It is obvious that it is Conservative men making the comments about the problem with the idea of publicly funded, certified, non-profit day care centres for being too institutional (subtext it's a prison) and a one size fits all without flexibility for working parents, and it won't work in rural Canada, and, and, and, and......
Conservative MP Rona Ambrose, who represents Edmonton-Spruce Grove, worked with Harper to write the Conservative child-care policy. She spoke with Larry Johnsrude, reporter/editor for edmontonjournal.com.
"We feel very strongly that our plan should be universal and equitable. The Liberal plan is regulated nine-to-five public day care through an public infrastructure and is a small percentage of the total child-care options being used by parents right now and is their last choice. Their first choice is for one of them to stay at home if they can afford to. Their second choice is (to leave their children) with a trusted neighbour or friend and the last choice is institutionalized care."
Also see:
Whose Family Values
Day Care
Defend Public Day Care
6 comments:
As a single working mother I had my daughter in a number of good daycares, most of them non-profit, one of them award-winning.
And I make no bones about preferring the CPC policy, because it DOES provide choice and it DOES create daycare spots. Try reading the whole policy, and then critiquing.
The Quebec daycare plan alone is costing $1.3 billion a year and it has massive waiting lists. Over 85,000 at last report. Average income of those using Quebec daycare - $60,000. Also, Quebec has a $7.00 user fee.
The Quebec system is based on public, regulated, certified and unionized non-profit centres. Sounds familiar.
Welcome to National Daycare waiting lists.
I have looked at the CPC day care policy and thats why I am critical of it, its made in Alberta and no different than the Klein Reich's plan. Which has resulted in Alberta having the lowest number of public day cares in Canada and hence of course the longest waiting lists. So is this your model? Of course it also has the largest amount of private day care and baba's babysitting. In the former case as I have documented in my links we have case after case of children killed or injured in for profit day care here because of poor pay, lack of staffing ratios and lack of regulations and enforcement. Sounds like the CPC platform to me.
As for Quebec the que is 60,000 and once they get federal funding that will reduce......as for unionized workers you want cheap...Alberta is cheap and we have graduated thousands of skilled child care workers who left the industry cause the pay was so low....
Read the NDP platform which has regulated public day care and a tax credit...But idelogically you are opposed to day care period. So anwser me this what is the genetic factor that makes it natural for parents to be able to teach and educate their children? Why does the right think growing up with mommy and daddy precludes growing up with other kids, and it that is the case why send your kids to Kindergarten or school?
And when you answer that honestly then we will know where you really stand. Opposed to public education, public day care, public services period.Because you have to pay for someone else using these services...as well as yourself.....
BBS, there is a wait list for the $7 per day spots, but not for the $14 per day spots - my buddy in Gatineau got a spot in under 2 weeks. The difference it written off on his taxes.
In Ottawa, the cost is $38 per day, if you can find it. More than not, its a "lady who takes in kids". She not unionized (nor are many of the non-profits in Quebec) nor is she qualified to do the job - for $38 per day, you kids get all the TV they can watch and a snack.
Welcome to free market daycare.
"But idelogically you are opposed to day care period"
Since you have already decided what my opinions are, there is really no reason to carry on the discussion.
Hey BBS you didn't answer my question, what a cop out.
Post a Comment