Tuesday, February 04, 2020

Nomagic, a startup out of Poland, picks up $8.6M for its pick-and-place warehouse robots


THE ROBOTS ARE COMING AND THEY ARE COMING FOR YOUR JOB YOU GET TO SUPERVISE THEM 
Factories and warehouses have been two of the biggest markets for robots in the last several years, with machines taking on mundane, if limited, processes to speed up work and free up humans to do other, more complex tasks. Now, a startup out of Poland that is widening the scope of what those robots can do is announcing funding, a sign not just of how robotic technology has been evolving, but of the growing demand for more automation, specifically in the world of logistics and fulfilment.
Nomagic, which has developed way for a robotic arm to identify an item from an unordered selection, pick it up and then pack it into a box, is today announcing that it has raised $8.6 million in funding, one of the largest-ever seed rounds for a Polish startup. Co-led by Khosla Ventures and Hoxton Ventures, the round also included participation from DN Capital, Capnamic Ventures and Manta Ray, all previous backers of Nomagic.
There are a number of robotic arms on the market today that can be programmed to pick up and deposit items from Point A to Point B. But we are only starting to see a new wave of companies focus on bringing these to fulfilment environments because of the limitations of those arms: they can only work when the items are already “ordered” in a predictable way, such as on an assembly line, which has mean that fulfilment of, for example, online orders is usually carried out by humans.
Nomagic has incorporated a new degree of computer vision, machine learning and other AI-based technologies to  elevate the capabilities of those robotic arm. Robots powered by its tech can successfully select items from an “unstructured” group of objects — that is, not an assembly line, but potentially another box — before picking it up and placing it elsewhere.
Kacper Nowicki, the ex-Googler CEO of Nomagic who co-founded the company with Marek Cygan (an academic) and Tristan d’Orgeval (formerly of Climate Corporation), noted that while there has been some work on the problem of unstructured objects and industrial robots — in the US, there are some live implementations taking shape, with one, Covariant, recently exiting stealth mode — it has been mostly a “missing piece” in terms of the innovation that has been done to make logistics and fulfilment more efficient.
That is to say, there has been little in the way of bigger commercial roll outs of the technology, creating an opportunity in what is a huge market: fulfilment services are projected to be a $56 billion market by 2021 (currently the US is the biggest single region, estimated at between $13.5 billion and $15.5 billion).
“If every product were a tablet or phone, you could automate a regular robotic arm to pick and pack,” Nowicki said. “But if you have something else, say something in plastic, or a really huge diversity of products, then that is where the problems come in.”
Nowicki was a longtime Googler who moved from Silicon Valley back to Poland to build the company’s first engineering team in the country. In his years at Google, Nowicki worked in areas including Google Cloud and search, but also saw the AI developments underway at Google’s DeepMind subsidiary, and decided he wanted to tackle a new problem for his next challenge.
His interest underscores what has been something of a fork in artificial intelligence in recent years. While some of the earliest implementations of the principles of AI were indeed on robots, these days a lot of robotic hardware seems clunky and even outmoded, while much more of the focus of AI has shifted to software and “non-physical” systems aimed at replicating and improving upon human thought. Even the word “robot” is now just as likely to be seen in the phrase “robotic process automation”, which in fact has nothing to do with physical robots, but software.
“A lot of AI applications are not that appealing,” Nowicki simply noted (indeed, while Nowicki didn’t spell it out, DeepMind in particular has faced a lot of controversy over its own work in areas like healthcare). “But improvements in existing robotics systems by applying machine learning and computer vision so that they can operate in unstructured environments caught my attention. There has been so little automation actually in physical systems, and I believe it’s a place where we still will see a lot of change.”
Interestingly, while the company is focusing on hardware, it’s not actually building hardware per se, but is working on software that can run on the most popular robotic arms in the market today to make them “smarter”.
“We believe that most of the intellectual property in in AI is in the software stack, not the hardware,” said Orgeval. “We look at it as a mechatronics problem, but even there, we believe that this is mainly a software problem.”
Having Khosla as a backer is notable given that a very large part of the VC’s prolific investing has been in North America up to now. Nowicki said he had a connection to the firm by way of his time in the Bay Area, where before Google, Vinod Khosla backed a startup of his (which went bust in one of the dot-com downturns).
While there is an opportunity for Nomagic to take its idea global, for now Khosla’s interested because of the a closer opportunity at home, where Nomagic is already working with third-party logistics and fulfilment providers, as well as retailers like Cdiscount, a French Amazon-style, soup-to-nuts online marketplace.
“The Nomagic team has made significant strides since its founding in 2017,” says Sven Strohband, Managing Director of Khosla Ventures, in a statement. “There’s a massive opportunity within the European market for warehouse robotics and automation, and NoMagic is well-positioned to capture some of that market share.”


Google's location tracking finally under formal probe in Europe

Google’s  lead data regulator in Europe has finally opened a formal investigation into the tech giant’s processing of location data, more than a year after receiving a series of complaints from consumer rights groups across Europe.
The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) announced the probe today, writing in a statement: “The issues raised within the concerns relate to the legality of Google’s processing of location data and the transparency surrounding that processing.”
“As such, the DPC has commenced an own-volition Statutory Inquiry, with respect to Google Ireland Limited,  pursuant to Section 110 of the Data Protection 2018 and in accordance with the co-operation mechanism outlined under Article 60 of the GDPR. The Inquiry will set out to establish whether Google has a valid legal basis for processing the location data of its users and whether it meets its obligations as a data controller with regard to transparency,” its notice added.
We’ve reached out to Google for comment. Update: The company has now sent this statement, attributed to a spokesperson: “People should be able to understand and control how companies like Google use location data to provide services to them. We will cooperate fully with the office of the Data Protection Commission in its inquiry, and continue to work closely with regulators and consumer associations across Europe. In the last year, we have made a number of product changes to improve the level of user transparency and control over location data.”
BEUC,  an umbrella group for European consumer rights groups, said the complaints about “deceptive” location tracking were filed back in November 2018—several months after the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force in May 2018.
It said the rights groups are concerned about how Google gathers information about the places people visit which it says could grant private companies (including Google) the “power to draw conclusions about our personality, religion or sexual orientation, which can be deeply personal traits.”
The complaints argue that consent to “share” users’ location data is not valid under EU law because it is not freely given — an express stipulation of consent as a legal basis for processing personal data under the GDPR — arguing that consumers are rather being tricked into accepting “privacy-intrusive settings”.
It’s not clear why it’s taken the DPC so long to process the complaints and determine it needs to formally investigate. (We’ve asked for comment and will update with any response.)
BEUC certainly sounds unimpressed, saying it’s glad the regulator “eventually” took the step to look into Google’s “massive location data collection”.
“European consumers have been victim of these practices for far too long,” its press release adds. “BEUC expects the DPC to investigate Google’s practices at the time of our complaints, and not just from today. It is also important that the procedural rights of consumers who complained many months ago, and that of our members representing them, are respected.”
Commenting further in a statement, Monique Goyens, BEUC’s director general, also said: “Consumers should not be under commercial surveillance. They need authorities to defend them and to sanction those who break the law. Considering the scale of the problem, which affects millions of European consumers, this investigation should be a priority for the Irish data protection authority. As more than 14 months have passed since consumer groups first filed complaints about Google’s malpractice, it would be unacceptable for consumers who trust authorities if there were further delays. The credibility of the enforcement of the GDPR is at stake here.”
The Irish DPC has also been facing growing criticism over the length of time it’s taking to reach decisions on extant GDPR investigations. A total of zero decisions on big tech cases have been issued by the regulator some 20 months after GDPR came into force in May 2018.
As the lead European regulator for multiple tech giants — as a consequence of a GDPR mechanism which funnels cross-border complaints via a lead regulator, combined with the fact so many tech firms choose to site their regional HQ in Ireland (with the added carrot of attractive business rates) — the DPC does have a major backlog of complex cross-border cases.
However, there is growing political and public pressure for enforcement action to demonstrate that the GDPR is functioning as intended.
Even as further questions have been raised about how Ireland’s legal system will be able to manage so many cases.
Google has felt the sting of GDPR enforcement elsewhere in the region; just over a year ago the French data watchdog, the CNIL, fined the company $57 million for transparency and consent failures attached to the onboarding process for its Android mobile operating system.
But immediately following that decision Google switched the legal location of its international business to Ireland, meaning any GDPR complaints are now funneled through the DPC.

After Epic 'Nightmare' in Iowa, Democratic App Built by Secretive Firm Shadow Inc. Comes Under Scrutiny"
"This outfit is inexcusably secretive."
Published on Tuesday, February 04, 2020 by Common Dream
At Shadow, https://shadowinc.io our mission is to build political power for the progressive movement by developing affordable and easy-to-use tools for teams and budgets of any ...

Web results

SEE AGENT 99 I TOLD YOU IT WAS KAOS
Image result for GET SMART KAOS"
https://getsmart.fandom.com/wiki/Siegfried 

Officials from the 68th caucus precinct overlook the results of the first referendum count during a caucus event on February 3, 2020 at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa. (Photo: Tom Brenner/Getty Images)

ARE THEY USING TEXAS INSTRUMENT SCIENTIFIC CALCULATORS, THEY ARE THEY ARE USING TEXAS INSTRUMENTS CALCULATORS, THE HARDEST CALCULATOR TO PROGRAMME WITH! SO NO WONDER THEY HAD PROBLEMS FROM THE GIT GO. PLUS THEIR AGE .....OF THE INSTRUMENTS WHAT DID YOU THINK I WAS REFERRING TO. 

Amid all the finger-pointing and anger that followed the nightmarish Iowa Democratic presidential caucuses Monday night, many journalists and progressive observers honed in on the smartphone app the state Democratic Party used—with disastrous consequences—to record and report the results of the highly anticipated contest.
"The DNC and the Iowa Democratic Party have engineered a nightmare. People are going to lose their minds over the result, whatever it is. Epic, raw incompetence."
—Zach Carter, HuffPost
The app, according to several news reports, was developed by the secretive for-profit tech firm Shadow Inc., which has ties to and receives funding from ACRONYM, a Democratic digital non-profit organization. Shadow's CEO is Gerard Niemira, who worked on Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.

"State campaign finance records indicate the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow... more than $60,000 for 'website development' over two installments in November and December of last year," HuffPost reported late Monday. "A Democratic source with knowledge of the process said those payments were for the app that caucus site leaders were supposed to use to upload the results at their locales."

Shadow has also been paid for services by the Nevada Democratic Party and the presidential campaigns of former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, according to Federal Election Commission filings.
Democratic Party officials kept the details of the app as well as Shadow's involvement hidden from the public ahead of the Iowa caucus. But as Monday night wore on and frustration with the delayed reporting of the caucus results boiled over, journalists began scrutinizing the new technology and its developer more closely.
The New York Times, citing anonymous people who were briefed on the app by Iowa Democratic Party officials, reported that the app was hastily constructed in just two months and "not properly tested at a statewide scale."

"The party decided to use the app only after another proposal for reporting votes—which entailed having caucus participants call in their votes over the phone—was abandoned, on the advice of Democratic National Committee officials," the Times reported.

"The secrecy around the app this year came from the Iowa Democratic Party, which asked that even its name be withheld from the public," according to the Times. "There were concerns that the app would malfunction in areas with poor connectivity, or because of high bandwidth use, such as when many people tried to use it at the same time."
Mandy McClure, communications director of the Iowa Democratic Party, said in a statement that the new app was not responsible for the delayed results.
"This is simply a reporting issue," said McClure. "The app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results."

Results of the caucuses are expected Tuesday, but no specific time has been given. The presidential campaigns of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Buttigieg released portions of their internal caucus data suggesting they emerged victorious from the bungled process.

In a statement released in the early hours of Tuesday morning, ACRONYM spokesperson Kyle Tharpe attempted to distance his group from Shadow's technology.

"ACRONYM is an investor in several for-profit companies across the progressive media and technology sectors," said Tharpe. "One of those independent, for-profit companies is Shadow Inc., which also has other private investors. We are reading confirmed reports of Shadow's work with the Iowa Democratic Party on Twitter, and we, like everyone else, are eagerly awaiting more information from the Iowa Democratic Party with respect to what happened."




A voting app by Shadow Inc. takes center stage at chaotic Iowa caucuses

Image Credits: Tim Hynds/Sioux City Journal / Getty Images
American democracy can be confusing and messy. There is, perhaps, no better example than last night’s Iowa caucuses. The votes that kick off presidential primary season are, at once, a wonderful celebration of citizen participation in representative democracy and a rather complex system that remains a mystery to many of those outside the nation’s 31st most populous state.
It is, however, an extremely important one for presidential candidates who spend the months leading up to the event doing photo ops while awkwardly attempting to eat food from a stick. It’s the source of much momentum that can propel a candidate into the general. As such, the chaos and uncertainty following last night’s voting are all the more troubling. The day after the long-awaited and much ballyhooed caucuses, no victor has been declared (though some appear to have already declared themselves).
At the center of the confusion is an app reportedly built by a for-profit company called “Shadow Inc.” According to reporting by The New York Times, the app used by the Iowa Democratic Party was “quickly put together in just the past two months” and not subjected to the kind of scrutiny one might traditionally reserve for software used in such an important statewide contest. The app is said to be a replacement for a system wherein caucus participants called in their election. The party reportedly paid Shadow around $63,000 in two installments to build one of its “affordable and easy-to-use tools.”
We reported on the crashed app and delay late last night. “We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results,” Iowa Democratic Party spokesperson Mandy McClure said in a statement. “The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results.”
McClure was quick to point out that no evidence of a hack or other intrusion was found — an important point after the fallout from the 2016 election.
Shadow’s background is, fittingly, shrouded in some mystery. Digital nonprofit firm ACRONYM, which has been tied to Shadow, issued a statement late last night claiming to merely be an investor that didn’t provide any technology to the Iowa Democratic Party. “We, like everyone els,e are eagerly awaiting more information from the Iowa Democratic Party,” spokesperson Kyle Tharp said in a statement.
followup statement from the Iowa Democratic Party Chair Troy Price chalks the error up to a “coding issue.”
As part of our investigation, we determined with certainty that the underlying data collected via the app was sound. While the app was recording data accurately, it was reporting out only partial data. We have determined that this was due to a coding issue in the reporting system. This issue was identified and fixed. The application’s reporting issue did not impact the ability of precinct chairs to report data accurately.
Because of the required paper documentation, we have been able to verify that the data recorded in the app and used to calculate State Delegate Equivalents is valid and accurate. Precinct level results are still being reported to the IDP. While our plan is to release results as soon as possible today, our ultimate goal is to ensure that the integrity and accuracy of the process continues to be upheld.
Price also echoes the early statement regarding hacking and insists that, in spite of reports of insignificant testing, the system was vetted by security experts.
“We have every indication that our systems were secure and there was not a cybersecurity intrusion,” he writes. “In preparation for the caucuses, our systems were tested by independent cybersecurity consultants.”
The LA Times notes that Shadow began life as Groundbase, which was founded by former Clinton 2016 digital campaign staffers, Gerard Niemira and Krista Davis.
The unclear and uncertain nature of the situation has gone way toward fueling doubt among voters in a time when many are understandably already skeptical of the system.


WHY IOWA SHOULD NOT BE FIRST NOR A CAUCUS BASED PRIMARY
Iowa Caucus Night Is an Utter Disaster
FUBAR
Image result for the shadow"
SEE 

NEW DETAILS SHOW HOW DEEPLY IOWA CAUCUS APP DEVELOPER WAS EMBEDDED IN DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT

Top Hollywood celebrities and Silicon Valley investors are linked to the app that failed in Iowa

The App That Disrupted the Iowa Caucuses

Iowa Caucus Night Is an Utter Disaster
---30--
CULTURE

Jesse Mockrin Paints Billie Eilish in the Style of Caravaggio for Vogue


BY DODIE 
KAZANJIAN February 3, 2020
 
Portrait by Jesse Mockrin


Just before Thanksgiving, when I asked the Los Angeles–based artist Jesse Mockrin if she was interested in doing a portrait of Billie Eilish for Vogue, she said yes without missing a beat. By the next morning, she sent an email containing five sketches of Eilish. Each one was based on a different historical painting (including Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring, but Eilish's earring was a sword, not a pearl).

Mockrin was a natural for this project. She once told me that she wanted her paintings to blur or break down gender barriers, so that “the figure is a figure.” Her work has always been about connecting the contemporary with historical painting—bringing the past into the present, building on similarities between the now and the then: A series of paintings in her early work combines K-pop stars with historical images of androgynous boys. In Jesse’s portrait for Vogue, Billie Eilish meets Caravaggio.


When did Billie Eilish first catch your eye? Are you a fan? If so, what was it that you liked about her?

I first read about her in the New York Times in March of 2019, when she was about to release her first album. She already had a huge following by then. She seemed preternaturally mature and I liked her genderless style. I am interested in gender as a construct, both contemporary and historical. I’m also interested in parts of our culture that expand and challenge our notions of gender—in music, fashion, etc. I liked that she was giving teenage girls a model that was based on creativity and self-expression rather than traditional sex appeal. I was once a teenage girl—I came of age in the Britney Spears era. I would have appreciated Billie Eilish and I am glad to see her shifting the culture.

 
Courtesy of Jesse Mockrin
Courtesy of Jesse Mockrin

Your paintings often reimagine details from Renaissance work—an arm or a leg or a face that’s often turned away from the viewer. How did it feel to zero in on the face of a contemporary idol—a real person in real time?


I was nervous I wouldn’t be able to capture the likeness required for this kind of portrait. I don’t use projected images in my painting because I want my hand to come through in the work, so it was a challenge to make sure her features came through. In many ways her face is reminiscent of other faces in my work—the deep-set eyes, small nose, and full lips. And it was fun to paint Billie because of her striking contemporariness—the hair, the nails, the jacket.

You based your portrait on Caravaggio’s 1593 Boy With a Basket of Fruit. Why that particular painting—did you feel there was something of Billie in that 16th-century boy? She’s as contemporary as anyone on the planet. How did she fit into that character for you—in other words, why did you cast her in that role?

I did a series of paintings early on combining images of K-pop stars with historical paintings of androgynous boys, so it felt natural to look for a connection to Billie in the past. In the Caravaggio painting that inspired me, his model was sixteen years old. The basket of fruit represents abundance, youth, vitality...all things Billie has in spades. I chose to insert the insects, which come from the tradition of Dutch Golden Age still-life painting, but also from the ways Billie herself has used insects in her imagery. In the way Billie represents herself, beauty and darkness are inextricably intertwined, just as they are in the gorgeous Dutch paintings of flowers and fruit, peppered with snails and insects. There is a kind of danger lurking within all the success and fame she has achieved at such a young age. Youth and beauty will rot and wither just like fruit. What I like about Billie in this painting is that she knows it, and she embraces it.

Caravaggio's painting Boy with a Basket of Fruit (1593).
Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio. Boy with a Basket of Fruit, 1593 / Alamy

You asked for Billie to be photographed at a certain angle in a certain light, and then worked from that photo, not from life. If you could have it either way, which do you prefer?

I actually prefer working from photographs. My work is so much about the image—the image of the icon, the images of the paintings that are reproduced in books or on the internet. It is also about the loss of information and the power of the surface. I feel like the surface of things paradoxically contains a deep well of possible meanings.
Billie Eilish at the 62nd Annual Grammy Awards in January.Photo: Getty Images

Did you listen to Billie’s music while you were painting?

I did, a few times! I listened to her album a lot in the studio when it first came out.

A photograph of Billie that’s been going viral since the Grammy Awards shows her holding all five of her new Grammys in both arms. It made me think of your portrait of her—both arms brimming with an abundant basket of fruit and insects. The similarity of the pose is uncanny. Did you have a premonition of her sweeping five Grammys?


JM: I didn’t—but the basket of fruit is a metaphor for abundance, which in the context of the Grammys turned out to be very apt. Even before the Grammys, it felt clear that Billie was riding high.
Biden vs Sanders: How One Latino Family In Iowa Is Thinking About Tonight’s Democratic Caucus

In Marshalltown, Iowa — a town that went for Trump in 2016 — one large and politically engaged family is motivated by one thing: beating Donald Trump.




Nidhi PrakashBuzzFeed News Reporter February 3, 2020

Nidhi Prakash / BuzzFeed News

The Lopez family discusses politics over lunch at Ramona Lopez's home in Marshalltown, Iowa.

MARSHALLTOWN, Iowa — Three days before the caucuses, Ramona Lopez gathered much of her extended family — she has 7 children, 17 grandchildren, as well as sons- and daughters-in-law — at her warm yellow house in Marshalltown, Iowa, to have a spirited discussion about whom they each plan to support on Monday night.

Lopez, 61, was always determined her children would be “good people with a sense of responsibility to the community.” On Saturday, she watched the lively back-and-forth between her children with pride while devouring homemade guacamole, salsas, rice and beans, and two types of carne asada, making sure no one's plate was empty for long.

“It’s one’s responsibility to be able to talk about these things,” she said with her family gathered around her kitchen table. “We need to be assertive people. We need to be strong, mentally and physically.”

“I want [Sanders] to win,” said Raymond Correa, 31, who attended both Sanders and Biden events in Marshalltown with his mother the previous weekend, adding that he had his doubts about whether Sanders could win and actually get anything done.

“That’s what they said about Trump!” his sister Jacqueline Correa, 27, shot back. “You donated to [Sanders]! You’ve literally put your money where your mouth is!”

The family is deciding between Sanders and Biden, the two candidates who have been neck and neck in recent polls, and who most members of the family believe seem most likely to defeat Donald Trump.

Nidhi Prakash / BuzzFeed News

Latino voters in places like Marshalltown are keenly aware of what’s at stake in a presidential election that will almost certainly include vitriol around immigration and racist rhetoric.

Iowa’s Latino population has grown to 6.2%, more than double what it was 20 years ago. Groups like the League of United Latin American Citizens have been working on turnout ahead of the caucuses — the group says it has registered 10,000 new Latino voters this year.

The Lopez family is one of the oldest Latino families in Marshalltown, where Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by seven points in 2016. Ramona moved here in the late ’80s from Jalisco, Mexico, and started working at the meatpacking factory in town. In the late ’80s and ’90s, she protested the factory's working conditions and led protests against police brutality that targeted Latinos. Ramona and her family say they’re thinking this decision through not just for themselves but for the good of their community and all the people who come to Ramona as a community leader for her guidance.

“This is what I know for sure: Bernie is a socialist. Joe Biden is middle-class and represents the richer people. We’re not those people,” Ramona said.

“I love Joe Biden because I have a lot of friends in richer positions, people in power, and I like his presentation. He’s calmer and everything — exactly what represents the middle class, not the lower class,” she said. “I think the candidate for us is Bernie Sanders. He’s more of a dreamer, like me.”

Ultimately, she said, both candidates and all Democratic voters have this in common: They all want to defeat Donald Trump. And while she thinks Biden may have a slight edge in that area, she’s decided on Sanders as a candidate who has detailed, clear plans for climate change, immigration, labor, and education, among other issues.

The family has been visited by canvassers for almost every candidate. They’ve welcomed them all in to sit at the kitchen table and talk, and shared with them whatever’s on the stove. On Saturday, a canvasser for the Biden campaign came by. Soon after, Texas Rep. Filemon Vela stopped in to visit the family on behalf of the Biden campaign. (The family said no other campaign has actually sent a high-profile supporter to visit.) The following day, a Sanders canvasser dropped by. Above the kitchen table, there are two “Bernie” signs — and on a door in the living room, a “Todos con Biden” door hanger.

“We’ve received everyone from the campaigns. I tell them: 'I’m 60 years old. I have 30 years’ involvement in politics. I make my own decisions,'” Ramona said.

She said she spoke to Sanders when he was in Iowa in 2016 and pressed him to do more on immigration.

“Last time he was here, I talked to him and I told him he needs to come up with answers, with plans for immigration. ‘I know it’s hard. You’re not going to win, you or anyone else, if you don’t have an answer for this,’” she said she told Sanders. After seeing him with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez last Saturday, she said, she was more confident that he had a solid plan around immigration.

The following day, Ramona went to see Biden with her son Raymond, who was impressed with the former vice president's plan to invest resources in Central American countries and his emphasis on foreign policy.

“I think Bernie is stronger,” Ramona whispered right after meeting and taking a photo with Biden last Sunday.



Nidhi Prakash / BuzzFeed News

Ramona Lopez and her son Raymond Correa meet former vice president Joe Biden after an event in Marshalltown.

Some of her children, as well as her 17-year-old granddaughter, Itzary Mundo, who’s caucusing for the first time on Monday, are convinced that Sanders is their candidate.

Others, like Raymond, like what they hear from Sanders but aren’t sure they believe he’ll actually deliver on his promises. Despite that, Raymond said, he’d donated $50 to the Sanders campaign recently.

“What I did like about Joe Biden, when we saw him, was that he said ‘I’m not actually here to promise you a bunch of stuff,’” he said, adding that the remark made the candidate seem realistic.

And then there’s ICE. For Latino families in Marshalltown, the uptick in ICE raids is more than a distant concern — the town’s meatpacking factory was one of those targeted in a massive operation in 2006, which resulted in at least 100 workers being arrested and separated from their families.

Gladys Mundo, Ramona’s 40-year-old daughter, worked as a child development specialist during those raids. She saw the impact of that up close, and the way politicians talk about immigration is something she watches closely.

Gladys and her sister Jacqueline said neither of them think any of the candidates have really spoken to the fears and uncertainties immigrants in the US deal with, though they’ve heard more than they have in the past on immigration.

“They talk about kids in cages. That’s just one part of the whole thing. You can’t talk about these isolated things,” said Jacqueline.

“Candidates come and visit towns like this on the campaign trail. Where are they after that?” said Gladys. “There’s a loss of faith in the system.”

While everyone who falls between Ramona, 61, and Itzary, 17, in the family were still undecided between Sanders and Biden, they were all certain they would be turning out on caucus night.

“We all need to caucus. We’ve been here in the US a really long time,” said Jacqueline, adding that the conversation around immigration has become more in-depth and more unavoidable for Democrats because “now we can vote. And there’s a lot of us.”

Nidhi Prakash is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Washington, DC.
Contact Nidhi Prakash at nidhi.prakash@buzzfeed.com


SEE https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/02/in-deep-white-iowa-first-latino.html



Did Solomon's Temple have competition?
ARCHAEOLOGY: Iron Age Temple Complex Discovered Near Jerusalem Calls Into Question Biblical Depiction of Centralized Cult. Tel Moแบ“a site proves there were other sanctioned temples besides the official temple in Jerusalem, TAU and IAA researchers say (Tel Aviv University press release).

In 2012, a monumental Iron Age temple complex dating to the late 10th and early ninth centuries BCE was discovered at Tel Moแบ“a near Jerusalem by archaeologists of the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA). The site, identified as the biblical city of Moแบ“a, within the boundary of the tribe of Benjamin (Joshua 18:26), served as an administrative center for the storage and redistribution of grain.

In the spring of 2019, the first academic excavation of the site set out to fully unearth and study two cult buildings discovered one on top of the other at Tel Moแบ“a: The monumental temple complex built in the late 10th to early ninth centuries BCE, and a structure beneath it that has only partially been uncovered, tentatively dated to the 10th century BCE.