Saturday, December 07, 2024


‘Cracked under the pressure’: Alarm sounded as US postal worker suicides quadruple


Alexandria Jacobson, Investigative Reporter
RAW ST0RY
December 6, 2024 

A U.S. Postal Service letter carrier makes a delivery in Fullerton, Calif. in August 2020 (Shutterstock/Matt Gush)

Content warning: This article discusses suicide and self-harm. If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis and needs emotional support, help is available 24/7 via call or text at 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org.


Over the course of nearly 20 years, Carlos Ulloa has worked for the United States Postal Service in a range of capacities — from starting as a letter carrier to delivering parcels to driving trucks and serving as a supervisor of distribution operations.

But after two mental health episodes in the last four years due to work-related stress, Ulloa, of Belleville, N.J., transitioned to a custodial role at a national distribution center in Jersey City.

“My plans were to move up, to keep going up and not to end up as a custodian, cleaning bathrooms and floors and stuff like that,” Ulloa told Raw Story. “I was supposed to continue to grow up and stay into management after I was promoted.”

But about four years ago, Ulloa said a new plant manager “started putting me down in front of my own suit, my own employees, yelling and screaming and whistling and pointing his finger at me.” The manager would talk to him like he was “some kind of dog” and expected him to give up his weekends and work overtime — when he was already frequently late getting his grandkids to school and providing transportation for his daughter, Ulloa said.

One day Ulloa showed up to work intoxicated and ended up being reported missing after leaving the building and hiding in his attic.

“I guess I cracked under the pressure,” Ulloa said.

Postal inspectors, postal police officers and ambulance crews came to his home and took him to a hospital, where he was later put in a psychiatric ward for trying to run away, he said. Ulloa began seeing a psychiatrist every day for about five months where he said they discussed “any sadness, any problems, that we want to take our lives, alcohol, drugs.”

When Ulloa was ready to return to work, he was told that he couldn’t return to the same facility and was asked where he might want to be transferred to continue as a supervisor or potentially grow into other leadership roles.


That’s when Ulloa decided he didn't want to be in management anymore with “too much stress, too much going on.” He decided he’d be better off working as a mechanic or in maintenance.

However, the new custodial job didn’t provide the stress relief Ulloa was seeking either as he said his new supervisor bullied and harassed him, too. Last December, Ulloa told a supervisor he was considering ending his life due to work pressure.

One of Ulloa’s friends, a postal police officer who was off-duty at the time, was able to calm him down over the phone and drove to the facility to ensure Ulloa didn’t harm himself and was given medical attention. He spent another week in a psychiatric hospital.


“I used to never have a depression problem. Now, I gotta take pills for the depression problems,” said Ulloa, adding that he would like to see the Postal Service “be more supportive, maybe more aware of, especially upper management, to see their own supervisors or other managers how they treat employees.”

Ulloa isn’t the only Postal Service employee to recently deal with suicidal ideation. The latest annual report for the United States Postal Inspection Service, the law enforcement branch of the Postal Service, revealed that 201 suicides were reported in its fiscal year 2023.

That’s more than quadruple the 47 suicides reported by the Postal Inspection Service in fiscal year 2022.


And it’s more than double the national suicide rate for the general population of 14.2 deaths per 100,000 people, according to 2022 figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Postal Inspection Service qualifies all of its crime figures — from burglaries to robberies to homicides, suicides and assaults — by saying in the report, “Though not all of these reports are credible, the Inspection Service takes all reports of violent crime seriously and responds to every reported incident.”

Based on the Postal Service’s reported 635,350 total career and non-career employees in 2023, the suicide rate for postal employees would be about 31.6 per 100,000 people, if all 201 reported suicides involved Postal Service employees.


Spencer Block, a public information officer for the Postal Inspection Service's Chicago headquarters referred Raw Story to the Postal Service headquarters. Spokespeople for the Postal Service and the Postal Inspection Service did not respond to Raw Story’s multiple requests for comment. Neither responded to clarifying questions about the suicide and crime statistics reported.

The need for a volunteer emergency response team

Thirty volunteers from the National Association of Letter Carriers union formed an emergency response team in March due to “concern with the letter carriers being assaulted out there on the street, issues of substance abuse, mental health issues that we saw within our craft,” Mack Julion, assistant secretary-treasurer for the National Association of Letter Carriers, told Raw Story.

Julion, who has been a letter carrier in Chicago since 1997, said the group has seen “quite a few this year” in terms of suicides by letter carriers and has responded to such incidents and other traumatic events by visiting affected facilities where members might be upset. The program is based off of the emergency response team model from the United Steelworkers union, and volunteers received certifications from the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation, Inc..

“One traumatic incident could lead to more traumatic incidents, more trauma, if not properly dealt with,” Julion said. “It is healthy to address and deal with these traumatic situations and help people process their grief, because without that, that could lead to more trauma.”

In particular, violence against letter carriers has been an ongoing issue over the last five years, according to a Raw Story investigation that found a 543 percent increase in robberies of postal workers between 2019 and 2022.

Khalalisa Norris, a letter carrier in Chicago’s Austin neighborhood, twice experienced gun violence on the job, most recently being robbed in January 2023 at gun point for her arrow keys — the antiquated universal keys that thieves target to unlock numerous mailboxes in a given zip code.


Khalalisa Norris, 46, was robbed at gunpoint while working as a letter carrier on Chicago's West side. Norris met with Raw Story on Feb. 19 in the nearby Chicago suburb, Oak Park, Ill. (Photo by Alexandria Jacobson/Raw Story)

Norris told Raw Story in November that she still hasn’t been able to return to her full mail route out of fear after her robbery experience and that she still sees a psychiatrist for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. She said she’s been working with her union to push Congress for more safety protections for letter carriers.

While the Postal Service offers a “pretty good” Employee Assistance Program, Julion said the emergency response team was “an attempt to go beyond that.”


“When these incidents happen out at the station, EAP comes out, talks to the carriers, and a lot of carriers are kind of skeptical, if you will, because this EAP service seemed like just the arm of the Postal Service or management,” Julion said. “By us having our own people going out, talking with our people and literally getting trained to go out to deal with these situations is very helpful.”

Julion said June was a particularly busy month for the emergency response team, which has two volunteers located in each of its 15 regions. He estimated that four suicides were reported within two weeks.

One incident the team responded to this year involved an attempted suicide at a post office in Aurora, Co., where a man expressed stress about his wife potentially being deported. He was saved when an office door was broken down to stop him.


A Marine Corps veteran committed suicide after “dealing with depression and suicidal ideation for some time,” Julion said. The unadjusted rate of suicide for veterans in 2021 was 33.9 per 100,000 people, according to a 2023 annual report from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

In October 2021, a letter carrier committed a double murder-suicide at a sorting facility in Memphis, killing a supervisor and manager before killing himself, AP reported. Experts said the COVID-19 pandemic added extra stress to Postal Service employees at the time.

Frank Albergo, president of the Postal Police Officers Association, told Raw Story that postal police officers, the Postal Service’s own uniformed police force, formerly patrolled that Memphis facility before the union became embroiled in a four-year-long dispute with the Postal Service about its ability to protect letter carriers and the mail off postal property.

“We rarely patrol it anymore because we just don't have the manpower,” Albergo said. “That would have been something that we might have been able to prevent. Whether or not we could prevent it, we'll never know, but we never even had the chance. That's the problem.”
‘Doesn't surprise me’: A history of postal employee suicides

The circumstances around suicides are “complex” and don’t always involved mental illness, Erich Mische, CEO of suicide education nonprofit, Suicide Awareness Voices of Education, told Raw Story.

Julion agreed that not all of the suicides the emergency response team dealt with were “so much postal related as much as it is life, situations happening, and people not knowing how to respond or deal with them.”

Still, Julion acknowledged that Postal Service employees work in a “high-stress, high-speed workplace.”

“We often tell people the post office is like no other place that you’ve ever worked. We feel we are the best at what we do. We deliver everything, everywhere, every day. Rain, snow, sleet, hail, COVID, we deliver,” Julion said. “It’s what we do, and to have a sort of expectation like that, you can imagine the kind of pace that we work at on the inside and the kind of pressures that can be put on us to deliver, particularly if there's issues of understaffing.”

Letter carriers, particularly, often take pride in servicing the American people and don’t want to disappoint customers, which can “drive people crazy,” Julion said.

Ulloa said he certainly felt that level of pressure.

“The post office is just stressful enough, just to know that you have a time limit to get the mail out or the packages out and stuff like that,” Ulloa said. “I understand that we all push it and everything else, but they always want more with less people, and then the people won't stay because the management just doesn't grow with them.”

Before becoming a postal police officer, Albergo was a letter carrier and still has nightmares about the job due to the “stressful environment,” he told Raw Story.

“All I can tell you is I was a letter carrier for six years. I would not want to be a letter carrier now,” Albergo said.

Harassment and abuse has “always been a problem in the Postal Service,” Albergo said, noting that workplace stress and violence has been an issue for more than 30 years, according to a February 1992 joint statement signed by postal unions. The statement was released in the wake of a quadruple murder-suicide in Royal Oaks, Mich., where a terminated employee fired more than 100 shots at a post office, killing four employees before killing himself.


“We openly acknowledge that in some places or units there is an unacceptable level of stress in the workplace; that there is no excuse for and will be no tolerance of violence or any threats of violence by anyone at any level of the Postal Service; and that there is no excuse for and will be no tolerance of harassment, intimidation, threats, or bullying by anyone,” the statement read.

While Mische wasn’t familiar with the specific statistic of 201 suicides reported in the 2023 Postal Inspection Service report, he said “it doesn't surprise me.”

“Generally speaking, suicide rates with postal employees, I think that's been an issue for a long time. I think you can go as far back as the last 10 or 20 years and find stories about suicide rates in terms of occupation for postal employees and actually federal employees," Mische said.

A December 2023 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention called out that the suicide rate for male postal service clerks was 58.2 per 100,000 civilian, non-institutionalized working persons aged 16–64 in 2021.

Mische said “job stress” and “substance abuse issues” are significant factors when looking a suicide rates by job industry.

“Any organization, whether it's a federal government agency, the Postal Service, or it's a construction company, whatever agency or company, public or private, that conversation about suicide and suicide prevention’s got to start at the top with the leadership of any organization saying we are going to make this a priority addressing the issue of suicide,” Mische said.

Leadership needs to be open about the issue of suicides in the workforce despite decades of stigma, which “has cost more lives in our society than had we spent the last several decades being open and honest about the difficult circumstances surrounding suicide,” Mische said.

Institutions that want to provide support to employees struggling with suicidal ideation or related issues should present a message to employees saying, “We're going to make making resources available to help those who may be dealing with suicidal ideation, and get them the help they need. And then, as an organization, we're going to continue to support that individual until they get to a place where they feel as though they are stable," Mische said.

The National Association of Letter Carriers’ president was unavailable for an interview. The American Postal Workers Union did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.
News groups sue Idaho prison leader for increased witness access to lethal injection executions


The execution chamber at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution is shown as Security Institution Warden Randy Blades look on in Boise, Idaho, Oct. 20, 2011. (AP Photo/Jessie L. Bonner, File)



BY REBECCA BOONE
 December 6, 2024


BOISE, Idaho (AP) — The Associated Press and two other news organizations are suing Idaho’s top prison official for increased access to lethal injection executions, saying the state is unconstitutionally hiding the actual administration of the deadly drugs from public view.

The AP, The Idaho Statesman and East Idaho News filed the lawsuit against Idaho Department of Correction Director Josh Tewalt in Boise’s U.S. District Court on Friday.

The news organizations contend the public has a First Amendment right to witness the entire execution process, including when execution team members push the lethal injection medications into the IV lines connected to a condemned person. Idaho’s prison officials have kept that part of the execution concealed behind screens or walls in each of the three executions completed in the last half-century.
ADVERTISEMENT


“At its core, this case involves the press’s ability to fulfill its ‘significant role in the proper functioning of capital punishment’ by providing independent public scrutiny of the State of Idaho’s execution process,” attorney Wendy Olson wrote in court documents. She noted the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has repeatedly found that the public has the right to view executions from start to finish — including in a similar lawsuit brought by AP and other news organizations against Idaho officials in 2012. In that case, the appellate court ordered prison officials to allow media witnesses to watch as the IVs are inserted.

“The Ninth Circuit has not minced words,” Olson said, quoting from another 9th Circuit ruling from 2002: “An informed decision by the public is critical in determining whether execution by lethal injection comports with ‘the evolving standards of decency which mark the progress of a maturing society.’”

Idaho Department of Correction spokeswoman Sanda Kuzeta-Cerimagic said the department had not yet been formally served with the lawsuit. But she wrote in an email that “our execution practices have been repeatedly upheld, including meeting or exceeding the requirements under the First Amendment to provide an opportunity to observe the processes integral to an execution.”

“IDOC is committed to transparency in the execution process and will continue to provide one of the most transparent execution processes in the country,” Kuzeta-Cerimagic wrote.

Tewalt and other prison officials have told lawmakers in the past that anything threatening the confidentiality of execution team members or the source of the state’s execution drugs could put Idaho’s ability to carry out capital punishment at risk, in part because it would be difficult to find qualified volunteers willing to put someone to death.

The news organizations point out in the lawsuit, however, that media witnesses can already see other execution team members, though their identities are concealed by medical masks, head coverings and other devices. The same solution could be used for the execution team members tasked administering the lethal drugs, the news organizations said.

Idaho has only attempted four lethal injection executions since the U.S. Supreme Court lifted a moratorium on executions in the 1970s. When Keith Eugene Wells was executed in 1994, IV lines ran from his arm to a screen, behind which execution team members used a device to deliver a cocktail of lethal drugs. In the 2011 execution of Paul Ezra Rhoades and the 2012 execution of Richard Albert Leavitt, the IV lines ran through an opening in the wall of the execution chamber, into another area that was hidden from view.

The same setup was used in February, when the state attempted to execute Thomas Eugene Creech. But that execution was called off after the execution team members were unable to successfully establish an IV line despite trying eight different locations in Creech’s arms and legs.

In October, the state announced it would begin using central venous lines — threading a catheter through a large, deep vein until it reaches the condemned person’s heart — for lethal injections if attempts to insert standard IV lines fail. Prison officials also remodeled the execution chamber to add a special “execution preparation” room for the central line procedure, and installed closed-circuit cameras so that media witnesses can watch.

The news organizations want a federal judge to order the state to allow media witnesses the same closed-circuit camera access to the “Medical Team Room,” where the lethal drug preparation and administration occurs.

“There is no logical reason why the events that will take place in the Medical Team Room should fall outside the scope of the well settled First Amendment right to view an execution in its entirety,” Olson wrote.

“Simply put, there is nothing more ‘intertwined’ with the execution process than the preparation and administration of the very drugs that will effectuate Idaho’s most severe punishment,” she said.



The Legacy of Fred Hampton

Lessons for the Current Moment

December 5, 2024
Source: Liberation Road


Thomas Hawk - Fred Hampton. Flikr.



On December 4, 1969, Black Panther Party leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark were drugged and murdered by the Chicago Police Department. There have been documentaries and a feature film about the murder but they only capture part of the moment.

Hampton was among the most outstanding of the Panther leaders. Indeed, he was a true visionary. The architect of the first “Rainbow Coalition”—uniting African Americans, Puerto Ricans, and poor whites—he had an impulse towards the uniting of class struggle and struggles against national oppression. Certainly he would have offered great leadership to the Black Panther Party as a whole had he lived.

I remember the day that his murder was announced. It is difficult to capture in words the impact of the murder. Many of us were starting to become used to news about the jailing, torturing, and murder of political activists, but Fred Hampton was in a different category. This was a strategic blow to the Panthers and to the broader movement.
Original Rainbow Coalition pin

As we enter the new MAGA era it is worth reflecting on moments of intense repression. At the time of Fred Hampton’s murder, Richard Nixon had been in office for less than a year. The repression that fell on various groups, including but not limited to the Panthers, was something that many non-activists could ignore even though for the activist world it was heart-wrenching. The MAGA world we are entering shall leave no one untouched, however. It is for this reason, if for no other reason, that we must think broadly and creatively regarding the sort of united front necessary to defeat the far Right. This is a united front that will go beyond legal defense campaigns. It may have an impact on the lives of millions. It will necessitate self-defense; creative, “guerrilla” media (social media, alternative press, etc.); forms of mutual assistance; mobilizations; worker organizing; strikes; counternarratives. And it will most especially necessitate strategy and organization.

The Panthers understood part of this but they tended to focus on the attacks against them (and other activists) by the State. We must think differently and, as such, both offensively and defensively.

On offense, we must think about the environmental movement and environmental justice movements. The environment is the Achilles heel of the far right. They have no solution to the environmental catastrophe aside from genocide. Forces on the left need to not only push for environmental reforms but also link that to the defense and strengthening of the social safety net. Recent hurricanes, wildfires, droughts and pandemics have made clear that there must be a role for government,not only to provide assistance in the aftermath of environmental catastrophes, but to be thinking in advance regarding the steps to take to mitigate disaster. The right will not be thinking about that. As socialists, we need to think about our role in this, a role that must go beyond propaganda. Environmental activists have been asking how they can support the labor movement. In truth, they need to be uniting with the labor movement rather than thinking about supporting it. Uniting as in taking on this offensive battle against environmental catastrophe and the neoliberal devastation of the social safety net. That IS class struggle.Fred Hampton (left) with members of the first Rainbow Coalition (Credit: ST-17112848-0006, Chicago Sun-Times collection, Chicago History Museum)

Fred Hampton appreciated that if we are to win we must think in majoritarian terms. In today’s situation that means fully breaking with postmodernism and its obsession with particularities and symbols, and starting to think in terms of “the people”—the conscious force led by workers that seeks to win and save humanity. Those who truly understand that it is “us” (those unplugged from “the Matrix”) against “them” (the oligarchs and those who willingly—and often stupidly—serve them).

The loss of Fred Hampton was the loss of decades. But there are many Fred Hamptons out there. They need organization and for sure they need to be focused on strategy. Socialists need to unite with those Fred Hamptons, thereby transforming ourselves and transforming them.

Failure is not an option.


Bill Fletcher Jr born 1954) has been an activist since his teen years. Upon graduating from college he went to work as a welder in a shipyard, thereby entering the labor movement. Over the years he has been active in workplace and community struggles as well as electoral campaigns. He has worked for several labor unions in addition to serving as a senior staffperson in the national AFL-CIO. Fletcher is the former president of TransAfrica Forum; a Senior Scholar with the Institute for Policy Studies; and in the leadership of several other projects. Fletcher is the co-author (with Peter Agard) of “The Indispensable Ally: Black Workers and the Formation of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, 1934-1941”; the co-author (with Dr. Fernando Gapasin) of “Solidarity Divided: The crisis in organized labor and a new path toward social justice“; and the author of “‘They’re Bankrupting Us’ – And Twenty other myths about unions.” Fletcher is a syndicated columnist and a regular media commentator on television, radio and the Web.

CANADA

Chilling Protest with Designations of Terrorism

US documents say the organization helps fund a terrorist group. But lawyers warn of chilling legitimate protest.
December 6, 2024
Source: The Tyee


Jada-Gabrielle Pape has fears after a National Post article falsely said she belonged to Samidoun, recently added to Canada’s terrorist entities list. 
Photo by Jen St. Denis.

The moment Jada-Gabrielle Pape saw an online National Post report calling her “one of Samidoun’s most active organizers,” she was gripped with fear.

The Canadian government had declared the Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network a terrorist entity less than a month earlier. Samidoun has been an active presence at many protests in Vancouver.

Pape is passionate about advocating for Palestinians and has attended many protests in Vancouver. But she says she is not a member of Samidoun.

Pape immediately wondered about how her life could change. Would her work as a consultant be affected? Would she be added to no-fly lists or targeted by police?

“As an Indigenous person, we’re targeted by the state at a disproportionate rate,” said Pape, who is Coast Salish from the Saanich and Snuneymuxw nations. “I’m afraid to be targeted by the police and by the state and afraid of what it will do to my family. My family is very afraid for me.”

Pape immediately reached out to the National Post to demand a correction. The columnist hadn’t contacted her before claiming, without evidence, she was a member of a terrorist organization, she noted.

Editors quickly removed any reference to her from the article. The National Post did not respond to The Tyee’s request for comment.

Reader comments posted on the article are filled with threats of violence; many express the view that Muslim immigrants should be deported and immigration should be curtailed.

Supporters of Samidoun’s designation as a terrorist entity say it will let police take legal action against anyone who donates to or financially supports the organization.

But legal experts argue the designation process lacks transparency and can paint all pro-Palestinian protesters as terrorist supporters, stoke Islamophobia and have a chilling effect on legitimate protest.
What’s a terrorist entity?

Liza Hughes, executive director of the BC Civil Liberties Association, said Pape’s experience is an example of how the federal government designation of Samidoun as a terrorist entity can chill political speech.

The designation process, Hughes said, is opaque, politically driven and lacks transparency, with few avenues of appeal.

That can affect free speech, she said, as people fear being linked to any organization that might be designated as a terrorist entity.

“This lack of transparency that makes the system flawed to begin with is a major factor in spreading the chill on expression in support of Palestine, because it leaves people feeling like ‘Who will be next?’” Hughes said.

People — like Pape — who are organizing support for Palestine are being discredited based on the terrorism designation, she said, “whether or not they’re actually associated with Samidoun.”
Who’s on the terrorism list, and why?

There are 79 organizations on Canada’s current list of designated terrorist entities, most foreign-based.

Listed entities can have their property seized, and it’s a criminal offence to “knowingly participate in or contribute to, directly or indirectly, any terrorist group.” But that participation is only an offence “if its purpose is to enhance the ability of any terrorist group to facilitate or carry out a terrorist activity,” according to Public Safety Canada.

Jessica Davis, an expert in terrorism financing who is the president of a consulting firm called Insight Threat Intelligence, agreed Canada’s lack of transparency around the process for designating terrorist entities is a problem. It’s impossible to know why some groups are being listed, she said.

The process was introduced in response to the 9/11 attacks in the United States, in 2001, she said, and needs to be reassessed and reformed.

“Our listings are somewhat political theatre,” Davis said. “You can look at the Proud Boys listing under a similar light — no matter what you feel about the Proud Boys, there was pressure to list that group, and that’s what ended up happening.”

The Proud Boys, a far-right neo-fascist group, were added to the terrorist list in 2021 after their prominent participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol that sought to disrupt the transfer of presidential power from Donald Trump to Joseph Biden.

Hughes said that while the listing targets organizations rather than people, individuals can be charged criminally as a result of certain actions related to the listed entity. Hughes cited multiple examples of people being charged for the criminal offence of knowingly participating in or contributing to the activity of a terrorist group. The charges have usually been related to doing something violent or travelling to another country to join a terrorist group, Hughes added.

Public Safety Canada’s website says the process of listing a terrorist entity begins with “criminal and/or security intelligence reports” indicating reasonable grounds to believe the group has either knowingly carried out, participated in or facilitated terrorist activity, or that it has acted on behalf of an entity involved in terrorist activity.

The reports are then submitted to Canada’s public safety minister, who makes a decision on whether to recommend listing the group as a terrorist entity.
The case against Samidoun

On Oct. 15, both Canada and the United States announced they would add Vancouver-based Samidoun to their terrorism lists. The Netherlands, Germany and Israel had previously listed the organization.

The organization, founded in 2011 with branches in 12 countries, says it works to support Palestinian prisoners held in Israel.

Public Safety Canada’s announcement about the listing said the organization “has close links with and advances the interests of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine,” which is a listed terrorist entity in Canada, the United States and Europe. The PFLP has carried out several violent attacks in Israel, including the assassination of a government minister.

The U.S. announcement said Samidoun was listed “for being owned, controlled or directed by, or having acted for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, the PFLP.”

“Based on its past and recent actions, Samidoun meets the threshold for listing as set out in the Criminal Code,” a Public Safety Canada spokesperson told The Tyee over email.

The United States called Samidoun a “sham charity” that provides financial support to the PFLP.

Advocacy groups supporting Israel, such as the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs and B’nai Brith Canada, have pushed for Samidoun to be designated as a terrorist entity for years.

Those calls intensified as pro-Palestinian activism ramped up in response to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people. Israel’s retaliatory war in Gaza has killed 44,000 so far and has created dire humanitarian conditions.

Both Hamas and Israel have been accused of committing war crimes. The United Nations has said Israel’s actions in Gaza are consistent with genocide, and the International Criminal Court recently issued arrest warrants for Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and former defence minister Yoav Gallant.

On its website, Samidoun’s statements frequently support Hamas and praise violent efforts to replace Israel with a Palestinian state. The organization also has been active helping to organize several university protests in the United States.

At a rally in Vancouver in April, the international co-ordinator for Samidoun, Charlotte Kates, led a call-and-response chant in praise of Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. Protesters associated with Samidoun have also been blamed for burning a Canadian flag and chanting “Death to Canada, death to the United States, and death to Israel” during a protest on the one-year anniversary of Oct. 7.

Davis said those actions don’t meet the bar for listing an organization as a terrorist entity in Canada. Samidoun’s alleged financial connections to the already-listed PFLP was the likely reason the group was listed.

In a statement responding to its listing as a terrorist entity, Samidoun said that it “does not have any material or organizational ties to entities listed on the terrorist lists of the United States, Canada or the European Union.”

The listing “is meant to introduce a norm in which organizations may be designated as ‘terrorist’ for organizing demonstrations, lectures, publishing posters and engaging in entirely public and political work that challenges imperialist states’ complicity in Israeli war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ongoing genocide in Gaza,” the organization wrote.

A week after Samidoun’s designation was announced, B’nai Brith Canada released a seven-point plan for tackling antisemitism that included the “comprehensive listing of terrorist organizations,” amendments to the Criminal Code and banning rallies “that support terror entities.”

Vancouver police have recommended hate speech charges against Kates for her comments praising the Oct. 7 attack at a rally in April, but Crown prosecutors have not yet decided to proceed.

Following Samidoun’s designation as a terrorist entity, Vancouver police carried out an aggressive raid on Kates’s home as part of their investigation. Police justified the use of force, including the use of an emergency response team, based on a prior risk assessment.

The Tyee contacted Kates’s lawyer, who declined to comment for this story.
Civil liberties concerns

While organizations like B’nai Brith see Samidoun as a public safety threat, some pro-Palestinian supporters are concerned that the terrorism listing is just one more way to shut down speech about the consequences of Israel’s war in Gaza.

Ryan Booth, a pro-Palestine supporter who says he is not a member of Samidoun, says he has attended many of the rallies Samidoun was active at over the past year. He believes attendance has dwindled following the terrorism designation.

“There’s real terrorists out there, there’s real threats — ISIS, ISIL, al-Qaida,” Booth said. “Those guys are out there, and every time you call a peaceful Canadian protester a terrorist, you’re going to take away a little bit of the actual threat that is terrorism.”

Hughes said the terrorism listing is being used to discredit anyone opposed to Israel’s attacks on Gaza.

“We are seeing this terrorism listing being used to discredit any support for Palestine and also to kind of retroactively justify the claims that anyone who attends the protest must be supporting Hamas,” Hughes said. “So, of course, it intimidates anyone organizing or thinking of organizing any form of justice for Palestinians.”

Hughes said people who want to advocate for Palestinians are already facing “systemic suppression,” often taking the form of professional consequences like being disciplined, investigated or fired.

Pape is still trying to deal with the National Post’s false claim that she is a member of a terrorist organization.

The violent raid on Kates’s home — which employed heavily armed officers and a flash bomb — has left her fearing a similar raid on the home where she lives with family members.

“I have trouble falling asleep and I wake easily throughout the night. I sleep fully clothed in case the police come,” she told The Tyee.

“These are realistic concerns for Indigenous people and for those of us in solidarity with Palestine — and they are not things I should be afraid of in my home.”

With files from Amanda Follett Hosgood.


Jen St. Denis  is a reporter with The Tyee. She has covered a variety of topics, including housing, the overdose crisis, civic issues, politics and justice. In 2023, she won a Canadian Association of Journalists written news award for her reporting on a fatal fire at the Winters Hotel in Vancouver. In 2024, her reporting on three cases involving missing Indigenous women and youth was nominated for the Canadian Journalism Foundation’s Landsberg Award. St. Denis has previously worked as a reporter for the Star Vancouver, Business in Vancouver and CTV. Her work has also appeared in the Toronto Star and South China Morning Post. She grew up in Nelson, B.C., and has lived in Vancouver since 2001. Find her on X @JenStDen and on Instagram @JenStDenis.


 

America’s ‘Greatest Ally’ Cost US Taxpayers $310 Billion


The Qualitative Military Edge agreement between the United States and Israel has cost U.S. taxpayers $310 billion since Israel was founded. Many people in the United States and around the world are upset with how the United States continues to support Israel as they besiege and bombard Gaza, resulting in what some estimates say are 200,000 deaths. What people may not be aware of is that it is U.S. law to defend and sustain Israel’s hegemony. The QME agreement between the United States and Israel has its roots in the 1960s during the peak of Cold War tensions. The U.S. saw Israel as an invaluable geopolitical ally to combat the expansion of Soviet influence into the Middle East. Lydon B. Johnson was the first president to speak publicly about arms deals with Israel.

The Six-Day War in 1967 proved Israel’s military capabilities, and the U.S. felt that Israel could be a valuable partner in combating Soviet influence in the Middle East. Following the Six-Day War, there was a spike in military and financial transfers to Israel using the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. The QME was further solidified during the Yom Kippur War in 1973 when a U.S. airlift of military supplies to Israel was critical in turning the tide of the conflict.

In 2008, in the last months of the Bush administration, the QME agreement between the U.S. and Israel became an official U.S. law by amending the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 to become the Naval Vessel Transfer Act of 2008. This law made it a legal requirement for the U.S. to ensure that any arms sales to Middle Eastern countries do not compromise Israel’s military superiority.

Legacy media will tell us that this legislation enjoyed bipartisan support, driven by a recognition of Israel’s strategic role in the region when, in truth, it was driven by AIPAC and Senator Joe Liberman, while one of the biggest opponents of the bill was Senator Rand Paul who railed against the budget of this bill especially as domestic debt soared and argued he for a more balanced approach that would not alienate Arab allies, in a time when the U.S. sought to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan.

In response to what the U.S. government called a failed state in Syria and a rise in ISIS and Al-Qaeda, the U.S. gave Israel F-35 fighter jets America’s most advanced stealth fighters, making Israel the only country at the time outside of the U.S. to operate the F-35. These jets made Israel a regional superpower because no other nation in the region had this capability. The decision to equip Israel with F-35s is not a secret; we were told this move was to counter Iran’s regional influence, while the real reason at the time was to put Israel on an even playing field with Russia in Syria.

The Naval Transfer Act of 2008 legally required the United States to ensure that Israel maintains a qualitative military edge over its adversaries. Specifically, it mandates that any sale of arms to Middle Eastern countries must undergo a rigorous review to confirm that it does not compromise Israel’s QME. The law defines QME as the capability to “counter and defeat any credible conventional military threat” with minimal damage to Israel’s forces and resources. The QME is a legal commitment from the U.S. to ensure that Israel is not only victorious in battle but will be able to win decisively. This law is reaffirmed by congressional vote year after year, with Congress passing various recent provisions that mandate the Department of Defense to report on Israel’s QME status periodically.

Israel is often called America’s greatest ally when, in truth, Israel is really America’s greatest overseas asset. Since 1958, the United States has been funneling hundreds of billions of dollars to Israel. American tax dollars built the democratic state of Israel, and while this issue is often seen as a policy decision, since 2008, it has been official U.S. law. Before 2008, it was just an unwritten rule that republican and democratic administrations signed off on for decades. Politicians and talking heads can repeatedly claim that Israel is an ally, which they are, but at what cost?

Security in the Middle East or Peace in the Middle East are just catchphrases used to perpetuate this false notion that only through Israel can we attain peace in the Middle East. Iraq, Syria, and Yemen were all conflicts that Israel vehemently pushed the international community to pursue. Netanyahu lied to Congress about WMDs in Iraq, moved mountains to destabilize Syria, and then cried to the UN about the Houthis in 2014.

The original basis of the Israeli QME was to use Israel to combat Soviet expansion into the Middle East, and this policy has not changed over the last 70-plus years. The Iranian Revolution in 1979 shifted the focus of the QME a bit to containing a new threat from Iran. Operation Cyclone in Afghanistan was in part to maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region, and we know how that ended. The United States cannot allow Russia or China to build relationships with Middle Eastern countries because the U.S. will not be able to guarantee Israel’s qualitative military edge if they allow Russia and China to advance the militaries and economies of nations in the Middle East.

The current status quo policy on Russian or Chinese influence in the Middle East is not to prevent Russia or China from threatening America’s interests in the region; It’s about protecting Israel’s security under the guise of perpetuating Western ideology and control. Allowing this law to remain on the books codifies into public law that U.S. lawmakers in both Democratic and Republican administrations are beholden to Israel, no matter what. The international stage is far too dynamic to have policy decisions adhere to such a static law.

The price of war is always paid by the people of those nations, not the governments that orchestrate conflicts. American taxpayers have shouldered the burden of the war machine for far too long without reaping any rewards from so-called assets overseas the military-industrial complex claims to protect. We have built infrastructure in other nations as ours crumbles and assure the security of foreign lands as ours dwindles, but it seems as soon as someone mentions Russia or Muslim extremists, people forget all of this, standing in line with a war drum strapped to their chest, pounding away robotically.

Joziah Thayer is a researcher with the Pursuance Project. He founded WEDA in 2014 to combat mainstream media narratives. He is also an antiwar activist and the online organizer behind #OpYemen.

How an atheist hoaxer got Christian nationalists to publish Karl Marx

(RNS) — James Lindsay made his name submitting hoax articles to academic journals to mock liberals. Now he’s after Christian nationalists — by submitting a fake article taken mostly from the Communist Manifesto.


James Lindsay presents a session of "The EVILution of Communism Workshop"
 for New Discourses, Nov. 4, 2024. (Video screen grab)

Bob Smietana
December 5, 2024

(RNS) — An atheist writer and critical race theory critic who made his name submitting fake articles for publication in progressive academic journals and later attacking “liberal” evangelicals has a new target: conservative Christian nationalists.

James Lindsay, who describes himself as a “professional troublemaker,” rewrote parts of “The Communist Manifesto,” adding some critiques of “the liberal establishment,” and then sent it off to the American Reformer, an online magazine that seeks to “promote a vigorous Christian approach to the cultural challenges of our day.”

The essay, published with a fake byline of “Marcus Carlson,” was published in mid-November, and begins with a lead that mimics the work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.

“A rising spirit is haunting America: the spirit of a true Christian Right,” the essay begins, reminiscent of the opening lines of “The Communist Manifesto”: “A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism.”


Karl Marx, circa 1865. (Photo via Roger Viollet Collection/Getty Images/Public Domain)

The idea, Lindsay explained, was to embarrass what he described as “Woke Right” conservatives by getting them to publish the works of actual communists.

“They published Karl Marx’s definitive Communist work, dressed up to resemble their own pompous, self-pitying drivel, when it was submitted from a completely unknown author with no internet footprint whatsoever bearing the name ‘Marcus Carlson,’” Lindsay wrote in revealing his hoax, an announcement that coincided with the magazine’s “Giving Tuesday” campaign.

The founder of American Reformer seemed to take the hoax in stride.

“Well, you have to hand it to James Lindsey — he ‘got us,’” Josh Abbotoy, co-founder of American Reformer, wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, referring to Lindsay’s hoax.

The publication’s editors, who did not respond to a request for comment, added Lindsay’s byline to the story but did not retract it. However, in an editor’s note, they wrote that they’d be beefing up their editorial screening — and noted Lindsay’s lack of faith.

“The following article was written by James Lindsay, who, as an avowed atheist, is not eligible for publication in American Reformer,” the editors wrote.

The Karl Marx hoax is the latest twist in the story of Lindsay, a former massage therapist with a Ph.D. in mathematics who reinvented himself as an internet gadfly and self-proclaimed enemy of “woke” Americans — and an occasional ally of conservative Christians.

Lindsay first came to fame in 2018, when he and a pair of co-authors submitted a series of papers to what they called “grievance studies” academic journals, including one paper about “fat bodybuilding” and another about sex at dog parks. Some of the journals published the papers — which included fake research and, in one instance, a similar strategy of updated passages of Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” with buzzy academic phrases — launching Lindsay into a career in mocking so-called woke liberals and critical race theory.

RELATED: Why grievance studies hoaxer and atheist James Lindsay wants to save Southern Baptists

He later teamed up with some conservative Southern Baptists who claimed their denomination had become too liberal, especially making videos about the “woke invasion” with Michael O’Fallon, an activist who also organized cruises for Calvinist Christian nationalists.

In 2023, conservative activist Charlie Kirk interviewed Lindsay at a Turning Point USA event for pastors, claiming he’d traveled the country with the atheist activist, trying to convince Christians to fight liberals.

Lindsay, who did not respond to a request for an interview, has now turned against what he calls “The Woke Right,” which he described on his podcast as conservatives using “woke methods” to promote conservative values.

The term “woke” was popularized during the protests that followed the death of George Floyd, as a way of saying that people were aware of systemic racism. That led to a conservative backlash, including from some evangelical groups who objected to any mention of social justice in religious circles.

By 2022, some conservatives had begun to turn the phrase on their own, accusing others in their ranks of being divisive extremists who seek out conflict.

“If the first words out of their mouth, for instance, are ‘establishment’ and ‘globalists,’ you can rest assured they are not very thoughtful and they are probably about to lie to you,” U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Republican from Texas, told the Texas Tribune in 2022. “I’m just sick of it because it’s manufactured division.”

Neil Shenvi, a popular blogger and critic of critical race theory, labeled Christian nationalists such as Stephen Wolfe, author of “The Case for Christian Nationalism,” as part of the “woke right” for promoting the idea that conservative Christians — especially white Christians — are being oppressed by liberals.

Lindsay has taken up the fight, putting him at odds with the American Reformer and groups like it. Stephen Wolfe has also been among his targets, as has former Trump administration staffer turned Southern Baptist critic William Wolfe, Gab founder Andrew Torba, Candice Owen, Tucker Carlson and Joel Webbon, a Texas pastor known for his antisemitic takes, claims of “anti-white discrimination” and his hopes to ban women from voting.

The American Reformer hoax set off a social media feud between Lindsay’s allies and the supporters of those he criticized — with Lindsay’s post on X about the matter receiving 1.9 million views and 666 comments as of Thursday morning (Dec. 5).

While the American Reformer’s editors were fooled by the hoax, some of its readers were not. Within days of the article’s publication, readers noticed something was off and suspected plagiarism. “So, as an old commercial would go, is the above article real or is it memorex?” wrote a reader in the comments.