Monday, September 05, 2022

RCMP feared that Mounties might leak operational plans to convoy protesters: documents


'The potential exists for serious insider threats,' says the Feb. 10 advisory
An RCMP tactical vehicle drives past the Parliament buildings on Sunday, Feb. 20, 2022 in Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

The RCMP feared that serving Mounties sympathetic to the convoy protest against pandemic measures in Ottawa earlier this year might leak operational plans to protesters, says an internal threat advisory obtained by CBC News.

"The potential exists for serious insider threats," says the Feb. 10 advisory from the RCMP's ideologically motivated criminal intelligence team.

"Those who have not lost their jobs but are sympathetic to the movement and their former colleagues may be in a position to share law enforcement or military information to the convoy protests."

The document, obtained by CBC News through an access to information request, shows the RCMP worried that some of their own might co-operate with the protesters who barricaded streets in downtown Ottawa for weeks.

It was well-documented during the protests that some key convoy supporters had previous ties to law enforcement — among them a former RCMP officer who was on the prime minister's security detail and a former military intelligence officer.

That sparked concerns within the RCMP's ideologically motivated criminal intelligence unit about convoy participants getting an inside track on how police operate.

"Convoy supporters formerly employed in law enforcement and the military have appeared alongside organizers and may be providing them with logistical and security advice, which may pose operational challenges for law enforcement should policing techniques and tactics be revealed to convoy participants,'' says the unit's advisory.

Barbara Perry, director of the Centre on Hate, Bias and Extremism, said it's no surprise the RCMP was worried about members leaking information to convoy participants.

"We have to look at what we do know about sexism, misogyny and racism within the RCMP. And you know, those are the bread and butter of the far-right movement," she said.

Perry said researchers have been able to delve into extremism in the Canadian Armed Forces, but researching extremist ties in law enforcement has been harder.

"That thin blue line is alive and well and police are very reticent to speak about these sorts of issues," she said.

Ben Froese, a crane operator who was parked on Wellington Street, is pepper sprayed while police enforce an injunction against protesters in Ottawa on Feb. 19, 2022. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

"We haven't really done a whole lot of research in the Canadian context but in the U.S., study after study shows that law enforcement rates very high in terms of authoritarian values, which is part and parcel of the far-right as well. So I think there's definitely overlap."

CBC asked the RCMP whether its concerns about "insider threats" ever materialized. The police force did not respond in time for publication.

Michael Kempa, an associate professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa, said worries about information leaks may have played a role in how police shared information during the convoy occupation.

"When the convoy had settled in, there would have been concerns in all police organizations that there would be a small number of police with sympathies for the convoy," he said.

"That's because there's these sympathies in our society. So yes, I would be very confident that police leadership would have been careful in how they were sharing information, taking that into consideration."

Security adviser 'unclear' on OPS enforcement plan 

The police response to last winter's Freedom Convoy protests will take centre stage next month when a public inquiry begins its study of the federal government's rationale for using emergency measures.

Concerns about how information was being shared among police and security forces was teased out in talking points prepared for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's national security and intelligence adviser — also released to CBC News in the same access-to-information package.

On Feb. 9, according to the documents, national security adviser to the prime minister Jody Thomas held a meeting with federal deputy ministers to update them on the protests and the police response.

Jody Thomas, national security and intelligence adviser to the prime minister, arrives at the West Block on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 10, 2022. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

By that date, a dedicated cohort of protesters upset with COVID-19 public health measures had blocked city streets for nearly 13 days, prompting the City of Ottawa to declare a state of emergency. Mayor Jim Watson described the situation as the "the most serious emergency our city has ever faced."

Peter Sloly, chief of the Ottawa Police Service (OPS) at the time, told a Feb. 7 Ottawa city council meeting that he needed an influx of almost 2,000 police officers and civilians to "turn up the heat."

But Sloly's plans for going forward weren't clear to everyone involved. 

"Over the course of the two weekends and throughout the weeks, OPS has brought in additional police resources from a number of Ontario municipalities and the OPP, depending upon the estimated and actual number of protesters," Thomas's notes say.

"However, the OPS has not yet shared its forward plan for enforcement with partners and it is unclear whether the plan has been developed. This has resulted in some surge resources from OPP and other municipal law enforcement being redeployed."

A spokesperson for the Privy Council Office (PCO) said the term "partners" would have referred to other security and policing agencies, including the RCMP and the Parliamentary Protective Services.

When asked for more details about the enforcement plan, a spokesperson for the Ottawa Police Service said the force will not comment "while the parliamentary review is underway."

The RCMP also wouldn't comment on the discussions the Mounties were having at the time with the OPS, the main police force of jurisdiction for the Ottawa protest.

"It would not be appropriate to comment on specific operational discussions that took place with our law enforcement and security partners at the time, as this information will be disclosed in due course at the Public Order Emergency Commission," said RCMP spokesperson Charlotte Hibbard. 

"The RCMP has a longstanding positive relationship with the Ottawa Police Service and other law enforcement and security partners within the National Capital Region. "

An Ontario Provincial Police tactical officer looks on from the top hatch of an armoured vehicle as demonstrators prepare to leave in advance of police enforcing an injunction against a demonstration blocking traffic across the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor, Ont., on Feb. 12, 2022. (Nathan Denette/The Canadian Press)

Scott Blandford is an assistant professor and program coordinator for the policing and master of public safety program at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ont. He said that when one police force sends aid to another, they usually keep each other in the loop.

"I personally can't see an organization withholding intelligence and information once another organization has committed to provide aid," he said.

"I think what happened here was that the situation was so dynamic, was changing by the day, not only by the number of people that were becoming involved and what their involvement was. And in a lot of ways ... the initial movement was co-opted by a number of other organizations which kept adding new layers and new dimensions to it."

In such a fast-changing climate, he said, policing plans might have to change daily.

U.S. nudged Canada to use emergency powers: docs

The documents released to CBC also show the government crafted a strategic action plan sometime between Jan. 24 and Feb. 11 that raised concerns about how police were responding to the protests.

According to the plan document, the purpose of the plan was to "support a discussion by committee members on the strategic direction and ideas for federal actions to empower the City of Ottawa's resolution of the ongoing demonstration." (PCO did not identify the committee in question for CBC News.)

"There is currently no clear path and an escalation of sympathetic protests across Canada risks further jeopardizing the national interest," says the document.

"The ineffectiveness of governments and law enforcement to resolve this situation is drawing the attention of the public from the occupiers' actions to the lack of response."

On Feb. 12, the OPS, the Ontario Provincial Police and the RCMP formed an Integrated Command Centre to coordinate their response to the Ottawa protests.

By that point, other protests against pandemic measures were erupting across the country. One shut down the border crossing at the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor. Ont. — Canada's busiest commercial route.

On Feb. 10, the U.S. urged the federal government to use its emergency powers to end border blockades, according to a Privy Council Office national operations update released as part of the document dump.

On Feb. 14, Trudeau announced the government would invoke the Emergencies Act for the first time since it was crafted in 1988 — a controversial move that gave authorities temporary powers that included the ability to freeze the bank accounts and credit cards of protesters. Attending any event deemed an unlawful assembly, such as the Ottawa convoy protest, also became illegal.

"It is now clear that there are serious challenges to law enforcement's ability to effectively enforce the law," Trudeau said during a news conference that day. The act was revoked on Feb. 23 after police cleared Ottawa streets.

Talk of a 'breakthrough' the night before invocation 

According to court documents previously made public, Thomas — who was the former deputy minister of national defence before becoming Trudeau's top intelligence adviser  — told cabinet there was "potential for a breakthrough" with convoy leaders the night before the Emergencies Act was invoked. 

Those redacted court documents were filed recently in Federal Court as part of a lawsuit challenging the government's use of the act.

The court documents do not include any details about the possible breakthrough cited by Thomas on Feb. 13.

The office of Canada's public safety minister has since said that Thomas was referring to negotiations led "principally" by the City of Ottawa that were "ultimately unsuccessful" after being "disavowed" by many associated with the convoy.

"The government considered this as a factor in the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act," said a statement from Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino's office.

"The situation remained volatile and the threat of future blockades remained. In Ottawa, there was a significant escalation in the boldness of the protestors and ... the city's 911 system was overloaded due to hoax calls."

WATCH | Why Ottawa protesters seem to be a step ahead of police

Experts say the presence of former police officers within the ranks of the Ottawa protesters is giving them a tactical edge over local law enforcement.

Weeks after the occupation ended, Thomas defended the decision to use the act, saying the protesters were "dug in" and "there's no doubt [they] came to overthrow the government."

The government's decision to invoke the Emergencies Act has drawn intense criticism from political opponents and civil liberty advocates.

From the opposition benches, Mendicino has faced calls to resign and questions about who wanted the government to deploy emergency powers.

As part of themergences Act, a public inquiry is being held to analyze the federal government's reasons for deploying emergency measures.

That inquiry was scheduled to start later this month but has been delayed until Oct. 13.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca
DIY FASCISM
Report shows extremism becoming individualized as organized groups fall out of favour in Alberta

Author of the article:Dylan Short
Publishing date:Sep 03, 2022 • 
A Soldiers of Odin member stands guard at an anti-Islam rally at Calgary city hall on Saturday, June 3, 2017. A new report says organized hate groups such as the Soldiers of Odin are giving way to more individualized examples of extremism. 

PHOTO BY BRYAN PASSIFIUME /SunMedia

A new report on hate and extremism in Alberta and Canada shows there has been a trend for people prone to radical ideas acting alone rather than with a group.

The report, released this week by the Organization for the Prevention of Violence, showed that, over the past three years, groups that were once prevalent in Alberta, such as the Soldiers of Odin and the Three Percenters, who were prone to ideological violence, have largely disbanded or become disorganized. In their place, much of the extremism in the province and throughout North America has moved towards people acting alone.

Michael King, OPV’s director of research, said Canada has been willing to label groups as hate organizations, a distinction most people don’t want to be associated with.

“This has spooked people,” said King. “People are less interested in being in these groups.”

King said, in turn, there has been an increase in “salad bar” extremism, where individuals will pick and choose radical ideas that they associate with from various ideologies and groups.

“People picking and choosing stuff from neo-Nazi ideology, picking elements of it, but not everything. Then also picking stuff from the sovereign citizens movement or the freemen on the land movement, but not everything,” said King. “They don’t go super extreme, but they do think some parts of that are applicable and then they also espouse some of the theories of QAnon and they put that all together and then they have their own ideology.”

King said the move to a more individualistic brand of ideological extremism could make people prone to violence more difficult to detect as they wouldn’t be as easily identifiable. However, he said lone actors would have a more difficult time causing widespread, large-scale violence.

He said that while there are a lot of experts who are focused on one type of extreme ideology, such as experts on ISIS, moving forward people will have to be able to spot a larger number of ideologies.

John McCoy, executive director of OPV, said there has also been a rise in anti-government and anti-authority movements.

“We’ve seen kind of a lot of anti-authority, anti-government sentiments, and in some cases, you know, moving into the realm of promotion of violence or violent extremism,” said McCoy. “There’s a lot of anger that drives towards people in government but also drives towards the media.”

He said the rise of people who are acting alone and buying into conspiracy theories is making it difficult for people who are combating extremism to pick out who is prone to violence. Pointing to the Nova Scotia shootings where a gunman killed 22 people, the brothers in Saanich, B.C., who were killed during a bank robbery and members of the Coutts blockade who were found with weapons, McCoy said a lot of the ideological violence in Canada has not been group-affiliated but has had anti-authority sentiments attached to it.

“There’s no group affiliation,” said McCoy. “It’s sort of like a loose network of like-minded individuals with grievances being particularly important, and grievances towards government particularly important.”

King said there has also been an identified rise in people suffering from mental-health issues becoming prone to radicalization. He said moving forward, there will have to be conversations and discussions around whether a psychosocial intervention is needed to prevent violence or if a security or law enforcement approach is best suited to intervene.

“They need to consider psychosocial responses to some of these cases. Not all of these cases fit that bill, but the government needs to increasingly consider that as a viable counterterrorism tool,” said King.

dshort@postmedia.com

70% of Chileans in Canada support draft constitution, as majority in Chile vote to reject it

The 'reject' camp won the referendum Sunday, meaning Chile will keep its Pinochet-era constitution for now

Sebastian Ried, a Chilean living in Hamilton, voted in the referendum at a polling station in Toronto, one of six cities where Chileans could vote in Canada. He felt 'hope and fear' earlier in the day but was saddened by the results, he said Sunday evening. (Submitted by Sebastian Ried)
While voters in Chile made it clear Sunday they do not support the constitution that was proposed to replace the dictatorship-era document the country currently has, Chileans in Canada overwhelmingly voted in support of the draft.

"I'm sad but the results were overwhelming," Sebastian Ried, a Chilean man who lives in Hamilton and voted in the referendum from Canada, said Sunday evening. 

With 99 per cent of the votes counted, the rejection camp had 61.9 per cent support compared to 38.1 per cent for approval. Unlike recent elections, voting was mandatory.

Meanwhile, results from Chileans abroad were exactly reversed — 60.9 per cent voted to support the new draft, 39.1 per cent rejected. In Canada, the gap was even wider, with 70.4 per cent supporting, 29.6 per cent rejecting. 

There were around 15 million Chilean citizens and residents eligible to vote, including 97,000 Chileans abroad. Six cities in Canada held polling stations Sunday: Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Ottawa, Winnipeg and Montreal. A total of 4,838 Chileans cast ballots in those cities by the end of the day. 

"It scares me that advances for the rights of women, Indigenous peoples and the environmental are not being recognized," said Ried who voted in support of the draft and had felt a mix of hope and fear earlier in the day.

If the proposal had passed, it would have replaced the constitution imposed under the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet and dramatically changed the country. 

Daniela Caballero, who came to Canada with her husband Cristian Mansilla and their daughter in 2019, also voted in support of the draft, saying she was hoping it would help lessen inequality in Chile. 

"First of all, I'd like to say I appreciate the transparency, and how quickly we are getting the results," she said after polls closed. "I'm proud of the democracy that we have, far from Pinochet's dictatorship."

Still, she was sorry to see the results, she said. "Looks like this is not how we will change the constitution.... I hope tonight every Chilean (especially the politicians) takes a big breath and thinks about how we are going to do it." 

Significant changes had been proposed

The vote came less than a year after leftist Gabriel Boric, a former student activist, won the presidential election in Chile and nearly three years after protests broke out in the country calling for, among other reforms, a new constitution.

"I think [the draft] recognizes a series of rights and problems that our country has not accepted. And it seems to me that it is a very good first step to building a fairer and better country for all Chileans," Ried said earlier on Sunday. 

According to Pascal Lupien, a political science professor at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ont., whose research focuses on Latin America and social movements, the new constitution would have been a complete overhaul.

"I mean, it's just completely different … Chile would go from a very conservative, elitist, rigid constitution to one of the most progressive constitutions in the world," he said before the vote. 

Some changes laid out in the draft included the abolition of the senate to replace it with a chamber of regions which, as the name states, would represent the different regions of the country.

The draft also listed education, housing and healthcare as rights, which would have been run by the state.

Nature would have also been accorded rights, Lupien said, something that could have caused tension with the country's powerful mining industry, which Canada also has stakes in.

According to the Canadian government, Chile is Canada's top investment destination in South and Central America —12th worldwide — with Canadian companies "present in mining, utilities, chemicals, transportation and storage services and financial services." 

According to Lupien, Chile is the only country in Latin America that doesn't recognize Indigenous people in its constitution. The draft proposed more rights, including some land rights, for Indigenous people, he said. 

That section in particular had been the target of misinformation in both Chilean media and social media, Lupien said.

"[This] has led a lot of people to believe that this will basically cause the state to disintegrate [and] that Indigenous people will be able to impose Indigenous law on non-Indigenous people."

That was not in fact the case, Lupien said.

Mixed reactions to the draft

Going into Sunday, Chileans both in Chile and in Canada were divided on the decision to change the constitution. 

One Chilean man, not in Canada, said in a tweet translated from Spanish that the reason why he was rejecting the new draft is that "Chile is getting farther from Toronto and closer to Caracas, Venezuela. Chile is being destroyed from within like cancer," he wrote on Friday.

One woman writing from Canada, said she was voting to reject it as, in her view, "the new Constitution only divides," she said on Twitter Sunday.

Daniela Caballero and Cristian Mansilla immigrated to Canada from Chile with their daughter in 2019. (Submitted by Daniela Caballero)

From Canada, where thousands of Chileans came as refugees during the Pinochet era, Caballero said the vote had "a special meaning."

"[My generation is] the sons and daughters of democracy. We didn't live in a dictatorship [like our parents did]," she said.

Chile returned to democracy in 1990 but Pinochet's constitution remained. 

"For some of those adults that were young when [Pinochet] was there, they say, 'OK, this is the last step to take this guy out.'" 

'Back to the drawing board'

Lupien says there will likely be another constitutional convention after another draft is written. "Likely, they will be forced to remove some of the more progressive elements," he said.

"There's going to be, I think, a lot of turmoil, because there are a lot of people that have really been pushing for this.

"They will have to just go back to the drawing board... The decision to write a new constitution has been made, but that will probably take another year or so."

Ried says it's still the right time for a change in the country, with it closing in on the 50th anniversary of the 1973 Chilean coup d'état. 

"As a minimum moral duty to our country, we deserve to start the 50 years of this anniversary with a new constitution."

UN monitors thrust into debate over what to do with 1.4 trillion litres of oilsands wastewater

International scrutiny comes as Canada works toward new rules that could see release of treated water for first time

Author of the article: Meghan Potkins
Publishing date: Aug 26, 2022\

Scarecrows, used to deter birds from landing, stand in the Syncrude Canada Ltd. 
tailings pond in the Athabasca Oil Sands near Fort McMurray, Alberta, in 2018. 
PHOTO BY BEN NELMS/BLOOMBERG
t
When the Mikisew Cree First Nation grew tired of warning elected officials that the Peace-Athabasca Delta in northern Alberta was slowly drying up, they went international in a bid to find help.

That’s how a group of United Nations monitors came to be seated in a community hall in the remote community of Fort Chipewyan last weekend, going over the nation’s list of concerns for Wood Buffalo National Park, the site of one of the largest freshwater deltas in the world and and home to endangered whooping cranes and the continent’s largest wild bison populatio

“We just felt ignored, like our concerns were not being heard,” said Melody Lepine, Mikisew First Nation’s director of government and industry relations. “So we went international and UNESCO listened.”

This is the second mission to northern Alberta by UNESCO investigators since 2016. Monitors, who concluded their trip Friday, will try to determine whether Wood Buffalo National Park should be on the list of World Heritage Sites in Danger — an outcome the UN agency has suggested is likely, since Canada hasn’t made enough progress in addressing a number of threats to the Peace-Athabasca Delta, including the impact of oilsands tailings ponds on water quality.



Representatives of the Mikisew Cree and UNESCO delegation earlier this week. 
PHOTO BY SUPPLIED/COURTESY MELODY LEPINE

The international scrutiny comes as the federal and Alberta governments are working to develop new regulatory requirements that could enable the release of treated water from the oilsands mines for the first time since the sector’s inception.



For its part, the oilsands industry says wastewater used in the industry’s bitumen mining process that has been stored for decades in vast toxic ponds in northern Alberta can be treated and safely released back into the environment.

An oilsands tailings pond north of Fort McMurray, in 2011. 
PHOTO BY TODD KOROL/REUTERS FILES

The sector has been working on plans for the reclamation of tailings sites — a process the industry says will require the release of wastewater into the Athabasca River. Unlike other mining and industrial operations in the country, oilsands operators have not been permitted to release treated water and volumes have been building for decades — now in the range of 1.4 trillion litres.

“We’re very much in alignment in wanting to protect the downstream environment and protect the Peace-Athabasca Delta and obviously, the Wood Buffalo National Park,” Rodney Guest, Suncor Energy Inc.’s director of water and closure, told reporters last week during a briefing hosted by the Mining Association of Canada.

“When we talk about designing these (tailings) facilities and doing the integrated water management, across the board it takes into consideration the nature and the need to protect these valuable, beautiful areas for those uses.”

Water used in the oilsands is recycled again and again before it is eventually stored in tailings facilities. Tailings are the sand, silt, clay and water separated from the bitumen during processing — a highly toxic mix that includes residual hydrocarbons, salts, organic compounds and metals — stored in engineered dams or dykes constructed above ground or in mined-out pits.

The sight of tailings ponds in northern Alberta will be familiar to most Canadians, associated with headlines decrying the migratory birds that die each year from landing on the ponds. The tailings themselves — captured in stark, iconic images by the likes of famed Canadian photographer Edward Burtynsky — have arguably taken on outsized symbolic significance, as they have become emblematic of the industry.

A duck gets its bill cleaned after landing in a tailings pond in 2008. 
PHOTO BY JORDAN VERLAGE/SPECIAL TO THE SUN

Some reclamation of tailings sites has already occurred and several large field pilots are underway. But industry says it will be necessary for treated water to be released for reclamation to occur at a majority of tailings sites, and advocates insist there are proven methods for doing so safely, including chemical treatment techniques, sedimentation and flotation processes, and filtration.

Responses from environmental and Indigenous groups to these assurances range from skepticism to outright opposition.

Indigenous communities in northern Alberta were already concerned with the proximity of tailings ponds to the Athabasca River, alarmed over evidence of infiltration into groundwater, and concerned about the impact of other upstream developments such as British Columbia’s Site C hydro dam project. Communities such as the Mikisew Cree First Nation and the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) have been meeting with UN monitors this week, and Indigenous leaders say they want to be consulted before any treated tailings are released into the Athabasca River.


A log lays in a tailings pond at the Suncor oilsands operations
 in Fort McMurray, in 2014. 
PHOTO BY TODD KOROL/REUTERS FILES

“We’re basically in jeopardy of losing our ecological system,” said ACFN Chief Allan Adam. “There’s a lot people downstream that are not too happy about what is happening today and they’re going to voice their opinion and they’re going to make sure that their concerns are heard loud and clear.”

Oilsands companies say the sector is ready to deploy water treatment technologies; they just need to see new regulatory requirements, which are expected in 2025. The industry believes it is both technically and economically possible to process tailings water for release back into the environment.

“We’ve done lots of testing to know that we can treat the water and get the chemistry into the acceptable range for aquatic organisms and the environment,” Suncor’s Guest said.

We're basically in jeopardy of losing our ecological system
ALLAN ADAM, ACFN CHIEF

Total water volumes currently stored in tailings ponds are equal to about two per cent of the annual flow of the Athabasca River. Industry officials say treated water volumes would be released slowly, over many years. The sector has not released a dollar figure for the cost of treating and releasing tailings water, but Guest suggested that it would be “substantial.”

Despite the efforts underway to draft regulations for the release of tailings water, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault recently made clear in public comments that releasing oilsands wastewater isn’t the only option and Ottawa will be looking at other solutions, including recycling it back into operations or injecting the water underground.

Guilbeault also said last week that treated water would have to be drinkable in order to be released into the Athabasca — a comment that was poorly received by several industry experts, who said no other mining or heavy industry is required to meet such a standard.

An aerial view of a tailings pond near Fort McMurray. 
PHOTO BY RYAN JACKSON/EDMONTON JOURNAL

“Nowhere in Canada, nowhere in North America, do we do a direct reuse of industrial wastewater for drinking water purposes,” Guest said. “We do not treat industrial wastewater and then turn around and put it in a pipeline and pipe it into somebody’s home.”

Oilpatch veteran Greg Stringham acknowledged the debate around the disposal of oilsands wastewater and the reclamation of tailings sites has been politicized.

“Lots of other industries have materials that they need to deal with on a waste basis and this one seems to attract a lot of attention — but rightfully so, there’s a lot of it, so it needs to be done correctly,” said Stringham, former vice-president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.

The ultimate goal needs to be long-term sustainability and water quality that is equal to or above what's in the environment around it
GREG STRINGHAM

“I’m not going to put blame on either side. I’m just saying that the ultimate goal needs to be long-term sustainability and water quality that is equal to or above what’s in the environment around it.”

But Indigenous communities say existing regulations haven’t done enough to protect the Peace-Athabasca Delta and they’re worried about the consequences of releasing the tailings.\

One regulatory problem, according to an independent report commissioned by the Mikisew Cree, is the province’s weak mechanism for ensuring adequate funds are in place for the reclamation and remediation of mines.

The total estimated environmental liabilities of Alberta’s mines officially climbed above $33 billion in June 2021, although some sources have pegged the liabilities for the oilsands alone at $130 billion. Regardless, the regulator’s rules have allowed companies to set aside only $1.5 billion for cleanup under the Mine Financial Security Program. Critics say recent changes have weakened the rules further by allowing companies to provide financial surety in the form of a “surety bond” rather than cash, something experts say amounts to a promise that the company will have the money when the time comes for cleanup.

Alberta’s own auditor general has warned that the rules won’t protect taxpayers from being liable in the event of a broad decline in the oilsands sector — an eventuality that can’t be discounted amid declining investment in fossil fuels due to climate concerns.

“We absolutely don’t support the treatment and release of oilsands process water, including tailings. We don’t have any confidence in it,” Lepine said. “We’re relying on really broken, weak regulatory systems already in place that are causing these impacts and allowing these impacts to continue. So we don’t have any trust, we don’t have any confidence that they can do this.”
Canada turns to 1977 treaty with U.S. for second time in Line 5 battle

A shutdown could have 'domino effects' on thousands of jobs in the oil industry

Author of the article: Naimul Karim
Publishing date:Aug 29, 2022 •
Equipment along the Enbridge Inc.'s Line 5 pipeline route in Sarnia, Ont.
 PHOTO BY COLE BURSTON/BLOOMBERG FILES

Canada has invoked a 45-year-old treaty for the second time to trigger direct negotiations with U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration to ensure that oil flows into southern Ontario through Enbridge Inc.’s Line 5 pipeline.

The federal government formally invoked the 1977 Transit Pipelines Treaty to begin a dispute settlement process that will set up direct communication with Washington over the pipeline that carries light crude oil and natural gas liquids from Alberta to Ontario through the United States.

In October, the government turned to the treaty when Michigan tried to shut the line down over concerns about a potential spill. On Monday, the treaty was invoked in response to “serious concerns regarding the possible shutting down” of the pipeline on the Bad River Band tribe’s reservation in northern Wisconsin.

“The economic and energy disruption and damage to Canada and the U.S. from a Line 5 shutdown would be widespread and significant,” Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly said in a statement. “At a time when global inflation is making it hard on families to make ends meet, these are unacceptable outcomes.”

Joly added that a shutdown could have “domino effects” on the jobs of thousands of Canadians in the oil industry and other connected sectors and communities on both sides of the border.
Canada and the U.S. has held two meetings since it invoked the treaty for the first time in October, a foreign affairs spokesperson said. Prior to turning to the treaty for the second time, the two countries met thrice “informally” to address concerns around Line 5 in Wisconsin.

Calgary-based Enbridge Inc., which owns Line 5 and is North America’s largest pipeline company, has been fighting Michigan in a legal battle over the pipeline. In July, the state’s regulators ordered the company to file additional information on the safety of its proposed Line 5 oil pipeline tunnel which it plans to build to rehouse its existing 540,000 barrel per day pipeline.

The company also has a proposal to relocate the segment of the Line 5 outside and around the Big River Band Reservation, which Joly said Canada “strongly supports.”

“Canada respects the rights and interests of Indigenous peoples, such as the Bad River Band’s governance of their territory as a U.S. Tribe,” Joly said. “In the forthcoming negotiations with the United States under the treaty, Canada is committed to working constructively to find a solution that responds to the interests of communities.”

In a statement, Enbridge said it appreciated the Canadian government’s efforts to keep the line operating.

“Enbridge remains open to resolving this matter amicably with the Bad River Band… the company is actively pursuing permits for a 41-mile re-route of Line 5 around the Reservation,” Enbridge said, adding that pipelines continue to be a safer and more reliable way to transport fuel than a truck, train or barge since the other modes burn more fuel, releasing more greenhouse gases.

The 1977 treaty was initially pushed by the U.S. government at a time when oil producers were interested in building a pipeline from Alaska through Canada to the lower 48 states.

It states that “no public authority in either party shall institute any measures … which are intended to, or which would have the effect of, impeding, diverting, redirecting or interfering with in any way the transmission of hydrocarbon in transit.”

IN OILBERTA
Largest rooftop solar array in Canada installed at Edmonton Expo Centre

By Emily Mertz Global News
Posted August 18, 2022

When the $5-million solar panel project is done at the Edmonton Expo Centre, it will be the largest rooftop solar array in the country. Sarah Reid reports. – Aug 18, 2022



There are certainly other buildings in Edmonton with rooftop solar panels, but the Expo Centre is certainly the biggest.

In fact, when the $5-million project is done, it will be the largest rooftop solar array in the country.

READ MORE: City of Edmonton offering rebates for green home improvements

The Expo Centre will have 5,754 solar panels installed in Phase 1 of the project (across 193,735 square feet above Halls D through H) and if approved, Phase 2 will see more panels installed over Halls A, B and C.

“The Edmonton EXPO Centre is a unicorn of sorts when it comes to rooftop solar panels,” program manager Brad Watson said.

“Its size and dimensions, unobstructed sightlines and lack of interfering rooftop infrastructure allowed us to build an array of this size.”

2:55 Alberta energy industry undergoing green transition – Apr 23, 2021


The Expo’s solar array will generate at least 2.8 gigawatts of energy annually, “equal to that of about 375 homes,” Watson explained.

It’s estimated to save about $290,000 to $460,000 per year.

Solar panels on the roof of the Edmonton Expo Centre on Thursday, Aug. 18, 2022. Global News

“Our new rooftop solar installation means that we will be producing our own renewable, clean solar energy right here on top of our building,” Melissa Radu, with Explore Edmonton, said.

“It also acts as a reminder to Edmontonians and visitors to our city that Edmonton is a leader for innovative energy technologies in our country and that we are working hard to support a transition to a lower-carbon economy.”

READ MORE: Edmonton signs 20-year wind and solar contracts as part of net-zero goal

The solar system is expected to have a lifespan of at least 25 years. The city forecasts it will pay for itself within 10 to 17 years, taking into account fluctuations in energy prices and energy consumption. Phase 1 is expected to be complete in November.

Phase 2 will add a production of approximately 1.9 gigawatts to the system and the estimated cost is roughly $3.4 million. Phase 2 would add an additional saving of about $185,000 to $300,000 per year, the city said.

There are 10 other solar projects in Edmonton and there are currently six city solar arrays operating.

Solar panels on the roof of the Edmonton Expo Centre on Thursday, Aug. 18, 2022.
 Global News

© 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
Burning forests for energy isn’t ‘renewable’ – now the EU must admit it

Greta Thunberg and others

The EU’s classification of wood fuels is accelerating the climate crisis. Next week, a key vote can change that



‘Forests degraded by clearcutting are also more flammable, and in the midst of an accelerating climate crisis, this is a huge risk.’ A clearcut forest in North Carolina, America, where trees are made into wood pellets.
 Photograph: Matt Adam Williams/PA

Mon 5 Sep 2022 

Next week the future of many of the world’s forests will be decided when members of the European parliament vote on a revised EU renewable energy directive. If the parliament fails to change the EU’s discredited and harmful renewables policy, European citizens’ tax money will continue to pay for forests around the globe to literally go up in smoke every day.

Europe’s directly elected representatives now have to choose: they can either save the EU’s “climate targets” with their legislative loopholes or they can begin saving our climate, because right now, that is not what EU targets are working towards.


Increasing volumes of wood pellets and other wood fuels are being imported from outside the EU to satisfy Europe’s growing appetite for burning forests for energy. This is an appetite that the existing EU renewable energy directive incentivises. It does this by classifying forest biomass on paper as zero-carbon emissions when in reality, burning forest biomass will produce higher emissions than fossil fuels during the coming decisive decades.


'Carbon-neutrality is a fairy tale': how the race for renewables is burning Europe's forests


The interlinked crises of wars and rising food and energy prices underline the urgent need for policies that enable energy saving and energy efficiency, and the importance of decarbonising the EU’s energy sector. It should be obvious that decarbonising can only be done by using non-carbon energy sources. It is critical to phase out fossil fuels, but the energy sources we replace them with are just as important.

The EU’s renewable energy directive should apply solely to actual renewable energy forms – and forests are not renewable. Forests are ecosystems created by nature that cannot be replanted. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states that we need to restore and preserve more forest ecosystems – but as internationally renowned scientists have warned, the EU’s renewable energy directive incentivises a daily loss of irreplaceable forest ecosystems in favour of the harmful replanting of new trees.

There is just not enough time for these tree plantations to regrow to be in line with the Paris agreement. Forest biomass takes minutes to burn, whereas it takes anywhere from decades to centuries for the climate and environmentally harmful tree plantations to resequester the carbon emitted. This equals decades of carbon debts that we do not have time for.

The same goes for the burning of what the industry calls forest residues, such as treetops and branches. Burning any part of the tree means burning carbon. When forestry residues come from an 80-year-old tree, it will take 80 years for an equivalent tree to regrow – and this is time we do not have.

For forest residues to become sustainable end-products, forestry needs to be sustainable in the first place; but this is not the case today. Most people would assume a few things about our forests based on what they’ve been told: first, that Europe has a fair amount of protected forests – and even if not yet as much as the EU has promised, that protection rates are at least moving in the right direction. Other common misconceptions are that forestry is carried out sustainably, that predominantly climate-friendlywood products are produced, and that only forest residues are burned for energy.

In reality, none of this is true for the EU today. Strictly protected forests are being logged daily, half of what is logged in EU forests, not just residues, is burned as fuel. Certified and supposedly “sustainable” forestry causes increased emissions, a daily loss of biodiversity and a systematic violation of indigenous peoples’ rights in Europe’s Arctic regions.

Wood store of the biomass power plant in Viehhausen, Germany. 
Photograph: Lukas Barth/Reuters

The policy-driven conversion of forests to environmentally harmful tree plantations is threatening the way of life of indigenous Sámi communities. Their reindeer have survived the harsh arctic climate for time immemorial, but after only 60 years of so-called sustainable forestry, 71% of lichen-rich forests crucial for the survival of the reindeer have already disappeared in Sweden. Sámi communities are sounding the alarm: they are telling us “the reindeer are starving”.

Forests degraded by clearcutting are also more flammable, and in the midst of an accelerating climate crisis, this is a huge risk. This was clearly demonstrated by the out-of-control fires that broke out across Europe in the recent extreme heat, leading to a large-scale release of carbon, further intensifying climate breakdown.

We need to drastically reduce all types of greenhouse gas emissions, not only those from fossil fuels. In addition, and not instead of, we must remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Instead of trusting non-existent, unreliable and expensive carbon capture technologies, the best way to do that is to protect and restore more forests. If we continuously log forests, there will always be more carbon in the atmosphere than if the forest had remained unlogged. Due to incentivised logging, the EU is already beginning to see the collapse of its carbon sinks in countries like Finland and Estonia.

We clearly need to move towards ecosystems-based forestry and away from today’s forestry model, which means thinning, clearcuts and the planting of industrial tree stands.

Such a shift would equal more sustainable rural jobs and lead to more climate-resilient forests, both of which are vital for a just transition. On that note, all subsidies given to burn forest biomass must be reallocated to true renewables such as offshore-wind, solar and geothermal.

Yet as things stand, the renewable energy directive creates a downward-facing negative spiral. We can, however, turn this around. Members of the European parliament have a precious window of opportunity and a duty. They have until 1pm on Wednesday to table an amendment to remove forest biomass from the renewable energy directive. They can vote this change through on 13 September. They have 48 hours to do the right thing. If they fail, they will lock in decades of increased carbon emissions, biodiversity loss and human rights violations.





Greta Thunberg of Fridays for Future Sweden co-wrote this article with Lina Burnelius of Protect the Forest Sweden; Sommer Ackerman of Europe Beyond Burning; Sofia Jannok, Sámi artist and environmental activist; Ida Korhonen of Luonto-Liitto, Finland; Janne Hirvasvuopio, Sámi and environmental activist; Jan Saijets, Sámi activist; Fenna Swart of Comite Schone Lucht, Netherlands; and Anne-Sofie Sadolin Henningsen of Forests of the World, Denmark