Sunday, May 30, 2021

 

Jebel Sahaba: A succession of violence rather than a prehistoric war

CNRS

Research News

IMAGE

IMAGE: PROJECTILE IMPACT PUNCTURE WITH AN EMBEDDED LITHIC FRAGMENT IN THE POSTERIOR SURFACE OF THE LEFT HIP BONE OF INDIVIDUAL JS 21. view more 

CREDIT: © ISABELLE CREVECOEUR/MARIE-HÉLÈNE DIAS-MEIRINHO

Since its discovery in the 1960s, the Jebel Sahaba cemetery (Nile Valley, Sudan), 13 millennia old, was considered to be one of the oldest testimonies to prehistoric warfare. However, scientists from the CNRS and the University of Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (1) have re-analysed the bones preserved in the British Museum (London) and re-evaluated their archaeological context. The results, published in Scientific Reports on May 27, 2021, show that it was not a single armed conflict but rather a succession of violent episodes, probably exacerbated by climate change.

Many individuals buried at Jebel Sahaba bear injuries, half ot them caused by projectiles, the points of which were found in the bones or the fill where the body was located. The interpretation as evidence of mass death due to a single armed conflict, however, remained debated until a team of anthropologists, prehistorians and geochemists undertook a new study of the thousands of bones, about a hundred associated lithic pieces and the entire burial complex (now submerged by Lake Aswan) from 2013 to 2019.

The bones of 61 individuals were re-examined, including microscopic analysis, in order to distinguish traces of injury from damage produced after burial. About a hundred new lesions, both healed and unhealed, were identified, some with previously unrecognised lithic flakes still embedded in the bones. In addition to the 20 individuals already identified, 21 other skeletons have lesions, almost all suggestive of interpersonal violence, such as traces of projectile impact or fractures. In addition, 16 individuals have both healed and unhealed injuries, suggesting repeated episodes of violence over the course of a person's life rather than a single conflict. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that some skeletons appear to have been disturbed by later burials. Surprisingly, men, women and children seem to have been treated indiscriminately in terms of the number and type of injuries or the projectiles direction (2).

These new data also reveal that the majority of lesions were produced by composite projectiles, throwing weapons (arrows or spears) composed of several sharp lithic pieces, some of which are laterally embedded. The presence of variously sharpened points, with variations in the orientation of the cutting edge, suggests that the intended purpose was to lacerate and bleed the victim.

These new results reject the hypothesis of a disaster cemetery linked to a single war. Instead, this site indicates a succession of limited raids or ambushes against these hunter-fisher-gatherers, at a time of major climatic variations (end of the last ice age and beginning of the African humid period). The concentration of archaeological sites of different cultures in such a limited area of the Nile Valley at this time suggests that this region must have been a refuge area for human populations subject to these climatic fluctuations. Competition for resources is therefore probably one of the causes of the conflicts witnessed in the Jebel Sahaba cemetery. This analysis, which changes the history of violence in prehistory, invites us to reconsider other sites from the same period.

###

Notes

(1) Working in the laboratories : « De la Préhistoire à l'actuel : culture, environnement et anthropologie » (CNRS/Université de Bordeaux/Ministère de la Culture), « Archéozoologie, archéobotanique : sociétés, pratiques et environnements » (CNRS/Museum national d'Histoire naturelle) and « Travaux et recherches archéologiques sur les cultures, les espaces et les sociétés » (CNRS/Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès/Ministère de la Culture).

(2) Information from comparisons with experimental archaeological work on hunting techniques.


The robot smiled back

Columbia Engineering researchers use AI to teach robots to make appropriate reactive human facial expressions, an ability that could build trust between humans and their robotic co-workers and care-givers

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE

Research News

New York, NY--May 27, 2021--While our facial expressions play a huge role in building trust, most robots still sport the blank and static visage of a professional poker player. With the increasing use of robots in locations where robots and humans need to work closely together, from nursing homes to warehouses and factories, the need for a more responsive, facially realistic robot is growing more urgent.

Long interested in the interactions between robots and humans, researchers in the Creative Machines Lab at Columbia Engineering have been working for five years to create EVA, a new autonomous robot with a soft and expressive face that responds to match the expressions of nearby humans. The research will be presented at the ICRA conference on May 30, 2021, and the robot blueprints are open-sourced on Hardware-X (April 2021).

"The idea for EVA took shape a few years ago, when my students and I began to notice that the robots in our lab were staring back at us through plastic, googly eyes," said Hod Lipson, James and Sally Scapa Professor of Innovation (Mechanical Engineering) and director of the Creative Machines Lab.

Lipson observed a similar trend in the grocery store, where he encountered restocking robots wearing name badges, and in one case, decked out in a cozy, hand-knit cap. "People seemed to be humanizing their robotic colleagues by giving them eyes, an identity, or a name," he said. "This made us wonder, if eyes and clothing work, why not make a robot that has a super-expressive and responsive human face?"

While this sounds simple, creating a convincing robotic face has been a formidable challenge for roboticists. For decades, robotic body parts have been made of metal or hard plastic, materials that were too stiff to flow and move the way human tissue does. Robotic hardware has been similarly crude and difficult to work with--circuits, sensors, and motors are heavy, power-intensive, and bulky.

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/1vBLI-q04kM
PROJECT WEBSITE: 
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~bchen/aiface/

The first phase of the project began in Lipson's lab several years ago when undergraduate student Zanwar Faraj led a team of students in building the robot's physical "machinery." They constructed EVA as a disembodied bust that bears a strong resemblance to the silent but facially animated performers of the Blue Man Group. EVA can express the six basic emotions of anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, and surprise, as well as an array of more nuanced emotions, by using artificial "muscles" (i.e. cables and motors) that pull on specific points on EVA's face, mimicking the movements of the more than 42 tiny muscles attached at various points to the skin and bones of human faces.

"The greatest challenge in creating EVA was designing a system that was compact enough to fit inside the confines of a human skull while still being functional enough to produce a wide range of facial expressions," Faraj noted.


To overcome this challenge, the team relied heavily on 3D printing to manufacture parts with complex shapes that integrated seamlessly and efficiently with EVA's skull. After weeks of tugging cables to make EVA smile, frown, or look upset, the team noticed that EVA's blue, disembodied face could elicit emotional responses from their lab mates. "I was minding my own business one day when EVA suddenly gave me a big, friendly smile," Lipson recalled. "I knew it was purely mechanical, but I found myself reflexively smiling back."

Once the team was satisfied with EVA's "mechanics," they began to address the project's second major phase: programming the artificial intelligence that would guide EVA's facial movements. While lifelike animatronic robots have been in use at theme parks and in movie studios for years, Lipson's team made two technological advances. EVA uses deep learning artificial intelligence to "read" and then mirror the expressions on nearby human faces. And EVA's ability to mimic a wide range of different human facial expressions is learned by trial and error from watching videos of itself.

The most difficult human activities to automate involve non-repetitive physical movements that take place in complicated social settings. Boyuan Chen, Lipson's PhD student who led the software phase of the project, quickly realized that EVA's facial movements were too complex a process to be governed by pre-defined sets of rules. To tackle this challenge, Chen and a second team of students created EVA's brain using several Deep Learning neural networks. The robot's brain needed to master two capabilities: First, to learn to use its own complex system of mechanical muscles to generate any particular facial expression, and, second, to know which faces to make by "reading" the faces of humans.

To teach EVA what its own face looked like, Chen and team filmed hours of footage of EVA making a series of random faces. Then, like a human watching herself on Zoom, EVA's internal neural networks learned to pair muscle motion with the video footage of its own face. Now that EVA had a primitive sense of how its own face worked (known as a "self-image"), it used a second network to match its own self-image with the image of a human face captured on its video camera. After several refinements and iterations, EVA acquired the ability to read human face gestures from a camera, and to respond by mirroring that human's facial expression.

The researchers note that EVA is a laboratory experiment, and mimicry alone is still a far cry from the complex ways in which humans communicate using facial expressions. But such enabling technologies could someday have beneficial, real-world applications. For example, robots capable of responding to a wide variety of human body language would be useful in workplaces, hospitals, schools, and homes.

"There is a limit to how much we humans can engage emotionally with cloud-based chatbots or disembodied smart-home speakers," said Lipson. "Our brains seem to respond well to robots that have some kind of recognizable physical presence."

Added Chen, "Robots are intertwined in our lives in a growing number of ways, so building trust between humans and machines is increasingly important."


CAPTION

Data Collection Process: Eva is practicing random facial expressions by recording what it looks like from the front camera.

CREDIT

Creative Machines Lab/Columbia Engineering 

About the Study

The study is titled "Smile Like You Mean It: Driving Animatronic Robotic Face with Learned Models."

Authors are: Boyuan Chen, Yuhang Hu, Lianfeng Li, Sara Cummings, and Hod Lipson, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Columbia Engineering.

The robot blueprint is titled "Facially Expressive Humanoid Robotic Face."

Authors of the robot blueprint paper are: Zanwar Faraj, Mert Selamet, Carlos Morales, Patricio Torres, Maimuna Hossain, Boyuan Chen, and Hod Lipson, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Columbia Engineering.

The study was supported by National Science Foundation NRI 1925157 and DARPA MTO grant L2M Program HR0011-18-2-0020.

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

LINKS:

Paper 1: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12724

Paper 2: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468067220300262

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/1vBLI-q04kM

PROJECT WEBSITE: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~bchen/aiface/

http://engineering.columbia.edu/
https://engineering.columbia.edu/faculty/hod-lipson
https://me.columbia.edu/
https://www.creativemachineslab.com/
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~bchen/
https://www.zanwarfaraj.com/
https://www.cs.columbia.edu/

Columbia Engineering

Columbia Engineering, based in New York City, is one of the top engineering schools in the U.S. and one of the oldest in the nation. Also known as The Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, the School expands knowledge and advances technology through the pioneering research of its more than 220 faculty, while educating undergraduate and graduate students in a collaborative environment to become leaders informed by a firm foundation in engineering. The School's faculty are at the center of the University's cross-disciplinary research, contributing to the Data Science Institute, Earth Institute, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Precision Medicine Initiative, and the Columbia Nano Initiative. Guided by its strategic vision, "Columbia Engineering for Humanity," the School aims to translate ideas into innovations that foster a sustainable, healthy, secure, connected, and creative humanity.




HAPPY BIRTHDAY MIKHAIL BAKUNIN

 


Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin  30 May [O.S. 18 May] 1814 – 1 July 1876) was a Russian revolutionary anarchist, socialist and founder of collectivist anarchism. He is considered among the most influential figures of anarchism and a major founder of the revolutionary socialist and social anarchist tradition.[5] Bakunin's prestige as a revolutionary also made him one of the most famous ideologues in Europe, gaining substantial influence among radicals throughout Russia and Europe.

Mikhail Bakunin - Wikipedia






  • \

  • Bakunin and Marx: A Hundred Years’ Perspective

    "Introduction," pp. 15-29 in: Mikhail Bakunin: From Out of the Dustbin; Bakunin's Basic Writings, 1869-1871, ed. and trans. R.M. Cutler (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ardis Publishers, 1985). Reprinted as: The Basic Bakunin: Writings, 1869-1871, Great Books in Philosophy (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1992).
  • God and the State : Mikhail Bakunin : Free Download ...

    https://archive.org/details/god_and_the_state_librivox

    2007-01-29 · Bakunin's most famous work, published in various lengths, this version is the most complete form of the work published hitherto. Originally titled "Dieu et l'état", Bakunin intended it to be part of the second portion to a larger work named "The Knouto-Germanic Empire and the Social Revolution" (Knouto-Germanic Empire is in reference to a treaty betwixt Russia and Germany at the …

  • Edward Hallett Carr - Michael Bakunin PDF

    https://anarcho-copy.org/copy/michael-bakunin

    Edward Hallett Carr - Michael Bakunin PDF dosyası indirme sayfası. önceki sonraki. Edward Hallett Carr / Michael Bakunin PDFpdf dosya bilgisi md5 İNDİR 2.5MB Mülkiyet Hırsızlıktır Copy (A) bu sayfa anarho-copy html generator tarafından oluşturulmuştur. 2021:05:01 14:30:59. pdf yükleme tarihi Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:09:23 GMT ...

  • Works of Mikhail Bakunin 1873 - Marxists

    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bakunin/works/1873/statism...

    Source: Bakunin on Anarchy, translated and edited by Sam Dolgoff, 1971; See Also: Conspectus of Bakunin's Statism and Anarchy by Karl Marx, 1874. Statism and Anarchy is the first completed volume of

  • "Science & Society", Mr A. H. Nimtz & Bakunin

    2016, "Science & Society", Mr A. H. Nimtz & Bakunin
    162 Views89 Pages
    An academic from the United States of America, August H. Nimtz, published in the journal "Science & Society" (July 2016) a short article entitled "Another 'side' to the Story" to which this text does not constitute an answer but rather a critical digression, which explains its length. Indeed, Mr. Nimtz's article condenses into three pages almost all of Marx's absurdities about Bakunin, and my text attempts to set the record straight, not from preconceived ideas but from documents of the time. My text also attempts to show that Mr. Nimtz's deeply rooted anti-Bakuninian prejudices, characteristic of Marxist historiography devoid of any critical examination of facts and documents, are a radical handicap that prevents analysis of the many points of convergence between the two men. The question is not whether social-democratic strategy or revolutionary syndicalist-type strategy (which was in fact the one advocated by Bakunin), was more effective in achieving immediate and temporary improvements in the living conditions of the working population; the question is: what would be the most effective way for this working population to collectively takeover all the machinery of society and to make it work so that it meets the needs of the entire population? The basis of the debate between Marx and Bakunin, between Marxism and Anarchism is there. Unfortunately, Marx’s stubborn refusal to discuss these issues, his obsession with accusing Bakunin of all kinds of evils, his systematic avoidance of debate, prevented the establishment of a real debate that could have led to a constructive synthesis.  (99+) (PDF) "Science & Society", Mr A. H. Nimtz & Bakunin | René Berthier - Academia.edu
  • Bakunin's Collectivist Anarchism

    202 Views19 Pages
    ​Mikhail Bakunin is now considered to be one of the greatest (if not the greatest) anarchist thinkers of the 19th century. Despite the fragmented nature of his writing, one finds in it those ideas which have become the foundation of modern collectivist anarchism. The task of this paper is to reconstruct and further explore those ideas. Firstly, we will explore Bakunin's conception of collectivist anarchism. This includes his collectivist conception of freedom, his critique of modern society, and his conception of collectivist anarchist social organization. Secondly, we will analyze James Guillaume's synthesis of Bakunin's ideas on social organization. We will finish by touching on the theory of Participatory Economics, a modern attempt to detail what collectivist anarchist society might look like.(99+) (PDF) Bakunin's Collectivist Anarchism | Simon B Monette - Academia.edu 
  • ANARCHISM, MARXISM, AND THE IDEOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF THE CHICAGO IDEA

    2009, WorkingUSA
    30 Pages
  • Bakunin’s Anti-Jacobinism: ‘Secret Societies’ For Self-Emancipating Collectivist Social Revolution

    290 Views11 Pages
    The three terms describing the goal of Bakunin’s ‘secret societies’ in this article’s subtitle (‘self-emancipating’, ‘collectivist’ and ‘social revolution’) correspond to the three following ‘antis’. Anti-Blanquism corresponds to the self-emancipation that the secret society transmits throughout society (rather than being emancipation decreed and enacted from on high). Anti-Bebelism corresponds to its collectivist nature, in contrast with the authoritarian communist nature of such a decreed revolution, also following Bakunin’s famous distinction between the two at the 1868 Geneva Congress of the League of Peace and Freedom. Anti-Bernsteinism corresponds to the social revolution itself and particularly its internationalist nature. An understanding of how these strands are interwoven throughout the ‘infrastructure’ of Bakunin’s mature anarchist thought and activity requires an awareness of the early and enduring influence upon him by Fichte as well as Hegel. At the convergence of these strands is his anarchist concept of the purpose and activity of the secret revolutionary organisation, or ‘secret society’. (99+) (PDF) Bakunin’s Anti-Jacobinism: ‘Secret Societies’ For Self-Emancipating Collectivist Social Revolution | Robert M Cutler - Academia.edu
  • Genesis of German liberalism
  • “not reaching heaven and not touching the earth"
  • René Berthier
  • From Chapter 1 (revised) of Bakounine politique, révolution et contre
  • révolution en Europe centrale (Bakunin Policy: Revolution and Counter
  • Revolution in Central Europe), Éditions du Monde libertaire, 1991.
  • Bakunin is often accused, including by some anarchist authors or close to the
  • movement, of being "germanophobic". Of course, when a conviction is deeply rooted,
  • there is no point in trying to extract it. 
  • "Bakounine politique, révolution et contre révolution en Europe centrale" (Bakunin
  • Policy, Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Central Europe) does not deal with the
  • Marx-Bakunin opposition as it is usually presented in the First International. The book
  • attempts to show the crucial importance that his reflections on the history and destiny
  • of Germany have played on the formation of Bakunin's political thought. 
  • The Russian revolutionary had a fascination for this country; he was a remarkable
  • connoisseur of its literature, its music. He knew Mozart's "Don Giovanni" by heart. His
  • knowledge of German philosophy acquired in Berlin from one of Hegel's disciples was
  • recognized by all. All his life he tried to find the key to this mysterious nation whose
  • bourgeoisie was never able to make its revolution.
  • But Bakunin did not put all the Germans in the same boat. He never confused the
  • German bourgeoisie on the one hand, and the proletariat and peasantry on the other.
  • He never attributed to the German working class the defects he perceived in the
  • bourgeoisie. 
  • (99+) (PDF) Bakunin : Genesis of German liberalism | René Berthier - Academia.edu