Tuesday, January 02, 2024

Hamas leader Saleh Aruri assassinated in Beirut

Hamas deputy head Saleh al-Aruri and leaders in the Qassam Brigades have been assassinated in Beirut's southern Dahiya neighborhood. Hamas says the "cowardly assassination" will not undermine the continuation of the Palestinian resistance.

BY AMENA AL-ASHKAR AND MONDOWEISS PALESTINE BUREAU
HAMAS LEADER SALEH ARURI DURING A PRESS CONFERENCE IN DAMASCUS, DECEMBER 21, 2010. (PHOTO: APA IMAGES)

At least six people have been killed in an alleged Israeli drone strike in the Lebanese capital of Beirut on Tuesday evening, including senior Hamas leader Saleh al-Aruri.

Initial reports by Lebanese state media said that “four people were martyred and a number of others injured when the Hamas office was targeted” in the Mashrafiyah neighborhood of the southern Beirut suburb of al-Dahiya, an area where both Hezbollah and Palestinian groups operate out of. Lebanese news channel Al-Mayadeen later reported that the death toll had climbed to six, while sources told Mondoweiss that the toll had reached seven.

Reuters and Lebanese media reported that the strike was carried out by Israel. The Israeli government and military have yet to officially confirm any involvement in the assassination.

Reports indicated that the primary target of the strike was 57-year-old Saleh al-Aruri, the deputy chairman of Hamas’ political bureau, and a founding commander of the movement’s military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades. Though Hamas has yet to confirm the identities of the other six killed in the strike, sources told Mondoweiss that among them were Samir Abu Amer, a top Hamas military leader in Lebanon, and Abu Ahmad al-Aqraa, a senior Hamas military leader in charge of West Bank operations.

The strike took place around 5:30 p.m. local time. Sources told Mondoweiss that initial evidence seemed to indicate that two high-precision missiles were fired toward a building in the neighborhood, reported to be the Hamas offices. One was fired at an apartment, and the second at a vehicle on the street, alleged to have belonged to Aruri. According to Al Jazeera, Lebanese civil defense crews were still fighting flames caused by the strike more than an hour later.

Hamas confirmed the killing of Aruri, calling it a “cowardly assassination” that “proves once again the abject failure of the enemy to achieve any of its aggressive goals in the Gaza Strip.”

“The cowardly assassinations carried out by the Zionist occupation against the leaders and symbols of our Palestinian people inside and outside Palestine will not succeed in breaking the will and steadfastness of our people or in undermining the continuation of their valiant resistance,” senior Hamas official Izzat al-Rishq said in a statement.
Who is Saleh al-Aruri?

Saleh Aruri spent 15 years in Israeli prison until 2010, and was exiled from Palestine upon his release by Israeli authorities. During those years, he operated out of various capitals over the years, including Istanbul, Damascus, and most recently, Beirut. He is widely credited as the primary mastermind behind financing and organizing military cells in the West Bank from outside of Palestine during his period of exile, and in solidifying military and financial ties with various regional actors.

In the years following 2014, Aruri was engaged in serving as an intermediary between on-the-ground Hamas operatives in Palestine and sources of Hamas funding internationally. This included fomenting armed cells and planning for various kidnapping operations, including the 2014 kidnapping of three Israeli settlers in Hebron. In the past two years, armed resistance in the West Bank has witnessed a resurgence, and while the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) has been recognized as responsible for funding many of the armed groups that arose in Nablus and Jenin, Aruri has also been mentioned as playing a significant role in mobilizing support for armed resistance in the West Bank during this period.

With the winding down of the Syrian Civil War and the rapprochement between Hamas and the “resistance axis” alliance of Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria in 2018, Saleh al-Aruri played a significant role in strengthening ties with Hezbollah. The building of Hamas’s military capabilities in Gaza is partly due to Hezbollah’s assistance to the movement in recent years, with Aruri serving a crucial intermediary role in this regard.

In late October last year, Israeli forces took over and occupied Aruri’s family home in his hometown of Arura, near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, and used it as an “intelligence base” before destroying it. Residents of the village said at the time that the home was uninhabited and that Israel’s takeover and destruction of the home was largely a symbolic act of revenge for the Hamas attacks on October 7.
Israeli ministers applaud strike, analysts warn of major escalation

The assassination of Aruri comes a day before Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah is expected to appear for a televised address, the third such address made by the leader since last October.

Nasrallah previously warned in a speech last summer that any assassination of any Lebanese, Palestinian, or Iranian individual on Lebanese territory would be met with a strong reaction from Hezbollah.

Since October 7, however, Israeli strikes and artillery fire targeting Hezbollah positions, as well as journalists and Lebanese civilians along the southern Lebanese border, have failed to materialize into a strong reaction from Hezbollah, beyond cross-border skirmishes and rocket fire toward Israeli military positions and towns along Israel’s northern border.

Tuesday’s assassination could change that, analysts warn. Speaking to Al Jazeera, Imad Harb, director of research at the Arab Center Washington DC, called the strike a “dangerous escalation,” noting that it marked the first assassination of a Hamas leader outside of occupied Palestine since October 7. The fact that the strike took place in Beirut, not on the southern Lebanese border, and in the heart of Hezbollah’s stronghold in the city, sends the message that Israel “can reach anyone, anywhere in Lebanon,” Harb said.

He added that Hezbollah may respond “by allowing more Hamas attacks from southern Lebanon on Israel. And definitely, it’s going to be more vigilant regarding its own leaders,” though both Israel and Hezbollah appear uninterested in “blowing up the front” completely.

A spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry condemned the assassination, saying Iran condemns “the violation of Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by the Zionist regime.”

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati issued a statement responding to the attack, condemning the Israeli “crime,” and warning against Israel’s attempts to drag Lebanon into a larger-scale confrontation.

In the occupied West Bank, a general strike in mourning over the assassination of Aruri was called by the Ramallah branch of Fatah, the ruling party of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Meanwhile, Israeli Hebrew media reported that Israel is “expecting retaliation” for the attack, “including possible long-range rocket fire on Israel,” the Times of Israel reported.

While Israel has yet to officially claim responsibility for the strike, it is being regarded as a major win for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while celebrated by Israeli officials.

Likud MK and former Israeli representative to the UN Danny Danon tweeted out his praise to Israeli security forces for the killing of Aruri, saying, “I congratulate the IDF, the Shin Bet, the Mossad and the security forces for killing senior Hamas official Salah al-Aaruri in Beirut.

Anyone who was involved in the 7/10 massacre should know that we will reach out to them and close an account with them.”

Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich also tweeted in celebration of the strike, saying, “So let all thine enemies perish,” referencing The Book of Judges, the seventh book of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament, Times of Israel noted.

Times of Israel added that Israeli Channel 12 reported that Netanyahu’s cabinet secretary Yossi Fuchs sent a directive to Israeli ministers ordering them “not to speak publicly about the alleged Israeli strike.”

Though there is no confirmation about what role, if any, Aruri played in planning the October 7 attacks, dubbed by Hamas as “Operation Al-Aqsa Flood,” Netanyahu and other Israeli military leaders have vowed to target Hamas officials both in Gaza and abroad.
Back in November, Netanyahu said that he “instructed the Mossad [Israeli intelligence agency] to act against the heads of Hamas wherever they are.” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant described Hamas leaders worldwide as “walking dead,” saying “they are living on borrowed time” and are “destined to die.”

Who is Saleh al Arouri, the Hamas deputy assassinated by Israel?


Born in Aroura town of the occupied West Bank, Arouri joined Hamas and eventually went into exile to various countries. In a recent interview, Arouri said, "It is not strange for us for the commanders and cadres of the movement to be martyred."



REUTERS

"I never expected to reach this age, so I am living on borrowed time," Arouri said in August / File Photo: Reuters

Saleh al Arouri, the deputy political head of Hamas and a founder of the group's military wing, had been in Israel's sights for years before he was assassinated in a drone strike in a southern suburb of Beirut.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had threatened to kill him even before October 7 surprise blitz by Hamas.

Israel had accused Arouri, 57, of masterminding attacks against it in the occupied West Bank, where he was the group's top commander.

In 2015, the US Department of the Treasury designated Arouri as a "Specially Designated Global Terrorist", offering $5 million for information about him.

Some Israeli lawmakers celebrated the assassination while Mike Waltz, a Florida Republican, hailed the assassination of Arouri and called it a "very big deal".

Asked about assassination threats against him in an interview with Beirut-based Al Mayadeen in August, Arouri said, "It is not strange for us for the commanders and cadres of the movement to be martyred."

"I never expected to reach this age, so I am living on borrowed time," he said.

In the same interview, he threatened that in case of a war, "Israel will suffer a defeat unprecedented in history."




Arouri's life and history


Born in the town of Aroura in the occupied West Bank, Arouri joined Hamas and eventually went into exile, first to Damascus, where then Syrian government was a strong supporter of the group.

He resided in Syria for three years before leaving, living as a nomad between several countries.

He left in 2011 when Hamas split with regime leader Bashar al Assad, siding with the opposition in Syria's civil war.

He later moved to Lebanon in 2018 until his assassination on Jan. 2.

Arriving in Beirut, Arouri made few public appearances. Hamas was able to build up its political and military presence in Lebanon.

In early September, Arouri held a meeting with Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah that was attended by Ziad Nakhaleh, the leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group, during which they discussed the situation in the Palestinian territories. A similar meeting was convened after October 7.




Drone strike


Since October 7, Arouri kept a low profile while others in the Hamas political leadership made frequent public appearances in Beirut, including in near-daily press conferences.

He was assassinated in a strike on an apartment building in the middle of Beirut's southern suburbs, a political and security stronghold of Hezbollah but also a densely populated urban area.

Hamas officials confirmed Arouri's death, along with six other Hamas members, including two military commanders.

A Lebanese security official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the media, said the attack appeared to have been carried out by a drone that fired missiles into the building, targeting one specific floor.

The strike shook the surrounding area, shattering windows in neighbouring buildings and causing a fire on the street in the Musharafieh district.

Residents of the area rushed to the streets around the targeted building, digging through rubble and broken glass, looking for survivors or bodies.

An Associated Press photographer at the scene described seeing at least two bodies and other body parts scattered in the street. A witness at the scene, Abbas Ghannam, told the AP news agency that he had heard the sound of a drone before it hit.

"It was not a military jet; it was a drone. It has a low sound," he said.




'Harsh retaliation'

This could be the first Israeli attack on Beirut since the 34-day war between Israel and Hezbollah in the summer of 2006 that ended in a stalemate.

It could mark a major escalation in the war in Lebanon.

After Netanyahu's previous threats to Arouri, Nasrallah warned Israel not to target any Lebanese, Palestinian, Syrian or Iranian officials in Lebanon, saying that would lead to "harsh retaliation" by the group.

Hezbollah said in a statement that the targeting of Arouri "in the heart of the southern suburbs of Beirut" constituted "a serious attack on Lebanon, its people, its security, sovereignty and resistance."

"We affirm that this crime will never pass without response and punishment," it said.

Nasrallah is set to speak on Wednesday, on the anniversary of the killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in a US air strike.

Israel has killed over 22,000 Palestinians so far in its brutal war on besieged Gaza and wounded more than 57,000 others. Some 7,000 Palestinians are said to be buried under the mountains of concrete and twisted steel of bombed buildings.

SOURCE: TRTWORLD AND AGENCIES

Lebanon's prime minister condemns Israeli strike in Beirut

Lebanon to file urgent complaint with UN Security Council against Israel over attack

Mohammad Sıo |03.01.2024 -
Officers inspect the area after Israeli drone struck a Hamas office in Dahieh region of Beirut, Lebanon on January 02, 2024.

BEIRUT

Lebanese caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati issued a statement late Tuesday condemning an explosion in the southern suburbs of the capital Beirut, calling it a "new Israeli crime."

The Palestinian resistance group Hamas confirmed the assassination of its deputy chief Saleh Arouri in the blast.

Hamas said two commanders of its armed wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, were also killed.

Lebanon’s official National News Agency earlier reported that Arouri was killed in an Israeli drone strike on a Hamas office in Mecherfeh in southern Beirut. At least six people were killed in the attack.

"This explosion aims to usher Lebanon into a new phase of confrontations following the daily ongoing attacks in the south, which result in a significant number of martyrs and injuries," he added.

“Lebanon is committed to the resolutions of international legitimacy, especially (UN) Resolution 1701,'' he said.

“However, it is Israel that has breached and surpassed the resolution, as it remains unsatisfied with the level of death and destruction. It is evident to all that the decision of war rests in Israel's hands, and it is imperative to restrain and halt its aggression,'' Mikati said.

In this respect, Lebanon intends to file an urgent complaint with the UN Security Council against Israel in light of the attack, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement.

Lebanon has previously lodged several complaints against Israel in the Security Council, including cases related to targeting journalists in southern Lebanon and the occupying border towns.

*Writing by Mohammad Sio


West Bank denounces al-Arouri killing, declares general strike
West Bank denounces al-Arouri killing, declares general strike
[03/January/2024]

AMALLAH Jan 03. 2024 (Saba) -National and Islamic parties in the West Bank declared a general strike and mobilization on Wednesday, mourning martyr Saleh Al-Arouri, the Deputy Chief of the Political Bureau of Hamas.

The Fatah Movement - Ramallah Region said in a statement: Wednesday is the day of a general and comprehensive strike in the Ramallah and Al-Bireh governorate in response to the assassination of Al-Arouri in Beirut.

Mosques all around the world mourned the great leader who was assassinated in the Southern Suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, by the Israeli enemy on January 2, 2023.

Protesters took to the streets in Arura, condemning his assassination and portraying an image that was replicated in multiple cities and towns across the West Bank.

Najat


Hezbollah condemns assassination of Hamas leader Salah Arouri, comrades in Beirut

Arouri's assassination sends 'highly symbolic political and security messages,' says Hezbollah, warning that killings will ‘never go unpunished’

Mohammad Sıo |03.01.2024 -
Police officers take security measures after Israeli drone struck a Hamas office in Dahieh region of Beirut, Lebanon on January 02, 2024.


ISTANBUL

The Lebanese group Hezbollah condemned the assassination of Hamas deputy chief Salah Arouri and his comrades in Beirut on Tuesday in a rapidly unfolding and deeply concerning series of events.

The assassination is a ''serious attack on Lebanon, its people, security, sovereignty and resistance,'' the group said in a statement.

Arouri's assassination ''contains highly symbolic political and security messages and entails a dangerous development in the course of the war between the enemy (Israel) and the axis of resistance,'' it said.

"Our resistance is steadfast and loyal to its principles that it has undertaken. The fighters are in the highest state of readiness," said the statement, emphasizing ''the assassination crime of Arouri and his comrades will never go unpunished.''

The Palestinian resistance group Hamas confirmed the assassination in the Lebanese capital Beirut.

Hamas said two commanders of its armed wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, were also killed.

Lebanon’s official National News Agency reported earlier that Arouri was killed in an Israeli drone strike on a Hamas office in Mecherfeh in southern Beirut. At least six people were killed in the attack.

*Writing by Mohmmad Sio

Lebanon's Hezbollah vows retaliation for Hamas' Al-Arouri

Lebanon's Hezbollah vows retaliation for Hamas' Al-Arouri
2024-01-02 

Shafaq News/ Lebanese Hezbollah declared that the assassination of Saleh Al-Arouri, Deputy Head of the Political Bureau of Hamas, in an Israeli bombing in Beirut, will "never" go unpunished.

In a statement, Hezbollah mourned Al-Arouri, calling him a "great mujahid leader" who contributed to the "defense of the oppressed people of Palestine."

The party accused Israel of resorting to assassination due to its failure to subjugate Gaza and other areas.

Hezbollah asserted that the crime was a continuation of the assassination of leader Sayyed Razi Mousavi (a high-ranking general of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps' elite Quds force, which Israel killed in Syria). Considering the operation a "dangerous assault on Lebanon, its people, its security, its sovereignty, and its resistance."

The statement affirmed that the crime "would not pass without a response and punishment."

Deputy Hamas chief Saleh al-Arouri was killed on Tuesday night in an Israeli drone strike on Beirut's southern suburbs, a stronghold of Hezbollah.

Lebanon's national news agency said six people were killed when the drone struck a Hamas office.

Hamas mourned two other officials with Al-Arouri.

IT'S CALLED APARTHEID 
Israeli post-war scenario: splitting Gaza into small areas ruled by tribes

Rather than a single political entity ruling Gaza, local media says the Israeli army wants to divide the Palestinian enclave into regions and sub-regions that Tel Aviv would communicate with separately.




AP

Up to 1.9 million people, or over 85 percent of the population, have been displaced across Gaza by Israeli attacks, according to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees. / Photo: AP

A post-war scenario in Gaza has come to light in which the Israeli army could divide the besieged territory into areas ruled by tribes or clans rather than a single political entity.

According to Israel's public broadcaster KAN, the plan was devised by the Israeli army and is expected to be presented to the Cabinet on Tuesday.

It stipulates that Gaza be divided into regions and sub-regions, with Israel communicating separately with each group for matters including the distribution of humanitarian aid.

The proposed scheme may also extend to the occupied West Bank and recommends dividing the territories into emirates and Israel retaining security control.



Palestinian Authority rule

Tel Aviv is yet to comment on the report, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said on several occasions that he will not allow the Palestinian Authority, which is based in the occupied West Bank, to have any role in ruling Gaza in the post-war period.

The stance contradicts the US position, which has suggested that the Palestinian Authority should rule over Gaza after the end of the conflict, which erupted with the October 7 cross-border offensive by Hamas.

Israel's onslaught has killed nearly 22,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and left the besieged territory into ruins as most of its infrastructure has been destroyed or damaged.

Up to 1.9 million people, or over 85 percent of the population, have been displaced across Gaza, according to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees.

Around 1,200 Israelis are believed to have been killed in the Hamas attack on October 7.


SOURCE: AA

Israel announces its Gaza endgame: Ethnic cleansing as ‘humanitarianism’

Benjamin Netanyahu announced his endgame in Gaza: the “voluntary migration” of Palestinians forced to choose between leaving or dying by bombardment and starvation. His goal is to end the Palestinians as a people and as a national movement.
MONDOWEISS
ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU MEETS US SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD AUSTIN AT ISRAELI ARMY HEADQUARTERS, THE KIRYA, IN TEL AVIV, ALONGSIDE ISRAELI MINISTER OF DEFENSE YOAV GALLANT, ARMY CHIEF OF STAFF LT.-GEN. HERZI HALEVI, AND CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF GEN. CHARLES BROWN. (PHOTO: © KOBI GIDEON/ISRAELI GPO VIA ZUMA PRESS/WIRE/APA IMAGES)

On Christmas Day, the Wall Street Journal thought it appropriate to publish an Op-Ed by the world leader who is currently slaughtering more innocents than any other, Benjamin Netanyahu. In that article, Netanyahu gave us his “vision” for his endgame in Gaza. He laid out three aims: “Hamas must be destroyed, Gaza must be demilitarized, and Palestinian society must be deradicalized. These are the three prerequisites for peace between Israel and its Palestinian neighbors in Gaza.”

Israel maintains that destroying Hamas will take months and perhaps years. Already, most Gazans are struggling to find shelter, food, and water. Decent medical care has become almost an impossible dream as medical professionals scramble to do what they can without supplies, medical equipment, electricity, or even hospital facilities. Disease, malnutrition, exposure, infection from wounds, horrendous sanitary conditions, and other threats are running rampant. It’s important to realize that the people dying from these causes are not being recorded in the daily casualty counts.

All of that is after less than three months. 1% of Gaza’s population has already been killed, and fungal infections are so widespread they’re even killing Israeli soldiers now. Imagine what things will be like in another month, let alone a year.

By “demilitarized,” Netanyahu means a permanent Israeli military presence not only in Gaza but also at the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt. This is ostensibly to prevent weapons smuggling, but there is no such thing as stopping smuggling — no country has ever been able to do that. Occupied people, besieged people, and people living under tyranny will always find a means of resistance.

When Netanyahu says “deradicalized,” what he is referring to is a “re-education” program for Palestinians so they will learn to love their Israeli colonizers. His comparison to Germany and Japan after World War II is so absurd it hardly merits discussion. But to be clear, the Allied powers, after devastating both Germany and Japan, actively rebuilt the countries and boosted the countries’ economies toward independence and growth. They gave the people of Germany and Japan a reason to want to reconcile with the Allied powers and to see their respective pre-war governments as having led them to disaster.

Netanyahu does not intend to do this, or anything of the kind. The last thing he wants to see is any kind of independent Palestine. He’s certainly made that plain enough times. And he has no intention of rebuilding Gaza with a vibrant economy, but to repeat the isolation Gaza has experienced since 1948, first by Egypt, and then, since 1967, by Israel. His notion that “ Palestinian civil society needs to be transformed so that its people support fighting terrorism rather than funding it,” reads as a ridiculous fantasy that arises from the false, racist notion that Palestinians are being taught to resent Israelis, not that the experiences of violence, killings, deprivation, and humiliation by Israel might just engender some negative feelings.

Additionally, that concept of “deradicalization” is not only offensive in its explicit denial of the conditions that have led to Palestinian resistance—legal under international law or otherwise—it is also so elastic that Israel could accuse even the most quisling Palestinians, like the Palestinian Authority, of remaining “radical” until the end of time no matter how much they kowtow to their occupiers. And Netanyahu has every reason to believe Israel will be supported in this by Washington and Brussels.

No, this was not about describing how to end the slaughter in Gaza. It was about declaring that the carnage would be going on for a long time and that its ultimate goal, as has been clear since October 7, is to finally end the struggle over Palestine by destroying the Palestinians as a people and as a national movement.
Ethnic cleansing as ‘humanitarianism’

The plan, as Netanyahu elaborated at a Christmas Day meeting of his Likud faction, is to squeeze the people of Gaza so hard they will have no choice but to leave or die. “Regarding voluntary emigration, I have no problem with that,” he told Likud Knesset Member and former Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon. “Our problem is not allowing the exit, but a lack of countries that are ready to take Palestinians in. And we are working on it. This is the direction we are going in.”

The term “voluntary emigration” is likely to be heard quite a lot in the coming weeks and months, and it is one of the most cynical, dishonest terms one can imagine. There is, of course, nothing voluntary about people leaving Gaza. Israel has made the place unlivable, and that was before the current bombardment.


If you cut off water, electricity, food, and medical care, destroy all the shelter, and then ask a person, “Would you still like to stay?” their decision to leave is obviously not voluntary.

Now, they are essentially being forced to leave under the threat of imminent death. The people of Gaza did not suddenly lose their attachment to Palestine. They will die if they stay, as will their children. If you cut off water, electricity, food, and medical care, destroy all the shelter, and then ask a person, “Would you still like to stay?” their decision to leave is obviously not voluntary.

Yet this will be presented as a “humanitarian solution.” And it is an option that, at least according to one poll publicized by Danon, enjoys vast support among Israelis. The poll asked, “To what extent do you support encouraging the voluntary migration of the residents of the Gaza Strip?” 68% strongly supported such encouragement, with another 15% saying they were somewhat supportive of it. Only 17% said they didn’t support it much or at all.

The push for this “humanitarian solution” is not confined to the government. The Jerusalem Post published an Op-Ed, also on Christmas Day, that argued for the transfer of Gazans to the Sinai on the same “humanitarian” grounds. The detachment from reality in the article, as well as the blatant racism, are stunning.

Claiming that “Since Israel’s unconditional turnover of the Gaza Strip to the Palestinian Authority in 2005, Gazans have completely failed to generate a productive Palestinian-administered entity, despite generous economic support,” the author — Joel Roskin, a professor of geology at Bar-Ilan University — goes on to say that “this may be associated with the coupled effect of an intrinsic hatred-focused, fanatic, anti-Israel Islamic culture, and links with Iran, along with limited geographical conditions, poor natural and human resources, and a high population density.”

The racism is unvarnished and unapologetic. The complete absence of acknowledgment of Israel’s seventeen-year siege on Gaza is par for the course, the description of the “generous economic support” Gaza has received both a fabrication and classic victim-blaming. Much of that support was for reconstruction after Israel destroyed infrastructure, homes, and buildings, as well as humanitarian aid, which, due to Israel’s harsh restrictions of the Gaza economy and restrictions in both the United States and Europe on the ability to even send charitable donations, much less invest directly, did nothing to improve the economy. Indeed, this was a frequent complaint of advocates for Palestinians in general. Humanitarian aid does not boost an economy, it retards it. Economic aid can boost an economy depending on how it’s used, but such use was always forbidden by the United States and the European Union, which, directly or indirectly, were the sources of the funding.

But this is likely to be seen in both Israel and the White House as the height of magnanimity on Israel’s part. They just want to help the poor, barbaric Gazans who only know how to hate and kill to find a better life far from the lands that Israel has stolen from them, it will be said. It is the cruelest form of the “white man’s burden” trope.

Netanyahu still has a quandary, though. As he pointed out, other countries are not willing to help Israel ethnically cleanse Gaza of its Palestinian inhabitants. Indeed, while the Biden administration, the U.K., and Europe all keep their heads buried firmly in the sand about Israel’s clear intentions, Egypt and Jordan can afford no such delusions.

On Wednesday, King Abdullah of Jordan and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El Sisi met to discuss the situation in Gaza. A statement released by the Jordanian news agency Petra made their position clear: “His Majesty King Abdullah and Egypt President Abdel Fattah El Sisi on Wednesday in Cairo reiterated their complete rejection of all attempts to liquidate the Palestinian issue and forcibly displace Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.”

Netanyahu’s strategy is clearly to continue slaughtering Palestinians and degrading the living conditions in Gaza to the point that Egypt will have to give in and allow the formation of Palestinian settlements in the northern Sinai. The monstrosity of that plan should be clear to anyone with the slightest hint of humanity in them. But humanity seems to be in short supply in both Israel and Washington.

Egypt is trying to prevent this impossible choice from being forced upon them. That is why they recently submitted a three-phase peace proposal to Israel, Hamas, and the United States, which would see the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian political prisoners and a shared “technocratic” government in Gaza as a temporary measure, pending elections that would bring a united Palestinian government to both the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Hamas and Islamic Jihad have rejected the notions of both a temporary ceasefire and their relinquishing of all power in Gaza. Hamas has called for democratic elections following the fighting and indicated that they are open to sharing power with the PLO and working within a unified framework. Israel has not blatantly rejected the plan but has insisted they will not stop the war until Netanyahu’s three conditions are met, which is a de facto rejection of the plan. The U.S. has remained absolutely silent, which speaks more loudly about Joe Biden’s contempt for any stoppage of the killing than any words could.

Even the Biden administration cannot credibly claim to be unaware of the Netanyahu plan. Everything Israel has done in Gaza points clearly to an attempt to force the majority of the people out of Gaza for the foreseeable future. This isn’t speculation; it is clear from both the words and actions of Israeli leaders, from Netanyahu on down. This is not something that can be addressed with a little bit more humanitarian aid. Joe Biden, Antony Blinken, and the rest of the administration leadership are well aware of this. Unless popular unrest can force a change, they will most certainly let Netanyahu push this as far as he can.

Mitchell Plitnick

Mitchell Plitnick is the president of ReThinking Foreign Policy. He is the co-author, with Marc Lamont Hill, of Except for Palestine: The Limits of Progressive Politics. Mitchell's previous positions include vice president at the Foundation for Middle East Peace, Director of the US Office of B'Tselem, and Co-Director of Jewish Voice for Peace.

You can find him on Twitter @MJPlitnick.
More by this author

South Africa’s genocide case against Israel sets up high-stakes legal battle at the UN’s top court
Published: 2 hours ago

 Israeli soldiers take up positions near the Gaza Strip border, in southern Israel, Friday, Dec. 29, 2023. The army is battling Palestinian militants across Gaza in the war ignited by Hamas' Oct. 7 attack into Israel. South Africa has launched a case at the United Nations' top court alleging that Israel's military campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide. The filing and Israel's decision to defend itself at the International Court of Justice sets up a high-stakes showdown in the before a bench of the court's black-robed judges in the wood-panelled Great Hall of Justice.
 (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit, File)

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — South Africa has launched a case at the United Nations’ top court alleging that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide.

The filing and Israel’s decision to defend itself at the International Court of Justice set up a high-stakes showdown before a panel of judges in the Great Hall of Justice.

The case will likely drag on for years. At its heart is the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, drawn up in the aftermath of World War II and the Holocaust.

The convention defines genocide as acts such as killings “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”

Here are some further details on the case and its ramifications.

WHAT IS SOUTH AFRICA’S ARGUMENT?

South Africa’s 84-page filing says Israel’s actions “are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part” of the Palestinians in Gaza.

It asks the ICJ, also known as the world court, for a series of legally binding rulings. It wants the court to declare that Israel “has breached and continues to breach its obligations under the Genocide Convention,” and to order Israel to cease hostilities in Gaza that could amount to breaches of the convention, to offer reparations, and to provide for reconstruction of what it’s destroyed in Gaza.

The filing argues that genocidal acts include killing Palestinians, causing serious mental and bodily harm, and deliberately inflicting conditions meant to “bring about their physical destruction as a group.” And it says statements by Israeli officials express genocidal intent.

South Africa argues that the court has jurisdiction because both countries are signatories of the genocide convention. The convention’s ninth article says disputes between nations over the convention can be submitted to the International Court of Justice.

Many South Africans, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, have compared Israel’s policies regarding Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank with South Africa’s past apartheid regime of racial segregation. Israel rejects such allegations.

WHAT WAS ISRAEL’S RESPONSE?


Israel’s government swiftly rejected the genocide claim. A Foreign Ministry statement said South Africa’s case lacks a legal foundation and constitutes a “despicable and contemptuous exploitation” of the court.

Eylon Levy, an official in the Israeli prime minister’s office, on Tuesday accused South Africa of “giving political and legal cover” to the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas that triggered Israel’s campaign. But he confirmed that Israel would send a legal team to the Hague “to dispel South Africa’s absurd blood libel,” he said.

An Israeli official said the country, which has a history of ignoring international tribunals, decided to defend itself for several reasons. Among them are Israel’s role in promoting the original genocide convention after the Holocaust and its belief that “we have a strong case.” He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing behind-the-scenes deliberations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to press ahead with the war until Hamas is crushed and the more than 100 hostages still held by the militant group in Gaza are freed. He’s said that could take several more months.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

South Africa’s filing includes a request for the court to urgently issue legally binding interim orders for Israel to “immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza.”

Such orders, known as provisional measures, would remain while the case progresses. They’re legally binding but not always followed. In 2022, in a genocide case filed by Ukraine against Russia, the court ordered Moscow to immediately suspend its invasion. The order was ignored, and deadly strikes continue.

The court will soon schedule public hearings. Lawyers for South Africa and Israel can make arguments. Judges drawn from around the world will likely take days or weeks to issue a decision on preliminary measures.

The court will then enter a lengthy process of considering the full case.

Israel could challenge the jurisdiction and seek to have the case thrown out before lawyers start arguing. Other countries that have signed the genocide convention could also apply to make submissions.

IS THE COURT HEARING SIMILAR CASES?


Two other genocide cases are on the busy court’s docket. The case filed by Ukraine shortly after Russia’s invasion accuses Moscow of launching the military operation based on trumped-up claims of genocide and accuses Russia of planning acts of genocide in Ukraine.
ADVERTISEMENT


Another ongoing case involves Gambia — acting on behalf of Muslim nations — accusing Myanmar of genocide against the Rohingya Muslim minority.

In a past case brought by Bosnia, the court in 2007 ruled that Serbia “violated the obligation to prevent genocide … in respect of the genocide that occurred in Srebrenica in July 1995.” The court declined to order Serbia to pay compensation. Croatia also sued Serbia in 2015, but the world court ruled that Serbia didn’t breach the convention in that case.

ICJ OR ICC?

The Hague calls itself the international city of peace and justice. It is home not only to the ICJ, but to the International Criminal Court, based just a few miles (kilometers) away, near the North Sea coastline.

The two courts have different mandates.

The ICJ, which held its first sitting in 1946 as the world emerged from the carnage of WWII, adjudicates cases between nations. They’re often land and maritime border disputes, as well as disagreements over interpretation of international treaties.

The ICC is much younger. It started work in 2002 with the lofty goal of ending global impunity for atrocities. Unlike the ICJ, it seeks to hold individuals criminally responsible for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The ICC has an ongoing investigation into the Israel-Palestinian conflict, dating back to the last war in Gaza. So far, it has not issued any arrest warrants.

ICC prosecutor Karim Khan said last month that an investigation into possible crimes by Hamas militants and Israeli forces “is a priority for my office.”

WHAT ABOUT PAST U.N. CASES?

Two now-defunct U.N. tribunals also held landmark genocide trials.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia convicted a series of high-ranking Bosnian Serbs, including former President Radovan Karadzic and his military chief Gen. Ratko Mladic, for their roles in the July 1995 massacre of more than 8,000 men and boys in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica.

Both Karadzic and Mladic were given life sentences.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda convicted a string of leaders involved in the African nation’s 1994 genocide when some 800,000 people, mainly ethnic Tutsis, were slaughtered.

___

Associated Press writer Josef Federman contributed from Jerusalem.
Israel will 'sort out' top court post Hamas, Hezbollah — anti-Arab minister

Controversial far-right lawmaker Zvika Fogel says Israeli government will "sort out" Supreme Court over its decision against PM Netanyahu's sweeping judicial reform plan that critics say could pave way for authoritarian rule.


Zvika Fogel, centre, faces backlash over his statement on the Supreme Court. / Photo: X: @tzvikafoghel

An Israeli far-right lawmaker has sought action against the Supreme Court after it ruled against the extreme-right government's controversial legal overhaul.

"First, we will destroy Hamas, then we will take care of Hezbollah and for dessert, we will sort out the Supreme Court," said Zvika Fogel, a member of the radical Jewish Power party on Tuesday.

"Everything in its own time. Patience," he added on X.

Jewish Power has been referred to as Kahanist and anti-Arab.

The court on Monday ruled against an amendment passed by parliament in July which scraps the "reasonableness" clause, used by the tribunal to overturn government decisions which are deemed unconstitutional.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had argued the sweeping judicial reform agenda was necessary to rebalance powers between judges and politicians.

But his detractors warn the multi-pronged package could pave the way for authoritarian rule.

The legal overhaul sparked mass protests on a weekly basis in Israel from the start of 2023 until the war on besieged Gaza.

'Despicable and shameful'

Fogel's statement was denounced by war cabinet member Benny Gantz, who called it "despicable and shameful". And Interior Minister Moshe Arbel said, "There is no place for including the Supreme Court in the same sentence as our worst enemies".

But Fogel was defended by his party chief and extremist national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who argued that "those who see a comparison between Hamas and the Supreme Court in this tweet have issues with reading comprehension".


Recently, Ben-Gvir along with another extremist minister Bezalel Smotrich called for ethnic cleansing of Palestinian residents in Gaza so that illegal Jewish settlers could "make the desert bloom".

The comments underscored fears in much of the Arab world that Israel wants to drive Palestinians out of land, repeating the Nakba or forced exodus of Palestinians from their land in 1948 upon the formation of the state of Israel.

"What needs to be done in the Gaza Strip is to encourage emigration," Smotrich said. "If there are 100,000 or 200,000 Arabs in Gaza and not 2 million Arabs, the entire discussion on the day after will be totally different."

Since October 7, Israel has killed over 22,000 Palestinians in its brutal war on besieged Gaza, and wounded 57,035 others. Some 7,000 Palestinians are feared buried under debris of the annihilated homes and businesses.

MIDDLE EAST 01 Jan 2024
Top Israeli court overturns key component of Netanyahu's judicial overhaul

SANTA MUERTE IS AZTEC

Exorcist Warns Cult Of ‘St. Death’ Worships Satan ‘Implicitly Or Explicitly’

La Santa Muerte (‘Holy Death’ or ‘Saint Death’). Photo by Not home, Wikipedia Commons.


By 

By Diego López Colín


Father Andrés Esteban López Ruiz, a member of the College of Exorcists of the Primatial Archdiocese of Mexico, recently warned about the risks of the cult of “Santa Muerte” or “St. Death,” pointing out that those who practice it “implicitly or explicitly worship Satan, risking submitting themselves to him and experiencing his extraordinary action.”

In an article published on the website of the International Association of Exorcists, the priest noted that the “proliferation of this cult has led to a significant increase in the extraordinary action of the devil,” which can include demonic possession.

López said that Mexican exorcists have confirmed “numerous cases of oppression, obsession, and demonic possession linked to the practice and growing spread of the cult of ‘Santa Muerte.’”

According to the priest, this cult, far from being a “pre-Hispanic phenomenon,” dates back to the early 1960s and gained more notoriety in 1965. In that year, he noted, it was promoted in the Tepito market in Mexico City, a place “known for smuggling and illegal activities.”

In addition, the priest said it had a “significant development” in Catemaco, a town in the state of Veracruz that has “an ancient tradition of witchcraft, shamanism, and occultism.”


The Santa Muerte cult is a “Mexican version of satanic worship,” he pointed out, which fuses elements of “Brazilian quimbanda, Cuban Santeria, pre-Hispanic cultures, and occult satanism.”

The member of the College of Exorcists warned that this cult “includes satanic practices that materially and formally constitute apostasy, blasphemy, and sacrilege” as well as acts of “violence against life and very serious violations of the penal code, such as murders, crimes, robberies, and drug trafficking.” 

“These very serious sins place those who commit them under the direct control of Satan and, with divine permission, can easily become occasions for his extraordinary action,” the exorcist explained.

López warned that within the communities that idolize Santa Muerte, “formal pacts with the devil” are made by people who seek “gifts and wealth.”

“More and more people suffer not only from witchcraft in general but also from curses associated with this cult,” he added.

In addition to the pastoral response of the Catholic Church, which “seeks to preserve the people of God” from these evils “through the Gospel proclamation, catechesis, and education,” López stressed that in many cases “it is necessary to perform major exorcisms to help those who have suffered the consequences of the cult of ‘Santa Muerte.’”

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.



CNA
The Catholic News Agency (CNA) has been, since 2004, one of the fastest growing Catholic news providers to the English speaking world. The Catholic News Agency takes much of its mission from its sister agency, ACI Prensa, which was founded in Lima, Peru, in 1980 by Fr. Adalbert Marie Mohm (†1986).

Pakistan: Continuing Chaos In Balochistan – Analysis

Baluchistan, Pakistan. Credit: VOA

By 

By Tushar Ranjan Mohanty


On December 27, 2023, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) told the Islamabad Federal Capital’s Police not to treat Baloch protesters as “enemies”. Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb’s remarks came as he heard a petition filed on December 21, 2023, challenging the arrest of marchers who arrived in the Federal Capital, Islamabad, on foot from Turbat town in the Kech District of Balochistan, and denying them the right to stage a protest in Islamabad against extrajudicial killings as well as enforced disappearances of their loved ones.

Expressing his outrage, Justice Aurangzeb asked the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP, operations) if the order to treat the protesters ‘harshly’ was given by him and declared, “You make some people sit in your lap while you treat others like this… They have come [here]. Let them sit.” 

During the hearing, the counsel for the petitioner – organisers of the protest, Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) – disclosed that 34 Baloch protesters were still in custody. Earlier, on December 25, 2023, Police freed 290 Baloch protesters who had been arrested when they attempted to hold a protest in Islamabad on December 21, 2023. 

The Baloch protest march started in Turbat town, Kech District, Balochistan, on December 6, 2023, after the alleged extrajudicial killing of a Baloch youth by Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) personnel on November 23, 2023. On that day, CTD claimed to have killed four suspected terrorists in an intelligence-based operation (IBO) near a bus terminal on Pasni Road in Turbat town. However, the family of one of the deceased – Balaach Mola Bakhsh – and members of civil society staged a sit-in at Shaheed Fida Ahmed Chowk, accompanied by the deceased’s body, and alleged that Balaach was taken away by the CTD from his home in the night of October 29. After 22 days, on November 20, a First Information Report (FIR) was registered against Bakhsh by the CTD, claiming that he had been caught in possession of explosives. He was presented before a court, where another 10 days of police remand were granted. His bail plea was scheduled for November 24, 2023, before which he was killed. 

The main demand of the protesters was the arrest of the CTD officials involved in the killing, and the formation of a judicial commission for an independent inquiry into the Department’s action. 

As the sit-in protest in Turbat against Balaach’s killing did not yield any result, the protestors decided to relocate their sit-in to Quetta, the provincial capital of Balochistan. They concluded the sit-in in Turbat on December 5, 2023, after which they began their march towards Quetta. As things did not move, the protestors started march towards Islamabad and reached Islamabad on December 20. However, they met with brutal force and more than 200 protesters were taken into custody by the Islamabad Police on December 21. 

It is pertinent to recall here that in Balochistan, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings by the security forces and their proxies have long been rampant. Victims of enforced disappearances include political workers, journalists, human rights defenders, and students. According to the Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP), more than 7,000 persons have gone ‘missing’ from Balochistan since 2000. However, the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances formed in 2011 with the objective of tracing the missing persons and fixing responsibility on the individuals or organisations responsible for it, posted data on its website claiming that there were just 454 ‘active cases’ of enforced disappearances from Balochistan, as of October 2023. 

Further, according to partial data compiled by the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP), of the 4,700 conflict-linked civilian fatalities recorded in Balochistan since 2004 (data till December 31, 2023), at least 1,469 are attributable to one or another terrorist/insurgent outfit. Of these, 494 civilian killings (300 in the South and 194 in the North) have been claimed by Baloch separatist formations, while Islamist and sectarian extremist formations – primarily Islamic State, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Ahrar-ul-Hind (Liberators of India) – claimed responsibility for another 975 civilian killings, 892 in the North (mostly in and around Quetta) and 83 in the South. The remaining 3,231 civilian fatalities – 1,848 in the South and 1,383 in the North – remain ‘unattributed’, and are largely believed to have been the handiwork of the Security Forces (SFs) and their death squad proxies. 

The state sponsored enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings have led to a spiral of retaliatory attacks and violence targeting the SFs and state establishments in the province, by Baloch insurgents. Civilians believed to be siding with the state machinery, have also been targeted. In this environment of chaos, Islamist terrorist groups have also thrived and even joined the Baloch groups. The major active Baloch insurgent groups include the Baloch National Army (BNA), Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), Balochistan Liberation Tigers (BLT) and United Baloch Army (UBA). 

According to the SATP database, overall fatalities in Balochistan increased from 406 in 2022 to 466 in 2023, up by 14.77 per cent (data till December 31, 2023). This is the highest number of fatalities in a year since 2016, at 636. Overall fatalities in Balochistan have been on a continuous rise since 2020, after a recent low of 180 in 2019. Balochistan alone accounted for 31.32 per cent of Pakistan’s total of 1,492 terrorism/insurgency-linked fatalities in 2023. 

Civilian fatalities in particular have recorded a significant spike in 2023, from 88 in 2022 to 160 in 2023, an increase of 81.81 per cent. The 2023 tally for this category is the highest since 2018, when there were 234 civilian fatalities. After a recent low of 83 in 2019, civilian fatalities have tended to increase, though there was a drop in 2022, with 88 killed, as compared to 111 in 2021. 

Non-locals, who are thought to be Army collaborators, face the wrath of Baloch insurgents. These ‘non-locals’ work as spies for SFs, and are also believed to be part of a systematic effort to deny work and benefits to the Baloch population. Baloch insurgent groups such as the BLA, BLF and the Balochistan Republican Army (BRA), among others, began to voice anti-outsider, particularly anti-Punjabi, sentiments in their campaigns in the wake of the military action against the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti, leader of the Bugti tribe and President of the Jamhoori Watan Party (JWP), in a military operation in the Chalgri area of the Bhamboor Hills of Dera Bugti District, on August 26, 2006. Further, many of the ‘outsiders’ are engaged on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects and are targeted because Baloch insurgents fear that CPEC will convert the Baloch people into minorities in their own homeland. Indeed, CPEC projects principally employ workers brought in from outside the province, overwhelmingly from Punjab. 

According to partial data compiled by SATP, a total of 254 ‘non-locals’ have been killed in Balochistan since August 26, 2006, (data till December 31, 2023). Of these, 198 were Punjabis. Other non-locals also fell to the ethnic collateral damage, including 37 Sindhis. The ethnic identity of the remaining 19 was unspecified. Significantly, most of the Punjabi settler killings were recorded in South Balochistan, which accounts for 167 of the total of 198 such killings (principally in Bolan, Kech, Gwadar, Panjgur, Khuzdar, Sibi and Lasbela Districts); and 31 in North Balochistan (mostly in Kalat, Nushki, Quetta and Mustang Districts). The overwhelming concentration of such killings in the South is because of the presence and dominance of Baloch insurgent groups in this region. 

Though SF fatalities in 2023 saw an eight per cent decline, down to 186 in 2023, as against 202 in 2022 (the highest in a year since 2000, when SATP started compiling data on conflict in Pakistan), the toll still remains very high. The 2023 number is the second highest recorded in this category during this period. The third highest of 177 was recorded way back in 2012. 

Meanwhile, terrorist fatalities continued to rise. From a recent low of 37 in 2020 they jumped to 116 in 2022 and 120 in 2023. 

Other parameters of violence also indicate that the overall security situation in Balochistan has deteriorated significantly in 2023. Overall terrorism-related incidents increased from 271 in 2022 to 278 in 2023, the highest in a year since 2015, at 444. Incidents of killing increased from 160 in 2022 to 168 in 2023, the highest since 2015, at 204. The number of suicide attacks and resultant fatalities increased from three and 13, respectively, in 2022, to five and 70, respectively, in 2023. The tally for suicide attacks in 2023 (five) is the highest since 2019, when there were six suicide attacks. However, in terms of resultant fatalities in such attacks, the 2023 tally (70) is the highest since 2018, when there were 209 fatalities. 

Islamist groups, mainly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and its allied groups have also been active in the province. Reports about a TTP-Baloch alliance appeared to receive some confirmation when TTP ‘spokesperson’ Mohammad Khurasani congratulated the Baloch insurgent groups for their twin attacks on Panjgur and Nuskhi Army camps on February 2, 2023, stating,

The Pakistani Army is carrying out the massacre in Balochistan. We are against the massacre of Balochistan as well as in Waziristan by the Pakistani Army. Our enemy is common.

Moreover, the then Federal Interior Minister Sheikh Rashid, citing intelligence reports, told the media on February 3, 2023,

Baloch militants are not capable of launching major attacks in Nuskhi and Panjgur. TTP (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan) has the capability, experience and latest NATO weapons to launch such attacks. There’s some understanding between the TTP and Baloch militants. They have their hideouts in Afghanistan.

The growing nexus between the Baloch insurgents and the TTP is also visible in the absorption of two Baloch groups into the TTP fold. On April 12, 2023, the TTP claimed that a group from Quetta District, led by Asim Baloch, and another from Kalat District, led Akram Baloch, had joined its ranks. Though the development is worrisome for the security agencies and the government, it is not new. Indeed, a local Baloch jihadist group, led by Mazar Baloch from Makran, Balochistan, had joined the TTP on December 23, 2022, as well. Ustad Aslam Baloch’s group from Nushki District was the first Baloch group from Balochistan to join the TTP in June 2022. 

The insurgents also target the economic interests of the Pakistani state, as Islamabad is widely and rightly believed to be exploiting Balochistan’s natural resources. Baloch insurgents carried out at least 255 attacks targeting Gas/Oil installations and tankers in Balochistan, which resulted in the loss of 36 lives and 43 injuries. Attacks targeting this source of energy have a significant detrimental impact on Pakistan’s economy, a reality the Baloch insurgents are well aware of, and seek to leverage. 

The CPEC projects in the province have been a major bone of contention between Pakistani state and Baloch insurgents. The Baloch resentment towards the CPEC project since its inception in 2013 is that both the civilian population and insurgents believe that CPEC is part of a ‘strategic design’ by China to loot resources. The USD 62 billion CPEC is a massive series of projects that includes a network of highways, railways and energy infrastructure, spanning the entire country. CPEC is a flagship project in China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). 

Baloch groups have carried out attacks directly targeting Chinese nationals engaged in economic activities. According to partial data compiled by SATP, since July 19, 2007, at least 14 attacks directly targeting Chinese nationals have been recorded in Pakistan (12 in Balochistan and two in Sindh), resulting in 79 deaths (data till December 31, 2023). The dead included 10 Chinese nationals, 13 Pakistani SF personnel, 41 Pakistani civilians and 12 attackers. Another, 53 persons, including six Chinese nationals, were injured in these attacks. Most recently, on August 13, 2023, terrorists attacked a convoy of vehicles belonging to SFs and Chinese engineers near the Faqir Colony Bridge in Gwadar city (Gwadar District). The BLA, which took responsibility for the attack, claimed that 11 SF personnel and four Chinese nationals were killed in the attack. Jeeyand Baloch declared that BLA’s Majeed Brigade, its ‘suicide bomber squad’, was behind the attack and stated, further,

We have cautioned China repeatedly to reconsider its activities in Balochistan. BLA views such endeavours as acts of exploitation… Any foreign investments in the region should only proceed after Balochistan achieves independence.

The statement added that BLA had issued a 90-day ultimatum for China to withdraw from Balochistan, or prepare for intensified attacks on its ‘key interests’ in the region.

Though caretaker Prime Minister (PM) Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar on December 26, 2023, asserted that the welfare and prosperity of the people of Balochistan were amongst his Government’s top priorities, for those who know Islamabad’s longstanding approach towards Baloch people, this is nothing more than a rhetoric. In fact, Islamabad remains hellbent on crushing the legitimate grievances of the Baloch people and exploiting this resource rich province to benefit other parts of the country – particularly Punjab – while the people of this beleaguered province remain deprived of most of the basics, and have the worst developmental profile in the country.

  • Tushar Ranjan Mohanty
    Research Associate, Institute for Conflict Management



SATP, or the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP) publishes the South Asia Intelligence Review, and is a product of The Institute for Conflict Management, a non-Profit Society set up in 1997 in New Delhi, and which is committed to the continuous evaluation and resolution of problems of internal security in South Asia. The Institute was set up on the initiative of, and is presently headed by, its President, Mr. K.P.S. Gill, IPS (Retd).