Saturday, February 01, 2025

US aid was long a lifeline for Eastern Europe. Trump cuts are sending shockwaves through the region

STEPHEN McGRATH and AUREL OBREJA
Thu, January 30, 2025














Moldova EU Europe US Aid
FILE - United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken walks during a visit to the site of Moldelectrica Chisinau Substation in Braila, a USAID supported project, south of the capital of Moldova, Wednesday, May 29, 2024
. (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda, File)

CHISINAU, Moldova (AP) — President Donald Trump’s abrupt freeze of U.S. foreign aid is sending shockwaves through Eastern Europe, leaving pro-democracy groups, independent media, civil society initiatives and local governments scrambling to make ends meet in a region often defined by rivalries between East and West.

The U.S. State Department said that the 90-day freeze aims to root out waste and block so-called woke programs to expose U.S.-funded activities “that run contrary to our national interests” — as Trump aggressively rolls out his “America First” agenda.

Fears of a rise in influence from Russia and China

Eastern Europe has been a longtime geopolitical battleground where Western foreign policy interests often collide with those of Moscow or Beijing.

Many fear the cessation of U.S. funds could expose Washington's allies — and create a vacuum that its foes could gladly seek to fill.

“In Moldova’s case, foreign donor support is vital to balancing the media landscape," says Oxana Greadcenco, the director of independent media platform Moldova.org. “Many television networks and media institutions are funded by Russia so there needs to be a counterbalance ... This is an unprecedented situation, but we are trying not to panic.”

The U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, informed her that grants officially ended on Jan. 24 and they aren’t allowed to spend any remaining funds in their accounts. This week, Greadcenco promoted their online Patreon campaign, which garnered 135 new backers in two days, which should cover salaries for the platform’s 16-strong staff through March, she said.

“We did not expect it to impact Moldova so severely, as we thought there would only be a partial cut in funds,” she told The Associated Press. "Being aware of how much Moldova depends on U.S. funds, not just NGOs and the press but also local municipalities, many public institutions … this is a shock for everyone."

Vital aid for former communist countries


Since the 1990s, USAID has invested several billion dollars in countries like Moldova, Serbia, Albania, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina — all former communist countries with aspirations of joining the European Union.

In these countries, USAID money has promoted democratic institutions and reforms, aided infrastructure and energy security projects, bolstered businesses and economies, and supported a significant number of nongovernmental organizations and independent media platforms. The agency says it “tailors its approach to each country’s unique challenges and opportunities.”

“It’s no exaggeration to say that we have democracy in Moldova, in part thanks to American financial support,” Valeriu Pasa, the chairman of the Chisinau-based think-tank WatchDog, said in a statement on Wednesday. He added that the U.S. benefits "from us being more democratic and developed, ensuring we don’t turn into a Russian or Chinese colony.”

The wide-ranging effects of the USAID spending freeze spanning different sectors highlight how critical the funds are to the region.

Sytrime Dervisholi, executive director of the Prefabricated Construction Association of Kosovo, says the halted USAID funds will adversely affect her association’s ability to provide technical assistance to member companies that require vocational education and training, and access to grants.

“Kosovo, but also our association … is dependent on foreign aid, mostly on U.S. aid,” she said. “So we really do hope that this measure will be … canceled after 90 days,” when the funding reviews by U.S. officials have concluded.

Safet Gerxhaliu, an independent economic analyst in Kosovo, also believes the USAID freeze could have “a very negative impact” on the country’s future, affecting everything from the government to the private sector and education.

“I do believe that the impact is very bad, because those measures come at the same time that Kosovo is under sanctions from the European community,” he said. Brussels froze some funding to Kosovo in 2023 following a series of clashes with ethnic Serb minorities.

Although Serbia obtained EU candidate status in 2012, the Balkan nation is also a key ally of Russia and China in Europe. Under the government of populist President Aleksandar Vucic, reforms in areas such as strengthening the rule of law and tackling corruption have been slow, and the USAID suspension could further hamper progress.

“We currently have a USAID project about public financing. Training for local NGOs regarding following of public finances,” Nemanja Nenadic from Transparency International organization in Serbia, told the AP. “This has been put on hold.”

US funds help monitor elections


For the Promo-LEX Association, a longtime pro-democracy and human rights NGO in Moldova, USAID funds are vital since they account for about 75-80% of its projects, which include monitoring elections, political financing and parliamentary oversight.

“All USAID-funded activities have been put on hold. Without immediate alternative support, these crucial activities may not continue at the same scale or effectiveness,” said Ion Manole, the association’s executive director. “Given previous Russian interference — through illicit campaign funding, political corruption, and disinformation — our observation mission is essential to ensuring electoral transparency."

Moldova will hold a pivotal parliamentary election this fall which comes after the pro-Western government accused Russia of meddling in two key votes last year — including backing a vast vote-buying scheme in the country of about 2.5 million people.

“Without resources, we cannot deploy long-term observers, conduct election-day monitoring, or track foreign interference effectively," Manole said. “A change to an anti-Western government could affect Moldova’s European path and ... significantly destabilize the whole of Eastern Europe and the Black Sea region.”

“We remain hopeful that the U.S. government’s evaluation process will allow programs like ours to resume,” he said, adding that his NGO is already seeking alternative funding, mainly from European donors.

A geopolitical opportunity for Moscow


Cristian Cantir, a Moldovan associate professor of international relations at Oakland University, told the AP that any suspension of aid “gives Russia an unnecessary opportunity to exploit and benefit further from Moldova’s weaknesses, which the lack of USAID funding would exacerbate.”

“Moscow would therefore have greater abilities to derail Chisinau from its European Union integration course,” he said. “Similarly, cutting funding to independent news outlets makes it more difficult for journalists to hold corrupt politicians — many of whom have connections to Russia — accountable and therefore weakens Moldova’s sovereignty and institutional independence.”

The Trump administration has cast the aid freeze as an accountability quest to justify American spending abroad. Beyond support for Ukraine in recent years, the U.S. is spending about $40 billion in foreign aid annually, according to the U.S. State Department.

Greadcenco of the Moldova.org news platform hopes that other international partners will consider stepping in to stem a potential longer-term shortfall.

“These funds are vital to keeping Moldova afloat,” she said. “I dread to think what the complete cessation of these funds would mean for our country.”

___

Stephen McGrath reported from Sighisoara, Romania. Jovana Gec in Belgrade, Serbia, Llazar Semini in Tirana, Albania, and Florent Bajrami in Pristina, Kosovo, contributed to this report.
Colombia's president calls for migrants to leave jobs in the US and return home

FOR JOBS IN THE COCA FIELDS

Associated Press
Fri, January 31, 2025

FILE - Colombia's President Gustavo Petro arrives at the opening ceremony of COP16, a United Nations' biodiversity conference, in Cali, Colombia, Oct. 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara, file)

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Colombia's president is calling on his compatriots working without legal status in the United States to leave their jobs and return home as soon as possible.

“Wealth is only produced by the working people,” Gustavo Petro said in an early morning post on the X platform. “Let's build social wealth in Colombia."

The leftist president said his government would provide loans to those who take up his offer to return home and enlist in one of its programs to start a business.

Petro made his comments following a bitter feud over immigration last weekend with U.S. President Donald Trump that nearly triggered a trade war and rupture in diplomatic relations between the U.S. and its historic ally in South America.
ADVERTISEMENT


Petro, in an earlier social media storm, accused the Trump administration of mistreating migrants who entered the U.S. illegally by handcuffing them and removing them on military flights to Latin America. Trump exploded when Petro denied two such flights permission to land.

Later, the two sides negotiated a truce amid protests by investors that Petro was sabotaging Colombia's export economy, which relies heavily on purchases from the U.S.

Colombia accepted 475 deportation flights from the U.S. from 2020 to 2024, fifth behind Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and El Salvador, according to Witness at the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data. It accepted 124 deportation flights in 2024.

Colombian president urges undocumented Colombians in US to return

Filip Timotija
Fri, January 31, 2025



Colombian President Gustavo Petro urged undocumented Colombians who are living in the U.S. to return home, saying they would be rewarded for it.

“I ask undocumented Colombians in the U.S. to immediately leave their jobs in that country and return to Colombia as soon as possible,” Petro said in a Friday morning post on social platform X.

“Wealth is produced only by working people,” he added.

Petro said the Colombian Department of Social Prosperity will look to give out loans to those returnees who enroll in the program.

“Let’s build social wealth in Colombia,” he wrote.

The president and his government were engaged in a heated back-and-forth tussle last weekend over immigration and trade.

Petro initially said that U.S. planes carrying Colombian migrants would not be able to land in the country.

President Trump retaliated by threatening to impose a 25 percent tariff on Colombian goods coming into the country while also banning government officials and their family members from being able to travel to the U.S.

Similarly, Petro said Colombia would be instating a 25 percent tariff on goods.

The situation was tentatively resolved Sunday night, when White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in a statement that the two sides agreed and that Colombia will accept “all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay.”

Since then, Colombian planes have been arriving in Bogotá with migrants who Petro said were not “criminals.”

“Our compatriots come from the United States free, dignified, without being handcuffed. We structure a productive, associative and cheap credit plan for migrants,” he said.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Embassy in Bogotá shut down visa appointments for Colombians seeking entry to America over the “Colombian government’s refusal to accept repatriation flights of Colombian nationals.”

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
SNOPES Fact Check: Yes, Musk Once Posted It Would Take Airplane Crash To End 'Crazy' DEI Hiring Policy

Jordan Liles
Fri, January 31, 2025 


Getty Images

Claim:

Elon Musk posted on X in January 2024, regarding aviation hiring, "It will take an airplane crashing and killing hundreds of people for them to change this crazy policy of DIE."

Rating:

Rating: Correct Attribution

A claim circulating online in late January 2025 alleged Elon Musk, the tech entrepreneur heading up the new U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, once posted on X that it would take an airplane crash for the government to end a "crazy" hiring policy involving diversity, equity and inclusion.

Users on Facebook, Instagram, Threads, TikTok and X shared the claim about the purported Musk post, which read, "It will take an airplane crashing and killing hundreds of people for them to change this crazy policy of DIE." The text featured a misspelling of DEI.



The rumor Musk created the post was true. He posted (archived) the message on Jan. 9, 2024, in response to a user who, according to NBC News, speculated United Airlines pilots who went to historically Black colleges and universities would score lower than the average of IQ of Air Force pilots. That user later deleted their post.



The post resurfaced following a deadly midair collision between an American Airlines plane and an Army helicopter in Washington on Jan. 29, 2025. The incident claimed the lives of all 67 people aboard both aircraft. Within hours, President Donald Trump and other members of his administration baselessly blamed diversity hiring and DEI as a potential factor leading to the collision. Trump also acknowledged investigators had only just begun their work to determine the cause of the crash.

Days earlier, on Jan. 20 — the first day of Trump's second term in office — he signed an executive order seeking to end federal programs, offices, positions, plans, actions, initiatives, grants and contracts associated with DEI, DEIA ("A" for accessibility), environmental justice and equity.

As of this writing, The Associated Press reported, "Investigators are examining the actions of the military pilot as well as air traffic control, after the helicopter apparently flew into the jet's path." The reporting also said investigators declined to speculate on the cause of the crash. The National Transportation Safety Board website published, "In general, the NTSB tries to complete an investigation within 12 to 24 months, but these and other factors can greatly affect that timing."

We contacted two of Musk's companies to request comment regarding the post and will update this article if we receive a response.
Trump Blamed DEI at News Conference

On Jan. 30, Trump began a White House news conference by calling for a moment of silence and speaking about the tragedy. During his remarks, he said, "We do not know what led to this crash, but we have some very strong opinions and ideas, and I think we'll probably state those opinions now." He then cast blame for the incident on a Federal Aviation Administration diversity and hiring initiative.

As Snopes previously reported, while the FAA hiring policy Trump citied genuinely existed, the implication the policy was new, or that it stemmed from efforts beginning under President Joe Biden's administration, was demonstrably false. The FAA's website hosted a page featuring the policy since at least February 2013. The page existed online during the entirety of Trump's first term in office.

Other members of the Trump administration also briefly spoke during the news conference. Sean Duffy, the new transportation secretary, echoed Trump's remarks about hiring "the best and the brightest." Pete Hegseth, the new defense secretary, added, "The era of DEI is gone at the Defense Department and we need the best and brightest, whether it's in our air traffic control or whether it's in our generals or whether it's throughout government." Vice President JD Vance also mentioned staffing "the best people" and spoke of doing away with race-based hiring initiatives.

ABC News chief White House correspondent Mary Bruce asked the first question of the news conference: "Mr. President, on DEI and the claims that you've made, are you saying this crash was somehow caused and the result of diversity hiring? And what evidence have you seen to support these claims?"

Trump responded, "It just could have been," then continued speaking about high standards for safety positions.

Moments later, NBC News chief White House correspondent Peter Alexander directly quoted reporting from Snopes, telling Trump his mention of the FAA's diversity and hiring initiative referenced a policy existing on the agency's website since 2013, and during his first term in office. Trump denied the claim. Alexander asserted, "Respectfully, it was on the website." Trump replied, "Quiet. Quiet," moving on to a different reporter.



Sources:

Colvin, Jill. "Who Is Sean Duffy, the New Transportation Secretary Responding to the DC Plane Crash?" The Associated Press, 30 Jan. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/sean-duffy-transportation-crash-dca-5d372d1945929293f10c1f0de58df3cc.

"Diversity and Inclusion." Federal Aviation Administration via Internet Archive Wayback Machine, https://web.archive.org/web/20190108213923/https://www.faa.gov/jobs/diversity_inclusion/.

"Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing." The White House, 20 Jan. 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing/.

Ingram, David. "Elon Musk Criticized by Civil Rights Groups for Posts Calling DEI Initiatives Unsafe." NBC News, 10 Jan. 2024, https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/elon-musk-boeing-dei-diversity-x-posts-pilots-rcna133351.

Kasprak, Alex. "FAA Policy About Hiring People with Intellectual Disabilities Has Existed for Over a Decade." Snopes, 15 Jan. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//news/2024/01/15/faa-dei-initiatives/.

"Live Updates: Black Box from American Airlines Plane Recovered Following Deadly DC Air Collision." The Associated Press, 31 Jan. 2025, https://apnews.com/live/dc-plane-crash-reagan-updates-day-2.

Miller, Zeke, and Chris Megerian. "Trump Blames Diversity Hiring as Probe into Deadly DC Plane Crash Begins." The Associated Press, 30 Jan. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-crash-reagan-washington-buttigieg-diversity-biden-ef1e07684bbc845e9e7981c1ae060af2.

Olson, Alexandra, and Zeke Miller. "Trump Administration Directs All Federal Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Staff Be Put on Leave." The Associated Press, 21 Jan. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/dei-trump-executive-order-diversity-834a241a60ee92722ef2443b62572540.

"President Trump Holds Press Briefing on Aviation Disaster." Rev.com, 30 Jan. 2025, https://www.rev.com/transcript-editor/shared/vDeEKu7TiLcoaDVgWSIlFVCQwtmVciQM1BPaPySYPDgF4jTXqJEeowTpw9ZKtSttXtCkCGg_7NBSyu3DD0NT4DW70ow.

"The Investigative Process." National Transportation Safety Board, https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/process/Pages/default.aspx.

Whitehurst, Lindsay, et al. "'Heartbreaking' Search for Those Killed in DC Aircraft Collision Takes Its Toll." The Associated Press, 31 Jan. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/ronald-reagan-national-airport-crash-325edc6c0c2439dd6c1e73a81e382c0e.
BLACK HISTORY MONTH

President Trump expects to end birthright citizenship with support from Supreme Court

Bart Jansen, USA TODAY
 Fri, January 31, 2025 

WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump said Thursday he expects the U.S. Supreme Court will side with him in the legal fight over ending citizenship for the children of immigrants in the country without legal authorization.

A federal judge has blocked Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for children born to parents who are both in the country without authorization. But when asked whether he expected at least five of the nine members of the high court to support his position, Trump said yes.

"I think so, yeah," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after signing unrelated executive orders. "I just think we’ll end up winning in court, in the Supreme Court. I think we’re going to win that case. I look forward to winning it."

Trump's policy appears to clash with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution approved in 1868. The amendment says, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Trump signed the executive order on his first day in office Jan. 20. Trump argued the amendment applied to the children of former slaves, which he called "good and noble," but that it is no longer tenable with international migration.

What the Trump administration means for you: Sign up for USA TODAY's On Politics newsletter.

U.S. District Judge John Coughenour in Seattle called the order “blatantly unconstitutional” in blocking it. But Trump said he would ultimately win if and when his efforts reach the Supreme Court.

“Birthright citizenship, if you look back at when this was passed – made – that was meant for the children of slaves," Trump said. "This was not meant for the whole world to come in and pile into the United States of America. Everybody coming in and totally unqualified people and with perhaps unqualified children. This wasn’t meant for that."

El Paso County joins legal battle against Trump’s push to end birthright citizenship

Adam Powell, El Paso Times
Wed, January 29, 2025

El Paso County is joining the fight against President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents without legal immigration status.

The El Paso County Commissioners Court approved on Monday, Jan. 27, filing the suit, which argues that Trump's order — entitled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship" — violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. and subject to its jurisdiction, and conflicts with the Immigration and Nationality Act.

“This executive order is a direct challenge to constitutional principles that have defined who we are as a nation,” El Paso County Attorney Christina Sanchez said in a statement Wednesday, Jan. 29. “Joining this legal fight is essential to protect the rights of children in our community and to ensure no family faces unjust barriers to opportunity.”


El Paso County Attorney Christina Sanchez stands for a portrait outside the El Paso County Court House on Tuesday, June 25, 2023.

Trump announced his order on birthright citizenship on the first day of his second term and immediately faced pushback. The following day, 18 states filed suit, and within the week, a federal judge blocked the order.

For Sanchez, the order's implications could be dire.

“This order threatens to deprive vulnerable children of healthcare, food assistance, and other basic needs,” Sanchez said. “It also risks creating a permanent underclass in our society, harming education outcomes, public health, and local economies. This is something we cannot allow to happen."

Trump's order, however, if allowed to stand, would become effective 30 days after it was signed on Jan. 20 and only affect people born after that date. The order effectively makes new exceptions for birthright citizenship to include the following:

A person whose mother "was unlawfully present in the United States" and whose "father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth;"

A person whose "mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under a Visa Waiver Program or on a student, work, or tourist visa)" and whose "father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth."

The suit calls for a nationwide injunction to stop the order.

“Protecting our community means fighting against policies that undermine fairness and equality,” Sanchez said. “We will continue to stand firm in our commitment to justice and to the well-being of El Paso families.”

Adam Powell covers government and politics for the El Paso Times and can be reached via email at apowell@elpasotimes.com.

President Donald Trump this week issued an executive order barring birthright citizenship to children of undocumented residents. Here, Trump speaks during a Get Out The Vote campaign rally at Coastal Carolina University on Feb. 10, 2024, in Conway, South Carolina.

Trump's DOJ Responds To Pregnant Women Suing To Protect Birthright Citizenship

Pocharapon Neammanee
Sat, February 1, 2025

The Trump administration responded on Friday to a lawsuit filed on behalf of five pregnant women who challenged his executive order to end birthright citizenship.

The case, filed in Maryland federal court in January, challenges President Donald Trump’s order, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” that seeks to make it so that that children born in the United States to parents who are undocumented immigrants or who are in the country on a temporary legal basis will not automatically be United States citizens.

In an opposition motion filed against the women on Friday, the Department of Justice characterized the order as “common sense.”

“Monica,” a Venezuelan-born medical doctor now living in South Carolina under temporary protected status, is one of the five represented in the case. She is due in August, and stated in her declaration to the court that she is frightened for her child because she cannot return to her country for citizenship.

“There is no Venezuelan Consulate in the United States where I could
even apply for Venezuelan citizenship for my baby, and we would have to travel outside of the U.S. in order to obtain a Venezuelan passport for our child,” Monica wrote in her declaration.

“I was very shocked,” Monica told The Guardian. “This is a right that is in the constitution of this country — so you cannot imagine that they would take it away just because.”

The complaint, filed by immigrant advocacy groups Casa, Inc. and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, called the executive order, a “flagrant violation” of the Citizenship Clause in 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The Citizenship Clause states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

According to the logic of Trump’s order, the children of undocumented immigrants are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, and thus the 14th Amendment does not apply to them.

Monica, along with the four other women represented in the case, stated in their declaration they are afraid to use their full names in the litigation out of fear of retaliation from the government, which for some may include deportation.

The advocacy groups also filed a temporary restraining order blocking the policy from going into effect, arguing that it would cause “irreparable harm.” The restraining order cites a previous legal case, calling the executive order “a form of punishment more primitive than torture,” by making a baby born in the U.S stateless.

One of the women, Liza, stated in her sworn declaration that she fears returning back to her home country of Russia out of fear of persecution, and thus wouldn’t be able to secure a Russian passport for her child.

“When I heard that President Trump signed an Executive Order that would deny my child United States citizenship, my world fell apart,” she said.

Federal district court Judge John Coughenour of Washington state temporarily blocked Trump’s executive order last week in a separate filing, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”

“I have been on the bench for over four decades,” Coughenour reportedly said. “I can’t remember another case where the question presented was as clear.”

In the opposition motion filed Friday, the Justice Department defended the executive order, arguing the Constitution does not entitle “the children of those who have circumvented (or outright defied) federal immigration laws” to citizenship.

The filing characterized claims that the executive order is illegal as “dramatic assertions.” It quoted Trump’s claims that immigrants in the U.S unlawfully are a threat to national security, and argued that the situation warrants a “full panoply of immigration measures,” including the executive order.

The motion also echoed the executive order’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment. The DOJ wrote that a person under the “jurisdiction” of the U.S. must have a “direct and immediate allegiance,” which would not apply to “foreigners admitted temporarily or individuals here illegally.”


The pregnant women who fear Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Daniella Silva
Sat, February 1, 2025 

Liza and her husband, who are Russian immigrants, are expecting their first child in May.

Nivida, an immigrant from Honduras who is in her late 20s, expects to give birth to a boy in April. What would normally be a time of excitement for her growing family is instead shadowed by a deep fear that they will be torn apart.

President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship could mean their baby would be left without the same rights as their other child, who was born in Louisiana as an American citizen.

Nivida is from Honduras and her husband is from Mexico, they currently live in Louisiana. Her husband has an open application for a special visa for victims of a crime that could eventually lead to lawful permanent residency, a process that could take years, according to Nivida and court documents from the advocacy group representing her case. She had an initial asylum application in the immigration court that was recently dismissed, according to Nivida the court documents, but is still able to file another asylum case with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.


Nivida's U.S.-born first child touches her belly.

“I don’t want them to take away the citizenship of innocent babies born here, it shouldn’t matter the status of their parents, their race, their color, they shouldn’t be discriminated against,” said Nivida in Spanish, who asked that her full name not be used out of fear of immigration reprisal and her safety. “I believe violating the protection that the Constitution gives to a child born here is violating his or her rights as an individual.”

Last week, the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, the immigrant services organization CASA and the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law filed a lawsuit on behalf of five pregnant women and ASAP and CASA’s members against Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship, which he called “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.” The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit.

About two dozen states have also filed lawsuits against the Trump administration contesting the order, which experts say violates the 14th Amendment, which says, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Nivida, who is a member of ASAP, said she decided to speak out on behalf of the thousands of pregnant women and their babies who will be impacted by the order if it’s allowed to take effect in late February. She and others came to the United States seeking protection and stability but now find their unborn babies’ futures uncertain, according to the lawsuit.

Trump’s executive order attempts to limit birthright citizenship to people who have at least one parent who is a United States citizen or permanent resident. It also states that those born to parents who are in the country legally, but temporarily, will no longer be automatically guaranteed citizenship, including high-skill work visas like the H1B and student visas like the F1. But legal experts say the true scope of the order is unclear and could lead some children to be temporarily stateless.

Meny, a pregnant asylum seeker from Honduras who is also a member of ASAP, said the order “creates a lot of uncertainty, a lot of fear” and has taken an emotional toll on her family.

She and her partner both have open asylum cases claiming political persecution before USCIS, have been legally working in California and are “very grateful to this country because really we have had so many great opportunities here,” said Meny, who is in her mid-30s and asked that her full name not be used out of fear of immigration reprisal.


Meny is due in July.

“The news is very shocking, we really hope it doesn’t come to be,” she said in Spanish. “As moms, of course we want what’s best for our children. It’s a great concern.”

Meny, who is due in July, said she feels desperate thinking of her baby’s future and the rights her child may not have as Trump enacts his anti-immigration agenda. Meny said that as an asylum seeker fleeing prosecution, returning to her home country is not an option.

“Being immigrants doesn’t mean we’re enemies of this country. The majority of us come here for reasons of survival,” she said.

Liza and her husband, who are Russian immigrants, are expecting their first child in May. She heard from a friend that Trump was considering restricting birthright citizenship, but thought, “no, it can’t be true” as she understood the right to be a part of the U.S. Constitution.

“My husband and I were shocked that it actually happened,” said Liza, who has asked that her full name not be used for fear of immigration reprisal, adding that the two couldn’t wrap their minds around the fact “that this is going to be reality.”

Liza, one of the five women who are plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said her husband has an open asylum case because of persecution in Russia and she is currently on a student visa while getting her master’s degree. Liza, who is in her late 20s, said she fears her baby will be left stateless if her child is denied birthright citizenship as they do not feel safe applying for Russian citizenship for their baby as asylum seekers fleeing Russia. As a former independent journalist in Russia, Liza and her family are fleeing persecution and said “I don’t really have an option to go back there.” Even though there is a Russian Embassy in the United States, she said it is not safe for her and her husband to go there as asylum seekers.

She said her biggest fears are that she and her family may be “arrested, deported, taken back to Russia, and the baby will be, will be separated from us.”

Last week, a federal district court judge temporarily blocked Trump’s executive order. In that case, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers told the judge that the birthright citizenship order was an “integral part” of Trump’s efforts to “address this nation’s broken immigration system and the ongoing crisis at the southern border.”

Nivida, Meny and Liza all said they were shocked when Trump issued the order as it shook their belief in the Constitution and the rule of law in the United States.

Liza said she was still hopeful in the court system of the United States as “those courts are not like courts in Russia who do whatever they are told to do.”

When Nivida first heard Trump’s promise to end birthright citizenship on the campaign trail, she said she was not yet alarmed because of the faith she had in America’s democracy and the rule of law.

“These were things I really admired. Now, I have a lot of doubts,” she said.
Americans sour on some of Trump's early moves, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds


Daily Life in New York City

By Jason Lange and James Oliphant
Tue, January 28, 2025 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans have a dim view of some of President Donald Trump's early barrage of executive orders, including his attempt to do away with so-called birthright citizenship and his decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

Since taking office on Jan. 20, the Republican president has moved quickly to crack down on immigration and scale back the size of government, efforts that respondents to the three-day poll that closed on Sunday look on more favorably.

Overall, the poll showed 45% of Americans approve of Trump's performance as president, down slightly from 47% in a Jan. 20-21 poll. The share who disapproved was slightly larger at 46%, an increase from 39% in the prior poll.

The poll had a margin of error of about 4 percentage points.

"While it does seem Trump is getting a honeymoon to some extent, his numbers are still not impressive by historical standards," said Kyle Kondik, an analyst with the University of Virginia Center for Politics.

During Trump's first term, his approval rating hit as high as 49% during his first weeks in office but he closed out his term at 34% approval following the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.

It may be too early to evaluate whether Trump is squandering his political capital by focusing on issues where he is not aligned with the public, Kondik said. But the poll shows that many of his early actions have been greeted warmly only by his hardcore base of supporters.

Voters more generally remain deeply concerned about the high price of food, housing and other necessities, the poll found.

Most Americans opposed ending the nation's longstanding practice of granting citizenship to children born in the U.S. even if neither parent has legal immigration status, the poll found. Some 59% of respondents - including 89% of Democrats and 36% of Republicans - said they opposed ending birthright citizenship.

A federal judge last week temporarily blocked the Trump administration from making changes to birthright citizenship, but the White House has vowed to fight on.

LITTLE SUPPORT FOR 'GULF OF AMERICA'


Seventy percent of respondents oppose renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, an action Trump ordered on his first day in office. Only 25% of respondents supported the idea, with the rest unsure.

Some 59% of respondents, including 30% of Republicans, opposed Trump's moves to end federal efforts to promote the hiring of women and members of racial minority groups. When asked specifically about Trump's order to close all federal diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, offices, respondents were more evenly divided, with 51% opposed and 44% in favor, largely along partisan lines.

Support for expanding fossil fuel drilling - another early policy change in the new administration - was highly concentrated in Trump's party, with 76% of Republicans backing the easing of drilling restrictions and 81% of Democrats opposing it. Some 59% of respondents said they opposed the United States pulling out of the Paris climate accords.

Public views also split along partisan lines for billionaire businessman Elon Musk, one of Trump's most prominent allies. While 75% of Republicans in the survey said they had a favorable view of Musk, 90% of Democrats said they had an unfavorable view.

One possible source of concern for Trump's political team could be the still overwhelming sense that rising prices remain untamed. Some 50% of poll respondents said the country was on the wrong track when it came to the cost of living, compared to 25% who said it was moving in the right direction. The rest said they weren't sure or didn't answer the question.

SUPPORT ON IMMIGRATION, HIRING FREEZE

There were positive indicators for Trump, as well.

Some 48% Americans approve of Trump’s approach on immigration, compared to 41% who disapprove. And the poll showed Trump having significant levels of support on the hiring freeze he ordered at most federal offices, with 49% of respondents backing a freeze, including 80% of Republicans and 43% of Democrats.

Kondik said that Trump ultimately may be judged by the public on big-picture issues such as the economy and immigration and that opposition to smaller-scale policy measures may not be damaging.

“Trump was elected in large part because voters tended to side with him on the economy and immigration. To the extent he is viewed as doing positive things on that, it’s probably good for him,” Kondik said.

But, he added, if voters in the coming months perceive Trump’s immigration crackdown or his government downsizing efforts to be overly harsh, that could change.

Trump won’t be on the ballot again, but the backlash could be felt by congressional Republicans running for re-election next year, he said.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which was conducted online and nationwide over Jan. 24-26, surveyed 1,034 adults.

Start of Black History Month
\

Pentagon agency pauses Black History Month, MLK Day observances

Alex Coleman
Fri, January 31, 2025
THE HILL

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — A retired chief warrant officer in the military is upset about the Pentagon’s intelligence arm’s decision to no longer celebrate Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Women’s History Month, and Pride Month.

“I am disappointed number one, but I’m actually not surprised because this president told us that these are the kinds of things that he was going to do,” said Tennessee Rep. Karen Camper.

The affected events include: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday, Black History Month, Women’s History Month, Holocaust Day and Days of Remembrance, Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Pride, Juneteenth, Women’s Equality Day, National Hispanic Heritage Month, National Disability Employment Awareness Month and National American Indian Heritage Month.

“This this how I think some veterans will feel. This is an attack on all of the civil rights, you know, achievements that we’ve made in this country to move us forward and a lot of those servicemen that are serving, their families lost lives, gave up a tremendous amount of sacrifice in order to move this country forward,” said Camper.

President Trump has put a spotlight on DEI initiatives in a series of executive orders in his first week in office, with the White House saying that “DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.”

“The Holocaust observances, the disability was in there. So, I do feel that these groups will end up joining arms together to help you know fight these thing,” said Camper.


Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 


Pentagon agency bans Black History Month in compliance with Trump’s anti-DEI push

Allison Detzel
Sat, February 1, 2025


Pete Hegseth at the U.S. Capitol on Dec. 4, 2024.

Just days before the start of Black History Month, employees from the Pentagon’s intelligence agency received a memo notifying them that all activities related to the annual commemoration were now banned.

According to a memo obtained by NBC News, the Defense Intelligence Agency ordered a pause of all activities and events related to 11 “special observances” in compliance with President Donald Trump’s ban on DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) programs in the federal workplace.

In addition to Black History Month, the agency also ordered the suspension of events marking Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month, National American Indian Heritage Month, LGBTQ Pride Month, Women’s History Month, Juneteenth, Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Martin Luther King III, son of the civil rights icon, responded to reports of the memo with a post on X, writing, “Now more than ever, I am dedicated to being about my father’s business and I encourage all people of good will to be about the business of Peace, Justice, Love, and Equity.”

Employees of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services received a similar directive last week. In an email shared with NBC News, they were notified that all affinity groups, also known as employee resource groups, were “being disbanded and special observances are being canceled.”

Federal agencies across the government have scrambled to comply with Trump’s executive order targeting DEI. Posts related to such initiatives have been removed from several government websites, including the Office of Personnel Management and the Homeland Security Department. Federal agency webpages that previously led to posts on diversity and accessibility resources now display a “Page Not Found — 404” error message. Agencies have been ordered to place DEI staff on paid leave while the government draws up plans for their dismissal.

Trump’s new defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, who now oversees the Pentagon, has been one of the most ardent supporters of the president’s anti-DEI push. On Wednesday, Hegseth sent out a memo of his own announcing the creation of a task force aimed at abolishing diversity initiatives across the department. In that memo, Hegseth wrote that DEI efforts “are incompatible with the values of DoD.”

Despite these orders, it appears the White House still plans to celebrate Black History Month. During her first briefing on Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked if the Trump administration intended to mark the annual event.

“As far as I know, this White House certainly still intends to celebrate — and we will continue to celebrate American history and the contributions that all Americans, regardless of race, religion or creed, have made to our great country,” Leavitt told reporters before declaring that “America is back.”

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com



Hegseth axes Pentagon ‘identity months’ the same day Trump calls for Black History Month observance

Irie Sentner
Sat, February 1, 2025 
POLITCO USA


WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 30: U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (L) takes the podium from U.S. President Donald Trump as they speak to reporters about the collision of an American Airlines flight with a military Black Hawk helicopter near Ronald Reagan National Airport, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Officials believe that all 64 people on the commercial jet and the three service members on the U.S. Army helicopter died when they collided midair and crashed into the Potomac River airport outside Washington, D.C. on Wednesday. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)


Identity months are officially dead at the Pentagon.

The Defense Department will no longer use “official resources, including man-hours” to celebrate “cultural awareness months,” according to guidance Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth issued Friday — on the eve of Black History Month, which began Saturday.

The list of celebrations called out include National African American/Black History Month, Women’s History Month, Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Pride Month, National Hispanic Heritage Month, National Disability Employment Awareness Month and National American Indian Heritage Month.

“We are proud of our warriors and their history, but we will focus on the character of their service instead of their immutable characteristics,” the guidance says. It notes that service members and civilians may attend events “in an unofficial capacity outside of duty hours.”

Hegseth's orders came the same day that President Donald Trump issued a proclamation calling for the recognition of Black History Month.

On Friday, Trump called “upon public officials, educators, librarians, and all the people of the United States to observe this month with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.”

Asked Friday if agencies that had called off Black History Month activities should reinstate them in response to the proclamation, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters “the president is leading here at the White House.”

A Pentagon spokesperson declined to comment.
Trump moves to cancel recent union agreements with federal workers


Fri, January 31, 2025 
By Jack Queen

(Reuters) - Donald Trump said on Friday that any collective bargaining agreements reached with federal workers within 30 days of his inauguration will not be approved, the latest salvo in the U.S. president's bid to remake the federal workforce.

In a memo addressed to the heads of all executive departments and agencies, Trump said former U.S. President Joe Biden's administration purposefully finalized collective bargaining agreements with federal employees in its final days "in an effort to harm my administration by extending its wasteful and failing policies beyond its time in office."

It was not immediately clear how many agreements would be affected by the new policy, which refers to them as "lame-duck collective bargaining agreements."


Collective bargaining agreements are deals between unions and their employees that outline working conditions, pay and other policies.

The move comes as President Donald Trump embarks on a massive makeover of the U.S. government, firing and sidelining hundreds of civil servants in his first steps toward downsizing the bureaucracy and installing more loyalists.

The memo cites a U.S. Department of Education collective bargaining agreement reached three days before Trump took office that "generally prohibits the agency from returning remote employees to their offices."

Trump has signed an executive order that would require federal employees to work in-office five days a week, reversing a remote working trend that took off in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

(Reporting by Jack Queen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Sandra Maler)
View comments (3.8k)


 Trump to sign memo lifting Biden's last-minute collective bargaining agreements






Brooke Singman
Fri, January 31, 2025

FIRST ON FOX: President Donald Trump is expected to sign a memo Friday to lift the collective bargaining agreements (CBA) former President Joe Biden put into effect before leaving office, Fox News Digital has learned.

The president’s memo will direct federal agencies to reject last-minute collective bargaining agreements issued by the Biden administration, which White House officials said were designed to "constrain" the Trump administration from reforming the government.

Trump Administration Offers Buyouts To Federal Employees, Including Remote Workers: 'Deferred Resignation'

President Donald Trump's memo will direct federal agencies to reject last-minute collective bargaining agreements issued by the Biden administration.

The memo prohibits agencies from making new collective bargaining agreements during the final 30 days of a president’s term. It also directs agency heads to disapprove any collective bargaining agreements that Biden put through during the final 30 days of his term.

The White House said collective bargaining agreements enacted before that time period will remain in effect while the Trump administration "negotiates a better deal for the American people."

Biden’s Social Security Administration Commissioner, Martin O’Malley, in December 2024 came to an agreement with the American Federation of Government Employees guaranteeing that the agency’s 42,000 employees would not have to work in office during the Trump administration.

The White House told Fox News Digital that the new policy "ensures the American people get the policies they voted for, instead of being stuck with the wasteful and ineffective Biden policies rejected at the ballot box."

'Get Back To Work': House Oversight To Take On Government Telework In 1St Hearing Of New Congress

"The outgoing Biden administration negotiated lame-duck, multi-year collective bargaining agreements — during the week before the inauguration — in an attempt to tie the incoming Trump administration’s hands," a White House fact sheet on the memo obtained by Fox News Digital states.

The White House pointed to the Biden administration’s Department of Education’s agreement that prohibited the return of remote employees and agreements for the Biden Small Business Administration and Federal Trade Commission.

President Donald Trump’s new memo is also aimed to ensure that federal government agencies operate under similar rules as private sector unions and employers.

"These CBAs attempt to prevent President Trump from implementing his promises to the American people, such as returning Federal employees to the office to make government operate more efficiently," the fact sheet states. "President Biden’s term of office ended on January 20th. Under this memorandum, he and future Presidents cannot govern agencies after leaving office by locking in last-minute CBAs."

White House Opm Orders All Dei Offices To Begin Closing By End Of Day Wednesday

The president’s new memo is also aimed to ensure that federal government agencies operate under similar rules as private sector unions and employers.

The memo comes after the White House Office of Personnel Management (OPM) directed agency and department heads to notify employees by the new return to in-person work order. That order required employees to work full-time in the office unless excused due to disability or qualifying medical conditions.

Trump Will Fight Biden Remote Work Deal; Union Vows To Fight Back

Additionally, OPM sent emails this week to the full federal workforce offering the option of resignation with full pay and benefits until Sept. 30 if they do not want to return to the office. Those workers have until Feb. 6 to decide.

The federal workers who did not get that option include postal workers, military immigration officials, some national security officials and any positions agencies decide to carve out.

Trump Plans To Nullify New Federal Union Contracts

Dave Jamieson
HUFFPOST
Updated Sat, February 1, 2025 

President Donald Trump said late Friday that he plans to nullify federal employee union contracts that agencies agreed to late in former President Joe Biden’s term.

In a memo to agency heads, Trump said that Biden officials had negotiated new collective bargaining agreements meant “to harm my Administration,” in part by undermining his return-to-office mandate, and that he intended to scrap them and bargain his own.

He referred specifically to a contract ratified with the Education Department days before he took office.

“Such last-minute, lame-duck CBAs, which purport to bind a new President to his predecessor’s policies, run counter to America’s system of democratic self-government,” he claimed.


The memo did not make clear his legal justification for nullifying existing union contracts. He referred to a 2010 Supreme Court decision that stated that a president “cannot choose to bind his successors by diminishing their powers.”

“Therefore, it is the policy of the executive branch,” Trump proclaimed, that contracts negotiated within 30 days prior to a presidential inauguration “shall not be approved.”

He said that contracts involving federal law enforcement would be exempted.



If our contracts are violated, we will aggressively defend them.Everett Kelley, president, American Federation of Government Employees

The American Federation of Government Employees, a union representing some 800,000 workers, said Trump would be breaching legally binding contracts. The union called it an attempt to “frighten and confuse career federal employees.”


“Federal employees should know that approved union contracts are enforceable by law, and the president does not have the authority to make unilateral changes to those agreements,” Everett Kelley, the union’s president, said in a statement. “AFGE members will not be intimidated. If our contracts are violated, we will aggressively defend them.”

Unions at many federal agencies made a point of negotiating new contracts last year before the Trump administration arrived, with an eye toward locking in contractual protections. Trump has promised to lay off workers en masse, weaken job protections and end the remote work arrangements that federal employees have had for years.

HuffPost reported last week on negotiations at the Federal Trade Commission, where a group of attorneys, economists and statisticians secured a temporary contract the weekend before Trump appointed a new Republican chair. Such late agreements appear to be the sort Trump is looking to wipe out early in his tenure.

Warring with the federal workforce was a hallmark of Trump’s first presidency, and he’s quickly picking up where he left off.


On his first day in office he issued an executive order outlining his intention to reclassify tens of thousands of civil servants to make it easier to fire them. Meanwhile, the Office of Personnel Management is offering federal workers a deferred resignation program, suggesting they could resign now and still be paid through September.

OPM sent out a follow-up email about that offer Thursday, answering some frequently asked questions and insulting workers in the process.

“We encourage you to find a job in the private sector as soon as you would like to do so,” the email explained. “The way to greater American prosperity is encouraging people to move from their lower productivity jobs in the public sector to higher productivity jobs in the private sector.”

Trump offers buyout to all federal workers. How many are there in Connecticut?

Melina Khan, USA TODAY NETWORK - New England
Fri, January 31, 2025 


President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that all federal employees are being offered a buyout to resign if they don't want to return to in-person work.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management said in an email memo to employees that the offer would give federal workers eight months of pay and benefits if they resign by Feb. 6.

"If you choose not to continue in your current role in the federal workforce, we thank you for your service to your country and you will be provided with a dignified, fair departure from the federal deferred resignation program," the memo said.

Federal worker buyout: Who does it apply to?

The federal worker buyout doesn't apply to all government employees. The following groups are not included in the buyout offer:


Military personnel of the armed forces


U.S. Postal Service employees


Positions related to immigration enforcement and national security

There are some other exclusions.
How many federal workers are in CT?

Connecticut has 5,325 federal civilian employees as of March 2024, according to data from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management,
How many total federal workers are there?

According to data from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, there are more than two million civilian federal employees as of December 2024 estimates.
Which states employ the most federal workers?

Washington, D.C., employs the most federal employees as of March 2024. After that, the states with the highest totals are:

California: 147,487


Virginia: 144,483


Maryland: 142,876


Texas: 129,738


Florida: 94,014

This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times