Monday, April 29, 2024

 

Fading lights: Comprehensive study unveils multiple threats to North America’s firefly populations



As cities grow, they encroach on firefly natural habitats reducing their populations. A multi-university study is hoping to begin reversing the decline of this critical insect.



UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY






A landmark study conducted by the University of Kentucky Martin-Gatton College of Agriculture, Food and Environment; Bucknell University; Penn State University; and the USDA has shed light onto the precarious situation facing firefly populations across North America. The study’s results identified multiple factors impacting their numbers, offering a deep dive into how shifting environmental and human factors influence these iconic insects.

The study, published in Science of the Total Environment“Illuminating Patterns of Firefly Abundance Using Citizen Science Data and Machine Learning Models,” identified the factors likely responsible for troubling declines in firefly populations across North America. To study these population changes, the research used a mix of field surveys from citizen scientists and advanced machine learning techniques to analyze over 24,000 surveys from the Firefly Watch citizen science initiative.

Key Findings

This research marks the first comprehensive attempt to apply a data-driven approach to understanding firefly population dynamics on a continental scale. Key findings from this new study indicate that fireflies, part of the beetle order, are sensitive to various environmental factors, from short-term weather conditions to longer climatic trends, including the number of growing-degree days related to temperature accumulations.

“Subtle changes in climate patterns, especially related to temperature, are significantly impacting firefly breeding cycles and habitat quality,” said Darin McNeil, study principal investigator and assistant professor of wildlife ecology and management.

Christina Grozinger, publius vergilius maro professor of entomology at Penn State University, said while scientists previously knew that urbanization, agricultural intensification and climate change can affect biodiversity, less was known about how these complex factors interact and what people can do in their own backyards, towns and cities to support biodiversity.

“In this study, we integrated large scale data sets on species abundance, land use, soil type, weather and climate using machine learning models to precisely model and predict firefly abundance patterns at the local scale across the eastern U.S.,” Grozinger said. “We were very fortunate to have a multi-year citizen science data set that spanned more than 24,000 observations.”

The study underscores fireflies' sensitivity to climatic variables such as temperature and precipitation. Fireflies thrive in temperate conditions, with wet and warm summers creating the ideal breeding environment and cold winters supporting the survival of immature stages like eggs, larvae and pupae.

However, as global temperatures rise, these conditions become less predictable and, often, less hospitable. Changes in precipitation patterns, another critical factor for firefly survival, have led to either overly dry conditions that reduce larval survival or excessively wet conditions that can flood breeding grounds and disrupt life cycles.

“Artificial lights at night could disrupt firefly populations, possibly affecting both adult and larval stages,” McNeil said. “Firefly larvae, which live in the soil, are particularly vulnerable to changes in light exposure and artificial light could alter their developmental cycles and survival rates. Firefly larvae, which are predatory, also require moist soil conditions because the humidity supports soft-bodied invertebrates like snails and slugs that firefly larvae use as prey.”

Urban growth, such as establishing impervious surfaces such as sidewalks, buildings and roads, poses a significant threat to firefly populations by invading natural habitats and decreasing available breeding areas. Light pollution from streetlights and commercial signs is particularly disruptive, as it interferes with the fireflies' bioluminescent communication essential for mating. The study indicates that fireflies are markedly less common in areas with significant nighttime light pollution.

Agriculture impact on fireflies

Certain agricultural practices also seem to contribute to the decline of fireflies. The extensive use of pesticides and herbicides has been linked to decreased firefly numbers, likely due to reduced prey availability and direct toxicity. This new study did not find a pesticide effect; in fact, certain agricultural areas supported some of the highest firefly densities, perhaps because some practices (e.g., livestock grazing) support meadow-like conditions that benefit fireflies. The study warns against increasing agricultural intensification, especially practices that reduce the organic debris and moist environments firefly larvae require to thrive.

The paper reveals that the decline in firefly populations is not uniform across all climates or regions. Some species adapted to dryer environments or those with specific breeding patterns may be less affected by certain changes, whereas others are more vulnerable. This highlights the complexity of natural ecosystems and the need for tailored conservation strategies.

The research team also made significant strides in identifying potential conservation measures to mitigate these impacts. These include reducing light pollution, preserving natural habitats and implementing wildlife-friendly agricultural practices that support fireflies.

Fireflies’ importance in the environment

The decline of fireflies is more than the loss of a beloved natural spectacle; it signals broader ecological disruptions that could have cascading effects on other species and ecosystems. Fireflies play a role in the food web, serving as prey for some species and as predators for many invertebrates. Their disappearance could have unforeseen repercussions on local biodiversity.

“As the study concludes, further research is encouraged, particularly in exploring the long-term trends of firefly populations and the efficacy of various conservation strategies” McNeil said. “Moving forward, focused studies that survey particular firefly species, rather than the firefly community as a whole, will be important. This approach will be crucial in ensuring that future generations can also enjoy the natural wonder of fireflies lighting up the night sky.”  

“Each individual species has its own habitat requirement and things it needs to succeed,” adds Bucknell University assistant professor of biology Sarah Lower, a noted firefly researcher. “With the citizen science data in this study, we’re looking at fireflies in the aggregate, but we would like people in citizen science getting more training in species identification. If we can get species-level information, we can provide more specifics on species living in a particular area and how best to protect them.”

To create similar data sets for other firefly species, the research team is also leveraging technology and AI to develop automated monitoring systems through an NSF funded INSECT NET graduate training program.

Individuals interested in learning more about the land use, weather and climate conditions in their locations can use Penn State's Beescape tool, which provides location-specific habitat quality scores for pollinators.

This work was funded by the Penn State Insect Biodiversity Center, Penn State’s Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences and Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences via the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations.

 

uOttawa scientists team up with global partners to secure your coffee’s future


UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA
uOttawa scientists team up with global partners to secure your coffee’s future 

IMAGE: 

“THE RESEARCH DELVED INTO ITS CONNECTIONS WITH DIFFERENT COFFEE SPECIES, ESPECIALLY ITS BEGINNINGS AS A HYBRID WITH TWO SEPARATE SUB-GENOMES AND HOW IT IS RESPONDING TO ENVIRONMENTAL OBSTACLES”

DAVID SANKOFF

— FULL PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, FACULTY OF SCIENCE

view more 

CREDIT: UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA




Are you a fan of sipping a cup of coffee and enjoying its delightful fragrance? This popular beverage, loved by people worldwide, can be traced back to the humble coffee plant, specifically, the Coffea arabica species. How did this plant evolve into the drink we all know today? And what measures can we take to ensure its future?

Coffea arabica is a widely-cultivated coffee species with a complex evolutionary history. Scientists from the University of Ottawa took part in a recent study that examined its genomic variations. The study discovered important genes associated with resistance to pathogens, providing valuable information on breeding opportunities and mechanisms for diversification.

A global team of 70 researchers from 15 different laboratories, including uOttawa’s bioinformatics lab, collaborated on this project. David Sankoff, full professor in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at the Faculty of Science, worked alongside PhD candidate Zhe Yu, whose PhD thesis is related to this study. Likewise, Daniella Santos Muñoz conducted research for her master’s thesis in connection with the project. Other contributors included former PhD student Chunfang Zheng and visiting professor João Meidanis from Brazil.

The production of coffee, particularly Coffea arabica, renowned for its exceptional quality and taste, plays a significant role in the world economy. Researching the genomic and evolutionary history of this species is essential for enhancing breeding practices and ensuring the sustainability of coffee farming.

Sankoff highlight’s the project’s “detailed study of the evolution, genetics, geography and history of the Arabica coffee genome. The research carried out in our own lab delved into its connections with different coffee species, especially its beginnings as a hybrid with two separate sub-genomes and how it is responding to environmental obstacles, by examining changes in the sub-genomes.”

Genomics for disease-resistant coffee crops

The study discovered intricate gene clusters in Coffea arabica, pinpointing genomic areas associated with disease resistance, indicating potential methods to enhance the resilience of coffee plants.

“The field research was primarily conducted by teams in France and Brazil. Wet-lab experiments took place in Nestlé’s laboratory in Switzerland, while raw data was managed at Cornell University in the United States. The analysis was carried out by researchers from the United States, Finland, Singapore, France, Belgium, Italy and other locations, including our own laboratory. The writing process was mainly coordinated by Professor Jarkko Salojärvi in Singapore and Finland,” says Sankoff.

The variety of coffee plants available today underscores the significance of genetic diversity in coffee breeding. This diversity enables the development of superior coffee plants with enhanced flavour, higher yields and increased environmental sustainability.

The study’s genomic analysis sheds light on the evolutionary trajectory and genetic potential of Coffea arabica, offering resources for coffee breeding. Harnessing the power of genomics will help realize the potential of this beloved beverage crop and ensure its continued success in the face of rapidly evolving agricultural challenges from pathogens and climate warming.

The study, titled The genome and population genomics of allopolyploid Coffea arabica reveal the diversification history of modern coffee cultivars, was published in Nature Genetics.

 

Electric vehicle drivers can estimate their personalized fuel savings with new Argonne tool


New tool allows public to calculate electric vehicle savings to their ZIP code



DOE/ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Car Charging 1600x900 

IMAGE: 

VEHICLE PLUGGED INTO A CHARGING STATION.

view more 

CREDIT: (IMAGE BY ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY.)





A new tool launched by Argonne enables drivers to estimate, at the ZIP code level, how much they save on fuel costs by driving an electric vehicle.

A new tool launched by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory enables drivers to estimate, at the ZIP code level, how much they save on fuel costs by driving a plug-in electric vehicle (either a plug-in hybrid (PHEV) or a battery electric vehicle (BEV)).

The tool, Driving Electric: Local Fuel Savings Calculator, is freely available to the public. Drivers can enter their ZIP code or state, as well as any information they have about their vehicle size, model year, tank size, fuel economy and annual mileage. The tool then generates estimates of how much drivers can save.

“Driving a plug-in electric vehicle rather than a conventionally fueled vehicle results in fuel cost savings and reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in more than 99% of U.S. ZIP codes,” said Yan (Joann) Zhou, principal transportation systems analyst in the Energy Systems and Infrastructure Analysis (ESIA) division at Argonne. ​“With this new tool, drivers can enter information about their vehicle, their location, annual mileage and local fuel prices and see how much they’re saving per mile, per tank and per year.”

“When more individuals choose to drive BEVs, they’re not only contributing to cleaner air — they can also enjoy significant cost savings for themselves.” — Dr. Zhou, principal transportation systems analyst at Argonne

The EV savings calculator is based on Argonne’s recently published technical report, Adoption of Plug-In Electric Vehicles: Local Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Across the U.S. With this report, scientists shed light on new information that previously was not well understood: How local factors like fuel and electricity costs can affect an individual’s savings — and how they can reduce GHG emissions — depending on where they live.

The researchers found that, compared to driving a gas vehicle of equivalent size, driving a BEV leads to significant savings of up to $2,200 annually. The largest fuel savings were found in areas with high gasoline prices, low electricity prices, preferences for larger vehicles and high annual mileage driven. Additionally, the researchers found that, compared to driving an equivalent gas vehicle, driving a PHEV leads to savings of up to $1,500 annually.

The report also examines the impact of GHG emissions, using a ​“well-to-wheels” approach, which considers the entire life cycle of a vehicle’s energy consumption. The investigators found that BEV drivers have the potential to save close to five tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per every 10,000 miles driven. ​“When more individuals choose to drive BEVs, they’re not only contributing to cleaner air — they can also enjoy significant cost savings for themselves,” said Xinyi Wu, a transportation systems analyst in the ESIA division and lead author of the report. ​“With this tool, individuals can now see just how much they can save based on where they live and how much they drive.”

Access the tool at ener​gy​.gov/​l​o​c​a​l​-​f​u​e​l​-​s​a​vings.

This project was funded through DOE’s Office of Policy and Vehicle Technologies Office in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

Argonne National Laboratory seeks solutions to pressing national problems in science and technology. The nation’s first national laboratory, Argonne conducts leading-edge basic and applied scientific research in virtually every scientific discipline. Argonne researchers work closely with researchers from hundreds of companies, universities, and federal, state and municipal agencies to help them solve their specific problems, advance America’s scientific leadership and prepare the nation for a better future. With employees from more than 60 nations, Argonne is managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science.

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States and is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, visit https://​ener​gy​.gov/​s​c​ience.

 

U.S. reservoirs hold billions of pounds of fish


Better reservoir management could aid food security and fisheries conservation



UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS





After nearly a century of people building dams on most of the world’s major rivers, artificial reservoirs now represent an immense freshwater footprint across the landscape. Yet, these reservoirs are understudied and overlooked for their fisheries production and management potential, indicates a study from the University of California, Davis. 

The study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, estimates that U.S. reservoirs hold 3.5 billion kilograms (7.7 billion pounds) of fish. Properly managed, these existing reservoir ecosystems could play major roles in food security and fisheries conservation.

“There is a large amount of fish mass in U.S. reservoirs that are being overlooked, despite the value being comparable to fish harvest from fisheries around the world,” said lead author Christine Parisek, a Ph.D. candidate in the UC Davis Ecology Graduate Group and the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology.

States with most reservoir fish

For the study, the authors analyzed, digitized, ranked and classified reservoir data collected by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers between the 1970s and 1990s, after dam construction had tapered off from its heyday of the 1940s to 1960s. The data include fish biomass and production rates from 301 reservoirs in the United States.

Southern U.S. reservoirs contained 1.92 billion kilograms (4.2 billion pounds) of fish. Reservoirs across the entire U.S. were estimated to contain 3.43 billion kilograms (7.6 billion pounds) of fish.

Most states show reservoir stock of at least 100 million kilograms (220 million pounds). The top five states with the most standing stock, or total weight, of reservoir fish are Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Florida and South Dakota. 

When total weight is adjusted for how much reservoir surface area is available in the state — similar to a per capita measure — Louisiana, Indiana, Alabama, Maryland and Illinois ranked highest. 

The study also said the large mass of fish in U.S. reservoirs is significant for the global carbon cycle, as fish play important roles in carbon flux, food webs, nutrient cycling and energy transfer. 

Managing amid challenging realities

The authors emphasize the study is not making an argument for prioritizing building reservoirs over protecting and restoring natural-flowing rivers. The study states: “Ecological effects of dams have been overwhelmingly negative and represent one of the principal drivers of freshwater biodiversity loss at all scales.” 

The study does suggest unrealized opportunities to better manage both natural and built ecosystems, given the realities of reservoirs’ continued existence, climate change, and the dire challenges facing native fish.

“We should be able to walk and chew gum,” said fish ecologist and senior author Andrew Rypel, director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and professor in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology. “We should be able to decommission and remove some dams, and manage others for food and as important habitats. 

“In a worst-case scenario where salmon go extinct and native fishes go away, these fisheries may be all we have left. It’s worth having some foresight about how to make them well managed and how to use these ecosystems to deliver value for the environment and for people.”

Additional authors include co-first author Francine De Castro, Jordan Colby and Steven Sadro of UC Davis, and George Leidy of consulting firm AECOM and Stillwater Science.

The study was funded by the National Science Foundation, UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences’ Bechtel Next Generation Funds, Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of California, and the California Trout and Peter B. Moyle Endowment for Coldwater Fish Conservation.

 

Pioneering plant science research paves the way for deeper understanding of how the plant immune system functions


Plant Science research reveals how callose accumulation impacts plasmodesmata channels.




DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER

Tessa Burch-Smith, PhD 

IMAGE: 

Tessa Burch-Smith, PhD AND TEAM IN HER LAB.

view more 

CREDIT: DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER





ST. LOUIS, MO, April 29, 2024 – Researchers in the laboratory of Tessa Burch-Smith, PhD at the Danforth Plant Science Center and the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, are conducting pioneering work to discover how plants transmit information, important molecules and viruses between cells. In a recent study they demonstrated how plasmodesmata (PD) – structures that connect neighboring cells in leaves and other organs – are controlled by deposition of callose (a carbohydrate polymer) when plants are responding to infection. Their research compared different methods to rigorously quantify callose accumulation around the microscopic PD channels and paves the way for deeper understanding of how the plant immune system works. Results of their study were recently published in Comparing methods for detection and quantification of plasmodesmal callose in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves, in the journal Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions

Callose, a polymer made of glucose molecules, is essential for regulating intercellular trafficking via plasmodesmata (PD). Pathogens manipulate PD-localized proteins to enable intercellular trafficking by removing callose at PD, or conversely by increasing callose accumulation at PD to limit intercellular trafficking during infection. Plant defense hormones like salicylic acid regulate PD-localized proteins to control PD and intercellular trafficking during immune defense responses such as systemic acquired resistance. 

Measuring callose deposition at PD in plants has emerged as a popular way to assess likely trafficking of molecules between cells during plant immunity. Despite the popularity of this metric there is no standard for how these measurements should be made. 

First Author Amie Sankoh, PhD, and her undergraduate colleague, Joseph Adjei, compared three commonly used methods for identifying and quantifying PD callose by aniline blue staining were evaluated to determine the most effective in the Nicotiana benthamiana leaf model. Both Amie and Joseph are Deaf and communicate primarily via American Sign Language.

Their results revealed that the most reliable method used aniline blue staining and fluorescent microscopy to measure callose deposition in fixed tissue. Manual or semi-automated workflows for image analysis were also compared and found to produce similar results although the semi-automated workflow produced a wider distribution of data points.

“We were surprised at how different the reliability of the different methods for detecting callose could be. We think this work will greatly improve consistency in experiments across labs” said Dr. Sankoh.

This study relied on the Advanced Bioimaging Laboratory at the Danforth Center. 

The team plans to use the identified protocol and analysis to investigate how callose levels at PD change over the course of infection with various hormones. Such studies could identify important times at which PD could be manipulated to disrupt the infection process and prevent plant disease.

The research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation. 

About the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center
Founded in 1998, the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center is a not-for-profit research institute with a mission to improve the human condition through plant science. Research, education, and outreach aim to have impact at the nexus of food security and the environment and position the St. Louis region as a world center for plant science. The Center’s work is funded through competitive grants from many sources, including the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Agency for International Development, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and through the generosity of individual, corporate, and foundation donors. Follow us on Twitter at @DanforthCenter.

For more information contact:
Karla Roeber, Vice President, Public and Government Affairs, kroeber@danforthcenter.org

 

Quantitative study assesses how gender and race impact young athletes’ perceptions of their coaches




UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO





Quantitative study assesses how gender and race impact young athletes’ perceptions of their coaches

 

Across the U.S., there are over 8 million student-athletes in high school and college. Engaging in sports can contribute to physical, mental, and social benefits, and coaches can play a key role in student-athletes’ continued participation in sports.

 

recent study led by UNC Greensboro’s Dr. Tsz Lun (Alan) Chu, published in Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, examines how multiple aspects of a young athlete’s identity, including gender and race, may relate to their perceptions of their coaches and mental health.

 

“There have been quite a few studies on this topic looking at gender and cultural differences from a qualitative standpoint, but they have not looked at the combination of these factors using a quantitative approach, which is crucial,” says Chu, who conducts research in applied sport psychology.

 

His recent study takes steps to fill that gap by surveying 846 athletes, about half in high school and half in college, with the first analysis assessing two gender categories – male and female – and three race/ethnicity categories – White, Hispanic/Latino, and Black.

 

“About one-third of young athletes drop out within a year of participation, so it’s really important we understand how coaches can support them,” Chu says.

 

Athletes were asked to rate the degree to which their coach created a supportive or unsupportive environment, including their coach’s controlling, empowering, and inclusive behavior. The researchers also asked athletes about the degree to which they felt their psychological needs, including a sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were met in the sporting environment.

 

“Psychological needs are the factors that make you feel satisfied mentally in your life and are the things that every person would need in order to feel motivated and do their best,” says Chu, who is a certified mental performance consultant and an associate professor in the UNCG Kinesiology Department.

 

In their preliminary study, the authors were surprised to find that, as a group, Black female athletes reported the most positive perceptions of the coaching climate and satisfaction with their psychological needs compared to other race by gender subgroups.

 

“When individuals have more than one marginalized identity, they tend to feel isolated and less supported,” Chu says “So, it was surprising that Black females had the most positive perceptions of their sports environments, which were mostly male-dominated spaces in this study. We’re interested to see if these findings hold in a larger sample involving more diverse schools.”

 

Consistent with past literature, the authors found that Black male athletes perceived more disempowering coaching climates compared to other race by gender subgroups. In light of these findings, Chu suggests coaches take a nuanced approach to ensure athletes from all backgrounds feel supported in sports.

 

“Even though your coaching approach may work for 80 percent of your athletes, it doesn’t mean you should just stick with that approach,” he said. “There may be some athletes that need a different method, and you have to adapt.”

 

In future studies, Chu plans to explore how athletes from more backgrounds, including Asian, Indigenous and Native American athletes, perceive their coaches. He also hopes to examine how a coach’s identity may relate to player’s perceptions of them and impact the athlete-coach relationship.

 

Funding for this study was from the Association for Applied Sport Psychology Research Grants. They received $4,027 to travel to schools for data collection, provide incentives for participation, and hire research assistants during the active data collection phase.

 

 

 

 

 

Quantitative study assesses how gender and race impact young athletes’ perceptions of their coaches

Across the U.S., there are over 8 million student-athletes in high school and college. Engaging in sports can contribute to physical, mental, and social benefits, and coaches can play a key role in student-athletes’ continued participation in sports.

recent study led by UNC Greensboro’s Dr. Tsz Lun (Alan) Chu, published in Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, examines how multiple aspects of a young athlete’s identity, including gender and race, may relate to their perceptions of their coaches and mental health.

“There have been quite a few studies on this topic looking at gender and cultural differences from a qualitative standpoint, but they have not looked at the combination of these factors using a quantitative approach, which is crucial,” says Chu, who conducts research in applied sport psychology.

His recent study takes steps to fill that gap by surveying 846 athletes, about half in high school and half in college, with the first analysis assessing two gender categories – male and female – and three race/ethnicity categories – White, Hispanic/Latino, and Black.

“About one-third of young athletes drop out within a year of participation, so it’s really important we understand how coaches can support them,” Chu says.

Athletes were asked to rate the degree to which their coach created a supportive or unsupportive environment, including their coach’s controlling, empowering, and inclusive behavior. The researchers also asked athletes about the degree to which they felt their psychological needs, including a sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were met in the sporting environment.

“Psychological needs are the factors that make you feel satisfied mentally in your life and are the things that every person would need in order to feel motivated and do their best,” says Chu, who is a certified mental performance consultant and an associate professor in the UNCG Kinesiology Department.

In their preliminary study, the authors were surprised to find that, as a group, Black female athletes reported the most positive perceptions of the coaching climate and satisfaction with their psychological needs compared to other race by gender subgroups.

“When individuals have more than one marginalized identity, they tend to feel isolated and less supported,” Chu says “So, it was surprising that Black females had the most positive perceptions of their sports environments, which were mostly male-dominated spaces in this study. We’re interested to see if these findings hold in a larger sample involving more diverse schools.”

Consistent with past literature, the authors found that Black male athletes perceived more disempowering coaching climates compared to other race by gender subgroups. In light of these findings, Chu suggests coaches take a nuanced approach to ensure athletes from all backgrounds feel supported in sports.

“Even though your coaching approach may work for 80 percent of your athletes, it doesn’t mean you should just stick with that approach,” he said. “There may be some athletes that need a different method, and you have to adapt.”

In future studies, Chu plans to explore how athletes from more backgrounds, including Asian, Indigenous and Native American athletes, perceive their coaches. He also hopes to examine how a coach’s identity may relate to player’s perceptions of them and impact the athlete-coach relationship.

Funding for this study was from the Association for Applied Sport Psychology Research Grants. They received $4,027 to travel to schools for data collection, provide incentives for participation, and hire research assistants during the active data collection phase.

 

Tepper School study reveals voter moral justifications for politicians' misstatements




CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY




In a new study, researchers used online surveys conducted primarily when Donald Trump was president to show that both Republican and Democratic voters provided explicit moral justification for politicians’ statements that were factually inaccurate, especially when they aligned with their personal politics.

The study was conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, Rice University, the University of Colorado-Boulder, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It is in press at the American Journal of Sociology.

“What we found is that political misinformation isn't just about whether voters can tell facts from fiction,” said Oliver Hahl, associate professor of organization theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship at Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business, who coauthored the study. “It seems like it's more about how statements, whether true or not, speak to a broader political agenda.”

Researchers conducted six surveys to gauge voters’ responses to statements by politicians that flouted the norm of fact-grounding (i.e., that one should stick to facts when giving a statement) while proclaiming deeper, socially divisive “truths.” Five were conducted during Trump’s presidency and one was conducted in the spring of 2023. Participants were recruited from either Amazon’s Cloud Research Platform, a crowd-sourcing platform that assists people with virtual tasks, or Prolific, a research platform that provides academics and companies access to participants for studies and surveys.

All six surveys had similar structures and questions, though some questions were specific to a particular political context. Each survey gauged voters’ reactions to false statements by politicians, including Trump, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida, President Joe Biden, and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. 

The results of all the surveys showed a significant tendency by partisans to deliberately support violations of the norm of fact-grounding, justifying these factually inaccurate statements in moral terms when they could have relied on a factual justification. The surveys also provided consistent evidence that voters distinguish between objective evidence and truth, favoring the latter when judging statements of favored politicians and the former when judging disfavored candidates. 

Importantly, results from the last two surveys indicated significant moral flexibility among both Democrats and Republicans.

The results challenge the common belief that partisan voters' positive reactions to misinformation from their party leaders are solely because of laziness or bias leading them to confuse factually inaccurate information for truth. Instead, the evidence consistently shows that voters are flexible with the facts – exhibiting factual flexibility.

Yet they also provide consistent evidence of moral flexibility, whereby voters justify demagogic fact-flouting, or disregarding or ignoring facts, as an effective way of proclaiming a deeply resonant political “truth.” A key implication is that political misinformation cannot be eliminated by getting voters to distinguish fact from fiction; voters’ moral orientations may be such that they prefer fact-flouting.

In most studies, Trump supporters showed considerable flexibility with the facts regarding his statements. However, the study focusing on the “big lie,” which surveyed only those who voted for Trump in 2016, proved to be an exception.

Conducted in 2021, the survey explored voters’ responses to Trump’s claims that the 2020 U.S. presidential election was “rigged” or “stolen.” Participants were more likely to consider Trump’s allegations as grounded in objective evidence rather than subjective viewpoints.

Compared to other topics, Trump’s allegations that the election was stolen were portrayed as factual. There is less moral flexibility with this issue, possibly because these claims were presented more as facts. However, the emphasis on factual accuracy concerning the big lie still varies based on people’s political affiliations.

Among the limitations of their work, the authors note that the statements used in the surveys represented just one type of political misinformation (demagogic fact-flouting by partisan politicians). In addition, the measurement and analysis strategy used was new and lacked a track record, and the samples were not nationally representative. 

“Our findings reiterate the sociological insight that commitment to democratic norms cannot be assumed and indicate the importance of that caution when it comes to the problem of political misinformation,” said Minjae Kim, Assistant Professor of Management at Rice University’s Jones Graduate School of Business, and study coauthor. 

“In particular, efforts to combat voters’ positive response to misinformation cannot be limited to teaching them to simply work harder to digest accurate information (e.g., fact-checking).”