Sunday, December 12, 2021

Two more quakes rattle central Kansas just days after a larger tremor hit the area



Mitchell Willetts
Sun, December 12, 2021

Two earthquakes shook central Kansas overnight, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, and Kansans could certainly feel it.

A magnitude 3.8 earthquake was detected shortly after 8 p.m. Saturday, Dec. 11, about 4 miles west-southwest of Gypsum, and 13 miles south-southeast of Salina, according to the USGS. At least 98 people reported feeling the earthquake to the USGS.

A milder earthquake, magnitude 2.5, shook the area about one hour earlier, data shows.

Both quakes came just days after a 4.3 tremor rocked Gypsum the morning of Dec. 8, McClatchy News reported. More than 250 people reported feeling it at the time, with one Twitter user saying it shook their house and knocked things over.

While earthquakes with a magnitude of 2.5 or greater are “often felt,” it takes a magnitude of at least 5.5 to cause damage to buildings, according to Michigan Tech.



Fracking in Kansas

The Kansas Corporation Commission is responsible for regulating fracking in Kansas. The commission enforces regulations on the following: Monitoring of potential seismic effects of fluid injection The reporting and disclosure of the types of fluids used in fracking, at what volume, and a description of each chemical additive used in fracking
https://ballotpedia.org/Fracking_in_Kansas

Areas of Activity

As of May 2017, there were 1,039 horizontal wells that were hydraulically fractured. In 2016, Kansas had 93,464 producing oil and gas wells. According to the Kansas Geological Survey, approximately 244,000 oil and gas wells were drilled in Kansas from 1947 to 2011. Of that total, approximately 57,000 wells—23.4 percent of all wells—were hydraulically fractured. The map to the left shows known oil and gas fields in Kansas as of May 2017. The map to the right shows the location of hydraulically fractured horizontal wellsas of January 2015. Read more







Gas field tremor terror haunts Dutch villages



Although the Dutch are almost done with Europe's biggest natural gas field, the Groningen site is not yet done with residents (AFP/JOHN THYS)

Jan HENNOP
Sat, December 11, 2021

Teacher Daan Schoolland was asleep with his partner when the earthquake struck the northern Dutch hamlet of Garrelsweer in the middle of the night.

"It was like a wave, we could feel it coming towards us," the burly father-of-three recalled. "When I woke up, the whole room was still shaking and my kids were crying in terror."

The 3.2-magnitude earthquake in November was the largest for more than two years in this flat, agricultural region bordering Europe's biggest natural gas field.

And it was the latest reminder that, although the Dutch are almost done with it, the Groningen field is not yet done with residents.

The area had been plagued since 1986 by increasingly strong earthquakes caused by air pockets collapsing after the gas has been pumped out.

Two years ago, Schoolland cheered with other locals as the government announced it would shut off the taps at the field by 2030.

Schoolland felt even more relieved when the timeframe was then shortened to the end of 2022. The Dutch government set up two commissions, one to deal with compensation and another to help residents fortify their homes against future quakes.

But his relief was short-lived.

Shortly after last month's earthquake, the government's top mining official issued a disturbing warning that tremors would continue.

"Even if we stopped right now extracting every molecule of gas, earthquakes will still continue to happen," said Theodor Kockelkoren, the Dutch inspector-general of mines.

"Our estimation is that it will actually still take a couple of decades" for the soft earth below Groningen to finally settle, he told AFP.

- 'Insane' -


That's more bad news for residents like Schoolland, who is locked in a legal battle with one of the government's commissions for compensation to fix damage to his home that he blames on the quakes.

"Look, here you can see how this studio apartment is pulling away from the rest of the house," Schoolland told AFP, pointing to a crack in his home, originally built as a school in 1952 and later converted into a house.

"It's really silly that a judge now needs to say, 'pay these people for the damage the mining company has caused.' It's insane."

Schoolland is not alone.

Locals were "happy" with the announcement that extraction would end, "but in its place came something that became legally and technically far too complex", said Coert Fossen, deputy chairman of the Groningen Bodem Beweging (GBB), the civic group fighting for residents' compensation.

"People sometimes have damage to their homes running up to 100,000 euros ($113,000)," Fossen told AFP. "Yet, they have to fight for the last 100 euros. The process has become very juridical."

Compounding the issue, with Europe battling surging energy prices as it heads into the winter, the Dutch government has warned extraction may temporarily rise in 2022, just as the field was meant to close.

"However, I will only take this step if there is really no other option," Economic Affairs Minister Stef Blok said.

- 'Lost my faith' -


For residents shaken by thousands of tremors, the government's promises ring hollow.

Prime Minister Mark Rutte's administration announced last month that some 27,000 homes need to be inspected, but so far only eight percent have been completed, according to the GBB.

"The Dutch government is struggling to ensure that the strengthening of houses and the repair to damages is done in a very expedient and efficient way," said Kockelkoren.

An economic affairs and climate policy ministry spokesman told AFP "the results of earthquakes in Groningen are complex" and admitted that fortifying buildings "isn't going well".

But Jules van de Ven said the government had made 1.15 billion euros available for new ways of testing whether buildings are quake-proof, and 1.5 billion euros more for cultural, educational and social projects.

Residents also now benefited from a "reverse burden of proof" legal system, which presumes that damage is caused by quakes and it is up to experts to prove otherwise, he added.

The government had also taken over the process of claiming damages from the NAM mining company, so now "people don't need to fight with the company. We do it for them."

But for Schoolland, that's small consolation.

"I have lost my faith in the government," he said. "It's gone."

jhe/dk/imm/rl
Green finance: Sustainability-linked bonds boom as investors demand companies commit to fighting climate change


Sun, December 12, 2021

Financial instruments linked to sustainability will form the next phase in the evolution of green fundraising in Asia, as investors demand companies show their commitment to fighting climate change, according to Swiss bank UBS.

Whereas green bonds designed to fund projects that are environmentally friendly are a "test of the waters" for firms in the sustainable finance space, the more ambitious companies will be looking at issuing sustainability-linked products, said Tasos Zavitsanakis, executive director of the sustainable finance office in Greater China for UBS in an interview.

Borrowers of sustainability-linked instruments need to set predetermined sustainability performance targets that are both relevant and important. If the targets are not met, the debtors will have to bear a penalty in the form of a higher coupon or interest rate.

"It's about them demonstrating their commitment, to an extent that it's an incentive for them to meet their targets. If you don't meet your targets, you're going to have to pay a higher coupon or to buy carbon credits," said Zavitsanakis.

Once companies start putting in place a "credible" transition plan for their business to fight climate change, "naturally [they] can link that to a sustainability-linked commitment. It becomes an evolution," he said.

Since the first sustainability-linked bond (SLB) was issued in 2019, issuance had reached US$8.2 billion globally last year, according to financial data provider Refinitiv. It has ballooned over 11 times to US$92.9 billion this year.

The issuance of SLBs in the Asia-Pacific region excluding Japan had reached US$11.2 billion as of December 6 this year, with those from China accounting for US$2.8 billion and those from Hong Kong amounting to US$546 million, according to Refinitiv. This type of bond was only launched in the region this year.



Amy Lo, co-head of Wealth Management, Asia-Pacific, and Tasos Zavitsanakis, executive director, sustainable finance, Greater China, of UBS. Photo: K. Y. Cheng alt=Amy Lo, co-head of Wealth Management, Asia-Pacific, and Tasos Zavitsanakis, executive director, sustainable finance, Greater China, of UBS. Photo: K. Y. Cheng>

In January, Hong Kong's New World Development became the first developer globally to issue a US dollar sustainability-linked bond, committing to use 100 per cent renewable energy by 2026 for its rental properties in the Greater Bay Area. If it fails to do so, it will pay a penalty worth 0.25 per cent of the bond per year that would go toward carbon offset schemes.

The sustainability-linked features are appealing to institutional and family office investors that are "really serious about allocating assets into sustainable kinds of investing", said Amy Lo, co-head of UBS Wealth Management, Asia-Pacific, in the same interview.

"It's actually tougher for the issuer to issue the sustainability-linked bond ... you have to meet the targets, otherwise you get a penalty.

"We have some investors who are really buying into it, because they feel the company is more serious about delivering what they pitch they are."

Under the SLB principles published by the International Capital Market Association in June 2020, issuers are expected to set performance targets that are ambitious, comparable, verifiable, consistent with their overall sustainability strategy, and go beyond a "business as usual" trajectory.

"Investors with a sustainable focus ... not only look at whether they would get higher returns for those instruments, but also whether their money is really encouraging and incentivising the issuer to do a better sustainable performance," said Gan Luying, head of sustainable bonds in HSBC's Asia-Pacific debt capital markets team. She was speaking at Fitch Ratings' ESG Outlook Conference Asia-Pacific last Wednesday.

Sustainability-linked loans (SLL) with penalties are also gaining traction in Asia, showing that companies are more confident in setting and reaching their climate ambitions, according to Tracy Wong Harris, Standard Chartered's head of sustainable finance for Greater China and North Asia at a media round table late last month. Common penalties included tiered interest rates, purchase of carbon credits or donations to charities that serve environmental or social causes.

The transaction volume of SLLs for Standard Chartered in Hong Kong grew by over three times in the first nine months of the year, compared to the whole of 2020, according to Wong Harris.

Copyright (c) 2021. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

Smashed cars, burnt trees, soggy insulation: Post-disaster cleanup is expensive, time-consuming and wasteful

Sybil Derrible, Associate Professor of Sustainable Infrastructure Systems, University of Illinois at Chicago, 
Nazli Yesiller, Director, Global Waste Research Institute, California Polytechnic State University, 
Juyeong Choi, Assistant Professor, Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering, Florida State University

Sun, December 12, 2021

A collapsed building in Mayfield, Ky., after a tornado hit the town on Dec. 11, 2021. Brett Carlsen/Getty Images

Communities across the U.S. Southeast and Midwest will be assessing damage from the deadly and widespread tornado outbreak on Dec. 10-11, 2021 for some time. But it’s clear that the cleanups will take months, and possibly years.

Dealing with enormous quantities of debris and waste materials is one of the most significant challenges for communities in the wake of natural disasters. Often this task overwhelms local waste managers, leaving waste untouched for weeks, months or even years.

The most destructive and costliest wildfire in California’s history, the Camp Fire, killed 85 people and destroyed nearly 19,000 structures in November 2018. A year later, crews were still collecting and carrying away piles of wood, metals, appliances, contaminated soil, toxic household chemicals, and other debris and waste totaling more than 3.2 million metric tons – roughly the weight of 2 million cars.

Hurricane Michael, which hit Florida in October 2018, left about 13 million cubic meters of debris. To visualize what that looks like, picture a pile of 13 million boxes, each the size of a washer and dryer. More than a year later, crews were still removing the waste.

As researchers who study urban engineering, disaster management and planning, and waste management, we see this as a critical and under-studied problem. Disasters will continue to happen and the losses they cause will continue to grow as a result of climate change, population growth, urbanization, deforestation and aging infrastructures. Societies urgently need better strategies for dealing with the wastes these events leave behind.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Ida, Amy Voisin cleans up a heavily damaged bowling alley in Houma, La. on Aug. 31, 2021. AP Photo/David J. Phillip

Trails of wreckage

Climate-related disasters like floods, landslides, storms, wildfires, and extreme hot and cold waves afflict millions of people around the world. These events have been increasing over time, particularly over the past several decades, and so have the losses they cause.

In 2020, the U.S. experienced a record-setting 22 natural disasters that each caused at least a billion dollars in damages. For 2021, the count stood at 18 such events through early October. The mid-December tornado outbreak doubtlessly will add to it.

Map showing locations of major storms, flooding and wildfires across the US.

Disasters commonly produce thousands to millions of tons of debris in a single event. For example, waste from hurricanes includes vegetation, such as trees and shrubs; municipal solid waste, such as household garbage; construction and demolition materials; vehicles; and household hazardous materials, including paints, cleaning agents, pesticides and pool chemicals.

Debris from wildfires largely consists of ash, contaminated soils, metal and concrete, along with other structural debris and household hazardous items such as paints, cleaners, solvents, oils, batteries, herbicides and pesticides.
Dangerous and in the way

Debris collection and cleanup following a disaster is a slow, expensive and dangerous process. First, crews clear out debris from roads used for rescue efforts. They then move the material to temporary storage areas. No one has yet invented a way to easily sort or contain hazardous materials, so they remain mixed into the debris mass. This poses major challenges for reusing and recycling post-disaster waste.

Beyond direct health and safety risks, debris also threatens the environment. It can emit air pollutants and contaminate groundwater, surface waters and soil. Uncollected debris and waste can hamper rescue and recovery efforts and slow down rebuilding efforts.

As an example, when Hurricane Katrina flooded New Orleans in 2005, it left behind an estimated 75 million cubic meters of waste that interfered with and slowed down recovery efforts. The debris included close to 900,000 white goods, such as refrigerators, 350,000 cars and more than 16,000 metric tons of rotten meat. Cleanup costs were estimated at roughly US billion.

Toward reusing disaster waste

At an expert workshop that we organized in 2019, we identified steps for sustainably managing disaster debris and waste. As we see it, the key tasks are to (1) identify what is contained in these wastes; (2) find better approaches to recycling and reuse; (3) design new technologies to identify hazardous components and sort the different types of waste; and (4) develop markets to promote reuse and recycling.

Today public officials and planners know little about the amount and types of materials generated during disasters – what they contain, in what proportions, whether they are large and sortable versus fine and mixed, and how much can be reused or recycled. Developing new technologies and management approaches that can assist debris characterization, reuse and recycling should be a top priority.


For example, drones and autonomous sensing technologies can be combined with artificial intelligence to estimate amounts and quality of debris, the types of materials it contains and how it can be repurposed rapidly. Technologies that allow for fast sorting and separation of mixed materials can also speed up debris management operations

Turning the problem around, creating new sustainable construction materials – especially in disaster-prone areas – will make it easier to repurpose debris after disasters.

Finally, new business models can help generate demand for and access to waste and recycled products. With proper sorting, some disaster materials can be used to make new products or materials. For example, downed whole trees can become timber resources for furniture makers. Today, opportunities to match materials with markets are wasted – pun intended.


This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It was written by: Sybil Derrible, University of Illinois at Chicago; Juyeong Choi, Florida State University, and Nazli Yesiller, California Polytechnic State University.

Read more:

After a record 22 ‘billion dollar disasters’ in 2020, it’s time to overhaul US disaster policy – here’s how


Biloxi’s 15-year recovery from Hurricane Katrina offers lessons for other coastal cities


Coal ash spill highlights key role of environmental regulations in disasters

Sybil Derrible receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the Illinois Department of Transportation. In Fall 2019, he was a Visiting Professor at the University of Transport Technology in Hanoi (Vietnam),

Juyeong Choi receives funding from the National Science Foundation, Natural Hazards Center, and the Florida Department of Transportation. He is an Assistant Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering.

Nazli Yesiller receives funding from the National Science Foundation, California Air Resources Board, California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and W.M. Keck Foundation.
Officials underestimating 'forever chemicals' lurking in US food: scientists

Sun, December 12, 2021


The American food supply is likely riddled with far more dangerous toxins than the average consumer would anticipate, and scientists say they lack sufficient, streamlined data about the "forever chemicals" lurking in food packaging and farmlands.

While state and federal agencies have improved data collection for PFAS - perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances - in drinking water, only "anecdotal evidence" exists for other exposure sources, such as ingestion of food, inhalation of dust and dermal uptake, Elsie Sunderland, an environmental chemistry professor at Harvard University, told the Subcommittees on Environment and Research and Technology earlier this week.

"While we've made progress in understanding the contribution of drinking water as an exposure source, the relative importance of these other sources is basically not understood," Sunderland said in a Friday interview with The Hill.

PFAS include thousands of toxic compounds linked to kidney, liver, immunological, developmental and reproductive issues. While these substances are most known for contaminating groundwater via firefighting foam, they are also key ingredients in food packaging and household products like nonstick pans, toys, makeup and waterproof apparel.

Sunderland recalled how she and a student were running samples from a contaminated groundwater site, when they decided to test PFAS levels in the compostable food packaging they had with them. They found that the levels were "higher than all the contaminated groundwater."

Scientists say that PFAS-coated packaging is not just problematic for the consumer of that particular meal.

"When you go to throw your compostable food packaging in the compost pile, you're contaminating your compost, which you then send to these big places to be composted," Abigail Hendershott, executive director of the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART), told The Hill.

The E.U. has deemed the dietary intake of PFAS so problematic that several countries have banned it in food packaging, Sunderland said in her testimony. By contrast, data on PFAS exposures in the U.S. food supply are minimal and analytical methods in research are limited - likely leading to an underestimation of exposures.

"Europe is just a little bit ahead and they have more of a precautionary approach," Sunderland told The Hill. "Here we're really into quantitative risk assessment and demonstrating that something causes an appreciable harm before we regulate."

But that type of "reactive management strategy" doesn't work well when targeting chemicals like PFAS, since scientists cannot "catch up" with the thousands of chemicals in the class, according to Sunderland.

The Food and Drug Administration recently undertook a "Total Diet Study" that looked at PFAS content in nationally distributed processed foods, finding that 164 of the 167 foods tested had no detectable levels of PFAS. The FDA's acting commissioner, Janet Woodcock, said in a statement that the administration would work to understand PFAS concentrations in foods, aiming "to ensure the U.S. food supply continues to be among the safest in the world."

Sunderland said she found this study problematic due to its small size and lack of specific information about the samples. The sample size was not representative of the U.S. population, she continued, noting that if the findings were multiplied by the amount of food that people eat, the results not meet the safety levels established by the European Food Safety Authority.

"I also think there's a bit of a mixed mandate that FDA has because they sell food, but they also are charged with food safety," Sunderland said.

The murkiness regarding levels of PFAS in the nation's food supply is not limited to packaging. In many states, like Maine and Michigan, high levels of PFAS have also been found on farmlands, where mixtures of biosolids and industrial sludge have been used as fertilizer, according to Sunderland's testimony.

"Michigan has a rich history of manufacturing and farming, and when those two exist together, there's a concern about the potential for PFAS to enter the food supply," added Hendershott, from Michigan's MPART initiative, in her subcommittee testimony.

MPART was established in 2017 as a body to protect drinking water standards and investigate sources of PFAS in Michigan, including in food chain staples like fish.

"What Michigan's really been doing is a multifaceted approach to evaluating PFAS occurrence in our state," Hendershott told The Hill. "And it all ties into food safety."

Hendershott said that greater federal support is necessary to understand how PFAS enters the food cycle, like when cattle encounter PFAS by grazing on PFAS-contaminated fields, according to her testimony.

"This is the foundation of food supply, going straight to our farmers and ensuring our farmers have good, safe drinking water, they have fields and crops that are not contaminated with PFAS," Hendershott told The Hill.

In addition to a lack of data on PFAS in U.S. food supplies, there are limitations to current analytical methods. Sunderland said that officials, therefore, "are systematically underestimating exposures to these compounds," according to her testimony.

Sunderland stressed the need for new analytical tools to detect PFAS precursors - compounds that break down into PFAS but are difficult to detect - as well as simpler measurement techniques for routine monitoring across communities.

She also called for the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to standardize methods and laboratory intercomparisons, to ensure that data generated across multiple labs is comparable. Doing so, her testimony explained, could help "address the chemical whack-a-mole situation we are now experiencing."

"The 'whack-a-mole' situation is basically - we phase out one PFAS, and then industry introduces a new one that's chemically slightly different and tells everybody it's safe," Sunderland said. "It takes 20-30 years before we really understand, using human cohort data, that this is the problem. And by that time, there's already a new compound."

In his opening statement, however, Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Fla.) maintained that "scientific research is determining not all PFAS chemicals entail the same risks."

Waltz added that "more research is needed to better understand the individual properties and characteristics of PFAS."

"We don't need these chemicals in most of the consumer products, in my opinion and the opinion of most of my colleagues," Sunderland countered, in her conversation with The Hill.

At a congressional level, Sunderland said she would like to see more support for ongoing research at the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, the EPA and the U.S. Geological Survey - looking at exposure pathways for diverse demographic groups in a statistically representative manner.

Hendershott, meanwhile, called for "better predictive models for PFAS behavior," stressing in her testimony that measurement techniques have outpaced risk assessment abilities.

Hendershott added she would like to see more studies on which crops have the least PFAS uptake and whether there are any types of PFAS-resistant crops that could be grown. But such research, she agreed, requires standardization so that methodologies and results are comparable among laboratories.

"There needs to be a lot more study and research on dietary exposure - how that happens," Hendershott said. "Food packaging obviously could be a source. But there are a lot of other potential sources that need to be researched. So it is kind of a black box at this point that needs a lot more study."
‘Pollution everywhere’: how one-click shopping is creating Amazon warehouse towns



Maanvi Singh in Rialto, California
Sat, December 11, 2021

Three generations of Arah Parker’s family have lived in her pleasant, yellow-hued home, where there used to be a clear view of the San Gabriel mountains from the kitchen window.

There used to be – until the country’s hunger for online shopping swallowed the neighborhood.

Four massive Amazon warehouses – ranging from 500,000 to nearly 900,000 sq ft – now surround this historically Black community, as do distribution centers for Target, Under Armour, Monster Energy and Keeco textiles. Her home is now boxed in on three sides by concrete block buildings and the quiet road out front has been paved into a four-lane expressway rumbling with delivery trucks.

The ancient mountains are obscured by a “big, block wall” and more often than not, they are further shrouded by a noxious layer of haze belched up by the trucks.

“To watch the transformation, it really has been disheartening,” said Parker, 39.

The Inland Empire region, where Parker lives, is now one of the biggest national hubs for the e-commerce industry. The changes it has undergone are being replicated in cities and towns across the country.

To feed the one-click, one-day delivery demands of the nation, new warehouses are opening quickly, often in Black and brown neighborhoods. They sometimes chew up entire suburban blocks and communities in the process, crowding roadways with delivery trucks and vans and air space with cargo planes, clouding the air with more pollution.

Located about 60 miles east of Los Angeles, the Inland Empire has the third-largest concentration of Amazon warehouses in the US, according to a database of Amazon facilities Consumer Reports (CR) purchased from MWPVL, a logistics consulting firm.

The people living within a mile of most Amazon warehouses are more likely to be poor and people of color than those living in the typical neighborhood in the surrounding urban area, a new analysis by CR, published this week in collaboration with the Guardian, found.

About 67% of residents in the Inland Empire are people of color. Within a mile of the average Amazon warehouses in the area, 81% of residents are people of color, according to the CR analysis.

Amazon, which is the largest private employer in the region, has continued to rapidly expand its facilities and warehouses here. The company opened eight new facilities in the Inland Empire in 2020 and at least five this year – altogether operating 34 facilities in the area.

In an area that already faces some of the worst traffic and air pollution in the US, the explosive growth of the warehouse industry threatens to exacerbate already high rates of asthma and other respiratory issues. Placed close to the LA and Long Beach ports – the two busiest in the US – and encompassing four major freeway routes, the region is strategically situated, not just for Amazon, but about every major e-commerce and logistics company.

Overall, there are hundreds of warehouses in the Inland Empire.

“Our communities of color have become the sacrifice for one of the biggest, wealthiest companies in the world,” said Anthony Victoria, an environmental justice organizer based in the region. “This is the cost of online shopping.”
‘Billionaires’ dumping ground’

Parker’s neighborhood in Rialto, where her grandfather and great uncle settled during the 1940s, is now reduced to just her family, and one other one down the street. All the other neighbors sold their plots to warehouse developers.

“You should see how they try to race the semis down the street,” said Marcus Gutierrez, who lives near Parker with his sister Maria. “They’ve taken out our mailbox twice,” Maria chuckled. “We have to be careful when we go get the mail because the trucks will take the mail right out of your hands.”

The trucks are everywhere – idling outside sports arenas and high schools. Six out of eight schools in the Inland town of Bloomington are located or will be located right next to a warehouse. Eighteen-wheelers are parked along small residential streets. Semis rattle through the streets, the vibrations over time causing cracks into the homes they drive by.

At the mall in Moreno Valley, shoppers sometimes see a fleet of Amazon delivery vans parked in the lot by the JCPenny.


Our communities of color have become the sacrifice for one of the biggest, wealthiest companies in the world
Anthony Victoria

“It’s everywhere – warehouses everywhere and pollution everywhere,” said Mitzi Archer, the board president of the non-profit Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ). “You don’t see that in Beverly Hills. You don’t see that in the wealthy parts of Los Angeles. They’re coming into communities populated with Hispanic and Black people.”

Archer and her family have been living in Moreno Valley, about 500 feet from the 60 highway and a continuous procession of semis, for nearly three decades. Her son Thomas Winbush Jr, 27, struggled with asthma growing up. And her late husband, Winbush’s namesake, died at age 57, of multiple myeloma – a blood cancer in the bone marrow.

In Archer’s husband’s last days, the doctor told her something that still makes her angry. “She said the type of cancer could be caused by a lot of things, but based on where we lived, it was likely from the environment.”

Her family had been exposed for decades, even before Amazon had arrived. CCAEJ, which Archer joined shortly after her husband’s death, was started in the 1970s to fight for those living near the Stringfellow Acid Pits, a notorious toxic waste site. Elsewhere in the Inland Empire, pollution from the BNSF rail yard in San Bernardino emits a stream of pollution linked with elevated cancer risk.

Billionaires have long treated the region as a dumping ground, said Tom Dolan, the executive director of the faith-based advocacy organization, Inland Congregations United for Change. In fighting against rail yard pollution, local activists had to take on BNSF, a company owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. “Now it’s no longer just Warren Buffett, it’s Jeff Bezos and Amazon,” said Dolan. “And we’re paying their cost of doing business.”

Dolan himself developed chronic bronchitis – a condition that is common among smokers – but in his case was likely triggered by pollution. When tailpipe emissions cook under the sunlight and heat to create a thick layer of smog over the region, Dolan has been in and out of the hospital. His wife Cecilia Miranda Dolan, who used to work as a physical education teacher at the Norton Science Academy, an elementary school located near the Amazon Air Regional Air Hub in San Bernardino, said a third of her students had some respiratory issue. “They could run for just 100 meters before it was too much.”

‘Local leaders sold off people’s lungs’


A recent report from the local air quality monitoring management office found that people living within half a mile of warehouses have higher rates of asthma and heart attacks than residents in the area overall. Across Riverside and San Bernardino counties, which encompass the Inland Empire, 71% of children 10 and under have asthma, according to public health data compiled by the University of California, LA.

“It feels like we’re disposable humans,” said Amparo Miramontes, who moved from LA to the Inland city of Fontana about a decade ago, in search of an affordable home to raise her family during the Great Recession. Around the same time, warehousing began to take hold in the region.

And Miramontes and her whole family believe they have felt the effects. It started when she and her husband began getting frequent nosebleeds. Her then-infant daughter kept falling ill with respiratory infections.

My son had these big, huge black rings under his eyes all the time
Amparo Miramontes

Soon, Miramontes developed asthma so severe that when she became pregnant with her son, she couldn’t breathe in enough oxygen for the both of them. “At one point, my oxygenation wouldn’t go over 60%, no matter how hard I tried,” she said. Her baby was born with respiratory issues. At four months, he needed a nebulizer four times a day. At 10 months, his lungs remained weak. “He had these big, huge black rings under his eyes all the time,” she said, a sign that his oxygenation levels were low and he was anemic.

Her son, now eight, still uses a nebulizer often and an inhaler regularly – but he’s been doing much better since she invested in air purifiers at home and enrolled him in a magnet school about 15 miles away, where the air quality is better. She doesn’t let either of her kids play outdoor sports and constantly worries about the long-term effects on their health. With each new proposed warehouse development in her neighborhood, she grows angrier. Local leaders, she said, “have basically sold off people’s lungs”.

She thinks often about whether she should move, but for now, she wants to stay and fight – in part because she feels it’s the right thing to do. She’s seen the warehousing industry spread, across southern California and the US. “It’s a hard decision,” she said. “Sometimes I’m like, ‘Damn, I’m a horrible mom. I need to leave.’”

To track precisely how much the warehouse boom has impacted air pollution, non-profit organizations in the area as well as researchers from UC Riverside, have been fitting residents with wearable air quality trackers.

Facing pressure from local activists, Riverside, Colton and Jurupa Valley have issued moratoriums on opening new warehouses, while officials assess their environmental impact.

In May this year, the local air quality regulator adopted a rule that will require operators of warehouses 100,000 sq ft or larger to cut or offset emissions or pay a mitigation fee to fund air quality improvements nearby. Over the next few years, to avoid paying fees, warehouse operators will have to show that they have taken steps such as transitioning to electric or natural gas-fueled trucks, installing rooftop solar panels or providing air filters to neighboring schools and child-care centers – changes that regulators say could result in up to 300 fewer deaths and 5,800 fewer asthma attacks from 2022 through 2031.

Amid mounting criticisms over pollution, Amazon has said it is planning to transition to electric transport and delivery vehicles. “We’re deploying 100,000 electric delivery vehicles by 2030 that will save millions of metric tons of carbon and reduce local air pollution, installing solar rooftops at our facilities, including 11 solar rooftop systems in the Inland Empire,” said Amazon spokesperson Maria Boschetti, in an emailed statement.

However, Ivette Torres, a researcher with the local non-profit environmental justice group People’s Collective for Environmental Justice (PC4EJ), said even if Amazon transitions to electric vehicles, they worry that the onus of acquiring new, electric trucks will likely still fall on local drivers and fleets, they said.

And even if environmental protections are put in place, Amazon and other e-commerce companies have created a community that has become so deeply dependent on the industry, that extricating the Inland Empire from its grasp will be complicated, Torres noted.

At San Bernardino’s Cajon High School, the company has funded an Amazon Logistics & Business Management Pathway Program of Study, which helps to train students to work in the logistics industry. Another high school in town, Pacific High, prepares students to work on commercial diesel trucks. Young people are receiving the message “that if they want to work another type of job, they have to leave the area”, Torres said.
‘Worn down by labor, torn down by pollution’

The promise of jobs and tax revenue is what local leaders and elected officials have used to justify the approval of more warehouse constructions. The region had been hit hard by the Great Recession and in 2012, when Amazon opened its first warehouse in the region, the unemployment rate for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area was 11.7%, the highest among US metro areas with populations greater than 1m.

In July, the California attorney general filed a lawsuit against Fontana, challenging its approval of a 205,000 sq ft project that would border a public high school. But Acquanetta Warren, the Fontana mayor who has helped usher in about 60 warehouses and logistics facilities over the past five years – and who critics have dubbed “Warehouse Warren” – has remained steadfast.

​​“We have the cheaper land,” Warren said, and the region is surrounded by freeways – the 10, the 15, the 210, 215 and 60. The warehouses’ presence in Fontana and surrounding towns made strategic sense. And “they’re the key to our economic vitality”, she said.

Warehouse workers told the Guardian that jobs can be grueling. “It’s a lot of wear and tear on the body,” said one former Amazon worker, who badly injured her arm during a shift at a fulfillment facility, quitting shortly afterward.

But she returned to Amazon, because it was the only place she knew she could quickly and easily find work during the Covid-19 lockdowns. “It pretty much was the only option,” she said. Other current and former Amazon workers said they had been discouraged from taking restroom breaks and were pushed by management to lift and load heavy boxes at near-impossible speeds.

Some current and former employees surveyed by researchers at UC Riverside said they permanently lost hearing because they weren’t offered proper ear protection while working in loud sorting and loading centers.

“This is the slow violence of the supply chain,” said Victoria, the environmental activist. “You get worn down by the hard labor. Or you get torn down by the pollution.”

Local residents said they are often left feeling like they are no match against the powerful e-commerce industry and local governments eager to build more warehouses. In a region where Latino residents make up the majority and where many residents are monolingual Spanish speakers, council meetings to discuss new warehouse constructions often lacked Spanish translation.

Ma Carmen González, a community organizer with PC4EJ, said city officials have repeatedly told her she needs to bring her own translators. Earlier this year, even after local activists pushed the San Bernardino city council to assess the costs of providing Spanish-language interpretation at meetings, one local councilman, Fred Shorett, scoffed, “this is an English-speaking country”.

González said she’s grown increasingly angry and disheartened with each new warehouse that’s constructed in San Bernardino. As the industry takes over, “we are the forgotten ones”, she said.


This story is co-produced with Consumer Reports


Consumer Reports has no relationship with any of the advertisers on this site.
Activist group targets Exxon with shareholder climate resolution


Signage is seen at an Exxon gas station in Brooklyn, New York City

Sun, December 12, 2021
By Ron Bousso and Sabrina Valle

LONDON (Reuters) - Climate activist group Follow This targeted Exxon Mobil Corp with a shareholder resolution urging it to deepen its carbon emissions reduction targets, ramping up pressure on the oil and gas company over its energy transition strategy.

The shareholder resolution ahead of the 2022 annual general meeting urges Exxon to publish medium and long-term targets to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its operations and the burning of fuels sold to customers, known as Scope 3 emissions, in order to meet the U.N.-backed targets to limit global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius.

Exxon has successfully blocked attempts to file similar resolutions with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the presidency of Donald Trump. Exxon has not responded to an inquiry on whether it would seek to block the latest Follow This resolution.

Dutch organisation Follow This first targeted Royal Dutch Shell in 2016 and later expanded actions to other top oil and gas companies, gaining growing shareholder support. It is the first time it is targeting U.S. companies Exxon and Marathon Petroleum Corp.

Companies have introduced in recent years climate strategies that vary widely in scope and ambition.

It has also filed new resolutions with Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Occidental Petroleum, and Phillips 66, as well as Shell and BP PLC for the 2022 meetings.

"In previous years, Big Oil's executives have shown that they only move after their shareholders vote for climate resolutions," Follow This founder Mark van Baal said in an investor briefing.

A coalition of Exxon investors said in a report released on Thursday that it wants the oil company to replace its chief executive officer and move more aggressively to slash GHG emissions.

Six months after hedge fund Engine No. 1 successfully placed three new directors on Exxon's board to improve its climate approach, the report also said its newly appointed board members and management team have not done enough to transition to clean energy or overhaul spending.

Exxon earlier this month released its new investment strategy into 2027, increasing spending over the next six years on GHG emission-reduction projects to a total of $15 billion.

Chevron's board "reviews proposals from shareholders in detail and will make recommendations to stockholders about how to vote on each request" in its proxy statement, planned for April 7, spokesperson Sean Comey said.

Marathon, BP and Shell confirmed receiving the resolution. Phillips 66 and Conoco declined to comment.

(Reporting by Ron Bousso and Sabrina Valle; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

Activist Investors Call On Exxon To Replace Its CEO


It seems like "activist" environmentalists investors in Exxon simply aren't ever going to be happy.

A group of these investors is now urging Exxon to replace its CEO and move even quicker to slash greenhouse gasses, despite the fact that Exxon is already years ahead of schedule in doing so on several goals.

But the Coalition for a Responsible Exxon (CURE) says the company has been "too slow" to reshape itself, according to Reuters.

CURE, which has 145 members, said: "CURE awards the new board an overall grade of D- for failing to make any tangible progress on the targets set by us, other shareholders and independent observers at the time of the annual meeting."

The group took exception to the company's corporate goals released earlier this month because the plan "fails to set segment-specific reduction targets for Exxon's midstream and downstream businesses," the report says.

Exxon responded: "The plans support the corporate strategy of continued structural cost savings, investment in low-cost-of-supply and lower-emission products, and further portfolio high-grading, positioning the company to double earnings and cash flow by 2027 versus 2019."

Despite this, CURE is still calling for Exxon's CEO to be replaced.

Recall, just days ago, we wrote about Exxon being ahead of schedule in several of their emission targets.

In Exxon's full corporate plan to 2027, which can be found on its website here, the company said it "plans to increase spending to $15 billion on greenhouse gas emission-reduction projects over the next six years while maintaining disciplined capital investments."


Bloomberg also noted that Exxon confirmed "it was on track to meet its 2025 greenhouse gas emission-reduction plans by year-end 2021, four years ahead of schedule."

Related: The Oil Price Crash Has Taught U.S. Shale A Valuable Lesson

Turning to financials, the oil supermajor said it plans on maintaining capital investments between $20 to $25 billion, per year, through 2027.


The company also said it has repaid $11 billion in debt, to date, in 2021. Exxon says it'll be "comfortably" in its range of targeted debt-to-capital ratio by year end.


These plans, of course, follow our reporting in October that the company was considering abandoning some of its oil and gas projects to appease environmental advocates.

The company's board, we noted in October, which includes three directors nominated by activist investors, had "expressed concerns about certain projects, including a $30 billion liquefied natural gas development in Mozambique and another multibillion-dollar gas project in Vietnam."

The change in strategic direction comes as Exxon's board is facing growing pressure from investors to restrain its fossil fuel investments and limit its carbon footprint. The board is also considering the carbon footprint of the new projects, and how they would affect the company's ability to meet environmental promises it has made.

Back in September we reported that as part of appeasement of the ESG lobby, the oil giant planned on implementing disclosures of shale emissions. The company announced it would start measuring its methane emissions from production of natural gas at a facility it owns in New Mexico. Exxon joins other shale gas producers, like EQT, who already provide similar data.

But for the company's activist investors, it doesn't seem like it'll ever be enough...

By Zerohedge.com
Marshall Islands could be wiped out by climate change – and their colonial history limits their ability to save themselves


Autumn Bordner, Research Fellow, University of California, Berkeley 
and Caroline E. Ferguson, Postdoctoral Scholar, University of California Santa Barbara
Sun, December 12, 2021

The Marshall Islands and other small island nations are urgently threatened by rising seas. Stefan Lins/Flickr, CC BY

Along U.S. coastlines, from California to Florida, residents are getting increasingly accustomed to “king tides.” These extra-high tides cause flooding and wreak havoc on affected communities. As climate change raises sea levels, they are becoming more extreme.

King tides are nothing new for the Marshall Islands, a nation made up of 29 low-lying coral atolls that stretch across more than a million square miles of Pacific Ocean northeast of Australia. By 2035, the U.S. Geological Survey projects that some of the Marshall Islands will be submerged. Others will no longer have drinking water because their aquifers will be contaminated with saltwater. As a result, Marshallese would be forced to migrate away from their homelands.

This scenario is not inevitable. As part of our research on climate justice, we visited the Marshall Islands and interviewed leaders and community organizers in 2018 and 2019. We learned that large-scale adaptation measures that could save both these and other islands are still possible, and that Marshallese leaders are committed to adapting in place. But their nation’s colonial history has made it hard for them to act by leaving them dependent on foreign aid. And, to date, outside funders have been unwilling or unable to invest in projects that could save the nation.

Most of the world’s other island nations share similar colonial histories and face comparable climate challenges. Without swift and dramatic adaptation, entire island nations could become uninhabitable. For the Marshall Islands, this is expected to occur by midcentury.



A radioactive legacy

The Marshall Islands were settled at least 2,000 years ago and fell under colonial rule during the 19th century. The U.S. captured the islands during World War II and became colonial administrator through the United Nations, accepting “sacred trust” obligations to protect the health and welfare of the Marshallese people and promote their political and economic self-determination.

Instead, from 1946 to 1958, the United States tested 67 nuclear weapons on inhabited Bikini and Enewetak Atolls, forcing these and other exposed communities to evacuate their homelands. Thousands of Marshallese remain in exile to this day, largely on tiny islands that are extremely climate-vulnerable or in the United States. Others have returned to their atolls, where radioactive fallout still contaminates the land. All of those exposed to radiation continue to face long-term health risks.


Marshall Islanders are forcibly evacuated from Bikini Atoll in 1948

The Marshall Islands gained sovereignty in 1986. But the U.S. retains full authority and responsibility for “security and defense matters in or relating to the Marshall Islands,” including the right to use Marshallese lands and waters for military activities.

Moreover, while the islands were a U.S. trust territory, the United States did not foster a self-sufficient economy. Instead, it injected large amounts of aid under the assumption that the islands were, in the words of Pacific scholar Epeli Hau'ofa,“too small, too poor and too isolated to develop any meaningful degree of autonomy.” The bulk of this aid went toward providing social services rather than promoting economic development, resulting in an economy based almost entirely on financial transfers from the U.S.

It’s not rocket science

What options does the Marshall Islands have for protecting its citizens from climate change? When we met with former National Climate Advisor Ben Graham in 2019, he told us that it will take “radical adaptation” to remain in place.

To control flooding driven by rising seas, the nation would need to reclaim and elevate land and consolidate its population in urban centers. Doing so is “not rocket science,” Graham told us. “China is building islands by the acre every day, Denmark is planning to construct nine artificial islands. … It’s not new, but it is expensive.”



According to Graham, implementing the forthcoming National Adaptation Plan will cost on the order of US$1 billion. That’s money the country doesn’t have.

But one atoll is likely to be saved: Kwajalein, which is occupied by the U.S. military. Already, the U.S. has made substantial investments to understand how sea level rise is affecting its military assets on Kwajalein

.
Aerial view of islands and islets of Kwajalein Atoll. The Marshall Islands could be among the first nations inundated by climate change. Brandi Mueller/Getty Images
Radical adaptation or forced migration?

Like most island states, the Marshall Islands relies heavily on external funding, often from former colonial administrators. Outside aid, primarily from organizations like the World Bank and donor countries like the U.S. and Australia, accounts for more than 25% of its gross domestic product, which in 2018 was $221.3 million.

These funders exert outsized control over the development agendas of the nations they support, including the power to decide which climate change adaptations are appropriate. In particular, funders tend to impose strict social and environmental safeguards, which limit the range of adaptation options the Marshall Islands and other aid-dependent sovereigns can pursue.

To date funders have only supported small-scale short-term projects, such as flood warning systems and improvements to tidal forecasting. And many have come to view migration as a suitable alternative to the type of large-scale adaptation that would allow nations to survive and people to live and thrive in their homelands. As Ben Graham put it to us, “there are those who say … your population is too small to spend half a billion dollars on it. Just relocate. It’s not worth keeping your culture and your sovereign status.”

But international law indicates that funders should not have the power to decide whether sovereign nations can survive climate change. The international norm of self-determination requires that decision to lie with the affected nation and its people. Yet unless the status quo is changed, the Marshallese face a forced migration caused by outside powers, just as they did 74 years ago as a result of U.S. nuclear weapons testing.
Island climate justice leaders

The Marshallese face overwhelming challenges, but they are not passive victims. The Marshall Islands was the first nation to increase its greenhouse gas reduction pledge under the Paris Agreement. Its representatives have served as tireless advocates for climate action and human rights on the international stage. And the Marshall Islands spearheaded the successful campaign to include a “well-below 2 degrees” warming target in the Climate Accords.

But they can’t fight alone. The nation’s president, David Kabua, recently called upon wealthy nations to live up to their Paris Agreement commitments to reduce emissions and mobilize the funding that vulnerable nations need to survive.

Two Indigenous poets, Kathy Jetñil-Kijiner from the Marshall Islands and Aka Niviâna from Greenland, meet at the source of rising seas to share a moment of solidarity.

For years, the U.S. and other developed nations have failed to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions quickly enough to meet targets in the Paris climate agreement that are intended to avoid warming on a catastrophic scale. They have also failed to meet their pledges to help vulnerable states adapt to climate change. The U.S., meanwhile, has refused to provide over $2 billion that an independent nuclear claims tribunal awarded to the Marshall Islands as compensation for damage caused by nuclear testing.

The Biden administration has a chance to change course. We believe that the U.S. should provide direct support for Marshallese climate adaptation efforts. This would help to redress the long history of use and abuse, broken promises, and unfulfilled obligations that has left the Marshall Islands so exceptionally climate-vulnerable today.

Fact-check: How far has the U.S. cut its reliance on coal compared to other countries?



Duncan Slade, PolitiFact.com
Sun, December 12, 2021, 11:00 AM·6 min read

Senator Joe Manchin: The United States had 589 coal-fired plants 10 years ago, and “we're down to 504. … We are the only nation that has reduced our reliance (on) coal energy."

PolitiFact's ruling: Half True


Here's why: As the U.S. and global economies recover from the strains of the coronavirus pandemic, the demand for energy has outstripped supply, sending energy prices higher.

With energy prices expected to remain high in the near future, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., called a meeting of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, which he chairs, to hear testimony from experts on energy trends.

During a discussion of carbon capture technologies — ways to capture, transport and bury atmospheric carbon dioxide deep underground — Manchin cited several statistics about the trend lines during the past decade for coal-fired power plants.

Manchin said that China, India, and other major nations have increased the number of coal-fired power plants, while the U.S. has decreased its number.

"The United States had 589 (coal-fired plants) 10 years ago," Manchin said during the Nov. 16 hearing. "We're down to 504. … We are the only nation that has reduced our reliance as far as in coal energy."

We decided to check Manchin’s math.

How many coal-fired plants are there in the U.S.?


Manchin’s deputy press secretary, Jeremy Ortiz, told PolitiFact West Virginia that the senator was referring to coal plant data from the Global Energy Monitor, a nonprofit group that tracks energy data. The group’s Global Coal Plant Tracker collects data on all coal-fired power plants that generate at least 30 megawatts of power.

Manchin’s figure for current coal-fired plants — 504 — is close to one of the figures in the Global Coal Plant Tracker database. However, Manchin used the wrong terminology to describe this number.

Data from the tracker show that there are 498 coal-fired units in the U.S., and that’s not far from 504.

But notice what is being counted: units, rather than "plants," which is the word Manchin used. The tracker’s database counts a much smaller number of coal-fired plants in the US. — 246.

So what’s the difference?

"​​Units often consist of a boiler and turbine, and several units may make up one coal-fired power station," said Flora Champenois, a coal research analyst with the Global Energy Monitor. "Interchanging the terms for plants and units is inaccurate." For example, she said, the Clifty Creek station in Indiana is one power plant, but it operates six units.

Has the U.S. been closing coal-fired power plants over the past decade?


U.S. coal capacity did peak a decade ago at around 340 gigawatts and has declined to 232 gigawatts today, Champenois said. Low-carbon alternatives have increasingly become competitive with coal on price, and the shift away from coal has been reinforced by increased attention among utilities, governments and the public to carbon emissions’ role in driving climate change.

Champenois added that while the U.S. has been retiring coal-fired plants at a "record pace," it is not on track to meet the goals set by the Paris Agreement, the global climate accord that the U.S. rejoined earlier this year.

Have other countries reduced their reliance on coal?


Champenois said that the U.S has retired more capacity, measured in gigawatts, than any other country since 2000, which supports Manchin’s assertion that no other country has reduced its reliance on coal for energy as much as the U.S. has.

But many other countries have been cutting back, too.


China has retired a lot more coal-fired units than the U.S. has, and many of the European Union’s 27 countries have retired a much larger percentage of their existing capacity, Champenois said.

The EU has reduced coal consumption by half since 2015, Sean O’Leary, senior researcher at the Ohio River Valley Institute, told PolitiFact West Virginia

That said, measuring the impact of these reductions in countries like China and India is tricky.

Despite the pace of coal-fired retirements, China, India and the rest of the world have also added coal-fired power units, plants and capacity during the past decade, producing net increases in all three metrics. By contrast, the U.S. has seen decreases in all three.

China has been adding non-coal assets at a faster pace than it’s adding coal-fired assets, meaning that coal’s share of its energy portfolio has been declining.

"Although China is increasing generation from coal, coal's share of Chinese generation has been declining since 2010, and China has announced its intention to reduce coal-fired generation starting in 2026," O’Leary said.

Despite the complexities of measuring the global changes in coal use, O’Leary said that Manchin overstated how unusual the United States’ transition away from coal has been.

"The notion Manchin tried to convey, that the U.S. is alone in cutting reliance on coal while the rest of the world bounds ahead, is just plain wrong," O’Leary said.
Our ruling

Manchin said the U.S. had 589 coal-fired plants 10 years ago, and "we're down to 504. … We are the only nation that has reduced our reliance as far as in coal energy."

Manchin is broadly right to note that the U.S. has decreased its reliance on coal for generating electricity over the past decade, although he incorrectly labeled the units of measurement that went along with his figures.

He also has a point that the U.S. has led the world in the number of retirements of coal-fired assets, but it’s worth noting that the U.S. is not alone, as other countries have also made significant cuts in coal-fired power over the same period.

We rate the statement Half True.

Sources


Joe Manchin, remarks at a Senate Energy Committee hearing, Nov. 16, 2021


Global Coal Plant Tracker data compiled for PolitiFact West Virginia


Global Energy Monitor, "US Coal Retirement Rate Needs to Increase by 66% to Keep 1.5°C Within Reach," November 2021


Penn State University, Current and Future Energy Sources of the USA, accessed Dec. 11, 2021


Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, Dec. 7, 2021


Global Energy Monitor, Clifty Creek Station, accessed Dec. 11, 2021


Reuters, "President Xi says China will start cutting coal consumption from 2026," April 22, 2021


Global Electricity Dashboard, Share of electricity production by fuel: China, accessed Dec. 11, 2021


Statista, Coal-fired electricity generation worldwide from 1985 to 2020


PolitiFact West Virginia, "Are 1,600 new coal-fired power plants being constructed today?" Sept. 20, 2019


Email interview with Flora Champenois, coal research analyst at Global Energy Monitor, Dec. 9, 2021


Email interview with Sean O’Leary, senior researcher at the Ohio River Valley Institute, Dec. 9, 2021