Friday, May 08, 2020

Workers in Iowa meat industry fear returning to processing plants

Outbreak at pork plant leads to more than 1,600 cases and 20 deaths as Trump orders meatpackers to restart production.


by William Roberts


Medical workers test a local resident at a drive-through COVID-19 testing site in Waterloo, Iowa, the United States [Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo]

Quia Campbell is a hairstylist and mother of five with family members who got sick with COVID-19 while working at a massive pork slaughterhouse in Waterloo, Iowa.

After her father came home sick from work at the Tyson Fresh Meats plant in early April, Campbell became alarmed.

Management at the plant - in the Midwest region of the United States - was not acting on workers' concerns about spreading the coronavirus in close-quarter conditions at the plant, labour advocates said.

"I was devastated because he has 14 grandkids that he's around. We were panicking like, 'Are our kids going to get sick? What is going on?'" Campbell, 31, said.

Campbell and her friends launched a social media campaign and organised a protest urging the shutdown of the plant. After weeks of rising community pressure, the Tyson plant suspended operations on April 22. More than 1,000 of its nearly 3,000 workers tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus, and the infection has spread to the wider community and caused 20 deaths, according to local authorities.

Now, in a major test of President Donald Trump's push to reopen the US economy, the Tyson plant in Waterloo is reopening even as COVID-19 case numbers continue to rise locally and nationwide. Workers and their families are fearful.

"A lot of people are on edge," Campbell told Al Jazeera.

Trump used a wartime law on April 28 to direct meatpacking plants nationwide to continue operating during the pandemic to avert food shortages. More than 170 meat and poultry processing plants nationwide have reported COVID-19 outbreaks, according to the Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting.

Before the coronavirus forced its shutdown, the Tyson plant in Waterloo slaughtered 19,500 hogs a day, producing 3.9 percent of the US pork supply. Farmers were forced to destroy their animals when the plant stopped running.

US President Donald Trump meeting with Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC [Tom Brenner/Reuters] [Reuters]

On Wednesday, Iowa's Republican Governor Kim Reynolds joined the president at the White House to tout Iowa's progress in reopening meatpacking plants. Employees must get tested for the coronavirus before returning to work and are required to wear face masks and stay six feet apart, she noted.

"We are providing them the confidence of a safe environment, but at the same time we're making sure that food supply chain is moving and that the country is being fed," Reynolds told reporters at the White House.

But local officials see a bigger problem. With the virus spreading in communities, the state is not providing adequate testing and is not fully counting data on new cases, they say. Further, without monitoring and enforcement, reopening of the meatpacking plants is seen as an experiment in social distancing.

"It is irresponsible to downplay what is happening," said Ras Smith, who represents Waterloo in the Iowa state legislature.

"We are seeing outbreaks all over the state," Smith told Al Jazeera.

The Tyson pork processing plant, temporarily closed due to an outbreak of the coronavirus disease in Waterloo, Iowa [Brenna Norman/Reuters] [Reuters]

Major meatpacking plants in the Iowa cities of Columbus Junction, Tama, Estherville, Perry and West Liberty were forced to close last month because of the coronavirus. A pet food plant in Independence also has had cases, according to workers.

"Governor Reynolds is out of touch with the people of Iowa," Smith said.

Straddling a tributary of the Mississippi River flowing through the agricultural heart of the Midwest, Waterloo is a diverse city of 68,000 people. Nearly everyone in town knows someone who works at the local meatpacking plant. Most of the workers are people of colour or immigrants. Many are undocumented.

"I was enraged. I was incensed," said Tony Thompson, the sheriff of Black Hawk County after he visited the Tyson plant in early April.

Seeing conditions at the plant, "I knew they had just blown a hole out of the front-line of defence in our community," Thompson told Al Jazeera.

Thompson was one of 20 local officials who signed a letter to Tyson in mid-April asking the plant to shut down.

Now, most of the 1,600 confirmed cases in the Waterloo area can be traced to the plant, said the sheriff. And while Tyson has done an "impressive" job fitting the plant with dividers to separate employees on the processing line, "that in no way alleviates" the damage already done, he said.

Tyson invited workers to tour the newly outfitted plant on Wednesday and distributed a video illustrating the new social-distancing measures and health-monitoring procedures.



"We have been speaking with a lot of different workers," said Nilvia Reyes Rodriguez, a community organiser with the League of United Latin American Citizens Local 370 in Waterloo.

"With the reopening happening, there are concerns as to whether truly all of the measures can be implemented," Rodriguez told Al Jazeera.

"The way the production is currently run, they just feel that it is going to be hard to implement safety measures," she said.

Working conditions in the US meatpacking industry are difficult and dangerous. The killing floor where animals are executed before being processed is a brutal scene. Processing lines involve rapid, repetitive cutting motions that can lead to injuries. All of it takes place in a cold, refrigerated atmosphere.

The work pays low wages and is more often done by immigrants and minorities. As a result, workers' rights to safe working conditions are not well protected, and their latitude to speak up without being threatened is compromised, labour advocates said.


Coronavirus: US meat processing plants forced to close (2:02)

In Waterloo - where many of the meatpacking workers are Congolese immigrants and Burmese refugees - some feel their lives are being put at risk to keep up the national pork supply.

"A lot of people think that is still a tad bit too soon in light of what we think we know. The cases are still going up. We haven't even flatlined yet," said Abraham Funchess, director of the Waterloo Commission on Human Rights, which has opened an inquiry into what's happening at the Tyson plant.

"They are very reluctant about wanting to go back in because they realise they are risking their lives," Funchess said.

Trump is betting his re-election prospects in November on how the contest between the virus and reopening the economy in places like Iowa works out. In states like Iowa, control of the US Senate is in play.

Republican Joni Ernst, who has been quiet about the meatpacking issues in Iowa, is among several US senators who face difficult re-elections.

Despite the upbeat messages from Trump and Governor Reynolds, local officials said the state of Iowa is not putting in place the testing and monitoring measures needed to stop the pandemic.

Jonathan Grieder is a member of the Waterloo City Council and a high school teacher. He knows former students whose parents have died from COVID-19.

"It is very clear that essential workers - who are often paid very little, who are often from communities at risk, economically, politically and socially - are so essential but we are so willing to exploit them because it is bothersome for the rest of us with privilege to deal with this issue," Grieder told Al Jazeera.

"This has been an abject failure," he said.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA



Trump: 'Rogue group' behind plot to overthrow Venezuela president

Venezuelan prosecutor requests extradition of US military veteran and two Venezuelans accused of involvement in plot.


Personal documents are shown by Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro (not pictured) a day after Venezuela's government said it foiled an attempted incursion by 'terrorist mercenaries' from Colombia [File: Miraflores Palace/Handout via Reuters]

MORE ON VENEZUELA
Report: Venezuela opposition plotted Maduro overthrow  yesterday
Venezuela broadcasts video of captured US mercenary  2 days ago
Pompeo: No US gov't involvement in Venezuela overthrow plot  2 days ago
Venezuela 'failed coup plot': What we know so far  2 days ago


President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated that the United States government was not behind a bungled incursion into Venezuela this week, allegedly to overthrow President Nicolas Maduro, saying in a Fox News channel interview that he would not rely on a small group for such an operation.

"I know nothing about it. I think the government has nothing to do with it at all, and I have to find out what happened," Trump said. "If we ever did anything with Venezuela, it wouldn't be that way. It would be slightly different. It would be called an invasion."
More:

Venezuela says eight killed in foiled 'invasion by sea'

US indicts Venezuela's Maduro on 'narco-terrorism' charges

Opposition leader Guaido returns to Venezuela after tour

Trump said the incursion "was not a good attack," carried out by a "rogue group" that included Venezuelans and "people from other countries".

"I saw the pictures on a beach. It wasn't led by General George Washington, obviously," he said, referring to the first US president, often considered a military genius.

A former US soldier captured in Venezuela has said he was contracted by a Florida security firm to seize control of Caracas's airport and bring in a plane to fly Maduro to the US. According to a document published by the Washington Post on Thursday, members of the country's opposition parties negotiated a $213m deal with the company, Silvercorp USA, to invade the country and overthrow Maduro.


Report: Venezuela opposition plotted Maduro overthrow (2:53)

Venezuela's chief prosecutor Tarek Saab said on Friday his office had requested detention and extradition orders of US military veteran Jordan Goudreau and two Venezuelans accused of involvement.

Saab accused Goudreau and the two opposition Venezuelan politicians, Miami-based political strategist Juan Rendon and exiled legislator Sergio Vergara, of being involved in the "design, financing and execution" of the plan to invade and overthrow Maduro.

Goudreau, chief executive of the Florida-based security company Silvercorp USA, has claimed responsibility for the plan, which left eight people dead and more than a dozen in custody, including two US citizens accompanying the dissident Venezuelan security forces.

Rendon has said that while he negotiated an agreement with Silvercorp late last year, he cut ties with Goudreau in November and that Goudreau went forward with the failed operation on his own. Vergara did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
#KAKISTOCRACY

The US was sick long before coronavirus
Trump putting his utterly unqualified son-in-law in charge of US's response to the pandemic should not surprise anyone.

by Belen Fernandez 7 May 2020
President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner attends a coronavirus response meeting in the Oval Office at the White House, on April 30, 2020 [File: Carlos Barria/Reuters]

At the end of March, as coronavirus deaths in the United States began to spiral out of control, President Donald Trump broadcast some important news on Twitter.

Displaying his signature pathological attachment to unnecessary capitalisation, the president boasted that - according to the New York Times - the "Ratings" of his "News Conferences etc" were so off the charts as to rival "Monday Night Football" and the finale of "The Bachelor".

Granted, car accidents also get a lot of views - which does not mean they are good.

As if things were not bad enough, Trump's coronavirus performance quickly became an even more horrifying spectacle with the ascension of Jared Kushner - first son-in-law and preferred presidential adviser - to the position of de facto commander of the US response to the pandemic.

And how are Kushner's own "ratings"? Well, at least he is keeping viewers on their toes.
'Shadow' taskforce

After initially reportedly assuring Trump that coronavirus was no big deal, Kushner was naturally deemed to be the best person to attend to the ensuing disaster - despite his own role in fuelling it and his utter lack of qualifications in any relevant field. (Judging from Kushner's numerous other assignments resolving everything from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the opioid crisis, "qualifications" are perhaps no longer a thing.)

He is now heading up a "shadow" coronavirus taskforce, not to be confused with the official coronavirus taskforce headed by Vice President Mike Pence. Kushner's force involves his own former roommate - current US foreign investment tsar Adam Boehler - as well as a bevy of private-sector executives.

By all lucid accounts, the Kushner group's manoeuvrings have simply bumped an already chaotic government response up to obscene new levels of confusion.

Kushner is furthermore "essentially operating without accountability", as Jordan Libowitz - communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington - pointed out in an April 6 article for NBC News. The shadow taskforce is being run "off the books, with closed-door meetings and private email accounts" - which, Libowitz suggests, could potentially be a good way to "steer emergency government funds into your family's bank account without people finding out".

After all, there is no better time than a global pandemic to make the rich richer.
Kushner will 'get us all killed'

Kushner's latest enterprise has prompted news headlines like: "Lawmakers Want to Know: WTF Is Jared Kushner Doing?" As for his known activities, these include scoffing at New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's claim of a ventilator shortage (New York now has almost 20,000 coronavirus deaths) and throwing a hissy fit over the outrageous presumption by individual US states that they might somehow be entitled to access the national stockpile of medical equipment.

In a super-sketchy sequence of events, a health insurance company linked to Kushner and his brother was tasked with developing a coronavirus website for the US government - before the project was "mysteriously scrapped".

As it so happens, the Kushner family real estate business could also "be a prime beneficiary of a provision in the federal [coronavirus] recovery bill that allows owners of apartment buildings to freeze federal mortgage payments on low- and moderate-income properties", according to a Politico analysis.

In the midst of Kushner's coronavirus machinations, even the New York Times felt compelled to run an op-ed titled "Jared Kushner Is Going to Get Us All Killed" (though the heading was later toned down).

But while this concern is certainly valid, we should not forget that the US has been in the business of killing people for a long time - and that the prioritisation of profit over human life far predates the existence of Kushner, as transparently repugnant a figure as he may be.
All sorts of death sentences

Beyond the matter of the US's predilection for waging wars that have slaughtered unthinkable numbers of people across the globe, it is worth recalling that the US military is also one of the primary polluters on the planet - and as such has made significant contributions to climate change, which was what was getting us all killed before the coronavirus interlude.

Meanwhile, the fact that the US throws gargantuan sums of money at its military killing machine rather than at, you know, domestic healthcare programmes or other more helpful endeavours is itself effectively a death sentence for many Americans.

It is also how we end up with US nurses wearing rubbish bags to protect themselves from coronavirus - and the news that uninsured Americans could be slammed with $75,000 in medical fees if hospitalised for the disease.

Of course, poverty - another defining feature of the landscape in one of the world's "richest" countries - has long been proved to be deadly. And sure enough, coronavirus has hit low-income communities the hardest. "Above all," a Bloomberg editorial notes, "it disproportionately kills black people."

Over at the Wall Street Journal, a short dispatch on "coronavirus capitalism" and its "darker side" laments that, in March, a two-pack of Purell hand sanitiser was listed on Amazon for $99.95. The author concludes that, while epidemics may come and go, "human nature, unfortunately, stays the same" - a rather sweepingly inaccurate assessment given that the history of the world shows plenty of good examples of non-capitalist human populations.

But in the US, capitalism is not just dark; it is a veritable plague.
Underlying conditions

Although Trump and his co-star Kushner are certainly committed as can be to the darkest sides of capitalism - eg, a willingness to throw countless Americans onto the coronavirus pyre to save the economy - it turns out they are not even that good at managing the system to effect their nefarious ends.

In a recent email to me, evolutionary biologist Rob Wallace, author of Big Farms Make Big Flu, remarked that, while bourgeois political economy dictates that the state "act as capital's handmaiden", Trump & Co are dropping the ball: "A family who has had every underwear picked up by ill-paid staff can't even envision what's involved in servicing the logistics and infrastructure capital needs to accumulate from one side of the world to the other."

American power, he wrote, is "on the hook for cleaning up pandemics" that capital helps to create, thereby keeping the world on the same catastrophic developmental path. But as it currently stands, we are down to Jared Kushner, who, "reading a couple articles, is cleaning up the COVID fix with what is tantamount to mass murder."

Ultimately, though, Kushner's pathologies could be diagnosed as symptomatic of the US's underlying conditions. Long before coronavirus, the country was critically ill.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Belen Fernandez is a contributing editor at Jacobin Magazine.


In Pictures: 'Full-flower supermoon' amid coronavirus lockdowns

May's full moon occurred over a world beginning to re-emerge after weeks of lockdowns.



This picture shows the closest supermoon to the Earth behind the cross on a church in downtown Moscow. KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP


The last "supermoon" of 2020 rose in the night sky on Thursday over a world beginning to re-emerge after weeks of coronavirus-related lockdowns.

The supermoon phenomenon occurs when the moon is within 10 percent of its closest distance to the Earth at the full moon.

May's full moon - at the height of the Northern Hemisphere spring - is also called a "flower moon" - hence Thursday's "full-flower supermoon".

The year's two previous supermoons occurred in March and April.

Clouds over much of Europe and Asia obscured views of the moon, which appears slightly larger than usual - and the streets remained relatively quiet, with many countries still imposing coronavirus-related restrictions.

But from Hong Kong to Jerusalem to Caracas, some locals donned masks and ventured out to take photos of the celestial spectacle.



The full moon rises above the Camlica Mosque in Istanbul, Turkey UMIT BEKTAS/REUTERS

The full moon, also known as the supermoon or Flower Moon, rises above the Statue of Liberty. BRENDAN MCDERMID/REUTERS

The Flower Supermoon rises over Curitiba, Brazil. The supermoon is visible as the full moon coincides with the satellite in its closest approach to Earth, which makes it appear brighter and larger than other full moons. DANIEL CASTELLANO/AFP

Silhouettes of media members and people document the full moon over Primrose Hill, London, Britain HANNAH MCKAY/REUTERS

The full moon is seen next to Tower Bridge, London, Britain SIMON DAWSON/REUTERS

The full moon rises over a mosque minaret on the 14th day of the holy fasting month of Ramadan, in Amman, Jordan MUHAMMAD HAMED/REUTERS

A bird flies past the full moon as it is seen behind the Lomonosov Moscow State University in Moscow, Russia SHAMIL ZHUMATOV/REUTERS

A supermoon rises over Mow Cop Castle near Stoke-on-Trent, central England [Oli Scarff/AFP]
A supermoon rises over Mow Cop Castle near Stoke-on-Trent, central England 
OLI SCARFF/AFP

Outrage as UK officer seen tasering Black father in front of son
Incident, which is being shared online, prompts accusations police officer in Manchester used disproportionate force.

NOT JUST THE USA WHITE SUPREMACY WAS SPREAD BY THE EMPIRE
In the footage, a Greater Manchester Police officer is seen using a taser on Desmond Ziggy Mombeyarara in front of Mombeyarara's young son [Courtesy: Twitter user @essmurph]

London, United Kingdom - A UK policeman who tasered a father in front of his young child is facing accusations of using excessive force unnecessarily after the moment was caught on video and shared widely on social media.

In the video, two policemen can be seen at a petrol station in Manchester, northern England, arguing with the driver, 34-year-old Desmond Ziggy Mombeyarara, outside a police car as his son stands by his legs, distressed and shouting "Daddy!".
More:

UK police accused of abusing power to enforce COVID-19 lockdown

'Many black communities have poor experiences at hands of police'

London protests erupt over death of Rashan Charles

One of the officers releases the taser on Mombeyarara, who is Black.

The taser makes a bang and Mombeyarara falls to the ground.

His son shouts "daddy!" again, cries and stamps his feet in a traumatised manner.

The officer who fired the taser orders Mombeyarara to "put your hands behind your back, now!", but he appears unable to do so.

The other officer then picks the crying child up and takes him away.

Tasers disable people by firing an electric charge into their bodies through needle-tipped darts.

According to the College of Policing, a professional body for policing in the UK, the usual reaction of someone who has been tasered "is loss of some voluntary muscle control accompanied by involuntary muscle contractions".

During the discharge, the subject may "not be able to respond to verbal commands during the discharge" or could "freeze on the spot".


This just happened a few hours ago @gmpolice pic.twitter.com/0sIwn3NrHI— Yaa🇬🇭 (@essmurph) May 7, 2020

In a statement on Friday, Greater Manchester Police said the incident took place on Wednesday before 11pm, local time.

"Police officers observed a vehicle being driven unsafely at high speed on Chester Road, in Stretford," said the statement, adding they stopped Mombeyarara and arrested him.

Mombeyarara was charged with resisting arrest, speeding, not having car insurance, failing to stop when required, refusing a test and being unfit to drive through drink.

He was also charged with "one count of unnecessary travel", which refers to violating current coronavirus lockdown measures in the UK, under which only essential travel is allowed.

He was remanded in custody and appeared before Manchester Magistrates' Court on Friday.

According to Manchester Evening News, Mombeyarara pleaded guilty to several charges, but denied guilt in obstructing or resisting a constable in the execution of duty.

A hearing was adjourned until July 31, Mombeyarara was granted unconditional bail and an interim driving disqualification was imposed.

"We have voluntarily referred this matter to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), to ensure transparency and independence in terms of reviewing the circumstances of the arrest," said Greater Manchester Police.

Superintendent Mark Kenny said: "We are aware of public concern regarding this arrest and I want to reassure the public that this matter is being reviewed and treated seriously. In addition, we have voluntarily referred this matter to the IOPC."

The IOPC is a police watchdog, sponsored by the UK Home Office.

Andy Burnham, Manchester mayor and a politician with the opposition Labour Party, said: "I was concerned about what I saw ... It is not at all clear that the level of force used in this instance, particularly in front of a child, was proportionate or justified and that is why I have asked for an urgent and independent review to be carried out."

He added, however: "From what I have been told, it would appear that the officers were right to apprehend the individual who was putting his child and others at risk by his actions."
'Tasers should be last, not first resort'

Deborah Coles, head of Inquest, a UK charity providing expertise on state-related deaths, wrote on Twitter that she had "serious questions".

Greater Manchester Police "must answer as to why a taser was discharged in a petrol station and with a young child present. Tasers should be a last not first resort. Reinforces concerns about disproportionate use of force against black people".

Aamer Anwar, a Scottish-based lawyer, tweeted: "Force used must be reasonable, legitimate & proportionate - using a taser at a petrol pump, do they not realise the deadly danger of using it near flammable material? Doing it right in front of the man’s toddler? A lot of questions."

Twitter user Michael Morgan said: "This taser incident is yet another example of institutionally racist policing and disproportionate use of force."

Example, a British musician, said: "This is disgraceful. There'll be so many people saying 'why didn’t he cooperate?' But how can two male police officers not deal with this WITHOUT a taser !!?? And the poor kid. Scarred for life. The cycle continues."


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS
In 2001, a British-Chinese protest against virus-related racism

Foot-and-mouth was unfairly blamed on China and fuelled hatred in the UK, prompting a diaspora resistance movement.
On April 8, 2001, about 1,000 members of the UK's Chinese diaspora protested against false allegations that foot-and-mouth originated in China, charges which led to racist attacks [Courtesy Sarah Yeh

London, United Kingdom - In 2001, foot-and-mouth disease tore through the United Kingdom, from Scotland to Cornwall, devastating British industries and costing the country billions of pounds.

In the eyes of some Britons, certain sections of the media and reportedly the government, it was the Chinese who were to blame.

The outbreak almost 20 years ago led to the slaughter of millions of farm animals and the loss of livelihoods for many in the agricultural sector.

The exact origin of the 2001 foot-and-mouth outbreak remains unclear to this day, but there is certainly no consensus that the epidemic was caused by the actions of Chinese businesses in the UK.

An abattoir in Essex, southern England, reported the first cases among pigs, but the infection was believed to have been brought there from a farm in Northumberland, in the north, where pigs had been infected for some time before.
People weren't coming in as customers but coming in to play football and, while they're doing that, shouting racist abuse.

JABEZ LAM, EQUAL RIGHTS CAMPAIGNER

On March 27, 2001, UK media said the government was investigating reports that illegally imported meat served in Chinese restaurants was the likely source of the disease - prompting condemnation from Chinese catering associations.

At the time, equal rights campaigner Jabez Lam was supporting Chinese victims of hate crimes and started receiving reports of more cases.

Verbal and physical abuse was rising in the streets, and at Chinese restaurants and takeaways.

"I received many calls about incidents where people weren't coming in as customers but coming in to play football and, while they're doing that, shouting racist abuse," Lam told Al Jazeera. "Plenty of criminal damage. People throwing glass at the shop front. There were incidents of graffiti."

Chinese restaurants across the country reported a 40 percent downturn in trade, with some businesses not receiving a single customer after the rumour broke.

"Because of the rumour, the business just went downhill very, very quickly," Clint Woo, who owned a restaurant called China City on Stowell Street in Newcastle, where the city's Chinatown had sprung up, told Al Jazeera.

"Not just my restaurant but the whole street."

With the spread of foot-and-mouth traced to a farm seven miles (11km) away in Heddon-on-the-Wall, Northumberland, the glare was fixed firmly on Stowell Street's restaurants, which supplied farmers with pigswill - kitchen refuse which is fed to pigs.

The allegation, which was attributed to an official at the now-defunct Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF), stoked fear and anger.

Despite the lack of proof and as the government was yet to officially confirm or deny the claim, the press continued to run with the rumour.

The Daily Mirror, for instance, printed the headline: "Sheep and Sow Sauce", bolstering the racist stereotype of unsavoury Chinese food practices.

"Maybe the meal you last bought on an evening out was sub-standard or even diseased," a column in the newspaper read.

The result, as Lam recalled, was that "racial attacks and abuse increased".

According to Sarah Yeh, founder of Dimsum, a website aimed at British-Chinese people, this level of bullying galvanised a community that was otherwise hesitant to engage in activism.

"It was so obviously wrong and unjust," she remembered.

"The perception was very much that Chinese people kept their heads down and got on with work, and that's not something I felt was a particularly good thing because we were still being subjected to racism," she said.
On April 8, 2001, CCRAG members including Anna Chen (third from left), Sarah Yeh (centre), Jabez Lam (right), protested in front of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and secured a meeting with then minister Nicholas Brown [Courtesy: Sarah Yeh]

Lam, members of Dimsum and various Chinese community groups, such as the London Chinatown Association, formed the Chinese Civil Rights Action Group (CCRAG) and set out to refute the unfounded allegation.

Communication would need to play a key role.

So Anna Chen, another CCRAG member, organised a media campaign, disputing false press reports and organising interviews with campaigners.

The Dimsum website informed the community about the campaign and publicised the call to action that would garner the most attention - a protest on April 8, 2001 from London's Chinatown to Westminster and MAFF headquarters.

The march attracted around 1,000 people, an unusually high turnout for the British-Chinese community.

Yeh said protesters ranged from students to catering workers, immigrants to British-born Chinese, and the young and old.

"It was the first for so many people. So many Chinese people had connected together of different ages and different generations, and it was really very inspiring."

At MAFF, they held a meeting with minister Nicholas Brown, of the then ruling Labour Party, who came out to directly address the protesters.

He told the crowd it was "untrue" that the government had tracked the source of foot-and-mouth to Chinese restaurants and criticised the "racist overtones" found in media reports.

The community had been vindicated.

"But we'd won the fight, not the war," said Yeh.
'The whole street never recovered'

Alongside other Chinese business owners in Newcastle, Clint Woo had set up the Chinatown Traders' Action Group and managed to secure £20,000 ($25,000) of compensation for the group from the government.

"For a street of businesses, that's really not much," said Woo. "You can argue that the whole street never recovered."

The sum also did not cover anywhere near the £24m ($30m) loss to the Chinese catering industry nationally, as estimated by the CCRAG.

In September that year - seven months after the first case of the epidemic - the outbreak was mostly over.

Today, in addition to the fear of contracting COVID-19, the Chinese diaspora - as well as those of East and Southeast Asian origin - are contending with virus-related racism again.

Weeks before the UK went into lockdown, Chinese restaurants across the nation reported a drop in trade of up to 75 percent amid growing reports of racist incidents and online abuse.

Despite this, Lam, the equality campaigner, is optimistic.

"The younger generation of Chinese are more forthcoming in expressing their views and a lot of organisations are coming up to serve the different sectors of the communities," he said.

"Also, there is a readiness of joint collaboration with other communities, whether it's BAME, the mainstream or disadvantaged groups. They are joining in social movements, in commenting on community affairs, in participation. I think it's more hopeful."


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Stephanie Soh
Sanctions make Iran's coronavirus crisis more deadly

In the face of this global threat, the US should abandon its maximum pressure strategy against Iran and lift sanctions.

 Protesters call for the Trump administration to ease economic sanctions on Iran to help the country's fight against COVID-19, March 11, 2020, Washington, US [Carlos Barria/Reuters]

As COVID-19 continues to wreck lives and livelihoods across the globe, some countries, such as the United States, seem to be suffering the consequences of this deadly pandemic more than others, largely due to the shortsightedness of their governments.

Indeed, President Donald Trump's reluctance at the outset of the pandemic to take the necessary measures to stem the spread of the virus in his country led to the US having the world's largest number of confirmed coronavirus cases and deaths. So far, more than 1.2 million Americans have tested positive for COVID-19 and some 76,000 others have lost their lives to this highly infectious disease.

Iran is another country that was hit particularly hard by the pandemic. According to official figures, there are more than 100,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Iran and some 6,500 people have succumbed to the disease. Experts and officials both in Iran and abroad, however, have cast doubts over these figures, saying the real numbers of cases and deaths are likely even higher than reported.

The Trump administration, seemingly in denial about its own shambolic response to the crisis, tried to blame the pandemic's high toll in Iran on the incompetence and corruption of the Iranian government. The Iranian leadership indeed made some mistakes in its handling of this public health emergency, such as initially underestimating the threat posed by the virus and failing to close the country's borders in time. It is, however, impossible to claim that the Iranian government is solely responsible for the devastation the pandemic has caused in the country.

Ever since Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and embarked on a maximum pressure strategy against Iran some two years ago, the Islamic Republic has been under strict economic sanctions that limit its ability to trade with other nations. These sanctions, which choked of Iran's oil exports, crippled its economy and practically pushed it out of the international banking system, made it impossible for the country to swiftly take the necessary medical, economic and social measures to protect its citizens from the coronavirus.

The role US sanctions have played, and continue to play, in the devastation caused by the coronavirus in Iran led to renewed discussions on the effectiveness, legality and legitimacy of sanctions not only in Iran and the US, but also across the world.

Political leaders, diplomats, defence officials, experts, civic organisations and activists from Asia to Europe have urged the Trump administration to ease its sanctions against Iran to help the country's fight against coronavirus and help save "hundreds of thousands of lives".

In Iran, the government admitted that the sanctions make it difficult to obtain vital medical supplies and equipment to treat COVID-19 patients and called for their immediate lifting. Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, for example, tweeted that the US has moved from "economic terrorism" to "medical terror" by declining to lift the sanctions after the beginning of the outbreak in Iran in mid-February, and urged the international community to stop aiding "war crimes" by obeying "illegal and immoral" sanctions.

There have also been widespread calls for the lifting of sanctions in the US. Nine US politicians, including former Democratic presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, for example, sent an open letter to the Trump administration asking for sanctions relief for Iran amid the COVID-19 crisis. The New York Times, meanwhile, published an editorial calling for the easing of sanctions.

But there have also been calls within the US for the sanctions to not only remain in place, but also to be tightened during this time of crisis. A cluster of right-wing think tanks in Washington, led by The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) and American Enterprise (AEI), for example, have been aggressively lobbying the Trump administration to escalate militarily towards Iran and tighten sanctions amid the pandemic. The Wall Street Journal, meanwhile, published an editorial claiming it is "no time to end Iran sanctions". We have seen similar think pieces published in other reputable American media organisations, such as Foreign Policy and Bloomberg.

For now, the Trump administration seems to be heeding the calls from right-wing figures and institutions to use the coronavirus pandemic as an opportunity to double down on its "maximum pressure" policy against Iran. So far, Washington has not only blocked Iran's attempt to get a loan of $5bn from the World Bank to combat COVID-19, but it also further tightened its sanctions on the country. On May 6, he vetoed a US Congress resolution that would have terminated the president's power to use armed forces in hostilities against Iran.

Trump appears to be eager to please Saudi Arabia and Israel, the primary supporters of his administration in the Middle East, by increasing pressure on Iran during this global crisis. Moreover, amid the pandemic, he seems more confident than ever before that the economic sanctions would eventually force Iran to return to the negotiating table in a weak and desperate position. He also likely believes by hardening his stance against an adversary during this difficult time, he can rile up his support base, encourage jingoism, and increase his chances of being re-elected in November.

But the US president is known for making major U-turns when it suits his political needs and desires. If Iran continues to stand tall in the face of increasing economic, political and diplomatic pressures, Trump may decide that easing the pressures on the country, and paving the way for peace may be more beneficial for his political future. He can point to the ongoing humanitarian emergency in Iran caused by the coronavirus pandemic to explain this about-turn. This way, he can claim that he sorted out "the Iran problem" without admitting that his maximum pressure policy failed to deliver the desired results.

It is impossible to ascertain which one of the two paths the most unpredictable US president in living memory is going to follow. If Trump continues to follow the advice of conflict-hungry hawks in Washington and the Middle East, we can see a military escalation between the US and Iran in the coming months. This outcome would not only further devastate an already conflict-ridden region, but also exacerbate Iran's coronavirus crisis. 



But Trump can still change course and use the COVID-19 crisis as an opportunity for "humanitarian diplomacy".

As a first step, he can remove the sanctions on Iran's financial institutions and allow the country to receive at least a portion of its oil revenue. This would allow the Iranian government to swiftly buy the medical equipment and drugs it needs to treat coronavirus patients.

Then he can allow Iranians living in the US to send money and medical goods to their families back home - this would help elevate many Iranian families from poverty and help Iran's fight against the pandemic.

Next, Trump can greenlight a prisoner swap between the two countries, and end the suffering of hundreds of families who are worried about the wellbeing of their loved ones during the pandemic.

As the final step in a "COVID-19 humanitarian diplomacy package", Trump can allow for the normalisation of relations between the American and Iranian peoples. By allowing the private sector entities, and private citizens, in the two countries to interact normally, Trump could trigger a surge in American-Iranian partnerships in many sectors, including medical research and development.

All this would not compromise the negotiating positions of the two governments, but would encourage them to move towards peace rather than war.

The novel coronavirus pandemic is the most serious public health threat our world has faced in a century. It made the inhumane and unjust sanctions the US has imposed on Iran deadlier than ever. The Trump administration should immediately change course and lift the sanctions on Iran before it is too late. If it fails to do so, the consequences for millions of Iranians will be dire.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Seyed Hossein Mousavian

Seyed Hossein Mousavian is Middle East Security and Nuclear Policy Specialist at Princeton University.
Beating coronavirus needs return to health surveillance, says WHO
Nations must return to testing, tracing and quarantining strategy rather than reopening economies, says WHO official.

Mike Ryan, the World Health Organization's emergencies chief (left), called for a spirit of solidarity to continue fighting the spread of the virus [File photo/Denis Balibouse/Reuters]

If the world is to bring the coronavirus outbreak under control, nations must carry out the "basic principles" of public health surveillance, a top World Health Organization expert said on Friday.

The call for a return to greater vigilance comes as more countries turn their efforts towards reopening economies battered by the pandemic.

"We seem ... to be avoiding the uncomfortable reality that we need to get back to public health surveillance," Mike Ryan, the head of the WHO's health emergencies programme, said during a media briefing. "We need to go back to where we should have been months ago - finding cases, tracking cases, testing cases, isolating people who are tested positive, doing quarantine for contacts."
More:

US blocks UN Security Council vote on coronavirus: Live updates

World gambles with looser lockdowns, risks coronavirus resurgence

No UK lockdown lifting yet, Johnson to detail strategy on Sunday

All nations should focus on the fundamentals of the global coronavirus fight: scouting potential new infections, hunting them down, confirming them and then separating those afflicted, to save others from the disease, said Ryan.

The WHO is facing a $1.3bn funding deficit for its effort to tackle COVID-19, after United States President Donald Trump last month told his administration to temporarily halt funding to the United Nations health agency. US officials are demanding a WHO overhaul, saying it mishandled the coronavirus crisis.

European Union preparing to reopen borders [2:35]

WHO's Ryan on Friday urged nations to stick together as the disease spreads from country to country, sometimes at different rates and with wide swings in death tolls. Ryan highlighted how Russia appears to be dealing with a "delayed epidemic" as a spike in confirmed new infections in recent days has catapulted it past France and Germany in the total number of cases.

"Through solidarity we will win the fight, and nobody is safe until everybody is safe", Ryan said.

"There is a path out, but we must remain ever vigilant, and we may have to have a significant alteration of our lifestyles until we get to a point where we have an effective vaccine."

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also drew on the theme of international solidarity as he referred to Friday's anniversary of the eradication of smallpox, which was declared fully beaten 40 years ago.

"Its eradication stands as the greatest public health triumph in history," he said.

"As the world confronts the COVID-19 pandemic, humanity's victory over smallpox is a reminder of what is possible when nations come together to fight a common health threat."
READ MORE
Moscow extends lockdown until May 31 as COVID-19 infections soar

There has been a slew of news in recent days about coronavirus vaccine candidates, including announcements that tests in humans have begun with some trials expected by summer, though experts have warned a successful preventative treatment may still be many months away.

"As you know, WHO is now working with many partners to accelerate the development of a vaccine for COVID-19, which will be an essential tool for controlling transmission of the virus," said Tedros.

"But although a vaccine was crucial for ending smallpox, it was not enough on its own. After all, the vaccine was first developed by Edward Jenner in 1796. It took another 184 years for smallpox to be eradicated.

"The decisive factor in the victory over smallpox was global solidarity."


SOURCE: NEWS AGENCIES

Here’s Jupiter Like You’ve Never Seen It Before As Astronomers ‘Get Lucky’

Jamie Carter
Senior Contributor
Science
I write about science and nature, stargazing and eclipses.

This image showing the entire disk of Jupiter in infrared light was compiled from a mosaic of nine ... [+] INTERNATIONAL GEMINI OBSERVATORY/NOIRLAB/NSF/AURA, M.H. WONG (UC BERKELEY) AND TEAM ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: MAHDI ZAMANI

Some of the highest resolution images of Jupiter ever obtained from the ground have been shot from the Gemini North telescope on Hawaii’s Maunakea volcano.

Remarkably, when combined with those of the Hubble Space Telescope and NASA’s Juno mission at Jupiter, the resulting multi-wavelength images reveal lightning strikes.

They also reveal something new about Jupiter's “Great Red Spot.”
Stunning Images Of A 'Churning' Jupiter Emerge After NASA Spacecraft's Close Shave Last Week By Jamie Carter

The dramatic images are the result of combining three types of images over three years of observations:

pin-sharp infrared images from Gemini North’s Near Infrared Imager (NIRI)
optical and ultraviolet images by Hubble Space Telescope
radio observations by NASA's Juno spacecraft now orbiting Jupiter
Today In: Science

Ask Ethan: Can We Extract Energy From Gravitational Waves?


When Is The Next Supermoon? When To See The Biggest, Brightest And Best Supermoons Of Your Life


Earth’s Magnetic North Pole Is Shifting Dramatically From A Powerful Tug Of War


So what do astronomers call the technique for getting some of the sharpest-ever images of Jupiter from a ground-based telescope? “We used a very powerful technique called lucky imaging,” said Michael Wong of UC Berkeley, who led the research team.

These images of Jupiter were taken in infrared light using the international Gemini Observatory, a ... [+] INTERNATIONAL GEMINI OBSERVATORY/NOIRLAB/NSF/AURA M.H. WONG (UC BERKELEY) AND TEAM ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: MAHDI ZAMANI

“Lucky imaging” is when lots of very short exposure images are taken and only the sharpest—taken at brief moments when the Earth’s atmosphere is stable—are retained.
Why using ground-based telescopes is so difficult

Imaging using ground-based telescopes is tricky because the telescope has to peer through Earth’s turbulent atmosphere where wind and temperature changes distort and blur the image (as shown on the left of the above image). Once in a while everything settles and a “lucky” sharp image is obtained (right). The research team kept all the sharpest exposures and created a mosaic of the whole disk of Jupiter.

“These images rival the view from space,” said Wong.

These images of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot were made using data collected by the Hubble Space ... [+] NASA, ESA, AND M.H. WONG (UC BERKELEY) AND TEAM
What’s going on in the ‘Great Red Spot?’

Dark spots in the Great Red Spot—the Solar System’s largest storm 22 degrees south of Jupiter’s equator that’s been raging since at least the year 1830—are revealed by these new images to be gaps in the cloud cover. Gemini’s images showed bright glowing infrared hotspots that could only be gaps.

“Similar features have been seen in the Great Red Spot before, but visible-light observation couldn’t distinguish between darker cloud material, and thinner cloud cover over Jupiter's warm interior, so their nature remained a mystery,” said Glenn Orton of JPL and a member of the team.

Hawaii, Big Island, Mauna Kea telescopes GETTY
THESE OBSERVATORIES ARE ON SACRED ABORIGINAL LANDS
TERRITORY NOT CEDED TO AUSTRALIA

Jupiter’s constant, gigantic storms

The giant planets has enormous storms compared to those on Earth, with thunderheads reaching 40 miles from base to top. That’s five times taller than those found on on Earth. Jupiter also sees lightning flashes up to three times more energetic than Earth’s largest “superbolts.”


This natural-color (visible light) image of Jupiter was captured by Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3 on ... [+] NASA, ESA, AND M.H. WONG (UC BERKELEY)MORE FROM FORBESNo, There Won't Be A 'Smiley Face' In The Night Sky In May (But Something Else Will Make You Happy)By Jamie Carter
How sharp are Gemini’s images of Jupiter?

Gemini’s infrared “lucky imaging” observations achieved 300 miles/500 kilometers per pixel, which is an angular resolution down to 0.13 arc-seconds. “At this resolution, the telescope could resolve the two headlights of a car in Miami, seen from New York City,” said Andrew Stephens, the Gemini astronomer who led the observations.

The results were published in the April 2020 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

On July 14, 2020, Jupiter will be an opposition—Earth will be directly between the Sun and the giant planet—so the latter will appear to be at its brightest of the entire Earth year. Get behind any small telescope and you’ll be able to see its distinctive cloud bands—and its Great Red Spot—for yourself. Even with binoculars you’ll easily see its four largest moons; Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto.


Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website or some of my other work here.

Jamie Carter
I'm an experienced science, technology and travel journalist interested in space exploration, moon-gazing, exploring the night sky, solar and lunar eclipses,…

US economy loses a record 20.5 million jobs in April

Job losses from coronavirus lockdowns send US unemployment rate skyrocketing to highest level since Great Depression.

by Patricia Sabga
People who lost their jobs as coronavirus lockdown measures swept the United States wait in line to file for unemployment benefits [File: Nick Oxford/Reuters]

We have never seen anything like this before.

The depth and breadth of the damage inflicted on the United States economy by coronavirus lockdown measures came into sharp, painful focus on Friday with government figures showing a record 20.5 million Americans lost their jobs in April.

Data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) also showed the unemployment rate skyrocketed to 14.7 percent last month - the highest since the Great Depression.

Behind all of these numbers are real people whose livelihoods have been brutally and tragically disrupted by the pandemic.
More:

Millions of Americans still can't access jobless benefits: survey

Coronavirus recession will hit women harder, experts warn

For millennials, coronavirus economic blow awakens bad memories

The data further confirms the overwhelming consensus that the US economy is in the throes of a sharp recession. But in a sobering reality check, the headline numbers likely understate the true scale of the carnage.

"Although the unemployment rate only climbed to 14.7 percent, slightly below expectations, that was principally because the BLS is still having problems with misclassifying absent workers who should have been recorded as on temporary layoff," Capital Economics chief US economist Paul Ashworth wrote in a note to clients. "Without that distortion, the unemployment rate would have been close to 20 percent last month."

Though historic, the data came as no surprise. Some 33.5 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits in the seven weeks ending May 2, offering a preview of the monthly damage on tap.

But the April numbers do provide more details about which workers and which sectors of the economy were hardest hit by stay-at-home orders.

Broken out by race and gender, the unemployment rate hit 13 percent for adult men and 15.5 percent for adult women; 14.2 percent for whites, 16.7 percent for Blacks, 14.5 percent for Asians and 18.9 percent for Hispanics.

All of these groups with the exception of Black people posted record high unemployment rates.

Every major sector of the economy haemorrhaged jobs last month, but losses were particularly acute in leisure and hospitality where employment plummeted by 7.7 million, or 47 percent. Nearly three-quarters of that carnage - some 5.5 million job losses - were borne by food services and drinking places.

Education and health services lost 2.5 million jobs in April, while healthcare shed 1.4 million, led by losses in dentists' offices.

Employment in professional and businesses services, and retail trade each fell by 2.1 million.

Some 1.3 million manufacturing workers lost their jobs in April, with nearly two-thirds of that total coming from personal and laundry services.

Job losses in construction were just shy of one million last month.

The average work week for all employees ticked up slightly in April to 34.2 hours, but Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner William W Beach urged caution when interpreting that data, noting in a statement that "the majority of the increase in average weekly hours reflects the disproportionate number of workers with shorter work weeks who went off payrolls."

Beach also urged caution when interpreting the $1.34 rise in average hourly earnings because it reflects the disproportionate loss of low-wage jobs.
When will the labour market recover?

The big question now is when the US jobs market will return to its pre-coronavirus strength. With so many unknowns surrounding the trajectory of the pandemic, forecasts are riddled with uncertainty. But economists are doing their best with the data they have to hand.

A lot is riding on how long it takes consumers to regain their confidence and start spending again on goods and services, because consumer spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of US economic growth.

Gregory Daco, chief US economist at Oxford Economics highlighted this point in a note to clients on Friday,

"We anticipate that the severe income loss, elevated precautionary savings and lingering virus fear will curtail consumer demand well past the lockdowns," he said, adding that "while we expect some jobs will be recovered over the coming months, we anticipate an unemployment rate well above 10 percentby year-end."

During the Great Recession and its aftermath, the number of job seekers overwhelmed the number of open positions for years. This extreme "slack" in the labour force depressed average wages and analysts say that could well happen again.

In a note to clients on Monday, Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius said: "Even under a reasonably optimistic growth forecast, it will take several years to put people back to work and fill empty offices and storefronts," he wrote, adding "while we expect some jobs will be recovered over the coming months, we anticipate an unemployment rate well above 10 percent by year-end."


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS