group on a list of extremist ideologies that should be reported to the authorities running the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme. Police now say that was an error.

Amnesty International condemned the decision on Saturday as criticism grew and questions remained about how Extinction Rebellion (XR) came to be included in the guide alongside neo-Nazi and terrorist groups.

The climate emergency campaign group was included in a 12-page document produced by Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) titled “Safeguarding young people and adults from ideological extremism”.

XR has instructed lawyers.

Jules Carey, who acted for XR when it successfully struck down police protest bans in the courts last year, told the Guardian that the latest guidance was unlawful. “It is extraordinary that Counter Terrorism Policing South East have added Extinction Rebellion to the list of terrorist groups and extremist organisations that the Prevent strategy was set up to deal with.

“The guidance issued by the CTPSE is clearly unlawful. It constitutes an unlawful interference with human rights including free speech, right to assemble and enjoyment of a private life.

“The guidance is clearly designed to harm Extinction Rebellion and cast those who support the movement as domestic extremists. It is a glaring example of the sort of overzealous policing we have come to expect around protests. Being referred to Prevent could have long-lasting and life-changing consequences for a young school activist.”

After inquiries by the Guardian police said they were recalling the guidance and that XR had been included in error in the guide, which was distributed to police, government and teachers in November 2019.

Carey, of Bindmans solicitors, said: “It is not sufficient that CTPSE have sought to recall the guide from those that they shared it with. The advice in the guide … itself needs to be formally withdrawn and any decision taken to refer an activist of XR to Prevent needs to be urgently reversed.”

Kerry Moscogiuri, Amnesty International UK’s campaigns director, said the police guidance added to longstanding concerns about Prevent. “It’s deeply shocking that the police ever seriously considered classifying peaceful climate crisis protesters as extremists. To see that schoolchildren were effectively going to be profiled under these proposed measures, just deepens our shock.

“Given that children are potentially those who will be most affected by the climate emergency, it’s vital that they are able to speak out on these issues without this heavy-handed and entirely disproportionate police attention. This episode only adds to our existing concerns about Prevent, which is a highly dubious scheme sorely in need of a proper, independent and impartial review.”

Prevent is the the government’s anti-radicalisation programme. It is intended to spot people at risk of becoming involved in terrorism and divert them away from extremism.

Concerns have been raised that it impinges on freedom of thought and speech. Its supporters, which include the government and the police, say it is vital to stop the flow of recruits to Islamist and extreme rightwing violence, but it has been accepted that changes may be needed.

A review of Prevent that is due to report later this year is expected to be delayed after its original chair stepped down following criticism and a legal challenge.

The police document revealed by the Guardian said that issues to look out for included people who speak in “strong or emotive terms about environmental issues like climate change, ecology, species extinction, fracking, airport expansion or pollution”.




The guide advises readers to listen and look out for young people who “neglect to attend school” or “participate in planned school walkouts” – an allusion to the school strikes for the climate, a global movement of which the activist Greta Thunberg is a lead proponent. Thousands of UK pupils and millions worldwide walked out of school last year in protest at government inaction on the climate crisis.

The document also flags young people taking part in non-violent direct action, such as sit-down protests, banner drops or “writing environmentally themed graffiti”.

The disclosure that XR has been listed alongside proscribed groups such as National Action and al-Muhajiroun is being blamed on police in the south-east of England rather than a decision at the national level.

Clare Collier of the civil rights group Liberty said: “This is a startling example of how Prevent stifles free speech, labels dissent as dangerous and gives the police sweeping powers to monitor non-violent, non-criminal behaviour. The definition of extremism under Prevent is fundamentally flawed and so wide that thousands – including children – are swept up by it.

“Protest is fundamental to democracy and our ability to stand up to power. This year alone Extinction Rebellion, the school strikes and other protests have shown how valuable protest is for bringing about change. We corrode the right to protest at our peril.”

A spokesperson for the Muslim Council of Britain, which has long criticised how Prevent operates, said: “This case illustrates the serious flaws in the Prevent programme and a kneejerk reaction to create a list of undesirables, drawn up by divisive ideologues. The sooner a replacement independent reviewer can be found, the better.”

CTPSE would not answer questions about how XR came to be included.

On Friday DCS Kath Barnes, the head of CTPSE, said: “I would like to make it quite clear that we do not classify Extinction Rebellion as an extremist organisation. The inclusion of Extinction Rebellion in this document was an error of judgment and we will now be reviewing all of the contents as a result.


“It was produced by CTPSE to assist our statutory partners – including police forces and government organisations – in identifying people who may be vulnerable as a result of their links to some organisations.

“The document was designed for a very specific audience who understand the complexities of the safeguarding environment we work within and who have statutory duties under Prevent. We are in the process of confirming who it has been shared with and recalling it.

“We as counter-terrorism policing, along with our partners, have a responsibility to protect vulnerable people. Officers are trained to spot those who may be vulnerable, and the membership of an organisation that supports environmental or animal welfare issues alone would not be a trigger.”



UK police say it was mistake to call climate group extremist
Jan. 11, 2020
1of2The Red Rebels join climate change protesters outside the Australian Embassy in London, where Extinction Rebellion are staging a protest against the Australian government's response to the wildfires in Australia, Friday Jan. 10, 2020. (Jonathan Brady/PA via AP)Photo: Jonathan Brady, AP
2of2Activist of 'Extinction Rebellion' and 'Parents for Future Berlin' attend a protest rally against the climate policy of Australia's government in front of Australia's embassy in Berlin, Germany, Friday, Jan. 10, 2020.Photo: Michael Sohn, AP


LONDON (AP) — British police say it was an “error of judgment” to include environmental protest group Extinction Rebellion in an official document that listed extremist organizations.

The counterterrorism police unit for southeast England included the climate change protesters alongside Islamic extremists and banned neo-Nazi group National Action in a guide to "safeguarding young people and adults from ideological extremism," The Guardian newspaper reported.

The guide said that “while concern about climate change is not in itself extreme, activists may encourage vulnerable people to perform acts of violence.”

The Guardian said in its Saturday edition that the document, dated November 2019, was distributed to teachers, police officers and schools but later withdrawn.

“I would like to make it quite clear that we do not classify Extinction Rebellion as an extremist organization," said Detective Chief Superintendent Kath Barnes, head of Counterterrorism Policing South East. "The inclusion of Extinction Rebellion in this document was an error of judgment, and we will now be reviewing all of the contents as a result."

Extinction Rebellion condemned the “terrorism slur” as “a deliberate attempt to silence a legitimate cause.”

The group has staged protests around the world, often involving peaceful civil disobedience, to call for tougher action to fight global warming. Hundreds of its activists have been arrested in Britain over the past year as the group blocked roads and bridges and disrupted planes, trains and subways.


---30---
Another massive 6.0 earthquake shook Puerto Rico, and the island hasn't recovered from the last major earthquake less than a week ago

Two firemen survey a collapsed building after an earthquake hit the island in Guanica, Puerto Rico on January 7, 2020. - A strong earthquake struck south of Puerto Rico early January 7, 2020 followed by major aftershocks, the US Geological Survey said, the latest in a series of tremors that have shaken the island since December 28. Photo by Ricardo ARDUENGO / AFP

Another massive 6.0-magnitude earthquake struck Puerto Rico early Saturday as the island continued to struggle with the damage from ongoing earthquakes.
On Tuesday, Puerto Rico experienced the largest earthquake in a century when a 6.4-magnitude earthquake killed one person, injured 9 others, and knocked out power across the island.
The Associated Press reports that the Saturday 6.0 earthquake caused further damage to Puerto Rico's southern coast, but that no injuries were initially reported.
Hundreds of thousands of Puerto Ricans are without water or electricity and thousands are sleeping in shelters or on the streets due to fear and extensive damage to homes.

Another devastating earthquake has struck Puerto Rico, where hundreds of thousands are still recovering from the largest earthquake in a century that shook the island on Tuesday.

A preliminary 6.0-magnitude earthquake hit early Saturday, damaging the southern coast, the Associated Press reports. The epicenter of the quake was offshore, and early reports indicate the shaking was felt across the island.

Puerto Rico's Electric Power Authority told the AP that power outages were reported across much of the southern region of the island, while hundreds of thousands are still without running water and electricity.

Alvin Baez/REUTERS

Tuesday's 6.4-magnitude earthquake killed one person, injured 9, and knocked out power across the island. Nearly 2,000 Puerto Ricans are sleeping in shelters or on the streets, fearful to return to their homes or unable to due to extensive damage. No injuries from Saturday's earthquake have been reported yet, according to the AP.

The larger earthquakes join an ongoing threat to Puerto Ricans of smaller quakes across the island. According to EarthquakeTrack, the island has experienced more than 40 earthquakes with a 1.5-magnitude or greater in the past 24 hours, and more than 500 in the past week.

—David Begnaud (@DavidBegnaud) January 11, 2020

After Tuesday's earthquake, President Donald Trump declared an emergency in Puerto Rico, and the island's Gov. Wanda Vásquez activated the National Guard. In the southwest coastal town of Guánica, which was hit hardest by the 6.4-magnitude earthquake, more than 200 people had to sleep on the streets after further damage destroyed the gymnasium they had taken shelter in.

The strongest earthquake before that one occurred in 1918, when a 7.3-magnitude earthquake shook the island, causing a tsunami and killing 116 people. 

France strikes: PM offers to temporarily withdraw controversial pension plans on 38th day of nationwide protests

Union welcomes proposed change as sign of government's 'will to compromise'


Vincent Wood

A man holds a banner reading "living yes ! Surviving no !" 
as protesters demonstrate in Paris ( AFP via Getty Images )

The French Prime Minister has offered to temporarily withdraw plans for controversial pension reforms following weeks of protest action in towns and cities across the country.

In letters to Union chiefs, Edouard Philippe said he would be willing to pull back plans to raise the age at which citizens would receive full pension benefits up until 2027.


It comes as strikes against the changes to the law roll into their 38th day, with protestors including CGT union members and Gilets Jaunes activists taking to the streets of Paris to air their grievances with the policy introduced by Emmanuel Macron.

The proposal to extend the age at which workers would be eligible to full state pension benefits to 64 from 62 was considered to be among the most controversial elements of the reforms that made up a key election pledge for Mr Macron in 2017.

Initially the French government had proposed increasing the pension age to 62 years and four months in 2022 - gradually increasing the boundary until it was set at 64-years in 2027.

In his letter Mr Philippe said: "To demonstrate my confidence in the social partners, and not to prejudge the outcome of their work concerning the measures to be taken to achieve balance in 2027, I am prepared to withdraw from the bill the short-term measure which I had proposed, consisting in gradually converging from 2022 towards an equilibrium age of 64 years in 2027'".

Meanwhile protestors, who remain amassed at the Place de la Republique in Paris, remain sceptical – urging for action to carry on until the withdrawal of the policy takes place.

However union the French Democratic Confederation of Labor (CFDT) welcomed the move, saying it marked "the government's will to compromise" and will help to "continue discussions" on the policy.

---30---

The countries with the worst internet freedom in the world

Posted  by Louis Doré in news
UPVOTE
Picture: Carto/Louis Doré
The UK is the eighth most free country in the world on the internet.
This is according to the Freedom on the Net index by Freedom House, which surveyed 65 countries across the world.
Governments in 15 countries temporarily shut down access to the entire internet or mobile phone networks, sometimes solely to prevent users from disseminating information through social media.
Here's how Freedom House graded countries across the world:
Picture: Carto/Louis Doré
Estonia was joint with Iceland for the top ranking in the index, followed by Canada, the US and Germany.
Meanwhile, China was bottom of the index, followed by Iran and Syria.
Freedom on the internet declined around the world for the sixth consecutive year, and two thirds of internet users (67 per cent) live in countries where criticism of the government, military or ruling family are subject to censorship.
Picture: Freedom House
Freedom House labelled China the year's "worst abuser of internet freedom".
The Chinese government’s crackdown on free expression under President Xi Jinping’s “information security” policy is taking its toll on the digital activists who have traditionally fought back against censorship and surveillance. Dozens of prosecutions related to online expression have increased self-censorship, as have legal restrictions introduced in 2015. A criminal law amendment added seven-year prison terms for spreading rumors on social media (a charge often used against those who criticize the authorities), while some users belonging to minority religious groups were imprisoned simply for watching religious videos on their mobile phones.
UK
Hundreds of allegations of abuse against child prisoners are revealed as serious restraint incidents triple


Exclusive: Campaigners warn that troubled youngsters are being failed by system that is starved of resources – amid a surge in cases of children suffering injuries and struggling to breathe after being restrained

May BulmanSocial Affairs Correspondent @maybulman
Saturday 11 January 2020 


Figures reveal there were more than 550 allegations of child abuse and/or neglect against staff in England’s seven child prisons in two years ( Getty )

Hundreds of children are alleged to have been abused and neglected in prison over the last three years amid a dramatic rise in young offenders being injured.

There were more than 550 allegations of child abuse or neglect made against staff in England’s seven child prisons between 2016-17 and 2018-19, according to figures obtained through freedom of information (FoI) requests to local councils by charity Article 39.


And the number of restraint incidents that have resulted in children suffering injuries or compromised breathing have more than tripled since 2014, from 54 to 193 last year, according to data obtained by charity Article 39.

Young offenders are being failed by a system that is starved of resources and facing a “calamitous” turnover of staff, campaigners say.

Read moreYoung offenders at risk of rickets due to lack of sun, inspector warns‘I help young offenders and government is trying to deport me’Over half of male young offenders are from BME background

The number of children being physically assaulted by prison officers is increasing despite a considerable drop in the child prison population. Government statistics show there were 1,157 young offenders in custody in 2013-14 compared with 832 in 2018-19 – a decrease of 28 per cent.

Experts speculated that the increase was in part due to improved reporting of serious incidents by prison staff, but said such a dramatic rise was also down to a lack of funding in the youth custody estate and failure to adopt a “child-focused” approach towards young offenders.

It comes after scandal-hit youth jail Medway was judged by Ofsted to be placing children at “unacceptable risk”, with a significant increase in use of force against children, despite efforts to improve conditions since a BBC Panorama investigation four years ago exposed widespread abuse at the facility.

The report found that around 359 incidents involving force were reported in the last six months – of which approximately 115 incidents occurred in September alone – and that staff were still using techniques during physical-restraint incidents that inflicted pain on children, with seven such incidents recorded since January.


Carolyne Willow, director of Article 39, said the rise in serious restraint incidents was “deeply concerning” but the true number of abuses against incarcerated children would be far higher, as flaws in the recording of these incidents and fear of retribution among young people meant many went unreported.

She pointed out that only half of the six councils with child prisons in their area provided information showing how many allegations referred to them were substantiated, indicating a lack of data and auditing that she said “obscures the true picture”.


Ms Willow added: “It is also down to the difficulty children face when reporting abuse within closed institutions – they’re often scared of retribution and being treated less favourably by staff. It is often one child’s word against several members of staff. They know that the odds are they won’t be believed.

“They’re kept in a state of subservience and powerlessness, where grown adults in uniform are allowed to inflict physical and psychological pain. And often they don’t know when something is unlawful and abusive. They think if something is commonplace and is done in public and more than one member of staff is doing it, then that must be the official way.”

She said staff shortages were a “massive issue”, with the institutions operating with the “least number of staff that the state can get away with”, adding: “It creates the most appalling physical environments for children. The government has publicly acknowledged that they’re not fit for purpose.”

Frances Crook, chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said the charity was “very worried” about child abuse in jails and that the figures “appeared to represent the tip of the iceberg”.

“We intend to do some further work ourselves in the coming months to explore what is going on, and to find out why children and young people are being placed in such dangerous prisons,” she added.

The data on restraint, published in documents released by the Ministry of Justice under FoI laws, show the number of reports made by prison staff under the Serious Injury and Early Warning Signs process – used to record restraint that has resulted in a child having breathing difficulties or other injuries – has increased by 257 per cent in four years.

Of these reports, 28 involved a child having breathing difficulties, 124 had complaints of such difficulties, seven had serious injuries, 11 had a loss of or reduced consciousness and 22 complained of feeling sick.
Responding to the findings, Anna Edmundson, NSPCC policy manager, said there should be clearer and more robust child protection procedures in place, adding: “Many of these children have already experienced abuse and neglect and that complex background is part of the reason they might be detained.

“Despite a long list of recommendations about how these institutions need to change to better protect children, progress is painfully slow and safeguarding still doesn’t appear to be the top priority.”

John Drew, former chief executive of the Youth Justice Board (YJB), said the rise was “very concerning” and that while it was in part attributable to greater awareness of the importance of reporting abuse, it was also the result of a “demoralised prison service, starved of resources and facing a calamitous turnover of staff”.

He continued: “Almost all of the staff working in child prisons are good people doing a very difficult job in circumstances that very few of their critics would be able to do. But until we start spending a lot more money looking after children in custody, these figures will not fall.

“More money for smaller units, which can be nearer to home, and more money for more staff are obvious places to start. A child-focused approach, based on children’s rights, will also make a big difference.

“Listening to children in custody can lead to big differences in attitude, as well as better support for staff, including clinical supervision so that they understand why the children in their custody behave the way they do and how they can be helped.”

A Youth Custody Service spokesperson said: “Staff are trained to resolve conflict verbally and we are clear that restraint should only be used as a last resort, where there is a risk of harm to self or others, and no other form of intervention is possible or appropriate.

“We asked the chair of the Youth Justice Board, Charlie Taylor, to undertake an independent review of pain-inducing restraint techniques and we are now carefully considering it before responding in the new year.”
---30---
UK
WHAT IS THE GENDER PAY GAP AND HOW IS IT DIFFERENT FROM EQUAL PAY?

Equal Pay Day marks the day of the year women are effectively working for free due to the gender pay gap


Olivia Petter @oliviapetter1

Thursday 14 November 2019 was Equal Pay Day in the UK, a day that marks the time of the year from which women are effectively working for free due to the gender pay gap.

In April 2019, thousands of British companies published their latest gender pay gap figures, revealing the percentage difference between the average hourly earnings for men and women.

The data revealed that men are typically paid significantly more than women in most UK businesses.

Despite efforts and campaigns by women’s rights groups to close the gap, the results found that the gender pay gap had widened in favour of men in the past year, with 78 per cent of the biggest companies in Britain reporting a gap in favour of men.

But confusions surrounding the pay gap are rife, with many conflating it with equal pay and others denying its existence completely.

Women's march 2019 – global protest in picturesShow all 30

Read on for everything you need to know about the gender pay gap, from what causes it to how to find out whether there’s one at your company.
What is the gender pay gap?

The gender pay gap is the average difference between hourly wages for men and women.

Since changes to the Equality Act came into force in April 2017, companies with more than 250 employees have been legally required to report their gender pay gap figures by the end of the financial year.


Organisations must also reveal the proportion of men and women who receive financial bonuses.

The deadline for this is 30 March for public bodies and 4 April for private companies.

In December 2018, the World Economic Forum reported that it will take 202 years to close the gap.


The gender pay gap isn’t the same as equal pay. Unequal pay is when women are paid less than men for doing the exact same work.

Equal pay has been a legal requirement since the Equal Pay Act was introduced in 1970. Despite this, pay discrimination remains rife, explains Sam Smethers, chief executive of the Fawcett Society.


“We know from our Equal Pay Advice Service that it is still happening,” Smethers explains. “Gender pay gap reporting does not give women the information they need to challenge unequal pay. For that they need to know what their colleagues earn. Most employers say they don’t have an issue – but unless they have conducted an audit and set up a transparent pay framework, how would they know for sure?”

The BBC famously became embroiled in a controversy over unequal pay in July 2017 after it published a list of its highest-earning presenters, revealing a stark imbalance between the number of men and women at the top of the broadcasting company.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is currently in the process of conducting an investigation into the BBC over suspected pay discrimination against female employees. The organisation hopes to publish its findings by spring 2020.

How is the gender pay gap calculated?

Companies must report their gender pay gap in terms of six figures, explains Dr Jana Javornik of Leeds University Business School. These include: mean gender pay gap, median gender pay gap, mean bonus gender pay gap, median bonus gender pay gap, proportion of males and females receiving a bonus payment and proportion of males and females in each quartile band.

The mean gender pay gap is an average. It’s calculated by adding up the wages of all male and female employees and dividing it by the number of employees. The pay gap is the difference between the mean figures for men and women, which is reported as a percentage.
The median gender pay gap is calculated by listing all male and female employees’ wages from highest to lowest and comparing the number that sits in the middle for each gender.

The difference in salary between those two people is the pay gap figure. This doesn’t account for age, previous experience of differences in job roles, but it’s still viewed as the most representative calculation, given that the mean gender pay gap figures can be skewed if there are some particularly highly paid employees. Hence, the median gender pay gap is the figure that is more widely reported.

“Companies also need to provide a written statement confirming that the calculations are accurate,” Javornik tells The Independent. “This must be signed by a senior employee, such as a director or chief executive, and provide a narrative that will help people to understand their view of why a gender pay gap is present and what the organisation intends to do to close it. This then needs to be published somewhere accessible on their own website and placed on a designated government website.”​
How can you find out the gender pay gap at your company?

If you work for a company with more than 250 workers, you can find out its gender pay gap on the Government Equalities Office website.

Companies employing fewer people than this are not legally required to report their gender pay gaps. But in the name of transparency, some smaller firms have started to do so.

You can find out if your company is reporting its gender pay gap by asking someone in your human resources department.
What causes the gender pay gap?

A gender pay gap can be caused by a multitude of things, such as having fewer women in senior or more high-earning roles or more women working part-time.

“Everyone is legally entitled to equal pay for equal work, but there may be a range of factors behind pay gaps and it doesn’t necessarily mean that unlawful discrimination is happening,” explains a spokesperson for the EHRC.
The gender pay gap explained

While the cause for a pay gap can differ between companies, publishing and monitoring pay gaps alone can help employers identify reasons for their gap and should help them develop action plans to tackle the causes, the spokesperson tells The Independent.

“For example, if women are mainly at lower-paid levels in the organisation, the employer might want to develop a positive action plan to encourage and support women to apply for more senior roles,” they suggest.

“Or if women are more likely to work part-time because of childcare responsibilities, the employer might want to review their flexible working policies and ensure that part-time work and flexible work is available at all levels of the organisation.”
What social elements contribute towards the gender pay gap?

Speaking to The Independent, a spokesperson for the Women’s Equality Party adds that the seeds of the gender pay gap are sown from a young age.

“Our education system continues to influence gender norms that lead girls into lower paying jobs that are less valued,” they explain.

Dr Julie Davies of The University of Huddersfield concurs that the roots of the gender pay gap are formed early on, telling The Independent: “This happens when women don’t negotiate their salary in their first role due to societal pressures, and so there is a cumulative effect as they move from one job to another. Often women don’t ask for more money and are just grateful to be offered a job.”
What is the motherhood gap?

Also known as the motherhood penalty, the motherhood gap refers to the disadvantages that many women face in the workplace after having children.

Many new mothers may need to work part time to accommodate for childcare, for example, which means they might earn less and be at a disadvantage when it comes to progressing compared to their male colleagues.

As outlined in a report published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies on Wednesday, many new mothers may choose to work closer to home, which can reduce their job opportunities and give them less access to productive, high-paying firms.

This has been proven by research into average commuting times among women, which typically fall after childbirth, the IFS report states.

“Offering all jobs as flexible would remove the barriers faced by women who are more likely to have to negotiate flexible working or accept part-time jobs that are often low-paid,” explains the EHRC spokesperson.

“Creating workplaces with flexible cultures will increase opportunities for everyone, giving people greater choice about the role they play both at work and home.”

Encouraging men and women to share childcare responsibilities by making paternity leave a more enticing incentive will also help rectify the balance, they add.
How can we close the gender pay gap?

The EHRC outlines its strategy for closing the pay gap on its website.
Its main recommendations are as follows:
Address differences in subject and career choices, educational attainment and access to apprenticeships
Improve work opportunities for everyone, no matter who they are or where they live, by investing in sector-specific training and regional enterprise
Encourage men and women to share childcare responsibilities by making paternity leave a more effective incentive and improving access to childcare
Increase diversity at all levels and in all sectors by encouraging employers to tackle bias in recruitment, promotion and pay, and introducing a new national target for senior and executive management positions
Report on progress towards reducing pay gaps by extending reporting to ethnicity and disability and collecting annual statistics.

Alexandra Anders, talent director at human capital management software company Cornerstone OnDemand, explains that closing the gender pay gap is primarily about building and maintaining a more diverse workforce.

“There’s work to be done with training managers who may have previously worked in a male-dominated team,” Anders tells The Independent. “From a leader’s perspective, when you bring a diverse set of people together you must be clear how you want to be as a company.

“Yes, there will be local laws and cultural aspects that individuals in your organisation hold dear, but you must set the ‘laws’ as a company and what it means to be at your organisation. And for many organisations, this means moving away behaviours that stifle diversity.”

Read more 
Nearly half of American men think gender pay gap is ‘made up’

Anders added that companies have a responsibility when it comes to tolerating incidents that will widen their gender pay gap.

“For example, if you have a male candidate who asks for £90,000 per year and a woman who asks for £40,000 per year, but both of them are happy with those respective salaries – should your company accept that?


“If you do, there will always be a pay gap between those two people as they work and grow, so it’s better to review the appropriate pay for that job function and level. It’ll pay off in the long-term and lead to better retention rates.”

Financial journalist and author of Money: A User’s Guide Laura Whateley adds that implementing shared parental leave is key if we’re to combat the gender pay gap.

“Many companies still offer women more generous maternity packages than they do shared parental leave packages for men, so it makes more sense for the woman to take time off for childcare,” she tells The Independent.

“But this has a knock-on effect on other things, too, like women’s pensions. The gender pension gap is even bigger than the gender pay gap because money that women don’t pay into their pensions while they’re off work caring children, or while they are earning less to begin with, compounds over time.”

---30---