Wednesday, February 12, 2020

NATURAL CAPITALISM

 Global economic growth will take big hit due to loss of nature

Damage to environment could wipe £368bn a year from growth by 2050 and UK will be hard hit, WWF warns

Phillip Inman and Fiona Harvey Wed 12 Feb 2020 

 
The Totten glacier in Antarctica. If the region warms more quickly than expected, losses will be greater, the report predicts. Photograph: Esmee van Wijk/Australian Antarctic Division


Loss of nature will wipe £368bn a year off global economic growth by 2050 and the UK will be the third-worst hit, with a £16bn annual loss, according to a study by the World Wildlife Fund.

Without urgent action to protect nature, the environmental charity warned that the worldwide impact of coastal erosion, species loss and the decline of natural assets from forests to fisheries could cost a total of almost £8tn over the next 30 years.

It said the loss appeared to be modest at just 0.67% of global income in 2050, but the estimate was conservative and the total was likely to be much higher should areas like the Antarctic deteriorate at a faster pace, causing greater warming and higher-than-forecast sea levels across the world.

The Global Futures report found that the deterioration of natural habitats including forests, wetlands and coral reefs will undermine the building blocks of essential ecosystems, reducing fish stocks, timber production and the number of pollinators.

In one of the first exercises of its kind, the report said that increases in the use of fossil fuels and the expansion of agriculture and urban development into previously unused landscapes would see huge financial costs linked to losses in pollination, coastal protection, water supplies and stored carbon.

Global food prices are also likely to increase as the agriculture sector is hit by the loss of nature, with prices rising by an estimated 8% for timber, 6% for cotton, 4% for oil seeds and 3% for fruit and vegetables by 2050.

Karen Ellis, director of sustainable economy at WWF, told the Guardian that the estimates were “very conservative” and governments should expect the impact of the climate emergency to be much higher.

“[The study] only looked at six ecosystem services, so this is almost certainly an underestimate. The real costs are probably much higher. This is the first attempt to make such a comprehensive assessment, so this is a preliminary estimate,” she said.
She said the authors had been unable to make an estimate of the cost of remedial action to repair the damage to ecosystems, as there were too many variables, but that such estimates might be possible in future studies.

Most climate change assessments up to now have focused on the funds needed to mitigate a rise in global temperatures of 1.5C.

The Stern report, written by the UK economist Lord Stern in 2006, found that cutting carbon emissions to limit temperature increases would cost 1% of GDP annually, but ignoring climate change could cause economic damage up to an estimated 20% of GDP.

The WWF study, which was produced in partnership with the Global Trade Analysis Project at Purdue University and the Natural Capital Project in the US, covered 140 countries.

The UK could be one of the worst-hit countries, behind only the US and Japan, with annual costs from lost natural services that would equal the current combined yearly funding for the police, fire services, prisons and law courts.

The main economic costs for Britain would be through the loss of habitats that form natural coastal protection systems and homes for marine life, such as seagrass beds, reefs and saltmarsh.

That would lead to flooding and erosion as well as declining fish stocks harming the fishing industry, WWF said.

---30---

Natural capital refers to the resources and services provided by nature. They are of enormous economic value - more so than the gross world product. Natural ...


Natural Capitalism (taking natural capital into account ...

Mar 15, 2016 - Uploaded by Sustainability Illustrated
For more information, read the book Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution by by Paul ...


Natural Capitalism: Path to Sustainability? - Natural ...



Jul 1, 2001 - Corporate Environmental Strategy July 2001. In this article, the Lovins'2 explain what is meant by Natural Capitalism, four principles that enable 
Somewhere along the way to free-market capitalism, the United States became the most wasteful society on the planet. Most of us know it. There is the waste we ..
Hawken, Paul, Hunter Lovins and Amory Lovins. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. New York: Little, Brown & Company, 1999.
This approach is called natural capitalism because it's what capitalism might become if its largest category of capital—the “natural capital” of ecosystem ...
Most businesses still operate according to a world view that hasn't changed since the start of the Industrial Revolution. Then, natural resources were abundant ...

I'm here to talk about work that Hunter Lovins and Paul Hawken and I have been doing, and still are, on the subject of natural capitalism. Perhaps I should start ...
Natural capital refers to the earth's natural resources and the ecological systems that provide vital life-support services to society and all living things.
Oct 20, 2009 - We stand at the cusp of a significant paradigm shift. We have been building towards a transformational tipping point, where natural capital will ...
Feb 22, 2000 - Natural Capitalism By Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins Little, Brown, 1999, 396 pages. Imagine for a moment a world where ...
Natural Capitalism as an idea and thesis for a book emerged in 1994, the year ... Revolution, sets out the principles and underlying theory of natural capitalism.
Jan 4, 2015 - Without "natural capital" there is no life and therefore no economic activity. Nature provides such free "ecosystem services" as nutrient cycling, ...
Nov 5, 2000 - Calmly and confidently, the mustachioed guru of eco-efficiency explains how 'natural capitalism' can save money and the planet both at the ...
Perhaps the most widely discussed recent book on the transition from a wasteful, unsustainable economic system to a more sustainable one is Natural ...
Definition of Natural Capitalism in the Financial Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is Natural Capitalism? Meaning of Natural ...


by AD Guerry - ‎2015 - ‎Cited by 478 - ‎Related articles
Jun 16, 2015 - Natural capital” refers to the living and nonliving components of ecosystems—other than people and what they manufacture—that contribute to ...
Jun 1, 2003 - Pierre Desrochers is research director at the Montreal Economic Institute (www.iedm.org). In their bestseller Natural Capitalism, a book so ...
Amazon.in - Buy Natural Capitalism book online at best prices in India on Amazon.in. Read Natural Capitalism book reviews & author details and more at ...
Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Paul Hawken, Author, L. Hunter Lovins, Joint Author, Amory Lovins, Joint Author Little Brown and ...
NaturalCapitalism. The most innovative companies have already learned that saving energy and waste is not only an environmental action. It can also be good ...
The final strategy is: Investing in Natural capital - reversing the worldwide ecosystem destruction to restore and expand the stocks of natural capital. If industrial ...
by D Greenwood - ‎2001 - ‎Cited by 2 - ‎Related articles
neoclassical and endogenous growth theory, and the “natural capitalism” argument. ... environmental and social concerns, and section III the “natural capitalism” ...
by LH Lovins - ‎2001 - ‎Cited by 50 - ‎Related articles
In this article, the Lovins' explain what is meant by Natural Capitalism, four principles that enable business to behave responsibly towards both nature and ...

Sep 12, 2011 - Natural Capitalism is an U.S.-based social reform trend that wants to make capitalism accountable for its `negative externalities'

by LH Lovins - ‎2001 - ‎Cited by 50 - ‎Related articles
In this article, the Lovins' explain what is meant by Natural Capitalism, four principles that enable business to behave responsibly towards both nature and ...
There are no more reespected voices in the environmental movement than these authors, true counselors on the direction of twenty-first-century... Read More.
Natural capitalism — what our economic system would look like if the ecosystem services were truly valued — entails 4 basic shifts in business practice.
A Road Map for Natural Capitalism. By Amory B. Lovins, L. Hunter Lovins, Paul Hawken. Updated on: November 7, 2007 / 3:31 PM / MoneyWatch ...
by A Collins - ‎2000
Aug 9, 2000 - Natural capitalism: the next industrial revolution by Paul Hawken, Amory B Lovins and L Hunter Lovins, 1999. Earthscan, xix + 396 pp, £18.99 ...
As part of the CFDA's ongoing commitment to sustainability through education and professional development, this sustainability-centered resource hub is ...
Featured Book. Natural Capitalism. Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins & L. Hunter Lovins 10th Anniversary Paperback Edition ...
During the development of the Natural Capital Protocol, the Coalition and our partners worked to distil the many working definitions of 'natural capital' into a ...
The author lays out a compelling case for economic evolution; he argues convincingly that we need to adjust our economic system to include "natural capital", ...

The book is Natural Capitalism by Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, and Hunter Lovins. I read this book the first time last summer, after tuning into a talk on National ...
Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution: Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, L. Hunter Lovins: 9780316353007: Books - Amazon.ca.
Natural Capitalism is a critique of traditional "Industrial Capitalism", saying that the traditional system of capitalism "does not fully conform to its own accounting principles. It liquidates its capital and calls it income.
Author‎: ‎Paul Hawken‎; ‎Amory B Lovins‎; ‎L Hunter ...
Publisher‎: ‎Little, Brown & Company
Publication date‎: ‎1999
Pages‎: ‎xix, 396 p
Not Capitalism, But Regulation to Blame at IOP Talk
(NOPE, IT'S STILL CAPITALISM)
By Nick Tarr 
February 5, 2020

On Wednesday, January 29, the University of Chicago Institute of Politics (IOP) hosted Pulitzer Prize–winning journalists and partners Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn for a discussion of their new book, Tightrope: Americans Reaching for Hope. Moderated by IOP director David Axelrod, the event shed light onto its titular question, “The Future of Capitalism: Is Individualism Killing Opportunity in America?”

For Kristof and WuDunn, who have seen poverty’s ability to destroy lives firsthand, the answer is personal. The event kicked off with a discussion of the coauthors’ history with economic plight. WuDunn’s grandparents fled China in poverty, and Kristof grew up on a farm in rural Oregon with his father, an Armenian immigrant. “A quarter of the kids on my number six bus died from drugs, alcohol [and] suicide,” Kristof recounted. He and WuDunn count these among what they call “deaths of despair,” or deaths related to issues from living below the poverty line, like drug abuse, depression, and PTSD.

WuDunn pointed to research that indicates a decrease in the life expectancy of middle-aged white people, a group she claims is especially afflicted by this despair. “Even in the Great Depression, there was rising life expectancy. We’re likening this to a social Great Depression,” she said. WuDunn asserted that this is not linked directly to capitalism. Rather, she and Kristof argue that it is our model of capitalism that is failing.

“From 1945 to the 1970's, we had a capitalist system in the U.S. that delivered extremely well. Inequality was actually declining,” Kristof said. He also pointed to other capitalist countries, like Germany and Canada, that were able to fix the same problems he now sees in America.

“Life expectancy isn’t falling in those countries,” he added. “For many Americans, the American dream is broken,” said WuDunn, who blames failing policy around healthcare and other economic safety nets for this sinking life expectancy.

"There’s a misperception in the U.S. that this is the inevitable consequence of automation and globalization, and it’s not,” Kristof said. “It’s the consequence of bad policy driven by a bad narrative.”

To illustrate this, WuDunn used an example of two groups of auto workers—one from Detroit, Michigan, and the other from Windsor, Ontario—who were laid off following the 2008 recession. The U.S. workers received unemployment benefits, but lost their healthcare; the Canadian workers not only kept their healthcare but were reincorporated into the labor force with public training and guidance.

“The government takes a much more active role there,” she said. “Years later, they didn’t have the problems, like self-medication, depression, and PTSD, the same way that the people in Detroit did.”

The coauthors pointed out that the people who need these benefits the most are often the ones who vote against them. “People in counties that had higher rates of death by despair were substantially more likely to vote for Trump,” Kristof said, adding that one of the factors that increase despair is inadequate healthcare, which she said Trump is fueling.

Kristof’s critique extended to Democrats as well. “These issues come from 50 years of bipartisan failure. The Democrats have their fingerprints on this as well,” he said. They also pointed out that, by percentage, the poorest Americans are more willing to donate in hopes of fixing issues that affect them because they have firsthand experience.

“We’ve lost empathy because we live in bubbles,” said WuDunn. She advocated for the breaking of these bubbles as a potential solution: “When people in poor neighborhoods confront the need, they give, they respond. I think that we’d also see that in the top 20 percent if they saw the need.”

Kristof and WuDunn ended the conference on a hopeful note. Kristof cited Kansas’s recent move to increase taxes. “Ultimately, Kansas voters rebelled because their schools were doing too poorly,” he said. “Likewise, you have red states like Idaho, like Utah, that are expanding Medicaid.”

He added that the idea that Americans once got by without government benefits is historically inaccurate; even the pioneers who settled in Oregon, Kristof pointed out, had the Homestead Act. “My area was transformed by these big ideas,” he said.“That is what, I think, can again transform the opportunities for the kids on the number six bus.”


---30---
Professors Discuss the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence at Night Owls Lecture


Photo courtesy of the University of Chicago.
Maroon Staff / The Chicago Maroon

By Isaac Krakowka

“[Is artificial intelligence] going to make us evil and worse versions of ourselves? I don’t know,” James Evans, a professor of sociology, said during a discussion titled “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.” The event, hosted by philosophy professor Agnes Callard as part of the Night Owls series, was held in University Church last Thursday night.

“I don’t have stances. I have questions,” Callard said when asked about her position on the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI). “I feel like my students are in the same position. We are not sure how to think about the fact that some pretty large percentage of our lives are lived online, and we’re also not sure about where it’s going.”

Discussion began with Callard grappling with two distinctly different viewpoints on the agency of the Internet in a modern society.

“I have a kind of basic question about whether or not we’re living in a digital utopia in which the free exchange of ideas has never been easier or better, or a kind of privacy-encroaching social media hellscape in which our identities are being stolen by these online interactions,” Callard said.

“If everybody is connecting and collaborating and chit-chatting, this global collapse of differential culture...facilitates more combinations in the short term, but it deprives humanity of the possibility of diversity in the long term,” Evans said in response to Callard’s questions about privacy encroachment.

Theo Knights, a first-year master’s student, and Evan Zhao, a fourth-year undergraduate student, were among the many attendees at the talk. Zhao expressed his enjoyment for this series of lectures because of the inquisitive nature that Callard and her contemporaries bring to debate topics. “A lot of faculty don’t really make efforts to have this more public-facing, student-oriented event, so it’s interesting to come here and be able to see these faculty discussing ideas,” Zhao said.

Knights came to see the discussion in part because he wanted to see how a non-sensationalized discussion of artificial intelligence played out, noting that the issue incites a great deal of discussion, but few agreed-upon facts.

“I think there is a lot of alarmism, so it’ll be interesting to see how that can be engaged, maybe discussed, from a place of knowledge rather than usual speculation that a lot of people have about jobs disappearing because of AI,” Knights said.

Confronting the sociological implications of artificial intelligence, Evans and Callard discussed different social implications of AI, including increased homogeneity of ideas and the tools that artificial intelligence can use to predict human scenarios. AI is “predicting what scientific results are going to come up in the future, what scientific papers will be written next year,” said Callard. “It’s amazing that that can be done.”

Evans cited decreases in the freedom of choice in society as a potential danger of AI technology.

“Any choice that I make online is the result of the placement of an opportunity which was generated as a prediction of the choice I would like to make,” Evans said.

Students also raised concerns centered around the accessibility of personal information and data targeted by AI. One student questioned whether the prediction of the disease dynamics of coronavirus is an ethical application of the technology. Another student asked about artificial intelligence recognizing faces to track movement, diminishing an individual’s privacy online.

“I don’t even know what privacy looks like or feels like anymore,” Evans said.

At the culmination of the talk, Evans and Callard said that much of the impact that AI has on daily life is still unknown. Evans pointed out that there is still much to learn about AI’s impact. “There are enormous challenges, and the biggest challenges are the challenges of actually figuring out what’s good and bad,” Evans said.

“The insights of these two are very interesting,” third-year Ian Ross said. “They sound very confident about a lot of answers, not confident about others. Just hearing that kind of informs me a little bit on what’s known and what’s thought about, at least in the philosophical community, about AI.”

---30---

Where Lincoln turned to explain the strange
Nov 19, 2012


The cover, at left, of the 660-page book "The Collected Annals of the Journal of the Fortean Research Center." Founded 30 years ago in 1982, the group explored, studied and cataloged logic-defying phenomena for more than 13 years before fizzling out in 1995 and 1996. At right, a cover of one of the center's journals.Courtesy images

Bigfoot stealing watermelons out of your garden? Strange circular patterns in your wheat field? Pet goat mutilated with surgical precision?

Today, when police and the “mainstream media” refuse to listen, Nebraskans can turn to the Internet.

But in the days before the Web, when Lincolnites asked “Who ya’ gonna call?” The answer was the Fortean Research Center.


Founded in 1982, the group explored, studied and cataloged logic-defying phenomena for more than 13 years before fizzling out in 1995 and 1996.


At its peak, the group boasted more than 300 members across the globe and investigated everything from unidentified flying objects at nuclear weapon storage facilities to crow corpses hung near the homes of two local legends, Bloody Mary and Pig Man.

In the beginning

Seeing is believing, says Ray Boeche, the Fortean Research Center's founder.

Boeche became a believer at age 10, during the summer of 1965. He was playing outside when a power outage hit his neighborhood in Nebraska City. Moments later, his mother shouted from the porch and pointed to an enormous rotating disk flying from south to north.

He soon discovered he wasn’t alone. Other Nebraskans also had experienced the unexplainable.

“A lot of the things you run across have really mundane explanations,” Boeche said. “But it's that core of 5 or 10 percent of things that you can't explain, with all the available factors you have, that make you wonder, 'What is this?'” Boeche said.

Boeche spoke with a man who crashed his motorcycle on Superior Street after seeing Bigfoot run out of Salt Creek and sprint across the road in front of him. He interviewed Herbert Schirmer, the former Ashland police officer who spotted a flying saucer during an early morning shift Dec. 3, 1967, and said aliens abducted him. And Boeche examined a goat mutilated in the Dundee neighborhood of Omaha.

“I thought, 'If I'm stumbling across this kind of stuff, there has to be more out there people aren’t talking about,'” he said.

In 1981, he started the Nebraska Association for the Study of the Unexplained and a year later renamed it after paranormal researcher and author Charles Hoy Fort, who wrote extensively in the 1920s and '30s about what he called “data that science has excluded.”

The Fortean Research Center sent letters to local media and law enforcement offering to investigate odd incidents that neither had the manpower or interest to pursue.

“It waxes and wanes, but there always is this undercurrent of weird things going on,” Boeche said.

A calling

The group met regularly in basements, bookstores and coffee houses giving those with an open mind a chance to discuss -- without fear of ridicule -- strange and mysterious experiences for which science had yet to provide definitive answers.

It started with a core handful of local paranormal investigators, including Boeche, ufologist Scott Colborn and ghost expert Dale Bacon, who died March 28 after a battle with cancer.

The organization teamed up with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the early 1980s to host conferences on UFOs.

The research center also published a sporadic journal and the inspired KZUM radio show "Exploring Unexplained Phenomena."

The show, started by Colborn and Boeche in 1984, is the world's longest-running paranormal talk program, said Colborn, who continues to host it from 10 to noon Saturdays.

Nebraska Forteans were among the front-line researchers delving into the December 1980 UFO sightings in the Rendlesham Forest between NATO bases at Bentwaters and Woodbridge in England. Colborn and Boeche sought help from then-U.S. Sen. Jim Exon, a Democrat from Nebraska, to push for the release of classified documentation of the incident.

Although they procured many documents, Boeche and Colborn eventually hit a brick wall, and say that one of Exon's top staff once let slip that a large government file existed about Nebraska investigators.

“We hit something that somebody didn't want us talking about. Now, what it is, I have no idea,” Boeche said.

But in 1988, Boeche stepped down as director of the organization and enrolled in graduate school to pursue a theology degree. Colborn and Bacon took over and kept it going through the mid-1990s. Colborn left in 1995 to devote more time to family, and the Fortean Research Center soon faded into the ether.

The mystery continues

The Fortean Research Center detailed its findings in a sporadically published journal.

Its pages included UFO-related government documents, accounts of a “winged weirdie” seen over Falls City, bipedal humanoid sightings, animal mutilations, strange beasts and tales of restless spirits.

“We were covering things from all over the world,” Boeche said. “But if anything happened locally, it got reported there.”

Just in time for the 30th anniversary of the founding of the paranormal investigation organization, Boeche has released "The Collected Annals of the Journal of the Fortean Research Center," a tome of more than 660 pages.

“I feel a need to begin to compile some of my research materials into a usable form, and make them available to others, whatever small value they may hold. This is my first, but hopefully not last, offering to the Fortean research community,” he wrote in the foreword to the book. Boeche is a pastor of adult education at Christ Lutheran Church in Lincoln.

The journal's type has been enhanced for legibility and, where possible, Xeroxed photos have been replaced with scans of original documents and photos.

The book is available through www.lulu.com and eventually will be for sale through other outlets, Boeche said.
Radio show started in 1984

The KZUM radio program "Exploring Unexplained Phenomena" was started in 1984. Host Scott Colborn believes it is the longest-running paranormal talk radio program in the world. This story orginally had the wrong year for the show's start.

Frederik Pohl, born November 26 1919, died September 2 2013 Frederik Pohl, who has died aged 93 was a publisher who launched Isaac Asimov’s career then became a hugely respected sci-fi writer himself

Frederik Pohl Photo: NEW YORK TIMES/REDUX/EYEVIN 16 Oct 2013
Frederik Pohl, who has died aged 93, was a renowned science fiction writer, editor and lecturer.

He was born in New York City on November 26 1919. A nomadic early life took him to Panama, Texas and New Mexico as his father pursued a career as a machinist . Plagued by illness, Frederik was educated at home by his mother, who instilled in him an early appreciation of literature. Back in New York in 1931, he entered Brooklyn Technical High School, but left at 17 .

After discovering science fiction stories through the American pulp magazines prevalent at the time, Pohl joined the Futurians, a science fiction fan organisation noted for the radical views of its members. Many of his earliest stories were written in collaboration with others in the group, notably CM Kornbluth.

By the age of 20 Pohl was editing the pulp science fiction magazines Astonishing Stories and Super Science Stories; much of his early work he sold to himself as editor .

During the war he joined the US Army Air Force, serving as a sergeant in Italy and France. After the conflict he returned to New York, where he used his contacts to establish himself as a science fiction literary agent, helping to make the names of many writers in the field during the late 1940s. He was instrumental, for example, in getting Isaac Asimov’s first book published by Doubleday, and he also oversaw the development of Robert Sheckly into a major writer.

Related Articles

Steve Moore 13 Apr 2014

Daniel Keyes 18 Jun 2014

Isaac Asimov 16 Oct 1992

Sir Arthur C Clarke 19 Mar 2008

Ray Bradbury 06 Jun 2012

Iain Banks 09 Jun 2013

In 1952 Pohl renewed his collaboration with Kornbluth, this time on a series entitled The Gravy Planet, which ran in Galaxy magazine. Retitled The Space Merchants when it was published in book form in 1953, it proved one of the most significant sci-fi novels of its time – a rich satirical blockbuster which was to influence a generation of writers.

In it, as in many of his works, Pohl presents a future that is anything but utopian. Corporate power has replaced democracy, with the public duped into consumerism stimulated by powerful withdrawal symptoms.

From then on Pohl concentrated on writing and disbanded his literary agency. He collaborated with numerous other writers, notably Jack Williamson, and also edited Galaxy and If magazines from 1961 to 1969, introducing many new writers to the field .

It was not until the 1970s that his own solo writing career blossomed. Two novellas – The Gold at the Starbow’s End and The Merchants of Venus (both 1971) – were well received. Then his novel Man Plus (1976), which focused on the adaptation of a man for life on Mars, won him a Nebula award.

Pohl considered his next novel, Gateway (1977), to be his best work. It describes human attempts to understand and harness technology abandoned on an asteroid by an alien race known as the Heechee. By trial and error, man gradually learns to use some alien spaceships, so discovering distant and profitable corners of the galaxy; the risks are high, however, and the novel’s hero sees his lover dragged into a black hole.

Gateway ,the book Pohl considered his best

From 1974 to 1976 Pohl served as president of the Science Fiction Writers of America, becoming a sought-after speaker and lecturer on science-fiction issues. Later, companies would invite him to prognosticate on future technology trends, though he tended to warn that predictions, even in the short term, were all but useless.

A stickler for detail, Pohl was determined to get as much science correct as possible in his books. His research took him all over the world and he was elected a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2004, when he published the final novel in the Heechee saga, he apologised to his readers for having suggested, in Gateway, that aliens might have taken refuge in a black hole. With the physics of black holes having been more fully understood in the intervening years, Pohl acknowledged that nothing and no one could exist within a black hole. In 2000 he published a series of essays recounting his research trips: Chasing Science: Science as a Spectator Sport.

In all he published more than 60 novels. His most lauded effort was Jem: The Making of a Utopia (1979), which remains the only science fiction title to have won the National Book Award.

Frederik Pohl was married five times. He is survived by three daughters and a son; by two stepdaughters; and by his wife, Elizabeth.

Frederik Pohl, born November 26 1919, died September 2 2013
Raining Frogs & Fish: A Whirlwind of Theories

By Benjamin Radford April 11, 2014

#FORTEAN PHENOMENA #ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA

A woodcut showing a rain of frogs in Scandanavia, from 'Prodigiorum ac Ostentorum Chronicon,' one of the first modern books about strange phenomenon, was published in 1557. (Image: © Public domain.)

For millennia, people have reported a rare and strange phenomenon: a sudden rain of frogs — or fish or worms — from the sky. You may be minding your own business walking in a park on a blustery day when a small frog hits you on the top of the head. As you peer down at the stunned animal, another one comes down, and another and another all around you, in a surreal rain of frogs in various states of trauma.



Charles Fort was an early collector of reports about strange phenomena. (Image credit: Public domain.)

Charles Fort, an early collector of reports about strange phenomena, noted the following in his 1919 tome, "The Book of the Damned": "A shower of frogs which darkened the air and covered the ground for a long distance is the reported result of a recent rainstorm at Kansas City, Mo." This report first appeared in the July 12, 1873, issue of Scientific American. Fort noted dozens of similar reports from around the world and wrote that as "for accounts of small frogs, or toads, said to have been seen to fall from the sky, [a skeptical] writer says that all observers were mistaken: that the frogs or toads must have fallen from trees or other places overhead."

Any number of small animals have been reported falling from the sky, including ants, small fish and worms. Modern examples tend to be rare, but reports do surface occasionally in magazines devoted to strange phenomenon such as Fortean Times (named after Fort). Frog rains were mentioned in an episode of "The X-Files" titled "Die Hand Die Verletzt" ("The Hand That Wounds"), in which Agent Scully exclaims, "Mulder... toads just fell from the sky," to which the unflappable Agent Mulder replies, "I guess their parachutes didn't open."

Bob Rickard and John Michell, in their book, "The Rough Guide to the Unexplained," note that "The quality of the evidence for rains of fishes and frogs is good, with a canon of well-observed cases going back to antiquity." According to Jane Goldman's "The Book of The X-Files," "Falls of animals were first recorded in A.D. 77, in Pliny's 'Natural History' which scoffed at the idea that they could rain from the skies, suggesting instead that they grew from the ground after heavy rains.

This explanation likely seemed reasonable 2,000 years ago — after all, some animals such as worms and insects do seem to suddenly "appear" on the grounds during and following heavy rains, driven to the surface because they cannot breathe in the soaked soil. So if the frogs don't originally come from the skies, and they don't "grow" out of the ground after being watered, where do they come from? [Pictures: Cute and Colorful Frogs]


Explanations?

The most likely explanation for how small frogs get up into the sky in the first place is meteorological: a whirlwind, tornado or other natural phenomenon. Fort admitted that this is a possibility, but offered several reasons why he doubted that's the true or complete explanation: "It is so easy to say that small frogs that have fallen from the sky had been scooped up by a whirlwind ... but [this explanation offers] no regard for mud, debris from the bottom of a pond, floating vegetation, loose things from the shores — but a precise picking out of the frogs only. ... Also, a pond going up would be quite as interesting as frogs coming down. Whirlwinds we read of over and over — but where and what whirlwind? It seems to me that anybody who had lost a pond would be heard from." For example, Fort argued, one published report of "a fall of small frogs near Birmingham, England, June 30, 1892, is attributed to a specific whirlwind — but not a word as to any special pond that had contributed."

What about the reasons that Fort and others cite for why a whirlwind is not a good explanation? Frogs and fish do not of course live in the sky, nor do they suddenly and mysteriously appear there; in fact they share a common habitat: ponds and streams. It's certain that they gained altitude in a natural, not supernatural, way. [Countdown: Fishy Rain to Fire Whirlwinds: The World's Weirdest Weather]

That there are very few eyewitness accounts of frogs and fish being sucked up into the sky during a tornado, whirlwind or storm is hardly mysterious or unexplainable. Anytime winds are powerful enough to suck up fish, frogs, leaves, dirt and detritus, they are powerful enough to be of concern to potential eyewitnesses. In other words, people who would be close enough to a whirlwind or tornado to see the flying amphibians would be more concerned for their own safety (and that of others) to pay much attention to whether or not some frogs are among the stuff being picked up and flown around at high speeds. These storms are loud, windy, chaotic, and hardly ideal for accurate eyewitness reporting.

A 1555 engraving of a rain of fish. (Image credit: Public domain.)

The same applies to Fort's apparent surprise that, following frog falls, farmers or others don't come forward to identify which specific pond the frogs came from. How would anyone know? Whirlwinds and tornadoes may move quickly and over many miles, destroying and lifting myriad debris in its wake. Unless a farmer took an inventory of all the little frogs in a pond both before and after a storm, there's no way anyone would know exactly where they came from, nor would it be noteworthy.

Of course, a wind disturbance need not be a full-fledged tornado to be strong enough to pick up small frogs and fish; smaller, localized versions such as waterspouts and dust devils — which may not be big enough, potentially damaging enough, or near enough to populated areas to be reported in the local news — may do the trick.

High winds, whirlwinds and tornadoes are strong enough to overturn cars and rip the roofs off of buildings. In 2012, a 2-year-old Indiana girl was lifted into the air during a storm, and, incredibly, carried into the sky and found alive 10 miles away. Strong winds are certainly powerful enough to lift up and carry frogs into the air. It is, of course, possible that there is some unknown, small-frog-levitating force at work in nature, but until and unless that is verified, it seems likely that this mystery is solved after all.

Benjamin Radford, M.Ed, is a member of the American Folklore Society and author of seven books including Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries. His Web site is www.BenjaminRadford.com.

Charles Fort: Pioneer in the Search for Scientific Anomalies or Anti-dogmatist who Collected Bizarre Stories?

25 MARCH, 2016 - 13:50 DHWTY

Charles Hoy Fort was an American “self-educated newspaperman, modestly-successful short story writer, unsuccessful novelist and inventor, and eccentric natural philosopher,” regarded by some, especially his devotees, who call themselves ‘Forteans’, as a pioneer of anomalistic.

This is a term coined in 1973 by an anthropologist by the name of Roger W. Wescott, and has been used to describe the “interdisciplinary study of scientific anomalies (alleged extraordinary events unexplained by currently accepted scientific theory)”. Fort was fascinated by such anomalies, and spent much of his adult life collecting accounts of such events.
Charles’ Troubled Early Life

Charles Fort was born on August 6, 1874 in Albany, New York. Fort’s parents were Dutch immigrants who became fairly prosperous in the United States. Fort’s family owned a wholesale grocery business in Albany. Fort had a painful childhood, as it has been said that his father was abusive and often beat him. Some believe that as a result of these experiences, Fort became skeptical and distrustful of authority and dogma.

Charles Fort. ( Daniel Moler )

In 1892, at the age of 18, Fort escaped his father’s authoritarian ways by leaving home. He began working as a journalist for a New York newspaper and eventually became an editor of a Long Island paper. He quit his job, however, in 1893, and hitchhiked around the world.


His travels were cut short in 1896 when he contracted malaria in South Africa. After that, Fort returned to New York, and married Anna Filing. One source claims that Anna was “an Irish immigrant whom he had known in Albany”, whilst another says she was “an English servant girl in his father's house”.
Unidentified Flying Objects – the reality, the cover-up and the truth
The ancient history of UFOs and the unclassified document of Oppenheim and Einstein
Fort’s Writings

For the next couple of years, Fort lived in the Bronx with his wife. During this time, the couple lived in poverty, and Fort tried to make ends meet by writing stories for newspapers and magazines. Fort eventually gave up on writing fiction. In 1906, he began to collect accounts of anomalies. However, this was not his initial aim. Instead, whilst doing his research in the New York Public Library, he read about a whole range of subjects, including science, art, philosophy, and economics. It was here that he found reports of odd things, and started to collect them by scribbling them on small sheets of paper.


In 1915, Fort had finished writing two books, X and Y. Unfortunately, publishers during that time were not interested in them, and hence they were considered failures. These books were later lost, as Fort destroyed both manuscripts later in his career.

In the same year, Fort was encouraged by Theodore Dreisner (a magazine editor whom Fort met in 1905 and befriended) to compile his reports of anomalies into a book. In the following year, Fort received a modest inheritance from an uncle which allowed him to concentrate on his writing. Thus, in 1919, the Book of the Damned was published.

Theodore Dreiser, photographed by Carl Van Vechten. ( Public Domain )
The Emergence of the Fortean Society

Whilst Forteans regard Charles Fort as a pioneer in the study of anomalies, others are less certain about it. For example, one source describes Fort as an “anti-dogmatist who collected weird and bizarre stories.”
The Establishment Has Already Acknowledged A Lost Race of Giants - Part 1
DNA Evidence Suggests Captured Russian Ape Woman Might Have been Subspecies of Modern Human

Apart from collecting bizarre reports, it has been claimed that Fort did not actually do much else. For example, it has been pointed out that Fort did not question the veracity of the accounts he collected. Additionally, Fort was not really interested in making any sense out of the accounts he collected either. It has also been argued that Fort’s primary goal of collecting these accounts of anomalies was to embarrass and ridicule scientists with stories that could not be explained or answered by science. For Fort, scientists were on his list of authoritative figures he distrusted.

Charles Fort died at the age of 57 on May 3, 1932 in the Bronx, New York. A year before his death, the Fortean Society was established by one of Fort’s friends, Tiffany Thayer. Fort, who was a skeptic even of his own authority, refused to join this society. Whilst some emphasize his hostility towards science, other regard him as a hero and an inspirational figure whose writings on anomalies has profoundly impacted the way we view and approach this subject.

Fortean Societies can be found in different parts of the world, but Charles Fort also inspired magazines, such as the Fortean Times, and a short-run TV program called Fortean TV . Both the magazine and the show have a focus on anomalous phenomena that probably would have interested Fort.




Steve Moore - obituary
Steve Moore was the co-founder of The Fortean Times who detailed the strange and supernatural

Steve Moore DIED 13 Apr 2014
Steve Moore, who has died aged 64, had a prolific career at the margins of literature. His output included scripts for comic strips, novelisations of films and supernatural fiction. He also edited several collections of pieces sent in by readers of The Fortean Times — a magazine devoted to strange phenomena — of which Moore was a founder and mainstay.

He compiled The Fortean Times Book of Strange Deaths (1999), in which one entry ran: “In Japan in 1981, Kenji Urada was killed when a robot at the Kawasaki factory where he worked mistook his head for a component that needed tightening up.” For their Book of Close Shaves And Amazing Luck, he observed that “you may be lucky to be alive if you’ve just had a six-foot steel crowbar driven through one side of your skull and out the other, but most of us would rather we didn’t actually need that sort of luck in the first place”.


Long fascinated by the I Ching and a Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society, his Fortean contributions also included book reviews and articles on Oriental curiosities. His involvement had begun in 1973 when he contributed stories to what was then known as The News; he had known its publisher, Bob Rickard, since 1969, when both worked on a fanzine, Orpheus (where Moore once penned an editorial on “the psychological benevolence and universal importance of the suet pudding”).

Moore favoured goatee beards, wore black satin jackets and practised magic. He believed that as he had been born “at the full moon atop a crescent-shaped hill” and bore a “crescent birthmark on my left forearm … I was obviously destined to be either a werewolf or a lunatic. Fortunately there’s been no sign of fur or ripping out people’s throats so far.”

The hill in question was Shooters Hill in south London, where he was born on June 11 1949 and where he lived for nearly all his life in the same book-filled house. It was where he published fanzines during the late Sixties, where he worked on nearly all his subsequent writings, and where he died.

Leaving school aged 16, Moore was a flour grader at the Rank Hovis McDougall laboratory in Deptford, then an office boy at Odhams Press, a subsidiary of the publishers IPC. Within three months he became a junior sub-editor on Pow! and Fantastic comics, both of which featured imported strips from Marvel Comics (by the late Seventies, Moore would be working for the British arm of that imprint). He became a freelance writer in 1972.

He produced film and TV tie-in Christmas annuals for Supergran, Dick Turpin and a Polish-produced series, Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson (1979) — which was never shown in Britain. Moore also wrote for IPC’s girls’ comic Mirabelle, but was too embarrassed to buy any of its copies; embarrassment continued when, having been assured a Titbits feature on sexual exploits in Bangkok would be credited to his pseudonym Pedro Henry, it went to press under his real name.

Returning to IPC in 1977, he wrote for 2000AD from its 12th issue onwards. His strips for Marvel’s Doctor Who Weekly (later Doctor Who Magazine) were also clearly in 2000AD’s style. Moore’s creation of muscular, weapon-wielding “Abslom Daak – Dalek Killer” had more in common with the character Snake Plissken from Escape From New York than any jelly baby-proffering timelord.

A fellow Doctor Who contributor was the unrelated Alan Moore, who described Steve as his “oldest and dearest friend”, who had taught him the mechanics of comic strips. Alan made his namesake the subject of the essay Unearthing (2006); meanwhile, Steve wrote the novelisation of the film V For Vendetta (published 2006), adapted from his friend’s graphic novel.

He published a Gothic fantasy novel, Somnium, in 2011.

Steve Moore never married. For many years he cared for his brother Chris, who suffered from motor neurone disease and died in 2009.


Steve Moore, born June 11 1949, died March 16 2014



MJ Banias – The UFO People: A Curious Culture – May 28, 2019

Posted by: Alejandro Rojas May 28, 2019 1 Comment
Open Minds UFO Radio: MJ Banias is the author of “The UFO People: A Curious Culture.” He is an educator, writer and blogger. He was a former field investigator with the Mutual UFO Network, has been featured on multiple podcasts and radio shows, and contributes to Mysterious Universe and RoguePlanet. His work has been included in Fortean Times, FATE Magazine, and in a book entitled UFOs: Reframing the Debate. He lives in Canada with his wife, two children, and a massive cat.

In this episode we talk to MJ about what he had found when taking a closer look at those who are interested in the UFO phenomenon. Are UFO people a community on their own? How does the UFO topic effect the general public? What does MJ feel the future for the UFO topic holds? How is all of this changing as these recent UFO developments permeate the wider public? We will cover all of this and more in this fascinating episode.

For more on MJ visit his website TerraObscura.net.

Purchase is book on Amazon here.






‘The discovery of primitive life on another planet wouldn’t change the world’: Andrew May, Astrobiology



By Nick Smith

Published Monday, November 18, 2019




The question of there being other life forms elsewhere in the universe is one of the greatest mysteries of all. What do we mean by extraterrestrial ‘life’ in any case? Author and scientist Andrew May has the answers.



The first problem facing anyone seriously considering the question of whether there is life elsewhere in the universe is to reach an understanding of what the concept of ‘life’ might mean. Without that we can’t prepare ourselves for the implications of whatever answers our scientific investigations may return. It’s an issue Andrew May is happy to address in his new book ‘Astrobiology: The Search for Life Elsewhere in the Universe’, but it’s one that, even when expressed as a pair of simple alternatives, immediately seems to take us away from what we’re all secretly hoping for: the universe of ‘Star Wars’ and ‘Star Trek’.

“It’s worth making the distinction,” says May, “between the search for advanced aliens – SETI, or in more modern parlance ‘technosignatures’ – and the search for ‘biosignatures’ indicating the presence of non-technological life: anything from primitive bacteria to an intelligent pre-industrial society.” Perhaps counterintuitively, we’ve been searching for technosignatures for about six decades (“without success”, May reminds me) despite the fact that the technology deployed in that search is continuously improving, while we continually come up with new ideas of what to look for. “On the other hand, the search for biosignatures has barely begun.” May assures me that this aspect of the search for life out there, “should really get going in the next couple of decades, and I’d expect the first positive results in that sort of timeframe too”.

Before we get too excited about “positive results”, what May is talking about is traces of microscopic life – not technologically advanced civilisations – leading him to suspect that “non-experts [including journalists] are going to be thoroughly underwhelmed”. But the good news is that we know carbon to be one of the most common elements in the universe. We also know that it has a propensity for forming molecules, “as complex as DNA, with billions of atoms in it”, making the carbon-abundance a good place to start our search. We also “know what sort of biosignatures to look for with carbon-based life”. But what if there are life-forms out there not built on carbon? May admits that, “we could fail to spot alien life if it was chemically different from life on Earth”.

As we are culturally predisposed to think of alien life as being big-brained green humanoids, and because we are also ‘Earth-centric’, refusing to believe that there is nothing particularly special about our geographical location in the universe, it’s sometimes difficult to take seriously the idea that there are other living organisms in the cosmos. But, as May says in ‘Astrobiology’, what we have here is a strong case for managing our expectations. “If you mean ‘life’ in the literal scientific sense of microscopic single-celled organisms, seaweed, earthworms or whatever, then it’s not an outrageous or shocking idea that such things might exist on dozens of other planets within a few light-years of Earth.” More cautiously, “if you’re thinking about a technologically savvy civilisation at a comparable or higher level than ourselves, you’re going to have to look much further afield. But the chances are pretty good that they – or the machines they built – are still around somewhere in the galaxy.\=

Extra-terrestrial life is a common theme in science fiction. But is it a serious prospect in the real world? Astrobiology is the emerging field of science that seeks to answer this question, and ‘Astrobiology’ is the title of Andrew May’s latest book addressing just such a question, giving his expert overview of our current state of knowledge, looking at how life started on Earth, the tell-tale ‘signatures’ it produces, and how such signatures might be detected elsewhere in the Solar System or on the many ‘exoplanets’ now being discovered by the Kepler and TESS missions. Then there’s the really big question: when we eventually find extra-terrestrials, will they be friendly or hostile? Part of Icon Books’ ‘Hot Science’ series, ‘Astrobiology’ is a concise and balanced examination of a subject where the questions challenge our assumptions as much as the answers.

Astrobiology is a serious subject and May is perfectly qualified to discuss it. With an academic background in astrophysics from Manchester University to go with his degree in natural sciences from the University of Cambridge, post-doctoral research at both Groningen and Oxford and an industry career in operational analysis relating to novel aerospace and underwater systems, it would seem that he’s not the sort of writer to allow popular culture to pull the wool over his eyes for so much as a second. But he is also “perennially interested in ideas, especially way out ones”, so while on the one hand he is the author of several books of popular science, he is also a contributor to the Fortean Times, a magazine with the tagline: ‘The world of strange phenomena.’

Critically, when it comes to astrobiology, one of the main reasons to trust him as an authority is that while he is “fascinated by anything to do with the search for extraterrestrial intelligence” he initially couldn’t even pretend to be excited by micro-organisms, wherever they may live. “That’s an important admission to make – and one not many writers on the subject will admit to. But I’m sure it’s a common view among the public at large.” What this means is that when he took on the task of writing ‘Astrobiology’, May was intending to focus mainly on the more interesting subject of intelligent aliens while, “glossing over the lower life forms as quickly as possible. In spite of myself, as I was writing it, I got really quite excited about the latter aspect and it ended up filling half of the book.”

The position is simple. In a nutshell, we’ve been looking for ‘little green men’ – the ‘technosignature’ side of the equation – for more than half a century and we can’t find any. We’ve barely started looking for evidence of biology on a microscopic level – ‘biosignatures’ – and there is a strong case for being optimistic about making discoveries in our lifetimes. It follows then that the next big question is what impact all of this will have on us Earthbound humans. “Call me cynical,” says May, “but I don’t think that the discovery of primitive life on another planet would change the world very much.” This is because scientists will say that this is exactly what they expected to find, while tabloid journalists will raise the objection that this simply wasn’t what they meant by alien life.

“At the other extreme,” May continues, “receiving a SETI-style message from an alien civilisation – if it was an unambiguously artificial signal – would be earth-shattering. That’s true even if the message were undecipherable, or just a beacon containing no real information, because it would almost certainly originate from a civilisation a lot more advanced than our own. And if that could be decoded... just imagine what we’d learn from it.” What gets far fetched to the point of impossibility is the idea that we will soon discover humanoid aliens that look and behave like ourselves. “Science fiction has a lot to answer for here, together with the closely related folklore of flying saucers and alien abductions.”

‘Astrobiology: The Search for Life Elsewhere in the Universe’ by Andrew May is published by Icon Books, £8.99
EXTRACT
Interstellar engineering

Even if there are thousands of intelligent civilisations in the galaxy, only a small minority of them – if any – are likely to be blasting out radio messages we could detect. If the messages are aimed at us, or other civilisations like us, the senders would have to share our interest in interstellar communication – which may not be the case. On the other hand, if we’re just talking about accidental leakage from domestic communications, it implies that the aliens are going about it in an energy-inefficient way – which seems unlikely for an advanced civilisation. It’s far more likely that any aliens that might exist are simply minding their own business. Without knowing the exact nature of that business, there’s still a chance that it would produce ‘technosignatures’ – tell-tale signs that aliens are there – that we could detect.

If they are on the same technological level as us, for example, we can start by imagining what unusual features about our own planet might reveal our presence to a distant observer. One possibility is nightglow. Seen from space, the side of the Earth that should be pitch black – the side facing away from the Sun – is artificially illuminated by millions of tiny pinpoints of light, coming from cities and other products of human civilisation. The situation on any other planet with a similar civilisation will be the same, resulting in a characteristic signature in terms of light emitted. By astronomical standards the light will be very faint, and our current telescopes aren’t powerful enough to spot it at a distance measured in light years – but the next generation of instruments might be.

Another tell-tale sign of our presence is something we can be less proud of, and that’s industrial pollution in the atmosphere.
Edited extract from ‘Astrobiology’ by Andrew May, reproduced with permission.

---30---