Sunday, June 18, 2023

BOOK EXCERPT
A Car Bomb Nearly Killed Eco-Activist Judi Bari—and Yet the Feds Blamed Her


Greg King
Sun, June 18, 2023 

Photo Illustration by Luis G. Rendon/The Daily Beast/Greg King/Getty

LONG READ

I spent the summer of 1990 “hiding out” at my parents’ modest home in western Sonoma County. At twenty-nine years old I’d landed back at the family abode after my two closest colleagues had been violently attacked and almost killed for attempting to protect redwood forests. After I’d lived through five years of threats and assaults for the crime of trying to save the very last ancient redwood groves still standing outside of parks—a disturbing tide of attrition now horribly punctuated by an assassination attempt—I had little choice but to take up residence in my old bedroom, surrounded by the safety of family.

On May 24, Earth First! activist Judi Bari was piloting her Subaru station wagon through Oakland, California, when a pipe bomb exploded under her driver’s seat. When Judi hit the brakes a ball bearing broke out of a small slot and rolled into a groove where it connected two points and ignited the sophisticated bomb. The explosion blew a wide hole through the floorboard beneath Judi’s seat and blasted the roof of the Subaru wagon into a dome. Nails from the bomb entered the seat back but miraculously missed Judi. Bari was severely injured. Her passenger, fellow Earth First! activist Darryl Cherney, suffered a scratched cornea and a blown eardrum.

As if the bombing wasn’t bad enough, the FBI and Oakland Police immediately arrested Bari and Cherney for “transporting their own bomb.” The arrest of the non-violent activists set off a chain of events that would once again demonstrate the FBI’s complicity in violence aimed US activists for exercising their constitutionally protected right of protest. The Alameda County district attorney refused to file charges against the pair, citing a lack of evidence, as it was clear that Bari and Cherney had been set up.


Three months after the bombing Bari ran an op-ed in the New York Times. She called the attack an act of “unspeakable terrorism,” and she warned, “If [the FBI] can succeed in framing and discrediting us, then domestic dissent is not safe from Government sabotage. The right to advocate social change without fear of harassment is the cornerstone of a free society.”

Forests Are Being Destroyed and ‘Nature Lovers’ Are Helping

To this day neither the FBI nor Oakland Police has ever conducted a genuine probe of the bombing, choosing instead to smear Bari and Cherney in the press. A subsequent investigation and successful lawsuit filed by the activists against the police agencies not only uncovered official malfeasance in the case—the “framing” of the activists and the violation of their civil rights—but would leave little doubt in the minds of many, including one of the country’s most celebrated civil rights attorneys, that the FBI had been directly involved in the bombing itself.

Predictable Violence


State violence against environmental activists—whether perpetrated directly or simply enabled—is nothing new in the United States. As a veteran of the “redwood wars” of Northern California during the 1980s and 1990s, I was assaulted several times and received dozens of death threats, all of which garnered no more than a shrug from police officials. During the years that we fought for environmental justice, we would also witness in horror as police and sheriff’s officers would actually instigate, rather than investigate, violence against activists.

No matter the countless assaults and death threats against us, I don’t recall a single instance of a police officer making an arrest or even investigating. When a logger assaulted a woman in front of thirty witnesses, breaking her nose, then threatened those thirty witnesses by firing a shotgun in the air, Mendocino County sheriff’s deputies refused to arrest the assailant or even take statements from the victims. In 1998, when redwood activist David “Gypsy” Chain was crushed to death by a falling tree—cut by an angry timber worker who had previously threatened to kill him—the logger who felled the tree was not arrested nor did the Humboldt County District Attorney even investigate the incident. When the owner of a log trucking company struck a demonstrator in the face as she was protesting the company’s hauling of old-growth redwood logs—and did so directly in front of a Humboldt County Sheriff’s officer who witnessed the attack from just two feet away—the truck owner was not arrested nor cited, nor even admonished. When private tree climbers, employed by timber companies but deputized by Humboldt County sheriffs, violently and dangerously extracted tree sitters from 100 feet above the ground, law enforcement lauded the action. When Humboldt County Sheriff’s officers used cotton swabs to rub pepper spray directly into the eyes of environmental protestors, the cops were neither reprimanded nor suspended. Amnesty International called the pepper spray attack “torture.” The activists won a lawsuit.

Assassination

The assault that most brazenly exposed police complicity in violence against environmental activists was the 1990 assassination attempt against my two closest colleagues in the redwood fight, Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney. On May 24, 1990, the Earth First! activists were traveling in Oakland, California, when a pipe bomb detonated directly under Bari’s seat. The attack severely injured Bari and left Cherney with a scratched cornea and a blown eardrum. The FBI immediately took over the case and directed the Oakland Police to arrest Bari and Cherney for “knowingly carrying their own bomb.” Still, the Alameda County District Attorney refused to file charges in the case, citing a lack of evidence.

To this day neither the FBI nor Oakland Police has ever conducted a genuine probe of the bombing, choosing instead to smear Bari and Cherney in the press. A subsequent investigation and successful lawsuit filed by the activists against the police agencies not only uncovered official malfeasance in the case—the “framing” of the activists and the violation of their civil rights—but would leave little doubt in the minds of many, including one of the country’s most celebrated civil rights attorneys, that the FBI had been directly involved in the bombing itself.

‘Climate Justice’ Greens See Red on Climate Change

My path to Earth First! began in 1985, when I worked as a newspaper reporter who happened to cover timber politics. By late in 1986 I’d quit my job, moved from my native Sonoma County 200 miles north to Humboldt County, and camped for weeks at a time 150 feet into the redwood canopy to prevent a Houston corporation, Maxxam, from clear-cutting the last virgin redwoods still standing outside of parks. My immersion was so total that on April 24, 1990, I had been arrested, alongside a dozen other activists, for attempting to hang a banner 250 feet over the roadway of the Golden Gate Bridge. It was my sixth arrest in three years for non-violent civil disobedience. Exactly one month later, the pipe bomb exploded under Judi Bari’s driver’s seat.

Soon after the bridge action, a producer from a San Francisco television station invited me to attend one of the weekly roundtables hosted by a group of Bay Area TV and radio journalists. She said that each week they discussed current issues. Would I like to address their meeting on May 24 and provide input on what, perhaps, they should cover? I prepared a short discourse on efforts by a Houston corporation, Maxxam, to liquidate the last virgin redwood groves still standing outside of parks. In late 1985 Maxxam had partnered with Michael Milken and Drexel Burnham Lambert, among other future financial felons, to float nearly $800 million in high yield “junk bonds” to force a takeover of the 117-year-old Pacific Lumber Company. At the time Pacific Lumber owned the very last ancient redwood groves still standing outside of parks. It was a pitched battle already well covered by Bay Area and press outlets across the country.

I also asked the reporters to pay greater attention to “the ongoing and often illegal harassment, incarceration, and violence wielded by the state, in partnership with private companies, against activists who are exercising their constitutionally protected rights of free speech such as demonstrations and direct action.” By then redwood activists in California’s Humboldt and Mendocino counties had suffered several assaults and countless death threats, all delivered under a shield of impunity granted by officials and police agencies in those counties. We were on our own. I wanted the Bay Area media to understand that, from where I sat, something terrible was about to happen.

After the meeting I returned from the Bay Area to my parents’ quiet home in western Sonoma County. A note from my mother said that a friend had called. “Darryl and Judi in car accident,” said the note. When I talked with my friend her voice broke. She told me there had been no accident. “It was a bomb,” she said.

Near Death

The pipe bomb exploded directly under Judi Bari’s driver’s seat just before noon on Thursday, May 24, 1990. The sophisticated antipersonnel device was wrapped in finishing nails, for shrapnel, and detonated while Bari was driving along Park Boulevard, near Oakland High School, in the East Bay Area. When Bari hit the brakes a ball bearing broke out of a small slot and rolled into a groove where it connected two points and ignited the bomb. The explosion blew a wide hole through the floorboard beneath Bari’s seat and blasted the roof of the Subaru wagon into a dome. Nails from the bomb entered the seat back but miraculously missed Bari. Also miraculously, the gas-oil mixture included with the bomb did not ignite. Still, the seat spring impaled Bari’s butt, and her pelvis and coccyx were shattered. Nerve damage was severe, and surgeons initially told Bari she would never walk again.

When the bomb exploded, Bari and Cherney were headed to Santa Cruz to perform a benefit concert in support of Redwood Summer, a planned three-month suite of demonstrations and occupations designed to draw thousands of protesters to the northern redwoods. Redwood Summer, along with a looming ballot initiative that threatened to ban clear-cutting in all of California, had set the timber industry on edge. Violence was in the air.

The bomb was meant to kill Bari. And it would have, except the full force of the blast shot downward instead of up. Had it worked perfectly, Bari would have been blown to pieces, and both she and Darryl would have been immolated. Nonetheless, within hours after the bombing Oakland Police, operating on orders from the FBI, placed both activists under arrest for “transporting an explosive device.” The truth was something far grimmer.

Just after the bombing, as Bari was being wheeled into surgery, an Oakland Police officer asked Bari, “Who did this to you?”

Timber,” said Bari.

The following year, when a reporter asked Bari what she wanted the FBI to do about the bombing, she said, “Find the bomber and fire him.”

The activists and their attorneys would eventually come to believe that both answers were correct, a view widely shared in U.S. environmental and activist communities. Revered environmentalist David Brower, former executive director of the Sierra Club, said of the bombing, “We’ve seen, in the operation of our own government, all sorts of acts that make it almost impossible to believe our government. As they can fund death squads in El Salvador, they can fund death squads in the United States.”

The first FBI agent to show up at the bomb scene was Special Agent Timothy McKinley. He’d arrived less than twenty minutes after the bomb detonated. Later, in a report, McKinley wrote that the next FBI officer on the scene had told him, “Judy Beri [sic] and Darryl Cherney are the subjects of an FBI investigation in the terrorist field.” This agent was Frank Doyle, a bomb expert with the FBI. Later court testimony revealed that exactly one month before the Oakland bombing—on the same day that we were trying to banner the Golden Gate Bridge—Doyle “had run what he called ‘bomb school’ anti-terrorism courses on Louisiana-Pacific land” in Humboldt County, reported The Los Angeles Times. At the time, Louisiana-Pacific was one of the world’s largest timber companies. In the United States, the company faced no louder nor more effective foe than Judi Bari. Bari didn’t just lead demonstrations against the firm’s liquidation logging of 300,000 acres of second-growth redwood in Mendocino County. She also organized labor. Judi Bari was a double threat.

Doyle arrived on scene shortly after McKinley and immediately took charge. Later he told the court he just happened to be “driving around the East Bay” in his Suburban. Special Agent John Conway showed up next, followed by a dozen other agents from what the FBI called its Terrorist Squad. Later Bari quipped that the FBI had arrived so quickly, it was as if agents had been “standing around the corner with their fingers in their ears.”

During a briefing on the evening of the bombing, FBI agent John Reikes told Oakland Police officers that he was “in charge of the FBI terrorist investigation unit and that these people [Bari and Cherney] in fact qualified as terrorists, and that there was an FBI investigation going on other incidents where these individuals were suspects,” Oakland Police sergeant Michael Sitterud later declared in a sworn deposition. At the time of the bombing, Reikes was in a meeting with Soviet security agents to formulate a safety plan for an upcoming visit to the U.S. by Mikhail Gorbachev, then the president of an unraveling Soviet Union. Yet, when the call came, Reikes left the important meeting. At the bomb site, he told the assembled cops and G-men that Bari and Cherney had been headed to Santa Cruz County to bomb the Moss Landing power plant and that the pair were “known terrorists.” In court, both statements would be revealed as false.

The FBI moved with remarkable speed to link Bari and Cherney with the bomb. Later the activists’ lawyer, famed civil rights attorney Dennis Cunningham, said, “They cooked [an affidavit] up and presented it to a judge at 2:00 in the morning, got a search warrant, searched the homes of Darryl and Judi overnight. The next day, the news was there. It was all on the news. They took several of [Judi and Darryl’s] friends into custody, and then they went ahead with this case.”

FBI agents traveled by helicopter two hundred miles to Bari’s and Cherney’s homes. The FBI didn’t just search Bari’s house; they tore it apart and terrorized her young children, who were there with Bari’s ex-husband. They confiscated hundreds of common household items—a red marker, duct tape, Elmer’s glue—that they said were bomb-making materials. Agents ripped apart windowsills in search of nails, which they would later claim matched those that were strapped to the bomb. It was a transparent fabrication, but from coast to coast the press covered the “discovery” as fact. Even after the FBI’s own top crime lab analyst, David R. Williams, based in Washington, D.C., examined the nails and determined that they were nowhere near a match—nor could they possibly be, since nails are produced in batches of many millions—the FBI insisted that indeed they were. In his affidavit, Sitterud, the Oakland Police sergeant, even reported that Williams had told him that the “‘bomb fragmentation nails’ and the two identical nails from the box in Ms. Bari’s residence were manufactured by the same machine within a batch of two hundred to one thousand nails.” In a later deposition, Williams testified that he had said no such thing.

Blaming the Victim


The pipe bomb had clearly been placed under Bari’s seat, where police and paramedics found a gaping two-foot-by-four-foot hole. Later a paramedic would testify that he had actually stood in the hole under the driver’s seat to extract Bari from the car. Yet, within an hour of the bombing and forever afterward, the FBI and the Oakland Police would insist that the bomb had been on the floor of the backseat, no matter that the backseat was virtually undamaged. Therefore, they said, Judi and Darryl must have seen the device and were “knowingly carrying their own bomb.”

Yet Bari’s legal team would eventually obtain photos of the bombed-out car taken by Michelle Gribi of the Oakland Police, who was the first police officer on scene. In her report, Gribi writes that she “took photos showing the damage under the driver’s seat.” The photos clearly show a gaping hole directly under the driver’s seat and an intact backseat.

“They released to us these incredible photos that absolutely, without a doubt, show that the FBI and the Oakland Police lied and they knew they were lying,” Bari said at the time. “Any idiot would have known that the bomb was under the front seat and meant to kill… My observation of these photos is that the evidence was unambiguous, and so the arrest, based on the claim that they thought the bomb was in the backseat, must have been deliberate rather than a mistake.”

Falsified Evidence

In 1999, investigative reporter Nicholas Wilson published a retrospective article on the bombing of Judi Bari in the Albion Monitor, based in Mendocino County. Wilson was one of the few reporters to follow the bombing story in real time and throughout the 1990s. By 1999 Wilson had access to troves of material made public through Bari’s and Cherney’s lawsuit.

Wilson wrote, “There is evidence… from the FBI’s own files, that agents falsified evidence against Bari and Cherney, suppressed exonerating evidence, and conspired with Oakland [Police] to try to frame them…There is…good reason to believe the FBI was actively (or passively) involved in the bombing.”

Wilson continued, “Within an hour of the Oakland explosion, none other than Special Agent Doyle, the bomb school instructor, was taking charge of the bomb scene investigation. Since he was the FBI’s top Bay Area bomb expert, the other FBI and Oakland bomb investigators first at the scene, some of whom had been his students, deferred to his assertions about the evidence.

“It was Doyle who allegedly overruled the Oakland sergeant on the scene who said the bomb was under the driver’s seat and that he could see the pavement under the car through the hole in the seat. It was Doyle who falsely said the bomb was on the floor behind the driver’s seat where it would have been easily seen. It was also Doyle who falsely claimed that two bags of nails found in the back of Judi’s car matched nails taped to the bomb for shrapnel effect, when in fact they were not even the same type, and were clearly different to the naked eye.

“Other officers on the scene testified that Doyle argued with them, and quoted him saying, “I’ve been looking at bomb scenes for 20 years, and I’m looking at this one, and I’m telling you you can rely on it. This bomb was visible to the people who loaded the back seat of this car.”

“Was it an honest mistake? Not likely, the judge ruled in denying Doyle immunity from the lawsuit. Dennis Cunningham argued in a court brief, ‘In sum, there was no way such an experienced bomb technician as Frank Doyle… or the other investigators—or Ray Charles or Stevie Wonder—would not have known that the bomb was under the seat when it blew up.’”

Cunningham went on to argue that “the investigation that [the FBI] conducted was in fact really a sham. There was not a serious or good faith attempt to solve the bombing either… And within the cover of that… they did a lot of work investigating Earth First.”

No matter the evidence, FBI and Oakland Police fed state and national media with streams of fabrications to further discredit Earth First! and convict Bari and Cherney in the press. In 1990 the FBI’s media outreach about the bombing was so regular and ubiquitous that in July, when Earth First! activist Mickey Dulas arrived in New York to appear on the Donahue daytime TV show, her cab driver, learning that she was there to represent Bari and Cherney, said, “You mean the people who bombed themselves?”

On July 17, 1990, Alameda County assistant district attorney Chris Carpenter announced that his office would not prosecute Bari and Cherney due to lack of evidence. By then, most people in possession of even a cursory understanding of American politics—and everyone who knew Bari and Cherney—understood that the case against the pair had been made up.

“The D.A. didn’t want to go down with the ship that the FBI and the Oakland Police were sinking in,” Cherney told the press after the district attorney’s announcement. He added, “There’s little joy in vindication when there’s still a mad bomber on the loose.”

“I don’t intend to be run out of town,” said Bari. “I don’t intend to shut up.” Now, she said, “We’re going to sue their asses.”

Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney filed their lawsuit against the FBI on Tuesday, May 21, 1991. Three days later, on the first anniversary of the bombing, Bari addressed two hundred supporters gathered outside the federal building in San Francisco. In her trenchant fashion, Bari laid out the basis of her suit.

“I was targeted for assassination by the timber corporations, backed by the full power of the police state,” said Bari. “No serious investigation has taken place. I’ve been blamed for the crime like a rape victim.”

Disrupt and Destroy

In addition to highlighting the FBI’s history of repression, the Bari-Cherney lawsuit would expose the Oakland Police Department’s long collaboration with the FBI to disrupt and destroy political movements. In a deposition, Kevin Griswold, the “intelligence division” chief of the Oakland Police Department, admitted that his office had monitored Earth First! activities since 1984, including through the efforts of at least one informant who had infiltrated West Coast Earth First! groups. He noted that his department kept files on more than three hundred political groups and individuals throughout the San Francisco Bay Area.

In a 1997 brief, Dennis Cunningham told the court, “What can be found… is overwhelming evidence that the FBI engaged in a plot to ‘neutralize’ Earth First! by fomenting the arrest of Judi and Darryl, after they were bombed, by willing co-conspirators in the Oakland Police Department. Both groups lied about the evidence in order to smear Judi and Darryl in the headlines, then lied again and again to keep the sensational case going, when it was clear there was no evidence to connect the two to the bombing in any way. And they’re lying now to cover-up the lies they told in 1990 & 1991… [T]he major lying and political foul play by the FBI which occurred in this case qualify it as a major scandal in its own right. A Special Prosecutor should be appointed to look into the lying and falsifying that has occurred, and is still going on.”

There would be no such special prosecutor. But after 11 years and many attempts by the FBI to quash the suit, the case would go to court. Plaintiffs’ attorneys in the suit—Dennis Cunningham, Tony Serra, William Simpich, and Robert Bloom, joined by William Goodman and Michael Deutsch at the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, with important organizational assistance from Judi’s friend Alicia Bales—emphasized that the bombing of Bari and Cherney was not an isolated case but a symptom and manifestation of an internal U.S. government program of repression that had existed throughout the twentieth century.

“As plaintiffs have constantly tried to get the Court to see, and accept, the gravamen of their case is that defendants’ plot against them, the unconscionable and illegal acts and omissions by defendants, and the blatant lies told and now to be told again in furtherance of it, was born of the unholy, anti-constitutional mission of political repression set for the FBI by J. Edgar Hoover, maintained by his successors, and carried on by various chains of command and legions of field agents throughout its history,” the attorneys wrote on page two of the Bari trial brief, filed on April 8, 2002. “The essence of the conspirators’ secret efforts to smear Earth First!, and ‘otherwise neutralize’ plaintiffs and Redwood Summer, was to manipulate the investigation of the Oakland bombing in such a way as to generate sensational news stories, proclaiming that these environmental activists had been engaged in an effort to carry out a terrorist attack of some sort.”

Leading up to the trial, plaintiffs’ attorneys conducted more than 50 depositions of FBI agents, Oakland Police officers, activists, and others. The FBI and Oakland Police conducted no depositions, an astonishing dereliction that mirrored the agency’s refusal, to this day, to carry out an actual investigation. During the two-month trial, which ran from April into June 2002, plaintiffs called 41 witnesses. The defendants called none.

The FBI went so far as to attempt to disallow Judi Bari from providing her own deposition in her own case. In 1996 Bari was diagnosed with breast cancer, which had spread to her liver. Rather than undergo chemotherapy treatments that were unlikely to work and would further debilitate her and disallow pursuit of the lawsuit, Bari set herself to organizing into a set of binders a complete record of more than fourteen thousand pages of documents and three hundred photos for the legal team to utilize in her absence. The team would also need Bari’s testimony, which she was unlikely to be alive to provide. When Bari’s attorneys asked that she be allowed to give her deposition, Justice Department attorney Joseph Sher managed to block the action for more than a month, accusing Bari of “faking cancer.”

The court finally allowed Bari to give her deposition on January 30 and 31, 1997, providing testimony while reclining on a couch. Attorneys for the FBI and Oakland Police asked not a single question. Judi Bari died on March 2, 1997. Her estate and Darryl Cherney continued to prosecute their case, which would expose a “sham investigation, bogus investigation of the bombing,” which was but one element of “an intelligence gathering operation… political spying operation about the Earth First movement and about the environmental movement in Northern California,” Dennis Cunningham said in his opening remarks during Bari and Cherney’s trial against the FBI and Oakland Police, in 2002. “The mechanism of this was in classic terms a frame-up, a frame-up that was concocted by the FBI and Oakland Police.”

Cunningham said that, whereas the Oakland Police were willing participants in a fabricated effort to harm Bari and Cherney, “Particulars of the frame-up were pretty much all—not all, but mostly generated by the FBI agents.” He continued, “The FBI had a major role. They took possession of all the evidence. They were really the driving force behind the case [which was] instigated by the FBI because of a preexisting desire to harm Earth First in the First Amendment context, harm this group to disrupt its work . . . to smear the group in the public mind, and this was a golden opportunity for that and the people in the car who had been bombed to be represented as bombers. And the headlines could reflect that fact, and the world would be told that Earth First had bombers in it and these environmentalists were dangerous and had to be feared. . . . [W]hen the FBI came on the scene . . . the FBI agents there spoke to the [Oakland] police officers . . . Sergeant [Michael] Sitterud in particular, [and said] that the FBI was familiar with these people already as terrorist suspects, as people who in his words, the kind of people who would be carrying a bomb. And that was told to the police officers within the first hour after the explosion. But you’ll see that the Oakland officers in no sense were duped. … [T]hey were willing coparticipants. They jumped right in. They thought it was a fine idea, and they made their own contributions. And they took on the burden of making the arrests themselves, and putting the case into their system instead of the federal system so that they were operating at the front for the case, for the false case, and the FBI was in the background.”

Are Environmentalists Using Native Americans, and Does It Matter?

On June 11, 2002, the federal jury agreed. They found six of the seven FBI and Oakland Police defendants liable for violating Bari’s and Cherney’s First Amendment right of free speech and for violating the Fourth Amendment through false arrest and illegal search and seizure. A predominantly conservative jury awarded Bari’s estate and Darryl Cherney $4.4 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Darryl Cherney told the press, “The American public needs to understand that the FBI can’t be trusted. Ten jurors got a good, hard look at the FBI, and they didn’t like what they saw.”

In 2017, the Environmental Protection Information Center posthumously honored Judi Bari with its annual Sempervirens Lifetime Achievement Award. Several people spoke in her honor, sang environmental songs, and gathered with three hundred revelers at the Mateel Community Center in Redway, Southern Humboldt County. One of the speakers was Dennis Cunningham.

Cunningham was well known for representing prisoners who had been involved in the 1971 riot at Attica State Prison in New York, which left 43 people dead after guards opened fire on prisoners and hostages alike. He was also a leading attorney in the lawsuit that exposed the FBI–Chicago Police conspiracy to assassinate Black Panther leader Fred Hampton, a case Cunningham pursued for 13 years. In 1983, plaintiffs won a $1.8 million settlement in the suit, the largest damage result against the FBI until the Bari case. Cunningham and attorney Mark Harris also represented plaintiffs in the pepper spray lawsuit against the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Department. He arrived at the Mateel a folk hero.

On stage, Cunningham honored Judi Bari’s acumen and courage. But he also said something that, because it came from the lead attorney in the case, surprised me. Cunningham said, without equivocation, that he believed the FBI must have been directly involved in planting the pipe bomb in Bari’s car. Cunningham told an attentive crowd, “Judi was someone, as events proved, who was dangerous to the state. She was like some of the Panthers and some of the other organizers who were really special targets of the FBI in the sixties and seventies that had something that they could recognize was powerful, that she could generate herself out of her own personality, her own experience, her own understanding of the politics that she was involved in. It was only because she holds that kind of danger that they took the risk of striking at her the way they did. I don’t think after the case that we were ever in too much doubt that they [the FBI] were in on the bombing before it happened. It was the only way to explain how they dealt with it and how they managed to persuade the Oakland cops to arrest her immediately, and how they were able then to put out all the poison in the press and to generate this sense that Earth First! was a closet terrorist group, and it worked for them. It worked for the people that they were working with, which was timber, and it worked in the sense of defeating the Forests Forever initiative, which clearly was gonna win and then clearly lost because it was possible for the timber industry to associate it with the bombing. It took a lot of years—I mean, that bombing happened in 1990, the trial took place in 2002. And then, only then, was it possible to establish that that was all a lie, that the whole case against Judi and Darryl was a lie. Judi and Darryl worked all those years and kept that movement alive to fight back against that terrific and horrendous strike at her, at them, that the bombing represented.”



Excerpted from The Ghost Forest: Racists, Radicals, and Real Estate in the California Redwoods by Greg King. Copyright © 2023. Available from PublicAffairs, an imprint of Hachette Book Group, Inc.
Biden will announce $600 million in climate investments during California trip


U.S. President Joe Biden speaks about administration plans to confront climate change at the White House ceremony in Washington

Reuters
Sun, June 18, 2023 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden will visit Palo Alto, California on Monday and announce over $600 million in climate investments to help coastal communities around the country fight climate change, a White House official said on Sunday.

The investments will be funded by Biden's climate and infrastructure bills and will include a $575 million project to fight rising sea levels, storm surge and tidal hurricanes, said the official, who did not wish to be named.

It will also include a $67 million investment for California to modernize its electric grid to reduce the impact of extreme weather events such as wildfires.

Biden signed a $430 billion bill last August that was touted as the biggest climate package in U.S. history.

The president's trip to California will also see him raise campaign cash from tech and climate donors as he races to raise over a billion dollars for his re-election fight.

(Reporting by Nandita Bose in Washington; editing by Diane Craft)
Their parents made China the world's factory. Can the kids save the family business?





Duck egg products factory in Ruichang

Sun, June 18, 2023
By David Kirton

RUICHANG, China (Reuters) - When Steven Du took over his parents' factory producing temperature control systems in Shanghai, one of the first changes he made was to turn on the plant's heating in winter - something his frugal forebears were reluctant to do.

"If you don't improve their environment, the workers aren't as happy and it's harder for them to do their best work," the 29-year-old said. "The change is worth the extra cost."

Du, like tens of thousands of other young Chinese factory bosses, is inheriting a basic manufacturing business that can no longer rely on the labour-intensive model that made China the world's largest exporter of goods.

A shrinking and ageing workforce and competition from Southeast Asia, India and elsewhere are making at least a third of China's industrial base - the low-end manufacturers - obsolete, Chinese academics say.

This do-or-die mission of tech upgrades and practical changes largely falls on a group of people in their 20s and 30s known as "chang er dai", or "the second factory generation", a play on the derogative term for spoilt, rich children, "fu er dai".

"If I'm chang er dai, I'm trying to save my family business from bankruptcy," said Zhang Zhipeng, a research assistant at the Shenzhen Research Institute of High-Quality Development and New Structure, who estimates roughly 45,000 to 100,000 of this cohort are at various stages of taking over up to one-third of private Chinese manufacturing firms.

The large-scale generational transition, which comes as China's growth prospects dim, is the first in the country's private sector since the chang er dai's parents emerged as industrialists in the decades after Mao Zedong's death in 1976.

Reuters interviewed eight chang er dai for this report, who described their attempts to bring family businesses into the modern era with efficiency upgrades while facing challenges such as labour costs, shortages of workers and, in some cases, disagreements with relatives on the best way forward.

Du spoke on the condition that his business not be named to protect the privacy of his semi-retired parents, whom he said were in their 50s and largely leave factory affairs to him.

Like his peers, Du grew up with a level of comfort and opportunities his parents never dreamed of.

He went to high school and university in New Zealand, specialising in electrical engineering. He moved to the United States, working at Apple supplier Foxconn's Wisconsin facilities. He studied Taiwanese and Japanese production methods, focused on reducing inefficiencies.

Those skills would come in handy in a factory the Chinese state set up in 1951 and privatised in 2002.

His father's business acumen and his mother's hard work helped turn the factory into a supplier to large Chinese appliance firms. It also sells components used in temperature-control systems for shopping malls, computer rooms, battery cooling, and medical equipment.

But production processes remained largely unchanged until Du took over in 2019. He introduced specialised industrial software that cuts across accounting, orders, procurements, deliveries, and other processes previously handled by humans, Du said.

He remodelled the factory floor to allow forklifts to drive around easily, grouping storage and production units differently to minimise physical effort for a workforce whose average age is around 50. A worker now walks 300 metres to complete the more complex tasks, down from one kilometre, and needs less than a third of the time to do it.

While his mother spent long hours micromanaging production, Du ends most days around 4 p.m. in a gym he set up inside the factory, and allows workers to use, before driving home.

"Young people like to be lazier, but laziness is actually a manifestation of progress," he said.

Du raised wages by 10-20% in the past three years, to keep staff turnover under 5%, but says his factory is 50% more efficient.

"Factories need to transition to higher-end manufacturing or are doomed to fail, because their costs are rising," said Zhang, the researcher.

A 'MOTHER'S SON'


Zhang Zeqing estimates he achieved a similar efficiency boost by digitalising processes since he began co-managing with his parents their egg-products factory in Ruichang, a southeastern city.

At Ruichang City Yixiang Agricultural Products, workers in green uniforms place duck eggs into cups attached to a conveyor belt that feeds a vacuum-packing machine. A new screen above the machine displays the speed at which the eggs are sealed and estimates average output per worker, as well as the time and manpower needed to pack 10,000 eggs.

Barcodes track all products from farm to factory to store, allowing supervisors to monitor orders, production and delivery on their phones and make decisions based on real-time data.

"Before, we'd record all this by hand on paper," said the 30-year-old. "All of the internal data was muddled. It led to a lot of wastage."

Like five of the other chang er dai who spoke to Reuters, Zhang never planned to take over the factory. He wanted to study landscape design in France.

But he felt he had to step in, at least for a few years, and convince his now 55-year-old parents that tech upgrades, and setting up new distribution channels on e-commerce platforms, were worth investing in.

Something had to be done, he thought, as "the frontline employees are getting older and young people are less willing to work on the frontline". China has record rates of jobless youth but many of them have university degrees and prefer not to work in factories, even if they take a job below their education level.

Zhang's parents resisted at first, unwilling to spend money on a business they thought was doing fine. But they relented, eventually.

Sales have risen 35% annually since he came on board.

"I sometimes wonder why our e-commerce was successful when others failed. A manager at a company told me that because you are your mother's son, she will support you infinitely, that is, even if you fail," Zhang said.

'TOO CHALLENGING'


To be sure, China as a whole is upgrading its industrial complex in more significant ways than the changes implemented by young factory managers like Du and Zhang.

Some segments, such as the heavily robotised electric vehicle industry, are disrupting global markets thanks to state subsidies, as well as foreign capital and know-how.

Chang er dai, however, help lift the bottom, which is also important for preserving China's share of world manufacturing, two industry experts told Reuters.

Some of the technology Zhang introduced came from Black Lake Technologies, a company founded by Zhou Yuxiang, who counts more than 1,000 chang er dai among his clients.

"For the past decades, the model of many Chinese factories was based on revenue growth, so very few of them paid attention to production efficiency or digitalisation," said the 34-year-old, who also sees himself as chang er dai, though he is not managing his parents' business.

"They manage their operations typically through stacks of paper. More advanced factories might use Excel, but that's it."

Tian Weihua, an academic specialising in manufacturing upgrades at the Science and Technology Innovation Research Institute, a government think-tank, says the tech savvy and foreign experience of chang er dai give them a better chance than their parents to keep businesses competitive in a new environment of higher costs, weaker external demand and emerging manufacturing centres in cheaper, less developed countries.

But "technological upgrading doesn't cure all ills", said Tian, adding that further steps will be needed, including on product innovation.

Not all chang er dai will get there.

After studying textile design at the University of Arts in London, Zhang Ying, 29, took over her family's garment factory in the eastern city of Ningbo in 2017.

But the business was struggling. Wages had more than doubled within a decade, to over 7,000 yuan a month. Workers, mostly migrants from inland provinces, were in short supply. She wouldn't dare fire them.

Last year, she took time off to have a child and left other managers in charge. She has no intention to return.

"It was too challenging: the pressure was too sudden and great. I was getting hives from the stress and needed to be on medication for a year, so I quit," she said.

(Reporting by David Kirton; Editing by Marius Zaharia and David Crawshaw)
No One Ever Made the Case for Reparations Better Than Reagan

Nicolaus Mills
Sat, June 17, 2023

Photo by Wally McNamee/CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images

Today, as Californians consider a reparations package that could reach $800 billion to pay for the harm the state has done to its African-American population on matters ranging from over-policing to housing discrimination, there’s a pro-reparations argument that needs to be revived. It’s that made by Ronald Reagan 35 years ago.

With California’s Task Force to Study and Develop Reparations Proposals for African Americans getting ready to submit a draft of its report to the state legislature by late June, Reagan’s argument has become more relevant than ever. “For here we right a wrong,” Reagan declared in 1988, as his second term as president was nearing its end. Reagan spoke these words to mark his signing of a bill designed to provide restitution for the World War II internment of Americans of Japanese ancestry.

At a time when those making the case for reparations are accused of being woke, we forget the heartfelt case for payments combining restitution and reparations that Reagan made without fearing he would lose his credentials as a political conservative.

How Japanese Americans Survived Internment in WW2

The decision to remove Japanese Americans from their homes during World War II reflected long standing anti-Asian prejudices. The Roosevelt administration contended that Japanese Americans posed a danger to the country in case of a Japanese attack on America’s West Coast. But there was no comparable treatment of German Americans or Italian Americans despite the United States also being at war with Germany and Italy.

Reagan’s speech is one that few want to recall because of the racism it calls attention to, but the speech is a lesson in how to deal with history we would like to have back. At the speech’s core lies Reagan’s belief that, while we cannot undo the wrongs of the past, we can mitigate their continuing impact.

In his address to the nation in 1988, Reagan managed to apologize for government wrongdoing and argue that his apology left America stronger. “So what is most important in this bill has less to do with property than with honor,” Reagan declared. “We reaffirm our commitment as a nation to equal justice under the law.”

The timing of Reagan’s speech is noteworthy. It came decades before the Supreme Court in 2018 explicitly repudiated the Roosevelt-era Supreme Court’s 1944 Korematsu decision sanctioning the wartime internment of Japanese Americans. In words that echo Reagan’s, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. described Korematsu as “morally repugnant” and “gravely wrong the day it was decided.”

Prior to 2018 the strongest legal dissent from the Korematsu decision was the “confession of error” that the Justice Department issued in 2011 when it acknowledged the misleading role the Solicitor General had played in 1944 in defending the internment of Japanese Americans.

Reagan began his 1988 speech by describing the cruelty of the internment that the government was now seeking to redress. He spoke of thousands of Americans of Japanese ancestry being removed from their homes and placed in makeshift internment camps solely because of their race.

The rush to internment began on February 19, 1942, 73 days after the United States entered World War II when President Franklin Roosevelt issued Order 9066. The order came with so little planning that for a time Japanese-American families were interned in the horse stables at Santa Anita race track. In his address Reagan believed it was important not to sugarcoat the emotional and economic impact of internment.

The redress for Japanese Americans interned during World War II has meant tax-free payments of $20,000 to more than 82,000 claimants as a result of the 1988 act. The total amounts to over $1.6 billion.

Reagan was not put off by the cost of restitution, which in fact falls short of the amount of money lost by the men and women interned in the 1940s when put in current dollars. At the heart of Reagan’s speech was his belief that “no payment can make up for those lost years.”

Thirteen years after Ronald Reagan’s White House speech, the National Japanese-American Memorial to Patriotism During World War II opened in Washington on June 29, 2001. Unlike the memorials on the National Mall, the National Japanese-American Memorial does not immediately draw attention to itself. The memorial sits just north of the Capitol on a small triangle of land at the intersection of New Jersey Avenue and D Street.

The 33,000 square-foot park and plaza that hold the memorial invite contemplation. Designed by Washington, D.C. architect Davis Buckley, the memorial, like Reagan’s speech, makes a point of being direct and elegiac about the injustices it addresses. On one of its walls are the names of the 10 internment camps where Japanese Americans were held during World War II, and at the center of the memorial is a bronze sculpture, “The Golden Cranes,” by Nina Akamu, whose grandfather died in an internment camp. Her sculpture consists of two cranes struggling to break free of the barbed wire that entangles them.

Ronald Reagan was not able to attend the opening of the Japanese-American Memorial, but he is present there. Words from his 1988 speech are inscribed on the edge of the memorial pool.

Reagan concluded his speech by recalling the time he attended a 1945 medal ceremony in Orange County, California, at which World War II General Joe Stillwell honored a Japanese-American military hero of the war in Europe with a posthumous Distinguished Service Cross. Reagan’s role at the 1945 medal ceremony, like that of the other celebrities there, was a minor one, but decades later, he saw his presence at the ceremony worth addressing.

In doing so, Reagan was not just personalizing his speech. He was making clear a lesson in continuity that is easy to forget: the burden of righting a historic wrong sanctioned by the government does not simply fall on those responsible for the wrong at the time it was committed. It falls on a state or nation owning up to its past.

Nicolaus Mills is author of Like a Holy Crusade: Mississippi 1964—The Turning of the Civil Rights Movement in America. He is professor of American studies at Sarah Lawrence College.
 The Daily Beast.
US authorities seize shipment of swim bladders from endangered fish valued at $2.7 million


US Customs and Border Protection

Ashley R. Williams
Sun, June 18, 2023 

US Customs and Border Protection officers in Arizona have seized 242 pounds of swim bladders – the organ that helps fish control their buoyancy – that came from the endangered Totoaba fish, authorities said.

Officers working at the Nogales Port of Entry in Santa Cruz County discovered the organs hidden inside a commercial shipment of frozen fish fillets, CBP announced.

The swim bladders discovered on April 13 were valued at an estimated $2.7 million, according to a news release.

The US Fish and Wildlife Service conducted preliminary DNA testing that revealed the bladders belonged to the Totoaba macdonaldi species native to Mexico’s Gulf of California. The agency took possession of the bladders and is investigating the smuggling attempt with Homeland Security Investigations.

Authorities said the seizure is likely the second largest of its kind in the US and the largest Totoaba seizure in Arizona.

Totoaba fish, whose swim bladders are considered an Asian cultural delicacy and are used in traditional Chinese medicine, are protected by the Endangered Species Act, according to CBP. The species has been listed as endangered since 1979.

Illegal fishing, habitat destruction and unintentional catches have contributed to the Totoaba fish’s decline, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

It’s illegal to sell, take, transport or possess the federally protected species in the US and Mexico, CBP said in the release.

Time to Seek Justice–Not Hand Out the Nobel Prize–for Economic Crimes


 
JUNE 16, 2023

 JUNE 16, 2023




Photo by Clay Banks

Amnesty International Philippines named FPIF commentator Walden Bello “Most Distinguished Defender of Human Rights” for 2023.  This is his acceptance speech.

I would like to thank Amnesty International for this honor of naming me the Most Distinguished Human Rights Defender for 2023. Let me say that while I have long been active in the protection of the right to life, the right to be free from persecution, and the right to due process, I would like to believe that the panel of judges are also making a statement about my long-time engagement with economic rights.

Most of my life’s work has been devoted to intellectually and politically demolishing the ideology and policies of neoliberalism that have wreaked so much havoc not only among our people but in countries throughout world.  The destruction of our manufacturing and the devastation of our agriculture has led to so much poverty and inequality and sheer misery, leaving so many of our youth with no other choice but to abandon our ruined country.

To borrow the distinction made by the philosopher Isaiah Berlin, there are negative rights, such as the right not to be tortured, and positive rights, or those that contribute to our full development as human beings.  Human rights campaigns have traditionally focused on negative rights–that is, the protection of people from repression and persecution. I believe that it is time we also campaign against individuals and institutions that violate the people’s positive rights. Neoliberal policies such as those that have been imposed by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, institutionalized in the Philippine political economy, and rationalized by a succession of economic managers and economists have created massive poverty and inequality that have prevented millions of our fellow Filipinos over the last five decades from their full development as human beings because they have destroyed, disarticulated, and disintegrated the country’s base of physical survival, that is, the economy. That is a crime.

Neoliberal policies are now discredited. The Washington Consensus is in the junk heap. No self-respecting economic manager, except perhaps in the Philippines, any longer invokes the “magic of the market” or the so-called benefits of free trade. Yet in so many countries, and not just in the Philippines, neoliberal policies continue to be the default mode, like the proverbial dead hand of the engineer on the throttle of a speeding train. They continue to inflict severe damage on the life chances of billions of people because they have been institutionalized.

Those who have been responsible for destroying economies cannot be allowed to just walk away from the wreckage, just as that monster, former President Rodrigo Duterte, cannot be allowed to just get away with spilling the blood of 27,000 Filipinos. The bureaucrats and technocrats of the IMF and World Bank, their local accomplices particularly in the Department of Finance and National Economic Development Authority, as well as the ideologues of neoliberalism that have spread the false gospel from their perches in such institutions as the University of Chicago and the University of the Philippines School of Economics must also be brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Duterte’s hands are bloody, but so are the hands of these white-collar criminals very dirty. Like those bombing crews that drop their lethal payloads from 27,000 feet or the remote controller that directs a drone to destroy a wedding party in Pakistan from thousands of miles away in Nevada, USA, these people are not exempted from guilt owing to their distance from the sites of death, destruction, harrowing poverty, and misery.

It is high time we seek justice for economic crimes. It is high time we cease honoring such criminals with Nobel Prizes in Economics but bring them instead to the ICC. If the arraignment of such economic criminals cannot immediately be done owing to the need to amend the Rome statute, then let us at least establish a “Hall of Infamy” where we can enshrine such dead and living stars of neoliberalism as the Nobel Prize laureate Milton Friedman, the ideological soulmate of the General Augusto Pinochet; Michel Camdessus and Christine Legarde, the best known faces of IMF-imposed austerity; former World Bank President Robert McNamara, who conspired with the dictator Marcos to make the Philippines one of the guinea pigs of structural adjustment; and Pascal Lamy and Mike Moore, who spearheaded the drive to imprison the global South in the iron cage of free trade, the World Trade Organization.

I would also push for the inclusion in such a Hall of Infamy Filipino luminaries of technocratic neoliberalism, the people who worked with international technocrats to condemn us to permanent debt slavery, destroy our manufacturing, and bring our agriculture to a terminal state. Here I would include the economic managers and economists Jesus Estanislao, Gerry Sicat, Cesar Virata, Bernie Villegas, and Carlos Dominguez.

And, of course, one must not forget Cielito Habito, who as National Economic Development Authority chief almost singlehandedly wiped out Philippine manufacturing with his push to bring down average tariffs to 4-6 percent simply to prove that Filipinos could take economic pain better than Pinochet’s Chicago Boys in Chile, who did not allow tariffs to go below 11 percent. Nor must we overlook the WTO-USAID mercenary Ramon Clarete, who famously sought to sugarcoat the impending murder of our agricultural sector by claiming that Philippines’ joining the WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture would result in 500,000 new jobs every year in the countryside!

But some people might object: Habito and Clarete are such mild-mannered individuals to deserve being tagged as economic criminals. So was the Nazi Adolf Eichmann, whom Hannah Arendt famously described as representing “the banality of evil.” Others might say, well they were wrong, but were they not well intentioned? This excuse does not even deserve an answer since the dictator Ferdinand Marcos, Sr, and Duterte also saw themselves as well-intentioned as they went about their grisly business. The road to hell, one must repeat again and again, is paved with good intentions.

Being tried at the ICC or honored with membership at the Hall of Infamy would be a lesson to all that bad ideas and bad policies have consequences, often devastating ones—that you cannot play academic and policy games with the lives of millions of people.

Let me end by demanding the release of my fellow Ignite awardee Senator Leila de Lima, packing off Duterte to the ICC jail in The Hague, an end to impunity, and the dismantling of all those neoliberal policies that have destroyed our economy and brought so much misery to our people.  And, again, thank you Amnesty.

Walden Bello, a columnist for Foreign Policy in Focus,  is the author or co-author of 19 books, the latest of which are Capitalism’s Last Stand? (London: Zed, 2013) and State of Fragmentation: the Philippines in Transition (Quezon City: Focus on the Global South and FES, 2014).

Replacing the capitalist dream of AI-driven profits

When asked to share alternatives to capitalism, ChatGPT offered many options, none of which rely on the fantasy that money hoarding at the top can eventually benefit the rest of us.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and how it’s going to change the world is a popular topic of conversation these days. There is concern that it will generate ever-more deceptive imagery that can upend people’s lives or create propaganda that can fuel mass fear. There’s the ultimate fear of human extinction from the increasingly sophisticated evolution of AI. These are valid worries.

This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Then there’s the seemingly more mundane threat that AI poses to employment. It is expressed in the form of countless stories that have some iteration of the headline: whichjobsareatmostriskofbeinglosttoAI?

Most analysts predict that AI will replace graphic designers, copywriters, customer service agents, and telemarketers. Some of the most dystopian of these listicles focus on teachers and psychologists being replaced by AI.

The stories are written with the intention of predicting the coming storm so that people can prepare themselves for the future. But the headlines are also intentionally designed as clickbait, likely fueling fear-based consumption of the stories by readers eager to find out if their own jobs are likely to be replaced by AI in the coming years. Indeed, I found several stories, like this one, where my own vocation of journalism was in the crosshairs of AI.

The framing of “Will AI replace your job?” obscures the bigger problem that has been at work for centuries: and that is how our jobs, and therefore our educations, careers, and livelihoods, are at the whims of a capitalist system intent on minimizing costs and maximizing profits.

Indeed, Mathias Doepfner, the CEO of the German media group that owns Politico, who warned that AI could replace journalism jobs, used Darwinian logic in saying, “Artificial intelligence has the potential to make independent journalism better than it ever was—or simply replace it,” and therefore, “Only those [publishing houses] who create the best original content will survive.”

And while critics of AI counter that it could never replace humans because of our innate creativity and curiosity, the point that often gets missed is that humans are the ones engaging in the great AI replacement of jobs—a small handful of humans. They hail from the rarified group of elites who sit in corporate board rooms and deliver presentations to shareholders about how they plan to maximize dividends by replacing humans with AI.

The question we should be asking isn’t whether AI can replace humans. It should be: why are some humans so intent on replacing the jobs that the rest of us hold, with AI? Even further, why do we live in a world where we lack so much control over our destinies in the first place?

AI, like other innovations that have automated jobs, is simply a tool that can make life easier. I can use a machine to wash my clothes and another one to wash my dishes instead of wasting my time with handwashing. Graphic designers already use software to digitally paint images instead of painting them by hand. If AI is a tool that can make certain jobs easier and free up our time for relaxation and leisure while we reap the same or greater compensation then so be it. But it ought not to be inevitable that corporate employers will cut our salaries or entirely replace our jobs with AI. That is a choice being made in a system that relies on profit motives rather than human well-being.

What we consider a vocation, big business treats as a cog in a giant wheel called “the labor market.” Dire predictions of AI “disruptions” to this market cast the entire trend as almost a natural phenomenon, whose trajectory is simply out of human hands.

But the reason that AI is booming is because it translates into a giant windfall for corporations. One economic prediction concludes that “the market for artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to show strong growth in the coming decade. Its value of nearly [$100 billion] is expected to grow twentyfold by 2030, up to nearly [$2 trillion].”

AI is big business, perhaps the biggest of them all. The dystopia it promises is a natural endpoint—of unregulated capitalism. If the “man behind the curtain” is eager to replace us, why can we not rip the curtain down and replace him?

So, I asked ChatGPT, the popular AI chatbot that is basically a smarter Google, the following question: “Does a capitalist economic model center human [well-being]?” The first sentence of a lengthy response was, “The capitalist economic model, in its purest form, does not explicitly center human well-being as its primary objective.”

ChatGPT proceeded to tell me that “Capitalism emphasizes individual economic freedom and the pursuit of self-interest, with the belief that this leads to overall economic growth and prosperity.”

“Belief” is the operative word here. It is a matter of faith that capitalism leads to prosperity for all. There is a religious fervor that was once popularly called “trickle-down economics,” underpinning a system where reality is at odds with the fantasy of capitalist wealth sharing.

When examining broad trends, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that wealth inequality in the U.S. grew significantly between 1979 and 2019. The CBO report, which is based on a nonpartisan analysis, concluded that “Increases in market income at the top of the distribution drove much of the rise in income inequality over that time.” In other words, the rich got richer because they hoarded more wealth.

It also found that “transfers increasingly lessened income inequality when transfer rates grew among households in the lowest quintile.” This technical language simply means that when people accessed government benefits their incomes increased. It’s like saying, “People benefitted when given benefits.”

There is no need for belief or faith in a system where the government is designed to directly help the people it represents. Belief and faith are required only to prop up the great lie that a capitalist economy helps everyone prosper. If we want people to prosper, we can make it so. There are many forms this can take: renewing the child tax credit, replacing private health care with a tax-funded Medicare for All system, increasing Social Security benefits, paying reparations to Black people, and even guaranteeing a basic income. None of them rely on faith. They help people because they are designed to help people.

I asked ChatGPT, “What sort of economic system can replace capitalism and ensure the [well-being] and prosperity of the vast majority of humans?” The machine spat out five different options ranging from socialism to a “resource-based” economy “where the allocation of resources is based on careful assessment and sustainable management of Earth’s resources.”

Even AI knows that there are alternatives to the current system that rules our lives. If capitalism can replace us, surely, we can replace capitalism?

Author Bio: Sonali Kolhatkar is an award-winning multimedia journalist. She is the founder, host, and executive producer of “Rising Up With Sonali,” a weekly television and radio show that airs on Free Speech TV and Pacifica stations. Her forthcoming book is Rising Up: The Power of Narrative in Pursuing Racial Justice (City Lights Books, 2023). She is a writing fellow for the Economy for All project at the Independent Media Institute and the racial justice and civil liberties editor at Yes! Magazine. She serves as the co-director of the nonprofit solidarity organization the Afghan Women’s Mission and is a co-author of Bleeding Afghanistan. She also sits on the board of directors of Justice Action Center, an immigrant rights organization.

Unabomber: Troubled Life of a CIA Mind Control Victim



 
JUNE 16, 2023
COUNTERPUNCH
Facebook

Photograph Source: Lord Jim – CC BY 2.0

He was once a mathematician, a boy who earned a full scholarship and gained admission to Harvard University. Throughout his higher education, he excelled academically and displayed a remarkable intellect. However, as time passed, he grew disillusioned with the detrimental impact that state and private institutions were inflicting upon society. This frustration led him to abandon his previous life and develop a deep-seated hatred for the destruction of society and natural resources caused by modern technologies. In his anguish, he turned to violence, becoming a lone wolf who terrorized the United States of America for approximately 17 years. Operating from his forest cabin in Montana, he managed to detonate around 16 mail bombs.

To halt his campaign of bombings, he orchestrated a plan that involved the New York Times and the Washington Post publishing his extensive essay titled “Industrial Society and Its Future,” consisting of thirty-five thousand words. The newspapers complied with his demand, and following the publication, the series of attacks ceased. However, his brother eventually reported him to the authorities, leading to his arrest and the conclusion of what became the FBI’s most expensive operation in history.

Recently, Theodore (Ted) Kaczynski, also known as the “Unabomber,” passed away in prison at the age of 81. US authorities ruled his death a suicide. Understanding the life of Kaczynski is significant, as it offers valuable insights into the intricate relationship between the open state, the deep state, and the public. He vehemently despised cowardly and opportunistic leftists. In addition to studying major social transformations throughout history, he fearlessly wrote about them, providing a unique perspective.

Kaczynski once noted, “If you claim that the French and Russian revolutions failed, you might face objections. Most revolutions have two objectives: the destruction of the old society and the establishment of a new social model envisioned by the revolutionaries. Fortunately, the French and Russian revolutionaries achieved the former but failed to create the new societies they dreamt of. They were highly successful in dismantling the old order, though. We should have no illusions about the possibility of constructing a new and ideal form of society. But many so-called revolutions solely aim to destroy the existing society.” Through numerous articles published under various anonymous names, he extensively analyzed a wide range of social, political, and economic issues.

It is an extraordinary occurrence for someone to enter Harvard at the age of 16, pursue a career as a mathematics professor, and then abruptly abandon everything to become a terrorist. Before delving further into Kaczynski’s life, it is crucial to consider the social and political landscape of the time he lived in and when he attended Harvard.

This period marked five years since the end of World War II. Nazi Germany had been defeated, and countries like Japan and Italy, former adversaries of the Western Alliance, began aligning themselves with Western nations. Meanwhile, the United States administration focused on a separate project: undermining the power of the Soviet Union led by Joseph Stalin. Stalin had supported the Allies during the war, aiding in Germany’s defeat and the conclusion of the global conflict, and now the US sought to establish unipolarity.

To achieve this complex objective, the United States targeted various segments of American society, initiating different sub-projects that later came to be known as the Cold War. It was crucial to experiment with the populace to fortify the state’s structure and maintain its position as the world’s superpower. The primary emphasis centered on manipulating people’s minds to fulfill the deep state’s objectives. Though these events might seem like elements from a work of fiction, they were conducted in the research laboratories of numerous institutions across the United States of America, incurring substantial costs.

Some of these projects were later declassified, although heavily censored, in documents released by the CIA for public access. One of the well-known programs was MK-Ultra, a research program conducted by the CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence, focusing on mind control and chemical manipulation. Through this project, the world was confronted with the disturbing reality of the US administration, which, despite its professed values of individual liberty, human dignity, and human rights, engaged in inhumane actions to maintain its power. The Deep State, the true enabler of the US administration, was revealed to be involved in these unethical activities. Tragically, some of America’s brightest college students became unwitting victims of these experiments, leading to severe consequences for their lives.

Established in the early 1950s with official government sponsorship, MK-Ultra continued until at least the late 1960s and involved the use of unsuspecting US citizens as test subjects. Ted Kennedy spoke to Congress in 1977 about this abhorrent research, stating, “According to information disclosed by the Deputy Director of the CIA, more than thirty institutions, including universities, were involved in this ‘extensive testing and experimentation’ program, which included members from all walks of life, representing both natives and foreigners. Secret drugs were administered and used for investigations.”

In a series of chilling experiments, human subjects were subjected to the administration of the potent psychoactive drug LSD, disregarding their well-being entirely. Dr. Frank Olson, a participant in these disturbing investigations, met a tragic fate, officially deemed a suicide by authorities. The Rockefeller Commission, tasked with examining related activities, acknowledged the death of an unidentified doctor but remained silent about Olson. Later disclosures revealed that Olson had been forcibly given LSD. President Ford extended a government apology to Olson’s family for this heartrending tragedy. The CIA admitted the illegal nature and scientific insignificance of much of the research conducted under Project MK-Ultra. Adding to the alarm, those overseeing these experiments lacked proper scientific qualifications. Disturbingly, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of a significant portion of information and evidence associated with the studies, hindering subsequent investigations. As a result, crucial information was lost in these inhumane experiments, leaving the Church and Rockefeller committees with insufficient evidence to formulate necessary conclusions and recommendations.

Notably, Harvard University was among the institutions implicated in these experiments carried out across over thirty government institutions and universities. Dr. Henry A. Murray, who had provided psychoanalysis on Adolf Hitler to the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), led the project at Harvard. In 1950, Murray spearheaded a three-year series of experiments involving a group of Harvard psychologists. The aim of the research, akin to other projects, was to clandestinely explore the use of drugs and other techniques to manipulate individual mental states and modify brain function. Unbeknownst to him, Ted Kaczynski was one of twenty-two Harvard undergraduate students subjected to these mind manipulation experiments.

While Kaczynski, who hailed from a Polish descent family that resettled in the United States, claimed during the trial that his mind was not affected by the research, many researchers who were investigated regarding these unethical secret experiments expressed differing opinions. Alston Chase, a Harvard University graduate who extensively studied and wrote the book “Harvard and the Unabomber: The Education of an American Terrorist,” concluded that Kaczynski and his classmates were unwitting victims of Murray’s unethical research methods. They were subjected to experiencing emotions such as sadness, sexual fantasies, lust for power, uncontrollable anger, and pain.

As a consequence of these experiments, individuals were inevitably susceptible to radicalization and violence. Therefore, accountability should not only rest on Murray and his team but also on the CIA, the sponsor of their inhumane and undemocratic research. It is undeniable that the organization’s crimes may have contributed to various mental disorders. Ted Kaczynski, later branded as a ‘domestic terrorist,’ stands as another unfortunate example of how the deep state has subverted the positive attributes and public duties of the legitimate state, exploiting them for its own agenda.

Whether Kaczynski could have employed different methods and strategies to convey his message is a separate argument. However, the facts he presented in his writings have gained increasing relevance over time. The most disconcerting reality lies in the unknown and incalculable impact that loners like Kaczynski, who spend years attempting to effect societal change through the dissemination of profound political ideas alongside acts of violence, leave behind upon their death. Is it possible to prevent the remnants of such individuals, who are perceived as “evil criminals” by society, from manifesting in different ways and sprouting in different individuals? This question raises profound concerns.

Nilantha Ilangamuwa is a Sri Lankan born author. He was the-editor of Sri Lanka Guardian, an online daily newspaper. He was also the editor of the Torture: Asian and Global Perspectives, bi-monthly print magazine, co-published by the Danish Institute Against Torture ( DIGNITY) based in Copenhagen, Denmark.

From Willie B. to Teddy K.: Double 5 x 5


 Facebook

(For William Butler Yeats on his 158th birthday.)

I: WELCOME TO OUR TOXIC-BYZANTIUM

It’s William-Yeats birthday today &
The Poet meant to bring his Collected Poems down to
The fireside, but forgot it, so
He sought refuge in Charles Simic who’s
A different sort of poet except it’s all La Cazone–

If this Poet could be as relaxed-&-happy as
The cat sleeping on-the-hearth, he’d just Meow
Rather than sounding-out all this poetry—
Rain careened-down through the night as
The mercury plunged & grass, chard & kale celebrated—

This Poet hasn’t gotta cook today ‘cause
We’re dining w/ Patrick & Molly who
Are back from France w/ gifts & a need
To slide-back-into their busy-lives slowly—
Not often does this Poet get to encourage others to slow down—

On-top of the usual complications
We’ve had a missing-weed-situation—
Which the Poet took a long-break to alleviate
By going up to the attic
To strip a jar-of-buds from the last of the 2022 stems—

William said, That is no country for old men
& there wasn’t one then, nor-isn’t one now
So we old Poets gotta make our own by
Gathering in choruses &
Louder singing, Fuck the Lords & Ladies of this toxic Byzantium!

II: LEAVE THAT GOLDEN-CALF BEHIND

Ted Kaczynski died in prison this week—
His prophetic-writings on our Suicide-Machine
Industrial-Civilization have
To marginalize-him, been pathologized as Schizophrenic
When the Dude was R.D.-Laing right-on-sane— 

If you, ala 50’s TV, could be Una-Bomber for a Day
Whom would you w/ your letter-bombs blow-up?
My fucking-list is endless
But if I blew them all-to-smithereens
It wouldn’t change a thing until

We rediscovered our Indigenous-Hearts—
Ted K was one of a line of prophets
That ran through Thoreau-to-Melville
Who saw that the American-Whale-hunt
Was bound for Davey-Jone’s Locker—

Ted was like a Derrick Jensen
Who actually began to blow-up damns
Ala Vladamir Putin
Who’s no environmental-hero
Nor is Joe Biden who blows up underwater-gas-pipelines

Releasing massive amounts of Methane—
The whole-fucking-lot of ‘em are insane—
Our only hope now, such as it is, is
W/ the Poets who must like Moses lead us
To the Land of Buttermilk-Shortbread drizzled-w/ Raw local-Honey.

Orin Domenico is a poet living in Utica, New York. His latest volume is My Rap Sheet is Long (Black Rabbit Press).