Showing posts sorted by relevance for query POLITICAL ASTROLOGY. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query POLITICAL ASTROLOGY. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, July 22, 2021

A new 'Library of Esoterica' brings the occult to your coffee table


Steffie Nelson
December 15, 2020·

The High Priestess: Manzel Bowman, "Manzel's Tarot," 2017 (detail) An image from "Tarot. The Library of Esoterica." (Manzel Bowman / Taschen)

Not so long ago, the discovery of esoteric knowledge was a rite unto itself, requiring research and travel, as many dead ends as discoveries. Today, these quests are as simple as a Google search, a glance at an astrology app or a scroll through Instagram, where the hashtag #witchesofinstagram will lead you to nearly 6 million posts.

The democratization of the arcane is a welcome development, but the mystery of the occult will never lose its allure. The Library of Esoterica, a new series from the art book publisher Taschen, acts as a bridge between the dark halls of history and the vast data at our fingertips. Created by a team based in Los Angeles, the series debuted in August with “Tarot”; volume two, “Astrology,” just landed in bookstores. “Witchcraft” is slated for September.

Edited by author, journalist and filmmaker Jessica Hundley, the series speaks the universal language of symbolism. “The idea,” says Hundley, “was to create a super introductory, very inclusive and seductive way into these practices, which is through the art.” Taschen, with its lavish art production, made the ideal partner “because that's what they do best.”


When Taschen founder Benedikt Taschen suggested to managing editor Nina Wiener that the topic of “secret knowledge” was worth exploring more deeply, “Jessica was one of the first people I thought of to go to,” says Wiener.

Metaphysics and the counterculture are a through line of Hundley’s work, including a number of Taschen collaborations — most notably an overview of Dennis Hopper’s photography enriched by hours of interviews with the actor.


Vladimir Manzhos Waone, "The Magus," Ukraine 2012-14. From "Astrology: The Library of Esoterica." (Vladimir Manzhos Waone)

Hundley has been fascinated by alternative spiritualities and the occult since she was a goth-punk teenager on the East Coast, “listening to Siouxsie Sioux and reading tarot cards.” She moved to Los Angeles in 1998, drawn to the city’s legacy of esoteric exploration and its renown as a place where dreams are made manifest and identity is mutable. “The freedom to define your own identity also means defining your own spirituality,” Hundley says, “and that's built into so much of the ethos of Los Angeles.”

L.A.’s homegrown institutions helped get the Library off the ground. The Philosophical Research Society in Los Feliz, a library and research center founded in the 1930s by scholar, mystic and collector Manly P. Hall, has been the team’s primary research partner. The Getty, with its collection of alchemical art and texts, was another important local resource. But contributors ranged far and wide, from the Met and the British Museum to artists in Tokyo and Kenya.

For the series’ designer, Nic Taylor, one “formative moment” was a visit to New York City’s Morgan Library, which houses J.P. Morgan’s collection of occult art and books — including the oldest existing tarot cards, the gold-leafed Visconti-Sforza deck from 14th century Italy.

In conceiving an overarching series design, Taylor, co-founder of L.A.-based Thunderwing Studios, incorporated elements common to antiquarian books, aiming to “take the gestures that are historic to bookmaking and update them and make them feel fresh.” Every detail, from the series logo — a key formed by the letters T, L, O, E — to the sacred geometric gold foil designs along the spines, feeds into the reader’s experience of these books as objects of beauty and, yes, magic.


The Empress: Sebastian Haines, "The Tarot of the Golden Serpent," 2013 (detail) (Sebastian Haines)

Cards on the Table


“Tarot,” written by Hundley, sets the tone for the series. “I wanted to come at it from a journalistic, academic viewpoint and not get mired in the dogma,” she says. This meant consulting with numerous specialists and quoting foundational texts while still allowing her passion to shine through. The book is organized by card, not chronology, inviting us to consider personal journeys. The first in the 78-card deck is the Fool, “full of blissful ignorance and blind optimism,” Hundley writes, “as he takes his first step into the abyss.”

This archetypal character then encounters different aspects of himself in the form of the High Priestess, the Hermit, the Devil. He meets the world with innocent joy (the Sun) and explores his subconscious (the Moon); he confronts destiny (the Wheel of Fortune), destruction (the Tower) and, finally, liberation (the World). Is it any wonder that artists are consistently drawn to these symbols?

There are about 20 historical examples of each "major arcana" card in “Tarot,” creating a tapestry of interpretations. More than 100 featured decks include work by fine artists such as Salvador Dali, Francesco Clemente, Pedro Friedeberg, Niki de Saint Phalle and Penny Slinger, the feminist-surrealist who wrote the book’s foreword. The best-known deck, from which most modern tarot evolved, is the 1909 Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot, created by Pamela Colman Smith and Arthur Edward Waite, who met in England as members of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. (“It was essentially an artist collective,” says Hundley of the secret society, which included William Butler Yeats.)

Tarot evolves alongside art and culture, Hundley says: “You had a surge of decks made in the 1960s and ‘70s that were aligned with the counterculture … and then with the New Age movement of the ‘80s you had another surge … I think with each movement, the circle comes back around.”


Spread from "Tarot. The Library of Esoterica." Left: Strength: Michael Eaton & A. A. Khan, "The Black Power Tarot," 2015. Right: Hy Roth, Linweave Tarot, 1967. (Michael Eaton & A. A. Khan/Hy Roth)

Every decade hosted brilliant additions to the canon; witness Julia Turk’s Navigators Tarot of the Mystic Sea from 1994, whose vibrant Sun card shines from the cover of the book. But it was the 2012 self-publication of Kim Krans’ Wild Unknown deck, inspired by the natural world, that Hundley points to as the launch of a new era. Working in all media, contemporary artists continue to evolve the form, drawing from a prismatic array of philosophies, traditions and cultural movements — from ecofeminism and shamanism to Mexicayotl and Black Power. (The last one features Billie Holiday and Tina Turner as figures.)

Which brings us to the democracy of the web. Many of these self-published decks were discovered online. Browsing eBay, Hundley happened upon an exquisite deck of Afro-futurist digital collages by the artist Manzel Bowman. Not only are several of Bowman’s cards included in “Tarot,” his art graces the cover of “Astrology.”

The Return of the Stars


Alphonse Mucha, Zodiac, Bohemia/France, 1896. From "Astrology: The Library of Esoterica." (The Art Institute Chicago)

Technology also democratized the age-old practice of seeking guidance from the cosmos, as Susan Miller writes in her forward to “Astrology.” One of the first in her field to flourish online (she launched her popular site Astrology Zone in 1995), Miller describes how computer-generated charts have made complicated calculations accessible to a new generation.

“Astrology” focuses on what we know as the Western horoscopic system, codified in 539 BC when the Babylonians created and named the wheel of the zodiac. By charting the movements of five planets plus the sun and moon in relation to this wheel, they gave us a way to talk about our identities, our instincts, how we love and communicate.

Andrea Richards, the book’s author, is the first to say that she is not an astrologer but a journalist and scholar, interested in examining “the beliefs around beliefs.” She dismisses the notion of astrology as “fortune-telling”; instead, it’s about “patterns and stories and the transmissions of stories between generations.”

One revelation of this volume is that astrology and astronomy were once sister sciences. Cambridge University even had an astrology chair. But after the Enlightenment, shame was cast upon matters of the spirit. And yet, as Richards attests, the practice never went away: world leaders from Queen Elizabeth I to Winston Churchill to the Reagans have relied on the counsel of their personal astrologers.


John Alcorn, Sagittarius, from Sydney Omarr's "Astrological Revelations About You" series. (John Alcorn)

As with “Tarot,” one comes away with an understanding of astrology’s place in history, pop culture, art, mythology and psychology. Included are 15th century frescoes, 18th century etchings, Mucha posters, cigarette ads, assemblage work by Betye Saar in the 1960s, a 1970s psychedelic calendar, ’80s fantasy art, scientific charts and telescopic space photographs. Each chapter is anchored by the words of respected scholars and younger stars like Chani Nicholas and Jessica Lanyadoo.

In Richards’ opinion, we are experiencing a new kind of spiritual awakening, in which intellectual rigor can coexist with the metaphysical. While writing the book, she recalls, “At one point I had this remarkable day. I had spoken with a scientist at NASA, an astrologer and a historian, and I was like, ‘that confluence of people is exactly what this book is.’ … Finally, I think people are ready to recognize that there are multiple paths to truth.”

So it will be for the next book in the series. Author, podcast host and professional witch Pam Grossman, who is co-editing the upcoming “Witchcraft” with Hundley, believes those multiple paths have always been key to witchcraft’s appeal. “There is no pope of witchcraft,” she says. “Everyone’s practice is extremely personal.”

What Grossman finds unique about this cultural moment (in which, for example, witchcraft is exploding on TikTok) is that “more previously marginalized people are in positions to make decisions — queer people, people of color who have a history of being othered by the white cis patriarchy.”


Vasko Taškovski, Pisces, Macedonia 1998. From "Astrology: The Library of Esoterica." (Vasko Taškovski)

By virtue of this intersection with cultural shifts and the long association of the witch archetype and feminism, “Witchcraft” will likely be more political than the first two volumes — which does not mean it will be any less aesthetically striking. Grossman was a consultant on Zoe Lister-Jones’ recent revamp of “The Craft,” and she is “deeply interested in how cinema, fashion, music and television have helped us to evolve the image of the witch.” She also shares with Hundley a love for fine artists, including Leonora Carrington and Remedios Varo, “who use their art practice as a form of magic making.”

Growing up in the analog era, Grossman spent hours in her local library poring over a series called “Man, Myth & Magic.” She considers the Library of Esoterica to be “an updated, more stylish version of that.” The prospect, Grossman says, “makes the 14-year-old in me levitate with joy.”

Nelson is the editor of Slouching Towards Los Angeles: Living and Writing by Joan Didion’s Light" and the co-author of "Judson: Innovation in Stained Glass."

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Sunday, January 26, 2020

Trystes Cosmologiques: When Lévi-Strauss Met the Astrologers

Graham Douglas


In October 1969 the famous anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss gave an interview to the well-known French astrologers André Barbault and Dr Jean-Paul Nicola for the astrology magazine L'Astrologue. To the author's knowledge this interview has never been discussed in academic journals, and is here published for the first time in English translation. It is considered in the context of its time, and of the issues discussed: the Surrealist movement, which had an important influence on Lévi-Strauss's early work; the structure of the unconscious mind; and the question of causation in astrology. At the end of the interview Lévi-Strauss suggested a joint project with his interviewers to study the interpretations of serious astrologers as a way of understanding how their minds work. According to Dr Nicola, the suggestion was never developed because in his opinion there was no chance of getting astrologers to agree on how to go about it. In the last 20 years however, several theses have been devoted to similar projects.


ANDRE BARBAULT PASSED ON THROUGH THE DUAT TO NUIT
OCTOBER 2019

For a critical review of predictive astrology, see Jacques Reverchon: "Value of the Astrological Judgements and Forecasts", CURA, 2003. ... It is thus that the Saturn-Neptune cycle will become the primary terrain I explore. The twentieth issue of Cahiers Astrologiques (March-April 1949 ...

André Barbault, né à Champignelles (Yonne) le 1 octobre 1921 et mort le 8 octobre 2019 à Labaroche (Haut-Rhin), est un astrologue français. Il a été à l'origine ...
by Lynn Bell. This article was published in 2018 and we are posting in memory of André Barbault who passed away this year. I remember my first encounter with ...

Mundane astrology master André Barbault has passed away, age 98. And we have just lost Ed Tamplin. We shall remember both in The Astrological Journal....

André Barbault was a prominent French astrologer and writer, the author of over 50 books. His special interest has been in Mundane astrology and how ...
The Reference in Astrology: 
The idea of Astroflash dates back to 1966 when an important product manager Mr. Roger Berthier, co-founder of the Euromarche supermarket chain, had the idea to offer to its customers their horoscope. André Barbault, the most famous French astrologer, author of numerous works, like the celebrated Zodiac Collection (Seuil) was contacted. After 8 months of teamwork with computer analysts, a first astrological product, placing side by side a psychological portrait and a long term calendar was born.Because of its initial success, they decided to market and sell the horoscope by mail-order . An advertising campaign started in 1967 and perfected by Publicis lasted until April 1968. Although the topics developed in the ads were inspired by extensive psychological analysis, their effectiveness remained mediocre.They soon discovered, however, that a press meeting was a means to attract a large number of customers. This was in May of 1968 - in a car-shop on the Champs Elysées: the "computer - astrologer" attracted the masses. The possibility to immediately obtain a personalized horoscope anonymously, and for a moderate price, proved to be conclusive.
The Astroflash Center opened its doors in September of 1968, being the first client to rent a space in the Galerie des Champs, located at 84, Avenue des Champs Elysées, in Paris: a place visited daily by thousands of people. Now the number of daily Astroflash customers is around 100 to 200. So a total of 70,000 people per year, not including mail orders.
Women come in first at around 62%.- Young people are the most interested ?- One customer out of every two is under 30.?- High income customers are outnumbered.?- Foreigners: 15 to 20%.Every social strata show an interest in Astroflash.??Famous figures coming from the Political, the Entertainment as well as the Sports World have had their horoscopes done by Astroflash. General de Gaulle's horoscope remains famous...
Since 1968, Astroflash has been creating new products and perfecting them, investing constantly, as well as translating the products in many different languages (French, English, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian, and Danish).The range of horoscopes consist of essentially psychological portraits - with a special version for children. A search of affinities among partners (comparative birth charts) and long-term forecast horoscopes (6 month, solar returns).Astroflash also places a Map of the Heaven at astrologers, professionals or amateur's disposal.
Reasons for success are first the customer's satisfaction who comes from the quality of our studies: all without exception are conceptualized by two famous French astrologers: André Barbault and Jean-Pierre Nicola. Secondly, after having been stated, the elements taken into account are interpreted. The interpretation of the birth charts is made according to tradition - enriched by new elements of modern psychology.

Wednesday, January 01, 2020


WALTER MERCADO
PUERTO RICO'S LGBTQ ACTIVIST ASTROLGER REMEMBERED 

THE MAN WHO BROUGHT DOWN THE PR GOVERNMENT 
Film

Sundance Film Festival to Premiere Documentaries on Walter Mercado & Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Dad


Courtesy of HistoryMiami Museum

By Vanessa Erazo |


The Sundance Film Festival is set to premiere some high-profile documentaries in 2020. The audiences in Park City, Utah, will be the first to screen projects about two legendary Puerto Ricans: Walter Mercado and Luis Miranda.

Directed by Cristina Costantini and Kareem Tabsch, Mucho Mucho Amor focuses its lens on the world-famous astrologer. The festival’s synopsis describes the trajectory of the movie as: “Raised in the sugar cane fields of Puerto Rico, Walter grew up to become a gender-nonconforming, cape-wearing psychic whose televised horoscopes reached 120 million viewers a day for decades before he mysteriously disappeared.” It will likely be a bittersweet screening since Mercado did not live to see his documentary premiere.

Siempre, Luis from director John James follows Luis Miranda (the father of Broadway scribe Lin-Manuel Miranda) in his “improbable journey from Puerto Rico to the halls of power.” The documentary will chart his life and career as a political activist and strategist including bringing the cast of Hamilton to Puerto Rico for a performance of the award-winning musical after Hurricane Maria hit the island. Lin-Manuel, naturally, is set to appear in the film.

Lin-Manuel Miranda is also involved with another documentary screening at the festival. We Are Freestyle Love Supreme chronicles the 15-year journey of the founding members of an improv hip-hop group. Lin-Manuel acts as a producer and is a subject of the project alongside Thomas Kail, Anthony Veneziale, Christopher Jackson, Utkarsh Ambudkar and Chris Sullivan.

It’s going to be a very Puerto Rican Sundance.


BREAK OUT YOUR WINTER CAPE CUZ OUR DOCUMENTARY ABOUT WALTER MERCADO IS GOING TO SUNDANCE!!!! https://t.co/Rfvqrwt69P pic.twitter.com/znOerou0F4

— Cristina Costantini (@xtinatini) December 4, 2019


Culture

“A Rainbow Amid the Gray”: Why We Welcomed Walter Mercado Into Our Lives for Decades


Art by Stephany Torres for Remezcla
Written by Raquel Reichard | 2 months ago

When news broke that Walter Mercado passed away on Saturday, November 2, Latines across generations were in mourning. For decades, the Puerto Rican astrologer spiritually advised our community with his lively yet warmhearted horoscopes. But beyond sending his messages from the stars, Mercado also influenced us by complicating masculinity with his flamboyant sense of style, teaching even our most religious elders lessons about acceptance as well as gender fluidity and expression and offering early representation to young queers of a joyous, loving unapologetic life outside dichotomous gender norms. At 87, Mercado was an icon, a man with an impact so wide and deep that it will undoubtedly outlive his physical time on earth.

We reached out to artists, astrologers, healers, writers, activists and everyday Latines to learn how the late Mercado influenced their own lives, professions and outlooks as well as Latine culture and experiences overall. From self-love and cosmological teachings to childhood Spanish lessons and memories tied to loved ones who have passed on, these are the many ways the community will remember and carry Mercado’s light.

"A welcome respite from the images of masculinity I was told to emulate."


It’s hard to summarize the impact Walter Mercado had on me and so many other young, queer Puerto Ricans. I was bad at sports (particularly baseball) early on, which felt like such a disappointment to my parents. I was a really expressive child drawn to performance and the arts, which usually prompted my dad to tell me to act more like a “macho” in public. But Walter was a welcome respite from the images of masculinity I was told to emulate. Here was this astrologer with giant capes, glittering broaches and broad hand gestures — a man who embraced the campiness, magic and mystery that existed all around us. He never identified as a queer person, but he seemed to reject the machismo that I felt constrained my own magic. And my family loved him! He was a staple in our home every week. No one could speak while Walter was on — there was a reverence for his craft, for his performance, in my home that I felt gave me permission to be a little more me. Perhaps by accident, this dancer-turned-telenovela-star-turned-astrologer became my patron saint — and a source of joy for so many other young Latinx weirdos who looked at him and saw infinite possibilities outside what we’d been told was the norm.

– Gabe Gonzalez, Journalist



"He was all colors."
As a young pisces, I spent hours looking for inner and spiritual guidance. Walter Mercado was definitely one of my go-to people who I felt really knew and understood me. I remember being 14 years old and reading his horoscopes and predictions for the new year, which led me to develop an interest in astrology. Later in my life, astrology found me and I had the opportunity to study it professionally in Colombia. That is when I understood Walter’s legacy. He had to create a character in order to bring light to astrology in a world that understood little about it. He knew the science behind astrology. He was genius in knowing what to do to really make a stand in order to break all standards in Puerto Rico, Latin America and the U.S. He was all colors, non-binary, gave legit astrological predictions, was respectful, inserted love into all of his work and truly cared for people. Thanks to Walter, a lot of us never felt alone.

I had the opportunity to get to know Walter while collaborating on a project a couple of years ago. He was so loving and validating. We shared our views on astrology and talked about our spiritual gurus, including Carl Jung, one of my favorite psychology theorists. And while talking about the unconscious and how astrology had so much to say about connections, we found out that we both shared the same birthday, which is March 9. Thanks to Walter, now young astrologers like myself have the opportunity to practice astrology as a profession. There is still a long way to go to further his legacy and continue to educate the masses about the value of astrology as a human science.

– Dr. Veroshk Williams, Puerto Rican astrologer and psychologist


"Accepted us before many of us knew how to accept ourselves."

Walter Mercado gave me a look into a spiritual world that helps me understand myself and those around me with compassion more than any organized religion ever offered me. Walter Mercado broke many barriers, but, for me, a Mexican-Salvadoran, his most important one was being Puerto Rican at the top of his game in a U.S. Latinx media industry that heavily favored and catered to the Mexican community. Astrology has been gaining popularity among millennials, especially those who belong to the queer community, but for many queer Latinxs, our relationship with these two intersected worlds began with him. The beauty of Walter Mercado for queer Latinxs like me is that I experienced his queer, non-binary astrological magic alongside problematic Catholic matriarchs whom we were too afraid to come out to. This pisces Puerto Rican angel accepted us before many of us knew how to accept ourselves. QDEP, Walter Mercado, y con mucho mucho mucho amor.

– Delma Catalina Limones, Communications Professional and Writer 





"A loving contribution and source of light."

Walter Mercado was not just a household name, or an icon, his horoscopes were considered gospel. My Dad, a Capricorn who wasn’t the biggest on astrology, even respected the moment of silence taken when Walter came on the TV. I spent a lot of time going to Miami in high school to visit my abuelita, especially while she was undergoing treatment for cancer. These times were hard but also so special to me. We would watch Laura, novelas and more for hours at a time. When Walter Mercado came on, though, it was almost its own ritual: We would listen to the horoscopes, and then she would provide me with further insight about mine. We both admired Walter’s wardrobe, and I personally lived for the fact that Walter always had a face that was beat by the cosmos themselves.

I felt seen for a number of reasons by Walter: a practitioner who had created their own lane, a Bori at that; one who embodied the giving kind heart of Boricua culture (con mucho mucho mucho amor!); one who didn’t conform to what was deemed “masculine” or “feminine” but created their own spectrum of existence in regards to that. As someone who has always operated on a spectrum when it comes to sexuality and gender expression, seeing someone who was spiritual do the damn thing unapologetically inspired me in ways I will never be able to thank Walter enough for. Those moments with my abuelita will always be cherished, and anytime I heard Walter Mercado, I was taken right back there.

Walter Mercado truly was a loving contribution and source of light in the lives of all reached. Whether with his on-point horoscopes or the memories we created around them, we’ve gained an ancestor who is a shining light. The transition of death will not change that — no matter how broken our hearts are by the loss at this time. Thank you for everything, Walter Mercado.

-Emilia Ortiz, Bruja, Healer and Mental Health Advocate


"A rainbow amid the gray."

We remember how confused yet intrigued we were when, as kids, Walter Mercado would come on Channel 47 to translate what the stars communicated to him. As Dominicans, his colorful capes and feminine demeanor were attributes we were not accustomed to seeing on someone perceived to be a man. Regardless of the socialized confusion, our hearts grew fonder of this charismatic person who seemed to have a way with words. Walter Mercado was like a rainbow amid the gray of the 6 o’clock news. His segments, though short, always left us with a sense that “everything is gonna be all right.” Walter Mercado proved to us that being yourself, being a bruja, was magical. So in learning of his passing, the brujas were a bit shocked but mostly at peace. We know that a supernova star now sits among the constellations in the sky. Gracias, Walter Mercado. Con mucho mucho amor y que brille para el la luz eterna.

– Griselda and Miguelina, Brujas of Brooklyn

"It was OK to live authentically and with flare."

As a young kid, I would see Walter Mercado on TV wearing glittery jackets or colorful gowns, big rings and a soft beat. Before I could name my queerness and embody a trans femme identity, Walter Mercado showed me that it was OK to live authentically and with flare. He inspired us to look to the stars for answers, introducing astrology to so many of us baby queers. For a whole generation of Latinxs, despite all the things we may have been going through, his message of living in abundant love allowed us to access peace in that moment.

– Aldo Gallardo, Trans Activist 




"He was also an icon."

“Shhh, mi horoscopo,” is what my mother would say when Walter Mercado would finally show up on the TV screen once Primer Impacto was over. I knew not to utter a word and risk my mom missing her horoscope. Growing up, Walter Mercado’s spiritual advice and predictions were king and queen in our home. He didn’t just represent the mystical truth straight from the stars; he was also an icon. His very presence pushed social norms and gender nonconformity as he rocked sequins-filled capes, shiny makeup and oozed of flamboyant confidence. I’m grateful for his presence in our home, not just for reinforcing the messages from the stars but also giving me hope there would be space for me to step out of the box and be my own colorful self in even the most non-traditional ways. Tu presencia me ha dado mucho esperanza para el futuro, Walter Mercado, que descanses con las estrellas.

Cindy Y Rodriguez, Journalist, Bruja and Founder of Reclama

"The patron saint of Boricua brujxs."

Walter Mercado was a formative part of my childhood. Afternoons spent on my abuela’s plastic-covered sofa somewhere in East Harlem, sitting through hours of semi-decipherable news and novelas where the words washed over me, Walter was a sharp departure, a magical daily interruption of silk and sparkle with messages from the divine. The moment of focus required when he would finally announce “SA-GI-TARIO!” felt like all of a sudden the world stopped and this magical being was speaking directly to me and I could suddenly understand Spanish. Then I’d look up and realize all the women in my house, who were fluent, were just as affixed. May Walter Mercado join the pantheon of our egun as the patron saint of Boricua brujxs with full pomp and regalia, a spectacular new cape and the never-ending knowledge that because of his spirit and offerings, the world was left better, more open to magic, flamboyant clairvoyance, unabashed fluidity of human expression, reverence for honest direct messages and, above else, of course, mucho mucho amor.

– Chiquita Brujita, Bruja, Performance Artist and Candle Maker


"The people’s astrologer."

The people’s astrologer. One of my clearest memories as a child is growing up during the war in El Salvador with the news on at all times. It was exhausting, but for a few minutes, among the constant chaos, Walter Mercado came on our TVs talking to us about the stars, our signs and our outlook. He always ended it basically saying that regardless of anything to do everything with love. My love for astrology started as a little girl watching him in his non-conforming glory. His unapologetic disregard of expectations taught me more than I realized growing up. Rest in peace, sweet pisces.

– Johanna Toruño, Artist, Unapologetic Street Series

"One of my first metaphysics and cosmology teachers."

“As a baby queer and baby empath, I remember how much comfort I felt during Walter’s segments at home. It was something we didn’t talk about too much but that we watched as part of our evening routine. I remember being drawn to Walter’s passion, tone and body language. Although as a young queer person I didn’t have the language for it, I appreciate how he brought gender nonconformity into our home unapologetically. I looked forward to his outfits, the colors, the backgrounds of the segments and the jewelry he adorned himself with. Walter was one of my first metaphysics and cosmology teachers. He inspired me to look at the stars, to wonder, to know that the world was so vast and that it extended beyond the physical realm. He taught me that everything was connected and that everything was impacted by everything else, a teaching that has expanded so much in my life and that I deeply thank him for.”

– Berenice Dimas, Herbal Educator and Creator of Bruja Tip


"He will never be forgotten."

My earliest memory of Walter Mercado is my mother watching Spanish television and this superhero-looking person appearing on the TV. My mom would quickly hush me to be quiet because her horoscope was about to be read by Walter Mercado. This was a consistent accordance in our home. Mami would make sure to listen to not only her horoscope but that of her four kids and friends.

Walter was more than an astrologer. He was a low-key brujo who had all of our abuelas, mothers, tías, sisters and maybe even your dads and tíos acting like they’re not into astrology but inconspicuously listening to their readings. Because of his iconic status in our community, I dropped a sweater with the words blazing “Walter Mercado is my Spiritual Advisor” as a homage to the mystical figure five years ago.

At a time when astrology seems to be a trend, with apps like Co – Star, The Pattern and the occasional astrology chatter on Twitter, we can’t forget the godfather. For a man to die at the age of 87 and still be culturally relevant speaks to his impact. He will never be forgotten.

– M. Tony Peralta, Contemporary Artist and Designer
walter mercado. Monday, November 4, 2019 at 5:52 PM EST



The Tributes Pour in After News of Walter Mercado's Death



Film

Watch Walter Mercado Give the Most Epic Life Advice: "Have Sex With a Sunset"


Walter Mercado: "I Am Publicly Asking Mr. Rosselló to Resign"


Here Are the Rituals Walter Mercado Wants You to Follow to Manifest Your Best Life in 2020



5 Walter Mercado Books to Read When You're in Need of Spiritual Guidance



21 Walter Mercado Illustrations That Shine as Bright as the Spiritual Adviser



Culture

9 Walter Mercado Outfits That Were Truly Out of This Worl
d

Art by Stephany Torres for Remezcla
By Ecleen Luzmila Caraballo | 2 months ago

Whoever said a jack of all trades is a master of none wasn’t Latino, and they certainly did not know of Walter Mercado Salinas. Aside from being an esteemed astrologer, Mercado was a dancer, writer, actor and – a qué no lo sabías – a recording artist. According to reports from the early ‘90s, music was amongst the Puerto Rican legend’s bright and varied armory of responses to this thing called life. Albeit a brief dance with the art form, his contribution is yet another gift to us all.

He always kept the main thing the main thing, though. In fact, the underlying higher purpose in even pursuing music in the first place was to further refine his craft. “The songs will help my astrology,” the iconic gender non-conforming household name told the Orlando Sentinel in 1992. “I am not leaving one for the other.”

A quick search makes it seem like the album itself (rightfully titled Walter Mercado, the album) never existed. Throughout the decade in which the album came to life, Mercado rolled out a series of guides and horoscopes as collections via Sony Music. His soothing voice served as one of reason and peace with insight on everything from signs of love to how to attract more money and more.

His album, it seems, was a way to share parts of himself beyond what we knew from his televised readings. It includes a salsa number dedicated to the island that raised him. “Sueño Con Volver” is a testament to his love for his homeland of Puerto Rico.


“Nunca te olvido isla mía, tu eres parte de mi ser,” he sings. “Sueño con volver… a la tierra del amor (a Puerto Rico)/donde siempre brilla el sol (a Puerto Rico)/donde todo es paz y amor (a Puerto Rico).”


Unsurprisingly, Mercado shone on this medium as much as he did any other.

“It has been a new experience,” he said, “like giving birth to a child, like giving birth to something beautiful.”

And with that, Walter Mercado leaves behind more than one message we won’t soon forget.

Como soñamos que volvieras, Walter. Que en paz descanse.

Tuesday, August 08, 2023

Should There be a Supreme Court? 


Its Role Has Always Been Anti-Democratic



 
COUNTERPUNCH
Facebook

“Brown, J., an’ Harlan, J., is discussin’ th’ condition in th’ Roman Impire befure th’ fire …” Political cartoon by Frederick Opper, 1890. Library of Congress.

Vested interests create “checks and balances” primarily to make political systems non-responsive to demands for social reform. Historically, therefore, the checks are politically unbalanced in practice. Instead of producing a happy medium, their effect often has been to check the power of the people to assert their interests at the expense of the more powerful. Real reform requires a revolution – often repeated attempts. The Roman Republic suffered five centuries of fighting to redistribute land and cancel debts, all of which failed as the oligarchy’s “checks” imposed deepening economic dependency and imbalance.

The Supreme Court is America’s most distinctive check. Its deepening bias since its takeover by “conservatives” claiming to be “originalist” interpreters of the constitution, has led to the most widespread protests since Franklin Roosevelt threatened to pack the court in the 1930s by expanding its membership to create a more democratic majority. Although appointed by presidents and consented to by Congress, the judges’ lifetime tenure imposes the ideology of past elections on the present.

So why are they needed at all? Why not permit Congress to make laws that reflect the needs of the time? The Court’s judges themselves have pointed out that if Congress doesn’t like their rulings, it should pass its own laws, or even a constitutional amendment, to provide a new point of reference.

That is not a practical solution in today’s world. The most obvious reason is that Congress is locked in a stalemate, unable to take a firm progressive step because of how far the U.S. political as well as judicial system has long been dominated by corporate and financial interests. wielding enormous sums of money to corrupt the election process since the Citizens United ruling in 2010 even at the nomination stage to determine the candidates. The Federalist Society has embarked on a five-decade lobbying effort to groom and promote judges to serve the vested interests.[1] When today’s Supreme Court act as mediums to ask what the original drafters of the Constitution wanted or meant, they simply are using these ghostly spirits as proxies for today’s ruling elites.

Long before the U.S. Supreme Court’s “originalist” seances rejecting as unconstitutional laws that most Americans want – on the excuse that they are not what the wealthy New England merchants and southern slave-owners who drafted the Constitution would have intended – classical Greek and Roman oligarchies created their own judicial checks against the prospect of Sparta’s kings, Athenian popular assemblies and Roman consuls enacting laws at the expense of the vested interests.

Sparta had two kings instead of just one, requiring their joint agreement on any new rules. And just in case they might join together to limit the wealth of the oligarchs, they were made subject to a council of ephors to “advise” them. A kindred Roman spirit called for two consuls to head the Senate. To ward against their joining to cancel debts or redistribute land – the constant demand of Romans throughout the Republic’s five centuries, 509-27 BC – the Senate’s meetings could be suspended if religious authorities found omens from the flight of birds or other airy phenomena. These always seemed to occur when a challenge to the oligarchy seemed likely to pass.

The historian Theodor Mommsen called this tactic “political astrology.” The most blatant attempt occurred in 59 BC when Julius Caesar was elected consul and proposed an agrarian law to settle some of Pompey’s veterans as well as urban plebs on public land in Italy. Additional land was to be bought from private owners, using funds from Pompey’s campaign in Asia Minor.

 Cato the Younger led the Roman Senate’s Optimates who feared Caesar’s (or anyone’s) popularity. Opposing any change in the status quo, he started one of his famous all-day speeches. Caesar ordered him led away, but many senators followed Cato out, preventing a vote from being taken. Caesar then simply bypassed the Senate to put the measure before the Centuriate Assembly, composed largely of army veterans. That was a tactic that the reformer Tiberius Gracchus had perfected after 133 to promote his own land redistribution (for which he was assassinated, the oligarchy’s traditional fallback defense in all epochs).[2]

When Caesar’s opponents threatened violence to block the popular vote, Pompey threatened to use his own force. And when the time came for the Senate to ratify the law, Caesar and Pompey filled the Forum with their soldiers, and a large crowd gathered. Cato’s son-in-law, M. Calpurnius Bibulus was Caesar’s annoying co-consul, and tried to suspend the voting by claiming to see bad omens, making public business illegal.

Caesar overruled Bibulus, based on his own higher authority as pontifex maximus, leading Bibulus to declare the rest of the year a sacred period in which no assemblies could be held or votes taken. But the crowd drove him away and broke his insignia of consulship, the ceremonial fasces carried by his lictors, and beat the tribunes allied with him. Cato likewise was pushed away when he tried to force his way to the platform to block the vote. He and Bibulus fled, and Caesar’s bill was passed, including a clause requiring all senators to take an oath to adhere to it. Bibulus went home and sulked, insisting that the entire year’s laws be nullified because they were passed under threat of violence. It was the oligarchy, however, that settled matters by assassinating Caesar and other advocates of land and debt reform.

Athens, which turned oligarchic in the 4th century BC after losing the Peloponnesian War with Sparta, used a tactic closer to today’s Supreme Court by trying to subject laws to conformity with an alleged “ancestral constitution” that presumably should never be changed – at least in a way that would favor democracy. Claiming to restore the supposed constitution of Solon, the Thirty Tyrants installed by Sparta’s oligarchy in 404 BC downgraded the Athenian boule’s governing five hundred citizens into a merely “advisory” group whose views had no official weight.[3]

The great watershed in Athenian history had been Solon’s seisachtheia – literally “shedding of [debt] burdens” in 594 BC, cancelling personal debts that bound debtors in near bondage. New demands for debt cancellation and land redistribution remained the primary democratic demands for the next four centuries. Androtion (ca. 344 BC), a follower of the oligarchic Isocrates, sought to claim the authority of Solon while denying that he had actually cancelled debts, claiming that he merely revalued the coinage, weights and measures to make debts more easily payable.[4] But there was no coinage in Solon’s time, so this attempt to rewrite history was anachronistic. That often happens when mediums claim to channel the spirit of the dead who cannot speak.

In a similar tradition, the authors of America’s constitution created the Supreme Court to provide a check on the danger that political evolution might lead Congress to pass laws threatening oligarchic rule. There no longer is a pontifex to block democratic lawmaking by claiming to read auspices in the flight of birds or other airy phenomena. Instead, there is a more secular subordination of new laws to the principle that they must not be changed from what was intended by the authors of the Constitution – as interpreted by their counterpart elites in today’s world. This approach fails to take into account how the world is evolving and how the legal system needs to be modernized to cope with such change.

I have found it to be an axiom of the history of legal philosophy that if the popular political spirit is for democratic reform – especially supporting taxes and other laws to prevent the polarization of wealth between the vested interests and the economy at large – the line of resistance to such progress is to insist on blocking any change from “original” constitutional principles that supported the power of vested interests in the first place.

The U.S. political system has become distorted by the power given to the Supreme Court enabling it to block reforms that the majority of Americans are reported to support. The problem is not only the Supreme Court, to be sure. Most voters oppose wars, support public healthcare for all and higher taxes on the wealthy. But Congress, itself captured by the oligarch donor class, routinely raises military spending, privatizes healthcare in the hands of predatory monopolies and cuts taxes for the financial rent-seeking class while pretending that spending money on government social programs would force taxes to rise for wage-earners.

The effect of the corporate capture of Congress as well as the Supreme Court as the ultimate oligarchic backstop is to block Congressional politics as a vehicle to update laws, taxes and public regulation in keeping with what voters recognize to be modern needs. The Supreme Court imposes the straitjacket of what America’s 18th-century slaveowners and other property owners are supposed to have wanted at the time they wrote the Constitution.

James Madison and his fellow Federalists were explicit about their aim. They wanted to block what they feared was the threat of democracy by populists, abolitionists and other reformers threatening to check their property “rights” as if these were natural and inherent. The subsequent 19th century’s flowering of classical political economists explaining the logic for checking rentier oligarchies was far beyond what they wanted. Yet today’s Supreme Court’s point of reference is still, “What would the authors of the U.S. Constitution, slaveowners fearful of democracy, have intended?” That logic is applied anachronistically to limit every democratic modernization from the right of unionized labor to go on strike, to abortion rights for women, cancellation of student debt and the right of government to tax wealth.

Even if Congress were not too divided and stalemated to write laws reflecting what most voters want, the Supreme Court would reject them, just as it sought for many decades to declare a national income tax unconstitutional under the theory of “takings.” The Supreme Court can be expected to block any law threatening the victory of the Thatcherite and Reaganomics doctrine of privatization, “small” government unable to challenge the power of wealth (but big enough to crush any attempts by labor, women or minorities to promote their own interests), a state of affairs that is an anomaly for a nation claiming to be a democracy.

A nation’s constitution should have the flexibility to modernize laws, taxes and government regulatory power to remove barriers to broadly-based progress, living standards and productivity. But these barriers have been supported by oligarchies through the ages. That was why the Supreme Court was created in the first place. The aim was to leave the economy in the control of property holders and the wealthiest families. That anachronistic judicial philosophy is helping turn the United States into a failed state by empowering a wealthy minority to reduce the rest of the population to economic dependency.

We are repeating the economic polarization of ancient Greece and Rome that I have described in my recent book The Collapse of Antiquity. The 7th– and 6th-century BC crisis of personal debt and land concentration led to social revolution by reformers (“tyrants,” not originally a term of invective) in Corinth, Sparta and other Greek-speaking city-states and Aegean islands. Solon was appointed archon to resolve the crisis in Athens. Unlike reformers in other Greek cities, he did not redistribute the land, but he did cancel the debts and removed the land’s crop-payment stones. The ensuing 6th century saw Solon’s successors lay the groundwork for Athenian democracy.

But the next three centuries saw the rise of creditor oligarchies throughout Greece and Italy, using debt as a lever to monopolize land and reduce citizens to bondage. These increasingly aggressive oligarchies fought, with more and more overt violence, against new reformers seeking to cancel debts and redistribute the land to prevent the economy falling into austerity, clientage and reliance on the dole. Their oligarchic ideology was much like that of today’s right-wing Supreme Court in its approach to constitutional law. The common denominator is an age-old drive to prevent democratic change, above all by using wealth as a means of controlling the political process. That is the philosophy outlined in the Powell Memo, and in the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling permitting the political campaign system to be financialized and, in effect, privatized in the hands of the Donor Class.

As in classical antiquity, the exponential rise in debt has polarized wealth ownership. Personal debt bondage no longer exists, but most home buyers and wage earners are obliged to take on a working-lifetime debt burden to obtain a home of their own, an education to get a job to qualify for mortgage loans to buy their home, and credit-card debt simply to make ends meet. The result is debt deflation as labor is obliged to spend an increasing proportion of its income on debt service instead of goods and services. That slows the economy, while creditors use their rising accumulation of wealth to finance the inflation of housing prices, along with stock and bond prices – with yet more debt financing.

The conflict between creditors and debtors is a red thread running throughout American history, from the Whiskey Rebellion of the 1790s to the monetary deflation of the 1880s as “hard money” creditor interests rolled back prices and incomes to be paid in gold, increasing the control of bondholders over labor. Today, U.S. debt and tax policy is passing out of the Congress to the Supreme Court, whose members are groomed and vetted to make sure that they will favor financial and other rentier wealth by leading the Court to impose the founders’ pre-democratic philosophy of constitutional law despite the past few centuries of political reforms that, at least nominally, have endorsed democracy over oligarchy.

The victory of rentier wealth has led to the deindustrialization of America and the resulting predatory diplomacy as its economy seeks to extract from foreign countries the products that it no longer is producing at home. This is why foreign countries are moving to pursue a philosophy rejecting debt deflation, privatization and the shift of economic planning from elected governments to financial centers from Wall Street to the City of London, the Paris Bourse and Japan.

Any resilient society’s constitution should be responsive to the evolution of economic, technological, environmental and geopolitical dynamics. U.S. legal philosophy reflects mainstream economics in trying to lock in a set of principles written by creditors and other rentiers fearful of making the financial system, tax system and distribution of wealth more conducive to prosperity than to austerity and economic polarization. While there no longer is an attempt to roll back the clock to impose the outright slavery that most framers of the Constitution endorsed, the spread of debt deflation and debt dependency has become a form of economic bondage that is the modern “conservative” counterpart to the racial slavery of old. It is what the “original” power elite are thought to have wanted if we choose to go back in a time machine and ask them, instead of looking toward a less oligarchic future.

Notes.

[1] The Lewis Powell memo to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on August 23, 1971 laid out this plan. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/democracy/the-lewis-powell-memo-a-corporate-blueprint-to-dominate-democracy/. For a review of how this almost conspiratorial propaganda and censorship attack was financed see Lewis H. Lapham, “Tentacles of Rage: The Republican propaganda mill, a brief history,” Harpers, September, 2004. Available at: http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Republican-Propaganda1sep04.htm.

[2] See Cassius Dio, Roman History 38.2.2. I discuss this affair in The Collapse of Antiquity, chapter 18.

[3] Athēnaion Politeia 35.2 and Xenophon, Hellenica 2.3.2 and 11.

[4] Plutarch, Solon 15.2.

Michael Hudson’s new book, The Destiny of Civilization, will be published by CounterPunch Books next month.