Saturday, October 29, 2022

More than 6,000 baby turtles are 
released in Peru

LIMA, Oct 30,  2022 (BSS/AFP) - More than 6,000 hatchlings of three species of endangered turtles have been released into lakes and lagoons in Peru's Amazon basin to help them repopulate, officials said Saturday.

To achieve that, wildlife officials collect turtle eggs and transfer them from natural beaches of the Amazon basin, to artificial beaches where they are artificially incubated for 60 days until they hatch.

Gustavo Montoya, head of the Cordillera Azul del Sernanp National Park, told AFP that over 6,100 baby turtles of the taricaya, charapa and teparo species have been released into the waters of the Amazon basin.

"With the release of these species at risk, it will be possible to repopulate the lagoons and rivers of the Amazon," said Montoya.

Environmental scientists say that preserving the Amazon rainforest and its ecosystem i

GOP airs ad with hate pastor who called LGBTQ people “child molesters”

He said most gay men die before age 39 because they have hundreds of sexual partners
.
By Alex Bollinger Saturday, October 29, 2022

Kari LakePhoto: YouTube screenshot


Kari Lake, the Republican running for governor of Arizona, is airing an ad starring fundamentalist Desert Bible Church pastor Justin Erickson.

In the ad, Erickson is identified as a small business owner, although the ad doesn’t say what his business is. He complains about inflation, which he blames on Democratic candidate Katie Hobbs.

In a 2014 sermon, Erickson claimed that “50 percent of the homosexual LGBT-Now-Q community, 50 percent have AIDS.” Later he said, “80 percent of homosexuals have STDs and – how sad is this? – two percent, two percent of homosexuals in the LGBT community make it to the age of 65. The average lifespan for an average person in our world is 75. Those in the LGBT community, most of them don’t make it to 39.”

He also made up numbers about promiscuity: “The average homosexual has had in a lifetime over 500 sexual partners. Eighty percent admit that half of them are absolute total strangers. Thirty percent of those who commit homosexuality, 30 percent, have had over 1000 partners. Three hundred different people a year.” A 2013 survey found that the average number of sexual partners men who have sex with men had in the previous year was 2.3.

Erickson, of course, wasn’t all that concerned with LGBTQ people’s health because he went on to falsely imply that LGBTQ people are more likely to be child molesters: “One in twenty are child molesters, on the sex offender registry.” That statistic isn’t correct, according to Mother Jones.

He also accused LGBTQ people of being murderers.

“The LAPD has a statistic when they- when the officers come on to a crime scene and there is a murder and the murder itself has been an absolute bludgeoning, multiple stab wounds, multiple gunshot wounds, they immediately begin with the premise that this is a homosexual love quarrel,” he claimed.

In the years since that sermon, he doesn’t appear to have softened his antipathy toward LGBTQ people. In a 2019 Facebook post, he shared a message that purports it’s not possible to be a gay Christian.

His church’s website says that it’s God’s “biological design for marriage as only being between one man and one woman” and that they “affirm the headship of the husband and the submission of the wife as a living demonstration of Christ in His relationship to the church.”

It’s unclear why Lake would choose Erickson to appear in this ad; presumably, she could have found another small business owner who supports her campaign to complain about inflation and blame it on state government.

Lake made headlines earlier this year for her anti-LGBTQ statements about drag queens, who she claimed were being “welcomed” into schools.

“They kicked God out of schools and welcomed the Drag Queens,” she wrote on social media this past June. “They took down our Flag and replaced it with a rainbow. They seek to disarm Americans and militarize our Enemies. Let’s bring back the basics: God, Guns & Glory.”

Drag queen Richard Stevens – who goes by Barbra Seville on stage – wrote on Facebook that Lake took her kid to one of his drag shows. When Lake’s lawyer told Stevens to stop talking about Lake’s love of drag from before she was a Republican politician or else she might file a lawsuit, his lawyer wrote a hilariously fearless letter in response.

“[Your cease and desist letter] was served on Richard just as he was going to perform at a family-friendly Drag Brunch — the kind of event that Ms. Lake used to enjoy,” the letter began. “Ms. Lake even hired Richard to perform as Barbra Seville at a baby shower for another well-known news anchor. We have the evidence.”

“Something happened to [Lake] to make her mean, angry and sullen. Now Kari is a bully,” the letter continued. “The reservoir of goodwill she had built up over the years as a cherished news anchor — well, that’s been drained to the point where we might as well just refer to her now as Kari Puddles.”

“To be clear: Mr. Stevens will not ‘cease and desist,’” the letter concluded. “If Ms. Lakes moves forward with filing a suit… I cannot imagine your client will be happy to revisit all the times she spent with Barbra Seville when I depose Ms. Lake.”

Lake’s campaign said that Stevens performed as a “Marilyn Monroe impersonator” at a party, which means that he wasn’t doing a drag show. She also said that drag is “sexualizing young children.”

“The event in question was a party at someone else’s house, and the performer was there as a Marilyn Monroe impersonator,” her campaign said in a statement. “It wasn’t a drag show, and the issue we’re talking about isn’t adults attending drag shows, either. The issue is activists sexualizing young children, and that’s got to stop.”

Lake is a 2020 election denier, falsely claiming that Donald Trump in fact won the election and President Joe Biden stole it with a massive, interstate conspiracy that left no evidence.





















AMERIKA

If ‘democracy is on the ballot,’ why don’t voters seem to care?


·Senior Editor

“The 360” shows you diverse perspectives on the day’s top stories and debates

What’s happening

Ever since the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, Democrats have persistently made the case that former President Donald Trump and his backers in the Republican Party pose a unique threat to the stability of American democracy.

Despite all these warnings — and the presence of hundreds of election-denying GOP candidates on the ballot across the country — voters do not appear to be treating perceived threats to the electoral system as a key issue in the November midterms.

It’s not that they don’t believe the threats are real, but they largely view them as less important than other problems. In a New York Times/Siena College poll released earlier this month, 71 percent of voters said they believe democracy is at risk, but only 7 percent said they view it as the most important issue facing the country.

Part of the reason for the disconnect is that a significant share of those who worry about the validity of elections are Republican voters who have bought into Trump’s thoroughly debunked claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent. But even among Democratic voters, protecting democracy consistently rates below issues like the economy and inflation.

Many election experts say there’s ample reason to believe that Democrats’ concerns about the future of U.S. democracy are well-founded. On top of documented efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election, about 60 percent of Americans will have an election denier on their midterm ballot, according to a tally compiled by FiveThirtyEight. Some of those candidates are running for offices such as governorsecretary of state and attorney general, which would give them significant power over how elections are conducted in their states if they were to win. There have also been a number of reports detailing how local officials and poll workers may be preparing to undermine voting procedures next month.

Why there’s debate

If the fate of American democracy itself is on the ballot, as Democrats have repeatedly warned, then why do voters seem to be prioritizing other issues?

The most commonly raised explanation, from experts across the political spectrum, is that voters always put the most emphasis on issues that affect them directly. They say inflation, crime, gas prices and other things that people experience in their daily lives resonate more than abstract concepts like democracy.

Many left-leaning pundits have also made the case that in the two years since Trump attempted to overturn the election, Americans have become gradually desensitized to the GOP’s antidemocratic actions. Others blame the news media for treating the campaign to undermine democracy as just another partisan issue that should be viewed with the same “both sides” lens as debates over tax rates and health care policy.

Many Republicans falsely believe that the 2020 election was stolen. But even among the minority of conservatives who accept that Joe Biden’s victory was legitimate, there’s a widely held view that Democrats have overstated how much danger the GOP poses to democracy — to the point where voters have largely tuned them out. Others on the right argue that Democrats forfeited any opportunity to make that case by allowing problems like inflation and crime to become such dominant issues.

What’s next

Most election-denying Republican candidates are running for seats in deep red districts and are expected to win comfortably. But some of the most consequential races are taking place in swing states like Pennsylvania, Arizona and Nevada and are expected to be extremely close come Election Day.

Perspectives

Many voters consider Trump to be the only true danger to democracy

“As we’ve seen throughout this campaign cycle, Democrats are attempting to run against Donald Trump, who hasn’t been in office for 21 months. But that won’t cut it when pocketbook/kitchen table issues blot out everything else, especially in races for the Senate and the House.” — Joe Concha, The Hill

Americans have gradually become desensitized to the threats democracy faces

“There’s something bigger going on here than just the usual political churn, or even the idea that voters are more motivated by pocketbook issues than amorphous ones like a potential future need for abortion. Voters are adapting to authoritarianism. And that doesn’t just portend a bad outcome for Democrats in November; it suggests America’s democratic future is at acute risk.” — Jill Filipovic, Guardian

Many voters lost faith in American elections years ago

“The bottom line is that democracy itself is broadly perceived as so broken that Trump’s deliberate effort to break it by an act of insurrection is being accepted by an alarming percentage of the population as just another warning light. They see it as no more significant than ineffective anti-inflation policies rather than as a unique threat to our system of self-government.” — Ed Kilgore, New York

Few voters appreciate the threat democracy is under

“Liberal democracy will not make a comeback unless people are willing to struggle on its behalf. The problem is that many who grow up living in peaceful, prosperous liberal democracies begin to take their form of government for granted.” — Francis Fukuyama, Atlantic

It shouldn’t be a surprise that voters aren’t convinced by Democrats’ warnings

“Why are Americans more concerned about inflation than about the catastrophic prognostications of the partisan press and its ersatz counterparts in MAGA-world? Because, sensibly enough, they believe that only one of those problems is real.” — Charles C.W. Cooke, National Review

Overuse has turned warnings into a meaningless cliché

“The phrase a ‘threat to American democracy’ is so commonplace these days that it hardly carries any meaning.” — Emily B. Finley, Wall Street Journal

Democrats have failed to keep the issue at the top of voters’ minds

“While the President claimed Trump’s ‘MAGA’ fans had embraced ‘semi-fascism’ and some Democratic campaigns have run ads warning of an autocratic GOP, Democrats are running far harder on the conservative Supreme Court majority’s overturning of abortion rights and their new law trimming some prescription drug costs.” — Stephen Collinson, CNN

The media isn’t making the danger clear to voters

“The results of next month’s voting will determine if there are any more real elections in the future. … And yet these issues are almost totally absent from mainstream political reporting, and apparently, the minds of swing voters who will decide the control of Congress and statewide offices around the country.” — Ryan Cooper, MSNBC

The news media has treated attacks on democracy as just another partisan debate

“Because the news media tries to cover both parties equally critically, the story of U.S. politics today is often depicted as an extreme Republican Party facing an almost-as-extreme Democratic Party dominated by over-educated elites who are hostile to the values of average Americans and leave them little choice but to vote Republican. But that’s an attempt to turn a one-sided problem into a two-sided one.” — Perry Bacon Jr., Washington Post

Voters always prioritize the concrete issues that affect them directly

“Americans these days — and particularly the swing voters who are being watched and courted so assiduously — are underwhelmed by abstract ideas, faraway crises or problems scheduled to materialize sometime in the future. With some exceptions, they’re focused on the here and now. Pocketbook issues. Quality-of-life issues. Better schools. Safer streets. The cost of living.” — Nicholas Goldberg, Los Angeles Times

As elected Republicans continue effort to kill DACA, most Americans support continuing program


Gabe Ortiz
Daily Kos Staff
Friday October 28, 2022 · 

Oscar Barrera-Gonzalez (L) receives help from volunteer Ivan Corpeno in filing his application for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program at Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles on Aug. 15, 2012, in Los Angeles, California.

Republicans’ efforts to kill the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and deport young undocumented immigrants overwhelmingly fly in the face of public opinion. New Data for Progress polling shows that voters support continuing the popular and successful policy by a nearly 30-point margin, 58%-31%.

Support is strongest among Democrats, at 79%, followed by independents, at 58%. “Though a slight majority of Republicans oppose continuing DACA, 37 percent support keeping it in place,” Data for Progress said. Elected Republicans led by very corrupt Texas attorney general Ken Paxton have been steadily working to end the successful and popular immigration program through the courts. Currently, no new applications are being accepted.

“Though DACA is a critical program for young immigrants, it is only a temporary solution,” Data for Progress said. Its polling shows that voters also strongly support permanent relief.

RELATED STORY: Thousands of teachers could be pushed out of their jobs due to GOP litigation seeking to end DACA

“Meanwhile, the American Dream and Promise Act, passed by the House of Representatives in 2021, would provide a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers,” Data for Progress said. “By a +32-point margin, voters back a policy to provide DACA recipients the opportunity to gain U.S. citizenship.”

Support is strongest from Democrats, again at 79%. Support from independents ticks slightly up from DACA, at 59%. Support from Republicans also goes up, to 43% compared to DACA’s 37%.

“Protecting Dreamers is also politically popular. A plurality of voters (47 percent), including 57 percent of Latina/o voters, say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who supports a path to citizenship for DACA recipients. Only 29 percent of voters say this would make them less likely to vote for that candidate, while 24 percent state it would not impact their decision.”

A second poll that was conducted by Democratic and Republican firms and released by immigration reform advocacy group FWD.us this week also shows strong support for a package that pairs permanent protections for DACA recipients with border security. “By a 50-point margin, voters support the proposed legislation (71% support / 21% oppose) with a plurality (45%) strongly supporting.” What that “border security” would look like when the number of border agents has already doubled from 2003 is unclear, and could hurt border communities affected by border militarization even more.

But following a conservative appeals court ruling that sent the DACA case back to anti-immigrant Texas judge Andrew Hanen, affected individuals said lawmakers must do their jobs and come together to figure out and pass legislative relief by year’s end.

“Right now, Congress needs to cut a bi-partisan deal and pass immigration legislation in 2022, that means averting the weekly loss of 5,000 work authorizations from DACA recipients over the next two years should the program be terminated,” DACA recipients Erika Andiola and Astrid Silva wrote at Univision. “Congressional staffers should the Fifth Circuit ruling as a wake-up call and ensure their bosses (whether they’re seeking re-election or not) do not waste any (and perhaps the only) opportunity to pass immigration legislation—including the upcoming lame duck session of Congress.”

Among the thousands of DACA beneficiaries who will lose their relief every week when Republicans end DACA through the courts and if Congress doesn’t act are 9,000 educators. Republicans are trying to force thousands of teachers out of their jobs as the nation also faces a teacher shortage.

Maria Rocha has taught students pre-K through sixth grade and worked as a nanny and housekeeper before becoming an educator. She told Bloomberg that she “saw the lack of teachers that looked like me, that were from my community, that related to the students. There’s a science behind teaching. I’m fascinated with teaching kids how to say thank you, how to blow your nose, how to start reading.”

DUCK AND COVER
Will Putin Drop a Nuclear Bomb on Ukraine? Here's What Americans Think
10/29/22 

More than half of Americans believe Russia using a nuclear bomb in Ukraine is either a "realistic" or "very realistic" scenario, according to an exclusive Newsweek poll.

When asked: "Do you think it is a realistic possibility that Russian President Vladimir Putin may use a nuclear bomb in Ukraine?" 14 percent of eligible U.S. voters said "very realistic," with 44 percent saying it was "realistic."


Another 19 percent said nuclear use is "neither realistic nor unrealistic," whilst just 12 percent of Americans described it as either "unrealistic" or "very unrealistic."


Between October 23 and 24, 1,500 "eligible voters in the United States" were surveyed, with the poll conducted by Redfield & Wilton Strategies for Newsweek.

Above, a nuclear test conducted in Nevada on September 14, 1957 is seen. Inset, Russian President Vladimir Putin is seen at Thursday's Valdai International Discussion Club. More than half of Americans think Putin using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine is "realistic" or "very realistic," according to an exclusive "Newsweek" poll.
CONTRIBUTOR/CORBIS/GETTY

The poll also found 52 percent of Americans think Ukraine should seek to "recover all territory lost since February 2022," before seeking a peace agreement with Russia.

Another 20 percent said Ukraine should regain all territory lost since 2014, which includes the Crimean peninsula, before striking a deal with the Kremlin. In addition, 27 percent of those surveyed said they didn't know.

On Wednesday, Russia conducted major nuclear weapons drills, which were described on Russian state television as practice for "destroying the USA and formerly great Britain." The exercises involved Tupolev Tu-95MS long-range bombers and a Yars 

In a statement, the Russian defense ministry said: "The event was held in order to test the level of preparedness of the military command and control echelons and the skills of senior and operational personnel in organizing troop command and control. The tasks set out during the drill of the Strategic Deterrence Forces were performed in full. All missiles reached their targets, confirming the rated characteristics."

READ MORE

Russian state TV host: Ukraine invasion to become "gigantic European war"

Ben Hodges, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general, has warned it is "very unlikely" Russia will deploy a nuclear weapon, however.

Speaking to the Kyiv Post earlier this week he said: "Russia does have thousands of nuclear weapons and I take the threats very seriously, but I think it's very unlikely that they would use the nuclear weapon because of all the negative consequences they would have to face."

On Thursday, the U.S. Department of Defense released a new report, the 2022 National Defense Strategy, which called Russia an "acute" threat to America.

"Contemptuous of its neighbors' independence, Russia's government seeks to use force to impose border changes and to reimpose an imperial sphere of influence. Its extensive track record of territorial aggression includes the escalation of its brutal, unprovoked war against Ukraine," the report said.

It continued: "Russia presents the most acute example of [potentially escalating to nuclear employment] given its significantly larger stockpile of regional nuclear systems and the possibility it would use these forces to try to win a war on its periphery or avoid defeat if it was in danger of losing a conventional war."

Newsweek has reached out to the Russian foreign ministry for comment.



WHY I OPPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY
DNA evidence frees California man after nearly 40 years in prison


Saturday 29 October 2022
Maurice Watkins spent nearly 40 years behind bars.
Credit: AP

A man who spent almost 40 years in prison in the US – and almost faced the death penalty – is finally free thanks to long-untested DNA evidence that pointed to a different person.

Maurice Watkins, 69, was put behind bars in 1983 for murder and two attempted murders.


But his conviction and life sentence were dropped, nearly 39 years later, at the request of prosecutors and his lawyers from the Los Angeles Innocence Project at California State University.

“I prayed for many years that this day would come,” Mr Hastings said at a news conference on Friday.

“I am not pointing fingers, I am not standing up here a bitter man, but I just want to enjoy my life now while I have it.”

The victim in the case, Roberta Wydermyer, was sexually assaulted and killed by a single gunshot to the head, authorities said.

Maurice Watkins spoke at a news conference.
Credit: AP

Her body was found in the trunk of her vehicle in the Los Angeles suburb of Inglewood.

Mr Hastings was charged with special-circumstance murder and the district attorney's office sought the death penalty but the jury deadlocked.

A second jury convicted him and he was sentenced in 1988 to life in prison without possibility of parole.

Mr Hastings has maintained he was innocent since the time of his arrest.

At the time of the victim's autopsy, the coroner conducted a sexual assault examination and semen was detected in an oral swab, the district attorney's statement said.

Mr Hastings sought DNA testing in 2000, but at that time the DA's office denied the request

.
Maurice Watkins always said he is innocent.
Credit: AP

He submitted a claim of innocence to the DA's Conviction Integrity Unit last year and DNA testing last June found that the semen was not his.

The DNA profile was put into a state database this month and was matched to a person who was convicted of an armed kidnapping in which a female victim was placed in a vehicle's trunk as well as the forced oral copulation of a woman.

That suspect, whose name was not released, died in prison in 2020.

The district attorney's office said it is working with police to further investigate the involvement of the dead person in the case.

“What has happened to Mr Hastings is a terrible injustice,” District Attorney George Gascón said in a statement.

“The justice system is not perfect, and when we learn of new evidence which causes us to lose confidence in a conviction, it is our obligation to act swiftly.”

Tiffany Cross Calls White Women ‘Biggest Beneficiary’ of Affirmative Action Ahead of SCOTUS Case

White women benefit from affirmative action more than any other group, MSNBC’s Tiffany Cross claimed on Saturday during a panel discussion focused on raising the alarm about affirmative action policies being on the chopping block in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in two challenges against affirmative action policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina on Monday.

“Now with the court’s conservative majority, this case has a real chance you guys of dismantling affirmative action in a country where despite this, quote, racial reckoning everyone loves to talk about, we’re still very much on the journey to equity and equality,” the Cross Connection host said before jumping into a panel discussion with former Obama administration counselor Christopher Kang and Damon Hewitt, one of the lawyers arguing against the affirmative action challenges in court.

Hewitt argued on Saturday that relying solely on standardized testing for college admissions has a negative impact on students of color.

“Not only do they privilege family income and what have you, but they’re also literally under-predicting talent and merit among students of color. So schools are depriving themselves of a whole swath of talent of students of color if they only rely on standardized tests,” the attorney said.

In her own analysis, Cross offered the opinion that White women actually benefit the most from affirmative action, eventually showing a graphic of a Teen Vogue article making the same point.

“And the biggest beneficiary of affirmative action? White women,” Cross said. She also argued “legacy admissions” do not benefit students of color.

Kang appeared to agree and blasted the court, saying precedence and law hasn’t changed over the years, only the faces and political leanings on the Supreme Court.

“This is all part of a broader white supremacist agenda that they’re trying to bring through their courts and now they can because they’ve rested control of the Supreme Court,” he said. “Nothing has changed over the last 40 years in terms of the precedent and the law. It’s just the fact that the Justices are different.”


 man, laptop, chart

Jerome Powell, Vladimir Putin, and Mohammed bin Salman are on the verge of throwing the entire world into a massive depression.

[Federal Reserve Chair] Powell’s interest rate increases are compounded by the action taken this morning by Russia and Saudi Arabia, leading the OPEC+ meeting in Vienna, to cut oil production by 2 million barrels a day.

These two leaders of OPEC+ have a visceral hatred of both President Joe Biden and democracy itself — and throwing oil prices to or above $100 a barrel and gas prices above $6/gallon here in the US will have massive political repercussions, handing a sword to Republican partisans who also openly hate democracy.

It will also fuel inflation, provoking even more wrong-headed rate increases by Powell. And it’s not like there aren’t credible voices telling Powell he’s playing with fire.

What, for example, do the United Nations’ Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, and the corporate accountability group Accountable.us all know that Powell and his mostly-Republican colleagues at the Fed fail to understand?

In a nutshell, it’s pretty straightforward: Today’s inflation is caused in large part by the one-off confluence of rebound from two years of depressed demand hitting highly monopolized and fragile supply systems.

To compound the problem, this situation has become an excuse for the world’s largest corporations — particularly the fossil fuel industry giants and their patrons in Russia and Saudi Arabia — to extract the largest profits in history from the rest of us.

Two weeks ago the World Bank warned us, as The Wall Street Journal headline noted, that fixing inflation by raising interest rates alone would be a disaster: “World Bank Warns of Global Recession Next Year if Central Banks Lift Interest Rates Too High.”

This week it’s the United Nations, as noted again by The Wall Street Journal in an article published Monday and titled: “U.N. Calls On Fed, Other Central Banks to Halt Interest-Rate Increases.”

The UNCTAD report, issued the same day as the Journal article reported on it, is blunt in its assessment. The lead paragraph on their report’s home page says it clearly:

The world is headed towards a global recession and prolonged stagnation unless we quickly change the current policy course of monetary and fiscal tightening in advanced economies.

The reason world bodies are talking about the US Fed and American interest rates is that when the US Fed raises interest rates here, other countries have to do the same or their currencies will begin to sink against the dollar.

Rapid devaluation like that can be very destructive to their economies, so what the Fed does, interest-rate-wise, the world must do.

And the world, increasingly, thinks this is going to be a disaster, particularly when combined with Russia and Saudi Arabia’s new actions today designed to destabilize western democracies. 

A Fixed Idea of a Fix

But the Fed persists. Instead of heeding the warnings of “liberals” like the World Bank, the United Nations, corporate watchdog groups, and wise elders (and Ph.D. economists) like Reich, Republican bankster Powell and many of his colleagues around the world are exclusively using the sledgehammer of interest rate increases to try to tamp down inflation.

Raising interest rates has already crippled the American housing market; mortgage companies are laying off employees and going bankrupt in ways we haven’t seen since the Bush Crash of 2008. Refinance applications are down 45 percent in just six months, and houses are sitting on the market longer and longer every week.

Amazon just laid off 100,000 employees, and both Netflix and Google have announced hiring freezes. The signs of impending recession are all around us. Technically we’re already in one, as GDP has contracted for two straight quarters.

But Powell and the Fed are on course for more interest rate increases. Meanwhile, some of our largest and most profitable corporations are on a price-gouging binge that is exploding inflation.

As Accountable.us notes in a report this week, US gasoline prices are up 13 percent for the year, while oil prices have only increased 1.2 percent. In other words, they are screwing us.

Today’s OPEC+ took about 2 percent of the world’s crude oil off the market, a radical action that will explode oil prices and send gas prices spiraling up just in time for the November election.

Meanwhile, corporate profits across the board are higher than any time in American history, as the Federal Reserve documents:

Nonfinancial Corporate Business: Profits After Tax (without IVA and CCAdj)

The explosion in after-tax corporate profit. Graph courtesy of the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Photo credit: FRED

As Reich notes in his excellent Substack newsletter:

Yet the Fed isn’t paying attention. Minutes of the Fed’s July 26-27 policy meeting reveal seven mentions of ‘wage’ or ‘wages’, 17 of ‘labor market’, eight of ‘job’ or ‘jobs’, and not one of ‘profit’.

Inflation and Oligopoly

Inflation isn’t particularly mysterious: It’s simply what happens when prices go up or there’s a decline in the purchasing power of money.  

It can be driven by supply shocks — shortages of essential commodities — as it was in the 1970s by the Arab Oil Embargo. It can be driven by fiscal irresponsibility, as we’ve seen in developing countries. Or it can be driven by an economy that no longer responds to competitive pressures.

Supply shocks arguably began today’s inflation, but it’s the lack of competition that’s sustaining and driving it today.

In an unregulated capitalist system, the first imperative of business is to eliminate competition. This can be done by offering a better product or the same product at a lower price. It can be accomplished through innovation and invention. It can be accomplished by better marketing and promotion.

But the easiest way to eliminate competition is to create monopolies. As I lay out in The Hidden History of Monopolies (forward by Ralph Nader), this is the path that American companies had chosen for them by Ronald Reagan when, in 1983, he directed the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission to essentially stop enforcing our nation’s antitrust laws.

The immediate result was an explosion of mergers and acquisitions, what people old enough to remember the era knew as the “M&A Mania.” Michael Milken, “Chainsaw Al” Dunlap, Michael Douglas in the movie Wall Street were all singing the same tune: Smash together all the medium-sized companies into giant behemoths that would never again have to worry about real or meaningful competition.

By the turn of the century we’d achieved a state of oligopoly, a situation where every industry in America was finally dominated by a handful of companies that worked together like cartels to monopolize markets.

When one airline raises prices a hundred bucks, for example, every other one does the same five minutes later. When one brand of potato chips downsizes their bags by an ounce, all its “competitors” do the same the next day.

As a result, the average American pays — every year — $5,000 more in total for everything from cell service to drugs to internet access than do the citizens of countries that still enforce antitrust laws, like Canada and most of Europe. 

And now these corporate giants, throwing millions into this fall’s elections on behalf of Republican candidates, are using their monopolistic positions to squeeze more and more profits out of the American consumer.

The UN Conference on Trade and Development has a simple and straightforward solution to the problem of corporate price gouging driving inflation. They are explicitly calling on:

…[g]overnments to deploy a pragmatic strategy, including price controls, antitrust measures and windfall taxes on excessive corporate profits and to use these funds to support the most vulnerable.

The Economic-Political Convergence

Instead, the Republican at the head of our Fed is planning to further increase interest rates, provoking the first serious recession during the administration of a Democratic president since Jimmy Carter was bushwhacked by the Reagan campaign late in 1980.

They say the Fed and its chair are immune from political pressure. It’s BS.

In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson famously pulled his Fed chairman, Bill Martin, into the Oval Office and slammed him up against a wall, warning him to stop raising interest rates. Martin had just announced a rate hike coming up and he followed through, but that was it: He didn’t repeat his error for the next three years.

The month after LBJ announced he wasn’t going to seek reelection, however, Martin raised interest rates by a full point. The political pressure was off and Martin reacted.

I’m not suggesting that Biden should slam Powell against a wall, but going hard on the UN’s suggestions is an easy alternative, particularly given the coming explosion in gasoline prices.

When, back in March, Biden tried to reach out to our allies Saudi Arabia and the UAE to ask them to restore the production they’d cut under threat from Trump in 2020, both refused to take his call, according to press reports.

Meteor Blades reported at Daily Kos that The Wall Street Journal laid it out:

The Saudis have signaled that their relationship with Washington has deteriorated under the Biden administration, and they want more support for their intervention in Yemen’s civil war, help with their own civilian nuclear program as Iran’s moves ahead, and legal immunity for Prince Mohammed in the US, Saudi officials said. The crown prince faces multiple lawsuits in the US, including over the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018.

The Emiratis share Saudi concerns about the restrained U.S. response to recent missile strikes by Iran-backed Houthi militants in Yemen against the UAE and Saudi Arabia, officials said. Both governments are also concerned about the revival of the Iran nuclear deal, which doesn’t address other security concerns of theirs and has entered the final stages of negotiations in recent weeks.

The outcome was predictable. Saudi Arabia and Russia are cutting oil production to keep oil prices and profits high, while Biden is attacked from every direction in the US for high prices at the pump. 

Republican politicians grandstand on the issue and hammer it daily into the news, blaming the increased price of gasoline on a president who’s trying to both get Iranian oil back on the market and increase Saudi production. 

The high price of gas and diesel, meanwhile, keep jacking up US inflation, giving the GOP another lead pipe to hit Democrats over the head with.

The United Kingdom — run by a Conservative government — just put into place a windfall profits tax on their fossil fuel industry: Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) should do the same and push it through Congress via reconciliation right after the election.

Similarly, Biden could instruct his DOJ, FTC, and SEC to begin comprehensive analysis of those sectors of the American economy where monopoly and oligopoly are making it easy to price gouge American consumers.

Big Oil, banks, airlines, internet service providers, Big Pharma, cell companies, media operations, and pharmaceuticals are all good places to start.

History shows it is possible to slow — and even stop — inflation without producing a recession. It also shows that overzealous Fed activity, such as Powell is currently risking, can produce a disaster.

Let’s repeat the best of history rather than the worst.

Reprinted from The Hartmann Report with the author’s permission.

Thom Hartmann is a four-time Project Censored-award-winning, New York Times best-selling author of 34 books in print and the #1 progressive talk show host in America for more than a decade.

Video shows alleged Ukrainian drone swarm attack on Russian warships in Crimea

Russia accused Ukraine of carrying out the attack, with British support.


BY NICHOLAS SLAYTON | PUBLISHED OCT 29, 2022

FILE - Russian Black Sea fleet ships are anchored in one of the bays of Sevastopol, Crimea, March 31, 2014. (AP Photo, File).

Russian warships anchored at the Crimean port of Sevastopol were targeted by a swarm of armed drone aircraft and boats early Saturday morning. Russia accused Ukraine of sending the drones, but Kyiv has not claimed responsibility for the strike. 

The coordinated attack, which mixed both armed aerial drones and uncrewed surface vessels loaded with explosives, damaged at least one Russian ship at the strategically important port, which is home to the Russian navy’s Black Seat Fleet, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense.

The sudden early morning attack saw the drones swarm in on the Russian ships, attacking from multiple vectors. The multi-pronged drone assault used at least nine aerial drones and seven drone boats, all loaded with explosives, the Russian Ministry of Defense said, according to the Russian news organization TASS.

“All air targets were destroyed,” the statement said.

Footage that surfaced on social media Saturday morning appears to show the attack from the perspective of the drone boats as they skim along the water, in some cases taking fire from Russian helicopters as they swiftly move toward their targets.


Footage of the attack was captured by the drones and CCTV cameras in the harbor.



It’s unclear exactly how much damage was dealt to Russian ships at Sevastopol, but multiple vessels were in the port at the time of the attack. According to the Russian MoD, at least one vessel sustained ‘minor’ damage.

The water-borne drones themselves appear to be a same kind of watercraft as the mysterious single-engine boat that was previously spotted near the city In September, which our colleagues at The War Zone reported was likely a “suicide drone” loaded with explosives and meant to detonate on impact.


Russia also accused British “specialists” of helping coordinate the attack but did not offer any evidence. The British government denied any involvement, accusing the Russian government of “peddling false claims of an epic scale.”


The drone swarm constituted the “most massive attack by UAVs and remote-controlled surface drones in the waters of the Sevastopol Bay in the history [of the special military operation],” the governor of Sevastopol, Mikhail Razvozhaev, said in a statement to TASS.



As a result of the attack, Russia announced it was pulling out of the agreement to allow Ukrainian grain exports transit through the Black Sea. That United Nations-brokered deal was set up in July and is meant to help get the much-needed grain out to stop famine in North Africa and other regions.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba accused Russia of using a “false pretext” to back out of the deal.

Saturday’s attack is not the first time Ukraine targeted Russian warships and the navy. In April, a cruise missile sank the cruiser Moskva, two months after Ukranian soldiers on Snake Island in the Black Sea told its crew “go fuck yourself.On July 31, a Ukrainian drone strike hit the Black Sea Fleet’s headquarters in Sevastopol, injuring five.

Ukraine has carried out a series of attacks in recent weeks inside Russian-controlled territory, targeting key infrastructure and military targets. Earlier this month a strike damaged the bridge linking Crimea to Russia, killing three people.