Israel, Morocco agree to normalize relations in Trump administration deal


A man holds Palestinian and Moroccan flags during a protest on September 18 opposing the normalization of relations with Israel and showing Palestinian support, in front of Parliament in Rabat, Morocco. File Photo by Jalal Morchidi/EPA-EFE

Dec. 10 (UPI) -- Israel and Morocco have agreed to normalize relations, the Trump administration announced on Thursday.

With the deal, Morocco is the fourth Arab country to normalize relations with Israel since the summer, after the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Sudan.

"As part of this deal, Morocco will establish full diplomatic relations and resume official contacts with Israel. They will grant overflights and direct flights to and from Israel for all Israelis," White House adviser Jared Kushner told reporters in a press call Thursday.

"They'll reopen the liaison offices in Rabat and Tel Aviv immediately, with the intention to open the embassies in the near future. They'll be promoting economic cooperation between Israeli and Moroccan companies."

President Donald Trump called it a "historic breakthrough."

"Our great friends Israel and the Kingdom of Morocco have agreed to full diplomatic relations -- a massive breakthrough for peace in the Middle East," he tweeted.

THE REAL STORY

US IMPERIALISM APPROVES OF MOROCCO'S COLONIALIST EXPANSION INTO THE WESTERN SAHARA 

Additionally, Trump signed a proclamation declaring Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara, a disputed territory in northwestern Africa.

The Moroccan government has mostly controlled the area, but a small portion has been managed by the partially recognized Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, a self-proclaimed sovereign state established by the Polisario Front in the 1970s.

"The United States believes an independent Sahrawi State is not a realistic option for resolving the conflict and that genuine autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty is the only solution," the proclamation states. "We urge the parties to engage in discussions without delay, using Morocco's autonomy plan as the only framework to negotiate a mutually acceptable solution.

"To facilitate progress toward this aim, the United States will encourage economic and social development with Morocco, including in the Western Sahara territory, and to that end will open a consulate in the Western Sahara territory, in Dakhla, to promote economic and business opportunities for the region."

Morocco is said to be the first country to recognize the United States after it declared independence 244 years ago.

"Morocco recognized the United States in 1777," Trump added in a tweet. "It is thus fitting we recognize their sovereignty over the Western Sahara."

Morocco and the United States recently renewed a defense cooperation road map through 2030.

upi.com/7060326

SEE https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/12/trump-recognized-moroccos-illegal.html

Western Sahara - Newikis

https://newikis.com/en/Western_Sahara

This article is about the geographical area. For the partially recognized state that controls the Free Zone and claims sovereignty over ... partially controlled by the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic and partially occupied by neighboring Morocco. Its surface area amounts to 266,000 square kilometres (103,000 sq mi). It is one of the most sparsely populated territor

https://wiki2.org/en/Western_Sahara

This article is about the geographical area. For the partially recognized state that controls the Free ... French: Sahara Occidental) is a disputed territory in the Maghreb region of North Africa, partially controlled by the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic and partially Moroccan-occupied, bordered by Morocco proper to the north, Algeria to the northeast, Mauritania to the east ...

Western Sahara - Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core

https://infogalactic.com/info/Western_Sahara

For the partially recognized state that controls the Free Zone and claims sovereignty over Western Sahara, ... The exiled government of the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) is a form of single-party parliamentary and presidential system, but according to its constitution, this will be changed into a multi-party system at the achievement of independence. It is presently ...

Morocco - TheInfoList

www.theinfolist.com/php/SummaryGet.php?FindGo=Morocco

Morocco was the only African state not to be a member of the African Union due to its unilateral withdrawal on 12 November 1984 over the admission of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in 1982 by the African Union (then called Organisation of African Unity) as a full member without the organisation of a referendum of self-determination in the disputed territory of Western Sahara. Morocco ...

Western Sahara | Familypedia | Fandom

https://familypedia.wikia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara

Western Sahara (/ʔ səˈhɑːrə,_ʔˈhærə/; Arabic: الصحراء الغربية aṣ-Ṣaḥrā’ al-Gharbīyah; Berber: Taneẓroft Tutrimt; Spanish and French: Sahara Occidental) is a disputed territory in the Maghreb region of North Africa, partially controlled by the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic and partially Moroccan

1.4 million American workers apply for unemployment benefits, as relief bill negotiations drag on

Initial claims for unemployment benefits hit 1.4 million last week, according to the Labor Department. That's the highest level since mid-September.

The dynamic points to rising layoffs, according to economists, while Congress continues talks on a Covid relief bill.

Meanwhile, coronavirus cases are surging, job growth is slowing and there are millions more unemployed workers than available jobs.

© Provided by CNBC A person wearing a protective mask walks past a store for lease in San Francisco, Calif., on Dec. 8, 2020.

Greg Iacurci CNBC Dec. 10, 2020.

Americans applied for unemployment benefits last week at the highest level in three months, signaling deepening job loss as a raging coronavirus pandemic continues its assault on the economy and Congress continues work on another relief package.

Nearly 1.4 million workers filed an initial claim for benefits last week, according to Labor Department figures issued Thursday. Workers file an initial claim to establish or re-establish eligibility for aid.

About 950,000 applied for traditional state unemployment insurance. Another 428,000 sought Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a temporary federal program for self-employed, gig and other workers typically unable to collect state assistance.

Worsening outlook

Together, initial claims are at their highest point since mid-September.

"[The] rebound signals things aren't just stagnating, they're worsening," Daniel Zhao, an economist at Glassdoor, a job and recruiting site, said.

© Provided by CNBC

Nine months into the crisis, the volume of initial claims eclipses any pre-pandemic record.

When stripping out data for the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program, which was created in March by the CARES Act relief law, claims for state benefits are still higher than all but the worst week of the Great Recession.
'Resurgent virus'

"Layoffs appear to be rising, consistent with the resurgent virus," Heidi Shierholz, director of policy at the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, and former Labor Department chief economist, wrote Thursday in an analysis.

The U.S. recorded 3,124 new Covid-19 deaths on Wednesday, the deadliest single-day tally of the pandemic so far, according to a CNBC analysis of Johns Hopkins University data

© Provided by CNBC

Meanwhile, Congress is trying to hammer out details on another relief package. A deal has remained elusive for months.

Lawmakers are rushing to avoid a benefits cliff that looms at year's end, at which time jobless benefits will expire for millions of workers and federal eviction protections lapse.

Job growth last month slowed to its lowest level since May. There are about 4.2 million more unemployed workers than job openings, according to an analysis of federal data issued Wednesday.

© Provided by CNBC

Unemployment benefits generally replace half of a worker's lost wages. However, some workers get much less of a wage replacement due to weekly caps on aid amounts, which vary widely among states. Six states — Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee — cap their unemployment benefits at a level below the country's $7.25 hourly minimum wage.

Roughly 19 million Americans were collecting unemployment benefits at the end of November.
Multiple layoffs

Evidence suggests most new applications for unemployment benefits are coming from workers who have been laid off multiple times during the Covid pandemic.

Such claims accounted for 80% of all initial claims in California during the last week in October, according to a recent analysis published by the California Policy Lab. The U.S. Labor Department doesn't report such figures for the whole country.

We're the only game in town, we're getting very close: Sen. Joe Manchin on stimulus bill

"It's hard to know if these folks are applying for a second (or even third) time, but it's very likely," Eliza Forsythe, an assistant professor and labor economist at the University of Illinois, said of nationwide claims data.

Workers who re-enter the unemployment system essentially pick up where they left off, meaning they have fewer weeks of assistance available.

Repeat claims make it difficult to determine who may soon exhaust benefits, Forsythe said.

While the high level of unemployment claims is concerning, the extent to which Thanksgiving influenced last week's spike is unclear, she said. Workers who would have otherwise filed during the holiday week may have been pushed to the following week.

"I'd like to see another week of data before feeling comfortable saying that claims are rising," she said.

TWEEDLE DEE & TWEEDLE DUM

Stimulus update: McConnell signals no Republican support for COVID-19 deal from bipartisan group

It comes as President Donald Trump's top negotiator took the opposite view. "I think we're making a lot of progress," Steven Mnuchin said Thursday.

By Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Thursday, December 10, 2020 

Stimulus talks continue as millions of Americans struggle

WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is hitting the brakes on the emerging COVID-19 aid package from a bipartisan group of lawmakers, saying Republican senators won't support $160 billion in state and local funds as part of a potential trade-off in the deal.

McConnell's staff conveyed to top negotiators that the GOP leader sees no path to an agreement on a key aspect of the lawmakers' existing proposal - a slimmed-down version of the liability shield for companies and organizations facing potential COVID-19 lawsuits - in exchange for $160 billion in state and local funds that Democrats want.

A senior Democrat confirmed that McConnell's position was conveyed to negotiators and was granted anonymity to discuss the private talks. McConnell's office did not immediately respond for a request for comment.

The hardened stance from McConnell, who does not appear to have the votes from Republicans for a far-reaching compromise, creates a new stalemate over the $900-billion-plus package, despite days of toiling by a bipartisan group of lawmakers toward a deal.

SEE ALSO: New White House offer adds $600 checks to COVID-19 relief

The Trump administration has dived back into Capitol Hill's confusing COVID-19 negotiations, offering a $916 billion package to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that adds a $600 direct payment to most Americans.

It comes as President Donald Trump's top negotiator on COVID-19 financial aid took the opposite view. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin reported headway Thursday on the package from the bipartisan senators' group.

"I think we're making a lot of progress," Mnuchin said.

Deadlines, real and perceived, haven't been sufficient to drive Washington's factions to an agreement, despite the U.S. breaking a record-high 3,000 daily COVID fatalities, and hospitals straining at capacity from soaring caseloads nationwide.

A one-week stop-gap measure to prevent a federal shutdown appears to have sapped some urgency from the talks. The short-term government-wide funding bill, approved by the House on Wednesday, needs to clear the Senate before Friday at midnight to avert a partial closure.

The next deadline would be Dec. 18, but both House and Senate leaders say they won't adjourn without passing an aid measure.

But many Republicans have long viewed the state and local aid as a bailout they would have trouble supporting, despite the pleas for funds coming from governors and mayors nationwide.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who is sending lawmakers home while talks continue, said Congress would keep working up to or even after Christmas to get an agreement. The new Congress is being sworn in on Jan. 3.

"Now if we need more time then we take more time, but we have to have a bill and we cannot go home without it," Pelosi said. She also gave an upbeat assessment on the talks.

North Carolina Triangle small businesses are contending with increased COVID-19 cases -- causing concerns that customers may stay away or stricter regulations will be implemented right in the heart of the holiday shopping season.

McConnell has proposed a five-year liability shield from virus lawsuits, retroactive to December 2019, but the bipartisan group was eyeing a scaled-back shield of six months to a year. Labor and civil rights groups oppose any shield, which they say strips essential workers of potential legal recourse as they take risks during the pandemic.

Republicans say the right people to handle final negotiations are the four leaders of Congress and the Trump administration, with the focus on a proposal by McConnell, R-Ky., to eliminate a Democratic demand for $160 billion or so in assistance for state and local governments.

The Trump administration is back in the middle of the negotiations with a $916 billion plan. It would send a $600 direct payment to most Americans but eliminate a $300-per-week employment benefit favored by the bipartisan group of Senate negotiators.

The offer has the endorsement of the top House Republican and apparent backing from McConnell, who had previously favored a $519 billion GOP plan that has already failed twice. But Democrats immediately blasted the plan over the administration's refusal to back the partial restoration, to $300 per week, of bonus pandemic jobless benefits that lapsed in August.

President-elect Joe Biden is pressing for as much pandemic relief as possible, though he's not directly involved in the talks. McConnell, like Pelosi, says Congress will not adjourn without providing the long-overdue COVID-19 relief. The pressure to deliver is intense; all sides say failure isn't an option.

The bipartisan negotiating group - led by Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and GOP Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, among others - is seeking to rally lawmakers behind the $908 billion framework that includes the $300-per-week pandemic jobless benefit and $160 billion for states and local governments.

It also includes a four-month extension of jobless benefits set to expire at the end of the month, $300 billion for "paycheck protection" subsidies for struggling businesses, funding for vaccines and testing, and a host of smaller items such as aid to transit systems, the U.S. Postal Service and health care providers.

THIRD WORLD USA 

COVID Relief Talks Are Pitting Essential Workers Against the Unemployed

By Dustin Rowles | Politics | December 9, 2020 | PANJIB.COM

The economic situation in America is dire right now. The virus is out of control; there are scattered shutdowns across the country; schools/childcare is a nightmare right now; we’re adding to the unemployment numbers instead of seeing them slow; and people are worried about their financial situation, their job security; and their ability to pay their mortgages. Debt is rising, and anxiety is back up to where it was around the summer. Only 9 percent of Americans say their mental health improved in the last week, the worst figure since August.

And yet, while every other civilized country in the world is providing financial assistance to its citizens, we’re just not doing that in America currently. Our politicians couldn’t come to an agreement before the election, and then punted until after the election thinking that the political dynamics would shift. While we do have a new incoming President, the politics of a stimulus bill haven’t actually shifted that much, but for the fact that we need it much more than we did two months ago. Enhanced unemployment benefits are going to run out for a lot of people at the beginning of the year; eviction moratoriums may end; small business (and especially restaurants) aren’t going to make it through the winter without help; all that PPP money is gone, and — oh by the way — 2,500 people are dying a day, while more than 200,000 new infections are being added.

The good news, however, is that there is bipartisan consensus in Congress for a relief package that will help. It’s pretty basic: Additional PPP money, more money for schools, money to facilitate vaccine distribution, money to extend eviction moratoriums, and most importantly, perhaps, money to continue enhanced unemployment benefits.

… except maybe not. The White House and Steve Mnuchin have gotten involved, and that’s never a good idea, and they have an alternate proposal, and how’s this: No enhanced unemployment benefits, but $600 stimulus checks to every individual (plus $600 for each child).

It’s easy to see this as an excuse to send another check with Trump’s name to every American on his way out, and maybe that’s exactly what it is to Trump. But I can also tell you that there’s some real friction between unemployed low-income workers and low-income employees who work but who might be better off collecting unemployment benefits, especially those low-income workers who also have to figure out child care. At this point, with enhanced benefits, unemployment pays around $10 an hour, and that’s as good as minimum wage in some places and better than minimum wage for those who also have to pay for childcare. So there are a lot of minimum wage workers who are wondering why unemployed people continue to get enhanced benefits while they get nothing for continuing to put their lives at risk to work as essential workers in grocery stores, Amazon warehouses, in restaurants, or as delivery drivers. Those people are wondering why they don’t get a little extra scratch for sacrificing their lives, while a lot of low-income workers earn the same amount for staying at home, where it’s safe.

And this is why representatives from both sides of the spectrum — Bernie Sanders on the Democratic side, Josh Hawley on the Republican side — won’t approve of the bill without direct payments, although they probably have different ideological reasons: Bernie for socialist reasons (everyone deserves a bigger piece of the pie), and Hawley for Republican reasons (it’s not fair that poor people get more money and middle-class families do not!).

Obviously, the real answer is: Do both: Enhanced unemployment benefits and direct payments. And maybe that’s where we end up because Trump is apparently willing to go up to $2,000 in direct payments (again, with his name on the check, so ego!), but Republicans have unfortunately decided to become fiscal conservative, deficit hawks again, which they only do when Democrats are in power. It’s unclear how any of this will shake out, but time is running out. The House has approved a stopgap measure to avert a government shutdown until December 18th, by which time Congress will basically have to have a relief package in place or we end the year with no COVID relief and a government shutdown.

It would be the most fitting 2020 ending ever.

BAIT & SWITCH

Donald Trump Sees Your $1,200 Stimulus Checks and Raises You…$600 Checks

The administration also wants to provide less than one quarter of the federal unemployment benefits being proposed by Congress.

BY BESS LEVIN DECEMBER 9, 2020

As you’ve probably heard by now, there’s a very scary, very contagious disease ravaging the U.S. called COVID-19, which has not only killed more than 287,000 people but millions of jobs and thousands of businesses as well. Not having a job, you see, is bad for people who can’t just drop $30 million on a Miami island and actually have to think about where they’re going to get money to pay for things like shelter and buy stuff like food. It’s extra bad if they happen to live in a country where the government does comparatively little to help people who’ve fallen on hard times and exceedingly bad if that country is the United States, where the president is a cartoonishly evil moron named Donald Trump, who apparently thinks everyone can just get by on possible tax fraud and other financial schemes.

On Tuesday, that outlook translated to the Trump administration proposing an economic relief package that would not only offer much fewer federal unemployment benefits than what has been proposed by lawmakers, but would reduce those $1,200 checks people got in the spring by half. Per The Washington Post:

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has proposed that lawmakers approve another stimulus check worth $600 per [adult] and $600 per child, the people familiar with the plan said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to share details of private deliberations. The new White House proposal was a nonstarter for Democrats and a sharp rejection of the bipartisan efforts that have brought the two parties closer to a compromise on a legislative package amid signs that the U.S. economy is deteriorating under the increasing strain of the coronavirus.

Under the bipartisan framework released last week by a group of moderate lawmakers, Congress would approve about $180 billion in new federal unemployment benefits for tens of millions of jobless Americans. That would be enough to fund federal supplementary unemployment benefits at $300 per week while extending various unemployment programs that are set to expire at the end of the year. The framework did not include another round of stimulus payments. By contrast, Mnuchin has submitted a plan to provide about $40 billion in new funding for federal unemployment benefits. Mnuchin’s plan would extend expiring benefits but does not include any supplementary federal benefit, meaning millions of jobless workers would receive no additional federal help, one person familiar with the plan said.

While economists have not universally endorsed stimulus checks, with some arguing that millions went out to families whose breadwinners have not lost their jobs or been forced to take pay cuts, others have noted, per the Post, that “the checks helped stabilize a turbulent economy and reached many people struggling economically who were denied unemployment benefits or other forms of social insurance.” An analysis by the Urban Institute in August found that another round of checks would prevent 6.3 million people from falling into poverty.

In response to the plan submitted by Mnuchin, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer issued a joint statement saying, “The president’s proposal starts by cutting the unemployment insurance proposal being discussed by bipartisan Members of the House and Senate from $180 billion to $40 billion. That is unacceptable.”

In other congressional news, on Tuesday, Representative Katie Porter skewered Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for blocking the bipartisan relief package unveiled earlier this month because it doesn’t protect employers for being sued for negligence. “Everyone at the negotiating table—including Senate Rs—has agreed to a compromise. Except one,” Porter tweeted. “Mitch McConnell is refusing to bring it to the floor unless it wipes away all COVID-related lawsuits filed that ‘allege injury or death’ due to corporate negligence. These lawsuits represent the worst of the worst examples of disregard for human life—cases filed on behalf of nursing home patients and grocery store workers who died because the company in charge of keeping them safe prioritized cutting costs over protecting them.“ She added: “The same McConnell who said that President Trump is ‘100% within his rights’ to pursue baseless lawsuits alleging election fraud is now refusing to pass urgently-needed relief unless it strips those same rights from the most vulnerable among us. This must be exposed.”

Trump’s Election Loss Temper Tantrum Is Stoking the Fires of Right-Wing Violence


Elle Meyers Bree Burkitt
Originally Published December 10, 2020 COPPER COURIER, ARIZONA

Supporters of President Donald Trump demonstrate at a ‘Stop the Steal’ rally in front of the Maricopa County Elections Department office on November 7, 2020 in Phoenix, Arizona. The demonstration began at the State Capitol earlier in the day. News outlets project that Joe Biden will be the 46th president of the United States after a victory in Pennsylvania with Kamala Harris to be the first woman and person of color to be elected Vice President.

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images

State election officials and local health and school boards are the latest targets of threats and intimidation.

Die hard Trump supporters are becoming increasingly violent as the president continues his crusade to remain in power despite losing the presidential election.

President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud have been repeatedly shot down in courts across the country, but his rhetoric continues to encourage his most fervent supporters to take matters into their own hands.

The Republican Party of Arizona took to Twitter and twice called on its followers to be willing to “die for something” or “give up [your] life for this fight.”
https://twitter.com/AZGOP/status/1336186861891452929

Local officials of both political parties have been subject to an increasing number of threatening calls, emails, and online harassment. Some officials have encountered people outside their homes, protesting their stance on the election and public health measures.

Trump supporters, some armed with guns, gathered outside the home of Michigan’s secretary of state because of her role as Michigan’s Chief Elections Officer. Other officials have had their mail filled with racist letters and death threats. Even the parents of some officials have encountered harassment and hate mail.

And Arizona’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs said last month that she and her family were threatened as Trump and his supporters questioned election results. A video showing a group of people standing outside her home chanting “We are watching you” was shared by 12 News.

“(The threats) are a symptom of a deeper problem in our state and country — the consistent and systematic undermining of trust in each other and our democratic process,” Hobbs wrote.

Lower profile officials have not been spared being subject to increasingly dangerous behavior. This week, a health board meeting in Idaho ended after about 15 minutes because protesters were gathered outside the health board office and board members’ homes. Board member Diana Lachiondo left the meeting early saying that protesters were outside her home, banging on the front door.

“My 12-year-old son is home by himself right now and there are protesters banging outside the door,” she said. “I’m going to go home and make sure he’s okay.”

Minutes later the other members of the board stopped the meeting entirely.

“I got a call from the mayor, and it sounds like the police, and she is requesting that we stop the meeting at this time because of the intense level of protesters in the parking lot and concern for police safety and staff safety as well as the protesters that are at some of our board members’ homes right now,” Central District Health Board Director Russ Duke said. The board then ended the meeting.

After the General Election, armed protesters gathered outside the Maricopa County elections center for days, defending the debunked claims that votes had been stolen from Trump. At one point, members of the 300-strong crowd attempted to storm the building where volunteer poll workers counted votes inside.

A few days later, protesters rallied outside the state Capitol to contest Biden’s win, accusing the media of conspiring to steal the election and calling the results a coup.”

to contest Joe Biden’s election as U.S. president, charging the media with conspiring to steal the election and calling the results a coup.

More demonstrations are planned for the days before the Electoral College will cast their votes to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s victory on Dec. 14. The Proud Boys, an all-male right-wing group, and the Women for America First are planning a pro-Trump rally at the Lincoln Memorial this weekend, according to the Washingtonian. Local organizations are already planning counter-protests.

Violence from right-wing organizations isn’t a new phenomenon and it’s been on the rise in recent years.

Data from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) found that right-wing extremists and American white supremacists have killed at least 329 people in the last 26 year. There was also an increase in “hate incidents” in the United States in the days and months after Trump was elected in 2016, making it clear that the president’s rhetoric has an impact on that violence.

The increasing number of threats and acts of violence have some officials calling on the president to stop lying.

Gabriel Sterling an election official in Georgia made a fiery speech in Atlanta last week saying the threats “have to stop.”

“Someone’s going to get hurt, someone’s going to get shot, someone’s going to get killed,” Sterling said forcefully. “It’s not right. Mr. President, you have not condemned these actions or this language. Senators, you have not condemned this language or these actions. This has to stop. We need you to step up. And if you take a position of leadership, show some.”




Elle Meyers  is a Congressional Reporter for COURIER where she covers national politics and lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Previously Elle was a beat reporter in Montgomery County, Maryland and she is a native of Portland.


Bree Burkitt is the Editor for The Copper Courier. She previously worked as an editor and public safety reporter for The Arizona Republic, in addition to The Spectrum & Daily News in Southern Utah. She's a graduate of Northern Arizona University and an Arizona native

USA
Domestic Violence Homicides Surged This Year and Advocates Fear It Could Happen Again


 Bree Burkitt December 9, 2020 COPPER COURIER, ARIZONA

ShutterStock

Advocates fear a second wave of the coronavirus could have deadly results for those trapped in already-tenuous cohabitation situations.

The COVID-19 pandemic came with many unexpected impacts, including an increase in domestic violence in Arizona and across the country.

At least 92 Arizonans died in domestic violence incidents through the end of October 2020—a 16% increase from the same time period 2019, according to data compiled by the Arizona Coalition to End Sexual & Domestic Violence.

Some cities, such as Phoenix, saw the number of domestic violence-tied homicides jump from 10 in 2019 to 24 in 2020—a 140% increase—during the first six months of the year as Arizonans grappled with the start of the pandemic and the accompanying isolation.

And it only got worse with the number of domestic violence deaths. Reported deaths as a result of domestic violence through Aug. 3 jumped by 180% compared with the same time period in 2019.

Annual national data on domestic violence killings isn’t released until 2021, but initial numbers show a similar increase in major cities across the country.

As more people work or attend school from home and stay-at-home orders went into effect in March, more domestic violence victims have had to stay with their abusers.

And survivors who are able to safely leave are turning to shelters with more severe injuries, according to Jenna Panas, CEO of the Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence. Domestic violence hotlines also saw an uptick in calls.

The COVID pandemic left many in already-tenuous cohabitation situations even more isolated, often having nowhere to turn as they’re now trapped 24/7 with their abuser and unable to make a plan for safety.

“It’s the tip of the iceberg,” Panas said. “There’s actually this huge wave of violence happening because of the isolation.”

Panas explained that the COVID pandemic also brought additional stressors that can make an already strained situation more volatile. People losing their jobs or stressing about how to educate their children at home can place additional strain. Plus, many people are now without the activities they once used to cope, such as going to the gym or socializing.

“You add something like that to an already difficult situation and a negative relationship and you’re going to see it get worse,” she said.

She speculated that the number of domestic violence incidents has likely increased during the pandemic, but gone unreported with fewer opportunities to interact with friends in person or come into contact with mandatory reporters, such as counselors or social workers.

With the country facing another wave of new coronavirus cases, advocates fear the spike in domestic violence-related deaths could continue through the last weeks of the year and into 2021—especially if businesses are asked to shut down again. However, Gov. Doug Ducey has spurned the idea of a statewide shutdown and previously stated during a December media briefing that additional restrictions could bring complications, such as increased domestic violence, child abuse, and suicide attempts.

Panas urged people to reach out to those they’re concerned about and to believe anyone who confides in them that they’re experiencing domestic violence. Just because a relationship seems fine from the outside doesn’t mean it’s not happening.

“I think so many times survivors and victims are afraid to come forward and just tell a friend because they’re afraid of the reaction of not being believed,” Panas said.

A friend or family member could be the lifeline someone needs as they attempt to leave the home or relationship, Panas said. Both survivors and allies can call the coalition’s hotline at 602-279-2980 to speak to an advocate. Local police agencies also offer anonymous reporting.



Bree Burkitt is the Editor for The Copper Courier. She previously worked as an editor and public safety reporter for The Arizona Republic, in addition to The Spectrum & Daily News in Southern Utah. She's a graduate of Northern Arizona University and an Arizona native.

India, Mexico most dangerous countries for media in 2020

Diplomatic Correspondent | Published: Dec 11,2020


India and Mexico have been the most dangerous countries for media work this year, the Press Emblem Campaign said in its annual report in Geneva on Thursday.

The number of journalists killed increased by 10 per cent compared with last year.

In total, since January, 83 media workers have been killed in 30 countries around the world, up from 75 in 2019.

India leads with 13 assassinations, ahead of Mexico where 11 journalists were killed.

Among the most dangerous countries are Pakistan, where eight were killed, Afghanistan where five died, Iraq with 5 deaths, the Philippines with 4 deaths and Honduras with 4 deaths.

Three assassinations were recorded in Nigeria as well as in Syria and Venezuela with two each in Brazil, Guatemala, Liberia and Somalia.

Finally, one victim has been identified in the following countries: Argentina, Bangladesh, Barbados, Cambodia, Cameroon, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique, Paraguay, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Turkey, and Yemen.

Elias Mia, a 52 year old journalist of local Daily Bijoy was hacked to death in Geodhara area of Bandar in Narayanganj district on October 12 after he had reportedly exposed a criminal nexus engaged in utility gas line distribution and related trade.

Of the 83 journalists murdered, only 16 were in conflict zones — Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen.

The report mentioned that the pandemic helped to freeze some conflicts and also limit the movement of journalists to dangerous areas.

‘Fewer journalists have died in areas of armed conflict this year, but too many of them have been targeted for their work in peaceful countries,’ commented PEC general secretary Blaise Lempen.

While Mexico has been among the most dangerous countries for several years, the increase in the number of deaths in India is particularly worrying, with 10 more deaths in a year, according to the PEC.

The PEC strongly condemned these attacks and called for justice asking the governments to bring to book those responsible for these crimes.

In the past ten years, from 2011 to 2020, 1180 journalists were killed, or 118 per year, 2.26 per week, according to figures from the PEC.

More than 520 journalists have also died from COVID-19 since March.

Over the year, nearly 600 journalists died as a result of the violence and the pandemic, a very heavy price, the worst since the Second World War.

The PEC said its figures are higher than those of other organisations because the PEC lists all the killed media workers, whether or not their deaths were related to their professional activity.

EU, Germany join forces with Bangladesh to safeguard workers


United News of Bangladesh . Dhaka | Published: Dec 10,2020

The European Union and Germany signed an agreement to provide EUR 113 million, nearly Tk 1,145 crore, in support to the government’s ‘Social Protection Programme’ for unemployed and distressed workers in the RMG, leathergoods and footwear industries.

This programme, which is part of Team Europe’s contribution to fight COVID-19 and its consequences in Bangladesh, offers a safety net to workers whose livelihoods are affected by the economic fallout, said the European Union Embassy in Dhaka on Thursday.

It also contributes towards strengthening the resilience of Bangladesh’s social security system.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a public health emergency with immediate economic consequences.

The government of Bangladesh responded swiftly with significant stimulus packages to the industries and scaled-up assistance to mitigate socio-economic impacts, with a particular attention to Bangladeshis living in poverty or who are highly vulnerable.

The European Union and Germany are joining forces with the government to safeguard the livelihoods of vulnerable workers in the garment and leather export-oriented industries who are at a heightened risk of being pushed into poverty.

This support will allow these workers to transit over a specific critical period, without major disruptions in their lives and consumption levels.

EU Ambassador Rensje Teerink said the COVID-19 pandemic has had detrimental consequences over the world and the poor are the first to bear the brunt of this crisis.

She said social protection is essential to protect people in situations of vulnerability, particularly when a crisis hits.

By providing income support to workers in key export sectors who lost their jobs, at least temporarily, the social protection programme for unemployed and distressed workers responds to an immediate need to protect livelihoods, said the Ambassador.

‘It is also part of longer-term efforts to establish sustainable social security mechanisms for workers, alongside continuous investments in skilling and job creation. In close coordination with our Member States and like-minded partners, the EU remains committed to support the government of Bangladesh to boost the resilience of its social protection system in line with best practices,’ said the ambassador.

German Ambassador Peter Fahrenholtz said Germany’s contribution is part of our long-standing cooperation to support the workers in the textile industry in Bangladesh.

‘During these difficult times, we are glad to join forces with the EU in order to help the Government of Bangladesh to mitigate the negative impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on the livelihoods of textile workers,’ he said.

In line with the programme guidelines issued by the Department of Labour, Ministry of Labour and Employment, in charge, temporary cash assistance will be provided to workers who suffered income losses during the pandemic and lost their jobs because of reduced worldwide demand or due to health and safety precautionary measures.

Eligible workers, according to the guidelines, will receive Tk 3,000 per month/worker for a period of up to 3 months.

They will be identified in close coordination with the employers’ associations, which include Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association, the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association), the Leathergoods and Footwear Manufacturers & Exporters Association of Bangladesh and the Bangladesh Finished Leather, Leathergoods and Footwear Exporters' Association.

The first payments to eligible beneficiaries should take place before the end of the year, as announced by the Government.

The EU and Germany grant of EUR 113 million will be channelled through the EU sector budget programme on National Social Security Strategy reforms in Bangladesh.

US voices concern over Bangladesh transfer of Rohingya

Agence France-Presse . Washington | newagebd.net

Published:  Dec 11,2020

Rohingya refugees stand in a queue after they disembarked from a Bangladesh Navy ship to the island of Bashar Char in Noakhali on December 4, 2020.- AFP photo

The United States on Thursday voiced concern over Bangladesh’s transfer of Rohingya refugees to a low-lying island and said that any movement should be voluntary.

Bangladesh, which has taken in nearly one million Rohingya who fled a brutal offensive in neighbouring Myanmar, has started the relocation of 1,00,000 of them from squalid camps on the mainland to Bhashan Char, a silt island frequently in the path of cyclones.

The United States reiterated its appreciation to Bangladesh for accepting the refugees but said it was ‘concerned’ about last week’s transfer of more than 1,600 Rohingya and plans to move more.

‘The United States concurs with the UN that any such relocations must be fully voluntary and based on informed consent without pressure or coercion,’ State Department spokesman Cale Brown said in a statement.

UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric earlier pointed to reports, corroborated by accounts on the ground to AFP, that refugees have been pressured into relocating.

Related Coverage:
› UN recognises investment in Bhasan Char: Mia Seppo
› Bhasan Char receives 1,642 Rohingyas

Bangladesh’s foreign minister AK Abdul Momen called the claims ‘a damn lie’ and said facilities on the island were ‘much better’ than the camps.

The United States called for Bangladesh to allow ‘thorough and independent technical and protection assessments’ of Bhashan Char to determine whether the island, said to be prone to flooding, is suitable for refugees.

The US statement comes after outgoing president Donald Trump slashed his country’s own refugee admissions to a record low, with the wealthiest nation planning to admit no more than 15,000 from around the world in the current fiscal year.

The State Department said the United States is the leading supporter of refugee programs inside Bangladesh, contributing $962 million since 2017.

The United States also reiterated calls on Myanmar to allow the return of the refugees — a prospect that few see as immediate.

The Buddhist-majority nation refuses to consider the mostly Muslim Rohingya as citizens and in 2017 launched a military campaign in which refugees recounted mass killings, widespread rape and the burning of villages

UNHCR seeks access to Bhasan Char

Shahidul Islam Chowdhury | Published: Dec 08,2020 | newagebd.net 


The UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi has sought access for the UN partners, including the UNHCR, to the Rohingya people who have been relocated to the Bhasan Char island.

‘UNHCR and UN partners seek access to them in order to hear their voices, understand their wishes and see conditions on the island,’ Filippo Grandi said in a tweet, adding that any transfer must follow a voluntary and informed decision.

The Bangladesh government has recently relocated a total of 1,642 displaced Rohingya people of Myanmar to Bhasan Char from Cox’s Bazar camps amid concerns of the UN offices in Bangladesh and protest from several foreign rights bodies.

Over 300 other Rohingya people, who were rescued from boats in the Bay of Bengal from traffickers, have also been taken to the island earlier. 

The government has been providing humanitarian relief support to all the Rohingya people in Bhasan Char through the Office of the Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commissioner’s Office, additional RRRC Shamsud Douza told New Age on Tuesday. 

Foreign minister AK Abdul Momen on Monday said that the UN should help the Rohingyas in Bhasan Char in accordance with the mandate on the basis of which the UN worked in Bangladesh.

‘They should follow the mandate. It doesn’t matter where they’re [victims] living,’ he said.

The minister, however, made it clear that the arrangement made in Bhasan Char was for a short period as the prime objective of the government was to repatriate the displaced Rohingya people to their ancestral homes in Rakhine of Myanmar.

Asked whether the UNHCR has formally sought access to the island, it’s spokesperson Louise Donovan said on Tuesday, ‘The UN has been consistent in seeking access to Bhasan Char and to the refugees. We look forward to continuing a constructive dialogue with the government regarding its Bhasan Char project, including the proposed UN technical and protection assessments.’

The recent relocation was the first phase of transfer to the island as the government would take there about 100,000 members of the community to decongest existing camps situated in areas adjacent to borders with Myanmar.

The relocation of a section of Rohingya people from camps in Cox’s Bazar to the 13,000-acre Bhasan Char facility that was developed with all amenities, including embankments to withstand natural disasters such as cyclones and tidal waves, at a cost of more than US$350 million was essential to decongest camps on the security grounds, said the Bangladesh government.

Some 8,60,000 Rohingyas, mostly women, children and aged people, entered Bangladesh fleeing unbridled murder, arson and rape during ‘security operations’ by the Myanmar military in Rakhine, what the United Nations has denounced as ethnic cleansing and genocide, beginning from August 25, 2017.

The latest Rohingya influx has taken the number of undocumented Myanmar nationals and registered refugees from that country in Bangladesh to over 1.1 million, according to estimates by UN agencies and Bangladesh foreign ministry.

Not a single Rohingya has returned to their home in Rakhine as the Myanmar government has almost stalled the Rohingya reparation process resorting to various means, including near discontinuation of clearing of names of the refugees eligible to go back to the country, and an unwillingness to hold meetings of the bilateral joint working group and the tripartite mechanism led by China.

Rights groups urge Bangladesh to halt Rohingya relocation

Staff Correspondent | Published: Dec 03,2020 
(newagebd.net)


International rights groups Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch on Thursday urged Bangladesh authorities to immediately halt a plan of relocating the Rohingya refugees to Bhasan Char Island.

‘The authorities should immediately halt relocation of more refugees to Bhashan Char, return those on the island to their families and community in mainland Bangladesh, and follow due process including the full and meaningful participation of refugees in any plan for their relocation,’ London-based Amnesty International’s South Asia campaigner, Saad Hammadi said in the statement.

In separate statement, New York-based Human Rights Watch’s Asia director Brad Adams said Bangladesh government was actively reneging on its promise to the UN not to relocate any refugees to Bhasan Char island until humanitarian experts give a green light.

‘If the government were genuinely confident in the habitability of the island, they would be transparent and not hastily circumvent UN technical assessments,’ he said.

The AI and HRW statements came amid reports of a government plan to start the relocation of some 4,000 refugees to Bhasan Char next week, though Bangladesh authorities were yet to announce any date.

‘The relocation of so many Rohingya refugees to a remote island, which is still off limits to everyone including rights groups and journalists without prior permission, poses grave concerns about independent human rights monitoring,’ said Hammadi.

‘It is crucial that the Bangladeshi authorities must let the UN, rights groups and humanitarian agencies carry out independent assessments of Bhashan Char’s habitability first before taking any steps to relocate people there. No relocation plan, either to Bhashan Char or to another location, can be undertaken without the full and informed consent of the individuals involved,’ he added.

‘Some refugees already on the island have shared their anxiety with Amnesty International at being cut off from their families and community.

‘Bangladesh and other members of the international community have a critical role not only in protecting the rights of the Rohingya people but also in ensuring their full and meaningful participation in decisions that affect them.’

Bhashan Char is a silt island developed by the Bangladesh Navy, where the Bangladeshi authorities plan to relocate 100,000 Rohingya refugees.

Human Rights Watch said it recently spoke with 12 families, who said their names were on the list, but that they had not willingly volunteered to relocate. Some refugees on the list have fled out of fear of forced relocation.

In a statement on December 2, the United Nations said that it had not been involved in preparation for this transfer to Bhasan Char and that ‘any relocations to Bhasan Char should be preceded by comprehensive technical protection assessments,’ reiterating that the UN stood ready to proceed with such assessments ‘if permitted by the Government.’

European Union Ambassador Rensje Teerink said that the EU would not comment on relocation to Bhasan Char until the UN had been allowed to complete technical and humanitarian missions to the island.

Rohingyas suffer from severe mental health crisis: Report

United News of Bangladesh . Dhaka | Published: Dec 10,2020 | newagebd.net


Rohingyas in Bangladesh who survived genocide in Myanmar are experiencing a ‘severe’ mental health crisis, according to data in a new report published on Thursday by Fortify Rights.

The report includes quantitative data on Rohingya experiences with human rights violations in Myanmar, traumatic events in Myanmar, symptoms of mental harm-including post-traumatic stress, depression, and anxiety-functioning difficulties, as well as Rohingya opinions on returning to Myanmar.

‘The Rohingya mental health crisis is life threatening and has been largely overlooked,’ said Matthew Smith, chief executive officer of Fortify Rights.

‘The scale of the problem is massive but not insurmountable. Governments should prioritise the mental health of the Rohingya community and ensure survivors of the genocide in Myanmar can rebuild their lives with dignity.’

United Nations agencies estimate that 12 months after an emergency, approximately 15 to 20 per cent of adults will experience some type of moderate or mild mental health disorder.

However, data published on Thursday revealed that 88.7 per cent of Rohingya refugees experienced symptoms of depression, 84 per cent experienced symptoms of emotional distress, and 61.2 per cent experienced symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The data further shows how these symptoms adversely impact the daily lives and functioning of Rohingya genocide survivors.

The 99-page report titled The Torture in My Mind’: The Right to Mental Health for Rohingya Survivors of Genocide in Myanmar is based on participatory action research conducted between March 2018 to November 2020 by a team of ten ethnic-Rohingya researchers trained and supported by Fortify Rights.

The report provides new evidence of the severe mental health toll that genocide, human rights violations, and violence has on survivors.

The quantitative methods used in the report ensure the results are representative of the entire Rohingya refugee population in Bangladesh.

The most highly reported symptoms experienced by Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh related to reliving traumatic events.

For example, 97.6 per cent of Rohingya experienced some level of ‘recurrent thoughts or memories of the most hurtful or terrifying event,’ ‘feeling as though the event is happening again’ (96.6 per cent), and ‘recurrent nightmares’ (82.2 per cent).


The trauma symptoms experienced by a majority of Rohingya are indicative of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, a serious mental-health condition that can interfere with leading a constructive life.

Nearly all Rohingya survey participants reported personally experiencing or witnessing traumatic experiences in Myanmar: 98.6 per cent of Rohingya refugees experienced exposure to frequent gunfire in Myanmar, 97.8 per cent witnessed the destruction or burning of villages, 91.8 per cent witnessed dead bodies, and 90.4 per cent witnessed physical violence against others.

Some 86.2 per cent experienced the murder of an extended family member or friend by security forces, 70.6 per cent experienced the ‘death of family or friends while fleeing or hiding,’ and 29.5 per cent experienced the murder of an ‘immediate family member.’

Of those indicating the murder of an immediate family member, 99.3 per cent reported that security forces in Myanmar perpetrated the killing.

Many Rohingya participants also reported experiencing bodily harm in Myanmar, including torture (55.5 per cent), beatings by a non-family member (46.1 per cent), stabbings (29.4 per cent), or physical injury from being shot (5.1 per cent).

Eight Rohingya women (3.1 per cent) reported being raped, and 87.5 per cent of these women reported being raped by Myanmar security forces.

The research also found 34.3 per cent of Rohingya refugee men experienced sexual abuse, sexual humiliation, or sexual exploitation in Myanmar, compared with 31.1 per cent of women-figures that may be affected by underreporting.

In addition, 67.3 per cent of Rohingya survey participants indicated that they had witnessed sexual violence or abuse in Myanmar.

The report findings demonstrate that restrictions on education, freedom of movement, healthcare, religious expression, and other violations are pervasive in Myanmar and contribute to protracted symptoms of trauma, depression, and anxiety.

The vast majority of Rohingya also experienced symptoms of anxiety and depression, including ‘worrying too much about things’ (92.5 per cent), ‘feeling sad’ (91.3 per cent), ‘loss of interest in things they previously enjoyed doing’ (89.5 per cent), and ‘feeling tense or agitated’ (88.7 per cent).

Most of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh (68.7 per cent) reported feeling ‘humiliated or subhuman,’ which also significantly contributes to mental-health distress.

According to the report, 91.3 per cent of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh face some level of difficulty carrying out common daily activities, such as maintaining basic hygiene, engaging in social or religious activities, or performing other daily tasks. Of those who experience functioning difficulties, 62.3 per cent attributed these difficulties to ailing mental health.

Participatory action research is intended to advance community-supported, action-oriented solutions.

The ten-member Rohingya research team who worked on this project conducted 495 household surveys, 13 pre-research focus-group discussions, 33 participant feedback sessions, and 16 community workshops with Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh.

The report includes a chapter profiling the research team, providing further insight into their contributions and the impact of the research process itself.

‘We shaped the whole project, and we shaped the goals,’ said one Rohingya member of the research team. ‘Regarding this project, one of the best things that makes me happy, that makes me confident, is that this project helps us serve our own community by ourselves, not by any others.’

Members of the research team also contributed to a participatory photo essay published in the report by award-winning Bangladeshi photographer Saiful Huq Omi, whereby each team member decided how they would be photographed.

‘Rohingya are not merely victims,’ said Matthew Smith. ‘The idea that persecuted groups can’t objectively represent themselves is false and pernicious. The Rohingya team did excellent work documenting information that will affect humanitarian priorities and efforts to ensure justice.’

The Rohingya are a predominantly Muslim ethnic minority indigenous to Myanmar’s Rakhine State.

There are an estimated 2.5 million Rohingya worldwide, including approximately 600,000 in Rakhine State and approximately one million living in Bangladesh.

More than 700,000 Rohingya fled to Bangladesh following attacks led by the Myanmar armed forces in 2016 and 2017.

Fortify Rights, a UN Fact-Finding Mission, Rohingya-led organisations, and others determined those attacks amounted to genocide and crimes against humanity.

All Rohingya surveyed for this report (100 per cent) believe that the ultimate intent of the Myanmar military and government was to destroy the Rohingya people.

‘The human right to mental health for Rohingya is inextricably linked to ending the violations and ensuring justice and accountability,’ said Matthew Smith.

‘Many direct-service providers do excellent work to address the mental health needs of refugees and migrants, and Bangladesh and donor governments should ensure those efforts are brought to scale for Rohingya. Bangladesh should do everything in its power to remove any conditions that cause psychological harm to the Rohingya population.’

On Bullsh*t Jobs | David Graeber | RSA Replay

In 2013 David Graeber, professor of anthropology at LSE, wrote an excoriating essay on modern work for Strike! magazine. “On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs” was read over a million times and the essay translated in seventeen different languages within weeks. Graeber visits the RSA to expand on this phenomenon, and will explore how the proliferation of meaningless jobs - more associated with the 20th-century Soviet Union than latter-day capitalism - has impacted modern society. In doing so, he looks at how we value work, and how, rather than being productive, work has become an end in itself; the way such work maintains the current broken system of finance capital; and, finally, how we can get

DEBT: The First 5,000 Years While the "national debt" has been the concern du jour of many economists, commentators and politicians, little attention is ever paid to the historical significance of debt. For thousands of years, the struggle between rich and poor has largely taken the form of conflicts between creditors and debtors—of arguments about the rights and wrongs of interest payments, debt peonage, amnesty, repossession, restitution, the sequestering of sheep, the seizing of vineyards, and the selling of debtors' children into slavery. By the same token, for the past five thousand years, popular insurrections have begun the same way: with the ritual destruction of debt records—tablets, papyri, ledgers; whatever form they might have taken in any particular time and place. Enter anthropologist David Graeber's Debt: The First 5,000 Years (July, ISBN 978-1-933633-86-2), which uses these struggles to show that the history of debt is also a history of morality and culture. In the throes of the recent economic crisis, with the very defining institutions of capitalism crumbling, surveys showed that an overwhelming majority of Americans felt that the country's banks should not be rescued—whatever the economic consequences—but that ordinary citizens stuck with bad mortgages should be bailed out. The notion of morality as a matter of paying one's debts runs deeper in the United States than in almost any other country. Beginning with a sharp critique of economics (which since Adam Smith has erroneously argued that all human economies evolved out of barter), Graeber carefully shows that everything from the ancient work of law and religion to human notions like "guilt," "sin," and "redemption," are deeply influenced by ancients debates about credit and debt. It is no accident that debt continues to fuel political debate, from the crippling debt crises that have gripped Greece and Ireland, to our own debate over whether to raise the debt ceiling. Debt, an incredibly captivating narrative spanning 5,000 years, puts these crises into their full context and illuminates one of the thorniest subjects in all of history. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Graeber teaches anthropology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. He is the author of Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value, Lost People, and Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. This talk was hosted by Boris Debic on behalf of the Authors@Google program.

Place Culture Politics

David Harvey in conversation with David Graeber Wednesday, April 25th, 2012 at 6.30 pm Proshansky Auditorium, CUNY Graduate Center Long before the Occupy movement, modern cities had already become the central sites of revolutionary politics, where the deeper currents of social and political change rise to the surface. Consequently, cities have been the subject of much utopian thinking. But at the same time they are also the centers of capital accumulation and the frontline for struggles over who controls access to urban resources and who dictates the quality and organization of daily life. Is it the financiers and developers, or the people? Rebel Cities places the city at the heart of both capital and class struggles, looking at locations ranging from Johannesburg to Mumbai, and from New York City to São Paulo. Drawing on the Paris Commune as well as Occupy Wall Street and the London Riots, Harvey asks how cities might be reorganized in more socially just and ecologically sane ways—and how they can become the focus for anti-capitalist resistance. DAVID HARVEY is the director of the Center for Place, Culture and Politics at the CUNY Graduate Center. DAVID GRAEBER is Reader in the Department of Anthropology, Goldsmiths, University of London. He has also worked extensively on value theory, and has recently completed a major research project on social movements dedicated to principles of direct democracy, direct action, and has written widely on the relation (real and potential) of anthropology and anarchism. He is currently working on a project on the history of debt.

Red Plateaus

We're proud to present this talk by David Graeber and David Wengrow, entitled The Myth of the Stupid Savage: Rousseau's Ghost and the Future of Political Anthropology. Originally presented at the PPA+ Conference at the University of Amsterdam in May 2019. 

Article: http://www.journaldumauss.net/?La-sag... 

Support us on Patreon at patreon.com/redplateaus or follow us on twitter @rplateaus

Novara Media

David Graeber: A Celebration of His LifeStreamed live on Sep 27, 2020

David Graeber’s life and work leaves an indelible mark on thinkers and activists from London through New York, from Rojava to Quebec. To celebrate his life and work Novara Media are hosting a live stream with academics, activists, and politicians who have been influenced by, and who were an influence on, his intellectual endeavours and activist pursuits. With: Molly Crabapple John McDonnell David Wengrow Dani Ellis Debbie Bookchin Aaron Bastani Grace Blakeley Alpa Shah Jeremy Corbyn Hosted by Ash Sarkar Subscribe to Novara Media on YouTube ⇛ http://novara.media/youtube Support our work ⇛ https://novaramedia.com/support

David Graeber is funny •Sep 7, 2020

Liquid Knowledge
David had a way of communicating ideas considered radical that made them sound like common sense. And with an unassuming sense of humor. -Beka Economopoulos

Artangel

Longplayer Conversation 2014: David Graeber and Brian Eno

The 2014 Artangel Longplayer Conversation between Brian Eno and David Graeber took place 7pm, Tuesday 7 October 2014 at the Royal Geographical Society, London SW7. Longplayer is a thousand-year long musical composition conceived and composed by Jem Finer. The Longlayer Conversations began with a meeting in 2005 between New York artist and musician Laurie Anderson and Nobel prize-winning author Doris Lessing; they continue to take place in the context of this project. Watch, listen to or read about previous Artangel Longplayer Conversations here: artangel.org.uk/projects/2000/longplayer/conversations/ Find out more about Longplayer here: artangel.org.uk//projects/2000/longplayer/about_the_project/about_the_project

 

LondonReviewofGames

David Graeber: On Bureaucratic Technologies & the Future as Dream Time

  01.19.2012 

The twentieth century produced a very clear sense of what the future was to be, but we now seem unable to imagine any sort of redemptive future. How did this happen? One reason is the replacement of what might be called poetic technologies with bureaucratic technologies. Another is the terminal perturbations of capitalism, which is increasingly unable to envision any future at all. David Graeber likes to say that he had three goals for 2011: to promote his new book, Debt: The First 5000 Years (Melville House), learn to drive, and launch a worldwide revolution. He's done well on the first, failed the second, and the third may be on the way, in the form of the Occupy Wall Street movement that Graeber helped initiate. He teaches anthropology at Goldsmiths, University of London, and is also the author of Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value, Lost People: Magic and the Legacy of Slavery in Madagascar, Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology, and Direct Action: An Ethnography, among other books. David Graeber gave this talk in the School of Visual Arts theater on 19 January 2012 at 7. Q&A begins at 52:24 http://artcriticism.sva.edu/?post=dav... http://www.londonreviewofgames.org