Tuesday, July 19, 2022

Islamic veil: Why fewer women in North Africa are wearing it

By Magdi Abdelhadi
North Africa analyst

  • PublishedShae
IMAGE SOURCE,SOCIAL MEDIA

Photos of women in full Islamic attire - faces covered and in long dresses - next to old pictures of women in short skirts from the 1950s and 1960s in North Africa and the Middle East are often put together on social media to make a point.

The underlying message is: "Look what has become of Arab societies during the past 50 years or so."

To those who share such photos, it is the most visible sign of how their countries have regressed and abandoned the ideals of progress and modernity, exemplified by adopting a Western lifestyle.

But for the conservative forces that have shaped the region in the past few decades, it is quite the opposite: it is a positive act of asserting Muslim identity in societies that had for long been colonised and had a Western lifestyle imposed upon them first by colonial rulers, and then by Westernised elites out of touch with local culture.

From Morocco to Egypt and beyond, the issue of "Islamic dress code", in particular the veil or hijab, has been one of the most controversial piece of clothing.

By all accounts, its spread within the region has been down primarily to one factor: the emergence and eventual success of political Islam, the phenomenon also known as Islamism.

The whole of North Africa has powerful Islamist movements that either came to power or nearly did as in the case of Algeria in the early 1990s.

Even after they were removed from power, their influence over societies has remained considerable.

But that is beginning to change, according to many observers. And one of the most obvious ways to assess that is by looking at the most potent symbol of the impact of Islamism: the hijab.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Different views exist within Islam over whether women are required to cover their faces

Many observers have noted that the past few years have seen a steady decline in the phenomenon in North Africa.

In Moroccan news website Al-Yaoum 24, columnist Said El-Zaghouti recently wrote: "It's not hard to notice that the extent to which the hijab was worn in our Arab world, and in particular in Morocco, has gone down relatively, and that retreat and decline is to a large extent due to the decline and ebb of what is known as the Islamic current."

Young Moroccan women have spoken to local media about the social pressure, even harassment, they have to endure when they take off the hijab. But that has apparently not deterred them.

In Tunisia, where wearing the hijab was once an act of defiance because it was banned by successive autocratic regimes, it became popular for a brief period following the 2011 Arab Spring, but has started to fall off again recently.

Writing in the Arabic Independent, Tunisian journalist Huda Al-Trabulis highlights the complex motives for the appearance of the hijab in the country and its subsequent decline.

The hijab was once an act of resistance and opposition to secularism imposed from above during the rule of the post-independence autocrats, Habib Bourguiba and Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali.

It then became popular in the short period after the revolution in 2011 that saw the rise to power of the Islamist Ennahda movement, to the extent that the veiled woman was promoted as the model to follow for the Tunisian public.

But then it fell out of favour as successive Islamist-dominated parliaments failed to solve the country's many problems and Tunisia plunged into a deep economic and political crisis.

IMAGE SOURCE,AFP
Image caption,
Tunisia is heavily divided between those who advocate secularism and political Islam

In Egypt too, arguably the birthplace of the hijab as we know it today, the appearance and relative decline is tied up with the political fortunes of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian women began throwing off traditional face coverings nearly a century ago and by the mid-twentieth century the veil had almost completely disappeared.

But the hijab made its first re-emergence in the mid-seventies when then-President Anwar Sadat gave a green light to the Muslim Brotherhood to operate on university campuses to fight off political rivals from the secular left who had developed considerable influence over society in the previous decades.

The spread of the hijab continued almost unabated until 2013 when the Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi was removed from power.

Hostility to Islamist symbols - the hijab foremost amongst them - was palpable.

There were persistent reports of restaurants denying access to women wearing the hijab, or swimming pools refusing entry to women wearing the burkini, the supposedly Sharia-compliant swimsuit.

Today there is palpable decline that is hard to quantify due to a lack of objective surveys. The evidence is largely anecdotal.

Still, the hijab remains one of the country most divisive issues - a cultural and political fault-line not dissimilar to the one surrounding abortion in the US, with cultural and political rows breaking out at regular intervals on the matter.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt but has spread around the world

Most recently in Egypt reactions to the stabbing to death of a young university student in broad daylight by her suitor after she refused to marry him were as shocking as the crime itself.

To everyone the crime was abhorrent and duly condemned. But as soon as it emerged that the victim was unveiled, reactions began to diversify.

A famous tele-preacher urged women to cover their bodies properly to avoid meeting a similar fate. He actually said: "Cover your face with a basket."

And when her university sought to pay tribute to her, it produced a poster of her with her photo apparently doctored so it appeared as though she was wearing the hijab.

Both reactions triggered a barrage of angry responses from the secularised sectors of society.

The young man has been sentenced to death by hanging. But a campaign has swung into action to defend the convicted murderer.

No-one knows for sure who is behind it, but many suspect wealthy Islamists in exile have hired the highest paid lawyer in the country to defend the culprit in the appeal proceedings.

An intervention by al-Azhar - the highest religious institution in Egypt - to calm tension has ironically poured more oil on the fire.

The Grand Imam of al-Azhar, Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, has said that not wearing the hijab does not make the woman a renegade, but simply a woman who disobeyed God.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Egypt's Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb is a fierce critic of the Muslim Brotherhood

The statement that was meant to assuage secular sectors of society enraged women's rights and other secular groups even more.

Once again, social media were full of impassioned pleas for the hijab as an inalienable part of the faith and equally vociferous condemnation of the cloth.

Although support for the hijab appear to be waning in the region, especially among the young, the perception that it is inseparable from Muslim identity has become entrenched far and wide.

So much so that whenever any government - especially in Europe - introduces restrictions on wearing it in public institutions, that is usually denounced as a war on Islam itself.

Merely criticising the hijab in Western democracies has also become almost synonymous with "Islamophobia" or attacks on minority rights.

But in Muslim-majority societies it is still regarded as part of a legitimate campaign for the liberation of women from stifling tradition.

Lost royal city may have been unearthed by archaeologists in Iraqi Kurdistan

By Katie Hunt, CNN
Updated 7:01 PM ET, Tue July 19, 2022

Researchers excavate the perimeter wall at the entrance to Rabana Valley in Iraqi Kurdistan.

(CNN)A 2,000-year-old fortress built on a mountainside in what's now Iraqi Kurdistan could be part of a lost royal city called Natounia.

With the help of drone photography, archaeologists excavated and cataloged the site during a series of digs between 2009 and 2022. Situated in the Zagros Mountains, the stone fortress of Rabana-Merquly comprises fortifications nearly 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) long, two smaller settlements, carved rock reliefs and a religious complex.
The fortress was on the border of Adiabene, a minor kingdom governed by the kings of a local dynasty. These rulers would have paid tribute to the neighboring Parthian Empire, which extended over parts of Iran and Mesopotamia approximately 2,000 years ago, according to research led by Michael Brown, a researcher at the Institute of Prehistory, Protohistory and Near-Eastern Archaeology of Heidelberg University in Germany, with the help of Iraqi colleagues.

Carvings at the entrance to the fortress depict a king of Adiabene, based on the dress of the figure, in particular his hat, Brown said. The carving resembles other likenesses of Adiabene kings, particularly one found 143 miles (230 kilometers) away at the site of an ancient city called Hatra.



Upper fortifications at the 2,000-year-old site are shown.

While it's matter of speculation, Brown believes the fort was the royal city known as Natounia, or alternatively Natounissarokerta, that was part of the kingdom of Adiabene.
"Natounia is only really known from its rare coins, there are (not) any detailed historical references," Brown said via email.

Details deduced from seven coins describe a city named after a king called Natounissar and a location on the Lower Zab River, known in ancient times as the Kapros River.
"The location near to (but admittedly not on) the Lower Zab/ancient Kapros river, short occupation, and royal imagery all link the archaeological site to the description we can deduce from coinage. There are also some unusual high status tombs nearby," Brown said.

"It's a circumstantial argument. ... Rabana-Merquly is not the only possibility for Natounia, but arguably the best candidate by far (for) the 'lost' city, which has to be in the region somewhere."

The king in the carving could be the founder of Natounia, either Natounissar or a direct descendant.


The carving depicts a figure with an unusual hat and is thought to depict a king of Adiabene, said lead researcher Michael Brown of the University of Heidelberg.

The place name Natounissarokerta is composed of the royal name Natounissar, the founder of the Adiabene royal dynasty, and the Parthian word for moat or fortification, the study also said.

"This description could apply to Rabana-Merquly," Brown said. As a major settlement positioned at the intersection between highland and lowland zones, it's likely that Rabana-Merquly may have been used, among other things, to trade with pastoral tribes, maintain diplomatic ties, or exert military pressure.

"The considerable effort that must have gone into planning, building and maintaining a fortress of this size points to governmental activities," Brown said.

The study said the discovery adds to our knowledge of Parthian archaeology and history, which remains markedly incomplete, despite its evident significance as a major power in the ancient Near East.

The journal Antiquity published the research on Tuesday.

Trudeau: Russia is trying to ‘divide’ western allies over turbine issue

By Rachel Gilmore Global News
Posted July 19, 2022 

Trudeau says Canada won't allow Russia to use gas policy to divide
 and undermine public support for war in Ukraine

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is standing behind Canada’s decision to send repaired Russian turbines back to Germany — despite Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s assertion that the move violated sanctions.


READ MORE: Canada ships repaired turbine for Russian pipeline to Germany: report

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Trudeau said the decision to return the turbine was “difficult” but “right.”

“Russia will not succeed in either weaponizing its energy or dividing our allies amongst ourselves. We are focused on being there to support Ukraine,” he said.

“This decision was a difficult one but it was the right one to ensure that we continue to all stand together against Putin’s illegal war in support of Ukraine.”

Earlier this month, Canada granted an exemption to the economic sanctions issued against Russia in response to the invasion of Ukraine.

Ukrainian World Congress sues Canada over Nord Stream turbine

The two-year waiver would allow six Siemens Energy turbines, which were in Montreal for repairs, to be returned to Germany for use in the Russian state-owned Nord Stream 1 pipeline.

Canada sent a turbine for the Nord Stream gas pipeline to Germany by plane on July 17, according to Reuters.

Europe, which is heavily reliant on Russian gas supplies, has been experiencing a reduction in the power source as the Russia-Ukraine war drags on.

The Russian state-owned energy company Gazprom reduced gas deliveries from its Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which runs to northeastern Germany, by 60 per cent last month, citing turbine-related technical problems.

The pipeline is currently completely shut down for planned annual maintenance — but there had been fears Russia could extend this work past the planned July 21 completion date, a move that could jeopardize European gas storage plans ahead of the chilly winter months.

 Ukraine’s Zelenskyy slams Canada over return of sanctioned turbine – Jul 11, 2022

READ MORE: As Europe bakes, Germany reckons with a return to coal

But Russian gas flows from the pipeline are on track to restart on time, two sources familiar with the export plans told Reuters.

Officials in the German energy sector told Reuters that the country’s household energy costs could triple as Russian gas supplies dwindle — something they warned could cause social unrest.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Trudeau expressed concern about losing the support of the people when it comes to the West’s stance on the Russia-Ukraine war.

“Russia is choosing to weaponize energy policy as a way of continuing with its assault on Ukraine, but also as a way of dividing Western allies amongst ourselves, as well as undermine public support for our strong stance in favour of Ukraine and against Russia,” he said.

Still, Zelenskyy was incensed by Canada’s decision, calling it “absolutely unacceptable” last week.

“The decision on the exception to sanctions will be perceived in Moscow exclusively as a manifestation of weakness. This is their logic,” he said.

Trudeau defends decision to return turbines to Russia after Ukraine’s criticism

Ukrainian-Canadians have also expressed their shock and disappointment at the decision.

At a rally in Ottawa on Sunday, Canadian-Ukrainian Yuri Kolomiyets told the crowd of about 150 supporters assembled on the lawn of Parliament Hill that the decision will mean more oil and gas money for Russia to fund its attack on Ukraine.

“I guess it’s OK to supply genocidal maniacs with the technology and the money, as long as it keeps German voters happy,” Kolomiyets told the crowd, eliciting cries of “shame” in response.

“It’s not their children who are dying in the missile strikes.”

READ MORE: Canada’s decision to exempt gas turbines from sanctions right thing to do: Freeland

Retired Gen. Rick Hillier, who once served the Canadian chief of defence staff, spoke out against the decision earlier Tuesday. He cautioned that this could be the start of Western economic pressure easing on Moscow.

“This decision to send the turbines back … may be seen as the straw that broke the camel’s back, and we may start to see a relenting of pressure from NATO, from the West in general,” he said, speaking to reporters during a virtual news conference.

“Instead of going upwards and onwards with more and more sanctions, this might be the straw that causes it to turn downwards.”

— with files from The Canadian Press, Reuters, and Global News’ Aaron D’Andrea
 

 


  

Canada PM Trudeau blasts Hockey Canada leaders after sex assault fund reports

(Reuters) - Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Tuesday it was hard to trust those in charge at Hockey Canada after reports that the national governing body maintained a fund to pay for uninsured liabilities, including sexual abuse claims.



© Reuters/JENNIFER GAUTHIERCanada's Trudeau makes an announcement on Bowen Island

According to a report on the Globe and Mail website, a multimillion-dollar fund financed by registration fees of players across the hockey-mad country is used to settle abuse claims with minimal outside scrutiny.

"Right now it's hard for anyone in Canada to have faith or trust in anyone at Hockey Canada," Trudeau said in response to a question during an unrelated news conference in Bowen Island, British Columbia.

"What we're learning today is absolutely unacceptable. It's why a number of days ago or weeks ago, we froze funding to Hockey Canada pending significant reforms and transparency and accountability."

Hockey Canada did not immediately reply when asked by Reuters to comment on Trudeau's remarks.

In April, a woman filed a lawsuit that alleged she was sexually assaulted in a hotel room by eight hockey players following a Hockey Canada golf and gala event in 2018.

Hockey Canada settled the lawsuit in May. The allegations against the unnamed players have not been proved in court.

Last month, the Canadian federal government froze funding to Hockey Canada over its handling of the alleged sexual assault and out-of-court settlement while a number of sponsors have paused their relationship with the organisation.

Earlier this week, Hockey Canada said it decided to re-open an investigation into the alleged sexual assault as part of a plan to eliminate a "culture of toxic behaviour" within the sport.

"When I think about the culture that is apparently permeating the highest orders of that organisation, I can understand why so many parents, why so many Canadians who take such pride in our national winter sport are absolutely disgusted by what's going on," said Trudeau.

"Certainly as a government we will continue to be unequivocal in our condemnation of what we're learning and mostly in our demands that things change significantly."

(Reporting by Frank Pingue in Toronto; Editing by Toby Davis)
Trudeau launches expanded oceans protection plan, with aim to reach more regions

Tue, July 19, 2022 

BOWEN ISLAND, B.C. — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced new details about the federal government’s $3.5-billion plan to protect the oceans.

In its most recent budget, the government pledged to add $2 billion over nine years to the $1.5 billion already set aside for ocean protection.

Speaking at a press conference in British Columbia, Trudeau says the government has now launched an extended version of the plan.

The program has so far funded projects including coast guard search and rescue stations, restoring coastal aquatic habitats, disposing of abandoned boats, and partnering with Indigenous and coastal communities.

The new funds are aimed at expanding those efforts to more regions.

Trudeau says the latest plan is intended to keep oceans and coasts healthy, advance reconciliation and build a clean future.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 19, 2022.

 

‘We’re ready when Ottawa’s ready’: Canada’s premiers await federal response on health care

Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok said he’s looking forward to discussing increase in federal health care spending.

From left, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey, Yukon Premier Sandy Silver and Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok speak at a news conference at the 2022 summer meeting of Canada’s premiers. (Screenshot via Nunatsiaq News)

The federal government has yet to respond to a request from Canada’s premiers for an increase in federal spending on health care, says Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok.

“We’re, right now, really only asking Ottawa to come to the table,” he said in an interview.

“We’re ready when Ottawa’s ready.”

Akeeagok met with Canada’s 12 other premiers July 11 and 12 in Victoria, B.C., to discuss a number of issues, including health care.

It was at this meeting the premiers, together known as the Council of the Federation, made their request that the federal government increase its share of health care costs from 22 percent to 35 percent through the Canada Health Transfer.

The Canada Health Transfer is the largest federal transfer to provinces and territories and provides long-term funding for health care across the country.

The premiers’ request would require the federal government to pay an additional $27.6 billion annually, according to a February 2021 report from Canada’s provincial and territorial finance ministers.

Akeeagok said the discussion isn’t yet at a point of dividing up dollars between provinces and territories, and it’s too soon to say exactly what Nunavut would do with its share of that money.

However, the North’s unique challenge of being remote is a large part of the conversation for Nunavut.

“We’re not immune to the shortages and the impact we see in terms of health care,” Akeeagok said.

Nunavut NDP MP Lori Idlout said in an interview she supports the premiers’ call on the federal government.

“The current system is obviously not working. It hasn’t worked for many years,” she said of health care in Nunavut.

It’s important to recognize the abilities that already exist in communities and to figure out what services can be offered locally, rather than having to travel for, such as midwifery programs, she said.

Idlout used the high demand for counseling services in Nunavut as an example. She said some of the reliance on mental health professionals should instead be put on “local providers,” like elders.

There also needs to be more investment in programs that allow Inuit to join the health-care workforce in the territory, she said, whether it be for nursing or home care to look after elders.

But that’s only part of the solution, she said. Housing, especially in the context of overcrowded homes during COVID-19, is a factor also.

“Any kind of funding that ends up going to Nunavut, I think, always has to have at the core of it a form of increasing housing, addressing the old housing,” Idlout said.

“And making sure that we have more families that are able to feel safe, secure and comfortable in homes that will allow them to be healthy within each community.”

Additional reporting by Meral Jamal.

UK
Chancellor says public sector pay rises will not fuel inflation

Robert Dex
Tue, 19 July 2022 

Chancellor of the Exchequer Nadhim Zahawi speaking at the Financial and Professional Services Dinner at Mansion House in the City of London (PA)

Britain’s biggest public-sector pay increases in nearly 20 years will not fuel price pressures, Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi said.

Speaking at the City of London’s annual Mansion House dinner, the politician said fighting inflation was “a moral imperative”.

He was speaking after the government announced pay rises of about 4% to 5% for more than 2 million public-sector workers - a bigger increase than in recent years but well below current consumer price inflation of more than 9%.

“We are finding a careful balance, providing the highest uplift in nearly 20 years without making inflationary pressures worse,” Zahawi said.

Some contenders in the Conservative Party leadership race to succeed Boris Johnson as prime minister have said the Bank of England has been too slow to fight inflation but Zahawi said the bank was “rightly” independent to set interest rates as it saw fit.

“They have all the tools they need. And I know they have complete determination to do what is required,” he said.

“Protecting the country from the causes and consequences of rising inflation isn’t just a technocratic exercise. It is a moral imperative,” he added.

The government needed to play its part by delivering sound public finances and tackling longer-term bottlenecks in the supply of workers and energy, he said.

He also set out plans for post-Brexit changes to financial regulation. Zahawi became chancellor two weeks ago after the resignation of Rishi Sunak which led to the Prime Minister’s resignation and acknowledged his tenure might be “only a few months” as the new PM will appoint their own ministers.

UK pay settlements hold at 4%, highest since 1992 - XpertHR

By David Milliken - 

People walk through the financial district of Canary Wharf

LONDON (Reuters) - British employers agreed average pay rises of 4% with their staff in the three months to the end of June, the joint-highest since 1992 but falling further behind inflation, industry data showed on Wednesday.

Human resources data company XpertHR said the median pay settlement had remained unchanged for a third consecutive month, while inflation hit a 40-year high of 9.1% in May and the Bank of England expects it to exceed 11% later this year.

Separate figures on Tuesday showed the biggest real-terms fall in pay since official records began in 2001.

"Pay awards appear to have plateaued," XpertHR pay and benefits editor Sheila Attwood said.

If pay awards have indeed stopped accelerating, that will be welcomed by the Bank of England, which wants to ensure high inflation - largely driven by a jump in energy prices - does not become entrenched for years to come.

However, there may be further upward pressures due to ongoing industrial disputes and increased public-sector pay.

Rail workers staged their biggest strike in decades last month and plan further walkouts, as do telecoms, postal and airport workers.

Britain's government on Tuesday announced pay rises for more than 2 million public-sector workers - typically around 4-5%, but ranging from 2% for senior civil servants to 9.3% for the lowest health staff.

XpertHR said there was a wider-than-usual range of pay offers in the 324 deals, covering 780,000 workers, which it looked at from April to June. A quarter of settlements offered pay rises of less than 3%, while a quarter were for over 6%.

Official data for the three months to May showed private-sector pay was 7.2% higher than a year earlier, while public-sector pay was up 1.5%. Much of the difference reflected big pay rises in finance and construction, as well as one-off bonuses.

(Reporting by David Milliken, editing by Andy Bruce)
LGBTQ RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS
Russia's Parliament Considers Expanding Its ‘Gay Propaganda’ Law

A draft bill introduced this week is proposing a ban on public discussions of LGBTQ relationships in a positive light, and queer content in cinemas.


Jul 19, 2022


Russia’s parliament moved Monday to tighten already stringent restrictions on the discussion of LGBTQ rights and relationships.

A draft bill calling for the broadening of a 2013 ban on the “promotion of non-traditional sexual relations” to minors, widely referred to as the “gay propaganda” bill, was announced on the website of the parliament, or Duma.

Introduced by a cross-party group of six Communist and socially conservative deputies, the bill would ban public discussion of LGBTQ relationships in a positive or neutral light, and any LGBTQ content in cinemas.



Vyacheslav Volodin, the parliament speaker and an ally of President Vladimir Putin, proposed similar measures earlier this month. On July 8, he spoke in favor of a broad ban on disseminating information on LGBTQ relationships after Russia had withdrawn from the Council of Europe, a human rights watchdog, in March.

“With the exit from the Council of Europe, demands to legalize same-sex marriages in Russia have become a thing of the past. Attempts to impose alien values on our society have failed,” Volodin wrote on Telegram.


Pro-Kremlin figures have repeatedly pitched the ongoing war in Ukraine as a battle against “Western values,” which they say include LGBTQ visibility and rights.

On the same day the bill was submitted for consideration, Putin formally recalled Russia’s representative at the European Court of Human Rights, or ECHR, via a decree published Monday on the Russian government portal for legal information.


Last month, Putin signed into law a bill releasing Russia from its responsibility to enforce ECHR judgments issued after March 15, when Russia withdrew from the Council of Europe. The ECHR was established by a 1953 convention drafted by the then-newly formed council, which all member states are expected to ratify.






We Shouldn’t Be Working In This

ByShelly Asquith

This week’s heatwave will make work nasty at best and fatal at worst, especially for people in physical or outdoor jobs. We need a maximum working temperature in law to stop people facing conditions like this.


Anyone working in extremely hot weather faces heat hazards ranging from dizziness and headaches to fainting and heat stress. (FG Trade / Getty Images)

It’s really hotting up. Temperatures in Britain this week could reach the highest on record, and in ten years, scientists say we could see 40°C become the summer norm.

Our environment is not accustomed to such a rapid rise. Neither are our workplaces. It’s not just a case of being uncomfortably hot: working in dangerously high temperatures brings with it a whole range of risks.

Anyone working in extremely hot weather faces heat hazards ranging from dizziness and headaches to fainting and heat stress. When our blood temperature reaches 39°C, we’re at risk of a stroke or loss of consciousness, with delirium or confusion setting in above 41°C. Blood temperatures at this level can be fatal or cause irreparable organ damage.

We also see more accidents occur in hot weather. Our concentration starts to drop by five percent when temperatures exceed 28°C, meaning workers are more likely to make mistakes, putting themselves or others at risk. Sweaty palms can cause problems with the use of equipment.

Certain workers are exposed to more risk than others. Those whose jobs rely on working outdoors, like posties and construction workers, already have a three times higher likelihood of developing skin cancer. Train and long-haul drivers are at risk of overheating where cabs and vans do not have aircon, and from UVA radiation passing through windows. The Communication Workers Union recently shared the names of three postal workers who had died during or shortly after their delivery rounds during previous heatwaves.

Other high-risk jobs include those working indoors doing strenuous activity, or in workplaces that lack adequate air-cooling facilities or are already hot, like kitchens and factories. And anyone with existing illnesses like high blood pressure or heart disease is at increased risk, as are women during pregnancy or menopause.

So if Britain’s weather is catching up with hotter parts of the globe, what about our workers’ rights? In the US, almost 400 workers have died from heat exposure in the last ten years, and rates have doubled since the 1990s. The guidance there says workplace temperatures should not go beyond 24°C, and last year Biden announced a series of measures to tackle workplace heat exposure, with enforcement officers due to make unannounced inspections for the first time this summer. Meanwhile, our regulator struggles with half as much funding since the Tories took power: a gift to bad bosses.

Spain has strict guidelines on working temperature: it must not go beyond 27°C indoors or 25°C for physical activity. In China, when temperatures reach 37°C, outdoor work is banned during the hottest three hours of the day, and at 40°C it must stop altogether. In the UAE, outdoor work is banned entirely between the hours of 12:30 and 15:00, when it’s hottest.
What We Need

At present, Britain’s workplace regulation says temperatures should not drop below 16°C, but there’s no guidance on what a maximum should be. Employers are only advised to ensure the temperature is ‘reasonable’, leaving it wide open to interpretation.

What we need instead is clear guidance and a new law stipulating a maximum working temperature. The TUC wants to see employers forced to cool indoor workspaces when temperatures exceed 24°C, with working above 30°C banned. And we need employers forced to make changes to protect workers, with tougher regulation and enforcement on those who put workers in harm’s way.

While it may not be possible to control the temperature outdoors, workers are entitled to protection from sun exposure, including protective clothing and access to water. We need employers to be forced to consider adjusting shifts to avoid peak heat, too, and providing sunscreen free of charge.


But as with securing any worker protection, we cannot wait for change from the government or action by employers or regulators—we must force it through collective action.

Change could come from a call to increase access to welfare facilities. One group of workers on the London Underground, after being refused access to cool drinking water, on advice from their union, cited Section 44 of the Employment Rights Act to remove themselves from the workplace and shut down the station. Their move resulted in management introducing breaks for water.

Or it could be a call to relax uniform policies and dress codes. As a young teacher, Kevin Courtney, now head of the National Education Union, once forced a change to school policy by daring to wear shorts to work in hot weather. He was disciplined by the school management for doing so, leading to the rest of his colleagues returning to school the following day, all wearing shorts.

In workplaces everywhere, workers have challenged management to cool the air, with safety reps exercising their right to carry out inspections using thermometers. Struggling for safety from heat hazards presents a clear opportunity to involve members in demands and demonstrating to non-members the benefits of union membership.

The best examples of heat and sun risks being taken seriously are where workers have come together, proving the power of unions to protect our members. The threat to our health, let alone the planet, is urgent: it requires urgency in our organising, too.

See more information from the TUC on protecting workers from the risks of heat:

Too Hot, Too Cold

Cool It!, a guide for reps

It’s getting hot in here
About the Author

Shelly Asquith is Health, Safety & Wellbeing Officer in the TUC Organisation, Skills and Services Department.