Sunday, January 12, 2025

 

Earth’s air war: Explaining the delayed rise of plants, animals on land



Yale University
Why did plant life on Earth take so long to emerge? 

image: 

Yale University has produced a short video and is making it available for use by the news media. This video can be embedded in its entirety, along with credit to Yale University. Videos cannot be edited without prior permission from the Yale Office of Public Affairs & Communications. 

 

The picture should be linked to this site:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYCgx6N0dYc

view more 

Credit: Yale University has produced a short video and is making it available for use by the news media. This video can be embedded in its entirety, along with credit to Yale University. Videos cannot be edited without prior permission from the Yale Office of Public Affairs & Communications.




New Haven, Conn. — If you like the smell of spring roses, the sounds of summer birdsong, and the colors of fall foliage, you have the stabilization of the ozone layer to thank for it. Located in the stratosphere, where it shields the Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation, the ozone layer plays a key role in preserving the planet’s biodiversity.

And now we may have a better idea of why that took so long — more than 2 billion years — to happen.

According to a new, Yale-led study, Earth’s early atmosphere hosted a battle royale between iodine and oxygen — effectively delaying the creation of a stable ozone layer that would shield complex life from much of the sun’s ultraviolet radiation (UVR).

The new theory, described in a study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, may solve a mystery that has puzzled scientists for hundreds of years.

“The origin and diversification of complex life on Earth remains one of the most profound and enduring questions in natural science,” said Jingjun Liu, a doctoral student in Earth and planetary sciences at Yale and first and corresponding author of the new study.

Indeed, scientists have long wondered why land plants did not emerge on Earth until 450 million years ago, even though their progenitors, cyanobacteria, had been in existence for 2.7 billion years. Likewise, there are no fossils for complex land animals or plants before the Cambrian era (541 to 485 million years ago) despite the evidence of much older microfossils.

“The only existing explanation states that this delay is an intrinsic characteristic of evolution — that an enormous amount of time is required,” said Noah Planavsky, a professor of Earth and planetary sciences, faculty member of the Yale Center for Natural Carbon Capture, and senior author of the new study. “Yet that notion fails to explain how and why complex life originated and diversified.”

The new study suggests that something beyond the need for time was responsible: the delayed stabilization of Earth’s ozone layer, caused by elevated marine iodine concentrations that prevented a protective UVR shield from forming in the atmosphere.

Ozone production depends on atmospheric oxygen and background UVR. It has been widely accepted by scientists that once Earth established a substantial concentration of atmospheric oxygen, the planet formed an ozone layer that allowed for biological evolution to proceed unimpeded.

“We challenge this paradigm by considering how Earth’s evolving iodine cycle may have influenced ozone abundance and stability,” Liu said.

For the study, a Yale-led research team analyzed multiple lines of independent geological evidence and developed an ocean-atmosphere model to reconstruct the iodine-ozone dynamics for the early Earth. The researchers found that elevated marine iodide content (formed when iodine combines with another element to form a salt) prevailed through most of Earth’s history, which would have led to significant inorganic iodine emissions into the atmosphere after the rise of oxygen — with the potential for disrupting ozone.

The mechanism of ozone destruction by iodine is similar to the process by which chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) created the “ozone hole” over Antarctica. When CFCs undergo photolysis, they release reactive chlorine, which catalytically destroys ozone in the stratosphere, leading to as much as a 50% depletion over continental Antarctica at the peak of the problem.

“Iodine-driven catalytic cycles for ozone destruction follow a similar process and are kinetically much faster than those involving reactive chlorine,” Planavsky said. “Our photochemical calculations indicate that even a moderate increase in marine inorganic iodine emission could result in a whole atmosphere ozone depletion by tens or even hundreds of times relative to modern levels.”

Liu noted that at a global scale, unstable and low ozone levels likely persisted from 2.4 billion years ago until roughly half a billion years ago. “During this interval, even under high levels of oxygen production, atmospheric ozone could have been very low and was likely unstable, leading to periodic or persistent high fluxes of solar UVR at Earth’s surface,” Liu said.

Dalton Hardisty of Michigan State University, James Kasting of Pennsylvania State University, and Mojtaba Fakhraee of Yale are co-authors of the study.

#  #  #

 

More than half of college students report alcohol-related harms from others



A new study sheds light on the often-overlooked consequences of college drinking




Boston University School of Public Health






More than half of US college students experienced alcohol-related harms caused by others, according to the first national probability-based survey of such harms conducted in 20 years. The findings, published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Review in December, shed light on how others’ drinking affects students’ health, academics, and safety. 

“Our research reveals the far-reaching and often overlooked impact of alcohol on college campuses,” says study lead author Jih-Cheng (Jack) Yeh, a PhD candidate in health services and policy research at Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH). “Alcohol-related harms extend well beyond the drinker, influencing the broader campus community. These harms disrupt lives, strain campus resources, and create ripple effects that touch every part of the university experience.”

The study surveyed more than 1,900 students at 46 colleges and universities across the United States. Researchers found that 53.5 percent of students reported experiencing at least one harm caused by someone else’s drinking, ranging from verbal abuse and physical confrontations to academic disruptions and emotional distress.

The results showed that more than half of college sophomores and juniors—an estimated six million students—reported experiencing at least one alcohol-related harm. Students who identified as White, cisfemale, transgender, gender-nonconforming, or of higher socioeconomic status, as well as those living with roommates, attending four-year institutions, or participating in Greek life or intercollegiate athletics, were at greater risk.

The most commonly reported harm was babysitting drinkers (33.8 percent), followed by social harms, such as physical or psychological distress (23.5 percent), sleep or study disruptions (15 percent), and verbal harassment (14.3 percent). Other harms included being emotionally hurt/neglected or feeling threatened/afraid (13.1 percent), having unwanted sexual contact (5.1 percent), being physically assaulted (4.3 percent), and experiencing academic consequences such as dropping a class or transferring schools (3.1 percent).

“Heavy drinking among students causes collateral damage beyond the student drinkers themselves,” says study co-author Dr. Pamela Trangenstein, collaborator at Alcohol Research Group, a program of the Public Health Institute. “It is critical for the success and well-being of all students that we track, prevent and protect students from experiencing these harms.”

The new study adds to a bevy of research highlighting the dangers of alcohol consumption, including a recent advisory by the US Surgeon General that links alcohol consumption to seven types of cancer and suggests that alcohol beverages should display a warning label about this risk.

The researchers recommend several strategies for mitigating alcohol-related harms, including place-based initiatives that reduce alcohol consumption in university housing, targeted interventions with members of Greek life and student athletes, and greater use of evidence-based strategies to reduce and prevent alcohol consumption, including screening with personalized and normative feedback, limits on happy hours and drink-price discounting, and raising state alcohol taxes. These measures, they argue, could help reduce not only the direct effects of alcohol misuse but also the collateral damage experienced by others.

“College drinking is sometimes seen as a rite of passage, but this rite has dangerous and harmful ripple effects,” says study senior author Dr. David Jernigan, professor of health law, policy & management at BUSPH. “There is much more that campuses and governments can do to better protect students from these harms.”

** 

About Boston University School of Public Health 

Founded in 1976, Boston University School of Public Health is one of the top ten ranked schools of public health in the world. It offers master's- and doctoral-level education in public health. The faculty in six departments conduct policy-changing public health research around the world, with the mission of improving the health of populations—especially the disadvantaged, underserved, and vulnerable—locally and globally. 

 

Smart food drying techniques with AI enhance product quality and efficiency



University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
Composite image of a chart and a photo of apples and dried apple slices 

image: 

Illinois researchers studied optical sensing techniques for smart food drying, testing the systems on apple slices.

view more 

Credit: College of ACES




URBANA, Ill.– Food drying is a common process for preserving many types of food, including fruits and meat; however, drying can alter the food’s quality and nutritional value. In recent years, researchers have developed precision techniques that use optical sensors and AI to facilitate more efficient drying. A new study from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign discusses three emerging smart drying techniques, providing practical information for the food industry.

“With traditional drying systems, you need to remove samples to monitor the process. But with smart drying, or precision drying, you can continuously monitor the process in real time, enhancing accuracy and efficiency,” said corresponding author Mohammed Kamruzzaman, assistant professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE), part of the College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences and The Grainger College of Engineering at Illinois.   

In the paper, the researchers review academic literature about different types of equipment that apply precision techniques to enhance smart drying capabilities in the food industry.

They focus on three optical sensing systems – RGB imaging with computer vision, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (NIR-HSI) – discussing the mechanisms, applications, advantages, and limitations of each. They also provide an overview of standard industrial drying methods, such as freeze drying, spray, microwave, or hot-air oven drying, which can be combined with the precision monitoring techniques.

“You can use each of the three sensors separately or in combination. What you choose will depend on the particular drying system, your needs, and cost-effectiveness,” said lead author Marcus Vinicius da Silva Ferreira, a postdoctoral fellow in ABE.

RGB with computer vision uses a regular camera that captures visible light with a RGB color spectrum. It can provide information about surface-level features, such as size, shape, color, and defects, but it is not capable of measuring moisture content.

NIR spectroscopy uses near-infrared light to measure the absorbance of different wavelengths, which can be correlated to unique chemical and physical product characteristics, and it can measure internal qualities such as moisture content. However, NIR scans one point at a time.

This can work for a single product, like an apple slice, at least initially, Kamruzzaman said.

“But as the drying progresses, the material will shrink and become heterogeneous, because of cracking and bending. If you use NIR at that stage, and if you only scan a single point, you cannot measure the drying rate,” he noted.  

NIR-HSI is the most comprehensive of the three techniques. It scans the whole surface of the product, so it provides much more precise information about the drying rate and other features than NIR alone, since it extracts three-dimensional spatial and spectral information. However, NIR-HSI is also much more expensive than the two other sensors. The equipment costs 10 to 20 times more than NIR sensors, and 100 times or more than RGB cameras. Additionally, maintenance and computing requirements for HSI are substantially higher, further increasing the total cost. 

All three methodologies must be combined with AI and machine learning to process the information, and the models must be trained for each specific application. Again, HSI requires more computational power than the other two systems because of the large amount of data it collects. 

The researchers also developed their own drying system to test the various methods. They built a convective heat oven and tested the techniques on the drying of apple slices. They first combined the system with RGB and NIR; later they also tested the NIR-HSI system, the findings of which they plan to discuss in a forthcoming paper.

“For real-time monitoring, the convergence of RGB imaging, NIR spectroscopic sensors, and NIR-HSI with AI represents a transformative future for food drying. Integrating these technologies overcomes conventional drying process moni­toring limitations and propels real-time monitoring capa­bilities,” they concluded in the paper.

Future development of portable, hand-held NIR-HSI devices will further enable continuous monitoring of drying systems, providing real-time quality control in a variety of operating environments, they noted.

The paper, “AI-Enabled Optical Sensing for Smart and Precision Food Drying: Techniques, Applications and Future Directions,” is published in Food Engineering Reviews [DOI: 10.1007/s12393-024-09388-0]. This study was financially supported by the Cen­ter for Advanced Research in Drying (CARD), a U.S. National Science Foundation Industry University Cooperative Research Center. CARD is located at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

 

 

Market researchers and online advertisers, are A-B tests leading you astray? A new study says they could be



News from the Journal of Marketing



American Marketing Association




Researchers from Southern Methodist University and University of Michigan published a new Journal of Marketing study that examines platforms’ A-B testing of online ads and uncovers significant limitations that can create misleading conclusions about ad performance.

The study, forthcoming in the Journal of Marketing, is titled “Where A-B Testing Goes Wrong: How Divergent Delivery Affects What Online Experiments Cannot (and Can) Tell You About How Customers Respond to Advertising” and is authored by Michael Braun and Eric M. Schwartz.

Consider a landscaping company whose designs focus on native plants and water conservation. The company creates two advertisements: one focused on sustainability (ad A) and another on aesthetics (ad B). As platforms personalize the ads that different users receive, ads A and B will be delivered to groups with diverging mixes. Users interested in outdoor activities may see the sustainability ad whereas users interested in home decor may see the aesthetics ad. Targeting ads to specific consumers is a major part of the value that platforms offer to advertisers because it aims to place the “right” ads in front of the “right” users.

In this new study, researchers Braun and Schwartz find that online A-B testing in digital advertising may not be delivering the reliable insights marketers expect. Their research uncovers significant limitations in the experimentation tools provided by online advertising platforms, potentially creating misleading conclusions about ad performance.

The Issue with “Divergent Delivery”

The study highlights a phenomenon called “divergent delivery” where the algorithms used by online advertising platforms like Meta and Google target different types of users with different ad content. The problem arises when the algorithm sends different ads to distinct mixes of users using A-B testing: an experiment designed to compare the effectiveness of the two ads. Braun explains that “The winning ad may have performed better simply because the algorithm showed it to users who were more prone to respond to the ad than the users who saw the other ad. The same ad could appear to perform better or worse depending on the mix of users who see it rather than on the creative content of the ad itself.”

For an advertiser, especially with a large audience to choose from and a limited budget, targeting provides plenty of value. So large companies like Google and Meta use algorithms that allocate ads to specific users. On these platforms, advertisers bid for the right to show ads to users in an audience. However, the winner of an auction for the right to place an ad on a particular user’s screen is not based on the monetary value of the bids alone, but also the ad content and user-ad relevance. The precise inputs and methods that determine the relevance of ads to users, how relevance influences auction results, and, thus, which users are targeted with each ad are proprietary to particular platforms and are not observable to advertisers. It is not precisely known how the algorithms determine relevance for types of users and it may not even be able to be enumerated or reproduced by the platforms themselves.

The study’s findings have profound implications for marketers who rely on A-B testing of their online ads to inform their marketing strategies. “Because of low cost and seemingly scientific appeal, marketers use these online ad tests to develop strategies even beyond just deciding what ad to include in the next campaign. So, when platforms are not clear that these experiments are not truly randomized, it gives marketers a false sense of security about their data-driven decisions,” says Schwartz.

A Fundamental Problem with Online Advertising

The researchers argue that this issue is not just a technical flaw in this tool, but a fundamental characteristic of how the online advertising business operates. The platform’s primary goal is to maximize ad performance, not to provide experimental results for marketers. Therefore, these platforms have little incentive to let advertisers untangle the effect of ad content from the effect of their proprietary targeting algorithms. Marketers are left in a difficult position in that they must either accept the confounded results from these tests or invest in more complex and costly methods to truly understand the impact of creative elements in their ads.

The study makes its case using simulation, statistical analysis, and a demonstration of divergent delivery from an actual A-B test run in the field. It challenges the common belief that results from A-B tests that compare multiple ads provide the same ability to draw causal conclusions as do randomized experiments. Marketers should be aware that the differences in effects of ads A and B that are reported by these platforms may not fully capture the true impact of their ads. By recognizing these limitations, marketers can make more informed decisions and avoid the pitfalls of misinterpreting data from these tests.

Full article and author contact information available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241275886

About the Journal of Marketing 

The Journal of Marketing develops and disseminates knowledge about real-world marketing questions useful to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other societal stakeholders around the world. Published by the American Marketing Association since its founding in 1936, JM has played a significant role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline. Shrihari (Hari) Sridhar (Joe Foster ’56 Chair in Business Leadership, Professor of Marketing at Mays Business School, Texas A&M University) serves as the current Editor in Chief. https://www.ama.org/jm

About the American Marketing Association (AMA)

As the leading global professional marketing association, the AMA is the essential community for marketers. From students and practitioners to executives and academics, we aim to elevate the profession, deepen knowledge, and make a lasting impact. The AMA is home to five premier scholarly journals including: Journal of MarketingJournal of Marketing ResearchJournal of Public Policy and MarketingJournal of International Marketing, and Journal of Interactive Marketing. Our industry-leading training events and conferences define future forward practices, while our professional development and PCM® professional certification advance knowledge. With 70 chapters and a presence on 350 college campuses across North America, the AMA fosters a vibrant community of marketers. The association’s philanthropic arm, the AMA’s Foundation, is inspiring a more diverse industry and ensuring marketing research impacts public good. 

AMA views marketing as the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large. You can learn more about AMA’s learning programs and certifications, conferences and events, and scholarly journals at AMA.org.

 

Basking too long in a sauna without adequate hydration may risk heat stroke, doctors warn



Although rare, condition can be life threatening, even in absence of various risk factors



BMJ Group



Basking too long in a sauna may put bathers at risk of heat stroke, particularly if they haven’t drunk enough water beforehand, warn doctors in the journal BMJ Case Reports, after treating a woman whose condition required admission to hospital.

Although relatively rare, heat stroke can be life threatening, even in the absence of various underlying risk factors, such as heart, lung, or neurological disease, and heavy drinking or taking a cocktail of prescription meds, they point out.

Heat stroke is defined as a sharp increase in core body temperature above 40°C that is associated with acutely impaired brain function, and ‘non-exertional’ heat stroke results from prolonged exposure to high environmental temperatures, explain the authors.

They treated a woman in her early 70s who had been found unconscious in her local gym’s sauna, where she had been doing stretching exercises for around 45 minutes.

Her core body temperature was 42°C—normal temperature is 36.4°C—her blood pressure was extremely low, and her heart rate was extremely high. She had a seizure after her arrival in emergency care.

She had previously been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and an underactive thyroid, but she wasn’t a smoker or heavy drinker, and was a regular gym goer, so had few risk factors, point out the authors.

She was rapidly cooled with wet towels and a fan and given intravenous fluids and blood products to stabilise her. 

Blood tests revealed malfunctioning kidneys and liver, evidence of a minor heart attack, and muscle tissue breakdown (rhabdomyolysis). 

She regained consciousness within 2 hours of reaching normal core temperature but was confused and drowsy for 2 days. By day 3 this had resolved and she had no further seizures during her inpatient stay, which lasted 12 days.

After 26 days she had more or less fully recovered, except for some mild fatigue and mild liver function disturbance.

This is just one case report after prolonged sauna use, and as far as the authors are aware, only 9 other similar cases have been reported. But 3 of those people died as a result.

“The prognosis of heat stroke varies according to patient factors, particularly extremes of age,” explain the authors. “Classical heat stroke in elderly people carries a mortality rate of  [more than] 50%, and this increases further with each additional organ dysfunction. 

“Heat-related deaths spike during heat waves, as has been observed in multiple large international datasets. Deaths from heat stroke are expected to rise as global temperatures continue to increase," they add.

“Once heat stroke has occurred, the key determinate of outcome is how rapidly a patient is cooled, as the time spent with elevated core body temperature is correlated to the degree of cellular damage,” they emphasise.

The woman in question comments: “My experience has emphasised the dangers of saunas and how important it is to be fully hydrated on entering a sauna, and for them to be regularly checked by staff. As a regular sauna user, I never suffered any issues and, on reflection, I believe I had not drunk enough water.”

 

Many children and young people with diagnosable mental health disorders are not receiving timely help, says new research




University of Nottingham




Children and young people with high levels of mental health needs are struggling to receive the help they need, or to have their difficulties recognised, according to a new study.

The STADIA trial, which is published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, was led by experts from the School of Medicine at the University of Nottingham, and was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

The large study, which spans different parts of England, involved 1,225 children and young people with emotional difficulties who had been referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) for help, and followed them up over 18 months to see how they got on.

The children and young people in this group were found to have high levels of mental health needs, with 67% scoring very high for at least one emotional disorder, most commonly depression or an anxiety disorder. Despite this, only 11% received a clinical diagnosis of an emotional disorder from CAMHS.

Only 44% of children and young people had their referral to CAMHS accepted, and 35% required a re-referral to CAMHS, suggesting that there were delays in receiving help.

One year after their referral, these children and young people did not seem to improve. Their mental health difficulties continued to remain at a severe level over this period, with high levels of self-reported and parent-reported mental health symptoms, functional impairment, and self-harm thoughts and behaviour, even at 12 months follow-up.

At 18 months follow-up, less than half (47%) had been offered any treatment or intervention from CAMHS.

Professor Kapil Sayal, from the School of Medicine and the STADIA Chief Investigator said: “We are very concerned that many children and young people with high levels of mental health needs, particularly conditions such as depression and anxiety disorders, for which NICE-recommended evidence-based interventions are available, are struggling to access help and have their difficulties appropriately recognised. One year is a very long time in a child's life - delays in accessing the right care mean that their difficulties and distress, and the associated impact on their day-to-day lives and activities, are being unnecessarily prolonged.”

The results of the study also found that:

  • The completion of an online standardised diagnostic assessment tool by young people and parents, soon after the referral had been received by CAMHS, did not impact on receiving a clinical diagnosis from CAMHS.
  • Online/digital approaches to diagnostic assessment are highly acceptable to families and young people who have been referred to CAMHS, which suggests a way forward for offering and optimising access to the right help and support - as long as there is sufficient investment in CAMHS to properly implement this.

Professor Sayal adds: “It needs to be kept in mind that the time period of the study (reflecting referrals to CAMHS between 2019 and 2021) spanned the COVID-19 pandemic, with associated national lockdown and school closures – a time when many children and young people experienced greater levels of uncertainty, stress and mental health difficulties. Over the past few years, referrals to CAMHS have gone up considerably, which unfortunately has meant that not everyone who could benefit from support has been able to receive timely help and support.”

Colleen Ewart, Parent and STADIA Co-investigator and Patient & Public Involvement lead said: “Sadly, the stories I hear from young people and their parents or carers still echo our family experience of 15 years ago. We can and must do better for this generation of children and young people and those to come. Reducing delays in accessing the right help and quickly is essential to save untold suffering (often life-long) for children, young people and their families."

The research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), and led by Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Nottingham and the Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, in partnership with other NHS Trusts.

 

 

Morning coffee may protect the heart better than all-day coffee drinking


MAKE MINE A JUMBO


European Society of Cardiology
Dr Lu Qi 

image: 

Portrait of researcher Dr Lu Qi

view more 

Credit: Lu Qi / European Heart Journal



People who drink coffee in the morning have a lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a lower overall mortality risk compared to all-day coffee drinkers, according to research published in the European Heart Journal [1] today (Wednesday).

 

The research was led by Dr Lu Qi, HCA Regents Distinguished Chair and Professor at the Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine at Tulane University, New Orleans, USA. He said: “Research so far suggests that drinking coffee doesn’t raise the risk of cardiovascular disease, and it seems to lower the risk of some chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes. Given the effects that caffeine has on our bodies, we wanted to see if the time of day when you drink coffee has any impact on heart health.”

 

The study included 40,725 adults taking part in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2018. As part of this study, participants were asked about all the food and drink they consumed on at least one day, including whether they drank coffee, how much and when. It also included a sub-group of 1,463 people who were asked to complete a detailed food and drink diary for a full week.

 

Researchers were able to link this information with records of deaths and cause of death over a period of nine to ten years.

 

Around 36% of people in the study were morning coffee drinkers (they primarily drank coffee before midday), 16% of people drank coffee throughout the day (morning, afternoon and evening) and 48% were not coffee drinkers.

 

Compared with people who did not drink coffee, morning coffee drinkers were 16% less likely to die of any cause and 31% less likely to die of cardiovascular disease. However, there was no reduction in risk for all-day coffee drinkers compared to non-coffee drinkers.

 

Morning coffee drinkers benefitted from the lower risks whether they were moderate drinkers (two to three cups) or heavy drinkers (more than three cups). Light morning drinkers (one cup or less) benefitted from a smaller decrease in risk.

 

Dr Qi said: “This is the first study testing coffee drinking timing patterns and health outcomes. Our findings indicate that it’s not just whether you drink coffee or how much you drink, but the time of day when you drink coffee that’s important. We don’t typically give advice about timing in our dietary guidance, but perhaps we should be thinking about this in the future.

 

“This study doesn’t tell us why drinking coffee in the morning reduces the risk of death from cardiovascular disease. A possible explanation is that consuming coffee in the afternoon or evening may disrupt circadian rhythms and levels of hormones such as melatonin. This, in turn, leads to changes in cardiovascular risk factors such as inflammation and blood pressure.

 

“Further studies are needed to validate our findings in other populations, and we need clinical trials to test the potential impact of changing the time of day when people drink coffee.”

 

In an accompanying editorial [2] Professor Thomas F. Lüscher from Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK said: “In their study published in this issue of the European Heart Journal, Wang et al analysed the time of the day when coffee is consumed in 40 725 adults from the NHANES and of 1463 adults from the Women’s and Men’s Lifestyle Validation Study.

 

“During a median follow-up of almost a decade, and after adjustment for caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee intake, the amounts of cups per day, sleep hours, and other confounders, the morning-type, rather than the all-day-type pattern, was significantly associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of 0.84 and of cardiovascular mortality of even 0.69 as compared with non-coffee drinkers.

 

“Why would time of the day matter? In the morning hours there is commonly a marked increase in sympathetic activity as we wake up and get out of bed, an effect that fades away during the day and reaches its lowest level during sleep. Thus, it is possible, as the authors point out, that coffee drinking in the afternoon or evening disrupts the circadian rhythm of sympathetic activity. Indeed, many all-day drinkers suffer from sleep disturbances. In this context, it is of interest that coffee seems to suppress melatonin, an important sleep-inducing mediator in the brain.

 

“Overall, we must accept the now substantial evidence that coffee drinking, particularly in the morning hours, is likely to be healthy. Thus, drink your coffee, but do so in the morning!”