Tuesday, January 02, 2024

Analysing the missing pieces in Israel's rape allegations

Experts unravel the significance of independent investigations, reliable sources, and verified evidence in assessing the credibility of the rape allegation.

KUBRA SOLMAZ
TRT
Dec 28, 2023


AFP

Anti-government protesters gather in Kaplan Street in Tel Aviv on December 8 to demand immediate ceasefire and release of hostages. / Photo: AFP


More than two months after Hamas' unprecedented cross-border attack on October 7, the Israeli government's allegations of sexual violence by Palestinian resistance fighters have resurfaced as headlines in major international media outlets such as BBC, CNN, New Yorker, and New York Times.


These outlets have published explicit stories of alleged sexual violence, including accounts of gang rape and mutilation.


This renewed focus on the issue comes after the Israeli army held exclusive screenings for invited journalists of what it claims are eyewitness accounts of alleged Hamas crimes.


The 47-minute footage titled 'Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre' was screened on multiple occasions. However, Israeli officials have refused to share the footage with news agencies to report on and verify the contents independently.


This detail holds great significance. Despite offering extensive coverage of information conveyed by Israeli officials in these news reports, all of them carry a subtle disclaimer: that they cannot independently "verify individual allegations and claims".


In its quest for a thorough understanding of the significance of independent verification, TRT World contacted the UN, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International, organisations which investigate sexual violence allegations in conflict zones, to reveal the methods, approaches, and procedures they employ for verification.


"We are required to gather information from a wide variety of reliable sources (including civil society, victims' organisations, concerned states and non-state actors) to verify the veracity of the information we received," Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequence, tells TRT World.


She emphasises the importance of verifying reports of sexual violence and conducting thorough investigations independently, as highlighted in two previous press releases addressing Israel's accusations of sexual violence attributed to Hamas – one on November 20 and the other on December 14.


Reliable sources


When asked about the crucial steps that investigative teams deem essential in probing allegations of sexual violence in conflict zones, Lauren Aarons, Amnesty International's senior adviser on gender and conflict, concurs with the UN Special Rapporteur, emphasising the necessity to gather information from a diverse array of reliable sources.


"We rely primarily on information we have collected ourselves, supported by other information we trust or have been able to verify," she states. "We also seek information from all other relevant sources to be able to develop a full, comprehensive and reliable understanding of the facts, as well as what needs to happen next to ensure justice and the rights of survivors."


​​Regarding the sources cited by the Israeli government for their evidence, they predominantly involve individuals directly associated with the Israeli government, security services, or seemingly civilian institutions with connections to Israeli government officials and institutions.


​​Specifically, Israel's case relies on video testimony from a single eyewitness at the music festival, witness testimonies from body collectors of the Zaka organisation, military forensic teams, and army personnel, along with photographs suggesting potential sexual assaults on women.


Additionally, testimonies from Hamas fighters were obtained through Israel's Security Agency Shin Bet, known for its use of torture to elicit fake confessions.


Take, for instance, the involvement of body collectors as witnesses from the rescue and recovery organisation Zaka. Advertised as Israel's foremost non-governmental organisation in this field, it has 3,000 volunteers and receives funds from the Israeli government.


This is also the same organisation that propagated a fabricated story about babies being beheaded by Hamas. Yossi Landau, the head of operations at Zaka, claimed to have seen bodies of beheaded babies, a statement that has been refuted even by Israeli newspapers.


Furthermore, Zaka has become entangled in a web of scandals, with its leaders facing charges of sexual assault, rape, and child exploitation.


Cochav Elkayam-Levy is another figure portrayed by media outlets as the head of "the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas against women and children". She is also a law professor who has herself faced criticism for alleged human rights abuses.


More specifically, she offered a guidebook-style legal rationale for the Israeli authorities' handling of Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike, particularly those held in administrative detention without trial. She proposed the controversial method of force-feeding, which is widely regarded as a form of torture and unequivocally contravenes fundamental human rights principles.


Elkayam-Levy is also the founder and director of the Dvora Institute, which works as a close advisory body to the Israeli prime minister's National Security Council. The advisory committee for the Dvora Institute includes a former director of the Israeli Prime Minister's Office and three former officials in the National Security Council.


All of these suggest that Israel's rape accusations, attributed to Hamas, rely on anything but a wide variety of unreliable, one-sided sources echoing the Israeli state's narrative.


However, the question remains: Can we believe what Israel says based on the evidence provided by these not-so-reliable sources?


Where is the evidence?


Not only are the sources in question but also the evidence presented during interviews, briefings and screenings of footage provided by the Israeli state raise concerns.


Israel has consistently fallen short in furnishing news organisations with forensic evidence, concrete photographic proof, or victim testimonies, relying instead on inferences from its forensic teams and individuals mentioned above who evidently have ties to the Israeli government.


Currently, Israel's case relies on the video testimony of a sole eyewitness at the Nova music festival, detailing the purported gang rape, mutilation, and execution of one victim.


News reports also indicate that Israeli police claim to have "multiple" eyewitness accounts of sexual assault, but they have not provided further clarification on the exact number. Furthermore, it has been reported that Israeli police have not yet interviewed any of the purported rape survivors.


So far, Israeli government officials have yet to provide concrete information regarding the precise number of so-called victims. In investigations by prominent international organisations into such allegations, details such as the number of victims and their testimonies, dates, times, and locations play a crucial role in identifying key patterns and specific details to substantiate the allegations.


Reports from the UN, HRW, and Amnesty International on sexual violence incidents in conflict zones, including Sudan, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Libya, Iraq, Colombia, and numerous others in the last two years, have consistently included these critical pieces of information, a contrast to Israeli government's statements.


For instance, Amnesty International shared with TRT World the comprehensive array of evidence they gather and the meticulous steps taken to ensure the authenticity and reliability of such evidence:


Their collection methods encompass interviews with victims/survivors to capture their experiences and eyewitness accounts, discussions with witnesses directly involved, consultations with parents or guardians, especially in cases involving children, dialogues with medical professionals, community leaders, first responders, police, social workers, and other relevant individuals.


Additionally, they scrutinise medical or forensic records and assess any available video evidence, photos, and satellite imagery. Moreover, their investigative approach incorporates statements from the forces accused of sexual violence and interviews or responses from national authorities or armed groups implicated in such allegations.


Regarding the steps taken to establish authenticity and reliability, these encompass "identifying consistent patterns in accounts, aligning testimonies by survivors, witnesses and medical professionals, especially focusing on key patterns and particular details, videos and satellite imagery to corroborate certain aspects of reports, information from medical providers is sought, or other consistent with the patterns identified."


Unsubstantiated claims


Among those who attended one of the briefings of the Israeli government was British journalist Owen Jones, who released a YouTube video providing a detailed account of the Israeli state's screening session concerning these accusations.


"Some high-profile crimes are not substantiated by this footage", he notes, adding, "If there was rape and sexual violence committed, we don't see this on the footage either."


In the video, he emphasises the need for independent verification of the rape accusations, stating, "All of the footage in the possession of the Israeli state should be given over to independent journalists and professional analysts to build a fully accurate picture of exactly what happened that day."


However, the Times of Israel asserts that the Israeli army will not provide forensic evidence, stating that "physical evidence of sexual assault was not collected from corpses by Israel's overtaxed morgue facilities." According to reports, it is now considered too late to gather conclusive evidence.


Israel employs a systematic campaign of rape accusations as a weapon of war, expecting those who hear these narratives not to demand proper evidence but rather to believe them unquestioningly. This campaign also targeted women activists and groups advocating for a ceasefire in Gaza.


Samantha Pearson, the director of the Sexual Assault Centre at the University of Alberta in Canada, is among the individuals who have courageously pointed out the lack of verification in these accusations. Alongside dozens of academics and civil society organisations, she signed a letter highlighting the "repeated and unverified accusation that Palestinians were guilty of sexual violence".


The letter did not deny the occurrence of sexual violence but emphasised the insufficient evidence to support these accusations. What followed was even more intriguing, as Pearson was terminated from her position a few hours after signing this open letter.


Not cooperating at all


Israel not only refrains from providing any evidence for these allegations but goes even further by refusing to cooperate with international organisations that have previously conducted numerous investigations on the matter.


A recent example is their rejection of a visit from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, amid growing concerns over the escalation of violence in its war on Gaza. Israel stated, "Israel is not aware of any additional benefit to a visit from the High Commissioner at this time."


The Israeli state has consistently refused to collaborate with UN fact-finding missions, often casting doubt on the facts and figures released regarding their policies imposed on Palestinians.


However, the UN special rapporteur informed TRT World that they have recently requested official visits from both the Israeli government and Palestine.


The statement reads, "I have also asked both the State of Palestine and Israel to carry out an official visit to the occupied Palestinian territories (West Bank and Gaza) as well as Israel next year, focusing on the violence that has taken place against Israeli and Palestinian women since October 7, 2023. The request has been recently made, and I am awaiting their response."


The Israeli government's willingness to cooperate with the UN this time remains uncertain, but recent instances suggest a leaning towards promoting the existing narratives they already keep pushing.

THE FIRST IDF LIE
No 'confirmation' about allegations 'Hamas beheaded babies' — Israeli army



SOURCE: TRT WORLD

Kubra Solmaz
Kubra Solmaz is a deputy producer at TRT WORLD




OPINION

ZAKA is not a trustworthy source for allegations of sexual violence on October 7

ZAKA is one of the leading organizations alleging Hamas atrocities on October 7. But the organization’s volunteers have systematically given false testimonies, and continue repeating them to journalists on behalf of the Israeli government.
MONDOWEISS
VOLUNTEERS FROM ZAKA IN KIBBUTZ BE’ERI, OCTOBER 12, 2023. (PHOTO: AVI OHAYON/ISRAEL NATIONAL PHOTO COLLECTION)

Many of the reports in Israeli and international media networks — including CNN, the BBC, the New York Times, and many others — that accuse Palestinians of committing systematic wide-scale gender-based violence against Israeli women on October 7, 2023, rely on testimonies by Israeli ZAKA volunteers.

ZAKA is a non-governmental religious Haredi organization specializing in collecting dead bodies and body parts from sites of “unnatural” deaths and transporting them to morgues according to strict Jewish religious laws.

The organization was founded in the late 1990s by Yehuda Meshi-Zahav. Meshi-Zahav was previously the leader of “Keshet,” an ultra-Orthodox Jewish terrorist group that targeted forensic pathologists and used explosives against shops selling “secular newspapers.” Meshi-Zahav led ZAKA until 2021, when he attempted suicide after shocking revelations of dozens of rape and sexual assault cases committed by him. Since its inception, the organization — described as a “militia” by the highly esteemed Israeli journalist Yigal Sarna — has been subject to incessant criticism, investigations, and demands to dismantle it.

The testimonies provided by ZAKA’s members — all men, most of whom are volunteers — on sexual violence on October 7 are based on their interpretation of what they claim to have seen on bodies they collected after the attack. Not only do these men lack the professional qualifications to make such assessments (they are not medical experts), but their testimonies also lack details: no age, no location, and no time. Details and/or evidence have not even been given to journalists who have asked to see them while reporting on these testimonies. This means that it is impossible to either confirm or debunk them.

In other words, the organization’s testimonies hold no value unless one blindly trusts what its men say.

Since October 7, ZAKA has been playing a key role in Israel’s orchestrated propaganda campaign, spreading fake news and vague information in the service of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. Looking closely into ZAKA reveals that the organization and its volunteers lack credibility. In fact, a significant part of their testimonies has been proven to be comprised of fabrications.


“We need to buy time, which we also buy by turning to world leaders and to public opinion. You have an important role in influencing public opinion…[ZAKA testimonies] give us the maneuvering room.“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to ZAKA teams.

For those familiar with the organization, this is consistent with ZAKA’s questionable reputation. The organization has a troubled and problematic history that further undermines its legitimacy and credibility, from involvement in massive cases of sexual violence and silencing victims to financial corruption and the exploitation of tragic deaths to enhance its media appearance and grow its financial resources.

ZAKA’s reputation for spreading fake news has been known since its early years of activity. As the Israeli Army Radio correspondent in Jerusalem stated back in 2002, “ZAKA sends everything: what happened, what they think happened, and what didn’t happen as well. We verify everything, but they fulfill our need to know as quickly as possible…in the past, they sent numerous pieces of news that turned out to be lies.”
Vital role in government propaganda

On November 12, 2023, the Israeli website Ynet published a report about how ZAKA was recruited to join Israel’s hasbara campaigns on the events of October 7, and conducted interviews with dozens of foreign journalists coordinated through the Government Press Office (GPO). Hasbara is the Israeli term for “public diplomacy” or government propaganda campaigns.

The director of the GPO, Nitzan Hein, stated, “It is difficult to imagine the Israeli hasbara with foreign correspondents without the remarkable, valuable, and effective role of ZAKA’s men. Their activity is extremely important in hasbara.”

ZAKA also closely collaborates with the National Hasbara Headquarters in the Prime Minister’s office. One of the employees in the headquarters told Ynet how the state “worked on cementing the narrative that Hamas equals ISIS and enhancing the state’s legitimacy for a very forceful response…ZAKA’s men’s testimonies have shocked and exposed, in front of the correspondents, the kind of human monsters we are dealing with.”

YOSSI LANDAU AND SIMCHA GREINIMAN PARTICIPATE IN A TOUR OF KFAR AZA WITH JARED KUSHNER AND IVANKA TRUMP, DECEMBER 2023. (PHOTO: ZAKA FACEBOOK PAGE)

On November 23, 2023, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with the organization’s teams. The meeting revolved around their role in Israeli propaganda. The Prime Minister heard from the volunteers “about their public diplomacy activity in Israel and the world” and urged them to intensify their efforts, as they are important for legitimizing and extending the timeframe of the war:


“But we need to buy time, which we also buy by turning to world leaders and to public opinion. You have an important role in influencing public opinion, which also influences leaders. We are in a war; it will continue. The war is not only to take care of the 1,400 people…but also to give us the maneuvering room.”
“Non-governmental” organization

ZAKA utilizes its official designation as a “non-governmental” body to present itself as credible, and it is this supposedly independent status and ostensible lack of politicization that gives it particular legitimacy — by the organization’s own admission. For instance, one spokesperson for ZAKA told Ynet, “Being a voluntary organization without a political agenda leads to openness and more receptiveness…our testimonies are fully accepted as if they are dealing with an international humanitarian volunteer or a doctor.”

In practice, the status of ZAKA is more complex in terms of both function and legal status. This complexity makes disseminating fake news effective while allowing them to evade responsibility.

ZAKA is technically a non-governmental organization, but it enjoys significant governmental funding, working in full coordination with security and rescue forces. Indeed, ZAKA is recognized by the state as the only entity responsible for dealing with dead bodies in “unnatural” deaths.

In terms of political agenda, ZAKA is open about operating from and being guided by Zionist ideological objectives.

According to Yehuda Meshi-Zahav, ZAKA is also “acting as an arm for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” and “Ideologically, we are a nationalist organization seeking to integrate the Haredi public within Zionism.”

In 2015, the Israel Medicine Association issued guidelines regarding “mass casualty incidents” and how to prioritize the order of medical attention according to the injury severity following objective medical standards. In response, ZAKA’s “operation unit commander” stated that “he puts aside medical consideration and decisions are made on who deserves treatment based on whether they are Jewish.” This policy was dictated by the religious ruling by Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, who said during the discussion: “If it’s clear he is an Arab, don’t save him.”

A fake medical image and a track record of false testimonies

ZAKA’s men deceivingly draw on a false image of medical credibility, which is designed to make their testimonies trustworthy.

However, the organization’s volunteers lack any medical or healthcare qualifications, and its members are not qualified to infer or confirm any medical or forensic assessment of the bodies. ZAKA men are solely trained to recover and collect dead bodies according to strict religious laws, to ensure the dignity of the deceased, and to prepare bodies for burial.

Most of the so-called witnesses who were interviewed by media work in industry and commerce. Furthermore, as an orthodox Haredi organization, it has a radical religious position against autopsies and forensic procedures. In fact, it is within the organization’s official mandate to work to prevent autopsies, and the organization takes legal action to prevent having to comply with the state’s requests for forensic autopsies.

This murky position between governmental and non-governmental, medical and non-medical, facilitates ZAKA’s ability to lie without bearing responsibility.

In early December, when an investigation by Haaretz uncovered several lies propagated by the organization’s men since October 7, ZAKA’s official response was: “ZAKA volunteers are not medical experts and do not have the professional means to identify the deceased, ascertain their age, or declare the manner in which they were killed…due to the difficult condition of the bodies, it’s possible that volunteers misinterpreted what they saw.”

Among ZAKA’s lies, Haaretz listed a falsehood about the “bodies of twenty children with severed heads,” “piles of burned children,” and a “pregnant woman’s stomach ripped open, and her fetus stabbed.” It is hard to conceive of all these false testimonies as accidental “misinterpretations.”

Simcha Greiniman’s testimonies

In early December 2023, Israeli organizations held a session at the United Nations on the allegations of sexual assault on October 7. One of ZAKA’s men, Simcha Greiniman, spoke and was identified by some media outlets as the organization’s foreign media spokesperson. His testimony was featured in a position paper by Physicians for Human Rights Israel on gender-based violence on October 7.

A settler from the illegal “Modi’in Illit” settlement on the lands of the Palestinian villages Bil’in, Ni’lin, and Saffa, Greiniman’s main profession is carpentry, but he takes pride in his media performance: “They say I do a good job. When I sit in front of a foreign journalist, even if he is anti-Israel, I can make him cry,” Greiniman told Ynet.

This was evident in his testimony to the United Nations. His speech was emotionally intense. He delivered it very slowly, interrupted by sips of water, holding back tears, and struggling with speech. However, while the testimony focused on three different alleged cases, he gave zero concrete details that can be confirmed or disproven.

While it is understandable that he did not mention the victims’ names, he omitted other details that could have been mentioned for credibility, such as their ages, the name of the town where he saw these bodies or the time of finding them. In one case, he couldn’t even discern if the victim was male or female.

One might assume that Greiniman accidentally omitted these details due to his intense emotions. However, this was a premeditated decision: the British news website iNews published an interview where he presented the same testimony. When asked about the name of the kibbutz from which he described one of the scenes, he refused to answer. Any possible reason?

Previous false testimony exposed

Previously, Greiniman presented a horrifying story about two burnt bodies of children found under the rubble of a house in Kibbutz Be’eri. This story first appeared in a long interview with Greiniman on October 19, 2023, spanning two pages in a local Haredi newspaper. No further details about the incident were mentioned there.

Later, he repeated the story twice, but the story evolved in its details. On November 7, in an interview with the Haredi site “Kikar Shabbat,” he added that the age of the first child was 5 or 6 years old.

As for the second child, whose age was not specified, he claimed the child was found with a large knife lodged in his face. The next day, former minister Ayelet Shaked posted a video of Greiniman stating that the second child was 3-4 years old.

According to Israeli lists, the closest ages of the deceased children in Be’eri are either 12 years old or 10 months old, and there are no children matching the ages mentioned by Greiniman.

Furthermore, in the case of Be’eri, several testimonies by survivors have confirmed intense battles, with survivor Yasmin Porat testifying that the 10-month-old infant was killed by a shell from an Israeli tank amid gunfire exchanges. However, in his testimony, Greiniman stated that when he entered Be’eri, he “did not find any signs of fighting whatsoever.”

Baseless data

Several pieces of strange information emerge in ZAKA interviews. For instance, Greiniman reiterated in one of his interviews that “85% of the bodies of women arriving at the morgue were naked.”

Despite the hundreds of workers at the Shura Military Morgue, this detail has not been repeated anywhere. Some have spoken about the presence of “some” or “many” naked bodies, but no one came close to describing the quantity and proportion as Greiniman did.

Another official from ZAKA, Yossi Landau, claimed that “80% of the bodies showed signs of torture.” In another interview, the same official said, “70% of the bodies were shot from behind.” Later, he said that “80% were shot in the back.” None of the statistics above was ever officially stated or confirmed.

Another baseless claim is Greiniman’s testimony that they found in the pockets of Hamas fighters’ bodies foreign ID cards that prove “the fighters came from different countries.”

Greiniman also claims to have seen a video in which Hamas fighters killed Gazan workers who worked with permits inside Israel. Greiniman assured the interviewer that the fighters “knew they were from Gaza” because “the car plate was Palestinian…and you cannot mistake a person from Gaza. Their appearance is different from Israelis, even from Israeli Arabs, the mentality is different.”

This is another baseless lie. Apart from the racist assessment that “their appearance is different, the mentality is different,” there is no video showing such an incident. Moreover, Gazan workers are not allowed to enter Israel with cars, and Palestinian car plate numbers are generally not permitted in Israel, except in very rare cases of businesspersons and VIP permits.

In the same interview and others, Greiniman asserts that he has photos proving everything he says. He challenges anyone in doubt to come to Israel to personally show them the photos. However, in his interview with the Times of Israel on November 9, 2023, he was asked about the photos and replied: “I don’t have one picture in my phone.”

Times of Israel reports that Greiniman claims that “some emergency workers did photograph other scenes and sent pictures directly to official authorities.” They, however, add that: “The Times of Israel was not able to obtain images from various government sources.”

Yossi Landau, another source of fake news

The earliest mentions by ZAKA members of rape allegations appeared in the testimonies of Yossi Landau, a central figure in the organization who made multiple international media appearances. His testimony was also endorsed, without any verification of authenticity, by Physicians for Human Rights Israel in their report that accuses Palestinians of using sexual violence as a weapon of war.

YOSSI LANDAU. (PHOTO: WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

Similar to Greiniman, Landau has also been discovered to have disseminated fake news. On December 3, 2023, Haaretz published a report detailing several false testimonies disseminated by Israeli entities, confirming Landau’s personal responsibility for propagating some of these fake stories.

Among Landau’s lies was the myth of “dozens of beheaded children,” a claim that was refuted. Another reported lie was about the piles of children’s bodies burned together, a narrative that he repeated time and again, likening it to the Holocaust.

Landau also claimed, while crying in front of foreign reporters, to have seen “a pregnant woman, her abdomen ripped open, with the fetus outside her womb tied by the umbilical cord, and the fetus itself stabbed with a knife.” This has also proven to be a fabrication. Haaretz refuted any knowledge of a similar known case and interviewed the residents of the kibbutz, who denied the existence of such a case or even of a pregnant woman among their neighbors.

Landau’s lies shouldn’t come as a surprise. In a conversation with foreign journalists, he said, “When we go into a house, we use our imagination. The bodies were telling us stories that happened, that’s what happened.”

Disturbingly, despite being proven to be a pathological liar, Landau’s testimonies are still cited in PHRI publications and are circulating in major international media networks, including The New York Times‘ latest report on “how Hamas weaponized sexual violence on Oct. 7”.

In the Times article, Landau claims that ZAKA volunteers are not allowed to take pictures. Other volunteers, such as Haim Otmezgin and Simcha Greiniman, assured reporters that they have photos. The Times report also says that ZAKA volunteers “inadvertently” destroyed evidence. Sources in the Israeli army claimed this happened when ZAKA members changed the body bags to take photos of the bodies in bags bearing their logo.

Haim Otmezgin defending rape victims?

The head of ZAKA’s “special unit,” Haim Otmezgin, testified on November 30 in front of the “Women’s Affairs Committee” in the Israeli Parliament.

The Israeli press widely covered the testimony, which was endorsed by many Israeli women’s organizations. When he posted the video of his testimony in parliament on his Facebook page, he wrote: “The world needs to know in order to support us and enable us to accomplish the task.”

Like other testimonies by ZAKA’s men, his testimony lacked information and repeated false stories (beheaded babies, again). Otmezgin claims to “possess photos” of “a naked woman with a sharp object stuck in her crotch.” Nearly two months into the propaganda campaign, not a single journalist reported seeing these pictures. This isn’t the first time he has claimed to have evidence unseen by anyone else.

Since we are left to believe Otmezign’s words with no evidence to back them up, we must question his credibility.

Otmezgin is a reserve soldier in the Israeli army and the owner of a human resources company. His name appeared in the press earlier this year after his participation in the Israeli rescue team following the earthquake in Turkey. Upon his return, Turkish authorities opened an investigation against him, accusing him of stealing and smuggling from Turkey into Israel an antique manuscript from “the Book of Esther” found under the rubble.

But when it comes to believing Otmezgin, one must consider his connection to ZAKA’s founder, Yehuda Meshi-Zahav.
ZAKA leaders and the silencing of rape victims

In 2021, two investigative reports shook Israel. The first appeared in Haaretz newspaper, followed by TV reportage by the investigative news program Uvda. Both presented testimonies from victims of sexual assaults committed by the ZAKA founder over decades against both males and females, including children from the age of 12 and adults. The victims confirmed that those sexual crimes were widely known in Meshi-Zahav’s surroundings, likely also to Otmezgin, who was one of his closest trusted friends and worked alongside him for over 25 years.

Otmezgin publicly defended Meshi-Zahav, even after a series of testimonies emerged: “I recently spoke to him, asked how he’s facing the case, how he spends these days, supported him, and we talked about faith matters. Anyone who knows him knows he cannot harm any person.”

But Haim Otmezgin wasn’t the sole supporter of Meshi-Zahav. The ZAKA leadership, which is still in power, provided full support for him as well. Meshi-Zahav, according to evidence, used the organization’s funds, volunteer cards, and other properties for his criminal acts. In one of the first testimonies that emerged in Haaretz, a woman recounted how Meshi-Zahav threatened her during the rape: “If you utter a word, a ZAKA truck will run you over.”

Once the police investigation began, investigators announced they planned to interrogate the organization’s leadership on suspicions of silencing victims and concealing evidence. With Meshi-Zahav’s suicide, the file was closed.

In June 2023, Channel 12 revealed that the ZAKA organization, using donation funds, hired a private investigation office to track and gather smearing information about Isaac Weinhaus, an Orthodox Jewish activist working to expose sexual violence in the community. Weinhaus was one of the figures who contributed to breaking the silence surrounding Meshi-Zahav.

The fact that women’s organizations are now endorsing the statements of ZAKA leadership and demanding the world to blindly believe Meshi-Zahav’s defenders when it comes to the events of October 7 is not only absurd and cynical but is indicative of how deep anti-Palestinian racism runs.

The Short String

The Short String is an anonymous group of Palestinian journalists in Israel who analyze the role of international media and organizations in promoting Israeli propaganda. The authors have requested anonymity in the face of persecution, violence, and threats from Israeli authorities, which would put them in severe danger.
More by this author


Hamas leader Saleh Aruri assassinated in Beirut

Hamas deputy head Saleh al-Aruri and leaders in the Qassam Brigades have been assassinated in Beirut's southern Dahiya neighborhood. Hamas says the "cowardly assassination" will not undermine the continuation of the Palestinian resistance.

BY AMENA AL-ASHKAR AND MONDOWEISS PALESTINE BUREAU
HAMAS LEADER SALEH ARURI DURING A PRESS CONFERENCE IN DAMASCUS, DECEMBER 21, 2010. (PHOTO: APA IMAGES)

At least six people have been killed in an alleged Israeli drone strike in the Lebanese capital of Beirut on Tuesday evening, including senior Hamas leader Saleh al-Aruri.

Initial reports by Lebanese state media said that “four people were martyred and a number of others injured when the Hamas office was targeted” in the Mashrafiyah neighborhood of the southern Beirut suburb of al-Dahiya, an area where both Hezbollah and Palestinian groups operate out of. Lebanese news channel Al-Mayadeen later reported that the death toll had climbed to six, while sources told Mondoweiss that the toll had reached seven.

Reuters and Lebanese media reported that the strike was carried out by Israel. The Israeli government and military have yet to officially confirm any involvement in the assassination.

Reports indicated that the primary target of the strike was 57-year-old Saleh al-Aruri, the deputy chairman of Hamas’ political bureau, and a founding commander of the movement’s military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades. Though Hamas has yet to confirm the identities of the other six killed in the strike, sources told Mondoweiss that among them were Samir Abu Amer, a top Hamas military leader in Lebanon, and Abu Ahmad al-Aqraa, a senior Hamas military leader in charge of West Bank operations.

The strike took place around 5:30 p.m. local time. Sources told Mondoweiss that initial evidence seemed to indicate that two high-precision missiles were fired toward a building in the neighborhood, reported to be the Hamas offices. One was fired at an apartment, and the second at a vehicle on the street, alleged to have belonged to Aruri. According to Al Jazeera, Lebanese civil defense crews were still fighting flames caused by the strike more than an hour later.

Hamas confirmed the killing of Aruri, calling it a “cowardly assassination” that “proves once again the abject failure of the enemy to achieve any of its aggressive goals in the Gaza Strip.”

“The cowardly assassinations carried out by the Zionist occupation against the leaders and symbols of our Palestinian people inside and outside Palestine will not succeed in breaking the will and steadfastness of our people or in undermining the continuation of their valiant resistance,” senior Hamas official Izzat al-Rishq said in a statement.
Who is Saleh al-Aruri?

Saleh Aruri spent 15 years in Israeli prison until 2010, and was exiled from Palestine upon his release by Israeli authorities. During those years, he operated out of various capitals over the years, including Istanbul, Damascus, and most recently, Beirut. He is widely credited as the primary mastermind behind financing and organizing military cells in the West Bank from outside of Palestine during his period of exile, and in solidifying military and financial ties with various regional actors.

In the years following 2014, Aruri was engaged in serving as an intermediary between on-the-ground Hamas operatives in Palestine and sources of Hamas funding internationally. This included fomenting armed cells and planning for various kidnapping operations, including the 2014 kidnapping of three Israeli settlers in Hebron. In the past two years, armed resistance in the West Bank has witnessed a resurgence, and while the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) has been recognized as responsible for funding many of the armed groups that arose in Nablus and Jenin, Aruri has also been mentioned as playing a significant role in mobilizing support for armed resistance in the West Bank during this period.

With the winding down of the Syrian Civil War and the rapprochement between Hamas and the “resistance axis” alliance of Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria in 2018, Saleh al-Aruri played a significant role in strengthening ties with Hezbollah. The building of Hamas’s military capabilities in Gaza is partly due to Hezbollah’s assistance to the movement in recent years, with Aruri serving a crucial intermediary role in this regard.

In late October last year, Israeli forces took over and occupied Aruri’s family home in his hometown of Arura, near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, and used it as an “intelligence base” before destroying it. Residents of the village said at the time that the home was uninhabited and that Israel’s takeover and destruction of the home was largely a symbolic act of revenge for the Hamas attacks on October 7.
Israeli ministers applaud strike, analysts warn of major escalation

The assassination of Aruri comes a day before Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah is expected to appear for a televised address, the third such address made by the leader since last October.

Nasrallah previously warned in a speech last summer that any assassination of any Lebanese, Palestinian, or Iranian individual on Lebanese territory would be met with a strong reaction from Hezbollah.

Since October 7, however, Israeli strikes and artillery fire targeting Hezbollah positions, as well as journalists and Lebanese civilians along the southern Lebanese border, have failed to materialize into a strong reaction from Hezbollah, beyond cross-border skirmishes and rocket fire toward Israeli military positions and towns along Israel’s northern border.

Tuesday’s assassination could change that, analysts warn. Speaking to Al Jazeera, Imad Harb, director of research at the Arab Center Washington DC, called the strike a “dangerous escalation,” noting that it marked the first assassination of a Hamas leader outside of occupied Palestine since October 7. The fact that the strike took place in Beirut, not on the southern Lebanese border, and in the heart of Hezbollah’s stronghold in the city, sends the message that Israel “can reach anyone, anywhere in Lebanon,” Harb said.

He added that Hezbollah may respond “by allowing more Hamas attacks from southern Lebanon on Israel. And definitely, it’s going to be more vigilant regarding its own leaders,” though both Israel and Hezbollah appear uninterested in “blowing up the front” completely.

A spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry condemned the assassination, saying Iran condemns “the violation of Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by the Zionist regime.”

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati issued a statement responding to the attack, condemning the Israeli “crime,” and warning against Israel’s attempts to drag Lebanon into a larger-scale confrontation.

In the occupied West Bank, a general strike in mourning over the assassination of Aruri was called by the Ramallah branch of Fatah, the ruling party of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Meanwhile, Israeli Hebrew media reported that Israel is “expecting retaliation” for the attack, “including possible long-range rocket fire on Israel,” the Times of Israel reported.

While Israel has yet to officially claim responsibility for the strike, it is being regarded as a major win for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while celebrated by Israeli officials.

Likud MK and former Israeli representative to the UN Danny Danon tweeted out his praise to Israeli security forces for the killing of Aruri, saying, “I congratulate the IDF, the Shin Bet, the Mossad and the security forces for killing senior Hamas official Salah al-Aaruri in Beirut.

Anyone who was involved in the 7/10 massacre should know that we will reach out to them and close an account with them.”

Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich also tweeted in celebration of the strike, saying, “So let all thine enemies perish,” referencing The Book of Judges, the seventh book of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament, Times of Israel noted.

Times of Israel added that Israeli Channel 12 reported that Netanyahu’s cabinet secretary Yossi Fuchs sent a directive to Israeli ministers ordering them “not to speak publicly about the alleged Israeli strike.”

Though there is no confirmation about what role, if any, Aruri played in planning the October 7 attacks, dubbed by Hamas as “Operation Al-Aqsa Flood,” Netanyahu and other Israeli military leaders have vowed to target Hamas officials both in Gaza and abroad.
Back in November, Netanyahu said that he “instructed the Mossad [Israeli intelligence agency] to act against the heads of Hamas wherever they are.” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant described Hamas leaders worldwide as “walking dead,” saying “they are living on borrowed time” and are “destined to die.”

Who is Saleh al Arouri, the Hamas deputy assassinated by Israel?


Born in Aroura town of the occupied West Bank, Arouri joined Hamas and eventually went into exile to various countries. In a recent interview, Arouri said, "It is not strange for us for the commanders and cadres of the movement to be martyred."



REUTERS

"I never expected to reach this age, so I am living on borrowed time," Arouri said in August / File Photo: Reuters

Saleh al Arouri, the deputy political head of Hamas and a founder of the group's military wing, had been in Israel's sights for years before he was assassinated in a drone strike in a southern suburb of Beirut.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had threatened to kill him even before October 7 surprise blitz by Hamas.

Israel had accused Arouri, 57, of masterminding attacks against it in the occupied West Bank, where he was the group's top commander.

In 2015, the US Department of the Treasury designated Arouri as a "Specially Designated Global Terrorist", offering $5 million for information about him.

Some Israeli lawmakers celebrated the assassination while Mike Waltz, a Florida Republican, hailed the assassination of Arouri and called it a "very big deal".

Asked about assassination threats against him in an interview with Beirut-based Al Mayadeen in August, Arouri said, "It is not strange for us for the commanders and cadres of the movement to be martyred."

"I never expected to reach this age, so I am living on borrowed time," he said.

In the same interview, he threatened that in case of a war, "Israel will suffer a defeat unprecedented in history."




Arouri's life and history


Born in the town of Aroura in the occupied West Bank, Arouri joined Hamas and eventually went into exile, first to Damascus, where then Syrian government was a strong supporter of the group.

He resided in Syria for three years before leaving, living as a nomad between several countries.

He left in 2011 when Hamas split with regime leader Bashar al Assad, siding with the opposition in Syria's civil war.

He later moved to Lebanon in 2018 until his assassination on Jan. 2.

Arriving in Beirut, Arouri made few public appearances. Hamas was able to build up its political and military presence in Lebanon.

In early September, Arouri held a meeting with Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah that was attended by Ziad Nakhaleh, the leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group, during which they discussed the situation in the Palestinian territories. A similar meeting was convened after October 7.




Drone strike


Since October 7, Arouri kept a low profile while others in the Hamas political leadership made frequent public appearances in Beirut, including in near-daily press conferences.

He was assassinated in a strike on an apartment building in the middle of Beirut's southern suburbs, a political and security stronghold of Hezbollah but also a densely populated urban area.

Hamas officials confirmed Arouri's death, along with six other Hamas members, including two military commanders.

A Lebanese security official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the media, said the attack appeared to have been carried out by a drone that fired missiles into the building, targeting one specific floor.

The strike shook the surrounding area, shattering windows in neighbouring buildings and causing a fire on the street in the Musharafieh district.

Residents of the area rushed to the streets around the targeted building, digging through rubble and broken glass, looking for survivors or bodies.

An Associated Press photographer at the scene described seeing at least two bodies and other body parts scattered in the street. A witness at the scene, Abbas Ghannam, told the AP news agency that he had heard the sound of a drone before it hit.

"It was not a military jet; it was a drone. It has a low sound," he said.




'Harsh retaliation'

This could be the first Israeli attack on Beirut since the 34-day war between Israel and Hezbollah in the summer of 2006 that ended in a stalemate.

It could mark a major escalation in the war in Lebanon.

After Netanyahu's previous threats to Arouri, Nasrallah warned Israel not to target any Lebanese, Palestinian, Syrian or Iranian officials in Lebanon, saying that would lead to "harsh retaliation" by the group.

Hezbollah said in a statement that the targeting of Arouri "in the heart of the southern suburbs of Beirut" constituted "a serious attack on Lebanon, its people, its security, sovereignty and resistance."

"We affirm that this crime will never pass without response and punishment," it said.

Nasrallah is set to speak on Wednesday, on the anniversary of the killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in a US air strike.

Israel has killed over 22,000 Palestinians so far in its brutal war on besieged Gaza and wounded more than 57,000 others. Some 7,000 Palestinians are said to be buried under the mountains of concrete and twisted steel of bombed buildings.

SOURCE: TRTWORLD AND AGENCIES

Lebanon's prime minister condemns Israeli strike in Beirut

Lebanon to file urgent complaint with UN Security Council against Israel over attack

Mohammad Sıo |03.01.2024 -
Officers inspect the area after Israeli drone struck a Hamas office in Dahieh region of Beirut, Lebanon on January 02, 2024.

BEIRUT

Lebanese caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati issued a statement late Tuesday condemning an explosion in the southern suburbs of the capital Beirut, calling it a "new Israeli crime."

The Palestinian resistance group Hamas confirmed the assassination of its deputy chief Saleh Arouri in the blast.

Hamas said two commanders of its armed wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, were also killed.

Lebanon’s official National News Agency earlier reported that Arouri was killed in an Israeli drone strike on a Hamas office in Mecherfeh in southern Beirut. At least six people were killed in the attack.

"This explosion aims to usher Lebanon into a new phase of confrontations following the daily ongoing attacks in the south, which result in a significant number of martyrs and injuries," he added.

“Lebanon is committed to the resolutions of international legitimacy, especially (UN) Resolution 1701,'' he said.

“However, it is Israel that has breached and surpassed the resolution, as it remains unsatisfied with the level of death and destruction. It is evident to all that the decision of war rests in Israel's hands, and it is imperative to restrain and halt its aggression,'' Mikati said.

In this respect, Lebanon intends to file an urgent complaint with the UN Security Council against Israel in light of the attack, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement.

Lebanon has previously lodged several complaints against Israel in the Security Council, including cases related to targeting journalists in southern Lebanon and the occupying border towns.

*Writing by Mohammad Sio


West Bank denounces al-Arouri killing, declares general strike
West Bank denounces al-Arouri killing, declares general strike
[03/January/2024]

AMALLAH Jan 03. 2024 (Saba) -National and Islamic parties in the West Bank declared a general strike and mobilization on Wednesday, mourning martyr Saleh Al-Arouri, the Deputy Chief of the Political Bureau of Hamas.

The Fatah Movement - Ramallah Region said in a statement: Wednesday is the day of a general and comprehensive strike in the Ramallah and Al-Bireh governorate in response to the assassination of Al-Arouri in Beirut.

Mosques all around the world mourned the great leader who was assassinated in the Southern Suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, by the Israeli enemy on January 2, 2023.

Protesters took to the streets in Arura, condemning his assassination and portraying an image that was replicated in multiple cities and towns across the West Bank.

Najat


Hezbollah condemns assassination of Hamas leader Salah Arouri, comrades in Beirut

Arouri's assassination sends 'highly symbolic political and security messages,' says Hezbollah, warning that killings will ‘never go unpunished’

Mohammad Sıo |03.01.2024 -
Police officers take security measures after Israeli drone struck a Hamas office in Dahieh region of Beirut, Lebanon on January 02, 2024.


ISTANBUL

The Lebanese group Hezbollah condemned the assassination of Hamas deputy chief Salah Arouri and his comrades in Beirut on Tuesday in a rapidly unfolding and deeply concerning series of events.

The assassination is a ''serious attack on Lebanon, its people, security, sovereignty and resistance,'' the group said in a statement.

Arouri's assassination ''contains highly symbolic political and security messages and entails a dangerous development in the course of the war between the enemy (Israel) and the axis of resistance,'' it said.

"Our resistance is steadfast and loyal to its principles that it has undertaken. The fighters are in the highest state of readiness," said the statement, emphasizing ''the assassination crime of Arouri and his comrades will never go unpunished.''

The Palestinian resistance group Hamas confirmed the assassination in the Lebanese capital Beirut.

Hamas said two commanders of its armed wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, were also killed.

Lebanon’s official National News Agency reported earlier that Arouri was killed in an Israeli drone strike on a Hamas office in Mecherfeh in southern Beirut. At least six people were killed in the attack.

*Writing by Mohmmad Sio

Lebanon's Hezbollah vows retaliation for Hamas' Al-Arouri

Lebanon's Hezbollah vows retaliation for Hamas' Al-Arouri
2024-01-02 

Shafaq News/ Lebanese Hezbollah declared that the assassination of Saleh Al-Arouri, Deputy Head of the Political Bureau of Hamas, in an Israeli bombing in Beirut, will "never" go unpunished.

In a statement, Hezbollah mourned Al-Arouri, calling him a "great mujahid leader" who contributed to the "defense of the oppressed people of Palestine."

The party accused Israel of resorting to assassination due to its failure to subjugate Gaza and other areas.

Hezbollah asserted that the crime was a continuation of the assassination of leader Sayyed Razi Mousavi (a high-ranking general of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps' elite Quds force, which Israel killed in Syria). Considering the operation a "dangerous assault on Lebanon, its people, its security, its sovereignty, and its resistance."

The statement affirmed that the crime "would not pass without a response and punishment."

Deputy Hamas chief Saleh al-Arouri was killed on Tuesday night in an Israeli drone strike on Beirut's southern suburbs, a stronghold of Hezbollah.

Lebanon's national news agency said six people were killed when the drone struck a Hamas office.

Hamas mourned two other officials with Al-Arouri.

IT'S CALLED APARTHEID 
Israeli post-war scenario: splitting Gaza into small areas ruled by tribes

Rather than a single political entity ruling Gaza, local media says the Israeli army wants to divide the Palestinian enclave into regions and sub-regions that Tel Aviv would communicate with separately.




AP

Up to 1.9 million people, or over 85 percent of the population, have been displaced across Gaza by Israeli attacks, according to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees. / Photo: AP

A post-war scenario in Gaza has come to light in which the Israeli army could divide the besieged territory into areas ruled by tribes or clans rather than a single political entity.

According to Israel's public broadcaster KAN, the plan was devised by the Israeli army and is expected to be presented to the Cabinet on Tuesday.

It stipulates that Gaza be divided into regions and sub-regions, with Israel communicating separately with each group for matters including the distribution of humanitarian aid.

The proposed scheme may also extend to the occupied West Bank and recommends dividing the territories into emirates and Israel retaining security control.



Palestinian Authority rule

Tel Aviv is yet to comment on the report, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said on several occasions that he will not allow the Palestinian Authority, which is based in the occupied West Bank, to have any role in ruling Gaza in the post-war period.

The stance contradicts the US position, which has suggested that the Palestinian Authority should rule over Gaza after the end of the conflict, which erupted with the October 7 cross-border offensive by Hamas.

Israel's onslaught has killed nearly 22,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and left the besieged territory into ruins as most of its infrastructure has been destroyed or damaged.

Up to 1.9 million people, or over 85 percent of the population, have been displaced across Gaza, according to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees.

Around 1,200 Israelis are believed to have been killed in the Hamas attack on October 7.


SOURCE: AA

Israel announces its Gaza endgame: Ethnic cleansing as ‘humanitarianism’

Benjamin Netanyahu announced his endgame in Gaza: the “voluntary migration” of Palestinians forced to choose between leaving or dying by bombardment and starvation. His goal is to end the Palestinians as a people and as a national movement.
MONDOWEISS
ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU MEETS US SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD AUSTIN AT ISRAELI ARMY HEADQUARTERS, THE KIRYA, IN TEL AVIV, ALONGSIDE ISRAELI MINISTER OF DEFENSE YOAV GALLANT, ARMY CHIEF OF STAFF LT.-GEN. HERZI HALEVI, AND CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF GEN. CHARLES BROWN. (PHOTO: © KOBI GIDEON/ISRAELI GPO VIA ZUMA PRESS/WIRE/APA IMAGES)

On Christmas Day, the Wall Street Journal thought it appropriate to publish an Op-Ed by the world leader who is currently slaughtering more innocents than any other, Benjamin Netanyahu. In that article, Netanyahu gave us his “vision” for his endgame in Gaza. He laid out three aims: “Hamas must be destroyed, Gaza must be demilitarized, and Palestinian society must be deradicalized. These are the three prerequisites for peace between Israel and its Palestinian neighbors in Gaza.”

Israel maintains that destroying Hamas will take months and perhaps years. Already, most Gazans are struggling to find shelter, food, and water. Decent medical care has become almost an impossible dream as medical professionals scramble to do what they can without supplies, medical equipment, electricity, or even hospital facilities. Disease, malnutrition, exposure, infection from wounds, horrendous sanitary conditions, and other threats are running rampant. It’s important to realize that the people dying from these causes are not being recorded in the daily casualty counts.

All of that is after less than three months. 1% of Gaza’s population has already been killed, and fungal infections are so widespread they’re even killing Israeli soldiers now. Imagine what things will be like in another month, let alone a year.

By “demilitarized,” Netanyahu means a permanent Israeli military presence not only in Gaza but also at the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt. This is ostensibly to prevent weapons smuggling, but there is no such thing as stopping smuggling — no country has ever been able to do that. Occupied people, besieged people, and people living under tyranny will always find a means of resistance.

When Netanyahu says “deradicalized,” what he is referring to is a “re-education” program for Palestinians so they will learn to love their Israeli colonizers. His comparison to Germany and Japan after World War II is so absurd it hardly merits discussion. But to be clear, the Allied powers, after devastating both Germany and Japan, actively rebuilt the countries and boosted the countries’ economies toward independence and growth. They gave the people of Germany and Japan a reason to want to reconcile with the Allied powers and to see their respective pre-war governments as having led them to disaster.

Netanyahu does not intend to do this, or anything of the kind. The last thing he wants to see is any kind of independent Palestine. He’s certainly made that plain enough times. And he has no intention of rebuilding Gaza with a vibrant economy, but to repeat the isolation Gaza has experienced since 1948, first by Egypt, and then, since 1967, by Israel. His notion that “ Palestinian civil society needs to be transformed so that its people support fighting terrorism rather than funding it,” reads as a ridiculous fantasy that arises from the false, racist notion that Palestinians are being taught to resent Israelis, not that the experiences of violence, killings, deprivation, and humiliation by Israel might just engender some negative feelings.

Additionally, that concept of “deradicalization” is not only offensive in its explicit denial of the conditions that have led to Palestinian resistance—legal under international law or otherwise—it is also so elastic that Israel could accuse even the most quisling Palestinians, like the Palestinian Authority, of remaining “radical” until the end of time no matter how much they kowtow to their occupiers. And Netanyahu has every reason to believe Israel will be supported in this by Washington and Brussels.

No, this was not about describing how to end the slaughter in Gaza. It was about declaring that the carnage would be going on for a long time and that its ultimate goal, as has been clear since October 7, is to finally end the struggle over Palestine by destroying the Palestinians as a people and as a national movement.
Ethnic cleansing as ‘humanitarianism’

The plan, as Netanyahu elaborated at a Christmas Day meeting of his Likud faction, is to squeeze the people of Gaza so hard they will have no choice but to leave or die. “Regarding voluntary emigration, I have no problem with that,” he told Likud Knesset Member and former Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon. “Our problem is not allowing the exit, but a lack of countries that are ready to take Palestinians in. And we are working on it. This is the direction we are going in.”

The term “voluntary emigration” is likely to be heard quite a lot in the coming weeks and months, and it is one of the most cynical, dishonest terms one can imagine. There is, of course, nothing voluntary about people leaving Gaza. Israel has made the place unlivable, and that was before the current bombardment.


If you cut off water, electricity, food, and medical care, destroy all the shelter, and then ask a person, “Would you still like to stay?” their decision to leave is obviously not voluntary.

Now, they are essentially being forced to leave under the threat of imminent death. The people of Gaza did not suddenly lose their attachment to Palestine. They will die if they stay, as will their children. If you cut off water, electricity, food, and medical care, destroy all the shelter, and then ask a person, “Would you still like to stay?” their decision to leave is obviously not voluntary.

Yet this will be presented as a “humanitarian solution.” And it is an option that, at least according to one poll publicized by Danon, enjoys vast support among Israelis. The poll asked, “To what extent do you support encouraging the voluntary migration of the residents of the Gaza Strip?” 68% strongly supported such encouragement, with another 15% saying they were somewhat supportive of it. Only 17% said they didn’t support it much or at all.

The push for this “humanitarian solution” is not confined to the government. The Jerusalem Post published an Op-Ed, also on Christmas Day, that argued for the transfer of Gazans to the Sinai on the same “humanitarian” grounds. The detachment from reality in the article, as well as the blatant racism, are stunning.

Claiming that “Since Israel’s unconditional turnover of the Gaza Strip to the Palestinian Authority in 2005, Gazans have completely failed to generate a productive Palestinian-administered entity, despite generous economic support,” the author — Joel Roskin, a professor of geology at Bar-Ilan University — goes on to say that “this may be associated with the coupled effect of an intrinsic hatred-focused, fanatic, anti-Israel Islamic culture, and links with Iran, along with limited geographical conditions, poor natural and human resources, and a high population density.”

The racism is unvarnished and unapologetic. The complete absence of acknowledgment of Israel’s seventeen-year siege on Gaza is par for the course, the description of the “generous economic support” Gaza has received both a fabrication and classic victim-blaming. Much of that support was for reconstruction after Israel destroyed infrastructure, homes, and buildings, as well as humanitarian aid, which, due to Israel’s harsh restrictions of the Gaza economy and restrictions in both the United States and Europe on the ability to even send charitable donations, much less invest directly, did nothing to improve the economy. Indeed, this was a frequent complaint of advocates for Palestinians in general. Humanitarian aid does not boost an economy, it retards it. Economic aid can boost an economy depending on how it’s used, but such use was always forbidden by the United States and the European Union, which, directly or indirectly, were the sources of the funding.

But this is likely to be seen in both Israel and the White House as the height of magnanimity on Israel’s part. They just want to help the poor, barbaric Gazans who only know how to hate and kill to find a better life far from the lands that Israel has stolen from them, it will be said. It is the cruelest form of the “white man’s burden” trope.

Netanyahu still has a quandary, though. As he pointed out, other countries are not willing to help Israel ethnically cleanse Gaza of its Palestinian inhabitants. Indeed, while the Biden administration, the U.K., and Europe all keep their heads buried firmly in the sand about Israel’s clear intentions, Egypt and Jordan can afford no such delusions.

On Wednesday, King Abdullah of Jordan and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El Sisi met to discuss the situation in Gaza. A statement released by the Jordanian news agency Petra made their position clear: “His Majesty King Abdullah and Egypt President Abdel Fattah El Sisi on Wednesday in Cairo reiterated their complete rejection of all attempts to liquidate the Palestinian issue and forcibly displace Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.”

Netanyahu’s strategy is clearly to continue slaughtering Palestinians and degrading the living conditions in Gaza to the point that Egypt will have to give in and allow the formation of Palestinian settlements in the northern Sinai. The monstrosity of that plan should be clear to anyone with the slightest hint of humanity in them. But humanity seems to be in short supply in both Israel and Washington.

Egypt is trying to prevent this impossible choice from being forced upon them. That is why they recently submitted a three-phase peace proposal to Israel, Hamas, and the United States, which would see the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian political prisoners and a shared “technocratic” government in Gaza as a temporary measure, pending elections that would bring a united Palestinian government to both the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Hamas and Islamic Jihad have rejected the notions of both a temporary ceasefire and their relinquishing of all power in Gaza. Hamas has called for democratic elections following the fighting and indicated that they are open to sharing power with the PLO and working within a unified framework. Israel has not blatantly rejected the plan but has insisted they will not stop the war until Netanyahu’s three conditions are met, which is a de facto rejection of the plan. The U.S. has remained absolutely silent, which speaks more loudly about Joe Biden’s contempt for any stoppage of the killing than any words could.

Even the Biden administration cannot credibly claim to be unaware of the Netanyahu plan. Everything Israel has done in Gaza points clearly to an attempt to force the majority of the people out of Gaza for the foreseeable future. This isn’t speculation; it is clear from both the words and actions of Israeli leaders, from Netanyahu on down. This is not something that can be addressed with a little bit more humanitarian aid. Joe Biden, Antony Blinken, and the rest of the administration leadership are well aware of this. Unless popular unrest can force a change, they will most certainly let Netanyahu push this as far as he can.

Mitchell Plitnick

Mitchell Plitnick is the president of ReThinking Foreign Policy. He is the co-author, with Marc Lamont Hill, of Except for Palestine: The Limits of Progressive Politics. Mitchell's previous positions include vice president at the Foundation for Middle East Peace, Director of the US Office of B'Tselem, and Co-Director of Jewish Voice for Peace.

You can find him on Twitter @MJPlitnick.
More by this author

South Africa’s genocide case against Israel sets up high-stakes legal battle at the UN’s top court
Published: 2 hours ago

 Israeli soldiers take up positions near the Gaza Strip border, in southern Israel, Friday, Dec. 29, 2023. The army is battling Palestinian militants across Gaza in the war ignited by Hamas' Oct. 7 attack into Israel. South Africa has launched a case at the United Nations' top court alleging that Israel's military campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide. The filing and Israel's decision to defend itself at the International Court of Justice sets up a high-stakes showdown in the before a bench of the court's black-robed judges in the wood-panelled Great Hall of Justice.
 (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit, File)

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — South Africa has launched a case at the United Nations’ top court alleging that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide.

The filing and Israel’s decision to defend itself at the International Court of Justice set up a high-stakes showdown before a panel of judges in the Great Hall of Justice.

The case will likely drag on for years. At its heart is the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, drawn up in the aftermath of World War II and the Holocaust.

The convention defines genocide as acts such as killings “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”

Here are some further details on the case and its ramifications.

WHAT IS SOUTH AFRICA’S ARGUMENT?

South Africa’s 84-page filing says Israel’s actions “are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part” of the Palestinians in Gaza.

It asks the ICJ, also known as the world court, for a series of legally binding rulings. It wants the court to declare that Israel “has breached and continues to breach its obligations under the Genocide Convention,” and to order Israel to cease hostilities in Gaza that could amount to breaches of the convention, to offer reparations, and to provide for reconstruction of what it’s destroyed in Gaza.

The filing argues that genocidal acts include killing Palestinians, causing serious mental and bodily harm, and deliberately inflicting conditions meant to “bring about their physical destruction as a group.” And it says statements by Israeli officials express genocidal intent.

South Africa argues that the court has jurisdiction because both countries are signatories of the genocide convention. The convention’s ninth article says disputes between nations over the convention can be submitted to the International Court of Justice.

Many South Africans, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, have compared Israel’s policies regarding Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank with South Africa’s past apartheid regime of racial segregation. Israel rejects such allegations.

WHAT WAS ISRAEL’S RESPONSE?


Israel’s government swiftly rejected the genocide claim. A Foreign Ministry statement said South Africa’s case lacks a legal foundation and constitutes a “despicable and contemptuous exploitation” of the court.

Eylon Levy, an official in the Israeli prime minister’s office, on Tuesday accused South Africa of “giving political and legal cover” to the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas that triggered Israel’s campaign. But he confirmed that Israel would send a legal team to the Hague “to dispel South Africa’s absurd blood libel,” he said.

An Israeli official said the country, which has a history of ignoring international tribunals, decided to defend itself for several reasons. Among them are Israel’s role in promoting the original genocide convention after the Holocaust and its belief that “we have a strong case.” He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing behind-the-scenes deliberations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to press ahead with the war until Hamas is crushed and the more than 100 hostages still held by the militant group in Gaza are freed. He’s said that could take several more months.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

South Africa’s filing includes a request for the court to urgently issue legally binding interim orders for Israel to “immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza.”

Such orders, known as provisional measures, would remain while the case progresses. They’re legally binding but not always followed. In 2022, in a genocide case filed by Ukraine against Russia, the court ordered Moscow to immediately suspend its invasion. The order was ignored, and deadly strikes continue.

The court will soon schedule public hearings. Lawyers for South Africa and Israel can make arguments. Judges drawn from around the world will likely take days or weeks to issue a decision on preliminary measures.

The court will then enter a lengthy process of considering the full case.

Israel could challenge the jurisdiction and seek to have the case thrown out before lawyers start arguing. Other countries that have signed the genocide convention could also apply to make submissions.

IS THE COURT HEARING SIMILAR CASES?


Two other genocide cases are on the busy court’s docket. The case filed by Ukraine shortly after Russia’s invasion accuses Moscow of launching the military operation based on trumped-up claims of genocide and accuses Russia of planning acts of genocide in Ukraine.
ADVERTISEMENT


Another ongoing case involves Gambia — acting on behalf of Muslim nations — accusing Myanmar of genocide against the Rohingya Muslim minority.

In a past case brought by Bosnia, the court in 2007 ruled that Serbia “violated the obligation to prevent genocide … in respect of the genocide that occurred in Srebrenica in July 1995.” The court declined to order Serbia to pay compensation. Croatia also sued Serbia in 2015, but the world court ruled that Serbia didn’t breach the convention in that case.

ICJ OR ICC?

The Hague calls itself the international city of peace and justice. It is home not only to the ICJ, but to the International Criminal Court, based just a few miles (kilometers) away, near the North Sea coastline.

The two courts have different mandates.

The ICJ, which held its first sitting in 1946 as the world emerged from the carnage of WWII, adjudicates cases between nations. They’re often land and maritime border disputes, as well as disagreements over interpretation of international treaties.

The ICC is much younger. It started work in 2002 with the lofty goal of ending global impunity for atrocities. Unlike the ICJ, it seeks to hold individuals criminally responsible for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The ICC has an ongoing investigation into the Israel-Palestinian conflict, dating back to the last war in Gaza. So far, it has not issued any arrest warrants.

ICC prosecutor Karim Khan said last month that an investigation into possible crimes by Hamas militants and Israeli forces “is a priority for my office.”

WHAT ABOUT PAST U.N. CASES?

Two now-defunct U.N. tribunals also held landmark genocide trials.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia convicted a series of high-ranking Bosnian Serbs, including former President Radovan Karadzic and his military chief Gen. Ratko Mladic, for their roles in the July 1995 massacre of more than 8,000 men and boys in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica.

Both Karadzic and Mladic were given life sentences.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda convicted a string of leaders involved in the African nation’s 1994 genocide when some 800,000 people, mainly ethnic Tutsis, were slaughtered.

___

Associated Press writer Josef Federman contributed from Jerusalem.