Monday, January 20, 2020

The biology of coffee, the world’s most popular drink

January 20, 2020
By The Conversation


You’re reading this with a cup of coffee in your hand, aren’t you? Coffee is the most popular drink in the world. Americans drink more coffee than soda, juice and tea — combined.

How popular is coffee? When news first broke that Prince Harry and Meghan were considering Canada as their new home, Canadian coffee giant Tim Hortons offered free coffee for life as an extra enticement.

Given coffee’s popularity, it’s surprising how much confusion surrounds how this hot, dark, nectar of the gods affects our biology.

Coffee's ingredients

The main biologically active ingredients in coffee are caffeine (a stimulant) and a suite of antioxidants. What do we know about how caffeine and antioxidants affect our bodies? The fundamentals are pretty simple, but the devil is in the details and the speculation around how coffee could either help or harm us runs a bit wild.

The stimulant properties of caffeine mean that you can count on a cup of coffee to wake you up. In fact, coffee, or at least the caffeine it contains, is the most commonly used psychoactive drug in the world. It seems to work as a stimulant, at least in part, by blocking adenosine, which promotes sleep, from binding to its receptor.

Caffeine and adenosine have similar ring structures. Caffeine acts as a molecular mimic, filling and blocking the adenosine receptor, preventing the body’s natural ability to be able a rest when it’s tired.

This blocking is also the reason why too much coffee can leave you feeling jittery or sleepless. You can only postpone fatigue for so long before the body’s regulatory systems begin to fail, leading to simple things like the jitters, but also more serious effects like anxiety or insomnia. Complications may be common; a possible link between coffee drinking and insomnia was identified more than 100 years ago.

Unique responses

Different people respond to caffeine differently. At least some of this variation is from having different forms of that adenosine receptor, the molecule that caffeine binds to and blocks. There are likely other sites of genetic variation as well.

There are individuals who don’t process caffeine and to whom drinks like coffee could pose medical danger. Even away from those extremes, however, there is variation in how we respond to that cup of coffee. And, like much of biology, that variation is a function of environment, our past coffee consumption, genetics and, honestly, just random chance.

We may be interested in coffee because of the oh-so-joyous caffeine buzz, but that doesn’t mean that caffeine is the most biologically interesting aspect of a good cup of coffee.

In one study using rats, caffeine triggered smooth muscle contraction, so it is possible that caffeine directly promotes bowel activity. Other studies, though, have shown that decaffeinated coffee can have as strong an effect on bowel activity as regular coffee, suggesting a more complex mechanism involving some of the other molecules in coffee.
Antioxidant benefits

What about the antioxidants in coffee and the buzz that surrounds them? Things actually start out pretty straightforward. Metabolic processes produce the energy necessary for life, but they also create waste, often in the form of oxidized molecules that can be harmful in themselves or in damaging other molecules.

Antioxidants are a broad group of molecules that can scrub up dangerous waste; all organisms produce antioxidants as part of their metabolic balance. It is unclear if supplementing our diet with additional antioxidants can augment these natural defences, but that hasn’t stopped speculation.

Antioxidants have been linked to almost everything, including premature ejaculation.

Are any of the claims of positive effects substantiated? Surprisingly, the answer is again a resounding maybe.

Coffee and cancer

Coffee won’t cure cancer, but it may help to prevent it and possibly other diseases as well. Part of answering the question of coffee’s connection to cancer lies in asking another: what is cancer? At its simplest, cancer is uncontrolled cell growth, which is fundamentally about regulating when genes are, or are not, actively expressed.

My research group studies gene regulation and I can tell you that even a good cup of coffee, or boost of caffeine, won’t cause genes that are turned off or on at the wrong time to suddenly start playing by the rules.

The antioxidants in coffee may actually have a cancer-fighting effect. Remember that antioxidants fight cellular damage. One type of damage that they may help reduce is mutations to DNA, and cancer is caused by mutations that lead to the misregulation of genes.

Studies have shown that consuming coffee fights cancer in rats. Other studies in humans have shown that coffee consumption is associated with lower rates of some cancers.


 

Several studies have shown that coffee consumption reduces
 the rates of some diseases in rats and mice.
(Shutterstock)

Interestingly, coffee consumption has also been linked to reduced rates of other diseases as well. Higher coffee consumption is linked to lower rates of Parkinson’s disease and some other forms of dementia. Strikingly, at least one experimental study in mice and cell culture shows that protection is a function of a combination of caffeine and antioxidants in coffee.

Higher coffee consumption has also been linked to lower rates of Type 2 diabetes. Complexity, combined effects and variation between individuals seems to be the theme across all the diseases.

At the end of the day, where does all this leave us on the biology of coffee? Well, as I tell my students, it’s complicated. But as most reading this already know, coffee will definitely wake you up in the morning.

Thomas Merritt, Professor and Canada Research Chair, Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laurentian University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The National Film Board of Canada produced a documentary on the cultural history of coffee called ‘Black Coffee: Part One, The Irresistible Bean’




SEE https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=COFFEE
Trump’s obsession to wipe out all of Obama’s achievements is without bounds – even at the cost of children’s health

on January 20, 2020
By Terry H. Schwadron, DCReport @ RawStory
- Commentary

Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.


Sure, we know that Donald Trump believes in de-regulation.

And that he dislikes vegetables himself.

But partisan issues aside, perhaps we can all agree that deciding to green-light a rule change to lessen nutritional standards for school breakfasts and lunches to substitute more fries and pizza for fresh fruit and vegetables.

A new rule for the Food and Nutrition Service, part of the federal Department of Agriculture, happened to coincide – or perhaps was intentionally launched? – on Michelle Obama’s birthday, wiping out a signature achievement for the former First Lady for student health through balanced meals.

It’s a smallish issue, simple really, but one indicative of a White House that says one thing and does another, that finds reason to undercut active health measures, that finds the ideology of choice only in those areas where his predecessor has moved.

The Trump obsession to wipe out any achievements by the Obama administration is without bounds – even at the cost of children’s health.

According to USDA Deputy Under Secretary Brandon Lipps, who is responsible for administering nutritional programs feeding 30 million students at 99,000 schools, the new proposals would allow schools to cut the amount of vegetables and fruits and allow more pizza, burgers and fries.

That would suit the potato industry just fine, acknowledged the National Potato Council, which said: “potatoes are a nutrient dense vegetable, which contain more potassium than a banana and 30 percent of the daily value of vitamin C along with 3 grams of protein, fiber and carbohydrates that school children need to perform their best at school.”

Colin Schwartz, deputy director of legislative affairs for Center for Science in the Public Interest, told The Washington Post that the potato lobby has been pushing for this change, and that potato growers were behind a change that happened quietly last March making it easier to substitute potatoes for some fruit in weekly breakfast menus. The School Nutrition Association, the trade group for school food-service manufacturers and school food professionals, also has frequently advocated for less stringent nutritional requirements.

Previously, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Purdue weakened nutrition standards for whole grain, nonfat milk and sodium, citing food waste and non-participation as rationales. The rule provided the option to offer chocolate milk to children participating in school meal programs, and allowed other shifts that allowed foods that are saltier, fattier or more processed in the name of palatability.

Under the new rule, the amount of fruit could be cut in half, with those calories filled with sweet pastries and granola bars.

The Post reports that kids can get more than half of their daily calories from school meals. About two-thirds of the 30 million children who eat school meals every day qualify as low-income and are getting meals free or for a reduced price. Low-income kids are disproportionately affected by obesity and are less likely to be fed healthy meals at home, so the nutritional makeup of school meals is impactful

Apparently, the White House has not heard that the country is facing obesity problems – or it doesn’t care. For that matter, the administration has backed ruled that could end free school lunches for about 500,000 children.

Once again, one is left trying to balance fervor for “pro-Life” campaigns, or who promises “a beautiful health system” while trampling Obamacare, with what happens once children are born and trying to get through their day.

Even Trump might have heard that someone else had said, “Let them eat cake.” He thought it was literal.





He claims windmills increase carbon footprint and kill bald eagles




Several studies show different results

President Donald Trump, or should we say Donald Quixote, once again found himself railing against windmills this past weekend. In his speech delivered for the conservative student group Turning Point USA, Trump told his audience that he "never understood wind.”

“I know windmills very much, I have studied it better than anybody. I know it is very expensive. They are made in China and Germany mostly, very few made here, almost none, but they are manufactured, tremendous — if you are into this — tremendous fumes and gases are spewing into the atmosphere. You know we have a world, right?” Trump said.

The Commander-in-Chief then doubled down on his claims that windmills dramatically increased the United States’ carbon footprint, a belief shared with many hardline conservative critics of wind energy. Trump continued, “You talk about the carbon footprint, fumes are spewing into the air, right spewing, whether it is China or Germany, is going into the air.”



The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) reports that wind farms around the world generated enough energy to avoid 200 million tons of carbon pollution from burning fossil fuels last year.


Later on in the speech, Trump discussed the danger of windmills to the bird population, specifically bald eagles, saying, “A windmill will kill many bald eagles. After a certain number, they make you turn the windmill off, that is true. By the way, they make you turn it off. And yet, if you killed one, they put you in jail. That is OK. But why is it OK for windmills to destroy the bird population?”

However, a 2019 study published by Science Direct shows that only a little over 150,000 birds are killed by windmills each year, which is "a magnitude at the lower end of existing estimates that range between 20,000 and 573,000." A fraction of that was killed by cats and other natural predators. also, the wind farmers can make their turbines even safer with just a few simple adjustments.

Moreover, the wind has emerged as an increasingly viable alternative energy resource. Wind turbines convert the wind’s kinetic energy into electricity without emissions. In 2017, less than three percent of U.S. electricity was derived from wind energy wind. Since then, wind capacity has increased rapidly. A 2015 study conducted by the US Department of Energy found out that the wind could provide 20 percent of US electricity by 2030 and 35 percent by 2050. More than 54,000 utility-scale wind turbines are installed in the US, employing over 114,000 full-time employees.


---30---

  https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=trump 


















THE #GOP AND #ALTRIGHT HAS MADE #AOC THEIR #PELOSI FOR 2020
WITH FAKE NEWS ABOUT HER TAKING OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez listens as Facebook Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Financial Services Committee

GOP Claims AOC Working Harder To Seize Control Of Democratic Party

The GOP trains its sights on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and The Squad, accusing them of pushing ahead with a socialist takeover of the Democratic Party.



THEY BEGAN THE DARK MONEY FAKE STORY IN THE SPRING AND RECYCLED IT THIS WEEK

Search Results

Web results

Mar 14, 2019 - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has ties with a dark money group that ... Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 17, 2018 ... in “massive reporting violations,” former FEC commissioner Brad Smith ... For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
5 days ago - Daily Caller News Foundation logo ... Ocasio-Cortez has in the past called dark money the “enemy to ... Organize for Justice calls itself the “sister organization” of Justice Democrats ... Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 17, 2018 ... on a month-old page called “Watercooler Politics,” Quartz reported.
3 days ago - Ocasio-Cortez has been an outspoken critic of dark money, which ... her 2018 congressional primary campaign, The Daily Caller reported.
Mar 4, 2019 - ... has been quite vocal in condemning so-called dark money, but her own campaign went to ... PAYMENTS TO AOC BOYFRIEND SPUR FEC COMPLAINT ... "The law requires the PAC to report who it disburses money to. ... Brad Smith told the Daily Caller News Foundation's investigative unit that, because ...
5 days ago - According to the Daily CallerAOC has ties to her own dark money group ... In fact, Quartz reports the group's already forked over $20,000 on ...




Pain is written on a cat's face, U of C researchers find

BILL KAUFMANN
Updated: January 17, 2020

Cats may be notoriously aloof, but their facial expressions are giving away their inner pain, says a University of Calgary researcher.

In fact, the scientist and his colleagues at the University of Montreal are confident enough in what felines’ furry grimaces tell us, they’ve crafted a handy photo manual into reading cat angst.

That six months of research at the Quebec university involving about 50 cats with pre-existing illnesses will help veterinarians better detect pain and provide relief that’s usually better-delivered to dogs, said Dr. Daniel Pang, associate professor of anesthesia and analgesia.

“Veterinarians have had a hard time measuring pain, especially in cats,” said Pang of the U of C.

“Something that works faster, it’s what we haven’t had.”

That feline 0-2 grimace scale measures the level of expression in cats’ muzzle tension, whiskers change, head and ears position and orbital tightening in their eyes.

Ginger relaxes on the examination table at a lab in the University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. AZIN GHAFFARI / AZIN GHAFFARI/POSTMEDIA

“What people find easiest is looking at changes to their eyes, but you can’t look at just one thing, there are other indicators,” said Pang.

For instance, said the researcher, ears rotated outwards signal the presence of pain, as do squinted eyes.

Whiskers bunched together also denoted discomfort, according to the guide.

Cats that were used in the research had been suffering such maladies as trauma, intestinal conditions and skin problems, said Pang.

Resulting pain medication given the feline patients further confirmed the pain scales’ hunches, he added.

“Because our scales worked well for all those things, we’re pretty confident they’ll work well all-round,” he said.

Heavier shedding of fur, he said, could signal stress or a skin condition, “but isn’t as specific.”

As he explained the findings, which are part of a student’s PhD project three years in the making, Pang caressed an orange domestic long hair named Barney which leaned into his touch while a female named Ginger looked on.

“They’re both pretty happy cats,” said Pang.


That research was built on studies done on the facial features of cats’ traditional prey — mice and rats.

“Everything we learned from the rodent work, we kind of switched out that species and adapted it to cats,” said Pang, who co-authored the study with Dr. Paulo Steagall and lead author Marina Evangelista, PhD student at the University of Montreal.

“There are similar facial features in horses, cattle and sheep.”

A dog’s body language has always been more expressive and easier to interpret, said Pang.

“They’re easier to read and we’re more used to being around them, and cats don’t care (about being expressive),” he said.

How useful the scale is to cat owners isn’t quite as certain but should theoretically be beneficial, said Pang.

“Cat owners are great because they know their cat so well when they see a change, they tend to spot it anyway,” he said.

Interpreting the meaning of that change, Pang added, might not be so easy.

How to tell if your cat is in pain 1:49



SEE  https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=CAT

SEE  https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=ANIMAL

SEE  https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=PAIN

CrimethInc.'s Lifestyle Anarchism: Is it Revolutionary or Just a Petty-Bourgeois Prank? 
(Anarchist Studies Network Conference 2008)

Peter Seyferth



CrimethInc.’s Lifestyle Anarchism: Is it Revolutionary or just a Petty Bourgeois Prank?
By Peter Seyferth

CrimethInc. is a youthful group of anarchists with roots in Situationism and subcultures like punk rock. In their aesthetically outstanding publications they advocate dropping out of school or work and adopting an ecstatic, fun-seeking, petty criminal counter-cultural lifestyle that they claim is anarchistic and revolutionary.

CrimethInc. has been attacked by several anarchists (mostly adherents of syndicalist or insurrectionist lifestyles) for different reasons: According to those critics, CrimethInc. is a bunch of arrogant, privileged, white middle-class kids. Therefore CrimethInc. has no class analysis or “real theory” and does not understand or explain capitalism fully. They are much too simplistic and reduce society to the tension between having fun and being bored, while they should reduce it to class antagonism. They also ignore the central role of white supremacy. Consequently, CrimethInc. initiates actions that are not only useless (like Food Not Bombs or squatting) and non-threatening to capitalism and the state (because counter-cultures validate the dominant culture), but that are in fact dependent on capitalism’s oppression of non-whites and the poor, and that are hence directed against revolution. What CrimethInc. should do, according to the critics, is to provide serious revolutionary information (about school and workplace unions, about solidarity with struggling communities, about building social centers, and about supporting prisoners and asylum seekers etc.) and to engage in physical attacks on the system (e.g. bombing police stations).

For the most part, these criticisms are reactions to CrimethInc.’s introductory book Days of War Nights of Love (2000). Since then, many books, journals, papers, pamphlets, and other publications have been released by the CrimethInc. collective. In those works they defend their perspective and present it as part of a broader, more inclusive approach to revolution: There is not one objectively right way to overthrow capitalism, but there are many—and this is a strength rather than weakness. The CrimethInc. authors offer an “admittedly cursory analysis of class and declassing” in which they call desertion and refusal “the essence of resistance,” especially since unemployment rates are constantly increasing and workplace organization is further loosing relevance. In numerous “How to…” articles they give most of the serious revolutionary information requested by their critics. Issues of race and gender are dealt with, struggles abroad are given attention to.

In my contribution to the panel and/or publication I will analyze most of the CrimethInc. publications to date. I will concentrate primarily on the possible range of prefigurative politics in fields like class/classlessness, gender, race, and other dividing lines—and how useful CrimethInc.’s recommended “recipes” are. What would one have to add to this joyous and playful lifestyle to make it more threatening and thus revolutionary? To this question I hope I can offer answers that are at least worthy of discussion.

Location: Loughborough University, UK
Event Date: Sep 6, 2008


LIKE ADBUSTERS CRIMETHINC. IS A CONSUMER CULTURE REVOLT THE ANARCHISM OF BREAKING STARBUCKS WINDOWS THE DAY AFTER YOU
WENT FOR AN AMERICANO 

SEE  https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=ANARCHY

SEE  https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=ANARCHISM

Rabble Rousers and Merry Pranksters: A History of Anarchism in Aotearoa/New Zealand from the mid-1950s to the early 1980s


Introduction
 ....................................................................................................................v
 Acknowledgments
 ........................................................................................................ix
 Abbreviations
 .................................................................................................................x

1. The Early Years: The Mid-1950s to the Mid-1960s
Anarchism Before the 1950s .....................................................................................1
The Deadening Consensus .......................................................................................4
The Legend of Bill Dwyer and Student Provocateurs:Wellingtonian Anarchism ......................................................................8
Rationalism, Anthropology and Free Speech Fights:Anarchism in Auckland ..........................................................................................16
Anarcho-Cynicalism................................................................................................20
Aftermath: Dwyer the Anarchist Acid Freak .......................................................22

2. The Great Era of Radicalisation: The Late 1960s and Early 1970s
................27
The Youthquake, Protest Movement and Strike Wave .......................................27
The Later New Left and Anarchism .....................................................................33
The Shock of the New: The Progressive Youth Movement ...............................36
From Protest to Resistance: The Resistance Bookshops and Anarchism .........49
Third Worldism and Direct Action Maoism ........................................................56
The Fun Revolution and Anarchist Groupings ...................................................60

3. New Social Movements and Anarchism From the Early 1970sto the Early 1980s
The Rise of New Social Movements and Muldoonism ......................................73
The Women’s Liberation Movement, Anarchism and Anarcha-Feminism.....75
The Values Party and Libertarian Socialism? ...................................................
Return to the Land: Communes and Anarchism in the 1970s ..........................83
The Peace Movement and Anarcho-PacifIsm ......................................................85

4. Anarchist and Situationist Groups From 1973 to 1982
 ...................................89
Solidarity, Anti-Racism and Lumpen Activism: Anarchism in Auckland ......93
Anarchism in Christchurch Until the Late 1970s ..............................................107
Anarchism in Other Centres and the Unconventions .......................................116
Situationist Activity in Aotearoa .........................................................................121
The Springbok Tour, Neil Roberts and the Early 1980s ...................................126
Conclusions
 ................................................................................................................132
References
 ..................................................................................................................140

Carnival and Class: Anarchism and Councilism 

HENRI LEFEBVRE A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION

https://www.academia.edu/36133029/Andy_Merrifield_Henri_Lefebvre_A_Critical_Introduction

Whose City? A study of the colonisation of the
 city and the emancipation of urban space.



Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the applicability of utilizing Jurgen Habermas's Colonisation Thesis as a tool for analysing urban space and exploring problems within the contemporary city. In the first part the paper outlines the importance of focusing our attentions upon the city and constructing a conceptual framework! for understanding urban space. The work then outlines the theoretical framework of Habermas's Colonisation Thesis before an attempt to transpose this onto our understanding of urban space. The thesis concludes on an exploration of decolonisation and sociospatial change through both situationist theory and the lived experience of urban revolution uniting theory and practice.







This document forms part of an investigation into the definition of public space in the contemporary city and the nature of its ownership and control. The research and conclusions developed in this text are explored in conjunction with a series of design exercises, considered in the context of the city of Perth.
The role of public space in the city is a topical issue in the wider climate of economic downturn and political protest, as well as in the site specific context of Perth’s recently reinstated city status, and related discussion over the demolition or reuse of a number of the city’s significant former public buildings. The legal disputes and discussion over the Occupy protests, viewed alongside the congruous debate over the demolition of Perth City Hall, creates an intriguing and fluid backdrop for this research.