Thursday, July 23, 2020

LAWNORDER 

Joe Biden Says Donald Trump’s Use Of Federal Force In Portland Is "Egregious"

“They are brutally attacking peaceful protesters, including a U.S. Navy veteran,” Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, said in a statement to BuzzFeed News.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/henrygomez/biden-portland-protests-federal-officers

WORD OF THE DAY

extraordinary in some bad way; glaring; flagrant: an egregious mistake; an egregious liar. Archaic. !!!!!

LAWNORDER

ACLU sues federal agencies, Portland over abuses against protest medics


July 23 (UPI) -- The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit accusing local and federal law enforcement of targeting and attacking volunteer street medics during protests in Portland, Ore.

The civil rights lawsuit, filed Wednesday in federal court on behalf of four street medics, argues the alleged attacks violated the plaintiffs' First and Fourth Amendment rights.

"In well-document incidents, police and federal agents brutally attacked volunteer medics with rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray, batons and flash-bangs," the ACLU said in a press release.

The Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Marshals Service and the City of Portland, as well as several named and unnamed law enforcement officers, were listed as defendants.

RELATED St. Louis couple charged with threatening protesters with guns

"Volunteer medics should be celebrated, not attacked or arrested," Jann Carson, interim executive director of the ACLU of Oregon, said in a statement. "Our clients are volunteering day and night to provide aid to the injured and to create a safer environment for protesters and bystanders. These attacks are unconscionable as well as unconstitutional. This lawlessness must end."

Portland has been submerged in protests against police brutality and racial inequality since the May 25 police-involved killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Federal law enforcement agents have been sent to Portland under a late June executive order President Donald Trump signed to protect monuments and statues, which protesters nationwide had targeted for celebrating slaveholders or Confederate soldiers.

RELATED 12 arrested, at least 18 injured at Chicago protest

The lawsuit states Michael Martinez, a graduate student at Oregon Health & Science University, was arrested while packing up a medic tent on the night of June 13, saying in a statement that he was filing the lawsuit "because many people in this country, such as George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, will never have their day in court."

"I feel it's all the more important to use whatever resources and power I have to confront this abhorrent system, which allows people in America, primarily Black people, to be beaten and killed by police without consequence," Martinez said in a statement.

Savannah Guest, another plaintiff, accused law enforcement in the complaint of assaulting her while she was attempting to provide aid to an injured bystander who appeared to be suffering from the effects of tear gas exposure.

"It was terrifying," she said in a statement. "Every human being deserves help, but the federal agents showed no humanity or concern."

It is the second lawsuit the ACLU has filed against the City of Portland and the Trump administration over alleged abuses that have occurred during the protests. The lawyers group was awarded a court order prohibiting local law enforcement from attacking journalists and legal observers in the previous lawsuit filed on Friday.

"The Trump administration and Portland Police Bureau wax poetic about their concerns about lawlessness -- but they are responsible for it," said Shane Grannum, an attorney at Perkins Coie. "They have violated the constitutional rights of our clients to protest and lend medical services, supplies and treatment to protesters."

The lawsuit was filed as Trump announced his administration will deploy federal law enforcement officers to Chicago and Albuquerque to combat escalating violence in those cities.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot condemned the president's actions and said they do not need federal troops.

"We don't need unnamed secretive federal agents roaming around the streets of Chicago taking off our residents without cause and violating their basic constitutional rights," she said Wednesday in a press conference.
LAWNORDER

Donald Trump's Portland Rhetoric Doesn't Match Reality

The right-wing media portrays a city under siege — but the city's real siege is from the federal government.


Posted on July 21, 2020

Noah Berger / AP Photo
A worker, who declined to give his name, leaves a Portland, Ore., home that features a "STOP TRUMP" sign on Monday, July 20, 2020.

During a Fox News interview on Sunday, President Donald Trump painted an alarming picture of anti–police brutality protests in Portland.

“You know, if you look at what’s gone on in Portland, those are anarchists, and we’ve taken a very tough stand,” he told Chris Wallace. “If we didn’t take a stand in Portland — you know we’ve arrested many of these leaders. If we didn’t take that stand, right now you would have a problem like you, you— they were going to lose Portland.”

Many people in Portland feel they are not living in the same city they see on TV or online. They said that outside the downtown core where nightly protests take place, it’s business as usual. It’s the actions of both the local police and then the Department of Homeland Security that trouble them, both of which have used tear gas and "less-than-lethal" weapons against protesters.

Across right-wing media, Portland has been portrayed as a city besieged by anarchist violence. A Friday morning segment on Fox News described the city as “plagued” by “violent clashes.” In a Facebook post that gathered over 50,000 likes, Breitbart called the protests “sustained Antifa violence.” On Wednesday, managing editor at right-wing website Human Events Ian Miles Cheong tweeted that protesters were “terrorists.”

“These are anarchists. These are not protesters,” Trump said Monday, echoing the claim of acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Chad Wolf, who has called the protesters "violent anarchists.”


And while some protesters have written graffiti on buildings and briefly lit a fire inside the Portland Police Association building — which was quickly extinguished — the majority of the actions remain peaceful.



Mike Baker@ByMikeBaker
The protest crowds in Portland continue to grow in response to the arrival of the feds. There are probably about 2,000 people here right now in front of the Justice Center, with moms in yellow lined up in front, stretching across a whole block.04:27 AM - 21 Jul 2020
Reply Retweet FavoriteTwitter


Chelsea Unsbee, a Portland resident who has been following the protests closely but steered clear of the downtown for health reasons, told BuzzFeed News that characterizing the city as engulfed in violence was “bizarre.”

“If I wasn’t physically downtown, I wouldn’t know there was a protest happening,” she said.

Mathieu Lewis-Rolland, a freelance photographer and photojournalist, has been documenting the protests since they started. Lewis-Rolland began livestreaming his coverage on Facebook for his own safety, and on Sunday he walked around the city for his viewers to show how the protests were only located in about four blocks downtown.

News editor at Portland Mercury Alex Zielinski has also been covering the protests since the beginning. She told BuzzFeed News that before the DHS came to the city, attendance had been dwindling. Now, interest in attending protests has been reignited.

“It’s remarkable to hear the way Portland is being portrayed in national news right now,” she said.

Lewis-Rolland and the Portland Mercury have joined an ACLU lawsuit to block federal law enforcement from arresting or using physical force against journalists or legal observers.

Zielinski doesn’t live downtown, and were it not for the sounds of helicopters and munition, she wouldn’t know demonstrations were taking place. Although businesses downtown are boarded up, Zielinski said that happened before the protests, when coronavirus lockdowns started.

The characterization of Portland as a city “under siege” has become a joke to the residents. In one Twitter thread started by Oregonian reporter Eder Campuzano, people sent photos of the city looking peaceful.



🌈👻 Aiden Thomas CEMETERY BOYS PREORDER CAMPAIGN!@aidenschmaiden
@edercampuzano views of downtown from the south waterfront. dogs playing and people picnicking. yesterday we had a farmer’s market in the park. ain’t nothing “under siege”.08:18 PM - 17 Jul 2020
Reply Retweet FavoriteTwitter


That doesn’t mean that there isn’t violence in the four-block city center where protests are taking place, but most of it is not coming from the protesters, according to people who spoke to BuzzFeed News.

Lewis-Rolland said there’s a bonfire every night near two parks and there’s some graffiti, too. Some protesters have thrown water bottles or other objects at the police. But in response, authorities in riot or tactical gear have used tear gas and less-than-lethal weapons on crowds indiscriminately.

“It’s hard because it gets late enough and you think, Wow, the cops aren’t going to come out tonight, and the energy completely dies down, everyone’s looking like they’re sleepy,” he said. “And then all of a sudden, they’ll come out, and they’ll do their thing, and the cycle just continues. People are getting more and more mad.


Ellen Rosenblum@ORDOJ
Mr. President: You are getting bad intel from your people if you think things have gone well here in Portland. The presence of your federal agents has made things significantly worse, including causing the greatest injuries so far. Thanks, but no thanks!08:18 PM - 20 Jul 2020
Reply Retweet FavoriteTwitter


The national attention has set off online harassment of local reporters, Zielinski said, and discussions with worried relatives who falsely believe the city is engulfed in violence.

“I have family members who live on the outskirts of Portland,” Unsbee said, “and they still believe the news more than what I’m saying.”

Portland's dilemma may soon reach other cities across the nation: Yesterday, Trump said he was looking to deploy more federal law enforcement to other cities across the country. “In Portland, they’ve done a fantastic job,” he said.

But in the Northwestern city, residents continue to be baffled.

“Regardless of which side of things you’re on, that shouldn’t change the reality of what happened,” Unsbee said.


MORE ON THIS
“Flat-Out Unconstitutional”: Federal Officers In Unmarked Vans Are Snatching People Off The Streets In Portland
Craig Silverman · July 17, 2020
Olivia Niland · July 19, 2020
Ryan Mac · July 19, 2020



Jane Lytvynenko is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Toronto, Canada. PGP fingerprint: A088 89E6 2500 AD3C 8081 BAFB 23BA 21F3 81E0 101C.

Christopher Miller is a Kyiv-based American journalist and editor.

LAWNORDER
Ex-officer
AND MURDERER Derek Chauvin, wife face tax fraud charges



In addition to a second-degree murder charge, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin also faces nine counts of tax fraud. File Photo courtesy Ramsey County Sheriff's Office | License Photo

July 22 (UPI) -- The former Minneapolis police officer accused of second-degree murder in the death of George Floyd was charged with tax fraud Wednesday.

Derek Chauvin and his wife, Kellie Chauvin, each face nine counts of tax fraud for allegedly underreporting their income by nearly $500,000 from 2014 to 2019. Washington County prosecutors said the couple didn't file any tax returns from 2016-18.

The couple allegedly owe the state of Minnesota more than $21,000 in taxes as well as a $17,000 penalty.

"When you fail to fulfill the basic obligation to file and pay taxes, you are taking money from the pockets of citizens of Minnesota," said Washington County Attorney Pete Orput. "Our office has and will continue to file these charges when presented. Whether you are a prosecutor or police officer, or you are doctor or a realtor, no one is above the law."

The Chauvins' taxes came under scrutiny after Derek Chauvin was arrested for his involvement in Floyd's death on May 25. He was recorded on video kneeling on Floyd's neck for more than 8 minutes as Floyd repeatedly said he couldn't breathe.

Derek Chauvin and three other Minneapolis officers were arrested Floyd for allegedly attempting to use a counterfeit $20 bill at a food store.

The other former officers -- J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane and Tou Thao -- face charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder and manslaughter. All four men were fired the day after Floyd's death.

RELATED George Floyd's family sues Minneapolis, officers involved in death

The incident sparked worldwide protests against racial bias and police brutality and forced many law enforcement agencies to review and reform their policies on use of force.

LAWNORDER


Lawsuit: Former cardinal abused boys in N.J. 'sex ring'



Cardinal Theodore McCarrick has been accused of sexually abusing a boy at a New Jersey beach house in the early 1980s. Photo by Patrick D. McDermott/UPI | License Photo


July 23 (UPI) -- An unnamed man has accused former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and other clerics in a lawsuit of sexually abusing him and other boys as part of a "sex ring" operated out of a New Jersey beach house in the early 1980s.

Jeff Anderson, one of the lawyers for the unnamed plaintiff, told reporters in a virtual press conference Wednesday that the lawsuit brings into "bright and broad focus over 50 years of criminal sexual predation by Cardinal Theodore McCarrick -- all of it cloaked in papal power."

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday evening in New Jersey, accuses McCarrick, 90, and five other officials of the Roman Catholic church of sexually abusing him when he was 14 along with other boys at the Sea Grit beach house from 1982 to 1983.

The unnamed accuser said in the lawsuit that McCarrick and other clerics would take the boys on overnight and weekend trips to the beach house where he would assign sleeping arrangements and "minor boys were assigned to different rooms and paired with adult clerics."

"And in the night and with the assistance of others, McCarrick would creep into this kid's bed and engage in criminal sexual assault of him, whispering 'it is okay,'" Anderson said.

McCarrick has been accused of sexual assault before, and in December of last year, a New Jersey man filed a lawsuit against him for abusing him when he was 14 in 1995.

The former Archdiocese of Washington from 2000 to 2006 resigned from the College of Cardinal in July 2018 amid fallout from an Archdiocese Review Board investigation into allegations be abused an altar boy as a priest of the Archdiocese of New York.

Pope Francis defrocked McCarrick in February of 2019 after the Vatican found him guilty of sexual abuse.

The suit also accuses Father Anthony Nardino, Brother Andrew Thomas Hewitt, Father Gerald Ruane, Father Michael Walters and Father John Laferrera of sexually abusing the unnamed plaintiff.

The Archdiocese of Newark has Ruane, Walters and Laferrera on a list of credibly accused clergy. All three are said to have been accused by multiple victims with Laferrera and Walters being permanently removed from the ministry. Ruane, it said, is dead.

AND THIS IS WHAT THE COVER UP IS FOR  
DEFENDING THE UNNATURAL PRACTICE OF CELIBACY 

LAWNORDER
Canada rules U.S. Safe Third Country agreement unconstitutional GREAT NEWS

HEY AMERIKA BETCHA DIDN'T KNOW WE HAD A CONSTITUTION TOO


A Canadian court has ruled its government's agreement with the United States concerning asylum seekers unconstitutional, stating it could not turn a blind eye to the detention of refugees by its southern neighbor. Handout photo/Office Congresswoman of Doris Matsui/UPI | License Photo

July 22 (UPI) -- A Canadian court on Wednesday ruled a U.S.-Canada agreement to deny entry to certain asylum seekers invalid, stating sending refugee claimants back to the United States where they risk imprisonment is unconstitutional.

Under the Safe Third Country Agreement, which was signed in December of 2002 and implemented in 2004, refugees seeking asylum at a Canadian land port are ineligible to make a claim if they had first traveled through a designated safe country, such as the United States.

In her ruling Wednesday, Justice Ann McDonald said the agreement was unconstitutional as sending refugee applicants to possible detention in the United States denied them their rights to life, liberty and security as guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

"For the reasons outlined below, I have concluded that the actions of Canadian authorities in enforcing the STCA result in ineligible STCA claimants being imprisoned by U.S. authorities. I have concluded that imprisonment and the attendant consequences are inconsistent with the spirit and objective of the STCA and are a violation of the rights guaranteed by section 7 of the Charter," she said.


The case was brought to the court by refugee advocacy groups including the Canadian Council for Refugees, Amnesty International, the Canadian Council of Churches and others, on behalf of asylum seekers who were deemed ineligible to apply for refugee status in Canada and sent back to the United States due to the agreement.

In her ruling, McDonald stated her suspension of the agreement will not take effect for six months to allow Parliament time to respond.

Both the Canadian Ministry of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security have been contacted for comment.

The Canadian Council of Refugees cheered the decision as "a great victory for advocates" and called on the Canadian government to not appeal the decision.

"The court could hardly fail to be moved by the testimonies of the appalling experiences of people in the U.S. immigration detention system, after Canada closed the doors on them," Dorota Blumczynska, president of the Canadian Council of Refugees, said in a statement. "Their experiences show us -- and convinced the court -- that the U.S. cannot be considered a safe country for refugees."

Alex Neve, secretary general for Amnesty International Canada, called for the Canadian government to now end the practice of sending refugees back to the United States.

"While the federal court has provided the government with six months leeway, it is imperative that Canada immediately end the return of claimants to the U.S.," Neve said in a statement. "The Safe Third Country Agreement has been the source of grave human rights violation for many years, unequivocally confirmed in this ruling."

According to court documents, Nedira Jemal Mustefa of Ethiopia had attempted to apply for asylum in Canada but was denied as she had been in the United States where she was returned and detained by authorities in solitary confinement at the Clinton County Correctional Facility.

In her affidavit, she said she did not know how long she was to be detained, describing her time in solitary confinement as "a terrifying, isolating and psychologically traumatic experience."

She also said she lost 15 pounds as she skipped meals believing that she was being fed pork despite her repeated attempts to tell guards that she could not eat it due to her religion.

She said she "felt scared, alone and confused at all times" and that she "did not know when [she] would be released, if at all," the court document states.

McDonald said in her ruling that her decision will provoke a reaction from U.S. officials, but while it isn't the court's job to pass judgment on the U.S. asylum system, it is its job to look at the consequences of sending refugee claimants back to the United States.


"In my view, the risk of detention for the sake of 'administrative' compliance with the provisions of the STCA cannot be justified," she wrote. "Canada cannot turn a blind eye to the consequences that befell Ms. Mustefa in its efforts to adhere to the STCA. The evidence clearly demonstrates that those returned to the U.S. by Canadian officials are detained as a penalty."
upi.com/7023699

'Waterfall' of microbes in Antarctic sea floor leads to discovery of methane leak


BUENOS AIRES (Reuters) - Scientists have discovered an active methane seep from Antarctica’s sea bed that could shed light on the potent greenhouse gas trapped beneath frozen continent.



Clusters of microbes are seen among starfish on the bottom of the ocean floor in the Ross Sea, indicating a methane seep, in Antarctica, in this handout photo taken in 2016. Antarctic Methane Seeps/Andrew Thurber/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES

Marine ecologist Andrew Thurber first glimpsed what a colleague described as a “microbial waterfall” during a dive in the icy waters of the Ross Sea in 2012. What looked like a superhighway of white patches on the ocean floor were clusters of tiny organisms drawn to the methane leak.

“My first thought was ‘wow,’ and I was immediately enamored with what this means for science,” said Thurber, an assistant professor at Oregon State University.

Scientists believe there is a massive amount of methane stored below the ocean floor in Antarctica. The discovery, published Wednesday in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, marks the first time a natural seep has ever been detected in the continent.


There is no evidence that climate change is behind the Antarctic methane seep — good news to scientists concerned that global warming could cause permafrost to thaw and release methane long trapped within.

However, if the methane reaches the atmosphere it could exacerbate global warming because methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Atmospheric levels of methane have been rising here due to human activities including agriculture and oil and gas drilling.

Thurber noted that the microbes found near the Antarctic seep actually help keep methane out of the atmosphere by consuming the gas before it can rise through the water into the air.

That will not help mitigate human-caused emissions, which account for at least half the methane in the atmosphere. Ocean sources of methane contribute just 1% of the total global emissions.

Most past research seeking natural underwater methane seeps have focused on depths of 200 to 600 meters, where the gas must pass through “a lot of microbial mouths” before it can reach the atmosphere, Thurber said.

The seep in Antarctica, however, was a mere 10 meters down, putting the methane on a fast track to the surface.

“Ten meters is not 600 meters. That methane can make it into the atmosphere and start becoming a potential player in methane budgets,” Thurber said.


Another concern, Thurber said, is that the microbes in cold, shallow water were slow to arrive at the Antarctic methane seep, a finding that could help scientists better understand microbial behavior and whether it could help stop methane seeping elsewhere from entering the atmosphere.

“We need to view these as systems that don’t respond in a matter of days or an hour or a month, but on the time scale of years,” Thurber said. “As years start to add up, that becomes something that may potentially impact our ability to predict our future planet.


Karla Heidelberg, a microbial ecologist with the U.S.-based National Science Foundation, said more methane seeps could be revealed as climate change causes oceans to warm and Antarctic ice sheets melt.

“As the ice coverage changes, it could expose more of these seeps to become potential inputs to atmospheric carbon,” Heidelberg said.

Antarctica’s frozen stores of methane could end up being a “tipping point” with massive warming potential if they are disturbed, said Ben Poulter, an environmental scientist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
“If those become de-stabilized, you would have a massive pulse of methane into the atmosphere that would cause more climate change,” Poulter said.


Reporting by Cassandra Garrison; Editing by Katy Daigle and David Gregorio

As Planet Edges Closer to Multiple Climate Tipping Points, Scientists Identify First Active Methane Gas Leak in Antarctica

"It is not good news."
Scientists revealed Tuesday that they detected the first leak of methane gas from the sea floor beneath Antarctica. (Photo: mariusz kluzniak/flickr/cc)
Scientists have for the first time identified an active leak of methane gas from the sea floor in Antarctica, increasing the possibility that the planet is close to one of the "tipping points" that would put the impacts of global heating out of humans' control.
According to The Guardian, researchers led by Andrew Thurber at Oregon State University found the methane leak in a region known as Cinder Cones in McMurdo Sound, within the Ross Sea. The site is 30 feet below the surface of the ocean.
In addition to finding methane dissolved in the water there, the scientists found that microbes which usually consume the gas before it reaches the atmosphere had only formed in small numbers five years after they first began to study the site. 
Thurber called the findings "incredibly concerning."
"It is not good news. It took more than five years for the microbes to begin to show up and even then there was still methane rapidly escaping from the sea floor," he told The Guardian. "The methane cycle is absolutely something that we as a society need to be concerned about."
Scientists have warned for years that the climate crisis could lead to the "tipping point" of methane leaks in the sea floor and the thawing of permafrost regions.
"At some point in a warming world, greenhouse gas emissions from nature will go way beyond anything we can control," tweeted Australian immunologist Peter Doherty.
The Ross Sea has not yet warmed significantly from the climate crisis, so the research did not directly link the methane leak to global heating. 
But climate models have not yet accounted for significant delays in the development of microbes, which help to keep methane from leaking into the atmosphere. 
"The big question is: how large is the lag [in microbe development] compared with the speed at which new leaks of methane might potentially form in the wake of retreating ice?" Prof. Jemma Wadham of the University of Bristol in the UK, who reviewed the study, told The Guardian.
Thurber called the discovery of the methane leak and the delayed microbe growth "a significant discovery that can help fill a large hole in our understanding of the methane cycle."
"Methane is the second-most effective gas at warming our atmosphere and the Antarctic has vast reservoirs that are likely to open up as ice sheets retreat due to climate change," he said in a statement.
Other tipping points identified by climate scientists include the disintegration of the ice sheet in West Antarctica, "dieback" in the Amazon which would transform the rainforest into a dry ecosystem, and the dying off of the coral reefs. 
Scientists raised alarm earlier this year about unusually warm water beneath a massive glacier in West Antarctica, and researchers warned in February that the third major bleaching event in five years at the Great Barrier Reef would put the reef "on a knife edge." 
Greta Thunberg Was On Stephen Colbert Last Night And Made This Profound Comment
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM - MARCH 05: Swedish environmental activist on climate change Greta Thunberg is ... [+] GETTY IMAGES

FROM THAT RADICAL ECO JOURNAL; FORBES!!!

Small changes lead to big results.


That’s a mantra I’ve been mulling over lately, especially after reading a new book by Jonah Berger called The Catalyst where he addresses the concept.

We think it’s all about big changes and big paradigm shifts. We want entire countries to change their policies in one massive shift, even though that rarely happens. What actually works is making minor adjustments over time.

Say what you will about the climate change crisis and if it’s as pressing as the pandemic, but there’s one person who has proven that small changes often count the most.

Greta Thunberg was on Stephen Colbert’s The Late Show last night and she made a profound statement about her own involvement in humanitarian efforts.

Before she became a household name, the teenager started a school strike that has now lasted more than two years. She wasn’t part of any lobbying group and wasn’t a mouthpiece for any professional organization at the time. She was just a kid with an idea.

“I didn’t have any expectations at all,” she said on the show. “I just thought I needed to do something. It is my moral duty as a human being to do anything. I just thought I would do something and started school striking. And then it exploded from there.”

She says the movement spread to different countries and millions have joined the cause. Her Twitter presence has skyrocketed to over four million followers.

Thunberg has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize the last two years (she has now lost twice) but was recently awarded the 2020 Gulbenkian Prize for Humanity; she plans to donate the award money — about $1 million euros — to climate change causes.

More than anyone in recent memory, the activist has shown how small changes can have a ripple effect. In Berger’s book, he talked about how you might not be able to convince people to change political parties or take massive shifts in political views, but maybe you can convince them to make small shifts — maybe recycle their trash once in a while as a good place to start.

In another book called Atomic Habits by James Clear, there’s a similar stance on how real change actually occurs. The author advocates for making small changes — even doing just one push-up in the morning so you can say you’re exercising. If you want to write a book, he says, it might seem like a daunting goal and too time-consuming, so it’s better to perhaps write at least a page and see what happens next. The brain science backs this up. At least writing one page teaches our brain what that’s like, sets a habit in motion, and gives us a reward.

Political change might be similar. We want to see radical polar shifts in ideologies, but maybe it all starts with acknowledging our own failings. For me, I’ve thought a lot about the Black Lives Matter protests and how systematic racism can take many forms. I’ve gone beyond just self-analysis, though. I’ve started planning small changes — maybe picking different people to profile in this very column — and looking ahead several steps beyond that.

My challenge for you is to think about the small changes you can make. For climate change initiatives, it’s when we all make changes one step at a time that we will see results. It can lead to big results.


John Brandon  is a well-known journalist who has published over 15,000 articles on social media, technology, leadership, mentoring, and many other topics. Before starting…

© 2020 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.






How the Disappearance of Unionized Jobs Obliterated an Emergent Black Middle Class


By William Lazonick, Philip Moss, and Joshua Weitz

JUN 15, 2020 | BUSINESS & INDUSTRY | RACE | UNITED STATES


Since the 1980s, the enemy of equal employment opportunity through upward socioeconomic mobility has been the pervasive and entrenched corporate-governance ideology and practice of maximizing shareholder value.

The Covid-19 pandemic has laid bare the deep-rooted racial divide that infects American society. According to APM Research Lab, the Covid-19 mortality rate for blacks has been 61.6 per 100,000 compared with 28.2 per 100,000 for Latinos, and 26.2 per 100,000 for whites. It’s another abhorrent statistic to add to the highly disproportionate number of African Americans who are poor, unemployed, and incarcerated.

The longer life-expectancy of white men compared with black men in the United States has narrowed in recent years, but that is because of a significant drop in longevity of white working-class males, who, even before the pandemic, were succumbing to “deaths of despair.” The fact is that blacks are doing terribly in a nation wracked by extreme economic inequality, which is dragging down the whole working class, irrespective of race or ethnicity. In a nation that once advertised itself as the land of upward socioeconomic mobility through equal employment opportunity, intergenerational downward mobility has become the norm.

As a new generation has taken to the streets with demands for social transformation, we need to look back a half century to a time when the quest for equal employment opportunity gave rise to an African American blue-collar middle class. During the 1960s and 1970s, blacks with no more than high-school educations gained significant access to well-paid unionized employment opportunities, epitomized by semi-skilled operative jobs in the automobile industry, to which they previously had limited access. Anti-discrimination laws under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act with oversight by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) supported this upward mobility for blacks in the context of a growing demand for blue-collar labor in the United States.

From the late 1970s, however, the impact of global competition and the offshoring of manufacturing combined with the financialization of the corporation to decimate these stable and well-paid blue-collar jobs. Under the seniority provisions of the increasingly beleaguered industrial unions, blacks tended to be last hired and first fired. As U.S.-based blue-collar jobs were permanently lost, U.S. business corporations and government agencies failed to make sufficient investments in the education and skills of the U.S. labor force to usher in a new era of upward socioeconomic mobility. This organizational failure left blacks most vulnerable to downward mobility.

Central to this corporate failure was a transformation of corporate resource allocation from “retain-and-reinvest” to “downsize-and-distribute.” Instead of retaining corporate profits and reinvesting in the productive capabilities of employees, major business corporations became increasingly focused on downsizing their labor forces and distributing profits to shareholders in the form of cash dividends and stock buybacks. Legitimizing massive distributions to shareholders was the flawed and pernicious ideology that a company should be run to “maximize shareholder value.” Eventually, the downward socioeconomic mobility experienced by blacks would also extend to devastating loss of well-paid and stable employment for whites who lacked the higher education now needed to enter the American middle class. By the twenty-first century, general downward mobility had become a defining characteristic of American society, irrespective of race, ethnicity, or gender.

In our project, “Fifty Years After: Black Employment in the United States Under the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,” supported by the Institute for New Economic Thinking, we analyze the socioeconomic forces behind the promising rise in the 1960s and 1970s but, subsequently, the disastrous fall of the black blue-collar middle class. We do so by taking a deep dive into little appreciated but publicly available employment data collected for more than fifty years by the EEOC, notwithstanding the fact that a treasure trove of company-level “EEO-1” submissions remains hidden from public view. Our new working paper begins the analysis.

We show that the institutional foundation for upward socioeconomic mobility was the employment norm of a career with one company (CWOC) that prevailed at major U.S. business corporations in the decades after World War II. For both blue-collar and white-collar employees, CWOC meant stable employment, rising real wages or salaries, healthcare coverage, and company-funded defined-benefit pensions in retirement. But CWOC was a white man’s world, to which minorities as well as women were given unprecedented access from the last half of the 1960s by virtue of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Government employment at local, state, and federal levels helped blacks gain access to the employment stability and rising pay that, along with health and retirement benefits, are foundational to the status of middle class. Blacks made their greatest progress, however, by entering unionized semi-skilled and skilled occupations in mass-production industries, most of which were dominated by a relatively small number of very large companies.

From the late 1970s, challenges from more productive foreign companies, particularly the Japanese, led to widespread plant closings and permanent layoffs in these industries, with a disproportionately adverse impact on black employment. Increasingly, automation and globalization also undermined stable and well-paid blue-collar employment in the United States. Automation and globalization, however, generated large profits for U.S. corporations that could have been reinvested in employees and new competitive products

The more fundamental cause of the fall of the black, and eventually white, blue-collar middle class was the demise of the CWOC norm that had defined the “Old Economy business model.” A concomitant of this dramatic change in corporate employment relations was the failure of federal and state governments to invest in the education of the American working class, whites as well as blacks, so that, intergenerationally, they could transition from high-school-educated blue-collar employment to college-educated white-collar employment.

As the U.S. industrial economy transitioned from an “Old Economy business model,” characterized by a career with one company, to a “New Economy business model,” characterized by interfirm labor mobility, advanced education and social networks became increasingly important for building careers in well-paid white-collar occupations. In our Fifty Years After project, we analyze how, along with non-white Hispanics, blacks found themselves at a distinct disadvantage relative to whites and Asians in accessing these New Economy middle-class employment opportunities.

The fundamental explanation for these changes in socioeconomic mobility, however, is found, not in employment relations per se, but rather in a profound transformation of corporate governance. Since the 1980s, the enemy of equal employment opportunity through upward socioeconomic mobility has been the pervasive and entrenched corporate-governance ideology and practice of maximizing shareholder value. Our Fifty Years After study—which will be available in a series of INET working papers over the next two months—shows that for most Americans, of whatever race, ethnicity, and gender, maximizing shareholder value is the not-so-invisible hand that has a chokehold on the emergence of the stable and well-paid employment opportunities that are essential for sustainable prosperity.

William Lazonick
Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Lowell
President, The Academic-Industry Research Network


Philip Moss
Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Lowell


Joshua Weitz
Research Associate, Academic-Industry Research Network​