Thursday, May 09, 2024

Haitian aid workers worry American Christians donors could worsen crisis

A network of five humanitarian organizations is working to convince American faith-based donors to shift their support away from funding for orphanages to focus on family-strengthening initiatives.


Women and malnourished children wait their turn to be weighed by health personnel at La Paix University Hospital, in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, May 8, 2024.
 (AP Photo/Ramon Espinosa)

May 9, 2024
By Fiona André


(RNS) — As the security crisis in Haiti continues, the humanitarian aid group Haiti Family Care Network is urging U.S. Christian donors to refrain from worsening the situation by donating to orphanages and to redirect their efforts instead toward initiatives helping parents support their children.

“There are actually better ways to care for the needs of children than building and supporting orphanages,” said Heather Nozea, chair of the network, which is part of Better Care Network, based in Guatemala.

In 2021, five humanitarian organizations created Haiti Family Care Network to change how relief for children works in the impoverished, often chaotically led nation. In 2011, the year after a 7.1 magnitude earthquake killed some 300,000, mostly around the capital, Port-au-Prince, orphanages proliferated from about 300 to 754, despite their failures to provide appropriate care for children.

“Everyone assumed that the best way to respond was by building and supporting new orphanages and it became a solution to problems without actually addressing the real problem,” said Nozea, who has worked in Haiti for eight years for Rapha International, an organization that fights human trafficking.

In many cases, parents placed their children in orphanages to guarantee they would receive consistent meals, health care and education. In some instances, children have been separated from their families simply to fill voids in orphanages, ensuring that the orphanage industry would continue to grow.

“More than 80% of them, they have families they can be connected to, so we prefer to call them residential care centers,” said Frédérique Jean-Baptiste, a child protection program manager for Catholic Relief Services based in Port-au-Prince.

The creation of these privately run agencies was made possible in large part by international donations, mostly from American Christians. According to a Lumos report, Americans donated $1.4 billion in the months after the earthquake, the bulk of it from faith-based groups. American Catholics alone were responsible for some $85 million of the total.

A 2017 report by IBESR, the Haitian adoption authority, revealed that only 30 of the 754 orphanages in Port-au-Prince met minimum standards of care. The report said the vast majority presented a risk for children and recommended their immediate closure.

Jean-Baptiste said cases of physical and verbal abuse are frequent in the orphanages. The Lumos report also draws attention to the suffering endured by children with disabilities.

A childhood in an orphanage has long-lasting effects on young people’s development, said Nozea, noting that, with many rules and daily structure, children are not given a chance to develop independence. Sometimes residents’ cognitive and personal development is slowed. Once they leave the orphanages to pursue life on their own, many of the young adults who grew up in orphanages show a lack of emotional, social and life skills.

Nozea said she has seen young adults unable to look after themselves and manage money. “The biggest populations that I’ve seen struggle in Haiti are young adults coming out of orphanages, who haven’t learned the life skills that a child naturally learns as they grow up in a family,” she said.

Armed gangs now control 80% of the capital through acts of terror, regularly resorting to physical and sexual violence and to kidnappings. Since January, 35,000 people have been displaced due to gang violence, and 1,500 have died.


A person lifts a sheet to look at the identity of a body lying on the ground after an overnight shooting in the Petion Ville neighborhood of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, March 18, 2024. (AP Photo/Odelyn Joseph)

This crisis has put additional strain on families’ capacities to provide for their children, and humanitarian workers share renewed fears that the 2010 scenario will repeat itself and more children will end up in orphanages.

In this context, the network has made efforts to convince Christian donors to shift away from funding for orphanages to focus on family-strengthening initiatives. But since many congregations and other donors have strong ties with the agencies they support, diverting the flow of cash is difficult. Many churches regularly bring donor congregations’ representatives to visit the orphanages and meet with the children, cementing the bonds between donors and orphanages.

“When you start to learn and realize that maybe it’s not what’s best for kids, that can be a really hard thing to come to terms with. So we get that, and we’re really empathetic to that. We don’t judge people,” said Nozea.

Direct discussions with pastors and individual donors have proved to be the most efficient in these situations.

“We want to make sure that in this current crisis that Haiti is going through again, that welfare organizations or good folks who want to help do not repeat the mistakes of the past,” said Jean-Baptiste.

Pro-China activists harass Tibetan protesters in Hungary during Xi’s visit

They rip up banners and block the demonstrators with flags of China.
By Tashi Wangchuk for RFA Tibetan
2024.05.09

Pro-China activists harass Tibetan protesters in Hungary during Xi’s visitA Tibetan protester shouts surrounded by Hungarian police next to a Tibetan flag on Gellert Hill opposing Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Budapest, Hungary, May 9, 2024.
 Denes Erdos/AP

Pro-China activists harassed Tibetan protesters in Budapest, Hungary, on Thursday during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit, ripping a big “Free Tibet” banner they had displayed, the protesters said.

The pro-China activists also waved at least 16 Chinese flags to hide from view Tibetan flags the protesters were holding, and blocked a Tibetan flag hanging on a bridge under which Xi’s motorcade had to pass under to go to a welcome reception.

Hungarian police standing nearby did not intervene, the Tibetan supporters said.

“These guys just came and ripped our banner, and they are still allowed to be here, pushing us further and further out,” Chime Lhamo, campaigns director of Students for Free Tibet, told journalists on the street. “Is this a free country?”

After the street encounter, the protesters were followed by what appeared to be about eight undercover police officers on their way to the Budapest airport, said one of the activists.

Tibetan protesters displayed Tibetan flags next to Chinese national flags on Gellert Hill to oppose Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Budapest, Hungary, May 9, 2024. (Denes Erdos/AP)
Tibetan protesters displayed Tibetan flags next to Chinese national flags on Gellert Hill to oppose Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Budapest, Hungary, May 9, 2024. (Denes Erdos/AP)

“Over the last few days, we were followed, harassed and intimidated by undercover Hungarian police, as well as Chinese people and police everywhere in the city,” Tenzin Yangzom from the International Tibet Network, told Radio Free Asia. “Everywhere in the city is swarmed by them.”

“We had come here to peacefully protest Xi’s genocidal policies in Tibet, East Turkistan, Hong Kong and beyond and the treatment of Tibetans, Hong Kongers, Uyghurs and Chinese people,” she said.

Paris protests

Xi arrived in the Hungarian capital of Budapest late Wednesday for the final leg of his five-day European tour that started in Paris and continued in Serbia.

His arrival in Paris on May 5 was met with protests, with Tibetan activists unfurling a large white banner on a bridge that said “Free Tibet. Dictator Xi Jinping, your time is up!” as his motorcade passed under it.

In Budapest,Tibetan protesters tried to hoist another such banner with the same message, this time in black, along with the Tibetan flag, on the Elizabeth Bridge, under which Xi's motorcade would have had to pass on its way to the presidential palace in Budapest on Thursday morning. But the Chinese activists disrupted them again.

Hungarian police headquarters in Budapest did not immediately respond to RFA’s request for comments and confirmation.

Tibetan activists and supporters prepare for a three-day protest in central Budapest, Hungary, on May 8, 2024, prior to a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping. (Attila Kisbenedek/AFP)
Tibetan activists and supporters prepare for a three-day protest in central Budapest, Hungary, on May 8, 2024, prior to a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping. (Attila Kisbenedek/AFP)

Ahead of Xi's arrival, Tibetans had gathered in central Budapest to protest his visit to Hungary and call for an end to human rights abuses in Tibet, which China annexed in 1951.

But Xi’s motorcade managed to avoid the Tibetan protesters in Budapest by taking an alternate route from the airport into Budapest.

“It is very difficult to stage protests here because there are many Chinese spies and police officials who are here,” Lhamo told Radio Free Asia.

Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban, one of Europe’s staunchest admirers of the Chinese Communist Party, has persistently opposed any criticism in the European Union of China’s human rights violations against Tibetans, Uyghurs and Inner Mongolians, as well as its policies in Hong Kong.

Egypt, Jordan reject displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, West Bank

Prime ministers reaffirm stance during news conference in Cairo

Ibrahim Al-Khazen |09.05.2024 -


CAIRO

Egypt and Jordan reiterated Thursday their rejection of the displacement of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi “confirmed the complete rejection of the displacement of Palestinians and the attempt to liquidate the Palestinian issue at the expense of Egypt and Jordan,” Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly said at a news conference in Cairo, alongside his Jordanian counterpart, Bisher Al-Khasawneh,

“Any action that could lead to the displacement of Palestinians from Gaza could extend to their displacement from the West Bank,” he said.

Madbouly indicated that Egypt “is trying to reach a Gaza cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas and take real steps to establish an independent Palestinian state.”

Al-Khasawneh said: “I conveyed a message from King Abdullah II to President al-Sisi, confirming the common positions of the total rejection of the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

“Egypt and Jordan reject any Israeli military operation in the Palestinian city of Rafah, and the world must bear responsibilities in this regard,” he added.

The Israeli army seized control on Tuesday of the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing on the border with Egypt -- a vital route for humanitarian aid into the besieged territory.

The move came one day after the army issued evacuation orders for Palestinians in eastern Rafah -- a move widely seen as a prelude to Israel's long-feared attack on the city, where 1.5 million displaced Palestinians have sheltered.

Israel has pounded the Gaza Strip in retaliation for an Oct. 7 attack by Hamas which killed less than 1,200 people.

More than 34,900 Palestinians have since been killed in Gaza, the vast majority of whom have been women and children, and 78,500 injured, according to Palestinian health authorities.

Seven months into the Israeli onslaught, vast swathes of Gaza lay in ruins, pushing 85% of the enclave’s population into internal displacement amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine, according to the UN.

Israel is accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice. An interim ruling in January said it is "plausible" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and ordered Tel Aviv to stop such acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.

*Writing by Mohammad Sio in Istanbul
Eurovision organisers will not ‘censor’ audience if Israel is booed again


Eden Golan of Israel performs the song Hurricane during the dress rehearsal 
(Martin Meissner/AP)

By Charlotte McLaughlin, PA Senior Entertainment Reporter in Malmo, Sweden
Today 

Eurovision Song Contest organisers have said they will not “censor” the audience at the second semi-final in Malmo, Sweden after Israel’s entry Eden Golan was booed during rehearsals.

Golan will be one of the last performers at Malmo Arena with her song Hurricane, which was reworked from an earlier track called October Rain, thought to be a reference to the date of the Hamas attack on Israel in which hundreds of people were kidnapped and killed.

She was booed by some of the spectators watching rehearsals on Wednesday and there were reportedly shouts of “free Palestine”.



“Just like in all major TV productions with an audience, SVT work on the broadcast sound to even out the levels for TV viewers,” a statement from the Eurovision organisers, including Swedish host broadcaster SVT, said.

“This is solely to achieve as balanced a sound mix as possible for the audience; and SVT do not censor sound from the arena audience.

“The same principle applies to all competing performances and opening and interval acts.

“The EBU (European Broadcasting Union) and SVT encourage all audiences to attend in the spirit of the contest, embracing its values of inclusivity, celebrating diversity and being United By Music.”

Earlier in the day, Greta Thunberg, 21, was at the Stop Israel demonstration, between Stortorget and Molleplatsen in the centre of the Swedish city ahead of a performance by singer Eden Golan who is representing Israel in the second semi-final on Thursday night.

The environmental activist was wearing a keffiyeh, a scarf commonly used to show support for Palestine, around her body in the centre of the crowd.

During the march, Stockholm-born Thunberg refused to comment apart from telling the PA news agency that she was “good” while flanked by other young activists.

Swedish police have estimated between 10,000 to 12,000 people took part in the protest march.

During the demonstrations, smoke canisters in the colours of the Palestinian flag were set off and protesters, some of whom had dogs, young children and bicycles with them, were carrying signs displaying images of Gaza civilians who have been injured amid the Hamas-Israel conflict.



Protesters hold up a banner with the words in Swedish No To Genocide (Martin Meissner/AP)

At one point, the pro-Palestinian demonstrators were told to go back by police and, following shouts of “free Palestine”, returned to the main gathering.

There was also a banner created with Eurovision-style branding with the words “genocide” on it, an accusation vigorously denied by Israel amid the war with Hamas which was sparked by the October 7 killings and kidnappings of hundreds of Israelis.

The sign was later taken to Malmo Arena, where activists handed out leaflets making similar allegations.

At a protest in Malmo, Rory Flynn, 27, from Kildare, told the PA he is from the Eurovision Irish fan club and has started a “separate movement” to protest against Israel, adding the country’s entry in Sweden is “overshadowing the competition”




Eden Golan of Israel will perform at the second Eurovision semi-final on Thursday (Martin Meissner/AP)

He said: “We feel that it’s important to make our voices heard in the competition in the arena. Others are doing a full boycott – and full respect to people who are doing a full boycott – but we think it’s important that our voices are heard in the arena and around Malmo.”

Mr Flynn also said his group booed during Golan’s dress rehearsals this week, adding: “This song is a propaganda song. OK, it was originally called October Rain and now it’s called Hurricane, you can see there, it’s the same melody; the lyrics have been changed at the request of the EBU (European Broadcast Union), but it is the same song.

“And it is about justifying Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and I think that says it all really, you know, I think it’s quite appropriate to kind of boo that propaganda.”

Fellow Irishman Kieran O’Casey, 71, from Dublin, said he was not a Eurovision fan, but was in Malmo to make a stance against the bombing in Gaza.

“I’m not a hardliner that they (Ireland) should have totally boycotted,” he added.

“I don’t think Israel should have been allowed to participate, not in the face of Israel’s behaviour.



People wave Palestinian flags during a Pro-Palestinian demonstration for excluding Israel from Eurovision (Martin Meissner/AP)

“There’s no way because in a way, it’s a kind of, it’s an acceptance you can do what you want but we’re gonna be pals and sing songs and wear glittery clothes while the bombing was going on. You know, it’s obscene.”

Protesters marched across the city to Molleplatsen Park, with the crowd stretching around a mile long.



People carry Israeli and Swedish flags during a pro-Israel demonstration to pay tribute to Israel’s Eurovision participant Eden Golan in Malmo, Sweden (Johan Nilsson/TT News Agency via AP)

Malmo-born Adam, who would not give his surname, told PA that the demonstrators were not “against Israelis” but the country’s “politics”.

He also said that there are “protests” against Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu taking place in the Middle Eastern country.

A small gathering of pro-Israeli activists also held demonstrations in Malmo to show their support for Golan.
Union Theological Seminary votes to divest from companies profiting from Gaza war

Union, a private, ecumenical school that serves as Columbia University’s faculty of theology but maintains a separate endowment, is the first U.S. institute of higher education known to divest from the war in Gaza.


Smoke and explosions rise inside the Gaza Strip, as seen from southern Israel, March 17, 2024. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

May 9, 2024
By Fiona Murphy

NEW YORK (RNS) — Union Theological Seminary’s board of trustees voted Thursday (May 9) to divest from all companies profiting off the war in Gaza.

Union, a private, ecumenical school, shares a graduate studies program with Columbia University but is independent and maintains a separate, $127 million endowment, is the first U.S. institute of higher education known to divest from the war in Gaza.

“We do it with humility and we do it with a sense of moral conviction,” said Union’s president, the Rev. Serene Jones.

In November, Union’s board of trustees, which includes Jones, hired Cambridge Associates, a private investment management company, to review the seminary’s investment portfolio to identify companies that are financially invested in the war in Gaza.

RELATED: For Muslim student protesters, a sense of purpose mingled with fear

The board will now transition to selling its shares of the identified companies. “We have a very good investment committee who are completely, at a moral level, committed to seeing this through,” Jones said.

In a statement after the trustees had approved the measure, they said, “With respect to companies that are profiting from the present war in Palestine, we continue to
hold these standards high and have taken steps to identify all investments, both domestic and
global, that support and profit from the present killing of innocent civilians in Palestine.”

Chris Marsicano, an assistant professor of educational studies and public policy at Davidson College, cautioned that divesting could take months, or even years, explaining that a single investment group can be invested in thousands of companies at one time. Additionally, the hedge funds that manage university endowments are constantly buying and selling shares and changing their investment strategy for the financial benefit of the institution, which makes an investigation difficult.

Brown Memorial Tower at Union Theological Seminary in New York. (Photo by Chris06/Wikimedia/Creative Commons)

As a seminary, Union already screens its investments based on social and environmental principles. “We don’t invest in any armaments or weapons,” Jones said. “It’s a small thing, but symbolically it’s an important step to take.”

“Although our investments in the war in Palestine are small because our previous, strong anti-armament screens are robust,” the trustees’ statement said, “we hope that our action today will bring needed pressure to bear to stop the killing and find a peaceful future for all.”

At Trinity College in Ireland, the school’s administration recently released a statement promising to “endeavour to divest” from Israeli companies after a five-day encampment led by student protesters caused conflict on campus. Student protesters in Ireland considered it only a partial victory as the university clarifies that divestment “will be considered by a task force as a first step.”

Calls for divestment have been a major demand of students participating in sit-ins and encampments at more than 100 colleges around the U.S. in protest of Israel’s response to Hamas’ terrorist attack and kidnapping on Oct. 7.

Union’s student body actively supported the dissenting Columbia students whose tents filled the university’s main quad in past weeks. Last month, a group of Union students hosted a Communion service in Columbia’s encampment attended by hundreds of people and held a small Passover Seder in Union’s courtyard for Jewish students suspended from Columbia.

“It felt like an ultimate integration of what I have learned at Union,” said Pearl Vercruysse, a third-year Master of Divinity student who participated in the Communion service, “and everything I’ve discerned as what I’m called to do in ministry.”

Credited with being the birthplace of liberation theology, Union has been a leading institution for progressive Christian activism for decades. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, German pastor executed by the Nazi regime, was briefly resident at Union, and the influential theologian Paul Tillich taught there for two decades. The controversial academic and current presidential candidate Cornel West has been associated with Union since the 1970s.

In 2014, Union trustees voted unanimously to divest from fossil fuels after a wave of student protests. Three months later, a group of students occupied a classroom to organize their demonstrations against the killing of Michael Brown by police in Ferguson, Missouri.

Known as the “Love Hub,” the classroom became a center for students and faculty protesting Brown’s death. James Cone, a Methodist minister and theologian who is considered the founder of Black liberation theology, delivered his last lecture in the Love Hub. After inviting the entire school, Cone spoke on the horrors of police violence, expanding on ideas from his 2011 book, “The Cross and the Lynching Tree.”

“The divestment happened just before I showed up, and was swiftly overshadowed by student activism around Ferguson,” said Jorge Rodriguez, a Union alumnus who now teaches history at the school.

In 1968, when students at Columbia created encampments to protest the Vietnam War, Union opened its door to students and faculty who were suspended and expelled. Union’s then-President John Bennett sided with the protesters, agreeing to cancel classes for the rest of the school year. “After the cessation of classes, students created what they called the Free University,” Rodriguez said.

“In this moment,” Rodriguez said, “my hope is that we would see that same phenomena happen again.”

A sign is displayed at the pro-Palestinian demonstration encampment at Columbia University in New York, April 22, 2024. (AP Photo/Stefan Jeremiah)

Union is currently hosting Columbia University professors who continue to teach students penalized for protesting the war in Gaza. Jones says these students are focused on completing their work so there is no reason, apart from violating a university policy for participating in an encampment, that they should not graduate.


RELATED: What we have to learn from students leading the charge for justice

In a letter to Columbia students published in April, Jones called the Union campus “a safe haven” for those penalized for taking part in the protests. “As president, I have your back,” she wrote.

In the past month, as hundreds of students and other individuals have been arrested by the New York Police Department for protesting the war in Gaza, Jones said she has never seen this kind of “military action” taken from a university in all her career. “I’ve never had to face this level of escalation,” Jones said. “I fear for our country.”

Several people detained as protesters block parking garage at Massachusetts Institute of Technology



Pro-Palestinian demonstrators wave flags outside the Stata Center at MIT, Thursday, May 9, 2024, in Cambridge, Mass. (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds)

BY STEVE LEBLANC
, May 9, 2024


CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Police detained several people Thursday at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology after demonstrators blocked a parking garage in their ongoing protest movement connected to the Israel-Hamas war.

Tensions have ratcheted up in standoffs with protesters on campuses across the United States and increasingly in Europe. Some colleges cracked down immediately, while others have tolerated the demonstrations. Some have begun to lose patience and call in the police over concerns about disruptions to campus life and safety.

In Boston, the U.S. city most identified with higher education, students have set up encampments on at least five campuses, including MIT, Northeastern University and Harvard University.

At MIT, protesters have been asking administrators to end all research contracts with Israel’s Ministry of Defense, which they estimate total $11 million since 2015. On Thursday, the school issued an alert just before 2 p.m. saying protesters were blocking the entrance to a campus parking garage and spilling onto a nearby street.

About two hours later, authorities split protesters up and pushed them away from the garage. At least three people were detained. Protesters walked away continuing to chant “free Palestine.” The crowd dispersed, and the garage was reopened by 5 p.m., the school said.




Thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters march in Malmo against Israel’s Eurovision participation


As pro-Palestinian encampments spread to European campuses, UK government seeks to head off unrest

MIT officials said later Thursday that fewer than 10 people were arrested by MIT police during the incident and the Stata Garage and Vassar Street are now open. Cambridge Police were also on hand to help clear the garage entrance, officials said.

Hannah Didehbani, an MIT student and one of the leaders of the protest, said the decision to block the garage was part of a larger effort to bring attention to what she described as MIT’s complicity with the Israeli military. Didehbani said she has been issued a suspension and an eviction notice by the school but said MIT cannot suspend the larger student movement.

“They’d much rather do those things than cut ties to a state that is currently enacting a genocide,” she said.

The pro-Palestinian protest movement began nearly three weeks ago at Columbia University in New York City. It has since swept college campuses nationwide, with more than 2,500 people arrested.
Spain universities say ready to suspend Israel ties

Spanish universities expressed willingness Thursday to suspend ties with any Israeli educational institution as the Gaza war rages.

The New Arab Staff & Agencies
09 May, 2024

Students participate in an assembly to talk about the protest camp in solidarity with Palestine at Complutense University in Madrid, Spain [Getty]

Spanish universities expressed willingness Thursday to suspend ties with any Israeli educational institution that failed to express "a clear commitment to peace" as Israel's war on Gaza rages.

Students protests have gathered pace across Western Europe in recent weeks with protesters demanding an end to the Gaza bloodshed and to cut ties with Israel, taking their cue from demonstrations that have swept US campuses.

In a statement, the university chancellors' governing board (CRUE) denounced the violence and threw its support behind the protests that have recently popped on Spanish campuses.

Demanding an immediate end to Israel's war on Gaza, they pledged "to review ties and if necessary, suspend collaboration with Israeli universities and research centres that haven't expressed a firm commitment to peace and respect for international humanitarian law."

But the diplomatically-worded statement did not go far enough to appease students at several protest encampments that have popped up across Spain, which have so far been peaceful.


"What we really want is for the government and the university rectors to meet our demands and cut ties with Israel," Sebastian Gonzalez, a 28-year-old law and political science student told AFP at Madrid's Complutense University as protesters were pitching several dozen tents on Tuesday.

"When our demands are met, then we will break up the camp. Until then we will continue resisting here and throughout Spain," said Gonzalez, a spokesman for the protesters.

In Spain, the first protest began on April 29 at Valencia University in the east, with students pitching around two dozen tents to demand "an end to the genocide in Gaza".

That was followed by a similar tent protest at Barcelona University and this week the encampments spread to Madrid, the northern Basque country, Alicante in the east and the southern Andalucia region.

RELATED
Dublin and Barcelona universities set to divest from Israel

The Gaza war began on October 7 when Hamas led an attack in southern Israel, killing more than 1,170 people, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures. Hamas says the attack came in response to Israel's occupation of Palestine and aggression against the Palestinian people.

Israel then launched a blistering air and ground offensive that has killed around 35,000 people, mostly women and children, according to the Gaza Strip's health ministry.

The war has sparked a wave of pro-Palestinian protests that have rocked US campuses for weeks in an intensity not seen for decades, with the movement then spreading to cities in Europe and even Australia.


Spanish Minister Urges Companies To Stop Doing Business With Israel


Spain's Social Rights Minister Pablo Bustinduy. Photo Credit: Pablo Bustinduy, screenshot video, X

May 10, 2024 
 EurActiv
By Fernando Heller

(EurActiv) — Spanish companies doing business with Israel should take all the necessary measures to ensure that their commercial relations with the state “do not contribute to the genocide in Palestine”, warned Social Rights Minister Pablo Bustinduy of the left-wing Sumar platform, provoking a harsh response from Tel Aviv.

According to sources from the Bustinduy‘s ministry, the minister has sent several letters to Spanish companies operating in Israel asking them to inform him of the measures they have taken to help prevent a worsening of the “genocide in Palestine”, Euractiv’s partner EFE reported.

More than 36000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of Israel’s offensive in Gaza following Hamas attacks in October 2023, according to local health officials.

Bustinduy – a former member of the now almost defunct far-left Podemos party – has asked companies to report on the measures they have taken to limit the risks of possible human rights abuses that their activities and business relations could entail in the occupied Palestinian territories, including Gaza.

The letter has been met with surprise in official circles in Madrid and anger in Tel Aviv, contributing to increasingly strained relations between the two sides.

The Israeli embassy in Spain’s capital on Wednesday accused the minister – and other members of Sumar and the Spanish radical left – of levelling a “false accusation” against Israel.

“The demonisation and delegitimisation of Israel, resorting to unfounded accusations, gives wings to Hamas and those who seek the disappearance of the state of Israel, are a clear incitement to hatred and encourage anti-Semitism”, a statement said.

Although the Israeli embassy in Madrid does not mention Bustinduy by name, the communiqué refers to the alleged hostile attitude of the Spanish radical left—Sumar, Podemos, and other regional parties—towards the country.

Israeli diplomatic sources refer – without mentioning any names – to “some Spanish ministers, intellectuals and media” who are said to be enemies of Israel.

The ultimate aim of the controversial letter, according to the social ministry’s sources, is for Spanish citizens to know what measures are being taken on the ground by companies in the Iberian country that trade with Israel so as not to participate – directly or indirectly – in “the serious human rights violations that suffered by the Palestinian people”.
New serious incident with Israel

In this regard, Bustinduy recalls in the letter that on 26 January, the International Court of Justice(ICC) in The Hague ordered Israel to take immediate and effective measures to prevent “genocide” in the Gaza Strip.

Meanwhile, Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo (PSOE/S&D) expressed surprise at the news on Wednesday.

Cuerpo insisted that the coalition government between Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s PSOE (S&D) and Sumar was “very clear” about its vision of the situation in Gaza and “the importance of maintaining human rights in the area”.

On the other hand, sources in the Spanish foreign ministry told EFE that they knew nothing about the matter.

“This is the first we have heard of this letter. We don’t understand what (Minister Bustinduy) means (when he talks about) ‘The government’. We don’t know anything about this letter,” the sources stressed.

It is not the first time that a member of Sumar has been highly critical of the Israeli offensive in Gaza.

Spanish Deputy Prime Minister and Labour Minister Yolanda Díaz, leader of Sumar, on several occasions, has publicly described Israel’s offensive as “genocide”, as has the progressive platform’s spokesman and Spanish Culture Minister Ernest Urtasun.

Last weekend, Díaz urged Sánchez that Spain should recognise Palestinian statehood as soon as possible, a promise that the Spanish prime minister has been making for months, which, according to some diplomatic sources, could be realised within a few weeks, perhaps before the summer.

EurActiv publishes free, independent policy news and facilitates open policy debates in 12 languages.

UN shifts discourse on war crime definition of 'forced displacement'

UN altered terminology from 'forced displacement' to 'displacement' for those fleeing bombings after Israeli's military assault on Rafah

Şerife Çetin |09.05.2024 - 



NEW YORK

Following Israel's ground assault on Rafah, the UN began using the term "displacement" instead of "forced displacement" for those fleeing.

It is a change in terminology that could be deemed a war crime.

"Yesterday’s evacuation orders from the Israeli military have already resulted in the forced displacement of tens of thousands of people from Rafah, in southern Gaza," the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said May 7.

UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric used the same terminology in a daily news conference but later noted that people had been "forced to leave to reach safety," indicating the complexity of the situation.

Change in terminology

UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq, during a news conference Thursday, reported that "80,000 people have been displaced in Rafah."

Haq suggested that the number may have reached 100,000 within hours, emphasizing the high tension in the region and the ongoing attacks.

Responding to Anadolu's question about when "forced displacement" is considered a war crime, Haq said war crimes could be defined by relevant legal institutions, and he could not make such a determination.

Haq noted that the UN defines forced displacement as "people being involuntarily displaced and forced to move."

When asked if, according to the UN, forced displacement implies war crimes, Haq responded that courts would make that determination.

On the question if the UN would characterize what is happening in Rafah as forced displacement, Haq replied: "You can see this displacement and you can see how what's happening today meets that definition."

*Writing by Merve Aydogan in Canada

Israeli attack on Rafah would make ‘unspeakable situation even worse’: US senator

'US cannot continue to provide more bombs and artillery shells to support Netanyahu’s disastrous and inhumane war policies,' Bernie Sanders says

Diyar Guldogan |10.05.2024 - 




WASHINGTON

US Senator Bernie Sanders on Thursday warned that any Israeli military operation in the Palestinian city of Rafah would further deteriorate the situation in the Gaza Strip.

"An attack on Rafah would simply make an unspeakable situation even worse," Sanders said in a statement.

As a result of the displacement, 80% of the population of Gaza, about 1.3 million people, including 600,000 children, are sheltering in Rafah, he said.

It is "densely crowded" with roughly 50,00 people per square mile, he added.

"President (Joe) Biden is right – the United States cannot continue to provide more bombs and artillery shells to support (Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu’s disastrous and inhumane war policies," Sanders stressed.


Biden paused last week the delivery of a weapons shipment that included 2,000-pound bombs, which Israel previously used to flatten wide swathes of Gaza. Biden’s decision to halt the shipment was made due to his concerns over Israel's planned invasion of Rafah.

Israel has pounded the Gaza Strip in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack in October, which killed less than 1,200 people.

More than 34,900 Palestinians have since been killed in Gaza, the vast majority of whom have been women and children. Over 78,500 others have been injured, according to Palestinian health authorities. Thousands remain missing.

Seven months into the Israeli war, vast swathes of Gaza lay in ruins, pushing 85% of the enclave’s population into internal displacement amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine, according to the UN. Most of the displaced have sought refuge in Rafah following earlier Israeli evacuation orders.

Israel is accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). An interim ruling in January said it is "plausible" that Tel Aviv is committing genocide in the coastal enclave, and ordered Tel Aviv to stop such acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians.

AOC and Bernie Sanders defend Biden’s decision to withhold military aid to Israel


AOC attacks former Bush administration press secretary and Bernie Sanders attacks Israel’s minister of national security on Twitter


Eric Garcia
Washington DC
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 22: U.S. President Joe Biden (R), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) (L) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY) walk to the Oval Office after returning to the White House on April 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. Biden and the members of Congress returned to the White House following an Earth Day event in Virginia. 
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) (Getty Images)

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont defended the President Joe Biden’s decision to pause military aid to Israel.

Earlier this week, Biden’s administration paused the shipment of 1,800 bombs that weighed around 2,000lbs (907kg) and 1,700 bombs weighing 500lbs (227kg). In an interview with CNN’s Erin Burnett, Biden acknowledged the hold, saying the United States would not supply Israel with weapons if it attacked Rafah, where numerous Palestinian civilians have taken shelter amid Israel’s assault on Gaza.

Many conservatives criticized the move, including Ari Fleischer, the former press secretary for George W Bush.

“Biden has lost his mind. If he does this, he is helping Hamas to survive — and win,” Mr Flesicher posted on Twitter/X. “I’ll take Donald Trump’s mean tweets any day. None of them is as bad as Biden.”

But Ocasio-Cortez, who supports a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and has criticised Israel’s approach repeatedly, defended Biden.

“Biden has not ‘lost his mind.’ He is upholding the word of the US,” she said. “There are 1.3 million people in Rafah. You do not need to slaughter them to go after Hamas. Biden stated the US red line was Rafah. It would make us weaker & the world less safe to let Bibi, or anyone, cross it.”

In addition, Sanders criticised a tweet from Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister, who said that Biden loved Hamas.

“This disgusting tweet comes from Israel's extremist National Security Minister, who was convicted by an Israeli court of racist incitement and supporting terrorism,” Sanders, who is Jewish and who lived in Israel during his youth, posted. “This is the government waging war against the entire Palestinian people. We cannot be complicit in Ben-Gvir's war.”

Both Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez voted against legislation to provide military assistance to Israel.

Elsewhere, Representative Jamaal Bowman of New York criticised his Democratic primary opponent George Latimier for opposing Biden’s actions.

“My opponent refuses to stand with President Biden,” he said. “Make no mistake, this is George Latimer siding with his Republican megadonors over President Biden.”
Despite Biden's pause, billions in US weapons will still flow to Israel

Tel Aviv is slated to receive a diverse array of American military equipment, spanning from joint direct attack munitions — transforming conventional bombs into precision tools — to tank rounds, mortars, and armoured tactical vehicles.



A view of M825 and M825A1 artillery shells labeled D528, the US Department of Defense Identification Code for “white phosphorus-based munitions” in Sderot, Israel on October 09, 2023.
[Mostafa Alkharouf /Anadolu Agency]

Billions of dollars worth of US weaponry remains in the pipeline for Israel, despite the delay of one shipment of bombs and a review of others by President Joe Biden's administration, concerned their use in an assault could wreak more devastation on Palestinian civilians.

A senior US official said this week that the administration had reviewed the delivery of weapons that Israel might use for a major invasion of Rafah, a southern Gaza city where over 1.5 million civilians have sought refuge, and as a result paused a shipment of bombs to Israel.

Washington has long urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government not to invade Rafah without safeguards for civilians, seven months into a war that has devastated much of Gaza.

Congressional aides estimated the delayed bomb shipment's value as "tens of millions" of US dollars. The shipment was supposed to consist of 1,800 2,000-pound (900-kilogramme) bombs and 1,700 500-pound (225-kilogramme) bombs, according to a senior US administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

A wide range of other military equipment is due to go to Israel, including joint direct attack munitions (JDAMS), which convert dumb bombs into precision weapons; and tank rounds, mortars and armoured tactical vehicles, Senator Jim Risch, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters.

Risch said those munitions were not moving through the approval process as quickly as they should be, noting some had been in the works since December, while assistance for Israel more typically sails through the review process within weeks.

Biden administration officials have said they are reviewing additional arms sales, and Biden warned Israel in a CNN interview on Wednesday that the US would stop supplying weapons if Israeli forces make a major invasion of Rafah.

Israeli bombardment in Gaza has killed some 34,904 Palestinians, wounding 78,514 and uprooted the majority of Gaza's 2.4 million people.

Separately, Representative Gregory Meeks, top Democrat on the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, has put a hold on an $18 billion arms transfer of package for Israel that would include dozens of Boeing Co. F-15 aircraft. At the same time, he awaits more information about how Israel would use them.

Biden's support for Israel in its war against Gaza has emerged as a political liability for the president, particularly among young Democrats, as he runs for re-election this year. It fuelled a wave of "uncommitted" protest votes in primaries and has driven pro-Palestine protests at US universities.

None of those weapons agreements are part of a spending package Biden signed last month that included about $26 billion to support Israel and provide humanitarian aid.

Risch and Meeks are two of the four US lawmakers — the chair and ranking member of Senate Foreign Relations and chair and ranking member on House Foreign Affairs — who review major foreign weapons deals.




'Fight with their fingernails'

Ignoring Biden's warning, hawkish Netanyahu issued a video statement on Thursday saying Israelis "would fight with their fingernails" in an apparent rebuff of Biden.

Republicans accused Biden of backing down on his commitments to Israel. "If the Commander-in-Chief can't muster the political courage to stand up to radicals on his left flank and stand up for an ally at war, the consequences will be grave," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said in a Senate speech.

Ten other Senate Republicans held a press conference to announce a non-binding resolution condemning "any action by the Biden Administration to withhold or restrict weapons for Israel."

White House National Security spokesperson John Kirby told reporters Israel was still getting the weapons it needs to defend itself. "He's (Biden's) going to continue to provide Israel with the capabilities that it needs, all of them," Kirby said.

Some Congressional Democrats welcomed Biden's action.

Senator Chris Murphy, the Democratic chair of the Foreign Relations Mideast subcommittee, cited concern about Rafah.

"I do not think it is our strategic or moral interest to help Israel conduct a campaign in Rafah that is likely to kill thousands of innocent civilians and not likely impact Hamas' long-term strength in a meaningful way," he told Reuters.

The US declared its support for Israel since the beginning of the war on October 7 last year. US never holds back in arming Israel, regardless of alarming Gaza civilian casualties.

The United States gives Israel $3.8 billion in annual military dole and often shields its ally at the United Nations.

 


Gen. Wesley Clark to Newsmax: Doubt Israel Needs Weapons From US


By Mark Swanson    |   Thursday, 09 May 2024 

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark told Newsmax on Thursday it's his belief that Israel has shrugged off President Joe Biden's hold on certain munitions, saying he would be "surprised if Israel needs anything from us."

Clark joined "The Record With Greta Van Susteren" to discuss Biden's holding back of munitions as a warning to Israel not to invade Rafah.

"Israel has adequate military means. I think the United States knows that. And Israel is going to do what Israel needs to do, and I think it should do that," Clark said.

"I'd be very surprised if Israel needs anything from us, actually," Clark said, regarding its incursion into Rafah. "I got a great deal of respect for the Israeli armed forces. I don't think they've exhausted their stockpiles. I don't think they're waiting for just-in-time arrival, on anything from rifles to tanks to spare parts or whatever that they need for Gaza.

"But I think they always feel more secure if they have a larger inventory. I think these shipments that have been stopped probably will result in some rundown of those inventories," he added.


Despite Biden’s pause, billions of dollars in US arms for Israel still in pipeline


GOP senator says wide range of other munitions set to go to Israel besides withheld bombs, but laments approval process for them not as quick as it should be
The Times of Israel

Illustrative - IDF tanks are positioned in southern Israel near the border with the Gaza Strip on May 9, 2024. (Ahmad Gharabli/AFP)

Billions of dollars worth of US weaponry remains in the pipeline for Israel, despite the delay of one shipment of bombs and a review of others by US President Joe Biden’s administration, which says it’s concerned the Israel Defense Forces could use them in densely populated Rafah, as is has in other parts of Gaza.

A senior US official said this week that the administration had reviewed the delivery of weapons that Israel might use for a major invasion of Rafah, a southern Gaza city where over one million civilians have sought refuge, and as a result paused a shipment of 2,000- and 500-pound bombs to Israel.

Washington has long urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government not to invade Rafah without safeguards for civilians, seven months after Hamas’s October 7 massacre in southern Israel started the war in Gaza.

The issue has become a major point of contention between Biden and Netanyahu, who insists a ground offensive into Rafah is necessary to fulfill the war goal of removing Hamas from power following the October 7 massacre. Netanyahu’s hard-right coalition partners have demanded that the offensive go ahead, threatening to bolt the government should it instead prioritize a truce agreement freeing hostages and halting the fighting.

Congressional aides estimated the delayed bomb shipment’s value as “tens of millions” of US dollars.

A wide range of other military equipment is due to go to Israel, including joint direct attack munitions (JDAMS), which convert dumb bombs into precision weapons; and tank rounds, mortars and armored tactical vehicles, Senator Jim Risch, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters.


File – Republican Sen. Jim Risch speaks to media about Israel, October 18, 2023, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)

Risch said those munitions were not moving through the approval process as quickly as they should be, noting some had been in the works since December, while assistance for Israel more typically sails through the review process within weeks.

Biden administration officials have said they are reviewing additional arms sales, and Biden warned Israel in a CNN interview on Wednesday that the US would stop supplying weapons if Israeli forces make a major invasion of Rafah.

The war in Gaza was triggered by Hamas’s October 7 massacre, which saw some 3,000 terrorists burst across the border into Israel by land, air and sea, killing some 1,200 people and seizing 252 hostages, mostly civilians, many amid acts of brutality and sexual assault.

The subsequent Israeli offensive, aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing the hostages, has killed some 35,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. The figure cannot be independently verified, and is believed to include both civilians and combatants killed in Gaza, including as a consequence of terror groups’ own rocket misfires.

Smoke billows from Israeli strikes on eastern Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on May 7, 2024. (AFP)

The IDF says it has killed over 13,000 operatives in Gaza, in addition to some 1,000 terrorists inside Israel on October 7. The IDF says 267 soldiers have been killed during the ground offensive against Hamas and amid operations along the Gaza border.

Separately, Representative Gregory Meeks, top Democrat on the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, is holding up an $18 billion arms transfer of package for Israel that would include dozens of Boeing Co. F-15 aircraft while he awaits more information about how Israel would use them, though the fighter jets are not slated to be delivered for several years.

“It’s enough of the indiscriminate bombing,” Meeks charged last month. “I don’t want the kinds of weapons Israel has to be utilized to have more death. I want to make sure humanitarian aid gets in, and I don’t want people starving to death.”

Biden’s support for Israel in its war against Hamas has emerged as a political liability for the president, particularly among young Democrats, as he runs for re-election this year. It fueled a wave of “uncommitted” protest votes in Democratic primaries and has driven anti-Israel protests at US universities, though a recent poll showed over 70 percent of Americans overall believe Israel should launch an offensive in Rafah to defeat Hamas.

None of those weapons agreements are part of a spending package Biden signed last month that included about $26 billion to support Israel and provide humanitarian aid.

Risch and Meeks are two of the four US lawmakers – the chair and ranking member of Senate Foreign Relations and chair and ranking member on House Foreign Affairs – who review major foreign weapons deals.

Historic Israeli desire to ‘go it alone’ is tested by Gaza and Iran


Amir Cohen/Reuters
Israeli soldiers stand atop a Merkava tank near the border with the Gaza Strip in southern Israel, May 9, 2024. Israel's ground incursion into the Gaza city of Rafah has so far been limited.

By Howard LaFranchi Staff writer
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
May 9, 2024|WASHINGTON


As the world grows increasingly critical of the war in Gaza and pressure builds for a permanent cease-fire, Israel finds itself torn between two inclinations: cooperate with the international community that rallied to its side after Hamas’ attack in October, and Iran’s in April, or go it alone.

And as negotiations over a potential cease-fire and hostage release deal continue, and even as Israel ratchets up bombardments and other operations in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, Israel is sending mixed signals over which path it will take.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continued this week to use a blustery “we will go it alone if we must” rhetoric publicly. At the same time, the promised assault on Rafah has so far been limited and targeted – although a massing of Israeli troops outside the city Thursday suggested accelerating preparations for a ground assault.

Israel is facing historic challenges over its instinct to act alone in war. One comes from a rift with its U.S. ally over Gaza. Another comes from the demonstrated benefits of regional cooperation and integration.

The choice facing Israel is pivotal and indeed historic in its ramifications.

Does it hold fast to a fundamental tenet of its founding national security doctrine, that it depends solely on itself and fights its wars alone? Or do shifting geopolitical dynamics – and especially Israel’s desire to strengthen regional ties in the face of confrontation with Iran and its proxies – call for a more cooperative and international security strategy?

Israel was already shifting away from a go-it-alone stance before the Hamas attack and Gaza war, some analysts say, pointing to deepening cooperation with a growing number of Arab neighbors. The question now, they add, will be how far and for how long Israel’s chosen path in Gaza sets back or even reverses Israel’s opening.

“This is an important moment that will have a very significant impact on what was already a process f more integration into the region and more opening up to international cooperation,” says Nimrod Goren, senior fellow for Israeli affairs at the Middle East Institute in Washington.

“I don’t think we’ll be going back to the notion of ‘Israel alone’ that Netanyahu is preaching now,” he adds, “but there is a sense that Israel’s global standing is very much on the line and will face the consequences of what happens” both in Rafah and with the cease-fire negotiations.


Mohammed Salem/Reuters
Palestinians sit next to their belongings in the southern Gaza Strip, May 9, 2024. People are fleeing Rafah after Israeli forces launched a ground and air operation in the eastern part of the southern Gaza city.

For some military analysts, the so-far limited Rafah operation should be seen as pressure on Hamas to accept a mutually palatable cease-fire deal. But others see it as a nod to U.S. President Joe Biden, who has stated his strong disapproval of Mr. Netanyahu’s promised full ground invasion of Rafah, where more than 1 million displaced Palestinians are sheltering.

“Netanyahu may very well be making these moves signaling Israel’s going into Rafah to keep the pressure on” the cease-fire and hostage-deal negotiations, says Benjamin Friedman, policy director and a Middle East expert at Defense Priorities, a realist foreign policy think tank in Washington.
Biden delays shipment of bombs

The Biden administration put some meat on the bones of its Rafah assault objections by last week pausing an arms shipment to Israel, a first for a U.S. president who has long portrayed his support for Israel as complete and unshakable. Mr. Biden ordered a halt to a shipment of 3,500 large bombs over concerns, according to administration officials, that they would be used to strike Rafah.

The president went a step further Wednesday, saying the United States is “not going to supply the weapons and the artillery shells” for an invasion. “They’re not going to get our support if, in fact, they’re going into these population centers,” he said in a CNN interview aired Wednesday evening.

International objections to an assault on Rafah were further underscored by the French Foreign Ministry earlier this week, when it revealed in a statement that President Emmanuel Macron warned Mr. Netanyahu in a phone conversation Sunday that Israel would be committing a war crime under international law if it forcibly displaces civilians from Rafah.

“What we are seeing publicly now is a fight between President Biden and Netanyahu over what the priorities are in the war, with Netanyahu trying to play the Rafah card especially for domestic political reasons,” says Mr. Goren, who is based in Israel. “But there is a gap between public statements and what is happening on the ground,” he adds, “and if you look closely, you see that Israel has up to now been taking into account U.S. and Egyptian and others’ demands.”

The choice Israel faces has been salient at least since March, when the U.S. signaled its growing frustration by declining to use its veto in the United Nations Security Council to stop a cease-fire resolution – an expression of global condemnation that until then had been a red line for the Biden administration.
Common cause against Iran

But then in April, the U.S. assembled and led a coalition of countries – including Jordan, Egypt, and even Saudi Arabia – to help defend Israel against an onslaught of Iranian drones and missiles dispatched by Tehran as retaliation for Israel’s bombing of an Iranian compound in Syria.

At the time, some U.S. officials and Middle East analysts expressed hope Israel would value having international partners – particularly Sunni Arab neighbors that share common cause against Iran – and alter its historical approach as a friendless Jewish state willing to act alone in a hostile world.


Maya Alleruzzo/AP
Families of Israeli hostages and their supporters carry photos depicting those held by Hamas in Gaza in a march calling on the Netanyahu government to make a deal to obtain their release, in Tel Aviv, Israel, May 8, 2024.

Some have even posited that the war in Gaza presents Israel and in particular Mr. Netanyahu with an opportunity to end the conflict and fashion a postwar era that results in greater security for Israel and stronger relations with its Arab neighbors, including Palestinians and Saudi Arabia.

But shortly after the U.S.-led coalition’s successful response to Iran’s first-ever direct assault on Israeli territory, Mr. Netanyahu reverted to a more traditional position of Israeli self-defense unfettered by international entanglements.

“If we need to stand alone, we will stand alone,” Mr. Netanyahu said Sunday before a group of survivors of the Holocaust. “If we do not defend ourselves,” he added, “nobody will defend us.”

Such rhetoric is directed at a particular segment of the Israeli public and at Mr. Netanyahu’s own right-wing coalition government, some experts say.

“Netanyahu likes the optics of defying the Biden administration and saying, ‘We Israelis can defend ourselves and do things on our own,’” says Mr. Friedman. “He knows that if he says publicly, ‘I can’t go into Rafah because of Biden and all the other international pressures,’ he risks losing his coalition, and as a result losing power.”
Eye on Israeli elections

As for the path ahead, Mr. Friedman says he sees Israel staying the course toward greater regional cooperation that it was already on before the war. Where Israel’s execution of the war will have greater impact, he adds, is on Israel’s relations with Europeans and other “liberal Western countries” that place a priority on issues like human rights and treatment of the Palestinians.

Moreover, eventual Israeli elections will play a key role in determining how Israel moves forward in the war’s aftermath, experts say.


For Mr. Friedman, Mr. Netanyahu may be playing for time to see how the U.S. presidential election goes in November. The Israeli leader “may very well be thinking that if Trump wins, he can get everything he wants in terms of the region and relations with the Saudis” without any of the concessions Mr. Biden is seeking on Palestinian governance and an eventual Palestinian state.

Mr. Goren foresees the broad question of Israel’s relations with the world taking a front-and-center role in any campaign before the next set of elections, whenever they occur.

“The war and its impact on Israel’s global standing are viewed one way by the more international elements, the tech companies and the universities and professors, and another way by Netanyahu’s base and others who basically see a hostile world,” he says. “The debate between those two sides will be played and become more important before the next Israeli elections.”