Monday, September 12, 2022

Fleeing Russian Tank Crashes Into Tree in Video Viewed Over 1M Times

A Twitter video mocking the retreat of Russian soldiers in Ukraine has gone viral on social media.



Russian demining team members work to clear an area in the city of Mariupol on July 13, 2022, amid the ongoing Russian military action in Ukraine. A video mocking the retreat of Russian soldiers in Ukraine has gone viral on social media. The video was posted last week Friday and has since garnered more than 1.3 million views
.© Olga Maltseva/Getty

The video, which was posted on the Calibre Obscura Twitter page, an organization that hosts a website dedicated to arms and war news, was captioned: "Amazing video of a Russian T-72 fleeing Ukrainian troops, discarding men and then crashing into a tree."

Duration 0:45
Ukrainian Forces Recapture Territories In The Kharkiv Region


The video shows a tank, reportedly belonging to the Russian army, driving down a road before passing what is indicated in the video to be a Ukrainian soldier is spotted on the side of the road.

After noticing the Ukrainian soldier, Russian soldiers on the outside of the tank jump from the moving vehicle into the dirt. while Yakety Sax, better known as the theme to The Benny Hill Show, plays in the background.

After the soldiers have all jumped from the outside of the tank, it continues to drive down the road before swerving and crashing into a tree.


At this moment, Yakety Sax transitions into Frolic, the theme from Curb Your Enthusiasm, a popular choice for videos that end in awkward moments.

The video was posted on Friday of last week and has since garnered more than 1.3 million views.

The tank crash video comes as Ukraine has launched a surprise counteroffensive in the areas around Kharkiv, the country's second-largest city. In recent days, Ukrainian forces have seized control of key cities such as Izyum and Kupyansk, forcing Russian soldiers to retreat.

Earlier this month, the Defense of Ukraine's Twitter page also took to mocking Russian soldiers for retreating in the face of the Ukrainian counteroffensive.

The Twitter page posted a 40-second video issuing an ultimatum to Russian soldiers and said they should leave Kherson Oblast in Ukraine or face death.


The video was set to the 1932 song Run Rabbit Run and showed footage of Russian soldiers appearing to be fired upon by missiles, artillery fire and snipers.

It mockingly called the Russian soldiers "guests" and plays footage of an alleged Russian soldier warning against Ukrainian forces.

Recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin has faced a backlash from pro-Kremlin bloggers amid his military's inability to subdue Ukraine in the conflict.

Putin launched the invasion of Ukraine on February 24, banking on his vast military to propel him to a quick victory. However, Ukraine met Russian troops with a stronger-than-expected defense effort, bolstered by aid from allies, including the United States.

Despite worldwide condemnation due to alleged human rights abuses committed by the Russian military and a lack of justification for the war, many in Russia rallied around Putin. However, these Ukrainian victories have seen some hardline pro-Russia bloggers, who for months cheered on the Russian leader's invasion, turn on him.

Newsweek has reached out to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ukraine's Ministry of Defense for comment.
'Misgendering' incident plunges Green Party of Canada into renewed turmoil


Just one year after its partial meltdown during the 2021 federal election, the Green Party of Canada is once again in crisis over an incident of “misgendering.”


Green Party of Canada Interim Leader Amita Kuttner said the Zoom “misgendering” incident was “reflective of a larger pattern of behaviours that a few in the party are perpetuating.”


Tristin Hopper 
National Post

It all started at a Sept. 3 media event in Vancouver kicking off the party’s leadership contest. In a Zoom appearance, Interim Leader Amita Kuttner was identified using a caption bearing the pronouns “she/elle.”

Kuttner, 32, identifies as non-binary and pansexual (attracted to all genders and orientations), and goes by they/them pronouns. In a subsequent statement , Kuttner slammed the “misgendering,” saying the incident “made me feel hurt and isolated” and hinted that it was “reflective of a larger pattern of behaviours that a few in the party are perpetuating.”

The statement added, “in moments like these I wonder — how can I ensure other people’s safety if I can’t even ensure my own?”

Kuttner’s statement was followed by a joint letter — signed by leadership candidates as well as the party’s two MPs, Elizabeth May and Mike Morrice — calling for a “restorative process” to root out “harassment” within the Greens. “The September 3 incident was but the latest in a number of similar behavioural patterns that Dr. Kuttner has faced throughout their tenure,” it read .

Green Party President Lorraine Rekmans was the first to resign. A volunteer who estimated that she has worked 40-hour weeks for the past year on party business, Rekmans implied in a Saturday resignation letter that leadership candidates were subtly blaming her for the “she/elle” mistake.

The multiple journeys of interim Green leader Amita Kuttner

Although the joint letter explicitly cleared Rekmans of responsibility for the incident, Rekmans wrote that she is “constantly distracted by claims of harm.”

“I was surprised that the contestants would use (the Sept. 3 media event) to attack the Party they were running to lead,” she wrote, adding, “I find that some in GPC, wish to cling to the image of a political party that is the same as all the other political parties in Canada, fuelled by money, and controlled by people who wield power.”

Krystal Brooks, the Ontario representative to the party’s federal council, also resigned. In a lengthy Sunday Facebook post , Brooks criticized the party for continuing its leadership race even while candidates were calling for an investigation into “systemic” harm within the party. The contest should have been postponed “pending the investigation,” wrote Brooks.

Brooks then attached emails showing that Morrice and May had apparently threatened to resign and sit as independents if the leadership contest was delayed. May, notably, is running as a candidate in that contest.

“I … recognize how deep the manipulation went prior to this event by Interim Leader, Dr. Amita Kuttner, although I’m not certain if you were aware that you were doing this or if you too were being manipulated,” wrote Brooks, adding “I have lost all faith in Caucus and those who they choose to hide behind.”

Notably, both resignees are Indigenous, with Rekmans having been celebrated only 12 months ago as “the first Indigenous woman to be president of a national political party in Canada.”

Amidst all this, Kuttner launched a fundraiser last Wednesday intending to spite Jonathan Kay, an editor with Quillette and occasional National Post columnist. Kay had tweeted that the misgendering controversy sounded “exactly like satire,” prompting Kuttner to ask supporters to donate $68,000 to counter Kay’s “hate.”


As of press time, the fundraiser has pulled in $226.69, $10 of which was donated by Kay himself.

The whole misgendering fracas is occurring as the party struggles to recover from its disastrous performance in the 2021 federal election.

Several months before the election, then-leader Annamie Paul had gone public with accusations that she had been repeatedly subjected to “anti-Semitic” and “racist” attacks from within the party (Paul is Jewish and Black).

Paul then limited her campaign almost exclusively to her personal bid for a seat in Toronto Centre. She would ultimately win just 3,921 votes, putting her in a distant fourth place behind the NDP, the Conservatives and the victorious Liberal candidate (who won 23,000 votes).

Paul would later deem her leadership as the “ worst period of my life.”

Although the Green Party retained both of its MPs, its share of the popular vote dropped off a cliff in the 2021 vote. In 2019, under May, 1.2 million Canadians had cast Green ballots. Under Paul, that was down to just 400,000 — the party’s worst showing since 2000.
Swedish voters boost anti-immigration party amid high crime
The leader of the Sweden Democrats Jimmie Akesson delivers a speech in Nacka, near Stockholm, Sweden, on Sept. 11, 2022.
 (Stefan Jerrevang / TT News Agency via AP)

Vanessa Gera, Jan M. Olsen and James Brooks
The Associated Press
Published Sept. 12, 2022 


STOCKHOLM -

A populist anti-immigration party has surged to become Sweden's second-largest political force after a national election dominated by fears of gang violence, which has given the once-safe Scandinavian country one of Europe's highest levels of gun violence.

Overall, a conservative opposition bloc including the anti-immigration party, the Sweden Democrats, had an extremely narrow lead over the incumbent centre-left with 94% of the votes counted. Download 

RELATED STORIES


Analysts expect the final tally will confirm a conservative bloc win, but the election was so close that electoral officials said they would not have the final result until outstanding postal votes and votes from abroad are counted.

With eight parties contending for seats in the 349-member Riksdag, Sweden's parliament, none can secure a majority of 175 seats, meaning that laws can only be passed with different parties working together. The parties campaigned under two general blocs, one conservative and the other a centre-left group headed by Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson, Sweden's first female prime minister.

The not-yet-final count indicated that the conservative bloc would have 175 seats and the centre-left would have 174.

"It is extremely close. Things can change, but I doubt it," said Zeth Isaksson, a sociologist at Stockholm University, who added that votes from abroad are traditionally conservative. "As it is now, it is more likely that the right side will win."

One certainty, however, is that the result marked a success for the right-wing populist Sweden Democrats, which won its best result since entering parliament in 2010. The party's founders in the 1980s had links to fascist and neo-Nazi movements but over the past two decades it has worked to move to the mainstream under its 43-year-old leader Jimmie Akesson.

Its transformation included changing its official logo from a torch to a flower and expelling the most radical members.

Those who support it like its tough vows to crack down on crime and strictly limit immigration, while opponents fear that its historic roots make it a threat to Sweden's democratic identity.

Mark Johnson, a 50-year-old Swedish finance worker, said while the party's strong showing was expected, it is still shocking for many Swedes because "it's hard to understand that we would be taking such an obvious turn to the right, to the far-right even."

The Sweden Democrats, which won 20.6% support in Sunday's vote, according to preliminary figures, up from 17.5% four years ago, gained on the rising fears of crime in largely immigrant neighbourhoods.

This year so far there have been 273 shootings, 47 of them fatal, according to police statistics. Those shootings also wounded 74 people, including innocent bystanders.

Andersson's Social Democrats, who have been in power in Sweden since 2014, remain the largest party, even gaining slightly to take 30.5% of the vote Sunday, according to the incomplete results. Andersson said Sunday night it was obvious that the social democratic movement, which is based on ideals of creating an equal society and a strong welfare state, remains strong in Sweden.

The Sweden Democrats wants to be part of a government, but this is unlikely to happen because there are parties in the centre-right bloc that oppose it, Isaksson said.

Richard Jomshof, the Sweden Democrats' party secretary, said Monday: "It is clear that we must be able to discuss ministerial posts. It is clear that we must be able to talk about the position of prime minister, speaker of parliament and the presidium positions in the various Riksdag committees."

But a senior member of the centre-right Liberals told Swedish radio Monday that it cannot allow the Sweden Democrats to be part of a government.

Still, if the right prevails, the Sweden Democrats will have "very strong leverage" and will push for some of its issues, like tightening immigration laws, Isaksson said. He said a likely outcome could be for the Sweden Democrats to end up outside a government but as supporters of it.

In Germany, the far-right Alternative for Germany party congratulated the Sweden Democrats on "their sensational success in the parliamentary elections." France's far-right leader Marine Pen also tweeted her congratulations to the "patriotic" Swedish party, saying: "Everywhere in Europe, people aspire to take their destiny back into their own hands!"

Isaksson also ruled out a governing coalition combining the centre-right Moderates, which have been leading the centre-right bloc, and the Social Democrats. Such a coalition has not occurred since the Second World War.

The Moderates dropped to become Sweden's third-largest party and won 19% support, based on the incomplete vote tally. However, party leader Ulf Kristersson on Monday appeared to be the most likely candidate to be the next prime minister. He told his supporters that he stands ready to try to create a stable and effective government.

Andersson, a 55-year-old economist, became Sweden's first female prime minister less than a year ago and led Sweden's historic bid to join NATO following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February.

------

Olsen reported from Copenhagen, Denmark. Frank Jordans in Berlin contributed
GEOLOGY/GEMOLOGY/ALCHEMY
Diamond-formation process inside earth’s core unveiled

Staff Writer | September 11, 2022 |

Diamond. (Image by Swamibu, Wikimedia Commons.)

Researchers at Arizona State University conducted a series of experiments where they compressed an iron-carbon alloy and water together to the pressure and temperature expected at the earth’s core-mantle boundary, melting the iron-carbon alloy.


They found that water and metal react and make iron oxides and iron hydroxides, just like what happens with rusting on the earth’s surface. However, they also noticed that due to the conditions of the core-mantle boundary, carbon comes out of the liquid iron-metal alloy and forms diamonds.

“Temperature at the boundary between the silicate mantle and the metallic core at 3,000 km depth reaches to roughly 7,000 F, which is sufficiently high for most minerals to lose water captured in their atomic-scale structures,” Dan Shim, one of the scientists involved in the study, said in a media statement. “In fact, the temperature is high enough that some minerals should melt at such conditions.”

Shim explained that because carbon is an iron-loving element, significant carbon is expected to exist in the core, while the mantle is thought to have relatively low carbon. However, scientists have found that much more carbon exists in the mantle than expected.

“At the pressures expected for the earth’s core-mantle boundary, hydrogen alloying with iron metal liquid appears to reduce the solubility of other light elements in the core,” the researcher said. “Therefore, the solubility of carbon, which likely exists in the earth’s core, decreases locally where hydrogen enters into the core from the mantle (through dehydration).

The stable form of carbon at the pressure-temperature conditions of earth’s core-mantle boundary is diamond. So the carbon escaping from the liquid outer core would become diamond when it enters into the mantle.”

According to Byeongkwan Ko, who led the Geophysical Research Letters paper that presents these findings, the new discovery of a carbon transfer mechanism from the core to the mantle helps shed light on the understanding of the carbon cycle in the earth’s deep interior.

“This is even more exciting given that the diamond formation at the core-mantle boundary might have been going on for billions of years since the initiation of subduction on the planet,” he said.

Ko’s study shows that carbon leaking from the core into the mantle by this diamond formation process may supply enough carbon to explain the elevated carbon amounts in the mantle.

He and his collaborators also predicted that diamond-rich structures can exist at the core-mantle boundary and that seismic studies might detect them because seismic waves should travel unusually fast through the structures.

“The reason that seismic waves should propagate exceptionally fast through diamond-rich structures at the core-mantle boundary is because diamond is extremely incompressible and less dense than other materials at the core-mantle boundary,” Shim said.

Ko, Shim and the rest of the team now plan to continue investigating how the reaction can also change the concentration of other light elements in the core, such as silicon, sulphur and oxygen, and how such changes can impact the mineralogy of the deep mantle.

 For the first time, a university offers a degree program in chess

As university classes resume across North America, one institution is offering a unique opportunity for students to earn a minor in chess education.

Webster University in St. Louis is renowned for attracting top-notch chess talent to its school, and now its School of Education is offering a minor degree focused on the game. Core courses range from chess in history to the psychology and strategy of the game.

“It’s the first time in history that chess has been put into a formal program in education in a university,” says Liem Le, Webster’s chess coach and an international grandmaster.

While there was pushback from some people who were skeptical that chess belonged in the academy, Le said the university administration was supportive.

“We were able to convince them many students would benefit from this,” he said.

Although Webster has a small enrolment of fewer than 7,000 students, chess has been a big part of its campus culture for years. It has one of the best collegiate teams in the country.

Le, the top grandmaster to come out of Vietnam, was a student himself at Webster and a member of the university chess team when it won four national championship titles. He became the university’s chess coach last year.

Liem Le v. Parham Maghsoodloo, Isle of Man, 2019

HANDOUT

How does White deliver a finishing blow?

Le played 34.Rf6+ gxf6 35.Qxf6+ and Black resigned, because after Kg8 36.Qh8+ Kf7 39.Qh7+ the Black Queen falls.

ANALYSIS-Pyrenees pipeline puts EU energy divisions in stark relief

CONTRIBUTORS
Andreas Rinke Reuters
Belén Carreño Reuters
Michel Rose Reuters

PUBLISHED SEP 12, 2022
 
CREDIT: REUTERS/ALBERT GEA

French scepticism about a new gas pipeline across the Pyrenees highlights the competing visions for Europe's future energy mix as the continent urgently confronts a power crisis.


PARIS/MADRID/BERLIN, Sept 12 (Reuters) - French scepticism about a new gas pipeline across the Pyrenees highlights the competing visions for Europe's future energy mix as the continent urgently confronts a power crisis.

MidCat would be a third gas connection between France and Spain which its main backers, Madrid, Lisbon and more recently Berlin, say would help Europe reduce its Russian gas reliance.

But French President Emmanuel Macron has bluntly told his partners he sees no case for the multi-billion euro project.

France says MidCat would take too long to build to ease the looming energy crunch, be costly for France and go against ambitions to shift towards a green economy.


Officials in Spain and Germany, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters they believe that France is acting to protect its own ailing nuclear industry and fend off competition from Spain as a staging post for imported gas.

"Macron is under pressure at home from different groups, which don't like the pipeline project, the biggest is surely the nuclear power sector," a senior German government source said.

Spokespersons for the French energy ministry and EDF, which operates France's nuclear reactors, declined to comment.

Russia supplied 40% of Europe's gas before its invasion of Ukraine. Now, the region is scrambling to diversify its energy sources and MidCat was one of the projects EU ministers discussed at an emergency meeting in Brussels last week.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz last month described the pipeline as "dramatically missing" from Europe's network, and last week raised the issue with Macron during a videocall.

Immediately afterwards, Macron said there was spare capacity in the pipes already linking Spain and France and MidCat could not be constructed swiftly enough to ease this winter's crisis.

"I do not understand what short-term problem this would solve," Macron said.

But while it may not provide immediate relief, Spain and Portugal say they have a solution with new gas routes and Madrid said it was ready to persuade Macron over MidCat.

Both have a large gas import capacity, with seven LNG terminals which convert tankers of liquefied natural gas (LNG) back into vapour form for use by industry and households if the infrastructure was in place for it to be piped to other countries such as Germany via France.

The French president has said he does not get all the fuss around MidCat, telling reporters last week: "I do not understand why we would jump around like Pyrenees goats on this topic".

This has led officials in Madrid to question if Macron may be angling for something in return, whether EU financing or backing for another project. And despite Macron's statements, French officials have left the door ajar to further discussions.

But in a sign of Spanish frustration, one source said France needed to demonstrate how it was contributing to European "energy solidarity", given half of its nuclear reactors are offline and it is relying on others to provide it with power.

Macron, however, has said that plans to reactivate a disused interconnector in eastern France so that Paris can pipe its own gas direct to Germany if required is evidence of its commitment.

It will allow France to deliver Germany up to 20 terawatt hours (TWh) of gas over the winter, roughly 2% of the gas needs of Europe's largest economy. A German official said the deal would not fix Germany's crunch but sent markets a message.

COMPETING INTERESTS

A joint proposal for a new trans-Pyrenees pipeline that would have a capacity to more than double the volume of gas piped between Spain and France was rejected by energy regulators for both countries in 2019.

The project was proposed by Terega, a gas grid company owned partly by Italy's Snam SRG.MI and EDF EDF.PA, and its Spanish counterpart Enagas ENAG.MC at an estimated cost of 3 billion euros.

While the French regulator said the economic benefits would be tilted towards Spain, Madrid says Russian moves to cut gas supplies mean that the upside of MidCat would now extend far beyond Spain's own borders.

However, France has terminals on its Atlantic and Channel shores and it too wants a slice of LNG imports.

"France has (LNG terminals) that can process gas for the whole of Europe," a French government source said.

But longer term, France is betting heavily on reviving its troubled nuclear industry in its drive for carbon neutrality, and Paris has questioned MidCat's green credentials.

It would be at least the end of the decade before MidCat could be finished, French energy ministry officials say.

"By that point, the priority will be de-carbonising the economy, not using more gas. So we're somewhat puzzled," one ministry official told Reuters.

HYDROGEN OPTION

Berlin's primary interest in MidCat lies in green hydrogen rather than near-term LNG supplies, two senior German officials told Reuters.

Officials in Madrid and Berlin argue the pipeline could be repurposed to carry zero-emission hydrogen fuel made in the Sahara desert or elsewhere to Europe's industrial heartland.

But France would rather produce hydrogen locally than rely on imports. And it doubts the short-term feasibility, a French government source said, of Germany's vision for hydrogen, which is notoriously more difficult to transport than natural gas.

In the face of French resistance, Madrid and Berlin are exploring alternatives. Plan B could bypass France altogether and build a pipeline under the Mediterranean to Italy.

Madrid is accelerating a feasibility study for a pipeline from Barcelona to Livorno on the Tuscan coast. A Spanish official said it would take longer to build, but had the political backing of the outgoing Italian government.

A senior official from Spain's autonomous Catalonia region, a backer of MidCat, said a submarine pipeline to Italy would be more costly and carry greater environmental and other risks.

One problem is the flammability of hydrogen, which also leaks more easily than gas because its molecules are smaller, while it can make also some grades of steel brittle, the official said.

Spain chides French reluctance on gas pipeline

Enagas says Spain-France gas link could be ready in 2 1/2 years

EU readies energy package, countries split over gas price cap

(Reporting by Michel Rose and Elizabeth Pineau in Paris, Andreas Rinke in Berlin, Belen Carreno in Madrid and Joan Faus in Barcelona; Writing by Michel Rose; Editing by Richard Lough and Alexander Smith)

Changes to Alberta government RESIDE program will fail to woo rural doctors: NDP

Lisa Johnson - Edmonton Journal

NDP health critic David Shepherd.

A $6-million recruitment program that secured just one physician in rural Alberta is failing the long list of residents without a family doctor, charges the NDP Opposition.


First announced in late January, the Rural Education Supplement and Integrated Doctor Experience (RESIDE) program offered up to 20 new family physicians bonuses of up to $100,000 to work in rural communities, in exchange for a three-year work commitment.

While around 20 physicians applied, only one is set to enter a practice in Cold Lake in January.

THERE ARE NO MINISTERS IN THE UCP GOVERNMENT THEY ARE ALL PRESS SECRETARIES

On Monday, Steve Buick, Health Minister Jason Copping’s press secretary,
said in a statement to Postmedia the ministry is working with partners including Alberta Health Services (AHS) to recruit physicians, and seeing success in spite of the pandemic.

“Since Jan. 1, AHS has announced 20 new physicians in rural communities, in addition to 11 physicians who have committed to enter practice in Lethbridge,” Buick said.

Since most applicants didn’t meet the criteria for RESIDE, Copping has approved changes to the program, administered by the Rural Health Professions Action Plan (RhPAP).

Those include expanding the list of eligible communities beyond the initial 15, expanding the eligibility criteria to include family physicians who completed their residency in Canada within the last five years, and allowing doctors to serve in communities for a minimum of two years instead of three. Those applications are now open, and RhPAP said they’ll be continuous to allow for flexibility.

NDP health critic David Shepherd said Monday with the program failing to place any new doctors on the ground this year, many of the 15 communities originally eligible continue to face a staffing crisis.

Shepherd said he’s skeptical tweaks to the financial incentive program will address staffing issues long-term.

“You can adjust these parameters in the program. You can shorten timeframes, you can increase the dollars, but that ultimately is not what’s going to solve the problem,” he said, acknowledging that staffing is a challenge across the country, particularly following the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“What no one in the UCP can fix is that frontline health-care professionals know they cannot trust the UCP,” Shepherd said.

The government and the Alberta Medical Association haven’t had a master agreement since early 2020, after the UCP’s Bill 21 gave the province the authority to unilaterally cancel its deal with doctors.

Members are set to vote on a tentative new deal between Tuesday and Sept. 28.

In the latest 2022-23 budget, the UCP budgeted $90 million per year to attract new family physicians to practice in rural and remote communities, spending Buick said offered “the country’s most generous incentives for rural practice.”

Shepherd suggested the government could better work with post-secondary institutions to offer experience for doctors in rural communities, collaborate with municipalities and streamline the process for bringing international medical graduates to the province.

“Three years of hostility and threats and harassment is not going to be erased with a slightly different program,” he said.

Buick responded by calling the NDP’s comments “overblown and distorted by politics.”

RENT IS INFLATIONARY
Canadian students pay 25% more for rent than the general population, new survey says 

NEWS PROVIDED BY
UTILE - Unité de travail pour l'implantation de logement étudiant
Sep 02, 2022,

MONTREAL, Sept. 2, 2022 /CNW Telbec/ - The Fostering Learning and Awareness on Student Housing (FLASH) survey, the largest statistical study ever conducted on the residential situation of Canada's student population, paints a bleak picture of the housing conditions of the country's 1.5 million student renters.

Conducted by the Unité de travail pour l'implantation de logement étudiant (UTILE), a Québec non-profit specializing in affordable student housing, the FLASH surveyed 18,000 students across the country. The data reveals that the median student rent paid in Canada in 2021 was $1250, 25% higher than the median cost of all rental units in the country. Seven out of ten students spend more than 30% of their total income on rent, exceeding the shelter-cost-to-income threshold generally considered critical for housing expenses.

"What we're seeing is that across the country the lack of affordable housing near educational institutions is forcing students to rent apartments which exceed their ability to pay," says Laurent Levesque, executive director of UTILE. "This drastically increases student debt and threatens accessibility to higher education."

The situation is particularly dire in the Greater Toronto Area and Vancouver, where the median student rent is $1,800, forcing student renters to allocate, on average, over half of their budget to housing alone.

Canada's appeal to international students in jeopardy


In recent years,federal and provincial governments as well as higher education institutions in Canada have made considerable efforts in order to attract international students. These endeavors have been largely successful: the international student population in Canada tripled between 2009 and 2021, reaching 620,000 students last year, adding to the already growing domestic student population.

"While attracting international students to Canada is great for our country's economic and scientific vitality, we have built nowhere near enough student apartments in the past decade to accommodate 400,000 additional students," Levesque observes. "In the absence of an adequate supply of student apartments to welcome them, these students have turned to the private rental market, creating significant pressure on the housing market in the process."

As increasing numbers of international students struggle to find affordable housing near Canadian universities, the appeal of Canadian institutions to prospective students decreases, thus hurting the country's international competitiveness.

Impacts beyond the student population


According to Levesque, the consequences of the student housing crisis are felt by everyone, not just the student community. "A common strategy used by students to reduce their housing costs is to rent larger apartments alongside more roommates; only 24% of students live by themselves. By doing so, they unintentionally compete with households with children, who are also looking to rent affordable units with multiple bedrooms. Therefore, building affordable student housing not only helps reduce student indebtedness, but it also frees up large apartments on the rental markets for families who wish to live near city centers."

See full report : utile.org/nouvelles/flash-2021.

SOURCE UTILE - Unité de travail pour l'implantation de logement étudiant

Organization Profile

UTILE - Unité de travail pour l'implantation de logement étudiant

Barbados ditched the Crown last year. Now that the Queen is gone, could Canada do the same?

Queen Elizabeth’s death this week has already sparked many important questions: What kind of King will Charles be , when will the money change, even, what will happen to the corgis ? But one of the most controversial ones, with the passing of the popular monarch, is: Could this be the time to cut ties with the royals? Or at least to re-examine those ties? It’s something the Caribbean nation of Barbados has recently done, severing its connections to the Crown and shifting from constitutional monarchy to republic in November 2021. Experts say this moment will open up conversations here in Canada about making a similar move but practically, it would be messy to unravel these long-standing relationships. Melanie Newton, an associate professor of history at the University of Toronto, who grew up in Barbados and served as a youth representative on the Barbados Constitution Review Commission in the late 1990s, said there was “overwhelming” public opinion that country should become a republic. “And then in 2020 after the killing of George Floyd and at the height of the Black Lives Matter movement, the government of (Prime Minister) Mia Mottley ... decided that this was really the moment,” she said. “The time to finally figure out a path to do this.” The country gained independence in 1966, after a colonial history stretching back to the 17th century. But like Canada, Barbados remained a constitutional monarchy, with the Queen as its head of state. It remains a part of the Commonwealth — a loose collection of countries that are mostly former territories of the British Empire, including Kenya, Bangladesh and Australia. The nation’s first president and new head of state, Sandra Mason, was sworn in at a ceremony in the capital of Bridgetown on Nov. 30, 2021, attended by both then-prince Charles and the most famous living Barbadian, Rihanna (the singer was declared a national hero during the transition). In his speech at that ceremony Charles acknowledged the “appalling atrocity of slavery,” and the country’s role as a hub for the slave trade, under British rule. This history of colonialism and slavery, as well as Brexit, and the Windrush scandal — when many older people who’d come from the Caribbean to work in Britain decades before were stripped of their rights — all played a part in this wave of public sentiment toward ditching the Crown, Newton said. As well, there were not very many Barbadians left who remembered colonialism and “no longer any kind of tie there.” The island side-stepped a public referendum on the matter — a handful of other nations, including Australia, have had them and failed to win support for severing royal ties. This was partly because Barbados had a framework for the transition, Newton said, but also because the issue had already been “litigated in court of public opinion.” On Friday, in his first speech to his subjects as monarch, King Charles III did not address the possibility of further fracturing under his reign. But he did address the “deep sense of gratitude” his family shares with those in the United Kingdom, and alongside all the countries where the Queen was Head of State, in the Commonwealth and across the world, “for the more than 70 years in which my Mother, as Queen, served the people of so many nations.” Jonathan Malloy, a professor of political science at Carleton University, said Elizabeth’s death has opened up space for questions on the future of the monarchy in Canada that had been put off. “The longevity of the Queen allowed a lot of pent-up conversations to say, well, wait until the Queen goes ... Well, the Queen’s gone,” he said. “A lot of people are saying this is now a time to change, but although the person, the monarch, has changed, the system is completely the same as it was yesterday.” It would be possible, but tough practically for Canada to follow in the footsteps of Barbados, said Malloy. “It’s simply a massive job,” he said, likening connections with the monarchy to a computer operating system. “You don’t really think about it, but everything, particularly the legal system, is just based on this Crown.” It would require the agreement of all the provinces — and the “unspoken question,” said Malloy, is what does “agreement” even mean. “It would be hard to see us moving away from the monarchy without a national referendum at least,” he said, and individual provinces might also want them. Such a change would require strong political will, driven by public opinion. Unlike in places such as Australia — or Jamaica , whose government announced an intent to remove the crown as the head of state earlier this year — Malloy just doesn’t see this in Canada at the moment. Newton, however, said the Queen’s death could spark such discussions. “I think it certainly opens up really important conversations here and I think it’s a real chance for public education about what the concept of the Crown actually means.” There’s a “mythology” particularly among white Canadians about the “Crown as benign institution,” which is rooted in the belief that slavery did not exist in this country, she said. When in reality it was “a very important part of Canada’s economic and political history,” and “a foundation to the order of racial inequality here.” At the same time, as someone who lost her own grandmother during the pandemic, Newton recognizes that this is a sad moment for many. “I think her death is immensely significant,” she said. “And I think the conversation about a republic is really a separate one, from really thinking through what the legacy of Queen Elizabeth is.” May Warren is a Toronto-based breaking news reporter for the Star. Follow her on Twitter: @maywarren11
History will judge Republicans who stay silent about the big lie

Robert Reich

If the democratic experiment called America continues to unravel because of what Republicans did or failed to do, they will live in infamy

‘When the history of this trying time is written, future generations of
 Americans will judge their actions and silences harshly.’
 Photograph: Octavio Jones/Reuters

Sun 11 Sep 2022 

I have a serious question for people who have power in America, and who continue to deny the outcome of the 2020 election and enable Trump’s big lie: what are you saying to yourself in private? How are you justifying yourself in your own mind?

I don’t mean to be snide or snarky. I’m genuinely curious.

If you hold public office and deny the outcome of the 2020 election, are you telling yourself that despite the overwhelming evidence that Biden won and the lack of evidence of fraud, you still genuinely doubt the outcome?

But you must know that 60 federal courts have found no basis in Trump’s claim, nor have any so-called state “audits” and even Trump’s own attorney general found the claim baseless.

Or are you telling yourself that it will soon be over – that Trump will fade, that the big lie will disappear, that your party and America will soon move on?

But you must know you’re wrong. The big lie is growing. It has metastasized into a cancer that’s dividing the nation and devouring our democracy.

Or are you telling yourself that you have no real choice but to support the lie if you want to keep or obtain political power?

Even if true, is power so intoxicating to you – so important as an end in itself – that you’ll do anything for it?

Where will you draw the line? If Trump is reelected and imposes martial law? If he or another Republican president forbids public criticism of his administration? If he calls for violence against those who oppose him?

And what do you tell yourself about the measures your party is taking based on the big lie: suppression of votes, takeovers of election machinery, assertions that state legislatures can overturn voter preferences in the certification process, rejection of the January 6 committee’s findings?

You have sworn an oath to uphold the constitution. How do you defend yourself in your own mind?

I’m asking you, Kevin McCarthy. And you, Lindsey Graham, and Marco Rubio, and Rick Scott and Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz and Ron Johnson. And others.
The big lie is growing. It has metastasized into a cancer that’s dividing the nation and devouring our democracy

And I’m asking those of you with significant power in the Republican party who have remained silent in the face of all this – such as you, Mitch McConnell, and you, Mitt Romney: how do you justify your silence?

And I ask those of you now running for office who are denying the 2020 election results and pushing other aspects of Republican authoritarianism – such as you, JD Vance, and Blake Masters, Mehmet Oz, Herschel Walker, Doug Mastriano, and Kari Lake: what are you telling yourself in private? How are you excusing yourself? Why are you even running?

And I ask the billionaires and CEOs who are bankrolling these people: how do you rationalize spending millions, even tens of millions, helping them get or remain elected?

I’m asking you, Peter Thiel, and you, Stephen Schwarzman, and Ken Griffin and Steve Wynn and Mike Lindell and Patrick Byrne and others: is this really the way you want to spend your fortune? Is this your legacy to the nation?

And I ask all the people making money off this rot – the TV hosts and producers and media moguls who are raking it in while poisoning the minds of America with bald-faced lies – what are you telling yourself in private?

I’m asking you, Rupert Murdoch, and you, Tucker Carlson, and you, Sean Hannity, and you, Laura Ingraham: how are you defending yourself to yourself?

I don’t expect you to answer me. This is a question for you to answer to yourself, alone and in private.

But before you do, may I have a confidential word?

Whether you’re a politician supporting the big lie, a billionaire backer of it, or a broadcaster who’s pushing it, it is not too late for you to get off the road you are on.

Yet if you continue to promote or enable this lie, you are undermining our democracy. The crisis you have helped create is worsening. You bear part of the responsibility for what comes next.

When the history of this trying time is written, future generations of Americans will judge your actions and your silences harshly.

They will recall your cowardice and your self-justifications. They will remember your lust for power and your moral blindness. They will recollect your unwitting ignorance or your witting failure to come to democracy’s defense in this perilous time.

Generations to come will sit in judgment about what you have wrought. And if the democratic experiment called America continues to unravel because of what you did or failed to do, you will live in infamy.



Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley and the author of Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common Good. His new book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now. He is a Guardian US columnist. His newsletter is at robertreich.substack.com.