Sunday, January 16, 2022

 

Covid is ‘crashing’ as Omicron increasingly acts as a natural vaccine: Mild or no coronavirus symptoms yet all the antibodies

Covid scientist are increasingly convinced the Omicron variant is acting as a natural vaccine for tens of millions of people around the world as most infected people have no or very mild symptoms, yet their bodies do produce full antibodies.

Many countries are currently seeing record numbers of infections, including the UK, US, most of Europe and Asia, but hospital admissions only show a modest or even no serious increase.

In South Africa, where Omicron was first detected in November, infection rates are dropping rapidly and most experts believe the Omicron wave has passed and other countries should expect the same cycle in the next few months.

The high level of contagiousness, paired with very mild symptoms, may make Omicron a blessing in disguise, some Covid scientists argue. In fact, some go as far by suggesting there may no need to get vaccinated anymore, just get Omicron.

Dr Vishal Sehgal, president of medical services at Portea MeMedical in India, told the Times of India that “Omicron acts as a natural vaccine and proves beneficial as it is less life-threatening.”

Tail end of the pandemic?

A number of experts around the world are convinced the world is currently seeing the tail of the pandemic, based on other virus outbreaks in history.

Dr Namita Jaggi of Artemis Hospitals in India told various media outlets that “pandemics have traditionally speaking petered out by having variants that are milder and less severe till they finally die out.”

“So no, Omicron is not a cause of concern, rather we must optimistically hope that we are moving towards the end of the pandemic,” Jaggi said.


‘We are moving towards the end of the pandemic  

Dr Namita Jaggi

 Nicanor Austriaco, a Filipino-American molecular biologist, also believes Covid may slowly be killing itself off with the milder Omicron variant.

During a Town Hall meeting, last week, he said that those infected with Omicron will have antibodies that “will protect them against Delta, Gamma, Beta, Alpha and D614G” variants.

“This variant is the beginning of the end of the pandemic that has crippled the global community for two years already,” Austriaco told The PhilStar newspaper last week.


“As the virus rapidly increases, it’s going to try to spread to everyone and it’s going to try to find as many of our vulnerable. It is spreading so rapidly, what you will expect it will run out the ‘food’ soon.”

“And when it runs out of food, it will begin to crash, which is what you see in South Africa, the numbers are crashing.

“In London, the numbers are beginning to fall only because it spreads like wildfire, and when all the trees are burned, there’s nowhere for it to go. So it begins to crash.”

Nicanor Austriaco – molecular biologist


“We have to realize that Omicron is the beginning of the end of the pandemic because Omicron is going to provide the kind of population immunity that should stabilize our societies and should allow us to reopen,” Austriaco added.

In addition to that, pulmonologist Dr Puneet Khanna said that “viruses tend to evolve towards a less severe strain that can be easily transmitted but is less fatal.”

“Making humans very sick is not in the interest of the virus.” 

Dr Puneet Khanna 

“Thus, there is hope that in the future, the strain will turn weaker and cause a mild infection quite similar to common flu. But it has to be remembered tthat viruses keep on mutating and so later versions may get even dangerous mutations or become even milder,” Khanna told the Times of India.

Path out of Omicron

The latest figures in South Africa and a number of other countries, may offer the rest of the world a way out of Omicron, argued Salim Abdool Karim, one of South Afrcia’s most important infectious-diseases scientists.

He is convinced that “every other country, or almost every other, will follow the same trajectory.” The rate of new infections has consistenly dropped over the last 30 days.

New infections in South Africa in the last 30 days

Karim, who has led the pandemic response in South Africa, also told various media the peak of the Omicron wave has passed, comparing the wave of cases to Africa’s highest mountain.

“If previous variants caused waves shaped like Kilimanjaro, omicron’s is more like we were scaling the North Face of Everest,” Karim said, referring to the near-vertical jump in infections that South Africa experienced during the final weeks of November and first two weeks of December.

His peer, the chairwoman of the South African Medical Association, Dr. Angelique Coetzee, a household name in South Africa, could not agree more: the country is “over the curve and [infection] numbers are much lower,” she said.

Looking at the data coming out of Southern Africa and the UK, Marc van Ranst, a Belgian professor of virology at Leuven University and the Rega Institute for Medical Research. said that “the omicron variant is less pathogenic but with greater infectivity, allowing Omicron to replace Delta, this is very positive.”

“It is extremely important we need to closely monitor the clinical data of Omicron patients in South Africa and worldwide,” Van Ranst stressed.

Finally, another well-known virologist in Africa, Michelle Groome, of the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD), equally told multiple news outlets that “we have surpassed the peak of infections.”

Groome cited figures from the NCID showed that new cases dropped by nearly a quarter over the past seven days, following another 14 per cent drop the previous week.

There are currently no restrictions in South Africa. Restaurants, shops, cinemas, malls, bars, coffee shops and gyms are all open, both indoors as well as outdoors.


Most transmissible variant

Despite reasons to be cautiously optimistic, physician Leonard Pascual did warn that “Omicron is the most contagious variant yet of the Covid-19 virus. Don’t let anyone win you over with the narrative that is a cure-all, end-all, ‘vaccine.’ It’s still Covid.”

In fact, only “a whiff of infected breath” is enough to catch the most transmissible variant of coronavirus, a leading scientist warned earlier last week.

Professor Peter Openshaw, who sits on the UK’s New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag), stressed how infectious Omicron is.

“We’ve had several iterations of this virus going through different stages of its evolution,” he said.

“We’re lucky really that it wasn’t this infectious when it first moved into human-to-human transmission.”   Professor Peter Openshaw 

 To prevent new variants from emerging or prevent variants like Delta or Omicron from further adaptation, “take away the virus’ opportunity to replicate,” Canada-based Dr. Angela Rasmussen wrote last week.

“That means stop transmission to new hosts. Fewer new cases = less replication = less mutation = fewer variants emerging. So, as the article says, we need to reduce community transmission, increase surveillance and test/trace capacity, and address this while still rare,” she warned.


Explainer: Omicron vs Delta — what more we know about the new Covid-19 variant


The new variant is likely far more transmissible than Delta but studies suggest it may be less severe.
Published a day ago

Two years into the pandemic, the only thing we are certain of is the ever-changing, ever-mutating nature of the Sars-CoV-2 virus that causes Covid-19. Since the start of the outbreak in December 2019, the virus has spawned a series of variants named after Greek alphabets Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and now, Omicron.

The World Health Organisation (WHO), while labelling the new variant as Omicron, classified it as "highly transmissible" in November 2021. Since then, the variant has wreaked havoc in several countries, driving their number of cases to record highs.

Even as case numbers rise across the world — the United States has recently been averaging 800,000 new infections every day — health experts have predicted that the Omicron death toll may remain lower than the devastation caused in previous waves, particularly the one driven by Delta.
The discovery of Omicron

The new variant of the coronavirus was first detected in South Africa at the end of November last year, with scientists saying it was behind the spike in infections in the country. As with other variants, some infected people display no symptoms, South African experts had said at the time.

Shortly after, the WHO named the new variant Omicron and classified it as "highly transmissible".

The variant has about 50 mutations not seen in combination before, including more than 30 mutations on the spike protein the coronavirus uses to attach to human cells. Vaccines in current use target that spike protein, according to a Reuters report. This means protection provided by Covid-19 vaccines may be less effective on Omicron.


How transmissible is Omicron?


One of the earliest studies on the transmissibility of Omicron, conducted by researchers in the United Kingdom, revealed that the new variant was two to three times more likely to infect people, specifically in household settings, as compared to Delta.

Associate Professor of Epidemiology at Harvard's T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Bill Hanage, said Omicron was expected to show a tendency to clustered transmission in large gatherings.

A more recent study conducted in France suggested that Omicron may be 105 per cent more transmissible than Delta. The study, which analysed over 131,000 samples but is yet to be peer-reviewed, noted that even if the severity of Omicron was reduced compared to Delta, the higher reproduction number — the number of people in a population who can be infected by an individual at any specific time — meant that French hospitals may see higher activity, if not overloading.

Another factor that sets Omicron apart is the increased risk of reinfection. A study by Imperial College London showed that Omicron was 5.4 times more likely to reinfect than Delta.

In a recent press conference, WHO's technical lead on Covid-19, Maria Van Kerkhove, said Omicron was "efficiently transmitting" and being detected in all areas with good gene sequencing options.

Explaining why Omicron has led to a massive jump in case numbers, Kerkhove said the virus was able to adhere to human cells more easily because of its mutations, cause reinfection, and replicate in the upper respiratory tract, which she said, set it apart from other variants like Delta.

"This combination of factors allowed the virus to spread more easily. With Omicron, what we're learning is that your risk of getting severe disease is less than it is for Delta," she said. The infectious diseases expert cautioned, however, that the global health body was still seeing a rise in the number of hospitalisations and people who needed clinical care which would put pressure on countries' health systems.

What about severity?


While the number of infections is significantly higher, the rates of deaths, and even hospitalisations, are much lower when compared to Delta.

This is backed by several studies, including one conducted by South African scientists that found people diagnosed with Omicron over a period of two months were 80pc less likely to require hospitalisation than people infected with other variants. The scientists, however, said that a high level of immunity was partly behind the reduced need for hospitalisation in the country.

One of the study's authors, Professor Cheryl Cohen of the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, said, "Compellingly, together our data really suggest a positive story of a reduced severity of Omicron compared to other variants."

Separately, the UK Health Security Agency's research found the risk of hospitalisation after being infected with the Omicron variant was half as that with Delta. In addition, their study said that the risk of hospitalisation was reduced by 81pc in people who had received two and three doses of a Covid-19 vaccine compared to unvaccinated people.

In Scotland, researchers at the University of Edinburgh found that the number of Omicron patients who needed to be hospitalised was 68pc less compared to Delta. However, their study also underscored the increased risk of reinfection — 7.6pc of the samples analysed were reinfections compared to 0.7pc with Delta.

Yet another study, conducted by Imperial College London, suggested that the risk of hospitalisation for Omicron patients was 40 to 45pc lower compared to the Delta variant.

Earlier this month, Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa said it was "evident that Omicron is less severe" as he announced the easing of curbs despite a record rise in cases.

Closer to home, Indian health officials said that only five to 10pc of patients in the current wave driven by Omicron have required hospitalisation in contrast to 20 to 23pc in the previous wave driven by Delta.

However, hospitalisations have not remained low in all countries. There were 132,646 people hospitalised with Covid on Jan 10 in the United States, surpassing the record of 132,051 set in January 2021.

Elsewhere, hospitalisations in France have seen their biggest increase since April 2021 but remain below the peaks set at the end of 2020. The country's health minister said Omicron leads to less severe complications but hospitalisations were still increasing because it was highly infectious.

Read: N95, surgical or cloth — Is one face mask better than the other for optimum protection against Omicron?

Omicron affects airways, not lungs

Experts say one reason behind the reduced severity may be that Omicron multiplies faster in the airways and lower in the lungs.

According to researchers at the University of Hong Kong, "at 24 hours after infection, the Omicron variant replicated around 70 times higher than the Delta variant and the original Sars-CoV-2 virus. In contrast, the Omicron variant replicated less efficiently (more than 10 times lower) in the human lung tissue than the original Sars-CoV-2 virus, which may suggest lower severity of disease."

However, it cautioned that the overall threat from the variant was "very significant" because of its increased transmissibility.

According to a report by The Guardian, six separate studies found that Omicron does not cause as severe damage to the lungs as Delta and other variants.

Last week, WHO Incident Manager Abdi Mahamud, too, said more evidence was emerging that Omicron caused less severe illness because it affected the upper respiratory tract.

"We are seeing more and more studies pointing out that Omicron is infecting the upper part of the body unlike the other [variants] that could cause severe pneumonia," he was quoted as saying by Reuters.

Do existing vaccines offer protection against Omicron?


While protection against Omicron may wane a few months after receiving two shots of a vaccine, multiple studies showed that getting a booster dose produces antibodies capable of fighting the new variant.

Early findings from a real-world analysis suggested that the risk of catching Omicron was "significantly reduced following a booster vaccine", Head of Immunisation at the UK Health Security Agency Dr Mary Ramsay said.

"Two doses of AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines provided much lower levels of protection against symptomatic infection compared with what they provide against Delta.

"However, when boosted with a dose of Pfizer vaccine, there was around 70pc protection against symptomatic infection for people who initially received AstraZeneca, and around 75pc protection for those who received Pfizer," according to a Reuters report.

Studies conducted later also pointed to the same conclusion — booster doses offer protection against Omicron.

Danish researchers found that vaccine effectiveness for those who had received a shot of Pfizer or Moderna was re-established when they were given a booster dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

Research carried out by the pharmaceutical companies themselves has also shown encouraging results. Pfizer said a three-course shot of its vaccine was able to neutralise the Omicron variant in a lab test. Its CEO also said that the company is working on an Omicron-specific vaccine that will be ready by March.

Moderna said a booster dose of its vaccine appeared to be effective against Omicron, adding that it "boosts neutralising antibody levels 37-fold higher than pre-boost levels".

A study by the University of Oxford, while supporting a third dose of AstraZeneca's vaccine, concluded it had boosted neutralisation levels.

However, research on more doses of Chinese vaccines — Sinopharm and SinoVac — has not been as encouraging.

A joint study conducted by the University of Hong Kong and the Chinese University of Hong Kong showed that "third dose of [SinoVac] given to those who received two previous doses of [SinoVac] does not provide adequate levels of protective antibody."

Researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and a Shanghai-based lab specialising in respiratory infectious diseases found that Sinopharm's vaccine had "significantly lower" neutralising activity against the Omicron variant although they added the vaccine's efficacy against Omicron remained unclear.

A later study suggested that a protein-based vaccine produced by Sinopharm "significantly improved the immune responses against various Sars-CoV-2 strains, including Omicron" when administered after two doses of the original vaccine.

Other treatments are also available this time around. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two anti-viral pills — from Pfizer and Merck — that could be an important tool against Omicron.

Both companies said they expect their pills to be effective against the new variant.
COVID-19 starkly increases pregnancy complications, including stillbirths, among the unvaccinated, Scottish study shows

Separate study finds timing of infection during pregnancy predicts prematurity

14 JAN 2022
BYMEREDITH WADMAN
A premature infant just after delivery to a COVID-19-infected mother in Edinburg, Texas in July 2020. A new study highlights the risk of perinatal death in COVID-affected pregnancies.
LYNSEY ADDARIO/GETTY IMAGES REPORTAGE

Two studies released yesterday delivered dire news about the dangers of COVID-19 to unvaccinated pregnant women and their babies. Perhaps the most disturbing data came from a first-of-its-kind analysis that tracked the tens of thousands of pregnancies in Scotland since vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 became available. It found that unvaccinated, coronavirus-infected women were far more likely than the general pregnant population to have a stillborn infant or one that dies in the first month of life. Among the infected women in the study, every one of the perinatal deaths occurred in the pregnancy of someone who was unvaccinated.

The unvaccinated mothers themselves were also more endangered: Nearly every pregnant person with a SARS-CoV-2 infection who required critical care was unvaccinated. Unvaccinated women also had a far higher rate of hospitalization than their vaccinated counterparts in the study of nearly 88,000 pregnant women.

Yet the study found that in October 2021, months after COVID-19 vaccines became widely available, fewer than one-third of pregnant Scots delivering babies had been fully vaccinated. By contrast, more than 77% of adult women of childbearing age in the general Scottish population were, highlighting a disturbing vaccine hesitancy among the pregnant that is mirrored in many places around the world. “This should shake us up and really be a call to action,” says Yalda Afshar, a high-risk obstetrician at Ronald Reagan UCLA, Medical Center, who was not involved with the study. “Vaccination is the clear action item to improve health for pregnant people and their babies.”

Using data from an ongoing population study called COVID-19 In Pregnancy in Scotland (COPS), researchers at the University of Edinburgh and colleagues elsewhere tracked pregnant women in Scotland between December 2020, when COVID-19 vaccines first became available, and October 2021. The scientists report in Nature Medicine that although the risk of poor outcomes was generally elevated for unvaccinated pregnant women who got COVID-19 at any point in their babies’ gestation, it was starkly worse if that happened late in pregnancy.

In the 620 mothers who contracted COVID-19 in the 28 days before they delivered their babies, the study recorded 14 fetal or infant deaths, 10 of them stillbirths. All of the deaths occurred in unvaccinated pregnancies. That amounts to 22.5 deaths per 1000 births, compared to 5.6 perinatal deaths per 1000 births among all Scottish pregnancies from March 2020 through October 2021.

A mother’s COVID-19 infection also increased the risk of premature births, confirming earlier work. Scots infected at any point in pregnancy were likelier than the general pregnant population, surveyed from March 2020 through October 2021, to have premature babies: 10.2% versus 8%. Those who delivered their babies within 28 days of being infected saw the rate jump to 16.6

The pregnancy study also highlighted risks to the unvaccinated women’s own health: 98% of critical care admissions that occurred during the study and 91% of hospitalizations were in unvaccinated women. “My colleagues should not be doing ward rounds in critical care units,” says Sarah Stock, a maternal and fetal medicine specialist at the University of Edinburgh who is the first author of the paper. A pregnant woman critically ill with COVID-19 “should be an anomaly [and] not a daily occurrence.”

Worldwide, many pregnant women have been reluctant to get COVID-19 vaccines, with some citing the decision by vaccine companies to exclude pregnant women from initial trials and others swayed by misinformation, such as claims that the shots themselves cause perinatal deaths. To address safety concerns about taking the vaccine during pregnancy, the scientists also examined birth outcomes in the nearly 26,000 people who were vaccinated during their pregnancies. They found no indication that vaccination during pregnancy, including receiving a shot within 28 days of giving birth, increased preterm births or deaths of infants in the weeks before and after birth. The rates of these events matched those in the general pregnant population.

That finding “is really important” says Sarah Mulkey, a fetal and neonatal neurologist who studies congenital viral infections at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C., who was not involved in the research. “Other [recent] studies too … showed there is not an increased risk of preterm delivery or stillbirth or other abnormal pregnancy outcomes because of vaccination.”

A U.S. study published in Lancet Digital Health yesterday underscored the risk of even mild COVID-19 infection to pregnancy outcomes. In the retrospective study, researchers at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle examined electronic health records from more than 18,000 pregnant women at hospitals and clinics in five U.S. states who were tested for COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2021.

They matched 882 unvaccinated women who had a confirmed infection and mild to moderate symptoms with other pregnant women who tested negative. After controlling for factors likely to infect birth outcomes, like maternal age, race, ethnicity, and smoking status, the study found infected women were significantly more likely to have preterm births or stillborn infants.

The scientists also found that time of the infection was a very strong predictor of how close to term a woman would carry her pregnancy: the earlier in pregnancy a mother was infected with SARS-CoV-2, the earlier a baby was likely to be born. Perhaps surprisingly, the severity of COVID-19 symptoms didn’t worsen the outcome. “Even mild COVID-19 infections put pregnant people at increased risk for preterm delivery,” says Samantha Piekos, a systems biologist at ISB who is the paper’s first author.

Because of the increased risk to women who were even mildly ill early in pregnancy, Mulkey says another major take-home message “is that it’s very important for obstetricians, maternal and fetal medicine doctors and pediatricians to be asking a mother if she had infection early in pregnancy. When she does, that requires additional monitoring of the pregnancy and of the baby.”
UK
Kill The Bill 
Thousands of activists march through 20 towns and cities across the UK

Thousands of Kill the Bill activists march through central London as crowds take to the streets across Britain

People are protesting plans for increased police powers that could see the right to assembly cracked down on

The legislation was the subject of widespread dissent in March, particularly in the student area of Bristol
 
Demonstrations took place in cities including London, Bristol, Newcastle, Liverpool, and Manchester


By CHRIS MATTHEWS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 11:27 EST, 15 January 2022 

Demonstrations took place in cities including London, Bristol, Coventry, Newcastle, Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield and Plymouth on Saturday afternoon ahead of a crunch vote on the proposed bill on Monday.

Protesters describe the new legislation as a draconian crackdown on the right to assembly, freedom of expression and other civil liberties.

In London, many hundreds marched from Holborn towards Parliament Square in Westminster, chanting 'kill the bill' and carrying banners reading 'defend the right to protest' and 'we will not be silenced'.

Members of a wide range of social, racial and environmental justice groups joined the rally, demanding that peers stop the bill from becoming law.


Demonstrators hold up placards as they take part in a march to protest against the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill in central London

Demonstrators walk behind a 'Kill The Bill' banner on Whitehall as they take part in a march to protest against the bill

Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn addresses protesters during the 'Kill the Bill' march in London today

Defiant protestors in London chant 'kill the bill' against new law

Demonstrators with flares and placards outside Downing Street during a 'Kill The Bill' protest. Many were also aimed at Boris Johnson

Many of the protesters wore masks as they demonstrated on the streets of London. Pictured: A man holding a red flare in Manchester city centre

Around 3,000 protestors marched from Lincoln's Inn Fields to Parliament with some donning Black Lives Matter clothing during the demonstration

Protesters demonstrate during a 'Kill the Bill' protest outside Downing Street in London against the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Protesters make their point heard in Bristol city centre today during a 'Kill The Bill 'rally

A police officer in Bristol passes a protester dressed as an officer wearing a red nose at College Green today

Protesters describe the bill as a draconian crackdown on the right to assembly, freedom of expression and other civil liberties. Above, the scene in Bristol this afternoon

Demonstrators in Manchester city centre hold smoke flares today during the 'Kill The Bill' protest

Ben Hancock, 70, from London, said: 'The measures are completely draconian really, basically rights will be taken away from anybody to protest.'

'I mean, effectively we're going to be reduced to a state similar to Russia.'

Sue, a 62-year-old who would only give her first name and who had travelled to the protest as part of Extinction Rebellion from Godalming, Surrey, said: 'And I believe that some of the provisions in that bill will severely limit the sorts of things that we're able to do to protest.'

Tied to a fellow protester, she went on to say: 'So we won't, for instance, be able to be together like this holding hands, or, or even tying ourselves together.

'There are many, many things that we won't be able to do and really, protests will just be a thing of the past.


Demonstrations took place in cities including London, Bristol, Newcastle, Liverpool, Oxford, Swansea and Manchester

Protesters in Manchester called for an end to more police powers while they marched today through the city

Members of a wide range of social, racial and environmental justice groups joined the rally, demanding that peers stop the bill from becoming law. (Above, in Manchester today)

A woman in a black and yellow mask protests against the controversial bill in London on Saturday

Protesters hold placards and banners during the 'Kill the Bill' march on the national day of action in London today

Demonstrators hold up placards as they take part in a march, past The Royal Courts of Justice, Britain's High Court

Across Britain thousands of people took to the streets to show their displeasure at the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Police watch on as demonstrators protest the bill outside Downing Street with flares and signs directing anger at the proposals

Demonstrators hold a banner in London that calls to 'protect the right to protest' during a march against the proposed law

Protesters believe if the bill passes the right to protest may be compromised as police have more power to break them up

'Kill the Bill' protestors take to the streets in Manchester

A woman in a multi-coloured L  LGBTQ RAINBOW mask and a black GREY
hat holds a 'kill the bill' placard with an Extinction Rebellion logo on it

Drummers joined protesters in London to demonstrate against the bill. The drums they used were plastered in Extinction Rebellion stickers

One sign included the hashtag 'we won't be silenced' underneath a call to kill the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

One protester suggested there was one rule for the Prime Minister and another for the general public with images of Partygate and a woman being arrested at a vigil for Sarah Everard last year

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is set to be discussed by peers in the House of Lords tomorrow when it comes before them

Extinction Rebellion demonstrators in orange jumpsuits also joined a 'Kill The Bill' protest against The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill in Manchester city centre

Members of a wide range of social, racial and environmental justice groups joined the rally, demanding that peers stop the bill from becoming law
Policing bill is a 'vitriolic attack on our rights', says protester


'And it's a really dangerous step to try to take.'

The Bill would put protesters at risk of lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines for actions that cause 'serious annoyance', which could be done just by making noise.

It would expand stop and search powers, and new laws against residing on land without authorisation with a vehicle would effectively criminalise gypsy, Roma and traveller communities.

Amendments added to the bill by the Government in the House of Lords in November make obstructing major transport works a criminal offence and would equip police with the power to ban named people from demonstrating.

VIDEOS

 


 


  

Lib Dems take part in Kill the Bill protests around country

Lib Dems across the country joined protests across the country against the Policing, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Protests too place in London, Bristol, Cardiff, Coventry, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield and Plymouth, as well as a lot of smaller towns. The protests come ahead of a critical vote tomorrow in the House of Lords on amendments introduced in the Lords in November which greatly increase the authority of police to control protests including an increase in stop and search powers.

On Friday, Labour Lords belatedly said they will oppose the protest clauses. With the Lib Dems, Greens and independents opposing the restriction of the rights to protest, the amendments are likely to fall. As they were introduced in the Lords, they cannot be sent on to the Commons if peers vote against them.

Protest in Shrewsbury Quarry

Shropshire Lib Dem councillor for Meole, Bernie Bentick told the Shropshire Star:

This type of restriction on the ability to protest was seen at its worst in the 1930s in Germany and an attack on democracy by the current, disgraced, Conservative Cabinet.

Welsh Lib Dem Spokesperson for Montgomeryshire, Alison Alexander also spoke to the Shropshire Star:

There is a balance to be struck between the inconvenience protesters cause to the public and the value of protest to society. This Bill fails dismally to strike the correct balance.

That’s not just the view of the Welsh Liberal Democrats, that’s the view of former Prime Minister Theresa May, of Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights and of 109 Professors of Law from top UK universities.

The restrictions to protest are excessive, the penalties are excessive and the powers the Bill grants to the Home Secretary are wholly unacceptable in a healthy democracy. It is not just about the large protests you see on your TV, but also more local protests like those to save your local school or A&E being shut.

We must not allow hard won rights to be taken away and we must not be silenced.

Last month, Brian Paddick said on LDV that he thought this Bill was the most illiberal and authoritarian piece of legislation he had ever seen, highlighting some of the other awful measures it contains:

The new legislation allows the Home Secretary to force local authorities and other public bodies to hand over sensitive, personal information to the police, even against the informed judgement of professionals on the ground.  Liberal Democrats in the Lords will vote against this further extension of centralised power over local decision-making.

Part of the truly illiberal Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill that is not getting much publicity is a new duty on public bodies to give information to the police, so the cops can try to arrest their way out of the problem of serious violence.  What we actually need is a truly multi-agency, public health approach, where enforcement is only one part of the solution.  For example, when I went to Scotland I met a young father, whose partner committed suicide, who realised their son would grow-up without either of his parents if he did not turn away from violence, and with support, he has done just that.

Protest in Newtown

* Andy Boddington is a Lib Dem councillor in Shropshire. He blogs at andybodders.co.uk. He is Friday editor of Lib Dem Voice.



CRIMINAL CRYPTO CAPITALI$M
North Korean Hackers Carefully Stole $400 Million in Crypto Last Year

By Nicholas Pongratz15 January 2022,
Updated by Nanok Bie15 January 2022

IN BRIEF

North Korean hackers stole almost $400 million in cryptocurrency from at least seven cyberattacks against exchange platforms last year.

While Chainalysis neglected to identify every target of the hacks, the report detailed that they had primarily been investment firms and centralized exchanges.

While unsure about their ultimate motives, the report said it demonstrated deliberate forethought on the part of the hackers.

The Trust Project is an international consortium of news organizations building standards of transparency.


North Korean hackers stole almost $400 million in cryptocurrency from at least seven cyberattacks against exchange platforms last year.


“From 2020 to 2021, the number of North Korean-linked hacks jumped from four to seven, and the value extracted from these hacks grew by 40%,” according to a recent report from blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis. “Once North Korea gained custody of the funds, they began a careful laundering process to cover up and cash out.”

While Chainalysis neglected to identify every target of the hacks, the report detailed that they had primarily been investment firms and centralized exchanges. One such exchange, Liquid.com, had reported unauthorized access to several wallets it managed in August last year.

According to the report, the hackers used a variety of skills to extract funds from these organizations’ wallets into North Korea-controlled addresses. These included phishing lures, code exploits, malware, and advanced social engineering techniques. Additionally, the report detailed that North Korea significantly increased the use of ‘mixers’ to launder the stolen cryptocurrency.

Lazarus Group


It seems likely that many of these cyberattacks had been carried out by the Lazarus Group, which the United States said is controlled by the Reconnaissance General Bureau, the primary intelligence bureau of North Korea. The group has previously been accused of involvement in the “Wanna Cry” ransomware attacks and the cyberattacks perpetrated against Sony Pictures in 2014.

Last year, the United States charged three North Korean programmers with a massive, years-long hacking spree, allegedly hoping to steal $1.3 billion in cash and crypto. Meanwhile, South Korean media outlets reported late last year that North Korea had hacked 2 trillion won ($1.7 billion) worth of cryptocurrencies from exchanges. The reports also noted that the hackers seemed to be holding the assets, rather than selling them immediately for cash.

For its part, the Chainalysis report identified $170 million in unlaundered cryptocurrency holdings from 49 distinct hacks that occurred between 2017 to 2021. While unsure about their ultimate motives, the report said it demonstrated deliberate forethought on the part of the hackers. “Whatever the reason may be, the length of time that (North Korea) is willing to hold on to these funds is illuminating, because it suggests a careful plan, not a desperate and hasty one,” Chainalysis concluded.