Friday, March 20, 2026

'What jobs?' Trump's buddy sparks firestorm as new plot for robot takeover revealed

Robert Davis
March 19, 2026 9:32PM ET
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos speaks during the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland, Britain, November 2, 2021. Paul Ellis/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo


One of President Donald Trump's corporate allies sparked a firestorm on Thursday after his plans to lead a robot revolution in manufacturing were revealed.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon's Jeff Bezos is in talks to raise $100 billion to acquire manufacturing businesses and automate them with artificial intelligence. The report was published at a time when economic experts at the Federal Reserve had expressed concerns about the "almost zero" job growth over the previous year.

"The Amazon.com founder is meeting with some of the world’s largest asset managers to raise funding for the project," the report reads in part. "A few months ago, he traveled to the Middle East to discuss the new fund with sovereign wealth representatives in the region. More recently, he went to Singapore to raise funding for the effort as well, according to people familiar with the matter."

Political analysts and observers reacted to the report on social media.

"Jobs? What jobs?" military veteran John Jackson posted on X.

"Very curious what he means by AI or if he even knows," journalist Daniel Willis posted on Bluesky. "Because I’m not sure how a language simulator would automate manufacturing? Or if he just means machine learning, what there even is to automate beyond the programming we already give the robots who have done most of the work for decades?"

"The Epstein class is literally trying to take everyone's job and leave people to suffer and die with absolutely nothing," podcaster Kyle Kulinski posted on X. "Billionaires are a national security threat and need to be dealt with accordingly."

"This is the future people like @matthewstoller and @SohrabAhmari see for reshoring U.S. manufacturing," Derek Guy, editor at Put This On, posted on X. "It's reshoring in name only, as it does not create good-paying jobs for regular people."

Read the report article by clicking here.


The Fragment on Machines. Karl Marx – from The Grundrisse (pp. 690-712). [690]. The labour process. -- Fixed capital. Means of labour. Machine. -- Fixed ...




'Oh boy!' Jen Psaki beside herself as 'biggest grift' in Trump admin unearthed

Robert Davis
March 19, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 19, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein


MS NOW's Jen Psaki was beside herself on Thursday as she reported on two blockbuster stories about corruption in the Trump administration.

NBC News reported that former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's top lieutenant, Cory Lewandowski, asked federal contractors to pay him in exchange for growing their contracts with the agency. One company highlighted in particular was the private prison company, GEO Group.

"Oh boy!" Psaki exclaimed. "That is a hell of a story. And that is just one of the stories, just one about a major alleged grift we got today."

Bloomberg also reported on Thursday that President Donald Trump's son, Don Jr., recently invested in a rare earth minerals company at roughly the same time that the company secured a $620 million federal loan. That investment also happened at a time when the Trump administration is threatening to withhold funding for a critical H.I.V. prevention program in Zambia in exchange for more of the country's rare earth minerals.

"While the rare earth magnet startup was only valued at about $200 million when Don Jr.'s firm invested in it, today, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that the startup is now valued at nearly $2 billion," Psaki reported.

Representatives for both Lewandowski and Trump Jr. have denied any wrongdoing.



Epic demotion delivered to Trump in emasculating Morning Joe putdown

Travis Gettys
March 20, 2026
ALTERNET


U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Knesset on the day of Trump's address, amid a U.S.-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Jerusalem, October 13, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool/File Photo

President Donald Trump has become little more than a sidekick to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to a pundit on MS NOW's "Morning Joe."

The 79-year-old president decided to join Israel in a military operation against Iran nearly three weeks ago, but his justification and goals for the strikes have shifted — and Americans are skeptical of their necessity. Journalist Anand Giridharadas said Trump's deference to Netanyahu was uncharacteristic for him.

"He promised no more forever wars and these kind of stupid wars," Giridharadas said. "He promised safety, like just basic safety. He promised crackdown on refugees and the border issue, and he promised costs would come down. By doing this war – I wouldn't even call this a war of choice, it's like a war of whim and maybe a war of like, following your friend off a cliff.

"He is, on all four of those issues, betraying not me and you or anybody else, but his core base. Those four promises, 'No more stupid wars, I'll deal with costs because, you know, refugees and safety, because Iran is a terror state.'"

Trump has said the war was necessary to destroy Iran's missile capabilities, its navy and its nuclear program, in addition to ensuring the regime can no longer arm or support terrorism in other countries. But Giridharadas argued that Israel's goals were completely different in this joint military operation.

"It may not be able to win on this battlefield that we're seeing on our screen, but for the next 20 years to come, we're going to all have to live with the threat of terrorism that has been re-ignited by this kind of treatment," he said. "There are going to be refugee flows when all of this, you know, the Israelis apparently want state collapse. That's one of their goals, I read in the New York Times this morning. Well, that state collapse is going to mean refugees on a giant scale. It's one of the more populous countries in the world."

Giridharadas said the dynamic begs the question of why Trump has taken a back seat to Netanyahu.

"Costs are going through the roof, and I think it's really worth asking as Americans: Donald Trump has demoted himself to being sort of Bibi's VP, right?" he said.

"Like, it's a very strange. We fund Israel's weapons, like, Israel is economically and militarily viable because of American support. So Donald Trump talks a lot about leverage and as you know, is obsessed with the notion of, 'If I'm giving you something, I want to be able to dictate terms,' and his whole policy is now on every personal and and economic elsewhere is about that.

"But in this relationship, he seems to be willing to follow his friend off a cliff," he added, "and very interesting, David Sanger reporting in the Times today about the Israelis having goals that are totally different from American goals, and yet the Americans are just, you know, along for the ride. So I'm curious why someone who is so sensitive to his own humiliation is willing to be Bibi's VP."

Pete Hegseth's plummeting popularity blows away CNN data guru: 'On a different planet!'

Alexander Willis
March 20, 2026 
 RAW STORY


Harry Enten discusses polling data on CNN, March 20, 2026. (Screengrab / CNN)

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been overwhelmingly rejected by the American public, according to a new series of polls — and it's to such an extent that CNN’s Harry Enten was left astounded.

“He's going over like a lead balloon, not just overall, but especially with independents,” Enten said, reviewing new polling data from Quinnipiac and Yahoo. “Past secretaries of Defense at a time of war, this early on in the war, tend to be very popular, [but] just look at this!”

According to the new polling data, Hegseth’s net popularity currently sits at -15 overall and -28 among independent voters per Quinnipiac. Yahoo’s poll produced even lower figures, with Hegseth netting -18 net popularity, and a staggering -33 among independents.

The polls were conducted around two weeks after the Trump administration launched its war against Iran, a period that historically has seen secretaries of defense's popularity rise. That pattern was not repeated in Hegseth’s case.

“Normally, secretaries of defense are celebrated early in wars,” Enten noted. “At this point, Pete Hegseth is anything but celebrated.”

Looking at historical polling data, Enten noted that former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney enjoyed 62-point net popularity around two weeks into the Gulf War, and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, a 58-point net popularity a few weeks into the Iraq War. Roughly the same time into Trump’s Iran war, Hegseth had a -17 net popularity.

“It's just completely on the other side of the aisle, 17 points below water in the average!” Enten said. “He is on a completely different planet, this war is being received completely differently, at least when looking at the secretary of Defense.”

CNN’s John Berman asked Enten whether Hegseth’s unprecedented unpopularity this early on in the Iran war could be due to President Donald Trump’s own historic unpopularity.

“No!” Enten answered. “No, secretaries of Defense under the first Trump administration were popular, especially 'Mad Dog" [Jim] Mattis!”




Killed airman's dad claims Hegseth lied in war brag about son

Travis Gettys
March 20, 2026
RAW STORY



U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth salutes, as he and President Donald Trump arrive at Dover Air Force Base in Dover, Delaware, U.S., March 18, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper


The father of a slain service member denied Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's account of their private conversation.

The Pentagon chief said Thursday that he had met the day before with the families of six military service members killed in the Iran war, and he said they told him to "honor their sacrifice" and "finish the job." But the father of an Air Force crew member killed in a crash characterized their exchange differently, reported NBC News.

“I can’t speak for the other families," said Charles Simmons. "When he spoke to me, that was not something we talked about."

Simmons' 28-year-old son Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons, was among six crew members killed when their refueling plane crashed in Iraq last week. He told NBC News his comments to the defense secretary at Dover Air Force Base were a bit more ambivalent than Hegseth claimed.

“I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary," Simmons said he told Hegseth.

Simmons, a 60-year-old music teacher from Columbus, Ohio, flatly denied telling Hegseth or President Donald Trump that he wanted them to continue fighting the war.

"No, I didn’t say anything along those lines," he said.

A public official who was within earshot of the president's meetings with family members told NBC News they did not hear anyone tell him to "finish the job."

Simmons conceded that he didn't "have all the data" the president and top military leaders had access to, but he said he had "questions" about the war.

“Who wants war?” he added. “Sometimes it’s a necessity, and I just don’t know what’s going on.”

Simmons did say that his son had expressed support for the operation before volunteering for the ultimately fatal mission.

“He said, ‘Dad, I can’t give you any details, but if civilians knew what we knew, a lot of the criticism [of the war] would cease,” Simmons said.


Simmons did credit both Trump and Hegseth for greeting him with warmth and compassion, which he said contrasted with the president's public persona, and he said their sympathy seemed sincere.

“I was pleasantly surprised because the perception is they [Trump and Hegseth] don’t care, they’re going to do what they want to do,” he said. “I got to see a different side of them up close and personal.”



'Now we know' why Trump fired the Social Security inspector general: report

Brad Reed, 
Common Dreams
March 19, 2026


 A person holds a sign during a protest against cuts made by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to the Social Security Administration, in White Plains, New York, U.S., March 22, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Layne/File Photo

A Social Security advocacy organization on Thursday blasted the Trump administration for covering up damaging information contained in an inspector general report released in December.

According to The Washington Post, a report from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) inspector general (IG) about call wait times for beneficiaries was altered to make it seem as though wait times to speak to representatives had been reduced to under 10 minutes per call.

“An unpublished draft of the report... showed that the inspector general had planned to report another metric—called the ‘total wait time’—to measure the overall time it takes for callers to be connected with an SSA employee,” the Post explained. “According to that draft report, in 2025 total wait time averaged 46 minutes to over two hours.”

The Post added that this “information was deleted from the draft after the agency reviewed it before publication.”

Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, responded to the report by saying that “now we know why [President Donald] Trump fired the inspector general at Social Security,” noting that the SSA IG was one of several fired across multiple agencies at the start of Trump’s second term.

Altman then argued that the attack on inspectors general was part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle government transparency all together.

“Inspectors general are the American peoples’ eyes and ears in these agencies,” said Altman. “The Trump administration is undermining that oversight at every turn. Under this administration, the IG has no ability to conduct independent oversight. There is no meaningful check on the Trump administration’s Social Security sabotage.”

Democratic communications consultant Jesse Lee linked the damage to the SSA documented in the draft IG report to efforts by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which went on a firing spree of federal workers last year.

“So DOGE did a smash and grab at the Social Security Administration, breaking into the most sensitive data, firing phone and in-person case workers,” Lee wrote. “Trump appointee waved around an IG report claiming wait times were fine—after burying the real report saying they were up to two hours.”

A Missed Opportunity for the French Left

Source: Jacobin

This month’s local elections in France may not turn out to be such a debacle after all. A far cry from the nationalist and conservative wave that many had feared, left-wing candidates are reasonably well positioned to hold on to power, not only in major urban centers like Paris and Lyon. The first-round vote on March 15 also has the Left holding its own in smaller and midsize cities, and it has a chance to notch up victories in places like Toulouse.

The far right is making inroads, but that’s hardly breaking news. Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National and its allies are on the path to extend their grip in rural areas and traditional bastions along the Mediterranean coast and in the industrial north. They are even now eyeing larger cities like Nice and giving the Left a run for its money in Marseille, France’s second-largest city. This year’s biggest loser will likely be Emmanuel Macron, whose conservative-centrist bloc is set to continue its gradual disappearance from the political stage two years after its self-inflicted blow in the 2024 snap parliamentary elections.

The relative surprise is the Left. The parties that made up the erstwhile left-wing alliance Nouveau Front Populaire (NFP), which won the largest share of seats in the snap elections in summer 2024, are still providing a credible alternative — almost despite themselves.

France’s local elections are upturning one of the main stories of the last year, which saw the unity of the NFP succumb to an internecine power struggle between its two biggest factions: the centrist Parti Socialiste (PS) and Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s France Insoumise (LFI).

For mainstream media outlets and top brass in the center-left establishment, these elections were supposed to be the chance to mark a break from France Insoumise, the largest of the NFP caucuses elected in July 2024. Defying expectations of the party’s weakness in interim non-presidential elections, France Insoumise will win city hall control in bastions like Saint-Denis, a large municipality just north of Paris, and postindustrial Roubaix. It also has a shot in the largely inter-left duel for control of Lille. Elsewhere, its high first-round scores make it a critical share of the electorate that LFI’s estranged partners need to convince before the runoffs on March 22 — support which could prove critical in cities like Lyon, Marseille, and even Paris.

There’s one conclusion that hopefully all parties of the former NFP are paying attention to: after the drama of party struggles settles down, electorally there’s no way around the imperative for left-wing unity. One year before the 2027 presidential elections, and the parties of the Left remain as mutually dependent as ever. This applies both to France Insoumise, which doesn’t always seem to take the measure of its political isolation, as well as to the leadership of the PS, Greens, and Communists (PCF).   

This message may never really land. For months, this election was meant to be a referendum against Mélenchon’s force. Instead, these elections — LFI’s first major foray into municipal politics — has shown that the party maintains the loyalty of a solid chunk of the left-wing electorate, though its difficulty in breaking out of its traditional bastions ought to be cause for reflection. What’s proving worryingly sticky in the public perception of it as a party is its image as a divisive “far-left” grouping, in lockstep with its aging standard-bearer.

But nothing justifies the campaign of excommunication that the centrist PS has waged in its attempt to claw back hegemony over the left-wing space. From the Macronists to Le Pen, France’s chaotic political field has for months come together behind a full-on offensive against LFI, with accusations of antisemitism against Mélenchon and his party coming back in full force in recent weeks.

The mid-February killing of a fascist activist in Lyon also spiraled into a national indictment of the left-wing force, affiliated with activists of the Jeune Garde antifa group involved in the violent confrontation that resulted in Quentin Deranque’s death. Through it all, it was often hard to distinguish between PS spokesmen and their competitors in the Macronist center and far right.

In several key contests, PS and allied candidates now have little choice but to seek support from France Insoumise voters — just the electorate that has been denigrated as irrational and deluded radicals. Under PS leader Olivier Faure, the party is sticking to its preelectoral omertà against a national pact between France Insoumise and the center, rebuffing LFI calls for “anti-fascist” lists in the second round.

Encouragingly, there is some flexibility on the local level. In Lyon, incumbent Écologistes mayor Grégory Doucet has merged lists with the LFI hopeful, placing it in good position to hold off the Right. PS and allied candidates have even agreed to sign up behind LFI frontrunners in places like Toulouse. In Paris and Marseille, the center left has opted to go it alone, counting on lingering divisions on the Right to ensure victory.

The anti-LFI bashing tends to be reined in when push comes to shove. The centrist liberal Raphaël Glucksmann, a possible standard-bearer for the PS in 2027, is the leading advocate for the anti-LFI front. “The Glucksmann line has been defeated in the voting booths. The ‘never-PS’ line of Jean-Luc Mélenchon is also beaten,” left-wing MP Alexis Corbière told Le Monde in reaction to this Sunday’s results. But the persistent problem is translating cool-headed thinking like this into a baseline strategic assumption about the current political crisis. Himself one of the MPs purged from LFI in the lead up to the summer 2024 election, Corbière also serves as a reminder that LFI has not always made its stubborn strength easy for its partners to accept.

This electoral cycle ought to be seen as a missed opportunity. Instead of a chance to build on past gains, the Left has been mired by an internal power struggle that drowned out the outlines of a largely shared program for better municipal life. Calls for more investment in social housing and free school lunches, along with expanding public transportation, were heard from candidates across the left-wing field, from LFI and the PCF to Écologistes and, yes, the PS.

But looking back, it’s impossible to say that these propositions are what this campaign has really been about. Instead, these ideas and many like them became drowned out by reckless acrimony, deepening divisions a year before an election that could well see the far right sail into the presidency.

The price of disunity is that the Left is at best holding its ground, with few signs of the necessary breakthrough beyond its usual bases of support. It’s not hard to see a connection between that fact and another trend confirmed by this year’s vote: the French are voting less and less often. Barring the exceptionally low turnout in the pandemic-era 2020 local elections, this year’s vote looks set to mark a new record, with first-round abstention rising to over 42 percent from the 36 percent of registered voters in 2014.

Harrison Stetler is a freelance journalist and teacher based in Paris

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

With the US feeling to many like it’s spiraling out of control—recklessly piloted by a White House in chaos—NO KINGS on March 28, couldn’t be coming at a better time. It’s a line in the sand.

We are living through a systematic betrayal of the American people. The Trump administration promised everyday costs would drop; instead, our economy is being siphoned away while families choose between heat or eat. We were promised peace; instead, we are embroiled in a war no one voted for. We were told immigration enforcement would target the “worst of the worst”; instead, ICE and Border Patrol are seizing working immigrants from their homes. Even five-year-olds aren’t immune. And then, the unthinkable: US citizens murdered by state actors.

This isn’t a drill. This is an “All Hands on Deck” emergency.

Our mission is straightforward: “Each One Reach One.” Veterans of the resistance movement are already coming to NO KINGS. But to spur on grassroots activists and everyday citizens to reclaim democracy, we need people who have never before stood on a protest line. We need our neighbors, our coworkers, distant cousins, childhood friends.

Last April, three million people across the country attended Hands Off! rallies. Rebranded in June as NO KINGS, attendance grew to five million. By October’s second NO KINGS, the numbers had swelled to more than seven million.

More than 3000 events in all 50 states are planned for March 28, including 1000 cities.

Imagine the impact if every previous participant brought one new person. Imagine if the “Each One Reach One” campaign contributes to millions more attending NO KINGS! Imagine the sight of 10 million people—or more—standing up for our democracy in a single, unified voice. That isn’t a crowd. It’s a mandate.

Many people are frightened. They aren’t alone; we share their feelings. They feel the betrayal of the Affordable Care Act being gutted. They see their hard-working immigrant neighbors illegally rounded up. They see legislation like the SAVE America Act as a brazen, antidemocratic plot to prevent citizens from voting. Many want to act, but don’t know how.

Let’s reach out, following these guidelines:

  • Don’t underestimate their hesitation. Remind them it’s okay to be nervous. Tell them you’ll be right there with them.
  • Validate the betrayal: They are observant; they see what’s going on. It’s not partisan to be angry about the cost of living, rising gas prices, the frightening reality of an illegal war.
  • Help them see what’s involved: Explain where to meet, what to wear, and what to bring. Remove the mystery of the “protest.” Replace it with a plan.
  • Focus on the goal: Remind them that NO KINGS means a government that answers to the people—and that includes them. That the American experiment in democracy means no monarchs.

It’s time to lace up our boots. Start calling and texting people on our phones. Emailing everyone we can.

Seek out at least one person who thinks their voice doesn’t matter and explain to them that it does. On March 28, we show not just the White House—but the world—that when you push the people too far, the people push back.

No War. No Kings. No Way.

 

Source: The Wire

There is this to be said for the honourable Om Birla, speaker of the Lok Sabha: as a No-Confidence motion came to be tabled for his removal on charges of alleged partisan conduct in the running of the House, he lost not a minute in recusing himself from his perch, vowing not to return till he was exonerated.

This was done truly in the best interests of probity at the highest rung of constitutional governance.

But if you thought his laudable example may henceforth be emulated by other worthies in high constitutional office, think again.

Close on the heels of the now defeated No-Confidence motion against the honourable speaker, 193 members, no less, of parliament have tabled a motion to impeach the Chief Election Commissioner of India on grounds of, allegedly, failing to uphold with impartiality the “ basic” constitutional injunction to ensure “free and fair” elections in the republic by favouring, in multiple ways, the prospects of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

This is the first time since the first ever election in independent India that an Election Commissioner has thus come to be proceeded against – surely not a record to write home about, and a circumstance that ought to trouble the Commission to ponder that it should be so, and why.

The citizen wedded to the true spirit and sanctity of democracy would have expected that, regardless of calculations about how much success this move to impeach him may or may not enjoy, the CEC, along with the other two Commissioners would think it fit to follow Birla’s moral example and likewise recuse himself from his position till the conclusion of the impeachment process – a move necessarily bearing on garnering the trust of “we the people” in the integrity of India’s electoral processes.

But no; Gyanesh Kumar clearly is made of sterner stuff.

That the entire opposition, as in Birla’s case, representing over 60% of the popular vote, is ranged against him does little to induce the least introspection in Gyanesh Kumar.

Even if it is his view that the measure undertaken by the combined opposition is merely a case of crying wolf at electoral losses, democratic propriety might have triggered some qualm, after all, for continuing to man an office that must in every circumstance remain, like Caesar’s wife, above suspicion.

It may also be noted that this is the first Election Commission whose operations have had to be so continuously overseen by the top court of the Republic – hardly a certificate of merit for the voter who is looking to exercise the only right that puts her on a level with the highest and the mightiest.

In a cavalier conjunction, the Commission, if anything, has gone on to declare dates for elections to five state assemblies while the motion of impeachment is waiting to be considered in due process.

All that while also the Commission’s insistent Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, undertaken ostensibly to clean up voters lists, has now landed the realm in an unprecedented situation in two of the five states: in West Bengal, some 60 lakh individuals still await the acceptance of their claim to be genuine voters, a determination that must be made before April 6 and 9.

And think that such is the distrust in the operations of the Commission that unprecedentedly this task of voter verification has been assigned by the Supreme Court of India not to Commission workers alone but to the supervision of judges from here, there, and elsewhere, a measure unheard of in our republican history thus far.

There is no telling that this exercise in ensuring that every eligible citizen’s voter claim is recorded in due time will see completion.

Likewise, some 40 lakh residents of Kerala are now stranded in the Gulf countries owing to the war now underway, and we have no instruction as to how the Commission proposes to obtain their legitimacy and vote for the coming election to the Kerala assembly.

We Indians are often reminded of how ours is the “largest” democracy in the world; what we now need rather despairingly to know is that we are also the fairest.Email

avatar

Badri Raina is a well-known commentator on politics, culture and society. His columns on the Znet have a global following. Raina taught English literature at the University of Delhi for over four decades and is the author of the much acclaimed Dickens and the Dialectic of Growth. He has several collections of poems and translations. His writings have appeared in nearly all major English dailies and journals in India.

CENSORED BY YOUTUBE

Source: Journalistically Speaking with Rick Sanchez

In every war, the nation waging the war uses propaganda to rally its people and forces. However, the rhetoric is often dangerous and produces justification for war crimes. We’ve seen Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu use terms like ‘Amalek’ when referring to Palestinians in Gaza. We’ve heard Trump boast about mercilessly bombing the Iranian Navy and sinking their ships. This is supposed to be an ‘excursion’ to make the world safer. I don’t feel safer. So what gives?