Tuesday, February 14, 2006

The Real Debt and Deficit Crisis


Here is the real debt and deficit crisis, ironically one that is driving the booming economy in North America. Just as stocks rise when workers are laid off, so does an economy boom when driven not by production but by consumer debt. But as we all know all booms eventually bust.

And with such huge consumer debt and low average wages, getting lower as capitalism pushes to offset it's falling rate of profit on the backs of the workers who produce them, if a credit or capital crisis hits North America, this personal debt will have a greater impact than the Great Depression.
Economists warn on US debt crisis


Family debt soars as incomes stagnate
Canadians outspend their ability to repay, new report finds

Eric Beauchesne, The Ottawa Citizen; with files from CanWest News Service

Monday, February 13, 2006

Cash-strapped Canadian families are racking up debt at an alarming rate and the record number of households declaring bankruptcy will continue to rise unless people tighten their belts now, a new report warns.

"The alarm bells are ringing louder than ever," says the Vanier Institute for the Family, in a report on the state of family finances in Canada released on the weekend.

"They rang for governments and for many businesses and they did something about it. It is now time for families to do something about their own situations."

The average household income is now about $55,000 a year, roughly the same as at the start of the decade and up only one per cent, or about $500, from 1990.

In contrast, average household debt now stands at about $70,920, up 16 per cent from 2000, and 40 per cent from 1990.

"On average, households are putting nothing away for a rainy day, for a bout of unemployment, or for retirement," the report says.

The real hourly earnings of Canadians have increased by just a dime over the past decade and a half, the report says.

The marginal 10-cent-an-hour-after-inflation increase in hourly earnings since 1990 has been accompanied by fewer hours of work, says the respected social policy think-tank.

"As such, more members of cash-strapped families are stepping into the growing paid-labour market," it says.

While that has produced record levels of employment and dual-income families, their disposable income, after taxes and government benefits, has stagnated over the last five years.

With the booming real estate market and interest rates at historically low levels, Canadians have reduced their savings and taken on more debt, it notes.

The days of cheap debt, however, are coming to an end, it says, predicting interest rates will continue to rise over the short term at least.

Total debt per household is now equal to 125 per cent of disposable incomes, up from 91 per cent in 1990, an increase that has helped push insolvencies to record levels and will continue to do so.

And nothing the new Conservative government will address this crisis. All they have offered is tax credits to the rich and an inadequate baby bonus. Tax credits do not put real money in your pocket, as ING would say. In fact they only help those who pay taxes, and result not in a lower pay cheque per se but as a balance against earnings on your annual income taxes. Instead a tax cut on those earning under $100,000 would put real money back in your paycheque.

Unfortunately those tax cuts implemented by the Liberals before the election are going to be killed by the Conservtive government in order to pay off its GST promise. Once again helping the rich who are the only ones who really benefit from a GST cut, since it really only appears as a cost savings on big ticket items, like cars and other luxury goods.

See:
The Real Debt and Deficit Crisis January 2006

Storm Clouds Over The US Economy

Greenspans Legacy

The Wit and Wisdom of Warren Buffet

Housing Boom or Bust

Debt Crisis

Air Canada Profits From Bankruptcy


Jobs Not Tax Cuts


Retirement Reverse Discrimination


Social Insecurity- The Phony Pension Crisis



Tags









, , , , , , , ,

Sniveling NDP


The Federal NDP's defense of Buzz is not about the NDP it's all about the CLC.


A follow up from yesterdays article:
Bye Bye Buzz

Layton says he wouldn't have dumped Hargrove from party

How many knives in the back does it take before the snivelling leadership of the NDP gets the message? Apparently alot.

Hargrove unrepentant after NDP suspension

Buzz violated the party membership requirement that you neither belong to nor support any other Federal Politcal party. Yes Virigina you can be a Trotskyist in the party or even a Labour Leader who is outspoken. But you cross the line even if you are a Labour Leader when you campaign for and say Vote Liberal.

What a bunch of whimps.

Wouldn't boot Buzz, Layton says Toronto Star
NDP Leader Jack Layton says he wouldn't have suspended Buzz ... Canada.com
Union-boss booting has Layton buzzing
Calgary Sun -
Delivered rude shock Toronto Star
Buzz cut leaves split ends Hamilton Spectator
Why expel Hargrove? Globe and Mail -
Layton says he wouldn't have dumped Hargrove from party CBC British Columbia (Audio)
all 61 related »
Peggy Nash newly minted Federal MP and Buzz's former executive assistant snivels that the Ontario party shouldn't have dumped him.

NPI founder
and NDP reformer MP Libby Davis who allied with Buzz in the NPI whines that he was entitled to express his opinions. Yeah fine. But to endorse Liberal candidates and be Liberal party wall paper, well gimme a break.
Why Vote Liberal When You Can Vote NDP



Dan MacLennan of AUPE and Buzz's bosom buddy, is a Liberal, and broke his union away from the CLC at the same time the CLC sanctioned CAW for raiding. And Buzz visits this breakaway union everytime he comes to Alberta, and Dan visits the CAW annual conventions as well.

The siamese twins of the Canadian Left; the CLC and NDP may not appear united at election time but in the backrooms the boys are trying to patch things up with Buzz.

Cause they are afraid of an independent Labour Federation that would compete with the CLC. One that would be composed of the CAW, AUPE, and perhaps the General Construction Union of Toronto along with some of the Building Trades that have viewed, and here is the irony, the CLC and their relationship to the NDP as too left wing.

You see Buzz's Strategic Voting position is NOT radical. It is a rehash of Samuel Gompers election strategy; Reward your friends and punish your enemies. It is a return to the bread and butter issues politics of the 19th Century, before the labour movement in Canada created its own Labour parties.

Buzz claims to be the left wing of the labour movement would appeal to some other Left unions, but they would probably be more reluctant to leave the CLC as CUPE has shown. And his non alliance with the NDP his call for Stratefic Voting would appeal to right wing business unions, especially those in the Building Trades. Who would be willing to leave the CLC, as they have done in the recent past.

The Federal NDP's defense of Buzz is not about the NDP it's all about the CLC.



My blogs on Buzz






Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rules Are For Others

The attitude of the Bush Administration that it is above the law, like its domestic spying operations, leaking CIA agents names to the press, taking payola from Jack Abramoff. Or that rules are for other people, appears to apply in their personal as well as poltical lives.Cheney Apparently Breaks Key Hunting Rule

Cheney, an experienced hunter, has not commented publicly about the accident. He avoided reporters by leaving an Oval Office meeting with United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan before the press was escorted in.


He was also apparently hunting illegally. Cheney had no stamp to hunt quail See these guys are above the law and the rules.

No End to Questions on Cheney Hunting Incident

Published: February 14, 2006
The White House sought to explain why it took most of a day to disclose that the vice president accidentally shot a fellow hunter.

And while his hunting compatriot that he shot recuperates in hospital, Cheney hadn't visited him according to an interview on PBS last night with the Corpus Christi Caller Times reporter who broke the story. Caller-Times broke Cheney story through hustle, sources

The other hunting partner in the trio, the US Ambasabor to Switzerland visited Cheney's victim in hospital yesterday. As have the family on whose estate they were hunting. But not Dick. Nice guy. Guess the arrogance of office and the refusal to accept responsibility for ones actions that is a hallmark of the Bush team also applies in their personal lives too.

Cheney hunt trip 'victim' recovering in hospital

Although Mr Whittington should, according to hunting etiquette and safety procedures, have announced himself, primary responsibility for the accident lies with the man who pulled the trigger. In Washington, Mr Cheney's office said he had visited Mr Whittington on Sunday afternoon before returning to the capital.

This was perhaps the most high-profile piece of vice-presidential marksmanship since Aaron Burr shot and fatally wounded Alexander Hamilton, then serving as secretary of the treasury, in a duel in 1804 - the most famous such confrontation in US history.

White House Cover Up?

Typical of the Bush adminstration they attempted to cover this up. With the usual suspects involved including Karl Rove! The motto when in doubt lie, backpedal and cover up applies even to hunting accidents. This isn't just the gang that couldn't shoot straight it's also the gang that can't give a straight answer.

White House takes heat over Cheney shooting mishap

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House was bombarded with questions on Monday about why it failed to go public with news that Vice President Dick Cheney shot a fellow quail hunter until the day after the accident.

The accident happened about 5:30 p.m. on a private ranch about 200 miles south of San Antonio, where the vice president has hunted previously. Whittington was treated on the scene by Cheney's travelling medical detail before being taken by helicopter to the hospital.

The accident was not reported publicly by the vice president's office until Sunday afternoon and then only after an account provided by the ranch's owner appeared on the Web site of the local newspaper, the Corpus Christi Caller-Times.

In a testy exchange with reporters on Monday, White House spokesman Scott McClellan faced dozens of questions about the propriety of a private citizen making public a shooting incident involving the vice president and whether Cheney had followed White House protocol.



Bush Knew of Cheney's Hunting Accident Saturday
Ranch owner Katharine Armstrong said no one discussed notifying the public of the accident Saturday because they were so consumed with making sure Whittington was OK. She said the family realized in the morning that it would be a story and decided to call the local newspaper, the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. She said that is when she discussed the news coverage with Cheney for the first time

Michelle Pilecki: Trying to Sort Out the Discrepancies in Cheney Shooting Story

When the Veep Shoots Someone



And the whole media debacle of White House avoidance gives new meaning to Duck and Cover.

White House takes cover over shooting by Cheney
Globe and Mail - 2 hours ago
WASHINGTON — It was a scene that seemed straight out of a political skit on late-night TV. An irate White House press corps peppered the official White House spokesman with questions, the way birdshot is aimed at a cornered quail. ...
Some pellets of hunting humour Toronto Star
Cheney's Hunting Accident Provides a Bonanza for Joke Writers Bloomberg





Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , ,