Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Is it OK to call in sick with a common cold?


AS A PROFESSIONAL IN THE FIELD OF INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
THOSE IN OUR INDUSTRY HAVE LEARNED THAT YES IT IS 
  • 15 January 2020
  •  
Woman sneezingImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionShould she be sent home to rest on the sofa, or encouraged to work through her cold?
"For goodness sake, just go home," my boss implored. "People are complaining and don't want to catch your disgusting germs!"
My protests of "it's just a cold - I don't feel that bad" fell on deaf ears and I had to admit defeat gracefully rather than being frogmarched out of the newsroom.
While I wasn't feeling 100%, in my mind I certainly wasn't poorly enough to justify spending an afternoon under a duvet.
But forget Brexit - nothing seemed to divide my friends, colleagues and random social media posters more than the thorny question of whether you should call in sick with the sniffles.
Opinions varied from "oh, for heaven's sake, just grow a pair" via "ooh, that's a really tricky one..." to "how very dare you infect your poor colleagues, you selfish..."
And so I found myself entering the murky moral maze that brought together employment law, ethics and public health.
VirusImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionMany types of viruses can cause a common cold, with rhinoviruses the most common culprit

When is a cold more than a cold?

Colds are everywhere - on the tram, in the supermarket, in the playground. So unless you plan on not leaving the house EVER, someone will infect you.
So why are so many people agitated, I wondered to myself? Surely it's just part of winter?
"Colds are viruses and we react differently to them - we can't underestimate how lousy some people feel with a cold," said Rachel Suff, senior policy adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD).
"If you are really not well and your symptoms mean you are not going to be productive, it's better to go off sick. You're also not spreading your germs around the workplace."
Prof Martin Marshall, chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners, agreed that "every patient is different, and each one experiences illness differently".
But should we all be desperately trying to avoid colds? Aren't they great at building up our immune systems?
Prof Peter Openshaw, former president of the British Society of Immunology, who has done research in this area for more than 25 years, says colds can be good for our long-term health, but only sometimes.
It turns out there are "good colds" and "bad colds".
"It's my life-long quest to find out which viruses are 'good'," he said, "because some colds seem able to put your immune system through some kind of training course."

What about those with compromised immune systems?

One former colleague told me: "When my mum was seriously ill [with cancer], I got a chest infection after a colleague was ill and couldn't see her for three weeks and had to get carers."
While she conceded that she "could have got it from anywhere... I can guarantee being next to someone sneezing all over the desk didn't help!"
Prof Marshall suggests people, particularly if they are in caring roles, should "take into account factors such as... whether they are likely to come into contact with vulnerable groups, such as young children, pregnant women, or the elderly".
Hayley Johnson, an employment lawyer at Slater and Gordon, also pointed out the implications [of catching a cold] for people with cystic fibrosis or who have recently had chemotherapy, for example, can be incredibly serious.
sneezing manImage copyrightPA MEDIA
Image captionAnybody fancy joining me for lunch? Anybody?

Have attitudes shifted in recent years?

It would seem so.
The CIPD reported the typical employee's number of sick days dropped to 5.9 in 2019 - the lowest in the 19-year history of its annual survey of UK HR professionals.
That may explain why 83% of them have observed people going to work when they were ill. Or that 63% had witnessed colleagues working while on annual leave.
It's all tied up in workplace culture, said Ms Suff. "We know a lot of people can't cope with their workloads... People know that by not being there, there will be extra work for their colleagues."
Ms Johnson said that in recent years employers have tended to be "much more across sickness records" than previously, especially when it comes to "frequent, intermittent absences" of a few days here and there.
She thinks this is because "budgets are so tight nowadays that you've often got every employee doing the work of one and a half people".
Sometimes members of staff feel obliged to work when they are sick "because they fear the mountain of work will just keep piling up" for when they return.

Should your decision depend on who you work for?

"When somebody's got a cold, we send them home," said Paul Knowles, from Acoustic and Engineering Consultants Ltd in Marple, Cheshire.
"There are only six of us and so if three or four catch it and can't work, we are struggling to keep our clients happy."
Mike Cherry, national chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), urged those working for smaller companies not to be scared to talk to their boss.
"Nine in 10 small employers offer flexible working arrangements," he said.
"So in situations where a member of staff is feeling under the weather - but still well enough to get stuff done - it can be more straightforward to arrange a day working from home."
Finally, we should all spare a thought for freelancers and the self-employed, Mr Cherry said.
"The luxury of statutory sick pay is not available [so] the tendency to just crack on with it - for better or worse - is much more prevalent among sole traders."

Could I get sacked for calling in sick with 'just a cold'?

"Ultimately employees don't have to be bed-bound to be unfit for work," said Ms Johnson. "GPs are quite happy to sign people off with what many people would regard as a low-level virus.
"In my 10 years' experience as an employment lawyer I've only once seen a policy that says you need a sick note in all circumstances. Most say they are only required for five days or more."
She suggests a pragmatic, common-sense approach, based upon mutual trust.
"Employers can sack people who they think are lying," she said, giving a hypothetical example of "somebody who calls in sick but then posts photographs of themselves [on social media] having afternoon tea with prosecco!"
But the fact so many employers are willing to take their employees' word for genuinely being sick suggests there is at least a basic level of trust.
Biscuits the dog, wrapped in a blanketImage copyrightIAN SHOESMITH
Image captionShould dogs get duvet days too?

So what have I learned?

From examining all of the issues involved, I've come to the conclusion that maybe I should count my blessings, and be more mindful of those with severely compromised immune systems.
And if I am horribly infectious but not feeling too bad, perhaps I should be kind to myself - and everybody around me - by working from home until the lurgy blows over.
At least my dog Biscuits will be happy to see me...

Why India is greeting Amazon's Jeff Bezos with protests

Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, attends a company event in New Delhi, India, January 15, 2020Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionJeff Bezos is visiting India for the third time
The last time Amazon boss Jeff Bezos was here, he wore a long Indian coat, climbed into a gaudily decorated truck, posed for pictures and promised to invest a couple of billion dollars. He also gave dozens of media interviews. "You hear all the time that there are so many obstacles in doing business in India, but that's not our experience," he told a newspaper.
Five years on, the world's richest man has arrived on a two-day visit to a much less enthusiastic reception.
A union of small traders who claim to represent tens of millions of brick-and-mortar businesses have planned protests in 300 cities against Mr Bezos, accusing his firm of predatory pricing. They complain that the online giant's now six-year-old retail operation in the country is hurting them badly. Praveen Khandelwal of the Confederation of All India Traders, which is organising the protests, says Amazon's "sinister game and evil designs" have "already destroyed the business of tens of thousands of small traders" in India.
If this was not enough, hours before Mr Bezos's arrival, India's anti-trust regulator opened a formal investigation into the business practices of Amazon and its Indian competitor Flipkart, an Indian e-retailer, mostly owned by Walmart.
The regulator says it is looking into allegations of predatory pricing, the exclusive launch of mobile phones, deep discounting and preferential treatment of selected sellers by the online giants, among other things. Amazon said in a statement it would co-operate, address the allegations and was "confident in our compliance [with local rules]".
Members of the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) hold placards and shout slogans during a protest against the visit of Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, to India, in New Delhi, India, January 15, 2020.Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionTraders says Amazon is hurting small businesses
Amazon claims to have done a lot to empower retailers in India, its fastest-growing market.
With more than 60,000 employees and $5bn of investment in the country, the Seattle-based giant says it works with more than half a million sellers on the market place. (Under Indian laws, the site can only sell third-party goods from independent sellers.) More than half of the sellers come from small towns and cities, and many have grown rich during the site's popular festival sales, the firm claims.
Amazon also partners with small, so-called mom-and-pop stores to help customers buy products from the site for a commission. Some 50,000 Indian sellers have shipped $1bn worth of goods to destinations outside India, under a programme that enables them to list and sell their products around the world, the company claims.
On Tuesday, Mr Bezos announced that Amazon would aim to export goods worth $10bn from India by 2025. He also promised to invest $1bn in digitising small and medium businesses here. Mr Bezos is attending a company event in Delhi to fete small and medium businesses who partner with his firm. These initiatives do not appear to impress the protesters. "Mr Bezos is creating a false narrative of empowering small retailers," Mr Khandelwal says.
Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, attends a company event in New Delhi, India, January 15, 2020Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionMr Bezos attended a company event in Delhi
Amazon and Flipkart overwhelmingly dominate India's $39bn online retail market. Fuelled by an explosion of mobile phone subscribers - more than a billion already - and cheap data, it is the fastest growing e-commerce market and is expected to grow to $120bn in 2020. E-commerce attracted 124 rounds of international investor funding in 2017 alone. There are now more than 4,700 such start-ups in India.
But India is also a country where neighbourhood stores thrive.
These nifty stores - called kirana or neighbourhood corner shops - continue to rule the brick-and-mortar retail space. According to consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, there are 12 million such stores in India and an increasing number of them are adopting technology - accepting debit and credit cards and wallet payments, for example - to serve customers better. Researchers at the Indian School of Business who analysed more than a million sales transactions of a fast-moving consumer goods company in India with corner shops and organised retail for three years found that the mom-and-pop stores had a higher ability to earn a profit than modern trade outlets.
People move past a hoarding of Amazon India outside a metro rail station in New Delhi, India, October 23, 2019Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionAmazon says its sellers have grown rich through festival sales
Amazon is no stranger to battling regulators around the world. Last year EU anti-trust regulators opened an investigation after allegations that Amazon misuses "sensitive data" from independent retailers who sell on the online giant's website. The retailers' relationships with sellers of third-party goods is also being investigated in the US and Europe.
India is a promising, but tricky market. On the one hand, India's small traders are often seen as resistant to change and protectionist in nature. They also receive the backing of populist political parties.
On the other hand, there are genuine fears about the future of small brick-and-mortar businesses which face the onslaught of online giants. Consumers are largely happy with the speedy delivery and low prices that the e-commerce giants offer. And the government needs foreign investment to grow a slowing economy. How the regulator and Mr Bezos negotiate the maze will be interesting to see.

Iran chess ref Shohreh Bayat fears returning home over hijab row


Photos of Ms Bayat circulated in Iran showing her with the headscarf around her neckImage copyrightFIDE
Image captionPhotos of Ms Bayat (standing) circulated in Iran showing her with the headscarf around her neck

For 32-year-old Iranian Shohreh Bayat, the Women's World Chess Championship was meant to be a career highlight.
It is her first time as the event's chief arbiter - a senior role.
But that achievement has been clouded by controversy after the circulation of a photograph taken at game in Shanghai that appears to show Ms Bayat without a headscarf, as her country mandates.
She now feels unsafe to return to Iran, where women can be arrested for violating strict Islamic dress code.
"I turned on my mobile and saw that my picture was everywhere [in Iranian media]. They were claiming I was not wearing a headscarf and that I wanted to protest against the hijab," Ms Bayat told the BBC.
She says she was, in fact, covering her head as she always has at international tournaments, despite disagreeing with the rule.

'Women should have right to choose'

"It's against my beliefs. People should have the right to choose the way they want to dress, it should not be forced," she explained, speaking from Vladivostok in eastern Russia, where she is now refereeing the second leg of the World Championship.

Shohreh Bayat officiating in ShanghaiImage copyrightFIDE
Image captionIn this picture in Shanghai, Shohreh Bayat's hair is clearly covered to an extent

"I was tolerating it because I live in Iran. I had no other choice."
But this time Ms Bayat has run into serious problems.
The photographs circulating online and being discussed by Iran's state media show Ms Bayat's scarf apparently draped over her shoulders and not over her hair. In other pictures from the same day, her head is clearly - albeit loosely - covered.

Shohreh Bayat (L) prepares for a match at the 2020 International Chess Federation (FIDE) Women's World Chess Championship in Shanghai, 11 January 2020Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionMs Bayat said that after images circulated, she had nothing more to lose and removed her hijab

Ms Bayat says Iran's chess federation instructed her to "write something" in response to the fuss, which she took to mean an apology and a defence of Iran's dress code.
She refused.
So now she says it's too risky to return to her family.
"There are many people in prison in Iran because of the headscarf. It's a very serious issue. Maybe they'd want to make an example of me," she explains, adding that she had "totally panicked" when she saw the reaction online.
The International Chess Federation (Fide), has not commented officially on the situation, as Ms Bayat has not broken any of its rules. But English grandmaster and now Fide Vice-President Nigel Short did tweet a photo praising the chief arbiter.

Presentational white space

Ms Bayat says she asked Iran's chess federation to write a letter guaranteeing her safety on her return, but they declined. She believes that they are under pressure, from higher up.

'My achievements have been overlooked'

Ms Bayat is angry that the argument over how she dresses has overshadowed her achievements in chess, where she's one of only a few top level women arbiters in the world - and the only one at all in Asia.
"I can't think of any Iranian women who have worked at such a high-level tournament. But the only thing that matters for them is my hijab, not my qualification. That really bothers me," Ms Bayat says.
Her own case comes soon after Iran's first female Olympic medal-winner apparently defected. Kimia Alizadeh later posted on Instagram that she had left Iran partly because she was fed up with its mandatory dress code.

Kimia Alizadeh of Iran celebrates with the national flag after winning the women's -57kg bronze medal bout of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games Taekwondo eventImage copyrightEPA
Image captionKimia Alizadeh won a landmark bronze medal in taekwondo in the 2016 Rio Olympics

"I think people are under too much pressure, especially athletes," Ms Bayat says, adding: "This pressure to be something that you are not."
She had felt that herself, even before the main controversy erupted: she had sent a photograph for Iran's chess federation website, only to have it request another because the hijab on the image Ms Bayat had chosen was not "good enough".
For now, Ms Bayat is focusing on the job in hand: refereeing in Vladivostok as China's Ju Wenjun defends her title from Russian challenger Alexandra Gorychkina.
She's not yet sure of her own next move.
But as she cannot return to Iran, she has concluded that she has nothing more to lose and has removed her hijab altogether.
"This is a very hard decision. I feel so sad because I'm going to miss my family," she confesses, though she said taking off her scarf meant she could "be myself".
"If I had a choice to go back to Iran, of course I would love to," Ms Bayat says. "But I don't know what would happen to me."

line

Read more about the Islamic veil: