Tuesday, November 05, 2024

Concern grows for Iran woman detained over underwear protest

By AFP
November 5, 2024

The woman's fate has mobilised attention worldwide - Copyright POOL/AFP/File GIL COHEN-MAGEN

Stuart WIilliams and Cecile Feuillatre

Concern grew Tuesday for an Iranian student arrested after stripping to her underwear in protest at alleged harassment over her dress, with activists worried authorities could confine her in a psychiatric institution.

In videos shared on social media, the woman, a student at Tehran’s prestigious Islamic Azad University, was seen protesting outside the campus on Saturday dressed only in her bra and underpants.

Persian-language media outside Iran have reported university security guards harassed her over what she was wearing, ripping her headscarf and clothes. She then took most of them off in protest.

Other footage showed her defiantly walking down the street before plainclothes agents bundled her into an unmarked car and drove her away.

It remains unclear where she is being held.

Many activists regard her as a new icon of the struggle for women’s rights in Iran, more than two years after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, following her arrest for an alleged breach of the statutory dress code for women, sparked months of nationwide protests.

But Iranian authorities have alleged the student has a mental disorder, a claim activists fear may be a pretext for confining her in a psychiatric institution.

Rights group Amnesty International has called for the woman’s immediate and unconditional release, saying she “removed her clothes in protest against abusive enforcement of compulsory veiling by security officials”.

“I hail the courage of this young woman who demonstrated her resistance and turned herself into an icon for the women’s struggle in Iran,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told broadcaster France 2.

Under the dress code mandatory in Iran, women must wear a headscarf and loose-fitting clothes in public.



– ‘Tool to suppress dissent’ –



In a statement released Tuesday, the Iranian embassy in Paris said it wanted to address “false information” over the incident.

It said initial indications had “shown the student was suffering from family problems and a fragile psychological condition”.

“Signs of abnormal behaviour had already been observed by those close to her, including family members and students in her year,” it alleged.

Activists accused the authorities of seeking to portray women who protest against the dress code as mentally unstable.

“Iranian authorities systematically use involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation as a tool to suppress dissent, branding protesters as mentally unstable to undermine their credibility,” said the director of the New York-based Centre for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI), Hadi Ghaemi.

News website Iran Wire, which is based outside the country, said the woman was a “seventh-semester French language student” who had no previous history of mental health issues.



– ‘Symbol’ –



Several dozen people protested in Paris on Tuesday in support of the woman, with members of the feminist collective Femen stripping to their underwear and brandishing “Woman. Life. Freedom” slogans.

“We have no news of her. But what we do know is that the regime’s script is in full swing and she is now being presented as crazy and hysterical,” said Chirinne Ardakani, lawyer and member of the Iran Justice collective that organised the demonstration.

Iranian lawyer and Nobel Peace laureate Shirin Ebadi accused the authorities of “repeating the same threadbare scenario that the protester has a mental disorder”, and saying transferring such people to mental hospitals was “the most severe torture”.

Fellow Nobel Peace laureate Narges Mohammadi, who remains in Tehran’s Evin prison, said the student had turned her body into a “symbol of dissent”.

“Women pay the price for defiance, but we do not bow down to force… I call for her freedom and an end to the harassment of women,” Mohammadi said in a message from prison posted on her social media channels.

The video of the student strolling calmly in Tehran amid other women in the black Islamic chador dress has also captured the imagination of celebrities.

“Bravery,” said French film star Marion Cotillard as she posted the video on Instagram.

“You killed, you beat, you imprisoned… but the story ends with the victory of those who refuse to submit to your oppression,” said Iran-born and now France-based actor Golshifteh Farahani.

STALINIST MONARCHY

Award-winning Cambodian reporter quits journalism after arrest



By AFP
November 5, 2024


Cambodian journalist Mech Dara, who won an international award for his reporting on scam compounds, says he is leaving the profession after spending three weeks in jail - Copyright AFP TANG CHHIN Sothy
Suy SE

A high-profile Cambodian reporter who won an international award for uncovering alleged cyber scams told AFP Tuesday that he is quitting journalism, saying he has lost “courage” after being arrested by the authorities and freed on bail.

Police arrested Mech Dara on September 30 on charges of inciting social disorder, drawing condemnation from around the world.

He was released on bail three weeks later after apologising to Cambodia’s former leader Hun Sen and his son Prime Minister Hun Manet in a video shot while he was in prison.

“I have decided that I am retiring from journalism because of the arrest, the questioning and imprisonment,” Dara told AFP.

“I am still afraid.”

Dara said he was questioned all night after his arrest, and police threatened to hit him and deny him food and water unless he cooperated.

“I have lost my courage. It has attacked my spirit, and I have no more courage,” Dara said, referring to the arrest and time he spent in prison.

“The questioning and then being in the prison, it really, really crushed my soul — the soul that is always with me, no matter what is happening, I continue to report. But that spirit or soul is not with me any more.”

He also urged the court to drop the charges against him.

Hun Manet on Monday posted pictures of him meeting Dara, including one showing the pair embracing one another.

Dara said he informed Hun Manet of his decision to quit journalism during the meeting, which took place a day after his release.



– Scam farm reporting –



Police detained Dara, 36, after stopping a car carrying him and his family from Sihanoukville, a coastal city where many suspected cyber scam operations take place.

His reporting over 10 years has appeared in various international news outlets and he worked for the independent Voice of Democracy in Cambodia before the authorities shut it down in February 2023.

Dara has since used his social media platforms to share news content, particularly around the proliferation of “scam farms” — criminal operations that defraud victims online for vast sums of money and fuel human trafficking across the region.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken last year presented Dara with a Hero Award, which recognises efforts against human trafficking, for investigations into exploitation at the online scam compounds.

The award hailed his “courageous reporting on human trafficking for the purpose of forced criminality”, saying it had led to the government improving its response to the problem.

The Reporters Without Borders (RSF) press freedom campaign group said Dara’s departure would “leave a hole in the Cambodian journalistic field”.

“By repressing journalists such as Mech Dara, the Cambodian government sent a chilling message and directly threatens any remaining independent journalists in the country,” RSF’s Aleksandra Bielakowska told AFP.

Beh Lih Yi, Asia Program Coordinator at the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), said the departure of independent journalism was “alarming”.

“Cambodia’s once vibrant free press is a ghost of its former self after nearly four decades of Hun Sen’s iron-fisted rule. Prime Minister Hun Manet is no different from his father,” Beh told AFP.

Dara’s arrest came a day after he posted an image on social media purportedly showing a tourist site demolished to make way for a quarry, according to the Cambodian Journalists’ Alliance Association.

Local authorities labelled the now-deleted images “fake news” and called for Dara to face punishment for their publication.

After announcing charges against Dara, the Phnom Penh Municipal Court accused him of posting messages on social media platforms designed to “ignite anger (and) to make people misunderstand about the leadership of the Cambodian government”.

The charge of incitement is frequently used by Cambodian authorities against activists, and Dara could face up to two years in jail if convicted.

Cambodia places near the bottom of international press freedom rankings and rights groups have long accused the government of using legal cases as a tool to silence dissenting voices.


DECRIMINALIZE DRUGS!

Afghanistan poppy cultivation grows 19 percent despite ban: UN



By AFP
November 6, 2024

An Afghan farmer harvests opium sap from a poppy field in Badakhshan province in May, 2024 - Copyright AFP/File OMER ABRAR

Opium cultivation rose by 19 percent in Afghanistan this year, the UN reported Wednesday, despite a Taliban government ban that almost eradicated the crop.

Currently, 12,800 hectares of poppies are cultivated in Afghanistan — where up to 80 percent of the population depends on agriculture — a new survey by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) shows, the agency said in a statement.

The 19 percent increase year-on-year remains far below the 232,000 hectares cultivated when Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada banned the crop in April 2022, nearly a year after the Taliban returned to power, UNODC added.

The centre of poppy cultivation has also shifted, the agency noted, and is now concentrated in northeastern provinces instead of in the Taliban strongholds of southern Afghanistan.

In May, clashes between farmers and brigades sent to destroy their poppy fields resulted in several deaths in northeastern Badakhshan.

Following the poppy ban, prices soared for the resin from which opium and heroin are made.

During the first half of 2024, prices stabilised around $730 per kilogram, (two pounds) according to the UNODC, compared to about $100 per kg before 2022.

For years Afghanistan was the world’s biggest supplier of opium and heroin.

Many farmers in Afghanistan, one of the poorest countries in the world, were hit hard financially by the ban and have not been able to reap the same profits from alternative crops.

Even legal crops are only a short-term solution, according to the International Crisis Group (ICG), “so the focus should be on job creation in non-farm industries”.

The UNODC and the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) called for international support for farmers to transition to alternative crops and livelihoods, something the Taliban government has requested.

“With opium cultivation remaining at a low level in Afghanistan, we have the opportunity and responsibility to support Afghan farmers to develop sustainable sources of income free from illicit markets,” said UNODC Executive Director Ghada Waly in the statement.

Norway speeds ahead of EU in race for fossil-free roads


By AFP
November 5, 2024

Baard Gundersen at the wheel of his elect
ric BMW iX in Baerum, Oslo
 - Copyright AFP CHARLY TRIBALLEAU, Rebecca DROKE


Pierre-Henry DESHAYES

On the quiet streets of an Oslo suburb, electric vehicles are parked in nearly every other driveway as Norway speeds towards its goal of becoming the first country free of fossil fuel-powered cars.

Electric cars make up 43 percent of all cars in Baerum, with resident Baard Gundersen making the switch in 2016.

Now on his second fully electric car, the CEO of a coffee company described his decision as a “no-brainer”.

“It was much cheaper to buy a car like this than a traditional car, almost half price,” he said at the wheel of his BMW iX SUV.

Despite being a major oil and gas producer, Norway has adopted the most ambitious electric vehicle (EV) objective in the world: only zero-emission private new cars will be sold from next year.

While not a European Union member, Norway would beat the bloc’s deadline to phase out the sale of fossil fuel-burning cars by 2035 by a decade.

Driven by the popularity of Teslas, electric cars accounted for a staggering 96.4 percent of new car registrations in Norway in September, vastly outpacing the European average of 17.3 percent.

Norway has come a long way since 2012, when EVs only made up 2.8 percent of the market.

The boom has much to do with proactive policy.

At the turn of the century, authorities exempted electric cars from certain taxes.

Norway had never had its own carmaker, and the hope was that the policies would create fertile ground for a homegrown EV champion.

It turned out to be in vain, as Norway’s Pivco electric car maker — later renamed Think and for a while owned by Ford — went bankrupt in 2011.

But the tax exemptions remained — even if some have been rolled back in recent years — making all-electric cars competitively priced compared to those with combustion engines, which are heavily taxed.

“We have used the stick for fossil vehicles and the carrot for electric cars,” Cecilie Knibe Kroglund, state secretary at Norway’s transport ministry, told AFP.

“It’s possible that other countries will have to use other types of incentives depending on usage, their geography and the way public transport works. But as far as we are concerned, our incentives have worked very well,” she said.

– A-ha takes on EVs –

Electric cars have also long benefited from other special privileges, like exemptions from city tolls and free parking in public car parks.

This was prompted by a civil disobedience campaign in the 1990s by environmental activist Frederic Hauge, co-founder of the NGO Bellona, and Morten Harket, the singer of iconic Norwegian pop group A-ha — famous for the hit “Take On Me”.

Travelling around in a small Fiat Panda — converted to be electric — the two men stubbornly racked up a mountain of fines which they refused to pay in an effort to promote zero-emission vehicles.

Their trusty car was finally seized, but a few years later authorities ended up granting electric vehicles, which were still rare at the time, the special privileges.

“I didn’t feel like I was entering into the role of a rebel really,” Harket told the BBC in 2022.

“It was just necessary.”

In 2005, the government also allowed electric cars to use lanes reserved for public transport — thus enabling them to avoid traffic jams.

These benefits have eroded somewhat since, but in the meantime electric cars have become the norm in the Scandinavian country.

Over the past decade, technology and car ranges have also evolved along with the development of a vast network of charging stations.

In September, the number of electric cars on Norwegian roads exceeded that of petrol cars for the first time and they are hot on the heels of diesel cars — which are still the country’s most popular vehicles.

Since November 1, all taxis in Oslo have had to be emissions-free.

– Transferable model? –

German carmaker Volkswagen, the top brand in Norway, delivered its last internal combustion car, a Golf, to Norway in July.

“Since January 1, we have removed all fossil-fuelled cars from our catalogue,” Kim Clemetsen, head of marketing at a dealership that imports the brand, said.

“We now only sell electric cars.”

Other brands, such as Toyota, are resisting the push and are planning to continue to offer hybrid cars and even combustion engines in 2025.

Finance Minister Trygve Slagsvold Vedum, a staunch defender of rural interests, has also thrown a spanner in the works by saying that it is “not a problem at all” if “a few” combustion-powered vehicles are still sold next year.

But if current trends hold, the country should come very close to achieving its ambition of 100 percent zero-emissions vehicles.

Christina Bu, secretary general of the Norwegian Electric Vehicle Association, thinks this should be encouraging to other countries aiming to phase out combustion engines.

“Norway was in many ways not a very likely country to succeed with this: it’s a big country, long distances, very cold temperatures in winter, which affects the range of the car,” Bu told AFP.

“So there’s not really any reason why Norway should succeed rather than another country.”

Ultrafast fashion: Looking good results in medical and environmental concerns


By Dr. Tim Sandle
November 5, 2024
DIGITAL JOURNAL

AiDA was just one of the AidLab projects being showcased ahead of London Fashion Week, which started Friday - Copyright AFP JOSH EDELSON

The fashion industry produces up to 100 billion garments each year. Each year, approximately 92 million tons of clothing end up in landfills. It is responsible for roughly 10 percent of annual global carbon emissions.

Devansh Sood is the founder and CEO of Fique a clothing wear brand that offers protective Silver Shield-certified tested garments that block out Radio Frequencies (RF) and Electromagnetic Frequencies (EMF) produced from electronic devices, cell towers, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and power lines.

The brand was created by the fashion Activist Platform The Elegant Initiative (#elegantinitiative) and The Silver Lining Film, promoting the harmful effects of technology, such as everyday devices and electricity sources.

Sood points out that often fashion garments contain unsafe levels of toxic chemicals which can harm wellbeing and health. Toxic chemicals do not wash out, but they can leech out of clothes and be absorbed by your skin, potentially causing health problems.

Global Fashion Industry Waste

According to Sood:

• Up to 100 billion garments are produced by the fashion industry every year.
• Each year, as much as 92 million tons of clothing ends up in landfills.
• Only 20 percent of textiles are collected for reuse or recycling globally.

As an example, Sood mentions, a CBC investigation revealed that some of the most popular ultra-fast fashion brands on the planet had been selling toxic chemicals to the public, hidden in clothing and accessories.

Ultra fast fashion takes everything harmful about fast fashion and speeds it up. That means faster production cycles, faster trend churn, and faster to the landfills. The clothing is ultra plastic, with at least half of these garments made from virgin plastics that will shed microfibers into waterways and the air for years to come.

The negative impacts on workers and the environment reach new lows

Here, Sood says, scientists found that a jacket for toddlers, purchased from Chinese retailer Shein, contained almost 20 times the amount of lead that Health Canada says is safe for children. A red purse, also purchased from Shein, had more than five times the threshold.

For this, researchers tested 38 samples of children’s and adult clothes and accessories. One in five had concerning levels of chemicals, like lead, PFAS, and phthalates – a group of chemicals – often used to make plastic more durable, can interfere with some peoples’ reproductive hormones.

Phthalates are a family of chemical compounds primarily used to make plastics, PVC, or vinyl flexible and pliant. Phthalates are the most commonly used plasticisers in the world.

Phthalates have received significant attention due to their ubiquitous nature in industrial products and their potential for toxicity in the human body.

Furthermore, the research suggests that exposure to lead—a neurotoxicant—can damage the brain and nervous system, impacting growth, development, and behaviour patterns. This is a form of toxicity in which a biological, chemical, or physical agent produces an adverse effect on the structure or function of the central and the peripheral nervous system.

With another area of concern, fashion is one of the most labour-dependent industries in the world, as each piece of apparel travels through a complex supply chain. From the pickers harvesting the cotton to the yarn spinners and the workers manufacturing the garments – exploitation exists at many stages in the making of clothes.

Dutch, French authorities raid Netflix offices in tax probe

By  AFP
November 5, 2024

The raids on Netflix offices in Paris and Amsterdam to suspicions of 'covering up serious tax fraud and off-the-books work', a judicial source told AFP. - Copyright AFP/File Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV

French and Dutch authorities raided streaming giant Netflix’s offices in Paris and Amsterdam Tuesday as part of a tax fraud probe, a judicial source told AFP.

The search of “various locations” in France by specialist financial investigators relates to suspicions of “covering up serious tax fraud and off-the-books work” and is part of a probe opened in November 2022, the source said.

Netflix’s Amsterdam headquarters for Europe, the Middle East and Africa was also targeted for a search by a team of officials from both France and the Netherlands.

“French and Dutch authorities have been cooperating on this criminal case for many months,” the source said.

Netflix is under investigation in France for its tax filings for 2019, 2020 and 2021.

The company did not immediately respond Tuesday to AFP’s request for comment.

Netflix insisted last year that it complies with tax law in all countries where it operates, after the probes were revealed in a media report.

French outlet La Lettre A had reported that Netflix’s French operation was structured until 2021 so that all subscribers signed up with a Dutch subsidiary — thereby “minimising its tax bill”.

That left it paying less than one million euros ($1.1 million at today’s rates) in taxes to Paris across 2019 and 2020, when it had around seven million French subscribers.

Authorities are now trying to determine whether Netflix kept up illegal attempts to minimise its reported profits and thereby its tax bill, La Lettre A added.

The French subsidiary reported very low operating margins compared to the US mothership in 2021 and 2022, the outlet said, paying just 6.5 million euros in tax on its profits in 2022.

But its practice of billing a large share of revenue to entities outside France represented a “tax optimisation strategy that is legal” under certain conditions, La Lettre A added.

– Streaming success –

Netflix earned over $9.8 billion in revenue worldwide from its 282 million subscribers in July-September this year, with net profit reaching $2.4 billion.

The group arrived in France just over 10 years ago and now boasts 10 million households subscribed.

Netflix says it confirms with local laws on commissioning French content, paying the full rate of VAT and contributing to a film industry levy.

In 2023, the company said it pumped 250 million euros into producing French content, of which 50 million went to feature films.

Its top French-made output includes the “Lupin” series starring Omar Sy.

The show is a modern reimagining of the classic early-1900s tales of “gentleman thief” Arsene Lupin by writer Maurice Leblanc — France’s answer to British detective Sherlock Holmes.

The Netflix version broke into the top 10 most-watched shows in 70 different countries, the platform boasts.


Thousands in Tel Aviv protest Israel defence minister’s sacking


By AFP
November 5, 2024

Israelis protestors set a fire and block a road in Tel Aviv after Yoav Gallant's sacking as defence minister - Copyright AFP Cesar Manso
Michael Blum, Sharon Aronowicz

Thousands of Israelis rallied in Tel Aviv late Tuesday to protest the sacking of defence minister Yoav Gallant, calling on his successor Israel Katz to prioritise a hostage deal to return the captives still held in Gaza.

Chanting slogans against the government and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the demonstrators carrying Israeli flags gathered in the commercial hub shortly after Gallant’s dismissal was announced.

Protesters also blocked traffic and lit fires on the Ayalon highway in Tel Aviv, with some wearing “Bring them home now!” t-shirts referring to the hostages.

They held up signs with slogans such as “We deserve better leaders” and “Leaving no one behind!” and one protester wore handcuffs and a face mask with Netanyahu’s likeness.

“Bibi traitor! You’re guilty” chanted some, referring to Netanyahu and blaming for failing to prevent the Hamas attack on October 7 last year.

“We, the protesters, believe that Gallant… is actually the only normal person in the government,” said 54-year-old teacher Samuel Miller, slamming Netanyahu’s administration for opening “new fronts in uncalled-for wars”.

“He’s doing nothing to safeguard our peace, the peace of the Palestinians, the peace of everybody in this region,” Miller told AFP.

He also criticised Netanyahu’s government for “doing absolutely nothing to free the hostages” still held in Gaza.

Foreign minister Israel Katz took over the defence portfolio on Tuesday, after Netanyahu fired Gallant over eroded trust over the past months of the Gaza war.

– ‘Endangering Israel’s security’ –

An Israeli group campaigning for the release of hostages in Gaza on Tuesday expressed “deep concern” over the sacking and urged Katz to “prioritise” a deal to free the captives.

“We expect the incoming defence minister, Israel Katz, to prioritise a hostage deal… to secure the immediate release of all hostages,” the Hostages and Missing Families Forum said in a statement.

Gallant also called on the government to bring home the hostages, saying in a televised speech: “We must do this quickly, while they are still alive.”

Einav Tzangauker, whose son Matan is among the hostages, was among those protesting against Netanyahu in Tel Aviv.

“If it is possible to replace a defence minister in the middle of a war, then it is surely possible to replace a prime minister who is unqualified to bring back the hostages,” she told Israel’s Channel 12.

Netanyahu “is intentionally endangering Israel’s security and all that because of a dispute between him and Gallant on how to continue the war,” she added.

The war erupted on October 7, 2023 after Palestinian militants attacked Israel, resulting in 1,206 deaths, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of Israeli official figures.

Israel’s retaliatory campaign has killed 43,391 people in Gaza, a majority of them civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry the United Nations considers reliable.

During the October 7 attack, Palestinian militants seized 251 hostages, of whom 97 are still in Gaza. The Israeli military says 34 of them are dead.

Netanyahu Ousts Defense Minister Gallant Over Breakdown of Trust

STEVEN GANOT
11/05/2024


Foreign Minister Katz steps into defense role as Netanyahu reshuffles cabinet positions

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday night dismissed his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, citing a breakdown of trust over disagreements in managing Israel’s ongoing war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Netanyahu announced that Foreign Minister Israel Katz would assume the role of defense minister and extended an invitation to Gideon Sa’ar to take the role of foreign minister.

At a time of war, full trust between the prime minister and the defense minister is critical

In a statement released by his office, Netanyahu emphasized the need for complete trust between the prime minister and the defense minister during wartime. “At a time of war, full trust between the prime minister and the defense minister is critical,” he stated. “Unfortunately, this trust has eroded and attempts to bridge the gaps have failed.” He expressed concern that their disagreements had become public knowledge, potentially benefiting Israel’s enemies who “derived great benefit” from the situation.

This is not the first time Netanyahu has attempted to dismiss Gallant. On March 25, 2023, Gallant spoke out against the government’s proposed judicial reforms and called for a delay to allow for negotiations between the ruling coalition and the opposition. His stance led National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir to call for his dismissal. The following day, Netanyahu announced that he was firing Gallant, sparking massive protests that night in several major cities across Israel. However, Gallant’s office stated that he would continue in his post, as he had not received an official notice of dismissal. On April 10, Netanyahu reversed his decision and announced that he would not fire Gallant.

The current dismissal follows Gallant’s recent approval of drafting an additional 7,000 ultra-Orthodox men into the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), a move that sparked controversy within the coalition government. The ultra-Orthodox party United Torah Judaism (UTJ) has been pressing for the advancement of the so-called Daycare Bill, which aims to ensure that children of ultra-Orthodox men who have not completed mandatory military service remain eligible for state-funded daycare subsidies. This legislation seeks to circumvent a High Court ruling that deemed such financial support illegal for those avoiding military service.


Netanyahu removed the Daycare Bill from the Knesset agenda, defying UTJ’s demands and further straining coalition unity. In response, UTJ threatened to withhold support for other coalition legislation unless the bill was advanced. UTJ Member of Knesset Israel Eichler demanded that the bill be brought to a vote immediately. The coalition’s ability to pass the legislation is uncertain, as it has lost majority support with several lawmakers, including Gallant and Economy Minister Nir Barkat, indicating opposition to the bill.

There is no low to which this government will not sink

Opposition leaders criticized Netanyahu’s decision to dismiss Gallant. National Unity chairman Benny Gantz, a former member of Netanyahu’s war cabinet, accused the government of putting politics ahead of national security. “There is no low to which this government will not sink,” stated National Unity lawmaker Orit Farkash Hacohen. Yair Golan, chairman of The Democrats, a merger of the left-wing Labor and Meretz parties, urged citizens to “take to the streets” in protest.

The security of the State of Israel always was, and will always remain, my life’s mission

Gallant responded to his dismissal with a brief statement: “The security of the State of Israel always was, and will always remain, my life’s mission.”

Netanyahu praised Israel Katz as Gallant’s successor, highlighting his experience as foreign minister, finance minister, and intelligence minister, as well as his long-standing membership in the Security Cabinet. “He brings an impressive combination of experience and practical skill, known as a ‘bulldozer’ with a quiet strength and responsible determination—all essential qualities in the campaign’s leadership,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister also extended an offer to Gideon Sa’ar, currently a minister without portfolio, to serve as foreign minister. Netanyahu noted Sa’ar’s extensive experience in government and security matters, expressing confidence that his inclusion would strengthen the leadership during this critical time.

As Israel navigates the complexities of a prolonged war with Hamas and violent conflicts with Hamas-backer Iran and Tehran’s other proxies in the region, including Hezbollah and the Houthis, the reshuffling of key defense and foreign policy positions points to significant challenges facing the government. Internal disputes over military conscription and social benefits for the ultra-Orthodox community further complicate the political landscape, raising questions about coalition stability and the government’s ability to effectively manage ongoing war efforts.


 ALBERTA

The UCP’s new anti-trans bills are cruel

Naheed K. Nenshi
Leader
Alberta NDP

I’ve spent the past few months travelling to each corner of this province talking to Albertans from every background. I’ve heard directly from Albertans what issues they care about most. Let me tell you, it’s not taking away rights from trans kids and their parents.

In fact, punching down on minorities doesn’t even appear in the top 50 issues Albertans are concerned about. But anti-trans bills are being rammed through by the UCP anyway. We will fight this cruel legislation, but today I wanted to send a message to anyone who might be thinking “Am I next?”. The Alberta NDP sees you, and we will do everything we can to protect your rights.

Watch our message to trans Albertans, and all Albertans.

What we have heard over and over again from medical professionals and regular Albertans alike is, “Quit picking on vulnerable people.” Yet one quarter of the UCP’s legislation this fall is anti-trans legislation. She is acting like the Premier of a party, not the Premier of a province.

Albertans are far more concerned about their public healthcare, education, and how they can afford to pay their bills. But the UCP hasn’t funded our education system to give our kids a brighter future. And they’re doing nothing to clear up backlogs in the health-care system so people can get care. Instead, we’re getting harmful legislation most Albertans didn’t even ask for and don’t want.

As a teacher, an uncle, and a human being, I am disheartened by this government’s failure to prioritize the concerns of Albertans. And I know we have the responsibility to fight back on behalf of many people who will be harmed. I want all the kids in Alberta to know we love them, we support them, and we will never stop fighting for their rights and safety.

This is our message to all Albertans, including vulnerable trans kids. There is a place for you in Alberta. Our 85,000 members are in your corner, and we will stick up for you.

Watch the Video

Thank you,

Naheed

 

Naheed K. Nenshi
Leader
Alberta NDP


UK

F-word 'particularly common in north' - tribunal judge



The employment tribunal ruled the delivery driver was unfairly dismissed

A tribinal judge remarked that use of the f-word was "particularly common in the north" while explaining why a firm had been unfair to sack a worker for swearing.

Delivery driver Rob Ogden was fired from his job at wholesaler Booker Ltd in Oldham after swearing at a colleague.

But judge Jetinder Shergill said swearing was so widespread that Mr Ogden, who had worked there for seven years, had been made an unfair example of.

He said that while such language should not be used in the workplace it is a "common everyday experience, particularly in the north".

'Lawless'


Judge Shergill told the Manchester tribunal that a disciplinary investigation was fair, but employers should have exercised clearer standards and norms in the workplace.

Mr Ogden was said to have used offensive language against a female co-worker in July 2023.

The tribunal heard how during the same incident, which was an office discussion about doughnuts, weight loss and attending a weight loss club he said: “No wonder it takes you 19 weeks to lose a stone, it hasn’t taken me 19 weeks.”

The woman involved then made a complaint against Mr Ogden.

Mr Ogden told the tribunal that the workplace culture was “toxic” and “lawless” with lots of “banter” and mutual horseplay between staff, which could also be “jovial”.


These included references to colleagues’ weight, using the term “chubs”, chat about “fat club” and fake certificates left in the office commending the “gainer of the week”.

The worker who complained about Mr Ogden was said to have given “as good as she [got]”.

Judge Shergill found there was no real enforcement by managers of expected standards and norms in the workplace, and that some senior staff were part of the problem.

He ruled the firm then did not follow a reasonably fair procedure before it dismissed him in October 2023.

“The claimant had not been pulled up before over comments, and this likely led to a false sense of security in terms of it not being a disciplinary issue," he said.

“The free-for-all in the office suggested the claimant was the one who was without a chair when the music stopped.

"There was a real sense of him being made an example of, which in the context of the free-for-all office and significant failings in process was unreasonable.”

A further hearing will take place to decide how much compensation Mr Ogden is entitled to.
UK

Largest onshore windfarm could be built on moorland

Gemma Sherlock
BBC News, Manchester
PA Media
Scout Moor II would sit alongside the existing wind farm site

Plans to create England's largest onshore wind farm have been submitted following the end of an effective ban on the projects.

Cubico Sustainable Investments is proposing to build turbines on moorland next to the existing Scout Moor site between Rochdale, in Greater Manchester and Rossendale, in Lancashire.

The 100 megawatt Scout Moor II development will be the first onshore windfarm in the country for a decade if the plans are approved by Rossendale and Rochdale councils.

The proposal comes after the Labour government lifted the de facto ban on new onshore wind farms put in place by the previous Conservative government nine years ago.


Now the ban has been lifted, the developers hope the project, which they say will power over 100,000 homes and meet around 10% of Greater Manchester’s domestic energy needs, will be approved.

'Energy powerhouse'

Cubico added that Scout Moor II could be operational by 2030 and generate an estimated £200m of investment and hundreds of skilled green jobs across the lifetime of the project.

As part of the application, Cubico is also proposing a community wealth fund and moorland restoration and management plan to support local initiatives and promote biodiversity across the area.

David Swindin, chief executive officer at Cubico, said: "Our proposal for Scout Moor II reflects our strong confidence in the UK renewables sector and Britain’s potential to become a global clean energy powerhouse."

A previous proposal to expand the number of turbines at Scout Moor was introduced by Peel Wind Power in the mid-2010s.

While it was supported by Rossendale and Rochdale councils, it was refused by the then Secretary of State following a public inquiry.

Additional reporting by Bill Jacobs, Local Democracy Reporting Service.

CPJ, 14 organizations urge UK to pause economic cooperation with Egypt until Alaa Abd el-Fattah is freed

British writer Alaa Abd el-Fattah, who was due for release on September 29 after completing a five-year prison sentence. (Photo: AP/Nariman El-Mofty)

November 5, 2024 4:57 PM EST

The Committee to Protect Journalists joined 14 human rights organizations in a November 1 letter urging UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy to suspend all economic and financial partnerships with Egypt until the country frees British writer Alaa Abd el-Fattah, who was due for release on September 29 after completing a five-year prison sentence.

Egyptian authorities have refused to release Abd el-Fattah until January 2027, in violation of articles 482 and 484 of the country’s Criminal Procedure Law.

Abd el-Fattah was first arrested in September 2019, amidst a crackdown on protests calling for President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi’s resignation, and was sentenced to five years in prison on charges of anti-state and false news. In September 2024, CPJ separately called on the Egyptian government to release Abd el-Fattah, drop all remaining charges, and cease manipulating legal statutes to unjustly detain him.

Read the full statement here.
UK govt confirms bird flu outbreak in commercial poultry farm, raises alert level


The UK government said all poultry on the infected premises will be humanely culled. — Reuters pic

Wednesday, 06 Nov 2024 

LONDON, Nov 6 — The UK government said yesterday that cases of bird flu had been confirmed in commercial poultry at premises in Yorkshire, hours after it increased the risk level of the disease from medium to high.

All poultry on the infected premises will be humanely culled, and a three-kilometre protection zone had been put in place surrounding the premises, it said in a statement.

Bird flu, or avian influenza, which has killed hundreds of millions of birds around the globe in recent years, has increasingly spread to mammals, raising concerns it may lead to human-to-human transmission.

Earlier in the day, the government raised its alert level after two different strains of the virus, H5N5 and H5N1, were detected in wild birds in the country over the autumn, according to a government update yesterday.

Britain, which had increased the threat level to medium in mid-October, has experienced several bird flu outbreaks over the years, including one in 2021 that was then described as the largest-ever in the country. — Reuters
UK ‘falling behind’ on sewage pollution regulation while EU tightens rules

Helena Horton and Ajit Niranjan
THE GUARDIAN
Tue 5 November 2024 

A ‘bathing is not advised’ sign by the River Wharfe in Ilkley, West Yorkshire.Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

The UK is falling further behind on sewage pollution regulation as the EU tightens its rules to clean up Europe’s waterways, say critics.

EU member states agreed on Tuesday to update the urban waste water treatment directive to strengthen rules to clean up sewage and chemical pollution from treatment plants. European countries will have to update their sewage systems and treatment plants so that large amounts of human waste and chemicals are removed from rivers by a deadline of 2035. The companies deemed responsible will be required to pay for the infrastructure changes.

Meanwhile, the UK still has the old 1991 UWWT directive legislation, which was brought into EU law when the UK was still a member. UK water companies are charged with rules from this original directive, such as not allowing sewage to spill from storm overflows into rivers except under exceptional circumstances, for example extreme rainfall.


Earlier this year, the Guardian revealed that the UK is falling behind the EU on almost every area of environmental regulation, as the bloc strengthens its legislation while the UK weakens it. In some cases, ministers are removing EU-derived environmental protections from the statute book entirely.

Ben Reynolds, director of green thinktank IEEP UK, commented: “The recently adopted wastewater legislation in the EU increases and expands their standards to include things like a wider range of pollutants such as microplastics. Standards in the UK are no longer keeping track and are falling behind. With the dire state of river pollution in this country, in part due to sewage, the UK should be looking hard at all options to tackle this, and keeping track with these higher standards alongside smarter investment and more resources for enforcement should be on the table.”

UK companies have failed in many cases to update infrastructure to meet the 1991 directive, resulting in record sewage spills, in some cases happening when it is not raining at all. Meanwhile the EU is updating requirements. The new EU directive specifically targets phosphorus and nitrate pollution, which come from human and animal waste and contribute to an excess of nutrients in rivers, causing algae and plants to grow in large volume, and choking out the life in the waterway. This is removed by what is known as “tertiary treatment”, which is a more precise form of removing pollutants from water. In the 1991 directive, only water being discharged into “sensitive areas” such as nature reserves was required to go through tertiary treatment. The new EU rules require that all large wastewater treatment plants put their water through tertiary treatment.

Human health while swimming in open water is also addressed in the EU rules. Wastewater from certain treatment centres will have to go through a new and even stricter form of water treatment known as quarternary treatment, which removes micropollutants from water. These come from industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, cosmetic products, pesticides, and hormones. Assessments of threats to human health from these pollutants, including specifically to bathing waters, must be made. These rules are not being carried across to the UK.

There are fears the costs of implementing the new provisions will be significant in many EU member states.

“Britain wasn’t the only country struggling to reach the targets set even in the old rules,” said Tiemo Wölken, a German MEP from the centre-left Socialists and Democrats, who sits on the European parliament’s environment committee. “Especially in countries [that have] joined the EU more recently, you can still find many, sometimes a majority of plants, that are not in compliance.”

To ease the burden of ensuring cleaner waters, the new directive pushes most of the infrastructure costs on to industries such as cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, forcing manufacturers to pay for the removal of pollutants their plants spew into the water.

Wölken said: “It is problematic that this practical example of making polluters pay is not implemented in the UK, where the privatisation wave lies at the heart of the problem that exposed British citizens to raw sewage in their beautiful rivers and beaches.”

If EU states manage to implement the changes, sewer systems across Europe will become far more sophisticated than in the UK, leading to healthier waters that are more hospitable to people and wildlife.

Mark Owen, director of the European Anglers Alliance, said there was a lot of public and government awareness in the UK, with sewage and pollution having “made headlines daily for the last two years”, but that the new Labour government had not yet made concrete proposals.

“You must remember we’ve been screaming about this from the rooftops for decades,” he added.
London Underground drivers suspend planned strikes

Members of Aslef were due to walk out on Thursday and next Tuesday - which would have heavily impacted Tube services.



Tuesday 5 November 2024 


Planned strikes by London Underground drivers have been suspended after they received an "improved offer" over pay.

Members of Aslef were due to walk out on Thursday and again next Tuesday - which would have heavily impacted Tube services.


The Rail, Maritime and Transport union had already called off strikes by its members after resolving a dispute over pay.

Finn Brennan, Aslef's full-time organiser on London Underground, said: "Following fresh talks, and an improved offer, Aslef has agreed to suspend our planned industrial action on London Underground.

"Details of the offer will be discussed with our reps at a meeting on Thursday. We are pleased that this progress has been made and that strike action has been averted at this time."

Claire Mann, Transport for London's chief operating officer, said: "We are pleased that Aslef has suspended its planned industrial action on the Tube and that Londoners will not be disrupted this week or next.

"We believe that we have made an offer to our trade unions that is fair, affordable, good for our colleagues and good for London - and we urge our trade unions to continue working with us."

 Big tech isn't gonna solve our problems


A new book on 'transforming the future of war' ignores key questions about whether some military innovations are even necessary


William Hartung
Nov 06, 2024

The notion that AI-driven weapons will revolutionize warfare and put the country that masters them in the global driver’s seat is gospel among the new generation of techno-enthusiasts in the Pentagon and Silicon Valley.

But their claims for what emerging tech can do are unproven, and their visions of what it can achieve for the U.S. standing in the world are wildly unrealistic.

The latest addition to the AI discussion comes from Raj M. Shah and Christopher Kirchhoff in their new book, “Unit X: How the Pentagon and Silicon Valley Are Transforming the Future of War.” Shah and Kirchhoff are well qualified to speak on the topic. As former directors of the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Unit X (hence the title “Unit X”), the two men spent countless hours building relationships between the Pentagon and Silicon Valley.

They also traveled the world to get current military personnel to share their thoughts on whether the weapons they were going into battle with were effective and user-friendly. If the book was a film, it could have been called “Raj and Christopher’s Excellent Adventure.”

Shah and Kirchhoff are right about one thing. Too often, the technology embedded in current weapons systems is far, far behind capabilities that are routine in the civilian sector. But the answer is to replace items that aren’t up to their assigned missions. The goal should not be to create an AI-driven arsenal, with AI controlling not only drones, but combat aircraft, tanks, and ships, with the objective of minimizing the use of human crews.

But just because a machine operated military can be created doesn’t mean it should be. Before going all in on an AI-driven military, Pentagon planners and the larger public should consider the danger of catastrophic accidents tied to software failures, or of a greater temptation to go to war in light of the reduced risk of human casualties.

Beyond the issue of how to integrate new technology into the armed forces lies a much more consequential question: how will a new emphasis on speed and massive data processing capabilities, deployed with little or no human involvement, shape how wars are fought? Will it make war more or less likely? Will it cause mass casualties? Is it the secret to diminishing Chinese power or the first step in an all out arms race?

These are all tough questions, but one thing is clear: just because an individual or firm has the ability to develop a revolutionary technology doesn’t mean they are the ones best equipped to decide how to use it.

But someone forgot to tell the new age militarists in Silicon Valley that. The most “visionary” leaders in the emerging tech crowd — people like Elon Musk (Space-X), Peter Thiel (Palantir), and Palmer Luckey (Anduril) — see themselves as technological saviors who know how to restore U.S. global dominance, beat China, and transform life as we know it, if only government would get out of the way and let them do the job. The new breed of Silicon Valley weapons makers doesn’t just want to make gadgets, they want to remake the world.

To their credit, Shah and Kirchhoff do not share the near delusional faith in the power of technology held by Musk and his cohorts. They’re mostly concerned about how to get the most up-to-date technology to the warfighter, and on how to avoid falling behind in the race to acquire next generation weapons. They have plenty of examples to back up their claims about the U.S. military using outmoded technology for critical functions.

A case in point is the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC), based at al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The authors described CAOC as “the command post for U.S. military operations across the Middle East.” When Shah visited the facility in October 2016, the CAOC looked bright, shiny and modern — at least at first glance. But upon closer inspection, Shah found the facility’s equipment to be dangerously out of date:

“[I]ts technology was woefully inadequate. Systems patched together with duct tape and band aids were making it unnecessarily difficult for our service members to do their jobs. … The technology at CAOC was holding people back, slowing things down, and it’s not too much of a stretch to say this –putting lives at risk.”

But while Shah and Kirchhnoff have done a good job of exposing the Pentagon’s technological weak points, they are on much shakier ground when they turn from talk about developing technology to weighing in on the U.S. role in the world. They are basically techno-alarmists, warning that if we lose the military tech race it will only be a matter of time until chaos reigns and the bad guys run the world.

According to Shah and Kirchhoff, this dangerous trend began in the 2010s:

“Other militaries sensed the fragility of what held together the world order — the ability of the United States to unquestionably win wars and keep the peace. Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un each saw new ways to defeat the U.S. technologically.”

Unquestionably win wars? When was the last time that happened? The story of this century and prior is one of the United States taking on wars that should never have been fought, as in the Bush administration’s 2003 invasion of Iraq, or wars that went on far too long, as in America’s 20-plus year sojourn in Afghanistan. Needless to say, these conflicts did not make the world or their immediate regions more peaceful or more stable, given the hundreds of thousands of lives lost, the millions of people driven from their homes, and the installation of sectarian regimes that were either indifferent or outright opposed to taking dictates from Washington.

The problem in the above-mentioned wars was not the fault of the troops, who were by and large well-trained and well-armed. The problem was in the missions, which could not be won regardless of the technological sophistication of our forces. Even so, despite the clear evidence that technology alone will not secure America’s objectives, many of today’s military planners are looking at our biggest challenges — like how to deal with the threats posed by China — through a military-technical lens, putting diplomacy, dialogue, and reassurance in the back seat.

In the context of the recent, tragic history of American military interventions, Shah and Kirchhoff’s longing for a world where America calls the shots because of its military and technological superiority is almost quaint. The era of unsurpassed American military and economic dominance — which was never as great as advertised — is long gone, and a “revolution” in military technology will not change that. Trying to rise to dominance is a recipe for strategic and humanitarian disaster that will only hasten the decline in U.S. power and influence on the global stage.

A vigorous national conversation about how to subordinate new technology to a more realistic strategy is long overdue, and people like Shah and Kirchhoff should be part of that debate. But we need to hear more from experts and advocates outside the tech world if we are to come to a balanced conclusion.

Another key theme raised by “Unit X” is the difficulty of implementing change of any kind in the face of entrenched interests that have undue influence on the Pentagon, the Congress, and the broader public. Shah and Kirchhoff tell the story of two appropriations committee staffers who tried to zero out the budget of Unit X, for reasons unknown to either of them. Once Shah and Kirchhoff found the perpetrators, one of the staffers in question said that their boss was angry that none of the defense innovation funds were going to his home state of Indiana.

The pressure to spread the wealth from arms contracting across as many states and districts as possible is a tried and true method for keeping Pentagon dollars flowing, but it is also a deeply dysfunctional way to build a weapons system or set priorities for the future.

Advocates of new tech will continue to run into this problem as they push for a shift from big platforms like manned bombers, tanks and aircraft carriers to faster, more nimble, and more numerous systems that can be operated with or without human input. The political battle between the Silicon Valley upstarts and the old guard military-industrial behemoths like Lockheed Martin could be a decisive factor determining what kind of military America has in the decades to come.

Shah and Kirchhoff are under no illusion that the emerging tech crowd will automatically win the battle over the shape of America’s military, noting that “Advocates of innovation must keep pressing the seemingly Sisyphean task of reform. Leadership must back them to the hilt.”

There is no question that the United States needs strong, forward looking leadership if we are to navigate the coming period in world affairs in ways that promote peace and security rather than runaway arms racing and endless war. But developing new “miracle” technologies is not the answer. Technology should be a tool, not a cure for all of our ills or a driver of policy.

The sooner we abandon the hype surrounding emerging military technologies and take a cold, hard look at what strategy will be most likely to make the world a safer place in the years to come, the better off we will be.