Showing posts sorted by date for query Steelworkers. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Steelworkers. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, March 30, 2025

USW says Ancora aims to sell mills to fund US Steel revival

Bloomberg News | March 27, 2025 |

US Steel’s Gary Works in Gary, Indiana, the largest integrated mill in North America. (Archival image in the public domain from the US National Archives and Records Administration).

The United Steelworkers said an activist investor wants to sell United States Steel Corp.’s state-of-the-art mills to fund sweeping upgrades of union-run facilities that date back to the days of Andrew Carnegie.


US Steel, meanwhile, ratcheted up its criticism of the investor, Ancora Holdings Group, as the American steelmaker pursues completing its $14.1 billion deal with Nippon Steel Corp. before the agreement expires in mid-June.

USW president Dave McCall and District 7 director Mike Millsap wrote in a letter to members that it is scrutinizing Ancora’s plans, and reiterated its opposition to the US Steel-Nippon Steel combination. Ancora, which holds just 1% of US Steel’s shares, has pushed its case to replace the company’s board and install a new chief executive officer to lead a turnaround.

The letter, which was seen by Bloomberg News, highlighted to members that Ancora would sell the company’s Big River assets in Arkansas if its plan succeeds, and invest money from the sale in blast furnaces in Mon Valley, Pennsylvania; Gary, Indiana; and Granite City, Illinois.

A regulatory filing from the activist investor from earlier this month said “rescuing and investing” in the restoration of US Steel’s legacy assets would include up to $1.5 billion at Mon Valley Works, $500 million at Gary Works and $300 million at Granite City.

The USW letter didn’t mention how much money Ancora might expect from sales of the Big River assets. Nippon Steel last year submitted an offer for the Arkansas assets and some mining operations for an enterprise value of $9.2 billion.

The Big River assets produce automotive-grade material in so-called electric arc furnaces, and are viewed as more efficient and lower cost than the company’s legacy integrated plants. The integrated mills, which are union-run plants, require more energy use and a larger work force than the assets in Arkansas.

“Ancora publicly indicated that it intends to sell the Big River facilities, which are and have been a threat to our facilities from day one,” McCall and Millsap wrote. “Our union’s first and only concern has been the long-term viability of our facilities, and with it, ensuring a strong domestic steel industry well into the future.”


McCall said through a spokeswoman that the union recognized from the beginning that Big River Steel poses a threat to its members and to US national security. That echoes comments by former USW President Tom Conway in 2022 that US Steel’s purchase of Big River could mark the beginning of the end for union-run mills.

“We appreciate the positive feedback from the leadership of the USW, which will be a key partner in making US Steel great again,” Ancora said in an emailed statement. “Our slate plans to right current leadership’s wrongs by investing billions in union plants across the Rust Belt.”


The USW letter comes amid a flurry of public statements this week from leadership of US Steel and Nippon Steel. The American company, in a letter Monday to company shareholders, slammed Ancora, claiming some of its board nominees and CEO replacement have financially benefited from ties with competitor Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. It said the activist has no actionable path forward for investors.

It’s unclear what sway the union holds in determining US Steel’s future at this stage, even though it was deeply influential in former President Joe Biden’s decision to block the deal with Nippon Steel. President Donald Trump last month made clear he didn’t want the Japanese company to hold a majority stake in the US firm, but White House officials in recent weeks have met with high-ranking figures from US Steel, Nippon Steel and Ancora.

(By Joe Deaux)

Thursday, March 20, 2025

'Disappointing and devastating': US Steel manufacturer fires workers and blames Trump tariffs


A worker welds a steel tube at HCC, a company that uses parts to make combines, at the factory in Mendota, Illinois, U.S., February 21, 2025. REUTERS/Vincent Alban

Carl Gibson
March 20, 2025
ALTERNET

One steel manufacturer in the Midwest has announced it will be laying off hundreds of workers as a result of President Donald Trump's tariffs.

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported Thursday that 630 steelworkers in Minnesota are about to lose their jobs. Steel manufacturer Cleveland-Cliffs, which is based in Ohio, announced that the layoffs will be at the company's operations in the Minnesota towns of Hibbing and Virginia. Those facilities specialize in steel pellets used in auto manufacturing, and Cleveland-Cliffs said they will be subjected to "temporary idles" in order to "rebalance working capital needs and consume excess pellet inventory produced in 2024."

Earlier this month, Trump announced he would be imposing new 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. The Star-Tribune reported that while steelmakers like Cleveland-Cliffs expect a boost to their business as a result of the higher prices on their foreign competitors, the auto industry is still largely unprepared to shift production to the United States with new tariffs on imports from Canada, China and Mexico fast approaching in April.

Larry Cuffe Jr., who is the mayor of Virginia, Minnesota, told the Star-Tribune that the news of the layoffs was "disappointing and devastating." He added that he was unable to get a direct answer on when Cleveland-Cliiffs would resume operations at the idled facilities beyond "when the steel prices get better."

The layoffs have prompted a strong response from Minnesota lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. State senator Grant Hauschild, who is a member of the Democratic-Farm Labor Party (Minnesota's version of the Democratic Party) said that while he believes "strategic, smart tariffs on critical industries" like steel can protect American jobs, Trump's approach is too broad.

“My fear is that, while I do support tariffs on targeted areas, perhaps what we are doing is having reverberations that go far beyond what we were thinking," Hauschild said.

Republican state representative Cal Warwas promised that the laid-off workers would have a safety net, saying he was "working on a bill for extended unemployment." Warwas added that he would "do everything in my power to mitigate the pain of this situation and work toward any solution that gets people back to work."

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

 

ArcelorMittal, South Africa near funding deal to save mills

Image courtesy of ArcelorMittal.

South Africa is nearing a deal to provide funding to ArcelorMittal SA’s local unit and ensure its steel mills, which are crucial for the nation’s economy, remain open, people with knowledge of the matter said. The unit’s shares rose.

The government plans initial support of about 500 million rand ($28 million) specifically to pay steelworkers over a period of six to eight months, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is private.

It is also discussing additional bridge financing through the state-owned Industrial Development Corp., which will then raise its stake in the company from its current level of 8.2%, the people said.

The government, working through the state’s trade department and the IDC, also wants ArcelorMittal South Africa Ltd., known as AMSA, to consider offers for the two mills it plans to close, according to the people. The plants are situated in the towns of Vereeniging and Newcastle.

In a statement later on Wednesday, the government confirmed approval of nearly 417 million rand to sustain 2,982 employees over the next 12 months.

“The South African government continues to engage with ArcelorMittal South Africa to prevent the planned wind-down of the longs steel plant in Newcastle and to recalibrate the steel industry’s role in the South African economy,” the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition said. The government “considers this matter a priority and remains steadfast in its efforts to secure a long-term and sustainable future for the country’s steel sector.”

Winding down

AMSA hasn’t stopped the wind-down process but is engaging stakeholders on funding, it said in a statement Wednesday. Without an agreement on this and other matters, deferring the plans to idle the operations “will not be feasible,” the steel producer said. While it has received approaches on “strategic alternatives,” none of these constitute a firm intention to make an offer, it said.

Securing a deal to keep the mills open, which provide so-called long products including steel grades that can’t currently be made by local rivals, is crucial to the government’s plans to revive the economy through a massive infrastructure push. The car-making and mining industries are also the nation’s biggest foreign-exchange earners.

A decision may be announced as early as this week, according to the people, with one saying that AMSA’s board is meeting to consider the proposals.

The company, backed by Indian billionaire Lakshmi Mittal, is seeking about 3 billion rand to keep its mills open for another 12 months and build up inventory for carmakers such as Volkswagen AG and Isuzu Motors Ltd., the people said.

AMSA declined to comment. The IDC said it’s in talks with AMSA to help it find a solution to keep the mills open. It declined to comment on potential bids for the plants.

Earlier this year, the IDC provided AMSA with working capital to keep the operations open. That’s at least the second time the development-finance institution — the steelmaker’s biggest shareholder after its parent company — has helped the company.

The IDC is also investing in a 12 billion-rand car-manufacturing plant with Beijing Automotive International Corp. and other downstream auto manufacturing, making products produced by AMSA, such as spring steel, a flexible grade of the metal used in vehicles, essential to its broader mandate of driving manufacturing growth.

“Securing long steel supply, particularly outside of the commodity products, is a key strategic focus for the IDC,” it said.

AMSA South African rivals — so-called mini mills that use scrap metal obtained at discounted prices under a government program to make steel — have also received funding from the IDC, undercutting AMSA, which uses iron ore.

AMSA’s share price has fallen more than 90% since the end of 2005, valuing the company at about 1.6 billion rand even though its annual sales are about 40 billion rand. The stock surged as much as 21%, the most since October, before paring gains to close 7.7% higher in Johannesburg.

(By Loni Prinsloo and Antony Sguazzin)

Wednesday, March 05, 2025

Union-led Advisory Table releases report on Canada’s workforce future


By Jennifer Kervin
March 4, 2025
DIGITAL JOURNAL



Photo by ThisisEngineering on Unsplash

As Canada’s economy shifts with new technologies and evolving industries, workers face an uncertain path forward.

A new report from the Union-led Advisory Table, commissioned by the Government of Canada, outlines recommendations to help workers navigate job transitions and prepare for the future.

Unions Power Prosperity: A Report from the Union-Led Advisory Table outlines strategies to ensure workers are equipped with the skills and support they need to thrive in a changing labour market.
Recommendations to support workers through economic change

The advisory table, chaired by Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress, convened 14 additional labour leaders from across Canada between December 2023 and October 2024. Their discussions focused on ensuring workers can adapt to changes brought on by automation, sectoral shifts, and emerging industries.

With industries evolving due to climate policies and technological advancements, the report stresses the need for proactive workforce strategies. Recommendations include:Aligning skills training with industry demand.
Supporting workers transitioning from declining sectors to growth industries.
Ensuring continuous learning and foundational skill development.
Expanding access to skilled trades for women and underrepresented groups.

Bruske underlined the need for government and industry to collaborate closely with unions to ensure an equitable workforce transition.

“Meeting Canada’s economic and climate challenges starts with investing in and listening to workers,” she said in a statement.

“This means prioritizing more and better jobs, expanding workplace learning opportunities and including workers in decision-making. Unions have the tools, the know-how and the creativity to drive an innovative, prosperous and equitable economy.”
Collaboration as a key to workforce development

The report’s recommendations contribute to broader government efforts to build a modern workforce, including policies that address skills gaps and prepare workers for sectors like green energy. The advisory table emphasized that solutions require collaboration between workers, unions, employers, and government to ensure a workforce that meets Canada’s evolving labour market needs.

Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour Steven MacKinnon welcomed the report’s findings, emphasizing the role of worker input in shaping Canada’s economic future.

“Giving workers a seat at the table is the best way to help us understand how to prepare workers for the jobs of tomorrow so we can make sure our economy thrives,” he said in a statement. “We need their advice to confront the challenges of our changing labour market.”

The advisory table included leaders from some of Canada’s largest labour organizations, representing a broad range of industries and worker interests.

Chaired by Bruske, the group featured representatives from major unions such as Teamsters Canada, Unifor, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, and the United Steelworkers. Leaders from sector-specific unions, including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, and Canada’s Building Trades Unions, also contributed their expertise.

Their collective expertise provided insight into the challenges workers face and the steps needed to secure good-quality jobs in a changing economy.

With Unions Power Prosperity now published, policymakers and industry leaders will have a roadmap to strengthen workforce resilience and ensure Canadian workers are equipped for the future

.

This article was created with the assistance of AI. Learn more about our AI ethics policy here.


Written ByJennifer Kervin
Jennifer Kervin is a Digital Journal staff writer and editor based in Toronto.

Friday, February 28, 2025


Telus offers hundreds of buyouts to workers across Canada

February 27, 2025 

Telus Place in Montreal, Thursday, November 14, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes

VANCOUVER — For the second time this month, Telus is offering buyouts to hundreds of employees across the country.

The telecom company said it’s offering “generous” buyout packages as part of the company’s push for more self-serve solutions.

The United Steelworkers union says Telus has offered buyout packages to about 560 workers across the country.


The union condemned the move, accusing the company of reducing service levels and outsourcing work overseas.

Telus spokesperson Catherine Leclerc said it’s standard for the company to offer the packages to a broad number of team members.

She said Telus anticipates a very small number of those offered buyouts to take them, and said the company may limit the number of departures.

The Steelworkers union said the latest offers come after a wave earlier this month when Telus offered voluntary severance packages to 545 employees in several departments.

Thursday, February 20, 2025

 

Five Unions Call on Trump to Proceed with Chinese Shipbuilding Sanctions

Mark Kelly on bridge of training ship
Kelly a graduate of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy visited Hanwha Philly Shipyard to promote U.S. Shipbuilding (Hanwha Philly Shipyard)

Published Feb 20, 2025 4:28 PM by The Maritime Executive

 


The collation of four of America’s most powerful unions issued a letter calling on Donald Trump to finish the process started under the Biden Administration to sanction China for its efforts to dominate shipbuilding, the maritime and logistics sectors. Trump has stated his concern for the shipbuilding industry while in Congress efforts continue on the proposed SHIPS for America Act, which the sponsors say is the first unified effort to rebuild the U.S. merchant marine and shipbuilding.

The presidents of the United Steelworkers International, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, jointly signed the letter dated February 19. In it, they are, “urging your administration to enforce strong penalties against China for its unfair trade practices, particularly in shipbuilding, maritime, and logistics sectors.”

The five unions filed a formal complaint in March 2024 under the U.S. Trade Act and were successful in getting the Trade Representative’s Office to launch a formal investigation. The Biden Administration came out in favor of the action and carried it through to a formal report and recommendations issued in its closing days.

The letter cites the report and its finding that the “Chinese Community Party advanced a systematic array of unfair trade practices and economic policies designed to dominate and control the maritime, shipbuilding, and logistics sectors.” They highlight the findings that China distributed over $100 billion in unfair support for its shipbuilding industry. They point out that China received 71 percent of the shipbuilding orders in 2024 producing over 1,000 ships last year. They report the U.S. produced fewer than 10 ocean-going commercial ships in 2024 and has fewer than 80 in service. China by comparison they report has more than 5,500 flagged ocean-going merchant vessels.

“We urge you to take responsible action to impose tough penalties against vessels built according to the plans, policies, and actions of the Chinese Communist Party and to adopt complementary policies that rebuild America’s shipbuilding capacity and workforce,” the unions write in their letter to the president. They pointed out last year when they launched this initiative, they called for actions to deter the purchase of Chinese-built ships from entering U.S. ports.

The U.S. Trade Representative made recommendations calling for action. The Biden Administration agreed that responsive action was necessary but left it to the new administration to formulate the steps as part of its broader tariff program against China.

Trump has recently made comments in interviews about the lack of U.S. shipbuilding capabilities. He has said the U.S. might call on Allies such as South Korea to bolster its shipbuilding programs.

China has repeatedly criticized the investigation calling it short-sighted, lacking facts, and shifting blame for the decline of the U.S. shipbuilding industry. They point to the U.S.’s decline in shipbuilding since the 1940s and 1950s and the lack of investment to modernize and employ new technologies. The investigation they said was part of the China fear program led by the U.S.

The call to involve President Trump comes as Senator Mark Kelly and Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon visited the Philly Shipyard recently acquired by South Korea’s Hanwha Group. While touring the facilities and the training ship State of Maine which is outfitting at the yard, Kelly highlighted the importance of strengthening the U.S. maritime industry through the bipartisan SHIPS for America Act. He said it aims to rebuild the U.S. shipyard base and expand efforts to recruit, train, and retain skilled mariners and shipyard workers.

Monday, February 17, 2025

J.D. Vance draws inspiration from a 19th-century pro-slavery tyrant

Sabrina Haake
February 16, 2025 

REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

In 1828, gold was found in the Appalacian Mountains of Georgia on land that belonged to the Cherokee Nation. As word of the gold spread, miners and settlers pushed into the area. The State of Georgia wanted to regulate, permit and benefit from the commerce, but the land belonged to the Cherokee under treaty with the federal government. As the state and miners continued to encroach, the Cherokee Nation refused to cede more land and sought an injunction that eventually reached the Supreme Court.

In 1832, Chief Justice John Marshall infuriated sitting president Andrew Jackson by declaring that the State of Georgia had no right to encroach on Cherokee lands, because the land belonged to the Cherokee under the terms of a federal treaty. Ignoring the Supreme Court’s ruling, a furious President Jackson famously responded: “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

President Jackson, a champion of slavery and states’ rights, ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling, and instead endorsed the Trail of Tears, a forced march to Oklahoma during which thousands of Cherokee starved and froze to death. It was among the most shameful episodes of ethnic genocide in American history.

In 2021, two years before he became a US Senator, Vice President JD Vance embraced the spirit of Andrew Jackson. Vance said that when Trump returned to office, he should “Fire every single… civil servant… (and) replace them with our people. When the courts stop you, stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and say: The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.”

JD Vance is protecting Trump’s attacks against the federal government

His election as Vice President has not tempered Vance’s lust for power; if anything, it’s become worse. The Trump administration is closing entire federal agencies without understanding what services they provide or how they operate. Tech bros like to move fast and break things, but that’s not how government works, nor should it.

The federal government exists to serve the American people, not to turn a profit. When agencies are shuttered, Trump/Musk/Vance can brag on State TV about billions in “immediate savings,” but they have no idea what the downstream costs will be. How will closing USAID increase starvation and, thereby, radicalization and migration that will eventually visit our shores? When NIH research is shuttered, what will the resurgence of AIDs, polio, or epidemic variants cost in terms of human suffering and commerce? When FEMA or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is closed, who will forecast deadly weather events and who will help the stricken people?

These are questions outside the bandwidth of an impatient Ketamine addict and a low-impulse control President. Vance, in contrast, possesses the intellectual capacity but is using it to weild unchecked authority and upend the balance of power.

Vance goads federal judges


After illegally firing federal employees based on political purity tests, including FBI agents, inspectors general, DOJ lawyers and commissioners, then giving Musk’s teenagers access to federal payment systems, Trump issued a spending freeze to retroactively suspend Congressionally created programs. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against the freeze, which Trump loyalists both disregarded and attacked.

Last week, Vance blasted the judiciary writ large and suggested judges lack jurisdiction over Trump's ‘legitimate power,’ clearly gaslighting the right into believing that Trump’s actions are “legitimate.” Vance went even further, offering these examples:

“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal.”


Vance, who attended Yale Law School and presumably took ConLaw 101, knows better. Using Vance’s examples, if Trump orders the military to shoot peaceful American protesters in the head, something Trump’s falling down drunk Secretary of Defense would likely relish, Vance says the Courts are powerless to stop him. If the attorney general decided to imprison every Democrat in the nation, something Kash-enemies-list-Patel would enjoy, Vance says again that there’s nothing the courts can do.

Vance is wrong, and he knows he’s wrong.

JD Vance deliberately skews the separation of powers


Contrary to Vance’s claim, centuries of court cases establish the role of the courts in checking overreach by the executive branch. In 1952, inYoungstown Sheet & Tubing Company v. Sawyer, President Truman issued an executive order directing the Secretary of Commerce to take control of the nation's steel mills to avoid an expected United Steelworkers strike. The consequences to the nation’s economy promised to be devastating, so the federal government had a demonstrated, vital interest in blocking the strike. In a 6-3 ruling, however, the Supreme Court ruled held that a president lacks that authority, clarifying that “the President's power to see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker.”

Trump/Musk/Vance, by the wholesale elimination of federal agencies created by Congress, are trying to be lawmakers. Vance, claiming the courts can’t stop them, is trying also to usurp the role of the Judiciary.

The Chief Justice has clearly heard Vance denounce the court’s authority. In his traditional, year-end report on the federal judiciary, Roberts remarked that judicial independence “is undermined unless the other branches [of government] are firm in their responsibility to enforce the court’s decrees… Within the past few years … elected officials from across the political spectrum have raised the specter of open disregard for federal court rulings. These dangerous suggestions, however sporadic, must be soundly rejected.”

Courts are pushing back against Trump/Musk/Vance’s lawlessness

Last week, Reagan-appointed U.S. District Judge John Coughenour issued a stark warning of his own, accusing Trump of trampling on the Constitution for personal gain. “It has become ever more apparent that, to our president, the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals. The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or simply ignore, whether that be for political or personal gain.”

In a separate case demonstrating Trump’s defiance of a judicial order, plaintiffs alerted a federal court that Musk is still putting employees of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) on administrative leave, despite the judicial Order instructing the opposite.

As Trump/Musk/Vance fight to cancel money that has already been legislated by Congress to pay for essential services including Medicaid, school lunches, and low-income housing subsidies, the courts will block them. Fourteen states have already challenged Trump’s unchecked power. Whether Trump follows the ultimate rulings, or follows Vance and Andrew Jackson’s advice to ignore them, will determine whether we still have a functioning democracy.

Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25 year litigator specializing in 1st and 14th Amendment defense. Her Substack, the Haake Take, is free.

Saturday, February 15, 2025


Lib Dem leader Ed Davey calls on UK government to ‘hit Musk where it hurts’ with tariffs on Tesla cars

13 February, 2025 
Left Foot Forward

After Trump announced import taxes on steel and aluminium, Davey has called for “strong measures and words” in response to his and Musk’s actions.




The Lib Dem leader Ed Davey has called on the government to draw up plans for tariffs on Tesla cars if Trump follows through with import taxes on steel and aluminium.

At PMQs today, Davey called on Keir Starmer to stand up to president Trump, who has announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminium imported into the US, including from the UK, from March.

Davey said: “His [Trump’s] tariffs against steel and aluminium will hit Canada the hardest and will also hit jobs and the cost of living in our country”.

He added: “So in reminding America’s true and long standing friends and allies really are, will the prime minister also prepare a plan for tariffs in return, starting with a tariff on American electric cars.”

Starmer replied: “British steel is an essential part of our heartlands, and we will not abandon our skilled workforce, and it needs a level-headed assessment of the implications, which is what we’re going through at the moment.

“But we will always put our national interest first, and steelworkers first.”

In response, Davey said “It seems to me the way that Donald Trump and his ally Musk are operating, they do need to hear strong measures and words from even their allies”.

In a post on X, Davey stated: “The government should draw up plans for Tesla tariffs to hit Musk where it hurts, if Trump follows through with his threats to the UK steel industry.

“Trump and Musk can’t be allowed to bully the UK while the Conservatives and Nigel Farage cheer them on from the sidelines.”

Earlier this month, Elon Musk called Davey a “snivelling cretin” after the Lib Dem leader posted on X, stating, “People have had enough of Elon Musk interfering in our democracy when he clearly knows nothing about Britain.”

These remarks were made in response to Musk fuelling divisions over grooming gangs in the UK.

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward

Friday, February 14, 2025

The Teamsters and Trump’s Tariff Wars:

Where’s the Solidarity?



Teamsters Canada are in a different country and operate in a different labor ​movement that is now the subject of menacing threats of annexation and economic ruin from U.S. President Donald Trump, who is supported by Sean O’Brien.


 February 14, 2025
Facebook

Photograph Source: Vateamster – CC BY-SA 4.0

U.S. President Donald Trump’s on-again, off-again trade wars have revealed the limits of international solidarity by U.S. based unions, especially the Teamsters, to their counterparts in Canada.

The institutional links between U.S. and Canadian unions are more intimate than almost any of the trade union movements in the world. Many affiliates of the Canadian Labour Congress and the AFL-CIO in the United States, as well as unions like the Teamsters that are not members of the AFL-CIO, claim to be “international unions.” Yet, from the U.S. side of the border, this “internationalism” is more rhetorical than meaningful.

Many U.S. union members may refer to their national union offices as the “International,” but what this largely means is that aside from a handful of affiliated local unions in Canada, the unions have locals in Puerto Rico and other American colonies. Some of the big U.S.-based industrial unions, such as the Steelworkers do have a substantial presence in Canada. While they have called for Canada to be “exempt” from any tariffs but not Mexico.

The Teamsters Canada has a smaller presence but has around 140,000 in a wide variety of industries mirroring the U.S. Teamsters. Major logistics employers such as UPS and Rail are represented by Teamsters Canada, but others, such as DHL are represented by Unifor in Canada. T-Force Freight, formerly UPS Freight represented by the Teamsters, was sold to the Montreal based TFI International a few years ago. There are few, if any, cross-border contracts, so there are few opportunities for joint contract campaigns or strikes.

Tensions between U.S.-based unions and their Canadian affiliates, notably in the case of the autoworkers, exploded into public view. Jim Stanford, director of the Centre for Future Work, a labor economics think tank and a former economist in the Research Department at Unifor (and previously with the Canadian Auto Workers), wrote a few years ago:

For the first half-century of industrial unionism, unionized Canadian autoworkers belonged to the UAW, which included workers at the Canadian plants of GM, Ford, Chrysler, and then American Motors (eventually acquired by Chrysler) beginning in the 1930s. But after years of tension over strategy (reflected in the Canadians’ opposition to wage concessions, profit-sharing schemes, and two-tier wages), the Canadian branch of the UAW split away to form the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) in 1985. At the time, the UAW had about 1.2 million members, one-tenth (120,000) of whom belonged to its Canadian branch.

The Detroit-based leadership of the UAW — ironically headquartered at “Solidarity House” — gave little option to the Canadians led by Bob White to breakaway after years of concessions and plant closings without a fight. They eventually formed the Canadian Auto Workers Union (CAW). Solidarity House could do little about it.

The SEIU, considered a “progressive union” for many years, has practiced trade union colonialism in Puerto Rico and exercised repressive trusteeshipsagainst its local affiliates in Canada that disagree with its policies. The Teamsters practice their own colonialism in Puerto Rico, where Local 901 is affiliated with and subject to the discipline of the New York City-based Joint Council 16, which seems pretty far from Puerto Rico.

Teamsters Canada

The Canadian Conference of Teamsters was founded in 1976, later it renamed itself Teamsters Canada. The Teamster magazine reported at the time, “More than 100 hundred representatives of Canadian local unions were participants [on] March 9, 1976 in Toronto at the Founding Conference.” Also present were the Teamsters’ top leaders, General President Frank Fitzsimmons and General Secretary-Treasurer Ray Schoessling. Tensions between the Canadian and U.S. Teamsters over the years were largely contained by granting of autonomy to the Canadians formalized at the 2001 Teamster convention.

However, the autonomy of the Teamsters Canada had the unintended effect of turning them into an insular fiefdom ruled by a crew of old guard officials. There had been a vibrant reform movement centered in British Columbia whose most prominent activist was Diana Kilmury, a construction driver in Teamsters Local 213, beginning in the 1970s. Kilmury would go on to be the first woman elected to the General Executive Board of the Teamsters in 1991 and re-elected in 1996 on the Ron Carey slate. A reform movement in other Canadian Teamsters locals didn’t get off the ground.

Today, Teamsters Canada is led by François Laporte, who was elected president in 2015, as well as being an International Vice-President. LaPorte is an old guard figure who supported James P. Hoffa, Jr., the previous leader of the Teamsters, and ran on the winning O’Brien-Zuckerman Teamsters United slate in 2021. Yet, the Teamsters Canada are in a different country and operate in a different labor ​movement that is now the subject of menacing threats of annexation and economic ruin from U.S. President Donald Trump, who is supported by Sean O’Brien.

LaPorte responded to Trump​’s threats:

While millions of Americans struggle with exorbitant medical costs and lack of affordable insurance, Canada has a universal healthcare system that ensures every citizen has access to medical care without the fear of financial ruin. Canada also consistently ranks among the most educated countries in the world, having a higher percentage of college and university graduates than our southern neighbour.

Workers in Canada benefit from stronger labour protections, including paid parental leave, mandatory vacation and sick leave. Our country is officially bilingual, recognizing both English and French as official languages, reflecting our diverse heritage and reinforcing our unique cultural identity.

Canada also has a strong social safety net that provides employment insurance, affordable postsecondary education, childcare and pension plans that help ensure financial security for retirees. While both countries are diverse, Canada takes pride in its commitment to multiculturalism, not just as an ideal but as a fundamental part of our national identity.

And, finally:

Donald Trump’s threats aren’t just geopolitical posturing. They are a direct attack on Canadian values and families who depend on jobs in transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture. A 25% tariff could have severe impacts on the lives of hardworking Canadians and Americans. Canadian Teamsters, like other unions across the country, have always fought to defend Canadian jobs, and we will continue to do so.

LaPorte made some important points, ​but gloss​ed over the fraying Canadian welfare state, including its woefully underfunded healthcare system, and the longstanding bigotry directed at French-speaking Canadians, and the indigenous the peoples of its First Nations. Yet, there are important differences between the U.S. and Canada that has driven figures on the U.S. Right to froth at the mouth. Tucker Carlson, Trump’s best-known public advocate and the host one of Sean O’Brien’s favorite venues, said:

First of all, anybody with any ambition at all, or intelligence, has left Canada and is now living in New York. Second, anybody who sides with Canada internationally in a debate between the U.S. and Canada, say, Belgium, is somebody whose opinion we shouldn’t care about in the first place. Third, Canada is a sweet country. It is like your retarded cousin you see at Thanksgiving and sort of pat on the head. You know, he’s nice, but you don’t take him seriously. That’s Canada.

Meanwhile, the Teamsters led by Trump supporter Sean O’Brien have said nothing in response to Trump’s threats against Canada. What is the point of Canadian Teamsters being in this “International” union, if O’Brien is complicit in Trump’s mad schemes? O’Brien promotes T-shirts to his membership emblazoned with the slogan: “Teamsters vs. Everybody.” Such an insular perspective in a world that demands global solidarity will lead to disaster.